| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1268/2026 | liaquat Ali Larik VS The State | PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-353 | / |
Bail application called. Advocate for accused & DDPP for the state are present. Today bail application fixed for arguments. Heard arguments from both parties. Order passed and announced in open court. Bail of accused namely LIaquat Ali is granted in the sum of Rs:-30,000/-words thrity thousand only with P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of this court. |
||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1269/2026 | The State VS Zulifqar Ali Panhyar | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | / |
Bail application called. Advocate for accused & DDPP for the state are present. Today bail application fixed for arguments. Heard arguments from both parties. Order passed and announced in open court. Bail of accused namely Zulfiquar Ali is granted in the sum of Rs:-30,000/-words thrity thousand only with P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of this court. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 560/2024 | The State VS Darya Khan & Others | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-224,PPC-225,PPC-324,PPC-353 | 276/2023 A-Section Khairpur |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. Except accused Dilbar son of Badshah dino. Accused Dilbar son of Badshah dino Dharejo not produced from C.P Sukkur. Issue P.O for accused Dilbar son of Badshah dino Dharejo to Senior superintendent central prison correctional Facility-I Sukkur. Advocate for accused shakir and sadam Hussain called absent. Advocate for while remaining accused persons is present. DDPP for the state present.Today case was fixed for evidence. Process was issued against P.Ws. which was returned partly served. Retired sub-Inspectior shahbaz Dino is present. Advocate for accused filed application U/S 540 Cr.PC. Order passed on it. Allowed. Retired Sub-Inspector namely Shahbaz dino Shar is present and examined as P.W.No,03 at Ex.10. He produce DD entries No.25 and 30 at Ex.10/A and 10/B. Issue process against remaining P.Ws. Case adjourned. Put off to.....13.04. 2026, for evidence/Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 4 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 139/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Moosa | Chander Mal(Suspend) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 289/2025 B-Section Khairpur |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Moosa chano is produced by jail authority Khairpur. Advocate for accused and DDPP for the state are present.Today case is fixed for evidence. Process was issued against P.Ws but returned served upon PC/Waseem Ali Gambhir of this case is present.Prosecution examined namely PC/Waseem Ali son of Aijaz Ali Gambhir is present and examined as P.W. No.03 at Exh.05. Repeat process against remaining P.Ws. Case adjourned. Put off to???..13.04.2026, for evidence/Produced accused is remanded back to jail custody. |
| 5 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 138/2026 | The State VS Mubarak Ali | Chander Mal(Suspend) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 288/2025 B-Section Khairpur |
Case called. Accused Mubarak is produced by jail authority Khairpur. Advocate for accused and DDPP for the state are present. Today case is fixed for evidence. Process was issued against P.Ws but returned served upon PC/ Waseem Ali Gambhir of this case is present.Prosecution examined namely PC/Waseem Ali son of Aijaz Ali Gambhir is present and examined as P.W. No.03 at Exh.05. Repeat process against remaining P.Ws. Case adjourned. Put off to???...13.04.2026, for evidence/Produced accused is remanded back to jail custody. |
| 6 | PPC 137/2026 | The State VS Mubarak Ali & Others | Chander Mal(Suspend) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-324,PPC-353 | 287/2025 B-Section Khairpur |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Moosa, Imtiaz and Mubarak are produced by jail authority Khairpur. While remaining accused Muhammad Yousif and Kamran are present on bail. Advocate for accused present. Learned DDPP is also present. Today matter is fixed for evidence.Process was issued against P.Ws but returned served upon PC/Waseem Ali Gambhir of this case is present. Prosecution examined namely PC/Waseem Ali son of Aijaz Ali Gambhir as P.W. No.03 at Exh.05. Repeat process against remaining P.Ws. Case adjourned. Put off to???...13.04.2026, for evidence. Produced accused are remanded back to jail custody/Present accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 7 | 23 (I) A 168/2026 | The State VS Taimar Khan | ADPP() | NIL Advocate(ADVO-000-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 20/2025 Baberloi |
Case called. Accused Taimar Khan is called absent. Advocate for accused also called absent. DDPP for the state is present. Today case was fixed for charge. Notice was issued against accused Taimar Khan which was returned as un-served as per endorsement of process server. Order passed on it. Call surety papers of accused and issue N.B.W against the accused. Case adjourned. Put off to??????..23.04.2026, for Charge/Service of accused Taimar Khan & call surety papers of accused. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Amended Title of Plaint. | |||||||
| 1 | Ist Class Civil Suits 48/2017 |
Wazir Ali VS Arbelo & others | Moizzam Ali Baloch(ADVO-260-SBC-KHP) | Ghulam Rasool Khan Narejo(ADVO-356-SBC-KHP) | Suit called. Attorney of plaintiffs present, however his counsel called absent. Defendant No,1 who is attorney of defendant No,2 to 4 called absent, however his counsel present. While remaining defendants are called absent. Learned DDA for official defendant No,5 to7 is present. Today matter is fixed for filing amended title. Attorney of plaintiff filed adjournment application order passed on it. Adjournment granted in the interest of justice.Put off to???22.04.2026, for filing amended title on the next date of hearing by plaintiff side. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Order On Application | |||||||
| 2 | Ist Class Civil Suits 9/2021 |
Azizullah Gopang VS P.O. Sindh and others | Syed Mohsin Ali Shah(ADVO-1458-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Suit called. Plaintiff called absent, however his counsel present. Attorney of defendant No,4 called absent, but his counsel present. While remaining official defendants are called absent. Learned DDA is present on behalf of official defendants. Today matter is fixed for plaintiff evidence as well as order on application U/O 7 rule 11 CPC. Re-arguments heard for learned DDA on behalf of official defendants. Let the matter be fixed for order on application 7 rule 11 CPC. Put of to.... 20.04.2026, for plaintiff evidence as well as order on application U/O 7 rule 11 CPC. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 3 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 3/2025 |
Jan Muhammad Dharejo VS Pir Syed Faiz Muhammad Shah & Others | Nizamuddin(ADVO-1395-SBC-KHP) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-THT) | Execution application called. Attorney of applicant/decree holder called absent, however his counsel present.J.Ds are called absent. J.D.No.2 & 4 have been expired. The learned counsel for Decree holder is directed to join L.Rs of deceased J.D. No. 2 & 4 on the next date of hearing filing proper application. Advocate for plaintiff filed adjournment application order passed on it. Adjournment application granted as last and final chance.Matter adjourned. Put off to???20.04.2026, for learned counsel for Decree holder is directed to join L.Rs of deceased by next date of hearing filing proper application |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 4 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 2/2025 |
Qurban Ali Abbasi VS Mureed Ahmed Abbasi & Others | Muhammad Yaqoob Soomro(ADVO-523-SBC-KHP) | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-THT) | Execution application called. Decree holder called absent, however his counsel present.J.D. No.1 to 3 called absent, however their counsel present. While remaining J.Ds are called absent. Today matter fixed for for filing of objections on execution application by J.D.No.4 to 8 as well as filing objections on application U/O 22 rule 4 CPC by J.Ds. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to.....20.04.2026, for filing of objections on execution application by J.D.No.4 to 8 as well as filing objections on application U/O 22 rule 4 CPC by J.Ds side. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | Ist Class Civil Suits 10/2001 |
Mushtaque Hussain VS Muhaammad Bachal | Zubeda Khanam Jamali(ADVO-366/A-SBC-KHP) | Ghulam Rasool (ADVO-1715-SBC-KHP) | Both suits called. Attorney of plaintiffs in leading suit namely Zubaida K.Jamali is present, however his counsel called absent. Defendant No.1 of leading suit is present, however his counsel called absent. Attorney of defendant No.2 of leading suit as well as counsel are called absent, but his junior is present. Today matter is fixed for plaintiff evidence in leading suit. Advocate for defendant in leading suit filed adjournment application order passed on it. Adjournment granted as last and final chance in failure order will be passed as per law. Matter adjourned. Put off to..27.04.2026, for plaintiff evidence. |
||
| 6 | Ist Class Civil Suits 95/2011 |
Mst. Husna Bano VS Mushtaque Hussain & others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Both suits called. Attorney of plaintiffs in leading suit namely Zubaida K.Jamali is present, however his counsel called absent. Defendant No.1 of leading suit is present, however his counsel called absent. Attorney of defendant No.2 of leading suit as well as counsel are called absent, but his junior is present. Today matter is fixed for plaintiff evidence in leading suit. Advocate for defendant in leading suit filed adjournment application order passed on it. Adjournment granted as last and final chance in failure order will be passed as per law. Matter adjourned. Put off to..27.04.2026, for plaintiff evidence. |
|||
| 7 | Ist Class Civil Suits 154/2020 |
Muhammad Hussain VS Akhtar Hussain & Others | Ziaul Haque(ADVO-199-SBC-KHP) | Suit called. Attorney of plaintiffs called absent, however his counsel present. Attorney of defendants No,1 to 3 called absent, however his counsel present. Officials defendants are called absent. Learned DDA is present on behalf of official defendants. Today matter is fixed for plaintiff evidence as well as filing objections on application U/O 16 rule 1 & 2 CPC by defendant side. Advocate for defendant filed adjournment application order passed on it. Adjournment application granted. Matter adjourned. Put off to...23.03.2026, for plaintiff 2evidence as well as filing objections on application U/O 16 rule 1 & 2 CPC by defendant side |
|||