| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 269/2026 | Ghulam Murtaza VS The State | Iftikhar Ahmed (ADVO-3122-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | PPC-354 | 185/2026 Daharki |
The applicant/Complainant Mst.Sajida along with counsel Mr. Nawab Ali appeared and submitted an application under section 497(5) Cr.P.C for cancellation of bail. Order on it. Notice to accused ,call for report from I.O .Hearing 16.9.2026 |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 273/2026 | Muhammad Bilal @ Bilal VS The State | Bashir Ahmed (ADVO-557-SBC-GHT) | PPC-457 | 190/2026 Daharki |
Cr. B.A.called.The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused is present and submitted CTC FIR and letter for joining trial. Notice against complainant issued and returned un-served and same is extended. Put off to 14.9.2026 for hearing. Present accused directed to attend. |
|
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 275/2026 | Zohaib VS The State | Ghulam Yaseen Kobhar(ADVO-951-SBC-GHT) | Gambling Act -Section 5-A | 191/2026 Daharki |
Cr. B.A. called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present.Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order interim bail is confirmed. |
|
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 276/2026 | Misree VS The State | Ali Hassan (ADVO-50927-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 1/2025 Khenju |
Cr. B.A. called. The applicant/accused is present on interim bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. The complainant absent though notice issued. Put off to 17.09.2026 for hearing. Present accused directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | SC (Murder Trial) 46/2024 | The State VS Raees Asif Ali Chachar and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Nawab Ali(ADVO-1073-SBC-SUK) | Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 98/2023 Daharki |
SC called.Accused Shamshad Bibi alias Shazia is present on bail. Accused Nazeer and Raees Asif are confined at District Jail Rahimyar Khan. Learned counsel for the accused, learned DDPP for the state and Jr. Partner of learned counsel for the complainant are present. Complainant is absent though he was present on last date. No other PWs present. Jr. Partner of learned counsel for the complainant request for date, such is allowed. Case adjourned to 25.09.2026 for evidence. Issue BWs against R/PWs including complainant. Issue letter to Supt:District Jail Rahimyar Khan with direction the UTPs produced through video link. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 620/2026 | Nazar Muhammad VS SHO P.S Dad Leghari | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The applicant along with counsel, proposed accused and counsel as well as DDPP for the state are present. Proposed accused made is statement in written on memo that he ready to enter in private faisala. In such statement learned counsel withdraw the petition with permission to file a fresh. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. |
|
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1831/2026 | Muhammad Shareef Mazari VS SHO PS Khambhra and others | Aftab Ahmed(ADVO-40-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A.called. The learned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Learned counsel for the applicant request for date, such is allowed. Put off to 16.09.2026. for hearing. Issue notice to proposed accused. Late diary Proposed accused are appeared and submitted an application for time, such is allowe. Mr.Shah Mohammad advocate filed power. File. Petition already fixed on 16.09.2026 |
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1832/2026 | Muhammad Shareef Mazari VS SSP Ghotki and others | Aftab Ahmed(ADVO-40-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The learned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 646/2026 | Faiz Muhammad VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Aftab Ahmed(ADVO-40-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The learned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
|
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 645/2026 | Abdul Lateef VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Aftab Ahmed(ADVO-40-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The learned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
|
| 11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 651/2026 | Akhlaque Ahmed VS SHO P.S Daharki | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The learned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for the state present. Proposed accused as well as applicant ae absent. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted statement whereby he withdraw the petition. Order passed on separate sheet that petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. |
|
| 12 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 667/2026 | Ghanwar VS SSP Ghotki | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The learned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
|
| 13 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 669/2026 | Ghulam Muhammad VS SSP Ghotki & ors | Muhammad Yousaf(ADVO-920-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr. M.A. called. The learned counsel for the applicant and DDPP for the state are present. Report received from DSP complaint cell Ghotki. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet that in view of order, petition stands disposed of. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 14 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 43/2026 | Muhammad Yousif Awan VS Ghulam Rasool Dhandhu & others | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
DC called. The complainant is absent. Learned counsel for the complainant is present. Learned counsel for the proposed accused No: 1 is present and submitted statement with documents. File. Report not received from Mukhtiarkar ,tapedar of beat present and request for time, such is allowed. Now the direct complaint is fixed on 16.9.2026 for report/hearing. |
|
| 15 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 59/2026 | Muhammad Unhar Mahar VS Rahib Mahar and others | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Received direct complaint from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge, Ghotki,for disposal according to law and fixed today. Learned counsel for the complainant is present. Put off to 16.9.2026 for advocate to be heard. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 9/2025 |
Hari Chand VS Mukesh Kumar Choithani | Avinash (ADVO-722-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Execution application already disposed of. The matter is fixed for satisfactory of execution and decree. The Learned counsel for the DH present. J.D is absent. Put off to 16.09.2026 for execution of NBW against JD through SSP Ghotki. |
||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 91/2025 |
Iftikhar Ahmed Jatt through Legal heirs VS Shahnawaz and others | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The attorney of appellant absent.Learned counsel for the appellant present. Respondent No: 2-b and 5-b,7 and 15 are present. Rest of respondents absent. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent No: 15 is present. Put off to 23.9.2026 for service. Issue fresh notice to respondents/LRs of respondent No: 1, No2(a), c to h 5(a),c to f and 16 through court bailiff and post AD on costs. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Advocate to be Heard | |||||||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 92/2025 |
Iftikhar Ahmed Jatt through Legal heirs VS Gaji Chachar and others | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | Civil appeal is called. The appellant and attorney of appellant is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is present. Respondent No: 1 & 2 along with counsel are present. Official respondents absent. Intervenor Jalal din counsel and counsel absent. Today the matter is fixed for advocate to be heard on application u/0 1 r 10 CPC. Put off to 23.09.2026 for advocate to be heard. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 144/2025 |
Iftikhar Ahmed Jatt (expired) through Legal heirs VS Dr. Ghulam Yaseen Niazi and others | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | Civil appeal is called. The appellant and attorney of appellant are called absent. Learned counsel for the appellant is present.Respondent No:5,6(b),& 8 are present. Rest of respondents are absent. Mr. Jam Jamsheed Akhtar advocate for the contesting respondents No:2,4(a),4(d) to h and 5 is called absent. Mr.Ghulam Murtaza Dayo, learned counsel for the respondent No:8 present. The respondents No: 9 and 10 present and request for date to bring counsel, such is allowed. The matter is fixed for service and advocate to be heard on application u/o 41 r 27 CPC filed by appellant side. In respondents of service, the respondents No: 1(a),2(a) to 4(c) &11 not are not yet served. while respondent No: 6(b) Aijaz present and submitted an adjourment application for time, such is allowed.Respondent No: 3 expired as reported by his son Fida Hussain through submitting an application. Order on it. Put off to 23.09.2026 for proper filing of application of LRs of respondent No: 3 and service. Issue fresh notices to respondents 1(a),2(a) to 4(c) &11 through concerned court bailiff and post AD on costs. |
|||
| 5 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 40/2026 |
Muhammad Bux @ Muhammad Chacha r VS Allah Ditto Chachar and others | Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-326-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-650-SBC-GHT) | C.A. called.The appellant and counsel are present. Respondents 1 to 10 and counsel are called absent. Respondent 18 to 19 not served. Issue notice to respondents through court bailiff and post AD on costs. Hearing 25.9.2026 for service. |
||
| 6 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 42/2026 |
Allah Ditto Chachar VS Muhammad Bux and others | Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-650-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-326-SBC-GHT) | C.A. called. The appellant and learned counsel are called absent. Respondent No: 1 and learned counsel for the respondent No: 1 present. Respondents No: 2 to7 are official respondents and called absent. The respondent No: 8 and 9 struck of as shown in title of plaint. Now the appeal is adjourned to 25.09.2026 for arguments. Call R and Ps from trial court. |
||
| 7 | Summary Suits 22/2026 |
Sarang Batra VS Muhammad Illyas Shar | Nazeer Ahmed (ADVO-649-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff along with counsel,defendant and counsel are present. Today the suit is fixed for order on application leave to defend. Order passed on separate sheet that instant application allowed with direction to defend to furnish PR bond in the sum of Rs:48,00,000/-fourty eight lac. Put off to 2.10.2026 for compliance. |
|||
| 8 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 60/2026 |
Muhammad Hashim Kosh VS Province of Sindh and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Civil appeal is called. The appellant along with counsel are present. Official respondents No: 1 to 8 are called absent. One Muhammad Ashraf claiming as attorney of respondents No:8(a) and (b) is called absent.Respondents NO: 9 and 14 are present. Rest of respondents are called absent.MS Taibah Roohi,learned counsel appeared and submitted power onbehalf of respondent (9) Ali Nawaz.Order file.Respondent No: 14 Ghulam Rasool filed an adjournment application, such is allowed.(Respondent shown on title bearing No: 13(b) and 15 is same person namely Ali Gohar, for whom his son Aijaz Ahmed submitted an application that his father (Respondent No: 13(b) and same person shown at (15) has been expired. Other side informed.(Respondent shown in title page at Sr. No:13(c) and 15 who is same persons Ali Muhammad for whom his son namely Mohammad Pannah submitted an application for adjournment, such is allowed. Respondents No: 10,11,13(d) to (g) are not served. Issue fresh notices to them through court bailiff and post AD on costs. Hearing 23.09.2026 for service and appearance of respondents/objection on appeal. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 9 | Summary Suits 33/2025 |
Wali Muhammad Boohar VS Sadam Hussain Tanwari | Qadir Bux(ADVO-1126-SBC-GHT),Saeed Ahmed(ADVO-225-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff and his witness are called absent. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. Defendant along with counsel are present. Today the matter is fixed for hearing of application u/s 13 rule 2 CPC. Learned counsel for the defendant raised no objection on instant application and order on it.Allowed. Put off to 18.09.2026 for PE |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 10 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 112/2025 |
Muhammad Haneef Bhayo VS Jeewan Bhayo and others | Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT) | C.A. called. The appellant along with counsel are present. One Sadam Hussain, the attorney of respondent No: 2(a) to g and respondent No:6(b) are present. Respondent of respondents absent. M/S Danish Ali and Nawab Ali Pitafi, learned counsel for the contesting respondents are present. Partly arguments heard. Learned counsel for the respondent No: 6(b) filed statement with documents. Put off to 18.9.2026 for further arguments. |
|||
| 11 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 114/2025 |
Billal Afzal Jatt VS Iftikhar Ahmed Jatt and others | Saeed Ahmed(ADVO-1207-SBC-GHT) | Javed Hussain Seerlo (DDA)(ADVO-1015-SBC-SUK) | CA called. The appellant absent. Learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the contesting respondent are present. Private respondent absent. By joint request, civil appeal adjourned to 23.09.2026 for arguments. |
||
| 12 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 117/2025 |
Muhram Shar and another VS Muhammad Jaffar Kolachi and others | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | CA called. The appellant No: 2 along with counsel are present. The respondents absent. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent present. By joint request, appeal adjourned to 18.09.2026 for arguments. |
||
| 13 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 132/2025 |
Manzoor Ahmed Bhutto VS Mitho Khan Mahar and others | Muhammad Sadique Malik(ADVO-833-SBC-GHT) | C.appeal called. The parties are called absent. Learned counsel for the both parties present and their request, appeal adjourned to 25.09.2026 for arguments. |
|||
| 14 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 134/2025 |
Amanullah Gopang and others VS Nek Muhammad Shaikh and others | Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-110-SBC-GHT) | CA called. The appellant No: 1 and his counsel present. Learned counsel for the contesting respondent present and submitted an application informed that respondent No: 1(a) has been expired, notice to other side,who noted it. Put off to 25.9.2026 for filing of proper application for joining of LRs of respondent No: 1(a) |
|||
| 15 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 23/2026 |
Mst. Jatani Rind and ors VS Mst. Zainab Rind and others | Mushtaque Ahmed Kolachi(ADVO-73-SBC-GHT) | Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT) | CA called. Both parties counsel are present and at their request, appeal adjourned to 18.09.;2026 for arguments. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | |||||
| 1 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 17/2026 | Mst. Sadia Yaseen Awan VS Muhammad Danish Kanju | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Family appeal called. The appellant along with Jr.Partner of counsel for the appellant present. Respondent absent. learned counsel for the respondent present. The matter is fixed on 25.09.2026 for further hearing |
|