The P.O is on journey leave. Matter called. Plaintiff called absent but his counsel is present. Defendants No.2 Sardar Ali is present though served on 03.11.2025, defendants No.1 & 10 are already served on 11.11.2025, defendants No.3, 4 & 8 are also served on 03.11.2025 but called absent and none from them filed WS/Objections. Defendant No.7 is absent but already filed WS. DDA for official defendants No.3, 4, 7, 8 & 10 is present. Process upon defendants No.5, 6 & 9 not issued. However, earlier process upon defendants No.5 and 9 for the date of hearing viz. 11.11.2025 already returned served upon them as per endorsement of court bailiff of learned Senior Civil Judge, Kamber, which is placed on record for further appropriate order. Matter is adjourned. Put off to 27.11.2025, for Service of defendant No.6, further order/appearance of defendants No.5 & 9, WS/Objections of defendants No.1 to 4, 8 & 10. Repeat process upon defendant No.6 through concerned Court, A.D & TCS, as already ordered.

The P.O is on journey leave. Leading suit called. Mst Hameeda, the attorney to plaintiff in leading suit is absent with her counsel, plaintiff Mumtaz Ali is present in person. Muhammad Mehar, the defendant No.1 in leading suit and plaintiff in subsequent suit is absent. Ahmed Ali, defendant No.2 is absent, with their counsel. Defendants No.3 to 7 are already made ex-parte. Matter is adjourned to same stage. Put off to 15.12.2025, for plaintiff evidence in leading suit & hearing on Application U/O.39 R: 1 & 2 CPC.

The P.O is on journey leave. Case diary in written in leading F.C Suit No.85/2023 re- Mumtaz Ali Chandio Versus Muhammad Mehar and Others. The Court is lying vacant.