Suit called. The attorney of plaintiff called absent, along with her counsel. The defendant No.01 and 2 called absent. The official defendant No.3 called present and filed W.S. Order on it kept at Ex.No. Copy to other side. AD from defendant No.4 is already received. The DDA called present and already filed memo of appearance 03 and 04. Put off to 10.11.2026 for W.S of defendant No.01 and 02.

The suit was called. The attorney of plaintiff called absent along with Learned counsel and junior counsel called present. Defendant No.1 is present along with his counsel. Official defendants Nos. 2 to 6 were called and remained absent. The DDA representative appeared on behalf of the official defendants and had already filed statements. Defendants Nos. 7 and 8 had already been debarred from filing their written statements and proceeded against ex parte. The counsel for defendant filed side closed statement at Ex.No. Put off to 18.11.2026 for final arguments.

The leading suit was called. Plaintiff No.1, who is the attorney of Plaintiff No.2, was called absent but his learned counsel called present. Defendant No.1 was absent, but his learned counsel called present. The authorized official of Defendant No. 4 was called absent, and Defendant No. 4 had already filed a written statement (W.S.). The learned representative of the D.D.A. was present on behalf of the official defendants and had already filed a statement. Defendants Nos. 2, 3 and 5 had already been debarred from filing their written statements. F.C. Suit No. 49/2023 and F.C. Suit No.16/2025 have already been consolidated. The defendant No.06 of subsequent suit chief is recorded at Ex.No.42. The counsel for defendant No.06 filed adjournment application for reserve further examination in chief for production of necessary documents. Order on it. Allowed. Put off to 12.11.2026 for recording the defendant's evidence and for hearing of objections to the application for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC.

Suit called. The plaintiff called absent along with his learned counsel. One Zain-Ul-Abiddin son of plaintiff is present and submitted adjournment application for absence of plaintiff. Order on it. Condoned. Defendant No. 01 is called absent and has already been debarred from filing his written statement. Defendant No. 02 is called absent; however, he has already filed his written statement in person. Defendant No. 03 is called absent, but his learned counsel called present. Defendants No. 04 and 05 have already been debarred from filing their written statements. Official defendant No. 06 is called absent but has already filed his written statement on his own behalf as well as on behalf of defendant No.12. Defendant No. 07 has already filed his written statement. Defendant No. 08 is called absent but has already filed his written statement. Defendants No. 09 and 10, despite service, are called absent. Defendants No.11 and 12, despite service, are called absent; however, they have already filed their written statements. Defendant No.13 is called absent. Defendant No.14 is called absent but has already filed his written statement. The learned DDA is present on behalf of the official defendants and has already filed a statement adopting the written statement of official defendant No. 06 on behalf of defendants No. 09, 10, 12 and 13. The matter is adjourned to 12.11.2026 for further evidence of the plaintiff and arguments on the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

Subsequent suit called. The plaintiff called absent, but his learned counsel called present. Defendant No.2 and the attorney of Defendant No. 1 were called absent, but their learned counsel called present. Defendants Nos. 4 and 5 were called and remained absent, having already been debarred. Defendant No. 6 was called present, but partner counsel called present. Defendant No.3, despite having been duly served, was called and remained absent and was accordingly debarred. Official Defendant No. 7 was called and remained absent, though its written statement had already been filed. Official Defendants Nos. 8 and 9 were called and remained absent and had already been debarred. Suit Nos. 49/2023 and 16/2025 have already been consolidated. The defendant No.06 chief is recorded at Ex.No.42. The counsel for defendant No.06 filed adjournment application for reserving further examination is chief for production of necessary documents. Order on it. Allowed. In the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned to 12.11.2026 for defendants' evidence and for hearing of objections to the application for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC.