DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, KASHMORE @ KANDHKOT : 16-FEB-2026

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C)
1 BA in SC (Bail Application in Cases) 50/2026 Saeedal Sundrani VS The State   Ahmed Raza(ADVO-355 -SBC-KSH)   DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH)   PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-440 4/2023
Ghora Ghat

Criminal bail application of applicant/accused Saeedal is called, DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Ahmed Raza Sundrani advocate for accused is present. Police file received. Arguments heard from both sides on the bail application. Order passed and announced in open Court that the bail application is allowed, and the applicant/accused is directed to be released on furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with a personal bond in the like amount.

2 BA in SC (Bail Application in Cases) 49/2026 Saeedal Sundrani VS The State   Ahmed Raza(ADVO-355 -SBC-KSH)   DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH)   PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-440 3/2023
Ghora Ghat

Criminal bail application of applicant/accused Saeedal is called, DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Ahmed Raza Sundrani advocate for accused is present. Police file received. Arguments heard from both sides on the bail application. Order passed and announced in open Court that the bail application is allowed, and the applicant/accused is directed to be released on furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with a personal bond in the like amount.

3 BA in SC (Bail Application in Cases) 52/2026 Saeedal Sundrani VS The State   Ahmed Raza(ADVO-355 -SBC-KSH)   DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH)   PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-440 6/2023
Ghora Ghat

Criminal bail application of applicant/accused Saeedal called, DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Ahmed Raza Sundrani advocate for accused is present. Police file received. Arguments heard from both sides on the bail application. Order passed and announced in open Court that the bail application is allowed, and the applicant/accused is directed to be released on furnishing a solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with a personal bond in the like amount.

4 BA in SC (Bail Application in Cases) 51/2026 Saeedal Sundrani VS The State   Ahmed Raza(ADVO-355 -SBC-KSH)   DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH)   PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-440 5/2023
Ghora Ghat

Criminal bail application of applicant/accused Saeedal is called, DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Ahmed Raza Sundrani advocate for accused is present. Police file received. Arguments heard from both sides on the bail application. Order passed and announced in open Court that the bail application is allowed, and the applicant/accused is admitted to bail, subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with a personal bond in the like amount.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C)
5 Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 172/2026 Najabuddin @ Rajab Lund VS The State   Muhammad Aslam (ADVO-2480-SBC-KHP)   DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH)   PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-402 71/2025
Tangwani

Criminal BBA is called, applicant/accused Najabuddin @ Rajab is present on interim pre-arrest bail and his counsel Mr. Ghulam Mehdi Suhriyani is also present. DDPP for the state is present. Police file received. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court that interim bail order is hereby confirmed, subject to the same terms and conditions.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge
6 Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 60/2026 State VS Abdul Ghaffar   ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI)   ABDUL NABI BROHI S/O AHMED()   Sindh Arms Act 2013-23-i-A 44/2025
Miani @ Badani

Case called, accused Abdul Ghaffar is produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Abdul Nabi Brohi advocate for accused Abdul Ghaffar is present. Let the charge be framed, charge framed against accused Abdul Ghaffar at Ex.2 and plea of accused recorded R&R at Ex.2-A to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. Complainant ASI Abdul Kareem, PW PC Zakir Hussain, I.O SIP Ghulam Hyder, PWs PC Piyaro Khan and Abdul Majid appeared in some other case. The DDPP and DC prayed to proceed the case today. Property produced. Case proceeded. D/O complainant ASI Abdul Kareem recorded at Ex.3 and he produced entries, memo of arrest and FIR R&R at Ex.3-A to 3-C. D/O PW PC Zakir Hussain recorded at Ex.4 and he produced memo of place of incident R&R at Ex.4-A. D/O PW I.O SIP Ghulam Hyder recorded at Ex.5 and he produced entries, permission letter, serial No.19, RC and report of FSL R&R at Ex.5-A to 5-E. D/O PW PC Piyaro Khan recorded at Ex.6. D/O WHC Abdul Majid recorded at Ex.7. The DDPP for the state closed the side of prosecution vide statement at Ex.8. Let the statement of accused be recorded, statement of accused recorded at Ex.9. Arguments heard from both sides. Judgment passed and announced in open Court at Ex.10 that accused Abdul Ghaffar son of Ilyas Bhutto is acquitted u/s 265 H(i) Cr.PC. He is produced in custody through video link, remanded back alongwith acquittal intimation, with direction to jail authorities to release him forthwith in this case only and if he is not required to be detained in any other case.

7 PPC 59/2026 State VS Abdul Ghaffar and others   ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI)   ABDUL NABI BROHI S/O AHMED(),MOHAMMAD QASIM SOOMRO S/O MOHAMMAD RAFIQUE()   PPC-324,PPC-353 43/2025
Miani @ Badani

Case called, accused Abdul Ghaffar is produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, accused Abdul Ghafoor and Sattar @ Abdul Sattar are present on bail, while rest of accused have been declared as POs. DDPP for the state is present. Counsels for accused are present. Let the charge be framed, charge framed against accused Abdul Ghaffar, Abdul Ghafoor and Sattar @ Abdul Sattar at Ex.6 and plea of accused recorded R&R at Ex.6-A to 6-C to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. Complainant ASI Abdul Kareem, PW PC Zakir Hussain, I.O SIP Ghulam Hyder, PWs PC Piyaro Khan and Abdul Majid appeared in some other case. The DDPP and DCs prayed to proceed the case today. Property produced. Case proceeded. D/O complainant ASI Abdul Kareem recorded at Ex.7 and he produced entries, memo of arrest and FIR R&R at Ex.7-A to 7-D. D/O PW PC Zakir Hussain recorded at Ex.8 and he produced memo of place of incident R&R at Ex.8-A. D/O PW I.O SIP Ghulam Hyder recorded at Ex.9 and he produced entries, permission letter, serial No.19, RC and report of FSL R&R at Ex.9-A to 9-F. D/O WHC Abdul Majid recorded at Ex.10. D/O PW PC Piyaro Khan recorded at Ex.11. The DDPP for the state closed the side of prosecution vide statement at Ex.12. Let the statement of accused be recorded, statement of accused Abdul Ghaffar, Abdul Ghafoor and Sattar @ Abdul Sattar recorded at Ex.13 to 15. Arguments heard from both sides. Judgment passed and announced in open Court at Ex.16 that accused Abdul Ghaffar son of Ilyas Bhutto, Abdul Ghafoor son of Gul Muhammad Bhutto and Sattar @ Abdul Sattar Bhutto are acquitted u/s 265 H(i) Cr.PC. The accused Abdul Ghafoor and Sattar @ Abdul Sattar are present on bail, their bail bonds stand cancelled and sureties are discharged. While accused Abdul Ghaffar is produced in custody through video link, he is remanded back alongwith acquittal intimation, with direction to jail authorities to release him forthwith in this case only and if he is not required to be detained in any other case. While case against absconding accused be kept on dormant file, till their arrest or surrender before the Court.

8 PPC 82/2026 The State VS Bilawal and others   DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK)   PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 13/2025
Bhittai Colony

Case called, accused Bilawal, Muhammad Saddique and Yaqoob @ Muhammad Yaqoob are present on bail, while other accused have been declared as POs.DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Abdul Hameed Chachar advocate appeared and filed his power on behalf of accused Bilawal. Order. File. Mr. Mansab Ali advocate filed his power on behalf of accused Muhammad Siddique and Yaqoob @ Muhammad Yaqoob. Order. File. Let the charge be framed, charge framed against accused Bilawal, Muhammad Sadique and Yaqoob @ Muhammad Yaqoob at Ex.5 and plea of all present accused recorded R&R at Ex.5-A to 5-C to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. Complainant HC Abdul Qadir, PW PC Hikmatullah, I.O SIP Qamaruddin and WPC Irfan Ali are present in some other case. The DDPP and DC prayed to proceed the case today. Property produced. Case proceeded. D/O complainant HC Abdul Qadir recorded at Ex.6 and he produced entry and FIR R&R at Ex.6-A & 6-B. D/O PW PC Hikmatullah recorded at Ex.7 and he produced memo of place of incident R&R at Ex.7-A. D/O PW SIP Qamaruddin Malik recorded at Ex.8 and he produced entries, permission letter, RC and report of FSL R&R at Ex.8-A to 8-E. D/O PW WPC Irfan Ali recorded at Ex.9. The DDPP for the state closed the side of prosecution vide statement at Ex.10. Let the statement of accused be recorded, statement of accused Bilawal, Muhammad Sadique and Yaqoob @ Muhammad Yaqoob at Ex.11 to 13. Arguments heard from both sides. Judgment passed and announced in open Court at Ex.14 that accused Bilawal, Muhammad Siddique and Yaqoob @ Muhammad Yaqoob are acquitted u/s 265 H(i) Cr.PC. They are present on bail, their bail bonds stand cancelled and sureties are discharged. Case against absconding accused be kept on dormant file, till their arrest or surrender before the Court.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases
9 PPC 81/2025 The State VS Aslam Bangwar and others   DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI)   PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 5/2025
A-Section Kandhkot

Case called, accused Aslam is produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, accused Ghalib Hussain @ Zafar Ali @ Zafroo have already been acquitted while rest of accused have been declared as POs. DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Muhammad Siddique Bangwar advocate appeared and filed his power on behalf of accused. Order. File. Let the required papers be supplied to accused, case papers supplied to accused and such receipt brought on record at Ex.24. Mr. Muhammad Siddique Bangwar advocate filed an application u/s 265-K Cr.PC on behalf of applicant/accused Aslam. Order. Notice to DDPP , notice waived by DDPP and same application brought on record at Ex.25. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court at Ex.26 that accused Aslam son of Shah Dost Bangwar is hereby acquitted u/s 265-K Cr.PC. The accused is produced in custody through video link and he is remanded back along with acquittal intimation with direction to jail authorities to release him forthwith in this case only and if he is not required in relation to any other case.

10 PPC 179/2025 The State VS Aslam Bangwar and others   DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK)   PPC-399,PPC-402-C 61/2025
A-Section Kandhkot

Case called, accused Aslam is produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, accused Imtiaz and Ghalib Hussain have already been acquitted while rest of accused have been declared as POs. DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Muhammad Siddique Bangwar advocate appeared and filed his power on behalf of accused. Order. File. Let the required papers be supplied to accused, case papers supplied to accused and such receipt brought on record at Ex.13. Mr. Muhammad Siddique Bangwar advocate filed an application u/s 265-K Cr.PC on behalf of applicant/accused Aslam. Order. Notice to DDPP , notice waived by DDPP and same application brought on record at Ex.14. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court at Ex.15 that accused Aslam son of Shah Dost Bangwar is hereby acquitted u/s 265-K Cr.PC. The accused is present in custody through video link and is remanded back along with acquittal intimation with a direction to jail authorities to release him forthwith in this case only and if not to be detained in any other case.

11 PPC 149/2025 The State VS Saeedal Sundrani & Others   APG(ADVO-001-SBC-APG)   Ahmed Raza(ADVO-355 -SBC-KSH)   Anti Terrorism Act (ATA) -U/S 6 ATA,Anti Terrorism Act (ATA) -U/S 7 ATA,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-340,PPC-353,PPC-440 3/2023
Ghora Ghat

Case and criminal bail application of applicant/accused Saeedal called, accused Saeedal is produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, while other accused have been declared as POs. DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Ahmed Raza Sundrani advocate for accused is present. Arguments heard from both sides on the bail application. Order passed and announced in open Court that the bail application is allowed, and the applicant/accued is directed to be released on furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with a personal bond in the like amount. Let the charge be framed, charge framed against accused Saeedal at Ex.2 and plea of accused recorded R&R at Ex.2-A to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. Case put off to:21.02.2026, accused is remanded back to custody with directions to be produced on next date of hearing. For evidence. Issue summons for complainant & PWs and letter for case property.

12 PPC 150/2025 The State VS Saeedal Sundrani & Others   APG(ADVO-001-SBC-APG)   Ahmed Raza(ADVO-355 -SBC-KSH)   Anti Terrorism Act (ATA) -U/S 6 ATA,Anti Terrorism Act (ATA) -U/S 7 ATA,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-440 4/2023
Ghora Ghat

Case and criminal bail application of applicant/accused Saeedal called, accused Saeedal is produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, while other accused have been declared as POs. DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Ahmed Raza Sundrani advocate for accused is present. Arguments heard from both sides on the bail application. Order passed and announced in open Court that the bail application is allowed, and the applicant/accused is directed to be released on furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with a personal bond in the like amount. No.PW is present. Let the charge be framed, charge framed against accused Saeedal at Ex.2 and plea of accused recorded R&R at Ex.2-A to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. Case put off to:21.02.2026, accused is remanded back to custody with directions to be produced on next date of hearing. For evidence. Issue summons for complainant & PWs and letter for case property.

13 PPC 152/2025 The State VS Saeedal Sundrani & Others   APG(ADVO-001-SBC-APG)   Ahmed Raza(ADVO-355 -SBC-KSH)   PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-440 6/2023
Ghora Ghat

Case and criminal bail application of applicant/accused Saeedal called, accused Saeedal is produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, while other accused have been declared as POs. DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Ahmed Raza Sundrani advocate for accused is present. Arguments heard from both sides on the bail application. Order passed and announced in open Court that the bail application is allowed, and the applicant/accused is directed to be released on furnishing a solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with a personal bond in the like amount. No.PW is present. Let the charge be framed, charge framed against accused Saeedal at Ex.2 and plea of accused recorded R&R at Ex.2-A to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. Case put off to:23.02.2026, accused is remanded back to custody with directions to be produced on next date of hearing. For evidence. Issue summons for complainant & PWs and letter for case property.

14 PPC 151/2025 The State VS Saeedal Sundrani & Others   APG(ADVO-001-SBC-APG)   Ahmed Raza(ADVO-355 -SBC-KSH)   Anti Terrorism Act (ATA) -U/S 6 ATA,Anti Terrorism Act (ATA) -U/S 7 ATA,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-440 5/2023
Ghora Ghat

Case and criminal bail application of applicant/accused Saeedal called, accused Saeedal is produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, while other accused have been declared as POs. DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Ahmed Raza Sundrani advocate for accused is present. Arguments heard from both sides on the bail application. Order passed and announced in open Court that the bail application is allowed, and the applicant/accused is admitted to bail, subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with a personal bond in the like amount. No.PW is present. Let the charge be framed, charge framed against accused Saeedal at Ex.2 and plea of accused recorded R&R at Ex.2-A to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. Case put off to:23.02.2026, accused is remanded back to custody with directions to be produced on next date of hearing. For evidence. Issue summons for complainant & PWs and letter for case property.

15 Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 39/2026 The State VS Bilawal s/o Abdul Raheem Thaheem   DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH)   Abdul Hameed(ADVO-5309-SBC-HYD)   SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A 15/2025
Bhittai Colony

Case called, accused Bilawal is present on bail, DDPP for the state is present. DC is present. Let the charge be framed, charge framed against accused at Ex.2 and plea of accused recorded R&R at Ex.2-A to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. Complainant ASI Ghulam Sarwar, PWs PC Ashraf Ali and I.O SIP Qamaruddin Malik are appeared in some other case. The DDPP and DC prayed to proceed the case today. Property produced. Case proceeded. D/O complainant ASI Ghulam Sarwar recorded at Ex.3 and he produced entries, memo of arrest, search & recovery and FIR R&R at Ex.3-A to 3-D. D/O PW PC Ashraf Ali recorded at Ex.4. D/O PW I.O SIP Qamaruddin Malik recorded at Ex.5 and he produced entries, permission letter, memo of place of vardat and report of FSL R&R at Ex.5-A to 5-E. The DDPP for the state closed the side of prosecution vide statement at Ex.6. Let the statement of accused be recorded, statement of accused recorded at Ex.7. Accused submitted his written reply and admitted his guilt. Order keep on record and same brought on record at Ex.8. Arguments heard. Judgment passed and announced in open Court at Ex.9 that accused Bilawal son of Abdul Raheem Thaheem is hereby convicted u/s 265 H(ii) Cr.PC for offense u/s 23(i)(a) of the Sindh Arms Act, 2013. He is sentenced to the period already undergone in custody and is further directed to pay a fine of Rs.500/-. In the event of default in payment of the fine, he shall undergo simple imprisonment for two days. He is present on bail and his bail bonds stand cancelled and surety is discharged. A certified copy of this Judgment supplied to the convict free of cost and such receipt brought on record at Ex.10. The accused/convict has deposited the fine amount.

16 PPC 62/2026 The State VS Hussain Bhayo and another   ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-THT)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI)   PPC-397 138/2025
B-Section Kandhkot

Case tr: to the Court of ld: 2nd ADJ Kandkot for its disposal according to law.

17 PPC 84/2026 The State VS Kanbeer and others   DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK)   PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 102/2025
Karampur

Case called, accused Kanbeer is produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, while other accused have been declared as POs. DDPP for the state is present. Accused yet not engage his advocate. No.PW is present. Let the required papers be supplied to accused, case papers supplied to accused and such receipt brought on record at Ex.4. Case put off to:24.02.2026, accused is remanded back to custody with directions to be produced on next date of hearing through video link. For charge. Accused is directed to engage his advocate.

18 Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 81/2026 The State VS Abdul Waheed Shaikh   DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI)   SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) 2/2026
A-Section Kandhkot

Case called, accused Abdul Waheed Shaikh is produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, DDPP for the state is present. Accused yet not engage his advocate. No.PW is present. Let the required papers be supplied to accused, case papers supplied to accused and such receipt brought on record at Ex.1. Case put off to:23.02.2026, accused is remanded back to custody with directions to be produced on next date of hearing through video link. For charge. Accused is directed to engage his advocate.

19 PPC 80/2026 The State VS Abdul Waheed & ors   DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI)   PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 1/2026
A-Section Kandhkot

Case called, accused Abdul Waheed Shaikh, Aamir Ali Khoso, Zahid and Noor Ali @ Noorullah @ Nooro are produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, while accused Rabel has been declared as PO. DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Faizullah Muhammadani advocate appeared and filed his power on behalf of accused Zahid. Order. File. Accused Abdul Waheed, Aamir Ali and Noor Ali @ Noorullah @ Nooro yet not engage their advocate. No.PW is present. Let the required papers be supplied to accused, case papers supplied to accused and such receipt brought on record at Ex.4. Case put off to:23.02.2026, accused are remanded back to custody with directions to be produced on next date of hearing through video link. For charge. Accused are directed to engage their advocate.

20 Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 86/2026 The State VS Kanbeer s/o Abdul Hakeem Bijarani   DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK)   SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A 103/2025
Karampur

Case called, accused Kanbeer is produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, DDPP for the state is present. Accused yet not engage his advocate. No.PW is present. Let the required papers be supplied to accused, case papers supplied to accused and such receipt brought on record at Ex.1. Case put off to:24.02.2026, accused is remanded back to custody with directions to be produced on next date of hearing through video link. For charge. Accused is directed to engage his advocate.

21 PPC 93/2026 The State VS Manzoor @ Manoo & Ors   DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK)   PPC-120-B,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-440 140/2025
B-Section Kandhkot

Case called, accused Manzoor @ Manoo, Malguzar @ Malhoo, Gulzar, Imdad, Raheem @ Ghoro, Kundhar @ Kundho, Waris Ali, Sadam @ Adhar, Hayat and Khuda Bux @ Papoo are absconders and declared as POs while accused Morezado @ Moro shown as died in the challan, DDPP for the state is present. PW PC Lehaque is present, no other PW is present. D/O PW PC Lehaque recorded at Ex.4 and he produced memo of place of incident R&R at Ex.4-A. The DDPP for the state closed the side of prosecution vide statement at Ex.5 with prayer to keep the case on dormant file. Heard. Order passed and announced in open Court at Ex.6 that the case against above named absconding accused be kept on dormant file, till the time they are arrested and produced or surrender before the Court of law.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications U/S 265 K Cr.P.C
22 Criminal Misc. Applications in session cases 27/2026 Aslam Bangwar VS The State   Muhammad Siddique(ADVO-236-SBC-KSH)   DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH)   Cr.PC-265-K 61/2025
A-Section Kandhkot

Mr. Muhammad Siddique Bangwar advocate filed an application u/s 265-K Cr.PC on behalf of applicant/accused Aslam. Order. Notice to DDPP , notice waived by DDPP and same application brought on record at Ex.14. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court at Ex.15 that accused Aslam son of Shah Dost Bangwar is hereby acquitted u/s 265-K Cr.PC. The accused is present in custody through video link and is remanded back along with acquittal intimation with a direction to jail authorities to release him forthwith in this case only and if not to be detained in any other case.

23 Criminal Misc. Applications in session cases 26/2026 Aslam Bangwar VS The State   Muhammad Siddique(ADVO-236-SBC-KSH)   DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH)   PPC-324,PPC-353 5/2025
A-Section Kandhkot

Mr. Muhammad Siddique Bangwar advocate filed an application u/s 265-K Cr.PC on behalf of applicant/accused Aslam. Order. Notice to DDPP , notice waived by DDPP and same application brought on record at Ex.25. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court at Ex.26 that accused Aslam son of Shah Dost Bangwar is hereby acquitted u/s 265-K Cr.PC. The accused is produced in custody through video link and he is remanded back along with acquittal intimation with direction to jail authorities to release him forthwith in this case only and if he is not required in relation to any other case.