| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 232/2026 | Akhtar Ali Lakho VS The state | Irfan Ali (ADVO-1179-SBC-NWB) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 147/2026 Airport, Nawabshah |
BA is called. ADPP for State is present. DC is present. Heard the sides. Order thereon. BA is granted subject to furnish solvent surety of Rs. 20,000/- in PR bond like amount. Bail is disposed of accordingly. |
|
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 234/2026 | Khanak Mari & anthers VS The state | Hussain Bux(ADVO-683-SBC-NWB) | PPC-379 | 55/2026 Jam Dattar |
||
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 233/2026 | Munsif @ Mohsin @ Acho Mallah VS The state | Muhammad Suhail(ADVO-624-SBC-NWB) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 150/2026 Airport, Nawabshah |
BA is called. ADPP for State is present. DC is present. Heard the sides. Order thereon. BA is granted subject to furnish solvent surety of Rs. 20,000/- in PR bond like amount. Bail is disposed of accordingly. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 142/2024 | The State VS Suneel Kolhi and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 89/2024 Airport, Nawabshah |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Asif is present on bail, while remaining accused persons namely Kashif, Suneel and Anand are called absent as they are shown as absconders in the final challan. ADPP for state is present. No Pws are present despite of serious and sincere efforts made by this court by issuing the process against them which shows that they have lost interest to pursue the case. Suo Moto applicaton u/s 249A CRPC is taken into moto and verbal notice of same also extended to prosecutor. Order passed on separate sheet, Accused person namely Muhammad Asif is acquitted u/s 249-A CrPC by Suo-Motu. He is present on bail his bond stand cancelled and surety is discharged. Absconding accused persons are also acquitted from the charge of this case/crime in their absentia on same facts. |
| 5 | PPC 67/2025 | The State Versus VS Mst: Haseena & Others | Waseem Ali(ADVO-684-SBC-NWB) | PPC-379 | 1/2025 Women & Children SBA |
||
| 6 | Other CR/Sessions Cases (If Any) 142/2025 | The State VS Sameer Ahmed Shaikh & another | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 119/2025 A-Section Nawabshah |
||
| 7 | PPC 330/2025 | The State VS Mashooq Ali Chandio | ADPP(ADPP-0002-GOV-THT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-298-A | 12/2025 Jam Dattar |
|
| 8 | Other CR/Sessions Cases (If Any) 128/2026 | The State Versus VS Kashmir Khan Pathan & Others | Naeem Ahmed(ADVO-636-SBC-NWB) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 12/2026 A-Section Nawabshah |
||
| 9 | PPC 226/2026 | The State Versus VS Manzoor Hussain Khaskheli & Others | ADPP(ADPP-0007-GOV-MPK) | PPC-506 | 33/2026 Gupchani |
Case called. Accused persons namely Manzoor Hussain,Talib Hussain and Akhtar Hussain are are present on bail along with counsel. Learned ADPP is present on behalf of State. Matter fixed for evidence. Complainant and his witnesses are present along with counsel. other PWs are called absent. The learned counsel for accused submit adjournment application. Order passed on it. Matter put off to 15.09.2026 for Evidence. Present accused persons are directed to attend. Complainant bond down to produced his witnesses on next date of hearing. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 10 | PPC 142/2026 | The State Versus VS Imran Ali Bhatti & Others | Naeem Ahmed(ADVO-636-SBC-NWB) | PPC-302,PPC-324,PPC-337-H,PPC-504,PPC-506 | 233/2025 A-Section Nawabshah |
Cr. Case called accused Imran Bhatti and Rajab Bhatti are present on bail. While accused Farman is called absent he is absconder shown on charge sheet and already declared P.O.The junior of learned counsel for complainant is present. ADPP for the state is present. Copy supply to both accused person at Ex.4. Since the alleged offence punishable under Section 302,324 are exclusively triable by the Honorable Court of Sessions. Hence let the case be sentup to Honorable Sessions Court for further trial. Matter put of to 08.09.2026 for further trial. Office is directed to sent up the R & P of instant matter to Honorable Sessions Court. |
|
| 11 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 279/2026 | The State Versus VS Osama Khokhar | Imtiaz Ahmed-ADPP(ADVO-423-SBC-SHK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 98/2026 A-Section Nawabshah |
Cr. Case called accused Osama Khokhar is called absent without any intimation. ADDP for the state is present. Process NBW against accused return. Order on it. Let the c=stateent be recorded to process server. Statement recorded at Ex.1. Put off to 11.09.2026 for supply of copies. Issue 87/88 Cr.P.C against accused person. |
|
| 12 | PPC 282/2026 | The State Versus VS Mumtaz Ali & Others | Zaheer Ahmed (ADVO-962-SBC-NWB) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-337-H,PPC-354,PPC-504 | 22/2026 Jam Dattar |
Cr. Case called accused namely Mumtaz Ali, Aftab Ali, Mehtab Ali, Mst. Karbano, Ali Bux are present on bail. While accused Ali Hyder is called absent without any inrtimation. ADPP for the state is present. Matter fixed for supply of copies. Put off to 09.09.2026 for supply of copies. present accused are directed to attend. Issue NBW against accused Ali Hyder. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 13 | DC (Direct Complaint) 26/2026 | Mir Muhammad Abro Reader, D and SJ, SBA VS SIP Ali Bux Magsi | Imtiaz Ahmed-ADPP(ADVO-423-SBC-SHK) | PPC-174,PPC-175 | / |
D.C called Accused SIP Ali Bux Magsi is present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. Charge framed at Ex.2. Plea of accused recorded at Ex.2/A he plead not guilty calim for trial.Put off to 10.09.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. Issue Notice to complainant and all PWs. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications | |||||||
| 14 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 63/2026 | Siraj Ahmed VS The state | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-516-A | / |
||
| 15 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 60/2026 | Siraj Ahmed VS The state | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Cr.PC-523 | / |
||
| 16 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 61/2026 | Shakeel Hussain VS The state | Aziz Ur Rehman(ADVO-1340-SBC-NWB) | Cr.PC-516-A | / |
||
| 17 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 62/2026 | Shakeel Hussain VS The state | Aziz Ur Rehman(ADVO-1340-SBC-NWB) | Cr.PC-523 | / |
||
| 18 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 68/2026 | Faizan Ali VS The state | Raja Khan (ADVO-949-SBC-NWB) | Cr.PC-516-A | / |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 19 | DC (Direct Complaint) 24/2026 | Zuhaib Ahmed Malak Clerk, JM-II,Nawabshah VS SI Nisar Ali Abbasi Investigation Officer FIA CC SBA | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | PPC-175 | 3/2026 F.I.A. Shaheed Benazirabad |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 20 | Other CR/Sessions Cases (If Any) 139/2026 | The State Versus VS Seenghar Ahmed Brohi | Imam Bux (ADVO-784-SBC-NWB) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 9/2026 Gupchani |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 21 | PPC 175/2025 | The State VS Yameen Khan Shar | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-489-F | 109/2024 Jam Dattar |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
| 22 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 22/2026 | Imtiaz Hussain Bhatti VS Mazhar Hussain Bhatti & others | Shahnaz Bibi(ADVO-1230-SBC-NWB) | Cr.PC-133 | / |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 88 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 23 | Other CR/Sessions Cases (If Any) 434/2025 | The State Versus VS Jameel Ahmed Brohi | Asadullah (ADVO-982-SBC-NWB) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8 | 102/2025 Airport, Nawabshah |
||
| 24 | PPC 133/2026 | The State Versus VS Muhammad Tahir Jameel Khanzada | Sajid Hussain(ADVO-1258-SBC-NWB) | PPC-489-F | 251/2025 A-Section Nawabshah |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 87 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 25 | PPC 197/2026 | The State Versus VS Abdullah Lashari & Others | Ghulam Kalsoom(ADVO-616-SBC-NWB) | PPC-381-A | 149/2025 A-Section Nawabshah |
CR. case called accused Abdullah is present on bail along with junior counsel. While accused Nasir is absconder shown on charge sheet. ADPP for the state is present. Process 87 CR.P.C against absconder accused person not return. Put off to 10.09.2026 for formal. Present accused is directed to attend. Issue 87 Cr.P.C against absconder accused person. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For ex-parte proof. | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 7/2026 |
Miss Neelam Mughal VS Kamran Khan and another | Khalid Hussain(ADVO-481-SBC-NWB) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | |||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 22/2026 |
Piyar ALi Jamali VS M/S U Bank U- Microfinance Bank Ltd & Others | Zaheer Ahmed (ADVO-962-SBC-NWB) | Muhammad Kaleem (ADVO-905-SBC-NWB) | TC suit is called. Plaintiff is present along with his counsel. Mr. Adnan Ahmed Ansari, advocate is present on behalf of defendant No. 01. Mr. Kaleem Jatt, advocate is also present on behalf of defendant NO. 02 and he also submitted the Written Statement on behalf of defendant No. 02. Order on it. File on record. During proceedings the counsel for defendant No. 01 raised the Jurisdictional point, the issue of plaintiff is concerned with Shahpur Chakar Bank which does not comes with the Jurisdiction of this Court. Order thereon. The plaint be returned to plaintiff to file before the Court having Jurisdiction as this Court lacks the jurisdiction to try this suit, therefore plaintiff is hereby returned U.O 07 Rule 10 CPC with no order to costs, followed by the separate order. |
||
| 3 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 32/2026 |
Mansoor Mangrio VS SSP District Shaheed Benazirabad & Others | Irfan Ali (ADVO-5237-SBC-HYD) | TC suit is called. Plaintiff is present and his counsel is also present. Since admission of this suit before this court this court repeatedly directed the plaintiff for depositing the proper court fees stamps but he failed to comply the orders of this court therefore plaint is hereby rejected/dismissed u/o 7 Rule 11 CPC. |
|||