Suit called. The plaintiff No.01 who is attorney of other plaintiffs is present, but his counsel called absent. The defendant No.01 who is attorney of defendant No.2 to 08 called absent. Counsel of defendant No.01 called absent. The defendant No.09/A to 09/I and 11/A and 11/E refused and already de-barred. The defendant No.10 shifted at Khair Pur at Gambat and already filed W.S. The official defendant No. 12 already filed W.S but called absent. The official defendant No. 13 called absent. DDA is absent on behalf of official defendants. Put off to 18.11.2026 for filling the written statements.

Suit called. The plaintiff is present, but his counsel called absent. Defendant No.06 iwho is attorney of defendant No. 01 to 05, 07 to 10 and 12,16,17,21 and 30 present, along with his counsel filed written statement and objection to application u/o 40 rule 1 CPC so also filed vakaltnama on behalf of defendant No.01 to 05, 07 to 10 and 12,16,17,21 and 30. Order thereon. The defendant No.13 and 14 are present and submitted adjournment application egging of advocate till next date of hearing. Order on order sheet kept at Ex.No. The defendant No.15 called absent. The defendant No. 11 has shifted to America. Defendants No. 18,19,23 to 29, and 31,32 have shifted to Larkana, whereas defendants No.20 and 22 have shifted to Hyderabad as per bailiff record. Official defendant No. 33 is absent but has already filed his written statement. Official defendant No. 34 is absent. The acknowledgment due (A.D.) in respect of official defendant No. 35 has been already received. The DDA is absent but has already filed a memo of appearance on behalf of official defendants No.33 to 35. Put off to 26.11.2026 for service, filing of written statements, and objections to the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 CPC. Repeat summons issued to defendants No.11,18,19,20, 22 and 28 through pointation.

Suit called. The plaintiff is present along with his partner learned counsel. Defendant No. 3, being the attorney of defendants Nos. 1, 2, 9 and 10, is called absent, whereas his learned counsel is present and verbally requests time for filing the written statement. Last and final opportunity is granted to the said defendants for filing their written statements by the next date of hearing. Defendant No. 4 has already filed his written statement. Defendants Nos. 5 and 6 have already been duly served but are called absent. Defendants Nos. 7 and 8 have already been debarred from filing their written statements. Learned counsel for the official defendants, on behalf of the DDA, is also absent. In the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned to 18.11.2026 for filing of written statements on behalf of defendants Nos. 9 and 10, filing of objections to the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, and arguments on the application under Order V Rule 3 CPC.

The suit was called. The plaintiff appeared along with his counsel. Defendant No. 1 is present. The attorney of defendant No.2 is present. The counsel for defendant No.01 and 2 is present. Official Defendant No. 3 has already filed a written statement. Official Defendants Nos. 4 to 6 were served but remained absent and de-barred. The acknowledgment due from Defendant No. 7 has already been received, but Defendant No. 7 remained absent. The DDA absent. Put off to 23.11.2026 for compliance of order 10 (2) CPC and to the application under Order XXXIX, Rule 1 CPC, and for arguments on the application under Order VII, Rule 11 CPC.

Suit called. The attorney of plaintiff is present, but her learned counsel called absent. The defendants No. 01(a) to 1(I), 03, 03/B, 03/C, 04, 04/A, 05, 06, 06/B, 06/E and 07 have already de-barred. The defendant No.02,3/A,4/B, 5/A and 06/A are already de-barred, and their counsel also absent. The defendant No. 08 and 09 already filed W.S. The official defendant No.10 called absent. The learned DDA is absent. The defendant No.11 called present, but his learned counsel called absent. The defendant No.12 called absent, but his learned counsel called present. The defendant No.13 called absent and already de-barred. Witness Sub-Registrar called present and bound won. Put off to 19.11.2026 for plaintiff side evidence and arguments on applications u/s 151 CPC R/W sec: 476 of Cr.P.C R/W 193,196,468, & 471 of PPC for intention of criminal proceedings against the plaintiff attorney for producing fake forged and fabricated documents before this Honourable Court.

Suit called. The attorney for the plaintiff is absent, but his learned counsel called present. Defendant No.1 is present along with his learned counsel. Official defendants Nos. 7 and 8 are called absent; however, their written statement has already been filed. Official defendants Nos. 9 and 10 are called absent. Learned DDA is absent on behalf of the official defendants and has already filed memo of appearance. Witness Wahid Bux evidence is recorded at Ex.No.53. The counsel for defendant filed side closed statement at Ex.No.54. Put off to 25.11.2026 for arguments.

Suit called. The plaintiff is present, along with his counsel. The defendant No.01/B and attorney of 01/A and 01/C to 01/F (iv) called present, along with his counsel. The defendant No.02/A to 05/f declared expartee. The official defendant No.06 and 07 have already filed W.S. The official defendant No. 08 and 09 called absent and debarred. The DDA is absent. Witness Sub-Registrar called absent. Witness Sub-Registrar Larkana evidence is recorded at Ex.No.36. He produced the authority letter and relevant record at Ex.No.36/A and 36/B. Let the matter is fixed for re-examination of official witness viz: sub-Registrar for the purpose of above documents on next date of hearing. Put off to 19.11.2026 for plaintiff evidence/Cross.

Suit called. The plaintiff is present, but his learned counsel called absent and he sent the side closed statement through plaintiff. Order on it kept at Ex.No. The defendants No. 02 attorney of defendant No.01 and 04 to 08 called present, but his counsel called absent. The defendant No.03 and defendant No. 09 already filed written statement but called absent. The official defendant No.10 served but called absent. The learned DDA is absent on behalf of official defendants. Put off to 23-11-2026, for defendant evidence.

Suit called. Plaintiff No. 01 and 2 called absent. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs called present. Defendant No. 02, who is the attorney of Defendants No. 01/C, 01/D, 03, 05 and 06, is present, but their learned counsel called absent. Defendant No. 04 is also absent. Defendants No. 01/A, 01/B, 07 and 08, as well as official Defendants No. 10 and 11, are absent and have already been debarred from their right to appear and contest the suit. The A.D. in respect of Defendant No. 12 has already been received. The D.D.A. is absent; however, a memo of appearance on behalf of official Defendants No. 09 to 12 has already been filed. Adjourned to 18.11.2026 for plaintiff's evidence/cross-examination.

The suit was called. The plaintiff is present and submitted adjournment application for absence of her learned counsel. Order on it. Time granted. Defendant No. 01 is present along with his learned counsel. Defendants Nos. 02 and 03 are present, along with their learned counsel. Official defendant No. 05 has already filed his written statement. Official defendants Nos. 04 and 07 are called absent and have already been debarred from filing their written statements. The acknowledgment due (A.D.) in respect of official defendant No. 06 has already been received. The learned DDA is called absent on behalf of the official defendants. The matter is adjourned to 23.11.2026 for recording the plaintiff's evidence and for filing of objections/reply to the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The suit was called. The attorney for the plaintiff called present, along with his counsel and filed adjournment application. Order on it. Time granted. The attorney for Defendant No.1 and Defendants No. 2, 4(c), 4(d), 7 and 8 absent, but his counsel called present. Defendant No. 4(a), who has already filed a written statement in person, was absent. Defendant No.5 and its learned counsel were also absent. Defendants No. 3, 4(b) and 11 have already been debarred. Defendant No. 6 was present. Official Defendants No.9 and 10 have already been served. The DDA was absent on behalf of the official defendants, who have already filed their statements. The matter is adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to 16.11.2026 for arguments.