| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 81/2025 | The State VS Rameez Hussain Shah | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-489-F | 29/2025 Gambat |
Case called. Accused Rameez Ali shah present on bail. Ld. D.A called absent. Ld. ADPP for the state is present. Summon issued to complainant and all P.Ws is returned partly served partly un-served. Complainant Sheeraz Ahmed is present. Today case was fixed for evidence.D/O PW.01. Complainant Sheeraz Ahmed recorded his evidence on oath at Ex:-03.He produce different documents at Ex:-03/A to Ex:-03/C. Accused Rameez Ali Shah submitted adjournment application.Order on it. Adjourned with final chance. Hence case adjourned Put off to........02.10.2026. For evidence/cross reserved of PW.01. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 34/2023 | The State VS Muhammad Sabir | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-489-F | 173/2021 Gambat |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Sabir called absent. Ld. D.A called absent. Ld. ADPP for the state is present. Proclamation u/s 88 Cr.P.C not received from concerned Mukhtiarkar. Order passed and announced in open Court. The case against the accused Muhammad Sabir kept on dormant file, till his arrest or appearance before this Court. Order passed accordingly. |
| 3 | PPC 4/2026 | The State VS Azad Khan & another | ADPP() | Nazir Abbas(ADVO-1800-SBC-KHP) | PPC-337-H,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 4/2026 Gambat |
Case called. Accused Haji Khan called absent. While accused Azad Khan called absent, he is already declared as Proclaimed Offender. Ld. D.A called absent, but his jr: partner is present and submitted adjournment application for absence excused of accused Haji Khan.Order on it. Adjourned with final chance and absence excused. Ld. ADPP for the state is present. Ld.counsel for complainant also called absent. Complainant and his P.Ws are called absent. Proclamation u/s 87 Cr.P.C proceedings issued against complainant and P.Ws is returned un-executed.Order on it.Let the statement of ASI be recorded.Statement of ASI Imam Dino Narejo of PS Gambat recorded at Ex:-07. He produce different documents at Ex:-07/A to Ex:-07/E. Proclamation u/s 88 Cr.P.C at Ex:-08. Hence case adjourned. Put off to......16.09.2026.For service/order on proceedings u/s 87/88 Cr.P.C/Hg on application u/s 249-A Cr.P.C. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 119/2026 | Mst Faiza VS Mian Fahad Ali | NIL Advocate(ADVO-000-SBC-KHI) | NIL Advocate(ADVO-000-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Fiza Moomal called absent.Attorney of plaintiff Mian Gada Hussain also called absent, but his counsel Mr. Wajid Ali Abbasi is present and submitted statement along with publication in daily news paper Kawish dated:- 08.09.2026.Order on it.File.Defendant Mian Fahad Ali called absent, hence service upon defendant is hereby held good.Let the matter be fixed for appearance of defendant/W.S. Hence matter adjourned. Put off to.......28.09.2026. For appearance of defendant/W.S. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 116/2026 | Mst Shumaila VS Imran Ali | Ali Hyder(ADVO-1999-SBC-KHP) | Arif Ali (ADVO-2300-SBC-KHP) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Shumaila called absent, but her counsel Mr. Ali Hyder Jiskani is present. Defendant Imran Ali and his counsel Mr. Arif Ali Lashari are called absent.Brother of defendant namely Kamran Ali is present and submitted adjournment application.Order on it.Adjourned. Hence matter adjourned. Put of to.???.23.09.2026. For W/S. |
|
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 120/2026 | Mst Nagma VS Sadam Hussain | Muhammad Haneef (ADVO-1663-SBC-KHP) | NIL Advocate(ADVO-000-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Nagma is present, her counsel Mr. Muhammad Hanif Maitlo called absent, bu his jr: partner is present. Defendant Sadam Hussain called absent, his service already held good vide diary dated:-20.08.2026. Today matter was fixed for appearance of defendant/W.S. Hence matter adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to.......22.09.2026. For appearance of defendant/W.S. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 115/2026 | Mst Zareena VS Kamran Ali | Ali Hyder(ADVO-1999-SBC-KHP) | Arif Ali (ADVO-2300-SBC-KHP) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Zarina called absent, but her counsel Mr. Ali Hyder Jiskani is present. Defendant Kamran Ali is present, but his counsel Mr. Arif Ali Lashari called absent.Order passed on written statement.Copy to other side. Today matter was fixed for pre-trial. Ld. counsel for plaintiff submitted adjournment application.Order on it. Adjourned with final chance. Hence matter adjourned. Put off to.......23.09.2026.For Pre-trial. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 35/2025 | Mst. Noshaba VS Saeed Ahmed | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Noshaba a/w her counsel Mr. Shafi Muhammad Bango are present. Defendant Saeed Ahmed and his counsel Mr. Ashique Hussain Shaikh are present. Witness of defendant side namely Sajid Ali called absent. Today matter was fixed for cross evidence of defendant side. Ld. counsel for plaintiff submitted adjournment application.Order on it.Adjourned with final chance.Defendant Saeed Ahmed submitted adjournment application.Order on it.File. Hence matter adjourned. Put off to.......21.09.2026. For cross evidence of defendant side. |
|
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 8/2026 | Perah & others VS Kamal Channo | Inam Ali Larik(ADVO-1300-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Parah and her counsel Mr. Inam Ali Larik are present. Defendant Muhammad Kamal and his counsel Mr. Izat Ali Khaki are called absent. Today matter was fixed for evidence of plaintiff side. Witness of plaintiff side namely Ali Khan is present. D/O PW.01. Plaintiff Mst. Perah recorded her evidence on oath at Ex:-01. D/O PW.02. Ali Khan recorded his evidence on oath at Ex:-02. Hence cross of PWs No.01 and 02 is reserved. Hence matter adjourned.Put off to........... 28.09.2026. For evidence of plaintiff side/cross reserved of PWs No.01 and 02. |
|
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 18/2026 | Mst: Fozia VS Sameed Khemtio | Inam Ali Larik(ADVO-1300-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Fozia and her counsel Mr. Inam Ali Larik are present. Defendant Sameed called absent, but his counsel Mr. Shafi Muhammad Bango is present. Witness of plaintiff side namely Siraj Ahmed is present. Today matter was fixed for cross evidence of plaintiff side. Ld. counsel for defendant submitted adjournment application. Order on it.Detailed order passed on back side of instant applicationThe defendant shall cross-examine the plaintiff and her witness without fail, failing which the aforesaid costs shall be imposed and the matter shall proceedin accordance with law. Hence matter adjourned. Put off to............... 21.09.2026.For cross evidence of plaintiff's side/ maintenance. |
|
| 8 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 6/2026 | Ali Ahmed VS Mst: Taniya | Munir Azam(ADVO-25725-SBC-MLR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody),The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Matter called. Applicant Ali Ahmed a/w his counsel Mr. Muneer Azam Shar Baloch are present. Witnesses of applicant side namely Abdul Jabbar and Ayaz Ali called absent. Opponent Mst. Taniya and her counsel Mr. Shahid Hussain Shaikh are present and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opponent Mst. Taniya along with adjournment application.Order on it.File/Adjourned with final chance. Meeting of minor with applicant held in Court premises, after meeting minor handed over to opponent. Hence matter adjourned. Put off to .......29.09.2026. For evidence of applicant side/ Cross reserved of PW.01. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 9 | F.S. (Family Suits) 7/2026 | Mst:Sabhai & others VS Altaf Hussain | Shafi Muhammad Bango(ADVO-519-SBC-KHP) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for recovery of Gold Ornaments | Suit called. Plaintiff Mst. Sabhai called absent, but her counsel Mr. Shafi Muhammad Bango is present. Defendant Altaf Hussain called absent, who is already declared as ex-parte and debarred from written statement. Today matter was for final arguments. Final arguments heard by Ld. counsel for plaintiff.Let the matter be fixed for Judgment. Hence matter adjourned. Put off to......18.09.2026. For Judgment. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 10 | F.S. (Family Suits) 80/2025 | Mst. Mumtaz Khatoon VS Arbab Ali | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Mumtaz Khatoon is present,but her counsel Mr. Noor Muhammad Leghari called absent. Defendant Arbab Ali @ Mithal Arbab called absent, but his counsel Mr. Iqbal Ahmed Ujjan is present. Report regarding the status of property of defendant received from Mukhtiarkar Taluka Sobhodero.Order on it. File.Let the matter be fixed for Judgment. Hence matter adjourned. Put off to.......21.09.2026. For Judgment. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Judgment | |||||||
| 11 | F.S. (Family Suits) 14/2025 | Mst. Ruksana VS Parvez Ali | Shafi Muhammad Bango(ADVO-519-SBC-KHP) | Nazir Hussain (ADVO-2149-SBC-KHP) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Rukhsana and her counsel Mr. Shafi Muhammad Bango are present. Attorney of defendant namely Deedar Ali is present, his counsel Mr. Nazir Ahmed Tunio called absent, but his jr: partner is present.Today matter was fixed for Judgment.Heard and perused the record. Judgment passed and announced in open Court. The suit of plaintiff is hereby partly decree. Let the decree be prepared accordingly. |
|