| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Report | |||||||
| 1 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 58/2026 | Kanji Ram Menghwar VS Arjan Dass Menghwar and others | M. Jawed Arain(ADVO-933-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Direct complaint is called. The complainant, along with his learned counsel, is present. A letter has been received from the Mukhtiarkar (Revenue), Daharki, and the SHO, seeking time for submission of their reports. Order matter adjourned and time is allowed. Put off to 08.10.2026 for submission of the reports. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 669/2024 | The State VS Rahib Shar and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Shahzado(ADVO-522-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 33/2024 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
The verification of saving certificates of surety Mohammad Pannah who is stood surety for accused Yaseen Shar in the sum of Rs:30,000/- received from NSC Daharki. Surety is present. Further order passed on affidavit that surety is accepted. Issue release writ for accused Yaseen Shar according. Case already fixed on 6.10.2026 |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 303/2026 | Abdul Jabbar VS The State | Sher Muhammad(ADVO-1111-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-353 | 209/2026 Daharki |
Bail application under section 498 Cr.P.C is called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and learned DDPP for the state are present. Learned counsel for the accused filed statement with CTC of FIR and letter for joining investigation.Heard arguments. Order passed on separate sheet that interim bail granted to accused is confirmed. |
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 301/2026 | Hafiz Muhammad Awais & ors VS The State | Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-406 | 49/2025 Daharki |
Bail application under section 498 Cr.P.C is called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and learned DDPP for the state are present. Heard arguments. Order passed on separate sheet that interim bail granted to accused is confirmed. |
| 5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 306/2026 | Manazar Ali @ Mazar Hussain VS The State | Sher Muhammad(ADVO-1111-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-353 | 209/2026 Daharki |
Bail application under section 498 Cr.P.C is called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and learned DDPP for the state are present. Heard arguments. Order passed on separate sheet that interim bail granted to accused is confirmed. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 124/2020 | The state VS Munir Ahmed @ Mir and ors | M. Jawed Arain(ADVO-933-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-324 | 269/2019 Daharki |
SC called. The accused Muneer and Nadeem were convicted by this court vide judgement dated 20.5.2021 and they preferred appeal vide criminal appeal No: S 38/2021 before Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur whereby there were acquitted. Now the case of accused Abdul Hameed called, who is present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Complainant present. No other PWs present. Summons issued and returned. Complainant is present and request for grant of an adjournment, such is allowed. Put off to 5.10.2026.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to R/PWs. Present accused directed to attend. |
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 152/2024 | The State VS Mian Abdul Rehman @ Ahmed Shah | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-1427-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 302/2024 Daharki |
Case called. Accused confined at District Prison Ghotki, & produce him through video link. DC and DDPP for the state present . No other PWs present. Learned counsel for the accused request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 2.10.2026 for evidence. Issue summons for PWs. Next date informed to jail authority for production of UTP through video link. |
| 8 | SC (Murder Trial) 758/2024 | The State VS Mian Abdul Rehman @ Ahmed Shah | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-1427-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 294/2024 Daharki |
Case called. Accused confined at District Prison Ghotki, & produce him through video link. DC and DDPP for the state present . No other PWs present. Learned counsel for the accused request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 2.10.2026 for evidence. Issue summons for PWs. Next date informed to jail authority for production of UTP through video link. |
| 9 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 74/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Attal Shar | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 62/2025 Daharki |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused is absent. Learned DDPP for the State is present. The case is fixed today for recording of prosecution evidence. Summons were issued to the prosecution witnesses (PWs), who have been called absent. The case is adjourned to 17.10.2026 for recording of evidence. Fresh summons be issued to the PWs. The accused present today is directed to appear on the next date of hearing. |
| 10 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 75/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Nawaz Shar | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 61/2025 Daharki |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused is absent. Learned DDPP for the State is present. The case is fixed today for recording of prosecution evidence. Summons were issued to the prosecution witnesses (PWs), who have been called absent. The case is adjourned to 17.10.2026 for recording of evidence. Fresh summons be issued to the PWs. The accused present today is directed to appear on the next date of hearing. |
| 11 | SC (Murder Trial) 325/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Nawaz Shar and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | PPC-302 | 3/2025 Khenju |
S.C. called. Accused Muhammad Nawaz, Muhammad Attal, Shehryar Khan, and Jahangir Khan are present on bail. The remaining accused have been declared proclaimed offenders. M/s. Ali Ahmed Pathan and Amanullah Malik, learned counsel for the accused, learned DDPP for the State, and Mr. Anwar Ali Lohar, learned counsel for the complainant, are present. The complainant is absent, whereas witnesses Muhammad Yousif, Pir Bux, and Naseer Ahmed are present. No other PWs are present. The case is fixed today for recording of evidence. Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted an application for adjournment on the ground that the complainant, Jam Mehtab Dahar, who is an MPA as well as a member of the committee, is busy attending the first meeting of the committee being held today in Committee Room-I, Sindh Assembly Building, Karachi. Order on the application: In view of the grounds stated in the application and in the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned. The case is now fixed for 24.09.2026 for recording of evidence. Issue summons to the remaining PWs, except the complainant and the above-mentioned witnesses. The present accused are directed to attend the Court on the next date of hearing. |
| 12 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 11/2026 | The state VS Qurban Shar | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 14/2025 Khenju |
The case called. The accused, Qurban, is confined in District Prison, Ghotki, and was produced before the Court by the jail authorities through video link. Learned counsel for the accused and the learned DDPP for the State are present. The case is adjourned to 08.10.2026 for recording of evidence. Bailable warrants (BWs) are hereby issued against the PWs. The next date of hearing is communicated to the jail authorities for production of the UTP through video link. The same direction shall also be conveyed through the jail slip. |
|
| 13 | SC (Murder Trial) 27/2026 | The State VS Arbab Shar & others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 11/2025 Khenju |
Case called. Accused Arbab and Qurban are confined in District Prison, Ghotki. Only the production slip has been received, and the Jail Authorities have produced the said accused through video link. Accused Muhammad Hussain @ Hussain, Allah Dad, Shaman, and Amanullah are present on bail. The remaining accused, namely Mubarak, Bahadure, and Asif, have been declared Proclaimed Offenders. Mr. Mumtaz Ali Naich, learned counsel for the accused, the learned DDPP for the State, and Mr. Qadir Bux Bhatti, learned counsel for the complainant, are present. Today, the case is fixed for evidence. Accused Muhammad Hussain @ Hussain, Allah Dad, Shaman, and Amanullah, along with the legal representatives (L.Rs.) of the deceased, namely Rano (father of the deceased) and Mst. Umeedan (sister of the deceased), both adults, whereas Mst. Haneefan, Arbeli, and Marvi (minor sisters of the deceased), appeared before the Court and filed the following joint applications, bearing their signatures/thumb impressions, along with the signatures/thumb impressions of the accused: An application under Section 345(2) & (6), Cr.P.C., along with affidavits of the accused and the L.Rs. of the deceased. Another application under Section 345(4), Cr.P.C., seeking appointment of Rano as the Wali/guardian of the above-mentioned minor L.Rs. Order thereon: Notice is issued to the learned DDPP for the State. Report is called from the concerned Mukhtiarkar, SHO, and NADRA regarding the legal heirs of the deceased. Notices of the instant applications shall also be published in the daily newspaper Kawish. The case is adjourned to 08.10.2026 for submission of reports, further compliance in terms of the order passed on the instant applications, and for recording of evidence against accused Arbab and Qurban. The next date is communicated to the Jail Authorities for production of the UTPs through video link. The accused present on bail are directed to attend the Court on the next date. The next date is also communicated to the L.Rs. of the deceased and learned counsel for the complainant |
|
| 14 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 12/2026 | The state VS Arbab Shar | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 13/2025 Khenju |
The case called. The accused, Arbab, is confined in District Prison, Ghotki, and was produced before the Court by the jail authorities through video link. Learned counsel for the accused and the learned DDPP for the State are present. The case is adjourned to 08.10.2026 for recording of evidence. Bailable warrants (BWs) are hereby issued against the PWs. The next date of hearing is communicated to the jail authorities for production of the UTP through video link. The same direction shall also be conveyed through the jail slip. |
|
| 15 | PPC 108/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Hussain @ Hussain Shar and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 12/2025 Khenju |
Accused Arbab was not produced from District Prison, Ghotki. Only a jail slip was received, and the Jail Authority produced the accused through video link. Accused Muhammad Hussain, Allah Dad, Amanullah, Shaman, Ali Murad, and Abdul Wahid are present. The remaining accused, Bahadur, has been declared a Proclaimed Offender (P.O.). Learned DDPP for the State is present. Learned counsel for the accused is also present. The complainant and witnesses PC Farman and PC Manzoor are present. Deposition of ASI Riaz was recorded at Exh. 09. He produced the documents mentioned in his deposition, which were exhibited as Exh. 9-A to 9-C. Deposition of PC Farman was recorded at Exh. 10. He produced the mashirnamas mentioned in his deposition, which were exhibited as Exh. 10-A and 10-B. Deposition of PC Manzoor Ahmed was recorded at Exh. 11. He produced the letter, which was exhibited as Exh. 11-A. Put off to 08.10.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to the remaining prosecution witnesses (R/PWs). The next date of hearing be communicated to the Jail Authority with a direction to produce the UTP through video link on the date of hearing. The same direction shall also be conveyed through the jail slip. The accused present in Court are directed to attend on the next date of hearing. |
|
| 16 | SC (Murder Trial) 147/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Jameel Bughio and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Saeed Ahmed(ADVO-1207-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 151/2025 Daharki |
S.C. called. Accused Mohammad Jameel and Akhtar are not produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki, . Accused Mst. Parveen, not produced in custody from District Women Jail, Sukkur. Learned counsel for the accused Akhtar and Jameel present while Mr. Mohammad Javeed Arain, learned counsel for the pauper accused Mst. Parveen is also present. DDPP for the state is present. Mr. Ali Gul advocate learned counsel for the complainant present. Complainant filed an adjournment, such is allowed. No other PWs present. Put off to 08.10.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Issue PO for the accused Mai Parveen to Suptt: District Women Jail Sukkur with direction to produce through video link. Issue PO for the male accused to the concerned jail with direction to produce them through video link. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 17 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 288/2026 | Imran khan VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Sher Gul Mahar(ADVO-944LC-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
The petition already disposed of. Misc. application for non compliance of order filed by applicant through her counsel is called. Applicant is absent. Learned counsel for the applicant is present. DDPP for the state present. Report received from SHO Daharki. Order on it.In view of report instant misc. application disposed of. |
|
| 18 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 664/2026 | Mai Rani VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Abdul Manan(ADVO-757-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
The petition already disposed of. Misc. application for non compliance of order filed by applicant through her counsel is called. Learned counsel for the applicant is present. DDPP for the state present. Report received from SHO Daharki. Order on it.In view of report instant misc. application disposed of. |
|
| 19 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 691/2026 | Mst. Shareefan VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Abdul Ghaffar Soomro(ADVO-798-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6-II) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Report submitted by I.O . Learned counsel for the applicant not press the petition as endorsed on memo. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of as not press. |
| 20 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 689/2026 | Mst. Maryam VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Waseem Hassan(ADVO-254-SBC-THT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr.M.A. called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Learned counsel for the applicant not press the petition. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order petition stands disposed of as not press. |
| 21 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 696/2026 | Khalil Ahmed VS DIG Sukkur & ors | Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. I.O is present and submit report. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order,petition stands disposed of. |
| 22 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 697/2026 | Abdul Hameed VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Shagufta Bilqees Rajput(ADVO-55339-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Petition under section 22-A(6)(iii) Cr.P.C is called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order,petition stands disposed of. |
| 23 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 698/2026 | Kamal VS SHO P.S Daharki & ors | Ghulam Yaseen Kobhar(ADVO-951-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present.Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Proposed accused 1-2 present for whom Mr.Meherban Ali advocate filed power. File. Learned counsel for the proposed accused make his endorsement on memo. In light of such statement ,learned counsel for the applicant not press the petition. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
| 24 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 702/2026 | Shoaib VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Meharban Ali (ADVO-3015-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The Learned counsel for the applicant is present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. File. Learned DDPP for the state is present. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
| 25 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 709/2026 | Sonharo VS SSp Ghotki | Ghulam Rasool(ADVO-389-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Mr. Ghulam Rasool Mahar, advocate appeared and submitted petition u/s22-A(6)(iii) Cr.P.C with affidavit of applicant Sonharo. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.M.A. (Civil Misc. Appeals) 18/2025 |
Aurangzeb Samo and another VS Jamal Khatoon Samo and others | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | Application u/o 41 rule 19 CPC is called for advocate to be heard. Appellant No: 1 is present and request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 2.10.2026 for advocate to be heard. |
|||
| 2 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 41/2025 |
Muhkumuddin Dahar VS Akhtar Hussain Laghari and others | Rashid Ali(ADVO-208-SBC-GHT) | The revision was already disposed of in default for non prosecution. Today an application 151 CPC is fixed . Learned counsel for the appellant/applicant is present. Applicant is also present. Respondent absent. Learned counsel for the respondent is absent, his Jr. Partner is present and request for date, such request is allowed. Now the instant application fixed on 08.10.2026 for hearing. |
|||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 143/2025 |
Abdul Malik Shar and others VS Haji Maqsood Ahmed Arain and others | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | C.A. called. The appellant is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is also present. Respondents absent though notices were already issued by ordinary, post and publication but absent. The service against the respondents already held good. Put off to 14.10.2026 for appearance of respondents. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 4 | Summary Suits 13/2026 |
Ali Bux Mahar VS Nadeem Ahmed Malik | Abdul Sattar(ADVO-356-SBC-GHT) | Imtiaz Ahmad(ADVO-923-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff along with witness Moula dad and Mohammad Ibrahim are present. Defendant is present, his leave to defend already dismissed for non-prosecution. Learned counsel for the Plaintiff is present. Learned counsel for the defendant is absent. The plaintiff Ali Bux submitted affidavit in evidence of plaintiff, he submitted original cheque No:00000036 amount of Rs:12,00,000/- and also affidavit. Order on affidavit that keep on record.The witness Moula Dad and Mohammad Ibrahim are also submitted separate affidavits in evidence of Plaintiff. Order thereon, Keep on record. Put off to 5.10.2026 for further proceedings. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 5 | Summary Suits 22/2026 |
Sarang Batra VS Muhammad Illyas Shar | Nazeer Ahmed (ADVO-649-SBC-GHT) | In compliance of order dated 9.9.2026 passed by this court on application leave to defend. The defendant Mohammad Illyass Shar along with counsel appeared. Defendant Mohammad Illyass execute a PR bond in the sum of Rs:48,00,000/- before under signed. The case is already fixed on 2.10.2026 for further proceedings |
|||
| 6 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 104/2026 |
Mehboob Alam Bhutto VS Muhammad Arab Samejo and others | Amjad Islam (ADVO-20139-SBC-KHE) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal under Section 96 CPC is called. Learned counsel for the appellant is present. Notices issued to the respondents were returned by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Daharki, with the report that respondent No. 2 was served in person and received the notice on behalf of respondent No. 4. Respondents Nos. 6 and 7 were also duly served, whereas respondent No. 10 refused to receive the notice. Respondent No. 2 is present and has submitted an application for adjournment. Heard. The matter is adjourned. However, notices issued through TCS have been issued through TCS but delivery of notices report not yet received. The matter is, therefore, adjourned to 14.10.2026. Fresh notices be issued to respondents Nos. 1, 3 and 10 through the concerned Court Bailiff. |
||
| 7 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 113/2026 |
Abdullah Shar VS Naresh Lal and others | Rashid Ali(ADVO-208-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. called. Abdul Malik, attorney for the appellant, and Mr. Rashid Ali Sindhu, learned counsel for the appellant, are present. Today, the appeal is fixed for service. Notices issued to the respondents through the Bailiff of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Daharki, have been received back duly served upon Respondents No. 1, 5 and 7. Respondent No. 2 refused to receive the notice, whereas Respondent No. 3 has shifted to India. Respondent No. 4, namely Mumtaz Ali, is present, for whom Mr. Yar Muhammad Jalbani, Advocate, has filed his power of attorney along with a Special Power of Attorney executed by Respondents No. 1 to 3 in favour of Respondent No. 4. Order on the application. File. Mr. Rahim Bux Pitafi, DDA, appeared and submitted his statement and entered appearance on behalf of Respondents No. 5 to 9. File. Now, the appeal is adjourned to 10.10.2026 for filing of objections, if any, on the main appeal and for arguments. Call R. & P. from the trial Court. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 8 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 136/2025 |
Khadim Hussain Syed VS Rashid Ali Syed and others | Waqar Ali (ADVO-653-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal No. 138 of 2025 (Leading Appeal) and Civil Appeal No. 136 of 2025 (Subsequent Appeal, both appeal are called. The appellant, Muhammad Aleem, who is the respondent in Subsequent Appeal No. 136 of 2025, is present along with his learned counsel. Respondent No. 2, Khadim Hussain, who is the appellant in Subsequent Appeal No. 136 of 2025, is also present along with his learned counsel. The judgment is pronounced and announced in open Court, whereby both appeals are dismissed, with no order as to costs. Let the decree be prepared accordingly. Compared copy of judgment and decree of this court be sent to the learned Trial Court along with the Record and Proceedings (R&P) of the Trial Court, for information . |
|||
| 9 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 138/2025 |
Rashid Ali Syed and others VS Abdul Hameed Syed and others | Rashid Ali(ADVO-208-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal No. 138 of 2025 (Leading Appeal) and Civil Appeal No. 136 of 2025 (Subsequent Appeal, both appeal are called. The appellant, Muhammad Aleem, who is the respondent in Subsequent Appeal No. 136 of 2025, is present along with his learned counsel. Respondent No. 2, Khadim Hussain, who is the appellant in Subsequent Appeal No. 136 of 2025, is also present along with his learned counsel. The judgment is pronounced and announced in open Court, whereby both appeals are dismissed, with no order as to costs. Let the decree be prepared accordingly. Compared copy of judgment and decree of this court be sent to the learned Trial Court along with the Record and Proceedings (R&P) of the Trial Court, for information . |
|||