| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | SC (Murder Trial) 39/2025 | The State VS Insaf Ali Shar & others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Iran Ali (ADVO-701-SBC-SHK) | Mumtaz Ali(ADVO-1087-SBC-GHT),Saleem Akhtar Malik(ADVO-127-SBC-GHT),Shafi Muhammad Bango(ADVO-519-SBC-KHP) | PPC-302 | 40/2024 Reti |
The main case, along with the post-arrest bail application under Section 497, Cr.P.C., filed on behalf of accused Insaf Ali, is called. Accused Jiwan and Shan are present on bail, whereas accused Dishka and Javeed have already been acquitted under Section 265-K, Cr.P.C. Accused Insaf Ali has not been produced from District Prison, Sanghar. The complainant is present. Learned counsel for accused Jiwan and Shan, as well as learned counsel for accused Insaf Ali, are present. Learned counsel for the complainant, Mst. Shahzadi, is called absent, whereas the learned DDPP for the State is present. Today, the case is fixed for framing of charge and hearing of the post-arrest bail application of accused Insaf Ali. Since accused Insaf Ali has not been produced by the jail authorities, the charge could not be framed. Moreover, the complainant has submitted an application seeking adjournment of the bail application on the ground that she will engage counsel on the next date of hearing. The application is allowed. Accordingly, the case is adjourned to 31.10.2026 for framing of the amended charge against the accused persons and for hearing of the post-arrest bail application of accused Insaf Ali. Issue production orders to the Superintendent, District Prison, Sanghar, with the direction to produce accused Insaf Ali, an under-trial prisoner (UTP), through video link on the next date of hearing. The accused persons on bail are directed to appear in person on the next date. The next date of hearing has been communicated to the complainant. |
| 2 | SC (Murder Trial) 109/2026 | The State VS Abdul Rasheed Pitafi and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT),Rashid Ali (ADVO-2809-SBC-SUK) | PPC-302 | 58/2025 Dad Leghari |
Sessions Case called. Accused Bashir Ahmed, Muhammad Bux, Shamasuddin, Shafique, Riaz, and Karam are present on bail, whereas accused Abdul Ghaffar, Sajid, Sajjad Hussain, and Pehlwan are present on interim bail granted by the Honourable High Court of Sindh, Sukkur Bench, vide Criminal Bail Application No. S-921/2026. The remaining accused have been declared proclaimed offenders (POs). Learned counsel for the complainant are present. Learned counsel for the accused are called absent, whereas the learned DDPP for the State is present. Today, the case is fixed for compliance with Section 265-C, Cr.P.C. Copies of the relevant documents have been supplied to accused Karam, Riaz, Abdul Ghaffar, Sajid, Sajjad Hussain, and Pehlwan against receipt, which is placed on the record as Exhibit 6. Accordingly, the case is adjourned to 10.11.2026 for framing of charge. The accused persons on bail are directed to appear on the next date of hearing along with their learned counsel. The accused persons who are on interim bail granted by the Honourable High Court of Sindh, Sukkur Bench, are further directed to produce proof of confirmation of their bail on the next date of hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 328/2026 | Mehwal & ors VS The State | Ghulam Yaseen Kobhar(ADVO-951-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-435 | 70/2026 Dad Leghari |
Cr. B.A. called. The applicants/accused are present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that interim bail granted to accused is confirmed. |
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 331/2026 | Sonharo Khan VS The State | Mumtaz Ali(ADVO-1087-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337 | 9/2025 Khenju |
Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) is called. Accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and learned DDPP for the state are present. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, interim bail granted to accused is confirmed. |
| 5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 332/2026 | Abdul Hakeem @ Hakeem VS The State | Nawab Ali(ADVO-1073-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337 | 207/2026 Daharki |
Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) is called. Accused Abdul Hakeem @ Hakeem and Tufail Ahmed alias Papoo are present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and learned DDPP for the state are present. Heard arguments. Order passed on separate sheet that interim bail granted to accused is hereby confirmed. |
| 6 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 334/2026 | Mujeeb Ur Rehman & ors VS The State | Mujeeb Ur Rehman(ADVO-785-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-504 | 69/2026 Dad Leghari |
Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) is called. All accused are present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that interim bail granted to accused is confirmed. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 22/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Siddique Wirand | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Nawab Ali(ADVO-1073-SBC-SUK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 26/2025 Khenju |
Case called. Accused is Confined at District Prison Ghotki and not produced through video link by jail authority. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Case adjourned to 12.11.2026 for evidence. Issue BW against PWs. Issue PO for accused with direction to Jail authorities for next date of hearing with direction to produce the UTP through video link. |
| 8 | SC (Murder Trial) 57/2026 | The State VS Aziz Wirand & others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Nawab Ali(ADVO-1073-SBC-SUK) | PPC-302 | 25/2025 Khenju |
SC called. Accused Muhammad Saddique is confined at District Prison Ghotki and has not produced by the jail authority.Rest of accused declared as PO. Learned counsel for the complainant is absent. Learned DDPP for the state and learned counsel for the accused is present. Complainant along with witness Shahmir are present. No other PWs present. Learned counsel for the accused filed an adjournment, such is allowed. Put off to 12.11.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to R/PWs.Issue PO for the accused to jail authority with direction to produce the UTP through video link. |
| 9 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 36/2026 | The State VS Basheer Ahmed Pitafi | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Rashid Ali (ADVO-2809-SBC-SUK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 64/2025 Dad Leghari |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused is present. No PWs present. Put off to 10.11.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Present accused directed to attend. |
| 10 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 35/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Bux Pitafi | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Azam (ADVO-690-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 63/2025 Dad Leghari |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused is present. No PWs present. Put off to 10.11.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Present accused directed to attend. |
| 11 | PPC 122/2026 | The State VS Khair Muhammad @ Soobo Kanjo | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-364 | 136/2025 Daharki |
SC called. Accused is present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused is absent. DDPP for the state present. No other PWs present and avoiding from recording of evidence despites of issuance of summons. Issue BWs against complainant and PWs.. Put off to 2.11.2026 for evidence.Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 12 | PPC 239/2026 | The State VS Fateh Muhammad Solangi and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Meharban Ali (ADVO-3015-SBC-SUK) | Ghulam Yaseen Kobhar(ADVO-951-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 218/2025 Daharki |
Case called. All the accused are present on bail. Mr. Ghulam Yaseen Kobhar, learned counsel for the accused, Mr. Meherban Pitafi, learned counsel for the complainant, and learned DDPP for the State are present. Today, the case is fixed for recording of evidence. Process against Dr.Meer Hassan and I.O is issued and returned un-served and same is extended. Put off to 2.11.2026 for evidence.Present accused directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 13 | Habeas Corpus 318/2026 | Nadir Ali Lanjwani VS SHO PS Daharki | Qadir Bux(ADVO-1126-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Application under section 491 Cr.P.C is called. The learned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for the state are present. Heard. Order on memo. Issue rule nisi for recovery of detenue through SHO concerned. Hearing. 27.10.2026 |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 14 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 753/2026 | Bhajan Lal VS SHO P.S Daharki | Nawab Ali(ADVO-1073-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Petition under section 22-A(6)(i) Cr.P.C is called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Proposed accused No;3 along with counsel are present. On 21.10.2026,learned counsel for the applicant was filed statement whereby name of proposed accused Ali Sher withdraw from petition and order was passed on statement that request allowed .Today the petition is fixed for hearing and same is keep a side. In the meanwhile call One Pir Bux. Late diary. The applicant along with counsel, DDPP for the state, proposed accused No: 3 and his counsel and one Pir Bux who is called by the court are present. Heard both parties counsel. Learned counsel for the proposed accused filed statement with PSC of documents and case law. Now the petition adjourned to 26.10.2026 for order. |
| 15 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 762/2026 | Faisal Habib VS SHO P.S Daharki | Farman Ali (ADVO-533-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell ghotki. On notice, proposed accused Wali Mohammad present and submitted an adjournment, such is allowed. Put off to 26.1.2026 for hearing. |
| 16 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 760/2026 | Saifullah VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Kamran Ali (ADVO-717-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr.M.A. called. The learned counsel for the applicant and learned DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
| 17 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 764/2026 | Ali Nawaz VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Abdul Manan(ADVO-757-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr.M.A. called. The learned counsel for the applicant and learned DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
| 18 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 765/2026 | Mukhtiar Ahmed VS SHO P.S Daharki | Abdul Manan(ADVO-757-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Petition under section 22-A(6)(i) Cr. P. C is called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. On notice ,proposed accused present and submitted an application. In light of such application, learned counsel not press the petition. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, In view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
| 19 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 763/2026 | Qurban Ali VS SHO P.;S Daharki | Mushtaque Ahmed(ADVO-244-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant and counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Proposed accused is present and submitted reply. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
| 20 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 766/2026 | Syed Nazar Hussain Shah VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Nizamuddin(ADVO-1081-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 21 | PPC 417/2026 | The State VS Sharafat Al Golo and other | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 109/2026 Daharki |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 22 | SC (Murder Trial) 371/2024 | The State VS Akbar Ali Shar and others | Abdul Rashid Kalwar(ADVO-662-SBC-GHT),Qadir Bux(ADVO-1126-SBC-GHT) | Mumtaz Ali(ADVO-1087-SBC-GHT),Rashid Ali(ADVO-208-SBC-GHT) | Gender Based Violence-,PPC-302 | 234/2023 Ubauro |
Case of accused Insaf Ali is called,who is confined at District Jail Sanghar and not produced by the jail authority though PO was issued. Complainant and DDPP for the state present. Put off to 31.10.2026 for formal. Issue PO for the accused Insaf with direction to produce the accused through video link. Call supplementary challan of accused Insaf. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 23 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 58/2026 | Kanji Ram Menghwar VS Arjan Dass Menghwar and others | M. Jawed Arain(ADVO-933-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
DC called.The complainant along with counsel are present.All proposed accused present except accused Dileep. Learned counsel for the proposed accused present. Order passed on seperate sheet that instant direct complaint is allowed and same brought on regular file. Issue BW in the sum of Rs: 50000/- against accused Munwar while remaining accused present are directed to submit surety on next date of hearing. Put off to 30.10.2026 |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Advocate to be Heard | |||||||
| 24 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 33/2026 | Zameer Ahmed Chandio VS Muneer Ahmed Chandio and others | Aftab Ahmed(ADVO-40-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-326-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
DC called. The complainant and counsel are called absent. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, direct complaint is dismissed. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 22/2026 |
Sarang Batra VS Muhammad Illyas Shar | Nazeer Ahmed (ADVO-649-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff along with counsel and defendant along with counsel are present.Today the matter fixed for compliance of section 10(2) CPC but same is failed. Now the case is fixed on 5.11.2026 for draft issues. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | Summary Suits 7/2025 |
Avinash Balrajani VS Muhammad Anwar Mangrio | Nawab Ali(ADVO-1073-SBC-SUK) | Ihsan Ali(ADVO-323-SBC-GHT) | Summary Suit called. The plaintiff and the plaintiff???s witness are called absent, although their affidavits in evidence have already been filed. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. The defendant is also present. Accordingly, the case is adjourned to 21.11.2027 for recording of evidence and cross-examination of the plaintiff???s side. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 119/2025 |
Mst. Rasheedan Chachar VS P.O Sindh and others | Imtiaz Ahmad(ADVO-923-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | CA called. The appellant and counsel for the appellant are remained absent, while respondents are also called absent. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, appeal is dismissed in default for non-prosecution. |
||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 129/2025 |
Yar Muhammad Shar VS P.O Sindh and others | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | Mushtaque Ahmed Kolachi(ADVO-73-SBC-GHT) | Civil appeal under section 96 CPC is called. The appellant along with counsel , respondent No: 4 and 5 along with their counsel are present. Judgment passed and announced in open court that appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Let compared copy of this judgment along with decree and R and Ps of trial court be sent to concerned trial court for information. |
||
| 5 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 40/2026 |
Muhammad Bux @ Muhammad Chacha r VS Allah Ditto Chachar and others | Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-326-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-650-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal called. The appellant is present. Ali Nawaz, Respondent No. 9, is present and claims to be acting as attorney on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 7 and 10. Mr. Ghulam Murtaza Samejo, learned Advocate, is also present. The record and proceedings (R&Ps) of F.C.S. No. 97/2023, titled Muhammad Bux v. Allah Ditto and Others, have been received from the learned Senior Civil Judge, Ubauro, vide Letter No. 524/2026 dated 23.10.2026, in one part. The appellant has requested an adjournment, which is allowed. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned to 10.11.2026 for arguments. |
||
| 6 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 42/2026 |
Allah Ditto Chachar VS Muhammad Bux and others | Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-650-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-326-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. is called. Appellant No. 9 is present and claims to be acting as the attorney of the remaining appellants so also his counsel Mr. Ghulam Murtaza Samejo, present. Respondent Muhammad Bux is also present, while the official respondents are absent. Mr. Ghulam Murtaza Dayo, learned counsel for contesting Respondent No. 1, is absent. Respondent request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 10.11.2026 for arguments. |
||
| 7 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 99/2026 |
Muneer Ahmed and another VS Maqbool Ahmed Kori and others | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | CA called.The appellant along with counsel and respondent No: 1 and counsel are present. Partly arguments heard. Put off to 31.10.2026 for further arguments. Call R and PS from trial court. |
||