Case called. Accused Fayyaz and Tarique were produced in custody from CP Larkana through video link, while accused Haleem was produced in custody from D.P. Larkana through video link. Accused Hakim is present on bail. Accused Bashir Ahmed was called and appeared before the Court. He submitted an application seeking exemption from personal appearance. The NBW issued against him has been suspended. Order on it. Learned ADPP is present. Mr. Ayaz Hussain Khichi, learned Defence Counsel for accused Hakim, is called absent. Mr. Mushtaque Ahmed Khuhawar, Advocate, learned Defence Counsel for accused Bashir Ahmed, is present. Process issued for PW ASI Barkat Ali and PW PC Abdul Khalique has been received back unserved. To come up on 16.11.2026 for evidence. The accused who are present are directed to attend the Court on the next date of hearing, while the J.A. concerned is directed to produce the UTPs/accused through video link on the next date of hearing. Issue fresh summons to PW ASI Barkat Ali, PW PC Abdul Khalique and PW PC Abdul Samad for the next date of hearing.

Challan under Section 512 Cr.P.C. called. All the accused persons are absconders and have already been declared as proclaimed offenders (P.Os.). Proceedings against deceased accused Khan Muhammad alias Rab Rakhio have also abated on account of his death. Learned ADPP for the State is called present. Processes issued to all P.Ws. are received back duly served. I.O. Fakharuddin Rashadi and P.W. PC Ihsan Ali Jatoi are present and examined. The deposition of P.W. PC Ihsan Ali Jatoi is recorded at Ex. No. 05. He has also produced the memo of place of occurrence, which is exhibited as Ex. No. 05/A. The deposition of I.O. Fakharuddin Rashadi is recorded at Ex. No. 06. The reply to the show-cause notice issued to the I.O. is also filed. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned to 14.11.2026 for further proceedings. Issue summons to the I.O. and prosecution witnesses (P.Ws.) for the next date of hearing.

Suit called. Plaintiff No. 1, who is the guardian of plaintiff No.2, is called absent, but his counsel called present and filed statement on pointation of defendant No.07. Order on it. Defendant No.1 is present along with his counsel. The defendant No.06 served but called absent. Processes issued to defendant No.7 is returned un-served. Official defendant No. 2 has already filed his written statement (W.S.). Official defendants Nos.3 and 4, though served, are called absent. Acknowledgment Due (A.D.) in respect of official defendant No. 5 is received. Learned D.D.A. is called absent; however, he has already filed a memo of appearance on behalf of official defendants Nos. 3 to 5 and adopted the written statement already filed by official defendant No.2. Adjourned to 21.11.2026 for service of defendant No.7 and W.S of defendant No.06 and for arguments on the objection to the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 CPC. Issue summons to defendant No.7 through court Baillif pointation.

The suit was called. Plaintiff No. 01 was present, along with his learned counsel. The attorney for Defendant No. 01, who is also the attorney for Defendant No. 02, called present, along with his counsel and filed adjournment application. Order on it. Time granted. Official Defendant No. 03 has already filed his written statement. Official Defendants Nos. 04 and 05 were absent and had already been debarred. The learned representative of the DDA was also absent. It is noted that the DDA has already filed a statement and memo of appearance on behalf of Official Defendants Nos. 04 and 05, adopting the written statement already filed by Defendant No. 03, the Assistant Commissioner, Taluka Warah. Defendant No. 06 appeared pursuant to the amended plaint and has already filed his written statement. The matter is adjourned to 21.11.2026 for the defendant evidence.