| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 1 | (Prevention of Electronic crime Act, 2016) 79/2026 | State VS Muhammad Toufique Bozdar | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | Nooruddin(ADVO-1125-SBC-LRK) | PECA Act, 2016-U/S 20 (Offenses against dignity of a natural person),PECA Act, 2016-U/S 21 (Offenses against modesty of a natural person and minor),PECA Act, 2016-U/S 24 (Cyber Stalking),PPC-506-B | 3/2024 FIA Cyber Crime,Sukkur |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Rafique is present on bail. A.D legal called absent. Complainant called absent and her counsel is also absent. Put off to 05.09.2026, for Charge. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 82/2026 | State VS Zameer & others | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | Syed Jamal Shah (ADVO-1816-SBC-LRK) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-Fv,PPC-504 | 35/2026 Kanga |
Case called. Accused Zameer and Wahid Bux are present on bail. Advocate for accused present. While accused Muhammad Ibrahim Jagirani is absconding accused. Proclamation u/s 87 Cr.P.C issued returned. Statement of process server has recorded at Ex.........2. Proclamation u/s 88 Cr.P.C receive from concerned Mukhtiarkar at Ex.......3. Order passed on separate sheet at Ex.....4. Accused Muhammad Ibrahim son of Muhammad Hashim Jagirani is declared proclaimed offender. PS copy of case papers supplied to the accused Zameer and Wahid Bux. Put off to 04.09.2026, for Charge. Present accused Wahid Bux is directed to attend. Issue summons against the all P.Ws. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 471/2026 | Mst.Farzana VS Javed Soomro | Nadeem Ahmed(ADVO-821-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit is called. The plaintiff and her counsel Mr. Nadeem Ahmed Qureshi are present. Defendant called absent. Notice for publication issued. Counsel for the plaintiff filed statement along with copy of News paper in daily Awami Awaz. Order on it. File. Order passed on separate Sheet. Service of Defendant is hereby held good. Put off to 14.09.2026 for appearance/W.S. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 378/2026 | Mst. Waheeda Gadehi VS Abdul Rasool Gadehi | Sajjad Ali (ADVO-50905-SBC-KHS) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Plaintiff & her counsel are present. Defendant called absent. Service of defendant already held good. Defendant failed to filed W.S. Order passed on separate sheet. Defendant debarred. Advocate for plaintiff filed affidavit in exparte-evidence. Cross of plaintiff has recorded at Ex.... . Heard arguments. Judgment passed and announced in open Court at Ex..... . Ex-parte Decree be perpared. |
||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 467/2026 | Mst.Muskan Chandio VS Suhail Ahmed Chandio | Pardeep Kumar(ADVO-1067-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff called absent & her counsel is present. Defendant Suhail Ahmed is called absent. Counsel for the plaintiff filed withdrawal statement. Order passed on it. Suit of plaintiff is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. |
||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 490/2026 | Mst.Laila Korai VS Gada Hussain Korai | Tahira Parveen(ADVO-2057-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff and her counsel are present. Service held good. Defendant is present. Mr. Sajjad Ali Korkani advocate filed power on behalf of defendant. Order on it. File. Put off to 12.09.2026, for W.S. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 5 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 125/2026 | Sallar VS Mst. Najma and others | Ghulam Yasin Junejo(ADVO-907-SBC-LRK) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody),The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Guardianship Applicant called. Applicant & his counsel present. Opponents called absent & their no objections already filed . Family tree report already received from NADRA. Repots already received from U.C and SSP Larkana. Report not received from concerned Mukhtiarkar but intimation received for time. Time granted. Report not received from District Account Officer Larkana. Issue show cause notice to District Account Office Larkana (Treasury). Put off to 12.09.2026, for hearing/reports |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 513/2026 | Mst.Farzana VS Amjad Ali Mashori | Muhammad Bilal(ADVO-1657-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff and her counsel are present. Defendant and his counsel are present. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to 12.09.2026, for Pre-trial. |
||
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 524/2026 | Mst.Ghulam Fatima VS Imdad Ali Sangi | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Plaintiff called absent and her counsel is present. Defendant is present and his counsel are present. Service of defendant is already held good. Counsel for the plaintiff present and filed adj: application. Order on it. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to 08.09.2026, for pre-trial. |
|||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 8 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 122/2026 | Noor Muhammad Veesar VS Mst. Arbab Khatoon and others | Atta Hussain(ADVO-1582-SBC-LRK) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody),The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | G and ward application is called. Applicant is called absent but his counsel is present. opponents called absent. Verification reports already received from concerned U.C/NADRA. Report received from concerned Mukhtiarkar. Order on it. File. Clerk of the Mukhitarkar submitted the reply of show cause notice. Order on it. File. received Application u/s 32 rule 3 CPC already pending. Order passed on it. Allowed. Heard arguments. The Guardian ship application is hereby allowed. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 9 | F.S. (Family Suits) 393/2026 | Mst. Wafa Chandio VS Manzoor Ahmed @ Amjad Odho | Mumtaz Ali(ADVO-1155-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff Mst: Wafa Chandio & her counsel are present. Defendant called absent. Service of defendant is already held good. The defendant already debarred. Cross of plaintiff has recorded at Ex.... . Heard arguments. Judgment passed and announced in open Court at Ex.... . The suit of plaintiff is hereby disposed off . Decree be prepared. |
||
| 10 | F.S. (Family Suits) 392/2026 | Mst. Kiran VS Ali Hassan | Sabir Khan (ADVO-2420-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff & her counsel are present. Service of defendant has already held good. Defendant already debarred. Counsel for the plaintiff filed withdrawal statement. Order on it. The prayer of withdrawal regarding dower articles is hereby withdrawn with permission to file fresh. Cross of plaintiff has recorded at Ex.. . Heard arguments. Ex-parte Judgment passed and announced in open Court at Ex.... . The suit of plaintiff is hereby disposed off . Decree be prepared. |
||