Cr. Bail application under section 497 Cr.P.C called. The learned counsel for the applicant/accused and DDPP for the state are present.Complainant is present and filed an application raising no objection on bail. Order on it. Put off to 31.8.2026 for hearing.Call for police papers.

SC called. Accused Ali Gohar is confined at District Prison, Ghotki, and is produced before the Court by the jail authorities through video link. The remaining accused have been declared proclaimed offenders (P.Os.). Learned counsel for the accused and the learned DDPP for the State are present. ASI Azizullah Malhan is present and is examined at Exh. 11. He produced the memo of arrest, which was taken on record and marked as Exh. 11-A.The learned DDPP for the State submitted a statement whereby he closed the prosecution side. The same was taken on record and marked as Exh. 12. Adjourned to 01.09.2026 for recording the statements of the accused. The next date has been communicated to the jail authorities for the production of UTP Ali Gohar through video link.

S.C. called. Accused Ali Gohar was not produced from District Prison, Ghotki, and is produced through video link. The remaining accused were declared Proclaimed Offenders (P.Os.). The complainant, along with witnesses Nabi Bux and Hussain, is present. Official witnesses ASI Abdul Aziz and Shabir Ahmed are also present. Learned counsel for the accused and learned DDPP for the State are present. Learned counsel for the complainant is absent. Deposition of ASI Abdul Aziz Malhan is recorded at Exh. 11. He produced the memo of arrest at Exh. 11-A. Deposition of ASI Shabir Ahmed is recorded at Exh. 12. He produced the documents as mentioned in his deposition at Exhs. 12-A to 12-C. The complainant requested time to bring his learned counsel, which request was allowed.Present complainant and private PWs bound down.Put off to 01.09.2026 for recording the evidence of the remaining PWs. The next date is informed to the present PWs. The next date is also communicated to the Jail Authority for production of UTP Ali Gohar through video link.

SC called. The complainant iabsent. The accused Rano expired, proceedings against him already abated, while rest of accused are present on bail except accused M.Nawaz for whom separate application received for excusing of absence. Order on it. Notice against Mukhtiarkar and SHO concerned issued for recording to evidence in respect of inquires.Notice returned from SHO un-served and same is extended,while issue letter to Mukhtiarkar. Put off to 9.9.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend.

SC called. The accused is present on bail. DC and DDPP for the state present. No PWs present. PUt off to 8.9.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to R/PWs. Present accused directed to attend.

Accused Abdul Wahid and Ali Murad are voluntarily appeared with their counsel and submitted an application for excusing of their absence. Order on it. To be consider on date of hearing.The case already fixed on 10.09.2026

SC called. Accused Sohaib & Meer Hassan alias Suhno. not produced from District Prison Ghotki and produced through video link.Learned DDPP for the state and learned counsel for the accused are present.Suplimentry challan of accused Meer Hassan alias Suhno already received and same is attached with main R and Ps. The documents under provision of section 265-C supplied to learned counsel for the accused Meer Hassan alias suhno under receipt. Now the case and bail application of accused Meer Hassan alias Suhno fixed on 31.8.20926 for hearing/amended charge. Next date informed to jail authority for production of UTPs through video link.

SC called. The accused Shoaib is not produced from District Prison Ghotki, only slip received from jail and also produced him through video link.. Learned counsel for the accused is present. DDPP for the state is present.No PWs present. Put off to 31.8.2026 for evidence. Issue BW against R/PWs who are not examined. Next date informed to jail authorities .

Cr,M.A. called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki.Proposed accused absent though notice returned duly served. Now the petition is fixed on 31.8.2026 .Issue notice to proposed accused through DSP Ubauro with direction to produce proposed accused on date of hearing.

Cr. M.A. called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Proposed accused absent though notice issued and returned and same is extended. Put off to 31.8.2026 for hearing.

Cr. Misc. application under section 22-A(6)(i) Cr.P.C is called for hearing. The applicant along with counsel , learned DDPP for the state are present. Proposed accused are present and request for date, such is allowed.Report is received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Now the petition is fixed on 31.8.2026 for hearing.

Civil Appeal is called. The appellant, along with his learned counsel, Ch. Shahid Hussain, Advocate, is present. The respondents are called absent. Mr. Muhammad Sadiq Malik, learned counsel for the contesting respondents, is present.Today, the civil appeal is fixed for arguments on the main appeal as well as for hearing of the interrogatory application.Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted objections to the report of the Mukhtiarkar (Revenue), Ubauro, dated 19.08.2025, along with another application under Sections 75 and 151 read with Order XXVI Rule 9, C.P.C., supported by affidavits of Amanullah.Order thereon: The matter is adjourned. The appeal is now fixed for 11.09.2026 for arguments on the main appeal as well as for hearing of the interrogatory applications.

Suit called. Plaintiff is called absent. Mr. Adnan Siyal, learned counsel for the Plaintiff, is present. Defendant is called absent. Perusal of the record reveals that notice was duly issued to the Defendant through ordinary modes as well as through publication in Daily Awami Awaz dated 29.04.2026. Despite service, the Defendant has failed to appear. The suit is, therefore, fixed for appearance of the Defendant and further proceedings on 08.09.2026.

CA called. The appellant No: 1(who is attorney of rest of appellant) is present with his counsel. Respondent No: 1 present for whom Mr. Iftakhar Ahmed filed power with adjournment.Order thereon. DDA filed statement put his appearance on behalf of official respondents. Put off to 18.9.2026 for objection if any.

C.A. called. The appellant along with learned counsel is present. Notice issued to the respondents was returned from the learned Senior Civil Judge, Daharki, whereupon the bailiff reported that respondent No. 1 was served in person and also received the notices on behalf of respondents Nos. 3 and 4 Respondent No. 2 is absent. Respondent No. 1 is present and requested time to engage counsel. The learned D D A submitted a statement and entered his appearance on behalf of respondents Nos. 5 to 8.Service upon respondents Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5 to 8 is held good. The appeal is adjourned to 12.09.2026 for objections, if any, on behalf of respondents Nos. 1, 3 to 8, and for service upon respondent No. 2.Issue notice to respondent No. 2 through Court Bailiff as well as by post AD, on costs, as already ordered.

Civil appeal is called. The appellants along with counsel are present. Respondents are called absent.Mr. Danish Ali Pitafi, learned counsel for the contesting respondents present. Today the appeal is fixed for arguments. Learned counsel for the appellants filed an adjournment application for grant of time, such is allowed. Put off to 11.09.2026 for arguments.The R and Ps be called as already ordered.

CA called. Appellant is absent. Learned counsel for the appellant is present. Respondents absent. DDA absent. Partly arguments of learned counsel for the appellant is heard.Learned counsel for the appellant filed statement with case law. Put off to 7,09.,2026 for arguments of learned DDA for the state.

CA called. Appellant No: 4(a) is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is present. Respondents absent. DDA absent. Partly arguments of learned counsel for the appellant is heard.Learned counsel for the appellant filed statement with case law. Put off to 7,09.,2026 for arguments of learned DDA for the state.

CA called. Appellant is absent. Learned counsel for the appellant is present. Respondents absent. DDA absent. Partly arguments of learned counsel for the appellant is heard.Learned counsel for the appellant filed statement with case law. Put off to 7,09.,2026 for arguments of learned DDA for the state.

CA called. The appellant along with counsel are present. Respondents absent. M/S Danish Ali and Jr. of Mr. Nawab Ali Pitafi learned counsel for the contesting respondents present. Learned counsel for the appellant request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 11.09.2026 for arguments.

CA called. The appellant and counsel are called absent. Respondents absent.Learned counsel for the contesting respondents present.In the interest of justice, appeal adjourned to 11.09.2026 for hearing.

Civil appeal is called, The appellant along with counsel, respondent No: 1 and learned counsel for the respondent are present.Today the appeal is fixed for arguments, but learned counsel for the appellant submitted an adjournment, such is allowed.Put off to 11.09.2026 for arguments.

This is leading appeal is called. Appellant No: 2 present. Respondent No: 2 and counsel present.Appellant request for date,such is allowed. Put off to 3.09.2026 for arguments.

This is subsequent appeal of CA No: 138/2025 is called.The appellant and counsel present.Respondent No: 1 present. Put off to 3.09.2026