Case called. Accused Arbab and Qurban are confined in District Prison, Ghotki. Only the production slip has been received. Accused Muhammad Hussain @ Hussain, Allah Dad, Shaman, and Amanullah are present on bail, whereas the remaining accused, namely Mubarak, Bahadure, and Asif, have been declared proclaimed offenders. Mr. Mumtaz Ali Naich, learned counsel for the accused, and the learned DDPP for the State are present. Learned counsel for the complainant is absent. Today, the case is fixed for evidence against accused Qurban and Arbab. Meanwhile, applications under Sections 345(2) and 345(6), Cr.P.C., seeking permission to compound the offence and acceptance of the compromise arrived at between the legal heirs (L.Rs.) of the deceased and accused Muhammad Hussain @ Hussain, Allah Dad, Shaman, and Amanullah, are pending adjudication. In compliance with the directions issued in connection with the said applications, notice of the applications was published in the daily Kawish dated 13.10.2026, as stated by learned counsel for the accused, who has also submitted copies of the newspaper. However, the reports regarding the legal heirs of the deceased, called for from the concerned authorities, have not yet been received. Accordingly, reports regarding the legal heirs of the deceased shall be obtained from NADRA, the concerned Mukhtiarkar, and the SHO, Police Station Khenju, as already directed. The aforesaid applications, as well as the main case against accused Qurban and Arbab, are adjourned to 03.11.2026 for evidence. Summons be issued to the complainant and other prosecution witnesses (PWs). The next date of hearing shall be communicated to the jail authorities through a production slip, with directions to produce the under-trial prisoners (UTPs) through video link. The accused present on bail are directed to appear before the Court on the next date of hearing. Let the next date of hearing also be communicated to Rano, father of the deceased.

Deponent Nokhab son of Muhammad Bux alias Muhammad Gabole filed affidavit alongwith CTC of form VII for standing surety in the sum of Rs: 200,000/-each of accused Naseer and Fareed. Order on it.Send for verification. Case already fixed on 30.10.2026

The case called. The accused, is confined in District Prison, Ghotki. only slip received. Learned counsel for the accused and the learned DDPP for the State are present. No PWs present. Process issued and returned unserved. The case is adjourned to 3.11.2026 for recording of evidence. Bailable warrants (BWs) are hereby issued against the PWs. The next date of hearing is communicated to the jail authorities for production of the UTP through video link and same direction shall also be conveyed through the jail slip.

The case called. The accused, Qurban, is confined in District Prison, Ghotki. only slip received. Learned counsel for the accused and the learned DDPP for the State are present. No PWs present. Process issued and returned unserved. The case is adjourned to 3.11.2026 for recording of evidence. Bailable warrants (BWs) are hereby issued against the PWs. The next date of hearing is communicated to the jail authorities for production of the UTP through video link and same direction shall also be conveyed through the jail slip.

Case called. Accused Arbab has not been produced from District Prison, Ghotki. Only a jail slip has been received. Accused Muhammad Hussain, Allah Dad, Amanullah, Shaman, Ali Murad, and Abdul Wahid are present before the Court, whereas accused Bahadur has been declared a Proclaimed Offender (P.O.). The learned DDPP for the State and learned counsel for the accused are present. Today, the case is fixed for recording the evidence of ASI Muhammad Waris. A bailable warrant was issued against him through the concerned SHO, who entrusted the same to HC Haider Ali. However, HC Haider Ali returned the process unserved. Accordingly, the bailable warrant is extended for execution. Now, the case is adjourned to 03.11.2026 for recording the evidence of ASI Muhammad Waris. The accused present on bail are directed to appear before the Court on the next date of hearing. Let the next date of hearing be communicated to the jail authorities through a production slip, with directions to produce under-trial prisoner (UTP) Arbab before the Court through video link.

Case called.Accused Parveen is confined at District Women Jail, Sukkur and not produced by jail authority, while accused Muhammad Jameel is also confined at CP Sukkur and accused Mohammad Akhtar is also confined at District Prison Ghotki both are not produced by the jail authority. The complainant along with counsel , learned counsel for the all above named accused and DDPP for the state are present. Today the case is fixed for evidence and hearing of bail application under section 497 Cr.P.C of accused Parveen. the copies of instant bail application supplied to complainant party and DDPP for the state. Learned counsel for the complainant submitted an adjournment, such is allowed. Case adjourned by consent of both parties counsel. Put off to 3.11.2026 for evidence and hearing of instant bail application. Issue summons to PWs. Issue PO for the accused persons to jail authorities with direction to produce the UTPs through video link.

SC called. Accused is present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Summons to PWs issued and returned un-served and same is extended. No PWs present. Put off to 3.11.2026 for evidence. Present accused directed to attend.

SC called. Accused is present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused and DDPP for the state are present. Summons to PWs issued and returned un-served and same is extended. No PWs present. Put off to 3.11.2026 for evidence. Present accused directed to attend.

Application u/s 151 CPC called. The applicant along with counsel and learned counsel for the respondent present. Heard. Order on instant applciation allowed subject to cost of Rs:5000/-.let revision application restored on its original position. Put off to 29.10.2026 for compliance and hearing.

Summary suit called. Plaintiff No. 1 she is also next friend of Plaintiffs Nos. 2 and 3, and witness Muhammad Irfan Mustafa along with counsel are present. Defendant and his counsel Mr.Abdul Majeed Mirbahar are present. D/O Muhammad Irfan Mustafa recorded at Exh.09.Learned counsel for the Plaintiff submitted application for calling bank Manager of Faisal Bank Daharki. Order on it. Allowed. Call bank Manager with relevant record for evidence. Put off to 30.10.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side.

Civil Appeal under Section 96 of CPC is called. The appellant is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. Respondent No. 5 is also present, while the remaining respondents are absent. Mr. Jam Jamsheed Akhtar, learned counsel for the contesting respondent, and learned DDA for the official respondents, are absent. By joint request of parties, the matter adjourned to 3.11.2026 for further arguments.