Bail Application under Section 498-A, Cr.P.C. is called. The Applicant/Accused is present on interim pre-arrest bail. Learned counsel for the Applicant/Accused and learned DDPP for the State are present. Learned counsel for the complainant submitted an adjournment. The partly arguments of learned counsel for the accused is heard,he submitted statement with PSC of documents. Order adjournment filed by learned counsel for the complainant ,matter adjourned to 21.09.2026 for further argument of learned counsel for the accused and argument of learned counsel for the complainant side. Present accused directed to attend.

Cr. B.A. called. The applicant/accused is present on interim pre-arrest bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Complainant is present. Since the bail of co-accused is fixed tomorrow, hence this bail application adjourned to 19.9.2026 for hearing. Present accused directed to attend,.

Case called. The accused Jiwan and Shan are present on bail, while accused Dishka and Javeed were already acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C. The accused Insaf against complainant submitted an application on 14.9.2026 that accused is under custody of SHO PS Jhol District Sanghar and report is called from SHO Reti.. Learned counsel for the accused and learned counsel for the complainant are called absent. DDPP for the state is present. SHO Reti submitted report whereby he informed that he has submitted supplementary challan of accused Insaf before concerned Magistrate, further more informed that accused in Judicial custody at District Jail Sanghar. Issue PO for him. Put off to 3.10.2026 for want of supplementary challan of accused/custody of Insaf. Present accused are directed to attend.

Received the R&Ps from the Court of the Honourable Sessions Judge, Ghotki, vide Letter No. 8128/2026, for disposal in accordance with law. The accused, Rangho, Mumtaz, and Imtiaz, are present on bail, whereas the accused, Imran and Sahib Din, are present on interim pre-arrest bail granted by the Honourable High Court of Sindh, Bench at Sukkur, vide Cr.B.A. No. S-552/2026.The learned DDPP for the State is present. The accused Imran and Sahib Din have jointly filed an application seeking time to engage counsel. The application is allowed. Case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for framing of charge. The accused present today are directed to appear on the next date.

Civil appeal is called. The appellant and her counsel are called absent.Mr.Mushtaque Ahmed advocate for contesting respondent is present. Respondents absent. Put off to 30.09.2026 for serviced. Issue fresh notice to respondents No: 4(a) to c,5(a),c,d,f,g 6d and e through concerned court bailiff with direction to past notice outer door of residence of respondents in presence of two witness.

Civil appeal is called. The appellant No: 1 along with counsel are present. Respondent No: 1 along with counsel are present and submitted statement whereby he ready to argue the appeal straightly. . Rest of respondents absent. Put off to 30.09.2026 for arguments. Call R and Ps from trial court.

The summary suit is called. The plaintiff and his witnesses are called absent. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and states that the plaintiff has not been in contact with him since the last date of hearing. The defendant, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Ch. Shahid Hussain, is present. Today, the case is fixed for evidence on behalf of the plaintiff. Perusal of the record reveals that on 25.03.2026, issues were framed. Thereafter, the case was adjourned from time to time for recording of the plaintiff???s evidence. In the meanwhile, learned counsel for the plaintiff submitted an application under Order XIII Rule 2 CPC, which was allowed. The record further reveals that the plaintiff and his witnesses have remained absent for the last three dates of hearing. Likewise, today, the plaintiff and his witnesses are again absent. Learned counsel for the plaintiff, who is present before the Court, reports that the plaintiff is not in contact with him. On the other hand, the defendant and his learned counsel have been regularly appearing before this Court. In the interest of justice, the case is adjourned as a last and final opportunity to the plaintiff to lead his evidence. It is made clear that in case of failure on the next date, the right of the plaintiff to lead evidence shall be closed, and the matter shall be decided in accordance with law on the basis of the available record. Now, the case is fixed for 23.09.2026 for plaintiff evidence.

The summary suit is called. The plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is absent. The defendant is absent, whereas his learned counsel is present. Today, the case is fixed for orders on the application for leave to defend. An order on the said application has been passed on a separate sheet, whereby the instant application is allowed, with a direction to the defendant to furnish a P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 500,000/- (Rupees Five Lac only) within 15 days. Now, the case is fixed for 30.09.2026 for compliance and further proceedings.

Civil appeal called. The appellant No:1 present. Learned counsel for the appellant is absent, his Jr. Partner is present. Respondent No: 1 and his counsel present .Today matter is fixed for objection on application under order 41 rule 5 CPC and argument on main appeal. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent submitted an application whereby he ready for straight away arguments on instant application .Now the matter adjourned on 30.09.2026 for arguments on main appeal and hearing on instant application.

Civil appeal called. The appellant along with counsel are present. One Sadam Hussain attorney of contesting respondent No:1 (a) to 4 present. Respondent Ali Hassan is also present. Learned counsel for the contesting respondents are called absent. Present contesting respondents request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 39,09.2026 for further arguments.

Civil appeal called. The appellant and counsel are called absent. Respondents as well as attorney of private respondents are called absent. Mr. Mushtaque Ahmed Kolachi, learned counsel for the contesting respondent present. Jr. Patner of learned counsel for the appellant submitted an adjournment as her Sr. Counsel busy before Honorable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur, such is allowed and matter adjourned to 30.09.2026 for arguments.

CA called. The appellant along with counsel are present. Respondents absent. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent is absent, his munshi is present. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted an adjournment, such is allowed and matter adjourned to 30.09.2026 for arguments.