Matter called. Plaintiff No.1 called present, rest of plaintiffs called absent, their counsel is absent. Defendants No.1, 2, 4, 5 to 8 are already served on 30.10.2025 & 14.11.2025 but not yet filed WS/Objections. DDA is present. Plaintiff filed fresh address of defendant No.3. Order on it. Issue summons upon fresh address. Official defendant (Mukhtiarkar Shahdadkot) sent adjournment application through his clerk. Order on it. Allowed as last chance. Put off to 03.12.2025, for Service of defendant No.3, WS/Objections of defendants No.1, 2, 4 & 5 to 8.

Matter called. Plaintiff No.1, who is also attorney to plaintiffs No.2 & 3 called absent with counsel. Defendant No.1 called absent but his counsel is present and filed Statement/Intimation along with PS copy of Order dated 19.06.2025 entry No.353 dated 17.12.1985 cancelled by the Additional Commissioner (Rev) Larkana and copy of Notice issued by Member (Judicial-III) Board of Revenue Sindh Hyderabad. Order on it. File. Defendants No.2, 3, 4, 9 to 16 are already made ex-parte. Defendants No.7 & 8 called absent but already filed WS. Defendant No.5 already served on 10.09.2025 through publication but called absent and not yet filed WS/Objections. Process issued upon defendant No.6 by way of pasting and same is returned served as per endorsement of court bailiff of learned Senior Civil Judge, Kamber but publication notice upon defendant No.6 not issued. The Clerk/Munshi of learned counsel for plaintiffs filed adjournment application due to non-compliance of directions issued by this Court. Order on it. Allowed, as last and final chance. Put off to 16.12.2025, for Service of defendant No.6, WS/Objections of defendant No.5 and hearing on Application U/O.39 R.1 & 2 CPC. Repeat process upon defendant No.6 through publication as already ordered.

Matter called. Plaintiffs No.1 & 3 called present, plaintiff No.2 is absent, their counsel is absent. Process issued upon defendant No.1 but reply of same not yet returned from court of Honourable District Judge, Khuzdar. Defendants No.2 to 4, 6 to 8, 11 & 12 are already served on 07.10.2025, defendants No.5 & 9 are served on 01.11.2025, defendant No.10 is also served on 12.11.2025 but called absent and not yet filed WS/Objections. DDA is present. Counsel for plaintiffs not yet provided requisite Court Fee Stamps. Matter is adjourned with same directions as last chance. Put off to 10.12.2025, for Service of defendant No.1, WS/Objections of defendants No.2 to 12, and hearing on Application U/O.XXXIX R.1 & 2 R/W S.151 CPC. Repeat process upon defendant No.01 through court bailiff, courier & A.D as already ordered.

Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff is present without counsel. Attorney of defendant No.1 called absent with counsel. Defendants No.4 & 5 are absent. DDA is present. Defendant No.2, 3, 6 to 9 are already made ex-parte. The Nazir of this court being a Commissioner already submitted site inspection report in compliance of order dated 15.10.2025 passed by this Court which is placed on record. Both the parties or their counsel not yet filed objections on site inspection report. Attorney of plaintiff filed adjournment application. Order on it. Allowed. Matter is adjourned to same stage. Put off to 10.12.2025, for objections on site inspection report, plaintiff evidence and hearing on Application U/O.39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC.

Matter called. Plaintiff called present with counsel. Defendant No.1 called absent with counsel but already filed WS/Objections. Defendants No.2 and 4 called absent but already filed WS. DDA is present. Defendant No.3 is already served on 21.08.2025 but called absent and not yet filed WS/Objections; though mandatory provision has been passed. Such order passed on order sheet. Defendant No.3 is debarred from filing WS/Objection and proceeded as ex-parte. Learned counsel for plaintiff filed Objections on Application U/O.VII Rule 11 CPC with affidavit. Order on it. Copy to other side. Copy delivered to the Clerk/ Munshi of learned counsel for defendant No.1. Learned counsel for plaintiff also filed an Application Under Article 84 of Qanoon-e-Shahadat 1984 supported by affidavit with prayer to allow the application for thumb impression verification of defendant No.1. Order on it. Copy to other side. Copy delivered. Put off to 11.12.2025, for hearing on Application U/O.VII Rule 11 CPC, hearing on Application U/O.XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 CPC R/W S.151 CPC and Objections on application U/A.84 of Q.S 1984.

Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Ayesha is present with counsel. Defendant No.1 Sher Muhammad called absent but his counsel is present. No remaining contesting defendant is present. Learned counsel for plaintiff filed an Application U/O.VI Rule 17 CPC for amendment of plaint. Order on it. Copy to other side. Copy delivered. Further matter is adjourned. Put off to 08.12.2025, for Objections on application U/O.VI Rule 17 CPC and Settlement of Issues.

Matter called. Ayaz Ali, plaintiff No.1-A3A, who is also attorney to rest of plaintiffs called absent, plaintiff No.1-A1 Muhammad Naseer, plaintiff No.1-A3B Farman Ali also called absent with counsel. Altaf Hussain, defendant No.1-A1B who is also attorney to defendants No.1-A1A, 1-A1C to 1-A1F, 1-B1 to 1-B3, 1-C1 to 1-C5 called absent and already debarred from recording their evidence. Khalid Hussain, defendant No.73, who is attorney for defendants No.19, 26, 29, 31, 33, 36 to 44, 46 to 48, 51 to 60, 64, 65, 74, 75, 77, 78, 102, 104, 105, 106, 110, 111 & 125 called absent. Official defendants No.5 & 6 called absent. Defendants No.1-A2, 1-B-1A to 1-B-iE and 3/A to 3/H, 2, 4 & 7 to 12 to 18, 20 to 25, 27, 28, 30, 32, 34, 35, 45, 49, 50, 61, 62, 63, 66 to 72, 76, 79 to 101, 103, 107, 108, 109, 112 to 124, 126, to 167 are already made ex-parte. Official defendant No.6 (Sub-Registrar Shahdadkot) called absent but DDA is present and disclosed that the said post is lying vacant. Matter is adjourned to same stage. Put off to 10.12.2025, for evidence of official contesting defendants.

Matter called. Abdul Hameed, the attorney to plaintiffs No.1 to 3, 4/A to 4/D called absent, their counsel Mr. Mansoor Ali is present and filed an application for adjournment and submitted that his senior colleague Mr. Gulsher is currently engaged before the Honourable High Court of Larkana. Order passed on separate sheet. Accordingly, the adjournment application is allowed as a final opportunity, subject to the payment of a further cost of Rs.2,000/-. The matter is adjourned and will be listed again today at 2:00 PM. Meanwhile, the plaintiffs are directed to deposit the total cumulative cost of Rs.4,000/- (being Rs.2,000/- from the previous order and Rs.2,000/- imposed today). The plaintiffs are strictly directed to adduce their evidence by the next date of hearing without fail. Failure to comply with these directions may be result in the suit being dismissed once again under Order XVII Rule 3 of the CPC. The contesting defendants called absent. Mr. Mian Latif Sattar counsel for defendant No.10 is absent. Mr. Saeed Ahmed counsel for remaining contesting defendants is present. DDA is present. No witness from plaintiff side is present. Counsel for plaintiffs filed Statement and also to deposit fine amount of Rs.4000/- before the Nazir of this Court. Order on it. File. Put off to 15.12.2025, for plaintiffs evidence.

Matter called. Plaintiff Ashique Ali called absent but his counsel is present. Defendants No.1 & 3 called absent but their counsel is present. Suit against defendant No.2 has already been dismissed as withdrawn. Defendants No.4 to 7, 9 to 11, 14 to 18 are already made ex-parte. Official defendants No.8, 12 & 13 are absent but DDA is present. The summons upon remaining official witness not issued by office. No remaining official witness is in attendance. Matter is adjourned to same stage. Put off to 12.12.2025, for defendants evidence. Repeat summons for official witness Mukhtiarkar Miro Khan through bailiff, as already ordered.

Matter called. Plaintiff No.1 Lal Bux, who is also attorney to plaintiffs No.2/A & 2/B called absent but his counsel is present. Defendant No.1 Faiz Muhammad called absent but his counsel is present. Defendants No.2/A to 2/E, 3 to 6 & 8 are already made ex-parte. Defendant No.7 is absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff filed adjournment application. Order on it. Allowed. Matter is adjourned. Put off to 18.12.2025, for plaintiffs evidence and hearing/ arguments of learned counsel for defendant No.1 on Application U/O.39 Rule 1 & 2 R/W S.151 CPC.

Matter called. Plaintiff Abdul Sattar Bhatti is present along with his learned counsel. Defendants No.1 to 5 called absent. DDA is present. Legal Representative of defendants No.3 & 4 called absent. Today matter is fixed for evidence of plaintiff side. The evidence of plaintiff is recorded at Exh.No.16. He produced PS copies of documents at Exh.No.16/A to 16-D, respectively. Learned counsel for plaintiff filed side close statement which is kept on record at Exh.No.17. Put off to 28.11.2025, for evidence of defendants side.

Matter called. Abdul Hameed, the attorney to plaintiffs No.1 to 5 called absent with counsel. Plaintiff No.5 is said to be expired and counsel for plaintiffs not yet filed proper application. Defendant No.1 Jagdesh Kumar called absent but his counsel Mr. Mansoor Ali is present. Defendants No.10 to 12 and their counsel Mr. Riaz Hussain called absent. Attorney to defendant No.16 is absent with counsel Mr. Saddam Hussain. Defendant No.18 called absent but counsel Mr. Saeed Ahmed is present. Defendants No.20 and 23 called absent but counsel Mr. Muhammad Yousif is present. Defendant No.26 who is also attorney to defendant No.24 called absent but counsel Mr. Muhammad Sadique is present. Attorney to defendants No.44 to 48, 50, 52 & 54 and defendants No.51/A to 51/H called absent with counsel Mr. Parvez Ahmed. Official defendants No.58 & 59 called absent. Defendants No.2 to 9, 13 to 15, 17, 19, 21, 22, 25, 27 to 43, 49, 55 to 57, 60 to 71 are already made ex-parte. Learned counsel Mr. Altaf Qadir Awan appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendant No.60 (CMO Shahdadkot). Order on it. File. Learned counsel also filed an application U/O.IX Rule 7 CPC R/W Sec.151 CPC in respect of defendant No.60 with affidavit. Order on it. Copy delivered. Learned counsel for defendants No.60 & 61 filed an application U/O.1 Rule 10 (2) CPC R/W Sec.151 CPC supported by affidavit and also produced PS copies of relevant documents with prayer to join the Honourable District and Sessions Judge, Kamber-Shahdadkot as a defendant. Order on it. Copy delivered. DDA is present and already filed statement for official defendants No.55 to 59, 65, 68 to 70 along with P.S copies of transfer deed regarding suit Survey No.11 and others, bearing Juriyan No.323 dated 13-03-2018, register No.334 dated 13.03.2018 executed by Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Committee Shahdadkot in favor of Honourable Court and PS copy of Entry No.44 dated 16.03.2018 of V.F VII-B Deh Hameer Tapo Sando Taluka Shahdadkot in favor of Honourable Court as same entry was kept in compliance of letter of this Court. Put off to 04.12.2025, for objections on Application U/O.IX Rule 7 CPC R/W S.151 CPC (defendant No.60), hearing on Application U/O.IX Rule 7 CPC R/W S.151 CPC (defendant No.61), objections on Application U/O.1 Rule 10 (2) CPC R/W Sec.151 CPC, compliance in respect of proper application for L.Rs of plaintiff No.5 and further plaintiff evidence/cross-examination of attorney to plaintiffs.

Matter called..........

Diary is written in leading suit No.83 of 2023 re- Mehboob Ali Khan Manganhar Versus Mst. Naheed Khuhawar and others. The Court is lying vacant.

Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Eman called absent but counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendants No.1 to 9 called absent. DDA is present. Legal Representative of defendants No.3 to 5 is absent. Heard arguments of learned counsel for plaintiff. Further matter is adjourned to 28.11.2025, for further final arguments of learned DDA.

Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Maria called absent but counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendants No.1 to 9 called absent. DDA is present. Legal Representative of defendants No.3 to 5 is absent. Heard arguments of learned counsel for plaintiff. Further matter is adjourned to 28.11.2025, for further final arguments of learned DDA.