| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | BA in SC (Bail Application in Cases) 81/2026 | Bashir Ahmed and others VS The State | Abdul Ghani Bijarani(ADVO-71-SBC-KSH) | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | PPC-302 | 11/2026 A-Section Kandhkot |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 80/2026 | Ali Hassan and others VS The State | Abdul Hameed(ADVO-5309-SBC-HYD) | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | PPC-337-A(i) | 27/2026 Karampur |
R & Ps of instant Crl.BBA u/s 498, Cr.P.C received by this Court from the Court of Honourable Sessions Judge, Kashmore @ Kandhkot by way of transfer for its disposal according to the law. Matter is called. Applicants/accused 1.Ali Hassan s/o Bagan @ Bagan Ali, 2.Nazeer Ahmed s/o Bagan @ Bagan Khan & 3.Wakeel @ Wakeel Ahmed s/o Dur Muhammad, all by caste Meerani are present in the Court. Mr.Abdul Hameed Chachar, learned advocate for applicants/accused is present. Heard. Order passed, signed and announced in open Court. For the reasons to be recorded, the applicants/accused named above are admitted to interim pre-arrest bail, subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each to the satisfaction of this Court and they are required to join investigation and appear before the investigation officer of the case, as and when required. Applicants/accused are directed to attend this Court. One Bangul s/o Din Muhammad Malik voluntarily appeared before this Court and submitted his affidavit to stand surety for applicants/accused named above in the sum of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each & P.R bond in the like amount. To prove his solvency the surety produced original saving certificates of Rs.60,000/- (Sixty Thousand) issued by National Saving Centre Kandhkot and P.S copy of his CNIC. Order passed on affidavit. ???Call for verification, surety accepted provisionally in the sum of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each and P.R bond in the like amount. Bail bond taken from surety and applicants/accused. To come up again on.16.03.2026, for confirmation or otherwise. Applicants/accused are directed to attend on the date of hearing. Issue notice to learned ADPP for the State, Complainant so also call for police papers. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | SC (Murder Trial) 213/2016 | The State VS Haidro @ Ghulam Hyder Marhetto and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-BDN),Deedar Ali Bangwar(ADVO-198-SBC-KSH) | Saeed Ahmed Khan Bijarani(ADVO-176-SBC-KSH) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-302 | 104/2003 Buxapur |
Case is called. Accused Haidro @ Ghulam Hyder is present on bail. Accused Soomar @ Raheem Bux expired, proceedings against him already abated. While remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, Learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Aijaz Ahmed Bangwar, learned advocate for PW Yar Muhammad is present. No P.W is present, process issued against rest un-examined P.Ws return un-served by process server PC Dilmurad as per his endorsement. Mr.Saeed Ahmed B.Bijarani, learned advocate for accused is present and filed Crl.Misc.application u/s 265-K Cr.P.C on behalf of above named applicant/accused. Order on it. Notice to State counsel, such notice waived by ADPP at Ext.26. Arguments heard on appln.u/s 265-K Cr.P.C from both the sides. Order also passed thereon, signed and announced in open Court at Ext.27. For the reasons to be recorded, the application is allowed. Consequently, the applicant/accused Haidro @ Ghulam Hyder s/o Mir Dost Marheto, is hereby acquitted u/s 265-K Cr.P.C. He is present on bail, his bail bonds stands cancelled and surety is discharged from all the liabilities. Accused is present on bail and informed, accordingly. |
| 4 | SC (Murder Trial) 274/2023 | The State VS Lal Khan Jaffery and others | Muhammad Nawaz(ADVO-190-SBC-KSH) | Ahmed Raza(ADVO-355 -SBC-KSH) | PPC-302 | 85/2023 B-Section Kandhkot |
Case is called. Accused Lal Khan Jafferi is produced in custody by jail authority District Prison Shikarpur, through online video link. While remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, Learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Ahmed Raza Sundrani, learned advocate of accused present. Mr. Muhammad Nawaz Bangwar, learned advocate of complainant is called absent. Complainant Gelo Khan and PW Ali Sher are voluntarily appeared in the Court and submitted a joint application with prayer to vacate the B.Ws issued against them. Heard. Order on it. B.Ws are vacated, with warning to be careful in future. Process issued against rest P.Ws return un-served by the process server as per his endorsement. Case property is produced. Adjournment application submitted by the complainant. Order on it. Adj.granted as last chance. Case is adjourned to: 26.03.2026, for evidence. J/A concerned is directed to produce the custody of accused on the next date of hearing, through online video link. Case property return back to concerned PS with directions to be produced. Complainant and present P.W are directed to attend on the date of hearing. Issue summons against WMO Tabinda, WHC Akbar Ali, tapedar Muhammad Ayoub Soomro and I.O/SIP Khawand Bux Awan. |
| 5 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 112/2025 | Abdul Rasheed Samejo VS Hajano and others | Muhammad Qasim Khan (ADVO-12524-SBC-MLR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3/4 illegal Dispossession Act | / |
Direct complaint a/with application 7 of Illegal Dispossession Act called. Complainant Abdul Rasheed Samejo is present a/with his witnesses namely Ghulam Akbar and Mumtaz Ali. Mr.Muhammad Qasim Khan Marheto, learned advocate for complainant is present. Accused Sallahuddin Lashari is present on bail. While remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Abdul Ghani Bijarani, learned advocate of accused is called absent. Adjournment application submitted by the present accused. Order on it. Adj.granted as last chance. Direct Complaint a/with appln.u/s 7 of I.D.A put off to:19.03.2026, for evidence/hearing of appln.u/s 7 of I.D.Act. Present accused is directed to attend on the date of hearing. Complainant and P.Ws are also directed to attend on the date of hearing. |
| 6 | SC (Murder Trial) 517/2025 | The State VS Saddaruddin @ Fateh Din Sundrani and others | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Munir Ahmed M. Bijarani(ADVO-294-SBC-KSH) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-302 | 11/2025 Bhittai Colony |
Case is called. Accused Sadaruddin @ Fatehuddin and Abdul Razzaque are present on bail. While remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Deedar Ali Bangwar, learned advocate for complainant is called absent, however, his associate/junior Mr.Babal Khan is present. Mr.Munir Ahmed Bijarani, learned advocate for the accused is present. Complainant Sabz Ali, PWs Abdul Wahab, Qurban and Abdul Rauf are also present, process issued against rest P.Ws return un-served by SIP Adal Khan as per his endorsement. Adjournment application submitted by the complainant. Order on it. Adj.granted. Case put off to.01.04.2026, for Evidence. Present accused are directed to attend on the date of hearing. Complainant and present PWs are directed to attend on the date of hearing. Call case property from SHO concerned. |
| 7 | SC (Murder Trial) 545/2025 | The State VS Irfan Shah @ Ihsanullah Shah | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH),Sahib Khan Malik s/o Muhammad Siddique() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-279,PPC-320 | 130/2025 B-Section Kandhkot |
Case is called. Accused Irfan Shah @ Ihsanullah Shah is present on bail. Mr.Riaz Ahmed Channa, Learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Aftab Ahmed Channa, learned advocate for accused is present. Mr.Sahib Ali Malik, learned advocate for complainant is present. Except tapedar Khadim Hussain, no other P.W is present though complainant Sultan, P.Ws Ali Bux and Azamuddin were present on the last date of hearing. Case property is produced. Case proceeded. D/O tapedar Khadim Hussain recorded at Ext.8. He produce sketch of place of incident at Ext.8/A. Case put off to.17.03.2026, for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend on the date of hearing. Case property returned back with directions to be produced. Issue B.Ws against Complainant and private P.Ws through SHO concerned byname, copy to SSP Kashmore @ Kandhkot with directions to appear a/with LRs of the deceased. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 146/2026 | Azeeman Khatoon Soomro VS SHO PS Buxapur and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Crl.Misc.application u/s 22-A,B, Cr.P.C called. Applicant/petitioner Azeem Khatoon Soomro is present a/with her learned counsel Mr.Farooque Ahmed Soomro. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Proposed accused are called absent.Reports already received by this Court from concerned authorities. Arguments heard from both the sides. Order also passed, signed and announced in open Court. For the reasons to be recorded, the instant application stands dismissed. |
|
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 144/2026 | Washal Jakhrani VS SHO PS Kashmore and others | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Crl.Misc.application u/s 22-A,B, Cr.P.C called. Applicant/petitioner Washal Jakhrani is present in person. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Proposed accused No.1 also present in the Court. Vakalatnama filed by Mr.Nasrullah Dayo, advocate on behalf of petitioner. Order on it. Filed. Reports already received by this Court from concerned authorities. Arguments heard from both the sides. Order also passed, signed and announced in open Court. For the reasons to be recorded, the instant application stands dismissed. |
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 154/2026 | Mst: Durnaz Khatoon Gujrani VS SHO PS B/Section Kandhkot and others | Sahib Ali(ADVO-151-SBC-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Crl.Misc.application u/s 22-A,B Cr.P.C is called. Petitioner Mst.Dur Naz Gujrani is present a/with her learned counsel Mr.Sahib Ali Malik. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Proposed accused are called absent, notice issued against them return un-served by the process server ASI Noubat Ali Khoso as per his endorsement and same is extended to him for execution. Matter put off to.16.03.2026, for arguments/further proceedings. |
| 11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 158/2026 | Mohammad Ramzan Shaikh VS SHO PS A/Section Kandhkot and others | Suraj Vishnoo(ADVO-19308-SBC-KHS) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Crl.Misc.application u/s 22-A,B Cr.P.C is called. Petitioner Muhammad Ramzan Shaikh is present a/with his learned counsel Mr.Suraj Vishnoo Ujeenwal. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Town Officer Kandhkot namely Akash Kumar is present on behalf of proposed accused persons and submitted statement on their behalf. Order on it. Filed. Matter put off to.26.03.2026, for arguments/further proceedings. Parties are directed to attend on the date of hearing. |
| 12 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 159/2026 | Mst: Qaiman Shaikh VS SHO PS A/Section Kandhkot and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Crl.Misc.application u/s 22-A,B Cr.P.C is called. Petitioner Mst.Qaiman Shaikh is present a/with her learned counsel Mr.Suraj Vishnoo Ujeenwal. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Town Officer Kandhkot namely Akash Kumar is present on behalf of proposed accused and submitted statement. Order on it. Filed. Matter put off to.26.03.2026, for arguments/further proceedings. Parties are directed to attend on the date of hearing. |
|
| 13 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 165/2026 | Jamal Khan Suhriyani VS SHO PS A/Section Kandhkot and others | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Crl.Misc.application u/s 22-A,B, Cr.P.C called. Applicant/petitioner Jamal Khan is present in person. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Proposed accused No.1 is present. Vakalatnama filed by Mr.Khamiso Khan Dahani, advocate on behalf of present proposed accused. Order on it. Filed. Reports received by this Court from concerned authorities. Order on it. Filed. Arguments heard from both the sides. Order also passed, signed and announced in open Court. For the reasons to be recorded, the instant application stands dismissed. |
| 14 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 163/2026 | Azad Suhriyani VS SHO PS A/Section Kandhkot and others | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Crl.Misc.application u/s 22-A,B, Cr.P.C called. Applicant/petitioner Azad is present. Vakalatnama filed by Mr.Khamiso Khan Dahani, advocate on behalf of petitioner. Order on it. Filed. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Proposed accused No.1 is present. Vakalatnama filed by Mr.Aijaz Ahmed Bangwar, advocate on behalf of present proposed accused. Order on it. Filed. Reports received by this Court from concerned authorities. Order on it. Filed. Arguments heard from both the sides. Order also passed, signed and announced in open Court. For the reasons to be recorded, the instant application stands dismissed. |
| 15 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 161/2026 | Ghulam Malik VS SHO PS B/Section Kandhkot and others | Deedar Ali Bangwar(ADVO-198-SBC-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Crl.Misc.application u/s 22-A,B, Cr.P.C called. Applicant/petitioner Ghulam Malik is present. Mr.Deedar Ali Bangwar, learned advocate of petitioner is present. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Proposed accused are called absent, notices issued against them return un-served by the process server ASI Noubat Ali as per his endorsement that they are absconders in Crime No.20/2025 of PS B/Section Kandhkot. Reports received by this Court from concerned authorities. Order on it. Filed. Arguments heard from both the sides. Order also passed, signed and announced in open Court. For the reasons to be recorded, the instant application is found to be meritorious and is hereby allowed. The respondent No.1 (concerned SHO) is directed to record the statement of the applicant u/s 154, Cr.P.C, and if from such statement the commission of a cognizable offence is made out, the SHO shall proceed in accordance with law by registering the FIR. However, during the course of investigation, if the version of the petitioner is found to be false or fabricated, the concerned SHO shall be at liberty to initiate proceedings against him in accordance with the relevant provisions of law. Let copy of this order be sent to SHO concerned for information and necessary compliance. |
| 16 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 179/2026 | Raja Najeebullah Advocate VS SHO PS Ghouspur and others | Mohsin Ali(ADVO-151-SBC-THT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
|
| 17 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 177/2026 | Fida Hussain Awan VS SSP Kashmore at Kandhkot and others | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
|
| 18 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 178/2026 | Wahid Bux Bhutto VS SHO PS Miani at Badani and others | Munwar Ali(ADVO-2883-SBC-HYD) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 19 | PPC 213/2025 | The State VS Moula Dad @ Baboo and others | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | 21/2025 Tangwani |
Case is called. Accused Mouladad @ Baboo Bijarani Bijarani is produced in custody by J/A District Prison Shikarpur, through online video link. Co-accused Nazeer Ahmed, Azizullah and Abdul Majeed have already been acquitted by this Court on merits u/s 265-H(i) Cr.P.C, vide judgment dated 05.08.2026 (at Ext.15). While remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Faraz Ali Bijarani, learned advocate for accused is present and filed Crl.Misc.application u/s 265-K Cr.P.C on behalf of above named applicant. Order on it. Notice to State counsel, such notice waived by ADPP at Ext.17. Arguments heard on appln.u/s 265-K Cr.P.C from both the sides. Order also passed thereon, signed and announced in open Court at Ext.18. For the reasons to be recorded, the application is allowed. Consequently, the applicant/accused Mouladad @ Babu, is hereby acquitted u/s 265-K Cr.P.C. He is produced in custody from District Prison Shikarpur, through online video link and is informed accordingly. Let such acquittal information be issued. |
| 20 | PPC 248/2025 | The State VS Moula Dad @ Baboo and others | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-399,PPC-402 | 41/2025 Tangwani |
Case is called. Accused Mouladad @ Baboo and Shabir are produced in custody by J/A District Prison Shikarpur, through online video link. Co-accused Meerhaan @ Meerhaan Khan & Sadam Hussain have already been acquitted by this Court on merits u/s 265-H(i) Cr.P.C, vide judgment dated 01.09.2025 (at Ext.16). Co-accused Ghulam Murtaza has also been acquitted by this Court on merits u/s 265-H(i) Cr.P.C, vide judgment dated 02.12.2025 (at Ext.25). Co-accused Sabz Ali has also been acquitted by this Court u/s 265-K Cr.P.C, vide order dated 24.12.2025 (at Ext.28). Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Faraz Ali Bijarani, learned advocate for accused is present and filed Crl.Misc.application u/s 265-K Cr.P.C on behalf of above named applicants/accused. Order on it. Notice to State counsel, such notice waived by ADPP at Ext.29. Arguments heard on appln.u/s 265-K Cr.P.C from both the sides. Order also passed thereon, signed and announced in open Court at Ext.30. For the reasons to be recorded, the application is allowed. Consequently, the applicants/accused 1.Mouladad @ Babu s/o Faqeer Muhammad & 2.Shabeer Ahmed s/o Wali Muhammad, both by caste Bijarani, are hereby acquitted u/s 265-K Cr.P.C. They are produced in custody from District Prison Shikarpur, through online video link and are informed accordingly. Let such acquittal information be issued. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 21 | DC (Direct Complaint) 23/2025 | Rafique Ahmed Mazari VS Safeer Jageerani Incharge PS Kashmore & others | Mohsin Ali(ADVO-151-SBC-THT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-395,PPC-452 | / |
Direct Complaint is called. Complainant Rafique Ahmed Mazari is present, while his learned counsel Mr.Mohsin Ali Khan Pathan is called absent, however, his associate/junior Mr.Shoaib Ahmed Suhriyani is present. Proposed accused are called absent. Mr.Saeed Ahmed B.Bijarani, learned advocate for proposed accused 1,3 & 4 is present. The complainant submitted statement that his grievances have been redressed by the proposed accused, hence, he withdraws the instant direct complaint. Order on it. Filed. Heard. Order also passed in separate sheet, signed and announced in open Court. For the reasons to be recorded, the instant Direct Complaint is hereby disposed of as withdrawn. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 3/2026 | Sona Khatoon Malik VS Abdul Rauf and others | Mansab Ali(ADVO-13850-SBC-KHS) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278,SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | ||