| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 340/2020 | State VS Jameel @ Janbooro @ Akbar (Qadeer Dayo) Dayo | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | Javed Ahmed(ADVO-361-SBC-SHK) | PPC-324,PPC-337-Fi | 74/2018 Naudero |
Sessions Case called. Accused Qadeer Dayo is produced by the J.A D.P Larkana. Accused Jameel @ Jamboro @ Akbar & Ghulam Abbas Dayo are already acquitted U/S 345(6) Cr.P.C vide order dated 07.9.2021. While remaining accused are already declared as P.Os. ADPP for the state is present. Defence counsel for accused is called absent. Complainant Abdul Sattar and witness/injured Pervez Aslam are present. The both parties (complainant and accused) submitted application U/S 345 (2) Cr.P.C for permission to compound the matter. Order passed and announced in the open Court. The application is allowed. Both parties also filed compromise application U/S 345(6) Cr.P.C. Order passed and pronounced in the open Court. Accused Abdul Qadeer Dayo is acquitted U/S 345 (6) Cr.P.C., he is produced in custody and sent back to custody alongwith acquittal intimation. Both applications and orders are kept on record at Ex....34 to 37 respectively. |
| 2 | PPC 315/2022 | The State VS Bhooro ( Rabail Dahani ) and others | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | Amjad Ali s/o Muhammad Umar Bhatti(),Shahnaz Gul (ADVO-2153-SBC-LRK) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353 | 2/2022 G.K. Bhutto |
|
| 3 | PPC 878/2024 | The State VS Asamatullah (Asghar) and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Shahnaz Gul (ADVO-2153-SBC-LRK) | PPC-324,PPC-452,PPC-504 | 26/2024 G.K. Bhutto |
Sessions Case called. Accused Asghar Dahani is produced in custody by J.A C.P & C.F Larkana. The proceedings of case against accused Asmatullah and Qamaruddin were kept in abeyance. While remaining accused are already declared P.Os. ADPP is present D.C for accused is present. Process returned partly served with endorsement of process server that private P.Ws have been shifted to unknown place due to enmity and their where about is known, such proceedings U/S 87/88 Cr.P.C have already been initiated against them. Such statement of process server/HC Rasool Bux recorded at EX.....17. He produced carbon copy of DD entry, Summons of this Court and endorsement at EX....17/A to 17/C. P.W/PC Raja Khan Shar is present and examined vide his deposition recorded at EX.....18. DDP for teh State filed statement at EX....19 requesting therein for keeping the proceedings of the case in abeyance till appearance of complainant and his private witnesses. Order thereon. Put off to 14.10.2026 for evidence/further proceedings. Accused Asghar sent back to custody. |
| 4 | PPC 651/2025 | The State VS Shareef (Asghar Dahani) and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-402 | 8/2025 G.K. Bhutto |
Sessions Case called. Accused Asghar Dahani is produced in custody by J.A C.P Larkana. Accused Oshaque Jalbani Barkat Dahani are already acquitted U/S 265-H(i) Cr.P.C by this Court vide Judgment dated 13.8.2026. The Case against proclaimed offenders namely Shareef, Akbar, Saifal @ saifu, Khuda Bux @ Khudoo and 8 Deedar @ Shaka is already kept on dormant file. ADPP is present. D.C for accused is present. Process returned served upon complainant/ASI Ashique Ali, I.O/ASI Qadir Bux and PC Rasool Bux, they are present and examined. Deposition of complainant/ASI Ashique Ali recorded at EX....26. Deposition of I.O/ASI Qadir Bux recorded at EX...27. Deposition of PC Rasool Bux recorded at EX.....28. Summons for service upon remaining P.Ws handed over to same process server while extending till the next date of hearing. Accused Asghar Dahani sent back to custody. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 5 | PPC 679/2024 | The State VS Rehmatullah Korai and another. | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | PPC-114,PPC-324,PPC-427 | 82/2023 Naudero |
Sessions Case called. Accused Rehmatullah & Ghulam Murtaza are present on bail. ADPP is present. D.C for both accused is called absent. Counsel for complainant is called absent. At the request of complainant the matter is adjourned. Put off to 24.10.2026 for arguments of Counsel for complainant. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 1/2026 |
Amanullah Junejo VS Ishrat Abbass and others | Mansoor Ali (ADVO-2317-SBC-LRK) | Matter called. D.H Amanullah Junejo alongwith his Counsel Mr Mansoor Ali Bhutto is present. The J.D Ishrat Abbas appeared in-person and submitted application for grant of time for compliance of the order dated 09.09.2025 and decree dated 10.09.2025. Order. Passed on application. Granted. Put off 24.10.2026 for further compliance. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 2/2026 |
Mst. Ghazala Parveen Soomro VS Ishtiaque Ahmed Bhutto through his L.Rs and others | Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-749-SBC-LRK) | Matter called. D.H is called absent, her Counsel Mr Azizullah Narejo is present. J.Ds are called absent without intimation. DDA on behalf of official J.Ds No. 03 to 08 is present. J.D No. 1-A Mst Shabir Khatoon and official J.ds No. 3 to 8 are lready debarred from filing their objections vide order sheet dated 15.9.2026. Notice for service upon private J.D No.1/B to 1/G & 2 not issued by the D.H. Counsel for D.H filed application U.O 5 Rule 20 CPC for issuance of notice upon private J.D No.1/B to 1/G & 2 through substitute service of publication. Order on it. Notice to other side. DDA for official J.Ds received copy of application. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in the open Court. The Application U/O 5 Rule 20 CPC is allowed. Let the notice be issued to private J.D No.1/B to 1/G & 2 through substitute service of publication in newspaper DAILY JANG on cost. Put of to off to 21.10.2026 for service of private J.Ds No.1/B to 1/G & 2. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 3 | Ist Class Civil Suits 12/2026 |
Mst. Zakia Soomro VS Mumtaz Bosan and others | Suhail Ahmed (ADVO-1941-SBC-LRK) | Suit called. Plaintiff is called absent, her counsel Mr. Suhail Ahmed Veesar is present. None is present from the defendants side. The service was held good upon defendant No.01 & 03 and the defendant No.2 was debarred from filing of written statement/objection vide order dated 17.09.2026. DDA for official defendants is present. Put off to 17.10.2026 for written statement of defendants No. 1 & 3. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Issues | |||||||
| 4 | Ist Class Civil Suits 11/2026 |
Abdul Aziz Brohi through his attorney Rasool Bux Bhutto VS Qazi Fazulullah Brohi and others | Waqar Ahmed Siyal (ADVO-1668-SBC-LRK) | Suhail Ahmed (ADVO-1941-SBC-LRK) | Suit called. Attorney of Plaintiff alongwith his counsel is present. The defendants No.1/attorney of defendants No. 2 to 4 and 6 to 9 is present. Counsel for defendant No.1 is present. The defendant No.5 is strike out by the plaintiff from the present suit. Official defendants No.10,11 and 13 to 15 are called absent. DDA is present on behalf of official defendants No.10, 11 & 13 to 15. Counsel for Defendant No.12 Chairman Municipal Corporation/TMA Ratodero alongwith his Advocate is called absent. Counsel for plaintiff Mr Waqar Ahmed Siyal filed statement to withdraw the Vakalatnama filed by him for attorney of plaintiff. Order on it. File. Attorney of plaintiff submitted application for grant of time to engage his Counsel. Order on it. Granted. Counsel for defendant No.1 submitted application for grant of time to file proposed issues. Order on it. Granted. Put off to 16.10.2026 for settlement of issues. Both parties are directed to file proposed issues till next date of hearing. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | Ist Class Civil Suits 45/2024 |
Mst Paras Khatoon Siyal VS Sikander Siyal and others | Irfan Ali (ADVO-2405-SBC-LRK),Sarfraz Ali(ADVO-1386-SBC-LRK) | Waqar Ahmed Siyal (ADVO-1668-SBC-LRK) | Suit called. Attorney of Plaintiff is present. Counsel for attorney of plaintiff is called absent. Defendants No. 01 to 10 are called absent and they are already debarred from filing written statements/objections vide order dated 10.01.2025. Defendant No.11 to 14 are called absent. Counsel for defendants No.12 to 14 is called absent. Advocate for defendant No.11 is present. Official defendant No.16 is already debarred from filing W.S vide order dated 03.3.2025. DDA for official defendants No. 15 to 18 is present. Advocate for defendant No.11 submitted adjournment application. Order on it. Granted. Put off to 20.10.2026 for evidence of defendants side. |
||