| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 95/2022 | The State VS Zahid Khan & Others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-MLR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-34,PPC-380,PPC-457 | 676/2020 Shah Latif Town |
Case called. ADPP for the State is present. Accused Zahid and Sidique are present. ASI Shehzado being bound down called absent. Case is adjourned to 15-11-2025 for evidence. Office is strictly ordered to issue NBWs against IO through SHO PS Shahlatif Town. |
| 2 | DC (Direct Complaint) 4/2023 | Mst Nida VS Muhammad Usman & Others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-MLR),Rao Umer Farooque (ADVO-19828-SBC-MLR) | Muzafar Hussain(ADVO-16642-SBC-MLR) | / |
Direct Complaint called. Accused / respondent Usman and Ghulam Nabi are called absent. Counsel for accused and complainant are present. None appeared from witnesses. In the interest of justice cross examination is reserved. Matter is adj to 27-11-2025 for evidence. Issue NBWs against absent PWs except complainant. Issue BWs against accused. |
|
| 3 | PPC 49/2024 | ASI Muhammad Mohsin Abbas VS Shahid & Ors | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-MLR) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 85/2024 Site Super Highway Industrial |
Case called. ADPP for the State is present. Accused Shahid is present on bail. Process returned. PWs are absent. Case is adjourned to 04.12.2025 for evidence. Issue NBWs against PWs through SHO. |
|
| 4 | SCMO 68/2024 | Asim Bashir VS abidon | Abdul Basit (ADVO-20625-SBC-KHS) | PPC-489-F | 582/2024 Site Super Highway Industrial |
Case called. Learned ADPP for the State is present. Accused Abidoon Qadir is present along with his counsel. Counsel for the complainant is also present. Process returned. Complainant called absent. Case is adjourned to 20-11-2025 at 10:30 AM for evidence and further hearing and order 249-A C.r.P.C. Issue NBWs against the absent unexamined prosecution witnesses. |
|
| 5 | PPC 33/2025 | ASI Kareem Bux VS Sana Ullah & Ors | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-MLR) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 1431/2024 Site Super Highway Industrial |
Case called. ADPP for the State is present. Accused Sanaullah and Samad are present on bail a/w their counsels. Heard and perused. Accused persons are acquitted u/s 249-A Cr.P.C. Detailed order on separate sheet. |
|
| 6 | PPC 87/2025 | The State VS Nasrullah | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-MLR) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 530/2025 Site Super Highway Industrial |
Case called, ADPP for the state is present. Accused Nasrullah is present along with his counsel. None appeared from PWs. Put up on 19-11-2025 for evidence. Repeat summons to PWs. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 7 | SCMO 25/2022 | Muhammad Gul S/o Rehmat Gul VS Naeem & Others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-MLR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-34,PPC-447,PPC-511 | 699/2020 Sohrab Goth |
Case called. ADPP for the State is present. Accused Karamat, Naeem and Muhammad Riaz are present on bail while co-accused Noor Muhammad and Safaidullah and Zartab are already declared proclaimed offenders and accused Naeemullah S/o Mamtaz is not appearing before this court and while an intimation received from his counsel regarding his demise but such fact is not verified and not any documentary proof is provided. Hence accused is already absconder is considered as proclaimed offender. Counsels for present accused persons filed application u/s 249-A Cr.P.C. Son of complainant/ PW Abrar filed no objection on application 249-A Cr.P.C and also acknowledged that his father/ complainant has passed away. Heard and perused. Case against the present accused and absconder accused is disposed of. |
| 8 | PPC 154/2022 | Aziz ur Rehman VS Zahir Shah | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-MLR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-392 | 523/2022 Quaidabad |
Case called. ADPP for the State is present. Accused Zahir Shah called absent from so many dates. Further accused Ismail and Arif are absconder and today also no intimation has been received on their behalf. Case is to 18-11-2025 for formal and compliance. Repeat 87 and 88 Cr.P.C. |
| 9 | SCMO 29/2023 | ASI Soomar Khan VS Ladha | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-MLR) | PPC-9 | 120/2023 Site Super Highway Industrial |
Case called. ADPP for the State is present. Accused Ladha called absent. Process returned. Case is adj to 03-12-2025 for compliance. Repeat 88 against accused through Mukhtiarkar. |
|
| 10 | SCMO 65/2024 | Syed Muhamamd Hussain VS Muhammad Qasim | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-MLR) | PPC-489-F | 653/2024 Site Super Highway Industrial |
Case called. ADPP for the State is present. Accused Muhammad Qasim called absent. Process not returned. Case is adjourned to 04-12-2025 for evidence. Repeat U/S: 87 & 88 Cr.P.C against accused. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 11 | DC (Direct Complaint) 4/2025 | Mrs. Amber Bibi VS Abu Bakar | Rouf Ahmad(ADVO-18620-SBC-KHW) | / |
Direct complaint called. Proposed accused Abu Bakar is present a/w his counsel. Counsel for complainant received objections. In the interest of justice case is adj to 27-11-2025 for further proceedings. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 12 | PPC 227/2022 | Jawed Khan VS Arshad & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-MLR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-380,PPC-457 | 1662/2021 Shah Latif Town |
Case called. ADPP for the State is present. Accused Abdul Latif is present on bail while accused Arshad Boneri and Naseem Boneri are already declared as proclaimed offender vide order dated:-07-7-2022. Counsel for complainant is present. An associate counsel for accused is present and filed adjournment. In the interest of justice application is allowed as last and final chance and case is adj to 13-11-2025 for final arguments with direction to both sides to proceed with the matter else law will take its own course. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 87 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 13 | PPC 42/2025 | SIP Muhammad Pariyal VS Shahzaib Khan & Ors | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-MLR) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 1600/2024 Site Super Highway Industrial |
Matter called. Learned counsel for the state is present. Accused Shahzaib Khan and Syed Muhammad Sabir are absconder. Matter is adjourned to 04.12.2025. Issue 87 and 88 against absent accused. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 62/2023 | Mst Nida VS Muhammad Usman | Rao Umer Farooque (ADVO-19828-SBC-MLR) | Muzafar Hussain(ADVO-16642-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Suit called. Plaintiff is present a/ her counsel. An associate counsel for defendant is present. Heard and perused. Order passed on application for defense stuck off. Same is allowed. In the interest of justice cross is reserved as last and final chance. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned to 27.11.2025 for cross examination of plaintiff evidence as last and final chance with direction to both sides to proceed with the matter. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 103/2024 | Mst Humaira VS Hazoor Bux | Fayyaz Ahmed(ADVO-11789-SBC-KHS) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter called. An associate counsel for plaintiff is present. Perusal of record shows that service through all ordinary modes has already been served, therefore order passed. Service held good. In the interest of justice, the matter is adj. to 22.11.2025 for W.S/CA. fna. |
||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 102/2024 | Mst Tanazam Fatima VS Shahbaz Ali | Fayyaz Ahmed(ADVO-11789-SBC-KHS) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter called. An associate counsel for plaintiff is present. Perusal of record shows that service through all ordinary modes has already been served, therefore order passed. Service held good. In the interest of justice, the matter is adj. to 22.11.2025 for W.S/CA. fna. |
||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 45/2025 | Mst. Ruba Aziz & another VS Usman Imran | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Recovery of Medical Charges / Delivery Expenses ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. None is present from plaintiff side. In the interest of justice matter is adj. 15.11.2025 for service through all remaining modes as last chance. |
||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 120/2025 | Mst. Sumaira Bibi & another VS Muhammad Waseem | Farman Ali(ADVO-12254-SBC-KHE) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Suit called. Counsel for plaintiff is present and filed a statement coupled with a copy of publication. Matter adjourned to 15.11.2025 for services through remaining modes. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 6 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 17/2025 | Safia Usmani VS Inam ul Haq & others | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Application/Matter called. Counsel for applicant is present. Respondent no.02 Mrs. Mehmoona is present and filed her no objection on application coupled with her bio-metric affidavit. No any other respondent is present. Order passed. Respondent no.01 is deb-bared from filing his objections. Service held good. In the interest of justice matter is adj. 10.11.2025. |
|||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 7 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 2/2012 | Mst. Hifza Bibi & Ors VS Muhammad Qaisar | Matter called. JD is present. DH is also present and filed an application. Matter is adjourned to 15-11-2025 for compliance. Call report from Nazir. |
||||
| 8 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 33/2018 | MST HAFZA BIBI VS MUHAMMAD QAISER | Shamsul Hadi.(ADVO-7982-SBC-MLR) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Matter called. JD is present. DH is also present and filed an application. Matter is adjourned to 15-11-2025 for compliance. Call report from Nazir. |
||
| 9 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 65/2021 | Mst Nusrat Jahan VS Muhammad Ismail | Dilshad(ADVO-13969-SBC-MLR) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Matter called. Counsel for DH is present. None is present from other side. Matter is adjourned to 11-11-2025 for compliance and hearing on application of J/D for submitting decreetal amount in installment. Call report from Nazir and office. Call verification regarding CNIC details of JD from NADRA. Repeat warrants of arrest of JD. Issue notice to JD for application of enhancement of decreetal amount of DH. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Exparte Evidence | |||||||
| 10 | F.S. (Family Suits) 55/2025 | Atiqa Bibi VS Daniyal Khan | Abdul Nasir (ADVO-7636-SBC-KHC) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Suit called. None appeared from DH sides.In the interest of justice matter is adj. to 15.11.2025 for exparte evidence. |
|
| 11 | F.S. (Family Suits) 65/2025 | Mst. Abida & others VS Muhammad Zahid | Raza Hassan(ADVO-24374-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter called. None is present from plaintiff side. In the interest of justice matter is adj.14.11.2025 for exparte evidence as last chance. |
||
| 12 | F.S. (Family Suits) 80/2025 | Mst. Nadia VS Zakir Ali | Muhammad Shafaqat(ADVO-8712-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Mistakenly fixed today already disposed of. |
||
| 13 | F.S. (Family Suits) 107/2025 | Mst. Falak Naz VS Amir | Naseer Muhammad(ADVO-10866-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Dissolution of Muslim marriage act, 1939,Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance | Matter called. Plaintiff is present. Counsel for plaintiff is present. Exparte evidence of plaintiff recorded at Ex-P. Counsel for plaintiff field a statement for withdrawal of other prayers except khulla. Heard and perused. Khulla granted. Detailed judgement on separate sheet. |
||