The suit was called. The plaintiff appeared along with his counsel. Defendant No. 1 also appeared along with his counsel. Riaz Ahmed, son of Defendant No. 2, appeared and submitted an application seeking permission to act as special attorney. An order was passed on the application. The attorney for Defendant No. 2 also appeared. Official Defendant No. 3 has already filed a written statement. Official Defendants Nos. 4 and 5 were served but remained absent. Official Defendant No. 6 was served but remained absent. The acknowledgment due from Defendant No. 7 has already been received, but Defendant No. 7 remained absent. The DDA appeared. Put off to 19.10.2026 for filing the written statement defendant No.2 and objections to the application under Order XXXIX, Rule 1 CPC, and for arguments on the application under Order VII, Rule 11 CPC.

Suit called. The plaintiff???s attorney and counsel are present. Defendant No. 1, who is the attorney for Defendants No. 2 to 5, is present. Their counsel is absent. Official Defendant No. 6 is present and has filed a written statement. Order on it. Copy be supplied to the other side. Official Defendants No. 7 and 8 have already filed their written statements. The acknowledgment due (AD) from Official Defendant No. 9 has been received. The DDA is present and has filed a memo of appearance on behalf of Official Defendants No. 6 to 9. Order on the memo. Filed. Put off to 26.10.2026 for compliance of order 10 (2) CPC and arguments on application u/o 39 rule 1 CPC so also objection on application u/o 18 rule 18 CPC.

The suit was called. Plaintiff No. 1, who is the attorney for the other plaintiffs, appeared along with her counsel. Defendant No. 4, who is the attorney for Defendants Nos. 1 to 3, 9, 10 and 13, appeared along with his counsel. Witnesses Muhammad Tahir and Irshad Ali were also present. Defendants Nos. 5, 8, 11 and 12 have already been debarred from filing their written statements. Defendants Nos. 6 and 7 have already filed their written statements/objections in person. Defendant No. 14 was served and has already submitted a detailed report. Defendants Nos. 15 and 16 were called but remained absent. Mr. Fayazuddin, attorney for Defendants Nos. 17 and 18, was also called but remained absent along with his counsel. The DDA appeared on behalf of the official defendants. The evidence of witness Muhammad Tahir was recorded as Exhibit No. 59, and the evidence of witness Irshad Ali was recorded as Exhibit No. 60. Put off to 19.10.2026 for the defendants??? evidence. Summons shall be issued to Defendants Nos. 6, 7, 17 and 18.

Suit called. Plaintiff called present, along with his counsel. The defendant No.01 called absent and already de-barred. The defendant No. 02 is called absent and already filed W.S in person. The defendant No. 03 called absent, along with his counsel. The defendants No. 04 and 05 already de-barred. The official defendant No. 06 absent and already sent his W.S on his behalf as well as on behalf of defendant No.12. The defendant No.07 already filed W.S. The defendant No.08 already sent W.S but called absent. The defendant No.09, 10 already served but called absent. The defendant No. 11 and 12 served, but called absent and already filed W.S. The defendant No.13 called absent. The defendant No.14 called absent and already filed W.S. The DDA called present on behalf of official defendants and already submitted statement adopting W.S of defendant No. 06 on behalf of defendants No. 09,10,12 and 13 and filed adjournment application. Order on it. Time granted. Put off to 10.10.2026 for plaintiff evidence/Cross and arguments on application u/o 39 rule 1 CPC.

Suit called. The attorney of plaintiff called absent, but his counsel called present. The defendant No. 01 called present, but his counsel called absent. The official defendants No. 07 and 08 are called absent and already filed W.S. The official defendants No. 09, 10 are called absent. Learned DDA is present on behalf of official defendants and already filed memo of appearance. Put off to 07.10.2026 for defendant evidence and objection on application u/o 18 rule 18 CPC.