Suit called. The plaintiff called present, along with his partner counsel. Defendant No. 3, who is the attorney of defendants Nos.1 and 2, is absent, but his learned counsel called present. Defendant No. 4 has already filed his written statement. Defendants Nos. 5 and 6 have already been served but are called absent. Defendants Nos. 7 and 8 have already been debarred from filing their written statements and proceeded against ex parte. Learned DDA is absent on behalf of the official defendants. The matter is adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to 04.11.2026 for filing of written statements by defendants Nos. 9 and 10, arguments on the application under Order V, Rule 3, CPC.

Civil Suit called. The plaintiff attorney, Parvaiz Ali, called absent, but his learned counsel, Mr. Aijaz Ali Kalhoro, is present. Mr. Muhammad Ashique Dhamrah, learned Advocate for Defendant Nos. 1 to 4, is also absent. The acknowledgment due (A.D.) from Defendant No. 5 has already been received. The learned D.D.A. is absent. The matter is adjourned to 02.11.2026 for filing of the written statement and objection on application u/o VII rule 11 CPC.

Suit called. Plaintiff No. 01 is present, while Plaintiff No. 02 is absent. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs is present and filed statement relying on the documents which had already been produced with plaint. Order on it kept at Ex.No.25. Filed. Defendant No. 02, who is the attorney of Defendants No. 01/C, 01/D, 03, 05 and 06, is absent along with their learned counsel. Defendant No. 04 is also absent. Defendants No. 01/A, 01/B, 07 and 08, as well as official Defendants No. 10 and 11, are absent and have already been debarred from their right to appear and contest the suit. The A.D. in respect of Defendant No. 12 has already been received. The D.D.A. is absent; however, a memo of appearance on behalf of official Defendants No. 09 to 12 has already been filed. The examination-in-chief of Plaintiff No. 01 has been recorded as Exhibit No. 24. The relevant record produced by him has been exhibited as Exh. 24/A and Exh. 24/B, while the remaining documents have been marked as Mark-A to Mark-E. Learned counsel for the defendants is absent; therefore, cross-examination of Plaintiff No. 01 is reserved for the next date of hearing. Adjourned to 11.11.2026 for plaintiff's evidence/cross-examination.

The suit was called. The attorney for the plaintiff called present, along with his counsel. The attorney for Defendant No.1 and Defendants No. 2, 4(c), 4(d), 7 and 8 absent, but his counsel called present and filed adjournment application. Order on it. Time granted. Defendant No. 4(a), who has already filed a written statement in person, was absent. Defendant No.5 and its learned counsel were also absent. Defendants No. 3, 4(b) and 11 have already been debarred. Defendant No. 6 was present. Official Defendants No.9 and 10 have already been served. The DDA was absent on behalf of the official defendants, who have already filed their statements. The partly arguments heard by both parties. Put off to 11.11.2026 for arguments.

Suit called. The attorney for the plaintiff is present along with his learned counsel. Defendant No.1 is present along with his learned counsel and verbal requested the matter is adjourned in the interest of justice. Official defendants Nos. 7 and 8 are called absent; however, their written statement has already been filed. Official defendants Nos. 9 and 10 are called absent. Learned DDA is absent on behalf of the official defendants and has already filed memo of appearance. The matter is adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to 04.11.2026 for final arguments.

The suit was called. The plaintiff called present, along with his learned counsel. Defendants Nos.1 and 2/A to 2/D had already been debarred. Defendant No. 3 was present. Learned counsel for Defendants Nos. 3 to 5 was present and filed written final arguments on behalf of defendant No.03 to 5. Order on it. Official Defendants Nos. 6 and 7 were called and remained absent. Official Defendants Nos. 8 and 9 had already been debarred. The representative of the DDA absent on behalf of the official defendants. The final arguments heard by both parties. To come up on 06.11.2026 for Judgment.