Bail application under Section 498 Cr.P.C. is taken up. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the applicant/accused and learned DDPP for the State are present. The complainant is also present, for whom Mr. Sikander Ali Shah, learned counsel, has filed his power on behalf of the complainant. Let the same be taken on file. Learned counsel for the applicant/accused has filed a statement stating that the accused is ready and willing to enter into talks with regard to compromise/private faisla. In view of the above, the matter is adjourned to 03.10.2026 for hearing. The present accused is directed to remain in attendance on the next date of hearing.

Criminal Revision is taken up. The complainant is present, for whom Mr. Nawab Ali Pitafi, Advocate, has filed his power. Mr. Farman Ali Shar, learned counsel for the complainant, and learned DDPP for the State are also present. Respondent Mst. Zareena, along with her learned counsel, is present, whereas the remaining respondents and their learned counsel are called absent. R. & P. has been received from the learned Trial Court. Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted a statement along with relevant documents, which are taken on record. Partly arguments of learned counsel for the complainant, learned DDPP for the State, and learned counsel for respondent Mst. Zareena have been heard. Put off to 06.10.2026 for further hearing/arguments and order.

Case is called. Accused Mohammad Moosa, Shahzado and Misri are present on bail. Learned counsel for accused Mohammad Moosa and Shahzado is called absent, whereas Mr. Ali Hassan Malano, Advocate, has appeared and filed his power on behalf of accused Misri. Let the same be taken on record. Learned DDPP for the State is present. Today, the case is fixed for submission of the supplementary challan in respect of accused Misri. However, no intimation has been received from the concerned SHO regarding submission of the supplementary challan. Issue show-cause notice to the concerned SHO, calling upon him to show cause as to why the supplementary challan in respect of accused Misri has not been submitted and why no intimation in this regard has been furnished to the Court. Put off to 20.10.2026 for submission of the supplementary challan in respect of accused Misri and for framing of charge. The present accused are directed to remain in attendance on the next date of hearing.

Direct complaint called. The complainant and counsel are present. Proposed accused No: 1 &5 and counsel are present . Learned counsel for the proposed accused present. Both parties counsel filed separate statement with documents. File. Learned counsel for the complainant submitted an adjournment, such is allowed. Put off to 14.10.2026 for further hearing.

Direct complaint is taken up. The complainant is present, whereas learned counsel for the complainant is called absent. The proposed accused, Parvez Samejo, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Rashid Ali Sindh, is present. Today, the matter is fixed for arguments on behalf of the proposed accused. Learned counsel for the proposed accused has been heard. He has also submitted a statement along with copies of the case law, which are taken on record. Put off to 09.10.2026 for order.

Appellant No: 2 along with counsel appeared and submitted an application u/o 41 rule 5 CPC with affidavit of appellant. Order on it. Notice to other side. Matter already fixed on 09.10.2026.

In Solvency Petition is called. The petitioner is present. Learned counsel for the petitioner is present. Respondents No. 1, 2 and 15 are present. Rest of respondents are called absent. Learned counsel for the respondent 1-2 filed written statement on behalf of respondent No: 1-2,and objection on application 31 of provision of Insolvency Act with affidavit of respondent No: 1 Order thereon. Copy to other side. The learned for the applicant also submitted objection on application 7 rule 11 CPC.Order on it. Copy to other side. The parties received the above documents. Notice against respondents No: 16 18,19 issued and returned back duly served upon respondent No: 16 who called absent. Put off to 15.10.2026 for hearing of application 7 rule 11 CPC.