| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 255/2026 | Aftab Ahmed & ors VS The State | Saeed Ahmed(ADVO-1207-SBC-GHT) | PPC-452 | 171/2026 Daharki |
Cr. B.A. called. The applicants/accused are present on interim bail.Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Mr. Farman Ali advocate for complainant present. By joint request bail application adjourned to 29.8.2026 for hearing. Call I.O along with final M.Cs if any.Present accused directed to attend. |
|
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 254/2026 | Mukhtiar AHmed & ors VS The State | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-452 | 169/2026 Daharki |
Cr. B.A. called. The applicants/accused are present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused, complainant and DDPP for the state present.Learned counsel for the accused filed statement whereby he submit photograph,file, learned counsel for the complainant filed an adjournment,such is allowed. Put off to 29.8.2026 for hearing. Call I.O along with final M.C from concerned S.H.O. Present accused directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 11/2026 | The state VS Qurban Shar | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 14/2025 Khenju |
SC called. Accused is not produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki and only slip is received. DC and DDPP for the state are present. No PWs present. .Put off to 10.09.2026 for evidence.Issue BW against PWs Next date informed to jail authority on slip for production of UTP through video link. |
|
| 4 | SC (Murder Trial) 27/2026 | The State VS Arbab Shar & others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 11/2025 Khenju |
SC called. Accused Arbab and Qurban are not produced from District Prison Ghotki , only slip received.Accused Allah Dad ,Shaman , Amanullah and Muhammad Hussain are present on bail. Remaining accused Mubarak, Bahadur and Asif were declared as proclaimed offenders. Learned DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Mumtaz Ali, Learned counsel for the accused persons present.P>W Rano present and filed an adjournment application, such is allowed. No other PWs present. Summons issued and returned un served. The case is adjourned to 10.09.2026 for evidence. Repeat fresh summons to PWs. Next date informed to jail authority for production of UTP through video link. Present accused on bail are directed to attend. |
|
| 5 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 12/2026 | The state VS Arbab Shar | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 13/2025 Khenju |
SC called. Accused is not produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki and only slip is received. DC and DDPP for the state are present. No PWs present. .Put off to 10.09.2026 for evidence.Issue BW against PWs Next date informed to jail authority on slip for production of UTP through video link. |
|
| 6 | PPC 108/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Hussain @ Hussain Shar and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 12/2025 Khenju |
SC called. Accused Arbab is not produced from District Prison Ghotki only slip received from jail. Accused,Muhammad Hussain, Allah Dad, Amanullah and Shaman are present on bail while accused Ali Murad and Abdul Wahid remained absent without intimation., Remaining accused Bahadur is declared as PO. DDPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for the accused present. Put off to 10.09.2026 for evidence. Issue N BWs against accused Ali Murad and Wahid Bux.Next date informed to jail authority for production of UTP through video link . Present accused on bail are directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 7 | Habeas Corpus 253/2026 | Mai Parveen Gurgaij VS SHO PS DAharki and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Application u/s 491 Cr.P.C called. The applicant along with counsel , Respondent Mohammad Ummar with counsel along with detenue present. Daughter handed over to the applicant, in view of such, learned counsel for the applicant withdraw the instant application.Order passed on separate sheet that instant application disposed of. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1493/2026 | Zubair Ahmed Khambhro VS SHO PS Khambhra and ors | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr .M.A. called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present.Proposed accused and counsel present.Order passed on separate sheet that petition is allowed. |
|
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 519/2026 | Ghulam Muhammad VS SHO P.S Daharki | Ghulam Abbas Alias Javed Akhtar(ADVO-642-SBC-GHT),Kamran Ali (ADVO-717-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state present. Proposed accused present.Partly arguments heard. Put off to 29.8.2026 for further hearing of learned counsel for the proposed accused. |
|
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 557/2026 | Syed Naveed Hussain VS SHO P.S Daharki | Saif Ali Shah (ADVO-751-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant and counsel and DDPP for the state are present.Proposed accused absent. Order passed and announced in open court that petition is allowed. |
|
| 11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 590/2026 | Mst. Manzooran VS SHO P.S Daharki | Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-53056-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant along with counsel are present. DDPP for the state are present. Proposed accused present for whom Mr. Ali Gul advocate filed power.File.Proposed accused and counsel make their statement on memo, in light of such statement, learned counsel for the applicant with draw the petition. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. |
|
| 12 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 610/2026 | Qutub Din VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Ghulam Yaseen Kobhar(ADVO-951-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
|
| 13 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 607/2026 | Mst. Rasheedan VS SHO P.S Daharki | Muhammad Akram(ADVO-180-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The learned counsel for the applicant and DDPP_ for the state present. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that petition is dismissed. |
|
| 14 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 606/2026 | Ghulam Murtaza Shah VS SHO P.S Daharki | Muhammad Akram(ADVO-180-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal misc. application is called . The learned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for the state are present. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition is dismissed. |
|
| 15 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 615/2026 | Mohammad Hanif VS SHO P.S Daharki | Muhammad Asif (ADVO-2625-SBC-SUK) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Proposed accused is absent. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition is dismissed. |
|
| 16 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 616/2026 | Mahooque Ali VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr.M.A.called.The appellant along with counsel are present. Report received from DSP complainant.Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of ordcer, petition stands disposed of. |
||
| 17 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 614/2026 | Kishore Kummar VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr.M.A.called.The appellant along with counsel are present. Report received from DSP complainant.Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of ordcer, petition stands disposed of. |
||
| 18 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 617/2026 | Ashique Hussain VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The learned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition is allowed. |
||
| 19 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 619/2026 | Wazeer Ahmed VS SSP Ghotki & ors | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The learned counsel for the applicant is present. Report received from DSP Complaint cell Ghotki. Notice against proposed accused issued and returned. Proposed accused absent. Put off to 29.8.2026 for hearing. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications | |||||||
| 20 | SC (Murder Trial) 326/2026 | State VS Allahdad @ dad and others | Ghulam Mujtaba(ADVO-1548-SBC-SUK),Zainab Khatoon (ADVO-1659-SBC-SUK) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-302,PPC-324 | 97/2006 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Complainant Abdul Hakeem and Mst. Bagul appeared and submitted no objection affidavit. Order on there. Put up date of hearing. The complainant and injured Mai Bagul filed separate application praying therein that the this case proceeded by this court. Order.Keep on record. The case already fixed on 1.09.2026 |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 21 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 20/2026 | Arif Mehmood Pathan VS Sajid Hussain and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
DC called. Complainant is present and submitted an adjournment, such is allowed. Learned counsel for the complainant is absent. Proposed accused present,learned counsel for the proposed accused Sajid Hussain absent, while Mr. Ghulam Abass Shah, filed power on behalf of proposed accused except proposed accused No: 1. Put off to 3.09.2026 for hearing. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 28/2021 |
Niaz Ahmed VS Irshad Ahmed | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | 26th August 2026 declared as holiday hence case put up today.Writ Part called. R and not received from Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at sukkur. Plaintiff absent. Defendant is present . Put off to 15.09.2026. Issue court motion notice to plaintiff. |
|||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 40/2026 |
Muhammad Bux @ Muhammad Chacha r VS Allah Ditto Chachar and others | Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-326-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-650-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The appellant along with counsel are present. Respondent No: 9 and counsel for the contesting respondent present. Respondents No: 8, LRs of 18 and 19 called absent and not yet served, though process were issued. Put off to 11.09.2026 for service. Issue notices to respondent No: 8,LRs of respondent No: 18 and 19 through court bailiff as well as post AD on costs. |
||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 42/2026 |
Allah Ditto Chachar VS Muhammad Bux and others | Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-650-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-326-SBC-GHT) | Civil appeal called. The appellant No: 9 is present with his counsel. Respondent No: 1 and counsel are present. By consent, appeal adjourned to 11.09 .2026 for service of respondent No: 8 and 9.Issue notice against them through court bailiff and post AD on costs. |
||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 71/2026 |
Jind Wado Solangi VS Gul Hassan Solangi/Machi and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | 26th day of August 2026 declared as holiday hence case put up today. The learned counsel for the appellant is present.Respondents absent. Put off to 16.9.2026 for service. Issue notice to respondents through court bailiff and post AD on costs |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Report | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 48/2026 | Mai Hurmat Malik VS Aijaz Ahmed and others | Ghulam Abbas Alias Javed Akhtar(ADVO-642-SBC-GHT) | Sales Tax Act 1990-2(37) | SA called. The learned counsel for the applicant is present. Report about L.Rs of deceased received fro concerned SHO. Respondents absent. The no objection of respondents already on record. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that instant succ. application allowed. Let further compliance be made as per order. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 13/2026 | Firdus Anilla Buriro VS Incharge Succession certificatew and others | Javed Hussain(ADVO-450-SBC-GHT) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | S.A. called. The learned counsel for the applicant is present. Respondent No: 10 is called absent. The matter is adjourned to 4.09.2026 for appearance of respondent No: 10. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 3 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 17/2026 | Mst. Sadia Yaseen Awan VS Muhammad Danish Kanju | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Family appeal is called. Appellant along with counsel , counsel for the defendant are present.Defendant absent. R and Ps received from civil Judge and JM Daharki. Partly arguments heard. Put off to 11.09.2026 for further arguments |
||