| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 438/2026 | Lal Bux Zour @ Lala Zour VS The State | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-THT) | Cr.PC-498 | 119/2026 Sujawal |
Bail application called. Accused is present on bail along with his advocate. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Heard both sides. The bail granted to accused/applicant on 23.06.2026 by this court is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions. Accused is directed to join the learned trial court accordingly. Order passed and announced in open court and on separate sheet. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 2 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 270/2026 | Kirshan Kachi Kohli VS SSP Sujawal & Others | Kashif Ali(ADVO-52980-SBC-SUJ) | DDPP(DDPP-0001-GOV-THT) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Matter called. Both parties are present along with their respective advocates. Heard. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case, and in order to ensure transparency, fairness and impartiality, the Senior Superintendent of Police, District Sujawal, is directed to entrust the matter to a police officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP), who shall conduct a fair, impartial and comprehensive inquiry into the allegations levelled in the petition. The inquiry officer shall associate all concerned parties, examine the relevant record and evidence, afford reasonable opportunity of hearing to both sides, and thereafter submit his findings to the competent police authority. Upon receipt of such findings, the competent police officer shall proceed strictly in accordance with law and, if the inquiry discloses commission of a cognizable offence, take appropriate legal action without being influenced by any observation made in this order. Order passed and announced in open court and on separate sheet. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 4/2026 | The State VS Guli Baran & Others | ADPP(ADPP-0001-GOV-THT) | PPC-34,PPC-394,PPC-397,PPC-511 | 128/2025 Jati |
Case called. Accused Gul Mohamamd alias Gulli Baran called absent without intimation or an application nor his advocate has attended the court, despite the matter called repeatedly. Accued Kareem Bux and Nazeer have already been declared proclaimed offenders earlier. No PW is present. As per record/diary sheets, on 05.05.2026, the accued Gul Mohamamd alias Gulli Baran has attended the court, however, on the subsequent dates of hearing, i.e. 19.05.2026 and 22.05.2026, the accused Gul Mohammad alias Gulli Baran did not attend the court nor today. Learned state counsel is present who submitted to recall the bail order, consequent thereupon, the accused Gul Mohammad alias Gulli Baran was released from Jail on 22.04.2026. Keeping in view the plea of learned state counsel. None appearance of accused Gul Mohammad alias Gulli Baran without intimation or an application on last two dates of hearing as well today, the bail of accused Gul Mohammad alias Gulli Baran stands cancelled and office is directed to issue NBW against him thrugh SHO concerned. Office is further directed to issue notice under sectin 514 Cr.P.C to his surety Wahid Bux through SHO concerned. Adjourned to 10.07.2026 for service of NBW and notice under section 514 Cr.P.C. Repeat BWs against complainant and PWs. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 4 | SC (Murder Trial) 99/2025 | The State VS Achar Chang | DDPP(DDPP-0001-GOV-THT),Imran Ali Shah(ADVO-50-SBC-SUJ) | PPC-302 | 77/2018 Jati |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 1/2026 |
Abdul Ghani Kandhro VS Harish Kumar | Shoukat Ali (ADVO-1552-SBC-HYD) | Case called. Plaintiff is present along with his advocate. Defendant appeared along with his advocate Mr. Ayaz Latif Palijo, filed vakalatnama. Order on it. File. Learned advocate for defendant filed application for leave to defend; application under order 37 rule 03 CPC and application under Order 7 rule 11 CPC. Order passed thereon. Notice(s) to other side. Learned advocate for plaintiff received copies of all three applications. With consent, matter is adjourned to 24.07.2026 for filing counter affidavits of all three applications. |
|||