| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 247/2026 | The state VS Muhammad Ramzan @ Haji Kalhoro ( Munnawar Shar) and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-401 | 46/2025 Lashari |
Sessions case called. Accused Munawar Shar is produced in custody through video link by J.A D.P and C.F Larkana. Accused Mashooque Ali Mugheri is already acquitted U/S 265-H(i) Cr.P.C vide Judgment dated 13.5.2026. While case against absconding accused/P.Os namely Muhammad Ramzan @ Haji and Barkat Ali is already kept on dormant file. DDPP for the State is present. Process returned served. Complainant/ASI Allah Bux, P.W/mashir PC Mir Muhammad, PC Dhani Bux, WHC Ayaz Shar, I.O/ASI Qadir Bux and mashir/PC Ali Dino, they are present and examined. Deposition of Complainant/ASI Allah Bux recorded at EX.....16. Deposition of P.W/mashir PC Mir Muhammad recorded at EX....17. Deposition of PC Dhani Bux recorded at EX...18. Deposition of WHC Ayaz Shar recrded at EX.....19. Deposition of I.O/ASI Qadir Bux recorded at EX.....20. He produced copies of DD entries and memo of imaginary arrest at EX....20/A and 20/B. Deposition of mashir/PC Ali Dino recorded at EX.....21. Put off to 17.11.2026 for further evidence. J/A D.P Larkana is directed to produce the accused through video link on the next date of hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 400/2023 | The State VS Muhammad Paryal and others. | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | PPC-324 | 5/2023 G.K. Bhutto |
Sessions Case called. Accused Rashid @ Rashoo is present on bail. While case against remaining absconding accused/POs is already kept on dormant file. DDPP is present. D.C for accused is called absent. Charge against accused Rashid @ Rashoo framed at EX....16. Plea of accused recorded at EX....16/A, to which, the accused pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Put off to 23.11.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to P.Ws Call case property. Accused Rashid @ Rashoo is directed to attend. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | Ist Class Civil Suits 13/2026 |
Abdul Kareem Abro VS Mst. Hoor Khatoon and otherse | Waqar Ahmed Siyal (ADVO-1668-SBC-LRK) | Muhammad Sharif(ADVO-2270-SBC-LRK) | Suit called. Plaintiff is present, his Counsel is called absent. Defendant No.6/attorney of defendants No. 1, 3-a(i) 3-a(ii), 3-a(iii), 3-a(iv), 5, 7-a, 7-b, 7-e, 7-f, 10 & 11, is present. Ghulam MUhamad Abro/attorney of defendant No.9 is present. Defendants 12 to 15 are present, their Advocate Mr Zaib Hussain Pathan is present. The defendant No. 3-A(iv) Suhail Ahmed has been passed away and strucked off from this suit. While remaining defendants are called absent. Mr Sanaullah Bhutto Advocate for defendant No.6/attorney of defendants No. 1, 3-a(i) 3-a(ii), 3-a(iii), 3-a(iv), 5, 7-a, 7-b, 7-e, 7-f, 10 & 11 is called absent. DDA for official defendants is present. Service was held good upon defendants No.1, 3-a(ii), 3-a(iii), 4-a, 5, 7-a to 7-d, 7-f and 8 to 17 vide order dated 30.6.2026. Notice not issued to defendants No. 4-C to 4-f. Mr Shakeel Ahmed Abro filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendant No.8 through her attorney Allah Dino Abro alongwith PS cop of Special power of attorney. Order o it. File. Order passed on order sheet. Defendants No.4-b, 7-c,7-d are debarred from filing their written statements and declared exparte. Put off to 25.11.2026 for written statements of defendant 8 & Service/hearing on application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC. Plaintiff is directed to repeat notices to defendants No. 4-C to 4-f as already ordered, on costs. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 2/2026 |
Mst. Ghazala Parveen Soomro VS Ishtiaque Ahmed Bhutto through his L.Rs and others | Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-749-SBC-LRK) | Matter called. D.H is called absent, her Counsel Mr Azizullah Narejo is present. J.Ds are called absent. DDA on behalf of official J.Ds No. 03 to 08 is present. J.D No. 1-A Mst Shabir Khatoon and official J.ds No. 3 to 8 are already debarred from filing their objections vide order sheet dated 15.9.2026. Service upon private J.D No.1/B to 1/G & 2 was held good vide order dated 04.11.2026. Mr Shakeel Ahmed Abro Advocate filed statement that he shall file power on behalf of J.D No.2 on next date of hearing. Order on it. File. Put of to off to 18.11.2026 for objections of private J.Ds No.1/B to 1/G & 2. |
|||
| 3 | Ist Class Civil Suits 16/2026 |
Mst. Ishrat Begum Pathan VS Raja Muhammad Amjad Khan and others | Idrees Ahmed(ADVO-1648-SBC-LRK) | Tariq Naeem Awan(ADVO-310-SBC-LRK) | Suit called. Plaintiff is called absent, her Counsel Mr Mansoor Ali Bhutto is present. Defendant No.1 Raja Muhammad Amjad Khan and defendant No.2 Muhammad Arshad Khan are present, their Counsel is called absent. DDA for official defendants No. 3 to 5 is present. DDA submitted application for grant of time to file written statements of official defendants. Order passed on it Granted. Service against all defendants was held good vide order dated 25.9.2026. Put off to 25.11.2026 for written statements/objections on application U/S 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC of official defendants No. 3 to 5. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | Ist Class Civil Suits 39/2019 |
Ghulam Nabi Narejo VS Ghulam Shabir Brohi & Others | Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-749-SBC-LRK) | Abdul Hakeem Brohi(ADVO-383-SBC-LRK),Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-710-SBC-LRK) | Suit called. Plaintiff is present alongwith his counsel Mr Azizullah Narejo. Defendant No.1 Ghulam Shabir is expired/died. Defendant No.1-a/Legal heir of defendant No.1 namely Khalil Ahmed is present. Attorney of defendant No.03 namely Fahmeed Qazi is present. Defendant No.5 Fazal Muhammad is present. Remaining defendants are called absent and the right of their evidence was struck off and their side of evidence was closed and evidence declared as Nil vide order dated 01.10.2024. Counsel for defendants No. 01,1-a, 3 and 5 is called absent. Counsel for defendants No. 6 & 7 is called absent. Official defendants are called absent. DDA for official defendants is present. Plaintiff's Counsel filed objections on application U/S 151, R/W Order 18 Rule 17 CPC. Order on it. Counsel for defendants No. 1,3 & 5 received copy of objections. Put off to 18.11.2026 for hearing on application U/S 151, R/W Order 18 Rule 17 CPC./final arguments. |
||
| 5 | Ist Class Civil Suits 109/2021 |
Muhammad Arif Abro VS Mst: Yasmeen Abro & others | Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-710-SBC-LRK) | Abdul Rehman Bhutto(ADVO-430-SBC-LRK) | Suit called. Plaintiff Muhammad Arif is present alongwith his Counsel Mr Shakeel Ahmed Abro. Defendant No.1(i)/attorney of defendants No.1(ii) to 1(v) Uzam Ali Abro is present alingwith his Advocate Mr Abdul Rehman Bhutto. Official defendants are called absent. DDA for official defendants No.3 to 10 is present. The side of evidence of remaining official defendants is already closed suomoto by this Court vide order dated 27.9.2025. The Court witness Mukhtiarkar Barrage/Estate Larkana called absent. DDA submitted adjournment application. Order on it. Granted. Put off to 18.11.2026 for evidence/further examination in chief of Court witness Mukhtiarkar Barrage/Estate Larkana and production of record. |
||
| 6 | Ist Class Civil Suits 55/2024 |
Qamaruddin Arain VS Mst Rasheeda Bibi and others | Waqar Ahmed Siyal (ADVO-1668-SBC-LRK) | Muhammad Arshad Khan(ADVO-12842-SBC-KHS) | Plaintiff along with his counsel is called absent. Attorney of defendants No.1 & 2 along with his counsel is present. The official defendants No.3 to 8 are called absent. The official defendants No. 04 to 08 are already debarred from filing written statements. DDA for official defendants is present. Counsel for attorney of defendants No. 1 & filed statement alongwith PS copy of certified copy of Order dated 02.11.2026 passed by the Honourable Additional District Judge, Ratodero in Civil Revision No. 48.2026. Certified compared copy of same order is also received from the above Honourable Court. It is ordered that " Civil Revision application is allowed. The impugned order dated 16,9,2026 passed by the Court of Learned Senior Civil Judge, Ratodero, is hereby set a side. The application filed by the applicants/defendants for verification of the disputed thumb impression is allowed. The Learned trial Court is directed to send the disputed agreement to sell dated 31.01.2022 alongwith the specimen thumb impression of applicant/respondent No.1 Mst Rasheeda Bibi to a competent forensic science laboratory/NADRA, as legally permissible, for comparison and for expert opinion in accordance with law". Put off to 18.11.2026 for plaintiff side evidence/further proceedings. |
||
| 7 | Ist Class Civil Suits 47/2024 |
Abdul Aziz Rajput VS Mst Rasheeda Bibi Arain and others | Mumtaz Ali Jessar(ADVO-1740-SBC-LRK) | Muhammad Arshad Khan(ADVO-12842-SBC-KHS) | Suit called. Ali Muhammad/attorney of Plaintiff is present, his Counsel Mr Mumtaz Ali Jessar is called absent. Abdul Ghaffar/ Attorney of defendants No.1 & 2 is alongwith his Counsel is present. Official defendants No.3 to 6 are called absent. Official defendant NO.04 to 06 are debarred from filing of W.S and they shall be proceeded ex-parte. Witness of plaintiff Sub-Registrar, Ratodero is called absent. DDA for official defendants is present and submited adjournment application. Order on it. Granted. Put off to 18.11.2026 for plaintiff side evidence/production of record by Sub Registrar Ratodero. |
||
| 8 | Ist Class Civil Suits 21/2025 |
Muhammad Haneef and others VS Sikander Ali and others | Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-749-SBC-LRK) | DDA(ADVO-005-SBC-LRK) | Suit called. Plaintiff No.2/attorney of plaintiffs No.1, 3 & 4 alongwith his witnesses are called absent. Counsel for plaintiff Mr Azizulah Narejo is present. Defendants No.1 & 2 are called absent. Counsel for defendants No.1 & 2 is called absent. Official defendants No. 3 to 7 are called absent. DDA for Official defendants is present. Counsel for plaintiff submitted adjournment application. Order on it: Granted. Put off to 18.11.2026 For evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| 9 | Ist Class Civil Suits 16/2025 |
Mst. Rasheeda Bibi Arain VS Abdul Aziz Rajpoot and others | Muhammad Arshad Khan(ADVO-12842-SBC-KHS) | DDA(ADVO-005-SBC-LRK),Mumtaz Ali Jessar(ADVO-1740-SBC-LRK),Waqar Ahmed Siyal (ADVO-1668-SBC-LRK) | Suit called. Attorney of Plaintiffs No.01 & 2 namely Abdul Ghaffar along with his counsel is present. Attorney of defendant No.01 is present, his counsel is called absent. Defendant No.2 is present, his Counsel is called absent. Official defendants No.3 to 6 are called absent. The official defendants No.3, 4 & 6 are already debarred from filing their written statement vide order dated 27.9.2025 and matter to be proceeded ex-parte against them. DDA for official defendants is present. Counsel for attorney of plaintiff submitted adjournment application. Order on it. Granted. Put off to 18.11.2026 for plaintiff side evidence. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 10 | Ist Class Civil Suits 37/2023 |
Akshay Kumar and another VS Nizakat Junejo and others | Abdul Rehman Bhutto(ADVO-430-SBC-LRK) | Altaf Hussain Mirani(ADVO-2506-SBC-LRK),Razaque Rahim(ADVO-4525-SBC-HYD),Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-710-SBC-LRK) | Suit called. Attorney of plaintiffs namely Suneel Kumar is called absent, his counsel Mr Abdul Rehman Bhutto is present. Attorney of defendant No.1 namely Aamir Ali is present alongwith his Advocate Mr Altaf Hussain Mirani. Defendant No.2 Sec. Market committee Ratodero Aijaz Ali Mirani is present alongwith his counsel Mr Shakeel Ahmed Abro. Counsel for remaining defendants is called absent. Authorized person of official defendant No.7 namely Faisal Memon is called absent. The defendants No.3 to 6 and 8 to 10 are already declared exparte. Heard arguments on application U/O 16 Rule I CPC. Put off to 18.11.2026 for order on application U/O 16 Rule I CPC filed by plaintiff/further evidence of plaintiff side. |
||