| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 18/2026 | Chanesar Umrani VS The state | Zamin Ali(ADVO-1182-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-523,Cr.PC-550 | / |
Crl.misc.application u/s 523 Cr.P.C is called. Applicant Chanesar and his counsel Mr. Zamin Ali Jagirani are present. Report received from concerned SHO. Order thereon. The counsel for the applicant submitted application a/w publication in daily Awami Awaz dated 03.11.2026. Order thereon. Matter is adjourned due to strike of advocate. Put off to 14.11.2026. for further proceedings. |
|
| 2 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 15/2026 | Naimatullah Jagirani VS State | Zamin Ali(ADVO-1182-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-523,Cr.PC-550 | / |
Crl.misc.application u/s 523 Cr.P.C is called. Applicant Naimatullah Jagirani and his counsel Mr. Zamin Ali Jagirani are present. Report not received from concerned SHO. The counsel for the applicant submitted application a/w publication in daily Awami Awaz dated 06.11.2026. Order thereon. The applicant submitted an application. Order on it. Kept on record. Matter is adjourned due to strike of advocate. Put off to 14.11.2026. for report of SHO. Call report from concerned SHO. |
|
| 3 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 19/2026 | Jamal Khan VS State | Abdul Qadir (ADVO-50465-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-523,Cr.PC-550 | / |
Crl.misc.application u/s 523 Cr.P.C is called. Applicant Jamal and his counsel Mr. Abdul Qadir are present. Report received from concerned SHO. The counsel for the applicant submitted application a/w publication in daily Awami Awaz dated 03.11.2026. Matter is adjourned due to strike of advocate. Put off to 14.11.2026. for further proceedings. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 10/2025 | The state VS Muhammad Qasim Panhwar | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | PPC-489-F | 5/2025 Kanga |
The case is already fixed on dormant file. Case called. Accused Muhammad Qasim is already declared as PO vide order dated 25.3.2025. ADPP for the state is present. Progress report not yet received from the concerned P.S. Call progress report. Put off to 21.11.2026 for progress report. |
|
| 5 | PPC 104/2026 | State VS Ghulam Ali & others | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | PPC-324,PPC-354 | 48/2026 Kanga |
Case called. Accused Ghulam Ali, Abdullah @ Sanwal, Waquar and Jabbal are absconders. Reply of 87 and 88 Cr.PC is not received from concerned SHO and Mukhtiarkar. Put off to 14.11.2026, for service. Repeat proclamation u/s 87 CrPC and 88 CrPC through concerned SHO and Mukhtiarkar Garhi Yasin and Ratodero. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 290/2025 | Mst. Shaista Jabeen VS Ashfaq Ali Phularwan | Faheem Habib (ADVO-2414-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. The plaintiff Mst. Shaista is called absent but her father is present and her counsel Mr. Faheem Habib Ghouri is also present. Defendant Ashfaque is called absent. Notice issued against him through TCS is not returned served or unserved. Mr. Zeb Hussain Pathan advocate is present and filed vakalatnama on behalf of the defendant. Order on it. Put off to 14.11.2026 for evidence. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 12/2026 | Mst. Waheeda VS Fazul Rehman | Syed Soofan Shah(ADVO-1163-SBC-LRK) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Execution application called. Decree holder and her counsel Mr. Syed Soofan Shah are present. J.D Fazul Rehman and his counsel Mr. Naseer Ahmed are present. The JD filed statement for return of dowery articles. Order thereon. The Counsel for the DH submitted application for the appointment of commissioner to return the dowry articles from the house of the JD to hand over to the DH. Order thereon. Hence, the execution application is allowed. The order is passed on separate sheet. Ali Mardan Naik is appointed as commissioner to receive the dowry articles from the house of defendant and hand over the same to the plaintiff. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 42/2026 | Mst. Syeda Itrat Fatima VS Syed Masood Ali Shah | Ghulam Khudeja() | Abdul Qayoom (ADVO-50464-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff is present but her counsel is called absent. The defendant and his counsel were present. Matter is fixed on fast track. Matter is adjourned due to strike of advocates. Put off to 10.11.2026, for Cross of defendant side. |
|
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 534/2026 | Mst.Jameela VS Amir Nawaz Chachar | Farooque Ahmed (ADVO-2334-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff & her counsel are present. Defendant is present but his advocate is called absent. Matter is adjourned due to strike of advocates. Put off to 14.11.2026, for plaintiff evidence. |
||