Suit called. Mst. Naila, the attorney of plaintiff called absent,however. her learned counsel is present. Defendant No.3 Ali Gohar, who is also attorney to defendants No.1, 2/a, 2/c (defendant No.11) 2/d, 2/e (defendant No.9) to 2/i called present with counsel. Defendant No.2 (a) Ali Nawaz has been expired. Defendants No.4 to 8 and 10 (i) are already made ex-parte. The matter is adjourned on the verbal request of both parties. Put off to 14-03-2026, for Advocate to be heard on the point of maintainability of application and compliance of 10 rule 2 CPC.

Suit called. Plaintiff NO.01 who is attorney of remaining plaintiffs NO 2 to 6 is presnet, alongiwith his learned counsel Mr. Imdad Ali Mashori. Defendants No.1 to 5 & 7 to 11 are already made ex-parte. Yasir Hussain, the attorney to defendant No.12 is present with counsel Mr. Mansoor Ahmed Tunio. Noor Muhammad, the attorney to defendants No.13 to 18, 19/A to 19/D, 20 to 24, 25/A to 25/G, 26 to 29, 30/A to 30/C is present with counsel. . Munawar Ali, the attorney for defendant No.31 called absent but his counsel is present. None has filed objections on Application U/O.22 R.3 & 4 CPC R/W S.151 CPC. Letter issued for reports from concerned Mukhtiarkar & NADRA through TCS but reply of same not yet received; hence matter is adjourned. Put off to 14-03-2026, for submission of reports, Objections on Application U/O.22 R.3 & 4 CPC (def.No.6) and hearing on Application U/O.39 R. 1 & 2 CPC. Issue letter to Mukhtiarkar Jecababad and Incharge NADRA shahdadkot for report regarding lRS of deceased Mst. Sakina d/o Kareem Bux Brohi as already ordered.

Suit called. Plaintiff NO.1 is present, plaintiff NO.2 is called absent, advocate for plaintiff is present. Defendant No.1 is present with counsel. Defendant No.4, 8 & 10 are absent. Defendants No.2, 3, 5 to 7 & 9 are already made ex-parte. DDA is present. Today matter is fixed for framing of issues but the same could not be framed due to another F.C.Suit No.33/2025 re- Muhammad Azam Vs. Arsalan Khan and others pending on the board, which is of same nature; hence adjourned in interest of justice. Put off to 14-03-2026, for framing of Issues and hearing on Application U/O.39 R.1 & 2 CPC.

case called.....

Suit called. Plaintiffs are called absent, however, their learned counsel is also called absent. Defendant No.2 Mst. Musrat, who is also attorney to defendants No.1, 3 and 4 is present, defendant No.5 is absent, their counsel is present. Official defendant No.6 is absent but DDA is present. Rest of official defendants No.7 to 13 are already made ex-parte. Witnesses of defendants are called absent. Matter adjourned on the verbal request of advocate for defendant. Put off to 14-03-2026, for defendant evidence.

Suit called. Plaintiff Khadim Hussain is present alongwith his learned counsel. Defendants No.1, 2, 3, 5 to 9 are already made ex-parte. Defendant No.4 Muhammad Hayat is present along with his learned counsel. Today matter is fixed for evidence of plaintiff side. Advocate for plaintiff submitted adjournment application which is granted. Advocate for plaintiff submitted application u/o 16 rule 1 and 2 CPC alongwith affidavit of plaintiff Khadim Ali order on it, notice to other side. Put off to 12-03-2026 for plaintiff evidence and objections on application u/o 16 rule 1 and 2 CPC.

Matter called. Fateh Muhammad Plaintiff in leading who is defendant No.1 in subsequent suit is present, along with his learned counsel Mr. Ghulam Dastagir shahani. Defendant NO. 01 Piyaral in leading suit who is plaintiff in subsequent suit is present, alongwith his learned counsel Mr. Niaz Ali Memon. DDA is present on behalf of official defendants. Matter is adjourned on the verbal request of both parties. Put off to 14-03-2026, for defendant evidence in leading suit.

Diary is written in leading suit bearing No.91/2020 re- Fateh Muhammad Magsi Vs. Piyaral and others

Suit called. Nazar Muhammad, legal heir of plaintiff is present with counsel. Defendant No.1/A, 4 to 9 are already made ex-parte. The contesting private defendants No.2 and 3 are absent, however, their counsel is present. Clerk Mukhtiarkar Estate kamber is present and submitted intimation that the post of Mukhtiarkar Estate kamber is lying vacant. Order passed thereon. DC Kamber shahdadkot is required to do the need full for production of documents and recording of evidence on his behalf Put off to 28.02.2026, for plaintiff evidence and hearing on Application U/O.39 R.1 & 2 CPC.

Suit called. Plaintiff is present, however his witnesses are called absent. Advocate for plaintiff is present. Defendants NO. 1,3, 4 to 7 are already exparte. Defendant NO.2 is called absent, his advocate is also called absent. Today matter is fixed for evidence of plaintiff side. Matter is adjourned on the verbal request of learned counsel for plaintiff. The plaintiff is strictly directed to produce the set of witnesses on the next date of hearing. Put off to 14-03-2026, for defendant evidence.

Matter called. Khadim Hussain, plaintiff in the leading suit and defendant No.1 in the subsequent suit, is present along with his learned counsel. Defendant No.1, Muhammad Abid, in the leading suit, who is plaintiff in the subsequent suit, is present along with his learned counsel DDA is present on behalf of the official defendants. Advocate for plaintiff in leading suit submitted adjournment application order on it allowed as last and final chance. Case is put off to 12-03-2026 for recording of evidence of the plaintiff in the leading suit.

Diary is written in leading suit.

Appliciation is disposed off detail order passed on seperate sheet.

Application is disposed off detail order passed on seperate sheet