| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 247/2026 | The State VS Sarfaraz & ohters | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-337-H | 11/2023 Faiz Muhammad Narejo |
Case called. Accused Allah Bux called absent. Advocate for the accused moved application for absence condone of accused Allah Bux. Order on it. Remaining accused have already declared as Proclaimed offenders. Learned ADPP for the state is present. No pw is present. Process issued which returned usnserved for want of time. Time extended. Case adjourned. Put off to 18-11-2026 for evidence. |
| 2 | PPC 890/2025 | The State VS Lutfullah and others | ADPP() | Abu Bakar(ADVO-2142-SBC-KHP) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-L,PPC-397 | 21/2025 Pirgoth |
Case called. Accused Lutufullah, Sachal, Riaz Ali & Muhammad Mattal @ Awais are present on bail. DA ADPP and advocate for the complainant present. Complainant present and examined at Ex.3 who produced relevant documents. PW Sikandar Ali present and examined at Ex.4. PW ASI Deedar Ali Shaikh present and examined at Ex.5 who produced relevant documents. No other PW present. Issue BW against remaining PWs. Put off to 14-11-2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 3 | PPC 965/2025 | The State VS Mujahid and others | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-355,PPC-397 | 28/2025 Pirgoth |
Case called. Accused Mujahid and Sikandar Ali are present on bail. Accused Allah Wassayo, Muhammad Ismail, Saleem, Aheem Bux and Mumtaz have already declared as P.O. DA and ADPP for the state are present. PW ASI Abdul Jabbar is present and examined at Ex.6. PWI.O SIP Imam Bux Mallah examined at Ex.7 who produced relevant documents at Ex.7/A to 7/D. Complainant Abbas Ali present and examined at Ex.8 who produced FIR t Ex.8/A. thereafter the complainant moved application mentioning therein that he do not want o exaine remaining witnesses. Order on it. Notice to ADPP. ADPP closed the side of the prosecution at Ex. 9. Statement of accused recorded at Ex.10 & 11 respectively. Heard arguments. Judgment passed and announced in he open court. Prsent accused Mujahid and Sikanadar including absconding accused persons are acquitted u/s 265-H(i) Cr.P.C. Accused Mujahid and Sikandar are present on bail, their bail bond stands cancelled and their surety discharged |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 4 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 90/2026 | The State VS Tanveer Ahmed | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 175/2025 Pirgoth |
Case called. Accused Tanveer Ahmed called absent. NBW against accused Tanveer Ahmed and notice against his surety issued. Process server present and returned process unserved. Time extended. ADPP is present Case adjourned. Put off to 18-11-2026 for service. |