An order dated 4.09.2026 passed by the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur vide criminal bail applciation No: S-646/2026 Re- Alladin whereby bail of accused Alladin is allowed in the sum of Rs: 500000/- five lac and PR bond in the like amount and same order received from the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II M.Mathelo vide his letter No: 648/2026.Order on it.Send for verification. Deponent Muhammad Zeshan son of Mohammad Aslam Malik filed affidavit along with saving certificate in the sum of five lac for standing surety for accused Alladin. Order on it. Send for verification. Case already fixed on 22.09.2026

SC called. The accused Rano expired, proceedings against him already abated, while rest of accused are present on bail except accused Talib Hussain, for whom separate application received for excusing of absence. Order on it. Notice against Mukhtiarkar and SHO concerned issued for recording to evidence in respect of inquires.. SIP Bahram Bhutto is present, while no intimation received from Mukhtiarkar. Learned counsel for the complainant is absent. Learned counsel for the accused present. Complainant request for date, such is allowed.Put off to 23.09.2026 for evidence. Next date informed to SIP Bahram Bhutto to apepar for evidence. Issue fresh notice/summons to Mukhtiarkar concerned. Present accused are directed to attend.

Cr. M.A. called. The applicant with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Proposed accused absent. Mr. Ubedullah Azad advocate filed power of proposed accused and adjournment. Order thereon. Power file and adjournment granted. Put off to 14.09.2026 for hearing.

Cr. M.A. called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Proposed accused present for whom Muhammad Abdul Ahad advocate filed power and also submitted objection on petition.File. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Partly arguments heard. Put off to 11.09.2026 for further hearing/Order.

Cr. B.A. called. The applicants/accused are present on interim bail. DC and DDPP for the state present.Complainant present for whom Mr. Mohammad Javeed advocate filed power and adjournment application.Order thereon Power file and adjournment granted. Put off to 10.09.2026 for hearing. Present accused directed to attend.

Petition under section 22-A(6)(iii) Cr.P.C called. The applicant along with counsel and DDPP for the state present.Matter is fixed for advocate to be heard. Heard, learned counsel, in the meanwhile, call report from DSP complaint cell ghotki. Hearing. 15.09.2026

Cr. M.A. called. Learned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for the state are present. Report not received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Proposed accused absent. Call report from DSP complainant cell Ghotki and notice to proposed accused. Hearing. 12,09.2026 Late diary .Proposed accused present and request of date, such is allowed. The petition already fixed on 12.09.2026

Case Called. Accused Bashir Ahmed is present on bail. Accused Khalil Ahmed alias Ali Raza is confined in District Prison, Ghotki. Only a jail slip has been received . The remaining accused declared Proclaimed Offenders. Learned counsel for the accused, learned DDPP for the State, learned counsel for the complainant, as well as the complainant, are present. Today, the case is fixed for arguments on behalf of the complainant only. Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted an application seeking adjournment on the ground that transfer application is pending before the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur which is fixed on 17.09.2026.Order on it .In the interest of justice, matter is adjourned. Put off to 19.09.2026 for final arguments. Next date informed to jail authority for production of UTP through video link. Present accused on bail is directed to attend. Next date informed to complainant party.

C.A. called. The appellant is absent. Learned counsel for the appellant is present. Respondents absent though notices were issued by ordinary, post and publication but absent. The service against the respondents held good. Put off to 24.09.2026 for appearance of respondents.

C.A. called. The appellant No: 2-B along with counsel are present. Respondents No: 4(a)(who is attorney of respondents No: 1(a) to (f),3(b) to g,3(i) to K, 4(b) , 5 and 6 present, while rest of respondents absent.Perusal of judgment of trial court it reflect that 2(a) to f,3(a) (i) to vii absent. Now the appeal is fixed on 30.09.2026 for objection if any of present respodnents and service. Issue fresh notice to respondents No:2(a) to f,3(a) (i) to vii through court bailiff with direction to past notice outer door of residence of respondents.

Ex. application called. The DH is absent. Learned counsel for the D.H present. JD absent and not yet served. Issue notice to JD through court bailiff concerned court through Honourable District Judge Sanghar.and post AD on costs. .Hearing 23.09.2026 for service.

CA called. Appellant No: 1 along with counsel present and submitted an application u/o 41 rule 5 r/w-s 151 CPC along with supporting affidavit of appellant No: 1.Order on it. Notice to other side. The respondent No: 1 and counsel present and copy of instant application supplied to them. Put off to 26.09.2026 for objection on instant appeal and instant application.

CA called. The appellant along with counsel are present. Respondent Hazoor Bux and Mr. Soomar Dass ,learned counsel for the contesting respondents are present. Rest of respondents absent. Today the appeal is fixed for hearing /Order of application under order 22 rule 4 CPC regarding joining of L.Rs of deceased /respondent (1) Nabi Bux. but learned counsel for the appellant request for time to submit case laws, such request is allowed and matter adjourned. Put off to 16.9.2026 for order on instant application.

Civil appeal is called. Appellant Abdul Razzaque is present.Mr. Jam Jamsheed Akhtar ,learned counsel for the appellant, and respondent No: 1 his counsel Mr. Muhammad Tarique, learned counsel for the contesting respondents are present. Today is appeared fixed for arguments and hearing of application u/o 6 rule 17 CPC. Learned counsel for the respondent filed an adjournment for date, such is allowed. Put off to 23.9.2026 for arguments on main appeal and hearing of application 6 rule 17 CPC.

C.A called. The appellant along present. Respondent No: 4 and 5 are present.Rest of respondents are called absent. Learned counsel for the respondent No: 5 present. Today matter is fixed for re-arguments. Jr. Partner of learned counsel for the appellant filed an adjournment, such is allowed. Put off to 25.09.2026 for arguments.

CA called. The appellant is present . Learned counsel for the appellant is present. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent No: 1-2 present. DDA for official respondent present. Respondents No:1-2 are absent. Rest of respondents are called absent. Today the appeal is fixed for objection and hearing application u/s 8 of oath Act, filed by appellant side, Learned counsel for the contesting respondent request for date, such is allowed with direction to direct the respondent1-2 to appear on date of hearing. Now the appeal fixed on 16.09.2026 for objection /hearing on instant application.

C.A. called. The attorney of appellant is present. Respondent No: 1 present and submitted an adjournment for time to engage counsel, such is allowed. Put off to 26.09.2026 for arguments.