Deponent Mohammad Sulleman son of Hamadullah Dayo appeared and submitted affidavit along with saving certificate for standing surety in the sum of Rs:30000/- for accused Dost Ali alias chandi. Order on it.Send for verification. Case already fixed on 15.09.2026

Mr.Ayaz Ali Malik advocate appeared and submitted his power on behalf of proposed accused who is present and submitted written objection and detail reply on respondent No:1. and submit statement. Order on written objection that put up on date of hearing. The matter is already fixed on 3.09.2026

Deponent Rafique Ahmed son of Mohammad Azeem Kosh r/o Village Warryam Kosh appeared and submitted affidvit along with PSC of CNIC and CTC of form VII for standing surety of accused Sabir alias Sabir Hussain in the sum of Rs:100000/- one lac. Order on it.Send for verification.

Direct complaint is called. Complainant is absent. Learned counsel for the complainant present heard. Order on memo. Call report on above direct complaint from concerned SHO and Mukhtiarkar. Hearing 16.9.2026 for reports.

Bail application u/s 497 Cr. P.C of post arrest bail of accused Mehmood is called. Learned counsel for the accused absent. Complainant and DDPP present. Bail application adjourned to 10.9.2026 for further hearing/Order. Main case already fixed on 19.9.2026

SC called. The accused Muneer and Nadeem were convicted by this court vide judgement dated 20.5.2021 and they preferred appeal vide criminal appeal No: S 38/2021 before Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur whereby there were acquitted. Now the case of accused Abdul Hameed called, who is present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Complainant present. No other PWs present. Summons issued and returned. Complainant is present and filed an adjournment, such is allowed. Put off to 24.09.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to R/PWs. Present accused directed to attend.

SC called. All accused are present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused and learned counsel for the complainant are present. The complainant present. Today the case is fixed for SHO and Mukhtiarkar concerned , notice against them extended. The case adjourned to 16.09.2026 for Present accused and complainant, witness are directed to attend.

Case called. The accused Shabeer Ahmed @ Shaboo, Allah Bachayo, Badal, Muhammad Rafique alias Rafique, and Kamal Din are present on bail. Learned DDPP for the state are present, learned counsel for the accused present. BWs against PWs issued and returned. Complainant, PC Abdul Sami, PW Jamaldin and Shafique are present. No other PWs present.On request of learned counsel for the accused ,matter keep a side till 1.30 pm.Again called, the accused present on bail.The above named PWs are also present. Learned DDPP for the state is also present. Learned counsel for the accused sent an adjournment through his Jr. Partner. Order on it. Since complainant is aged person in attendance, and accused persons directed to paid fair charges of Rs:1000/- to complainant. The case is adjourned to 26.09.2026 for evidence. Next date informed to present PWs, while BW against R/PWs is extended. Present accused are directed to attend.

Already fixed on 9.9.2026

SC called. Accused Kamaldin and Ali Anwar are present, while accused Abdul Ghaffar is called absent, his application for excusing of absence filed on 19.8.2026 put up today. Order on it. Absence excused. Learned counsel for the accused is absent. DDPP for the state is present. On BW, the complainant is present, for whom Mr.Qadir Bux Bhatti, learned counsel filed power of complainant and also submit an application for adjournment. Order thereon. File. PW Balak Sher present. No other PWs present. Put off to 26.9.2026 for evidence. Issue fresh BW against R/PWs except complainant and PW Balaksher. Present accused directed to attend. Next date informed to complainant and present PW.

SC called. The accused is not produced from District Prison Ghotki, only slip received, however the jail authority has produced the accused through video link. DC , Jr. Partner of counsel for the complainant and DDPP for the state are present. . No PWs present. Process issued and returned un-served. Put off to 16.9.2026 for evidence. Issue fresh BW against PWs. Next date informed to jail authority for production of UTP through video link as well as same direction on jail slip.

SC called. The accused is not produced from District Prison Ghotki, only slip received, however the jail authority has produced the accused through video link. DC and DDPP for the state are present. No PWs pesent. Process issued and returned un-served. Put off to 16.9.2026 for evidence. Issue fresh BW against PWs. Next date informed to jail authority for production of UTP through video link as well as same direction on jail slip.

Cr.M.A. called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Proposed accused No: 4 9 to 11 are present. Learned counsel for the proposed accused present and filed statement with PSC of documents. File. Due to rush of work, the matter adjourned to 8.09.2026 for order.

SC called. Accused Hashim Shar is not produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. only slip received. however the jail authority produce him through video link. While remaining accused were declared as PO. Learned counsel for the accused, learned counsel for the complainant and DDPP for the state as well as complainant are present. Charge against accused framed through video link whereby accused plead not guilty and claimed for trial. Put off to 17.9.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs except complainant. Next date informed to jail authority for production of UTP through video link as well as same direction communicated on slip for production through video link.

Case called. The complainant and witness are called absent. Learned counsel for the complainant is present. All accused are present on bail. Today the case is fixed for evidence and hearing of application under section 7 of I.D.Act. The partly arguments of learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned counsel for the accused persons heard on instant application, now the case is adjourned to 17.9.2026 for further hearing if any on instant application/Order. Present accused are directed to attend.

Case called. The complainant and witness are called absent. Learned counsel for the complainant is present. All accused are present on bail. Today the case is fixed for evidence and hearing of application under section 7 of I.D.Act. The partly arguments of learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned counsel for the accused persons heard on instant application, now the case is adjourned to 17.9.2026 for further hearing if any on instant application/Order. Present accused are directed to attend.

DC called. Complainant along with counsel present. Partly heard learned counsel on maintenance of complaint. Put off to 8.9.2026 for further order.

Plaintiff along with counsel Mr. Ch. Shahid Hussain advocate appeared and submitted an application u/o 9 rule 9 CPC with affidavit of plaintiff for restoration of summary suit. Order on it. Advocate to be heard. Put off to 30.9.2026

Civil appeal called. The appellant are called absent. Mr.Chudhary Shahid Hussain, learned counsel for the appellant is present. Respondents absent. Learned counsel for the respondent No: 22 is present.Official respondents are also called absent. The application of attorney of Abdul Rahim for appellant side regarding publication is put up. Order on it. Let a notice against respondents be issued through publication /news paper daily Kawish on costs except respondent No: 22.Put off to 23.09.2026 for service.

Summary suit called. The Plaintiff along with counsel, defendant along with counsel are present. Today matter is fixed hearing on application leave to defend. Partly arguments heard on instant application. Put off to 11.09.2026 for further hearing/Order.

Civil appeal is called. Mr. Jam Jamsheed Akhtar ,learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Muhammad Tarique, learned counsel for the contesting respondents are present. Today is appeared fixed for further hearing /Order of application u/o 6 rule 17 CPC. Due to rush of work matter adjourned.Put off to 9.9.2026 for arguments on main appeal and hearing /Order of application 6 rule 17 CPC.

Summary suit called. Plaintiff and counsel present. Defendant and counsel present. By consent, matter adjourned to 9.09.2026 for further hearing on application leave to defend.

C.A. called. The attorney of appellant is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is also absent. The attorney of respondent No: 1 along with counsel are present. Rest of respondents absent. Learned DDA for official respondents No: 3 to 5 present. . Put off to 16.09.2026 for further arguments. Call R and Ps from trial court.

CA called. The appellant is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is absent and sent an adjournment, such is allowed. Respondent No: 5 present. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent present. Put off to 16.09.2026 for arguments.

Civil appeal is called. Mr. Jam Jamsheed Akhtar ,learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Muhammad Tarique, learned counsel for the contesting respondents are present. Today is appeared fixed for arguments and hearing of application u/o 6 rule 17 CPC. Learned counsel for the appellant filed an adjournment for date, such is allowed. Put off to 9.9.2026 for arguments on main appeal and hearing of application 6 rule 17 CPC.

CA called.The attorney of appellant along with counsel are present. Respondents absent. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent present. By consent, appeal adjourned to 16.09.2026 for further arguments.

CA called. The appellant is absent. Respondents are also absent. Learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Mian Abdul Sallam learned counsel for the contesting respondents present. Partly arguments heard. Put off to 16.9.2026 for further arguments.

CA called. The appellant is present . Learned counsel for the appellant is present. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent No: 1-2 present. DDA for official respondent present. Respondents No:1 is present. Rest of respondents are called absent. Today the appeal is fixed for objection and hearing application u/s 8 of oath Act, filed by appellant side, Learned counsel for the contesting respondent request for date, such is allowed. Now the appeal fixed on 9.09.2026 for objection /hearing on instant application.