| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Report | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 363/2023 | The State VS Sanaullah alias Paan Jalbani | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | Amjad Ali s/o Muhammad Umar Bhatti() | PPC-324,PPC-353 | 3/2023 Rato Dero |
Session case called. Today case is fixed for progress report in respect of Guidelines and Directions passed in "Nasrullah Case PLD 2016 Sindh 238". SHO P.S Ratodero sent report and requested for time. Order passed on it. 03 months granted. Put off to 24.6.2026 for progress report. |
| 2 | PPC 837/2023 | The State VS Farhan and others. | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Khadim Hussain(ADVO-1021-SBC-LRK),Suhail Ahmed (ADVO-1941-SBC-LRK) | PPC-324 | 87/2023 Rato Dero |
Case called. Today case is for progress report in respect of Guidelines and Directions passed in Nasrullah Case PLD 2016 Sindh 238.SHO PS Concerned sent report and requested for time. Order thereon. Time granted. Put off to 20.06.2026 for progress report. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 171/2026 | The State VS Mujahid @ Mujoo Jeho & others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-402 | 131/2025 Naudero |
Sessions Case called. Accused Mujahid @ Mujoo, Sajjad @ Sajoo, Ali Gul, Muzaffar and Guhram are absconders and declared P.Os. DDPP for the State is present. No P.W is present. Process returned un-served, handed over to same process server while extending ill the next date of hearing. Put off to 26.3.2026 for evidence U/S 512 Cr.P.C. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Ist Class Civil Suits 86/2018 |
Muhammad Umar Maqsood Farooqi & Others VS Nisar Ahmed Abro & Others | Atta Hussain (ADVO-1593-SBC-LRK) | Abdul Qadir(ADVO-2525-SBC-LRK) | Suit called. Attorney of Plaintiffs No.1 & 2 is called absent, his Counsel Mr Muhsin Raza Chandio is present. Defendant No.01 Nisar Ahmed alongwith his counsel is present. Remaining defendants are called absent. Learned DDA for official defendants is present. The matter is adjourned at the request of both Counsel. Put off to 02.4.2026 for evidence of defendant's side. |
||
| 2 | Ist Class Civil Suits 109/2021 |
Muhammad Arif Abro VS Mst: Yasmeen Abro & others | Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-710-SBC-LRK) | Abdul Rehman Bhutto(ADVO-430-SBC-LRK) | Suit called. Plaintiff is present, his Counsel is called absent. Defendant No.1(i)/attorney of defendants No.1(ii) to 1(v) Uzam Ali Abro for defendant 1(i)/attorney of defendants No.1(ii) to 1(v) is called absent, his Counsel Mr Mansoor Ali Bhutto is present. DDA for official defendants No.3 to 10 is present. The side of evidence of remaining official defendants is closed suomoto by this Court vide order dated 27.9.2025. The incharge Mukhtiarkar Barrage/Estate, Larkana namely Mr Aamir Ali Jhatiyal Asstt. Mukhtiarkar Bakrani is called absent. DDA submitted adjournment application. Order on it. Granted. Put off to 02.4.2026 for evidence of Mukhtiarkar Barrage/Estate Larkana and production of record. |
||
| 3 | Ist Class Civil Suits 4/2022 |
Nizamuddin Bossan VS Muhammad Rafique Bossan & Others | Muhammad Sharif(ADVO-1448-SBC-LRK) | Atta Hussain (ADVO-1593-SBC-LRK),Imdad Ali Mashori(ADVO-946-SBC-LRK) | Suit called. Plaintiff alongwith his Counsel is present. Defendants No.2/attorney of defendants No.1 to 3 are called absent, their counsel Mr Muhsin Raza Chandio is present. witness of defendants Sub Registrar Ratodero is called absent. DDA for official defendants No.4 to 9 is present. Counsel for defendants No. 1 to 3 submitted adjournment application. Order on it. Granted. Put off to 02.4.2026 for evidence of witness of defendant i-e Sub-Registrar Ratodero. |
||
| 4 | Ist Class Civil Suits 31/2022 |
Ghulam Shabir Jalbani & Others VS M/S Umar Jan and Company through its & Others | Atta Hussain (ADVO-1593-SBC-LRK) | Asadullah(ADVO-473-SBC-SHK) | Suit called. Plaintiff No.01/attorney of plaintiff's No.2 to 5/C is present, his Counsel Mr Muhsin Raza is present. Defendant No.03 and his advocate are called absent. Remaining defendants are called absent. Defendants No. 1 & 2 are already debarred from filing their written statements. Defendant No.4 is called absent. Authorised persons of Mukhtiarkar Ratodero namely Abdullah Soomro Tapedar is is called absent. DDA for official defendants is present and submitted adjournment application. Order passed on it. Granted. Put off to 02.4.2026 for evidence of defendant's side/Mukhtiarkar Ratodero and Assistant Commissioner. |
||
| 5 | Ist Class Civil Suits 25/2024 |
Noor Muhammad Chahwan and others VS Wazeer Ali chahwan and others | Mazhar Ali(ADVO-1106-SBC-LRK) | DDA(ADVO-005-SBC-LRK) | The suit has been remanded by the Appellate Court of Honourable Additional District Court, Ratodero. Suit called. The plaintiff No.2/attorney of plaintiffs No.1 and 3 to 16 is present alongwith his counsel. The defendants No.2 Barkat Ali/attorney of defendants NO.01,4 & 5 is present, his counsel is called absent. Defendant No. 06 Roshan Ali Unar who is attorney of defendants No.07 to 26 is present, his counsel is called absent. Defendant No.28 Bheeman Das/attorney of defendant No. 27 and 29 to 35 is alongwith his counsel is called absent. The learned DDA for official defendants No.36 to 44 is present. Defendant No.03 is called absent is already debarred from filing W/S. Plaintiff's Counsel submitted list of witnesses and list of documents. As per Section 16 Rule (I) CPC the list of witnesses and list of documents should be provided within seven days after framing of issues, therefore, both lists be returned to plaintiff's Counsel with directions to satisfy the Court. Put off to 08.4.2026 For plaintiff side evidence. |
||
| 6 | Ist Class Civil Suits 45/2024 |
Mst Paras Khatoon Siyal VS Sikander Siyal and others | Sarfraz Ali(ADVO-1386-SBC-LRK) | Waqar Ahmed Siyal (ADVO-1668-SBC-LRK) | Suit called. Plaintiff is called absent, her attorney is present. Counsel for plaintiff is called absent. Defendants No. 01 to 10 are called absent and they are already debarred from filing written statements/objections vide order dated 10.01.2025. Defendant No.11 to 14 are called absent. Counsel for defendants No.12 to 14 is called absent. Advocate for defendant No.11 is present. Official defendant No.16 is already debarred from filing W.S vide order dated 03.3.2025. DDA for official defendants No. 15 to 18 is present. due to absence of plaintiff's Counsel and Counsel for defendants No. 12 to 14, the matter is adjourned. Put off to 01.4.2026 for further evidence of plaintiff side/ hearing on Application U/O XVI Rule 6 & 7 CPC filed by plaintiff and application U/O 23 Rule 3 CPC filed by plaintiff and defendants No. 12 to 14. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 7 | Ist Class Civil Suits 9/2020 |
Rajib Ali Soomro VS Asif Ali Jalbani & Others | Atta Hussain (ADVO-1593-SBC-LRK) | DDA(ADVO-005-SBC-LRK) | Suit called. Plaintiff is called absent, his counsel Mr Muhsin Raza is present. Defendants No.1 to 3 along with their counsel are called absent. The side of evidence of private defendants is already closed by this Court vide order dated 06.8.2025. Official defendant No. 4, 5 & 6 are called absent. DDA for official defendants is present. Plaintiff's Counsel submitted adjournment application on the grounds that he will submit further written arguments on the next date of hearing. Order passed on it. Granted. Put off to 02.4.2026 for further arguments of both parties. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
| 8 | Ist Class Civil Suits 7/2026 |
Muhammad Yaseen Mangnejo and others VS Late Gulab Khatoon Mangnejo and others (through her L.Rs) | Dildar Ali Chandio(ADVO-985-SBC-LRK) | Suit called. Plaintiff is present, his Counsel is called absent. Today the matter is fixed for order. Order passed and pronounced in the open Court. The plaint of plaintiff is rejected U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC, with no order as to costs. |
|||