| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | Criminal Revisions 8/2026 | Muhammad Yaseen Malik and another VS Muhammad Ramzan Malik and another | Muhammad Noman(ADVO-1058LC-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-439 | / |
Criminal Revision Application is called. The applicants Muhammad Yaseen and Muhammad Sajid are present. Their advocate and learned ADPP for the state are present. Mr Zahid Razzak Pathan advocate for private respondents No.01 (Muhammad Ramzan) is present. The private respondent No. 2 (Saleem) is absent. The official respondents No.3 (Assistant Commissioner) 4 (Mukhtiarkar Revenue Ghotki) and 5 (SHO PS Sarhad) are absent. No compliance report is received. Issue reminder. P/J is on C/leave. Hearing 08.06.2026. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | Habeas Corpus 157/2026 | Mehraj Mohan Lal VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Received application u/s 491 Cr.P.C from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The counsel for applicant and ADPP for the State are present. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Present applicant, sought recovery of her daughter Shrimati Komal in terms of section 491 Cr.P.C with version that his son-in-law respondent Vinod Kumar did not allow him to meet his daughter which created apprehension in his mind that she will be confined so police authorities may be directed to recover her.Applicant and the learned counsel have been called absent despite several calls till 12-28 noon. It appears from application itself that applicant???s daughter is residing with her husband so no case of alleged wrongful confinement attracting section 491 Cr.P.C is prima facie made out and applicant did not come with clean hands. Consequently, Cr.M.A in hand stands dismissed for non prosecution with liberty to the applicant to address an application to police authorities or to seek civil remedy subject to law. |
||
| 3 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 987/2026 | Abdul Majeed Pahore VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law vide a letter No.4303dated 22.5.2026. The applicant is absent and his counsel is present. The ADPP is also present. Notice to ADPP. Notice also be issued against the proposed accused. Call for reports from complaint Cell and SHO concerned. P/J is on C/leave. Put off 04.6.026. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 148/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Yaseen Gadani and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 222/2025 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions Case called. Accused (1) Muhammad Yaseen Gadani is absent. Accused (2) Akhtar Ali and (3) Asad @ Deuty are present on bail. Accused (4) Daim and (5)Nazir Ahmed are absconding and declared as P.Os.On Barkat Ali has submitted an application for excusing the absence of accused Muhammad Yaseen Gadani. Order on it. Learned ADPP for State and Mr. Ali Ahmed Gadani, Advocate for accused Muhammad Yaseen is present. Issue summons to complainant and PWs. Call for case property. P/J is on C/leave. Adjourned to 04.06.2026, for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend and inform the absentee accused to attend. The applicant Barkat Ali is also directed to convey the next date to absentee accused to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 5 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 955/2026 | Ghulam Haider Kalwar VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant and his counsel are called absent The junior partner to counsel for applicant is present and he has submitted adjournment application. The ADPP for the State is present. Report from SHO PS A-Section is not received. Call for the same. P/J is on C/leave. Put off to 01.06.2026 for hearing. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 6 | SC (Murder Trial) 308/2018 | The state VS Hazaro and ors | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Ubedullah(ADVO-223-SBC-GHT) | Ajeeb Junejo(ADVO-1301-SBC-SUK) | PPC-302 | 61/2018 B-Section Ghotki |
Sessions Case called. Accused Ghulam Yaseen Bheri is present on bail granted by the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur. While accused (1) Hazaro (2) Muhammad Bux (3) Adam and (4) Muhammad Yakoub already re-convicted vide Judgment dated 26.04.2024. Accused (5) Ali Hassan was already acquitted vide Judgment dated 23.08.2021 and the case against absconding accused (6) Khando (7) Ghulam Mustafa (8) Pirano and (9) Mir Muhammad already kept on dormant file vide Judgment dated 23.08.2021. The ADPP for the State is present and DC is absent. The complainant and his advocate are called absent. Issue notice to the complainant. The main R&Ps already lying in the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur. Perusal of record it appears that; in this case, the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur has been pleased to direct this court that the trial of an accused Yaseen Bheri son of Mehrab Khan in this case be expedited and concluded within three months vide kind order dated 28.11.2024 passed in Cr.B.A No.S- 723/2024. But the trial is not yet commenced, due to non-availability of original R&Ps which has already been submitted to the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur in connection with Criminal Appeal No. S- 47 of 2024. An other copy of an Order dated 23.05.2025 was also already received from the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur, whereby time has been granted, but R&Ps not received back. However, a copy of an Order dated 12.03.2026 passed in Crl Appeal No.S-47, 48 and 49 of 2024 passed by the Honourable High Court of Sindh bench at Sukkur is received through the office of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki vide endorsement bearing No.Cr/ 2239 dated 19.03.2026. The Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkurhas been pleased to Order that "Let R&P be returned to the learned trial court". Only copy of Order is received, but R&Ps not received. Case is adjourned for want of original R&Ps. P/J is on C/leave. Put off to 08.06.2026 for formal hearing/Returning the main R&Ps. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 65/2026 | The State VS Shahnawaz @ Shani Malik | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 24/2026 Daharki |
Sessions Case called. Accused Shahnawaz alias Shani is produced in custody. ADPP is present. Miss Shabana Kousar is also present. P/J is on C/leave. Put off to 04.06.2026 for charge. In the meanwhile issue summons to P.Ws. Call for case property. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 7/2025 |
Muhammad Arshad Rajput VS Abdul Majeed Soomro | Zulfqar Ali(ADVO-278-SBC-GHT) | Ali Bux(ADVO-568-SBC-GHT) | Disposal Execution Application No.07/2025 (allowed on 04.06.2025) is called for satisfaction of decree dated 03.03.2025 passed in summary Suit No.19/2024. The Decree Holder Mohammad Arshad is present along with his advocate. The Judgment Debtor Abdul Majeed, his surety Sadam Hussain and advocate are called absent and JD failed to pay outstanding. Issue show cause notice to the Judgment debtor and his surety. Put off to 08.06.2026 for further compliance. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | Ist Class Civil Suits 86/2024 |
Allah Wassayo Ghoto VS Chandar Bhan & ors | Sudhamo @ Sudhamchand(ADVO-372-SBC-GHT) | Wazir Ahmed Goto(ADVO-88-SBC-GHT) | Consolidated leading F.C. Suit No.86/2024 is called along with subsequent Summary Suit No.15/2025. The plaintiff Allah Wassayo Ghoto (plaintiff in FCS No.86/2024 & defendant in Summary Suit No.15/2025), his counsel Mr Shafiaque Ahmed Laghari, the defendant No.01 Chandar Bhan (defendant No.01 in FCS No.86/2024 and plaintiff in Summary Suit No.15/2025) and junior partner to his counsel are present. The defendants No.02 to 05 (in FCS No.86/24 only) are called absent. However, Mr Hazoor Bux Maitilo learned DDA for official respondents No.2 to 5 is present. The junior partner to Mr Sudham Chand counsel for Allah Wassayo Ghoto requested to adjourn the matter on the ground that civil transfer application has been filed for transferring another CA No.26/2026. Request to adjourn instant matters is allowed in the interest of justice. P/J is on C/leave. To come up on 09.06.2026 for evidence of plaintiff's side. Parties are informed. |
||
| 3 | Summary Suits 15/2025 |
Chandar Bhan Hindu VS Allah Wassayo Ghoto | Wazir Ahmed Goto(ADVO-88-SBC-GHT) | Sudhamo @ Sudhamchand(ADVO-372-SBC-GHT) | Consolidated leading F.C. Suit No.86/2024 is called along with subsequent Summary Suit No.15/2025. The plaintiff Allah Wassayo Ghoto (plaintiff in FCS No.86/2024 & defendant in Summary Suit No.15/2025), his counsel Mr Shafiaque Ahmed Laghari, the defendant No.01 Chandar Bhan (defendant No.01 in FCS No.86/2024 and plaintiff in Summary Suit No.15/2025) and junior partner to his counsel are present. The defendants No.02 to 05 (in FCS No.86/24 only) are called absent. However, Mr Hazoor Bux Maitilo learned DDA for official respondents No.2 to 5 is present. The junior partner to Mr Sudham Chand counsel for Allah Wassayo Ghoto requested to adjourn the matter on the ground that civil transfer application has been filed for transferring another CA No.26/2026. Request to adjourn instant matters is allowed in the interest of justice. P/J is on C/leave. To come up on 09.06.2026 for evidence of plaintiff's side. Parties are informed. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 28/2026 |
Mumtaz Ahmed Mahar VS Banhon Mahar and others | Sudhamo @ Sudhamchand(ADVO-372-SBC-GHT) | Javed Hussain Seerlo (DDA)(ADVO-1015-SBC-SUK) | Civil Appeal is called. Mr Sanaullah Mahar the attorney of appellant, junior partner to his counsel, respondent No.1-A Amanullah (who is attorney of respondents No.1-B to 1-H), his counsel and Mr. Hazoor Bux Maitilo DDA for official respondents No.2 to 5 are present. The respondent No.1-I is called absent. Notices were issued against him through court and registered post A/D, but not returned served or unserved. R&Ps of lower court is also not received. CTA No. /2026 Re: Mumtaz Ahmed Vs Banhoon and others, is pending. P/J in on C/leave. Put off 09.6.2026 for receipt of result of the fate of CTA and further proceedings. |
||