| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 166/2025 | The State VS Daman Ali and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK) | Ghulam Hussain(ADVO-620-SBC-SHK),Ghulam Mustafa Junijo(ADVO-243-SBC-SHK) | PPC-337-A(i) | 33/2025 Lakhi |
Today case called. Accused Daman is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state and D.C are in attendance. The process server has submitted the report that the complainant and private PWs have permanently changed their address and were not present at the given address. Counsel for accused submitted an application u/s 249 Cr.PC. Order on it. Notice to ADPP. Order passed and annouced in open court. In the light of above discussion, I hereby order to stop the proceedings of the case till the appearance of complainant and P.Ws. The sureties are ordered to be discharged after the expiry of three??months. Detail order passed on separate order sheet. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 2 | SC (Murder Trial) 37/2026 | The State VS Hafeez and others | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-302,PPC-460 | 1/2026 Jhabar Shaikh |
This case is already sent up to the Honourbale Sessions Court Shikarpur for further proceedings. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 5/2026 | Ghulam Mustafa VS The State | Ghulam Mustafa(ADVO-447-SBC-SHK) | Gul Muhammad Mahar - ADPP() | Cr.PC-497 | 35/2022 Lakhi |
Today Bail application of accused Ghulam Mustafa Minhans called. ADPP for the state and D.C are in attendance. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open court. B.A is hereby granted in the sum of 30000/-, detailed order passed on separate order sheet. Surety Hafiz Muhammad Suhail son of Muhammad Ishaque appeared and submitted three original Special Saving Certificates in the sum of Rs.1,0000/- each only total Rs. 30000/- for standing surety of accused Ghulam Mustafa Minhans. Order on it. Surety accepted, subject to verification. Counsel for accused submitted statement. Order on it. File and provisionally surety accepted, issue release writ of accused Ghulam Mustafa Minhans to J/A Shikarpur. Matter is already fixed on 17-04-2026. For charge. |
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 6/2026 | Ghulam Mustafa VS The State | Seengar Ali Mangi(ADVO-392-SBC-SHK) | Gul Muhammad Mahar - ADPP() | Cr.PC-497 | 95/2025 Lakhi |
Today Bail application of accused Ghulam Mustafa Minhans called. ADPP for the state and D.C are in attendance. Arguments heard. Complainant appeared and submitted an application for no objection for grant of bail of accused. Order on it. Kept on record. Order passed and announced in open court. B.A is hereby granted in the sum of 30000/-, detailed order passed on seprate order sheet. Surety Hafiz Muhammad Suhail son of Muhammad Ishaque appeared and submitted three original Special Saving Certificates in the sum of Rs.1,0000/- each only total Rs. 30000/- for standing surety of accused Ghulam Mustafa Minhans. Order on it. Surety accepted, subject to verification. Counsel for accused submitted statement. Order on it. File and provisionally surety accepted, issue release writ of accused Ghulam Mustafa Minhans to J/A Shikarpur. Matter is already fixed on 17-04-2026 for final report. |
| 5 | PPC 21/2026 | The State VS Ali Bahar & others | Gul Muhammad Mahar - ADPP() | PPC-506-B | 12/2024 Daim Malik |
Today case. Accused Ali Bahar, Nadir Abdul Ghani are present on bail, while remining accused persons are absconders not yet served. Warrant U/S 87 Cr.Pc returned with endorsement. Order on it. Let the statement of ASI Abdul Hameed of PS Daim Malik be recorded at Ex. No. 02, he produced endorsement at Ex.02/A original copy of proclamation U/S 87 Cr.P.C at Ex.02/B, mashirnama at Ex.02/C and copy of publication at Ex.02/D and entry of PS at Ex.02/E. Detail order passed on it. Report of warrant under section 88 Cr.PC has received from Mukhtiarkar ?? taluka Lakhi District Shikarpur. Order on it. Kept on record. Complianant is present and submitted an application that, court may be acquitted accused persons she has no objection. Order on it. Counsel for accused submitted 249-A Cr.PC. Order on it. the application in hand merits consideration, same is hereby allowed and consequently accused persons namely 1. Ali Bhar s/o Jeal Shar 2. Abdul Ghani s/o Mirzan Shar 3. Nadir s/o Gul Muhhad @ Gulo Shar are hereby acquitted U/S: 249-A Cr.P.C from this case Order accordingly. The accused persons are on bail, their bail bond stand cancelled and sureties are discharged.???? The remaining absconding accused persons namely 1. Hussain Bux s/o Jeal 2. Mirzan s/o Rehan 3. Longan s/o Peeral 4. Inayatullah s/o Hido @ Hidaytullah 5. Ashfaq s/o Chibaur 6. Hinsar @ Nimo s/o Chibhur 7. Imtiaz s/o Akllah Wadhayo @ Faiz Muhhammad Faizo 8. Amjad s/o Imtiaz, all by case shar are also acquitted in absentia. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 6 | DC (Direct Complaint) 5/2025 | Mst Haseena Begum Mirani VS DSP Murtaza Meerani & Ors | Shahbaz Ali(ADVO-106-SBC-SHK) | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | Cr.PC-Section 200 ( Direct and Private Complaint) ,PPC-302 | / |
Today direct complaint called. Applicant and his counsel are present, other side called absent. D.C put off to: 20-04-2026, for order. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
| 1 | (Civil Misc. Applications In Case) 8/2026 |
Mst Sharifan Mahar VS Abdul Samad Mahar | |||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 2/2022 | Mst. Salma VS Waheed Ahmed | Aftab Ahmed(ADVO-728-SBC-SHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance | Today Family suit called. Plaintiff Mst. Salma called absent but her counsel is present. Defendant and his counsel are present. Family suit put off to 21-04-2026 for evidence as last chance. |
|
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 35/2025 | Umar Farooque Arain VS Mst Sadia Arain | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK) | Family Suit-Suit for recovery of Gold Ornaments | Family Suit called. Plaintiff Ummar Farooque called absent and his counsel is present. Defendant Mst. Sadia called absent but her father and her counsel are present. Suit put off to: 30.04.2026. For evidence. |
||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 66/2025 | Mst Shabana Parveen Dayo VS Abdul Naeem Dayo | Mashkoor Hussain(ADVO-296-SBC-SHK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff Mst Shabana and her counsel are present. Defendant and his counsel are called absent. Statement of Mst. Shahbana is recorded at EXP No: 02, PW/Witness namely Abdul Hameed is present and his statement is recorded at EXP No: 03. Suit putt off to: 22.04.2026 for evidence of defendant side. Both parties are directed to attend on the next date of hearing. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 29/2024 | Mst. Sadiya Arain VS Umar Farooque Arain | Muhammad Ali(ADVO-656-SBC-SHK) | Aftab Ahmed(ADVO-1404-SBC-SUK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Mst Sadia called absent but her father and counsel are present. Defendant Umar Farooque is called absent but his counsel is in attendance. Arguments heard. Judgment/Decree passed and annouced in open court. Suit is decreed. Detail Judgement passed on separate order sheet. |
|
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 64/2025 | Mst Sapna Mahar VS Akash Mahar | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family Suit called. Plaintiff Mst. Sapna called absent but her father and counsel are present. Defendant Akash and his counsel are called absent. Order passed and annouced in open court. Suit is hereby dismissed, detail order passed on separate order sheet. |
||