| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 16/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Azeem Arain & others | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | PPC-337-A(i) | 316/2025 Mirwah(Khp) |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Haneef is present in the court on bail, while accused Muhammad Azeem is t produced from Jail authority. Ld. ADPP and DA are present. Process returned. Time is extended. Issue P.O for accused Muhammad Azeem. Case is adjourned. P.O is on casual leave To come up on 08.08.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend and accused is back to jail |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 4/2025 | The State Versus VS Abdul Mateen Qureshi & others | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK) | PPC-420 | 190/2025 Mirwah(Khp) |
.Case called. Accused Abdul Mateen and Zubair are called absent. Ld. ADPP for the State and Ld. Advocate for accused Abdul Mateen are present. However, accused Abdul Mateen was granted exemption from personal appearance by the Court. NBWs be issued against accused Zubair through the concerned SHO, show cause notice issued to be concerned SHO. Letter is also directed to be issued to NADRA for blockage of the CNIC of accused Zubair. P.O is on casual leave To come up on 29.08.2026 for service of NBWs upon accused Zubair and for report from NADRA/reply of show cause notice. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 14/2026 | Amjad Ali Dasti VS Public at large | Muhammad Suleman Depar(ADVO-894-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act | G&W application called. Applicant Amjad Ali is called absent Counsel for applicant is present .Opponents called absent. Call reports from Mukhtiarkar and U.C. Matter is adjourned. P.O is on casual leave To come up on 12.08.2026 for reports. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 21/2026 | Mst. Nafeesa Shaikh VS Javed Soomro | Muhammad Aslam(ADVO-12492-SBC-KHC) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK) | Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff Mst. Nafees and her Ld. Counsel are in attendance. Defendant Javed Ali and her counsel are called absnet. the matter is adjourned. P.O is on casual leave To come up on 12.08.2026 for pre-trial. |
|
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 52/2026 | Mst Ghulam Fatima VS Nisar Ahmed | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff Mst. Ghulam Fatima called absent her counsel is present. Defendant Nisar Ahmed called absent. Defendant called absent he is already debarred. P.O is on Casual leave Put off to 08.08.2026 for pre-trial/exparte evidence |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 67/2026 | Mst. Farzana VS Aftab Ali | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff Mst.Farzana and her are in attendance. Defendant Afteb Ali and his Ld. Counsel are called absent . P.O is on casual leave To come up on 17.08.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 25/2024 | Mst. Nazia Gopang VS Haibat Khan Gopang. | Muhammad Aslam (ADVO-2480-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff Mst. Nazia called absent, however, her attorney called absent his counsel are Present . Defendant Haibat called absent but his Ld. Counsel is also present. the matter is adjourned. P.O is on casual leave To come up on 22.08.2026 for final arguments and hearing on the application under Section 151, CPC |
|
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 26/2024 | Baby Alia Gopang VS Haibat Khan Gopang. | Muhammad Aslam (ADVO-2480-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance | Family suit called. Plaintiff Mst. Nazia called absent, however, her attorney called absent Counsel is present. Defendant Haibat called absent but his Ld. Counsel is also present. the matter is adjourned. P.O is on casual leave To come up on 22.08.2026 for final arguments and hearing on the application under Section 151, CPC. |
|