Diary dated 25.09.2026 Deponent Khawand Bux son of Sahibdino Bhutto r/o village Azeem Bhutto taluka Ubauro filed affiavit along with form VII-B for standing surety for accused Mehmood in the sum of Rs:100000/- (One lac) .Order on it. Send for verification. Diary dated 30.09.2026 Verification report received from Mukhtiarkar (R) Ubauro under letter No:115/2026 dated 29.9.2026 reported as genuine one. Deponent Khanwand Bux present who is stood surety in the sum of Rs: 100,000/- for accused Mehmood. Further order passed on affidavit that surety is accepted. Issue release writ for accused Mehmood to jail authority accordingly. Main case fixed on 3.10.2026

Received R and Ps from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge,Ghotki vide letter No;8508/2026 for disposal according to law and fixed today.The accused Muhammad Usman and Saeed are present while accused Sahid Ahmed is absent for whom an application filed by co-accused for excusing of absence. Order on it. Excused. Put off to 14,10.2026 for formal. Present accused are directed to attend and to submit proof of their confirmation of bail.

Received R and Ps from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge,Ghotki vide letter No;8508/2026 for disposal according to law and fixed today.The accused are called absent. Put off to 8.10.2026 .Issue notice to accused.

Cr. B.A. called.The applicant/accused is present on interim bail and submitted objection on application filed by complainant on last date. learned DDPP for the state and complainant are present. For want of time matter adjourned. Put off to 6.10.2026 for further hearing/Order. Present accused directed to attend.

Case called. The complainant, Indhar Lal, and his witness are present. Mr. Muhammad Javeed Arain, learned counsel for the complainant, is also present. Accused Javeed has been declared a proclaimed offender, whereas accused Basheer Ahmed, Asif, Abdul Sami, and Majid are present on bail. Mr. Saleem Akhtar Malik, learned counsel for the accused, is also present. Both learned counsel for the parties jointly request an adjournment. The request is considered and allowed. Accordingly, the case is adjourned to 14.10.2026 for recording of evidence. The present accused are directed to ensure their attendance on the next date of hearing. The next date is communicated to the complainant and his witness.

The petition already disposed of. Misc. application for non compliance of order filed by applicant through her counsel 0n 26.09.2026 is called.. Applicant along with counsel are present and submitted statement with documents. File. Report from respondents not received. Put off to 6.10.2026.Call report on instant misc. application from respondent No: 2.

Cr. M.A. called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Proposed accused No: 2 & 3 present and submitted an adjournment. Order on it. allowed. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Put off to 3.10.2026 for hearing.

SC called. All accused were declared as proclaimed offender. Complainant counsel and DDPP for the state present. Learned DDPP for the state present. Put off to 11.11.2026 Issue letter to SHO concerned for progress regarding arrest of proclaimed offenders.

R&Ps have been received from the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, Ghotki, for disposal in accordance with law, and the case is fixed for today. Accused Sobo, Aslam, and Shafi have been declared proclaimed offenders, while nine (09) accused are present on bail. The learned DDPP for the State is present. In compliance with the requirements of Section 265-C, Cr.P.C., photocopies of the case papers have been supplied to the accused against receipt. Put off to 14.10.2026 for framing of charge. The present accused are directed to attend the Court on the next date of hearing.

Received R and Ps from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge,Ghotki vide letter No;8508/2026 for disposal according to law and fixed today. The accused are called absent. Put off to 3.10.2026 .

Case called. The complainant and his witness are called absent. Learned counsel for the complainant is present. All the accused are present on bail, along with their learned counsel. Today, the case is fixed for recording of evidence and for orders on the application under Section 7 of the Illegal Dispossession Act. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that he withdraw the instant application with permission to file a fresh.. Order on the application has been passed. The application is disposed of as withdrawn with permission to file as per law. Put off to 21.10.2026 for recording of evidence. The present accused are directed to attend the Court on the next date of hearing.

Case called. The complainant and his witness are called absent. Mr. Muhammad Tarique Panhwar, learned counsel for the complainant, is present. All the accused are present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused is also present. Today, the case is fixed for recording of evidence and for orders on the application under Section 7 of the Illegal Dispossession Act. Order on the said application has been passed and announced in open Court, whereby the application is allowed. Let further compliance be made in accordance with the order. Put off to 21.10.2026 for recording of evidence and compliance with the order passed on the application under Section 7 of the Illegal Dispossession Act. The present accused are directed to attend the Court on the next date of hearing.

Direct complaint is called. The complainant, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Jamsheed Ahmed Faiz, is present. The proposed accused, Parveez, is also present, for whom Mr. Rashid Ali Sindhu, learned counsel, has sent his power and an application for adjournment. Partly heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the complainant. On the adjournment application submitted by learned counsel for the proposed accused, it is ordered that the matter be adjourned for argument of Mr. Rashid Ali Sindhu, learned counsel for the proposed accused,. Put off to 01.10.2026 for arguments by learned counsel for the proposed accused.

Criminal Appeal is called. Learned counsel for the accused/appellants and learned DDPP for the State are present. The complainant is also present, for whom Mr. Qadir Bux Bhatti, Advocate, has filed his power and an application for adjournment.Today, an application under Section 426, Cr.P.C. is fixed for hearing. The power filed by Mr. Qadir Bux Bhatti, learned counsel for the complainant, is taken on record. On the adjournment application, it is ordered that the application under Section 426, Cr.P.C. be heard and the main appeal be adjourned. Arguments of learned counsel for the appellants and learned DDPP for the State on the application under Section 426, Cr.P.C. have been heard. A separate order has been passed whereby the instant application is allowed, subject to the furnishing of surety in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- each by the appellants, namely Aqeel, Saleh Muhammad, Adeel, and Shakeel.The appeal is adjourned to 13.10.2026 for arguments. Late diary. Deponent Karmullah son of Allah Juryio Qazi appeared and filed an affidavit along with a certified true copy of Form VII-B, for standing surety for the above-named appellants in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- each. The affidavit and surety documents are taken on record and accepted. Issue release writs in respect of the above-named appellants to the concerned Jail Authorities accordingly. The concerned Mukhtiarkar is also directed to effect the mortgage of the land offered as surety, in accordance with law, and submit compliance to this Court under intimation.

Case called. All the accused are present on bail. M/s Nawab Ali Pitafi and Ch. Shahid Hussain, learned counsel for the accused, are present. The complainant and his learned counsel, are also present. Today, the case is fixed for the statement of accused. Learned counsel for the accused request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 7.10.2026 for statement of accused. The accused present are directed to attend.

Sumamry suit called. The Plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is absent. Defendant is present and submitted his PR bond in compliance of order passed on application leave to defend. The learned counsel for the defendant sent an adjournment application. Order on it. Allowed. Put off to 3.10.2026 for W.S.

Civil appeal called. The appellant No:1 and Learned counsel for the appellant are absent,. Respondent No: 1 and his counsel present .Today matter is fixed for objection on application under order 41 rule 5 CPC and argument on main appeal. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent request for date, such is allowed.Now the matter adjourned on 09.10.2026 for arguments on main appeal and hearing on instant application.

The application under order 9 rule 9 CPC is called for advocate to be heard. Jr. Partner of learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and request for date, such is allowed .Put off to 21.10.2026 for advocate to be heard.

C.A. called. The appellant and her learned counsel are called absent, whereas Mr. Mushtaque Ahmed, learned counsel for the contesting respondent, is in attendance. Respondents No. 4(a) to 4(c), 5(a), 5(c), 5(d), 5(f), 5(g), 6(d), and 6(e) are called absent despite repeated issuance of notices. Perusal of the record, particularly the order dated 07.02.2025, reflects that the contesting defendants, who are respondents in the present appeal, have been appearing before the Court. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the appeal is fixed for arguments on 09.10.2026.

R&Ps of the Civil Appeal, along with the R&Ps of F.C.S. No. 39/2021, titled ???Barkat Ali Vs: PO Sindh and others have been received from the Court of the learned District Judge, Ghotki, vide Letter No. 8105 of 2026, dated 15.09.2026, for disposal in accordance with law, and the matter is fixed for today. Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. is called. The appellant, Muhammad Aslam, who is the attorney of the remaining appellants, is present. Mr. Aftab Ahmed Arain, learned counsel for the appellant, is absent. Respondent No. 1, along with learned counsel, is present. The appellant requests an adjournment to enable him to produce his learned counsel. The request is allowed. Put off to 14.10.2026 for arguments.

R&Ps of the Civil Appeal, along with the R&Ps of F.C.S. No. 215/2021, titled Muhammad Aslam and others v. Barkat Ali and others, have been received from the Court of the learned District Judge, Ghotki, vide Letter No. 8127 of 2026, dated 15.09.2026, for disposal in accordance with law, and the matter is fixed for today. Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. is called. The appellant, Muhammad Aslam, who is the attorney of the remaining appellants, is present. Mr. Aftab Ahmed Arain, learned counsel for the appellant, is absent. Respondent No. 1, along with learned counsel, is present. Rest of respondents are called absent. The appellant requests an adjournment to enable him to produce his learned counsel. The request is allowed. Put off to 14.10.2026 for arguments.

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. is called. Appellant No. 1(e), who is the attorney of the co-appellants, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Jamsheed Faiz, Advocate, is present. Today, the matter is fixed for service upon the respondents. Notices issued through the Bailiff of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Daharki, have been received back with the report that Respondents No. 2 and 3 have been served, whereas the remaining respondents have not yet been served.Put off to 14.10.2026 for service. Issue fresh notices to Respondents No. 1, 4, and 5 through the concerned Court Bailiff and by registered post A.D., on costs.

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. is called. Appellant Indhar lal who is the attorney of the co-appellants, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Jamsheed Faiz, Advocate, is present. Today, the matter is fixed for service upon the respondents. Notices issued through the Bailiff of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Daharki, have been received back with the report not yet been served. Put off to 14.10.2026 for service. Issue fresh notices to Respondents through the concerned Court Bailiff and by registered post A.D., on costs.

C.A. called. The appellant No: 2-B along with counsel are present. Respondents No: 4(a)(who is attorney of respondents No: 1(a) to (f),3(b) to g,3(i) to K, 4(b) , 5 and 6 present, while rest of respondents absent. Perusal of judgment of trial court it reflect that 2(a) to f,3(a) (i) to vii absent. Now the appeal is fixed on 17.10.2026 for objection if any of present respondents and service. Issue fresh notice to respondents No:2(a) to f,3(a) (i) to vii through court bailiff with direction to past notice outer door of residence of respondents as well as through publication daily Kawish on costs of appellant.

C.A. called. The appellant is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is called absent. Respondents are absent. Mr. Jamsheed Faiz, learned counsel for the contesting respondents, is present and has submitted an application for adjournment. The application is allowed, and the matter is adjourned. Put off to 21.10.2026 for interrogatory application and arguments on the main appeal.

C.A. called. The appellant is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is called absent. Respondents are absent. Mr. Jamsheed Faiz, learned counsel for the contesting respondents, is present and has submitted an application for adjournment. The application is allowed, and the matter is adjourned. Put off to 21.10.2026 for filing of objections and arguments on the main appeal.

Civil appeal called. The appellant along with counsel are present. One Sadam Hussain attorney of contesting respondent No:1 (a) to 4 present. Respondent Ali Hassan absent. Learned counsel for the contesting respondents are called absent. Learned counsel for the appellant request for adjournment, such is allowed. Put off to 16.10.2026 for further arguments.

Civil appeal called. The appellant No:2 and counsel are present. Respondents as well as attorney of private respondents are called absent. Mr. Mushtaque Ahmed Kolachi, learned counsel for the contesting respondent present .Learned counsel for the appellant request for adjournment, such is allowed. Put off to 09.10.2026 for arguments.

CA called.The appellant along with counsel , Respondent No: 4 and counsel are present. Rest of respondents absent.By consent, appeal adjourned to 7.10.2026 for further arguments.

CA called. The appellant along with counsel are present. Respondents absent. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent is absent, his munshi is present. Learned counsel for the appellant request for an adjournment, such is allowed and matter adjourned to 09.10.2026 for arguments.

C.A. called. Appellant No. 1, along with learned counsel, is present. Respondent No. 1, along with learned counsel, is also present and has filed a statement stating that he is ready to address arguments directly on the application under Order XLI, Rule 5, C.P.C., without filing any objections. The statement is taken on record. Put off to 09.10.2026 for arguments on the main appeal, including the interlocutory application. R&Ps be called as already ordered.