| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 374/2015 | State Versus VS Hussain Bux & Ors | DDPP(ADVO-003-SBC-SHK) | PPC-324 | 8/2015 Sultan kot |
Case called. Case of accused Hussain Bux Bakhrani has already been kept in abeyance and he is not yet served. Notice against him issued which returned back as un-seved, the same handed over to to SIP Umed Ali Jeho of P.S Sultan Kot for service, after extending next date of hearing. ADPP for the state is present. Case is put off to:-04.06.2026 For compliance. |
|
| 2 | 23 (I) A 375/2015 | State Versus VS Hussain Bux | DDPP(ADVO-003-SBC-SHK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 9/2015 Sultan kot |
Case called. Case of accused Hussain Bux Bakhrani has already been kept in abeyance and he is not yet served process against him issued which returned back as un-served the same handed over to SIP Umed Ali Jeho of P.S sultan Kot for service, after extending next date of hearing. ADPP for the state is present. Case is put off to:-04-06.2026, For Service/Compliance. |
|
| 3 | PPC 717/2016 | The State VS Moula Bux and ors | DDPP(ADVO-003-SBC-SHK) | PPC-376 | 108/2016 Khanpur |
Case called. Accused Moula Bux, Ghulam Alias Akhter and Saleh Alias Haji all by caste Brohi are not yet served. Notices against them not issued by the office. Notice against complainant and P.Ws not issued by the office. ADPP for the state is present. Case is put off to:-04.06.2026, For service/Compliance. Repeat process against accused and complainant and P.Ws, through SHO Police Station Khanpur. |
|
| 4 | 23 (I) A 414/2017 | The State VS Nazir Ahmed Mahar | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 33/2017 Chak |
Case called. Accused Nazir Ahmed and his surety namely Abdul Raheem Mahar are not yet served. Process against them is not issued by the office. ADPP for the State is present. Case is put off to:-04.06.2026, for Service. Repeat NBW against accused and notice U/S 514 Cr.P.C to his surety as already ordered, through SHO P.S Chak. |
| 5 | PPC 516/2019 | The State VS Abdul Ghaffar | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | Ghulam Mustafa Junijo(ADVO-243-SBC-SHK) | PPC-295-B | 57/2019 Chak |
Case called. Case of accused has already kept in abeyance and not yet served. Complainant & P.Ws are also not yet served. Process not issued by the office. ADPP for the state is present. Case is put off to:-04.06.2026, For Service. Issue process against accused and P.Ws. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 6 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 561/2026 | Niaz Jagirani VS The State | Mumtaz Ali Jahangir(ADVO-643-SBC-KHP) | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-365B | 22/2026 Dakhan |
Criminal Bail Application U/S 497 Cr.P.C, of applicant/accused Niaz s/o Sharafat Ali @ Muhammad Urs by Caste Jagirani, is called. Learned DDPP for the state and D.C are present. Complainant is present. Mr. Abdul Hameed Mangi Advocate is present and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. Order on it. File. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court, that post-arrest bail application is hereby granted to applicant/accused subject to furnish solvent surety in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Hundred thousands) and PR bond to the like amount for the satisfaction of this Court. It is worth noting that the observations made in this order are preliminary and will not prejudice the case of either party at the subsequent trial stage. The findings herein are tentative and shall not be construed as a binding determination of the merits of the case. The parties are free to present their evidence and arguments at the trial, whereupon the court shall render a final decision on the basis of the evidence presented. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 7 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 568/2026 | Gul Hassan Gopang VS The State | Muhammad Yasin (ADVO-774-SBC-SHK) | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-324 | 15/2025 Stuart Ganj |
Bail application under section 498-A Cr.P.C, called. Applicant/accused Gul Hassan s/o Dhani Bux by Caste Gopang, is present on interim bail. Learned ADPP for the state and D.C are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court, interim pre-arrest bail earlier granted to above named applicant/accused is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions. |
| 8 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 577/2026 | Farooque Ahmed @ Foji Brohi VS The State | Zahid Hussain(ADVO-374-SBC-SHK) | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-324,PPC-353 | 11/2023 Garhi Yasin |
Bail application under section 498-A Cr.P.C, called. Applicant/accused Farooque Ahmed @ Foji s/o Raheem Bux by Caste Brohi, is present on interim bail. Learned ADPP for the state and D.C are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court, the interim pre-arrest bail granted to the applicant/accused vide order dated 29.4.2026 is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions with direction to attend trial court till final disposal of the case. |
| 9 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 576/2026 | Farooque Ahmed @ Foji Brohi VS The State | Nisar Ahmed(ADVO-747-SBC-SHK) | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-302 | 35/2022 Garhi Yasin |
Bail application under section 498-A Cr.P.C, called. Applicant/accused Farooque Ahmed @ Foji s/o Raheem Bux by Caste Brohi, is present on interim bail. Learned ADPP for the state and D.C are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court, interim pre-arrest bail earlier granted to above named applicant/accused is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions. |
| 10 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 583/2026 | Syed Shah Mardann Ali Shah syed and others VS The State | Sahib Khan(ADVO-52916-SBC-SHK) | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-376 | 16/2025 Mari (Shkpur) |
Bail application under section 498-A Cr.P.C of applicants/accused 1. Syed Shah Mardan Ali Shah @ Mardan Ali Shah s/o Syed Shujah Muhammad Shah and Muhammad Jawad Hussaini Shah @ Muhammad Jawad Shah s/o Syed Mehboob Ali Shah Hussaini, received by way of transfer from the Court of Honourable Sessions Judge, Shikarpur, for disposal according to law, vide letter No.CR/3379/2026, dated 30-04-2026. Applicants/accused are present. D.C is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court, without touching merits of the case, the applicants/accused are admitted to interim pre-arrest bail subject to furnishing surety in the sum of rupees Rs.50,000/- ( Fifty thousands) each applicant/accused and P.R bond in the like amount. Applicants/accused are directed to join investigation/attend trial court and produce CTC of case diary. To come up for confirmation or otherwise on:-12-05-2026. Notice to DPP for the state as well as IO and complainant of this case. Call police papers. Required surety have been furnished by the both accused. OneSyed Kazim Shah Hussain s/o Syed Shuja Muhammad Shah Hussaini by Caste Syed R/O Bakail Pota Muhalla Matiari, is present and filed affidavit along with original SSC of Rs.10,0000/- one lac bearing No. HF148747 and HF148750, for standing surety of accused Syed Shah Mardan Ali Shah @ Mardan Ali Shah s/o Syed Shujah Muhammad Shah and Muhammad Jawad Hussaini Shah @ Muhammad Jawad Shah s/o Syed Mehboob Ali Shah Hussaini. Order passed on affidavit of surety. On S.A before me. Provisionally surety is accepted and send for verification. Accused are directed to attend. |
| 11 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 586/2026 | Ghulam Baqir @ Shoukat VS The State | Tarique Shabir (ADVO-533-SBC-SHK) | ADPP() | Cr.PC-498,PPC-365B | 6/2026 Karan Sharif |
Bail application under section 498-A Cr.P.C of applicant/accused Ghulam Baqir @ Shoukat s/o Ghazi by Caste Rahoojo, received by way of transfer from the Court of Honourable Sessions Judge, Shikarpur, for disposal according to law, vide letter No.CR/3387/2026, dated 30-04-2026. Applicant/accused is present. D.C is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court, without touching merits of the case, the applicant/accused is admitted to interim pre-arrest bail subject to furnishing surety in the sum of rupees Rs.50,000/- ( Fifty thousands) and P.R bond in the like amount. Applicant/accused is directed to join investigation/attend trial court and produce CTC of case diary. To come up for confirmation or otherwise on:-08-05-2026. Notice to DPP for the state as well as IO and complainant of this case. Call police papers. Required surety has been furnished by the accused Ghulam Baqir @ Shoukat. One Ali Nawaz s/o Muhammad Ramzan by Caste Channa R/O Larai Muhallah Eid Gah Road Shikarpur, is present and filed affidavit along with original documents of motorcycle ( Card) bearing registration No.SNE0575, for standing surety of accused Ghulam Baqir @ Shoukat. Order passed on affidavit of surety. On S.A before me provisionally surety is accepted subject to verification. Accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 12 | PPC 225/2025 | The State VS Khan Muhammad and others | Muhammad Shoaib(ADVO-684-SBC-SHK) | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | Gender Based Violence-,PPC-365B | 78/2024 Lakhi Gate |
Case called. Accused Zahid Ali, Aziz @ Azizullah and Shahid are present on bail. While remaining accused Barkat, Khan Muhammad, Amir, Sheral, have already been declared as P.Os. DDPP for the state is present. Advocate for accused Zahid Ali is present. Mr. Zabiullah Advocate is present and field Vakalatnama on behalf of accused Shahid Ali and Azizullah. Order passed on it. File. Mr. Imtiaz Ali Brohi, Advocate for complainant is called absent. B.W issued against remaining P.Ws, which returned back with endorsement of PC Sadam Hussain. Complainant Mst. Marvi and P.W Mst. Shaheen are called absent. P.Ws Mst. Rubeena, Mst. Rozeena, HC Abdul Hameed and I/O SIP Ghulam Nabi Shaikh are present. D.C have verbally request for adjourn the case, their request of allowed. Case put off to:-20-05-2026, for evidence. Present P.Ws are bound down. Issue BW against remaining P.Ws. Accused present on bail are directed to attend. |
| 13 | PPC 714/2025 | The State VS Ali Dost and Others | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK),Lal Muhammad (ADVO-615-SBC-SHK) | PPC-397,PPC-427 | 32/2025 Jagan @ Hamnanyun |
Case called. Accused Ali Dost, Ghulam Nabi and Ali Raza are present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. D.C is present. Learned ADPP for the state has filed statement for closing the side of prosecution at Ex-14. Case put off to:-04.05.2026 for Statement of accused U/S 342 Cr.P.C. Accused present on bail are directed to attend. |
| 14 | PPC 824/2025 | The State VS Rano Marfani and others | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | 109/2025 Garhi Yasin |
Case called. Accused Rano is present on bail. Accused Nisar and Abdullah are present in custody, produced by Jail As: from District Prison Shikarpur. While remaining accused have already been declared as P.Os. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Zahid Hussain Memon Advocate for accused is present. Process returned back with endorsement of process server. No P.W is present. Case Put off to:-14-05-2026 for evidence. Issue B.W against complainant and P.Ws. Call case property from concerned P.S. Accused present on bail is directed to attend. Accused present in custody and remanded back to custody with direction to produce them before this court on the date of hearing. |
| 15 | PPC 836/2025 | The State VS Mumtaz @ Muhammad Mithal & Ors | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | Ali Asghar(ADVO-388-SBC-SHK),M. Ali Memon(ADVO-262-SBC-SHK) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-216-A,PPC-324,PPC-337-H,PPC-353 | 108/2025 Khanpur |
Case Called. Accused Mumtaz @ Mohammad Mithal @ Mitho and Ayaz @ Ajan are present in custody, produced by Jail As: from District Prison Shikarpur. While remaining accused have already been declared as P.Os. Learned ADPP for the state is present. DC is called absent. B.W issued against complainant and P.Ws, which returned back with endorsement of process server. No P.W is present. Case put off to:-19.05.2026, for evidence. Issue B.W against complainant and P.Ws. Call case property from concerned P.S. Both accused remanded back to custody with direction to produce them before this Court on the date of hearing. |
| 16 | 23 (I) A 837/2025 | The State VS Mumtaz @ Muhammad Mithal | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | M. Ali Memon(ADVO-262-SBC-SHK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 112/2025 Khanpur |
Case Called. Accused Mumtaz @ Mohammad Mithal @ Mitho is resent in custody produced by Jail As: from District Prison Shikarpur. Learned ADPP for the state is present. D.C is present. No P.W is present. B.W issued against complainant and P.Ws, which returned back with endorsement of process server. No P.W is present. Case put up to:-19.05.2026, for evidence. Issue B.W against complainant and P.Ws. Call case property from concerned P.S. Accused present in custody and remanded back to custody with direction to produce them before this court on the date of hearing. |
| 17 | PPC 835/2025 | The State VS Mumtaz @ Muhammad Mithal & Ors | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | Ali Asghar(ADVO-388-SBC-SHK),M. Ali Memon(ADVO-262-SBC-SHK) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | 107/2025 Khanpur |
Case Called. Accused Mumtaz @ Mohammad Mithal @ Mitho and Ayaz @ Ajan are present in custody, produced by Jail As: from District Prison Shikarpur. While remaining accused have already been declared as POs. Learned ADPP for the state is present. DC is called absent. B.W issued against complainant and P.Ws, which returned back with endorsement of process server. No P.W is present. Case put up to:-19.05.2026, for evidence. Issue B.W against complainant and P.Ws. Call case property from concerned P.S. Both accused remanded back to custody with direction to produce them before this Court on the date of hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 18 | Habeas Corpus 413/2026 | Abdul Aziz Sethar VS SSP Shikarpur & others | Sajjad Hussain(ADVO-426-SBC-SHK) | ADPP() | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Application U/S 491 Cr.P.C, called. Applicant Abdul Aziz s/o Mahboob Ali by Caste Sethar, is present. Mr. Sajjad Hussain Arain, Advocate for applicant is present. Mr. Athar Ameer Pahore, learned ADPP for the state is present. Report received from DIG of Police Crime and Investigation Branch Sindh Karachi. Order on it. File. arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court, Since the detainue has been arrested in above crime registered at Police Station Dokri and his arrest was shown in the record as such the application is disposed of. The applicant is advised to adopt due course of law for release of detainee. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 19 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 572/2026 | Mst. Salma Manganhar VS SSP Shikarpur & Ors | Shakeel Ahmed G Ansari (ADVO-325-SBC-SHK) | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Application U/S 22-A, (6) 22-B Cr.P.C, for registration of the FIR, is called. Applicant, Mst. Salma w/o Ahsan Ali by Caste Manganhar, is present. Mr. Shakeel Ahmed Ansari, ADvocate for applicant is present. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Proposed accused No. 1 to 3 are present. Mr. Abdul Hameed Mangi, Advocate is present and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of proposed accused No.1 to 3. Order on it. File. Reports received from I/C DSP Complaints Cell, Shikarpur and ASI Doda Khan Luhar of P.S New Foujdari, which are kept on record. Arguments heard. Advocate for applicant has filed statement along with case law, which is kept on record. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court, that applicant has failed to make out prima-facie case and does not come with clean hands. Therefore, prayer of application for registration of FIR is hereby declined. However, the applicant is at liberty to file private complaint of the alleged incident, which is an alternate remedy available to him under law, if she is, advised so. She is present and informed, accordingly. |
| 20 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 574/2026 | Amjad Ali Shaikh VS SSP Shikarpur others | Mazhar Ali(ADVO-1106-SBC-LRK) | ADPP() | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Application Under Section 22-A & 22-B Cr.P.C, called. Applicant/complainant, Amjad Ali s/o Muhammad Mithal by Caste Shaikh, is called absent. Mr. Mazhar Ali Bhutto, Advocate for applicant is present. Mr. Athar Ameer Pahore, learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Azhar Hussain Abbasi Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of accused Naveed Ali and Javed. Order on it. Reports received from I/C DSP Complaints Shikarpur, ASI Doda Khan of P.S N.F andI/O SIP Muhammad Zafar Chang, which are kept on record. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court, the grievance of the applicant regarding non-arrest of the nominated accused and apprehension to his safety, the SSP Shikarpur is directed to ensure that efforts for the arrest of absconding accused persons are carried out strictly in accordance with law. The SSP Shikarpur shall personally monitor the investigation and take all necessary steps for early arrest of the accused persons, so that the rule of law is maintained and the concerns of the applicant are addressed. However, legal protection is fundamental right of every citizen. Official respondents are directed to ensure maintenance of public peace and tranquility and avoid committing excess in relations to their functions and duties. However, this order shall not affect any inquiry, investigation or trial if already pending against applicant before any forum. Let a copy of order be sent to the SSP Shikarpur and IO of above crime for information and strict compliance. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 21 | PPC 18/2026 | The State VS Yar Mohammad & Others | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK) | PPC-395 | 36/2025 Rustam |
Case called. Accused Khalid is present in custody produced by Jail As: from District Prison Shikarpur. While remaining accused have already been declared as P.Os. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Charge framed against accused at Ex-06. Accused pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial vide his plea at Ex-06. Case put off to:-14-05-206 for evidence. Issue B.W against complainant and P.Ws. Call case property from concerned P.S. Accused present in custody and remanded back to custody with direction to produce him before this court on the date of hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 22 | SC (Murder Trial) 185/2024 | The state VS Abdul Ghafoor and others | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK),DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-SHK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK) | PPC-302 | 1/2024 Golo Daro |
Case called. All the accused are absconders and have already been declared as Proclaimed offenders. ADPP for the state is present. Case Put off to:-26-05-2026. For further proceedings. |
| 23 | PPC 90/2025 | The State VS Darya Khan and others | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK),Ghulam Hussain(ADVO-620-SBC-SHK) | Ashique Ali (ADVO-14823-SBC-KHC),IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | PPC-324 | 61/2024 Chak |
Case called. Accused Darya Khan, Sameen @ Dakoo @ Abdul Sami and Jameel @ Anwar are absconders and not yet served. While remaining accused have already been declared as POs. ADPP for the state is present. Case put off to:-26.05.2026, for further proceedings. Issue notice U/S 514 Cr.P.C to sureties of absconding accused, through SHO P.S Chak. |
| 24 | PPC 712/2025 | The State VS Shakeel and other | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK),Paarsa Mangi (ADVO-782-SBC-SHK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Gender Based Violence-,PPC-364-A,PPC-365B,PPC-395,PPC-452 | 29/2025 Chak |
Case called. Accused Shakeel, Ghulam Yaseen, 3. Parvaiz, 4. Adam, 5. Shah Nawaz are absconders and not yet served. Learned DDPP for the state is present. Advocate for complainant is called absent. Complainant is called absent. Case Put off to:-26-05-2026, for further proceedings. |
| 25 | PPC 777/2025 | The State VS Zamir Chohan | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK) | PPC-337-Fi,PPC-397,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 26/2025 Raheemabad |
|
| 26 | SC (Murder Trial) 858/2025 | The state vs VS Abbas & ors | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK) | PPC-302 | 3/2025 Tajo Dero(Shikarpur) |
|
| 27 | PPC 845/2025 | The State VS Sain Bux & Ors | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402-C | 84/2025 Khanpur |
Case called. All the accused are absconders and have already been declared as P.Os. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Case put off to:-26-05-2026 for further proceedings. |
| 28 | PPC 232/2026 | The State VS Mst. Manzooran & others | ADPP() | Mashkoor Hussain(ADVO-296-SBC-SHK) | Gender Based Violence-,PPC-34,PPC-365B | 17/2025 Daim Malik |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Advocate to be Heard | |||||||
| 29 | Criminal Revisions 8/2026 | Shahal Khan Jatoi VS Naseemullah & Others | Muhammad Ali(ADVO-725-SBC-SHP) | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | Cr.PC-145,Cr.PC-439 | / |
Criminal Revision Petition U/S 435 & 439 Cr.P.C, of applicant Shahdad Khan s/o Abdul Haq Khan by Caste Jatoi, received by way of transfer from the Court of Honourable District & Sessions Judge, Shikarpur, for disposal according to law, vide letter No.CR/3398/2026, dated 30-04-2026. Order on it. Advocate to be beard on the point of maintainability on:-07-05-2026. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 30 | PPC 216/2025 | The State VS Zameer Hussain and others | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399 | 2/2025 Usman Eisani @ Bado |
Case called. Accused Malang is present in custody, produced by Jail As: from District Prison Shikarpur. While remaining accused have already been declared as P.Os. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Deedar Ali Brohi, Advocate for accused is present. The accountant District Court, Shikarpur was directed to en-cash the Defense Saving Certificates from concerned Saving Center, collect amount, deposit in Government Treasury while profit on DSC, if any, may be returned to the applicant/surety under proper receipt, letter not issued by the office. Advocate for accused has verbal request for adjourn the case, his request is allowed. Case Put off to:-08-05-2026, for arguments. Accused present in custody and remanded back to custody with direction to produce him before this Court on the date of hearing. Issue letter to Accountant for deposing the surety amount. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 31 | SC (Murder Trial) 335/2024 | The State VS Gul Bahar and others | ADPP() | Muhammad Ibrahim(ADVO-424-SBC-SHK) | PPC-302 | 3/2024 Lodra |
|
| 32 | PPC 521/2025 | The State VS Mushtaque & others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-SHK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK) | Gender Based Violence-,PPC-34,PPC-365B,PPC-452 | 6/2025 Madeji |
Case called. Accused Mushtaque Ali, Abdul Qadir and Liaqat Ali are declared as absconders and not yet served. Learned DDPP for the state is present. Report U/S 88 Cr.P.C of accused Liaqat not received from Mukhtiarkar Dera Allah Yar Balouchistan, letter not issued by the office. Case Put off to:-15-05-2026. Issue warrant U/S 88 Cr.P.C against accused Liaqat through Mukhtiarkar Jhat Pat, Dera Allah Yar Baluchistan. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 1 | F.R.A. (First Rent Appeals (F.R.A.)) 3/2025 |
Gulzar Ahmed Mahar VS TO lakhi Ghulam Shah and others | Muhammad Ali(ADVO-1500-SBC-SUK) | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | Rent appeal U/S 21 of the Sindh Rented Permisses Ordinance 1979, called. Appellant is present. Advocate for appellant is called absent. Respondents are called absent. Order already passed the service upon respondent No. 1 to 3 is already held good vide order dated 15-03-2025. Transfer application regarding transfer of this appeal is pending before Honourable District Judge, Shikarpur. Put off to:20-05-2026 for further proceedings. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 3/2026 |
Ghulam Mustafa Jafferi VS PO Sindh & others | M. Ali Memon(ADVO-262-SBC-SHK) | DDA(ADVO-005-SBC-LRK),Prem Chand(ADVO-297-SBC-SHK) | Civil Appeal U/S 96 of C.P.C, along with application U/O 149 C.P.C, called. Appellant Ghulam Mustafa s/o Haji Sono Khan by caste Jafferi, is present. Mr. Tarique Shabir Memon Advocate for appellant is present. Notice to respondent No. 7 & 8 not issued due to non payment of cost. Learned DDA on behalf of respondent No.1 to 5 is present. Respondent No.6 Mst. Kashmiran is present. Mr. Prem Chand Advocate on behalf of respondent No.6 is present. Advocate for appellant is directed to supply complete set of memo of appeal to advocate for respondent No.6. Advocate for appellant has filed application U/S 148 CPC. Order on it. Granted. Put off to:08-05-2026 for service. Issue notice to respondent No. 7 & 8 through all mods on the cost of appellant. |
||
| 3 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 14/2026 |
Muhammad Anwar Figar & Ors (Thr. attorney Muhammad Anwar Figar & Ors) VS P.O Sindh & ORs | Iftikhar Ahmed (ADVO-544-SBC-SHK) | DDA(ADVO-005-SBC-LRK) | Civil Revision Petition U/S 115 CPC, of Petitioners are called absent. Mr. Iftikhar Ahmed Shaikh Advocate for Petitioners is present. Notice issued against respondents, bailiff of this court returned notice with his endorsement. Learned DDA is present and filed Memo of appearance on behalf of respondent No.1 to 9. Order on it. Order passed on order sheet and announced in open court, the service upon respondents No.2 to 5, 7 to 9, 10 to 19 is held good. Let the fresh notice be issued against remaining respondents on cost of applicant through bailiff with directions to paste the notices upon outer door of houses of respondents No. 21 to 29 if they will not serve. Put off to:-18-05-2026 for service. Issue notice to respondent No.21 to 29 on the cost of petitioners. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Advocate to be Heard | |||||||
| 4 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 28/2026 |
Masoodin Shahzad and ohter Resp. No.1 is power of attorney of applicant No.02 to 04. VS P.O Sindh & Others | Raz Muhammad (Alias) Gul Raz(ADVO-410-SBC-SHK) | DDA(ADVO-007-SBC-NIL) | Civil Revision U/S 115 CPC, of applicants Masoodin Shahzad and others, received by way of transfer from the Court of Honourable District Judge, Shikarpur, for disposal according to law, vide letter No.DJ/-3400/2026, dated 30-04-2026. Order on it. Advocate to be beard on the point of maintainability on:-05-05-2026. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 5 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 33/2025 |
Shabir Ahmed Memon through his L.H Tarique Shabir and ohters VS Cheif Executive Officer SEPCO Sukkur and others | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | DDA(ADVO-007-SBC-NIL) | Civil Appeal U/S 96 C.P.C, called. Appellant No.1 Tariq Shabir Ahmed Advocate is present. Mr. Fayaz Ahmed Pathan Advocate on behalf of respondent No.1 to 4 is present. Respondent No.5 is called absent. Order already passed on order sheet the service upon respondent No.5 is held good. Arguments heard. Judgment passed and announced in open court, this Court is of the considered opinion that the impugned judgment and Decree dated 27.06.2025 cannot be sustained in the eyes of law. Accordingly, the instant appeal is partly allowed, and the impugned judgment and decree are hereby set aside, hence Point No.1 is replied in affirmative. In light of the above, the appellants (being the legal heirs of the deceased advocate) are entitled to recover the remaining unpaid professional fee of Rs. 34,720/- from the respondents. Regarding the claim for damages of Rs. 1,300,000/- and interest at 30% per month, this Court finds no basis whatsoever. The predecessor of the appellants produced no evidence in support thereof. Such claim is highly exaggerated and speculative. A decree be drawn accordingly, and the record and proceedings of F.C. Suit No. 202 of 2022, together with a copy of this judgment and decree, shall be transmitted to the learned trial court for information and compliance. |
||
| 6 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 59/2025 |
Zameer Ahmed and others VS P.O Sindh and other | Raz Muhammad (Alias) Gul Raz(ADVO-410-SBC-SHK) | DDA(ADVO-007-SBC-NIL) | Civil Revision U/S 115 Code of Civil Procedure and application U/O 41 Rule 5 R/W Section 151, CPC, called. Applicants are called absent. Mr. Raz Muhammad Hakro Advocate for applicants is present. Learned DDA on behalf of respondent No. 1 to 9 is present. Respondent No. 10 for self as well as attorney of respondents No,11 to 15 & 20 (iii) is called absent. Mr. Iftikhar Ahmed Shaikh Advocate on behalf of respondent No.10 for self as well as attorney of respondents No,11 to 15 & 20 (iii) is present. Advocate for appellant has filed adjournment application. Order on it. Granted. Put off to:-18-05-2026. For hearing. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 23/2026 | Agha Mir Alavi VS Assistantn Manager Registration NSRC/NADRA & Ors | Ahsan Ahmed Memon(ADVO-180-SBC-SHK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK) | Letter of Administration and Succession Certificates Act. 2020-U/S 5(B) | Petition for Succession Certificate U/S 05 B Sindh letter of Administration and Successions Act 2021, called. Petitioner is present and submitted Power of Attorney, which is kept on record. Mr. Haji Ahsan Ahmed Memon Advocate for petitioner is present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court, this application is disposed of. It is observed that respondent No.2 to 4 have not appeared before this Court in person to pursue or verify their claim. Instead, the petitioner has produced a power of attorney on their behalf. In such situation, the possibility of future dispute or claim from the said respondents cannot be ruled out. Therefore, in order to safeguard the interests of all concerned parties and to ensure transparency, it is hereby directed that the Accountant of the Honourable Sessions Court, Shikarpur shall collect the amount from the concerned National Savings Centre, Shikarpur. The said amount shall be disbursed strictly in accordance with law and after due verification of entitlement of the parties. The commissioner fees are fixed Rs.5000/-, which will be paid by petitioner and respondents No.2 to 4, equally. The petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. Let the copy of order sent to Accountant Sessions Court, Shikarpur for information and compliance under intimation to this Court within 30 days, without fail. |
|
| 2 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 22/2026 | Agha Mir Alvi VS Assistant Manager NADRA & others | Ahsan Ahmed Memon(ADVO-180-SBC-SHK) | Legal Advisor (NADRA)(ADVO-008-SBC-NIL) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Petition for Succession Certificate U/S 05 B Sindh letter of Administration and Successions Act 2021, called. Petitioner is present and submitted Power of Attorney of respondent No.2 to 4, which is kept on record. Mr. Haji Ahsan Ahmed Memon Advocate for petitioner is present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court, this application is disposed of. It is observed that respondent No.2 to 4 have not appeared before this Court in person to pursue or verify their claim. Instead, the petitioner has produced a power of attorney on their behalf. In such situation, the possibility of future dispute or claim from the said respondents cannot be ruled out. Therefore, in order to safeguard the interests of all concerned parties and to ensure transparency, it is hereby directed that the Accountant of the Honourable Sessions Court, Shikarpur shall collect the amount from the concerned bank as well as National Savings Centre, Shikarpur. The said amount shall be disbursed strictly in accordance with law and after due verification of entitlement of the parties. The commissioner fees is fixed Rs.10,000/-, which will be paid by petitioner and respondents No.2 to 4, equally. The petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. Let the copy of order sent to Accountant Sessions Court, Shikarpur for information and compliance under intimation to this Court within 30 days, without fail. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 3 | G.W. A. (G&W Appeals) 2/2026 | Mst. Zubaida Riaz VS Agha Talha & others | Waqar Ahmed(ADVO-422-SBC-SHK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 47 (Guardian Appeal ) | Guardianship appeal under section 47 of the Guardian and Wards Act 1890, called. Appellant Mst. Zubeda Riaz w/o Late Agha Riaz Akhter, is called absent. Mr. Waqar Ahmed Abro Advocate for appellant is called absent. Respondent No.1 is called absent. Mr. Zabiullah Advocate for respondent No.1 is present. In the interest of Justice Put off to:14-05-2026 for appearance of respondent No.2 and hearing. |
|