| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Report | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 40/2022 | The State VS Jahangeer and others | ADPP(ADPP-0005-GOV-MTR) | PPC-34,PPC-401 | 10/2022 Hala Old |
|
|
| 2 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 11/2025 | The State VS Javed Machi | Muhammad Arif Memon() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 1/2025 PS Excise Matiyari |
|
| 3 | PPC 80/2025 | The State VS Jani @ Jan Muhammad & others | Muhammad Arif Memon() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-392 | 15/2025 Khybrani |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | Other CR/Sessions Cases (If Any) 57/2025 | Mst. Khatija VS Rafique Ahmed & others | Rafique Ul Zaman (ADVO-20085-SBC-KHE) | Imran Zaib (ADVO-95-SBC-MTY) | Domestic Violence (Prevention & Protection) Act 2013 -Section VII ,PPC-332,PPC-337-A(iii),PPC-337-A(iv),PPC-350,PPC-351 | / |
29th July 2026 was declared as holiday on account of Urs of Hazrat Shah Abdul Lateef Bhittai (R.A), hence the case taken up today i.e 30-07-2026. |
| 5 | PPC 84/2025 | The State VS Abdul Rehman | Muhammad Arif Memon() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-489-F | 32/2025 Bhit Shah |
29th July 2026 was declared as holiday on account of Urs of Hazrat Shah Abdul Lateef Bhittai (R.A), hence the case taken up today i.e 30-07-2026. Case called. Accused Abdul Rahman Abbasi is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Complainant and his learned advocate are present. Remaining PWs called absent. Today case is fixed for evidence. At this stage Accused and complainant submitted joint applications u/s 345 (2) and 345 (6) Cr.P.C supported with their affidavits. Order passed on both applications, notice to learned ADPP. Learned ADPP noted. Arguments heard. Order passed on application u/s 345 (2) Cr.P.C, allowed. Accused Abdul Rahman is acquitted u/s 345 (6) Cr.P.C. Accused Abdul Rahman is present on bail, his bail bond stands cancelled and surety discharged. |
| 6 | PPC 152/2025 | The State VS Ghazala Shahzina and others | Muhammad Arif Memon() | Aaqil(ADVO-172-SBC-MTY) | PPC-34,PPC-420,PPC-504,PPC-506 | 94/2025 Hala |
|
| 7 | PPC 127/2025 | The State VS Parwaiz Ahmed | Muhammad Arif Memon() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-489-F | 58/2025 Khybrani |
|
| 8 | PPC 159/2025 | The State VS Shoukat Ali | Muhammad Arif Memon() | Abdul Jabbar(ADVO-268-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 61/2025 Khybrani |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 9 | PPC 103/2024 | The State VS Soonharo & Others | Muhammad Arif Memon() | Anwar Khan() | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-H,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 52/2024 Sekhat |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 8/2026 | Farhan Ali VS Mst. Kazbano | Peeral Majeedano(ADVO-13-SBC-MTY) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale | 29th July 2026 was declared as holiday on account of Urs of Hazrat Shah Abdul Lateef Bhittai (R.A), hence the case taken up today i.e 30-07-2026. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 5/2026 | Mst. Hafeez Bibi VS Syed Shah Faisal | Fazal Qadir Memon(ADVO-1318-SBC-HYD) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | |||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 11/2026 | Mst. Osiya VS Abdullah | Abdul Jabbar(ADVO-268-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff called absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff also called absent. Today matter is fixed for service. Matter called again and again but plaintiff and her learned counsel called absent. The suit of plaintiff is dismissed in non prosecution. |
||