Complaint under Section 3(2) of the Illegal Dispossession Act is called. The complainant along with his learned counsel is present. Reports regarding ownership and possession were called from the Mukhtiarkar (Revenue), Daharki, and the SHO, P.S. Daharki; however, the same have not been received. Instead, letters have been received from both offices seeking time to submit the reports. Time is allowed. Put off to 24.09.2026 for submission of reports.

Application under section 516-A Cr.P.C called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from SHO Ubauro. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, instant application allowed subject to furnishing surety in the sum of Rs:100,000/-(one lac). Late diary .Deponent Amir Bux son of Wahid Bux Panhwar r/o Raharki taluka Daharki, filed an affidavit along with PSC of sale deed (Original filed in crime No: 200/2026 PS Daharki) for standing surety for two buffaloes. Order on it. Provisionally accepted. Let letter be issued for restoration of baffaloes to concerned SHO. The applicant and surety also submitted PR bond and same on record.

Application under section 516-A Cr.P.C called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from SHO Daharki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, instant application allowed subject to furnishing surety in the sum of Rs:100,000/-(one lac). Late diary .Deponent Amir Bux son of Wahid Bux Panhwar r/o Raharki taluka Daharki, filed an affidavit along with original of sale deed for standing surety for two buffaloes. Order on it. Provisionally accepted. Let letter be issued for restoration of baffaloes to concerned SHO. The applicant and surety also submitted PR bond and same on record.

Criminal Revision under Sections 435 and 439, Cr.P.C. is called. The applicant, Dr. Gulsher Ahmed, is called absent; however, Mr. Farman Ali Shar, learned counsel for the applicant, is present. Learned DDPP for the State is present. Respondent No.1, Sadam Hussain, is called absent, as is his learned counsel, Mr. Anwar Ali Lohar. Notice issued to respondent No.3, Mst. Zareena, has been received back, and she is also called absent. Mr. Rashid Ali Sindhu, learned counsel, has sent his power on behalf of Mst. Zareena along with an application for adjournment through his Munshi. Order thereon is passed separately. Power?? file. And the adjournment is granted. The revision is now fixed for hearing on 01.10.2026. In the meantime, R&Ps be called from the learned Trial Court.

The application under Section 497(5), Cr.P.C. is called. The Complainant is absent. Mr. Nawab Ali Pitafi, learned counsel for the Complainant, and learned DDPP for the State are present. Notice of the instant application was ordered to be issued to the proposed accused; however, the same has not yet been served. Let notice of the instant application be issued to the accused. The instant application is now fixed for 23.09.2026 for service and hearing.

Bail Application under Section 498-A, Cr.P.C. is called. The Applicant/Accused is present on interim pre-arrest bail. Learned counsel for the Applicant/Accused and learned DDPP for the State are present. The Complainant and his learned counsel are also present. Today, the bail application is fixed for hearing. Learned counsel for the Complainant has submitted an application seeking adjournment on the ground that he requires time to collect certain documents and produce the same on the next date of hearing ,such is allowed. The bail application is adjourned to 18.09.2026 for hearing, with direction to the learned counsel for the parties to advance their arguments on the next date of hearing. The present accused is directed to attend the proceedings.

Case called. The complainant, Indhar Lal, and his witness are present. Mr. Muhammad Javeed Arain, learned counsel for the complainant, is also present. Accused Javeed has been declared a proclaimed offender, whereas accused Basheer Ahmed, Asif, Abdul Sami, and Majid are present on bail. Mr. Saleem Akhtar Malik, learned counsel for the accused, is also present. Both learned counsel for the parties jointly request an adjournment. The request is considered and allowed. Accordingly, the case is adjourned to 30.09.2026 for recording of evidence. The present accused are directed to ensure their attendance on the next date of hearing. The next date is communicated to the complainant and his witness.

S.C. called. Accused Mohammad Jameel and Akhtar are not produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki, only slip received . Accused Mst. Parveen, not produced in custody from District Women Jail, Sukkur. Learned counsel for the accused Akhtar and Jameel present while Mr. Mohammad Javeed Arain, learned counsel for the pauper accused Mst. Parveen is also present. DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Ali Gul advocate filed power of complainant and adjournment. Order thereon. Power file and adjournment granted. No PWs present. Put off to 24.09.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Issue PO for the accused Mai Parveen to Suptt: District Women Jail Sukkur with direction to produce through video link. Next date informed to jail authority Ghotki for production of male UTPs through video link.

Application under section 491 Cr.P.C is called. The applicant along with counsel are present. Rule nisi notice issued and Letter received from SHO Daharki, for time for compliance. Order on it. SHO produced detune. Respondent No: 3 Zahid present for whom Mdm Shabana advocate filed power and also submit statement with documents. Put off to 19.9.2026

Petition under Section 22-A(6)(i), Cr.P.C. is called. The Applicant is absent. Mr. Ghulam Rasool Shah, learned counsel for the Applicant, is present. Mr. Gohram Khan, learned DDPP for the State, is also present. Proposed accused No. 1, 2 and 4 are present, while the remaining proposed accused are absent. Today, the petition is fixed for hearing. Arguments of the learned counsel for the Applicant and the present proposed accused have been heard. Learned counsel for the Applicant has submitted a statement along with photocopies of the case law, which are taken on record. The matter is adjourned and fixed for 18.09.2026 for orders.

Petition under section 22-A(6)(iii) Cr.P.C is called. The applicant and counsel are present. DDPP for the state is present. Report not received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of.

Petition called. The leaned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for state are present. Heard. Order on memo. Call report from DSP complaint cell Ghotki and notice to proposed accused. Hearing. 19.9.2026

Petition under section 22-A(6)(iii) Cr.P.C called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Report not received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of.

Complaint under section 3(2) of Illegal Dispossession Act is called.The complainant along with counsel ,proposed accused No:1 along with counsel are present. Tapedar Muhammad Aslam is present and submitted an adjournment, for time to submit report. Order on it. Put off to 23.09.2026 for report of Mukhtiarkar/hearing.

Civil Appeal called. The Appellant is absent, while learned counsel for the Appellant is present. Respondents No. 1 to 4 have not yet been served. Official respondents No. 5 to 7 are also absent; however, Mr. Rahim Bux Pitafi, DDA for the State, has submitted his statement whereby he has entered appearance on behalf of official respondents No. 5 to 7.File . The appeal is now fixed for 25.09.2026 for objections, if any, and for service upon respondents No. 1 to 4. Fresh notices be issued to respondents No. 1 to 4 through Court Bailiff and registered post A/D, at the cost of the Appellant.

Civil Appeal under Section 96 CPC is called. Appellant No. 4, who is the attorney of the co-appellants, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Jam Jamshed Akhtar, Advocate, is present. Perusal of the notices issued to the respondents reveals that respondents No. 3 and 9 were served personally, as per the report of the Bailiff of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Ubauro. It is further reported that respondent No. 3, after being personally served, received the notices on behalf of respondents No. 1, 2 and 4 to 6, while respondent No. 9, after being personally served, received the notices on behalf of respondents No. 7, 8 and 10 to 12. Official respondent No. 13 has also been served. Today, respondent No. 3 is present, while respondents No. 1, 2 and 4 to 6 are absent. Mr. Ch. Shahid Hussain, learned Advocate, appeared and submitted his power on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 6. Respondent No. 10 is present and requested time to engage his counsel and to secure the appearance of the other private respondents. Official respondents No. 13 to 15 are absent. Mr. Rahim Bux Pitafi, learned DDA, appeared and submitted a statement whereby he entered his appearance on behalf of the official respondents. File . The matter is adjourned and fixed for 26.09.2026 for objections on the appeal and for appearance of respondents No. 7 to 9, 11 and 12.

Summary suit called. Plaintiff No. 1 she is also next friend of Plaintiffs Nos. 2 and 3, along with her learned counsel, Mr. Ubedullah Azad are present. Plaintiff???s witness, namely Irfan Ali, is also present. The defendant and his learned counsel are absent. An adjournment application has been sent by the learned counsel for the defendant on personal grounds due to illness. Heard. The matter is adjourned as a last chance. Put off to 21.09.2026 for plaintiff???s witness evidence.

Civil Appeal is called. The appellant and his counsel, Mr. Jam Jamsheed Akhtar, Advocate, are present. Respondent No. 1 has expired, and an application under Order XXII Rule 4 CPC is pending for hearing. Respondent No. 3, who is the attorney of Respondents No. 2, 4 to 6, is present. Official Respondents No. 7 to 9 are absent; Mr. Rahim Bux, DDA for the State, is present on their behalf. Further arguments on the application under Order XXII Rule 4 CPC are heard. Learned counsel for the appellant submits a statement along with copies of case law. The matter is now adjourned to 23.09.2026 for orders on the said application.

Civil appeal called. Muhammad Soomar, Attorney for the Appellant, along with his counsel, Mr. Mian Abdul Salam Arain, is present. The respondents and official respondents are absent. Mr. Abdul Fatah Samo, learned Advocate for the contesting respondents, is also absent; however, he has submitted written arguments, which are taken on record. Learned DDA for the official respondents is present. Learned counsel for the Appellant has also submitted written arguments. The appeal is adjourned and fixed for 02.10.2026 for further arguments, if any.

Correct gramicatly and proper diary. The civil appeal u/s 96 CPC is called. The appellant Mai Haneefa along with her counsel Mr. Shakeel Ahmed Kambooh are present. Respondent No: 1-2 namely Ashwani Kumar and Giran Lal along with their counsel Mr. Saleem Akhtar Malik are present. Today the matter is fixed for objection on application u/s 8 of oath Act 1873. Both respondents No:1-2 submitted joint application along with supporting affidavit whereby they raised no objection and ready to sworn oath . Order on it. Copy to other side. Accordingly, in view of the Special Oath voluntarily offered by the appellant and taken by respondents No: 1-2. after oath taken by the respondents No: 1-2.The order passed on separate sheet that in view of order,instant appeal is dismissed of accordingly with no order as to costs. Let compared copy of this order and R and Ps of trial court be sent to trial court for information.

Civil Appeal called. The appellant, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Ch. Shahid Hussain, is present. Respondent No. 5, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Muhammad Ayoub, Advocate, is present. The remaining respondents are absent. Mr. Rahim Bux Pitafi, learned DDA for the official respondent, is present. R and Ps of FCS No: 163/2023 in one part received from learned Sr. Civil Judge, Ubauro vide letter No: 343/2026 dated 30.06.2026. Partly arguments of both parties were heard. Learned counsel for the respondent filed a statement along with photocopies of case law. Put off to 30.09.2026 for further arguments/submission of case law, if any.