| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 6/2026 | Maqsood Ahmed VS State | Munir Ahmed (ADVO-2609-SBC-LRK) | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-379 | 9/2026 Taluka(Larkana) |
Crl: Bail Appln: U/S:497 Cr. P.C Called. Advocate for applicant/accused is present. ADPP for the state is present.; Arguments heard from both side. Order passed and announced in open court. The bail of applicant/accused is hereby granted subject to furnishing one solvent surety in the sum of Rs:30000/-with P.R bond in the like amount. One Aarif Hussain sonof Basheer Ahmed bycaste Khuhawar has submitted affidavit a/w P.S. Copy of CNIC. He produced Original Special saving certificates in the sum of Rs:30000/-.He wants to stood surety for accused Maqsood Ahmed. Order on it. S.A before me on oath. Surety Provisionally accepted. Issue release writ. Such release letter sent to the concerned jail authority with directions to accused appear before this court on: 03 .03.2026. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 117/2024 | The State VS Khadim Hussian and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Muhammad Bachal s/o Muhammad Ramzan Mangi() | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 63/2024 Lashari |
Case called. Accused Khadim Hussain and Afsar Ali are present on bail. While accused Kashif has already declared as P.O. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Advocate for the accused is present and submitted Appln: U/S:249-A CR.P.C. Order on it. Notice to other side. Mr. Muhammad Bachal advocate for complainant is called absent. Complainant and other P.Ws are called absent. Put off to 25.02.2026, for evidence/hearing on Appln: U/S:249-A Cr. P.C. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 3 | PPC 101/2025 | State VS Rashid Ali @Gudoo and others | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 39/2025 Kanga |
Case called. Accused Rashid @ Guddo, Imran Ali, Sajid Ali and Muhammad Azeem are Present on bail. Accused Mumtaz Ali, is called absent under intimation. Co-accused Rashid @ Guddo has submitted Appln: a/w affidavit for absence excuse of accused. Order thereon. ADPP for the state is present. Mr: Abid Abdul Qadir Abro advocate for accused persons is called absent his junior partner is present and submitted adjournment Appln: Order on it. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. P.W/Khalil Rehman and ASI/Haji Khan are is present. Put off to 25.02.2026, for evidence/cross examination. Present accused are directed to attend |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 4 | Juv. Child Act (JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ORDINANCE) 12/2026 | State VS Feroz & others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Irshad Ali Abbasi (ADVO-2375-SBC-LRK) | Hudood Ordinances-3-4 | 1/2026 Darri |
Case called. Accused Feroz, Gul Baig, Waqar and Zahid Ali are Produced in custody from C.P larkana. Accused Irfan Ali is produced in custody from D.P larkana. ADPP for the state is present. Advocate for accused Irfan is present. Mr: Irshad Ali Abbasi advocate has filed separate Vakalatnamas on behalf of accused Feroz, Gul Baig, Waqar and Zahid Ali. Order passed thereon. File. Charge framed against the accused at........Ex:No:02. Plea of accused were recorded at........Ex:No:02/A to E, respectively. P.W/PC/Abdul Lateef is present and examined at.......Ex: No: 03. He produced such mashirnama at.......Ex: No: 03/A & B, respectively. P.W/HC Barkat Ali is present and examined at.......Ex: No: 04. He produced such R.C at.......Ex: No:04/A. P.W/WHC/Abdul Rasheed is present and examined at.......Ex: No: 05. He produced such entry at...... .Ex:No:05/A. Other P.Ws: are not in attendance. Issue NBWs against them. Put off to 25.02.2026, for evidence. Produced accused sent back to custody. Issue NBWs against R.P.Ws: |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 57/2026 | Mst. Zoya Bhatti VS Sajjad Ali Bhatti | Ghulam Khudeja() | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family Suit called. Plaintiff Mst:Zoya and her counsel Mr: Ghulam Khudeja are present and submitted Appln: U/S:5 rule 20 CPC a/w affidavit of plaintiff. Order on it. Allowed. Defendant Sajjad Ali is not yet served. Issue notice against the defendant through Publication Awami Awaz. Put off to 05.03.2026 for service through publication. |
||
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 22/2026 | Ashfaque Ali Jalbani VS Imtiaz Ali and others | Ghulam Mujtaba (ADVO-2514-SBC-LRK) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | G and Ward application called. Applicant Ashfaque is called absent. His counsel Mr. Ghulam Mujtaba is present. The opponents are called absent. Notice was issued against the opponents which is returned partly served as per endorsement of the bailiff. Letter No.Judicial-I/039 dated 06.1.2026 was received from Sr. Supt. CP Larkana a/w application of confined opponent No.1 Imtiaz Ali is produced from D.P larkana. Report received from the Mukhtiarkar larkana. Order on it. File. Repoirt from NADRA office not yet received. Issue show cauce notice to Incharge NADRA office larkana. Put off to 27.02.2026 for service of opponent No.2/objection of opponent No.1. |
||
| 3 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 25/2026 | Mst. Raheela Bhutto VS Kamran Ali Bhuto | Ahmed Bakhsh(ADVO-933-SBC-LRK) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody),The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | |||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 4 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 8/2025 | Mst. Shazia VS Mehtab Ali | Atta Hussain (ADVO-1593-SBC-LRK) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family execution called. Plaintiff and her counsel are called absent his junior partner is present and submitted statement a/w receipt of registered A/D. Order thereon. Defendant/J.D not yet served. Repeat notice against him as already ordered. Put off to 04.03.2026, for service. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 849/2025 | Bibi Sadora Shah VS Syed Madah Hussain Shah | Nadeem Ahmed(ADVO-821-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff Mst. Sadora is present and his counsel Mr. Nadeem Ahmed Qureshi is also present. Defendant Sayed Madah Hussain Shah is served through publication his service is already held good on: 10.02.2026 and he is already debarred from filling written statement. Plaintiff re-called and re-affirmed and her cross examination is recorded. Final arguments heard. Judgment passed and announced in open court. The suit of plaintiff is hereby exparte decreed. Judgment & decree kept on record at........Ex:No: & . |
||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 866/2025 | Mst. Soni VS Asif Ali Sonari Baloch | Munawar Abbas (ADVO-52718-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family Suit Called. UTP/Plaintiff Mst: Soni produced in custody from dar-ul-aman Larkana. Mr: Munwar Abbass Chandio advocate for plaintiff is present. Defendant is served through Publication but he is called absent without any intimation. The service upon defendant is already held good on:17.02.2026. Order passed on ORDER SHEET. The defendant is debarred from filling written statement. Advocate for plaintiff has submitted affidavit in exparte proof. Put off to 28-02-2026 for final arguments. |
||
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 868/2025 | Mst. Naseeban VS Sachal Chandio | Munawar Abbas (ADVO-52718-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family Suit Called. UTP/Plaintiff Mst: Naseeban produced in custody from dar-ul-aman Larkana. Mr: Munwar Abbass Chandio advocate for plaintiff is present. Defendant is served through Publication but he is called absent without any intimation. The service upon defendant is already held good on:17.02.2026. Order passed on ORDER SHEET. The defendant is debarred from filling written statement. Advocate for plaintiff has submitted affidavit in exparte proof. Put off to 28-02-2026 for final arguments |
||
| 8 | F.S. (Family Suits) 867/2025 | Mst. Hajani VS Ali Muhammad Magsi | Munawar Abbas (ADVO-52718-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family Suit Called. UTP/Plaintiff Mst: Hajjani produced in custody from dar-ul-aman Larkana. Mr: Munwar Abbass Chandio advocate for plaintiff is present. Defendant is served through Publication but he is called absent without any intimation. The service upon defendant is already held good on:17.02.2026. Order passed on ORDER SHEET. The defendant is debarred from filling written statement. Advocate for plaintiff has submitted affidavit in exparte proof. Put off to 28-02-2026 for final arguments |
||
| 9 | F.S. (Family Suits) 888/2025 | Ali Gohar Solangi VS Mst. Malooka Solangi | Muhammad Akram(ADVO-2964-SBC-SUK) | Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights | Family Suit called. Plaintiff and his counsel are present. Defendant is present. Mr: Abdul Raqeeb Solangi is present and submitted written statement a/w affidavit of defendant. Pre-trial proceedings held between the parties in the chamber of under signed, in which pre-trial proceedings is successful. |
||
| 10 | F.S. (Family Suits) 30/2026 | Mst. Rozina Detho VS Najaf Ali Bhutto | Tarique Ali (ADVO-22545-SBC-KHS) | Family Suit-Sindh Muslim marriages and divorces registration Act, 1955,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family Suit called. Plaintiff Mst: Rozina Detho is called absent & her counsel Mr: Tarique Ali Chandio is present and submitted statement for withdrawn the suit. Defendant called absent his service is already held good. Order passed and announced in open court. The suit of plaintiff is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. |
||
| 11 | F.S. (Family Suits) 42/2026 | Mst. Syeda Itrat Fatima VS Syed Masood li Shah | Ghulam Khudeja() | Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff is called absent and her advocate Miss Ghulam Khudeja Bhatti is present. Defendant is called absent his counsel Mr: Fayaz Ahmed Soomro is present and submitted adjournment Appln: Order on it. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to 02-03-2026 for written statement. |
||