| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 854/2026 | Manzoor Chachar and others VS The State | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 33/2026 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Cr. B.A. called. The learned counsel for the applicants/accused , learned DDPP for the state are present. Mr. Mohammad Tarique Panhiyar advocate claiming as advocate in this crime present on video link. Complainant is present. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that bail allowed to accused subject to furnishing surety in the sum of Rs;30,000/-each of accused Manzoor, habibullah, Sijjad, Gul Sher, Fazal ur Rehman. with PR bond in the like amount. Deponent Nizmatullah son of Wazeer Ahmed Chachar appeared and filed affidavit along with saving certificate for standing surety for accused Sijjad and Gul Sher in the sum of Rs;30,000/-each An other deponent Ali Hassan son of Rehmatullah Chachar filed affidavit with saving certificate for standing surety in the sum of Rs:30,000/-each of accused Manzoor, Habibullah and Fazal Rehman. Order on both affidavits that surety accepted. let release writ for above named accused according and PSC of saving certificate sent to concerned office for verification and report. |
|
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 883/2026 | Anwar Ali Dashti VS The State | Muhammad Akram(ADVO-180-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497 | 43/2026 Khambra |
Received bail application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge,Ghotki, for disposal according to law and fixed today. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present.Partly arguments heard, in the meanwhile call for police papers. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 345/2026 | Khadim Hussain @ Khadim Seelro VS The State | Liaquat Ali(ADVO-317-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-302 | 79/2024 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Cr. B.A. called. The applicant/accused is present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present.The learned counsel for the complainant present through video link. Partly arguments heard. Put off to 12.5.2026 for further hearing and hearing of complainant side. Present accused directed to attend. |
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 346/2026 | Khadim Hussain @ Khadim Seelro VS The State | Liaquat Ali(ADVO-317-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT),Sadaqat Ali (ADVO-25178-SBC-KHS) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-302 | 35/2013 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Cr. B.A. called. The applicant/accused is present on interim pre-arrest bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present.Complainant is present and filed an application raising no objection, so also his brother. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that interim bail granted to accused is confirmed. |
| 5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 348/2026 | Abdul Fateh @ Fateh Muhammad @ Fatoo Seelro VS The State | Liaquat Ali(ADVO-317-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-302 | 87/2024 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Cr. B.A. called. The applicant /accused is present on interim pre-arrest bail. Learned counsel for the accused, learned counsel for the complainant, DDPP for the state as well as complainant are present. Complainant filed application raising no objection on bail. Heard. order passed on separate sheet that interim bail granted to accused is confirmed. |
| 6 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 111/2026 | Javed Hussain VS The State | Meharban Ali (ADVO-3015-SBC-SUK) | PPC-379 | 87/2026 Daharki |
Cr. B.A. called. The applicant/accused present on interim pre-arrest bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present.Heard.order passed on separate sheet that interim bail granted to accused is confirmed. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 7 | Criminal Revisions 32/2025 | Abdul Khalique Arain VS Muhammad Ishaque Kamboh and ors | Muhammad Umar (ADVO-892-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-439 | / |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 8 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 152/2024 | The State VS Mian Abdul Rehman @ Ahmed Shah | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-1427-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 302/2024 Daharki |
SC called. Accused is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. BWs against PWs issued and returned un-served. Put off to 26.5.2026 for evidence. Issue fresh BW against PWs. Produced accused remanded back to jail. |
| 9 | SC (Murder Trial) 758/2024 | The State VS Mian Abdul Rehman @ Ahmed Shah | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-1427-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 294/2024 Daharki |
|
| 10 | PPC 786/2024 | The State VS Khalil Ahmed @ Ali Raza Shaikh and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Jameel-ur-Rahman(ADVO-1595-SBC-SUK) | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-J | 168/2024 Daharki |
SC called. Accused Khalil Ahmed produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki.Accused Bashir Ahmed present for whom Mr. Farman Ali advocate filed power with adjournment.Order thereon.. Rest of accused declared as PO. The complainant, learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Process against PWs and I.O issued and returned.I.O Khair Mohammad is present. Put off to 18.5.2026 for evidence. Produced accused remanded back to jail, Present accused on bail is directed to attend. As far application 516 Cr.P.C filed by one Javeed and an other Gul Mohammad both applicants are present and same adjourned to same date . |
| 11 | SC (Murder Trial) 109/2026 | The State VS Abdul Rasheed Pitafi and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 58/2025 Dad Leghari |
Case called. Accused Bashir Ahmed ,Shafique, Mohammad Bux and Shamisdin are produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. Rest of accused declared as PO. Learned counsel for the accused is absent, complainant, his counsel and DDPP for the state are present. No other PWs present. Case adjourned to 21.5.206 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Produced accused remanded back to jail. Next date informed to complainant to attend. |
|
| 12 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 35/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Bux Pitafi | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 63/2025 Dad Leghari |
SC called.Accused is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. Learned DDPP for the state is present.Learned counsel for the accused absent. Put off to 21.5.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Produced accused is remanded back to jail. |
|
| 13 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 36/2026 | The State VS Basheer Ahmed Pitafi | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 64/2025 Dad Leghari |
SC called.Accused is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. Learned DDPP for the state is present.Learned counsel for the accused absent. Put off to 21.5.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Produced accused is remanded back to jail. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 14 | Habeas Corpus 133/2026 | Ghulam Yaseen Mirani VS SHO PS W/J/Shah | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Application under section 491 Cr.P.C called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Rule nisi issued through SHO W.J. Shah and report received. Mr. Imran Ali Chachar advocate filed power of some private respondents. Mst. Shakeelan present and her statement recorded .Oder passed on statement. In compliance of order, the applicant Yaseen and Arbab execute a PR bond . Detenue have gone with them. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 15 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 712/2026 | Illashi Bux Bhayo VS SHO PS Ubauro | Mushtaque Ahmed Kolachi(ADVO-73-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
|
| 16 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 242/2026 | Mai Rehmat VS SHO P.S Dad Leghari | Yar Muhammad(ADVO-178-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
||
| 17 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 255/2026 | Allah Bux VS SHO P.S Khenju | Waqar Ali (ADVO-653-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
||
| 18 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 266/2026 | Gul Muhammad VS SHO P.S Daharki | Ghulam Abbas Alias Javed Akhtar(ADVO-642-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
||
| 19 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 275/2026 | Mst. Anjli VS SHO P.S Daharki | Muhammad Azam (ADVO-690-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
||
| 20 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 273/2026 | Gul Hassan & another VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Shahid Ali Pitafi(ADVO-53028-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
||
| 21 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 263/2026 | Khan Muhammad VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 22 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 41/2026 | The State VS Ghulam Mustafa Shaikh | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 27/2026 Daharki |
SC called. Accused is not produced from jail. DDPP for the state is present. Put off to 19.5.2026 Issue PO for accused. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications | |||||||
| 23 | PPC 201/2023 | The state VS Nabi Bux and ors | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Qadir Bux(ADVO-1126-SBC-GHT) | Mumtaz Ali(ADVO-1087-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 321/2022 Daharki |
SC called. Accused Nabi Bux, Ghulam Haider @ Gullab.Abrar, Khuda Bux, & Akhtar are present on bail. Rest of accused declared as PO. Complainant present. M/S Mumtaz Ali Naich and Nawab Ali Pitafi, advocate for accused, Qadir Bux Bhatti, counsel for the complainant and DDPP for the state are present.Today an application u/s 231 Cr.P.C is fixed. Heard arguments. Order passed that instant application is allowed. Put off to 4.6.2026 for evidence. Present accused directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 24 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 16/2026 | Shafi Muhammad Samejo VS Ghulam Hussain Rahar and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
DC called. The complainant and counsel are present and submitted an application for correction in memo about caste of accused Rahar instead of correct caste as Sameja. Heard. Order on it. allowed. Put off to 15,5,2026 for hearing, in the meanwhile issue notice to proposed accused. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 25 | PPC 572/2024 | Muhammad Sachal Mirani VS Abdul Jabbar and others | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | Rashid Ali(ADVO-208-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 9/2025 |
Hari Chand VS Mukesh Kumar Choithani | Avinash (ADVO-722-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | |||
| 2 | C.M.A. (Civil Misc. Appeals) 18/2025 |
Aurangzeb Samo and another VS Jamal Khatoon Samo and others | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The appellant No: 1 and counsel are present. Respondents absent. From perusal of notice dated 11.2.2026, it reflect that same returned from Learned Sr. Civil Judge, Ubauro vide letter No: 103/2026 whereby notice upon respondent Khadim Hussain served,Again notice issued for date of hearing 4.3.2026 and same returned from learned Sr. Civil Judge, Ubauro vide letter No: 166/2026 dated 3.3.2026 whereby notice upon respondents Mohammad Ayaz, Javeed, Gul Hassan and Sher Ali were served as per report of bailiff.The notice against respondents issued for the date of hearing viz:16.4.2026 whereby report of bailiff received from learned Sr. Civil Judge Ubauro as per report of bailiff the son of respondent Riaz reported that his father was expired.Notice dated 28.4.2026 issued upon respondents and same returned from learned Sr. Civil Judge, Ubauro with report of bailiff vide letter No:243/2026 whereby report of bailiff that the respondent No: 2(a) served in person, who received the notice of respodents No: 2(b) to(2e),The notice dated 7.5.2026 issued upon the respondents whereby report of bailiff received through learned Sr. Civil Judge Ubauro vide letter No: 257/2026 whereby respondent No: 5 Riaz expired while rest of respondents absent. Today the matter is fixed for service and appearance of respondents but non from respondents appeared. The civil misc. appeal adjourned to 13.5.2026. Issue fresh notice to all private respondents through bailiff of concerned with direction to past notice outer door of residence of respondents, call R and Ps from trial court. |
|||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 7/2026 |
Niaz Ahmed Malik VS Fazal Din Malik and others | Akhtar Hussain Malik(ADVO-621-SBC-GHT) | ||||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 8/2026 |
Siraj Malik VS Ranjho Malik and ors | Akhtar Hussain Malik(ADVO-621-SBC-GHT) | ||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 5 | Summary Suits 16/2026 |
Allah Dino Mangi VS Mushtaque Ahmed Soomro | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | ||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 6 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 50/2026 |
Ali Gohar Bhutto VS Mst. Suhagin Bhutto and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The attorney of appellant along with counsel are present.One Mohammad Yakoob claiming as attorney of respondent No; 1 is present and filed an adjournment, such is allowed. The respondents No: 2 to 7 absent. Issue notice to respondents No: 2 to 7 of main appeal and application of limitation Act through bailiff of concerned court and Post AD on costs. Put off to 21.5.2026 for service. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 7 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 6/2026 |
Allah Jewayo Malik VS Punhoon Malik and others | Akhtar Hussain Malik(ADVO-621-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The learned counsel for the appellant is present.Respondent No: 4 present.Learned counsel for the contesting respondent present and request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 21.5.2026 for objection on appeal arguments. |
|||
| 8 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 14/2026 |
Muhammad Afzal Bhutto and others VS Mst. Suhagin Bhutto and others | Aftab Hussain (ADVO-887-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The appellant N:(1) who is attorney of appellant is present. The attorney of respondent No: 1 along with counsel are present. One Ali Nawaz claiming as attorney of L.Rs of Ali Gohar is present.Official respondents absent. Put off to 21.5.2026 for further proceedings/Objection if any. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 9 | Summary Suits 7/2025 |
Avinash Balrajani VS Muhammad Anwar Mangrio | Nawab Ali(ADVO-1073-SBC-SUK) | Ihsan Ali(ADVO-323-SBC-GHT) | |||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 10 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 131/2025 |
Mai Haneef Laghari VS Ashawani Kumar and others | Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-59-SBC-GHT) | ||||
| 11 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 136/2025 |
Khadim Hussain Syed VS Rashid Ali Syed and others | Waqar Ali (ADVO-653-SBC-GHT) | ||||
| 12 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 138/2025 |
Rashid Ali Syed and others VS Abdul Hameed Syed and others | Rashid Ali(ADVO-208-SBC-GHT) | ||||