| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | Ist Class Civil Suits 28/2026 |
Muhammad Allam Soomro VS Imran Ali Soomro & Ors | Ghulam Shabir(ADVO-1393-SBC-LRK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | The suit is called. The attorney for the plaintiff is present along with his learned counsel. The processes issued to Defendants No. 01 to 03 have not yet been returned. Defendant No. 01 is present and has moved an application seeking adjournment to engage an advocate. He has also submitted a Special Power of Attorney, which is kept on the order sheet as Exhibit No. _. Defendants No. 04, 06 and 07 have been served but are called absent and have already been debarred from proceeding further. Official Defendant No. 05 is also called absent and has already filed its written statement. The AD regarding Defendant No. 08 has been received. The DDA is called absent. Put up on 17.10.2026 for filing of written statements by Defendants No. 01 to 03 and for filing of objections to the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Issues | |||||||
| 2 | Ist Class Civil Suits 31/2025 |
Muhammad Nawaz & Ors VS Imdad Hussain & Ors | Asif Raza(ADVO-922-SBC-KMB) | Shafique Rehman(ADVO-103-SBC-KMB) | Suit called. The attorney of plaintiff called absent, but his counsel called present. The defendant No.01 who is attorney of defendant No.02 to 06 called present, but his counsel called absent. The official defendant No.07 already filed W.S. The official defendant No.08 to 10 called absent and de-barred. The D.D.A called absent on behalf of official defendants. The arguments heard on application u/o 1 rule 10 CPC. Order passed and announced in open court kept at Ex.No. The application is allowed. Put off to 17.10.2026 for proposed issues and arguments on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC so also objection on application u/o XXVI rule 9 CPC R/W section 151 CPC for appointment of local commission and amended plaint. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | Ist Class Civil Suits 31/2024 |
Mst.Shahzadi VS Ghazi Khan & Ors | Zeeb Hussain (ADVO-1867-SBC-LRK) | Zahid Hussain Chandio(ADVO-372-SBC-LRK) | Suit called. The matter is fixed for the plaintiff???s evidence. The attorney of the plaintiffs, namely Bahawal, and the witness, Ghulam Mustafa, are present along with their learned counsel. Defendant No. 01 is present along with his learned counsel, whereas defendants No. 02 to 10 are called absent. The learned DDA is also absent. The examination-in-chief of the attorney of the plaintiffs has been recorded at Ex. 26, and he has produced the relevant documents at Ex. 26/E and Ex. 26/F. The examination-in-chief of witness Ghulam Mustafa has been recorded at Ex. 30. The learned counsel for defendant No. 01 has requested that the cross-examination be deferred until the next date of hearing. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned to 22.10.2026 for the plaintiff???s evidence and cross-examination. |
||
| 4 | Ist Class Civil Suits 17/2025 |
Behram Khan VS Muhammad Yaqoob & Ors | Asif Raza(ADVO-922-SBC-KMB) | Mohammad Bakhsh(ADVO-9067-SBC-KHS) | Suit called. The plaintiff is present, along with his counsel. The defendant No.01/B and attorney of 01/A and 01/C to 01/F (iv) called present, along with his counsel. The defendant No.02/A to 05/f declared expartee. The official defendant No.06 and 07 have already filed W.S. The official defendant No. 08 and 09 called absent and debarred. The DDA is absent. Witness Mukhtiarkar Naseerabad is present and submitted adjournment application. Order on it. Put off to 10.10.2026 for plaintiff evidence. |
||
| 5 | Ist Class Civil Suits 38/2025 |
Muhammad Hassan Kalhoro VS Qalander Bux Mugheri & Ors | Ghulam Ali Abbasi(ADVO-2359-SBC-LRK) | Mazhar Ali(ADVO-37-SBC-KMB) | The suit is called. The plaintiff is present along with his learned counsel. The attorney for Defendant No. 01, representing Defendants No. 02 to 07, is present along with his learned counsel. Official Defendant No. 08 has already filed its written statement. Defendants No. 09 to 12 are called absent and have already been debarred from proceeding further. The acknowledgment due (AD) in respect of Official Defendant No. 12 has already been received. The DDA, appearing on behalf of the official defendants, is called absent. However, a memo of appearance on behalf of Official Defendants No. 08 to 14 has already been filed. Put up on 24.10.2026 for the plaintiff???s evidence and for filing of objections to the application under Order XVI Rule 6 read with Section 151 CPC, as well as to the application under Articles 76 and 77 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 6 | Ist Class Civil Suits 64/2021 |
Ghazi Khan Darban VS Ali Bux Darban & Ors | Zahid Hussain Chandio(ADVO-372-SBC-LRK) | Zeeb Hussain (ADVO-1867-SBC-LRK) | Suit called which is fixed for final arguments. The Plaintiffs attorney called present, along with his counsel and filed adjournment application. Order on it. Granted with interest of justice by awarding one more last and final opportunity. Let the matter be fixed on 22.10.2026 on the date delay mentioned by learned counsel. The Defendants No. 02 attorney of defendants No. 01, 03, 4, 06 & 9/B called absent, along with his counsel. Defendants No. 05 who is attorney of defendants No. 07 and 09/A and his counsel called absent. Defendants No. 08, 09 and 10 to 12 have already de-barred. The DDA absent. The transfer application is disposed vide order dated: 28.09.2026. Put off to 22.10.2026 for final arguments. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
| 7 | C. Misc. Appl. (Civil Misc. Applications) 92/2026 |
Muhammad Nawaz VS Imdad Hussain & Ors | Asif Raza(ADVO-922-SBC-KMB) | Shafique Rehman(ADVO-103-SBC-KMB) | Application u/o 1 rule 10 CPC called. The attorney of plaintiff called absent, but his counsel called present. The defendant No.01 who is attorney of defendant No.02 to 06 called present, but his counsel called absent. The official defendant No.07 already filed W.S. The official defendant No.08 to 10 called absent and de-barred. The D.D.A called absent on behalf of official defendants. The arguments heard on application u/o 1 rule 10 CPC. Order passed and announced in open court kept at Ex.No. The application is allowed. |
||