| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 68/2026 | The State VS Gulab Junejo and others | Misri Khan(ADVO-460-SBC-DDU) | PPC-34,PPC-452,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 51/2026 Nasirabad |
Case called. The accused 01. Gulab, 02. Gul Bahar, 03. Gulzar, 04. Sikandar are present on bail, ADPP present, learned counsel for accused is present. No P.Ws are present, process viz NBW returned un-served with endorsement of process server and statements of nek mards that the complainant and his private witnesses have left their houses and their present where abouts is not known, such statement of process server is recorded at Ex. No. 03. NBW and statements of nek mards at Ex. No. 03/A to 03/C. Order on it. Put off to 11.09.2026. For evidence. Issue proclamation u/s 87/88 Cr.P.C against the complainant and his private witnesses. Issue process against the official witnesses. Present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 2 | PPC 83/2026 | Abdul Kareem Panhawar VS Aijaz Ali and another | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | PPC-380,PPC-457 | 65/2026 Nasirabad |
Case called. The accused Aijaz is present on bail, while accused Sadam has already been declared as PO. Learned counsel for accused is present, learned ADPP present, complainant is present. P.Ws Piyaral, Faiz Muhammad and mashir Jalal are present, the deposition of complainant at Ex. No. 06, FIR at Ex. No. 06/A, P.W Piyaral and Faiz Muhammad at Ex. No. 07 and 08, mashir Jalal at Ex. No. 09. The complainant submitted an application that he do not want to examine remaining witnesses and case may be disposed of as per evidence on record, which is placed on record at Ex. No. 10. The learned ADPP submitted side close statement at Ex. No. 11. Arguments heard. Judgment passed at Ex. No. 12 and announced in open Court. The accused Aijaz is acquitted u/s 245(i) Cr.P.C he is present on bail, his bail bonds stands cancelled and surety discharged. Since there is no evidence against the proclaimed offender accused Sadam Hussain hence he is also acquitted in absentia, let the copy of Judgment be sent to the SHO concerned for information and compliance. |
|
| 3 | PPC 90/2026 | The State VS Hidayatullah Shaikh and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-381-A | 113/2026 Nasirabad |
Case called . UTP/Accused Hidayatullah is produced in custody from sub Jail, Warah, while accused Ghulam Mustafa is present on bail. The learned ADPP present, Learned DC absent. Complainant and P.Ws Ali Raza are present, process returned un-served against the r/P.Ws. Case property produced. The accused Ghulam Mustafa submitted an application for adjournment. Order on it. Granted accordingly. Put off to 07.09.2026. For evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. UTP/Accused sent back to custody. Complainant is directed to attend. Next date extended on process. Case property returned to P.S with directions to produce on next date of hearing. |
| 4 | PPC 98/2026 | The State VS Ghulam Sarwar Mughal and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Ghulam Muhammad Pathan(ADVO-991-SBC-LRK) | PPC-34,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 62/2026 Nasirabad |
Case called. Accused Ghulam Sarwar, Imran and Karam are present on bail, while accused Aamir has already been declared as P.O. ADPP present, learned counsel for accused absent. Complainant is present and submitted an application for adjournment. Order on it. Granted. Put off to 14.09.2026. For evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. Complainant is directed to attend and produce his witnesses. Issue fresh process to r/P.Ws. |
| 5 | PPC 109/2026 | The State VS Mashooque Ali Tunio and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Abdul Ghaffar Peerzada(ADVO-1235-SBC-LAR) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 17/2026 Nasirabad |
Case called. The accused Mashooque Ali is called absent under intimation submitted by co-accused Murtaza for absence excuse. Order on it absence of accused is hereby excused with directions to produce medical proof, while accused Muhammad Zaman, Ghulam Mustafa, Ghulam Murtaza are present on bail, while accused Shakeel is produced in custody from Sub Jail, warah, learned ADPP is present, learned counsel for accused is absent, complainant is present, learned counsel for complainant is absent. Process against r/P.Ws returned un-served. Put off to 15.09.2026. For evidence. Present accused are directed to attend and inform the date of hearing to absent accused. UTP./Accused sent back to custody. Present complainant is directed to attend and produce his witnesses. Issue fresh process to r/P.Ws as already ordered. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 12/2026 | Muhammad Nawaz Bhand VS Mst Rasheeda and others | Ahmed Ali(ADVO-163-SBC-KMB) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act | Case called . The applicant is present, learned counsel for applicant is present. Report of FRC is already received from NADRA authorities. Opponents No.01 to 03 are present and already filed Objections. The verification report and publication already received. Arguments heard. Order passed the application is allowed as prayed subject to furnishing a solvent surety in the sum of Rs: 15,00000/-(Fifteen Lac) and P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of this Court. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 15/2026 | Suhana Kumari VS The Public at Large | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act | Case called. The applicant is absent, learned counsel for applicant is present. Verification reports and publication are already received. Order passed and announced in open Court the application is allowed as prayed subject to furnishing a solvent surety in the sum of Rs: 20,00000/-(Twenty Lac) and P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of this Court. |
|||