| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 118/2025 | The State Versus VS Babar Umrani | Ali Haider(ADVO-1419-SBC-NSF) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 157/2025  Naushahro Feroze  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Babar Umrani is called absent without any intimation. Learned ADPP for the state is present, advocate for the accused is called absent. NBW against accused returned. Statement of process server is recorded, he produced documents at Exh-A/1 to Exh-A/6 . Put off to 20.11.2025 for evidence/formal. Issue proclamation U/S 87 & 88 Cr.P.C.  | 
  |
| 2 | Special Laws 119/2025 | The State Versus VS Kamil Khaskheli | Muhammad Ayaz Mari(ADVO-331-SBC-NSF) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 7,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 153/2025  Naushahro Feroze  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Kamil Khaskheli is present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. DC called absent. Process NBW against PWs returned. No PW is present. Put off to 18.11.2025 for evidence. Repeat NBW agaisnt remaining PWs. Present accused is directed to attend. Call case property if any.  | 
  |
| 3 | PPC 179/2025 | The State Versus VS Yaseen Solangi & others | In Person() | PPC-380 | 222/2025  Naushahro Feroze  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Yaseen Solangi produced by jail authority Naushahro Feroze. BW against PWs returned. Complainant along his counsel are present. Counsel for complainant filed adjournment application. Order on it. Put off to 17.11.2025 for evidence. Accused remanded back to Judicial Custody. Repeat summons to remaining PWs.  | 
  |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 39/2025 | The State Versus VS Yar Mohammad alias Yaroo and others | Ali Ahmed Vistro(ADVO-7-SBC-NSF) | PPC-379 | 474/2024  Naushahro Feroze  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Yar Mohammad is present on bail. While accused Noor Muhammad @ Noro and Badal @ Bado are already declared proclaimed Offender U/S 512 Cr.P.C. Complainant is present. Charge framed at Exh-02, plea recorded at Exh-2/A. Put off to 20.11.2025 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. Issue summons to PWs.  | 
  |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 5 | PPC 45/2025 | The State Versus VS Zameer Hussain Shah | In Person() | PPC-489-F | 319/2024  Naushahro Feroze  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Zamir Hussain Shah is called absent . Proclamation U/S 88 Cr.P.C against accused through Deputy Commissioner Khairpur not returned. Put off to 17.11.2025 for formal. Repeat proclamation U/S 88 Cr.P.C against accused. NBW against Mukhtiarkar Khairpur through SSP Khairpur.  | 
  |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Judgment | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 47/2025 | The State Versus VS Ali Akhatar Markhio | Rafi Raza(ADVO-505-SBC-NSF) | Abdul Ghaffar (ADVO-1428-SBC-NSF) | PPC-489-F | 19/2025  Naushahro Feroze  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Ali Akhtar is present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. Complainant is present. Counsel for the accused called absent. Judgment passed announced in open Court accused is hereby convicted U/S 245 (2) for twenty four months simple imprisonment and also to pay a fine amount of Rs.45,000/-. Accused is taken into custody and supplied the copy of Judgment free of cost. Accused sent to Judicial Custody at District prison Naushahro Feroze along convication warrant and slip.  | 
  
| 7 | PPC 77/2025 | The State Versus VS Qasir Nawaz Chandio | Riaz Hussain (ADVO-1145-SBC-NSF) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 7,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 79/2025  Naushahro Feroze  | 	
	  Case called. Accused is present on bail . ADPP for the state is present. Judgment passed announced in open Court accused Majid Vistro is hereby acquitted U/S 245(i) Cr.P.C. Accused is present on bail his bail bond stand canceled and surety discharged.  | 
  |
| 8 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 109/2025 | The State Versus VS Majid Vistro | Danish Mir(ADVO-25940-SBC-MLR) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 137/2025  Naushahro Feroze  | 	
	  Case called. Accused Majid Vistro is present on bail . ADPP for the state is present. Judgment passed announced in open Court accused Majid Vistro is hereby acquitted U/S 245(i) Cr.P.C. Accused is present on bail his bail bond stand canceled and surety discharged.  | 
  |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 25/2025 | Naik Mohammad VS Mst: Bali and others | Azhar Ali(ADVO-1396-SBC-NSF) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) |   G&W application called. Applicant called present, his counsel is present. Opponents called absent. Minor is present and filed application. Order on it. Put off to 13.11.2025 for further proceedings.  | 
  ||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 153/2025 | Mst: Shumaila Vistro VS Sarmad Vistro | Asadullah (ADVO-827-SBC-NSF) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article |   Family suit called. Plaintiff called absent her counsel absent. Defendant called absent, not yet served. Put off to 19.11.2025 for service through Publication and report waiting through Family Court Nawabshah.  | 
  ||
| 3 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 42/2025 | Hizbullah Chandio VS Mst: Zaheeran Chandio | Bilawal(ADVO-50510-SBC-NSF) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) |   G & W application called. Applicant is called absent, his counsel is present. Opponent called absent. Service held good upon defendant. Put off to 18.11.2025 for written statement.  | 
  ||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 200/2025 | Mst: Samina alias Fozia Solangi VS SajjadHussain Shahani | Gulab Khan(ADVO-441-SBC-NSF) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article |   Family suit called. Plaintiff is called present, her counsel is present. Defendant is called absent not yet served. Counsel for plaintiff filed statement along photo of minor. Order on it. Put off to 18.11.2025 for service. Issue notice to defendant through post AD, TCS, Publication and District Sessions Judge Khairpur Mirs.  | 
  ||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 202/2025 | Kaweeta Mal VS Hubdar Oad | Abrar Hussain(ADVO-336-SBC-NSF) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article |   Family suit called. Plaintiff called present, her counsel is present. Defendant called absent, not yet served. Counsel for plaintiff filed statement along UMS receipt. Order on it. Put off to 14.11.2025 for service through Family Judge Moro.  | 
  ||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 205/2025 | Mst: Raheela Naz Shaikh VS Aamir Shaikh | Waheed Ali(Adenda) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article |   Family suit called. Plaintiff along her counsel are present. Defendant is called absent, not yet served. Counsel for plaintiff filed statement along post register receipt. Order on it. Put off to 15.11.2025 for service. Issue notice to defendant through DJ ,TCS and Publication.  | 
  ||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 124/2025 | Mst: Piyari Khaskheli VS Shaan Ali Khaskheli | Abdul Hafeez() | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula |   Family suit called. Plaintiff is present, her counsel is present. Defendant called absent. Today matter was fixed for W.S but defendant is called absent, hence defendant is hereby declared ex-parte. Counsel for plaintiff field affidavit of plaintiff. Order on it. Examination in chief of plaintiff is recorded. Arguments heard. Ex-parte Judgment passed announced in open Court suit of plaintiff is hereby decreed accordingly.  | 
  ||
| 8 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 52/2025 | Hamid Mehmood Mughal VS Mst: Rahat Hanif Mughal & Others | Saqib Iqbal(ADVO-995-SBC-NSF) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 of Guardian and Wards Act R/W 100 Cr.PC,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale |   G & W application called. Applicant is called absent, his counsel is present. Opponents called absent. Put off to 12.11.2025 for objections and evidence.  | 
  ||
| 9 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 53/2025 | Shahid Hussain Mughal VS Mst: Sumera Kalsoom & Others | Saqib Iqbal(ADVO-995-SBC-NSF) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody),The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale |   G & W application called. Applicant along his minor is called present, his counsel is present. Opponent Mst. Sumera Kalsoom appeared. Counsel for applicant filed affidavit of applicant her examination in chief recorded. Statement of Applicant is recorded. Put off to 12.11.2025 for further proceedings.  | 
  ||
| 10 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 54/2025 | Sajjad Ali Solangi VS Mst: Faila Solangi | Zulfiqar Ali Panhwar(ADVO-389-SBC-NSF) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) |   G & W application called. Applicant is called absent, his counsel is present. Opponent is called present, her counsel is present. Put off to 11.11.2025 for objections.  | 
  ||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 11 | F.S. (Family Suits) 108/2025 | Mst: Khusboo Bhaat VS Ali Raza Kalhoro | Abrar Hussain(ADVO-336-SBC-NSF) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article |   Family suit called. Plaintiff and her counsel are present. Defendant called present, his counsel absent. Pre trial held declared failed. Issues framed. Khulla of plaintiff is hereby granted. Put off to 14.11.2025 for plaintiff side evidence.  | 
  ||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 12 | F.S. (Family Suits) 176/2024 | Mst: Saima Mughal VS Shehzad Ahmed Mughal | Sadam Hussain (ADVO-1160-SBC-NSF) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount |   Family suit called. The plaintiff and her counsel on the first call at 09:00am was absent, however the defendant in person was present. Matter kept aside for second call at 11:30am. The plaintiff and her counsel so also the defendant and his counsel are present in Court. The matter is fixed for plaintiff evidence as such the affidavit-in-evidence is already on record, however the plaintiff was directed to come in witness box for adducing the evidence but she refused straightway and said that she intends to withdraw the both cases pending and without permission of the Court went from the court and thereafter till 03:00pm (Court-timing) did not return or even his counsel, therefore, under such circumstances, it is clear-cut disobedience of the court proceedings which amounts "Contempt of Court", however, in order to avoid any adverse order or action, the matter is once again adjourned as last and final chance to the plaintiff side. Matter put up on 22.11.2025 for plaintiff's evidence.  | 
  ||
| 13 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 61/2024 | Mst: Saima Mughal VS Shehzad Ahmed Mughal | Sadam Hussain (ADVO-1160-SBC-NSF) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) |   Family suit called. The plaintiff and her counsel on the first call at 09:00am was absent, however the defendant in person was present. Matter kept aside for second call at 11:30am. The plaintiff and her counsel so also the defendant and his counsel are present in Court. Matter is adjourned by the consent of both parties. Put off to 22.11.2025 for applicant side evidence.  | 
  ||
| 14 | F.S. (Family Suits) 68/2025 | Mst: Aneela Mughal VS Mohammad Nasir Mughal | Ashraf Ali (ADVO-468-SBC-NSF) | Ahsan Ali(ADVO-1399-SBC-NSF) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article |   Family suit called. Plaintiff along her counsel are present. . Defendant is called absent, his counsel is absent. Examination in chief of plaintiff and her witness Mujahid Ali is recorded, in the interest of justice cross examination is reserved. Put off to 18.11.2025 for cross plaintiff side evidence.  | 
  |
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 15 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 29/2025 | Mst: Faila Solangi VS Sajjad Ali Solangi | Asadullah (ADVO-827-SBC-NSF) | Family Execution-Execution Application |   Family execution called. Decree holder is called present, her counsel is called present. J.D called present, his counsel present. DR Sarang Appeared in Circumcision report. Dr. Saran Tagar heard. As per the advise of Dr Sarang plaintiff is directed to approach him on 10.11.2025 pre-examination of minor Ayan Ali for plaining his circumcision's or other. Application U/S 9 (6) is taken. Order on it. Put off to 11.11.2025 for Arguments on family execution and notice on application U/S 9 (6) Family Laws 1964.  | 
  ||
| 16 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 38/2025 | Wali Mohammad Rajper VS Jan Mohammad and others | Shoukat Ali(ADVO-347-SBC-NSF) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act |   G & W application called. Applicant along his counsel is present. Opponents are absent. Arguments heard. Put off to 14.11.2025 for orders.  | 
  ||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Exparte Evidence | |||||||
| 17 | F.S. (Family Suits) 49/2025 | Mst: Kousar Bhaat VS Mohammad Murad Kerio | Abdul Ghafoor Mari(ADVO-233-SBC-NSF) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance |   Family suit called. Plaintiff is called present, her counsel is called present. Defendant called present, his counsel is called present. Counsel for plaintiff filed Application U/O 9 Rule 7 CPC. Order on it. Counsel for plaintiff filed affidavit of plaintiff and her witness Juman Khan in shape of Ex-parte evidence. Order on it. Put off to 10.11.2025 for ex-parte evidence and hearing on Application U/O 9 Rule 7 CPC.  | 
  ||