| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 1 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 43/2026 | State VS Qalandar Bux | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 4/2026 Larkana (CTD) |
Case transferred to the court of Honorable Sessions Court, Larkana as the offence is exclusively triable by the court of Sessions. |
|
| 2 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 44/2026 | State VS Kamaluddin | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 5/2026 Larkana (CTD) |
Case transferred to the court of Honorable Sessions Court, Larkana as the offence is exclusively triable by the court of Sessions. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 32/2026 | State VS Mir Khan & an other | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | PPC-324,PPC-353 | 44/2025 Rasheed Waggan |
Case transferred to the court of Honorable Sessions Court, Larkana as the offence is exclusively triable by the court of Sessions. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 228/2026 | Mst. Sumaira Khatoon Awan VS Israr Ahmed Bhand | Sajjad Ali(ADVO-1610-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | The PJ is on casual leave. Family suit called. Plaintiff Mst. Sumaira & her counsel Mr. Sajjad Ali Jamarani are present. Process not issued against defendant due to non payment of cost. Repeat summon to defendant as already ordered. Put off to 11.05.2026, for Service. |
||
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 75/2026 | Muzaffar Ali Kalhoro VS Mst. Fahmeeda | Saleemullah(ADVO-987-SBC-LRK) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | The PO is on casual leave. Guardianship Application called. Applicant Muzafar and his counsel Mr. Saleemullah Abbasi are called absent. The opponent is called absent. Notice issued against opponent is returned unserved as per endorsement of the bailff. Repeat notice against to opponent as already ordered. Put off to 14.05.2026, for service. |
||
| 3 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 77/2026 | Mst. Najma Khatoon Chandio VS Abdul Ghaffar and ors | Ahsan Ali (ADVO-2557-SBC-LRK) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale | The PO is on casual leave. Guardianship Application called. Applicant Mst. Najma is present and her counsel Mr. Ahsan Ahmed Mari is called absent but his jr.partner advocate is present. Opponent Waqar is present. Process notice not issued against opponents due to non payment of costs. Repeat notice against remaining opponents as already ordered on cost of the applicant and call verification reports of documents from concerned deparments produced by the applicant. Put off to 14.05.2026, for service/reports. |
||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 244/2026 | Mst. Zakiya VS Irfan Ali Brohi | Muhammad Mithal (ADVO-2387-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | The PO is on casual leave. Family suit called. Plaintiff Mst. Zakia & her counsel are called absent. Process not issued against defendant for want of cost. Repeat summon to defendant as already ordered. Put off to 14.05.2026, for Service. |
||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 262/2026 | Mst. Bakhtawar Khajar VS Nadir Ali Abro | Mir Muhammad(ADVO-1449-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | The PO is on casual leave. The family suit called. Plaintiff Mst. Bakhtawar and his counsel are present. Notice issued against the defendant is returned served as per endorsemetnt of the bailiff. The defendant is present. Hence, Service against the defendant is hereby held good.Mr. Manzoor Ahmed Kalhoro advocate is present and he submitted vakalatnama on behalf of the defendant, WS, PS copy of divorce deed and objections to application u/s 17-A of family court act. Order thereon. Put off to 14.5.2026 for pre-trial. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 169/2026 | Mst. Razul Khatoon Katohar VS Ghulam Abbas Katohar | Mumtaz Ali(ADVO-1155-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | The PJ is on casual leave. Suit called. Plaintiff & her counsel are called absent but his clerk is present. The defendant is called absent. Mr. Ali Bux Mashori advocate is present and he filed vakalatnama on behalf of the defendant. Order on it. File. The service against the defendant is hereby held good. Put off to 12.5.2026 for WS. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 62/2026 | Fahad Hussain Soomro VS Mst. Sumaira @ Rida Fatima | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Jactitation of Marriage | The PO is on casual leave. Family Suit called. Plaintiff Fahad Hussain is called absent, his attorney Fida Hussain is present. His counsel Mr: Ghulam Murtaza Tunio is present. Defendant Mst: Sumaira is called absent and her witnesses are called absent. Mr: Adnan Ali Khero advocate for the defendant is present. Put off to 15.5.2026 for evidence/cross of the defendant side. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 8 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 60/2026 | Muhammad Ali Tunio VS Mst. Tabasum Tunio | Muhammad Murad(ADVO-1869-SBC-LRK) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 12,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody),The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | The PO is on casual leave. Guardianship Application called.Applicant Muhammasd Ali is called absent but his counsel Mr. Muhammad Murad Tunio is present. The service is already held good against the defendant. Opponent called absent. Mr. Arsalan Jatoi Advocate for opponent is called absent. Put off to 13.5.2026, for Objection |
||
| 9 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 3/2026 | Mst. Nazia VS Ali Dino | Tufail Ahmed(ADVO-2505-SBC-LRK) | Family Execution-Execution Application | The PO is on casual leave. Family Execution application called. DH/Plaintiff Mst. Nazia & her counsel are called absent. But his jr.partner is present. JD/defendant Ali Dino is called absent. The service against him is already held good. Put off to 14.5.2026 for objection. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 10 | F.S. (Family Suits) 70/2026 | Mst. Sumaira @ Rida Fatima VS Fahad Hussain Soomro | Irshad Ali Chandio(ADVO-712-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | The PO is on casual leave. Family Suit called. Plaintiff Mst. Sumera @ Rida Fatime is called absent. Counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendant is called absent. Attorney of defendant is present. Counsel for defendant is present. Put off to 15.5.2026 for pre-trial. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 11 | F.S. (Family Suits) 28/2026 | Mst. Sughran Chandio VS Nabi Bux Chandio | Mir Muhammad(ADVO-1449-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | The PO is on casual leave. Family Suit called. Plaintiff is present. Her counsel Mr. Mir Muhammad Bhagat is present. Defendant and his counsel Mr. Wakeel Ali Shaikh are present. The counsel for the defendant submitted statement to deposit the Rs.17500/- interim maintenance amount of minors. Order thereon. Put off to 15.5.2026 for evidence. |
||
| 12 | F.S. (Family Suits) 67/2026 | Mst. Yasmeen Dayo VS Mumtaz Ali Juj | Tasawar Mahdi Sayed(ADVO-1876-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | The PO is on casual leave. Family suit called. Plaintiff Mst. Yasmeen is called absent. Her attorney/witness Asif Ali is present. Mr. Hizbullah Jokhio advocate for plaintiff is called absent. Defendant Mumtaz is present. Mr. Sardar advocate for the defendant is present. Put off to 19.5.2026 for evidence. |
||
| 13 | F.S. (Family Suits) 129/2026 | Mst. Reshma Khatoon Tunio VS Ahmed Ali Kalhoro | Muhammad Azam Jaan(ADVO-51098-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article,Family Suit-Suit for recovery of Gold Ornaments | The PO is on casual leave. Family suit called. Plaintiff Reshma is present. Her counsel Mr. Muhammad Azam Dahar is present. Defendant is called absent. Mr. Ali Dino Abro advocate for the defendant is present. Put off to 15.5.2026, for evidence/cross of the plaintiff. |
||