| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | BA in SC (Bail Application in Cases) 263/2026 | Naveed Khan Mirani VS The State | Shabir Ahmed(ADVO-347-SBC-KSH) | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | PPC-324,PPC-353 | 63/2026 Tangwani |
Criminal bail application of applicant/accused Naveed Khan is called, I/C DPP is present. Mr. Shabir Ahmed Khoso advocate for applicant/accused is present. Police file received. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court that the bail application is allowed, and the applicant/accused is directed to be released on furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.30,000/- along with a Personal bond in the like amount. |
| 2 | BA in SC (Bail Application in Cases) 265/2026 | Akram Bangwar VS The State | Shabir Ahmed(ADVO-347-SBC-KSH) | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | PPC-324,PPC-353 | 216/2026 A-Section Kandhkot |
Criminal bail application of applicant/accused Akram is called, I/C DPP is present. Mr. Shabir Ahmed Khoso advocate for applicant/accused is present. Police file received. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court that the bail application is allowed, and the applicant/accused is directed to be released on furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.30,000/- along with a Personal bond in the like amount. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 12/2026 | The State VS Khan Muhammad s/o Muhammad Afzal Nindwani | SPP(ADVO-006-SBC-LRK) | Saeed Ahmed Khan Bijarani(ADVO-176-SBC-KSH) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 2/2026 Ghulam Sarwar Sarki |
CNS Case called, accused Khan Muhammad is present on bail, I/C DPP is present. Mr. Saeed Ahmed B.Bijarani advocate for accused is present. No. PW is present, process returned unserved. Property not produced. Case put off to:11.09.2026, For evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. Process for complainant & R/PWs extended to process server. Call for case property. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 4 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1400/2026 | Fazal Muhammad Jaffery VS SSP Kashmore at Kandhkot and others | Shabir Ahmed(ADVO-347-SBC-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Criminal Misc. application is called, applicant Fazal Muhammad and his counsel Mr. Shabir Ahmed Khoso are present. I/C DPP is present. Reports received from DSP complaint cell Kashmore at Kandhkot and SHO concerned. Order. File. Respondent No.3 is present. Mr. Nazir Ahmed Channa advocate filed his power on behalf of respondent. Order. File. The advocate for respondent also filed statement alongwith supporte document. Order. File. The advocate for applicant also submitted statement alongwith supported document. Order. File. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court that the instant application stands dismissed. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 5 | PPC 399/2026 | The State VS Ghulam Rasool Muhammadani and others | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Abdul Wahab (ADVO-177-SBC-KSH) | PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | 153/2026 A-Section Kandhkot |
Case called, accused Ghulam Rasool and Abdul Ghaffar @ Hasnain are produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, while other accused have been declared as POs. I/C DPP is present. DC is present. Let the charge be framed, charge framed against accused Ghulam Rasool and Abdul Ghaffar @ Hasnain at Ex.5 and plea of accused recorded R&R at Ex.5-A & 5-B to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. Case put off to:10.09.2026, accused are remanded back to custody with directions to be produced on next date of hearing. For Evidence. Issue summons for complainant & PWs and letter for case property. |
| 6 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 400/2026 | The State VS Ghulam Rasool Mahamdani | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Abdul Wahab (ADVO-177-SBC-KSH) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 154/2026 A-Section Kandhkot |
Case called, accused Ghulam Rasool is produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, I/C DPP is present. DC is present. Let the charge be framed, charge framed against accused Ghulam Rasool at Ex.2 and plea of accused recorded R&R at Ex.2-A to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. Case put off to:10.09.2026, accused is remanded back to custody with directions to be produced on next date of hearing. For Evidence. Issue summons for complainant & PWs and letter for case property. |
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 401/2026 | The State VS Abdul Ghaffar @ Hasnain Bangwar | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Abdul Wahab (ADVO-177-SBC-KSH) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 155/2026 A-Section Kandhkot |
Case called, accused Abdul Ghaffar @ Hasnain is produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, I/C DPP is present. DC is present. Let the charge be framed, charge framed against accused Abdul Ghaffar @ Hasnain at Ex.2 and plea of accused recorded R&R at Ex.2-A to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. Case put off to:10.09.2026, accused is remanded back to custody with directions to be produced on next date of hearing. For Evidence. Issue summons for complainant & PWs and letter for case property. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Transfer Applications | |||||||
| 8 | Cr.T.A. (Criminal Trans. Applications) 9/2026 | Zafar Ali and another VS The State | Bashir Ahmed Chano(ADVO-26-SBC-KSH) | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | PPC-406,PPC-420 | 104/2025 Buxapur |
Criminal transfer application is called, applicants/accused and their counsel Mr. Bashir Ahmed Channa are present. I/C DPP is present. Comments received from learned trial Court. Order. File. Notice against respondent/complainant returned as per endorsement of process server. The advocate for applicants/accused filed statement alongwith supported true copies of FIRs. Order. File. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court that the transfer application lacks merit and is hereby dismissed. The learned trial Court is directed to proceed with the case in accordance with law and to ensure its expeditious disposal. |