The case was called. UTP/Accused Sajid Jatoi was produced through video link from the custody of the Superintendent, District Prison and Correctional Facility, Mach, Balochistan. Accused Sajid Ali Chandio is reported to have died, as mentioned in the challan sheet. The learned ADPP and the learned Defence Counsel were present. The processes issued to the complainant and the prosecution witnesses were returned duly served. SIP Nizamuddin Khand and P.W. P.C. Asif Ali were present. The cross-examination of SIP Nizamuddin Khand was recorded at Ex. No. 07. P.W. P.C. Asif Ali was bound down for the next date of hearing. The case is adjourned to 31.10.2026 for further evidence. UTP/Accused Sajid Jatoi, who was present through video link, is remanded back to the same custody.

The suit was called. The attorney for the plaintiff was present, whereas his learned counsel was called absent. The attorney for Defendant No. 01 was present and submitted an application seeking adjournment on the ground that his learned counsel had gone to Saudi Arabia to perform Umrah. The application was considered and time was granted. Official Defendant No. 02 had already filed a written statement. Official Defendants No. 03 to 06 were called absent. The AD on behalf of Official Defendant No. 07 had already been received. The learned DDA was absent on behalf of the official defendants; however, a statement had already been submitted adopting the written statement filed by the Mukhtiarkar, Warah, on behalf of all the official defendants. The matter is adjourned to 20.11.2026 for defendants' evidence.

The suit was called. The plaintiff was present along with his learned counsel. Defendant No. 03, who is the attorney of Defendants No. 01, 02 and 04 to 14, was present along with his learned counsel. Official Defendants No. 15 and 16 had already filed their written statements. Official Defendant No. 18 had also filed a written statement. Defendant No. 17, despite having been served, was called absent and had already been debarred from filing a written statement. The AD on behalf of Official Defendant No. 19 had already been received. The learned DDA was called absent on behalf of the official defendants. Arguments on the application under Order XVI, Rules 1 and 2, CPC, were heard. The order was passed and pronounced in open Court and kept at Ex. No. ____. The application was allowed. The matter is adjourned to 06.11.2026 for plaintiff's evidence and arguments on the application under Order XXXIX, Rule 1, CPC.