| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | DC (Direct Complaint) 9/2026 | Hashmat Ali Golo VS HC Jatoi Shar | Nawab Ali(ADVO-1073-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | / |
DC called. The complainant along with counsel and proposed accused No: 1 are present. Partly arguments of learned counsel for the complainant is heard. Put off to 13.11.2026 for further hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 337/2026 | Qurban Ali @ Qurban VS The State | Ghulam Abbas Alias Javed Akhtar(ADVO-642-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-379 | 71/2026 Dad Leghari |
The matter is fixed today for submission of the reply by SIP Aftab Ahmed. The complainant along with his learned counsel is present. SIP Aftab Ahmed is also present and has submitted a written request seeking time to file his reply, as directed vide order dated 30.10.2026. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned to 13.11.2026 for submission of the reply by SIP Aftab Ahmed regarding the adverse remarks made against him in the order dated 30.10.2026. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 341/2026 | Iftikhar Ahmed VS The State | Aijaz Ahmed(ADVO-1472-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-322 | 244/2026 Daharki |
Cr. Bail application under section 498 Cr.P.C called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail.Learned counsel for the accused present and submitted statement with letter for joining of trial. DDPP for the state is present. Complainant is present for whom Mr. Nawab Ali advocate filed power. Both learned counsel request for adjournment as today is strike of advocates, such is allowed. Put off to 14.11.2026 for hearing. Present accused directed to attend. Next date informed to complainant. |
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 345/2026 | Eijaz Ali VS The State | Abdul Hafeez Alias Sahib Dino(ADVO-291-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-489-F | 232/2026 Daharki |
Cr. B.A. called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Complainant present and filed an applciation.order on it. Heard. Order pass ed on separate sheet that interim bail granted to accused is confirmed. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | PPC 201/2023 | The state VS Nabi Bux and ors | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Qadir Bux(ADVO-1126-SBC-GHT) | Mumtaz Ali(ADVO-1087-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 321/2022 Daharki |
SC called. Accused Ghulam Haider @ Gullab.Abrar, Khuda Bux, Nabi Bux & Akhtar are present on bail. Rest of accused declared as PO.The complainant present.Mr. Nawab Ali Pitafi, learned counsel for the accused are present. Mr. Qadir Bux Bhatti, learned counsel for the complainant absent. learned DDPP for the state ispresent. Today is case fixed for evidence. Due to strike of advocate, case is adjourned..The case is fixed on 3.12.2026 for further order of Honourable High Court of Sindh in Cr. Misc. Application 476/2026. Present accused are directed to attend. Next date informed to complainant. |
| 6 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 55/2024 | The State VS Imran Ali Chachar | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Aftab Hussain(ADVO-324-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 147/2023 Ubauro |
SC called. The accused is not produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki only slip received from jail No PWs present. Learned counsel for the accused is present. Summons returned un served. .Put off to 21.11.2026 for evidence. Issue SS to PWs. Next date informed to jail authority for production of UTP through video link. |
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 56/2024 | The State VS Shabeer Ahmed Chachar | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Aftab Hussain(ADVO-324-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 146/2023 Ubauro |
SC called. The accused is not produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki only slip received from jail No PWs present. Learned counsel for the accused is present. Summons returned un served. .Put off to 21.11.2026 for evidence. Issue SS to PWs. Next date informed to jail authority for production of UTP through video link. |
| 8 | SC (Murder Trial) 297/2024 | The State VS Imran Ali Chachar and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT),Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT),Shabbir Ali(ADVO-1076-SBC-SUK) | Aftab Ahmed(ADVO-40-SBC-GHT),Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 120/2023 Ubauro |
Case Called Accused Imran Ali, Shabeer Ahmed and Deen Muhammad have not been produced in custody from District Prison, Ghotki. Only a jail slip has been received, Accused Riaz Ahmed, Ashique Hussain, Abdul Hameed and Fiaz Muhammad are present on bail. Proceedings against accused Shahzado have already abated due to his death. Learned counsel for the L.Rs of deceased(Mother of deceased) and Learned counsel for the accused are present. Mother of deceased present DDPP for the state present. Today the case is fixed for evidence and application u/s 265-K Cr.P.C.Today work is suspended duet to strike of advocates. Accordingly, the case is adjourned to 21.11.2026 for recording of evidence. and hearing of application 265-K Cr.P.C,. Issue bailable warrants to the P.Ws., except the complainant and P.Ws. Shahmir and Soomar. In respect of the complainant Gul Sher and P.Ws. Shahmir and Soomar, a letter be issued through the Home Department, Government of Sindh, Karachi, to the Superintendent, District Jail, Rahim Yar Khan, for their production through video link as already ordered. The next date of hearing is communicated to the Jail Authority, Ghotki, through the jail slip, with a direction to produce the UTPs through video link. The accused who are present on bail are directed to appear on the next date of hearing. |
| 9 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 130/2024 | The State VS Ameer Ali @ Ameer Bux Bhutto | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 32/2024 Reti |
SC called. The accused is not produced from jail District Prison Ghotki, .Learned DDPP for the state is present. No P.Ws present. Summons issued and returned un-served. Put off to 28.11.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to P.Ws.Issue PO for accused to jail authority with direction to produce the accused through video link. |
| 10 | SC (Murder Trial) 592/2024 | The State VS Ameer Ali @ Ameer Bux Bhutto and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Saleem (ADVO-3181-SBC-SUK) | Abdul Majeed Memon(ADVO-606-SBC-GHT),Nawab Ali(ADVO-1073-SBC-SUK) | PPC-302 | 30/2024 Reti |
SC called. The accused Amir Ali alias Amir Bux confined at District PrisonGhotki . Accused Ali Bilawal ,Mehmood and Nawab are present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused and learned counsel for the complainant ,and DDP for the state are present. Complainant along with witness G.Nabi and A.Sattar are present. No other PWs present. Mr.Qadir Bux Bhatti advocate sent power of accused Nawab. today is strike of advocate. Case adjourned. Put off to 28.11.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs except complainant & present PWs. Issue PO for accused Amir Bux to jail authority for production of UTP through vide link. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 11 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 74/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Attal Shar | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 62/2025 Daharki |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. Learned DDPP for the State is present. The case is fixed today for recording of prosecution evidence. No PWs present. Today is strike of advocate.. The case is adjourned to 19.11.2026 for recording of evidence. Fresh summons be issued to the PWs. The accused present today is directed to appear on the next date of hearing. |
| 12 | SC (Murder Trial) 325/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Nawaz Shar and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | PPC-302 | 3/2025 Khenju |
S.C. called. Accused Muhammad Nawaz, Muhammad Attal, Shehryar Khan, and Jahangir Khan are present on bail. The remaining accused have been declared proclaimed offenders. Mr. Farman Ali ,learned counsel for the accused, learned DDPP for the State, are present. Mr. Anwar Ali Lohar, learned counsel for the complainant, is absent. Complainant, witnesses Muhammad Yousif, Pir Bux, Chanesar and Naseer Ahmed are present. No other PWs are present. The case is fixed today for recording of evidence. Due to strike of advocates, case is adjourned to 19.11.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to the remaining PWs, except the complainant and the above-mentioned witnesses. The case property, viz vehicles (Vigos), produced by the complainant arty and same returned by with owners with direction to be produce on next date of hearing. The present accused are directed to attend the Court on the next date of hearing. |
| 13 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 75/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Nawaz Shar | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 61/2025 Daharki |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. Learned DDPP for the State is present. The case is fixed today for recording of prosecution evidence. No PWs present. Today is strike of advocate.. The case is adjourned to 19.11.2026 for recording of evidence. Fresh summons be issued to the PWs. The accused present today is directed to appear on the next date of hearing. |
| 14 | PPC 417/2026 | The State VS Sharafat Al Golo and other | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 109/2026 Daharki |
SC called. Accused Sobo,Aslam and Shafi Muhammad were already declared as proclaimed offender. Remaining accused are present on bail except accused Sharafat, Abdul Latif and Jamaldin for whom an application receive for excusing of absence. Order on it. Excused.Learned counsel for the accused and learned DDPP for the state are present.Complainant is present. No other PWs present. Put off to 20.11.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs.Present accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 15 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 800/2026 | Mohammad Amir VS SSP Ghotki & ors | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. Applicant is present for whom Mr.Sandeep advocate filed power. DDPP for the state is present.Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
|
| 16 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 799/2026 | Azhar Ali VS SHO P.S Daharki | Yar Mohammad Jalbani(ADVO-991-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Proposed accused absent and not served. Repeat notice against proposed accused. Put off to 11.11.2026 for hearing. |
| 17 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 803/2026 | Mst. Zahra & another VS The State | Meharban Ali (ADVO-3015-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant is absent. Learned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for the state are present.Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki.Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
| 18 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 807/2026 | Ghulam Hussain VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Mr. Saifullah Bhangar advocate appeared and submitted a petition under section 22-A(6)(iii) Cr.P.C with affidavit of applicant. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
||
| 19 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 808/2026 | Bhajan VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Mr. Saifullah Bhangar advocate appeared and submitted a petition under section 22-A(6)(iii) Cr.P.C with affidavit of applicant. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 20 | DC (Direct Complaint) 10/2026 | Smt. Darshna Menghwar VS Shaman Menghwar and others | Alam Sher Khan Bozdar(ADVO-1997-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | / |
DC called. The complainant along with counsel are present. Partly arguments heard. Put off to 20.11.2026 for further hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 21 | PPC 786/2024 | The State VS Khalil Ahmed @ Ali Raza Shaikh and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Jameel-ur-Rahman(ADVO-1595-SBC-SUK) | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-J | 168/2024 Daharki |
SC called. Accused Bashir Ahmed is present on bail. Accused Khalil Ahmed alias Ali Raza is confined in District Prison Ghotki and not produced from jail. The remaining accused declared as Proclaimed Offender. Complainant and his counsel present.Learned counsel for the complainant submitted an adjournment. Order on it. Since there is no stay and case is being adjourned for final arguments of learned counsel for the complainant, who is availing to argue the matter Matter adjourned with final chance. Matter adjourned to 13.11.2026 for final arguments. Issue PO for the accused Khalil to jail authority with direction to produce the UTP through video link. Present accused on bail directed to attend. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 26/2026 |
Om Prkash VS Shahbaz Lal | Ayaz Ahmed(ADVO-296-SBC-KSH) | Meharban Ali (ADVO-3015-SBC-SUK) | Summary suit called. The Plaintiff and defendant are present. Today matter is fixed for compliance of 10(2) CPC but both parties request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 21.11.2026 for compliance of 10(2) CPC |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 76/2025 |
Attaullah Almani & others VS Muhammad Chhuttal Almani | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | Mushtaque Ahmed Kolachi(ADVO-73-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The learned counsel for appellant and respondent No: 1 and counsel are present . Put off to 13.11.2026 for arguments/hearing of application 41 rule 5 CPC.Call R and Ps from trial court. |
||
| 3 | C.M.A. (Civil Misc. Appeals) 18/2025 |
Aurangzeb Samo and another VS Jamal Khatoon Samo and others | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | The application under Order XLI Rule 19 CPC is also called and is fixed for hearing of learned counsel. The applicant/appellant and learned counsel were absent when the matter was called. Respondent absent. Put off to 3.12.2026 for hearing of learned counsel on the instant application. |
|||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 132/2026 |
Habib-ur-Rehman Soomro through attorney Abdul Karim Soomro VS P.O Sindh and othrs | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | CA called. Learned counsel for the appellant present. Respondents absent . Put off to 3.12.2026 for service. Issue notice to respondents through court bailiff and post AD on costs. |
|||
| 5 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 143/2026 |
Muhammad Afzal Bhutto and others VS Mst. Suhagin Bhutto and another | Aftab Hussain (ADVO-887-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The appellant and counsel are called absent. Respondents absent. Matter adjourned to 28.11.2026 |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Advocate to be Heard | |||||||
| 6 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 29/2026 |
Muhram Shar and another VS Muhammad Jaffar Kolachi and others | Civil Revision is called for advocate to be heard. Applicant are called absent. Learned counsel for the appellant is present .Heard learned counsel for the applicant/appellant. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, instant revision is dismissed. Let copy of order of this revision is sent to concerned trial court for information. |
||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 7 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 6/2025 |
Abdul Shakoor VS Amjad Shahzad Shar | Shoaib Ahmed (ADVO-19454-SBC-KHS) | Farman Ali (ADVO-533-SBC-GHT) | C.A. called. The appellant is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is called absent. Respondent absent. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent present and made his endorsement that he argued on appeal straightly. Put off to 27.11.2026 for arguments. |
||
| 8 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 5/2025 |
Abdul Shakoor VS Amjad Shahzad Shar and others | Shoaib Ahmed (ADVO-19454-SBC-KHS) | Farman Ali (ADVO-533-SBC-GHT) | Civil appeal under section 96 CPC is called. The appellant is present. Respondent Sajjid is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. Mr. Jamsheed Faiz advocate for contesting respondents present and submitted statement witth PSC of documents.Order on it Copy to other side. Copy of statement and document supplied to appellant. Put off Today the matter is fixed for argument and hearing on application 6 rule 17 CPC but same did not proceed as today is strike of advocates. Put off to 27.11.2026 for hearing of instant application and argument on main appeal. |
||
| 9 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 117/2025 |
Muhram Shar and another VS Muhammad Jaffar Kolachi and others | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | Mushtaque Ahmed Kolachi(ADVO-73-SBC-GHT) | C.A. called. The appellants are called absent. Learned counsel for the appellant is present.Respondents absent. Learned counsel for the contesting respondents present. Judgement passed and announced in open court that appeal is dismissed. Let compared copy of judgment and decree of this court be sent to concerned trial court for information. |
||
| 10 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 14/2026 |
Muhammad Afzal Bhutto and others VS Mst. Suhagin Bhutto and others | Aftab Hussain (ADVO-887-SBC-GHT) | Akhtar Hussain Malik(ADVO-621-SBC-GHT) | Civil appeal is called. The appellant No: 1 (who is attorney of co-appellant ) is absent. Respondent No: 1 called absent. One Ali Nawaz is present claiming as attorney of LRs of respondent No: 2 present and filed an adjournment, such is allowed. Rest of official respondents absent. Learned counsel for the respondents No: 1 and 2 absent. Due to strike of advocate, matter is adjourned. Matter is adjourned to 28.11.2026 for arguments . |
||
| 11 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 50/2026 |
Ali Gohar Bhutto VS Mst. Suhagin Bhutto and others | Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The attorney of appellant along with counsel are present.. Attorney of respondent No: 1 and counsel ,respondent No: 3 and counsel are absent. Today is strike of advocate hence case adjourned.. Put off to 28.11.2026 for arguments. |
||