Cr. B.A. called. The applicants/accused are present on interim pre-arrest bail. Learned counsel for the accused, learned DDPP for the state, complainant are present. Mr. Mohammad Sadiq Malik advocate filed power of complainant.File.Learned counsel for the complainant submitted statement whereby he submit PSC of documents and learned counsel for the applicant/accused filed statement with PSC of documents as mentioned in statement. Heard arguments. Order passed on separate sheet that interim bail granted to accused is confirmed.

Received bail application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge, Ghotki, for disposal according to law and fixed today.Cr. B.A. called.The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that interim bail is confirmed.

Cr. B.A. called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused present and filed statement with CTC & letter of joining investigation. The bail application adjourned to 3.6.2026 for hearing. Issue notice to complainant. Present accused directed to attend.

Cr. B.A. called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that interim bail granted to accused is confirmed.

Cr.B.A. called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail.Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that interim bail granted to him is confirmed.

SC called. The accused Ali Gohar is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki.The case against remaining accused was already kept on dormant file. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Summons issued and returned. I/O SIP Mohammad Pannah is present. No other PWs present. Learned counsel for the accused is request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 03.6.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Produced accused remanded back to jail.

SC called. The accused Ali Gohar produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki.The case against remaining accused were already kept on dormant file. The learned counsel for the accused, learned DDPP for the state are present. On summons, the complainant, Dr. Zaibbunisa and PC Noor Mohammad are present. D/O Dr. Zaibunisa recorded at Exh. 8, she produced letter and post mortem at Exh.8-A and B. D/O HC Noor Mohammad recorded at Exh. 9, He produced report at Exh. 09-A. The complainant filed an application for adjournment for time,such is allowed. Put off to 3.6.2026 for evidence. Issue fresh summons to R/PWs except complainant.Produced accused remanded back to jail.

SC called. Accused Ali nawaz already acquitted u/s 265-K Cr.P.C by this court vide order dated 19.9.2025, The rest of accused were declared as PO .Now the case against accused Sachlo alias Mohammad Sachal is called, who is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki DDPP for the state present.The arguments on application 285-K Cr.P.C heard. Order passed on separate sheet that instant application allowed and accused Sachlo is acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C.Let acquittal slip for present accused be issued accordingly. Accused remanded back to back to jail with direction to release him if he is no more required in any other case.

SC called. All accused are present on bail except Rajib Ali for whom an application for excusing of absence. Order on it. To be consider at the time of appearance. Complainant along with witness are present. Learned counsel for the complainant is present. Mr. Nawab Ali Pitafi advocate for accused absent.Put off to 17.6.2026 for evidence. letter to concerned SHO and Mukhtiarkar for evidence with direction to appear in person or through any authorized person issued and returned un-served and same is extended. Present accused are directed to attend.Next date informed to complainant.

SC called. The complainant is present. Learned counsel for the complainant absent. The accused Rano expired,proceedings against him already abated, while rest ofaccused are present on bail except accused Talib and Mohammad Nawaz for whom applications received. Order on thereon.Absence excused.Learned counsel for the accused present.Summons against concerned SHO Mukhtiarkar issued returned un-served and same is extended. . Put off to 10.2026 for evidence of SHO and Mukhtiarkar. Issue summons to Mukhtiarkar Ubauro and SHO Ubauro with direction to appear in person or through reauthorized person for recording evidence to the extent of their reports. Present accused are directed to attend.

Case called.The accused is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. Learned counsel for the accused is present. Learned DDPP for the state is also present. Summons against PWs issued and returned un-served. No PWs present. The case is adjourned to 4.6.2026 for evidence. Issue fresh summons to PWs. Produced accused is remanded back to District Prison Ghotki

Case called.The accused is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. Learned counsel for the accused is present. Learned DDPP for the state is also present. Summons against PWs issued and returned un-served. No PWs present. The case is adjourned to 4.6.2026 for evidence. Issue fresh summons to PWs. Produced accused is remanded back to District Prison Ghotki

Case called. Accused Muhammad Nawaz and Muhammad Atta are produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. Accused Shehryar Khan and Jahangir Khan are present on bail granted by the Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan in (Crl. P.I.A 559/2026) and (crl. P.I.A 563/2026), while remaining accused were declared as Proclaimed Offenders. Mr. Amanullah G. Malik advocate appeared and submitted his power on behalf of accused Shahryar Khan and Jahangir Khan and also submitted an adjournment application. Order thereon. Power file and adjournment granted. He request for date to submit proof of their confirmation of bail, such is allowed. Mr. Anwar Ali Lohar, learned counsel for the complainant and learned DDPP for the state are present. Learned counsel for the accused Mohammad Nawaz and Attal also present. The complainant Jam Mehtab,witnss Mohammad Yousif,witness Ghulam Raza Shah , Chanesar, Naseer and Peer Bux are present. No other PWs present. Properties viz vehicles(Vego) produced by the complainant and same are standing out of court which was cheeked through PC (Naib court). Due to filing of adjournment application by learned counsel for the accused Shahryar and Jahangir Khan, the case is adjourned to 04.06.2026 for evidence. Next date informed to PWs. Property viz vehicles(Vegos) returned by the owner /complainant party with direction to be produce on next date of hearing. Present both accused are remanded back to District Prison Ghotki. Present accused on bail are directed to attend.

SC called. Accused is produced in custody from District Prision Ghotki. DC and DDPP for the state are present. No PWs present. Summons issued and returned un-served and same is extended. Put off to 09.6.2026 for evidence. Produced accused remanded back to jail.

SC called. The accused Abid is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. Accused Shafi Mohammad and Atta Hussain are present on bail. Mdm Taibah Rohi advocate of accused Abid present. The learned counsel for the accused Shafi Mohammad and Atta Hussain as well as learned DDPP for the state are present. No PWs present. Put off to 09.6.2026 for evidence. summons to PWs extended.. Produced accused is remanded back to Jail. Present accused on bail are directed to attend.

Cr. M.A. called.The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Proposed accused No: 1 and counsel present.Further arguments heard. Put off to 22.5.2026 for order.

Cr. M.A. called. The applicant, proposed accused No: 1 along with their counsel and DDPP for the state are present. By consent, the matter adjourned to 2.6.2026 for further hearing/Order.

Cr. M.A. called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Proposed accused Jamal present. Order passed on separate sheet that instant petition is dismissed.

Cr. M.A. called. The applicant with counsel are present. One Javeed Hussain who was submit application on 18,5,2926 is called absent. Proposed accused No: 2 present. Mr. Ghulam Murtaza Samejo present and filed power on behalf of proposed accused No: 1 and 2.File. Further arguments heard. Put off to 3.6.2026 for further hearing/Order.

Cr. M.A. called. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki.File. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of.

Case of accused Abdul Hameed and Sanaullah are called, who are present on bail. DDPP for the state present.Put off to 09.6.2026 for formal.Call for supplementary challan of accused from concerned police. Both accused are directed to attend.

SC called. The complainant absent. Learned counsel for the accused are present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused present.Requirements of section 265-(c) Cr.P.C supplied to accused under receipt at Exh. 1. Put off to 10.6.2026 for charge. Present accused directed to attend.

SC called. The complainant absent. Learned counsel for the accused are present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused present.Requirements of section 265-(c) Cr.P.C supplied to accused under receipt at Exh. 1. Put off to 10.6.2026 for charge. Present accused directed to attend.

SC called. The accused Parveen is not produced in custody from District (Women) jail Sukkur. Accused Akhtar and Jameel produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. DDPP for the state present. All present accused request for date, to bring their counsel , such is allowed. Put off to 3.6.2026 for formal. Produced accused remanded back to their respective jail.Issue PO for the accused Parveen to concerned jail with direction to produce the accused or to produce through video link/whats-app.

CA called. The appellant is called absent. Learned counsel for the appellant is present. Respondents are called absent. Respondents absent. The appeal is adjourned to 5.6.2026 for service. In the interest of justice, Issue fresh notices upon respondents through court bailiff and post AD/TCS on costs.

CA called. The learned counsel for the appellant is present. Respondents absent.Put off to 10.6.2026 for service. Issue fresh notices to respondents through court bailiff and post AD on costs.

CA called. The attorney of appellant is present.The learned counsel for the appellant is present. Mr. Mohammad Ayoub learned counsel for the respondent No: 22 is present. Official respondents No: 27 to 31 absent .Rest of Respondent absent.Put off to 17.6.2026 Issuance of notice upon the respondents through publication as already ordered and also issue notices upon the rest of respondents through court bailiff and post AD/TCS,

Ex. application called. The DH is absent. Learned counsel for the D.H present. JD absent and not yet served. Issue notice to JD through court bailiff and post AD on costs.Hearing 10.6.2026 for service.

C.Revision called. The appellant absent. Learned counsel for the appellant is present. Respondent No: 1 present and submitted an application whereby he withdraw the power and from power of attorney submitted by his counsel.Order on it. M/S Ch. Shahid Hussain and Kamran Ali advocate filed joint power of respondent No: 1. File. Put off to 10.6.2026 for arguments.

Summary suit called. Plaintiff with counsel present and submitted an application 13 rule 2 CPC with CTC copies of documents as mentioned in application with supporting affidavit of plaintiff.Order on it. Copy to other side. Defendant and counsel present. PSC of the same supplied to them. Put off to 10.6.2026 for objection on instant applciation/hearing.

CA called. The appellant and counsel Mr. Nizamdin are present.Respondent No: 1 is present.By consent, appeal adjourned to 11.6.2026 for arguments on application 6 rule 17 CPC & on main appeal.

CA and misc. application are called. The appellant is present with his counsel Mr. Nizsamdin. Respondent Amjid Shahzad present. Put off to 11.6.20-26 for order on application 6 rule 17 CPC

CA called. The attorney of appellant and counsel are present. Respondents absent. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent present. By joint request, appeal adjourned to 17.6.2026 for hearing on misc. application and on main appeal.

Summary suit called. Plaintiff with counsel are present.Defendant and counsel are called absent. Jr. Partner of learned counsel for the defendant is present and submitted an adjournment, such is allowed. Put off to 3.6.2026 for hearing on application leave to defend.

CA called. The appellant and his counsel are present. The respondent No: 1 Nabi Bux was expired as reported by learned counsel for the contesting respondent in counter affidavit/Objection filed by respondents on application 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC and on main appeal. The learned counsel for the respondent present. Respondent No: 3 present who is attorney of respondent No: 2, 4 to 6 present. Put off to 17.6.2026 for proper application for joining of LRs of respondent No: 1 and arguments.

CA called.Learned counsel for the appellant is present and submitted an adjournment,such is allowed. Defendants absent. Put off to 10.6.2026 for arguments.

CA called. Appellant No: 4(a) and counsel are present and submitted an adjournment,such is allowed. Defendants absent. Put off to 10.6.2026 for arguments.

CA called.Learned counsel for the appellant is present and submitted an adjournment,such is allowed. Defendants absent. Put off to 10.6.2026 for arguments.

CA called. The appellant along with counsel are present. One Sadam the attorney of contesting respondent and counsel are present. Mr. Nawab Ali, learned counsel for the respondent Ali Hassan is absent, his Jr.Partner present and request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 10.6.2026 for further arguments.

CA called. The attorney of appellant is present and filed an adjournment, such is allowed. Learned counsel for the appellant is present.The attorney of respondent No: 1 and counsel present. Put off to 17.6.2026 for arguments.

Family appeal called. Learned counsel for the appellant and respondent are present. By consent ,appeal adjourned to 10.6.2026 for arguments.