| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 1 | Special Laws 132/2026 | The State VS Gomand | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Beggar Act-9 Bagger Act | 186/2026 Jamshoro |
Case called. Accused Gomind is called absent. ADPP for the state is present. DC Mr. Nisar Ahmed Chandio is present. Summon issued to PWs returned un-served as per endorsement of HC Deen Muhammad of PS Jamshoro. Put off to-----------------------------------------12.09.2026 for charge. Issue NBW against accused through SSP Jamshoro. Meanwhile issue summon to all PWs. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Surety Proceedings | |||||||
| 2 | Special Laws 98/2025 | The State VS Nadir and another | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 62/2025 Jamshoro |
Surety proceedings called. Accused Nadir Chandio has already been acquitted U/S 245(i) Cr.P.C, while case against accused Saleh Buledi be kept on dormant file till his arrest vide Judgment dated: 11.05.2026. Show cause notice issued to surety (Hasnain) of accused Saleh Buledi returned un-served as per endorsement of HC Deen Muhammad of PS Jamshoro. Order passed on separate sheet. Surety of accused Saleh Buledi is forfeited. Put off to------------------------------04.12.2026 for progress report. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 88 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 3 | Special Laws 204/2025 | The State VS Usama & Others | ADPP(ADPP-0002-GOV-THT) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 234/2025 Jamshoro |
Case called. Accused Usama, Arif and Tanveer are called absent. However accused Ahsan was declared as proclaimed offender. ADPP for the state is present. DC Mr. Kundher Khan is called absent. Report regarding warrant of attachment of property U/S 88 Cr.P.C against accused Usama, Arif and Tanveer not received from Mukhtiarkar North Nazimabad Karachi Central. Put off to----------------------19.09.2026 for service. Repeat warrant of attachment of property U/S 88 Cr.P.C against accused Usama, Arif and Tanveer to the Mukhtiarkar North Nazimabad District Karachi Central through Deputy Commissioner District Karachi Central. |
|
| 4 | PPC 22/2026 | The State VS Tufail and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Sultan Ahmed(ADVO-121-SBC-TAY) | PPC-379,PPC-427,PPC-511 | 364/2025 Jamshoro |
Case called. Accused Tufail is produced from Central Prison Hyderabad, while accused Arab Khan is called absent. ADPP for the state is present. DC Mr. Sultan Ahmed Chandio is called absent. Report regarding warrant of attachment of property U/S 88 Cr.P.C against accused Arab Khan not received from Mukhtiarkar Kotri. Put off to--------------------------------------------------------------------17.09.2026 for report. Produced accused Tufail is returned back to Jail custody with directions to be produced on next date of hearing. Repeat warrant of attachment of property U/S 88 Cr.P.C against accused Arab Khan to the Mukhtiarkar Kotri through Deputy Commissioner Jamshoro. |
| 5 | PPC 31/2026 | The State VS Mehmood Ahmed and another | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | PPC-268,PPC-471 | 248/2025 Jamshoro |
Case called. Accused Mehmood Ahmed is called absent, while accused Hikmatullah is shown as absconder in the charge sheet. ADPP for the state is present. DC Mr. Shoaib Ali Narejo is called absent. Report regarding warrant of attachment of property U/S 88 Cr.P.C against accused Mehmood Ahmed and Hikmatullah not received from Mukhtiarkar. Put off to----------------------------------------18.09.2026 for reports. Repeat warrant of attachment of property U/S 88 Cr.P.C against accused Mehmood Ahmed to the Mukhtiarkar Quetta. Repeat warrant of attachment of property U/S 88 Cr.P.C against absconder accused Hikmatullah to the Mukhtiarkar Hyderabad through Deputy Commissioner Quetta. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 110/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Fahad & others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | PPC-420,PPC-489-F | 43/2026 Jamshoro |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Fahad and Bilal Hanif are called absent. ADPP for the state is present. Complainant is present. DC Mr. Arslan Ahmed Arain is called absent. NBW issued against accused Muhammad Fahad returned un-executed as per endorsement of HC Deen Muhammad of PS Jamshoro. Proclamation U/S 87 and 88 Cr.P.C issued against accused Bilal Hanif returned as per endorsement of HC Deen Muhammad of PS Jamshoro. Statement of HC Deen Muhammad is recorded t Ex.02, he produced proclamation U/S 87 Cr.P.C, publication, report and his endorsement at Ex.02/A to Ex.02/D. Report regarding warrant of attachment of property U/S 88 Cr.P.C not received from Mukhtiarkar Hyderabad. Put off to------------------18.09.2026 for service. Repeat NBW against accused Muhammad Fahad through SSP Jamshoro. Repeat warrant of attachment of porperty U/S 88 Cr.P.C against accused Bilal Hanif to the Mukhtiarkar Hyderabad. Issue letter to Honourable 1st Additional Sessions Judge Jamshoro for calling surety papers of both accused. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 87 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 113/2026 | THe State VS Halar and others | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-H,PPC-353,PPC-427,PPC-436 | 41/2026 Jamshoro |
Case called. Accused Halar is called absent, while accused Junaid is shown as absconder in the charge sheet. ADPP for the state is present. Proclamation U/S 87 and 88 Cr.P.C issued against absconder accused Junaid returned as per endorsement of HC Deen Muhammad of PS Jamshoro. Statement of HC Deen Muhammad is recorded at Ex.02, he produced proclamation U/S 87 Cr.P.C, publication, repolrt and his endorsement at Ex.02/A to Ex.02/D. B.W issued against accused Halar returned un-executed as per endorsement of HC Deen Muhammad of PS Jamshoro. Put off to-------------------------------------------------------------17.09.2026 for service. Issue NBW against accused Halar through SSP Jamshoro. Repeat warrant of attachment of property U/S 88 Cr.P.C against absconder accused Junaid to the Mukhtiarkar Kotri through Deputy Commissioner Jamshoro. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 4/2024 | Mst Naina Lund VS Rasheed Khaskheli | Asif Ali (ADVO-342-SBC-JMS) | Ayaz Hussain (ADVO-5711-SBC-HYD) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Execution Application called. The Execution Application has already been allowed vide order dated: 04.11.2024. Plaintiff/DH Mst. Naina Lund and her counsel Mr. Asif Ali Dahri are called absent. Defendant/JD Rasheed Khaskheli is also called absent. Notice was issued to defendant/ JD returned un-served. Put off to-------------------------------09.10.2026 for compliance. Repeat notice to defendant/JD. |
|
| 2 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 5/2025 | Mst Maryam VS Faraz Qureshi | Syed Muhammad Umer(ADVO-6507-SBC-HYD) | Sohail Ahmed(ADVO-1237-SBC-HYD) | Execution Application called. The Execution Application has already been allowed vide order dated: 23.05.2025. Plaintiff/ DH Mst. Maryam and her counsel Mr. Syed Mohammad Umar are called absent. Defendant/JD Faraz Qureshi is also called absent. Put off to----------------------09.10.2026 for compliance. |
||