| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 165/2025 | Habib-ur-Rehman Tunio VS Muhammad Murad Mugheri | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK),Suhendar Kumar(ADVO-1042-SBC-KMB) | Abdul Sattar(ADVO-1626-SBC-LRK) | PPC-420,PPC-489-F | 102/2025 Waggan |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Murad Mugheri is present on bail, learned counsel for accused is absent. ADPP for the state present, Complainant is called absent under intimation submitted by one Kamran Ali for his absence excuse. Order on it. Absence of complainant is hereby excused and adjournment is granted accordingly, learned counsel for complainant absent, his junior counsel present. Today matter is fixed for Evidence so also hearing on application u/s 497 (5) Cr P.C. No P.Ws are present. Put off to 17.11.2026 for Evidence/hearing on Crl. Misc. application under section 497(5) Cr.P.C . Present accused is directed to attend. Issue summons against the r/P.Ws. Present applicant is directed to inform the date of hearing to complainant and to produce his witnesses. |
| 2 | PPC 59/2026 | The State VS Abdul Ghani Lodro and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-452,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 41/2026 Nasirabad |
Case called. The accused Abdul Ghani, Ali Raza and Ahmed Raza are present on bail. ADPP is present. Learned counsel for accused is absent. Complainant is present, No P.Ws are present, process against the r/P.Ws are returned un-served, Learned counsel for complainant present. Process against r/P.Ws returned unserved. The accused Abdul Ghani submitted an application for adjournment. Order on it. Granted. Put off to 17.11.2026. For evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. Present complainant is directed to attend and produce his witnesses. Issue process to r/P.Ws as already ordered. |
| 3 | PPC 95/2026 | The State VS Nizamuddin Jhatial and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Muhammad Ali Pirzada(ADVO-120-SBC-KMB),Muhammad Azam (ADVO-379-SBC-KMB) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 100/2026 Nasirabad |
Case called. The accused 01. Nizamuddin, 02. Ali Murad, 03. Akhlaque Ahmed, 04. Raja, 05. Sudheer, 06. Muslim Ali, 07. Babar Ali are present on bail, learned ADPP present, learned counsel for accused absent. Complainant and P.Ws Shakeel Ahmed, Manthar Ali and Fayaz are present. Learned counsel for complainant is present. Process against the r/P.Ws returned un-served. The examination in chief of complainant at Ex. No. 03, P.W Shakeel Ahmed at Ex. No. 04, Manthar Ali at Ex. No. 05, Mashir Fayaz at Ex. No. 06, he produced mashirnama of place of incident and inspection of injuries at Ex. No. 06/A to 06/B. The cross is reserved at the adjournment application submitted by accused Naseer Ahmed. Order on it. The cross is reserved. Put off to 16.11.2026. For evidence/cross. Present complainant and P.Ws are directed to attend. Issue summons against the r/P.Ws. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 4 | PPC 126/2026 | The State VS Farhan Ali and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Abdul Ghaffar Peerzada(ADVO-1235-SBC-LAR) | PPC-381-A | 139/2026 Nasirabad |
Case called. UTP/Accused 01. Farhan, 02. Muhammad Hussain are produced in custody from sub Jail, Warah through video link, while 03. Accused Shakeel and Asadullah are present on bail, Learned ADPP is present, learned counsel for accused is present. complainant is present. Mr. Shafique Rehman Advocate is present and file Vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. Order on it. File and submitted an application for adjournment. Order on it. Granted. Granted accordingly. Process against r/P.Ws returned un-served. Put off to 17.11.2026. For evidence. UTP/Accused sent back to custody without directions to produce them through video link on next date of hearing. Present accused are directed to attend. Call case property produced and returned to P.S with directions to produce the same on the date of hearing. Issue summons against the r/P.Ws. Present complainant is directed to attend and produce his witnesses. |
| 5 | PPC 139/2026 | The State VS Jan Muhammad Jhatial and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Mehran Khan (ADVO-373-SBC-KMB) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi | 106/2026 Nasirabad |
Case called. The accused 01. Asif, 02. Jan Muhammad, 03. Asad, 04. Pathan, 05. Fayaz, 06. Pren, 07. Arbab are present on interim pre-arrest bail, learned ADPP present, learned counsel for accused is present, complainant is present, learned counsel for complainant is present. No P.Ws are present, process against r/P.Ws returned un-served. The complainant submitted an application for adjournment. Order on it. Granted accordingly. Put off to 16.11.2026. For evidence. Issue summons to r/P.Ws. Present accused are directed to attend and produce copy of confirm bail order. Present complainant is directed to attend and produce his witnesses. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 174/2026 | The State VS Abdul Mateen and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Mehran Khan (ADVO-373-SBC-KMB) | PPC-337-A(ii),PPC-337-L | 206/2026 Nasirabad |
Interim report in FIR in crime No. 206/2026 P.S Nasirabad called. The I.O/ASI Imdad Hussain is called absent. WPC Hubdar Ali is present and submitted final report against the accused Abdul Matten son of Allahdito Wahoocho who is shown on bail, while accused Abdul Qadeer and Sageer both sons of Allahdito by caste Wahoocho have been shown as absconders u/s 337-A(ii), L(ii), 34 PPC along with opinion and copies of documents. Order on it. Challan accepted. Register the case issued NBW against the absconding accused. The complainant and P.Ws Muhammad Haneef an Abdul Sattar are present. Let the case of absconding accused be bifurcated. The learned ADPP is present, learned counsel for accused is present. Copies of documents supplied to accused at Ex. No. 01. The accused submitted an application to wave the period of 07 days and pray for framing of charge. Order on it and is placed on record at Ex. No. 02. Charge framed against the accused at Ex. No. 03 to which pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial, such plea of accused recorded at Ex. No. 03/A. The deposition of complainant recorded at Ex. No. 04, FIR produced at Ex. No. 04/A, P.Ws Muhammad Haneef and Abdul Sattar at Ex. No. 05 and 06. The complainant submitted an application that he do not want to examine remaining witnesses and to dispose of the matter as per evidence brought on record. Order on it and is placed on record at Ex. No. 07. The learned ADPP for the State submitted side close statement at Ex. No. 08. Arguments heard. Judgment passed at Ex. No. 08 and announced in open Court. The accused Abdul Matten is acquitted u/s 245(i) Cr.P.C, he is present on bail, his bail bonds stands cancelled and surety discharged. The absconding accused are also acquitted in absentia. Let the copy of Judgment be sent to SHO concerned for information and compliance.. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 60/2026 | Mst. Parveen and others VS Iqbal Bhatti | Ibrar Ahmed(ADVO-23769-SBC-KHE) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. The plaintiff is present, learned counsel for plaintiff is present, defendant is called absent without intimation. Order on Order sheet. The defendant is hereby de-barred from filling of W.S and declared ex-partee. Put off to 14.11.2026. For ex-partee evidence. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Exparte Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 53/2026 | Mst. Aqsa Wahocho VS Ali Raza Wahocho | Zain Ul Abdin(ADVO-655-SBC-DDU) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family Suit called. The plaintiff is present, learned counsel for plaintiff is absent, the defendant is called absent and already de-barred and declared ex-partee. The plaintiff submitted an application for adjournment. Order on it. Granted. Put off to 14.11.2026. For ex-partee evidence. |
|
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 59/2026 | Mst. Shakeela VS Azeem Chinjni | Ahmed Ali(ADVO-163-SBC-KMB) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. The plaintiff is present, learned counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendant is called absent and already de-barred and declared ex-partee. The learned counsel for plaintiff already filed affidavit in ex-partee evidence. The witness Sadam Hussain is present, the deposition of plaintiff recorded at Ex. No. 13, she produced her affidavit in evidence at Ex. 13/A, witness Sadam Hussain at Ex. No. 14, he produced his affidavit in evidence at Ex. No. 14/A. The learned counsel for plaintiff submitted side close statement at Ex. No. 15. Arguments heard. Judgment passed and announced in open Court. The suit of plaintiff is ex-partee decreed as prayed and marriage of the plaintiff is dissolved with the defendant with no order as to cost. Let such decree be prepared accordingly. The copy of Judgment and decree be sent to the Chairman concerned Union Council, for information and compliance. |
|
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 58/2026 | Mst. Ambar Khatoon VS Jameel Ahmed Junejo | Hakim Ali(ADVO-130-SBC-KMB) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. The plaintiff is present, learned counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendant is called absent and already de-barred and declared ex-partee. The learned counsel for plaintiff already filed affidavit in ex-partee evidence. The witness Mst Sartaj Khatoon is present. The deposition of plaintiff recorded at Ex. No. 14, she produced her affidavit in evidence at Ex. 14/A, witness Mst Sartaj Khatoon at Ex. No. 15, she produced her affidavit in evidence at Ex. No. 15/A. The learned counsel for plaintiff submitted side close statement at Ex. No. 16. Arguments heard. Judgment passed and announced in open Court. The suit of plaintiff is ex-partee decreed as prayed and marriage of the plaintiff is dissolved with the defendant with no order as to cost. Let such decree be prepared accordingly. The copy of Judgment and decree be sent to the Chairman concerned Union Council, for information and compliance. |
|