| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 282/2026 | Mst. Parveen Soomro VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-302 | 151/2025 Daharki |
Cr. B.A. called. Learned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for the state are present. The complainant is present.Partly arguments of learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state heard. Complainant request for time,to bring counsel,such is allowed.Put off to 5.3.2026 for further arguments. |
|
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 305/2026 | Nadeem Ahmed @ Nadeem Shar VS The State | Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-380 | 241/2025 Daharki |
Cr. B.A. called. The learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the state are present. Heard arguments. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, bail application is dismissed. |
|
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 306/2026 | Nadeem Ahmed @ Nadeem Shar VS The State | Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-399 | 246/2025 Daharki |
Cr. B.A. called. The learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the state are present. Heard arguments. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, bail application is dismissed. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 38/2026 | Abdul Shakoor & ors VS state | Nizamuddin(ADVO-1081-SBC-GHT) | PPC-498-A | 22/2026 Daharki |
Cr. B.A. called.The applicants/accused are present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Complainant is present and raised no objection on confirmation of bail. Heard.Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, interim bail granted to accused is confirmed. |
|
| 5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 50/2026 | Raees Mehboob & ors VS The State | Abdul Manan(ADVO-757-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-Fiii | 28/2026 Daharki |
Cr.B.A. called. The applicants/accused are present on interim pre-arrest bail. Learned counsel for the applicants/accused and counsel for the complainant,complainant and DDPP for the state are present.Complainant and counsel raised no objection on confirmation of bail. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that interim bail granted to accused is confirmed. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 408/2025 | The State VS Abdul Lateef Kobhar and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | PPC- 459 | 70/2025 Daharki |
SC called. Accused Abdul Lateef is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. Accused Shah Ali and Haris were declared as proclaimed offender. learned DDPP for the state ispresent. The learned counsel for complainant and learned counsel for the accused are called absent.Jr.Partner of learned counsel for the accused is present and submitted bail application u/s 497 Cr.P.C for post arrest bail. Order on it. Notice to DDPP for the state and complainant. Complainant and witness are called absent.The transfer application is pending before Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur as reported by complainant on last date.Work suspended due to strike of advocates.In the interest of justice, the case is adjourned to 07.03.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs including complainant. Produced accused is remanded back to District Prison Ghotki. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 7 | Habeas Corpus 55/2026 | Shoaib Shah VS SSP Ghotki and others | Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Application u/s 491 Cr.P.C called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Rule nisi notice issued through SHO Daharki,who produced the detenue Mewish with lady police . Respondent No: 3,4,5 present for whom Mr.Ghulam Rasool Mahar advocate filed power. Statement of detenue Mst.Mehwish recorded. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, instant application stands disposed of. Copy of order supplied to ASI Ghulam Mohammad Seelro for compliance.In compliance of order, applicant executed a P.R. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 8 | Cr.P.C. 131/2026 | Mai Rehmat VS SSP Ghotki and ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present.Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki.File. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
||
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 132/2026 | Mai Rehmat VS SHO Daharki | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Report received DSP complaint cell Ghotki.Proposed accused present for whom Mr. Ubedullah Azad advocate filed power and also submitted statement whereby stated that have not harass the applicant, nor to do so. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 6/2026 |
Allah Jewayo Malik VS Punhoon Malik and others | Akhtar Hussain Malik(ADVO-621-SBC-GHT) | The civil appeal is called. The learned counsel for the appellant is present. Respondent No: 4 and one Imran authorised person of respondent No: 5 present. Learned counsel for the respondent No: 1(a) to 4 present. Mr.DDA for the state sent an statement through his clerk for appearance of respondents No; 5 to 7. file. Imran Ali submitted reply of civil appeal along with authority .Order on it.Copy to other side. Put off to 17.2.2026 for objection on appeal. |
|||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 8/2026 |
Siraj Malik VS Ranjho Malik and ors | Akhtar Hussain Malik(ADVO-621-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The learned counsel for the appellant is present. Respondent No: 3 & 4 present. One Imran Ali appeared on behalf of respondent No: 4 and submit reply on appeal. Order on it. Copy to other side. Learned counsel for the contesting respondents No: 1(b) to 6 present. Learned counsel for the appellant filed an application u/o 22 rule 4 CPC for joining of LRs of respondent No: 2.Order on it.Copy supplied to other side,who received the copy. Learned DDA sent statement put his appearance on behalf of respondents No: 4 to 6. File. Put off to 17.3.2026 for objection on appeal. |
|||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 7/2026 |
Niaz Ahmed Malik VS Fazal Din Malik and others | Akhtar Hussain Malik(ADVO-621-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The learned counsel for the appellant is present. Respondent No: 2 & 6 present. One Imran Ali appeared on behalf of respondent No: 7 and submit reply on appeal. Order on it. Copy to other side. Learned counsel for the contesting respondents No: 1(b) to 6 present. Learned counsel for the appellant filed an application u/o 22 rule 4 CPC for joining of LRs of respondent No: 1-A.Order on it.Copy supplied to other side,who received the copy. Learned DDA sent statement put his appearance on behalf of respondents No: 7 to9. File. Put off to 17.3.2026 for objection on appeal. |
|||