| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 98/2025 | The State VS Imtiaz Ali and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK),Mehran Khan (ADVO-373-SBC-KMB) | Razi Khan(ADVO-1186-SBC-LRK) | PPC-34,PPC-392 | 76/2025 Nasirabad |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Umar and Ali Mustafa are present on bail, while accused Imtiaz Ali and Muhammad Arab have already been declared as P.Os. ADPP is present. Learned counsel for accused is present. Complainant present, her counsel present. Process against r/P.Ws returned un-served. Today the application u/s 249-A Cr.P.C is fixed for hearing. The complainant is present and submitted an application that present applicants/accused are not her real culprits and raised no objection for their acquittal. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The applicants/accused Ali Mustafa and Muhammad Umar are acquitted u/s 249-A Cr.P.C, their bail bonds stands cancelled and surety discharged. The case against the P.O accused be kept on dormant file, till their arrest or otherwise. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 155/2026 | The State VS Rajib Chandio and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Abdul Khalique(ADVO-2627-SBC-LRK) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-H,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 185/2026 Nasirabad |
Case called. The accused Rajib Ali, Ghulam Qadir, Shah Nawaz, Shahid Ali and Gul Bahar are present on bail, learned ADPP is present, learned counsel for accused present, complainant present, learned counsel for complainant present. Charge framed against the accused at Ex. No. 02 to which pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial, such pleas of accused recorded at Ex. No. 02/A to 02/E. Put off to 07.11.2026.For evidence. Issue summons against the complainant and material witnesses. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 3 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 125/2026 | The State VS Hakim Ali Khoso | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 96/2026 Nasirabad |
Case called. UTP/Accused Hakim Ali Khoso is produced in custody from Sub Jail, Warah. Learned ADPP present. Mr. Mehran Khan Patoojo Advocate for accused present. The statement of accused u/s 342 Cr.P.C recorded at Ex. No. 09 to which accused declared himself to be innocent however did not examined himself on oath nor led evidence in his defence. Arguments heard. Judgment passed at Ex. No. 10 and announced in open Court. The accused is acquitted u/s 245(i) Cr.P.C. He is produce in custody and sent back to custody along with release writ with directions to release him forthwith if he is not required in any other custody case. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 4 | Gambling Act 143/2026 | The State VS Saeed Ahmed Kalhoro and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Mehran Khan (ADVO-373-SBC-KMB) | Gambling Act -Section 5-A | 172/2026 Nasirabad |
Case called. The case has already been disposed off. The accused Hameer and Pervaz are shown absconders, ADPP is present, rest of accused have already been convicted u/s 243 Cr.P.C. learned ADPP is present. Proclamation u/s 87 Cr.P.C issued against the accused returned with the endorsement of process server and mashirnama that he has completed all the formalities as envisaged u/s 87 Cr.P.C, such statement of process server recorded at Ex. No. 06, proclamation u/s 87 Cr.P.C and mashirnama at Ex. No. 06/A to 06/B. Order on it. Proclamation u/s 88 Cr.P.C issued against the accused, reply is received that the accused does not possess any moveable or immoveable property, which is placed on record at Ex. No. 07. The accused are declared as P.O. Heard. Order passed at Ex. No. 08 and announced in open Court. Let the case against the accused be kept on dormant file, till their arrest or otherwise. Office is directed to issue NBW against the absconding accused in perpetuity and SHO is directed to act as per sketched guidance in the case of Nasrullah and others Vs the SHO P.S Jacobabad and others. (PLD 2016 Sindh 238). |
| 5 | PPC 163/2026 | The State VS Tarique Ali Kalhoro | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK),Mehran Khan (ADVO-373-SBC-KMB) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-489-F | 163/2026 Nasirabad |
Case called. The accused Tarique is shown as absconder, learned ADPP is present, complainant is present, learned counsel for complainant is present. Proclamation u/s 87 Cr.P.C issued against the accused returned with the endorsement of process server and mashirnama that he has completed all the formalities as envisaged u/s 87 Cr.P.C, such statement of process server recorded at Ex. No. 02, proclamation u/s 87 Cr.P.C and mashirnama at Ex. No. 02/A to 02/B. Order on it. Proclamation u/s 88 Cr.P.C issued against the accused, reply is received that the accused does not possess any moveable or immoveable property, which is placed on record at Ex. No. 03. The accused is declared as P.O. Heard. Order passed at Ex. No. 04 and announced in open Court. Let the case against the accused be kept on dormant file, till his arrest or otherwise. Office is directed to issue NBW against the absconding accused in perpetuity and SHO is directed to act as per sketched guidance in the case of Nasrullah and others Vs the SHO P.S Jacobabad and others. (PLD 2016 Sindh 238). |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 55/2026 | Mst. Suhana alias Bakhtawar VS Muhammad Ali Soomro | Mehran Khan (ADVO-373-SBC-KMB) | Shafique Rehman(ADVO-103-SBC-KMB) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family Suit called. The plaintiff is present, learned counsel for plaintiff is present, defendant is present, learned counsel for defendant is present, the learned counsel for defendant filed W.S a/w affidavit and list of witnesses. Order on it. Copy supplied to other side. Put off to 03.11.2026. For P.T. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 52/2026 | Mst. Aasiya VS Panah alias Rabail Channo | Saad Ur Rehman Shah(ADVO-52800-SBC-KHS) | Family Suit-Dissolution of Marriage on the option of puberty | Family Suit called. The plaintiff is present, learned counsel for plaintiff is present, defendant is present, learned counsel for defendant is present, today the application regarding minority and maintainability of the suit is fixed for orders. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant application is dismissed with no order as to costs. Today the matter is fixed for pre-trial proceedings. Pre-trial held but failed. The arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The suit of plaintiff is decreed with no order as to costs. Let such decree be prepared accordingly and the copy of Order and Decree be sent to the Chairman concerned Union council, for information and compliance. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 19/2026 | Mst Kanwal VS Imran Ali | Abdul Khalique(ADVO-2627-SBC-LRK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Suit called. The plaintiff is present, learned counsel for plaintiff is present, defendant is called absent, learned counsel for defendant is absent. Witness Ashique Ali is present. In the interest of justice. Put off to 10.11.2026. For P.E/cross. |
|