| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 1 | Complaint 5/2024 |
Ali Bux Zaur VS Nex Cell Technologies & others | Abdul Samee(ADVO-5744-SBC-HYD) | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | |||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | Complaint 6/2024 |
Wajid Ali Khaskheli VS Yousif Ali Lakhani (Elegant Center Hyderabad) | Consumer complaint called. Complainant and his counsel Mr. Mazhar Ali Khaskheli are present, while Respondents called absent, his authorized person namely Muhammad Sultan Salahuddin and his counsel Mr. Veenjhar Ali Memon are called absent. Case diaries shows that the authorized person of respondent and his counsel are called absent without any intimation since 10.10.2025 which reflects that the respondent side not interested to pursue the matter. In the interest of injustice Matter is adjourned to 02.03.2026, at about 0930 hours, for cross examination with last chance to respondents to cross examine the complainant, in case of failure matter will be proceeded in accordance with law. The complainant is also bound to be in attendance on the date of hearing. |
||||
| 3 | Complaint 7/2024 |
Wajid Ali VS Owner / Manager Riddan & another | Mazhar Ali(ADVO-409-SBC-JMS) | IN PERSON (SELF)(ADVO-001-SBC-MKS) | Consumer Complaint called. Complainant and his counsel Mr. Mazhar Ali Khaskheli are present. Respondents Adil Lakahani and his counsel Mr. Veenjhar Ali Memon are called absent. Case diaries shows that respondent and his counsel are called absent without any intimation since 10.10.2025 which reflects that the respondent side not interested to pursue the matter. In the interest of injustice Matter is adjourned to------------ 02.03.2026, at about 0930 hours, for cross examination with last chance to respondents to cross examine the complainant, in case of failure matter will be proceeded in accordance with law. The complainant is also bound to be in attendance on the date of hearing. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compromise going on | |||||||
| 4 | Complaint 3/2025 |
Abdul Ghaffar Arain VS Chief Executive Officer CEO of Railway Pakistan at Lahore | Mazhar Ali(ADVO-409-SBC-JMS) | ||||