| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 122/2025 | The state VS Mukhtiar Ali Boosan and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Suhail Ahmed (ADVO-1941-SBC-LRK) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-380,PPC-457 | 8/2025 Waris Dino Machi |
Case called. Accused Mukhtiar Ali and Zubair present on bail. DDPP for the state is present. Advocate for accused is present. No PWs are present. The counsel for the accused submitted an adjournment application. Order on it. Put off to 27.4.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. Repeat NBWs against the complainant Umaid, PWs Basheer, Asadullah and SIP Abdul Hayee. |
| 2 | Juv. Child Act (JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ORDINANCE) 1/2026 | State VS Mubeen and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | PPC-380,PPC-457 | 149/2025 Darri |
Case called. Accused Mubeen @ Amir is produced from DP Larkana. Accused. Accused Fayaz, Barkat Ali and Munir are produced in custody from C.P Larkana. While accused Mumtaz @ Bhalai is already declared as P.Os. DDPP for the state is present. Ms. Fazeela Bhutto advocate for accused appointed on state expenses is present. Mr. Ahmed Bux Abro counsel for the complainant is called absent.The complainant Piyar Ali, PWs Ghulam Abbas and ASI/IO Ali Akbar are present. Deposition of complainant is recorded at Ex.7. He produced FIR at ?????????????????????????????????..Ex.7/A. Deposition of PW Ghulam Abbas is recorded at Ex.8. He produced memo of place of incident, memos of arrest and recovery at Ex.8/A to 8/C. Deposition of PW ASI/IO Ali Akbar is recorded at Ex.9. Put off to 20.4.2026 for evidence. Produced accused are sent back to custody. BWs against ASI Mumtaz is extended and handed over to the process server. |
|
| 3 | PPC 3/2026 | State VS Ghulam Hyder and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-Fv,PPC-452,PPC-504 | 61/2025 Kanga |
Case called. Accused Javed Ahmed is present on bail. Accused Ghulam Hyder and Kamran are called absent under intimation. While accused Ghulam Murtaza is declared as P.O. learned DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Ghulam Murtaza Jokhio advocate for the accused is present and submitted an excuse application regarding absence of accused Kamran and Ghulam Hyder. Order on it. Absence excused. Notice issued against Dr.Anosha is returned served. Dr. Anosha is present and bound down. Put off to 20.4.2026, for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 4 | PPC 37/2026 | State VS Asghar and an other | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | Mushtaq Ahmed Khuhawar(ADVO-533-SBC-LRK) | PPC-504,PPC-506 | 13/2026 Kanga |
Case called. Accused Asghar and Muhammad Uris are present on bail. DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Mushtaque Hussain Khuhawar counsel for the accused is present. Mr. Zeeshan Ahmed Deenari advocate for the complainant is present. PWs ASI Haji Khan and Aabdul Ghaffar are present. Deposition of ASI/IO Haji Khan is recorded at Ex.6. He produced entries No.30 and 14, memo of place of incident and memo of arrest and recovery at Ex.6/A to 6/C. Deposition of PW Abdul Ghaffar is recorded at Ex.7. DDPP for the state filed side close statement at Ex.8. Order thereon. Heard arguments. Judgment passed and announced in the open court. Accused Asghar and Muhammad Uris are acquitted u/s 245(i) Cr.PC. The accused are on bail, their bail bonds stand cancelled and sureties discharged. The Judgment is kept on record at Ex???????????????.9. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 5 | PPC 16/2026 | State VS Ali Bux & others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | PPC-337-A(v),PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 69/2025 Kanga |
Case called. Accused Ali Bux, Deedar, Dildar and Shakeel Ahmed are declared as POs. DDPP for the state is present. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in the open court. Accused Ali Bux, Deedar, Dildar and Shakeel Ahmed are declared as POs and case against them is kept on dormant file till their arrest/appearance before the court. The order is kept on record at Ex.5. |
|
| 6 | PPC 21/2026 | State VS Sadam @Sadam Hussain Kalhoro | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | PPC-324,PPC-354,PPC-401 | 3/2026 Kanga |
Case called. Accused Sadam is called absent under intimation. DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Bilawal Abbasi advocate for the accused Sadam is present and he submitted an excuse application of accused Sadam. Order on it. Attendance excused. From perusal of record of CFMS it is observed that accused Sadam has been granted bail by the court of Honorable Sessions Judge, Larkana vide order dated 07.3.2026 in B.A No.386/2026. While accused Babar and Nale Mitho are absconders. Proclamation 87 Cr.PC issued against the accused is returned unserved as per endorsement of process server. The statement of the process server is recorded at Ex.2. He produced copy of proclamation, separate endorsement, memo and entry at Ex.2/A to 2/D. Reply of attachment u/s 88 Cr.PC is received from Mukhtiarkar taluka Larkana at Ex.3. Order on it. File. Order u/s 512 Cr.PC is passed at Ex.4. The absconding accused Babar and Nale Mitho are declared as POs. Put off to 27.4.2026 for receipt. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 8/2025 | Mst. Shazia VS Mehtab Ali | Atta Hussain (ADVO-1593-SBC-LRK) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family execution called. Plaintiff/DH is called absent While her counsel Mr. Mohsin Ali Chandio is present. The JD/Defendant is called absent. The counsel for the DH submitted statement a/w copy of daily Awami Awaz newspaper dated 14.4.2026. Hence the service against the JD is hereby held good. Order on sheet. Put off to 23.4.2026, for objection/appearance of the JD. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 8/2026 | Muhammad Ali Umrani VS Mst. Amina Khatoon and others | Muhammad Murad(ADVO-1869-SBC-LRK) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 4 | G and Ward application called. Applicant Muhammad Ali is called absent. His counsel MR. Muhammad Murad Tunio is called absent. While his jr.partner is absent. Opponent No.1 and 2 are called absent. Report already received from UC 19 Ratokot regarding death verification report and report of LRs of deceased. Report already received from NADRA office Larkana. Report already received from Mukhtiarkar taluka Larkana regarding LRs. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in the open court. The instant G and ward application is hereby disposed of accordingly. |
||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 133/2026 | Mst. Shahida Jogi VS Shoukat Ali Jogi | Ghulam Khudeja() | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Suit called. Plaintiff is present. Ms. Ghulam Khudeja Bhatti counsel for the plaintiff is present. The service against the defendant is already held good but he is called absent. Put off to 22.04.2026 for WS/appearance of the defendant. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 893/2025 | Mst. Afsheen VS Muhammad Mouazzam Shahzad | Pirah Parveen (ADVO-2311-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family Suit called. Plaintiff Mst: Afsheen is present. Her counsel Ms. Pirah Parveen Shaikh is present. Defendant is called absent. Heard arguments on appl.u/o 9 rule 7 r/w 151 CPC. Order passed on separate sheet. The application is hereby allowed. The counsel for the plaintiff submitted affidavit in evidence. Order on it. File. She also filed an appl.u/s 151 CPC. Order on it. Call CCTV footages from CCTV admin room for verification. Notice to other side. Put off to 23.04.2026 for hearing on application u/s 151 CPC/evidence. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 28/2026 | Mst. Sughran Chandio VS Nabi Bux Chandio | Mir Muhammad(ADVO-1449-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family Suit called. Plaintiff is present. Her counsel Mr. Mir Muhammad Bhagat is present. Defendant is present. Mr. Saqlain Hussain Sangi counsel for the defendant is present. The counsel for the plaintiff submitted affidavit in evidence of the plaintiff and witness Hassan Ali at Ex..and Ex... Order thereon. Put off to 30.4.2026 for evidence. Call verification report of nikahnama and agreement from concerned Oath commissioner. |
||