Direct complaint called. Complainant Hashmat along with counsel present. Statement under section 200 Cr.P.C of complainant is recorded. Order on it. Let PE be held. The R and Ps of direct complaint be sent to learned Judicial Magistrate, Daharki for recording PE and report. Matter fixed on 2.10.2026

Complaint under Section 3(2) of the Illegal Dispossession Act is called. The complainant along with his learned counsel is present. Reports regarding ownership and possession were called from the Mukhtiarkar (Revenue), Daharki, and the SHO, P.S. Daharki; however, the same have not been received. Instead, letters have been received from both offices seeking time to submit the reports. Time is allowed. Put off to 24.09.2026 for submission of reports.

Criminal Revision under Sections 435 and 439, Cr.P.C. is called. The applicant, Dr. Gulsher Ahmed, is called absent; however, Mr. Farman Ali Shar, learned counsel for the applicant, is present. Learned DDPP for the State is present. Respondent No.1, Sadam Hussain, is called absent, as is his learned counsel, Mr. Anwar Ali Lohar. Notice issued to respondent No.3, Mst. Zareena, has been received back, and she is also called absent. Mr. Rashid Ali Sindhu, learned counsel, has sent his power on behalf of Mst. Zareena along with an application for adjournment through his Munshi. Order thereon is passed separately. Power?? file. And the adjournment is granted. The revision is now fixed for hearing on 01.10.2026. In the meantime, R&Ps be called from the learned Trial Court.

The application under Section 497(5), Cr.P.C. is called. The Complainant is absent. Mr. Nawab Ali Pitafi, learned counsel for the Complainant, and learned DDPP for the State are present. Notice of the instant application was ordered to be issued to the proposed accused; however, the same has not yet been served. Let notice of the instant application be issued to the accused. The instant application is now fixed for 23.09.2026 for service and hearing.

Bail Application under Section 498-A, Cr.P.C. is called. The Applicant/Accused is present on interim pre-arrest bail. Learned counsel for the Applicant/Accused and learned DDPP for the State are present. The Complainant and his learned counsel are also present. Today, the bail application is fixed for hearing. Learned counsel for the Complainant has submitted an application seeking adjournment on the ground that he requires time to collect certain documents and produce the same on the next date of hearing ,such is allowed. The bail application is adjourned to 18.09.2026 for hearing, with direction to the learned counsel for the parties to advance their arguments on the next date of hearing. The present accused is directed to attend the proceedings.

Case called. All the accused are present on bail. M/s Nawab Ali Pitafi and Ch. Shahid Hussain, learned counsel for the accused, are present. The complainant and his learned counsel, Mr. Soomar Dass, are also present. Today, the case is fixed for the evidence of the Mukhtiarkar (R), Ubauro, and the SHO, Ubauro. Notices issued to them have been received back. One Lutuf Ali, Clerk of the Mukhtiarkar, Ubauro, is present and has submitted an adjournment application, stating therein that the Mukhtiarkar is busy before the Honourable High Court of Sindh, Sukkur Bench. Order on the application: The Mukhtiarkar, Ubauro, is directed to appear on the next date of hearing for recording of his evidence. The SHO, Ubauro, is absent. Notice against the SHO, Ubauro, is extended. Put off to 23.09.2026 for recording of evidence. The accused who are present are directed to attend the Court on the next date. The next date of hearing is communicated to the complainant party.

The case was called. Accused Muhammad Saddique is confined at District Prison, Ghotki, and was not produced from jail. Only a production slip was received from the jail authorities. Accused Aziz and Shoukat have already been declared proclaimed offenders. Mr. Nawab Ali, learned counsel for the accused, Mr. Abdul Razzaque Mahar, learned counsel for the complainant, and the learned DDPP for the State are present. Today, the case is fixed for recording of evidence. The complainant, Soonharo, is present, whereas no other prosecution witnesses are in attendance. Learned counsel for the accused has requested an adjournment on the ground that he is not prepared to proceed with the evidence. The request is allowed. With the consent of learned counsel for both parties, the case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for recording of evidence. Issue Bailable Warrants (BWs) against the remaining prosecution witnesses (R/PWs), except the complainant. The next date of hearing communicated to the jail authorities for production of the under-trial prisoner (UTP), Muhammad Saddique, through video link on jail slip.

SC called. The accused is not produced from District Prison Ghotki, only slip received, however the jail authority has produced the accused through video link. DC and DDPP for the state are present. No PWs pesent. Process issued and returned un-served. Put off to 29.9.2026 for evidence. Issue fresh BW against PWs. Next date informed to jail authority for production of UTP through video link as well as same direction on jail slip.

Case called. The complainant, Indhar Lal, and his witness are present. Mr. Muhammad Javeed Arain, learned counsel for the complainant, is also present. Accused Javeed has been declared a proclaimed offender, whereas accused Basheer Ahmed, Asif, Abdul Sami, and Majid are present on bail. Mr. Saleem Akhtar Malik, learned counsel for the accused, is also present. Both learned counsel for the parties jointly request an adjournment. The request is considered and allowed. Accordingly, the case is adjourned to 30.09.2026 for recording of evidence. The present accused are directed to ensure their attendance on the next date of hearing. The next date is communicated to the complainant and his witness.

S.C. called. Accused Mohammad Jameel and Akhtar are not produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki, only slip received . Accused Mst. Parveen, not produced in custody from District Women Jail, Sukkur. Learned counsel for the accused Akhtar and Jameel present while Mr. Mohammad Javeed Arain, learned counsel for the pauper accused Mst. Parveen is also present. DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Ali Gul advocate filed power of complainant and adjournment. Order thereon. Power file and adjournment granted. No PWs present. Put off to 24.09.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Issue PO for the accused Mai Parveen to Suptt: District Women Jail Sukkur with direction to produce through video link. Next date informed to jail authority Ghotki for production of male UTPs through video link.

Application under section 491 Cr.P.C is called. The applicant along with counsel are present. Rule nisi notice issued and Letter received from SHO Daharki, for time for compliance. Order on it. SHO produced detune. Respondent No: 3 Zahid present for whom Mdm Shabana advocate filed power and also submit statement with documents. Put off to 19.9.2026

Petition under Section 22-A(6)(i), Cr.P.C. is called. The Applicant is absent. Mr. Ghulam Rasool Shah, learned counsel for the Applicant, is present. Mr. Gohram Khan, learned DDPP for the State, is also present. Proposed accused No. 1, 2 and 4 are present, while the remaining proposed accused are absent. Today, the petition is fixed for hearing. Arguments of the learned counsel for the Applicant and the present proposed accused have been heard. Learned counsel for the Applicant has submitted a statement along with photocopies of the case law, which are taken on record. The matter is adjourned and fixed for 18.09.2026 for orders.

Petition called. The leaned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for state are present. Heard. Order on memo. Call report from DSP complaint cell Ghotki and notice to proposed accused. Hearing. 19.9.2026

Complaint under section 3(2) of Illegal Dispossession Act is called.The complainant along with counsel ,proposed accused No:1 along with counsel are present. Tapedar Muhammad Aslam is present and submitted an adjournment, for time to submit report. Order on it. Put off to 23.09.2026 for report of Mukhtiarkar/hearing.

Complaint under section (3) of illegal Dispossession Act is called. The complainant is abent. Learned counsel for the complainant is present .Heard learned counsel for the complainant on point of admission. Put off to 23.09.2026 for further order.

Execution application already disposed of. The matter is fixed for satisfactory of execution and decree. The Learned counsel for the DH present. J.D is absent. NBW against J.D issued through SSP Ghotki and same entrusted the SHO Daharki by name and warrant return back by SIP Sharaf din as un-executed and same is extended. Put off to 2.10.2026 for execution of NBW in the meanwhile a letter for non compliance of direction in respect of execution of NBW is sent to SSP Ghotki .

Civil Appeal called. The Appellant is absent, while learned counsel for the Appellant is present. Respondents No. 1 to 4 have not yet been served. Official respondents No. 5 to 7 are also absent; however, Mr. Rahim Bux Pitafi, DDA for the State, has submitted his statement whereby he has entered appearance on behalf of official respondents No. 5 to 7.File . The appeal is now fixed for 25.09.2026 for objections, if any, and for service upon respondents No. 1 to 4. Fresh notices be issued to respondents No. 1 to 4 through Court Bailiff and registered post A/D, at the cost of the Appellant.

Civil Appeal under Section 96 CPC is called. Appellant No. 4, who is the attorney of the co-appellants, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Jam Jamshed Akhtar, Advocate, is present. Perusal of the notices issued to the respondents reveals that respondents No. 3 and 9 were served personally, as per the report of the Bailiff of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Ubauro. It is further reported that respondent No. 3, after being personally served, received the notices on behalf of respondents No. 1, 2 and 4 to 6, while respondent No. 9, after being personally served, received the notices on behalf of respondents No. 7, 8 and 10 to 12. Official respondent No. 13 has also been served. Today, respondent No. 3 is present, while respondents No. 1, 2 and 4 to 6 are absent. Mr. Ch. Shahid Hussain, learned Advocate, appeared and submitted his power on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 6. Respondent No. 10 is present and requested time to engage his counsel and to secure the appearance of the other private respondents. Official respondents No. 13 to 15 are absent. Mr. Rahim Bux Pitafi, learned DDA, appeared and submitted a statement whereby he entered his appearance on behalf of the official respondents. File . The matter is adjourned and fixed for 26.09.2026 for objections on the appeal and for appearance of respondents No. 7 to 9, 11 and 12.

Summary suit called. Plaintiff No. 1 she is also next friend of Plaintiffs Nos. 2 and 3, along with her learned counsel, Mr. Ubedullah Azad are present. Plaintiff???s witness, namely Irfan Ali, is also present. The defendant and his learned counsel are absent. An adjournment application has been sent by the learned counsel for the defendant on personal grounds due to illness. Heard. The matter is adjourned as a last chance. Put off to 21.09.2026 for plaintiff???s witness evidence.

Civil Appeal is called. The appellant and his counsel, Mr. Jam Jamsheed Akhtar, Advocate, are present. Respondent No. 1 has expired, and an application under Order XXII Rule 4 CPC is pending for hearing. Respondent No. 3, who is the attorney of Respondents No. 2, 4 to 6, is present. Official Respondents No. 7 to 9 are absent; Mr. Rahim Bux, DDA for the State, is present on their behalf. Further arguments on the application under Order XXII Rule 4 CPC are heard. Learned counsel for the appellant submits a statement along with copies of case law. The matter is now adjourned to 23.09.2026 for orders on the said application.

Civil Appeal under Section 96 of CPC is called. The appellant, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Sudham Chand, is present. Respondent No. 5 is also present, while the remaining respondents are absent. Mr. Jam Jamsheed Akhtar, learned counsel for the contesting respondent, and Mr. Rahim Bux Pitafi, learned DDA for the official respondents, are present. Today, the matter is fixed for arguments. Partly arguments of the learned counsel for both parties are heard. Now, the appeal is adjourned to 06.10.2026 for further arguments/judgment.

Civil appeal called. Muhammad Soomar, Attorney for the Appellant, along with his counsel, Mr. Mian Abdul Salam Arain, is present. The respondents and official respondents are absent. Mr. Abdul Fatah Samo, learned Advocate for the contesting respondents, is also absent; however, he has submitted written arguments, which are taken on record. Learned DDA for the official respondents is present. Learned counsel for the Appellant has also submitted written arguments. The appeal is adjourned and fixed for 02.10.2026 for further arguments, if any.

Civil Appeal called. The appellant, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Ch. Shahid Hussain, is present. Respondent No. 5, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Muhammad Ayoub, Advocate, is present. The remaining respondents are absent. Mr. Rahim Bux Pitafi, learned DDA for the official respondent, is present. R and Ps of FCS No: 163/2023 in one part received from learned Sr. Civil Judge, Ubauro vide letter No: 343/2026 dated 30.06.2026. Partly arguments of both parties were heard. Learned counsel for the respondent filed a statement along with photocopies of case law. Put off to 30.09.2026 for further arguments/submission of case law, if any.

Civil Revision is called. The applicant is called absent. Learned counsel for the applicant is present. Respondent No: 1 along with counsel are present. Learned counsel of both parties request for date on the ground that they are not fully prepared, such request allowed. Put off to 25.09.2026 for arguments, in the meanwhile call R and Ps from trial court.