| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 268/2026 | Mohammad Hassan @ Shahban @ Shahid VS The State | Ghulam Yaseen Kobhar(ADVO-951-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 126/2025 Daharki |
Cr. B.A. called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that interim order granted to accused is confirmed. |
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 269/2026 | Ghulam Murtaza VS The State | Iftikhar Ahmed (ADVO-3122-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-354 | 185/2026 Daharki |
Bail application under section 498 Cr.P.C is called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Complainant present for whom Mr. Nawab Ali advocate filed power. Partly arguments heard. Learned counsel for the accused submitted whereby he submit PSC of CTC of FIR and 164 Cr.P.C statement of victim. Put off to 10.09.2026 for further hearing/Order. Present accused directed to attend. |
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 264/2026 | Abdul Majeed VS The State | Ghulam Yaseen Kobhar(ADVO-951-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(ii) | 121/2026 Daharki |
Cr. B.A. called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state present. Learned counsel for the accused filed statement whereby submit CTC of FIR.Put off to 10.09.2026 for confirmation or otherwise. Issue notice to complainant.Present accused directed to attend. |
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 263/2026 | Israr Ahmed VS The State | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-322 | 64/2026 Dad Leghari |
Cr. B.A. called. The applicants/accused are present on interim bail.Learned counsel for the accused present. DDPP for the state is present. Complainant is present and filed an adjournment, such is allowed. Put off to 10.09.2026 for hearing. Present accused directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | PPC 90/2026 | Indar Lal VS Basheer Ahmed Bughio and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3/4 illegal Dispossession Act | / |
SC called. The accused Javeed declared as proclaimed Offender. Rest of accused are present on bail. The complainant, learned counsel for the complainant are present. No P.Ws present.Learned counsel for the accused sent an adjournment for date, such is allowed. Put off to 16.09.2026 for evidence. Present accused directed to attend. |
|
| 6 | SC (Murder Trial) 147/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Jameel Bughio and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 151/2025 Daharki |
S.C. called. Accused Mohammad Jameel and Akhtar are not produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki and produced them by jail authority through whats-app/video link. . Accused Mst. Parveen, not produced in custody from District Women Jail, Sukkur. Learned counsel for the accused Akhtar and Jameel present while Mr. Mohammad Javeed Arain, learned counsel for the pauper accused Mst.Parveen is also present. DDPP for the state is present. No PWs present. Put off to 16.09.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Issue PO for the accused Mai Parveen to Suptt: District Women Jail Sukkur with direction to produce through video link. Next date informed to jail authority Ghotki for production of male UTPs through video link. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 599/2026 | Muhammad Malhar VS SHO P.S Daharki | Farman Ali (ADVO-533-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant and DDPP for the state are present. Proposed accused is present. Applicant not press the petition with permission to file a fresh one. Order passed on separate sheet that petition stands disposed of. |
|
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 637/2026 | Ghulam Shabeer VS SHO P.S Khenju | Saleem Akhtar Malik(ADVO-127-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant is present.Learned counsel for the applicant absent and sent an adjournment, such is allowed. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Proposed accused No: 1 present. Mr. Abdul Manan advocate filed power of proposed accused No: 1 and three others. Put off to 9.9.2026 for hearing. |
|
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 633/2026 | Muhammad Yousif VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Abdul Manan(ADVO-757-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state present. Proposed accused No: 2 present for whom Mr. Saleem Akhtar advocate sent power with an adjournment. Order thereon. Power file and adjournment granted. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Put off to 9.9.2026 for hearing. |
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 634/2026 | Jameel Ahmed VS SHO P.S Daharki | Aftab Hussain (ADVO-887-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. Learned counsel for the applicant is present and withdraw the petition. DDPP for the state is present.Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
| 11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 636/2026 | Zahoor Ahmed VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. Learned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for the state are present.Report not received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that petition stands disposed of. |
| 12 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 663/2026 | Waris Salar VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Iftikhar Ahmed (ADVO-3122-SBC-SUK) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
|
| 13 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 648/2026 | Mst. Nadia VS SSP Ghotki & ors | M. Jawed Arain(ADVO-933-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. Learned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Heard;. Order passed on separate sheet that petition stands disposed of. |
| 14 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 642/2026 | Abid Hussain VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Ali Akbar(ADVO-1359-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Notice against proposed accused issued and returned. One proposed accused present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Put off to 10.09.2026 for hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 15 | PPC 577/2024 | The State VS Farman Mirani and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 26/2024 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Case called. The accused Zahoor is confined at District Prison Ghotki and produced him from jail through video link. DDPP for the state is present. Perusal of record, it reflect that case against accused Zahoor was already disposed of by this court vide judgment dated 18.11.2024 whereby the accused Zahoor and Qasim were acquitted in their absentia. Order passed on separate sheet that case against him disposed of.Let the acquittal slip u/s 265-H(i) Cr.P.C be issued to jail authority accordingly. Office is directed to send the compared copy of judgement to concerned SHO for compliance and maintained the record. |
| 16 | PPC 726/2024 | The State VS Naveed @ Nomi Mahar and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Javed(ADVO-1125-SBC-GHT),Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 251/2024 Daharki |
. The accused Khalid declared as proclaimed offender. The accused Abdul Razaque and Javeed are called absent for whom separate applications received for excusing of absence. Order thereon. Accused Naveed alias Nomi confined in District Prision Ghotki and not produced from jail.Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Case adjourned to 28.09.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Issue letter/PO for the accused Nomi alias Noman to jail authority that the accused be produced through video link. As far the surety proceedings the surety along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Partly arguments on notice 514 Cr.P.C heard. Put off to 28.09.2026 for further hearing/Order. |
| 17 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 149/2024 | The State VS Khalid Kobhar | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-13-D,SINDH ARMS ACT-16-B,SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 259/2024 Daharki |
The case already kept on dormant file. Surety proceeding is called. The surety along with counsel and DDPP for the State are present. Partly arguments heard. Put off to 28.09.2026 for further hearing on notice 514 Cr.P.C/Order. |
| 18 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 101/2026 | The State VS Aijaz Ahmed Lund | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Azam (ADVO-690-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 18/2026 Khenju |
R and Ps received from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge, Ghotki,for disposal according to law and fixed today. The accused is present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Charge against accused framed at Exh. 2 to which accused plead not guilty and claimed for trial. Put off to 10.09.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Present accused directed to attend. |
| 19 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 100/2026 | The State VS Abdul Shakoor Lund | Muhammad Azam (ADVO-690-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 17/2026 Khenju |
R and Ps received from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge, Ghotki,for disposal according to law and fixed today. The accused is present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Charge against accused framed at Exh. 2 to which accused plead not guilty and claimed for trial. Put off to 10.09.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Present accused directed to attend. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 119/2025 |
Mst. Rasheedan Chachar VS P.O Sindh and others | Imtiaz Ahmad(ADVO-923-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Civil appeal is called. The appellant and her counsel are called absent. Notice against respondents No: 4(a) to c, 5(A) ,C,D E.G .6 D,E issued through bailiff of learned Sr. Civil Judge Ubauro and same is returned with report duly served upon son of respondent No: 5(d) but called absent. while one Muhammad Haris present claiming as attorney of respondents No: 5(b)(e),6(bi to V c, for whom M/S Mushtauqe Ahmed Kolachi and Ayaz Ali Malik advocate filed power. File.Put off to 18.09.2026 for serviced. Issue fresh notice to respondents No: 4(a) to c,5(a),c,d,f,g 6d and e through concerned court bailiff with direction to past notice outer door of residence of respondents in presence of two witness. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 70/2025 |
Haji Allah Dino Haiderani through LRs and others VS Government of Sindh through Secretary Revenue Department and others | Muhammad Jamshed Akhtar(ADVO-681-SBC-GHT) | C.A. called. The appellant No: 4(a) is present. Learned counsel for the appellants present. Respondents absent. DDA for official respondents present. Judgement passed and announced in open court that appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Let the decree be prepared accordingly. |
|||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 72/2025 |
Allah Dino Chachar (through L.RS) and others VS Government of Sindh through Secretary Revenue Department and others | Muhammad Jamshed Akhtar(ADVO-681-SBC-GHT) | C.A. called. The appellants are called absent. Learned counsel for the appellant present. Respondents absent. Learned DDA for official respondents present. Judgement passed and announced in open court that appeal is dismissed with no order, as to costs.Let the decree be prepared accordingly. |
|||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 83/2025 |
Abdul Qadir Naich VS Government of Sindh and others | Muhammad Jamshed Akhtar(ADVO-681-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The appellant along-with counsel are present. Respondents absent. DDA for official respondent present. Judgement passed and announced in open court that appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Let the decree be parpared accordingly. |
|||
| 5 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 58/2026 |
Raban Bheel and others VS Raja Bheel | Munir Ahmed Channa(ADVO-748-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Abbas Alias Javed Akhtar(ADVO-642-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The appellant is present and filed an adjournment, such is allowed. Respondent and counsel are present. Put off to 12.09.2026 for arguments. |
||