| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 34/2026 | Mst: Shamin VS Abdul Sattar | ADPP(ADPP-0006-GOV-SUK) | Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Both paryties and their counsel are called absent.Matter is adjourned in the interest of justice.Put off to 19.08.2026. for filing affidavit in evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 113/2026 | Mst Narmeen VS Muhammad Murtaza | Muhammad Moeez(ADVO-1914-SBC-SUK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff called absent her counsel present. Defendant called absent and not yet served. Repeat notice to defendant through Court bailiff with direction to past the notice outer door house of defendant in presence of two witnesses, through T.C.S courier service on costs of plaintiff. Put off to 08.08.2026 for Service. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 3 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 21/2026 | Muhammad Farooq VS Muhammad Panjal | Muhammad Nouman(ADVO-1967-SBC-SUK) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Application called. Applicant called absent his counsel present. Report not yet received from Mukhtiarkar. Letter issued to Mukhtiarkar for report, but failed to submit report. Issue show cause notice to Mukhtiarkar Taluka New Sukkur. Issue fresh letter to concerned Mukhtiarkar with direction to submit verification report of legal heirs. Put off to 22.08.2026 for report. |
||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 117/2026 | Bibi Nadra VS Rashid Ali Shah | Abdul Wahab (ADVO-924-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff and her counsel absent. Defendant is called absent and not yet served. Plaintiff side is directed to comply the service measures upon defendant through court bailiff, registered post, TCSs Courier service on costs of plaintiff. Put off to 24.08.2026 for service of notice upon defendant. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 41/2026 | Mst.Naushabo VS Muhammad Kashif | Muhammad Shah(ADVO-1242-SBC-SUK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff and her counsel are calledabsent. Defendant is called absent, service upon defendant already held good on 11.06.2026.Matter is adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to 19.08.2026. for appearance/W.S. |
||
| 6 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 16/2026 | Mst.Iqra VS Waqar Ameen | Faiz Muhammad Brohi(ADVO-707-SBC-SUK) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Matter called. Plaintiff/DH is called absent, her counsel is present. Defendant/JD is called absent. Record shows that Court adopted service measures upon defendant/JD and he was served as per endorsement of bailiff of this Court that JD avoided to receive the notice of the execution application and also pasted the notice at his outer door of house; then this Court fixed matter for filing of objection. Despite of given sufficient time to file objection but he failed to appear and as well as failed to file objection; thus, looking into the facts he is hereby debarred from filing objections. Let the matter be fixed on 12.08.2026 for arguments. |
||
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 50/2026 | SMT: Sapna Kumari VS Anil Kumar & anothers | Nathoo(ADVO-3043-SBC-SUK) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Matter called. Plaintiff and her counsel called absent. Defendant No.1 Anila Kumar, called absent already service held good on 23.04.2026. Defendant No.2 Tulsi Dass is called absent, his counsel is present. Matter is adjourned to 27.08.2026. for W.S and arguments on application for Striking off/Deleting the Name of defendant No.2 from the Array of Parties. |
||
| 8 | F.S. (Family Suits) 70/2026 | Mst Raheela VS Muhammad Farhan | Shah Nawaz (ADVO-2101-SBC-SUK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Suit called. Plaintiff and her counsel are present. Defendant is called absent. Record shows that this COurt adpoted all service measures upon defendnat, he was serverd through bialiff of this COurt and as per per endorsement of bailiff that notice was received by the brother of defendant namely Hamad, then this court fixed matter for appearance of defendant and filing of W/S but the wirtten statement has not been filed by him thugh stipulated time has already been lapsed, looking into the fact , he is debarred from filling W/S. Let the matter be filed on 21,08.2026 for exparte proof evidence. Plaintiff is directed to file her affidavit in exparte proof. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 9 | F.S. (Family Suits) 59/2026 | Mst.Arzo VS Shahzeb | Irshad Ali(ADVO-1590-SBC-SUK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Suit called. Parties and their counsels are present. Today, matter is fixed for pre-trial proceedings; parties made sit inside the chamber, they have been heard at length. Detail order passed and announced in open Court. Pre-trial proceedings declared as failed and marriage of plaintiff with defendant is hereby dissolved by way of Khula U/s 10 (4) of F.C.Act. Further, defendant is directed to return the dowry articles, gold ring and watch to plaintiff. Suit is disposed of accordingly in above terms. Pending application(s), if any, are hereby disposed of being infructuous. Office is directed to prepare decree and a copy thereof be sent to the concerned U.C. for information. However, the decree shall take effect after ninety (90) days. |
||
| 10 | F.S. (Family Suits) 66/2026 | Neelam Ali VS Kamran Ali | Muhammad Moeez(ADVO-1914-SBC-SUK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Both parties called absent their counsels are present. Photo copy of W.S supplied to counsel for plaintiff such receipt obtained. Both parties counsel request of adjourn the matter, their request allowed. Matter is adjourned to 12.08.2026. for Pre-trial/Issues. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 11 | F.S. (Family Suits) 49/2025 | Mst Fatima VS Muhammad Ibrahim | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff absent and her counsel present. Defendant Ibrahim is present, Junior counsel for defendant present and filed application for adjournment. Order on it. Allowed as last and final chance, no more chance would be given to the party. Put off to 08.08.2026 for evidence of defendant side. |
|
| 12 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 64/2025 | Mst Kareem Dad VS Mst Haleema | Sadam Hussain(ADVO-3194-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 12,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | Matter called. Applicant and his counsel are called absent. Opponent Mst. Halima has been produced by Incharge Women Jail along with minors, her counsel is also present. Today, matter is fixed for evidence of the applicant side as well as objection on the application of 12 of G&W Act. The applicant side failed to pursue the application U/s 12 of G&W Act; henceforth same is hereby disposed of being infructuous. Further, evidence of applicant was recorded on 07.04.2026 and the matter has been adjourned since for the recording the evidence of witness of applicant but till today, he did not appear before the Court; therefore the side of the applicant is hereby closed suo moto. Let the matter be fixed for evidence of opponent side. Put off to 18.08.2026 for evidence of opponent side. |
|
| 13 | F.S. (Family Suits) 339/2025 | Mst Mehwish VS Syed Waqar | Kashif Ali(ADVO-2712-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Suit called. Plaintiff is absent her counsel present. Defendant is present, his counsel absent. Advocate for plaintiff filed application for adjournment. Order On it. Allowed. Matter is adjourned as last and final chance. Put off to 24.08.2026 for filing of affidavit in evidence of plaintiff side. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 14 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 14/2024 | Mst. Fatima VS Muhammd Ibrahim+ | Ayaz Ali (ADVO-2363-SBC-SUK) | Abdul Sattar Shar(ADVO-2496-SBC-SUK) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 12 | ||
| 15 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 4/2025 | Muhammad Ibrahim VS Mst Fatima | Abdul Sattar Shar(ADVO-2496-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | ||
| 16 | F.S. (Family Suits) 77/2025 | Issac Samuel VS Smt.Saba | Badar Uddin(ADVO-2586-SBC-SUK) | Ghulam Ali Abbasi(ADVO-2359-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage | ||
| 17 | F.S. (Family Suits) 149/2025 | Mst Afsana VS Ali Raza | Muhammad Adil Khan(ADVO-1302-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff is present, her counsel is called absent. Defendant is called absent, his counsel is present. Arguments heard. Judgment passed and announced in open Court. Suit of the plaintiff is partly decreed. Pending application(s) if any are hereby disposed of being infructuous. |
|
| 18 | F.S. (Family Suits) 164/2025 | Smt Radha VS Hans raj @ rakesh | Rakesh Kumar (ADVO-2395-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Recovery of Medical Charges / Delivery Expenses ,Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Suit called. Plaintiff is called absent, her counsel is present. Defendant already debarred and made exparte. Today, arguments heard from plaintiff side. Exparte judgment passed and announced in open Court. Suit is disposed of accordingly. pending application(s) if any are hereby disposed of being infructuous. Office is directed to follow the procedure as per law. |
|
| 19 | F.S. (Family Suits) 228/2025 | mst sharqa VS Syed wasi Abdi | Abdul Salam (ADVO-2104-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | ||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Exparte Evidence | |||||||
| 20 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 69/2025 | Fayaz VS Mst Razia | Asif Zeeshan(ADVO-2389-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 12,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody),The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Matter called. Applicant is called absent, his counsel is present and moved adjournment application. Opponent is called absent and already been made exparte. Today, matter is fixed for exparte evidence. It is matter of record that since March 2026, matter continuously being fixed for exparte evidence but the applicant side failed to record his evidence; today this adjournment application. Counsel requested to allow the application as the applicant is out of jurisdiction and he sought adjournment as last and final chance, which is hereby allowed; no more chance would be given to applicant in future. In case of failure, appropriate order shall be passed as per scheme of law. Put off to 12.08.2026 for exparte proof evidence of applicant side. |
|