S.Case NO. 54/226 called. Accused Nisar Ahmed is present on bail. However, remaining accused have already been declared as proclaimed offenders. Learned ADPP for the state is present alongwith police papers. Mr. Shafi Muhammad Khoso, learned advocate for accused is present. NO PWs are present. Process issued returned un-served same process again extended and handed over to process server after extending its date of hearing. Put off to 30-03-2026, for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend.

Suit called. Plaintiff is called absent; however, his learned counsel is also not present. Defendants No.1 to 9 and 11 have not yet been served . Defendant No.10 has already been debarred from filing objections. Mr. Gulsher Junejo advocate filed vakalatnama on behalf of defendants NO. 12 to 14 and 16. Defendants NO. 12 to 16 are present. Advocate for defendants NO. 12 to 16 send adjournment application through his assistant/clerk order on it allowed. DDA is present on behalf of the official defendants. Put off to 01-04-2026 for service of Defendants No.1 to 9 and 11, and for filing of objections/written statements on behalf of Defendants No.12 to 22.Issue summons to Defendants No.1 to 9 and 11, through Court Bailiff by way of pasting as well as through Registered Post A/D, on payment of costs.

Suit called. Plaintiff is present, however, her learned counsel is called absent. Mr. Saeed Ahmed khoso advocate filed vakalatnama on behalf of defendants NO. 1 and 2 order on it file. Mr. saeed Ahmed Khoso advocate filed application u/o 09 rule 7 CPC read with section 151 CPC along with affidavit of defendant NO.1 and 2 order on it, notice to other side. The copy of such application supplied to other side. Mr. Imdad Ali advocate for defendant NO.3 is called absent his assistant/associate is present and submitted application u/o 7 rule 11 CPC alongwith affidavit of attorney of defendant NO.3 order on it copy to other side. The copy of such application is supplied to other side. Advocate for defendant NO.3 sent adjournment application which is allowed. DDA is present on behalf of official defendants. Put off to 08-04-2026, for w/stt of defendant NO.3 and objections on application u/o 7 rule 11 CPC and 9 rule 7 read with section 151 CPC.

Suit called. Plaintiff is Present along with his learned counsel. Defendants NO. 1 to 3 are present. Defendant NO. 2 and 3 moved adjournment application which is allowed. DDA is present on behalf of official defendants NO. 04 to 06. Put off to 21-04-2025, for objections and written statement of defendants.

Suit called. Plaintiff is present, however, his learned counsel is called absent. Advocate for defendants NO. 1 to 5 is present and submitted adjournment application which is granted. DDA is present on behalf of official defendants and did not file their w/stt. Put off to 08-04-2026, for filling writtten sttement of defendants.

Suit called. Plaintiffs are present, however, their learned counsel is called absent. Mr. Mukhtiar Ahmed representative of NADRA is present and submitted adjournment application which is granted. Put off to 01-04-2026, for written statement.

The leading suit was called. Abdul Haque, Plaintiff No.7 in the leading suit and also attorney for the remaining plaintiffs, is present, however, their learned counsel is called absent. Abdul Haleem, attorney for Defendants No.1 to 9 in the leading suit, is present; however, his learned counsel is absent. A Civil Revision against the order dated 03-06-2025, passed by this Court on the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC, is pending before the Honourable High Court of Sindh at Larkana. The order dated 03-06-2025 passed on the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC has already been communicated to the concerned officials through the bailiff of this Court, whereby the defendants were restrained from raising fresh construction over the suit land for a period of six months and directed to maintain status quo during the said period in respect of the suit land, till disposal of the instant suit, if the suit is decided before expiry of the said period.Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate, for defendnts NO. 23 to 37 called absent. Amended issued framed at EX.NO..Put off to 01-04-2026, for plaintiff evidence both parties are directed to file the list of witnesse and documents within seven days.

Case diary is written in leading suit No.95/2019 re- Sikander Ali Khoso and others VERSUS Abdul Nabi Khoso and others

Suit called. The attorney of the plaintiff is present along with learned counsel . Attorney of Defendant No.1 is present, however, his learned counsel is called absent. Defendants No.2 to 6 have already been proceeded against ex-parte. The F,C,Suit NO. 28/2023 is pending in same nature as the case property shown in plaint are same therefore issues could not be framed. Advocate for plaintiff is directed to file proper application for amalgamation of suit. Put off to 01-04-2026, for filling proper applciation for amalgamation of suit.

Suit called. Attorney of the plaintiff is present, however, her learned counsel is called absent. Mr, Muhammad Azam advocate for contesting defendants is present. DDA is present on behalf of official defendants. Attorney of plaintiff submitted adjournment application which is allowed. Put off to 01-04-2026, for plaintiff evidence. Plaintiff is directed to produce his set of of witnesses on the next date of hearing.

Suit called. Plaintiff is present, alongwith his learned counsel. Defendant No.1 Taj Bano is called absent, however, her learned counsel is also called absent. Defendant NO.2 is present his learned counsel is called absent. Defendant NO. 2 submitted adjournment appliation which is allowed. Defendants No.4 to 8 are already made ex-parte. DDA is present. Put off to 14-04-2026, for defendants evidence, cross examination for plaintiff side, and hearing on Application U/O.39 R.1 & 2 CPC. The defendant is directed to produce his witnesses on the next date of hearing.

R and PS submitted to the Learned senior civil court kamber.

Suit No. 79/2024 called. Plaintiff is called absent, her learned counsel also called absent. Defendants No.1, 2, 3, 4/f, 6, 7/a and 7/b are called absent though their learned counsel is also not present. Defendants No.4/A to 4/E have already been proceeded against ex-parte. Defendants No.8 to 12 are absent. Learned DDA is present. Matter is adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to 08-04-2026 for plaintiff???s evidence and hearing on application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC.

Suit called. Plaintiff NO.1 is present, however, the remaining plaintiff are absent. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. The defendant is called absent ,however, his learned counsel is also not present. Advocate for plaintiff submitted adjournment application which is allowed. Put off to 15-04-2026, for plaintiff evidence.

Suit called. Plaintiff Waheed Ali as well as attorney of rest plaintiff is present, however, his learned counsel is also present. Defendant No.1 Ghulam Ali, who is also attorney to defendant No.2 called absent, his learned counsel is present. Defendant No.9 Sikander Ali is absent, their counsel is absent. Official defendants No.3 to 8, 10 & 11 are already made ex-parte. DDA is present. Heard arguments on application u/0 16 rule 1 and 2 CPC. Order passed and announced in open court. Application is allowed. Let the summon be issued for witnesses on costs. Put off to 15-04-2026 for evidence of defendants side.

Suit called. Plaintiff is called absent, however, advocate for plaintiff is present. Advocate for contesting defendants called absent his assistant is present. Defendants No.7 to 10 and 12 have already been proceeded against ex-parte. Mr. Gulzar Ahmed Brohi is present but has not submitted the site inspection report. Advocate for plaintiff deposited commissioner fee. Put off to 08-04-2026 for submission of the commissioners report.

Execution application called. Decree Holder is called absent; however, his learned counsel is also not present. Amjad Ali Pirzado, attorney for JD No.1, is present; however, his learned counsel is called absent. In this matter the order passed by the Honourable High Court of Sindh, Circuit Court Larkana, in Civil Revision No. S-54 of 2025, whereby the Honourable High Court has suspended the operation of the order dated 17-01-2025 passed by this Court in the instant execution application. JDs No.2 to 4 and 6 have already been proceeded against ex-parte. JD No.5 is called absent; however, written objections have already been filed on his behalf. DDA is present. Put off to 20-=04- -2026 for further orders.

Matter called. The plaintiffs were called absent however, their learned counsel is present. Defendant NO. 1-H namely Khan Muhammad alias Muhammad Khan one of the legal heirs of the defendants is present whereas the remaining defendants were called absent. Perusal of record reflects that the contesting defendants have already been proceed exparte and the evidence of of the plaintiffs as well as the suportind defendants stands completed however, it is noted that no official from the revenue department has been examined. Order passed on order sheet. The office is directed to issue summon to the Mukhtiarkar sijawal requiring his appearance before this court on the next date of hearing alongwith the complete and relevant record pertaining to the suit property. the case is adjourned to 08-04-2026, for recording evidence of Mukhtiarkar sijawal.

Application is disposed off detail order passed on seperate sheet.