Bail application u/s 497 Cr.P.C is called. The learned counsel for the applicants/accused and DDPP for the state are present.On notice, complainant is appeared for whom Mr. Mohammad Tarique advocate sent power with adjournment application.Order thereon.Power file and adjournment allowed. Put off to 24.4.2026 for hearing.

Cr. B.A. called. The applicants/accused are present on interim prearrest bail. Learned counsel for the accused , DDPP for the state are present.Complainant and counsel are present. Partly arguments heard.Put off to 24.4.2026 for further hearing/Order. Present accused directed to attend.

Cr. B.A. called. The applicants/accused are present on interim pre-arrest bail.Learned counsel for accused present and submitted statement whereby submit CTC of FIR and letter for joining of investigation.File.Complainant present for whom Mr. Saleem Akhtar advocate filed power and request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 24.4.2026 for hearing. Present accused directed to attend.

SC called. Accused Shamshad Bibi alias Shazia is present on bail. While accused Raees Asif and Nazeer alias Riaz are confined at District Prison Rahimyar Khan .Accused Zain @ Kaka is absconder and declared as PO. learned counsel for the accused, learned counsel for the complainant and DDPP for the state are present..No PWs present.Process issued and returned un-served . Now case is adjourned for evidence..Put off to 13.5.2026 .Issue fresh summons to PWs. Present accused on bail is directed to attend .Issue letter to Home Department of Sindh Karachi, for production of UTP Raees Asif and Nazeer alias Riaz. As far the bail application of accused Raees Asif and Nazeer alias Riaz. Learned counsel for the accused, learned counsel for the complainant and DDPP for the state are present.Partly arguments heard. The bail application is fixed on 27.4.2026.Learned counsel for the accused filed two statement whereby he submit PSC of case law and an other he submit PSC of bail order of accused Shamshad Bibi.

SC called. The complainant is present. Learned counsel for the complainant absent and sent an application under section 540 Cr.P.C praying therein for summons the Mukhtiarkar and SHO concerned for recording evidence in respect of enquiries/reports submitted by them. Order on it. Notice to other side. The accused Rano expired,proceedings against him already abated, while rest ofaccused are present on bail except accused Mohammad Nawaz and Khalid, for whom separate applications received for excusing of absence, such are excused.Learned counsel for the accused present and raised no objection on application 540 Cr.P.C.Order on it. Allowed. Put off to 6.5.2026 for evidence of SHO and Mukhtiarkar. Issue summons to Mukhtiarkar Ubauro and SHO Ubauro with direction to appear in person or through reauthorized person for recording evidence to the extent of their reports. Present accused are directed to attend.

Case called. Accused Mohammad Mooosa and Shahzado are present on bail. Accused Misri is declared as proclaimed Offender.Learned counsel for the accused is called absent. BWs against PWs issued and returned un-served. No PWs present. The learned counsel for the complainant is present. Put off to 6.5.2026 for evidence/hearing of application 265-K Cr.P.C. Issue fresh BWs against PWs. Present both accused are directed to attend.

SC called. The accused is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Summons issued and returned un-served. No PWs present. Case adjourned to 6.5.2026 for evidence. Summons against PWs extended. Produced accused is remanded back to jail.

Case and bail application under section 497 Cr.P.C are called. The accused Farooque and Ghulam Nabi are produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. Accused Shahnawaz and Ali Gul were declared as proclaimed Offenders. Learned counsel for the accused who are in custody and learned DDPP for the state are present. The process against PWs issued and returned. Complainant and one witness Saeed Ahmed are present. No other PWs present. Mr. Mustaque Ahmed Kolachi,appeared and filed power on behalf of the complainant and also submitted an adjournment application. Power file and adjournment allowed. The case and bail application of above both accused fixed on 6.5.2026 for evidence /hearing of instant bail application. Process against R/PWs extended . Produced both accused are directed to attend. Present PWs informed next date to proceed the case.

SC called. The accused is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Summons issued and returned un-served. No PWs present. Case adjourned to 6.5.2026 for evidence. Summons against PWs extended. Produced accused is remanded back to jail.

Accused Nazar Mohammad appeared and submitted an application for joining of trial and also submitted PSC of interim bail letter granted by this court vide BA No: 103/2026.Order. Let suplimentry of accused be called from concerned SHO.The case already fixed on 23.4.2026 for formal. Present accused directed to attend.

Cr. M.A. called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Proposed accused No: 1 & 2 present for whom Mr. Farman Ali advocate filed power and adjournment application. Order thereon. Power file and adjournment allowed. Report also received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. In meanwhile learned counsel for the applicant partly argued and matter adjourned to 23.4.2026 for argument of learned counsel for the proposed accused.

Petition under section 22-A(6)(i) Cr.P.C is called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present.Report called from DSP complaint cell Ghotki, who submitted a letter through ASI Muhammad Ayoub for time to submit report, such is allowed and time granted. Notice for propped accused is extended. Put off to 24.4.2026 for report/hearing.

Case called. The accused Abid is produced in custody from District Jail, Ghotki and submitted an application for providing a counsel on state expenses.Order on it. Notice to DDPP for the state. DDPP is present. Put off to 5.5.2026 for hearing of misc. application. Produced accused is remanded back to jail.

The case is fixed for framing of charge and is called today.The accused Abdul Malik is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki, while the accused Atta Hussain and Shafi Mohammad are present on bail. Mr. Mohammad Tarique, learned counsel for the accused on bail, is present. Learned DDPP for the State is also present. Today, the case was fixed for framing of charge; however, the same could not be framed as one of the accused, namely Abid has not engaged counsel and already submitted an application for providing of counsel at State expense which is fixed for hearing, but at the request of accused Abid, the case is adjourned to 5.5.2026 for hearing of application of accused Abid.The produced accused is remanded back to District Prison Ghotki. The accused on bail are directed to attend on the next date of hearing.

Accused Nazar Mohammad appeared and submitted an application for joining of trial and also submitted PSC of interim bail letter granted by this court vide BA No: 102/2026.Order. Let suplimentry of accused be called from concerned SHO.The case already fixed on 23.4.2026 for formal. Present accused directed to attend.

Appeal called. The appellant is expired. Learned counsel for the appellant is present and request for date to file amended title page, request allowed. Respondent No: 9 and counsel present. Rest of respondent absent. Put off to 6.5.2026 for filing of amended title page for joining of LRs of appellant.

CA called. The appellant is expired. Learned counsel for the appellant is present and request for time to file amended title page of joining of LRs of appellant, such is allowed. Respondent No: 2 present. Put off to 6.5.2026 for amended title page.

CA called. Mohammad Ashraf attorney of appellant along with counsel are present. Respondent No: 1(3a)namely Shahnawaz(same persons shown in title sheet) expired as reported by learned counsel for the appellant. Respondent No: 4,7 and 15 are present. Rest of respondents absent. Respondents No: 2(a) (c) to h5(a) to f and 16 not yet served. Mr. Jam Jamsheed Akhtar advocate for respondents No: 3(c) to g,4 and 6 as well as learned counsel for the respondent No: 15 are present. Learned counsel for the appellant filed an application u/o 22 rule 4 CPC along with supporting affidavit of Mohammad Ashraf attorney of appellant praying for joining L.Rs of respondent Shahnawaz. Order on it. Copy to other side. The appeal is adjourned to 13.5.2026 for service/Objection on instant application.. Issue notice to respondents No: 2(a), c to h5(a) to f and 16 through court bailiff and post AD on costs.

Civil appeal is called. Muhammad Ashraf attorney of appellant along with counsel are present. Mr. Jam Jamsheed Akhtar, learned counsel for the contesting respondent No4(d) to g and 5 are present. Respondents No: 2 /4(a)namely Shahnawaz(Same person shown in title,7(4b) & 6 namely Ali Gohar(same persons shown in title) have expired as reported by learned counsel for the appellant. Respondent No: 5, 8, 9 and 10 are present. The respondents No: 4(c) who is same person as shown at Sr. No: 7, and 11 are absent.Learned counsel for the appellant filed an application u/s 22- rule 4 CPC with affidavit of attorney of appellant Mohammad Hashim for joining l.rs of espondents Shahnawaz(shown as respondent No: 2 and 4(a).Order on it. Notice to other side.The appeal is adjourned to 13.5.2026 for objection on application 22 rule 4 CPC for joining L.Rs of respondents No: 2(4 a)(4-B) and 6.and for service of respondents No: 7 and 11. Issue notice to respondents No: 7 and 11 through court bailiff as well as post AD on costs.

Civil misc. appeal is called. The learned counsel for the appellant is present. Respondents absent. Process issued upon respondents repeatedly but not yet served .Issue fresh notice upon the respondents through court bailiff, as well as post AD on costs. Hearing. 13.5.2026 for service.

Misc. application u/o 41 rule 19 CPC for restoration of appeal is called. The appellant and his counsel are called absent.Jr.partner of learned counsel for the appellant is present. Counsel for the contesting respondent present and request for supply of copy of instant application and same is supplied to him. Put off to 8.5.2026 for objection on instant application.

CA called. The appellant and counsel are called absent. The respondent No: 1 and learned counsel for the contesting respondents present. Learned counsel for the contesting respondents submitted two in one statement learned counsel submitted PSC of altoment order and an other statement learned counsel for the appellant submitted PSC of documents.Order file. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted application u/s 151 CPC for extension of status quo.Order on it. Extended till next date of hearing. Put off to 6.5.2026 for further arguments/hearing.

CA called. The appellant along with counsel, respondent No:5 are present. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent present.Learned counsel for the the both parties request for date, such is allowed.Put off to 13.5.2026 for hearing.

CA called. The appellant No: 12 Abdul Razaque and counsel are present. Respondent No: 1 and counsel present and submitted objection on application 6 rule 17 CPC, copy of it supplied to learned counsel for the appellant. Put off to 13.5.2026 for hearing of instant application as well as on main appeal.

CA called. One Mohammad Ashraf attorney of appellant No: 1(A) along with counsel are present. Respondent No: 1 & 2 and counsel present. Respondent No: 10 absent .The appeal adjourned to 13.5.2026 for service. Repeat notice to respondent No: 10 through court bailiff and post AD on costs.

CA called. The appellant No: 3(who is attorney of rest of appellants) along with counsel Mr. Mohammad Tarique are present. Respondent No: 1 along with counsel are present. Partly arguments of learned counsel for the appellant is heard. Put off to 5,5.2026 for further arguments.

CA called. The appellant along with counsel are present. Respondent absent. Mr. Saleem Akhtar, learned counsel for the contesting respondent present. Partly arguments heard. Put off to 07 .5.2026 for further arguments.Learned counsel for the appellant filed statement whereby he submit PSC of case laws.