| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Ist Class Civil Suits 63/2022 |
Al Kazim Mansoor Syed VS Muhammad Ibrahim Chandio & Ors | Imdad Ali Mashori(ADVO-946-SBC-LRK) | Shoukat Ali (ADVO-993-SBC-KMB) | The suit was called. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs appeared along with his associate counsel and filed objections to the application under Order XVI Rules 1 and 2 CPC. The objections were ordered to be supplied to the opposite side. Defendant No. 1 was called and appeared, but his learned counsel was absent. Official defendants Nos. 2 to 6 were called and remained absent. The DDA representative appeared on behalf of the official defendants and had already filed statements. Defendants Nos. 7 and 8 had already been debarred from filing their written statements and proceeded against ex parte. Arguments on the application under Order XVI Rules 1 and 2 CPC were heard. The order was passed and announced in open court, and the application was dismissed. The order was placed on the file as Exhibit No. ___. To come up on 27.10.2026 for defendants??? evidence. |
||
| 2 | Ist Class Civil Suits 49/2023 |
Jameel Ahmed Channa VS Khalid Waheed Channa & Ors. | Vinod Kumar(ADVO-1001-SBC-LRK) | Shafique Rehman(ADVO-103-SBC-KMB) | |||
| 3 | Ist Class Civil Suits 30/2024 |
Santosh Kumar VS Mukhtiakar Taluka Warah & Others | Rafiq Ahmed(ADVO-187-SBC-KMB) | DDA(ADVO-005-SBC-LRK) | |||
| 4 | Ist Class Civil Suits 5/2025 |
Sabir Hussain Kalhoro VS Ashiq Ali Kalhoro & Ors | Asif Raza(ADVO-922-SBC-KMB) | Aijaz Ali(ADVO-1148-SBC-LRK) | |||
| 5 | Ist Class Civil Suits 8/2025 |
Muhammad Ameen VS Mst.Aminat & Others | Aijaz Ali(ADVO-1148-SBC-LRK) | Asif Raza(ADVO-922-SBC-KMB) | |||
| 6 | Ist Class Civil Suits 16/2025 |
Khalid Waheed Channa VS Nisar Ahmed Channa & Ors | Shafique Rehman(ADVO-103-SBC-KMB) | Ahmed Ali(ADVO-163-SBC-KMB),Vinod Kumar(ADVO-1001-SBC-LRK) | |||
| 7 | Ist Class Civil Suits 35/2025 |
Sajjad Ali Phulpoto VS Chairman Town Committee Nasirabad & Ors | Banti Lal(ADVO-126-SBC-KMB) | Muhammad Ashique(ADVO-318-SBC-LRK) | |||
| 8 | Ist Class Civil Suits 37/2025 |
Ali Gul Leghari VS Zia-ur-Rehman & Ors | Zameer Ali Shah(ADVO-765-SBC-LRK) | Akhtar Hussain Meo(ADVO-4864-SBC-HYD),Syed Tofique Ahmed Shah(ADVO-3141-SBC-HYD) | |
||
| 9 | Ist Class Civil Suits 5/2026 |
Mst. Naseem Khatoon VS Muhammad Sidique & Ors | Asad Ali (ADVO-169-SBC-KMB) | Asif Raza(ADVO-922-SBC-KMB),Mohammad Bakhsh(ADVO-9067-SBC-KHS) | |||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 10 | C. Misc. Appl. (Civil Misc. Applications) 96/2026 |
Zia-U-Rehman VS Ali Gul Leghari & Ors | Akhtar Hussain Meo(ADVO-4864-SBC-HYD) | This is an application u/s 149 C.P.C filed by learned counsel for plaintiff. Heard & Perused. Order passed and announced in open Court. 30 days' time allowed for submitted required court fee. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
| 11 | C. Misc. Appl. (Civil Misc. Applications) 95/2026 |
Al Kazim Mansoor VS Muhammad Ibrahim & Ors | Imdad Ali Mashori(ADVO-946-SBC-LRK) | Shoukat Ali (ADVO-993-SBC-KMB) | The application u/o XVI rule 1 & 2 CPC called. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs appeared along with his associate counsel and filed objections to the application under Order XVI Rules 1 and 2 CPC. The objections were ordered to be supplied to the opposite side. Defendant No. 1 was called and appeared, but his learned counsel was absent. Official defendants Nos. 2 to 6 were called and remained absent. The DDA representative appeared on behalf of the official defendants and had already filed statements. Defendants Nos. 7 and 8 had already been debarred from filing their written statements and proceeded against ex parte. Arguments on the application under Order XVI Rules 1 and 2 CPC were heard. The order was passed and announced in open court, and the application was dismissed. The order was placed on the file as Exhibit No. ___. |
||