The suit was called. The attorney of plaintiff called absent along with Learned counsel and junior counsel called present. Defendant No. 1 was called and appeared, along with his learned counsel and filed adjournment application. Order on it. Time granted. Official defendants Nos. 2 to 6 were called and remained absent. The DDA representative appeared on behalf of the official defendants and had already filed statements. Defendants Nos. 7 and 8 had already been debarred from filing their written statements and proceeded against ex parte. Put off to 03.11.2026 for defendant evidence.

Suit called. The plaintiff and his witness, Saifullah, are present along with their learned counsel. Defendant No. 01 is called absent and has already been debarred from filing his written statement. Defendant No. 02 is called absent; however, he has already filed his written statement in person. Defendant No. 03 is called absent along with his learned counsel. Defendants No. 04 and 05 have already been debarred from filing their written statements. Official defendant No. 06 is called absent but has already filed his written statement on his own behalf as well as on behalf of defendant No.12 and Tapedar Prem Chand is present. Defendant No. 07 has already filed his written statement. Defendant No. 08 is called absent but has already filed his written statement. Defendants No. 09 and 10, despite service, are called absent. Defendants No. 11 and 12, despite service, are called absent; however, they have already filed their written statements. Defendant No. 13 is called absent. Defendant No. 14 is called absent but has already filed his written statement. The learned DDA is present on behalf of the official defendants and has already filed a statement adopting the written statement of official defendant No. 06 on behalf of defendants No. 09, 10, 12 and 13. The cross-examination of the plaintiff is recorded at Ex. No. 48, while the cross-examination of witness Saifullah is recorded at Ex. No. 50. The matter is adjourned to 03.11.2026 for further evidence of the plaintiff and arguments on the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC.