| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 238/2023 | The State VS Sikandar Ali Phulpoto | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 28/2023 Tando Masti Khan |
Case called. Accused Sikandar Ali Phulpoto has already been on kept on dormant file his till arrest. NBW issued against accused Sikandar Ali Phulpoto and notice U/S 514 Cr: P.C to surety, but not returned. Issue fresh NBW against accused Sikandar Ali Phulpoto and notice U/S 514 Cr: P.C to surety. Case adjourned. Put off to. 27.03.2026. For service of accused & his surety. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 681/2026 | Altaf Hussain Dharejo VS The State | PPC-397 | 180/2025 Kotdiji |
Cr: post arrest bail application called. Applicant/accused is confined in CP Khairpur. Counsel for applicant/accused is present. ADPP for the state is present. Call complainant and police papers. Bail application is adjourned. Put off to???27.02.2026 for hearing on bail application. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 650/2026 | Jamshed Ali alias Haji Muhammad and others VS The State | PPC-337-A(i) | 245/2025 A-Section Khairpur |
Cr: pre arrest B.A called. Applicants/accused present on interim bail. Counsel for applicants/accused is present. ADPP for State is present. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet. The interim bail already granted to applicants/accused is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions. |
||
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 366/2026 | Nazeer Ali Mangrio and others VS The State | PPC-324 | 145/2025 Tando Masti Khan |
Criminal pre-arrest bail application called. Applicants/ accused are present on interim bail. Mr. Atta Hussain Chandio advocate has filed power on behalf of complainant. Order passed on it. File. Complainant also present and filed affidavit for no objection. Order passed on it. File. Counsel for applicants/accused is present and put his endorsement over the memo of bail application for withdrawal of this bail application. Order passed on separate sheet. The present bail application is disposed of as withdrawn. Interim bail order is recalled and surety is discharged. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Compromise Appl: | |||||||
| 5 | SC (Murder Trial) 461/2010 | The State VS Gullan Jageerani & Others | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | Manzoor Hussain(ADVO-1122-SBC-KHP) | PPC-302 | 49/2010 Tando Masti Khan |
Case Called. Accused Gullan Jagirani is present on bail, ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for accused is absent. The compromise application is already filed showing the names of the legal heirs of deceased Mst: Khairan @ Wadi . The statements of the shown legal heirs are recorded but the perusal of NADRA record of the father shown in the compromise namely Wali Muhammad does not suggest the name of Mst: Khairan @ Wadi . The marriage certificate produced by the accused along with the compromise application suggests that the same was issued on 12.07.2024 but the present FIR was registered in the year 2010. The CNIC No. of Mst: Khair Bai is mentioned as bearing No: 45203-8283379-9. Let the CNIC No: 45203-8283379-9 be verified and call the record from NADRA. Issue letter to NADRA for verification of CNIC of deceased Mst: Khairan/Khair Bai. Matter adjourned to 26.03.2026. For report/ hearing on compromise applications. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Criminal Revision | |||||||
| 6 | Criminal Revisions 36/2025 | Nadir shaikh VS The State | Cr.PC-U/S 435 Criminal Revision | / |
Criminal revision called. Applicant Azizullah present along with his counsel. ADPP is present. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet. The instant criminal revision application is hereby dismissed accordingly. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 7 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 131/2025 | Mushtaque Hussain Thebo VS The State | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3/4 illegal Dispossession Act | / |
Cr: complaint application called. Applicant along with his counsel present. Reports are not received from concerned SHO P.S. T.M.Khan and Mukhtiarkar Khairpur. But one namely Ghulam Muhammad Senior Clerk of Mukhtiarkar is present and submitted adjournment applicaiton for production of report. Order passed on it. Time allowed for come up on 05.3.2026. and also Call report from SHO PS T.M.Khan. Matter adjourned. Put off to. 05.03.2026. For report/ hearing on application. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 8 | SC (Murder Trial) 1151/2014 | State VS Rashid Ali Chandio & ors Re-Muzaffar Hussain Chandio | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK),DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-KHI) | Khalil Ahmed(ADVO-918-SBC-KHP),Muhammad Tarique(ADVO-920-SBC-KHP) | PPC-302 | 38/2014 Ahmedpur |
Case called. Accused Muzafar Ali Chandio is present on bail. ADPP for State is present. Mr. Ghulam Shabir Bhutto advocate is present and filed power on behalf of accused Muzfar Hussain. Order passed on it. File. Application U/S 265-K Cr.P.C on behalf of accused Muzfar Hussain @ Muzafar Ali is pending. While accused Rashid Ali, Inam Ali, Mumtaz Ali and Nabidad all by caste Chandio have already been acquitted U/S 265-H(i) Cr: P.C by this Court dated 22.12.2016. No PWs are present. Issue summon upon all PWs. Counsel for complainant is absent. Case adjourned.Put off to. 24.03.2025. For Evidence/ hearing on application. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| 9 | SC (Murder Trial) 240/2020 | The State VS Gul Mohammad and others | Mumtaz Ali(ADVO-1659-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-114,PPC-302 | 65/2019 Baberloi |
Case Called. Accused Haji Pervez is present on bail. While remaining accused are already declared as P.O. ADPP for the State is present. Defense counsel is present . Complainant absent his counsel present. BWs issued against private PWs same is returned un-served. Time extended and handed over to concerned process server. Case adjourned. Put off to.. 28.02.2026. For evidence. Present Accused is directed to attend. |
| 10 | SC (Murder Trial) 388/2010 | The State VS Abdul Razak & others(Re-Masti Khan) | DDPP(ADVO-002-SBC-LRK) | Hazoor Bux Siming(ADVO-552-SBC-KHP) | PPC-302 | 67/2010 Tando Masti Khan |
Case called. Accused Sahib Dino and Masti Khan are present on bail. Mr. Manzoor Hussain Narejo counsel for accused Sahib Dino is present. Mr. Irshad Hussain Dharejo advocate for accused Masti Khan is also present. ADPP for the state is present. While remaining accused is already declared as P.O. Complainant was expired. BWs issued against PWs same is returned un executed. Time extended and handed over to concerned process server. Case adjourned . Put off to. 26.03.2026. For evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 11 | PPC 1021/2021 | The State VS Ghazi Amanullah & Others | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-395,PPC-436 | 37/2021 Faiz Muhammad Narejo |
Case called. Accused Nadir Ali, Nawab Ali, Dhani Bux, Abdul Fattah, Safiullah , Irshad Ali, and Ghulam Asghar are present on bail. Accused Ghazi Amanullah is called absent. Counsel for applicant has submitted application for absence excused of accused Ghazi Amanullah. Order passed on it. Excused. Accused Ghulam Sarwar is called absent without any intimation. While rest of accused Izhar already declared as P.O. ADPP for the State is present. Complainant and PWs are called absent. U/S 87/88 Cr.P.C issued against them . U.S 87 Cr.PC returned un-served. Process sever concerned PS Present and his statement recorded at Ex: 07, he produce relevant record at Ex:07/A to 07/D. and also U/S 88 Cr.P.C is received from concerned Mukhtiarkar Kingri. Order passed on it. File. Order passed on separate sheet. The proceeding against complainant and private PWs is hereby abated. Issue BWs against officials PWs. Case adjourned . Put off to.14.03.2026. For evidence and hearing on application U/S 265-K Cr: P.C. |
| 12 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 778/2022 | The State VS Sahib Dino Narejo | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 125/2022 Tando Masti Khan |
Case Called. Accused Sahib Dino is present on bail. Counsel for accused is present. ADPP for the State is present. No P.W is present. BWs issued against PWs same is returned returned for want of time. Time extended. Case adjourned . Put off to..26.03-2026. For evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| 13 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 838/2022 | The State VS Madah Hussain Rid | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Ghulam Shabir(ADVO-659-SBC-KHP) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 51/2022 Kotdiji |
Case Called. Accused Madah Hussain is present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Defense counsel is present. No PWs are present. Complainant is expired. Order passed on it. Call death certificate of complainant from concerned U-C. Issue BWs against PWs PC Rustam Ali Shambani and SIP Muhammad Daim Khan Narejo. Case adjourned . Put off to. 25. 03.2026. For evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 14 | PPC 837/2022 | The State VS Madah Hussain & Others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Ghulam Shabir(ADVO-659-SBC-KHP) | PPC-324,PPC-353 | 47/2022 Kotdiji |
Case Called. Accused Madah Hussain, Ghulam Ali, Rabail and Rashid are present on bail. While remaining of accused is already declared as P.O. ADPP for the State is present. Defense counsel is present. No PWs are present. Issue BWs against PWs Kamil Khan, HC:Nawaz Ali Malik, PC: Muhammad Ishaque Shar, PC Rustam Ali Shambani and SIP Muhammad Daim Narejo through SHO PS: Kotdiji. Case adjourned . Put off to.. 25.03.2025. For evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 15 | PPC 368/2023 | The State VS Waseem and others. | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-397 | 36/2023 Piryalo |
Case called. Accused Waseem & Safiullla are present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Syed Suhail Hussain Rizvi advocate is present on behalf of accused Waseem and Safiullah. No PWs are present. Issue BW PW PC Abdul Hafeez Channar, WHC of PS Piryaloi. Case adjourned. Put off to. 12.03.2026. For evidence. Present accused is directed to attend |
| 16 | PPC 600/2023 | The State VS Naseem Abbass & Others | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-324,PPC-337-Fiii | 87/2023 Tando Masti Khan |
Case Called. Accused Naseem Abbas, Abid Abbas, Ghulam Muhammad are present on bail. Accused Mujahid called absent. Counsel for accused is present and submitted application for absence excused of accused Muhahid. Order passed on it. Excused. ADPP for the State is present. PW/retired ASI Allah Bux Panhwar is already examined. Others PWs are called absent. BW issued against remaining PWs. Time extended. Case adjourned. Put off to. 25.03.2026. For evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 17 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 272/2024 | The State VS Kamran Phulpoto | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 331/2023 B-Section Khairpur |
Case called. Accused Kamran is present on bail. Mr. Sohail Ahmed Maitlo advocate is present on behalf of accused Kamran. ADPP for State is present. Other PWs are called absent. Issue BW against PW PC Aazam Ali Shahani and WPC Sher Shah. Call case property. Case adjourned. Put off to. 09.03.2026. For evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 18 | PPC 146/2024 | The State VS Muhammad Ramzan Ansari | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-324,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fv,PPC-34 | 123/2023 Pirgoth |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Ramzan Ansari is confined at C.P, Naushahro Feroze and produced on video link. ADPP for State is present. DA is called absent. Complainant is present, Mr. Fayaz Ahmed Maitlo advocate is present on behalf of complainant. No others PWs are present. Issue BWs against PWs. Case adjourned . Put off to. 09.03.2026. For evidence |
| 19 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 147/2024 | The State VS Muhammad Ramzan Ansari | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 125/2023 Pirgoth |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Ramzan Ansari is confined at C.P, Naushahro Feroze and produced on video link. ADPP for State is present. DA is called absent. Complainant is present, no others PWs are present. Issue BWs against PWs. Case adjourned . Put off to. 09.03.2026. For evidence |
| 20 | PPC 271/2024 | The State VS Kamran & Others | DDPP(DDPP-0001-GOV-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-147,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353 | 330/2023 B-Section Khairpur |
Case called. Accused Kamran and Shahid are present on bail. Accused Abdul Ghaffar confined in CP Khairpur and produce from CP Khairpur on video link. Mr. Sohail Ahmed Maitlo advocate is present on behalf of accused Kamran. Mr. Raza Hussain Rajper advocate already filed power on behalf of accused Shahid. While rest of accused Abid Phulpoto and Ubaid Phulpoto have already been declared as P.O. ADPP for State is present. No PWs are present. Issue BW against PW PC Aazam Ali Shahani and WPC Sher Shah. Call case property. Case adjourned. Put off to. 09.03.2026. For evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 21 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 576/2024 | The State VS Zameer Ali & others | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KHP) | Zulfiqar Ali(ADVO-1096-SBC-KHP) | Sindh Arms Act 2013-23-i-A | 11/2024 Sukkur (CTD) |
Case Called. Accused Zamir Ahmed & Akhtar are present on bail. Counsel for accused is present. Mr. Zulfiqar Ali Laghari advocate is present on behalf of accused Zamir Ali. ADPP for the State is present. Summons issued upon remaining all PWs same is returned for want of time. Time extended. Case adjourned. Put off to.. 28.03.2026. For evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 22 | PPC 277/2025 | The State VS Noman & Others | ADPP() | Syed Ahmar Raza Shah (ADVO-2220-SBC-SUK) | PPC-397 | 109/2024 Kumb |
Session case called. Accused Noman is confined in CP Khairpur and produce on video link. Accused Tarique is called absent without any intimation. Issue NBW against him. Mr. Ali Mardan Shar advocate is present on behalf of accused Nouman. ADPP for the state is present. Accused Naeem is already expired his proceedings already abated. No PWs are present. Issue summons to complainant and all PWs. Case adjourned. Put off to. 09.03.2026. For evidence/ service of accused Tarique. |
| 23 | PPC 825/2025 | The State VS Tabsum @ Nang & others | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-395 | 103/2024 Kumb |
Cr. Case called. Accused namely Tabsum Raza is present on bail . While rest of accused namely Lahooti Nishad, Rustam, Abalo, Aslam and Syed Hidayat Ali Shah are already declared as P.O. Counsel for accused is present. ADPP for the state is present. No PWs are present. Issue summons to complainant and all PWs. Call case property. Put off to..16.03.2026. For evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 24 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 6301/2025 | Kamran Khaliq Channo VS SHO PS B-Section Khaiprur | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
|
||
| 25 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 6165/2025 | Ali Dino Solangi VS SHO PS Kumb | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr: Misc: application called. Applicant along with his counsel called absent without any intimation. Reports are already received from SSP Khairpur and SHO PS. File. Order passed on order sheet. The instant Misc: Application is hereby dismissed in default for non -prosecution. |
||
| 26 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 123/2026 | Anees Qadir VS SHO PS B-Section Khairpur | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr: Misc: application called. Applicant is present his counsel called absent. Reports already received from SSP Khairpur, and concerned SHO PS: File. Mr. Ghulam Mehdi Burdi advocate is present and filed power on behalf of proposed accused Muzafar Ali. Order passed on it. File. Matter adjourned last opportunity. Put off to. 27.02.2026. For hearing on application. |
||
| 27 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 156/2026 | Muhammad Mithal Unar VS SHO PS Pir Jo Goth | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
|
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 28 | PPC 1198/2025 | The State VS Zameer & Others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-324,PPC-353 | / |
Cr. Case called. Accused namely Zameer, Zaheer and Sudheer are present on bail. Accused Ali Muhammad and Imran are confined in CP Khairpur and not produce. Issue P.O for both accused. While rest of accused are already declared as P.O. Counsel for accused also absent. ADPP for the state is present. Case adjourned. Put off to 17.03.2026 for supply of copies. Present accused are directed to attend. Issue P.O for both accused Ali Muhammad and Imran. |
| 29 | PPC 1197/2025 | The State VS Sudheer Ahmed & another | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-337-H,PPC-397 | 18/2025 Wada Machyoon |
Cr. Case called. Accused namely Sudheer Ahmed is present on bail. Accused Naveed @ Nao is confined in CP Khairpur and not produce. Issue P.O for accused Naveed @ Nao Jageerani. ADPP for the state is present. Case adjourned. Put off to 17.03.2026 for supply of copies. Present accused directed to attend. Issue P.O for accused Naveed. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 30 | PPC 461/2025 | The State VS Shazado & others | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-397 | 8/2023 Baradi Jatoi |
Cr. Case called. Accused namely Shahzado is called absent. one applicant namely Yasir Ali is present and submitted application for absence excused of accused Shahzado. Order passed on it. Condoned application is granted. Counsel for accused is absent. Rest of accused are already declared as P.O. ADPP for the state is present. Case adjourned. Put off to...12-03-2026. For charge. |
| 31 | PPC 272/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Saleh and other | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-395 | 6/2025 A-Section Khairpur |
Case Called. All accused are present on bail. Except accused Dil Jan but he is expired. PW Syed Akhtar Ali Shah is present on behalf of complainant. verification report of death certificate of deceased Dil Jan is received from Municipal Committee Khairpur. Order passed on it. File. Call report from concerned SHO PS: A.Sec: Khairpur. Counsel for all accused is present. ADPP for State is present. Case adjourned. Put off to...03.03.2026. For charge. Present accused are directed to attend. Call report of accused Dil Jan |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 32 | Electricty Acts (Electricity Acts) 676/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Nawaz & Others | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-462(i) | 295/2024 A-Section Khairpur |
Cr. Case called. All accused are already declared as P.O and also depositions of PWs have been already recorded. ADPP for the state is present. Case is adjourned. Put off to.....28-03-2026. For further proceedings. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications | |||||||
| 33 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 96/2026 | Anwar Ali Shah VS SHO PS A-Section Khairpur | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr: Misc: application called. Applicant along with his counsel called absent without any intimation. Order passed on order sheet. The instant Misc: Application is hereby dismissed in default for non -prosecution. |
||
| 34 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 5271/2025 | Muhammad Ali Magnejo VS SHO PS Wada Machhiyoon | Cr.PC-22-A | / |
Cr: Misc: contempt application called. Applicant/ complainant is present his counsel called absent. SHO PS: Wada Machiyoon called absent. Call SHO PS: Wada Machiyoon in person. Matter adjourned. Put off to. 27.02.2026. For hearing on application. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 35 | DC (Direct Complaint) 3/2026 | Ghazi Anwar VS Mst Tahira Parveen | PPC-495 | / |
Criminal direct complaint called. Complainant present & his counsel absent, his junior partner counsel present. Direct complaint is adjourned. Put off to. 30-03-2026. for hearing/ statement of complainant. |
||
| 36 | DC (Direct Complaint) 29/2025 | Dargahi @ Wazeer VS Bachal & others | PPC-324 | / |
|
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 37 | Electricty Acts (Electricity Acts) 929/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Mithal & Others | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Electricity Act -U/S 39-A (Penalty for Installation of Artificial means etc.) | 295/2024 B-Section Khairpur |
Case called . All accused are called absent and already declared as P.O. ADPP for the state is present. Counsel for accused called absent. Complainant & his counsel is present. Issue summons to all PWs. Case adjourned. Put off to...26.02.2026. For further proceedings. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 38 | PPC 977/2023 | The State VS Saddam & others | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-THT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-399,PPC-402 | 114/2023 Pirgoth |
Case called. Accused Sadam Hussain, Madad Ali, and Altaf Hussain are present on bail. Accused Ali Raza is expired. Death repot not received from SHO: PS: Ahmedpur. Reply/ compliance regarding production of death report of deceased Ali Raza is received from U/C Hadal Shah. Order passed on it. File. Call death report from SHO PS: Pirjogoth. ADPP for State is present. Defense counsels is present. Case adjourned. Put off to.. 06.03.2026. For statements of accused/ call death report of accused Ali Raza. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 39 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 404/2023 | The State VS Shahbaz Ali Khoso | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 53/2023 Tando Masti Khan |
Case Called. Accused Shahbaz Ali is present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Defense Counsel is absent. final arguments not heard due to counsel for accused called absent. Case adjourned. Put off to.. 28.02.2026. For final arguments. Accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 40 | Electricty Acts (Electricity Acts) 586/2025 | The State VS Abdul Sattar & Others | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-462(i) | 494/2024 B-Section Khairpur |
Case called . All accused are called absent and already declared as P.O. ADPP for the state is present. Call for Case property. Case adjourned. Put off to...28.03.2026. For service of accused/ further proceedings. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 18/2024 |
Mukesh Kumar VS Syed Sada Hussain Shah | Ghulam Akbar(Death) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Suit Called. Counsel for the plaintiff present, counsel for defendant called absent. The defendant already filed written statement and submit surety. Kept on record, today matter fixed for arguments on application U/O 7 RULE 11 CPC, defendant has submitted adjournment application. Order passed on it. Last chance given to plaintiff for arguments on application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC. Matter adjourned. Put off to 13-03-2026 for hearing on application. |
||
| 2 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 11/2024 |
Shah Nawaz Memon VS Sher Zaman | Shoaib(ADVO-1691-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Summary execution application called. Attorney of D.H/plaintiff is present along with his counsel. J.D/defendant & his counsel called absent without any intimation. Application U/S 151 CPC for compliance of order already pending filed by advocate for plaintiff/DH. Detailed report in respect of ownership and valuation of crush plant is not received from concerned Mukhtiarkar Kotdiji. Call report from concerned Mukhtiarkar Kotdiji. Execution application is adjourned. Put of to.12.03.2026 for report/compliance |
||
| 3 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 12/2024 |
Shakeel Ahmed Memon VS Sher Zaman | Shoaib(ADVO-1691-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Summary execution application called. Attorney of D.H/plaintiff is present along with his counsel. J.D/defendant & his counsel called absent without any intimation. Application U/S 151 CPC for compliance of order already pending filed by advocate for plaintiff/DH. Detailed report in respect of ownership and valuation of crush plant is not received from concerned Mukhtiarkar Kotdiji. Call report from concerned Mukhtiarkar Kotdiji. Execution application is adjourned. Put of to.12.03.2026 for report/compliance |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 8/2021 |
Shabir Ahmed Malik VS P.O Sindh & others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Civil appeal called, Appellant along with his counsel is present. None appeared on behalf of respondent. Order passed on order sheet. As per record of the case/appeal the present appeal was dismissed for non- prosecution on 06.08.2021 and thereafter the application for re-admission of the appeal was filed on 17.0.2025 after long delay of about four years, supported with the application for condonation of time U/A 5 of limitation Act. The appellant is required to satisfy this court on the point of maintainability of re-admission application on the point of limitation. Adjourned. Put off to..16.03.2026 for hearing. |
||
| 5 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 8/2022 |
Asad Ali Imam VS Shah Muhammad Shah | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | ??Application called. Decree holder and his counsel are again called absent. The present execution application is pending for service upon the J.D since year 2021 but after passing of about five years the notices are not issued. The decree holder kept on remaining absent from this court. Therefore, the present execution application is adjourned sine die. |
||
| 6 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 133/2022 |
Ariz Muhammad Katohar & others VS P.O Sindh & others | Shoaib(ADVO-1691-SBC-KHP) | Matter called. Appellant absent his counsel present. Application U/O 41 Rule 19 RWS 151 CPC is pending filed by appellant. Issue notice to others side through bailiff, courier as well as through Registered post AD on costs . Matter adjourned. Put off to 18-03-2026 for service. |
|||
| 7 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 96/2024 |
Abdul Latif & Others VS Moula Bux & Others | Zahid Hussain(ADVO-1738-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Matter called. Attorney of appellant is present along with his counsel. Respondents not yet served. Attorney Moula Bux of respondents No:2 to 4 & his counsel called absent. Notice not issued upon the remaining respondents through pasting on door . Order passed. Repeat notice against remaining defendants through pasting on door. Matter adjourned. Put off to.. 16.03.2026. For service of respondents through pasting on door/ objections. |
||
| 8 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 122/2024 |
Muhammad Siddique VS Mst. Zakia & Others | Nizamuddin(ADVO-1395-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Civil appeal called. Counsel for the appellant is present. Order passed on order sheet. The present appeal is kept on being fixed for service of respondents but still the service is not affected since year 2024. The appellant is required to affect the service upon respondents by courier as well as door pasting in presence of two witnesses. Matter adjourned. Put off to..06.03.2026 for service |
||
| 9 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 125/2025 |
Abdullah Al-Asad VS Province of Sindh & others | Civil Appeal called. Appellant is called absent but his counsel is present. Respondent/defendant No:02 and 05 are already served but called absent. Repeat notice against remaining respondents through bailiff, courier & registered post A.D on cost. Civil appeal is adjourned. Put off to 24-03-2026 for objections/ service of respondents/ defendants No:1, 3 to 4 on costs. |
||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Advocate to be Heard | |||||||
| 10 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 12/2026 |
Syed Jamal Shah VS Syed Mehdi & other | Rafique Ali (ADVO-2675-SBC-KHP) | Civil Appeal called. Appellant and his counsel are again called absent. The matter is fixed for advocate to be heard but none appeared on behalf of appellant. No court fee is affixed with appeal. Order passed on order sheet. In these circumstances, the present appeal is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 11 | Summary Suits 45/2024 |
Khalil Ahmed VS Ali Raza | Ahmed Muawiya Mehran(ADVO-1422-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Summery suit called. The judgement already announced by this court on 25.09.2024 and the plaintiff and his counsel present. The J.D/Defendant and his counsel present. Advocate for plaintiff has filed objection on application U/O 37 Rule 4 RWS 151 CPC on behalf of plaintiff. Order passed on it. Copy to others side. Copy received others side. Let the matter be fixed for hearing . Matter adjourned. Put off to. 11-03-2026. For hearing. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 12 | Summary Suits 60/2020 |
Saeed Khan Mari VS Bakshal Brohi | Nadir Ali(ADVO- 1611-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Summary suit called. Counsel for plaintiff is present. None appeared on behalf of defendant. Order passed on order sheet. The application U/O 9 Rule 7 CPC is already fixed for hearing since 24.10.2024 after filing of the same. The record suggests that previously same nature of applicaiton was filed by the same defendant U/S 9 Rule 7 CPC which was allowed on the no objection of the plaintiff and the defendant was directed to cross examine the plaintiff and his witnesses but the same order was not compiled by him and thereafter the present application was again filed U/O 9 Rule 7 CPC to recall the order dated 16.10.2024 with chance to cross examine the plaintiff witnesses and reopening the side of defendant to produce their evidence. The application is kept on being fixed for hearing but the same is till pending since October 2024. Today defendant is again called absent. The plaintiff extended his arguments on the same with objections. In these circumstances, let the matter be fixed for order on application U/O 9 Rule 7 CPC and if the defendant will appear he is given opportunity to submit his arguments. Matter is adjourned to 28.02.2026 for arguments and order on application U/O 9 Rule 7 CPC of defendant. |
||
| 13 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 251/2025 |
Muhammad Parvez Hajano VS Nizakat Ali Ujjan and others | Civil appeal called. Appellant is called absent. Counsel for appellant is also called absent. Counsel for private respondent is present and verbally submits that eh will directly argue the limitation application and do not file the objections. Matter is adjourned due to absence of appellant with last opportunity. Put off to.. 18.03.2026 for hearing. |
||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 14 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 20/2022 |
Pir Bux Sodhro VS P.O Sindh & others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Civil revision called. None appeared on behalf of either parties. The applicant is also called absent. The present revision application is pending for arguments since 17.05.2024 and matter is kept on being adjourned for the same purpose for more or less two years. The present revision application is filed against the impugned order whereby the application of defendant U/o 7 rule 11 CPC was declined. There is nothing on record and any intimation regarding conclusion of trial before the trial court since 2022. Order passed on order sheet. Therefore, in these circumstances, the present revision application is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution. |
||
| 15 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 192/2022 |
Talib Hussain & others VS P.O Sindh & others | Faqir Muhammad (ADVO-1302-SBC-KHP) | Sadam Hussain(ADVO-980-SBC-KHP) | Civil appeal called. Appellant along with his counsel present. Respondent present and his counsel called absent. DDA is present. Partly argument already heard. Matter adjourned . Put off to..11.03.2026 for further arguments. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 16 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 41/2025 |
Ismail Phulpoto VS Mst. Salmi Begum | Family appeal called. Appellant is present with his counsel. None appeared on behalf of respondent. Order passed on order sheet. The last opportunity was already granted to respondent for filling the objections but he also remained absent today. Therefore, they are debarred from filling of objections. Let the matter be fixed for arguments on appeal. Matter adjourned. Put off to.. 16.03.2026 for arguments on appeal. |
||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 52/2024 | Ali Akbar Soomro VS Mst. Murad Khatoon Soomro | Abdul Ghani(ADVO-1553-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Family Appeal called. None appeared on behalf of appellant. The present matter is fixed for service upon the respondent since 25.06.2024, but the service is not issued on any single occasion and date. The record suggests that appellant might have lost his interest. Order passed on order sheet. Therefore, keeping in view the conduct of appellant the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 2 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 36/2022 | Naveed Ali Channa VS Mst. Sanam Kanhar | Gulshan(ADVO-992-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Appeal called. None appeared on behalf of either party. The present matter is fixed for arguments since 06.09.2023 and several opportunities are given to the parties/appellant but they have chosen to remain absent before this court. Order passed on order sheet. Therefore, keeping in view the conduct of appellant the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Succession Miscellaneous Applications | |||||||
| 3 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 126/2025 | Mst Naveeda VS Public at Large | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | ||||
| 4 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 128/2025 | Mst Zubaida VS Public at large | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Petition called. Petitioner and also her counsel present. All reports are received from concerned authorities and already kept on record. All legal heirs of deceased are present and filed affidavits. Order passed on it. Filed. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet. The instant petition is hereby allowed accordingly. |
|||
| 5 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 115/2025 | Mst. Umarah Khatoon VS Public At Large | Letter of Administration and Succession Certificates Act. 2020-Section 10 | Petition called. Petitioner and also her counsel present. All reports are received from concerned authorities and already kept on record. Today report is received from U.C concerned Ubhri. Order passed on it. File. legal heirs of deceased Kiran and Arslan are present and filed affidavits. Order passed on it. Filed. Counsel for petitioner has submitted statement along with relevant record. File. Heard. Order passed on separate sheet. The instant petition is hereby allowed accordingly. |
|||