B.A called. The learned counsel for the applicant/accused is present and submitted statement of bail order of co-accused. Order on it. Filed. The learned ADPP for the state is present. arguments heard. Put off to 13.11.2026 for order.

Case called. Accused Ghulam Shabbir Bhayo is called absent, while rest of the accused have been declared as PO. Learned ADPP present. Mr. Ghulam Ali Chandio learned DC for accused Ghulam Shabbir Bhayo is present and submitted an application for condo nation. Order on it. Condoned. Process issued to P.W are returned un-served. Process date extended of process server of P.S Warah. Put off to 17.11.2026 for evidence.

Case called. Accused Ghulam Shabbir Bhayo is called absent. Learned ADPP present. Mr. Ghulam Ali Chandio learned DC for accused is present and submitted an application for condo nation. Order on it. Condoned. Process for PWs WASI Deedar Ali and PC Wazir Ali returned un-served. Process date extended of process server of P.S Warah. Put off to 17.11.2026 for evidence.

Suit called. The attorney of plaintiff called present, along with his counsel and filed written statement of defendants No.11 to 15. Order on it. Copy to other side. The defendant No.01 who is attorney of defendant No.02 to 06 called absent, along with his counsel. The official defendant No.07 already filed W.S. The official defendant No.08 to 10 called absent and de-barred. The D.D.A called absent on behalf of official defendants. Mukhtiarkar Revenue called absent, but clerk called present and submitted detailed report so also submitted detail report regarding legal heirs of deceased Rajib Ali. Order thereon. Filed. Put off to 23.11.2026 for compliance of order 10 (2) and arguments on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC so also objection on application u/o XXVI rule 9 CPC R/W section 151 CPC for appointment of local commission.

Suit called. The Plaintiff called present, along with his counsel. The legal representative of NADRA defendant No.1 to 03 called present and filed adjournment application. Order on it. Time granted. The official defendant No.4 called absent. The official defendant No.5 already filed W.S. AD from official defendant No.6 is already received. Put off 19.11.2026 for service/W.S.

Suit called. The Plaintiff called present, but his counsel called absent. Defendants NO.1 to 7 are called absent though already served service against them has already been held good. DDA is absent and already filed memo of appearance of behalf of official defendants. Put off to 18-11-2026 for W.S. of defendants. Call detail reports from official defendants No.08 to 10.

Suit called. The Plaintiff called present, but his counsel called absent. The legal representative of NADRA defendant No.1 to 04 called present and filed written statement. Order on it kept at Ex.No. Copy to other side. AD from official defendant No.4 is already received. Put off 19.11.2026 for compliance of order 10 (2).

Suit called. Plaintiff No.1 and 2 is present, but learned counsel called absent. Attorney of defendant called absent. Mr. Vinood kumwar advocate on behalf of attorney of defendant called present and filed adjournment application. Order on it. Time granted. DDA is absent. Matter is adjourned in the interest of justice. Put up on 26.11.2026 for settlement of proposed issues and objection on application Re-Joinder.

The leading suit was called. Plaintiff No.1, who is the attorney of Plaintiff No.2, was called absent but his learned counsel called present. Defendant No.1 was absent, along with his learned counsel. The authorized official of Defendant No. 4 was called absent, and Defendant No. 4 had already filed a written statement (W.S.). The learned representative of the D.D.A. was absent on behalf of the official defendants and had already filed a statement. Defendants Nos. 2, 3 and 5 had already been debarred from filing their written statements. F.C. Suit No. 49/2023 and F.C. Suit No.16/2025 have already been consolidated. Put off to 16.11.2026 for recording the defendant's evidence and for hearing of objections to the application for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC.

The suit was called. The plaintiff was present, while his learned counsel was called absent. However, his learned junior counsel was present and filed an application seeking adjournment on the ground that the plaintiff's learned counsel had gone to Saudi Arabia to perform Umrah. The application is allowed, and time is granted. Defendant No. 2, being the attorney of Defendants Nos.1, 3 and 4, was present, but his learned counsel called absent. Official Defendants Nos.5 to 12 were called absent. The learned representative of the D.D.A. was absent on behalf of the official defendants. Put up on 09.12.2026 for recording the defendant evidence and issue summons to witnesses Sub Registrar Naseerabad, Mukhtiarkar Naseerabad and Ibrahim Ali.

Suit called. The plaintiff called absent along with his learned counsel. Defendant No. 01 is called absent and has already been debarred from filing his written statement. Defendant No. 02 is called absent; however, he has already filed his written statement in person. Defendant No. 03 is called absent, but his learned counsel called present. Defendants No. 04 and 05 have already been debarred from filing their written statements. Official defendant No. 06 is called absent but has already filed his written statement on his own behalf as well as on behalf of defendant No.12. Defendant No. 07 has already filed his written statement. Defendant No. 08 is called absent but has already filed his written statement. Defendants No. 09 and 10, despite service, are called absent. Defendants No.11 and 12, despite service, are called absent; however, they have already filed their written statements. Defendant No.13 is called absent. Defendant No.14 is called absent but has already filed his written statement. The learned DDA is absent on behalf of the official defendants and has already filed a statement adopting the written statement of official defendant No. 06 on behalf of defendants No. 09, 10, 12 and 13. The transfer application is pending from Honourable Additional Sessions Judge-II,Kamber on the date of hearing.19.11.2026. The matter is adjourned to 26.11.2026 for further evidence of the plaintiff and arguments on the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

Subsequent suit called. The plaintiff called absent, along with his learned counsel. Defendant No.2 and the attorney of Defendant No. 1 were called absent, but their learned counsel called present. Defendants Nos. 4 and 5 were called and remained absent, having already been debarred. Defendant No. 6 was called present, but partner counsel called present. Defendant No.3, despite having been duly served, was called and remained absent and was accordingly debarred. Official Defendant No. 7 was called and remained absent, though its written statement had already been filed. Official Defendants Nos. 8 and 9 were called and remained absent and had already been debarred. Suit Nos. 49/2023 and 16/2025 have already been consolidated. In the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned to 16.11.2026 for defendants' evidence and for hearing of objections to the application for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC.

Suit called. Plaintiff No.01 and 2 is present, but his learned counsel called absent. However, his learned junior counsel was present and filed an application seeking adjournment on the ground that the plaintiff's learned counsel had gone to Saudi Arabia to perform Umrah. The application is allowed, and time is granted. The attorney for defendant No.2 is present, but his learned counsel called absent. Defendants Nos.1, 3 and 4 are called absent. Defendant No. 5 has already filed his written statement but is called absent. Defendants Nos. 6 to 9 have already been debarred from filing their written statements. Learned DDA is called absent. Put off to 09.12.2026 for plaintiff evidence.

Suit called. Plaintiff No.01 and 2 is present, but his learned counsel called absent. However, his learned junior counsel was present and filed an application seeking adjournment on the ground that the plaintiff's learned counsel had gone to Saudi Arabia 4to perform Umrah. The application is allowed, and time is granted. Defendant No.1, being the attorney of Defendants Nos. 2 and 3, was present, but his learned counsel called absent. Defendant No. 4 was also present along with his learned counsel. The matter is adjourned in the interest of justice. Put up on 09.12.2026 for the plaintiff evidence and further arguments on the application under Order XIII, Rule 2, CPC.

Suit called. Plaintiff called present, along with his counsel and filed adjournment application. Order on it. Granted as last and final chance in case of failure the matter will be decided the accordance with law. Defendant No. 01 called absent, along with his counsel. The official defendants No. 02 to 05 called absent. The learned DDA is absent on behalf of official defendants. Put off to 19.11.2026 for arguments.