| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 791/2026 | Sajjad Hussain VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The learned counsel for the applciant and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP Ghotki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view order, petition stands disposed of. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 786/2024 | The State VS Khalil Ahmed @ Ali Raza Shaikh and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Jameel-ur-Rahman(ADVO-1595-SBC-SUK) | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-J | 168/2024 Daharki |
Bail application under section 497 Cr.P.C of accused Khalil is called. Learned counsel for the accused and learned counsel for the complainant are absent. DDPP for the state present. BA adjourned to 4.11.2026 for hearing. Main case fixed on 7.11.2026 |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 333/2026 | Mohammad Farooque VS The State | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-489-F | 238/2026 Daharki |
Cr. B.A. called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and learned counsel for the complainant and DDPP for the state are present. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that interim bail granted to accused is confirmed. |
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 335/2026 | Syed Rizwan Ali Shah VS The State | Syed Nadeem Haider(ADVO-13415-SBC-KHE) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-420 | 230/2026 Daharki |
Cr. B.A. called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused present and submitted two statement ,in one whereby he submit documents,while an other he submit letter for joining of investigation. Complainant absent, for whom Mr. Danish Ali Pitafi, learned counsel sent an application 493 Cr.P.C and power. Order on it. Partly heard, learned counsel for the accused, DDPP for the state and argument of learned counsel for the complainant heard on video link/whatsapp. Put off to 3.11.2026 for further hearing/Order. Present accused directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 55/2024 | The State VS Imran Ali Chachar | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Aftab Hussain(ADVO-324-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 147/2023 Ubauro |
SC called. The accused is not produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki only slip received from jail No PWs present. Learned counsel for the accused is present. Summons returned un served. .Put off to 07.11.2026 for evidence. Issue SS to PWs. Next date informed to jail authority for production of UTP through video link. |
| 6 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 56/2024 | The State VS Shabeer Ahmed Chachar | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Aftab Hussain(ADVO-324-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 146/2023 Ubauro |
SC called. The accused is not produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki only slip received from jail No PWs present. Learned counsel for the accused is present is on bail.Put off to 07.11.2026 for evidence. Issue SS to PWs. Next date informed to jail authority for production of UTP through video link. |
| 7 | SC (Murder Trial) 297/2024 | The State VS Imran Ali Chachar and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT),Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT),Shabbir Ali(ADVO-1076-SBC-SUK) | Aftab Ahmed(ADVO-40-SBC-GHT),Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 120/2023 Ubauro |
Case Called Accused Imran Ali, Shabeer Ahmed and Deen Muhammad have not been produced in custody from District Prison, Ghotki. Only a jail slip has been received, Accused Riaz Ahmed, Ashique Hussain, Abdul Hameed and Fiaz Muhammad are present on bail. Proceedings against accused Shahzado have already abated due to his death. Learned counsel for the L.Rs of deceased(Mother of deceased) and Learned counsel for the accused are present. Mother of deceased present DDPP for the state present.Today the case is fixed for evidence and application u/s 265-K Cr.P.C.Copy of instant application supplied to learned counsel for the L.Rs of deceased. Accordingly, the case is adjourned to 7.11.2026 for recording of evidence. and hearing of application 265-K Cr.P.C,. Issue bailable warrants to the P.Ws., except the complainant and P.Ws. Shahmir and Soomar. In respect of the complainant Gul Sher and P.Ws. Shahmir and Soomar, a letter be issued through the Home Department, Government of Sindh, Karachi, to the Superintendent, District Jail, Rahim Yar Khan, for their production through video link as already ordered. The next date of hearing is communicated to the Jail Authority, Ghotki, through the jail slip, with a direction to produce the UTPs through video link. The accused who are present on bail are directed to appear on the next date of hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 769/2026 | Mst. Misfra Nazeer VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Azhar Rafique(ADVO-148-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicants along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 777/2026 | Sadam Hussain VS SHO P.S Daharki | Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-1427-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant is present and make his statement on memo and withdraw the petition with permission to file a fresh one. DDPP present. Proposed accused absent.Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposedof as withdrawn. |
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 787/2026 | Raheel VS SSP Ghotki & ors | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Private persons present and for whom Mr. Awais filed power. File.He submit statement with document. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Private persons filed application.Order on it. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
|
| 11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 786/2026 | Mst. Allah Dini VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Ali Muhammad(ADVO-1115-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for State present.Private person Asghar and two others present for whom Mr. Shahnawaz advocate filed power. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
| 12 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 788/2026 | Kamil VS SSP Ghotki & ors | M. Jawed Arain(ADVO-933-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant absent. Learned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
| 13 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 790/2026 | Arbelo VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The learned counsel for the applciant and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP Ghotki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view order, petition stands disposed of. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 14 | SC (Murder Trial) 39/2025 | The State VS Insaf Ali Shar & others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Iran Ali (ADVO-701-SBC-SHK) | Mumtaz Ali(ADVO-1087-SBC-GHT),Saleem Akhtar Malik(ADVO-127-SBC-GHT),Shafi Muhammad Bango(ADVO-519-SBC-KHP) | PPC-302 | 40/2024 Reti |
The main case, along with the post-arrest bail application under Section 497, Cr.P.C., filed on behalf of accused Insaf Ali, is called. Accused Jiwan and Shan are present on bail, whereas accused Dishka and Javeed have already been acquitted under Section 265-K, Cr.P.C. Accused Insaf Ali has not been produced from District Prison, Sanghar. The complainant is present. Learned counsel for accused Jiwan and Shan, as well as learned counsel for accused Insaf Ali, are present. Learned counsel for the complainant, is called absent, whereas the learned DDPP for the State is present.Complainant is present. Accused Insaf Ali submitted an application for shifting of custody of accused Insaf Ali to District Jail, Ghotki. Order on it. Call report from District Jail Sanghar. Today, the case is fixed for framing of charge and hearing of the post-arrest bail application of accused Insaf Ali. Since accused Insaf Ali has not been produced by the jail authorities, the charge could not be framed. Moreover, the complainant has requested for seeking adjournment of the bail application on the ground that she will brough her counsel on the next date of hearing.such request allowed. Accordingly, the case is adjourned to 14.11.2026 for framing of the amended charge against the accused persons and for hearing of the post-arrest bail application of accused Insaf Ali. Issue production orders to the Superintendent, District Prison, Sanghar, with the direction to produce accused Insaf Ali, an under-trial prisoner (UTP), through video link on the next date of hearing,so also call report on applciation filed by accused Shan Ali for shifting custody of Insaf Ali.The accused persons on bail are directed to appear in person on the next date. The next date of hearing has been communicated to the complainant. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 15 | SC (Murder Trial) 371/2024 | The State VS Akbar Ali Shar and others | Abdul Rashid Kalwar(ADVO-662-SBC-GHT),Qadir Bux(ADVO-1126-SBC-GHT) | Mumtaz Ali(ADVO-1087-SBC-GHT),Rashid Ali(ADVO-208-SBC-GHT) | Gender Based Violence-,PPC-302 | 234/2023 Ubauro |
Case of accused Insaf Ali is called,who is confined at District Jail Sanghar and not produced by the jail authority though PO was issued. Complainant and DDPP for the state present. Mr.Mumtaz Ali Naich advocate filed power of accused Insaf Ali.File.Put off to 7.11.2026 for formal. Issue PO for the accused Insaf with direction to produce the accused through video link. Call supplementary challan of accused Insaf. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 16 | DC (Direct Complaint) 10/2026 | Smt. Darshna Menghwar VS Shaman Menghwar and others | Alam Sher Khan Bozdar(ADVO-1997-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | / |
Direct complaint called. The complainant is present, while learned counsel for the complainant is absent. Put off to 7.11.2026 for hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 17 | PPC 234/2026 | The State VS Fareed Mirani and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Taibah Roohi(ADVO-879-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 40/2025 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Case called. Accused Alla-uddin is present on bail. Rest of accused declared as PO. Learned counsel for the accused and learned DDPP for the state are present. Judgment passed and announced in open court that above named accused acquitted u/s 265-H(i) Cr.P.C .The accused present on bail, his bail bond stands cancelled and surety discharged. The case against remaining accused kept on dormant file. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 40/2026 |
Aashique Ali Mazari VS Hakim Ali Mazari | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff and his counsel are remained absent without intimation. Defendant called absent as process fee not deposited by plaintiff and remained absent. Order passed on separate sheet that suit of plaintiff is dismissed in default for non prosecution. |
||
| 2 | Summary Suits 42/2026 |
Aneel Kumar VS Hafeez-ur-Rehman | Nazeer Ahmed (ADVO-649-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff along with counsel present. Defendant absent. Notice against defendant issued through post returned un-served, while report of bailiff on notice is not received. Put off to 12.11.2026.Issue fresh notice to defendant through bailiff of concerned court on costs. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 3 | Summary Suits 11/2026 |
Amanullah Shaikh VS Sarwar Ali Mirani and another | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | Mumtaz Ali(ADVO-1087-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit is called. Plaintiff along with counsel are present. Defendants absent. Learned counsel for defendant is also present. Today the matter is fixed for hearing on application leave to defend. But due to work suspended as reported by counsel,.the matter adjourned.. Put off to 14.11..2026 for hearing on instant application. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 99/2026 |
Muneer Ahmed and another VS Maqbool Ahmed Kori and others | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | CA called.The appellant along with counsel and respondent No: 1 and counsel are present. Put off to 2.11.2026 for further arguments. Call R and PS from trial court. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 49/2026 | Mst. Maryam Gabol VS Hamid and others | Abdul Razzak(ADVO-22874-SBC-KHS) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372,SUCCESSION ACT 1925-Matter | SA called. The applicant is absent. Learned counsel for the applicant is present. Verification of schedule A not received, call report from him. Put off to 12.11..2026 for appearance of respondent and verification of schedule A. |
|