| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1235/2026 | Nawab Ali @ Nawab Shar and others VS The State | Cr.PC-497 | 10/2026 Khenju |
Mr. Sadam Hussain advocate is appeared and submitted an statement whereby he under took that surety papers genunine one and he will bound till verification and prayed for acceptance of surety. Order on it. Habibullah is present. Further order passed on affiavit that surety is accepted. Issue release writ for accused Nawab Ali, Khaliqdino and Manzoor accordingly. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 116/2026 | Zaman Ali & ors VS The State | Nizamuddin(ADVO-534-SBC-GHT) | PPC-452 | 52/2026 Daharki |
Cr. B.A. called. The accused are present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused, learned counsel for the complainant, DDPP for the state are present.Complainant alongwith victim are present.Learned counsel for the accused filed statement whereby he submit PSC of 164 Cr.P.C of victim. Order. Heard.Order passed on separate sheet that interim bail granted to accused is confirmed. |
|
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 968/2026 | Makhno @ Qurban Shar VS The State | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 14/2017 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Pe-arrest bail of accused is called. Accused Makhno is present on interim bail and he is appeared to late. Learned counsel for the accused is absent and sent an adjournment application, such is allowed. DDPP for the state is present. Bail application adjourned to 20.6.2026 for hearing. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 139/2026 | Shoukat Ali VS The State | Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-650-SBC-GHT) | PPC-489-F | 58/2026 Daharki |
Cr. B.A. called. The applicant is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused is absent.Complainant, his counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Munshi of counsel for the accused is present and request for date as his counsel busy before Sessions Court, such is allowed. Put off to 20.6.2026 for hearing.Present accused directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | PPC 553/2024 | Muhammad Iqbal Malik VS Nazeer Ahmed Dhandho and others | Soomardass R. Parmani(ADVO-245-SBC-GHT) | Qadir Bux(ADVO-1126-SBC-GHT),Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
SC called. The all accused are present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused present.Complainant and witness along with counsel are present.By consent, the case is adjourned to 24.6.2026 for cross examination. Present accused are directed to attend. Next date informed to PWs.Issue letter to concerned SHO and Mukhtiarkar for evidence with direction to appear in person or through any authorized person . |
| 6 | PPC 669/2024 | The State VS Rahib Shar and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 33/2024 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
SC called. Accused Yaseen is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki.Accused Ahmed is present on bail. The suplimentry challan of accused Rahib, Sanaullah, Morio ,Dost Ali alias Chandi and Yaseen son of Sahibdino are received,they are confined in District Prison Ghotki. While rest of accused were declared as PO. Learned DDPP for the state is present. The case is fixed for formal state. Put off to 30.6.2026 Issue PO for the accused whom suplimentry challan is received to the Suptt:District Prison Ghotki. Produced accused incustody is remanded back to jail.Present accused on bail is directed to attend. |
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 3/2026 | The State VS Naseer Ahmed Gabol | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 44/2025 Dad Leghari |
||
| 8 | SC (Murder Trial) 10/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Moosa Gabol and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 29/2025 Dad Leghari |
.SC called. Accused Mohammad Moosa, Naseer, Fareed and Saddique are produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki, rest of accused declared as PO.Learned counsel for the accused Naseer and Fareed is present.Learned counsel for the papur accused Moosa is present while learned counsel for the accused Sadiq is absent. .Learned counsel for the complainant is also absent.Complainant and witness Ali Nawaz are present.. No other PWs present. Witenss Ali nawaz submitted an adjournment,such is allowed.Put off to 30.6.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to R/PWs. Produced accused are remanded back to jail. |
|
| 9 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 14/2026 | The State VS Farooque Ahmed Laghari | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 173/2025 Daharki |
SC called. The accused is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. Learned counsel for the accused is absent. Learned DDPP for the state is present. Summons against PWs issued and returned un-served .Case adjourned to 30.6.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Produced accused is remanded back to jail. |
|
| 10 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 13/2026 | The State VS Ghulam Nabi Laghari | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 174/2025 Daharki |
SC called. The accused is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. Learned counsel for the accused is absent. Learned DDPP for the state is present. Summons against PWs issued and returned un-served .Case adjourned to 30.6.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Produced accused is remanded back to jail. |
|
| 11 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 10/2026 | The state VS Ghulam Rasool Shaikh | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 152/2025 Daharki |
Already fixed on 23.6.2026 |
|
| 12 | SC (Murder Trial) 31/2026 | The State VS Farooque Laghari & others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 159/2025 Daharki |
Case called. Accused Farooque and G.Nabi are produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. The accused Shahnawaz and Ali Gul were declared as proclaimed Offender. Today the case is fixed for evidence and hearing of bail application under section 497 Cr.P.C of above both accused. Mr. Qadir Bux Bhatti, learned counsel for the accused , learned DDPP for the state, learned counsel for the complainant are present. Summons issued and returned. Complainant and witness Saeed Ahmed are present. No other PWs present. Learned counsel for the complainant filed an adjournment for date in trial, such is allowed.However matter concerned with bail application. The partly arguments of learned counsel for the accused, learned counsel for the complainant and DDPP for the state are heard. Learned counsel for the accused submitted an statement whereby he submit photo copy of bail order FIR, MLC of crime No: 1/2025 of PS Khenju, learned counsel for the accused submitted an other un-reported case law . The case is adjourned to 30.6.2026 for evidence. Issue fresh summons to R/PWs. Produced accused are remanded back to trial court. The bail application is adjourned to 20.6.2026 for further hearing/Order. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 13 | Cr.P.C. 199/2026 | Mst Naseema VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6-II) | / |
The petition was already disposed of. Misc. application is called for non compliance of order, filed by the applicant. The applicant absent, her counsel present and not press misc. application . Order passed on it . In view of order, instant pending application disposed of. |
||
| 14 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 314/2026 | Ramzan Khan VS SHO P.S Daharki | M. Jawed Arain(ADVO-933-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. Misc. application called. The applicant with counsel and proposed accused with counsel and DDPP for the state are present.Partly arguments heard. Put off to 20.6.2026 for further hearing/Order. |
|
| 15 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 332/2026 | Zahoor Ahmed VS SHO P.S Daharki | Taibah Roohi(ADVO-879-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant with counsel, DDPP for the state, proposed accused No: 2 and counsel for the proposed accused are present. Arguments heard. Put off to 20.6.2026 for order. |
|
| 16 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 353/2026 | Manzoor Ahmed VS SHO P.S Daharki | Taibah Roohi(ADVO-879-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. Learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the proposed accused and DDPP for the state are present. Partly heard. Put off to 19.6.2026 for further hearing/Order. |
|
| 17 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 371/2026 | Mst. Shahzadi VS SHO P.S Khenju | Ramesh Kumar B- Toga (ADVO-599-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
||
| 18 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 341/2026 | M.Saddique VS SHO P.S Daharki | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The learned counsel for the applicant present and submitted statement whereby he withdraw the petition. Learned counsel for the proposed accused sent statement whereby he withdraw power of proposed accused. DDPP present. Heard. Order passed on statement filed by learned counsel for the applicant for withdrawal of petition that in view of order, instant petition stands disposed of. |
||
| 19 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 330/2026 | Adit Hussain VS SHO P.S Daharki | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. Learned counsel for the applicant is present and withdraw the petition as endrosed on memo. DDPP for the state is present.Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposedof. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 20 | PPC 131/2026 | Jam Naveed Ahmed Dahar VS Muneer Ahmed Supio & others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | / |
|||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 21 | PPC 130/2026 | Ameer Hamza Dahar VS Muneer Ahmed Supio and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | / |
|||
| 22 | SC (Murder Trial) 147/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Jameel Bughio and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 151/2025 Daharki |
S.C. called. Accused Mohammad Jameel and Akhtar are produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. Accused Mst. Parveen, confined in District Women Jail, Sukkur, was produced through video link/WhatsApp. Accused Altaf Ahmed is shown in Column No. 2.Learned DDPP for the State is present. Mr. Saeed Ahmed Chachar, learned counsel for the above-named male accused, is also present.Accused Mst. Parveen requested time to engage counsel; her request is allowed. The matter is adjourned to 29.06.2026 for formal proceedings. Accused Mst. Parveen is directed to engage her counsel & bringh on the next date of hearing. The jail authorities are also directed to produce her before this Court on the next date of hearing.Accused Mohammad Jameel and Akhtar, having been produced before the Court, are remanded back to District Prison Ghotki. |
|
| 23 | SC (Murder Trial) 221/2026 | The State VS Hashim Shar and others | PPC-302 | 24/2025 Khenju |
Record and proceedings have been received from the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, Ghotki vide Letter No. 4889 of 2026 dated 11.06.2026 for disposal in accordance with law, and the case is fixed today.Accused Hashim Shar is confined in District Prison, Ghotki. The remaining accused, namely Ghulam Qadir, Haqnawaz, and Sarfraz, have already been declared proclaimed offenders. Learned Deputy Prosecutor is also present. The case is adjourned to 29.06.2026 for the formal stage. Let a Production Order be issued to the Superintendent, District Prison, Ghotki for production of under-trial prisoner Hashim Shar on the next date of hearing. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 24 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 16/2026 | Shafi Muhammad Samejo VS Ghulam Hussain Rahar and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
DC called. The complainant and counsel are present. Proposed accused are also present.Learned counsel for the proposed accused absent and sent an adjournment,such is allowed. The partly arguments of learned counsel for the complainant heard. Put off to 29.6.2026 for further arguments of learned counsel for the complainant and proposed accused. |
|
| 25 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 26/2026 | Khan Muhammad Laghari and others VS SHO PS Dad Laghari and other s | Aftab Hussain(ADVO-324-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Direct complaint is called. The complainant and his counsel are present. Proposed accused No: 4 & 8 present. The partly arguments of learned counsel for the complainant heard, while proposed accused Abdul Majeed submit an adjournment, such is allowed. Put off to 27.6.2026 for further hearing. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 31/2025 |
Basheer Ahmed Mahar VS Rao Muhammad Hussain Rajput | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff absent. Learned counsel for the Plaintiff is present. Defendant absent and not yet served. Put off to 05.8.2026 for service. Issue notice to defendant through all modes of service on costs. |
||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 22/2026 |
Muhammad Hashim Bhutto and other s VS Abdul Hakeem and others | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The Appellant No: 2(b) is present who is attorney of rest of appellant. Learned counsel for the appellant is also present. Learned counsel for the respondent No: 22 is present. Respondents No: 27 to 31 absent. Remaining respondents absent and not served. Put off to 6.8.2026 for service. Issue notice to respondents No: 1 to 21`,23 to 26 on costs as well as issue fresh notices through court bailiff on costs. |
|||
| 3 | C.M.A. (Civil Misc. Appeals) 5/2026 |
Abdul Raheem Arain VS Abdul Kareem and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is called. Muhammad Uzair, attorney of the appellant, is present along with Mr. Nawab Ali Pitafi, learned counsel for the appellant. Today, the matter is fixed for service. Abdul Fatah (Respondent No.13), who is the attorney of Respondents No.4, 15 and 16, is present. Mr. Sajid Hussain Arain, Advocate, has filed his power on behalf of the said respondents and has also submitted the photocopy of the Special Power of Attorney. Order on power. File. Mr. Abdul Manan Kobhar, Advocate, has appeared and filed his power on behalf of Mian Muhammad Ahmed Raza through his attorney Abdullah. A photocopy of the Special Power of Attorney is attached with the power. Order on power. Filed. The remaining respondents are absent and not served. The matter is adjourned to 29.06.2026 for service. Fresh notices be issued to Respondents No.1 to 8 through their attorney, Khubaib Ahmed, and to Respondents No.9 to 11 through the concerned Court Bailiff as well as through registered post A.D., at the cost of the appellant. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 4 | Summary Suits 23/2026 |
Muhammad Khan Bugti VS Shahbaz Lal | M. Jawed Arain(ADVO-933-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff is present. Defenant and counsel are present. Today matter is fixed for objection on application leave to defend. Learned counsel for the Plaintiff absent, Plaintiff request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 5.8.2026 for objection on leave to defend. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 5 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 12/2026 |
Imdad Ali Gurgaij VS Khuda Bux Kosh | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | C.R called. The learned counsel for the applicant is present. Respondent absent. Issue notice to respondent through court bailiff and post AD on costs. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 6 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 41/2026 |
Qurban Ali Bhutto VS Muhammad More Bhutto | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | CA called.Attorney of appellant is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is present. Respondent No: 1 and counsel are called absent. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent sent an adjournment, such is allowed with last and final chance. R and Ps not received from trial court. Call R and Ps as already ordered.Put off to 5.8.2026 for objection/arguments on appeal. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 7 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 84/2025 |
Mst. Bakhtawar Soomro VS Abdul Ghaffar Soomro and others | Abdul Salam Arain(ADVO-429-SBC-GHT) | Civil appeal is called. The attorney of appellant along with his counsel Mr. Mian Abdul Salam is present and has not press application under section 89-A read w/section X rule 1-A CPC. Order on it.Disposedof. Respondent Abdul Waheed is present and submitted an adjournment application as his counsel busy before Honorable High Court, such is allowed. Put off to 5.8.2026 for arguments on main appeal. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 8 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 128/2024 |
Akbar Khan Mirani through his attorney Saifullah Jatt VS Mst Khawar Kifayat and others | Rashid Ali(ADVO-208-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Umar (ADVO-892-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The attorney of appellant and counsel are called absent. The attorney of respondent No: 1 and counsel are present. The appeal adjourned to 5.8.2026 for arguments. Late diary The attorney of appellant is present. The civil appeal is already adjourned to 5.8.2026 for argumetns. |
||
| 9 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 118/2025 |
Abdul Sattar Chandio and others VS Divisional Superintendent (Pak Railway) and others | Nawab Ali(ADVO-1073-SBC-SUK) | Muhammad Umar (ADVO-892-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The appellant is absent. Learned counsel for the appellant is present. Respondent No: 4 called absent. learned counsel for the respondent No: 4 is present.Rest of respondents absent. matter is fixed for objection /arguments.but both learned counsel for the parties request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 5.8.2026 for arguments.Call R and Ps from trial court as already ordered. |
||
| 10 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 131/2025 |
Mai Haneef Laghari VS Ashawani Kumar and others | Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-59-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The appellant and her counsel are present. Respondents and counsel are called absent. On 13.5.2026 application under section 8 of oaths Act 1873 with supporting affidavit of appellant was filed and same put up today. Order on it. Notice to other side. The appeal is adjourned to 5.8.2026 for service of instant application & objection. |
|||
| 11 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 134/2025 |
Amanullah Gopang and others VS Nek Muhammad Shaikh and others | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The appellant No: 1 and counsel are present. Respondents absent. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent is present. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted an application u/s 151 CPC for extension of status quo. Order on it. Extended till next date.Letter received from Mukhtiarkar Revenue Ubauro he reported that village staff concerned as per direction visited the site for demarcation/mearsurement of suit land but at site the applicant alongwith his family members created hindrances and further he not submit clear compliance report.Order on it. Report is not satisfactory he to comply court direction as already given. Put off to 30.6.2026 for report about demarcation/arguments. |
|||
| 12 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 3/2026 |
Abdul Majeed Kosh VS Allah Wadhayo Kosh and ors | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The appellant and counsel are present. Respondents absent. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent sent an adjournment, such is allowed. Put off to 5.8.2026 for arguments. |
|||
| 13 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 2/2026 |
Muhammad Qasim Malik through attorney Ashique Hussain VS Allah Bachayo Memon and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The attorney of appellant is present .Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. Respondents absent. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent present. Appellant filed an adjournment, such is allowed. Put off to 6.8.2026 for arguments. |
|||
| 14 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 9/2026 |
Akbar Ali Chachar VS Nabi Bux Rind and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | ||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 13/2026 | Firdus Anilla Buriro VS Incharge Succession certificatew and others | Javed Hussain(ADVO-450-SBC-GHT) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | SA called. The applicant with counsel are present. Heard on application 1 rule 10 CPC. Order passed on it. Allowed. Put off to 20.6.2026 for amended title page. |
||