SC called. Accused Rano has expired, and proceedings against him have already abated. The remaining accused are present on bail except accused Talib and Muhammad Nawaz for whom application for excusing of absence received and further prayed for proceeding the case in absence of accused. Order on it. The complainant is present, whereas learned counsel for the complainant is absent. Learned counsel for the accused persons is present. Nazeer Ahmed Tapedar is present on behalf of Mukhtiarkar (R) Ubauro. and submit reply of show cause notice. Order on it. D/O Nazeer Ahmed recorded at Exh.7, who produced authority letter, report and PSC of for VII-B at Exh. 7-A to C. Now the case is fixed on 4.11.2026 for further proceeding. Present accused are directed to attend.

SC called. The accused is not produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. No PWs present. Learned counsel for the accused is present. Summons returned unserved. .Put off to 30.10 .2026.2026 for evidence. Issue SS to PWs. Issue PO for the accused to jail authority with direction to produce the UTP through video link.

Case called.The accused is present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. No PWs present. Put off to 10.11.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Accused is directed to attend.

Case called.The accused is present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. No PWs present. Put off to 10.11.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Accused is directed to attend.

Case called.The accused is present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. No PWs present. Put off to 10.11.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to PWs. Accused is directed to attend.

The case is called. All accused persons are present on bail. Mr. Jam Jamsheed Akhtar learned counsel for the accused, and the learned counsel for the complainant are present. The complainant, Jam Naveed, is also present, whereas the complainant???s witnesses are called absent. The learned counsel for the complainant has submitted an application seeking adjournment. Order on it. The matter is adjourned. In the meantime, Mst. Sadia Muneer has appeared, for whom Mr. Ghulam Abbas Shah, Advocate, has filed his power, which is taken on record. He has also submitted an application seeking clarification/correction of the order dated 30.09.2026 with regard to the identity, location and boundaries of the property, along with appropriate directions to prevent execution of the order against any property not covered thereby. The application is supported by the affidavit of Mst. Sadia Muneer. Order on it. Notice of the application be issued to the other side. In the meantime, Mst. Sadia Muneer is directed to produce the relevant documents pertaining to the bungalow. The Mukhtiarkar (Revenue), Ubauro, has also appeared and submitted an authority letter issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Ubauro, along with a progress report in the matter. Order on it. The case is adjourned to 11.11.2026 for evidence. The accused persons present today are directed to appear on the next date of hearing. The next date is communicated to the complainant and Mst. Sadia Muneer.

SC called. . The accused, Rangho, Mumtaz, and Imtiaz, are present on bail, whereas the accused, Imran and Sahib Din, are present on interim pre-arrest bail granted by the Honorable High Court of Sindh, Bench at Sukkur, vide Cr.B.A. No. S-552/2026.The learned DDPP for the State is present. Learned counsel for the accused present. Complainant present and filed adjournment with request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 10.11.2026 for evidence. Issue summons to R/PWs. Present accused directed to attend.

Petition under section 22-A(6)(i) Cr.P.C is called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present.Proposed accused No;3 along with counsel are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted statement with documents, so also learned counsel for the proposed accused filed one PSC of documents. Partly arguments heard. Put off to 24.10.2026 for further arguments.

Case called. The complainant along with counsel are present. All accused are present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused Parveez absent.while rest of accused request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 29.10.2026 for supply of documents. Present accused directed to attend.

S.C. Case.The case is called. Accused Muhammad Moosa and Sadiq are present on bail. Accused Naseer and Fareed are confined in District Prison, Ghotki, whereas accused Fida, Shabeer, and Shahnawaz have been declared proclaimed offenders. Mr. Anwar Ali Lohar, learned counsel for accused Sadiq, is absent. Ms. Shabana, learned counsel for accused Fareed, is also absent. Learned counsel for accused Naseer, learned counsel for the complainant, and the learned DDPP for the State are present. The complainant is also present. Today, the case is fixed for recording of evidence and further hearing of the bail application filed by accused Naseer. Arguments on the bail application of accused Naseer are heard. A separate order has been passed allowing bail to the accused, subject to furnishing surety in the sum of Rs. 200,000/- (Rupees Two Lac only) and a personal recognizance bond (PR bond) in the like amount. Learned counsel for the accused has further submitted an application seeking adjournment of the case for recording of evidence on another date. The application is allowed. Put up on 30.10.2026 for recording of evidence. Issue summons to the remaining prosecution witnesses (R/PWs). Issue production orders to the jail authorities for accused Naseer and Fareed to ensure their production through video link on the next date of hearing. The accused present in Court are directed to appear on the next date of hearing. The next date of hearing has been communicated to the complainant party.

SC called. Mevo, Soobo, Mohammad Pannah, Fida Hussain, Ali Muhammad, Aijaz, Rasheed, Nisar, Pehlwan are present. Proceedings against accused Shahnawaz is abated. Learned counsel for the accused, learned counsel for the father of deceased and DDPP for the State as well as Father of deceased are present. Learned counsel for the L.Rs of deceased is not press the application 497(5) Cr.P.C. Order on it. Disposed of. Put off to 10.11.2026 for charge. Present accused are directed to attend.

The case is called. All accused persons are present on bail. Mr. Jam Jamsheed Akhtar, learned counsel for the accused, and the learned counsel for the complainant are present. Jam Naveed, attorney of the complainant, is also present. The complainant???s witnesses are called absent. The learned counsel for the complainant has submitted an application seeking adjournment. Order on it.Matter adjoined. Accordingly, the matter is adjourned to 11.11.2026 for evidence. The accused persons present today are directed to appear on the next date of hearing. The complainant party is informed of the next date.

DC called. Learned counsel for the complainant is present and submitted an adjournment, such is allowed. Put off to 30.10.2026 for hearing.

Direct complaint called. Complainant is present and request for date, such is allowed. Advocate for complainant Complainant is absent.. Put off to 24.10.2026 for advocate to be heard on maintainability.

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. Called. The appellant is present along with his learned counsel. Respondent No. 4, namely Hazoor Bux, is also present along with his learned counsel, whereas the remaining respondents are called absent. The learned counsel for the contesting respondent has filed a counter-affidavit/objections to the amended title page concerning the impleadment of the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No. 1. Order: Notice of the objections be issued to the other side, who has received a copy thereof. The matter is adjourned to 11.11.2026 for hearing on the objections raised by the learned counsel for the contesting respondent regarding the amended title page and the implement of the legal representatives of Respondent No. 1.

Execution application already disposed of. The matter is fixed for satisfactory of execution and decree. The Learned counsel for the DH & DH present. J.D is absent. NBW against through SHO Daharki and same returned back by ASI Sadhayo as un-executed . Order on endorsement that Matter adjourned .Issue NBW against J.D through SSP Ghotki ,copy to DIG Sukkur/I.G sindh Karachi. for information and compliance. Hearing 17.11.2026.

The application under order 9 rule 9 CPC is called for advocate to be heard. Jr. Partner of learned counsel for the plaintiff is present and request for date, such is allowed. Put off to17.11.2026 for advocate to be heard.

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. Called. The learned counsel for the appellant is present. Respondent No. 11, namely Ali Asghar (being the same person shown at Sr. No. 22 of the plaint), is called absent, whereas his learned counsel, Mr. Ubedullah Azad, is present. A copy of the appeal is supplied to him. The remaining respondents are absent despite service through ordinary process and publication; hence, service upon them is held sufficient. Adjourned to 11.11.2026 for objections, if any, to the main appeal, and arguments. The office is directed to call for the Record and Proceedings (R&Ps) from the learned Trial Court.

The matter is called for deposit of court fee and advocate to be heard on appeal. Learned counsel for the appellant is present and submitted an application u/s 148 CPC.Order on it. Matter adjourned. Put off to 10.11.2026 for deposit of court fee and advocate to be heard on point of admission.

Ex. application called. The DH is absent. Learned counsel for the D.H present. JD absent and not yet served though notices issued through court. Issue fresh notice to JD through court bailiff concerned court through Honorable District Judge Sanghar. and post AD/TCS on costs. . Hearing 11.11.2026 for service.

Civil Revision Application under Section 115, C.P.C. Called. The applicant and his learned counsel are absent. However, the Munshi of the learned counsel for the applicant is present. Notices issued to the respondents through the Court Bailiff of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Ubauro, have been received back with the bailiff report stating that Respondents No. 3 and 4 have been served, whereas the remaining respondents have not yet been served. The respondents are called absent. Adjourned to 30.10.2026. Issue fresh notices to Respondents No. 1, 2 and 5 through the Court Bailiff and by registered post A.D., at the applicant???s cost.

Civil appeal under section 96 CPC is called. The appellant along with counsel are present. Respondent No: 1 present, who is claiming as attorney of respondent No: 3 and 4 and their counsel Mr. Sudham Chand advocate are present. Respondent Muneer is also present. DDA for official respondents present. By consent, the appeal adjourned. Put off to 11.11.2026 for arguments.

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. Called. Appellant No. 12, Abdul Razzaque, being the attorney of the co-appellants, is present along with his learned counsel. Respondent No. 1 is also present along with his learned counsel, Mr. Muhammad Tarique, Advocate. Respondent No. 11, namely Makhno, has expired, while the remaining respondents are absent. Today, the matter is fixed for filing an appropriate application for bringing the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No. 11, Makhno, on record. The learned counsel for the appellants has submitted an application under Order XXII, Rule 4, C.P.C., supported by the affidavit of Appellant Abdul Razzaque. The learned counsel for the other side has raised no objection to the application. Order on it., the application is allowed. The matter is adjourned to 11.11.2026 for filing of the amended title page showing the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No. 11, Makhno.

C.A. called. The appellant is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is called absent. Respondent Amid Shahzad along with counsel Mr. Jamsheed Faiz learned counsel for the contesting respondent present. Appellant request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 7.11.2026for filing of objections and arguments on the main appeal.

Civil appeal under section 96 CPC is called. The appellant is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. Respondent Amjid Shahzad along with counsel Mr. Jamsheed Faiz are also present. Today the matter is fixed for argument and hearing on application 6 rule 17 CPC but the appellant submitted an adjournment application, such is allowed. Put off to 7.11.2026 for hearing of instant application and argument on main appeal.

CA called.The appellant along with counsel present . Respondent No: 4 and counsel for the contesting respondents are present. Today appeal is fixed for arguments. and advocate to be heard on application u/s75 & 151 R/W-S 26 rule 9 CPC. Partly heard learned counsel for the parties. Now the appeal is adjourned to 29.10.2026 for further argument if any.

Leading Civil Appeal No. 10 of 2026 Re: Ghulam Mustafa v. Public at Large & Subsequent Civil Appeal No. 11 of 2026 Re: Ghulam Mustafa v. Mst. Gul Baharan Both appeals are called. Appellant No. 1(h), namely Arab, is present. Mr. Shahid Hussain, learned counsel for the appellants, is also present and has submitted consolidated written final arguments on behalf of the appellants in both appeals. Respondents No. 1 to 7 are absent. The learned DDA for the official respondents is present. Abdul Majeed, attorney of Respondents No. 8(a) to 8(f), is present along with Mr. Abdul Fatah Samo, Advocate. Respondent No. 9, being the attorney of Respondents No. 10 to 15, is also present along with their learned counsel, Mr. Muhammad Tarique, Advocate. The appeals are adjourned to 28.10.2026 for arguments on behalf of the contesting respondents. The office is directed to call for the Record and Proceedings (R&Ps) from the learned Trial Court.

The instant subsequent appeal is called. Appellant No. 1(h), along with his learned counsel, is present. Abdul Majeed, attorney of Respondents No. 1(a) to 1(f), along with their learned counsel, is present. Respondent No. 2 is also present along with his learned counsel. The leading appeal, bearing No. 10 of 2026, titled Ghulam Mustafa v. Public at Large, has been adjourned to 28.10.2026. Accordingly, the instant subsequent appeal is also adjourned to 28.10.2026 to be taken up along with the leading appeal.

Civil Appeal under Section 96, C.P.C. The appeal is called. The attorney for the appellant is present. The learned counsel for the appellant is also present. Respondent Muhammad Moar is present and submitted an application whereby he stated that he argue the matter him self. Order on it. while the remaining respondents are absent. The appeal is fixed today for argument. Hearing 4.11.2026

Civil appeal under section 96 CPC is called. The appellant No: 1 along with counsel Ch. Shahid Hussain are present. Respondent No: 1 and counsel Mr. Iftikhar Hussain Shahani are present. R and Ps received from the court of learned Sr. Civil Judge, Ubauro in two parts vide letter No 491/2026 dated 7.10.2026.Learned counsel for the appellant request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 30.10.2026 for arguments.