| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | BA in SC (Bail Application in Cases) 343/2026 | Sawali Mazari and another VS The State | Badal Khan Shaikh(ADVO-35-SBC-KSH) | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | PPC-399,PPC-402 | 34/2026 Miani @ Badani |
Criminal bail application of applicants/accused Sawali and Faqir Muhammad @ Faqiro is called, I/C DPP for the state is present. Mr. Muhammad Badal Shaikh advocate for applicants/accused is present. Police file received. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court that bail is therefore allowed subject to furnishing solvent sureties of Rs.30,000/- each, with PR bonds in the like amount. |
| 2 | BA in SC (Bail Application in Cases) 345/2026 | Sawali Mazari and another VS The State | Badal Khan Shaikh(ADVO-35-SBC-KSH) | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | 44/2026 Gublo |
Criminal bail application of applicants/accused Sawali and Faqir Muhammad @ Faqiro is called, I/C DPP for the state is present. Mr. Muhammad Badal Shaikh advocate for applicants/accused is present. Police file received. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court that bail is allowed subject to each applicant furnishing solvent sureties of Rs.30,000/- along with PR bonds in the like amount. |
| 3 | BA in SC (Bail Application in Cases) 344/2026 | Sawali Mazari and another VS The State | Badal Khan Shaikh(ADVO-35-SBC-KSH) | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | 33/2026 Miani @ Badani |
Criminal bail application of applicants/accused Sawali and Faqir Muhammad @ Faqiro is called, I/C DPP for the state is present. Mr. Muhammad Badal Shaikh advocate for applicants/accused is present. Police file received. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court that bail is accordingly allowed subject to furnishing solvent sureties of Rs.30,000/- each, with PR bonds in the like amount. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1426/2026 | Akbar @ Ali Akbar and others VS The State | Saeed Ahmed Khan Bijarani(ADVO-176-SBC-KSH) | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | PPC-341,PPC-353,PPC-435 | 117/2026 Karampur |
Criminal BBA is called, applicants/accused Akber @ Ali Akber, Peroz and Ghulam Ali @ Ghulam are present on interim pre-arrest bail and their counsel Mr. Saeed Ahmed B.Bijarani is also present. I/c DPP is present. Police file received. The advocate for applicants/accused filed statement alongwith supported case diary. Order. File. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court that the interim pre-arrest bail already granted is confirmed on the same terms and conditions. |
| 5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1424/2026 | Abdul Ghani @ Dholo Golato VS The State | Muhammad Nawaz(ADVO-190-SBC-KSH) | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-H | 129/2026 Buxapur |
Criminal BBA is called, applicant/accused Abdul Ghani @ Dholo is present on interim pre-arrest bail and his counsel Mr. Muhammad Nawaz Bangwar is also present. I/C DPP is present. Police file received. Complainant is called absent and notice against him returned as per endorsement of process server. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court that the interim pre-arrest bail already granted to the applicant is confirmed on the same terms and conditions. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Compromise Appl: | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 481/2026 | State VS Umed Ali Solangi and others | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | ABDUL NABI BROHI S/O AHMED() | PPC-324,PPC-34 | 75/2026 Kashmore |
Case and compromise application are called, accused Umed Ali is present on bail, accused Naseer @ Naseer Ahmed and Haneef @ Muhammad Haneef have already been acquitted, while accused Adit has been declared as PO. I/C DPP is present. DC is present. Supplementary challan of accused Umed Ali received from the Court of learned Civil Judge and J.M-II Kashmore. Arguments heard from both sides on the compromise application u/s 345(2) & (6) Cr.PC. Order passed and announced in open Court at Ex.11 that the compromise application is accepted in terms of section 345(2) Cr.PC. Consequently, accused Umed Ali son of Mitho by caste Solangi, is acquitted u/s 345(6) Cr.PC. He is present on bail, his bail bonds are cancelled and surety is discharged. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Criminal Revision | |||||||
| 7 | Criminal Revisions 11/2026 | Akbar Ali Bangwar VS The State and another | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Civil Revision-u/s 435 | / |
Crl: Revision has been tr: to the Court of ld: ADJ Kashmore for its disposal according to law. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 8 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 18/2026 | The State VS Abid Ali Bahalkani | SPP(ADVO-006-SBC-LRK) | Saeed Ahmed Khan Bijarani(ADVO-176-SBC-KSH) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 17/2026 Tangwani |
CNS Case called, accused Abid Ali is present on bail, I/C DPP is present. Mr. Saeed Ahmed B.Bijarani advocate for accused is present, No.PW is present, process returned unserved, as per endorsement of process server. Property produced. CNS Case put off to:05.11.2026, present accused is directed to attend. For Evidence. Process against complainant & PWs extended to process server. Property returned back with directions to be produced on next date of hearing. |
| 9 | PPC 484/2026 | The State VS Sher Jaan and others | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Pirkash Lal (ADVO-50443-SBC-KSH) | PPC-399,PPC-402 | 126/2026 Kashmore |
Case called, accused Sher Jan is present on bail, while other accused have been declared as Pos. I/C DPP for the state is present. Mr. Pirkash Lal advocate for accused is present. No.PW is present, process returned unserved. The I/C DPP for the state closed the side of prosecution vide statement at Ex.9. Let the statement of accused be recorded, statement of accused Sher Jan recorded at Ex.10. Arguments heard from both sides. Judgment passed and announced in open Court at Ex.11 that accused Sher Jan son of Azizullah by caste Khoso is acquitted u/s 265-H(i) Cr.PC. He is present on bail, his bail bond stands cancelled and surety is discharged. Case against absconding accused be kept on dormant file till their arrest or surrender before the Court. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1854/2026 | Zahid Ali Samejo VS SSP Kashmore at Kandhkot and others | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Criminal Misc. application is called, applicant Zahid Ali Samejo is called absent. I/C DPP is present. Reports received from DSP complaint cell Kashmore at Kandhkot SHO concerned. Order. File. Respondent No.4 is present. The applicant is called absent without any intimation. Heard. Order passed and announced in open Court that the applicant has lost his interest to prosecute the matter, therefore, instant criminal Misc. application is dismissed, in non-prosecution. |
| 11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1888/2026 | Abdul Rehman Nindwani VS SHO PS Dera Sarki and others | Muhammad Nawaz(ADVO-190-SBC-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Crl. MA has been tr: to the Court of ld: 2nd ADJ Kandhkot for its disposal according to law. |
| 12 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1865/2026 | Rehmatullah Shaikh VS SSP Kashmore at Kandhkot and others | Abdul Aziz Bangwar(ADVO-54340-SBC-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Criminal Misc. application is called, applicant Rehmatullah and his counsel Mr. Abdul Aziz Bangwar are present. I/C DPP for the state is present. Reports received from DSP complaint cell Kashmore at Kandhkot and SHOs concerned. Order. File. Respondents No.5,6,7 & 9 are present. Mr. Imtiaz Ali Ogahi advocate appeared and filed his power on behalf of present respondents. Order. File. Arguments heard from both sides. Order passed and announced in open Court that the application is disposed of and official respondents are directed to provide due legal protection to the applicant in accordance with law and submit compliance report within seven (07) days. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 13 | PPC 524/2026 | The State VS Akram & Ors | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Shabir Ahmed(ADVO-347-SBC-KSH) | PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | 216/2026 A-Section Kandhkot |
Case called, accused Akram is present on bail, while other accused have been declared as POs. I/C DPP is present. DC is present. Let the charge be framed, charge framed against accused Akram at Ex.5 and plea of accused recorded R&R at Ex.5-A to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. Complainant HC Abdul Wahab, PWs PC Muhammad Tayab and I.O SIP Muhammad Anwer are present in some other case. The I/C DPP and DC prayed to proceed the case today. Property produced. Case proceeded. D/O complainant HC Abdul Wahab recorded at Ex.6 and he produced entry and FIR R&R at Ex.6-A & 6-B. D/O PW PC Muhammad Tayab recorded at Ex.7 and he produced memo of vardat and memo of arrest R&R at Ex.7-A & 7-B. D/O PW I.O SIP Muhammad Anwer recorded at Ex.8 and he produced entries, permission letter, RC, CRO and report of FSL R&R at Ex.8-A to 8-G. The I/C DPP for the state closed the side of prosecution vide statement at Ex.9. Let the statement of accused be recorded, statement of accused Akram recorded at Ex.10. Arguments heard from both sides. Judgment passed and announced in open Court at Ex.11 that accused Akram son of Ghulam Rasool by caste Bangwar is acquitted u/s 265 H(i) Cr.PC. He is present on bail, his bail bond stands cancelled and surety is discharged. Case against absconding accused be kept on dormant file till their arrest or surrender before the Court. |
| 14 | PPC 535/2026 | The State VS Zubair Thahim & Ors | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-317-SBC-KSH) | PPC-399 | 227/2026 A-Section Kandhkot |
Case called, accused Zubair is present on bail, while other accused have been declared as POs. I/C DPP is present. DC is present. Let the charge be framed, charge framed against accused Akram at Ex.5 and plea of accused recorded R&R at Ex.5-A to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. Complainant HC Shoukat Ali, PWs PC Muhammad Tayab and I.O SIP Muhammad Anwer are present in some other case. The I/C DPP and DC prayed to proceed the case today. Case proceeded. D/O complainant HC Shoukat Ali recorded at Ex.6 and he produced entries and FIR R&R at Ex.6-A to 6-C. D/O PW PC Muhammad Tayab recorded at Ex.7 and he produced memo of vardat and memo of arrest R&R at Ex.7-A & 7-B. D/O PW I.O SIP Muhammad Anwer recorded at Ex.8 and he produced entries R&R at Ex.8-A to 8-C. The I/C DPP for the state closed the side of prosecution vide statement at Ex.9. Let the statement of accused be recorded, statement of accused Zubair recorded at Ex.10. Arguments heard from both sides. Judgment passed and announced in open Court at Ex.11 that accused Zubair son of Allah Dewayo by caste Thaheem is acquitted u/s 265 H(i) Cr.PC. He is present on bail, his bail bond stands cancelled and surety is discharged. Case against absconding accused be kept on dormant file till their arrest or surrender before the Court. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 15 | PPC 543/2026 | The State VS Abdul Ghaffar and others | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Muhammad Akram (ADVO-427-SBC-KSH),Zahid Ali Shah(ADVO-120-SBC-KSH) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-337-Fiii,PPC-337-Fv,PPC-504 | 28/2026 Rasaldar |
Case has been tr: to the Court of ld: 2nd ADJ Kandhkot for its disposal according to law. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 33/2026 |
Muhammad Ismail and others VS Muhammad Harif and others | Ashique Illahi Sundrani(ADVO-102-SBC-KSH) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-KSH),Muhammad Qasim Khan (ADVO-12524-SBC-MLR) | Civil Appeal has been tr: to the Court of ld: 2nd ADJ Kandhkot for its disposal according to law. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 33/2026 |
Muhammad Ismail and others VS Muhammad Harif and others | Ashique Illahi Sundrani(ADVO-102-SBC-KSH) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-KSH),Muhammad Qasim Khan (ADVO-12524-SBC-MLR) | Civil Appeal has been tr: to the Court of ld: 2nd ADJ Kandhkot for its disposal according to law. |
||