| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 1 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 89/2026 | Sooraj Kumar VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Abdul Manan(ADVO-757-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present.Proposed accused Subash is present.The applicant filed an application on the ground that compromise talks is going on hence he withdraw the petition.Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
| 2 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 90/2026 | Mst. Shaila VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Abdul Hafeez (ADVO-2229-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant is absent. Learned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for the state are present.Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. File. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order,petition is stands disposed of. |
| 3 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 97/2026 | Javed Iqbal Larik VS SHO P.S Daharki | Nizamuddin(ADVO-1081-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
The misc. application under order 22 -A(6)(i) Cr.P.C is called. The applicant is called absent. Learned counsel for the applicant and learned DDPP for the state are present. Report is not received. The petition is fixed on 16.2.2026 for report.Call report from DSP complaint cell Ghotki and issue notice to proposed accused. |
| 4 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 100/2026 | Sangeeta VS SHO P.S Daharki | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
The criminal misc. application under section 22-A(6)(i) Cr.P.C is called. The applicant is present. Learned DDPP for the state is also present. On notice proposed accused are present for whom Mr. Muhammad Javeed Arain ,advocate appeared and filed power.File. The report is called from DSP Complaint cell Ghotki but same is not yet received. Call report from him as already ordered. Put off to 16.2.2026 for report and hearing. |
| 5 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 82/2026 | Subash VS The State | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present.Proposed accused Sooraj is present.The applicant filed an application on the ground that compromise talks is going on hence he withdraw the petition.Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 359/2025 | The State VS Mir Hassan Soomro and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-364 | 96/2025 Daharki |
SC called. The accused are present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused, DDPP for the state are present. Complainant and his counsel absent. Partly arguments of learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the State heard. Put off to 19.2.2026 for further arguments.Present accused directed to attend. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 134/2025 |
Amanullah Gopang and others VS Nek Muhammad Shaikh and others | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | Civil appeal is fixed for service of respondent No: 1(b) and objection on application u/o 41 rule 5 CPC and same is called. The appellant(1) is present along with counsel. Respondent No: 1(a) along with counsel are present and submitted counter affidavit by the respondent 1(a) in shape of objection on application 41 rule 5 CPC, copy supplied to other side. The respondent No: 1(b) is absent though the notices against her repeatedly issued through court bailiff and same notice received by the respondent No: 1(a) as respondent No: 1(b) is her sister, hence service against her held good.Learned counsel for the appellant filed statement with CTC of diary of Ex. appl:No: 15/2025 issued by the court of learned Senior Civil Judge, Ubauro. Put off to 19.2.2026 for hearing of instant application as well as arguments on main appeal. Call R and Ps from trial court. |
|||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 8/2026 |
Siraj Malik VS Ranjho Malik and ors | Akhtar Hussain Malik(ADVO-621-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The appellant is called absent. Learned counsel for the appellant is present and submitted statement whereby informed that respondent No: 2 has been expired.Order on it. The notice against the respondents issued and returned from learned Sr. Civil Judge Ubauro whereby bailiff one Khamiso received notice of respondents No: 1 to 3. Respondent Shabir Ahmed present. One Imran Ali Tapedar appeared on behalf of respondent No: 4 and filed adjournment application, such is allowed.Mr. Irshad Ahmed advocate filed power on behalf of respondent No: 1 & 3.File. Put off to 2.3.2026 for objection on appeal if any and filing of proper application for joining of L.Rs of respondent No: 2. |
|||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 6/2026 |
Allah Jewayo Malik VS Punhoon Malik and others | Akhtar Hussain Malik(ADVO-621-SBC-GHT) | C.A. is called. The appellant is absent. Learned counsel for the appellant is present. Notice issued against the respondents No: 1(a),b,d to h,2 to 5 and same is returned from learned Sr. Civil Judge, Ubauro as un-served. Respondent (4) is present. Mr. Irshad Ali Solangi,advocate appeared and filed power on behalf of respondent No: 1(a) to 1(h),2 to 4 .File.He also submitted an adjournment application, such is allowed. Official respondents called absent except respondent No: 5, from whom one Imran Tapedar is present and filed adjournment application, such is allowed. Put off to 2.3.2026 for objection on appeal if any & service of respondents No: 6 and 7. Issue fresh notice against them through court as well as post AD on costs. |
|||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 7/2026 |
Niaz Ahmed Malik VS Fazal Din Malik and others | Akhtar Hussain Malik(ADVO-621-SBC-GHT) | C.A. is called. The appellant is absent. Learned counsel for the appellant is present. Notice issued against the respondents and same is returned from learned Sr. Civil Judge, Ubauro as served upon respondent No: 2. Respondent (2) is present. Mr. Irshad Ali Solangi,advocate appeared and filed power on behalf of respondent No: 1(b) to 1(g),2 to 6 .File.He also submitted an adjournment application, such is allowed. Official respondents called absent except respondent No: 7, from whom one Imran Tapedar is present and filed adjournment application, such is allowed. Learned counsel for the appellant filed statement as well as respondent No: 6 filed application whereby informed that respondent No: 1-A Mehrab is expired.Order on it.Put off to 2.3.2026 for objection on appeal if any & service of respondents No: 8 and 9 and to file a proper application for joining of L.Rs of respondent No: 1-A. Issue fresh notice against them through court as well as post AD on costs. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 5 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 6/2025 |
Abdul Shakoor VS Amjad Shahzad Shar | Shoaib Ahmed (ADVO-19454-SBC-KHS) | Farman Ali (ADVO-533-SBC-GHT) | The appeal is fixed for objection on application under order 6 rule 17 CPC and argements on main appeal and same is called today. The appellant is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is called absent. The respondent and counsel are called absent. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent sent an adjournment application, such is allowed. Put off to 28.2.2026 for objection on application 6 rule 17 CPC and arguments. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 6 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 5/2025 |
Abdul Shakoor VS Amjad Shahzad Shar and others | Shoaib Ahmed (ADVO-19454-SBC-KHS) | Farman Ali (ADVO-533-SBC-GHT) | This appeal along with an application under order 6 rule 17 CPC are called. The appellant is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is called absent. The respondent and counsel are called absent. Learned counsel for the appellant sent an adjournment application, such is allowed. Put off to 28.2.2026 for hearing of instant application and arguments on main appeal. |
||