| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 3/2025 |
Jan Muhammad Dharejo VS Pir Syed Faiz Muhammad Shah & Others | Nizamuddin(ADVO-1395-SBC-KHP) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-THT) | Execution application called. Attorney of applicant/decree holder called absent, however his counsel present. J.Ds are called absent. Today matter is fixed for filing objections on application U/O 22 rule 4 RWS 151 CPC by J.D side. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice as last chance. Put off to....11.06.2026, for filing objections on application U/O 22 rule 4 RWS 151 CPC by J.D side. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | Ist Class Civil Suits 17/2018 |
Syed Suhail Arif Shah VS Abdul Karim Shaikh and others | Safdar Ali(ADVO-878-SBC-KHP) | Khan Muhammad(ADVO-764-SBC-KHP) | Suit called. Plaintiff is present, however his counsel called absent. Defendant No,1 is present, however his counsel called called absent. Intervener as well as counsel are called absent. While remaining defendants are called absent. Learned DDA is present on behalf of official defendants. Today matter for for want of re-arguments on application U/S 151 CPC filed by the defendant No 1& 2/filing objections on two applications U/O 23 rule 3 RWS 151 CPC by learned DDA/arguments on application U/O1 rule 10 CPC advocate from Intervener/as well as filing amended W.S. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to....29.05.2026, for want of re-arguments on application U/S 151 CPC filed by the defendant No 1& 2/ filing objections on two applications U/O 23 rule 3 RWS 151 CPC by learned DDA/ arguments on application U/O1 rule 10 CPC advocate from Intervener/as well as filing amended W.S. |
||
| 3 | Ist Class Civil Suits 70/2019 |
Khan Muhammad VS P.O Sindh & others | Nisar Ahmed(ADVO-628-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | Ist Class Civil Suits 186/2014 |
Mir Muhammad VS Jhamandas & others | Mohsin Abbas(ADVO-699-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | |
||
| 5 | Ist Class Civil Suits 393/2017 |
Mir Muhammad VS P.O Sindh & others | Ali Dino Shaikh(ADVO-27-SBC-KHP),Jaffar Ali Shah(ADVO-640-SBC-KHP) | Kalandar Bux Phulphoto(ADVO-207-SBC-KHP) | |
||
| 6 | Ist Class Civil Suits 217/2019 |
Ghulam Raza Wassan VS P.O Sindh & Others | Ghulam Rasool Khan Narejo(ADVO-356-SBC-KHP) | DDA(ADVO-007-SBC-NIL) | |
||
| 7 | Ist Class Civil Suits 220/2019 |
Ghulam Raza Wassan VS P.O Sindh & Others | Ghulam Rasool Khan Narejo(ADVO-356-SBC-KHP) | DDA(ADVO-007-SBC-NIL) | |
||
| 8 | Ist Class Civil Suits 219/2019 |
Ghulam Raza Wassan VS P.O Sindh & Others | Ghulam Rasool Khan Narejo(ADVO-356-SBC-KHP) | DDA(ADVO-007-SBC-NIL) | |
||
| 9 | Ist Class Civil Suits 218/2019 |
Ghulam Raza Wassan VS P.O Sindh & Others | Ghulam Rasool Khan Narejo(ADVO-356-SBC-KHP) | DDA(ADVO-007-SBC-NIL) | |
||
| 10 | Ist Class Civil Suits 33/2021 |
Muhammad Ibrahim VS P.O Sindh & others | Ali Mardan Shar(ADVO-844-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | Suit called. Attorney of plaintiff as well as counsel are present. Defendant No.7 as well as counsel are present. While remaining defendants are called absent. Learned DDA is present on behalf of official defendants. Today matter is fixed for defendant evidence. Defendant No.7 Chief Municipal officer Khairpur is present and examination in Chief has been recorded as D.W.01 at Exh.D/01. He produce documents at Exh.D and Exh. D/03. Matter adjourned. Put off to...11.06.2026. For defendant evidence. |
||
| 11 | Ist Class Civil Suits 1/2026 |
Abdul Faheem and another VS PO Sindh & Others | Syed Mohsin Ali Shah(ADVO-1458-SBC-KHP) | DDA(ADVO-007-SBC-NIL) | |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 12 | Ist Class Civil Suits 24/2020 |
Ali Hassan Ujjan VS P.O sindh and others | Ghulam Shabir(ADVO-659-SBC-KHP) | Safdar Ali(ADVO-587-SBC-KHP) | Suit called. Attorney of plaintiff as well as counsel are called absent. Defendant No,8 who is attorney of defendant No,9 to12, as well as counsel are present. While remaining defendants are called absent. Learned DDA for official defendants is present. Today matter is fixed for final arguments. Heard arguments from advocate for defendants No 9 to 12 & Learned DDA, matter was repeatedly called but learned counsel for plaintiff called absent without any intimation to this court, hence matter is adjourned for judgment on:-29.05.2026, Learned counsel for defendant filed statement alongwith case laws order passed on it. File, meainwhile learned counsel for plaintiff at is liberty on the argue on the matter on.29.05.2026 fixed for judgment. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Judgment | |||||||
| 13 | Ist Class Civil Suits 176/2017 |
Eid Muhammad VS P.O Sindh & others | Nizamuddin(ADVO-1395-SBC-KHP) | Suit called. Plaintiff as well as counsel are called absent.Junior of advocate for plaintiff present. Attorney of private defendants present, however his counsel called absent. While remaining defendants are called absent. Learned DDA is present on behalf of official defendants.Today matter is fixed for fixed for judgment. Judgment passed and announced in open court. Therefore, suit of plaintiff is hereby dismissed. |
|||