SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE / ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE II, LARKANA : 07-NOV-2025

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2

CIVIL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance
1 C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 5/2022
Ali Bux Bugti VS Himath Ali Bugti   Inayatullah Morio(ADVO-376-SBC-LRK)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK)

The P.O is on C/Leave. Execution application called. Decree holder and his counsel are called absent. JDs called absent. Mukhtiarkar Larkana called absent but clerk of Mukhtiarkar is present. Repeat show cause notice to Mukthiarkar taluka Larkana through Deputy Commissioner Larkana Put off to 19.11.2025 , for compliance of judgment & decree.

CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings
2 Ist Class Civil Suits 81/2025
Ghulam Shabir Chachar VS Mst: Anees Begum and another   Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-710-SBC-LRK)   Vinod Kumar(ADVO-1001-SBC-LRK)

The P.O is on C/Leave. Suit Called. Plaintiff is present but his counsel called absent. Defendant No.3 who is also attorney of defendant No.1 and his counsel are called absent. Defendant No.2 has expired as per statement of counsel for plaintiff. Put off to 28.11.2025 for arguments on application U/O 6 Rule 17 CPC R/W Section 151 CPC and propose issues.

3 Ist Class Civil Suits 80/2025
Syed Laeeque Ali Hussaini VS Ghulam Shabir Chachar & Others   Vinod Kumar(ADVO-1001-SBC-LRK)   Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-710-SBC-LRK)

The P.O is on C/Leave. Suit Called. Plaintiff and his counsel are called absent. Defendant No.1 is present but his counsel called absent. Defendant No.02 to 04 are called absent and already made as ex-parte. DDA is present. This suit is connected with F.C.S.NO. 81/2025 (New) No.09 of 2025 (OLD). Put off to 28.11.2025 for further proceedings .

CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence
4 Ist Class Civil Suits 42/2025
Aijaz Ali Soomro VS Mansoor Ali Panhwar & others   Ghulam Ali Abbasi(ADVO-2359-SBC-LRK)   Aamir Ali (ADVO-1952-SBC-LRK),DDA(ADVO-005-SBC-LRK),Mazhar Ali(ADVO-1106-SBC-LRK)

The P.O is on C/Leave. Suit called. Plaintiff and his counsel are called absent and junior advocate is present. Defendant No. 01 & 02 are called absent. Defendant NO. 03 to 05 are called absent and also their counsel are called absent. Mukhtiarkar Larkana & Tapedar are called absent but clerk of Mukhtiarkar Larkana is present. DDA is present on behalf of defendant No. 04 and 05. Tapeadar present Put off to 28.11.2025, for plaintiff evidence.

5 Ist Class Civil Suits 1/2024
Afroz Ali Agani & others VS Abdul Hakeem Agani & others   Rasool Bukhsh Soomro(ADVO-703-SBC-LRK)   Ajmeer Ali(ADVO-1437-SBC-LRK)

The P.O is on C/Leave. Suit called. Plaintiff No. 01 and his counsel are called absent. Defendant No. 01 is present but his counsel called absent and clerk of advocate is present. Defendant No. 02 to 04 are called absent and already debarred from filling of written statement. DDA is present on behalf of defendant No. 02 to 04. Put off to 20.11.2025 for Cross of defendant/witness.

CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications
6 Ist Class Civil Suits 162/2024
Gahi @ Gada Hussain (died) & others VS Shman Samtio (died) & others   Ghulam Dastagir Shahani(ADVO-179-SBC-LRK)   Inayatullah Morio(ADVO-376-SBC-LRK)

The P.O is on C/Leave. Suit called . Plaintiff No 1 D is present but his counsel called absent and junior advocate is present. Attorney of defendant No. 1-C, 1-D,,2-A to 2/F and 03 is present but his counsel called absent and junior advocate Mr. Arif Hussain Samtio, is present. Defendants No 7,8, and 09 called absent. Put off to 20.11.2025 for further proceedings/ Arguments on application us 151 CPC.

7 Ist Class Civil Suits 27/2025
Ayan Hussain Jatoi VS Mr. Ghulam Hussain Shaikh & Others   Muhammad Bux (ADVO-2344-SBC-LRK)  

The P.O is on C/Leave. Suit called. Plaintiff called absent but his counsel is present. Defendants No. 01 to 03 are called absent. Defendant No. 04 is already debarred from filling of written statement. Put off to 17.112025, for plaintiff evidence./ Arguments on application u/o 07 rule 11 CPC