Suit called. Plaintiff No. 1, who is the guardian of defendant No. 2, is called absent along with his counsel. Defendant No. 1 is present along with his counsel. Processes issued to defendants Nos. 6 and 7 are returned duly served, and service is held good. Order on the order sheet is kept at Ex. No. __. Official defendant No. 2 has already filed his written statement (W.S.). Official defendants Nos. 3 and 4, though served, are called absent. Acknowledgment Due (A.D.) in respect of official defendant No. 5 is received. Learned D.D.A. is called absent; however, he has already filed a memo of appearance on behalf of official defendants Nos. 2 to 5 and adopted the written statement already filed by official defendant No. 2. Adjourned to 06.11.2026 for compliance with Order X Rule 2 CPC and for arguments on the objection to the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 CPC. Issue summons to defendant No. 7 through affixation at the outer door of his residence.

Suit called. The plaintiffs' attorney and counsel are present. Defendant No. 1, who is the attorney for Defendants No. 2 to 5, is present. Their counsel is present. Official Defendant No. 6 called absent and already filed a written statement. Official Defendants No. 7 and 8 have already filed their written statements. The acknowledgment due (AD) from Official Defendant No. 9 has been received. The DDA is absent and has filed a memo of appearance on behalf of Official Defendants No. 6 to 9. Order on the memo. Filed. Put off to 09.11.2026 for compliance of order 10 (2) CPC and arguments on application u/o 39 rule 1 CPC so also objection on application u/o 18 rule 18 CPC.

The suit was called. Plaintiff No.1, who is the attorney for the remaining plaintiffs, appeared along with her associate counsel. Defendant No.4, who is the attorney for Defendants Nos. 1 to 3, 9, 10 and 13, appeared along with his learned counsel. Defendants Nos. 5, 8, 11 and 12 have already been debarred from filing their written statements. Defendants Nos. 6 and 7 have already filed their written statements/objections in person. Defendant No. 14 was duly served and has already submitted a detailed report. Defendants Nos. 15 and 16 were called but remained absent. Mr. Fayazuddin, attorney for Defendants Nos. 17 and 18, appeared along with his learned counsel. The DDA was absent on behalf of the official defendants. The cross is examination of Mr. Fayazuddin, attorney for Defendants Nos. 17 and 18, was recorded as Exhibit No. 61. The matter is adjourned to 09.11.2026 for defendant evidence and for providing fresh addresses of Defendants Nos. 6 and 7.

Suit called. The plaintiff is present, along with his counsel. The defendant No.01/B and attorney of 01/A and 01/C to 01/F (iv) called present, but his counsel called absent. The defendant No.02/A to 05/f declared expartee. The official defendant No.06 and 07 have already filed W.S. The official defendant No. 08 and 09 called absent and debarred. The DDA is absent. Witness Mukhtiarkar Warah is present and examined. Witness Clerk of Mukhtiarkar Warah Abdullah evidence is recorded at Ex.No.35, he produced the authority letter at Ex.No.35/A. Put off to 30.10.2026 for plaintiff evidence and issue B.W to Sub-Registrar Larkana.

The suit was called. Plaintiff No. 01 was present, along with his learned counsel. The attorney for Defendant No. 01, who is also the attorney for Defendant No. 02, called absent, but his counsel called present. Official Defendant No. 03 has already filed his written statement. Official Defendants Nos. 04 and 05 were absent and had already been debarred. The learned representative of the DDA was also absent. It is noted that the DDA has already filed a statement and memo of appearance on behalf of Official Defendants Nos. 04 and 05, adopting the written statement already filed by Defendant No. 03, the Assistant Commissioner, Taluka Warah. Defendant No. 06 appeared pursuant to the amended plaint and has already filed his written statement. The counsel for plaintiff filed side closed statement at Ex.No.44. The matter is adjourned to 06.11.2026 for the defendant evidence.

Suit called. The plaintiff was called absent, whereas his learned counsel was present and filed a statement regarding the plaintiff???s absence, along with an application supported by copies of the diary entries. Order thereon. Defendant No. 1 was present, whereas his learned counsel was absent. In the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned to 16.11.2026 for plaintiff???s evidence/cross-examination.

Leading Suit called. The plaintiff called present, along with his counsel. The defendant's No. 01 absent & 2 called present, along with his counsel. The defendant's No. 03 to 04-I are called absent and already de-barred from filling of W.S. The official defendant's No. 05 to 08 called absent. The learned DDA present on behalf of official defendants and already filed statement. The suit No. 44/2024 and 45/2024 have already consolidated. The final arguments heard by both sides. Put off to 30.10.2026 for judgment.

The subsequent suit was called. The attorney of plaintiff is present along with his counsel. Defendant No. 03 appeared along with his learned counsel, whereas Defendants No. 01, 02, and 04 to 09 were absent. Defendants No. 10 to 14 were also absent. The learned representative of the DDA appeared on behalf of the official defendants and submitted that the statement had already been filed. Suit Nos. 44/2024 and 45/2024 have already been consolidated. The final arguments heard by both sides. The matter is adjourned to 30.10.2026 for judgment.