| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 1 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 24/2026 | Niaz Muhammad Abbasi VS Haji Ahmed Shaikh and others | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Direct complaint (IDA) is called. The complainant is present along with his counsel Mr. Jamshed Ahmed Faiz. Order passed. Heard. File perused. Call reports from SHO and Mukhtiarkar concerned for 19.5.2026. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 28/2025 | Khudad Dad Gabole VS Abdul Ghani Gabole and others | Ali Raza Kalwar(ADVO-237-B-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
|
| 3 | PPC 48/2026 | The State VS Abdul Aziz Pathan | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Abdul Sattar Mahar(ADVO-485-SBC-GHT) | PPC-320 | 104/2025 B-Section Ghotki |
Sessions Case called. Accused Abdul Aziz son of Nazeer Ahmed Pathan is present on bail. Learned ADPP for State and Mr. Mumtaz Ali Naich, learned counsel for accused are present. On issuance of process, case property produced and returned. Proceedings resumed. Deposition/further examination in chief and cross examination of of PW-01 complainant Abdul Wahab Dhareo, PW-02 PC-711 Abdul Ghaffar Abro, PW-03 PC-2819 Ishrat Ali Mahar and PW-04 SiP Qurban Ali Korai recorded (Exh.04 to Exh 07). PW-05 Dr Abdul Raiuf Mahar and PW-06 WMO Mariee Zuhaib Dayo are present and examined (Exh 08 and Exh 09). The learned ADPP has submitted statement for closing the side (Exh 10). The statement under section 342 Cr.P.C of accused recorded (Exh 11). Final arguments heard. Judgment passed on separate sheet (Exh 12) and announced. For offence punishable u/s 320 PPC to pay diyat amount of Rs:9,828,670/ (Rupees Nine million eight hundred twenty eight thousand six hundred and seventy only), as well as to undergo R.I for ten years as Ta???zir. In case of nonpayment of Diyat amount in lump-sum for payment to legal heirs of deceased Qadir Bux son of Gaggan Faqir Rajar, as well as to pay diyat amount of Rs:9,828,670/ (Rupees Nine million eight hundred twenty eight thousand six hundred and seventy only), and to undergo R.I for ten years as Ta???zir. In case of nonpayment of Diyat amount in lump-sum for payment to legal heirs of deceased Asiya wife of Ghulam Haider Mahar, he will remain inside prison till such payment of diyat amount.For offence punishable u/s 279 PPC, to undergo R.I for (02) two years and fine of Rs.3000/-. In case of nonpayment convict at fault will undergo S.I for (06) six months more.The sentence of imprisonment so awarded will run concurrently and benefit of section 382-B Cr.P.C extended to the convict. Per file, convict was arrested on 05.10.2025 and he was released on bail on 07.10.2025 as per case diaries. Parties are informed. Judgment supplied to convict on free of cost against receipt (Exh 13). Copy Conviction warrant placed on record (Exh 14), copy of conviction slip placed on record (Exh 15). Let the R&Ps be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 4 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 853/2026 | Atif Awan VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. On issuance and return of notices, the proposed accused No.01 and 04 appeared. The I/C Complaint Redressal Centre Ghotki has sent his report through ASI Muhammad Rafique Kolachi, which is taken on record and copy thereof provided to the counsel for applicant. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 5 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 854/2026 | Ghulam Muhammad Jhatiyal VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. On issuance and return of notices, the proposed accused No.01 to 04 appeared. Mr Dildar Ali Pathan advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of proposed accused persons, which is taken on record. The I/C Complaint Redressal Centre Ghotki has sent his report through ASI Muhammad Rafique Kolachi, which is taken on record and copy thereof provided to the counsel for applicant. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 896/2026 | Mai Ameeran Bozdar VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received application u/s 22-A(6) (i) Cr.P.C from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. Order passed. Notice to proposed accused. Call reports for 15.5.2026. |
||
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 903/2026 | Mst. Soorat Malik VS SHO PS Khanpur Mahar and ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received application u/s 22-A(6) (i) Cr.P.C from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. Order passed. Notice to proposed accused. Call reports for 15.5.2026. |
||
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 897/2026 | Ghulam Nabi Shaikh VS SHO PS Andal Sundrani and ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received application u/s 22-A(6) (i) Cr.P.C from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. Order passed. Notice to proposed accused. Call reports for 15.5.2026. |
||
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 898/2026 | Abid Ali Mahar VS SHO PS Sarhad and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received application u/s 22-A(6) (i) Cr.P.C from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. Order passed. Notice to proposed accused. Call reports for 15.5.2026. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 7/2025 |
Muhammad Arshad Rajput VS Abdul Majeed Soomro | Zulfqar Ali(ADVO-278-SBC-GHT) | Ali Bux(ADVO-568-SBC-GHT) | Disposal Execution Application No.07/2025 (allowed on 04.06.2025) is called for satisfaction of decree dated 03.03.2025 passed in summary Suit No.19/2024. The Decree Holder Mohammad Arshad is present along with his advocate. The Judgment Debtor Abdul Majeed, his surety Sadam Hussain and advocate are called absent and JD failed to pay outstanding. Issue show cause notice to the Judgment debtor and his surety. Put off to 18.05.2026 for further compliance. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 8/2026 |
Dileep Kumar VS Srichand Bhojwani | Naveed Ahmed Malik(ADVO-1132-SBC-GHT) | Execution Application No.08/2026 (in summary Suit No.24/2021 decided vide Judgment dated 12.3.2026) is called. The Decree Holder is present along with his counsel. Notice against Judgment debtor issued, returned by learned Senior Civil Judge Ghotki under covering letter No.343 dated 06.5.26 and endorsement of the bailiff, duly served upon the Judgment debtor, which is taken on record. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Execution Application is allowed in terms of directions as mentioned in the Order. For satisfaction of decree, formal date would be 15.6.2026. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 28/2026 |
Mumtaz Ahmed Mahar VS Banhon Mahar and others | Sudhamo @ Sudhamchand(ADVO-372-SBC-GHT) | Javed Hussain Seerlo (DDA)(ADVO-1015-SBC-SUK) | Civil Appeal is called. Mr Sanaullah Mahar the attorney of appellant, his counsel, respondent No.1-A Amanullah (who is attorney of respondents No.1-B to 1-H), his counsel and Mr. Hazoor Bux Maitilo DDA for official respondents No.2 to 5 are present. The respondent No.1-I is called absent. Issue notice against him through court and registered post A/D on costs with directions to the bailiff to serve the same by way of door pasting in presence of two nekmards of the locality. Call for R&Ps of lower court. Put off 19.5.2026 for service upon respondent No.1 and receipt of lower court R&Ps. |
||
| 4 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 9/2026 |
Ishfaque Ahmed Arain VS Muhammad Zubair Arain | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | Execution Application is called. The Decree Holder is present along with Junior partner to advocate for Decree Holder. The Judgment Debtor is present. Mr. Nadir Ali Chachar advocate apeared and he has filed his vakalatnama along with adjournment application on behalf of the Judgment debtor. Orders passed thereon. Put off to 19.05.2026 for filing the objections (if any) by the Judgment debtor. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | Summary Suits 13/2025 |
Shafquat Ali Kalwar VS Mujeeb-ur-Rehman Chachar | Mohammad Rafique(ADVO-1493-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Izhar Aslam(ADVO-994-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff, his counsel, defendant and his counsel are present. The counsel for defendant has filed adjournment application. Order on it. Adjourned as a last chance. In case of failure to adduce evidence his side will be closed and suit proceeded and decided as per law. Put off to 19.05.2026 for evidence of defendant's side. Parties are informed. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 6 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 7/2015 |
Shah Mohammad and others VS Deen Mohammad and others | Soomardass R. Parmani(ADVO-245-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Civil appeal is called. The The appellants and defendant are called absent. Their advocates are present. {Per record instant appeal was dismissed on 11.01.2022 as well as an application u/o XLI R 19 CPC, but Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur re-admit the appeal vide an Order dated 29.03.2024 passed in Civil Rev.Application No.S-174/22, so also vide an Order dated 29.03.2024 passed in Civil Rev:No.22/2016 allowed the appellant Shah Muhammad to produce a document mentioned in the application as additional evidence and decide the appeal in accordance with law. Such documents produced in evidence as per deposition of Shah Muhammad dated 27.08.2024 Exh 6. Thereafter this court had passed an Order dated 08.10.2024 with directions to frame issue, and to record the evidence of Shah Muhammad in that extent subject to cross-examination, after doing the needful, the R&Ps be remitted back to this court). In the meanwhile an Order dated 17.02.2025 passed by the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur in Civil Revision Application No.S-306 of 2024 produced, which reveals that the Honourable High Court has been pleased to direct this court not to proceed with the matter. The counsel for respondent has submitted statement along with CTC of case diary, which is taken on record. Put off to 26.05.2026 for receipt of further Order from the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 21/2026 | Mai Akhtiar Mahar VS In-Charge Succession Certificate Facilitation Unit NADRA Mirpur Mathelo and others | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | Succession Application is called. The applicant Mai Akhtiar Mahar is present along with her counsel Mr. Irshad Ali Soomro, who submitted statement along with copy of news paper daily AWAMI AWAZ dated 09.5.2026 which is taken on record. The opponent No.4 Sadori (for and on behalf of minor opponent No.5 namely Hassanian Ali) appeared and she has submitted No objection affidavit against application u/o 32 rule 3 CPC as well as on main application, which are taken on record. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Succession application is allowed. Let the succession certificate be issued in favour of the applicant in terms of directions as mentioned in the order. Parties are informed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
|||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 2 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 5/2026 | Mst. Shabeeran Mahar VS Riaz Ali Mahar | Rahib Islam Nabi(ADVO-1812-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Family Appeal is called. The appellants and their counsel are called absent. The respondent is absent. Process be issued as per fresh address as well as affixcation of process of outer door of his mentioned house at given address as per law. Put off to 18.05.2026 for service. |
|