| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Spl.B.A. (Special Bail Applications) 4/2026 | Soz Ali Jagirani VS The State | Anees Ahmed(ADVO-333-SBC-KSH) | SPP(ADVO-006-SBC-LRK) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 61/2025 Ghouspur |
CNS bail application of accused Soz Ali is called, DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Anees Ahmed Bhayo advocate for applicant/accused is present. Police file received. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court that the post arrest bail application in hand stands dismissed. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 144/2026 | Illimuddin and others VS The State | Fazal Muhammad(ADVO-323-SBC-KSH) | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi | 13/2021 Rasaldar |
Criminal BBA is called, applicants/accused Illamuddin, Asghar @ Meero and Abdul Qadir @ Ghulam Qadir are present on interim pre-arrest bail and their counsel Mr. Fazal Muhammad Jakhrani is also present. DDPP for the state is present. Police file received. Complainant Barkat Ali is present and submitted his no objection affidavit for grant of pre-arrest bail to the present applicants/accused. Order. Keep on record. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court that the earlier interim order is confirmed on the same terms and conditions. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 44/2026 | The State VS Ahmed Ali Mirani & others | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Bashir Ahmed Chano(ADVO-26-SBC-KSH) | PPC-324,PPC-337-Fiii,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | 378/2025 A-Section Kandhkot |
Case called, accused Ahmed Ali, Noor Ali @ Noorullah @ Nooro and Sher Khan are produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Bashir Ahmed Channa advocate for accused Ahmed Ali is present. Mr. Dur Muhammad Sabzoi advocate for accused Sher Khan is present. Mr. Abdul Ghaffar Bangwar advocate for accused Noor Ali @ Noorullah is also present. Complainant HC Ali Murad is present, no other PW is present, process returned unserved. Property produced. Case proceeded. D/O complainant HC Ali Murad recorded at Ex.8 and he produced entries, letter and FIR R&R at Ex.8-A to 8-E. The DDPP for the state closed the side of prosecution vide statement at Ex.9. Let the statement of accused be recorded, statement of accused Ahmed Ali, Noor Ali @ Noorullah @ Nooro and Sher Khan recorded at Ex.10 to 12. Arguments heard from both sides. Judgement passed and announced in open Court at Ex.13 that accused Ahmed Ali s/o Ali Raza @ Chibhar Mirani, Noor Ali @ Noorullah @ Nooro s/o Sultan Choliyani and Sher Khan s/o Shah Baig Sabzoi are acquitted u/s 265 H(i) Cr.PC. They are produced in custody through video link and they are remanded back alngwith acquittal intimation with direction to jail authority to release them forthwith in this case only and if they are not required to be detained in any other case. |
| 4 | PPC 42/2026 | The State VS Ahmed Ali Mirani & others | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Bashir Ahmed Chano(ADVO-26-SBC-KSH) | PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | 380/2025 A-Section Kandhkot |
Case called, accused Ahmed Ali, Noor Ali @ Noorullah @ Nooro, Sher Khan and Zahid are produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Bashir Ahmed Channa advocate for accused Ahmed Ali is present. Mr. Dur Muhammad Sabzoi advocate for accused Sher Khan is present. Mr. Faizullah Muhammadani advocate for accused Zahid is present. Mr. Abdul Ghaffar Bangwar advocate for accused Noor Ali @ Noorullah is also present. Complainant HC Abdul Haq is present, no other PW is present, process returned unserved. Property produced. Case proceeded. D/O complainant HC Abdul Haq recorded at Ex.6 and he produced entries, memo of arrest, letter and FIR R&R at Ex.6-A to 6-F. The DDPP for the state closed the side of prosecution vide statement at Ex.7. Let the statement of accused be recorded, statement of accused Ahmed Ali, Noor Ali @ Noorullah @ Nooro, Sher Khan and Zahid recorded at Ex.8 to 11. Arguments heard from both sides. Judgement passed and announced in open Court at Ex.12 that accused Ahmed Ali s/o Ali Raza @ Chibhar Mirani, Noor Ali @ Noorullah s/o Sultan Choliyani, Sher Khan s/o Shah Baig Sabzoi and Zahid son of Manzoor Ahmed Muhammadani are acquitted u/s 265 H(i) Cr.PC. They are produced in custody through video link, remanded back alongwith acquittal intimation, with direction to jail authorities to release them forthwith in this case only and if they are not required to be detained in any other case. |
| 5 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 43/2026 | The State VS Ahmed Ali Mirani | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Bashir Ahmed Chano(ADVO-26-SBC-KSH) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 381/2025 A-Section Kandhkot |
Case called, accused Ahmed Ali is produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Bashir Ahmed Channa advocate for accused Ahmed Ali is present. Complainant HC Abdul Haq is present, no other PW is present, process returned unserved. Property produced. Case proceeded. D/O complainant HC Abdul Haq recorded at Ex.6 and he produced entries, memo of arrest, letter and FIR R&R at Ex.6-A to 6-E. The DDPP for the state closed the side of prosecution vide statement at Ex.7. Let the statement of accused be recorded, statement of accused Ahmed Ali recorded at Ex.8. Arguments heard from both sides. Judgement passed and announced in open Court at Ex.9 that accused Ahmed Ali s/o Ali Raza @ Chibhar Mirani is acquitted u/s 265 H(i) Cr.PC. Accused is produced in custody through video link, he is remanded back alongwith acquittal intimation, with direction to jail authority to release him forthwith in this case only and if he is not required in any other case. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 166/2026 | Muhammad Ramzan @ Ali Bux Sabzoi VS SSP Kashmore at Kandhkot and others | Muhammad Siddique(ADVO-236-SBC-KSH) | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Criminal Misc. application is called, applicant Muhammad Ramzan @ Ali Bux and his counsel Mr. Muhammad Siddique Bangwar are present. DDPP for the state is present. Reports received from DSP complaint cell Kashmore at Kandhkot and SHOs concerned. Order. File. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court that this application is disposed of and official respondents are directed to provide legal protection to the applicant in accordance with law. |
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 161/2026 | Rashid Ali VS SSP Kashmore at Kandhkot and others | Agha Abdul Qayoom(ADVO-52903-SBC-KSH) | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Criminal Misc. application is called, applicant Rashid Ali and his counsel Mr. Abdul Qayoom Pathan are present. DDPP for the state is present. Reports received from DSP complaint cell Kashmore at kandhkot and SHOs concerned. Order. file. Mr. Bashir Ahmed advocate appeared and filed his power on behalf of respondent No.4. Order. File. Respondent No.4 is present and submitted his written reply. Order. Keep on record. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court that this application is disposed of and official respondents are directed to provide legal protection to the applicant in accordance with law. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 8 | PPC 59/2026 | State VS Abdul Ghaffar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | ABDUL NABI BROHI S/O AHMED(),MOHAMMAD QASIM SOOMRO S/O MOHAMMAD RAFIQUE() | PPC-324,PPC-353 | 43/2025 Miani @ Badani |
Case called, accused Abdul Ghaffar is produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, accused Abdul Ghafoor and Sattar @ Abdul Sattar are present on bail, while rest of accused have been declared as POs. DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Abdul Nabi Brohi advocate for accused Abdul Ghaffar is present. Mr. Muhammad Qasim Soomro advocate for accused Abdul Ghafoor and Sattar @ Abdul Sattar is present. No.PW is present. Let the required papers be supplied to accused, case papers supplied to accused and such receipt brought on record at Ex.5. Case put off to:16.02.2026, accused produced in custody is remanded back to jail with directions to be produced on next date of hearing. Present accused are directed to attend. For charge. |
| 9 | 23 (I) A 60/2026 | State VS Abdul Ghaffar | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | ABDUL NABI BROHI S/O AHMED() | Sindh Arms Act 2013-23-i-A | 44/2025 Miani @ Badani |
Case called, accused Abdul Ghaffar is produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Abdul Nabi Brohi advocate for accused Abdul Ghaffar is present. No.PW is present. Let the required papers be supplied to accused, case papers supplied to accused and such receipt brought on record at Ex.1. Case put off to:16.02.2026, accused produced in custody is remanded back to jail with directions to be produced on next date of hearing. For charge. |
| 10 | PPC 63/2026 | The State VS Nazeer Bhayo & others | ADPP(ADPP-0005-GOV-THT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-440,SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 13/2025 Durani Mahar |
Case called, accused Nazeer is present on bail, accused Yaqoob and Yar Muhammad @ Yaroo are produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, while other accused have been declared as POs except accused Shahid Hussain @ Shado who shown as died in the challan. DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Saeed Ahmed B.Bijarani advocate for accused Nazeer is called absent. Mr. Anees Ahmed Bhayo advocate appeared and filed his power on behalf of accused Yar Muhammad @ Yaroo. Order. File. Accused Yaqoob yet not engage his advocate. No.PW is present. Let the required papers be supplied to accused, case papers supplied to accused and such receipt brought on record at Ex.4. Case put off to:17.02.2026, present accused is directed to attend. Accused produced in custody are remanded back to custody with directions to be produced on next date of hearing. For charge. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 11 | PPC 519/2025 | The State VS Wajid and another | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | 121/2025 B-Section Kandhkot |
Case called, accused Wajid and Zulfiqar @ Bhutto are produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, accused Hairoo @ Hairuddin has already been acquitted, while rest of accused have been declared as POs except accused Shafiq @ Bakht and Moro @ Morezado who shown as died in the challan. DDPP for the state is present. Accused yet not engage their advocate. Let the required papers be supplied to accused, case papers supplied to accused through jail authority and such receipt brought on record at Ex.15. Accused Wajid and Zulfiqar @ Bhutto produced through video link and during proceedings they prayed for acquittal on the ground that co-accused has already been acquitted. Notice issued to the DDPP for the state regarding acquittal u/s 265-K Cr.PC of accused. Notice waived by DDPP. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court at Ex.16 that accused Wajid and Zulfiqar @ Bhutto are acquitted u/s 265-K Cr.PC. They are produced in custody through video link, remanded back along with acquittal intimation, with direction to jail authority to release them forthwith in this case only and if they are not required to be detained in any other case. |
| 12 | ATA 1997 (Anti Terrorism Act 1997) 177/2025 | The State VS Abdul Qadir @ Bhallar | 86/2024 Karampur |
Case called, accused Abdul Qadir @ Bhalar is produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, while other accused have been declared as POs. DDPP for the state is present. DC is present. No.PW is present. Let the charge be framed, charge framed against accused Abdul Qadir @ Bhalar at Ex.2 and plea of accused recorded R&R at Ex.2-A to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. Case put off to:12.02.2026, accused is remanded back to custody with directions to be produced on next date of hearing through video link. For evidence. Issue summons for complainant & PWs and letter for case property. |
|||
| 13 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 1/2026 | The State VS Hussain Bux Mazari | SPP(ADVO-006-SBC-LRK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Special Case Narcotics -U/s 9(i) (Sr.No.06)-a Amendment SCNS Act-2024 | 59/2025 Guddu |
CNS Case called, accused Hussain Bux is produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, DDPP for the state is present. Accused yet not engage his advocate and stated through video link that he has engaged his private advocate who will appear on next date of hearing. Case put off to:19.02.2026, accused is remanded back to custody with directions to be produced on next date of hearing. |
| 14 | PPC 19/2026 | The State VS Azad Sabzoi | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | 106/2025 Tangwani |
Case called, accused Azad is produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, accused Ahmed Ali and Umed Ali have already been acquitted, while rest of accused have been declared as POs, DDPP for the state is present. Accused yet not engage his advocate. Let the required papers be supplied to accused, case papers supplied to accused through jail authority and such receipt brought on record at Ex.14. Accused Azad produced through video link and during proceedings he prayed for acquittal on the ground that co-accused have already been acquitted. Notice issued to the DDPP for the state regarding acquittal u/s 265-K Cr.PC of accused. Notice waived by DDPP. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court at Ex.16 that accused Azad s/o Ali Hassan by caste Sabzoi is acquitted u/s 265-K Cr.PC. The accused having been produced in custody through video link, is remanded back to the jail authorities along with this acquittal intimation, with direction to the jail authority to release him forthwith in this case only, provided he is not required to be detained in connection with any other case. |
| 15 | PPC 36/2026 | The State VS Barkat and others | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-399,PPC-402 | 132/2025 B-Section Kandhkot |
Case called, accused Barkat, Wajid and Zulfiqar @ Bhutto are produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, accused Wahid Bux @ Abdul Wahid, Muhammad Ali @ Goro @ Ahmed Ali have already been acquitted, while rest of accused have been declared as POs except accused Khan Muhammad @ Khanan who shown as died in the challan. DDPP for the state is present. Accused yet not engage their advocate. Let the required papers be supplied to accused, case papers supplied to accused through jail authority and such receipt brought on record at Ex.15. Accused Barkat, Wajid and Zulfiqar @ Bhutto produced through video link and during proceedings they prayed for acquittal on the ground that co-accused have already been acquitted. Notice issued to the DDPP for the state regarding acquittal u/s 265-K Cr.PC of accused. Notice waived by DDPP. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court at Ex.14 that accused Barkat Wajid and Zulfiqar @ Bhutto are acquitted u/s 265-K Cr.PC. They are produced in custody through video link, remanded back along with acquittal intimation, with direction to jail authority to release them forthwith in this case only and if they are not required to be detained in any other case. |
| 16 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 39/2026 | The State VS Bilawal s/o Abdul Raheem Thaheem | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Abdul Hameed(ADVO-5309-SBC-HYD) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 15/2025 Bhittai Colony |
Case called, accused Bilawal is called absent, DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Abdul Hameed Chachar advocate for accused is present. No.Pw is present. Main connected case of accused yet not received. One Muhammad Shoaib appeared and submitted application regarding absence excuse of accused Bilawal. Order. Absence of accused is excused subject to produce proof. Case put off to:16.02.2026, applicant is directed to inform the date of hearing to accused. |
| 17 | PPC 40/2026 | The State VS Shahban Sabzoi & others | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-399,PPC-402 | 357/2025 A-Section Kandhkot |
Case called, accused Kalati is present on bail, accused Shahban jumped away the bail and declrared as PO, while other accused have alsobeen declared as POs. DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Muhammad Siddique Bangwar advocate for accused Kalati is present. Reply of proclamation warrant u/s 87 Cr.PC against accused Shahban returned as per report that accused shifted away to some un-known place, let the statement of process server be recorded, statement of process server ASI Amanullah recorded at Ex.6 and he produced report of SHO, mashirnama, entries, copy of notice published and proclamation warrant u/s 87 Cr.PC R&R at Ex.6-A to 6-F. Reply of warrant u/s 88 Cr.PC received from the Mukhtiarkar taluka Kandhkot that there is no any moveable or immoveable property in the name of accused Shahban. Order. File and same brought on record at Ex.7. Let the charge be framed against present accused Kalati. Charge framed against accused Kalati at Ex.8 and plea of accused recorded R&R at Ex.8-A to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. Case put off to:14.02.2026, present accused is directed to attend. Issue summons for complainant and PWs. |
| 18 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 9/2026 | The State VS Ghulam Abbas Manik | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 1/2026 R.D-109 |
Case called, accused Ghulam Abbass is produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Aijaz Ahmed Bangwar advocate appeared and filed his power on behalf of accused. Order. File. Let the required papers be supplied to accused, case papers supplied to accused and such receipt brought on record at Ex.1. Case put off to:23.02.2026, accused is remanded back to custody with directions to be produced on next date of hearing. |
| 19 | PPC 62/2026 | The State VS Hussain Bhayo and another | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-THT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-397 | 138/2025 B-Section Kandhkot |
Case called, accused Hussain and Hayat are absconders and declared as POs. DDPP for the state is present. No.PW is present. Case put off to:16.02.2206, Issue summons for complainant and PWs. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Succession Miscellaneous Applications | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 4/2026 | Mai Toti VS Inam Ali and others | Muhammad Siddique(ADVO-236-SBC-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278,SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Succession petition is called, petitioner Mai Toti is called absent and her counsel Mr. Muhammad Siddique Bangwar is present. None from otherside is present. Report/List of legal heirs of deceased received from Mukhtiarkar taluka Kandhkot. Order. File. Verification report of amount/account received from concerned bank. Order. File. The advocate for applicant filed statement alongwith supported news paper daily "Panhji Akhbar" dated:31.01.2026. Order. File. Matter put off to:09.02.2026, For appearance of respondents and further proceedings. |
|