| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 316/2026 | Jumo @ Jamal Din & ors VS The State | Abdul Manan(ADVO-757-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-Fv | 219/2026 Daharki |
Bail application under Section 498 Cr.P.C. is taken up. The applicants/accused are present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused/applicants and learned DDPP for the State are present. The complainant is also present,. Madam Taibah Rohi ,learned counsel for the complainant is present. Heard arguments. A separate order passed and announced in open court that interim bail granted to accused is hereby confirmed. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 29/2025 | Muhammad Anwar Machhi VS Rano and others | Rashid Ali(ADVO-208-SBC-GHT) | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
SC called. Accused Rano has expired, and proceedings against him have already abated. The remaining accused are present on bail. The complainant is present, whereas learned counsel for the complainant is absent. Learned counsel for the accused persons is present. SIP Hazar Khan is present, and his deposition has been recorded at Exh. 6. He has produced the documents referred to in his deposition, which have been marked as Exh. 6-A to 6-C. The matter is put off to 21.10.2026 for recording the evidence of the Mukhtiarkar. Despite repeated issuance of letters, the Mukhtiarkar has failed to appear .Issue a show-cause notice to the Mukhtiarkar, directing him to appear before the Court in person on the next date of hearing, along with a written reply to the show-cause notice, and to have his evidence recorded. The present accused are directed to attend the proceedings on the next date. The complainant is present and has been informed of the next date of hearing and directed to attend accordingly. Put off to 21.10.2026 for evidence of the Mukhtiarkar. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 3 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 728/2026 | Mst. Rani VS SHO P.S Daharki | Abdul Manan(ADVO-757-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Petition under section 22-A(6)(i) Cr.P.C is called.The applicant along wtih counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Some proposed accused present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. In light of report of DSP complaint cell, Ghotki, the learned counsel for the applicant withdraw the petition. A separate order passed that in view of order, petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. |
| 4 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 732/2026 | Mst. Mumtaz Bibi VS SHO P.S Daharki | Avinash (ADVO-722-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant absent. Learned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for the state is present. Proposed accused present for whom Mr.Abdul Manan advocate filed power. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that petition is allowed. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Advocate to be Heard | |||||||
| 5 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 33/2026 | Zameer Ahmed Chandio VS Muneer Ahmed Chandio and others | Aftab Ahmed(ADVO-40-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-326-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Direct complaint called. Advocate for complainant Complainant is present and request for date, such is allowed. Proposed accused 1-2 and counsel present. Put off to 21.10.2026 for advocate to be heard on maintainablity. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 553/2024 | Muhammad Iqbal Malik VS Nazeer Ahmed Dhandho and others | Soomardass R. Parmani(ADVO-245-SBC-GHT) | Qadir Bux(ADVO-1126-SBC-GHT),Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
SC called. All accused are present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused, learned counsel for the complainant, complainant are present. Today the case is fixed for recording of statement of accused. The statement of accused recorded wherein accused submitted documents which are exhibited with their statement respectively. Put off to 14.10.2026 for final arguments. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 9/2026 |
Akbar Ali Chachar VS Nabi Bux Rind and others | Muhammad Jamshed Akhtar(ADVO-681-SBC-GHT) | Soomardass R. Parmani(ADVO-245-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal under Section 96 CPC is called. The Appellant is present along with learned counsel. Respondent No. 1 has expired, whereas Respondent No. 4, namely Hazoor Bux, along with his learned counsel, is present. The remaining respondents are called absent. Today, the appeal is fixed for filing of the amended title page by bringing the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No. 1 on record. The amended title page has been submitted by learned counsel for the Appellant. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the respondents and to Respondent No. 4, Hazoor Bux.Put off to 21.10.2026 for appearance of the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No. 1. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 6/2026 |
Jam Sher Khan Samejo VS Sher Muhammad Hingorjo | Saleem Akhtar Malik(ADVO-127-SBC-GHT) | Ex. application called. The DH is absent. Learned counsel for the D.H present. JD absent and not yet served though notices issued through court. Issue fresh notice to JD through court bailiff concerned court through Honorable District Judge Sanghar. and post AD/TCS on costs. .Hearing 21.10.2026 for service. |
|||
| 3 | Summary Suits 28/2026 |
Suresh VS Muhammad Habib Pathan | Ghulam Abbas Alias Javed Akhtar(ADVO-642-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Summary Suit called. Plaintiff along with learned counsel is present, whereas the Defendant is called absent. Notice was issued to the Defendant through publication in daily Nawa-e-Waqat. The said notice has been duly published, and the newspaper containing the publication has been produced and submitted by learned counsel for the Plaintiff. Despite due publication of the notice, the Defendant has failed to appear before the Court. In the circumstances, the case is adjourned and fixed for 12.11.2026 for appearance of the Defendant. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 11/2026 |
Ghulam Mustafa Chachar VS Mst. Gulbaharan Chachar and others | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal under Section 96 CPC is called. Appellant No. 1(h), namely Arab, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Ch. Shahid Hussain, is present. Abdul Majeed, attorney of Respondents No. 1(a) to 1(f), along with learned counsel, Mr. Abdul Fatah Samo, is also present. Respondent No. 2, namely Shahzado, along with the Junior Partner of Mr. Muhammad Tarique, learned counsel for Respondent No. 2, is present. The official respondents are absent; however, DDA for the official respondents is present. Today, the matter is fixed for objections and hearing of the application under Section 151 CPC seeking amalgamation of the instant Civil Appeal with Civil Appeal No. 10 of 2026, Ghulam Mustafa vs. Public at Large, which is also fixed for today. Heard. Order passed on the instant application, the same has been allowed. Accordingly, Civil Appeal No. 10 of 2026, Ghulam Mustafa vs. Public at Large, is treated as the leading appeal, whereas the instant Civil Appeal No. 11 of 2026, Ghulam Mustafa vs. Gul Baharan, shall be treated as the subsequent appeal. The office is directed to keep a photocopy of the application & order passed on the application under Section 151 CPC and place the same on the file of the leading appeal. Now, the appeals are fixed for 21.10.2026 for arguments. In the meantime, the office is directed to call for the Record and Proceedings (R&Ps) from the learned Trial Court. |
||
| 5 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 10/2026 |
Ghulam Mustafa Chachar VS Public at Large and others | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | Farman Ali (ADVO-533-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal under Section 96 CPC is called. Appellant No. 1(h), namely Arab, is present. Appellant Mst. Bakhtawar, who is the next friend of Appellants No. 1(p) and 1(q), is called absent. Mr. Shahid Hussain, learned counsel for the appellants, is present. Respondents No. 1 to 7 are absent. Learned DDA for the official respondents is present. Abdul Majeed, attorney of Respondents No. 8(a) to 8(f), along with Mr. Abdul Fatah Samo, Advocate, is present. Respondent No. 9, who is the attorney of Respondents No. 10 to 15, along with the Junior Partner of Mr. Muhammad Tarique, Advocate, is also present. An order passed on the application under Section 151 CPC is placed on the file of Civil Appeal No. 11 of 2026, Ghulam Mustafa vs. Gul Baharan, whereby it has been ordered that the instant appeal shall be treated as the leading appeal, whereas Civil Appeal No. 11 of 2026 shall be treated as the subsequent appeal. Now, the appeal is fixed for 21.10.2026 for arguments. In the meantime, the office is directed to call for the Record and Proceedings (R&Ps) from the learned Trial Court. |
||
| 6 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 94/2026 |
Sagheer Ahmed Chandio VS Zameer Ahmed Chandio and others | Aftab Ahmed(ADVO-40-SBC-GHT) | Meharban Ali (ADVO-3015-SBC-SUK) | CA called. The appellant along with counsel are present. Respondent No: 1 filed objection in shape of counter affidavit on main appeal. Copy to other side. Put off to 21.10.2026 for arguments. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 7 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 82/2025 |
Taj Muhammad Chachar and others VS Illimuddin Mazari and others | Allah Dino(ADVO-1151-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal under Section 96 CPC is called. Appellant No. 12, Abdul Razzaque, who is the attorney of the co-appellants, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Jam Jamsheed Akhtar, is present. Respondent No. 1, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Muhammad Tarique, Advocate, is also present. Respondent No. 11, Makhno, has expired. Respondent Illimdin has submitted an application wherein the names of the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No. 11, Makhno, have been mentioned. Order thereon: Copy of the application be supplied to the other side. Learned counsel for the appellant has received the P.S.C. of the said application. Put off to 21.10.2026 for filing of a proper application for bringing the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No. 11, Makhno, on record. |
||
| 8 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 90/2025 |
Ameer Khan Chachar and others VS Shabeer Ahmed Rajput and ors | Abdul Hameed(ADVO-1050-SBC-GHT) | Rashid Ali(ADVO-208-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. The civil appeal is called. The appellants are called absent, whereas learned counsel for the appellants is also absent and sent an adjournment application on personal ground as his close relative has been expired, such is allowed. The respondent No:5 present, while learned counsel for the contesting respondents called absent. Put off to 15.10.2026 for arguments. |
||
| 9 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 3/2026 |
Abdul Majeed Kosh VS Allah Wadhayo Kosh and ors | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | CA called.The appellant along with counsel present . Respondent No: 4 and counsel for the contesting respondents are present. Today appeal is fixed for arguments. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted an application u/s75 & 151 R/W-S 26 rule 9 CPC with affidavit of appellant. Order on it. Advocate to be heard at the time of final arguments. Put off to 21.10.2026 for arguments and advocate to be heard on instant application. |
|||
| 10 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 6/2026 |
Mumtaz Khatoon Soomro VS Manzoor Ahmed Soomro and others | Sadaqat Ali (ADVO-25178-SBC-KHS) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Civil Revision under Section 115 CPC is called. The Applicant is called absent, whereas learned counsel for the Applicant is present. Respondent No. 1, who is the attorney of Respondents No. 2 to 5, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Ch. Shahid Hussain, is present. Respondents No. 2 to 9 are called absent. Mr. Ramesh Kumar, learned counsel for Respondents No. 2 to 5, is present. Respondent No. 6, namely Mst. Husna, has remained absent. The record reflects that notices have repeatedly been issued to her. The notice dated 04.03.2026 reveals that one Mushtaque, son of the Respondent No:1, received the notices on behalf of Respondents No. 1 to 6. Again, vide notice dated 17.03.2026, Respondent No. 1 received the notices on behalf of Respondents No. 2 to 6. Despite the same, Respondent No. 6 remains absent. Today, the matter is fixed for arguments. Part arguments of learned counsel for the Applicant, Mr. Ch. Shahid Hussain and Mr. Ramesh Kumar, learned counsel for the contesting respondents, have been heard. Learned counsel for the Applicant has also submitted a statement along with case law. Put off to 19.10.2026 for further arguments and/or judgment. |
||
| 11 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 58/2026 |
Raban Bheel and others VS Raja Bheel | Munir Ahmed Channa(ADVO-748-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Abbas Alias Javed Akhtar(ADVO-642-SBC-GHT) | CA called.The appellant is present and filed an adjournment, such is allowed. Respondent and counsel present. Put off to 16.10.2026 for arguments. |
||
| 12 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 99/2026 |
Muneer Ahmed and another VS Maqbool Ahmed Kori and others | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. The civil appeal is called. Appellant No. 1, along with the junior partner of learned counsel for the appellants, is present. Jr.Patner of learned counsel for the appellant request for date, such is allowed. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned to 10.10.2026 for arguments on the main appeal, & hearing application 41 rule 5 CPC. |
||