| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 9/2026 | Chela Ram VS General Public and others | Dhan Raj(ADVO-1096-SBC-MKS) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act | Guardian Application called. Applicant is present where as his counsel is present. The G.A. is fixed for service Process issued .Returned served as per endorsement of the bailiff of this court .Respondent No 1& 2 are present Clerk of U.C Mithrio Bhitti is present and Submitted Verification. Report from Union Council Mithrio Bhitti. Publication not published, Applicant Submitted application for grant of time. Order passed theor on Allowed. Since the Court is currently lying vacant, the matter is adjourned. Put off to.............10-10-2026. For Service. Issue Publication. on fresh cost. |
|
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 62/2026 | Sht. Kishori Bai VS Lachhman Das | Zaheer Uddin() | Bharat Lal(ADVO-131-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family Suit is called. The Plaintiff is absent, whereas her counsel is present. The matter is fixed for service. Summons issued to the Defendant has been returned duly served, as per the endorsement of the Bailiff of this Court. Order Service upon defendant is held good .Mr. Bharat Lal, Advocate, has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the Defendant. Order on it file..He has also submitted an application seeking time. The same is allowed.Since the Court is presently lying vacant, the matter is adjourned. Put up on 07-10-2026 for filing of the written statement and for arguments on the application under Section 17-A of the Family Courts |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 46/2026 | Sht. Kavita VS Mohan Lal | Mir Murtaza(ADVO-130-SBC-THP) | Zaheeruddin (ADVO-102-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family Suit is called. The Plaintiff is absent, whereas her counsel is present. The Defendant is present. The matter is fixed for filing of the Written Statement. Mr. Zaheeruddin, Advocate, has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the Defendant. Order on the. File. The learned counsel for the Defendant has also submitted an application seeking time. Order on the application. Allowed. Since the Court is presently lying vacant, the matter is adjourned and put off to 09-10-2026 for filing of the Written Statement and arguments on the application under Section 17-A of the Family Courts Act. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 36/2026 | Mst. Nabeela VS Mukhtiar Hussain | Muhammad Rafique(ADVO-91-SBC-THP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP),Zaheeruddin (ADVO-102-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family Suit called. The plaintiff is present, whereas her counsel is present. The defendant is absent, whereas his counsel is present.the matter is fixed for pre-trial proceedings. Learned counsel for the defendant submitted an application seeking exemption from the personal appearance of the defendant. Order passed thereon. The application is kept on record.Since the Court is presently lying vacant, the matter is adjourned and put off to 06-10-2026 for pre-trial proceedings. |
|
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 38/2026 | Sht. Hava VS Veenjho | Nirmala Bai(ADVO-53-SBC-THP) | Shanker Lal (ADVO-99-SBC-THP) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage | "The family suit is called. The plaintiff is present along with her counsel, and the defendant, Veenjho, is present along with his counsel. The matter was fixed for pre-trial proceedings; a chance was given to the parties, but the pre-trial proceedings failed. As the court is lying vacant, the matter is adjourned to ......10.10.2026 for the framing of issues." |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 6 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 4/2026 | Sht:Durgha Bai VS Shankar Lal | Kundan (ADVO-138-SBC-THP) | Ghulam Mustafa (ADVO-48-SBC-THP) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family Execution Application called. The Plaintiff/Decree Holder, along with her counsel, is present. The Defendant/Judgment Debtor, Shankar Lal, along with his counsel, is also present. The matter is fixed for arguments and compliance. The Defendant/Judgment Debtor, Shankar Lal, submitted an application to deposit a cash amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only). An order was passed on the application, and it was allowed. The Defendant/JD deposited the cash amount of Rs. 2,00,000/-(Two lakhs only) as part payment for the past maintenance of the plaintiff and the minor, Sharjeena (also known as Shazu). The said amount was received by the Plaintiff/Decree Holder, Sht. Durga Bai, and a receipt was issued to both sides..Additionally, a room set was handed over by the Defendant/JD to the Plaintiff/DH, which was received by the Plaintiff/DH, Sht. Durga Bai. An acknowledgment receipt was presented, ordered upon, and kept on record. .The Advocate for the Defendant/JD submitted a statement assuring that the remaining amount of Rs. 68,000/- will be submitted on the next date of hearing. Order Passed on separate Sheet .The order was announced in open court, and the Execution Application is allowed. Since the court is presently Lying vacant, the matter is adjourned. Put up on 14-10-2026 for compliance. |
|