| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 149/2024 | The State VS Khalid Kobhar | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-13-D,SINDH ARMS ACT-16-B,SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 259/2024 Daharki |
Surety Abdul Majeed appeared and submitted an application for deposit of Rs: 40000/- as imposed upon him as surety of accused Khalid and further prayed for return of saving certificate and issuance of letter for deleetion of entry. Order on it. Surety amount deposition in NBP Daharki through challan. Office is directed to maintain fine register. Further the original saving certificate return to surety and issue letter for deletion of entry .Case already fixed on 5.10.2026 |
| 2 | DC (Direct Complaint) 9/2026 | Hashmat Ali Golo VS HC Jatoi Shar | Nawab Ali(ADVO-1073-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | / |
Writ Part called. Direct complaint already sent for P.E to the learned Civil Judge and J.M. Daharki and same is not returned back. Matter is fixed on 20.10.2026 for want of direct complaint. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 314/2026 | Mumtaz Ali VS The State | Meharban Ali (ADVO-3015-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 46/2010 Khenju |
Criminal Bail Application under Section 498 Cr.P.C. is called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the applicant/accused and learned DDPP for the State are present. Arguments have been heard. Order is passed and announced in open Court whereby the interim bail already granted to the applicant/accused is hereby confirmed. |
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 313/2026 | Mumtaz Ali VS The State | Meharban Ali (ADVO-3015-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 15/2012 Khenju |
Criminal Bail Application under Section 498 Cr.P.C. is called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the applicant/accused and learned DDPP for the State are present. Arguments have been heard. Order is passed and announced in open Court whereby the interim bail already granted to the applicant/accused is hereby confirmed. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | SC (Murder Trial) 46/2024 | The State VS Raees Asif Ali Chachar and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Nawab Ali(ADVO-1073-SBC-SUK) | Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 98/2023 Daharki |
SC called. Accused Shamshad Bibi alias Shazia is present on bail. Accused Raees Asif and Nazeer alias Riaz are confined in District Prison, Rahim Yar Khan, and have not been produced by the jail authorities. Accused Zain alias Kaka is an absconder and has been declared a proclaimed offender (P.O.). M/s Jam Shahzad Thaheem and Danish Ali Pitafi, learned counsel for the accused, are present. Mr. Nawab Ali Pitafi, learned counsel for the complainant is absent, his Jr.Partner and learned DDPP for the State are also present. Process issued against the prosecution witnesses (PWs) has been received back. Complainant Naveed is absent though he was present on last date, whereas no other PWs are present. Jr. Partner of Learned counsel for the complainant requests an adjournment . The request is allowed in the interest of justice. The case is adjourned to 16.10.2026 for recording of evidence & hearing of application 265-K Cr.P.C .Issue fresh bailable warrants against the prosecution witnesses including complainant. Issue a letter to the Superintendent, District Prison, Rahim Yar Khan, directing that the under-trial prisoners (UTPs) be produced through video link on the next date of hearing. The accused present on bail is directed to appear on the next date of hearing. |
| 6 | PPC 726/2024 | The State VS Naveed @ Nomi Mahar and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Javed(ADVO-1125-SBC-GHT),Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 251/2024 Daharki |
Surety Abdul Majeed appeared and submitted an application for deposit of Rs: 40000/- as imposed upon him as surety of accused Khalid and further prayed for return of saving certificate and issuance of letter for deleetion of entry. Order on it. Surety amount deposition in NBP Daharki through challan. Office is directed to maintain fine register. Further the original saving certificate return to surety and issue letter for deletion of entry .Case already fixed on 5.10.2026 |
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 152/2024 | The State VS Mian Abdul Rehman @ Ahmed Shah | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-1427-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 302/2024 Daharki |
The accused, Mian Abdul Rehman, is confined at District Prison, Ghotki, and has not been produced by the jail authorities. Learned counsel for the accused and learned DDPP for the State are present. Today, the case is fixed for recording of evidence. SIP Ghulam Akbar is present and has submitted an adjournment on the ground that he is unwell. The request is allowed. No other prosecution witnesses are present. Accordingly, the case is adjourned to 08.10.2026 for recording of evidence. Issue Bailable Warrants (BWs) against the prosecution witnesses except complainant. Issue a Production Order (P.O.) for accused Abdul Rehman for his production as an under-trial prisoner (UTP) through video link. |
| 8 | SC (Murder Trial) 758/2024 | The State VS Mian Abdul Rehman @ Ahmed Shah | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-1427-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 294/2024 Daharki |
Case is called. The accused, Mian Abdul Rehman, is confined at District Prison, Ghotki, and has not been produced by the jail authorities. Learned counsel for the accused and learned DDPP for the State are present. Learned counsel for the complainant is called absent. Today, the case is fixed for recording of evidence. SIP Ghulam Akbar is present and has requested an adjournment on the ground that he is unwell. The request is allowed. No other prosecution witnesses are present. Accordingly, the case is adjourned to 08.10.2026 for recording of evidence. Issue Bailable Warrants (BWs) against the prosecution witnesses who have not yet been examined. Issue a letter to the concerned Medical Superintendent (M.S.) for securing the evidence of Dr. Nisar Ahmed. Issue a Production Order (P.O.) for accused Abdul Rehman for his production as an under-trial prisoner (UTP) through video link. |
| 9 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 109/2025 | The State VS Rashid Pitafi | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Sadam Hussain (ADVO-885-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 35/2025 Dad Leghari |
SC called. The accused is present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Statement of accused is recorded. Put off to 15.10.2026 for final arguments. Present accused directed to attend. |
| 10 | PPC 239/2026 | The State VS Fateh Muhammad Solangi and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Meharban Ali (ADVO-3015-SBC-SUK) | Ghulam Yaseen Kobhar(ADVO-951-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 218/2025 Daharki |
Case called. All the accused are present on bail. Mr. Ghulam Yaseen Kobhar, learned counsel for the accused, Mr. Meherban Pitafi, learned counsel for the complainant, and learned DDPP for the State are present. Today, the case is fixed for recording of evidence. Two witnesses and the complainant are present and have been examined. The deposition of witness Rehmat Bibi is recorded at Exh. 6. She has produced the Mashirnama of injuries, which is taken on record as Exh. 6-A. The deposition of complainant Muhammad Kamal is recorded at Exh. 7. He has produced certified copies of the order, statement and FIR, as mentioned in his deposition, which are taken on record as Exh. 7-A to 7-C. The deposition of injured witness Abid Hussain is recorded at Exh. 8. Put off to 16.10.2026 for recording of evidence of the remaining witnesses. Issue letter for evidence of Doctor to concerned M.S. Issue BW against R/PWs.The accused present today are directed to appear on the next date of hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 11 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 59/2026 | Muhammad Unhar Mahar VS Rahib Mahar and others | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Complaint under Section 3 of the Illegal Dispossession Act is called. The complainant is present. Learned counsel for the complainant is called absent. Report has been received from the Mukhtiarkar (Estate), H.Q. Ghotki at Mirpur Mathelo, and a photocopy of the same has been supplied to the clerk of learned counsel for the complainant. Meanwhile, letters have been received from the Mukhtiarkar (Revenue), Daharki, and the SHO, Daharki, seeking time to submit their respective reports. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned to 12.10.2026 for submission of the reports by the concerned Mukhtiarkar and SHO. |
| 12 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 60/2026 | Usama Samejo VS Ayaz Gurgaij and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Complaint under Section 3 of the Illegal Dispossession Act is called. The learned counsel for the complainant is present . Reports from the concerned Mukhtiarkar and SHO were called for today; however, the same have not been received, as the requisite letters could not be issued due to non-supply of the necessary documents by learned counsel for the complainant. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned to 15.10.2026. The concerned Mukhtiarkar and SHO are directed to submit their reports as already ordered. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 13 | PPC 786/2024 | The State VS Khalil Ahmed @ Ali Raza Shaikh and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Jameel-ur-Rahman(ADVO-1595-SBC-SUK) | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-J | 168/2024 Daharki |
Case Called. Accused Bashir Ahmed is present on bail. Accused Khalil Ahmed alias Ali Raza is confined in District Prison, Ghotki. Only a jail slip has been received .The remaining accused declared Proclaimed Offenders. Learned counsel for the accused, learned DDPP for the State, learned counsel for the complainant, as well as the complainant, are present. Today, the case is fixed for arguments on behalf of the complainant only. Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted an application seeking adjournment on the ground that transfer application is pending before the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur .Order on it .In the interest of justice, matter is adjourned. Put off to 15.10.2026 for final arguments. Next date informed to jail authority for production of UTP through video link such direction convey on slip. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 9/2025 |
Hari Chand VS Mukesh Kumar Choithani | Avinash (ADVO-722-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Execution application already disposed of. The matter is fixed for satisfactory of execution and decree. The Learned counsel for the DH & DH present. J.D is absent. NBW against through SHO Daharki and same returned back by SIP Sharaf din as un-executed . Order on endorsement that Matter adjourned .SSP Ghotki and SHO Daharki to take efforts for arrest and production of JD on or before 21.10.2026. NBW extended and handed over to said sip. |
||
| 2 | C.M.A. (Civil Misc. Appeals) 18/2025 |
Aurangzeb Samo and another VS Jamal Khatoon Samo and others | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | The application under Order XLI Rule 19 CPC is also called and is fixed for hearing of learned counsel. The applicant/appellant and learned counsel were absent when the matter was called. However, subsequently, in the late diary, applicant No. 1 and learned counsel appeared. The matter had already been adjourned. The next date of hearing was accordingly communicated to them. Put off to 17.10.2026 for hearing of learned counsel on the instant application. |
|||
| 3 | Summary Suits 22/2026 |
Sarang Batra VS Muhammad Illyas Shar | Nazeer Ahmed (ADVO-649-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff along with complainant are present. Defendant and his counsel are also present. Defendant submitted written statement through his counsel. Order on it.Copy to other side, same is received by learned counsel for the plaintiff. Put off to 24.10.2026 |
|||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 97/2026 |
Mevo Malik and others VS Noor Hassan Malik and ohters | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal under Section 96 CPC is called. The appellant is present along with learned counsel. The matter is fixed for service. Notices issued to the respondents have been received back from the learned Senior Civil Judge, Daharki, vide Letter No. 422 of 2026, wherein it has been reported that respondent No. 4 was served personally and received the notices meant for respondents Nos. 1-A to 2-B, 3, 5 and 9. Today, respondent No. 4 is present. Mr. Nawab Ali Pitafi has filed his power on behalf of respondent No. 4 and has also claimed to represent respondents Nos. 1-A to 1-D, 2-A, 2-B, 3 and 5 to 9. Learned DDA for the State is also present and has entered appearance on behalf of the official respondents. The appeal is now fixed for 14.10.2026 for filing of objections, if any, and for arguments. Call the R&P file from the learned Trial Court. |
||
| 5 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 95/2026 |
Mevo Malik & ors VS P.O Sindh & ors | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal under Section 96 CPC is called. The appellant is present along with learned counsel. The matter is fixed for service. Notices issued to the respondents have been received back from the learned Senior Civil Judge, Daharki, vide Letter No. 426 of 2026, wherein it has been reported that respondent No. 10 was served personally and received the notices meant for respondents Nos. 7-A to 8-B, 9, 5 and 11 to 15. Today, respondent No. 10 is present. Mr. Nawab Ali Pitafi has filed his power on behalf of respondent No. 4 and has also claimed to represent respondents Nos. 7-A to 8-B, 9, and 11 to 15. Learned DDA for the State is also present and has entered appearance on behalf of the official respondents. The appeal is now fixed for 14.10.2026 for filing of objections, if any, and for arguments. Call the R&P file from the learned Trial Cour |
||
| 6 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 96/2026 |
Noor Hassan Malik and others VS Mevo Malik and others | Nawab Ali(ADVO-1073-SBC-SUK) | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal under Section 96 CPC is called. Appellant No. 4, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Nawab Ali Pitafi, is present. Respondent No. 1, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Adnan Siyal, is also present. On joint request of the learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is adjourned to 14.10.2026 for filing of objections, if any, and for arguments. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 7 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 78/2026 |
Noor Hassan and others VS Mevo Malik and others | Nawab Ali(ADVO-1073-SBC-SUK) | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal under Section 6 CPC is called. Appellant No. 4, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Nawab Ali Pitafi, is present. Respondent No. 1, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Adnan Siyal, is also present. On joint request of the learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is adjourned to 14.10.2026 for filing of objections, if any, and for arguments. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 8 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 84/2025 |
Mst. Bakhtawar Soomro VS Abdul Ghaffar Soomro and others | Abdul Salam Arain(ADVO-429-SBC-GHT) | Civil appeal under section 96 CPC called. The attorney of appellant is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is called absent. One respondent Abdul Waheed present. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent present. By joint request of parties, the matter adjourned to 8.10.2026 for further arguments if any/judgment. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 56/2026 | Ali Sher Mahar VS Mai Khanzadi Mahar and others | Ghulam Abbas Alias Javed Akhtar(ADVO-642-SBC-GHT) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372,SUCCESSION ACT 1925-Matter | Application under Section 372 of the Succession Act is called. The applicant, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Ghulam Abbas alias Javeed Akhtar, is present. Today, the matter is fixed for submission of reports regarding the legal heirs of the deceased. The reports have been received from the NADRA Department and the SHO, Daharki.Since all the requisite formalities have been completed, the matter is adjourned to 06.10.2026 for arguments. |
||