| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 122/2026 | Muhammad Tarique Awan VS The State | Kashif Hussain(ADVO-3607-SBC-HYD) | Cr.PC-497,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 209/2026 Jamshoro |
Bail Application called. Mr. Kashif Hussain Advocate is present on behalf of applicant/ accused Muhammad Tarique. ADPP for the state is present. Arguments already heard of learned counsel for accused and learned ADPP for the state. Order passed on separate sheet. Bail is granted to applicant/ accused subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs:30000/- and P.R bond of like amount to the satisfaction of the court. |
|
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 121/2026 | Muhammad Raju & Others VS The State | Kashif Hussain(ADVO-3607-SBC-HYD) | Cr.PC-497,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 209/2026 Jamshoro |
Bail Application called. Mr. Kashif Hussain Advocate is present on behalf of above applicants/ accused. ADPP for the state is present. Arguments heard of learned counsel for accused and learned ADPP for the state. Order passed on separate sheet. Bail is granted to applicants/ accused subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs:30000/- each accused and P.R bond of like amount to the satisfaction of the court. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 69/2026 | The State VS Javeed and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Shueban(ADVO-329-SBC-DDU) | PPC-337-Fiv,PPC-337-L,PPC-363,PPC-511 | 569/2024 Kotri |
Case called. Accused Imamuddin is present, while accused Javeed and Abdul Sattar were declared as Proclaimed offenders vide order dated: 10.06.2025. ADPP for the state is present. Complainant and her counsel Mr. Ghulam Mustafa Abbasi are called absent. DC Mr. Aijaz Hussain Jatoi is called absent. PW Dr. Siraj ul Haque Ansari is called absent. Put off to-----------------------------------------28.08.2026 for evidence. Issue summon to remaining PW Dr. Siraj ul Haque Ansari. |
| 4 | PPC 15/2026 | The State VS Abdul Wahid Chandio | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK),Khalid Hussain(ADVO-438-SBC-JMS) | Allah Rakhio(ADVO-450-SBC-JMS) | PPC-382,PPC-457 | 371/2025 Jamshoro |
Case called. Accused Abdul Wahid is produced from Central Prison Hyderabad. ADPP for the state is present. Complainant and his counsel Mr. Khalid Hussain Thaheem are called absent. DC Mr. Allah Rakhio Rahujo is called absent. Show cause notice issued to Inchage Process Serving cell Jamshoro, but he is called absent. Put off to---------------------------------28.08.2026 for evidence. Produced accused is returned back to Jail custody with directions to be produced on next date of hearing. Office is directed to file Direct complaint against Incharge Process Serving cell Jamshoro for none service of NBW upon PW I.O ASI Muhammad Qasim Abro. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 5 | DC (Direct Complaint) 24/2026 | Dangano Khoso VS The State (PS Jamshoro) & Kehar Khoso | Rukhsana(ADVO-4949-SBC-HYD) | / |
Direct complaint called. Complainant Dagano is called absent and his counsel Miss Rukhsana Sahto is present. Arguments heard of learned counsel for complainant. Order passed on separate sheet. The complaint is dismissed U/S 203 Cr.P.C. |
||
| 6 | DC (Direct Complaint) 23/2026 | Mir Khan Lasi VS SHO PS Jamshoro & Kehar Lasi & others | Rukhsana(ADVO-4949-SBC-HYD) | / |
Direct complaint called. Complainant Mir Khan is called absent and his counsel Miss Rukhsana Sahto is present. Arguments heard of learned counsel for complainant. Order passed on separate sheet. The complaint is dismissed U/S 203 Cr.P.C. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 154/2025 | The State VS Muneer Ahmed and another | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK),Muhammad Saddique(ADVO-3166-SBC-HYD) | Asad Meer(ADVO-52685-SBC-JMS),Kashif Hussain(ADVO-391-SBC-JMS) | PPC-381 | 197/2025 Jamshoro |
Case called. Accused Munir Ahmed and Muhammad Hassan Khan are present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. Complainant and his counsel Mr. Muhammad Sadique Buledi are called absent. DC Mr. Kashif Hussain is present. DC Mr. Asad Meer Mallah is present. Statement of accused persons are recorded at Ex.09 to Ex.10. Arguments heard of learned counsel for the accused persons and learned ADPP for the state. Put off to------------------------29.08.2026 for arguments of learned counsel for complainant. Accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
| 8 | DC (Direct Complaint) 22/2026 | Kareem Bux Khoso VS SHO PS Jamshoro | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) | / |
Direct complaint called. Complainant Kareem Bux is called absent and his counsel Miss Rukhsana Sahto is present. Arguments already heard of learned counsel for complainant. Order passed on separate sheet. The complaint is dismissed U/S 203 Cr.P.C. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 88 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 9 | Special Laws 204/2025 | The State VS Usama & Others | ADPP(ADPP-0002-GOV-THT) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 234/2025 Jamshoro |
Case called. Accused Usama, Arif and Tanveer are called absent. However accused Ahsan was declared as proclaimed offender. ADPP for the state is present. DC Mr. Kundher Khan is called absent. Report regarding warrant of attachment of property U/S 88 Cr.P.C not received from Mukhtiarkar North Nazimabad Karachi Central. Surety of accused persons have already been forfeited U/S 514 Cr.P.C. Put off to--------------------------------------04.09.2026 for service. Repeat warrant of attachment of property U/S 88 Cr.P.C against accused Usama, Arif and Tanveer to the Mukhtiarkar North Nazimabad District Karachi Central. |
|
| 10 | Special Laws 216/2025 | The State VS Abdul Hafeez and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 268/2025 Jamshoro |
Case called. Accused Imran Ali is present on bail, while accused Abdul Hafeez @ Abdul Latif is called absent. However accused accused Sajid Hussain is shown as absconder in the charge sheet. ADPP for the state is present. DC Mr. Ali Raza Memon is absent. DC Mr. Azhar Ali Saryo is present and filed application U/S 75(2) Cr.P.C on behalf of accused Imran Ali. Order passed on it. NBW recalled. NBW issued against accused Abdul Hafeez @ Abdul Latif returned un-executed as per endorsement of HC Deen Muhammad of PS Jamshoro. Statement of HC Deen Muhammad is recorded at Ex.04, he produced un-executed NBW, statement of two witnesses, CNICs and his endorsement at Ex.04/A to Ex.04/F. Report regarding warrant of attachment of property U/S 88 Cr.P.C against absconder accused Sajid Hussain not received from Mukhtiarkar Muzaffargar. Put off to------------------------------------------------------12.09.2026 for report. Present accused is directed to attend. Issue Proclamation U/S 87 and 88 Cr.P.C against accused Abdul Hafeez @ Abdul Latif through SHO PS Jamshoro. Repeat warrant of attachment of property U/S 88 Cr.P.C against absconder accused Sajid Hussain to the Mukhtiarkar Muzaffargar through Deputy Commissioner Muzaffargar and also repeat show cause notice to Mukhtiarkar Muzaffargar. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 11 | PPC 113/2026 | THe State VS Halar and others | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-H,PPC-353,PPC-427,PPC-436 | 41/2026 Jamshoro |
Case called. Accused Halar is called absent, while accused Junaid is shown as absconder in the charge sheet. ADPP for the state is present. NBW issued against absconder accused Junaid returned un-executed as per endorsement of HC Deen Muhammad of PS Jamshoro. Statement of HC Deen Muhammad is recorded at Ex.01, he produced un-executed NBW, statement of two witnesses and his endorsement at Ex.01/A to Ex.01/D. B.W issued against accused Halar returned un-executed. Put off to--------------------------------04.09.2026 for service. Repeat B.W against accused Halar. Issue Proclamation U/S 87 and 88 Cr.P.C against absconder accused Junaid through SHO PS Jamshoro. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 87 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 12 | PPC 120/2026 | The State VS Noor Khan @ Nooro and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-341,PPC-353,PPC-427 | 33/2026 Jamshoro |
Case called. Accused Rano, Dado @ Dadan, Mashooque and Jani @ Ashique Ali are produced from Central Prison Hyderabad and accused Ishaque, Rahib Ali, Mehar Ali, Fazil, Deen Muhammad, Abdul Sattar, Photo, Sardar, Riaz, Abdul Ghaffar, Latif and Darya Khan present on bail, while accused Noor Khan @ Nooro, Mst. Kazbano, Mst. Sahiba, Mir Muhammad and Shah Bux @ Shahu are called absent. However accused Khuda Bux, Jamal, Ali Gul, Gul Muhammad and Mst. Masi Khao are shown as absconders in the charge sheet. ADPP for the state is present. DC Mr. Imdad Hussain Shahani is present. DC Mr. Izhar Ali Chandio is present. DC Mr. Muhammad Sadique Buledi is called absent. Proclamation U/S 87 and 88 Cr.P.C issued against absconders accused not returned from PS Jamshoro. Put off to--------------------------------------------------------03.09.2026 for service. Produced accused are returned back to Jail custody with directions to be produced on next date of hearing. Present accused are directed to attend. Issue P.O for accused Noor Khan @ Nooro. Repeat B.W against accused Mst. Kazbano, Mst. Sahiba, Mir Muhammad and Shah Bux @ Shahu. Repeat Proclamation U/S 87 and 88 Cr.P.C against absconders accused Khuda Bux, Jamal, Ali Gul, Gul Muhammad and Mst. Masi Khao through SHO PS Jamshoro. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 14/2025 |
Zain ul Abdeen VS Syed Alam & another | Khalid Mustafa(ADVO-386-SBC-JMS) | Roshan Ali(ADVO-25012-SBC-KHE) | Civil suit called. Plaintiff Zain ul Abdeen and his counsel Mr. Khalid Mustafa Shoro are called absent, his partner is present. Defendant No.1 through his LRs/ attorney namely Maqsood Alam is present, while defendant No:2 Moosa Ali is absent and their counsel Mr. Roshan Ali Baloch is called absent, his junior partner is present and filed objection in shape of counter affidavit on application U/O XIX Rule 1 & 2 CPC. Order passed on it. Copy to other side. Put off to-------------------------------------------31.08.2026 for arguments on application U/O XIX Rule 1 & 2 CPC. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 2 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 2/2026 |
Qasim Rodhnani VS Miraz Waseem Baig | Shahzad Ali(ADVO-4938-SBC-HYD) | Civil suit called. Plaintiff Qasim Rodnani is present and his counsel Mr. Shahzad Ali Daudpoto is called absent, his junior partner is present. Defendant Mirza Waseem Baig and his counsel Mr. Asis Gul Bhatti are present. Arguments heard on application U/O IX Rule 7 R/W Section 151 CPC of both side. Order passed on separate sheet. The application is allowed subject to furnish Rs:500/- fine to be deposited in Library of District Bar Jamshoro and defendant is directed to file written statement within 07 days. Put off to------------------------------------28.08.2026 for written statement/ objection. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 1/2026 | Meeral Panhwar VS Irfan Ali Panhwar | Mohammad Mithal Larik(ADVO-223-SBC-JMS) | Wajid Ali(ADVO-6212-SBC-HYD) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | G & W application called. Applicant Meeral Panhwar and his counsel Mr. M.M Larik are present. Opponent Irfan Ali Panhwar and his counsel Mr. Wajid Ali Unar are also present. Advocate for applicant filed Preliminary objection to the application U/S 12 of G & W Act. Order passed on it. Copy to other side. Advocate for applicant also filed statement alongwith photocopy of case law. Order passed on it. File. Statement of applicant Meeral Panhwar is recorded at Ex.09. Cross examination is reserved as the learned counsel for opponent filed application for adjournment. Order passed on it. Allowed in the interest of justice. Arguments heard on application U/S 12 of G & W Act of both side. Put off to---------------------------------03.09.2026 for evidence of applicant side/ order on application U/S 12 of G & W Act. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 2 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 2/2025 | Ghulam Rasool VS Meeral | Wajid Ali(ADVO-6212-SBC-HYD) | Mohammad Mithal Larik(ADVO-223-SBC-JMS) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family Execution Application has already been allowed vide order dated: 07.05.2025. Plaintiff/DH Ghulam Rasool since deceased through his legal heir namely Irfan and his counsel Mr. Wajid Ali Unar are present. Defendant/JD Meeral and his counsel Mr. M.M Larik are also present. Advocate for defendant/JD filed objection on application U/S 55 R/W order XXI Rule 30 and 151 CPC. Order passed on it. copy to other side. Arguments heard of both side on both applications. Put off to------------------------------------------03.09.2026 for compliance/ order on application for attachment and sale of immoveable property U/O 21 R.54 and 64 R/W S.151 CPC/ order on application u/s 55 R/W order XXI Rule 30 and 151 code of CPC for issuance of warrant against JD. |
|