| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Report | |||||||
| 1 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 45/2026 | Mubashir Hassan Leghari VS Parvez Samejo & others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Direct complainant is called. The complainant Mubashir Hussain along with his counsel Mr. Jamsheed Ahmed Faiz are present. The proposed accused Parveez Ahmed and his counsel M/S Mushtaque Ahmed Kolachi and Ayaz Ali Malik are called absent. Today the matter is fixed for report of Mukhtiarkar and written objection submitted by proposed accused No: 1 along with counsel yesterday and same put up today. Order on it.Copy to other side. The Mukhtiarkar (R) Daharki also submitted his report through Tapedar. Order on it. Copy to other side. The written objection of proposed accused and copy of report of Mukhtiarkar (R) Daharki supplied to complainant party. Put off to 12.09.2026 for hearing. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | SC (Murder Trial) 93/2026 | The State VS Mevo Kosh and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 65/2025 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Accused Ali Mohammad and Aijaz Ahmed appeared and submitted an application for joining of trial and also submit PSC of interim bail letter No:7663/2026 granted by Honourable Sessions Judge, Ghotki vide BA No:1988/2026. Mr.Qadir Bux Bhatti advocate present and filed power of above named accused. Order on application. Let supplementary challan of both accused are called from concerned SHO. Documents supplied to present accused under receipt. The case already fixed on 15.9.2026.Both accused are directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 258/2026 | M.Bachal and ors VS SHO P.S Daharki | Cr.PC-498 | / |
Bail application under section 498 Cr.P.C is called. The all accused are present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Learned counsel for the accused filed statement with documents. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that interim bail granted to accused is confirmed. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 201/2023 | The state VS Nabi Bux and ors | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Qadir Bux(ADVO-1126-SBC-GHT) | Mumtaz Ali(ADVO-1087-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 321/2022 Daharki |
SC called. Accused Ghulam Haider @ Gullab.Abrar, Khuda Bux, Nabi Bux & Akhtar are present on bail. Rest of accused declared as PO.The complainant present. M/S Mumtaz Ali Naich and Nawab Ali Pitafi, learned counsel for the accused are present. Mr. Qadir Bux Bhatti, learned counsel for the complainant, learned DDPP for the state are present. Today is case fixed for evidence. Learned counsel for the accused submitted statement whereby he was already submitted an order dated 13.7.2026 passed by Honorable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur in criminal Misc. application No: S 476 of 2026 whereby operation of order dated 7.5.2026 passed by this court is suspended till next date of hearing, and matter is pending for hearing. By consent of both parties counsel, the case is fixed on 19.9.2026 for further order of Honourable High Court of Sindh. Present accused are directed to attend. Next date informed to complainant. |
| 5 | PPC 133/2024 | The State VS Abdul Hameed Chachar and others | Iftikhar Ahmed (ADVO-3122-SBC-SUK),Saleem Akhtar Malik(ADVO-127-SBC-GHT) | Iqbal Ahmed (ADVO-712-SBC-GHT) | PPC-322 | 376/2023 Daharki |
The accused, Abdul Hameed, is on bail. Mr.(Mumtaz Ali Naich ) lawyer of accused present. From the State ,(DDPP Shuja Bakhat Khoso), are present. The learned counsel for the complainant is absent.The case is fixed for evidence and for hearing an application filed by the complainant's lawyer seeking permission to conduct proceedings/record evidence through a modern device (likely video link or similar technology). The complainant is present, While no other prosecution witnesses (PWs) are present. The accused's lawyers requested time to file their objections to the complainant's application such is allowed. Complainant informed that aTransfer Application No. S-25 of 2026 (Mst. Taj v. Abdul Hameed) is pending before the High Court of Sindh, Sukkur Bench. Complainant also request for adjournment application, such is allowed. The case is adjourned & fixed on 26.9 2026 for: Filing/hearing objections to the complainant's application regarding recording evidence through modern devices; and Further proceedings in the case. Issue summons to Remaining Official PWs.The accused is directed to attend and the complainant is also informed for the next hearing date. |
| 6 | SC (Murder Trial) 39/2025 | The State VS Insaf Ali Shar & others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Iran Ali (ADVO-701-SBC-SHK) | Mumtaz Ali(ADVO-1087-SBC-GHT),Saleem Akhtar Malik(ADVO-127-SBC-GHT),Shafi Muhammad Bango(ADVO-519-SBC-KHP) | PPC-302 | 40/2024 Reti |
Case called. The accused Jiwan and Shan are present on bail, while accused Dishka and Javeed were already acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C. The accused Insaf declared as Proclaimed Offender. M/S Mumtaz Ali Naich and Farman Ali Shar advocate for the accused present. DDPP for the state are present. Complainant and PW Mohammad Yakoob are present. No other PWs. Complainant filed an adjournment for date, such is allowed.. Put off to 18.09.2026 for cross of complainant and evidence of R/PWs. Issue Summons to R/PWs. Present accused are directed to attend. Next date informed to present PWs., |
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 74/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Attal Shar | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 62/2025 Daharki |
SC called. The accused is present on bail learned counsel for the accused is absent and DDPP for the state present No PWs present. Put off to 24.09.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Present accused directed to attend. |
| 8 | SC (Murder Trial) 325/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Nawaz Shar and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | PPC-302 | 3/2025 Khenju |
SC called. Accused Muhammad Nawaz ,Muhammad Attal , Shehryar Khan and Jahangir Khan are present on bail. The remaining accused have been declared proclaimed offenders. Learned counsel for the accused, DDPP for the state and learned counsel for the complainant are present. Complainant is absent, while witness Mohammad Yousif, Chanesar, Pir Bux and Naseer Ahmed are present. No other PWs are present. Property viz . vehicles are present out side the permissess of court . Today is case is fixed for evidence. Learned counsel for the complainant submitted an adjournment application . such is allowed and matter is adjourned to 24.09.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to R/PWs except complainant and above witnesses. Vehicles returned back by owner. Present accused are directed to attend. Next date informed to present PWs. |
| 9 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 75/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Nawaz Shar | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 61/2025 Daharki |
SC called. The accused is present on bail learned counsel for the accused is absent and DDPP for the state present No PWs present. Put off to 24.09.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Present accused directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 943/2026 | Aamir Saleem Arain VS SHO PS Ubauro | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Petition under Section 22-A(6)(i), Cr.P.C. is called. The petitioner, along with learned counsel, and the learned DDPP for the State are present. The proposed accused are present, except proposed accused No. 2. Learned counsel for the proposed accused is also present. Learned counsel for the applicant has filed a statement whereby he seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. Separate order is passed accordingly. In view of the said order, the instant petition stands disposed of. |
|
| 11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 561/2026 | Habibullah VS SHO P.S Dad Leghari | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr.M.A. called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state, proposed accused and Mr.Mukesh Kumar advocate present. Heard. Order passed that petition is allowed. |
|
| 12 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 589/2026 | Kamran VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Vikram Lal (ADVO-24795-SBC-KHS) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. Misc. application called. The applicant along with counsel are present. DDPP for the state and learned counsel for the proposed accused are present. Learned counsel for the applicant not press the instant petition. Order passed on separate sheet that petition dismissed as not pressed. |
|
| 13 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 613/2026 | Lal Mohammad VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. Misc. application called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Proposed accused is absent. Mr. Ubedullah Azad advocate appeared and request for date to file power on behalf of present, such is allowed. Put off to 9.09.2026 for hearing. |
|
| 14 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 620/2026 | Nazar Muhammad VS SHO P.S Dad Leghari | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Petition under section 22-A(6) (i) Cr.P.C is called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Learned counsel for the proposed accused is present and request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 11.9.2026 for further hearing. |
|
| 15 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 647/2026 | Mst Shahnaz VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. Learned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed. |
||
| 16 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 638/2026 | Imtiaz Ali VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Petition called. The petitioner along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Learned counsel for the applicant filed statement whereby he withdraw prayer C. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 17 | PPC 727/2024 | The State VS Nadir Shar and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 21/2024 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
SC called. The accused Nadir, Sanaullah, Liaquat, , Mushtaque, Rasheed,and Mir Mohammad , Abdul Hameed son of Pehlwan are present on bail. Rest of accused declared as PO. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Complainant Gul Hassan, Injured Noor Hassan and Abdul Rasheed are present. No other PWs present. Charge against accused framed at Exh.8 to which accused plead not guilty and claimed for trial vide plea at Exh. A to G. D/O complainant recorded at Exh. 9, he produced FIR at Exh. 9-A. D/O injured Noor Hassan recorded at Exh. 10. In the meanwhile the complainant Gul Hassan, Injured Noor Hassan and Abdul Rasheed including the above present accused submitted two application one u/s 345(2) Cr.P.C for permission to compound the offence and an other application u/s 345(6) Cr.P.C for acceptance of compromise. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order the above named accused are acquitted under section 345(6) Cr.P.C.They are present on bail, their bail bonds stands cancelled and surety discharged, while case against remaing accused are already kept on dormant file. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications | |||||||
| 18 | PPC 572/2024 | Muhammad Sachal Mirani VS Abdul Jabbar and others | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | Rashid Ali(ADVO-208-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
SC called. The complainant is present. Learned counsel for the complainant is absent. All accused are present. The learned counsel for the accused is present. The case is adjourned to 10.09.2026 for arguments. Present accused directed to attend. |
| 19 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 135/2026 | Sardaruddin @ Saddar VS The State | Mehrab Ali(ADVO-488-SBC-GHT) | PPC-457 | 32/2026 Dad Leghari |
The application under section 497(5) Cr.P.C is called. The complainant along with counsel, both accused along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Heard arguments on instant application. Order passed on separate sheet that instant application stands dismissed. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 20 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 20/2026 | Arif Mehmood Pathan VS Sajid Hussain and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
DC called. The complainant along with counsel are present. The proposed accused No: 1 , 5 and 9 are also present. Learned counsel for the proposed accused are called absent. Learned counsel for the proposed accused No: 5 and 9 sent an adjournment, such is allowed. Put off to 17.09.2026 for hearing. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Advocate to be Heard | |||||||
| 21 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 22/2026 | Abdul Ghafoor Shar VS Wahid Bux Shar and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Direct complaint is called. Complainant is absent. Learned counsel for the complainant is present and request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 12.09.2026 for advocate to be heard on point of admission of direct complainant. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 22 | PPC 786/2024 | The State VS Khalil Ahmed @ Ali Raza Shaikh and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Jameel-ur-Rahman(ADVO-1595-SBC-SUK) | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-J | 168/2024 Daharki |
Case Called. Accused Bashir Ahmed is present on bail. Accused Khalil Ahmed alias Ali Raza is confined in District Prison, Ghotki. Only a jail slip has been received from the prison authorities, and the said accused has also been produced through video link by the jail authorities. The remaining accused declared Proclaimed Offenders. Learned counsel for the accused, learned DDPP for the State, learned counsel for the complainant, as well as the complainant, are present. Today, the case is fixed for arguments on behalf of the complainant only. Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted an application seeking adjournment, along with a photocopy of the transfer application, stating therein that a transfer application has been moved by the complainant before the Honourable High Court of Sindh, Bench at Sukkur, which is fixed for hearing on 08.09.2026. He has, therefore, prayed that the matter may be adjourned. In view of the request made by learned counsel for the complainant, the case is adjourned to 09.09.2026 for arguments on behalf of the learned counsel for the complainant. The next date of hearing is communicated to the Jail Authority for production of UTP Khalil Ahmed through video link, and the same direction is also endorsed on the jail slip. The accused present on bail is directed to attend the Court on the next date of hearing. The next date of hearing is also communicated to the complainant party. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 41/2025 |
Muhkumuddin Dahar VS Akhtar Hussain Laghari and others | Rashid Ali(ADVO-208-SBC-GHT) | The revision was already disposed of in default for non prosecution. Today an application 151 CPC is fixed . Learned counsel for the appellant/applicant is present. Learned counsel for the respondent present and copy supplied to him. PUt off to 17.9.2026 for objection on instant application. |
|||
| 2 | Ins. Pet. (Insolvency Petitions) 3/2026 |
Suneel Kumar VS Shehriyar Ahmed and Shakeel Ahmed and others | Amanullah Kolachi(ADVO-1107-SBC-GHT),Ashok Kumar(ADVO-720-SBC-GHT),Hafeezullah Mirani (ADVO-52379-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | In Solvency Petition is called. The petitioner is called absent. Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. Respondents No. 1, 2 and 15 are present. Respondents No. 4, 5, 7 to 14 and 16 to 26 are called absent and are not yet served. The remaining respondents are also called absent. Today, the matter is fixed for service upon the respondents. Mr. Wajid Ali Shaikh, learned Advocate, has appeared and filed his power on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2. He has also filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, along with supporting affidavits of respondents No. 1 and 2, and another application under Section 151 CPC seeking postponement of the stage for filing written statements. Order on the first application, notice is ordered to be issued to the petitioner. A copy of the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC has been supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner,. The second application under Section 151 CPC is treated as an application for adjournment. The matter is, therefore, adjourned for filing of written statements. Respondent No. 15 is present but has failed to file his objection/written statement. By consent, the matter is adjourned to 01.10.2026 for:Filing of written statements by the respondents; Service upon respondents No. 4, 5, 7 to 14 and 16 to 26; and Filing of objections to the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.Issue notice to respondents No: 4,5, 7 to 14 and 16 to 26 through court bailiff and post AD on costs. |
||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 104/2026 |
Mehboob Alam Bhutto VS Muhammad Arab Samejo and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Civil appeal called. The learned counsel for the appellant is present. Respondents absent and not served. Issue notice to respondents through court bailiff and post AD on costs. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 136/2025 |
Khadim Hussain Syed VS Rashid Ali Syed and others | Waqar Ali (ADVO-653-SBC-GHT) | This is subsequent appeal of CA No: 138/2025 is called. The appellant No:2 present. Learned counsel for the appellant is present. Respondent No: 2 present. Learned counsel for the respondent absent and sent an adjournment, such is allowed.Put off to 17.09.2026 |
|||
| 5 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 138/2025 |
Rashid Ali Syed and others VS Abdul Hameed Syed and others | Rashid Ali(ADVO-208-SBC-GHT) | This is leading appeal of CA No: 136/2025 is called. The appellant present. Learned counsel for the appellant is absent and sent an adjournment application. Respondent No: 2 present. Learned counsel for the respondent present. Put off to 17.09.2026 arguments. |
|||