Suit called. The plaintiff is present along with his learned counsel. Defendant No. 3, being the attorney of defendants Nos. 1, 2, 9 and 10, is present along with his learned counsel and has submitted an application seeking adjournment on behalf of the said defendants. He has produced the next date of hearing fixed in the connected W.S. proceedings. Heard. Time is granted as a last and final opportunity. Defendant No. 4 has already filed his written statement. Defendants Nos. 5 and 6 have already been served but are called absent. Defendants Nos. 7 and 8 have already been debarred from filing their written statements. Learned DDA is absent on behalf of the official defendants. The matter is adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to 11.11.2026 for filing of written statements by defendants Nos. 9 and 10, and objection on application u/o 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC so also arguments on the application under Order V, Rule 3, CPC.

Suit called. Plaintiff is present along with his learned counsel. Defendant NO.1 is present, but learned counsel called absent. Defendants NO.4 and 5 are called absent though already filed their w/stt in sindhi language. Defendants No.2 to 6 were called absent. DDA is absent on behalf of official defendants. Heard arguments on application u/o 7 rule 11 CPC. Order passed and announced in open court kept at Ex.No. The application is dismissed. The counsel for plaintiff raised no objection on application u/o 1 rule 10 CPC. Order passed and announced in open court kept at Ex.No. The application u/o 1 rule 10 CPC is allowed. Put off to 10-11-2026, for filling written statement of remaining defendants Nos. 07,08 and 10 and amended tile.

Suit called. The attorney of the plaintiffs, namely Bahawal called absent, but the learned counsel called present. Defendant No. 01 is present along with his learned counsel and filed an application 1 rule 10 CPC. Order on it. Notice to other side. The defendants No. 02 to 10 are called absent. The learned DDA is also absent. The matter is adjourned to 10.11.2026 for the plaintiff's evidence and cross-examination and objection on application u/o 1 rule 10 CPC.

Suit called. The attorney of plaintiff is present, but her learned counsel called present. The defendants No. 01(a) to 1(I), 03, 03/B, 03/C, 04, 04/A, 05, 06, 06/B, 06/E and 07 have already de-barred. The defendant No.02,3/A,4/B, 5/A and 06/A are already de-barred, and their counsel also absent. The defendant No. 08 and 09 already filed W.S. The official defendant No.10 called absent. The learned DDA is present. The defendant No.11 called absent, but his learned counsel called present. The defendant No.12 called absent, but his learned counsel called present. The defendant No.13 called absent and already de-barred. Witness Sub-Registrar called absent. Put off to 11.11.2026 for plaintiff side evidence and arguments on applications u/s 151 CPC R/W sec: 476 of Cr.P.C R/W 193,196,468, & 471 of PPC for intention of criminal proceedings against the plaintiff attorney for producing fake forged and fabricated documents before this Honourable Court and issue summons to sub-Registrar Larkana.

Suit called. The plaintiff is present, but his learned counsel called absent. The defendants No. 02 attorney of defendant No.01 and 04 to 08 called present, along with his counsel. The defendant No.03 and defendant No. 09 already filed written statement but called absent. The official defendant No.10 served but called absent. The learned DDA is absent on behalf of official defendants. Witness Mukhtiarkar Naseerabad called absent but produced tapedar Jameel Ahmed is present and examined. The evidence is recorded Tapedar Jameel Ahmed at Ex.No.32, he produced the authority letter and relevant record at Ex.No.32/A to 32/C. Put off to 11-11-2026, for plaintiff evidence.

Suit called. The attorney for the plaintiff is absent, but his learned counsel called present. Defendant No.1 is present along with his learned counsel. Official defendants Nos. 7 and 8 are called absent; however, their written statement has already been filed. Official defendants Nos. 9 and 10 are called absent. Learned DDA is absent on behalf of the official defendants and has already filed memo of appearance. The counsel for plaintiff raised no objection on application u/o 9 rule 9 CPC. Heard. Order passed and announced in open court kept at Ex.No. The application is allowed. Put off to 11.11.2026 for evidence.