| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 526/2019 | The State VS Zulfiqar Ali @ Bhutto Gopang & Others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-LRK) | Rafique Ali (ADVO-2675-SBC-KHP),Shamsuddin(ADVO-1793-SBC-SUK) | PPC-324,PPC-353 | 71/2019 Kotdiji |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 2 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 602/2024 | The State VS Kamal Faqeer | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 212/2024 B-Section Khairpur |
Case called. Accused Kamal Faqeer alias Kamal phulpoto is present on bail. Advocate for accused and DDP for the state are present. Today case is fixed for final arguments. Arguments could not be heard as accused Abdul Qadeer of the main case has absconded away. Case adjourned. Put off to...13.04.2026, for final arguments/Present accused is directed to attend |
| 3 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 601/2024 | The State VS Mahnji @ Muhammad Arif | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 199/2024 B-Section Khairpur |
Case called. Accused Manjhi alias Muhammad Arif phulpoto is present on bail. Advocate for accused and DDP for the state are present. Today case is fixed for final arguments. Arguments could not be heard as accused Abdul Qadeer of the main case has absconded away.Case adjourned. Put off to...13.04.2026, for final arguments/Present accused is directed to attend.. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Judgment | |||||||
| 4 | 23 (I) A 527/2019 | The State VS Zulfiqar Ali @ Bhutto Gopang | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Shamsuddin(ADVO-1793-SBC-SUK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 73/2019 Kotdiji |
Case called. Accused zulfiqar Ali alias Bhutto is present on bail. Advocate for accused called absent. DDPP for the state present. Today case was fixed for judgment. Case be fixed for want of re-arguments.Put off to....14.04.2026, for re-arguments/Present accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 5 | PPC 599/2024 | The State VS Kamal Faqeer & others | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-324,PPC-353 | 158/2024 B-Section Khairpur |
Case called. Accused Manjhi and Kamal faqeer are present on bail. Accused Abdul Qadeer alias Qadoo phulpoto is called absent. Advocate for accused Kamal faqeer is present. DDPP for the state present. Today case is fixed for service of accused Abdul Qadeer alias Qadoo & his surety. N.B.W was issued against accused Abdul Qadeer and notice to his surety which was not returned served and un-served. Issue Show-Cause notice to concerned SHO. Repeat fresh N.B.W of accused Abdul Qadeer through concerned SHO and notice to 514 Cr.P.C against surety of accused Abdul Qadeer alias Qadoo phulpoto. Case adjourned. Put off to......13.04.2026, for Service of accused Abdul Qadeer alias Qadoo & his surety/Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 6 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 600/2024 | The State VS Abdul Qadeer @ Qadu | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 198/2024 B-Section Khairpur |
Case called. Accused Abdul Qdeer alias Qadoo phulpoto is called absent Advocate for accused called absent. DDP for the state present. Today case is fixed for service of accused Abdul Qadeer and his surety. N.B.W warrant was issued against accused Abdul Qadeer and notice to his surety which was not returned served and un-served. Issue Show-Cause notice to concerned SHO. Repeat N.B.W against accused Abdul Qadeer and notice to his surety. Case adjourned. Put off to 13.04.2026, for Service of accused Abdul Qadeer and his surety. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | Ist Class Civil Suits 62/2022 |
Shafquat Hussain VS Moula Dad & Others | Saeed Ahmed(ADVO-1224-SBC-KHP) | Suit called. Plaintiff No.1 called absent, however his counsel present. Defendant No,1 as well as counsel are called absent. While remaining official defendants are called absent. Learned DDA is present on behalf of official defendants. Today matter is fixed for service of defendant No.6. Notice was issued against defendant No,6 which was returned as un-served as per endorsement of bailiff. Order passed on it. Repeat process against defendant No.6, as already order as before. Matter adjourned. Put off to...27.04.2026. For service of defendant No.6. |
|||
| 2 | Ist Class Civil Suits 126/2022 |
Muhammad Ameen VS Abdul Saleem & Others | Nizamuddin(ADVO-1395-SBC-KHP) | Matter called. Attorney of plaintiffs, called absent, however his counsel present. Defedant No 2 & 4 called absent.While remaining defendants are called absent. Learned DDA is present on behalf of official defendants. Today matter is fixed for service of defendants No.3,5 to 12 as well as filing of W/S by defendants No.1,2 and 4.Perusal of record transpires that Court motion/notice was issued against them through bailiff of this Court, which was also served upon defendants No.6,9,10 and 11 as per his endorsement dated 01.04.2026 and 06.04.2026.In view of such fact, service against defendants No.6,9,10 and 11 is hereby held good. Order passed on order sheet.Issue court motion notice to defendant No.3,5 to 8 through bailiff, Issue court notice to defent No. 12 through TCS. Put off to 27.04.2026, for service of defendants No.3,5 to 8/service of defendant No.12 through TCS as well as filing of written statement by defendants No.1,2,4,6,9 to 11. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 3 | R.Ex. (Rent Executions) 3/2024 |
Mumtaz Hussain & others VS Allah Wadhayo & others | Safdar Ali(ADVO-878-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Rent application called. Attorney of applicants called absent, however his counsel present. Attorney of opponent except opponent No,1(i & ii), 2(i) and 4(c) present, however his counsel called absent. Today matter is fixed for filing objection on the application U/O XXII Rule 3 CPC as well as filing objections U/O XXII Rule 4 by opponents side but they have failed to file objections on the instant applications. The application was filed by the applicants through their counsel on 01.02.2025 and 11.01.2025 and since then same are pending for filing objections and the respondents have been remaining absent from filing objections therefore, they are debarred from filing objections on the instant applications U/O XXII Rule 3 CPC and application U/O XXII rule 4 CPC.Attorney of opponent filed adjournment application order passed on seprate order sheet. Let both the instant applications be fixed for arguments. Put off to...13.04.2026. for both the instant applications be fixed for arguments for filling objection as well as filing objections on rent application by opponent No, 1(iii to vi, viii & xi), 2(ii)(a to c), 2(iii to ix),3(i to v) and 4( a, b, d & e) |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | Ist Class Civil Suits 135/2020 |
Muhammad Aslam & others VS P.O Sindh & others | Fazul Nabi (ADVO-51515-SBC-KHP),Umrah Khan Pathan(ADVO-488-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Suit called. Plaintiff No,1 who is attorney of rest plaintiffs is present, however his counsel called absent. Defendant No,7 (a) who is attorney of defendant No, 7 (b) to 7(h) called absent, however his counsel present. Defendant No,6 as well as counsel are called absent. Today matter was fixed for plaintiff evidence. Mr. Muhammad Yakoob Soomro advocate is appeared and filed power on behalf of Plaintiff. Order passed on it. File. He also filed adjournment application order passed on it. Adjournment granted in the larger interest of justice. Learned counsel for plaintiff is not paid fine amount of Rs.25,000/- which imposed upon him by appleate court vide order dated.29.11.2023. Matter adjourned. Put off to...14.04.2026, for plaintiff evidence as well as compliance of appleate court vide order dated.29.11.2023 |
||
| 5 | Ist Class Civil Suits 206/2020 |
Ahsanullah & other VS Mst. Razia Bano & others | Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-2125-SBC-KHP) | DDA(ADVO-007-SBC-NIL) | Suit called. Attorney of plaintiffs, as well as counsel are present. Attorney of private defendants, witness as well as counsel are present. While remaining official defendants are called absent. Learned DDA is present on behalf of official defendants. Today matter is fixed for Cross examination to attorney of plaintiff and his witness. Advocate for plaintiff filed adjournment application order passed on it. Adjournment granted as last and final chance. Matter adjourned. Put off to....14.04.2026, for defendant evidence. |
||