Suit called. Plaintiff No.1, who is also attorney for the remaining plaintiffs, is present along with his learned counsel. Defendants No.5, 7 (defendant No.6/A being legal heir of deceased defendant No.6), 8 (defendant No.6/B being legal heir of deceased defendant No.6), 9, 10, 25, 27, 28 (defendant No.30/A being legal heir of deceased defendant No.30), 29 (defendant No.30/B being legal heir of deceased defendant No.30), and 33 to 38 have already been proceeded ex-parte. Defendants No.6 and 30 have expired.Defendant No.18, who is attorney for defendants No.17, 19 and 20, is called absent; however, their learned counsel is present. Defendant No.26 Muhammad Alim, who is attorney for defendant No.32, is present. Defendant No.31 Muhammad Ayoob, who is attorney for defendants No.21 to 24, is called absent; however, their learned counsel is present.Defendants No.1 to 4 and 11 to 16 were served on 23.01.2026, but are called absent today and have not yet filed their written statements/objections. Today the matter was fixed for filing the amended title page; however, the same has not been filed. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs has submitted an adjournment application. Order on it: allowed. Put off to 17-03-2026 for filing amended title page and written statements/objections of defendants No.1 to 4 and 11 to 16.

Suit called. Attorney of the plaintiff is called absent; however, her learned counsel is present. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has submitted an application under Order I Rule 10 read with Section 151 CPC for impleading necessary and proper parties. Order on it. Copy supplied to the other side.Defendants No.1 to 5 are called absent; however, their learned counsel is present. ADDA is present on behalf of the official defendants. Learned counsel for defendants No.1 to 5 has submitted a statement/objection stating that the name of another co-sharer, namely Abdul Sattar son of Ghous Bux, is also required to be brought on record. Order on it. Copy to the other side. Put off to 17-03-2026 for supplying copy of the statement to the other side and for filing objections on the application under Order I Rule 10 read with Section 151 CPC for impleading necessary and proper parties.

Suit called. The plaintiff is present along with his learned counsel. Defendant No.1 is present along with his learned counsel. Mr. Mukhtiar Ali, authorized representative of defendant No.2, is called absent. The remaining defendants are also called absent, though they have already filed their written statements. DDA is present.Today the matter was fixed for compliance of Order X Rule 2 CPC; however, the same has failed. Issues framed at Exh.No.18.Put off to 13-03-2026 for evidence. The parties are directed to file list of witnesses and documents within seven days.

Suit called. The plaintiff is present along with his learned counsel. Defendant No.1 is also present along with his learned counsel. Defendants No.2 to 5, 7, and 9 to 13 have already been proceeded ex-parte. Defendant No.8 is called absent. DDA is present. Defendant No.14 is called absent and has not yet been served.Learned counsel for defendant No.1 has submitted a statement stating therein that defendant No.14 has expired. Order on it. The plaintiff is directed to file a proper application for bringing the legal heirs of deceased defendant No.14 on record.Put off to 26-03-2026 for submission of proper application for impleading the legal heirs of deceased defendant No.14.

Execution application called. DH Abdul Razaque is present alongwith his learned counsel. JD No.1 Nizamuddin is present with counsel. JD No.2 is absent but already filed W/Objections. JD No.4 is already made ex-parte. JDs No.3 and 5 not yet served. DDA is present and already filed Statement which is placed on record that DH had made party to Sub-Registrar Miro Khan as JD No.3 but in Sub-Division Miro Khan there exist no any office of Sub-Registrar. Matter is adjourned on the same stage. Put off to 7-03-2026, for objections on Application U/S.152 CPC and hearing on Application U/O.XXI Rule 26 for Stay of Execution R/W S.151 CPC.

Suit called. Plaintiff No.2, who is also attorney for the remaining plaintiffs, is present along with his learned counsel.Defendant No.1 is called absent, while defendant No.2 is present. Learned counsel for defendants No.1 and 2 are present. The authorized representative and legal heir/representative of defendant No.3 is present. Defendants No.4 and 8 to 12 have already been proceeded ex-parte. Defendants No.5 to 7 are called absent. DDA is present.Learned counsel for defendants No.1 and 2 has submitted an adjournment application. Order on it: allowed.Put off to 14-03-2026 for hearing on the application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC.

Suit called. Ayaz Ali, plaintiff No.1-A3A, who is also attorney to rest of plaintiffs called present, plaintiff No.1-A1 Muhammad Naseer, plaintiff No.1-A3B Farman Ali is absent, their counsel is present. Altaf Hussain, defendant No.1-A1B who is also attorney to defendants No.1-A1A, 1-A1C to 1-A1F, 1-B1 to 1-B3, 1-C1 to 1-C5 called absent and already debarred from recording their evidence. Khalid Hussain, defendant No.73, who is attorney for defendants No.19, 26, 29, 31, 33, 36 to 44, 46 to 48, 51 to 60, 64, 65, 74, 75, 77, 78, 102, 104, 105, 106, 110, 111 & 125 called absent but defendant No.125 Khadim Hussain is present. Mr. Ghulam Yaseen Junejo advocate for defendants is present. Official defendants No.5 & 6 are absent. Defendants No.1-A2, 1-B-1A to 1-B-iE and 3/A to 3/H, 2, 4 & 7 to 12 to 18, 20 to 25, 27, 28, 30, 32, 34, 35, 45, 49, 50, 61, 62, 63, 66 to 72, 76, 79 to 101, 103, 107, 108, 109, 112 to 124, 126, to 167 are already made ex-parte. DDA is present of behalf of official defendants. Today matter is fixed for final arguments. Heard final arguments from both sides. Put off to 10-03-2026 for Judgment.

Execution application called. Muhammad Ashraf, DH No.4, who is also attorney for rest of DHs called present, along with Mr. Nizamuddin Bhutto, advocate. JD No.1 Shafi Muhammad called absent, JD No.2 Najeebullah called present, their counsel is also present Advoacate for JD NO. 2 submitted application under order XXI RULE 26 read with section 151 CPC for stay of execution application.Order passed thereon. Consequently, the instant application being devoid of merit and not sustainable in the eyes of law is hereby dismissed, with no order as to costs. However, in the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned to 02.04.2026 for final arguments. Learned counsel for the decree-holder has already advanced arguments; therefore, the learned counsel for the judgment-debtors are directed to address their arguments on the next date of hearing without fail. In case of failure, the matter shall be proceeded with and decided strictly in accordance with law.

Application is disposed off

Application is disposed off detail order passed on seperate sheet