| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 241/2026 | Jamaluddin Mahar VS The State | Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-324 | 237/2024 Ubauro |
Bail application under section 498-A Cr. P.C is called. The applicant/accused is present on interim pre-arrest bail. Learned counsel for the applicant and learned DDPP for the state is present.Heard.Order passed on separate sheet that interim bail granted to accused is confirmed. |
|
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 26/2026 | Hassan @ Hasnoo VS The State | Muhammad Azam (ADVO-690-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 37/2019 Khenju |
Bail application under section 498-A Cr.P.C called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused present and filed statement whereby he mentioned that accused joined trial. DDPP for the state is present.Complainant is also present. Learned counsel for the accused request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 19.2.2026 for hearing.Present accused directed to attend. |
|
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 31/2026 | Irfan @ Irfan Ali VS The State | Muhammad Azam (ADVO-690-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 37/2019 Khenju |
Bail application under section 498-A Cr.P.C called. The applicants/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused present and filed statement whereby he mentioned that accused joined trial. DDPP for the state is present.Complainant is also present. Learned counsel for the accused request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 19.2.2026 for hearing.Present accused directed to attend. |
|
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 27/2026 | Hassan @ Ghulam Hussain & ors VS The State | Muhammad Azam (ADVO-690-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(ii) | 5/2025 Khenju |
Bail application under section 498-A Cr.P.C called. The applicants/accused present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused present and filed statement whereby he mentioned that accused joined trial. DDPP for the state is present.Complainant is also present. Partly arguments heard.Learned counsel for the applicants/accused filed statement whereby he submit PSC of (03) case law. Put off to 19.2.2026 for further hearing.Present accused directed to attend. |
|
| 5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 30/2026 | Hassan Lund VS The State | Muhammad Azam (ADVO-690-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 46/2010 Khenju |
Bail application under section 498-A Cr.P.C called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused present and filed statement whereby he mentioned that accused joined trial. DDPP for the state is present.Notice against complainant issued and returned.Complainant is absent.. Partly arguments of learned counsel for the accused is heard. Put off to 19.2.2026 for further hearing.Present accused directed to attend. |
|
| 6 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 25/2026 | Hoor Ali @ Taswar VS The State | Muhammad Azam (ADVO-690-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 47/2010 Khenju |
Bail application under section 498-A Cr. P.C is called. The applicant/accused is present on interim pre-arrest bail. Learned counsel for the applicant and learned DDPP for the state is present.Learned counsel for the accused filed statement whereby mentioned that accused joined trial.Heard.Order passed on separate sheet that interim bail granted to accused is confirmed. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 152/2024 | The State VS Mian Abdul Rehman @ Ahmed Shah | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-1427-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 302/2024 Daharki |
SC is fixed for evidence and same is called. The accused Mian Abdul Rehman is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. Learned counsel for the accused and learned DDPP for the state are present. BWs against PWs issued and returned un-served. No PWs present. BWs against PWs is extended. Put off to 26.2.2026 for evidence. Produced accused is remanded back to District Prison Ghotki. |
| 8 | SC (Murder Trial) 758/2024 | The State VS Mian Abdul Rehman @ Ahmed Shah | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-1427-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 294/2024 Daharki |
SC is fixed for evidence and same is called. The accused Mian Abdul Rehman is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. Learned counsel for the accused and learned DDPP for the state are present.The learned counsel for the complainant is absent. Complainant and private PWs absent. BWs against PWs issued and returned un-served. No PWs present. BWs against PWs is extended. Put off to 26.2.2026 for evidence. Produced accused is remanded back to District Prison Ghotki. |
| 9 | PPC 786/2024 | The State VS Khalil Ahmed @ Ali Raza Shaikh and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Jameel-ur-Rahman(ADVO-1595-SBC-SUK) | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-J | 168/2024 Daharki |
SC called. Accused Khalil Ahmed is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. Accused Bashir Ahmed is present on bail.. Remaining accused declared as PO. Learned counsel for the accused & DDPP for the state are present. Complainant is present. No other PWs present. Counsel for the complainant is absent. Complainant filed an adjournment.Order on it. Allowed. Put off to 21.2.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to R/PWs. Produced accused remanded back to jail, Present accused is directed to attend. Next date informed to complainant to bring his private witness. As far application u/s 516 A Cr.P.C filed by complainant and an other filed by one Gul Mohammad are called. Complainant is present.The learned counsel for the complainant is absent. DDPP for the state and counsel for the applicant Gul Mohammad are present.The advocate for the indus mortors appeared and filed statement on behalf of company whereby he reported that order of this court to coduct forensic test of the suibject vehicle of this case , in this regard he submit that the copmany is not equirpped with such forensic expertise to make determination and assessment as required by the court and further suggested that concerned department which can actuatlly conduct such analysis/lab testing/foroensic is the department of Panjab forensic Science agency located at Punjab forensic Agency Thokar Niaz Baig old Multan road Lahore. Order on it. Copy to other side. Such PSC of statement supplied to both the applicants. Now the above both application adjourned on same date as main case is fixed. |
| 10 | PPC 428/2025 | The State VS Rashid Pitafi and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 33/2025 Dad Leghari |
SC called.The accused Raashid is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki,while accused Ghulam Yaseen, Rassheed and A.Haleem are present on bail. Rest accused declared as PO.DDPP for the state is present. Summons issued and returned un-served . No other PWs present.Time of summons is extended to all PWs. including complainant. Put off to 24.2.2026 for evidence. Produced accused is remanded back to District Prison Ghotki. Present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 11 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 109/2025 | The State VS Rashid Pitafi | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 35/2025 Dad Leghari |
SC called. Accused is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. Learned DDPP for the state is present. Summons issued and returned un-served. No PWs present. Time of summons for service of PWs is extended. Put off to 24.2.2026 for evidence. Produced accused is remanded back to jail. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 12 | Habeas Corpus 28/2026 | Khalil Ahmed Bhutto VS SHO PS Daharki and others | Muhammad Munir(ADVO-6998-SBC-KHS) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Application under section 491 Cr.P.C called.The applicant and counsel are called absent. DDPP for the state is present.Rule nisi notice for recovery of detenue is issued through SHO Daharki, who is not produced detenue and sent un-satisfactory report .Order on it. SHO PS Dahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhk and SSP Ghotki to take efforts for recovery & production of detenue till 19.2.2026.Privateperson Abdul Majeed is present for whom Mr. Azhar Awan advocate filed power. File..Put off to 19.2.2026 |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 13 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 183/2026 | Basheer Ahmed Chachar VS SHO PS Ubauro | Abdul Razzaque(ADVO-1152-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Learned counsel for the applicant withdraw the petition as endorsed on memo. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
|
| 14 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 100/2026 | Sangeeta VS SHO P.S Daharki | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. Learned counsel for the applicant, learned DDPP for the state, proposed accused and counsel are present.Letter received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki at Mirpur Mathelo, for time to submit report, such is allowed to submit report. Put off to 20.2.2026 for report and hearing. |
| 15 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 97/2026 | Javed Iqbal Larik VS SHO P.S Daharki | Nizamuddin(ADVO-1081-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Propsed accused with counsel are present. Report received from DSP Complaint cell Ghotk.File. Learned counsel for the proposed accused & proposed accused submitted in writting that they have not Hari of land of petition , nor they occupied the land and nor committed offence as endorsed on memo, in light of such statement, learned counsel for the applicant withdrawn petition as endorsed on memo.Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
| 16 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 99/2026 | Gurdas VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Vikram Lal (ADVO-24795-SBC-KHS) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The learned counsel for the applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
|
| 17 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 110/2026 | Mst. Shazia VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Ramesh Kumar B- Toga (ADVO-599-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant is absent. Learned counsel for the applicant is present. DDPP for the state present. Advocate is heard.Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
|
| 18 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 109/2026 | Mohan VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant is present.learned counsel for the applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
|
| 19 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 103/2026 | Ashique Ali VS SHO P.S Dad Leghari | Vikram Lal (ADVO-24795-SBC-KHS) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr.M. A. called.The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Report not received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki,only letter received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki.File. Proposed Shah Mohammad and three others present for whom Mr. Meherban Pitafi advocate filed power.File. Put off to 20.2.2026 for report. |
|
| 20 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 96/2026 | Aijaz Ahmed VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Ali Gul(ADVO-1045LC-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The learned counsel for the applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Criminal Appeal | |||||||
| 21 | Cr.A. (Criminal Appeals) 1/2026 | Shamasuddin Shar and another VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-408,Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 238/2024 Ubauro |
Already disposed of. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 4/2026 |
Akhtar Hussain VS Asad Hussain | Muhammad Asif (ADVO-2625-SBC-SUK) | Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff and counsel are called absent.Defendant is present for whom Mr.Danis Ali Pitafi advovate filed power and also submitted an application u/o 148 CPC for time to submit application leave to defend.Order on it.such is allowed. Put off to 19.2.2026 for further proceedings. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 2/2026 |
Muhammad Qasim Malik through attorney Ashique Hussain VS Allah Bachayo Memon and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The attorney of appellant and counsel are present.Respondents absent and not yet served, process against respondents issued through court bailiff of learned Sr.Civil Judge, Ubauro and same returned un-served,while no compliance of report post AD received. Put off to 3.3.2026 for service.Issue notice to respondents through court bailiff and post AD on costs |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | |||||
| 1 | G.W. A. (G&W Appeals) 8/2025 | Shabeer Ahmed Soomro VS Mst. Mehnaz Soomro and another | Ghulam Abbas Alias Javed Akhtar(ADVO-642-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 47 (Guardian Appeal ) | G & W appeal called. The applicant and counsel are called absent. The munshi of counsel for the appellant is present. Respondent No: 1 appeared and submitted application.Order on it. Matter is adjourned. put off to 27.2.2026 for objection/hearing, in the meanwhile call R and Ps from trial court. |