| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 46/2026 | Muhammad Murad Dahani VS The State | Jote Ali Khan(ADVO-430-SBC-KSH) | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | 4/2026 Ghulam Sarwar Sarki |
Criminal BBA is called, applicant/accused Muhammad Murad is present on interim pre-arrest bail and his counsel Mr. Jote Ali Bangwar is also present. DDPP for the state is present. Police file received. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court that the interim pre-arrest bail granted to the applicant/accused is hereby confirmed, subject to the same terms and conditions. |
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 59/2026 | Hidayatullah Bakhrani VS The State | Saeed Ahmed Bangwar() | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | 2/2026 Tangwani |
Criminal BBA is called, applicant/accused Hidayatullah is present on interim pre-arrest bail and his counsel Mr. Saeed Ahmed Bangwar is also present. DDPP for the state is present. Police file received. The advocate for applicant/accused filed statement alongwith supported document. Order. File. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court that the interim pre-arrest bail granted to the applicant/accused is hereby confirmed, subject to the same terms and conditions. |
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 58/2026 | Ghulam Muhammad @ Leghari and another VS The State | Khamiso (ADVO-276-SBC-KSH) | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | 4/2026 Ghulam Sarwar Sarki |
Criminal BBA is called, applicants/accused Ghulam Muhammad @ Leghari and Baboo @ Mehar Ali are present on interim pre-arrest bail and their counsel Mr. Khamiso Khan Dahani is also present. DDPP for the state is present. Police file received. The advocate for applicants/accused filed statement alongwith supported document. Order. File. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court that the interim pre-arrest bail granted to the applicants/accused is hereby confirmed, subject to the same terms and conditions. |
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 64/2026 | Meer Ahmed Bahalkani VS The State | Qadir Bux(ADVO-86-SBC-KSH) | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | 1/2026 B-Section Kandhkot |
Criminal BBA is called, applicant/accused Meer Ahmed is present on interim pre-arrest bail and his counsel Mr. Qadir Bux Golo is also present. DDPP for the state is present. Police file received. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court that the interim pre-arrest bail earlier granted to the applicant/accused is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | PPC 445/2023 | The State VS Farooque Ahmed and others | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | 136/2023 B-Section Kandhkot |
Case called, accused Farooque Ahmed is present on bail, while other accused have been declared as POs. DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Anees Ahmed Bhayo advocate for accused is present. Complainant SIP Janib Ali and I.O ASI Muhammad Ayoub Khoso are present, no other PW is present, process returned unserved. Property produced. Case proceeded. D/O complainant SIP Janib Ali recorded at Ex.13. D/O PW I.O ASI Muhammad Ayoub Khoso recorded at Ex.14. Case put off to:31.01.2026, present accused is directed to attend. For evidence. Property returned back with directions to be produced on next date of hearing. Process for R/PWs extended to process server. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 98/2026 | Ghulam Mustafa Bheri VS SHO PS A/Section Kandhkot and others | Jafar Ali (ADVO-263LC-SBC-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Criminal Misc application is called, applicant Ghulam Mustafa and his counsel are present. DDPP for the state is present. Reports received from DSP complaint cell Kashmore at Kandhkot and SHO concerned. Order. File. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court that the instant application is disposed of with liberty granted to the applicant to approach the concerned Court. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 40/2026 | The State VS Shahban Sabzoi & others | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-399,PPC-402 | 357/2025 A-Section Kandhkot |
Case called, accused Shahban is called absent without any intimation, accused Kalati is present on bail, while other accused have been declared as POs. DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Muhammad Siddique Bangwar advocate appeared and filed his power on behalf of accused Kalati. Order. file. Let the required papers be supplied to accused Kalati and such receipt obtained from him and brought on record at Ex.4. Accused Shahban is called absent without any intimation, therefore, Issue NBWs against him and notice u/s 514 Cr.PC against his surety. Case put off to:03.02.2026, present accused is directed to attend. Issue NBWs against accused Shahban and notice u/s 514 Cr.PC against his surety through concerned police. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 8 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 5/2026 | The State VS Waqar Malik | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Muhammad Nawaz(ADVO-190-SBC-KSH) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 318/2025 A-Section Kandhkot |
Case called, accused Waqar is present on bail, DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Muhammad Nawaz Bangwar advocate for accused Waqar is present. Let the statement of accused be recorded, statement of accused Waqar recorded at Ex.9. Arguments heard from both sides. Judgment passed and announced in open court at Ex.10 that accused Waqar s/o Sultan Malik is acquitted u/s 265 H(i) Cr.PC. Accused is present on bail, his bail bonds stands cancelled and surety is discharged. |
| 9 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 7/2026 | The State VS Asif Chachar | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Ghulam Mahdi(ADVO-269-SBC-KSH) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 319/2025 A-Section Kandhkot |
Case called, accused Asif is present on bail, DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Ghulam Mehdi Suhriyani advocate for accused is present. Let the statement of accused be recorded, statement of accused Asif recorded at Ex.9. Arguments heard from both sides. Judgment passed and announced in open court at Ex.10 that accused Asif son of Iqbal Chachar is acquitted u/s 265 H(i) Cr.PC. Accused is present on bail, his bail bonds stands cancelled and surety is discharged. |
| 10 | PPC 6/2026 | The State VS Asif Chachar & Ors | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Abdul Ghani Bijarani(ADVO-71-SBC-KSH),Faraz Ali(ADVO-267-SBC-KSH),Ghulam Mahdi(ADVO-269-SBC-KSH),Muhammad Nawaz(ADVO-190-SBC-KSH) | PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | 317/2025 A-Section Kandhkot |
Case called, accused Asif, Waqar and Feroz are present on bail, accused Farman and Shahbaz are produced in custody by J/A Shikarpur through video link, DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Faraz Ali Bijarani advocate for accused Farman and Shahbaz is present. Mr. Muhammad Nawaz Bangwar advocate for accused Waqar is present. Mr. Abdul Ghani Bijarani advocate for accused Feroz is present. Mr. Ghulam Mehdi Suhriyani advocate for accused Asif is also present. Let the statement of accused recorded, statement of accused Asif, Waqar, Feroz, Farman and Shahbaz recorded at Ex.14 to 18. Arguments heard from both sides. Judgment passed and announced in open court at Ex.19 that accused Asif s/o Iqbal Chachar, Shahbaz s/o Banhoo Soomro, Waqar s/o Sultan Malik, Farman Ali s/o Muhammad Bux Bhayo and Feroz s/o Muhammad Shahban Bijarani are acquitted u/s 265 H(i) Cr.PC. Accused Asif, Feroz and Waqar are present on bail, their bail bond stands cancelled and sureties are discharged. Accused Farman Ali and Shahbaz are produced in custody through video link, they are remanded back along with acquittal intimation, with direction to jail authorities to release them forthwith in this case only and if they are not required to be detained in any other case. |