| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2164/2026 | Akhtiar Mazari & another VS The State | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-515-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-395 | 202/2026 Daharki |
Received bail application under Section 497, Cr.P.C. from the Court of the Honourable Sessions Judge, Ghotki, for disposal in accordance with law. The same is called. Learned counsel for the accused is present and has submitted his power on behalf of accused. The same is taken on record. The learned DDPP for the State is also present. Learned counsel for the accused has submitted a statement seeking withdrawal of the instant application. Order passed on a separate sheet, whereby, in view of the order passed thereon, the instant application is disposed of as withdrawn. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 302/2026 | Ghulam Qadir VS The State | Nizamuddin(ADVO-1081-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-489-F | 206/2026 Daharki |
Criminal Bail Application under Section 498, Cr.P.C. is called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused, learned counsel for the complainant, and the learned DDPP for the State are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on a separate sheet, whereby the interim bail already granted to the accused is hereby confirmed. |
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 307/2026 | Majid @ Majid Hussain VS The State | Mukesh Kumar(ADVO-836-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Gambling Act -Section 5-A | 208/2026 Daharki |
Criminal Bail Application under Section 498, Cr.P.C. is called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and the learned DDPP for the State are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on a separate sheet, whereby the interim bail already granted to the accused is hereby confirmed. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 726/2024 | The State VS Naveed @ Nomi Mahar and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Javed(ADVO-1125-SBC-GHT),Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 251/2024 Daharki |
S.C. is called. Accused Khalid is declared a proclaimed offender. Accused Javeed is present on bail, whereas accused Abdul Razzaque is absent. Accused Naveed alias Nomi, who is confined in District Prison, Ghotki, has not been produced from jail. Learned counsel for the accused and the learned DDPP for the State are present. Case is adjourned to 05.10.2026 for formal proceedings. Issue bailable warrants against accused Abdul Razzaque. Issue letter/production order to the jail authorities for production of accused Naveed alias Nomi through video link. The accused present on bail is directed to attend the Court on the next date. As regards the surety proceedings, the surety, along with learned counsel and the learned DDPP for the State, is present. Order passed and announced in open Court whereby a sum of Rs. 40,000/- is imposed upon the surety, with direction to deposit the said amount before this Court on or before the next date of hearing. Surety Abdul Majeed, furnished on behalf of accused Khalid, is informed accordingly for compliance. |
| 5 | PPC 158/2026 | The State VS Shoaib Malik and another | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Ramesh Kumar B- Toga (ADVO-599-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 11/2026 Daharki |
Case is called. Accused Shoaib, who is confined in District Prison, Ghotki, is produced before the Court through video link by the jail authorities. Accused Mir Hassan alias Suhno is present on bail. Mr. Ramesh Kumar, learned counsel for accused Shoaib, and Mr. Farman Ali Shar, learned counsel for accused Mir Hassan alias Suhno, are present. P.C. Hafiz Dilber and P.C. Allah Wadhayo are present. No other PWs are present. Depositions of P.C. Hafiz Dilber and P.C. Allah Wadhayo are recorded at Exh. 11 and Exh. 12, respectively. Put off to 05.10.2026 for recording of evidence. Issue summons to the remaining PWs. The next date is communicated to the jail authorities for production of the UTP through video link. The accused present on bail is directed to attend the Court on the next date. |
| 6 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 56/2026 | The State VS Shoaib Malik | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Ramesh Kumar B- Toga (ADVO-599-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 12/2026 Daharki |
S.C. is called. The accused, who is confined in District Prison, Ghotki, is produced before the Court through video link by the jail authorities. Mr. Ramesh Kumar, learned counsel for the accused, and the learned DDPP for the State are present. P.C. Hafiz Dilber is present and examined at Exh. 6. He has produced the documents as mentioned in his deposition, which are marked as Exh. 6-A to 6-C. Put off to 05.10.2026 for recording of evidence. Issue summons to the remaining PWs who have not yet been examined. The next date is communicated to the jail authorities through jail slip, with directions to produce the UTP through video link. |
| 7 | SC (Murder Trial) 221/2026 | The State VS Hashim Shar and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),M. Jawed Arain(ADVO-933-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Yaseen Kobhar(ADVO-951-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 24/2025 Khenju |
SC called. Hashim Shar not produced from District Prison Ghotki. Remaining accused were declared as Proclaimed offender. Learned counsel for the accused, learned counsel for the complainant and DDPP for the state are present. Complainant is present. Complainant request for an adjournment, such is allowed. No other PWs present. Put off to 5.10.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Issue PO for the accused Hashim with direction to suptt: accused be produced through video link. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 8 | Habeas Corpus 279/2026 | Jamaluddin Bhutto VS SSP Ghotki and others | Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Ghulam Abbas Alias Javed Akhtar(ADVO-642-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Application under Section 491, Cr.P.C. is called. The applicant, along with learned counsel, and the learned DDPP for the State are present. Respondent No. 3 is present, for whom Mr. Muhammad Arain, Advocate, has filed his power . The same is taken on record. Respondent No. 3 has produced detenues Nos. 1 and 2 . In the meanwhile, the applicant has submitted an application seeking withdrawal of the instant application. Heard . Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, instant application dismissed as withdrawn. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 701/2026 | Mst. Shahbnam VS SHO P.S Khenju & ors | Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-53056-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Petition under Section 22-A(6)(i), Cr.P.C. is called. The applicant, along with learned counsel, and the learned DDPP for the State are present. Proposed accused Nos. 1 to 3 are present, for whom Mr. Muhammad Akram, Advocate, has filed his power . The same is taken on record. In the meanwhile, the applicant has submitted an application seeking withdrawal of the instant petition. Order passed on a separate sheet, whereby, in view of the order passed thereon, the instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. |
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 707/2026 | Karim Bux VS SHO P.S Daharki & ors | Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-1427-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Petition under Section 22-A(6)(i), Cr.P.C. is called. The applicant, along with learned counsel, and the learned DDPP for the State are present. Report has been received from the DSP, Complaint Cell, Ghotki. Proposed accused Illimdin is present, for whom Mr. Ghulam Yaseen, Advocate, has filed his power . The same is taken on record. Learned counsel for the proposed accused has made his endorsement on the memo. In view of the said statement, learned counsel for the applicant has sought withdrawal of the instant petition. Order passed on a separate sheet, whereby, in view of the order passed thereon, the instant petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. |
| 11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 706/2026 | Illam Din VS SHO P.S Daharki & ors | Ghulam Yaseen Kobhar(ADVO-951-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Petition under Section 22-A(6)(i), Cr.P.C. is called. The applicant, along with learned counsel, and the learned DDPP for the State are present. Report has been received from the DSP, Complaint Cell, Ghotki. Proposed accused No:1 to 4 present, for whom Mr. Ghulam Rasool Mahar Advocate, has filed his power . Mr. Danish Ali Pitafi advocate also sent power of proposed accused Karim Bux, Ghous Bux and one other.The same is taken on record. Learned counsel for the proposed accused has made his endorsement on the memo. In view of the said statement, learned counsel for the applicant has sought withdrawal of the instant petition. Order passed on a separate sheet, whereby, in view of the order passed thereon, the instant petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 12 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 149/2024 | The State VS Khalid Kobhar | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-13-D,SINDH ARMS ACT-16-B,SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 259/2024 Daharki |
The case already kept on dormant file.. As regards the surety proceedings, the surety, along with learned counsel and the learned DDPP for the State, is present. Order passed and announced in open Court whereby a sum of Rs. 40,000/- is imposed upon the surety, with direction to deposit the said amount before this Court on or before the next date of hearing. Surety Abdul Majeed, furnished on behalf of accused Khalid, is informed accordingly for compliance. |
| 13 | PPC 395/2026 | The State VS Nawab @ Nawabi Kosh and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 38/2026 Khambra |
SC called. The accused are called absent. DDPP for the state present. Put off to 5.10.2026 for formal. Issue PO for the accused Faiz Mohammad. Issue BW against accused remaining accused. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 14 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 10/2026 | Hoti Mahar VS Wazeer Pitafi and others | Wazir Ali(ADVO-292-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
DC called. The complainant and counsel are present. Notice against proposed accused issued and returned un-served and same is extended. Put off to 5.10.2026 for hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 15 | PPC 786/2024 | The State VS Khalil Ahmed @ Ali Raza Shaikh and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Jameel-ur-Rahman(ADVO-1595-SBC-SUK) | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-J | 168/2024 Daharki |
Case Called. Accused Bashir Ahmed is present on bail. Accused Khalil Ahmed alias Ali Raza is confined in District Prison, Ghotki. Only a jail slip has been received .The remaining accused declared Proclaimed Offenders. Learned counsel for the accused, learned DDPP for the State, learned counsel for the complainant, as well as the complainant, are present. Today, the case is fixed for arguments on behalf of the complainant only. Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted an application seeking adjournment on the ground that transfer application is pending before the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur .Order on it .In the interest of justice, matter is adjourned. Put off to 02.10.2026 for final arguments. Next date informed to jail authority for production of UTP through video link such direction convey on slip. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 40/2025 |
Fazal Haque Bhutto through Legal heirs and others VS Muhammad Bux Mirani | Bilal Ahmed(ADVO-775-SBC-GHT) | Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff and witness are absent. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. Defendant present for whom Mr.Abdul Majeed Mirbahar advocate filed power .File. Put off to 10.10.2026 for PE. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 2/2026 |
Muhammad Qasim Malik through attorney Ashique Hussain VS Allah Bachayo Memon and others | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | C.A. is called. The learned attorney for the appellant is present and has submitted an application seeking withdrawal of the instant appeal with permission to file a fresh one. Respondent No. 2 is present, for whom Mst. Shagufta, Advocate, has filed her power of attorney. The same is taken on record. Heard. Order passed on a separate sheet, whereby, in view of the order passed thereon, the instant appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 36/2026 | Fida Hussain Laghari VS Mst. Pathani and others | Farman Ali (ADVO-533-SBC-GHT) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372,SUCCESSION ACT 1925-Matter | Succession Application is called. The applicant, along with learned counsel, is present. Respondent No. 1, namely Sadardin, has expired, as reported by Mst. Pathani. The remaining respondents, including minor Respondent No. 7, are present. The adult respondent, namely Mst. Pathani, has submitted her own affidavit of no objection and, on behalf of minor Irfan Ali, has also submitted a separate affidavit expressing no objection to the grant of the succession certificate in favour of the applicant. Moreover, respondents namely Riaz Ahmed, Mst. Zulekhan, Mst. Saddiqa, and Fayyaz are present and have submitted separate affidavits expressing their no objection to the succession application being allowed in favour of the applicant. The affidavits are taken on record. Heard. Order passed on a separate sheet, whereby the instant application is allowed. Let compliance be made in accordance with the order. |
||
| 2 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 53/2026 | Mst. Shafiat Mangrio VS Rabnawaz Mangrio and others | Nizamuddin(ADVO-1081-SBC-GHT) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372,SUCCESSION ACT 1925-Matter | Succession Application is called. The applicant, along with learned counsel, is present. The respondents, including minor Respondent Nos. 6 and 7, are present. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted a statement along with the relevant newspaper publications. The report regarding the legal representatives has been received from the SHO, Dad Leghari. Heard on the application under Order XXXII Rule 3, C.P.C. Order thereon: Allowed. Respondent Rabnawaz has submitted an affidavit on his own behalf and on behalf of the minor respondents, expressing no objection to the grant of succession in favour of the applicant. The other adult respondents are also present and have submitted separate affidavits expressing their no objection to the succession application. The affidavits are taken on record. Heard. Order passed on a separate sheet, whereby the instant application is allowed. Let compliance be made in accordance with the order. |
||