CIVIL JUDGE & JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE II, LARKANA : 04-NOV-2025

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence
1 PPC 215/2019 The State VS Yar Muhammad ( Bashir Muhammad ) & others   ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK)     PPC-489-F,PPC-506 79/2017
Market (Larkana)

Case called. Accused Basheer Muhammad is present on bail. ADPP for the State is present.Advocate for complainant is present. B.Ws issued against P.Ws is returned partly served. Complainant Nizamuddin is present. Mr.Ghulam Yahya Bhutto advocate is present and he filed vakalatnama on behalf of accused Basheer Muhammad.Order on it. File. Both parties have filed a joint compromise application u/s 345(2) and 345(6) Cr.P.C a/w their affidavits. Order on it. Notice to ADPP for the State. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The application under Section 345(2) Cr.P.C is allowed and the accused person namely Basheer Muhammad, is hereby acquitted under Section 345(6) Cr.P.C. The accused is present on bail, his bail bond stands cancelled and surety is discharged. Applications and order are kept on record at ????????????????????????..Ex.16 to 18.

2 PPC 71/2025 The State VS Sara Amar and others   ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK),Ali Akbar Mangi(ADVO-963-SBC-DDU)   Abdul Samad(ADVO-6222-SBC-HYD)   PPC-489-F 69/2024
Civil Lines (Larkana)


22.11.2025

Case called. Accused Muhammad Shoaib is called absent under intimation. While accused Mst.Sara Amar is already declared as P.O. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for complainant is called absent. D.C for accused is called absent, while his junior associate is present and he filed application for excusing the absence of accused Muhammad Shoaib. Order on it. Absence condoned subject to medical documents. Summons issued against P.Ws is returned un-served. No P.W is present. Time extended and handedover to process server of P.S Civil Line. Put off to 22.11.2025 for evidence.

3 PPC 115/2025 The State VS Sajjad Mastoi   ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK)   Samadullah (ADVO-1858-SBC-LRK)   PPC-489-F 20/2025
Civil Lines (Larkana)


05.12.2025

Case called. Accused Sajad Mastoi is present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for complainant is present. Mr.Samadullah Mangi D.C for accused is present. Summons issued against P.Ws is returned partly served. Complainant Habibullah is present. Both complainant and accused person have submitted adjournment application a/w affidavits on ground that they are going on for compromise. Order on it. Granted. Put off to 05.12.2025 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Repeat summons against remaining P.Ws.

4 PPC 117/2025 The State VS Asadullah and othes   ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK)     PPC-489-F 67/2024
Civil Lines (Larkana)


22.11.2025

Case called. Accused Asadullah Barkat and Altanullah Barkat are called absent under intimation. While accused Amarullah Barkat, Shaistan, Kalsoom Barkat, Aisha Barkat, Muhammad Anwar, Amanullah and Muhammad Imran are already declared as proclaimed offenders. Advocate for complainant is called absent. D.C for accused is present and he submitted condonation application for absence of accused Assadullah and Altanullah. Order on it. Absence condoned as a last chance, no other chance will be given and subject to productions of diary of said Honourable court. B.W issued against surety Muhammad Tarique of accused Amarullah Barkat is returned un-served. Surety Muhammad Tarique of accused Amarullah Barkat is called absent. Summon issued againt P.Ws is returned partly served. No P.W is present. Put off to 22.11.2025 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. Repeat summons against P.Ws. Repeat B.W against surety Muhammad Tarique of accused Amarullah Barkat.

5 PPC 148/2025 The State VS Sabir Hussain Bhutto   ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK)   Sajjad Ali(ADVO-1610-SBC-LRK)   PPC-489-F 111/2025
Market (Larkana)


15.11.2025

Case called. Accused Sabir Hussain Bhutto is present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Mr.Sajjad Ali Jamarani D.C for accused is present. Summons issued against P.Ws is returned partly served. Complainant Khalid Ahmed is present. Mr.Irfan Ali Mirbahar advocate is present and he filed vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. Order on it. File. He also filed adjournment application. Order on it. Granted. Put off to 15.11.2025 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend.Time extended on summons and same is handedover to process server of PS Market.

6 PPC 243/2025 The State VS Mir Murtaza Tunio & others   ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK)   PPC-337-H,PPC-34,PPC-452,PPC-506-B 70/2025
Sachal (Larkana)

Case called. Accused Mir Murtaza Tunio, Ali Raza, Mahtab Kalhoro, Musawar Ali Shaikh are present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Summons issued against P.Ws is returned partly served. Complainant Danyal, P.Ws Ali Gul Tunio and ASI Muhammad Hassan are present. Case proceeded. Deposition of complainant Danyal is recorded at ??????????????????Ex.3. He produced copy of FIR at ??????????????????????????????????????????...Ex.3-A. Deposition of P.W Ali Gul is recorded at ???????????????????????????..Ex.4. Deposition of P.W ASI Muhammad Hassan is recorded at ???....Ex.5. He produced entry No.17 and 20, memo of visiting place of incident at Ex.5-A and 5-B. Complainant has filed statement for withdrawal from remaining witnesses. Order on it. Statement is kept on record at ?????????????????????????????????..??????.Ex.6. ADPP for the State has filed side close statement at ?????????..???.Ex.7. Statements of accused u/s 342 Cr.P.C of accused are recorded at Ex.8 to 11. Heard arguments. Judgment passed and announced in open court. Accused Mir Murtaza Tunio, Ali Raza, Mahtab Kalhoro, Musawar Ali Shaikh are acquitted u/s 245(i) Cr.P.C.Accused are present on bail, their bail bonds stand cancelled and sureties discharged. Judgment kept on record at ?????????????????????.?????????????????????..Ex.12.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments
7 PPC 191/2021 The State VS Shahzado Jatoi and others   ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK)   Shahbaz Ali (ADVO-2486-SBC-LRK)   PPC-337-H,PPC-506 27/2021
Ellahi Bux Siyal

Case called. Accused Shahzado Jatoi is present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. D.C for accused is present. Heard final arguments. Judgment passed and announced in open court. Accused Shahzado Jatoi is acquitted u/s 245(i) Cr.P.C. The accused is present on bail, his bail bond stands cancelled and surety discharged. Judgment kept on record at ?????????????????????.?????????????????????....???Ex.26.

8 PPC 163/2025 The State VS Muhammad Ali Chandio   ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK)   Tahir Hussain(ADVO-1669-SBC-LRK)   PPC-379 6/2025
Railway (Larkana)


06.11.2025

Case called. Accused Muhammad Ali Chandio is present on bail. Prosecutor of Railway is present. D.C for accused is present. Heard partly arguments. Put off to 06.11.2025 for further arguments. Present accused is directed to attend.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce
9 PPC 230/2025 The State VS Haq Nawaz Kakepoto   ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK)     PPC-489-F 26/2025
Civil Lines (Larkana)

Case called. Accused Haq Nawaz Kakepoto is absconder.ADPP for the State is present. Today case is fixed for appearance of accused, but he failed to appear before this court. Accused Haq Nawaz Kakepoto is hereby declared as P.O. Order passed and announced in open court. The case against accused Haq Nawaz Kakepto be kept on dormant file till his arrest, appearance or surrender himself before the court. The directions be given to SIO to submit the report at the ends of every three months. Order kept on record at ????????????????????????????????????.???????????????...Ex.4.

CIVIL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications
1 C. Misc. Appl. (Civil Misc. Applications) 19/2025
Mst.Rizwana VS Ali Raza   Irshad Ali Chandio(ADVO-712-SBC-LRK)   Abdul Ghani (ADVO-1459-SBC-LRK)

Misc. application filed by advocate for defendant/J.D is called. Defendant/J.D Ali Raza is called absent. Advocate for defendant/J.D is called absent, while his junior partner advocate is present. Advocate for plaintiff/D.H is present. Order passed and announced in open court.Application is dismissed.

FAMILY JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence
1 F.S. (Family Suits) 616/2025 Mst. Iram Mirbahar VS Rashid Ali Arbani   Tahir Hussain(ADVO-1669-SBC-LRK)   Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article

11.11.2025

Family Suit called. Plaintiff Mst.Iram is present. P.W Dilshad Ali is also present. Advocate for plaintiff is present. Defendant Rashid Ali is present. Advocate for defendant is called absent. Plaintiff Mst.Iram and P.W Dilshad Ali have submitted affidavit in evidence. Order thereon. Copy to other side. Put off to 11.11.2025 for evidence.