Case Called. Accused Abdul Hameed is called absent. An application seeking exemption from his personal appearance has been submitted. The application is taken up and the absence of the accused is excused. Mr. Mumtaz Ali Naich, learned counsel for the accused, is present. Learned DDPP for the State is also present, whereas learned counsel for the complainant is absent. Today, the case is fixed for recording of evidence and for hearing of the application filed by learned counsel for the complainant seeking permission to conduct the proceedings and record evidence through modern devices, including video link or other appropriate electronic means. The complainant was present on the last date of hearing; however, she is absent today. No other prosecution witness (P.W.) is present. The Presiding Judge is on C/Leave. On the last date of hearing, the complainant informed the Court that Transfer Application No. S-25 of 2026, Mst. Taj v. Abdul Hameed, is pending before the High Court of Sindh, Sukkur Bench. Accordingly, the case is adjourned to 17.10.2026 for filing and hearing of objections to the complainant's application regarding recording of evidence through modern devices, and for further proceedings in the case. Issue summons to the P.Ws. The applicant who has submitted the application for exemption from the personal appearance of the accused is directed to inform the accused to appear before the Court on the next date of hearing.

SC called. The accused is not produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki only slip received from jail No PWs present. Learned counsel for the accused is present. Summons returned un served. P.J is on C/L.Put off to 03.10 .2026.2026 for evidence. Issue SS to PWs. Next date informed to jail authority for production of UTP through video link.

SC called. The accused is not produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki only slip received from jail No PWs present. Learned counsel for the accused is present. Summons returned un served. P.J is on C/L.Put off to 03.10 .2026.2026 for evidence. Issue SS to PWs. Next date informed to jail authority for production of UTP through video link.

Case Called Accused Imran Ali, Shabeer Ahmed and Deen Muhammad have not been produced in custody from District Prison, Ghotki. Only a jail slip has been received, and the said accused have been produced by the Jail Authority through video link. Accused Riaz Ahmed, Ashique Hussain, Abdul Hameed and Fiaz Muhammad are present on bail. Proceedings against accused Shahzado have already abated due to his death. Learned counsel for the complainant and learned counsel for the legal representatives of the deceased are called absent. Learned counsel for the accused is present. The Presiding Judge is on C/Leave. Today, the case is fixed for recording of evidence; however, no P.W. is in attendance. An order dated 17.09.2026, passed in Criminal Bail Application No. S-514 of 2026 by the Honourable High Court of Sindh, Sukkur Bench, has been received, whereby the bail application of accused Deen Muhammad has been dismissed. Accordingly, the case is adjourned to 03.10.2026 for recording of evidence. Issue bailable warrants to the P.Ws., except the complainant and P.Ws. Shahmir and Soomar. In respect of the complainant Gul Sher and P.Ws. Shahmir and Soomar, a letter be issued through the Home Department, Government of Sindh, Karachi, to the Superintendent, District Jail, Rahim Yar Khan, for their production through video link. The next date of hearing is communicated to the Jail Authority, Ghotki, through the jail slip, with a direction to produce the UTPs through video link. The accused who are present on bail are directed to appear on the next date of hearing.

Case called. Accused Shabeer Ahmed alias Shaboo, Allah Bachayo Badal, and Muhammad Rafique are present on bail. Accused Kamaluddin is absent, for whom co-accused Ali Anwar has submitted an application seeking exemption from his personal appearance. The application is taken up and the absence of accused Kamaluddin is excused for today. Learned counsel for the accused is absent. Learned DDPP for the State is present. Today, the case is fixed for evidence. Processes issued against the prosecution witnesses (PWs) have been returned duly served. The complainant is present, whereas no other PWs are present. The Presiding Judge is on C/L. Accordingly, the case is adjourned to 17.10.2026 for recording of evidence. Fresh/repeated processes be issued against the PWs as per the above diary. The present accused are directed to appear on the next date of hearing. Accused Kamaluddin is also directed to appear on the next date of hearing.

S.C. Case Called Accused Manthar has not been produced in custody from District Prison, Ghotki; only a jail slip has been received. Accused Mumtaz and Zahoor are present on bail, while the remaining accused have been declared proclaimed offenders. Learned counsel for the accused is called absent. Learned counsel for the complainant and learned DDPP for the State are present. The complainant and P.W. Shoukat are present, whereas no other P.W. is in attendance. The Presiding Judge is on C/Leave. Accordingly, the case is adjourned to 10.10.2026 for recording of evidence and hearing of the bail application of accused Manthar. The accused present on bail are directed to appear on the next date of hearing. The next date of hearing is communicated to the complainant, who is directed to appear along with his witness. The next date is also communicated to the Jail Authority through the jail slip, with a direction to produce the UTP through video link.

S.C. Case Called Accused Ali Anwar and Abdul Ghaffar are present on bail, whereas co-accused Kamaluddin is called absent. An application has been submitted by co-accused Ali Anwar seeking exemption from the personal appearance of co-accused Kamaluddin. The application is taken up and the absence of accused Kamaluddin is excused. Learned counsel for the accused and learned DDPP for the State are present. Today, the case is fixed for recording of evidence. The complainant and P.Ws. are called absent. Bailable warrants issued against the P.Ws. have been returned unserved. Accordingly, the case is adjourned to 17.10.2026 for recording of evidence. Issue fresh bailable warrants against the P.Ws. The accused present on bail are directed to appear on the next date of hearing. Co-accused Ali Anwar is directed to inform accused Kamaluddin to appear before the Court on the next date of hearing.

S.C. Case Called Accused Muhammad Moosa and Sadiq are present on bail. Accused Naseer and Fareed are confined in District Prison, Ghotki, while accused Fida, Shabeer and Shahnawaz have been declared proclaimed offenders. Mr. Anwar Ali Lohar, learned counsel for accused Sadiq, is present. Mdm. Shabana, learned counsel for accused Fareed, is called absent. Learned counsel for accused Naseer is absent; however, his junior partner is present. Learned counsel for the complainant is also absent. Learned DDPP for the State is present. On 17.09.2026, an order dated 14.09.2026, passed by the Honourable High Court of Sindh, Sukkur Bench, in Criminal Bail Application No. S-693 of 2026, was received, whereby bail was granted to accused Fareed in the sum of Rs. 200,000/-, with P.R. bond in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. The said order has already been sent for verification. Today, the case is fixed for recording of evidence and for hearing of the application under Section 497, Cr.P.C. No P.W. is present. The Presiding Judge is on C/Leave. Accordingly, the main case and the bail application are adjourned to 03.10.2026 for recording of evidence and hearing of the bail application of accused Naseer. Issue summons to the P.Ws. The next date of hearing is communicated to the Jail Authority through the jail slip produced today, with a direction to produce the UTPs through video link. The accused who are on bail are directed to appear on the next date of hearing.

SC called. The accused is not produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki only slip received from jail No PWs present. Learned counsel for the accused is present. Summons returned un served. P.J is on C/L.Put off to 03.10 .2026.2026 for evidence. Issue SS to PWs. Next date informed to jail authority for production of UTP through video link.

S.C. Case Called Accused Shahbaz alias Bagoo, Riaz Ahmed, Ali Nawaz and Mohsin are present on bail. Mr. Farman Ali Shar, learned counsel for the accused, is present. Mr. Aftab Arain, learned counsel for the complainant, is called absent and has submitted an application under Section 497(5), Cr.P.C. Learned DDPP for the State is present. The Presiding Judge is on C/Leave. Today, the case is fixed for recording of evidence. Summons were issued through the SHO, Reti, who entrusted the same to HC Riaz; however, the summons have been returned unserved. The complainant is present, whereas no other P.W. is present. The application under Section 497(5), Cr.P.C. is taken up. Notice thereof is issued to the accused party. The accused are present, and a copy of the application has been supplied to them. Accordingly, the case is adjourned to 10.10.2026 for recording of evidence and for filing of objections to and hearing of the application under Section 497(5), Cr.P.C. Issue fresh summons to the remaining P.Ws., except the complainant. The accused present on bail are directed to appear on the next date of hearing. The next date is communicated to the complainant, who is directed to appear on the next date along with the private witness.

Petition under Section 22-A(6)(ii), Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the applicant and learned DDPP for the State are present. Report has been received from the DSP, Complaint Cell, Ghotki. The I.O. is absent. The Presiding Judge is on C/L. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for hearing. In the meantime, call I.O. along with the relevant police papers.

Direct complaint called. The complainant is present, whereas learned counsel for the complainant is absent. The Presiding Judge is on C.L. Put off to 03.10.2026 for hearing.

Writ Part called. R and not received from Honorable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur. Plaintiff absent. Defendant is present . P.J is on C/L. Put off to 3.10.2026. Issue court motion notice to plaintiff.

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is called. Muhammad Uzair, attorney of the appellant, is present along with Mr. Nawab Ali Pitafi, learned counsel for the present. Today, the matter is fixed for service. Advocate for contesting respondent present. Respondents absent. Respondents No: 1 to 8 and 9 to11 absent and not yet served. P.J is on C/L. The matter is adjourned to 14.10..2026 for service. Fresh notices be issued to Respondents No.1 to 8 through their attorney, Khubaib Ahmed, and to Respondents No.9 to 11 through the concerned Court Bailiff as well as through registered post A.D., at the cost of the appellant.

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. The civil appeal is called. Appellant No. 4, Muhammad Fazil, is present. Mr. Jam Jamsheed Akhtar, learned counsel for the appellants, is called absent. The respondents are also called absent. Mr. Ch. Shahid Hussain, learned counsel for contesting respondents Nos. 1 to 6, is called absent; however, his junior partner is present. Official respondents Nos. 13 to 15 are also called absent. Today, the appeal is fixed for the appearance of respondents Nos. 7 to 9, 11 and 12; however, they are called absent. The Presiding Judge is on C/L. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned to 14.10.2026 for the appearance of respondents Nos. 7 to 9, 11 and 12.

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. The civil appeal is called. Appellant No. 1, along with the junior partner of learned counsel for the appellants, is present. Respondent No. 1 is present, along with the junior partner of learned counsel for the contesting respondent. Today, the appeal is fixed for arguments on the main appeal and for objections to the application under Order XLI, Rule 5, C.P.C. However, the respondent has not filed any objections to the said application. The Presiding Judge is on C/L. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned to 10.10.2026 for arguments on the main appeal, objections to the said application, and hearing.

Summary suit called. Plaintiff and his witness are called absent. Mr. Nawab Ali Pitafi, learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. Defendant and his counsel are also present is on C/L. Put off to 10.1.2026 for P.E.

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. The civil appeal is called. The appellants are called absent, whereas learned counsel for the appellants is present. The respondents and learned counsel for the contesting respondents are called absent. Today, the appeal is fixed for arguments. The Presiding Judge is on C/Leave. Accordingly, the appeal is adjourned to 07.10.2026 for arguments.

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. The appeal is called. The attorney for the appellant is present. The junior partner of learned counsel for the appellant is also present. Respondent Muhammad Moar is present, while the remaining respondents are absent. The appeal is fixed today for arguments. However, the Presiding Judge is on C/L. Accordingly, the appeal is adjourned to 10.10.2026 for arguments.