Matter called. Learned counsel for the applicant is present. None is present from opponent side. Process has not got issued upon opponent side. In the interest of jsutice, matter is adjourned to 03.09.2026 for service upon defendant through Bailiff, Registered AD & Courier Service.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the applicant is present. None is present from opponent side. Process has not got issued upon opponent side. In the interest of jsutice, matter is adjourned to 03.09.2026 for service upon defendant through Bailiff, Registered AD & Courier Service.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and filed statement alongwith court fee stamp of Rs.15000/- which is kept on record. None is present from the defendants??? side. Summon has been duly published in newspaper daily EXPRESS Karachi dated 20.08.2026 and copy of newspaper is kept on record. Order passed on separate order sheet. Keeping in view of process reports, the service upon the defendant No.1 is held good. Put off to 21.09.2026 for filing W.S & C.A by all defendants.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendant which is kept on record and received copies. Counsel for the defendant requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for filing W.S & C.A by defendant and also submission of court fee stamp as last and final chance.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and submitted statement alongwith court fee stamp of Rs.15000/- which is kept on record. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3. Process through Bailiff returned served upon defendants No.1 and 2 and unserved upon defendant No.3. Order passed on process report. Repeat summon upon the defendant No.3 through Bailiff. The service upon the defendant No.1 & 2 is held good. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.3 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2 and also hearing on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and submitted statement alongwith court fee stamp of Rs.15000/- which is kept on record. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3. Process through Bailiff returned served upon defendants No.1 and 2 and unserved upon defendant No.3. Order passed on process report. Repeat summon upon the defendant No.3 through Bailiff. The service upon the defendant No.1 & 2 is held good. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.3 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2 and also hearing on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and submitted statement alongwith court fee stamp of Rs.15000/- which is kept on record. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3. Process through Bailiff returned served upon defendants No.1 and 2 and unserved upon defendant No.3. Order passed on process report. Repeat summon upon the defendant No.3 through Bailiff. The service upon the defendant No.1 & 2 is held good. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.3 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2 and also hearing on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and submitted statement alongwith court fee stamp of Rs.15000/- which is kept on record. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3. Process through Bailiff returned served upon defendants No.1 and 2 and unserved upon defendant No.3. Order passed on process report. Repeat summon upon the defendant No.3 through Bailiff. The service upon the defendant No.1 & 2 is held good. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.3 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2 and also hearing on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and submitted statement alongwith court fee stamp of Rs.15000/- which is kept on record. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3. Process through Bailiff returned served upon defendants No.1 and 2 and unserved upon defendant No.3. Order passed on process report. Repeat summon upon the defendant No.3 through Bailiff. The service upon the defendant No.1 & 2 is held good. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.3 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2 and also hearing on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and submitted statement alongwith court fee stamp of Rs.15000/- which is kept on record. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3. Process through Bailiff returned served upon defendants No.1 and 2 and unserved upon defendant No.3. Order passed on process report. Repeat summon upon the defendant No.3 through Bailiff. The service upon the defendant No.1 & 2 is held good. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.3 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2 and also hearing on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and submitted statement alongwith court fee stamp of Rs.15000/- which is kept on record. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3. Process through Bailiff returned served upon defendants No.1 and 2 and unserved upon defendant No.3. Order passed on process report. Repeat summon upon the defendant No.3 through Bailiff. The service upon the defendant No.1 & 2 is held good. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.3 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2 and also hearing on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and submitted statement alongwith court fee stamp of Rs.15000/- which is kept on record. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3. Process through Bailiff returned served upon defendants No.1 and 2 and unserved upon defendant No.3. Order passed on process report. Repeat summon upon the defendant No.3 through Bailiff. The service upon the defendant No.1 & 2 is held good. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.3 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2 and also hearing on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and submitted statement alongwith court fee stamp of Rs.15000/- which is kept on record. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3. Process through Bailiff returned served upon defendants No.1 and 2 and unserved upon defendant No.3. Order passed on process report. Repeat summon upon the defendant No.3 through Bailiff. The service upon the defendant No.1 & 2 is held good. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.3 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2 and also hearing on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and submitted statement alongwith court fee stamp of Rs.15000/- which is kept on record. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3. Process through Bailiff returned served upon defendants No.1 and 2 and unserved upon defendant No.3. Order passed on process report. Repeat summon upon the defendant No.3 through Bailiff. The service upon the defendant No.1 & 2 is held good. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.3 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2 and also hearing on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and submitted statement alongwith court fee stamp of Rs.15000/- which is kept on record. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3. Process through Bailiff returned served upon defendants No.1 and 2 and unserved upon defendant No.3. Order passed on process report. Repeat summon upon the defendant No.3 through Bailiff. The service upon the defendant No.1 & 2 is held good. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.3 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2 and also hearing on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and submitted statement alongwith court fee stamp of Rs.15000/- which is kept on record. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3. Process through Bailiff returned served upon defendants No.1 and 2 and unserved upon defendant No.3. Order passed on process report. Repeat summon upon the defendant No.3 through Bailiff. The service upon the defendant No.1 & 2 is held good. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.3 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2 and also hearing on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and submitted statement alongwith court fee stamp of Rs.15000/- which is kept on record. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3. Process through Bailiff returned served upon defendants No.1 and 2 and unserved upon defendant No.3. Order passed on process report. Repeat summon upon the defendant No.3 through Bailiff. The service upon the defendant No.1 & 2 is held good. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.3 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2 and also hearing on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3 and 4. Process through Bailiff returned served upon defendants No.1 and 2 and unserved upon defendant No.3 and 4. Order passed on process report. Repeat summon upon the defendant No.4 through Bailiff, Registered AD & Courier Service. Plaintiff is directed to file fresh address of defendant No.3. The service upon the defendant No.1 & 2 is held good. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.4 and also filing fresh address of defendant No.4 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2 and also submission of court fee stamp as last and final chance.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3 and 4. Process through Bailiff returned served upon defendants No.1 and 2 and unserved upon defendant No.3 and 4. Order passed on process report. Repeat summon upon the defendant No.4 through Bailiff, Registered AD & Courier Service. Plaintiff is directed to file fresh address of defendant No.3. The service upon the defendant No.1 & 2 is held good. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.4 and also filing fresh address of defendant No.4 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2 and also submission of court fee stamp as last and final chance.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3 and 4. Process through Bailiff returned served upon defendants No.1 and 2 and unserved upon defendant No.3 and 4. Order passed on process report. Repeat summon upon the defendant No.4 through Bailiff, Registered AD & Courier Service. Plaintiff is directed to file fresh address of defendant No.3. The service upon the defendant No.1 & 2 is held good. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.4 and also filing fresh address of defendant No.4 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2 and also submission of court fee stamp as last and final chance.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3 and 4. Process through Bailiff returned served upon defendants No.1 and 2 and unserved upon defendant No.3 and 4. Order passed on process report. Repeat summon upon the defendant No.4 through Bailiff, Registered AD & Courier Service. Plaintiff is directed to file fresh address of defendant No.3. The service upon the defendant No.1 & 2 is held good. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.4 and also filing fresh address of defendant No.4 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2 and also submission of court fee stamp as last and final chance.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3 and 4. Process through Bailiff returned served upon defendants No.1 and 2 and unserved upon defendant No.3 and 4. Order passed on process report. Repeat summon upon the defendant No.4 through Bailiff, Registered AD & Courier Service. Plaintiff is directed to file fresh address of defendant No.3. The service upon the defendant No.1 & 2 is held good. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.4 and also filing fresh address of defendant No.4 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2 and also submission of court fee stamp as last and final chance.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3 and 4. Process through Bailiff returned served upon defendants No.1 and 2 and unserved upon defendant No.3 and 4. Order passed on process report. Repeat summon upon the defendant No.4 through Bailiff, Registered AD & Courier Service. Plaintiff is directed to file fresh address of defendant No.3. The service upon the defendant No.1 & 2 is held good. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.4 and also filing fresh address of defendant No.4 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2 and also submission of court fee stamp as last and final chance.

Matter called. Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and submitted court fee stamp of Rs.15000/- and Courier receipts which are kept on record. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3. Process through Bailiff returned served upon defendants No.1 and 2 and unserved upon defendant No.3. Order passed on process report. Repeat summon upon the defendant No.3 through Bailiff and Registered AD. The service upon the defendant No.1 & 2 is held good. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.3 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and submitted statement alongwith court fee stamp of Rs.15000/- which is kept on record. Mr.Ayan Mustafa Memon and Mr.Muhammad Murad Maitlo advocates filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No.1 & 2 which is kept on record and received copies. None is present from defendant No.3. Process has not got issued upon defendants. Issue summon upon the defendant No.3 through Bailiff, Registered AD & Courier Service. Counsel for the defendants No.1 & 2 requested to grant some time to file C.A on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC before passing any interim order. Request allowed. Put off to 28.08.2026 for service upon defendant No.3 as well as filing W.S & C.A by defendant No.1 & 2 and also hearing on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs/D.Hs is present. Learned counsel for the defendant No.1/J.D is present. Mukhtiarkar Gulzar-e-Hijri is present in person. Mr.Khalid Maroof Survey Superintendent Karachi is present in person. Mr.Anwar Ahmed Panhwar Ex-Survey Superintendent is also present in person. Order passed on separate order sheet. Let the matter be referred to the Official Assignee of Honourable High Court of Sindh for compliance of order dated 29.11.2024 of the Honourable High Court of Sindh. The Survey Superintendent and Mukhtiarkar Gulzar-e-Hijri are directed to appear before the Official Assignee Honourable High Court of Sindh on 02.09.2026 and the Official Assignee Honourable High Court of Sindh may fix any appropriate date for making compliance of the order dated 29.11.2024 of the Honourable High Court of Sindh. In case of failure of attendance of the Survey Superintendent and Mukhtiarkar Gulzar-e-Hijri, the contempt proceeding shall be initiated against them. The attendance of then Survey Superintendent namely Mr.Anwar Ahmed Panhwar is dispensed with. Let the copy of this order as well as request be submitted to the Official Assignee Honourable High Court of Sindh for further proceedings and compliance of order dated 29.11.2024 of the Honourable High Court of Sindh. Put off to 09.09.2026 for compliance.

Matter called. None is prsent from the plaintiff side. Neither Process fees has been submitted nor court fee stamp has been submitted yet. The Vakalatnama of the plaintiff has not filed by the plaintiff. In the interest of justice, matter is adjourend to 28.08.2026 for compliance as well as office objection as last and final chance.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for the defendant No.1 is present and requested to grant some time to file Counter Affidavit on application U/O 6 Rule 17 CPC and application U/O 1 rule 10 CPC. 03 days time granted to file C.A. Learned counsel for the defendant No.4 is also present and endorsed no objection on the said applications. None is present from rest of defendants side. Put off to 28.08.2026 for hearing on such applications.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff alongwith plaintiff are present. Learned counsel for the defendant No.2 is present. Junior Counsel on behalf of defendant No.2 is present. None is present from rest of defendants side. Counsel for defendant No.2 cross-examined the plaintiff. On the request of Junior Counsel for defendant No.1, matter is adjourned to 27.08.2026 at 09.30 a.m. for cross examination of the plaintiff by the defendant No.1 as last and final chance.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for the defendant No.1 is present. None is present from rest of defendants side. Heard arguments on application U/O 14 Rule 5 CPC by the plaintiff side. Put off to 09.09.2026 for Order on application U/O 14 Rule 5 CPC.

Matter called. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs/D.Hs is present. Learned counsel for the defendant No.1/J.D is present. Mr.Asad Nadeem advocate filed memo of appearance on behalf of defendant No.4/SBCA which is kept on record. Mukhtiarkar Gulzar-e-Hijri is present in person. Mr.Khalid Maroof Survey Superintendent Karachi is present in person. Mr.Anwar Ahmed Panhwar Ex-Survey Superintendent is also present in person. Order passed on separate order sheet. Let the matter be referred to the Official Assignee of Honourable High Court of Sindh for compliance of order dated 29.11.2024 of the Honourable High Court of Sindh. The Survey Superintendent and Mukhtiarkar Gulzar-e-Hijri are directed to appear before the Official Assignee Honourable High Court of Sindh on 02.09.2026 and the Official Assignee Honourable High Court of Sindh may fix any appropriate date for making compliance of the order dated 29.11.2024 of the Honourable High Court of Sindh. In case of failure of attendance of the Survey Superintendent and Mukhtiarkar Gulzar-e-Hijri, the contempt proceeding shall be initiated against them. The attendance of then Survey Superintendent namely Mr.Anwar Ahmed Panhwar is dispensed with. Let the copy of this order as well as request be submitted to the Official Assignee Honourable High Court of Sindh for further proceedings and compliance of order dated 29.11.2024 of the Honourable High Court of Sindh. Put off to 09.09.2026 for compliance.