Suit called. Plaintiff Noor Muhammad @ Noor Ahmed is present; however, his learned counsel is called absent. Defendants No.1 to 6 have not yet been served. Official defendants No.7 to 10 are absent, though they were duly served on 09.12.2025 and have not yet filed their written statements/objections. DDA is present.The plaintiff submitted delivery reports of TCs received by defendant No.1. Order passed thereon; the same are taken on record. The process through Court Bailiff has not been issued by the office. Put off to 30-03-2026 for service and for filing written statements/objections by defendants No.7 to 10. Issue fresh process against defendants No.1 to 6 through Court Bailiff by way of pasting.

Suit called. Plaintiff NO.1 is present, however, the remaining plaintiff are absent. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is not present. The defendant is called absent,however, his learned counsel is also not present. Advocate for plaintiff submitted list of witnesses and documents through Munshi/Assistant which are kept on record. Order on it, copy to other side. Put off to 25-03-2026, for plaintiff evidence.

Suit called. Abdul Hameed, attorney for plaintiffs No.1 to 5, is absent; however, his learned counsel is also called absent. Plaintiff No.5 is reported to have expired.Defendant No.1 Jagdesh Kumar is absent; however, his learned counsel Mr. Mansoor Ali Tunio is also not present. Defendants No.10 to 12 are absent along with their learned counsel Mr. Riaz Hussain. Attorney for defendant No.16 is absent along with his learned counsel Mr. Saddam Hussain. Defendant No.18 is absent; however, his learned counsel Mr. Saeed Ahmed Khoso is also not present. Defendants No.20 and 23 are absent; however, their learned counsel Mr. Muhammad Yousif Magsi is also not present. Defendant No.26, who is also attorney for defendant No.24, is absent; however, his learned counsel Mr. Muhammad Sadique is also not present. Attorney for defendants No.44 to 48, 50, 52 and 54, as well as defendants No.51/A to 51/H, is absent along with learned counsel Mr. Parvez Ahmed. Official defendants No.58 and 59 are absent.Defendants No.2 to 9, 13 to 15, 17, 19, 21, 22, 25, 27 to 43, 49, 55 to 57, and 60 to 71 have already been proceeded against ex-parte. Mr. Altaf Qadir Awan, learned counsel for defendants No.60 and 61 (already ex-parte), is also absent.The DDA is present and has already filed statement on behalf of official defendants No.55 to 59, 65, and 68 to 70 along with photocopies of the transfer deed regarding suit Survey No.11 and others, bearing Juriyan No.323 dated 13-03-2018, Register No.334 dated 13-03-2018, executed by the Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Committee Shahdadkot, in favour of the Honourable Court, and photocopy of Entry No.44 dated 16-03-2018 of V.F. VII-B, Deh Hameer, Tapo Sando, Taluka Shahdadkot, in favour of the Honourable Court, the said entry having been made in compliance of this Courts letter. Today, the matter is fixed for hearing of applications under Order IX Rule 7 CPC read with Section 151 CPC (filed by defendants No.60 and 61), hearing of application under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC read with Section 151 CPC, compliance/filing of application regarding legal representatives of deceased plaintiff No.5, and further plaintiffs evidence/cross-examination of attorney for plaintiffs. In the interest of justice matter is adjourned on the same stage Put off to 31-03-2026 for further arguments on Application U/O.IX R.7 CPC R/W S.151 CPC (defendant No.60), Hearing on Application U/O.IX R.7 CPC R/W S.151 CPC (defendant No.61), and hearing Application U/O.1 R.10 (2) CPC R/W S.151 CPC, compliance/filing application in respect of L.Rs of plaintiff No.5 and further plaintiff evidence/cross-examination of attorney to plaintiffs.

Suit called. Ayaz Ali, plaintiff No.1-A3A, who is also attorney to rest of plaintiffs called present, plaintiff No.1-A1 Muhammad Naseer, plaintiff No.1-A3B Farman Ali is absent, their counsel is present. Altaf Hussain, defendant No.1-A1B who is also attorney to defendants No.1-A1A, 1-A1C to 1-A1F, 1-B1 to 1-B3, 1-C1 to 1-C5 called absent and already debarred from recording their evidence. Khalid Hussain, defendant No.73, who is attorney for defendants No.19, 26, 29, 31, 33, 36 to 44, 46 to 48, 51 to 60, 64, 65, 74, 75, 77, 78, 102, 104, 105, 106, 110, 111 & 125 called absent but defendant No.125 Khadim Hussain is present. Mr. Ghulam Yaseen Junejo advocate for defendants is present. Official defendants No.5 & 6 are absent. Defendants No.1-A2, 1-B-1A to 1-B-iE and 3/A to 3/H, 2, 4 & 7 to 12 to 18, 20 to 25, 27, 28, 30, 32, 34, 35, 45, 49, 50, 61, 62, 63, 66 to 72, 76, 79 to 101, 103, 107, 108, 109, 112 to 124, 126, to 167 are already made ex-parte. DDA is present of behalf of official defendants. Today matter is fixed for judgment. Judgment passed and announced in open Court. Suit of plaintiff is dismissed.