| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | Ist Class Civil Suits 219/2024 |
Nazeer Ahmed VS Aziz Ahmed Ghouri & others | Asif Ali(ADVO-198-SBC-JMS) | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | |||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | Ist Class Civil Suits 78/2025 |
Muhammad Aslam VS Province of Sindh & others | Raja Jawad Ali(ADVO-47-SBC-JMS) | DDA(ADVO-007-SBC-NIL) | Matter called. Plaintiff Mohammad Aslam Mangi is present, his counsel Mr.Shoaib Ali Narejo was absent however appeared after adjournment. Defendant No.01 has already been debarred and proceeded exparte vide order dated. 23.10.2025. Mr.Zaheeruddin Sahito learned counsel for defendants No.02, 03 & 05 is absent. Defendant 04 & 06 are absent. {They are also SDA officials and learned counsel vide order sheet 23.10.2025 was directed to filed vakalatnama on their behalf but the same has not yet been filed.} Service against Defendant No. 07 has already been declared held good vide order dated. 23.02.2026 but called absent. Matter is adjourned to -------------------------- 31.03.2026 for WS of defendant No.01 & 07, as last and final chance, failing which appropriate orders shall be passed. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For ex-parte proof. | |||||||
| 3 | Ist Class Civil Suits 109/2025 |
Naresh Kumar VS Majnu & others | Mmtaz(ADVO-77-SBC-JMS) | Rustam Ali(ADVO-2181-SBC-HYD) | Matter called. Plaintiff Naresh Kumar is absent, his counsel Mr.Mumtaz Ali Soomro is also absent, however, his associate is present. Defendant No.01 to 05 have already been debarred from filing WS and proceeded expartee vide order dated. 30.10.2025. Today matter was scheduled for expartee evidence. Affidavit in evidence of plaintiff is already on record. Due to absence of plaintiff and his counsel matter is not proceeded and adjourned in the interest of justice. Matter is adjourned to -------------------------------------- 31.03.2026 for expartee evidence/affidavit in evidence. (of plaintiff???s witnesses) |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 4 | Ist Class Civil Suits 18/2026 |
Inamullah Shaikh VS Province of sindh & others | Aayatullah(ADVO-2190-SBC-HYD) | DDA(ADVO-007-SBC-NIL),Zulfiqar Ali (ADVO-323-SBC-JMS) | Matter has already been restored to regual file. Matter called. Plaintiff Inamullah Shaikh and his counsel Mr. Ayatullah Khuwja are absent, however his associate is present. Mr.Adil Hussain Bhutto learned counsel for defendants No.02 & 03 is present and requested for time for filing WS. Learned DDA is present for defendants No.01, 05 to 07 and also requested for time for filing WS. While defendant No.04 is yet to be served. Notice issued against remaining defendants not returned either served or un-served. Matter is adjourned to ------------------------------ 25.03.2026 for service against all the defendants. Issue notice of suit as well as application U/o 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC defendant No. 04 on cost. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Advocate to be Heard | |||||||
| 5 | Ist Class Civil Suits 43/2026 |
Zulfiqar Ali and another VS Federation of Pakistan & others | Matter called. Plaintiffs are absent. Their counsel Mr.Raheel Ahmed is absent. Matter is at pre admission stage and scheduled for Orders. Order passed and pronounced. Instant plaint is rejected under Order VII, Rule 11 of the CPC in limine. |
||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 6 | Ist Class Civil Suits 162/2025 |
Muhammad Bachal Mallah VS Province of Sindh & others | Amjad Hussain(ADVO-3047-SBC-HYD) | DDA(ADVO-007-SBC-NIL),Naseer Ahmed(ADVO-64-SBC-JMS) | Matter called. Plaintiff Mohammad Bachal is absent, his counsel Mr.Khalid Hussian Thaheem is present. Learned DDA is present on behalf of defendants No.01 to 09. While defendant No.10 is confined at Central Prison Hyderabad in any Nab Refrence as Convicted Prisoner and produced in custody. His counsel Mr.Naseer A. Narejo is present. Today matter is scheduled for WS/Objections of defendants No.01 to 09, learned DDA representing defendants No.01 to 09 requested for time for filing WS. His request is allowed. Leraned counsel for defendant No.10 filed objections on application U/o 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC at Exh.09. Order on it. Copy to other side. Learned counel for defendant No.10 also filed application U/o VII Rule 11 CPC at Exh.10. Order onit. Notice to other side. Put off to --------------------------------------------- 07.04.2025 for filing of Written Statement / Objections on Application U/o 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC by defendants No. 01 to 09 and for submission of objections by the plaintiff on the application U/o VII Rule 11 CPC (filed by def.10.) The defendants No. 01 to 09 are directed to file their Written Statement positively on the next date of hearing, failing which appropriate orders shall be passed in accordance with law. |
||
| 7 | Ist Class Civil Suits 27/2026 |
Muhammad Iqbal & others VS Province of sindh & others | Noorul Amin(ADVO-42-SBC-JMS) | DDA(ADVO-007-SBC-NIL) | Matter called. Mohammad Raheel Attorney of Plaintiffs and his counsel Mr.Aahad Jawaid Qureshi are present. Mr.Ghulam Mujtaba Korejo learned counsel for defendant No.02 is absent. Defendant No.04 and his counsel Mr.Asif Ali Bughio are absent. Learned DDA is present for defendants No.01, 03, 05 to 07. Defendant No.08 is absent, his counsel Mr.Jameel Ahmed Kachelo is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff field objection on application U/o VII Rule 11 CPC at ----------------------------------------- Exh.19. Order on it. Copy to other side. Supplied. Matter is adjourned to ----------------------------- 25.03.2026 for / WS of defendants No.02 & 04 / Objections of defendants on i)Application U/o 18 Rule 18 CPC and Hearing on ii)Application U/o VII Rule 11 CPC. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 8 | Ist Class Civil Suits 22/2017 |
Pervez Ahmed & another VS Province of Sindh & others | Dileep Kumar(ADVO-2364-SBC-HYD) | Faisal Nadeem(ADVO-2926-SBC-HYD),Parkash Kumar(ADVO-1902-SBC-HYD) | Matter called. Plaintiff No.02 Mohammad Iqbal Samoo and his counsel Mr.Noman Jaffar are absent. Learned DDA is present for official defendants No.01 to 07. Defendant No.08 and his counsel Mr.Faisal Nadeem Abro are absent. The representative of defendant No.09 is absent, Mr.Abdullah Laghari learned counsel for defendant No.09 is also absent. Today matter is scheduled for further evidence of plaintiff side. / Neither plaintiff nor his witnesses are in attendance. In the interest of justice, matter is adjourned to ------ 08.04.2026 for further evidence of plaintiff side. Plaintiff party is directed to produce his witnesses on the next date of hearing and to conclude his evidence. |
||
| 9 | Ist Class Civil Suits 54/2017 |
M. Ameen Builders & Developers VS Govt of Sindh & others | Muhammad Zahid(ADVO-1993-SBC-HYD),Parkash Kumar(ADVO-1902-SBC-HYD) | Matter called. Plaintiff Muhammad Amin Babar is absent, his counsel Mr.Shoaib Ali Narejo is present. Learned DDA present for defendants No.1, 9 & 10. Mr.Mohammad Zahid Advocate for defendant No.02 to 06 absent. Barrister Jawad Ahmed Qureshi absent for defendants No:07 and 08 also called absent. Examination in chief of plaintiff Mohammad Ameen is already on record and today matter is scheduled for his cross examination. None from the defendants No.02 to 06 and defendants 07 & 08 are in attendance. Today Application U/o XVI Rule 1 & 2 CPC R/w section 151 CPC filed by learned counsel for plaintiff is also scheduled for objecions. Copy of application was collected by learned DDA on the last date of hearing, while defendants No.02 to 06 and 07, 08 are not in attendance. Learned counsel for plaintiff is required to get the notice of applications issued. Matter is adjourned to -------------------------- 24.03.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. /Cross Examination of Plaintiff by Mr.Zahid Hussain counsel for defendants No.02 to 06 and Mr.Jawad Ahmed Qureshi counsel for defendants 07 & 08 as last and final chance, failing which the appropriate orders shall be passed. Obejction on Application U/o XVI Rule 1 & 2 CPC R/w section 151 CPC. Let the notice of application be issued agains defendants No. 02 to 06 and 07, 08 through court, registered post AD and TCS, on cost. Const within three days. |
|||
| 10 | Ist Class Civil Suits 3/2021 |
Chanesar VS Qasim Khokhar & Others | M. Sachal Awan(ADVO-180-SBC-DDU) | Aijaz Ali(ADVO-3528-SBC-HYD),Ajay Kumar(ADVO-4657-SBC-HYD),Arslan (ADVO-5856-SBC-HYD),Ayaz Ali Ghuryani(ADVO-72-SBC-JMS) | Matter called. Plaintiff Chanessar and his counsel Mr. Sachal Awan are present. Defendant No.1 Qasim Khokhar is absent his counsel Mr.Ayaz Ali Ghuryani is present. Defendant No:02 and 04 already been debarred and proceeded exparte vide order dated:12.02.2022. Learned DDA is present for defendant No.05 and 06. Mohsin Panhwar attorney of defendant No.7 is present, his counsel Mr.Ajay Kumar is absent. Leraned counsel for defendant No.01 submtted application for adjournment, which is allowed. Matter is adjourned to ----------------------------------- 08.04.2026 for Evidence of defendant???s side. Defendant???s party is directed to ensure the attendance of their respective witnesses on the next date of hearing and to conclude their evidence. |
||
| 11 | Ist Class Civil Suits 95/2023 |
Abdullah & Others VS Province of Sindh & Others | Raja Jawad Ali(ADVO-47-SBC-JMS) | Kashif Hussain(ADVO-391-SBC-JMS),Zaheer Ud Din(ADVO-2718-SBC-HYD) | Matter called. Plaintiff No.8 Mustaqeem Khan (attorney of plaintiff No.1 to 7) is absent, their counsel Mr.Shoaib Ali Narejo is present. Defendant No:01 has already been declared exparte vide order dated:11.11.2023. Mr.Nisar Ahmed Chandio is absent for defendant No.02. Mr.Zaheeruddin Sahito is also absent for defendants No:03 to 05. Today matter is scheduled for evidence of plaintiff side. Neither plaintiff nor his witnsses are present. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned. Putt of to ----------------------------------------------------------- 31.03.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side/ o)Hearing on application U/o XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 CPC R/W Section 151 CPC. |
||
| 12 | Ist Class Civil Suits 176/2023 |
Muhammad Azeem VS Province of Sindh & Others | Wajid Ali(ADVO-171-SBC-JMS),Zohaib Hassan(ADVO-3551-SBC-HYD) | Khalid Mustafa(ADVO-37-SBC-JMS) | Matter Called. Plaintiff Muhammad Azeem and his counsel Mr.Zohaib Hassan Pahore are present. Learned DDA is present for defendant No.01 to 03. Defendant No.4 is present, while defendant No.05, 06 & 08 called absent. Mr.Khalid Mustafa Shoro learned counsel for defendants No.04 to 06 & 08 is absent, his associate is present. Defendant No.07 (in person) absent. Today matter is scheduled for evidence of plaintiff side. Witnesses are not produced by the plaintiff. Perusal of record shows that issues into the matter were framed on 09.09.2024 and since then matter is being adjourned on one and other pretext and plaintiff party failed to record/conclude their evidence. Today application U/o VI Rule 17 CPC R/w section 151 CPC filed by plaintiff party is also scheduled hearing. Learned counsel for defendants No.04 to 06 & 08 sent adjournment application, which is allowed. Put off to ----------------------------------------------- 01.04.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side./ Hearing on i)Application U/o VI Rule 17 CPC R/w section 151 CPC. |
||
| 13 | R.C. (Rent Cases) 1/2025 |
Ahmed Nawaz Kan VS Khuda Bux | Kashif Hussain(ADVO-3607-SBC-HYD) | Muhammad Umar(ADVO-3210-SBC-HYD) | Instant Rent Application has been remaneded vide order dated. 19.01.2026 passed in Rent Appeal No.08/2025 Re-Khuda Bux Vs Ahmed Nawaz & others passed by the Honorable Additional District Judge-II Jamshoro, with directions to do the need full and decide the matter after examination of witnesses shows itn eh rent agreement produced by the applicant / of if any witness of substantive evdiecen providing equal opertunity to both the paties. Rent Application called. Applicant Ahmed Nawaz and his Counsel Mr.Kashif Hussain Dawach are absent. LR of Opponent Mst.Zahida and her counsel Mr.Muhammad Umar Laghari are also absent. Persual of record shows that address of witnesses of applicant???s agreement is not available. Matter is adjourned to ---------------------------- 26.03.2026 for evidence. Applicant is directed to ensure the attendance of witnesses. |
||