SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE / ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE I, KHAIRPUR : 16-MAR-2026

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence
1 PPC 127/2026 The State VS Saeed & Others   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR),Chander Mal(Suspend)     PPC-324,PPC-353 185/2025
B-Section Khairpur


24.03.2026.

Case called. Accused Saeed son of Abul faqueer alias Abdul Sattar is produced by C.P. Khairpur. While rest accused Babo as declared as P.O. Advocate for accused and DDPP for the state are present. Today case is fixed for evidence. Process was issued against complainant and P.Ws which was returned. Complainant and P.Ws are called absent. Order passed on it. Repeat process against complainant and P.Ws. Case adjourned. Put off to.....24.03.2026,for evidence.Produced accused is remanded back to jail custody.

2 Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 128/2026 The State VS Saeed Kandhro   Chander Mal(Suspend)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR)   SINDH ARMS ACT-24 186/2025
B-Section Khairpur


24.03.2026.

Case called. Accused Saeed son of Abul faqueer alias Abdul Sattar is produced by C.P. Khairpur. Advocate for accused and DDPP for the state are present. Today case is fixed for evidence. Process was issued against complainant and P.Ws which was returned. Complainant and P.Ws are called absent. Order passed on it. Repeat process against complainant and P.Ws. Case adjourned. Put off to.....24.03.2026,for evidence.Produced accused is remanded back to jail custody.

3 Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 138/2026 The State VS Mubarak Ali   Chander Mal(Suspend)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR)   SINDH ARMS ACT-24 288/2025
B-Section Khairpur


30.03.2026.

Case called. Accused Mubarak is produced by jail authority Khairpur. Advocate for accused Mubrak and DDPP are present. Today matter is fixed for evidence. Process was not issued against complainant and P.Ws. Complainant and P.Ws are called absent. Repeat process against complainant and P.Ws as already order as before. Case adjourned. Put off to???..30.03. 2026,for evidence. Produced accused are remanded back to jail coustody.

4 Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 139/2026 The State VS Muhammad Moosa   Chander Mal(Suspend)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR)   SINDH ARMS ACT-24 289/2025
B-Section Khairpur


30.03.2026.

Case called. Accused Muhammad Moosa chano is produced by jail authority Khairpur. Advoate for accused called absent. DDPP for the state present. Today matter is fixed for evidence. Process was not issued against complainant and P.Ws which Complainant and P.Ws are called absent. Repeat process against complainant and P.Ws through concerned SHO. Case adjourned. Put off to..... 30.03.2026, for evidence. Produced accused is remanded back to jail coustody.

5 PPC 137/2026 The State VS Mubarak Ali & Others   Chander Mal(Suspend)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR)   PPC-324,PPC-353 287/2025
B-Section Khairpur


30.03.2026.

Case called. Accused Muhammad Moosa, Imtiaz and Mubarak are produced by jail authority Khairpur. While remaining accused Muhammad Yousif and Kamran are present on bail. Advocate for accused Mubrak and DDPP are present. Today matter is fixed for evidence. Process was issued against complainant and P.Ws which was not returned served and un-served. Complainant and P.Ws are called absent. Repeat process against complainant and P.Ws through concerned SHO. Case adjourned. Put off to???..30.03.2026,for evidence.Produced accused are remanded back to jail coustody/Present accused are directed to attend.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge
6 23 (I) A 168/2026 The State VS Taimar Khan   ADPP()   NIL Advocate(ADVO-000-SBC-KHI)   SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A 20/2025
Baberloi


06.04.2026.

Case called. Accused Taimar Khan is called absent. Advocate for accused also called absent. DDPP for the state is present. Today case was fixed for charge. Notice was issued against accused Taimar Khan which was returned as un-served as per endorsement of process server. Repeat notice to accused taimar Khan through concerned SHO as already order as before.Case adjourned. Put off to???.06.04.2026, for Charge/Service of accused Taimar Khan.

7 Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 187/2026 The State VS Fayaz @ Fawad   Chander Mal(Suspend)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR)   SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) 315/2025
Tando Masti Khan


24.03.2026.

Case called. Accused Fayaz alias Fareez Gopang produced by jail authority Khairpur. DDPP for the state present.Today case is fixed for framing of charge. Charge has been framed at Ex,02, Plea of accused person recorded at Ex:02/A he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Issue process against complainant and P.Ws through concerned SHO. Case adjourned. Put off to....24.03.2026,for Cgarge/Produced accused is remanded back to jail custody.

8 PPC 186/2026 The State VS Fayaz @ Fawad   Chander Mal(Suspend)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR)   PPC-324,PPC-353 314/2025
Tando Masti Khan


24.03.2026.

Case called. Accused Fayaz alias Fareez Gopang produced by jail authority Khairpur. DDPP for the state present.Today case is fixed for framing of charge. Charge has been framed at Ex,02, Plea of accused person recorded at Ex:02/A he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Issue process against complainant and P.Ws through concerned SHO. Case adjourned. Put off to....24.03.2026,for Cgarge/Produced accused is remanded back to jail custody.

CIVIL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service
1 Ist Class Civil Suits 126/2022
Muhammad Ameen VS Abdul Saleem & Others   Nizamuddin(ADVO-1395-SBC-KHP)  

07.04.2026.

Matter called. Attorney of plaintiffs, called absent, however his counsel present. Defedant No 2 & 4 called absent.While remaining defendants are called absent. Learned DDA is present on behalf of official defendants. Today matter is fixed for service of defendant No.3,5 to12 through bailiff as well as filing W.S by defendant No, 1,2 & 4. Issue court motion notice against defendant No.,3,5 to12 through bailiff. Matter adjourned. Put off to???.07.04.2025. For service of defendant No.3,5 to12 through bailiff as well as filing W.S by defendant No, 1,2 & 4.

CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A.
2 Ist Class Civil Suits 132/2023
Dr. Karar Hussain VS Inayat Hussain & others   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK)

31.03.2026.

Matter called. Plaintiff is present in person. Defendants are called absent. Advocate for defendant No,1(a) (b),11,24 and 25 is present. Learned DDA is present on behalf of official defendants. Today matter is fixed for filing amended W.S. Plaintiff in person Dr. Karar filed application to close Right of evidence U/O XVII rule 3 CPC RWS 151 CPC. Order passed on it. Notice to other side. He also filed application U/S 35-A CPC RWS 151 CPC dor imposing cost/fine on the defendant No,1(a) (b),11,24 and 25. Matter adjourned. Put off to.....31.03. 2026, for filing amended W.S/ filing objection on applications to close Right of evidence U/O XVII rule 3 CPC RWS 151 CPC as well as filing objection on application U/S 35-A CPC RWS 151 CPC dor imposing cost/fine on the defendant No,1(a) (b),11,24 and 25

CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence
3 Ist Class Civil Suits 178/2020
Asif Ali VS Ghulam Asghar Mughal   Shoaib(ADVO-1691-SBC-KHP)   DDA(ADVO-007-SBC-NIL)

31.03.2026.

Suit called. Attorney of plaintiff called absent, however his counsel present. Attorney of defendant No.1 called absent, however his counsel present. Defendant No.2 as well as counsel are called absent. Defendant No 3 as well as cousel are called absent defendant No 5 as well as counsel are called absent.While remaining defendants are called absent. Learned DDA is also present. Today matter is fixed for defendant evidence. Clerk of advocate for defendant filed adjurnment application order on it. Adjournment granted. Matter adjourned. Put off to....31.03.2026, for defendant evidence.