| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 125/2025 | The State VS Hadi Bux and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | PPC-114,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-H,PPC-506-B | 69/2024 Lashari |
Case called. Accused Hadi Bux, Abdul Ghaffar and Allah Dino alias Pervaiz are present on bail. While accused Abdul Fatah has already declared as P.O. Learned ADPP is present. Mr: Saeed Ahmed Malgani advocate for accused is present and submitted Appln: U/S:249-A CR.P.C. Order thereon.Complainanat and P.W/Bilawal are Present and also submitted Appln: a/w affidavit for absence excuse of other P.Ws. Order thereon. Put off to 18.12.2025 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 2 | PPC 113/2025 | The state VS Asif and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | PPC-380,PPC-457 | 54/2025 Rato Dero |
Case called. Accused Asif Ali and Habibullah Junejo are present on bail. While the case of accused Gul Hassan and Adam is bifurcated from this case and they are declared as P.Os. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr: Inam Rehman Abro advocate for accused is present. Mr. Zamin Ali Jagirani advocate for complainant is called absent. Mr: Muhammad Rafique Luhur advocate for complainant is also called absent. P.WS/Raheem Bux, Yaseen and HC Hazar Hussain are present and bound down. Matter adjourned due to strike of advocates. Put off to 20.12.2025 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 3 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 108/2025 | State VS Abdul Qadir @ Kashif | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 49/2025 Kanga |
Case called. Accused Abdul Qadir @ Kashif is produced in custody from D.P. Larkana. DDPP for the state is present. This case is off shot of main case Crime No.40/2025 Kanga u/s 302 which is pending for initial formalities, hence this case is adjourned to 11-12.2025 for receipt. Produced accused sent back to custody. |
|
| 4 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 106/2025 | State VS Zakir Hussain Brohi | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 46/2025 Kanga |
Case called. Accused Zakir Hussain @ Ali Madad is produced in custody from D.P. Larkana. DDPP for the state is present. This case is off shot of main case Crime No.40/2025 Kanga u/s 302 which is pending for initial formalities, hence this case is adjourned to 11-12.2025 for receipt. Produced accused sent back to custody. |
|
| 5 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 138/2025 | State VS Mir Murtaza Mirjat | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 60/2025 Kanga |
Case called. Accused Mir Murtaza is produced in custody from D.P Larkana. DDPP for the state is present. This case is off shot of main case/Crime No:57/2025 of Kanga P.S but same is adjourned due to non completing of initial formalities, hence this case is also adjourned to 16.12.2025, for receipt. Produced accused sent back to custody. |
|
| 6 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 137/2025 | State VS Ghulam Mustafa Mirjat | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 59/2025 Kanga |
Case called. Accused Ghulam Mustafa is produced in custody from D.P Larkana. DDPP for the state is present. This case is off shot of main case/Crime No:57/2025 of Kanga P.S but same is adjourned due to non completing of initial formalities, hence this case is also adjourned to 16.12.2025, for receipt. Produced accused sent back to custody. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 55/2025 | The State VS Ghulam Sarwar Magsi & others | ADPP(ADPP-0002-GOV-THT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-337-A(iii),PPC-34,PPC-447,PPC-506-B | 19/2025 Hyderi(Larkana) |
Case called. Accused Ghulam Sarwar, Dil Murad and Ghulam Mustafa are present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Akeel Ahmed Bhutto advocate for the accused is called absent. Complainant is present. Mr. Akbar Ali Dahar D.C for complainant is called absent his junior partner is present. Matter adjourned due to strike of advocates. Put off to 11.12. 2025 for final arguments of advocate for accused. Present accused accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 8 | PPC 126/2025 | The State VS Faizal Jakhro and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | PPC-114,PPC-337-A(ii),PPC-337-Fi | 146/2024 Rato Dero |
Case called. Accused Faizal, Nazar Muhammad, Sallah and Sadam are present on bail granted by the Court of Honorable Additional Sessions Judge, Ratodero. Accused Ghazan is jumped away during trial his bail bond is already forfeited and he is declared as PO. Learned ADPP for the state is present. D.C for accused is present. Mr: Anam Rehman Abro advocate for accused Saddam is present. Complainant and P.Ws: Sanaullah and Amjad are present and bound down. Other P.Ws: are not in attendance. Matter adjourned due to strike of advocates. Put off to 15.12.2025 for evidence/hearing on appl, U/S 249-A Cr. P.C. Present accused are directed to attend. Surety of accused Ghazan is present and submitted reply of notice U/S:514 Cr. P.C. Order thereon. |
|
| 9 | PPC 145/2025 | State VS Ghulam Mustafa & others | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | PPC- 459 | 57/2025 Kanga |
Case Called. Accused Fayaz Ali and Masood Ahmed are present on interim pre-arrest bail. Accused 01. Ghulam Mustafa Mirjat, 02.Mir Murtaza Mirjat and 03. Rahib are produced in custody from D.P Larkana. While Taimor and Habibullah are shown as absconders in the challan sheet. Proclamation U/S:87 Cr. P.C issued against them which is returned as per endorsement of process server a/w mashirnama. Such statement of process serer is recorded at........Ex: No: 02 . He Produced such copy of Proclamation U/S: 87 Cr. P.C, Sharah. Mashirnamas and entries at.........Ex: No: 02/A to , respectively. Reply Proclamation U/S:88 Cr. P.C is received from the concerned Mukhtiarkar which is kept on record at??????.Ex: No: 03.Order passed. Let the absconding accused be declared as Proclaimed offenders. Order kept on record at??????..Ex: No: 04. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Advocate for accused is present. Subsequent report of accused Fayaz and Masood is also received from the concerned P.S. Order thereon. Put off to 16.12.2025 for receipt. Present accused are directed to attend. Produced accused sent back to custody. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 475/2025 | Mst. Saima Dewro VS Rashid Ali Dewro | Ahmed Bakhsh(ADVO-933-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff, and her witness Mst: Hameeda and her counsel Ahmed Bux Abro are called absent. Defendant is called absent mother of defendant is also called absent. Mr: Hizbullah Jokhio advocate of mother of defendant is called absent. Matter adjourned due to strike of advocates. Put off to 12.12.2025, for cross examination of plaintiff side. |
||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 623/2025 | Mst. Babira Mirani VS Ghulam Rasool Mirani | Atta Hussain (ADVO-1593-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff Mst. Babira is present and her counsel Mr. Atta Hussain Chandio is called absent his junior partner is present. Defendant is present his service is already held good vide order dted:16.10.2025 and he is also debarred from filling written statement. Mr:Bilawal Mithani advocate has filed Vakalatnama a/w Appln: U/O:9 rule 7 CPC a/w affidavit of defendant. Order passed and announced in open court. The said Appln: is hereby allowed. He has also submitted written statement a/w affidavit and original agreement. Order thereon. Both parties counsels has requested that pre-trial proceeding be held, which is held between the parties in the chamber of under signed. The Pre trill proceeding successful. |
||