Case called. Accused Jiwan and Shan are present on bail, whereas accused Dishka and Javeed were already acquitted under Section 265-K, Cr.P.C. Accused Insaf has not been produced from District Prison, Sanghar. The complainant is present. Learned counsel for accused Jiwan and Shan are also present. Patner of learned counsel for the accused Insaf present and received the copies of case papers in compliance of section 265-C Cr.P.C under received. Today the case is fixed for formal and hearing of bail application accused Insaf. Complainant submitted an adjournment, such is allowed. Case and bail applciation of accused Isaf adjourned to 24.10.2026. for hearing of bail applciation and for charge. Issue PO for the accused Insaf to the Suptt:District Jail Sanghar with direction to produce the accused through video link. Present accused directed to attend,.

Bail application of accused Naseer is called. Learned counsel for the accused, learned counsel for the complainant are called absent. Complainant is absent. DDPP for the state is present. BA adjourned to 13.10.2026 for further hearing. Main case is already fixed on 21.10.2026

Bail application under section 497 Cr.P.C of accused Karam Pitafi, Shamsdin, Shafique, and Riaz are called.Mr. Ghulam Rasool Shah advocate for the accused Karam is absent (His argument on bail application was already heard) M/S Ali Akbar leghari learned counsel for the accused Riaz and Mr.Sadam Hussain Pitafi ,accused Shamisdin and Shafique are present. Learned counsel for the complainant and DDPP for the state are also present. The arguments of learned counsel for the accused and learned counsel for the complainant, and DDPP for the state are heard. The bail application of above named accused adjourned to 13.10.2026 for further hearing if any/Order. Main case fixed on 24.10.2026

SC called. Accused Ghulam Haider @ Gullab.Abrar, Khuda Bux, Nabi Bux & Akhtar are present on bail. Rest of accused declared as PO.The complainant present. M/S Mumtaz Ali Naich and Nawab Ali Pitafi, learned counsel for the accused are present. Mr. Qadir Bux Bhatti, learned counsel for the complainant, learned DDPP for the state are present. Today is case fixed for evidence. Lerned counsel for the accused request for date,such is allowed, so also accused Nabi filed adjournment, such is also allowed.The case is fixed on 7.11.2026 for further order of Honourable High Court of Sindh in Cr. Misc. Application 476/2026. Present accused are directed to attend. Next date informed to complainant.

S.C. Case Called Accused Manthar has not been produced in custody from District Prison, Ghotki; only a jail slip has been received. Accused Mumtaz and Zahoor are present on bail, while the remaining accused have been declared proclaimed offenders. Learned counsel for the accused ,Learned counsel for the complainant and learned DDPP for the State are present. The complainant and P.W. Shoukat, Mouj Ali are present, whereas no other P.W. is in attendance. Complainant filed an application against present accused on bail. Order on it.Copy supplied to them. By joint request of learned counsel for the parties, the case and bail application adjourned. Accordingly, the case is adjourned to 27.10.2026 for recording of evidence and hearing of the bail application of accused Manthar. The accused present on bail are directed to appear on the next date of hearing. The next date of hearing is communicated to the complainant, who is directed to appear along with his witness. The next date is also communicated to the Jail Authority through the jail slip, with a direction to produce the UTP through video link.

S.C. Case Called Accused Shahbaz alias Bagoo, Riaz Ahmed, Ali Nawaz and Mohsin are present on bail. Mr. Farman Ali Shar, learned counsel for the accused, is present. Mr. Aftab Arain, learned counsel for the complainant, is present. Mr. Saleem Akhtar advocate filed power on behalf of accused along with adjournment. Order thereon. Power file and adjournment granted. Put off to 28.1.2026 for evidence and hearing of application 497(5) Cr.P.C. Present accused directed to attend.

Complainant Nathu, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Ali Ahmed Juno, is present. The complainant was already submitted an application stating that accused Insaf has been declared a proclaimed offender (P.O.) in this case and is presently confined at District Prison, Sanghar, such PO was issued but the jail authority has not produced the accused. Put off to 24.10.2-026 for formal. Issue PO for the accused Insaf with direction to produce the accused through video link. Call supplementary challan of accused Insaf.

The complaint under Section 3(2) of the Illegal Dispossession Act was called. The complainant called absent. Learned counsel for the complainant is present. Proposed accused No: 1 and 6 present for whom Mr. Sikander Ali siyal advocate filed power. One Punhoon present and filed application with PSC of agreement. Order on it. Keep on record. Put off to 28.10.2026 for Hearing.

CA called. The appellant is absent. Learned counsel for the appellant present. Respondents absent despite of notices issued through ordinary as well as TCS. let the notice against respondents be issued through publication in daily Kawish Hyderabad on costs. Put off to 28.10.2026 for service.

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. called. Abdul Malik, attorney for the appellant, present. Learned counsel for the appellant absent. Respondent No: 4 present who is attorney of respondents No: 1-3. Learned counsel for the contesting respodnent present.DDA filed statement put his appearance on behalf of official respondents No: 5 to 7. File. Put off to29.10.226 for filing of objections, if any, on the main appeal and for arguments. Call R. & P. from the trial Court.

Summary suit called. Plaintiff and his witness are present. Mr. Nawab Ali Pitafi, learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. Defendant and his counsel are also present. By consent matter is adjourned. Put off to 15.10.2026 for P.E.

Summary suit called. Plaintiff and witness are absent. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. Defendant and counsel are present .By consent of both parties counsel, matter fixed on 22.10.2026 for PE

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. The appeal is called. The attorney for the appellant is present. The junior partner of learned counsel for the appellant is also present. Respondent Muhammad Moar is present, while the remaining respondents are absent. The appeal is fixed today for argument. Respondent No: 1 request for date such is allowed. Accordingly, the appeal is adjourned to 21.10.2026 for arguments.

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. The civil appeal is called. Appellant No. 1, along with the junior partner of learned counsel for the appellants, is present. Jr.Patner of learned counsel for the appellant request for date, such is allowed. Respondent No: 1 and counsel are present. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned to 17.10.2026 for arguments on the main appeal, & hearing application 41 rule 5 CPC.