| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2260/2026 | Khalid Hussain Shar VS The State | Aveenash(ADVO-707-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-324 | 178/2026 Daharki |
Deponent Sajid Hussain son of Abdul Haleem Shar filed affidvit along with saving certificate for standing surety in the sum of Rs: 50000/- for accused Khalid Hussain.Order on it. Accepted. Issue release writ for accused Khalid to jail authority concerned so also issue letter to concerned bank for mortgage of saving certificate till further order. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2237/2026 | Ahmed Ali Mazari & another VS The State | Abdul Shakoor(ADVO-583-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-337-A(ii) | 104/2026 Khambra |
Cr. B.A. called. The learned counsel for the applicant and leanred DDPP for the state are present. Witness Ali Gul present and filed an adjournment, such is allowed. Put off to 14.10.2026 for hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 321/2026 | Majid Hussain VS The State | Muhammad Adam(ADVO-54639-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-489-F | 134/2026 Daharki |
Cr. B.A. called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Complainant present submitted application raising no objection on bail. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that interim bail granted to accused is confirmed. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 425/2026 | The State VS Mir Hassan @ Suhno Shar and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-397 | 141/2026 Daharki |
Case called. Accused Mir Hassan alias Suhno is present on bail. Rest of accused were declared as PO. DDPP for the state is present. Complainant is present and request for date, such is allowed. No other PWs present. Put off to 15 .10.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Present accused directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 5 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 730/2026 | Abdul Sattar VS SHO P.S khenju | Ubedullah(ADVO-52355-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Proposed accused No: 4 present for whom Mr.Miss Shughafa advocate filed power. Present proposed accused and petition made their statement on petition, in view of order, instant petition disposed of as not press. |
| 6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 733/2026 | Khan Muhammad VS SHO P.S Khenju | Meharban Ali (ADVO-3015-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Proposed accused present for whom Mr. Iftakhar Ahmed Shahani advocate filed power and also submitted statement with documents. Heard arguments. Order passed on separate sheet that petition is dismissed. |
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 735/2026 | Mai Sawera VS SHO P.S Dad leghari | Sajad Ali(ADVO-867-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Petition is called.The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Proposed accused1.2 and 5 for whom Mr.Sadam Hussain advocate filed power. File. Proposed accused No: 1 submitted an application. Order on it. Keep on record. Learned counsel for the applicant, in light of such application withdraw the petition. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 737/2026 | Habibullah VS SHO P.S Dad Leghri | Rashid Ahmed(ADVO-443-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called.The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present.Proposed accused No: 4 and 5 are present. Mr. Nawab Ali Pitafi learned counsel appeared and filed power of proposed accused No: 5. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Partly arguments heard. put off to 14.10.2026 for further hearing/Order. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 9 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 59/2026 | Muhammad Unhar Mahar VS Rahib Mahar and others | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Direct complaint is called. The complainant and Jr.of learned counsel for the complainant present. Report received from Mukhtiarkar (R) Daharki under letter No: 1629 dated 09.10.2026 and report received from SHO Dad Leghari vide letter No: 634 dated 11.09.2026 in one leaf. Order Keep on record. Put off to 21.10.2026 for hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 10 | PPC 158/2026 | The State VS Shoaib Malik and another | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Ramesh Kumar B- Toga (ADVO-599-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 11/2026 Daharki |
Case is called. Accused Shoaib, who is not produced from jail and confined in District Prison, Ghotki, while accused Mir Hassan alias Suhno is present on bail. Mr. Ramesh Kumar, learned counsel for accused Shoaib, and Mr. Farman Ali Shar, learned counsel for accused Mir Hassan alias Suhno, are present. Put off to 15.10.2026 for statement of accused. Next date informed to jail authority on slip for production of UTP through video link. Present accused on bail directed to attend. |
| 11 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 56/2026 | The State VS Shoaib Malik | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Ramesh Kumar B- Toga (ADVO-599-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 12/2026 Daharki |
S.C. is called. The accused, who is not produced and confined in District Prison, Ghotki, only slip received from jail.. Mr. Ramesh Kumar, learned counsel for the accused, and the learned DDPP for the State are present. Put off to 15.10.2026 for statement of accused. Next date informed to jail authority on jail slip with direction to produce the UTP through video link. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 101/2026 |
Bahadur Mahar VS Muhammad Nawaz Samejo and others | Ghulam Abbas Alias Javed Akhtar(ADVO-642-SBC-GHT) | Civil appeal under section 96 CPC is called. Learned counsel for the appellant is present. Notice against respondents issued through post but no compliance report is received. Put off to 29.10.2026 for compliance regarding service upon respondents. Issue fresh notice to respondents through bailiff of concerned court on costs. |
|||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 100/2026 |
Sher Muhammad Mahar VS Muhammad Nawaz Samejo and others | Ghulam Abbas Alias Javed Akhtar(ADVO-642-SBC-GHT) | Civil appeal under section 96 CPC is called. Learned counsel for the appellant is present. Notice against respondents issued through post but no compliance report is received. Put off to 29.10.2026 for compliance regarding service upon respondents. Issue fresh notice to respondents through bailiff of concerned court on costs. |
|||
| 3 | Defamation Suits 3/2026 |
Muhammad Mithal Laghari VS Muhammad Siddique and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 49/2026 | Mst. Maryam Gabol VS Hamid and others | Abdul Razzak(ADVO-22874-SBC-KHS) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372,SUCCESSION ACT 1925-Matter | Succ. application called. The applicant and her counsel remained absent. Respondents are also called absent. From perusal of record,it reflect that notice against the respondents through publication was ordered,as well as report about L.Rs are also called. As per letter No:1525 dated 29.9.2026 received alng with PSC of report already sent by him, while report about LRs of deceased not received from Nadra and SHO. In the interest of justice, matter adjourned to 26.10.2026.Issue notice of succ. application through publication on costs of applicant and called report about L.Rs of deceased from SHO dad leghari and Nadra. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 2 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 56/2026 | Ali Sher Mahar VS Mai Khanzadi Mahar and others | Ghulam Abbas Alias Javed Akhtar(ADVO-642-SBC-GHT) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372,SUCCESSION ACT 1925-Matter | SA called. The applicant is present. Learned counsel for the applicant is present. Respondent absent. Put off to 15.10.2026 for arguments. |
||