Cr. M.A. called.The applicant counsel and DDPP for the state are present. Proposed accused absent and not served and same is extended. Put off to 26.10.2026 for hearing.

The matter is fixed today. Civil Appeal called. Mr. Rashid Ali Sindhu, learned counsel for the appellant, is called absent. Appellant No: 1 present and filed an application for time, such is allowed. One Masoo, who is Respondent No. 1 and is also shown at Serial No. 4(c), is present and claims to be the attorney of Respondent Nos. 4(a), 4(b) and 4(e). The remaining respondents are called absent. M/s. Mushtaque Ahmed Kolachi, learned counsel for the contesting Respondent No. 1 and Respondent Nos. 4(a) to 4(c) and 4(e), and Mr. Akhtar Hussain Malik, learned counsel for the contesting Respondent Nos. 3(b) to 3(f), are present. Perusal of the diaries reveals that eleven (11) respondents were shown in the title of the appeal, out of whom Respondent No. 1, Respondent Nos. 3(b) to 3(f), and Respondent Nos. 4(a), 4(b), 4(c) and 4(e) have engaged their respective counsel in the proceedings. The learned DDA for the State has also appeared and entered his appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 7 to 11. The record further reflects that Respondent No. 5, Abdul Sattar, appeared vide diary dated 06.08.2026 and submitted an application stating that Respondent No. 6, being his brother, and he himself have no interest in the appeal. As per diary dated 21.08.2026, service upon the legal representatives of Respondent No. 4(g) has been held good. Respondent No. 2, namely Luqman, who is also shown in the title as Respondent No. 3(a), Respondent No. 4(d) and Respondent No. 4(f), has not yet been served. Accordingly, the instant appeal is adjourned to 6.11.2026 for service upon Luqman, shown in the title as Respondent No. 2, who is same person as shown at respondent 3(a), Respondent No. 4(d) and Respondent No. 4(f). Issue notice through the Bailiff of the concerned Court as well as through registered post A.D., at the cost of the appellant.