| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 669/2024 | The State VS Rahib Shar and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Shahzado(ADVO-522-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 33/2024 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Verification of saving certificate received from Office NSC M.Mathelo and reported as genuine one. Deponent Zulfiqar Ali who is stood surety in the sum of Rs:30000/- for accused Ghulam Yaseen s/o Sahib dino. Order on it.Accepted. Issue release writ for accused G.Yaseen son of Sahibdino to Suptt: CP Sukkur accordingly. The case already fixed on 13.11.2026 |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 21/2026 | The State VS Abid Malik | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT),Taibah Roohi(ADVO-879-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 197/2025 Daharki |
Case called. Accused is not produced from District Prison Ghotki, only slip received and accused produced by jail authority on video link. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. No PWs present. Put off to 20.11.2026 for evidence. Issue fresh BW against PWs, Next date informed to jail authority on jail slip for production of UTP through video link. |
| 3 | SC (Murder Trial) 56/2026 | The State VS Abid Malik & others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT),Taibah Roohi(ADVO-879-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 183/2025 Daharki |
SC called. The accused Abid is not produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki only slip received from jail and produced by jail authority on video link. Accused Shafi Mohammad and Atta Hussain are present on bail. Mdm Taibah Rohi advocate of accused Abid present. The learned counsel for the accused Shafi Mohammad and Atta Hussain and learned DDPP for the state present. Summons issued and returned . No. PWs present including complainant though she was present on last date.The case is adjourned . Put off to 25.11.2026.2026 for evidence. Issue BWs to PWs. Present accused on bail are directed to attend. Next date informed to jail authority on slip with direction to produce UTP through video link. |
| 4 | PPC 130/2026 | Ameer Hamza Dahar VS Muneer Ahmed Supio and others | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Jamshed Akhtar(ADVO-681-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3/4 illegal Dispossession Act | / |
The case is called. All accused persons are present on bail. Mr. Jam Jamsheed Akhtar, learned counsel for the accused, and the learned counsel for the complainant are present. Jam Naveed, attorney of the complainant, is also present. The witnesses of complainant are called absent. The learned counsel for the complainant has submitted an application seeking adjournment. Order on it.Matter adjoined. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned to 25.11.2026 for evidence. The accused persons present today are directed to appear on the next date of hearing. |
| 5 | PPC 131/2026 | Jam Naveed Ahmed Dahar VS Muneer Ahmed Supio & others | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Jamshed Akhtar(ADVO-681-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3/4 illegal Dispossession Act | / |
The case is called. All accused persons are present on bail. Mr. Jam Jamsheed Akhtar learned counsel for the accused, and the learned counsel for the complainant are present. The complainant, Jam Naveed and witness are called absent. The learned counsel for the complainant has submitted an application seeking adjournment. Order on it. The matter is adjourned. In the meantime, Mst. Sadia Muneer called absent. Learned counsel for the Mst. Sadia present and submitted an application whereby he withdraw from applciation for correction of clarification.Order on it. In view of statement ,application dated 21.10.2026 is dismissed as withderawn.Put off to 25.11.2026 for evidence. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 799/2026 | Azhar Ali VS SHO P.S Daharki | Yar Mohammad Jalbani(ADVO-991-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant along with counsel present. DDPP for the state present. Proposed accused absent for whom Mr. Nawab Ali Pitafi advocate filed power and request for date, Power file and request allowed. By consent,matter fixed on 18.11.2026 for hearing. |
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 801/2026 | Mohammad Yousif VS SHO P.S Dad Leghari | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant along with counsel, proposed accused and counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Proposed accused make their statement as endrosed.In light of such statement learned counsel for the applicant withdraw the petition. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 8 | SC (Murder Trial) 258/2026 | The state VS Ghulam Fareed Laghari and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT),Mushtaque Ahmed(ADVO-1268-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 43/2025 Dad Leghari |
The case against accused already kept on dormant file. The letter issued to concerned SHO for progress about arrest of proclaimed offenders but no any progress made and report received un-served. DDPP for the state present. Put off to 30 .12.2026 for progress report about arrest of proclaimed offenders. |
| 9 | PPC 418/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Jumman Shaikh and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-397 | 72/2026 Daharki |
The case against accused was already kept on dormant file.Today the matter is fixed for progress for arrest of proclaimed offender, but no any progress report is received. Put off to 30.12.2026.Call for progress report about arrest of proclaimed offenders. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 82/2025 |
Taj Muhammad Chachar and others VS Illimuddin Mazari and others | Allah Dino(ADVO-1151-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. Called. Appellant No. 12, Abdul Razzaque, being the attorney of the co-appellants, is present along with his learned counsel. Respondent No. 1 is also present along with his learned counsel, Mr. Muhammad Tarique, Advocate. Respondent No. 11, namely Makhno, has expired, while the remaining respondents are absent.Learned counsel for the appellant request for date, such is allowed.Put off to 25.11.2026 for filing of amended title page for joining of respondent No: 11. |
||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 9/2026 |
Akbar Ali Chachar VS Nabi Bux Rind and others | Muhammad Jamshed Akhtar(ADVO-681-SBC-GHT) | Soomardass R. Parmani(ADVO-245-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. Called. The learned counsel for the appellant is present.Respondent No. 4, namely Hazoor Bux, is also present . whereas the remaining respondents are called absent. The learned counsel for the contesting respondent has sent adjournment application.Order on it. Matter is adjopurned. The matter is adjourned to 25.11.2026 for hearing on the objections raised by the learned counsel for the contesting respondent regarding the amended title page and the implement of the legal representatives of Respondent No. 1. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 143/2025 |
Abdul Malik Shar and others VS Haji Maqsood Ahmed Arain and others | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | CA called. Appellant No: 1 along with counsel are present. Respondents are called absent. Put off to 25.11.2026 for filing of objections, if any, and/or arguments. |
|||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 22/2026 |
Muhammad Hashim Bhutto and other s VS Abdul Hakeem and others | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. Called. The learned counsel for the appellant is present. Respondent No. 11, namely Ali Asghar (being the same person shown at Sr. No. 22 of the plaint), is called absent, whereas his learned counsel, Mr. Ubedullah Azad, are absent.Rest of respondents absent. Adjourned to 25.11.2026 for objections, if any, to the main appeal, and arguments. The office is directed to call for the Record and Proceedings (R&Ps) from the learned Trial Court as already ordered. |
|||
| 5 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 6/2026 |
Jam Sher Khan Samejo VS Sher Muhammad Hingorjo | Saleem Akhtar Malik(ADVO-127-SBC-GHT) | Ex. application called. The DH is absent. Learned counsel for the D.H present. JD absent and not yet served though notices were repeatedly issued.From perusal of record, it reflect that execution was admitted on 16.4.2026 since notices were issued but the J.D remained absent. Issue notice against the JD through publication daily Kawish Hyderabad on costs of DH as well as notice be issued against JD through court bailiff concerned court through Honorable District Judge Sanghar. and post AD/TCS on costs. . Hearing 21.11.2026 for service. |
|||
| 6 | Summary Suits 52/2026 |
Mahesh Kumar VS Ali Ahmed Mahar and others | Syed Nadeem Haider(ADVO-13415-SBC-KHE) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | R and Ps received from the Honourable District and Sessions Judge, Ghotki for disposal according to law and put up today. The Plaintiff absent. Defendant not served. Put off to 21.11.2026 for service. Issue notice to defendant through court bailiff and post AD on costs. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 7 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 94/2026 |
Sagheer Ahmed Chandio VS Zameer Ahmed Chandio and others | Aftab Ahmed(ADVO-40-SBC-GHT) | Meharban Ali (ADVO-3015-SBC-SUK) | CA called. The appellant and counsel are present. Respondent No: 2 present. Rest of respondents absent. Learned counsel for the contesting respondents absent and sent an adjournment.Order on it. Matter adjourned. Put off to 25.11.2026 for arguments. |
||
| 8 | Summary Suits 36/2026 |
Aneel Kumar VS Asif Ali Ghunio | Nazeer Ahmed (ADVO-649-SBC-GHT) | Nawab Ali(ADVO-1073-SBC-SUK) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff along with counsel are present and submitted objection inshape of counter affidavit on application leave to defend. Order on it. Defendant and counsel are present. Put off to 25.11.2026 for hearing on application leave to defend. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 9 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 10/2026 |
Ghulam Mustafa Chachar VS Public at Large and others | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | Farman Ali (ADVO-533-SBC-GHT) | Leading Civil Appeal No. 10 of 2026 Re: Ghulam Mustafa v. Public at Large & Subsequent Civil Appeal No. 11 of 2026 Re: Ghulam Mustafa v. Mst. Gul Baharan Both appeals are called. Appellant No. 1(h), namely Arab, is present. learned counsel for the appellants, is also present. Respondents No. 1 to 7 are absent. The learned DDA for the official respondents is present. Abdul Majeed, attorney of Respondents No. 8(a) to 8(f), is present. Respondent No. 9, being the attorney of Respondents No. 10 to 15, is also present along with their learned counsel. By joint request appeal adjourned.The appeals are adjourned to 25.11.2026 for arguments on behalf of the contesting respondents. The office is directed to call for the Record and Proceedings (R&Ps) from the learned Trial Court as already ordered. |
||
| 10 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 11/2026 |
Ghulam Mustafa Chachar VS Mst. Gulbaharan Chachar and others | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | The instant subsequent appeal is called. Appellant No. 1(h), along with his learned counsel, is present. Abdul Majeed, attorney of Respondents No. 1(a) to 1(f), is present. Respondent No. 2 is also present along with his learned counsel. The leading appeal, bearing No. 10 of 2026, titled Ghulam Mustafa v. Public at Large, has been adjourned to 25.11.2026. Accordingly, the instant subsequent appeal is also adjourned to 11.11.2026 to be taken up along with the leading appeal. |
||
| 11 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 99/2026 |
Muneer Ahmed and another VS Maqbool Ahmed Kori and others | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | C.A called. The appellant called absent. Learned counsel for appellant is present. Respondent No.1 and counsel for respondent present. Judgment passed and announced in open Court that appeal is dismissed. Let compaired copy of judgment of this appeal along with decree an R & Ps of trial Court be sent to Trial Court for information. |
||