| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 48/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Sharif & Others | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | PPC-337-Fi,PPC-452,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 2/2025 Sharif Kharos |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Sharif is present on bail. ADPP and D.C are present. Complainant, PWs along with and his advocate are called absent. Process retuned after extending for next date of hearing. Case putt off to: 26.02.2026. For evidence. Accused present on bail is directed to attend. |
|
| 2 | PPC 8/2026 | The State VS Naseem Ali Buriro | Gul Muhammad Mahar - ADPP() | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 114/2025 Lakhi |
Cr. Case called. Accused Naseem Buriro is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the State is present and counsel for accused called absent. Process returned as un-served as per endorsement. Order on it. Repeat process for next date. Case put of to. 26/02/2026 for evidence. Present accused is on bail and directed to attend, |
|
| 3 | PPC 149/2025 | The State VS Gopi Chand & Others | Gul Muhammad Mahar - ADPP() | PPC-406,PPC-420 | 108/2025 Lakhi |
Cr. Case called. Accused Gopi and Unqual Kumar are present on bail. Learned ADPP for the State and D.C are present. Process returned as un-served as per endorsement. Order on it. Repeat process to complainant and PWs. Mr. Arbab Khan Balouch advocate appeared and submitted vakalatnama on the behalf of accused persons Gopi and Unqual Kumar. Order on it. File. Case put of to. 27/02/2026 for evidence. Present accused are on bail and directed to attend, |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 63/2025 | Mst Farheen Mahar & others VS Ghulam Muhamma Mahar | Dur Muhammad(ADVO-566-SBC-SHK) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Plaintiff and her counsel are present. Defendant Ghulam Muhammad Mahar and his counsel are called absent. Counsel for plaintiff had submitted application for restoration of family suit. Order on it. Notice was extended to the defendant. Notice returned as served upon defendant as per endorsement of bailiff of this court that, defendant served in person such signature obtained from him on the page. This is the suit for the maintenance of seven minor children, so it cannot be disposed of on technical grounds, so in the interest of justice the application is allowed the plaint restored to the file. The application is allowed party is opportunity to the lead the evidence Family suit put off to: 20-02-2026 for evidence. |
||