| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 136/2026 | The State VS Ghulam Mustafa Massan and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-LRK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-337-H | 19/2026 Nasirabad |
Case called. Accused 01. Mehboob Ali, 02. Siraj Ali, 03. Ghulam Mustafa, 04. Mumtaz alias Tharo, are present on bail, while accused 05. Muhammad Yaqoob and 06. Khadim Hussain are called absent under intimation submitted by co-accused their absence excuse. Order thereon. Absence of accused is hereby excused. Learned ADPP present. Learned counsel for accused is present. No P.Ws are present, process viz N.B.W issued against the complainant and r/P.Ws and notice on application u/s 249-A Cr.P.C. returned un-served with endorsement of process server and P.S copy of FIR in crime No. 14/2026 u/s 302, 324, 504, 148, 149 PPC of P.S Nasirabad, statements of nek mards that the complainant and P.W Wajid have been nominated in FIR and shifted to some unknown place and their present where abouts is not known, such statement of process server recorded at Ex. No. 10, N.B.W, statements of nek mards, notice and copy of FIR produced at Ex. No. 10/A to 10/E. Arguments heard on application u/s 249-A Cr.P.C. Order passed and announced in open Court. The application u/s 249-A Cr.P.C is converted in to an application u/s 249 Cr.P.C. The proceedings of the case is stopped, till appearance of complainant and material witnesses. The accused are on bail, their bail bonds remain intact for the period of 06 months and further directed to appear before this Court, as and when required. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 177/2026 | The State VS Kamran Khaskheli | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-496A | 145/2026 Nasirabad |
Case called. The accused Kamran Ali is shown as absconder, learned ADPP is present, proclamation u/s 87/88 Cr.P.C issued against the absconding accused. The proclamation u/s 87 Cr.P.c is returned with mashirnama and entry and endorsement of process server that he has completed all the formalities as envisaged u/s 87 Cr.P.C, such statement of process server is recorded at Ex. No. 02. Proclamation u/s 87 Cr.P.C at Ex. No. 02/A, mashirnama and entry at Ex. No. 02/B and 02/C. Order on it. The reply of proclamation u/s 88 Cr.P.C is received that the accused does not possess any moveable or immovable property, which is placed on record at Ex. No. 03. The accused is declared as proclaimed offender. Order passed and announced in open Court at Ex. No. 04. Let the case against the accused be kept on dormant file till his arrest or other wise. Office is directed to issue NBW against the absconding accused in perpetuity and SHO is directed to act as per sketched guidance in the case of Nasrullah and others Vs the SHO P.S Jacobabad and others. (PLD 2016 Sindh 238). |
| 3 | PPC 178/2026 | The State VS Aijaz Brohi | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-489-F | 198/2026 Nasirabad |
Case called. The accused Aijaz Brohi is shown as absconder, learned ADPP is present, proclamation u/s 87/88 Cr.P.C issued against the absconding accused. The proclamation u/s 87 Cr.P.c is returned with mashirnama and entry and endorsement of process server that he has completed all the formalities as envisaged u/s 87 Cr.P.C, such statement of process server is recorded at Ex. No. 02. Proclamation u/s 87 Cr.P.C at Ex. No. 02/A, mashirnama and entry at Ex. No. 02/B and 02/C. Order on it. The reply of proclamation u/s 88 Cr.P.C is received that the accused does not possess any moveable or immovable property, which is placed on record at Ex. No. 03. The accused is declared as proclaimed offender. Order passed and announced in open Court at Ex. No. 04. Let the case against the accused be kept on dormant file till his arrest or other wise. Office is directed to issue NBW against the absconding accused in perpetuity and SHO is directed to act as per sketched guidance in the case of Nasrullah and others Vs the SHO P.S Jacobabad and others. (PLD 2016 Sindh 238). |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 3/2023 |
Meer Muhammad Panhwar VS Khan Muhammad and others | Zamir Hussain Solangi(ADVO-563-SBC-LRK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Civil suit No.3/2023 called. Plaintiff Meer Muhammad is present. learned counsel for plaintiff present. Defendant No. 04 present, Learned counsel for defendants present. Arguments heard at length. Put off to 28.11.2026 for Judgment. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 27/2026 | Mst Soonhn Mangi VS Muhammad Malook Jhatial | Luqman Magsi(ADVO-1666-SBC-LRK) | Abdul Khalique(ADVO-2627-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Suit called. The plaintiff is present, learned counsel for plaintiff is present, attorney of defendant is present, learned counsel for defendant is absent. Learned counsel for plaintiff filed affidavit in evidence of plaintiff. Order on it. Copy to other side. Copy supplied to attorney of defendant. Put off to 05.12.2026. For P/E/cross. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 45/2026 | Mst. Asifa VS Abdul Hafeez Kandhro | Ahmed Ali(ADVO-163-SBC-KMB) | Mehran Khan (ADVO-373-SBC-KMB) | Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. The plaintiff is present, learned counsel for plaintiff is absent, defendant is present, learned counsel for defendant is present. Judgment passed and announced in open Court. The suit of plaintiff is dismissed with no order as to costs. Let such decree he prepared accoridngly. |
|
| 3 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 19/2026 | Mst. Benazir VS Mst. Uzma and others | Abdul Ghaffar Peerzada(ADVO-1235-SBC-LAR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act | G & W Application called. The applicant is present, learned counsel for applicant is present, opponent is present. Learned counsel for opponent present. The verification reports are already received. Publication has already been made. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The application is allowed subject to furnishing a solvent surety in the sum of Rs: 5,00,000/- (Five Lac), with directions to invest the share of minors in any profitable scheme, or purchase any immoveable property in the name of minors. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Exparte Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 53/2026 | Mst. Aqsa Wahocho VS Ali Raza Wahocho | Zain Ul Abdin(ADVO-655-SBC-DDU) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family Suit called. The plaintiff is present, learned counsel for plaintiff is absent, the defendant is called absent and already de-barred and declared ex-partee. Mr. Ali Bux Mashori Advocate is present and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of plaintiff. Order on it. file. Witness Fida Hussain is present. The learned counsel for plaintiff filed affidavit in ex-partee evidence of plaintiff and her witness Fida Hussain. The deposition of plaintiff recorded at Ex. No. 15, she produced her affidavit in ex-partee evidence at Ex. No. 15/A, witness Fida Hussain at Ex. No. 16, he produced his affidavit in evidence at Ex. No. 16/A. The learned counsel for plaintiff submitted side close statement. Order on it and is placed on record at Ex. No. 17. Arguments heard. Judgment passed and announced in open Court. The suit of plaintiff is decreed expartee and the marriage of the plaintiff with the defendant is dissolved. Let such decree be prepared accordingly. The copy of Judgment and Decree be sent to Chairman Union Council concerned for information and compliance. |
|
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 60/2026 | Mst. Parveen and others VS Iqbal Bhatti | Ibrar Ahmed(ADVO-23769-SBC-KHE) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. The plaintiff is present, learned counsel for plaintiff is present, defendant is present and already de-barred and declared ex-partee. Mr. Zamir Ali Siyal Advocate is present and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendant. Order on it. File and an application for adjournment on behalf of defendant. Order on it. Granted accordingly. Put off to 28.11.2026. For ex-partee evidence. |
|