| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | SC (Murder Trial) 10/2013 | The State VS Attaullah Teghani and others | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-KSH),Deedar Ali Bangwar(ADVO-198-SBC-KSH) | Muhammad Siddique(ADVO-236-SBC-KSH),Raham Ali(ADVO-606-SBC-SHK) | PPC-302,PPC-324,PPC-337-H | 80/2008 Ghouspur |
Case is called. Accused Attaullah Teghani is present on interim pre-arrest bail. While remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Deedar Ali Bangwar, learned advocate for complainant is present. Mr. Muhammad Siddique Bangwar, learned advocate for accused is present. Except PW Ghulam Yaseen, no other P.W is present, process issued against rest P.Ws return un-served by the process server as per his endorsement and same is extended to him for execution. Case property not produced by the SHO concerned, however, report already received by this Court from SHO concerned, vide his report No.Cr.80 that same has been destroyed in the year of 2010 during heavy flood, such report kept on record (at Ext.10). Adjournment application submitted by present PW. Order on it. Adj.granted. Case is adjourned to.20.11.2026, for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend on the date of hearing. Present PW also directed to attend on the date of hearing. |
| 2 | SC (Murder Trial) 101/2021 | The State VS Javed Choliyani and others | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-KSH),Abdul Ghani Bijarani(ADVO-71-SBC-KSH) | Ahmed Raza(ADVO-355 -SBC-KSH) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-302,PPC-34 | 68/2020 Tangwani |
Case is called. Accused Javed Choliyani is present on bail. Co-accused Willayat Choliyani has already been convicted by this Court u/s 265-H(ii) Cr.P.C, vide judgment dated.08.07.2023 (at Ext.26). While remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Abdul Ghani Bijarani, learned advocate for PW Mst.Morezadi @ Zadi Khatoon is called absent, however, his associate/junior Mr.Muhammad Akram Menik is present. Mr.Ahmed Raza Sundrani, learned advocate for accused is present. Except PW Mst.Zadi @ Morezadi, no other PW is present, however, legal heir of the deceased/mother Mst.Malookan Khatoon is present, process issued against P.Ws return un-served by process server as per his endorsement. Case property is produced. Adjournment application submitted by PW Zadi Khatoon @ Morezadi. Order on it. Adj.granted. Case is adjourned to:28.11.2026, for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend on the date of hearing. Case property return back to SHO concerned with directions to be produced. Present PW also directed to attend on the date of hearing. Issue summons against official P.Ws except doctor. |
| 3 | SC (Murder Trial) 92/2021 | The State VS Javed Choliyani and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK),Abdul Ghani Bijarani(ADVO-71-SBC-KSH) | Ahmed Raza(ADVO-355 -SBC-KSH) | PPC-302,PPC-337-H | 1/2021 Karampur |
Case is called. Accused Javed Choliyani is present on bail. While remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Abdul Ghani Bijarani, learned advocate for complainant is present. Mr.Ahmed Raza Sundrani, learned advocate for accused is present. Except complainant Mst.Zadi @ Morezadi Khatoon and PW Mst.Malookan, no other P.W is present, process issued against rest P.Ws return un-served by process server as per his endorsement. Case property is produced. Adjournment application submitted by the complainant. Order on it. Adj.granted. Case is adjourned to:28.11.2026, for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend on the date of hearing. Case property return back to SHO concerned with directions to be produced. Complainant and present PW are also directed to attend on the date of hearing. Issue summons against official P.Ws. |
| 4 | SC (Murder Trial) 27/2023 | The State VS ShahNawaz & others | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-KSH),Deedar Ali Bangwar(ADVO-198-SBC-KSH) | Ahmed Raza(ADVO-355 -SBC-KSH),Nazar Muhammad(ADVO-439-SBC-KSH) | PPC-302 | 11/2022 Bhittai Colony |
Case is called. Accused Shah Nawaz and Hairoo are present on bail. While remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Deedar Ali Bangwar, learned advocate for complainant is present. Mr.Saeed Ahmed B.Bijarani, learned advocate of accused is present. Complainant Muhammad Ramzan, P.Ws Ghulam Nabi and Abdul Razzaque are also present in the Court. Case property is produced by the SHO concerned. Case proceeded. D/O PW Abdul Razzaque recorded at Ext.21. He produced his statement u/s 164, Cr.P.C at Ext.21/A. However, his cross examination kept reserved at the request of learned defense counsel. At the request of learned defense counsel, instant Case put off to.25.11.2026, for evidence/further examination-in-chief of complainant, PW Ghulam Nabi & cross examination of PW Abdul Razzaque. Present accused are directed to attend on the date of hearing. Case property return back to concerned SHO with directions to be produced. Complainant and present private PWs are directed to attend on the date of hearing. |
| 5 | SC (Murder Trial) 153/2025 | The State VS Rahib Suhriyani | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Saeed Ahmed Bangwar() | PPC-302,PPC-311,PPC-34 | 7/2025 B-Section Kandhkot |
Case is called. Accused Rahib Suhriyani is produced in custody by Jail Authority District Prison Shikarpur, through online video link. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr.Deedar Ali Bangwar, learned advocate for accused is present. I.O/SIP Muhammad Ayoub, Mir Hazar, the well conversant of late tapedar Ghulam Akbar and PW Waqar Ali are also present, process issued against rest P.Ws return un-served by the process serer as per his endorsement. Case property is produced. Case proceeded. D/O I.O/SIP Muhammad Ayoub recorded at Ext.14. He produced all the relevant DD entries and other relevant documents at Ext.14/A to 14/K respectively. D/O Mir Hazar, the well conversant of late tapedar Ghulam Akbar Sundrani recorded at Ext.15. He produced sketch of place of incident at Ext.15/A. D/O PW Waqar Ali also recorded at Ext.16. Case put off to:21.11.2026, for evidence. The accused is produced by the Jail Authority concerned through an online video link and shall also be produced on the next date of hearing, through online video link. Case property return back to concerned PS with directions to be produced. Issue summons against WPC Akbar Ali Chandio and WMO Eikta Bai. |
| 6 | SC (Murder Trial) 53/2026 | The State VS Sadique Khoso and others | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Muhammad Siddique(ADVO-236-SBC-KSH) | PPC-302 | 139/2025 B-Section Kandhkot |
Case is called. Accused Sadique Khoso is produced in custody by J/A District Prison Shikarpur, through online video link. While remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Muhammad Siddique Bangwar, learned advocate for accused on State expenses is present. PW/PC Barkat Ali and tapedar Akhtiar Ahmed are present in the Court. Case property is produced. Let the Case be proceeded. D/o of PC Barkat Ali is recorded at Ex-17. D/o of tapedar Akhtiar Ahmed is recorded at Ex-18, he produced sketch of place of incident at Ex-18/A. Thereafter, side close statement submitted by learned ADPP at Ext.19. Order on it. Filed. Case put off to:16.11.2026, for recording statement of accused u/s 342, Cr.P.C. The accused named above is produced by the Jail Authority concerned through online video link and shall also be produced on the next date of hearing, through online video link. |
| 7 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 29/2026 | Farooque Ahmed Ogahi VS Abdul Hakeem and others | Saeed Ahmed Khan Bijarani(ADVO-176-SBC-KSH) | Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-317-SBC-KSH),Muhammad Qasim Khan (ADVO-12524-SBC-MLR) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3/4 illegal Dispossession Act | / |
Direct Complaint of Illegal Dispossession Act is called. Complainant Farooque Ahmed Ogahi is present alongwith his learned counsel Mr.Saeed Ahmed B.Bijarani. Witness Zahoor Ahmed is called absent, while Mukhtiarkar Kandhkot namely Abdul Ghani, enquiry officer/ASI Muhammad Inam and mashir Noor Nabi are also present. Accused Abdul Hakeem, Ali Sher, Shamasuddin, Akhtiar Ali, Rashid Ali and Iftikhar Ali are present on bail. Mr.Muhammad Qasim Khan Marheto, learned advocate for all the present accused except accused Rashid Ali is present. Mr.Imtiaz Ali Ogahi, learned advocate for accused Rashid Ali also present. Matter proceeded. D/O Mukhtiarkar Kandhkot namely Abdul Ghani recorded at Ext.5. He produced enquiry reports alongwith its annexures at Ext.5/A to 5/F respectively. D/O enquiry officer/ASI Muhammad Inam Lashari recorded at Ext.6. He produce his enquiry report alongwith its annexures at Ext.6/A. D/O mashir Noor Nabi also recorded at Ext.7. Thereafter, adjournment application submitted by learned advocate of accused. Order on it. Adj.granted. Direct Complaint put off to.21.11.2026, for evidence/Cross examination. Present accused are directed to attend on the date of hearing. Complainant and present PWs are also directed to attend on the date of hearing. |
| 8 | SC (Murder Trial) 183/2026 | The State VS Shakal Mazari and others | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-KSH),Parvez Ahmed(ADVO-13855-SBC-KHS),Sher Ali(ADVO-1033-SBC-KMB) | Abdul Fahim(ADVO-356-SBC-KSH) | PPC-114,PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-302,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fii,PPC-337-L,PPC-506 | 9/2026 Kashmore |
Case is called. Accused Shakal & Fouj Ali are produced in custody by J/A District Prison Shikarpur, through online video link. Accused Shah Nawaz is present on bail. While remaining accused namely Jamsher, Sharbat, Ganj Ali, Mehboob and Sijawal are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Muhammad Murad Chachar, learned advocate for accused Shah Nawaz is present. Mr.Abdul Faheem Thaheem, learned advocate for accused Shakal and Fouj Ali is called absent. Mr.Sher Ali Mazari, learned advocate for complainant also is present. Except complainant Sijawal Khan, no other PW is present, process issued against P.Ws return un-served by the process server as per his endorsement. Case property is produced by the SHO concerned. Adjournment application submitted by the complainant. Order on it. Adj.granted. Case is adjourned to:26.11.2026, for evidence/further examination-in-chief of complainant Sijawal Khan and PW/mashir Altaf Hussain. Jail Authority concerned informed accordingly to produce the custody of accused Shakal and Fouj Ali on the next date of hearing, through online video link. Present accused Shah Nawaz is directed to attend on the date of hearing. Complainant also directed to attend on the date of hearing and ensure the attendance of his witnesses. Case property return back to concerned PS with directions to be produced. Time of process against rest P.Ws extended to process server for execution and return. |
| 9 | SC (Murder Trial) 413/2026 | The State VS Papu Khan Sundrani & Ors | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Mir Muhammad Sundrani() | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-302,PPC-311 | 16/2026 Ghora Ghat |
Case is called. Accused Papoo Khan Sundrani is present on bail, while remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Ashique Illahi Sundrani, learned advocate for accused is present. Except complainant/HC Altaf Ahmed and PC Barkat Ali, no other P.W is present, process issued against rest P.Ws return un-served by the process server as per his endorsement. Case property is produced. Case proceeded. D/o of PW-PC Barkat Ali recoded at Ext-12, he produced the relevant three R.Cs No.36,37 & 38 at Ext.12/A to 12/C respectively. At the request of learned defense counsel, instant Case is adjourned to:04-12-2026, for evidence/Cross examination of complainant & PW/PC Mansab Alli. Accused is directed to attend on the date of hearing. Case property return back to concerned PS with directions to be produced. Complainant is directed to attend. Process against reset P.Ws extended and handed over to process server for execution. Issue summons against I.O/SIP Nangar Ali Soomro. |
| 10 | SC (Murder Trial) 426/2026 | The State VS Ghulam Rasool @ Banho Mahamdani & Ors | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-369HC-SBC-KSH) | PPC-337-Fi,PPC-396,PPC-397,PPC-398 | 152/2026 A-Section Kandhkot |
Case is called. Accused Ghulam Rasool @ Banhon and Abdul Ghaffar @ Hasnain are produced in custody by Jail Authority District Prison Shikarpur, through online video link. While accused Bakhtiar is absconder and already declared as P.O. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr.Zulfiqar Ali Chachar, learned advocate for accused is called absent, however, his associate/junior Mr.Abdul Ghaffar Bangwar is present. Complainant/ASI Sukhio Khan, PW/PC Dilshad Ahmed, PC Barkat Ali and PW Aneel Kumar Hindu are also present in the Court, process issued against rest P.Ws return un-served by the process server as per his endorsement and same is extended to him for execution. Case property is produced. Adjournment application submitted by associate of learned defense counsel. Order on it. Adj.granted. Case put off to: 26.11.2026, for evidence. The accused named above are produced by the Jail Authority concerned through an online video link and shall also be produced on the next date of hearing, through online video link. Case property return back to concerned PS with directions to be produced. Complainant and present P.Ws are directed to attend on the date of hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 11 | Application u/s 491 CrPc 670/2026 | Tillan @ Shabir Ahmed Sundrani VS SHO PS Ghouspur and others | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
R & Ps of instant Crl.Misc.application u/s 491-A Cr.P.C received by this Court from Honourable Sessions Judge/Justice of peace, Kashmore @ Kandhkot by way of transfer for its disposal according to law. Matter is already fixed for today, therefore, called. Petitioner Tillan @ Shabir Ahmed Sundrani is present in person. Vakalatnama filed by Mr.Ubedullah Sundrani, advocate on behalf of petitioner. Order on it. Filed. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Reports received by this Court from SHO concerned and Raid Commissioner. Order on it. Filed. Arguments heard from both the sides. Order also passed, signed and announced in open Court. For the reasons to be recorded, the alleged detainee has been legally arrested in the FIR No.70/2026 u/s 324 PPC of PS Ghouspur, therefore, the purpose of the present application stands served. Accordingly, the application is disposed of in view of the above terms. |
| 12 | Application u/s 491 CrPc 671/2026 | Abbas Ali Dahani VS SHO PS Ghouspur and others | Qudratullah (ADVO-54608-SBC-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 13 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 659/2026 | Fateh Din Ogahi VS SHO PS Karampur/Jamal and others | Fazal Muhammad(ADVO-323-SBC-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Crl.Misc.application u/s 22-A,B (6) Cr.P.C is called. Petitioner Fatehuddin Ogahi is present alongwith his learned counsel Mr.Fazal Muhammad Jakhrani. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Proposed accused No.1 is present alongwith his learned counsel Mr.Ahmed Raza Sundrani. Arguments heard from both the sides. Order also passed, signed and announced in open Court. For the reasons to be recorded, instant petition is hereby dismissed. However, the petitioner, if so advised, is at liberty to file a Direct Complaint (D.C) before the competent Court of jurisdiction having territorial jurisdiction over the matter. |
| 14 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 664/2026 | Keharuddin Bhutto VS SHO PS Miani at Badani and others | Munir Ahmed M. Bijarani(ADVO-294-SBC-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Crl.Misc.application u/s 22-A,B (6) Cr.P.C is called. Petitioner Keharuddin Bhutto is called aabsent, while his learned counsel Mr.Munir Ahmed Bijarani is present. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Proposed accused No.3 is present and filed written reply. Order on it. Filed. Reports received by this Court from SHO concerned and DSP complaint Cell, Kashmore @ Kandhkot. Order on it. Filed. Arguments heard from both the sides. Order also passed, signed and announced in open Court. For the reasons to be recorded, instant petition is hereby dismissed. However, the petitioner, if so advised, is at liberty to file a Direct Complaint (D.C) before the competent Court of jurisdiction having territorial jurisdiction over the matter |
| 15 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 667/2026 | Fattah Din Bahalkani VS SHO PS B/Section Kandhkot and others | Nazar Muhammad(ADVO-439-SBC-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Crl.Misc.application u/s 22-A,B Cr.P.C is called. Petitoner Fatehuddin Bahalkani is present alongwith his learned counsel Mr.Nazar Muhammad Bahalkani. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Vakalatnama filed by Mr.Mahmood Asad Sabzoi, advocate on behalf of proposed accused No.1. Order on it. Filed. Written reply filed by learned advocate of proposed accused No.1. Order passed on it. At the request of learned advocate of petitioner, instant petition put off to.13.11.2026, for arguments/further proceedings. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 16 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 247/2011 | The State VS Hakim Ali Bijarani and others | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Saeed Ahmed Khan Bijarani(ADVO-176-SBC-KSH) | Hudood Ordinances-17/3 | 112/2008 Karampur |
Case is called. Accused Hakim Ali is present on bail. The case against co-accused Tagio and Mehrab was already kept in abeyance by this Court, vide order dated 23.05.2013. While remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Saeed Ahmed B.Bijarani, learned advocate for the accused is present. No P.W is present. Supplementary challan against the present accused already received by this Court. Copies of necessary case papers supplied to the present accused under proper receipt at Ext.08. Seven days time waive application submitted by learned advocate of accused with prayer to frame the charge against the present accused today, such application keep on record at Ext.09. Order on it. Allowed, let formal charge against the present accused also framed at Ext.10, his plea also recorded at Ext.10/A, to which present accused pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Case put off to:25.11.2026, for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend on the date of hearing. Issue summons against complainant and all the P.Ws, so also call for case property, if any. |
| 17 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 248/2011 | The State VS Hakim Ali Bijarani and others | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | Saeed Ahmed Khan Bijarani(ADVO-176-SBC-KSH) | Hudood Ordinances-17/3 | 113/2008 Karampur |
Case is called. Accused Hakim Ali Bijarani is present on bail. The case against co-accused Tagio, Mehrab and Bakhtiaro has already been kept in abeyance by this Court, vide orders dated 23.05.2013 & 26.12.2022. While remaining accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Saeed Ahmed B.Bijarani, learned advocate for the accused is present. No P.W is present. Supplementary challan against the present accused already received by this Court. Copies of necessary case papers supplied to the present accused under proper receipt at Ext.18. Seven days time waive application submitted by learned advocate of accused with prayer to frame the charge against the present accused today, such application keep on record at Ext.19. Order on it. Allowed, let formal charge against the present accused also framed at Ext.20, his plea also recorded at Ext.20/A, to which present accused pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Case put off to:25.11.2026, for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend on the date of hearing. Issue summons against complainant and all the P.Ws, so also call for case property, if any. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 18 | SC (Murder Trial) 564/2026 | The State VS Ghulam Rasool @ Goro Lolai & Others | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KSH) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-114,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-302,PPC-324,PPC-337-Fii,PPC-337-Fiii,PPC-337-H | 2/2026 Jangin |
R & Ps of instant case received by this Court from the Court of Honourable Sessions Judge, Kashmore @ Kandhkot by way of transfer for its disposal according to the law. Matter is already fixed for today, therefore, called. All the accused accused are absconders and already declared as P.Os. Mr.Gahi Khan Bangwar, learned ADPP for the State is present. No P.W is present. Case is adjourned to:20.11.2026, for evidence u/s 512, Cr.P.C. Issue summons against complainant and all the P.Ws, so also call for case property. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 19 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 9/2026 | Ubedullah Sundrani VS Shahban and others | Mir Muhammad Sundrani() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3/4 illegal Dispossession Act,illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 5 | / |
Direct Complaint of Illegal Dispossession Act is called. Complainant Ubedullah Sundrani is present alongwith his learned counsel Mr.Mir Muhammad Sundrani. Proposed accused are also present. Vakalatnama filed by Mr.Bashir Ahmed Channa, advocate on behalf of present proposed accused. Order on it. Filed. During arguments, learned counsel for the complainant offered that if the proposed accused undertook not to dispossess the complainant in future and stated that they are not in possession of the disputed land, the complainant would not press this complaint. Accordingly, the proposed accused Nos.1 & 2 filed a statement disclaiming any connection with, interest in, or possession over the disputed land. Order on it. Filed. Upon filing of the said statement, learned counsel for the complainant submitted a statement praying that the complaint be disposed of accordingly, with permission to file a fresh complaint if required. Order on it. Filed. Heard. Order also passed, signed and announced in open Court. For the reasons to be recorded, the complaint is disposed of as not pressed, on the basis of the statements filed by the parties. The complainant is at liberty to file a fresh complaint, if so required, in accordance with law. The parties are at liberty to approach the competent forum for the determination of their rights, including those arising from the lease. The complaint stands disposed of in the above terms. |