Direct complaint called. The complainant along with cousnel are present.Report received from SHO Daharki and Mukhtiarkar (R) Daharki.Proposed accused Arjan present. Mr.Mukesh Kumar advocate filed power of proposed accused Arjan and Deepak and also submitted statement with documents. Partly heard. Put off to 20.10.2026 for further hearing/Order.

Deponent Abdul Hakeem son of Abu Bakar Pitafi r/o village Haji Mahar taluka Daharki appeared and submitted an affidavit along with original sale deed for standing surety of accused Shamasuddin and Shafique in the sum of Rs:5,00,000/-five lac each. Order on it. Send for verification. Main case fixed on 24.10.2026

Case called. The accused are present, for whom Mr. Ali Akbar,leghari,advocate filed power.File. Complainant and DDPP for the state are present. Case adjourned to 29.10.2026 for charge. Accused are directed to attend and submit proof of their confirmation of bail.

Case called. The complainant, Indhar Lal, and his witness are present. Mr. Muhammad Javeed Arain, learned counsel for the complainant, is also present. Accused Javeed has been declared a proclaimed offender, whereas accused Basheer Ahmed, Asif, Abdul Sami, and Majid are present on bail. Mr. Saleem Akhtar Malik, learned counsel for the accused, is also present. By consent case adjourned to 28.10.2026 for recording of evidence. The present accused are directed to ensure their attendance on the next date of hearing. The next date is communicated to the complainant and his witness.

SC called. Accused Sobo,Aslam and Shafi Muhammad were already declared as proclaimed offender.Remaining accused are present on bail except accused Hashmat and Sharafat, for whom an application received for excusing of absence. Order on it. Absence excused. Mr.Ramesh Kumare advocate filed power of present accused. File.Put off to 24.10.2026 for charge. Present accused are directed to attend.

Direct complaint called. The complainant and counsel are present. Proposed accused No: 1 &5 and counsel are present . Learned counsel for the proposed accused present. By joint request, instant matter adjourned. Put off to 29.10.2026 for further hearing.

Case called. The all accused are present on bail. M/S Ch. Shahid Hussain and Nawab Ali Pitafi,learned counsel for the accused are present. Mr.Soomar dass, learned counsel for the complainant as well as complainant are present. Learned counsel for the accused filed statement with documents. Partly arguments heard. Learned counsel for the complainant filed two statement whereby he submit copies of case law. Put off to 29.10.2026 for further arguments/Judgment. Present accused are directed to attend. Next date informed to complainant.

Civil appeal is called. The attorney of appellant is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is present. Respondent No: 1 & 2 along with counsel are present. Official respondents absent. Intervenor Jalal din l absent. Today the matter is fixed for advocate to be heard on application u/0 1 r 10 CPC. and same is adjourned. Put off to 4.11.2026 for advocate to be heard on application u/o 1 rule 10 CPC.

Civil Appeal under Section 96 CPC Called for hearing. Appellant No. 1 is present along with learned counsel. Respondents are called but remain absent. Upon perusal of the record, it appears that notices were issued to the respondents through ordinary process as well as by publication. Despite of notices, the respondents have failed to appear. Accordingly, service upon the respondents is held to be sufficient. To come up on 28.10.2026 for filing of objections, if any, and/or arguments.

Civil Appeal under Section 96 CPC Case called. The appellant, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Ghulam Murtaza Dayo, is present. Official respondents Nos. 1 to 7 are absent. Muhammad Ashraf, claiming to be the attorney of respondents Nos. 8(a) and 8(b), is present along with his learned counsel, Mr. Ch. Shahid Hussain. Respondent No. 9, namely Ali Nawaz, is present along with his learned counsel, Ms. Taibah Rohi Jadoon. The remaining respondents are absent. Upon perusal of the record, it appears that on 11.09.2026, one Aijaz appeared and submitted an application stating that his father, Ali Gohar, shown as a party in the title at serial Nos. 13(b) and 15, had passed away. It is further stated that respondent No. 13(a) has also expired. Respondents Nos. 10, 12,13(c) to 13(g), and 16 have remained absent. Today, the matter is fixed for service. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed an application under Order XXII, Rule 4, CPC, along with an affidavit, seeking implement of the legal representatives of deceased respondent No. 13(a). Let notice of the application be issued to the other side. To come up on 04.11.2026 for service and objections, if any, to the aforesaid application. The appellant is also directed to file a proper application for implement of the legal representatives of deceased respondent No. 13(b), who is the same person as mentioned at serial No. 15 in the title. Issue fresh notices to respondents Nos. 10, 12, 13(c) to 13(g), and 16 through the bailiff of the concerned court, as well as through registered post with acknowledgment due (A.D.), at the appellants cost.

Civil appeal under section 96CPC is called. The appellant No: 1(who is attorney of rest of appellant) along with counsel are present. Respondent No:1(Barkat Ali) is present for whom Mr. Jam Jamsheed Akhtar advocate filed power. File. Rest of respondents are called absebnt. Mr. Gaman Khan Shar advocate appeared and submitted his vakalatnama on behalf of respondent namely Warryam Khan, Mukhtiarkar and Akhtiar Ahmed i.e.2(b),3 and 4. Order on it. File. Today, learned counsel for the respondents No: 2(b),3 and 4 submitted objection to civil appeal u/s 96 CPC along with affidavits of above respondents(Today they are absent in court).Order Copy to other side. Put off to 28 .10.2026 for arguments.

Civil appeal under section 96 CPC is called. Appellant No: 1(who is attorney of rest of appellant) along with counsel are present. Respondent No: 1Barkat Ali is present for whom Mr.Jam Jamsheed Akhtar, advocate filed power. File .Rest of respondents absent. Matter adjourned to 28.10.2026 for arguments.

Civil appeal is called. The appellant No: 4 along with counsel are present. Respondent No: 1 is present. Learned counsel for the respondent No: 1 absent, his Jr.Partner is present and request for date,such is allowed. R and Ps in FSC no: 251/2021 Re- Noor Hassan Vs:Mevo and ors received from the court of learned Sr. Civil Judge, Daharki. Put off to 19.10.2026 for arguments.

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. The civil appeal is called. Appellant No. 4, Muhammad Fazil, is present and submitted an adjournment, such is allowed. The respondents are also called absent. Mr. Ch. Shahid Hussain, learned counsel for contesting respondents Nos. 1 to 6, is present.. Official respondents Nos. 13 to 15 are also called absent. Today, the appeal is fixed for the appearance of respondents Nos. 7 to 9, 11 and 12; however, they are called absent.. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned to 4.11.2026 for the appearance of respondents Nos. 7 to 9, 11 and 12.as already ordered.

Civil appeal under section 96 CPC called. The appellant and counsel are called absent. Respondent No: 2 is present and submitted an adjournment application for time, such is allowed. Official respondents No:5 to 09 absent despite of issuance of notice. Private respondents No: 1, 3 to4 & 10 are not yet served. Issue fresh notices against them through bailiff of concerned court and post AD on costs.Hearing. 29.10.2026 for service

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. is called. Appellant No. 1(e), who is the attorney of the co-appellants, is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is absent.Today, the matter is fixed for service upon the respondents. Notices issued through the Bailiff of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Daharki, have been received back as un-served .Put off to 4.11.2026 for service. Issue fresh notices to Respondents No. 1, 4, and 5 through the concerned Court Bailiff and by registered post A.D., on costs.

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. is called. Appellant Indhar lal who is the attorney of the co-appellants, is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is called absent.Today, the matter is fixed for service upon the respondents. Notices issued through the Bailiff of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Daharki, have been received back with the report not yet been served. Put off to 4.11.2026 for service. Issue fresh notices to Respondents through the concerned Court Bailiff and by registered post A.D., on costs.

Civil Appeal under Section 96 CPC is called. Appellant No. 4, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Nawab Ali Pitafi, is present. Respondent No. 1, along with Jr. Partner of his learned counsel, Mr. Adnan Siyal, is also present. The appeal is fixed on 19.10.2026 for arguments.

Case called. The appellant is present, whereas his learned counsel is absent. However, an application under Sections 59 and 84 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 (Q.E.D.), along with the appellant affidavit, has been submitted through his junior partner. The application is fixed for advocate to be heard and shall be considered and decided along with the arguments on the main appeal, after hearing the learned counsel. Respondent Ali Hassan, along with his learned counsel, is present. The record and proceedings (R&Ps) of F.C.S. Case No. 150/2021, Mevo v. Province of Sindh, have been received. from the court of learned Sr.Civil Judge, Daharki vide letter No:436/2026 in one part (560) pages. To come up on 29.10.2026 for arguments on the main appeal and advocate to be heard on instant application.

CA called. The appellant Mevo is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is absent, his Jr.Partner is present. Respondent Ali Hassan and learned counsel for the contesting respondent present. Now the appeal is fixed on 19.10.2026 for arguments.

Civil Appeal under Section 96 of CPC is called. The appellant is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. Respondent No. 5 is also present, while the remaining respondents are absent. Mr. Jam Jamsheed Akhtar, learned counsel for the contesting respondent, and learned DDA for the official respondents, are present. Today, the matter is fixed for further arguments. Learned counsel for the appellant sent statement whereby he submit case law, so also learned counsel for the contesting respondent filed statement whereby submit case law. Now the appeal is fixed on 22.10.2026 for further arguments.

Civil appeal is called. The appellant and his counsel are called absent. The attorney of respondent No: 1(a) and b along with counsel are present. The official respondents are called absent. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to 4.11.2026 for arguments.

Summary suit called. Plaintiff along with counsel are present. Defendant absent. The suit is adjourned to 27.10.2026 for arguments.