Bail application under section 498 Cr.P.C called.The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused, complainant and his counsel as well as DDPP for the state are present. Learned counsel for the accused filed statement with documents. Put off to 2.09.2026 for Order. Present accused directed to attend.

Cr. B.A called.The applicant/accused are present on interim bail .Learned counsel for the accused and learned DDPP for the state are present. Complainant absent. One injured Mst. Aisha present and submitted an adjournment, such is allowed. Put off to 29.9.2026 for hearing. Call I.O along with police papers, criminal record of accused and CRO report. Present accused directed to attend.

Bail application is called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Complainant is present for whom Mr.Nizamdin advocate filed power and also request for date, such request is allowed. Put off to 28.09.2026 for hearing. Present accused directed to attend.

SC called. Accused Shamshad Bibi alias Shazia is present on bail. Accused Raees Asif and Nazeer alias Riaz are confined in District Prison, Rahim Yar Khan, and have not been produced by the jail authorities. Accused Zain alias Kaka is an absconder and has been declared a proclaimed offender (P.O.). M/s Jam Shahzad Thaheem and Danish Ali Pitafi, learned counsel for the accused, are present. Mr. Nawab Ali Pitafi, learned counsel for the complainant, and learned DDPP for the State are also present. Process issued against the prosecution witnesses (PWs) has been received back. Complainant Naveed is present, whereas no other PWs are present. Learned counsel for the complainant requests an adjournment on the ground that compromise talks between the parties are going on. The request is allowed in the interest of justice. The case is adjourned to 02.10.2026 for recording of evidence. Issue fresh bailable warrants against the remaining prosecution witnesses. Issue a letter to the Superintendent, District Prison, Rahim Yar Khan, directing that the under-trial prisoners (UTPs) be produced through video link on the next date of hearing. The accused present on bail is directed to appear on the next date of hearing.

S.C. called. The accused is called absent. Learned counsel for the accused is also absent. Learned DDPP for the State is present. The case is adjourned to 02.10.2026 for further orders regarding the absence of the accused. Late Diary: The accused has appeared and submitted an application seeking condonation of his late appearance. Order on the application. The case is already fixed for 02.10.2026 for recording the statement of the accused under section 342 Cr.P.C,. The accused is directed to remain present on the next date of hearing.

Case called. The accused is present on bail. Mr. Muhammad Azam Siyal, learned counsel for the accused, and Mr. Gohram Khan, learned DDPP for the State, are present. No PWs are present. Summons were issued to the PWs through the SHO, Khenju, who entrusted the same to HC Haider Ali Pitafi. The process server returned the summons unserved. Time for service of the process is extended, and the summons are handed over to him for service. The matter is adjourned and is fixed for evidence on 08.10.2026. The accused present today is directed to appear on the next date of hearing.

Case called. The accused is present on bail. Mr. Muhammad Azam Siyal, learned counsel for the accused, and Mr. Gohram Khan, learned DDPP for the State, are present. No PWs are present. Summons were issued to the PWs through the SHO, Khenju, who entrusted the same to HC Haider Ali Pitafi. The process server returned the summons unserved. Time for service of the process is extended, and the summons are handed over to him for service. The matter is adjourned and is fixed for evidence on 08.10.2026. The accused present today is directed to appear on the next date of hearing.

Petition u/s 22-A(6)(i) Cr.P.C called. The applicant present. Learned counsel for the applicant is absent. DDPP for the state is also present. Proposed accused No: 1 present for whom Mr. Hashmat Lal advocate filed power. File. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. The arguments of learned counsel for the proposed accused is heard, while matter adjourned to 29.9.2026 for hearing of learned counsel for the applicant and for order.

Petition under Section 22-A(6)(i), Cr.P.C. is called. The applicant absent and her learned counsel, and the learned DDPP for the State are present. Report has been received from the DSP, Complaint Cell, Ghotki. The proposed accused are called absent. The petition is adjourned to 28.09.2026 for hearing. In the meantime, a copy of the petition is supplied to the Process Server for service upon the proposed accused.

Petition under Section 22-A(6)(i), Cr.P.C. is called. The applicant, along with her learned counsel, and the learned DDPP for the State are present. Report has been received from the DSP, Complaint Cell, Ghotki. The proposed accused are called absent. The petition is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for hearing. In the meantime, a copy of the petition is supplied to the Process Server for service upon the proposed accused.

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. is called. The appellant is called absent. Mr. Akhtar Ali Malik, learned counsel for the appellant, is present. Respondent Shabeer Ahmed is also present. Mr. Irshad Ali Solangi, learned counsel for the contesting respondent, is also present and has submitted an application seeking adjournment. Order on the application. The matter is adjourned. To come up on 09.10.2026 for arguments. Call for the Record and Proceedings from the learned Trial Court.

Civil Appeal called. The appellant, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Ghulam Murtaza Dayo, is present. One Ali Nawaz, Respondent No. 9, is present and claims to be acting as attorney for Respondent Nos. 1 to 7 and 10. Respondent No. 8, the legal representatives of Respondent No. 18(a) to (e), and Respondent No. 19 have not yet been served. The remaining respondents are called absent. Mr. Ghulam Murtaza Samejo, learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 7 and 9, is called absent; however, his junior partner is present. Since some of the respondents have not yet been served, the appeal is adjourned to 09.10.2026 for service. Issue notices to Respondent No. 8, the legal representatives of Respondent No. 18(a) to (e), and Respondent No. 19 through the Bailiff of the concerned Court, with directions for service by affixation (door pasting). Also issue notices through registered post A.D., at the expense of the appellant. Respondent No. 9 is directed to submit proof of the power of attorney executed by Respondent Nos. 1 to 7 and 10.

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. is called. The appellant is present. Mr. Muhammad Tarique, learned counsel for the appellant, is absent; however, his junior partner is present. The respondents are called absent. Today, the appeal is fixed for service upon Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Notices were previously issued to the said respondents through the Bailiff of the learned Trial Court; however, the notices have not yet been received back, either served or unserved. In the interest of justice, fresh notices be issued to Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 through the Bailiff of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Daharki, for service upon the said respondents. Notices shall also be issued through registered post A.D., at the cost of the appellant. Put off to 09.10.2026 for service.

The Record and Proceedings of the Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C., titled Allah Wassayo & others v. Masoo Malik & others, as well as the Record and Proceedings of the Trial Court in F.C.S. No. 112 of 2024, titled Allah Wassayo & others v. Masoo Malik & others, have been received by this Court from the Court of the Honourable District Judge, Ghotki, vide office order and letter No. 7904 of 2026. The matter is fixed today. Civil Appeal called. Mr. Rashid Ali Sindhu, learned counsel for the appellant, is called absent. One Masoo, who is Respondent No. 1 and is also shown at Serial No. 4(c), is present and claims to be the attorney of Respondent Nos. 4(a), 4(b) and 4(e). The remaining respondents are called absent. M/s. Mushtaque Ahmed Kolachi, learned counsel for the contesting Respondent No. 1 and Respondent Nos. 4(a) to 4(c) and 4(e), and Mr. Akhtar Hussain Malik, learned counsel for the contesting Respondent Nos. 3(b) to 3(f), are present. Perusal of the diaries reveals that eleven (11) respondents were shown in the title of the appeal, out of whom Respondent No. 1, Respondent Nos. 3(b) to 3(f), and Respondent Nos. 4(a), 4(b), 4(c) and 4(e) have engaged their respective counsel in the proceedings. The learned DDA for the State has also appeared and entered his appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 7 to 11. The record further reflects that Respondent No. 5, Abdul Sattar, appeared vide diary dated 06.08.2026 and submitted an application stating that Respondent No. 6, being his brother, and he himself have no interest in the appeal. As per diary dated 21.08.2026, service upon the legal representatives of Respondent No. 4(g) has been held good. Respondent No. 2, namely Luqman, who is also shown in the title as Respondent No. 3(a), Respondent No. 4(d) and Respondent No. 4(f), has not yet been served. Accordingly, the instant appeal is adjourned to 09.10.2026 for service upon Luqman, shown in the title as Respondent No. 2, who is same person as shown at respondent 3(a), Respondent No. 4(d) and Respondent No. 4(f). Issue notice through the Bailiff of the concerned Court as well as through registered post A.D., at the cost of the appellant.

Summary suit is called. Plaintiff along with witness and counsel absent. Defendant absent . Today the case is fixed for ex-partee evidence. The Plaintiff Ghulam Hussain, Witness Mehboob Ali and witness Ghulam Muhammad are present and submitted separate affidavit in evidence. Order thereon. Keep on record. Put off to 9,10,2026

C.A. called. Appellant No. 1 and his learned counsel are present. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent is also present and has submitted a photocopy of the application under Order XXII, Rule 3, C.P.C., regarding the impleadment of the legal representatives of Respondent No. 1(a), filed before the learned Senior Civil Judge, Ubauro, in the Execution Application. The photocopy of the said application is supplied to the learned counsel for the appellant, with a direction to file a proper application for implement of the legal representatives of Respondent No. 1(a) on the next date of hearing, i.e., 09.10.2026.

Civil appeal under section 96 CPC is called. The appellant along with counsel , respondent No: 4 and 5 along with their counsel are present. Partly arguments heard. Put off to 0.10.2026 for further arguments/submission of case law if any.

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. is called. The appellant, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Sadiq Malik, is present. Respondent No. 1, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Mushtaque Ahmed Kolachi, is also present. The remaining respondents are called absent. The appeal is fixed today for arguments. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted an application seeking adjournment on the ground that he is not fully prepared to argue the matter and requires some time. Order on the application. The matter is adjourned and is fixed for arguments on 09.10.2026.

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. is called. The appellant is called absent. Mr. Akhtar Ali Malik, learned counsel for the appellant, is present. Respondent Shabeer Ahmed is also present. Mr. Irshad Ali Solangi, learned counsel for the contesting respondent, is also present and has submitted an application seeking adjournment. Order on the application. The matter is adjourned. To come up on 09.10.2026 for arguments. Call for the Record and Proceedings from the learned Trial Court.

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. is called. The appellant is called absent. Mr. Akhtar Ali Malik, learned counsel for the appellant, is present. Respondent Shabeer Ahmed is also present. Mr. Irshad Ali Solangi, learned counsel for the contesting respondent, is also present and has submitted an application seeking adjournment. Order on the application. The matter is adjourned. To come up on 09.10.2026 for arguments. Call for the Record and Proceedings from the learned Trial Court.

Civil appeal is called. The appellant No: 1 (who is attorney of co-appellant ) is present. Respondent No: 1 and her attorney called absent. One Ali Nawaz is present claiming as attorney of LRs of respondent No: 2 . Rest of official respondents absent. On request of Ali Nawaz to bring his counsel, such matter is adjourned to 09.102026 for arguments and with direction to Ali Nawaz to submit power of attorney of LRs of respondent No:2.

Civil Revision called. The appellant is called absent. Respondent No. 1 is present, while the remaining respondents are absent. Learned counsel for the applicant and the junior associate of learned counsel for the contesting respondent are present. Learned counsel for the applicant has filed a statement along with the documents mentioned therein. The junior associate of learned counsel for the contesting respondent has filed an application seeking adjournment on the ground that his senior is busy before the Honourable Sessions Court. Order on the application. The matter is adjourned. The Record and Proceedings in F.C.S. No. 29 of 2012, titled Manzoor v. P.O. Sindh, have been received from the learned Senior Civil Judge, Ubauro, in one part, vide his office letter No. 456/2026 dated 24.09.2026. Put off to 07.10.2026 for hearing.

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. is called. Appellant No. 9 is present and claims to be acting as the attorney of the remaining appellants. Mr. Ghulam Murtaza Samejo, learned counsel for the appellants, is absent; however, his junior partner is present. Respondent Muhammad Bux is also present, while the official respondents are absent. Mr. Ghulam Murtaza Dayo, learned counsel for contesting Respondent No. 1, is present. The junior partner of learned counsel for the appellants requests an adjournment. The request is allowed in the interest of justice. Put off to 09.10.2026 for arguments. In the meantime, the attorney for the appellants is directed to submit the power of attorney executed by Respondent No. 8 ,12 and the legal representatives of Respondent Nos. 11 .

Civil appeal under section 96 CPC is called. One Ali Nawaz who is attorney of appellant is present. The attorney of respondent No: 1 is called absent. One Muhammad Afzal Bhutto, respondent No: 3 present claiming as attorney of respondent No: 2,4 to 7 is present and request for date to bring his counsel, such request is allowed. Now appeal is fixed on 09.10.2026 for arguments and respondent No: 3 is directed to submit power of attorney of respondents No: 2 ,4 to 7