| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1/2026 | Saeed Ahmed VS The State | Ali Hub(ADVO-3159-SBC-SUK) | Deedar Ali(ADVO-102-SBC-TAY) | Cr.PC-497 | 3/2026 Chamber |
Cr bail application called. ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for applicant is present. Heard arguments of ADPP for the state. Criminal bail application allowed subject to furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.30000/- along with PR bond of like amount. The required surety has been submitted by the surety persons namely Abdul Ghani son of Kamal khan. Order on it. Surety accepted subject to furnishing verification. Learned counsel for accused/applicant submitted statement mentioning therein that the submitted surety is genuine. Order on it. Let the release be issued to concerned jail authority. |
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2/2026 | Dev Raj VS The State | Deedar Ali(ADVO-102-SBC-TAY) | Cr.PC-497 | 1/2026 Sanjer Chang |
||
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 3/2026 | Sadam Hussain Mallah VS The State | Ali Hub(ADVO-3159-SBC-SUK) | Deedar Ali(ADVO-102-SBC-TAY) | Cr.PC-497,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 5/2026 Chamber |
Cr bail application called. ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for applicant is present. Heard arguments of ADPP for the state. Criminal bail application allowed subject to furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.30000/- along with PR bond of like amount. The required surety has been submitted by the surety person. Order on it. Surety accepted subject to furnishing verification. Learned counsel for accused/applicant submitted statement mentioning therein that the submitted surety is genuine. Order on it. Let the release be issued to concerned jail authority |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 133/2025 | The State VS Ghulam Murtaza & others | ADPP() | PPC-109,PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-H,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 120/2025 Chamber |
Case called. Accused persons are present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. DC is present. PWs are called absent. Put off to 26.01.2026 for evidence issue summons to all pws and call case property. |
|
| 5 | PPC 149/2025 | The State VS Ghulam Murtaza & others | Deedar Ali(ADVO-102-SBC-TAY) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 125/2025 Chamber |
Case called. Accused persons are present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. DC is present. PWs are called absent. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to 26.01.2026 for evidence issue summons to all pws and call case property. |
| 6 | PPC 158/2025 | The State VS Altaf Hussain | Deedar Ali(ADVO-102-SBC-TAY) | Mazhar Hussain(ADVO-215-SBC-TAY) | PPC-448,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 146/2025 Chamber |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. DC is present. Complainant is along with his witnesses. Defense counsel submitted application for adjournment. Order on it. Adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to 14.01.2026 for evidence. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 126/2025 | The State VS Noshad Ali | Deedar Ali(ADVO-102-SBC-TAY) | Mashooque(ADVO-99-SBC-TAY) | PPC-295-A,PPC-298-A | 114/2025 Chamber |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. Learned counsel for accused is present. Statement of accused has been recorded. Put off to 14.01.2026 for arguments. Accused person is directed to attend. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 37/2025 | Mst Gulpari VS Mumtaz | Mashooque(ADVO-99-SBC-TAY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff and her counsel are present. Defendant is called absent. Record reveals that the service upon defendant was held good upon on 09.12.2025 but defendant has not appeared before this court. The suit of plaintiff is debarred from filling of written statement. STAGE 1. For exparte evidence. |
||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 47/2025 | Mst. Shama d/o Dost Ali VS Murad Ali Panhwar | Mashooque(ADVO-99-SBC-TAY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family Execution called. Decree holder is called absent but her counsel is called absent. JD is present but his counsel is called absent. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. |
||
| 3 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 7/2025 | Mst. Naseeban d/o Ranjho Bheel VS Bhemraj s/o Mitho Bheel | Mashooque(ADVO-99-SBC-TAY) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family Execution called. Decree holder is called absent but her counsel is called absent. JD is present but his counsel is called absent. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 46/2025 | Mst. Rukhsana VS Abdul Wahid Keerio | Mashooque(ADVO-99-SBC-TAY) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance of Iddat Period,Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | In The Court Of Family/ Guardian Judge- Chamber Family suit No. 46/2025 (Mst Rukhsana Vs Abdul Wahid) Date NO of Exhibit Pages Description of Exhibit, substance or motion etc Date of which hearing is adjourned 23.12.2025 Family suit called. Plaintiff and her counsel are present. Defendant is called absent. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. STAGE 1. For written statement. Reader Family Court-I Chamber 07.01.2026 |
|
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 48/2025 | Mst. Shahida Laghari VS Shahnawaz Laghari | Mashooque(ADVO-99-SBC-TAY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family Execution called. Decree holder is called absent but her counsel is called absent. JD is present but his counsel is called absent. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 40/2025 | Kanghar s/o Shankar VS Shr. Roshni d/o Ramchand | Mashooque(ADVO-99-SBC-TAY) | Aadil Akbar(ADVO-249-SBC-TAY) | Family Suit-U/S 12 (A) (I) of Hindu Marriage Act, 2017 | Family suit called. Plaintiff is called absent but his counsel is present. Defendant is called absent but her counsel is present. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. For pre trial |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 39/2025 | Mst Asma VS Jiyo Khaskheli | Mashooque(ADVO-99-SBC-TAY) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Recovery of Medical Charges / Delivery Expenses ,Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff is called absent but her counsel is present. Defendant is called absent but his counsel is present. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. STAGE 1. For evidence |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 8 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 12/2025 | Mst. Rasti Wd/o Ali Bux VS Khuda Dino & others | Mashooque(ADVO-99-SBC-TAY) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Guardian and Ward application called. Applicant is called absent but her counsel is present. Arguments have heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Guardian and Ward application is hereby allowed. |
|