| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 225/2026 | Junaid Chandio VS The State | Suhendar Kumar(ADVO-1042-SBC-KMB) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-34,PPC-392,PPC-394 | 110/2025 Waggan |
Crl. Bail application under section 497 r. P.C of accused Junaid son of Shoukat by caste Chandio called. Mr. Suhendar Kumar Advocate for applicant/accused is not present, nor sent any intimation. Mr. Shakeel Ahmed Awan Learned DDPP is present for State. Since, neither counsel for applicant/accused is present nor any intimation received on his behalf, therefore, the Bail application is dismissed for non prosecution. |
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 226/2026 | Junaid Chandio VS The State | Suhendar Kumar(ADVO-1042-SBC-KMB) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-186,PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-353 | 111/2025 Waggan |
Crl. Bail application under section 497 r. P.C of accused Junaid son of Shoukat by caste Chandio called. Mr. Suhendar Kumar Advocate for applicant/accused is not present, nor sent any intimation. Mr. Shakeel Ahmed Awan Learned DDPP is present for State. Since, neither counsel for applicant/accused is present nor any intimation received on his behalf, therefore, the Bail application is dismissed for non prosecution. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 241/2026 | Roshan Ali Sambhal and others VS The State | Abdul Ghaffar(ADVO-291-SBC-KMB) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-LRK) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-114,PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-504 | 7/2026 Gaji Khuhawar |
Bail application u/s 498, 498-A Cr. P.C called. Applicants/accused 1-Roshan Ali s/o Peeral 2-Pasand Ali @ Pasand Hussain s/o Muhammad Ibrahim 3- Ghulam Nabi s/o Roshan 4-Sadam Ali @ Sadam Hussain s/o Zameer Hussain 5-Ali Gul @ Guloo s/o Pasand Ali @ Pasand Hussain 6- Ghulam Shabir s/o Muharam Ali all by caste Sambhal are present on ad-interim pre arrest bail, Mr. Abdul Ghaffar Gopang Advocate for accused is present. Mr. Shakeel Ahmed Awan DDPP is present for state. Complainant appeared. Mr. Razi Khan Chandio Advocate filed Power on behalf of Complainant. Order on it. File. To come up on 09.03.2026 for confirmation or otherwise. The applicants/accused are directed to attend. Complainant is bound down to appear. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 114/2022 | The State VS Waseem @ Kashif and Others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | 4/2022 Waggan |
Sessions Case No. 114/2022. Accused Rizwan @ Foro Tunio produced through Video Link from Central Prison, Larkana, while accused Waseem alias Kashif ,Mumtaz and Zahid have already been acquitted. Mr. Razi Khan Chandio Advocate for accused is present. Mr. Shakeel Ahmed Awan DDPP is present for State. Depositions of IO/SIP Brakat Ali,PC Mashir Ghulam Mustafa, ASI Akhtiar Ali and PC Waseem Ahmed recorded at Ex...15 to 18. DDPP filed side close statement at Ex.....19. Put off to 13.03.2026 for statement of accused. Issue Production order for accused Rizwan @ Foro to Central Prison, Larkana for physically production in order to record statement of accused. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 45/2025 |
Zaib Khanzada and others VS Muhammad Saleem and others | Zamir Hussain Solangi(ADVO-563-SBC-LRK) | Civil appeal No.45/2025 called. Attorney of appellant namely Zeb is present. His counsel Mr. Zamir Hussain Solangi ld. Adv. is not present but already filed written arguments. Mr. Rafique Ahmed Naich Advocate for Respondents is not present, his private Clerk is present and brought Adjournment application, which is granted. Respondent Zeeshan Ali attorney of other respondents 1 and 3 is present. Mr. Ayaz Ali Sodhar learned DDA for the Official Respondents is present. Put off to 07.03.2026 for arguments of learned DDA and counsel for private Respondents. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Other case stage | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 12/2026 | Mst Farzana Kandhro VS Najam u din | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Succession Petition called. Petitioner is present her counsel Mr. Meharn Khan Patujo Advocate is also present. The reports already received from concerned quarters. Publication also made in daily Newspaper. One of legal heir namely Mst. Hameeda appeared and filed no objection affidavit. Order on it. R and R. Final arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Succession Petition is allowed as prayed with no order as to cots. Let the Succession Certificate be issued in favor of Petitioner, subject to furnishing of one solvent surety in the sum of Rs.10,00,000/- Ten Lac rupees with PR bond in the like amount to satisfaction of this Court. |
|||