| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 64/2026 | Shoukat Ali Abbasi VS The State | Zareen Dua (ADVO-6728-SBC-HYD) | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-THT) | Cr.PC-498 | 136/2025 Jati |
Bail application called. Accused Shoukat Ali is present on interim bail along with his advocate Mr. Aizaz Hussaini. I.O ASI Khan Mohammad Magsi is present, however, complainant Fida Jat called absent. Therefore, office is directed to issue notice to the complainant. I.O is also directed to serve notice upon complainant. Matter put on 09.02.2026 for confirmation or otherwise. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 2 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 8/2025 | Dhani Bux Jatoi VS Sonharo Chandio & Others | Muhammad Hanif (ADVO-250-SBC-JMS) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3,illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 5 | / |
I.D complaint called. Complainant Dhani Bux is present along with his advocate Mr. Lal Bux Jatoi. However, accused called absent. The accused Soonharo called absent without intimation. Office is directed to issue BWs against accused through SHO of PS Jhoke Shareef with directions to the SHO to produce accused on 23.02.2026. Matter put on 23.02.2026 for service. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 3 | SC (Murder Trial) 114/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Ibrahim Lund and Others | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-THT) | PPC-302 | 57/2025 Jati |
Case called. Accused Usman, Ibrahim, Yaqoob, Sajan, Adam and Sohrab are present in judicial custody produced by district prison Thatta. Accused Sain Bux and Khair Mohammad are declared as proclaimed offenders. Mr. Shabbir Ahmed Kumbhar filed vakalatnama on behalf of accused Sohrab, however advocate for remaining accused called absent and even advocate was not engaged by remaining accused. Complainant Shoukat Ali is present. Matter put on 19.02.2026 for framing of formal charge. Jail authorities are directed to produce accused persons with strong police escort on next date of hearing. |
|
| 4 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 49/2025 | The State VS Usman Lund | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-THT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 84/2025 Jati |
Case called. Accused Usman produced from district Jail Thatta.Accused didn't engage counsel yet.ADPP is present. Put off to..............19-02-2026 for charge frame.Accused remanded back to custody with direction to produce accused physically with strong Police Escort on next date of hearing. |
|
| 5 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 51/2025 | The State VS Yaqoob Lund | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-THT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 65/2025 Jati |
Case called. Accused Yaqoob Lund produced from district Jail Thatta. Accused didn't engage counsel yet.ADPP is present. Put off to.............. 19-02-2026 for charge frame. Accused remanded back to custody with direction to produce accused physically with strong Police Escort on next date of hearing. |
|
| 6 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 50/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Ibrahim Lund | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-THT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 64/2025 Jati |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Ibrahim Lund produced from district Jail Thatta.Accused didn't engage counsel yet.ADPP is present. Put off to..............19-02-2026 for charge frame.Accused remanded back to custody with direction to produce accused physically with strong Police Escort on next date of hearing. |
|
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 52/2025 | The State VS Sajjand alias Gana | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-THT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 67/2025 Jati |
Case called. Accused Sajjan alias Gana produced from district Jail Thatta.Accused didn't engage counsel yet.ADPP is present.Put off to..............19-02-2026 for charge frame.Accused remanded back to custody with direction to produce accused physically with strong Police Escort on next date of hearing. |
|
| 8 | SC (Murder Trial) 116/2025 | The State VS Rasool Bux and Others | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-THT) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-302,PPC-324 | 70/2025 Jati |
Case called. Accused Akber, Rasool Bux, Murtaza and Mohammad Mallah produced from district prison Thatta. Accused Juman, Kareem, Ali Ahmed and Nawaz already declared proclaimed offender. Complainant Hamzo is present along with his advocate Mr. Abdul Qadir Khaskheli. The accused did not engage their advocate and requested for time, therefore, case is adjourned to 21.02.2026 for framing of formal charge. Jail authorities are directed to produce accused persons with strong police escort on next date of hearing. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 9 | PPC 117/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Chandio & others | DDPP(DDPP-0001-GOV-THT) | Shabir Ahmed(ADVO-102-SBC-THT) | PPC-34,PPC-397 | 143/2025 Mirpur Bathoro |
Case called. Accused Mohammad Chandio produced from district prison Badin, Mr. Ghulam Shabbir Kumbhar advocate for accused is present. Accused abdul latif zour is present on bail. Statements of both accused recorded required under section 342 Cr.P.C as Ex. 16 and 17 respectively. Heard arguments. Both accused acquitted under section 265-H(i) Cr.P.C. Accused Mohammad Chandio remanded to judicial custody. Office is directed to issue such release order. The bail bond of accused latif is cancelled and surety discharged. Case disposed off accordingly. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 10 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 54/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Chandio | DDPP(DDPP-0001-GOV-THT) | Shabir Ahmed(ADVO-102-SBC-THT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A ,SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 155/2025 Mirpur Bathoro |
Case called. Accused Mohammad Chandio produced from district prison Badin, Mr. Ghulam Shabbir Kumbhar advocate for accused is present. Heard arguments. Accused acquitted under section 265-H(i) Cr.P.C. Accused Mohammad Chandio remanded to judicial custody. Office is directed to issue such release order. Case disposed off accordingly. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 40/2025 |
Muhammad Umer Otho and Others VS Province of Sindh and Others | Abdul Qadir(ADVO-2-SBC-SUJ) | Civil appeal called. Appellant No:02 & attorney of rest appellants called absent, their Counsel is present. Process returned unserved. DDA, Respondents 01 to 05,07,13 & 14 & official respondents called absent. Matter adjourned to.........24-02-2026 for for filing objections of Respondents 01 to 05,07,13 & 14. Repeat Process against Respondents 06,09,10,11 & 12 through bailiff & TCs on Cost. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 24/2025 |
Allahwarayo Rind VS Province of Sindh & Others | Mir Muhammad Jamali(ADVO-67-SBC-THT) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant is present but his counsel called absent. Respondents No: 01 to 03 already served but called absent. DDA called absent. Respondent No:04 Shajahan & being attorney of Respondent No:05 to 09 & 11 to 19 are present along with his counsel. Put off to..................28-02-2026. For W.S/Objection of respondents No: 01 to 09 & 11 to 19/hearing on application on application under ORDER 22 Rule IV CPC. |
|||