ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE III, GHOTKI : 21-OCT-2026

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C)
1 Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2342/2026 Hazoor Bux Gadani VS The State   Hussain Ahmed (ADVO-1011-SBC-GHT)   DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT)   Cr.PC-497,PPC-302 87/2025
Khanpur Mahar


21.10.2026

BA is called. The learned ADPP for the State, learned DC and complainant in person are present. DC filed two statements which are taken on record. Argument heard. Order passed and announced., The present applicant through the learned counsel sought post arrest bail in terms of section 497 Cr.P.C, which is hereby gratned subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.3,00,000/- ??and P.R bond in the equivalent amount. for legal justification that undeniably FIR dated:08-12-2025 does not contain name or face features of an unknown accused allegedly armed with a pistol, who also did not cause any harm to any of deceased persons or P.Ws but complainant along with witnesses through further statements dated:?? 16-6-2026 after inordainte delay of around six months surfaced name of present accused with reason that they went to a Dargah and saw present accused whome few women (identity not disclosed in further statement) were calling him as Hazoor Bux s/o Jan Muhammad Gadani, final report has been submitted and present accused having been inside Prison since June-2026 is no more required for invdestigation purpose, no incriminating material has been recovered from him thus he isno more required for investigation purpose and on court query complainant disclosed that present applicant???s sister was married to his husband Nari Gadani???s cousin, which means that he being caste fellow and relative due to his sister???s marriage with a male member of complainant family was already known to complainant and the alleged eye witness so his introduction as a co-accused under the attending circumstances is suspicious and makes case of further enquiry in terms of section 497 (2) Cr.P.C. Moreover, further-supplimentary statement as per dictum laid down by Honourable Superior Court is neither equivalent to FIR nor part thereof but such practice is usually adopted by police for ulterior motives at the sweet will of complainant

CIVIL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance
1 C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 7/2025
Muhammad Arshad Rajput VS Abdul Majeed Soomro   Zulfqar Ali(ADVO-278-SBC-GHT)   Ali Bux(ADVO-568-SBC-GHT)

Per file in hand my learned predecessor decreed the summary suit vide Judgment and Decree dated: 03.03.2025 to the extent of prayer clause ???A??? for recovery of Rs.4,05,000/ plus interest-markup from 13.01.2023 till recovery of amount which judgment debtor did not abide by so decree holder got filed execution application No.07/2025 which was allowed vide Order dated: 04.6.2025 after hearing both the learned counsel for parties as prayed with direction that in case of non recovery of decreetal amount, judgment debtor may be sent to District Prison Ghotki till recovery of decreetal amount and later on link Presiding Judge Mr Zakaullah Abro vide Order dated: 11.9.2025 declined J.D???s prayer for payment in installments and ordered judgment debtor to pay principal amount Rs:4,05000/ along with 12% per annum up to 12.4.2025 total Rs:5,14,350/ and future interest at the same rate till realization, but surprisingly another link Presiding Judge Mr. Nazakat Ali Tanwari vide Order dated:14.1.2026 allowed judgment debtor Abdul Majeed Soomro to deposit Rs:40,000/ per month till final satisfaction of decree without any reason or legal justification, today Judgment debtor has been called absent despite several calls, but a person namely Saddam Hussain Soomro (who claims to be brother of J.D) appeared along with learned counsel Mr. Ali Bux Mahar who still claims to be counsel for J.D appeared and paid part instalment Rs:25000 to decree holder in presence of his counsel. According to parties, J.D so far has paid Rs:4,05000/ and he is still bound to pay interest Rs.1,09350 (12% interest) for the period 13.01.2023 to 13.4.2025 and he will also pay future interest as per decree and orders passed by my learned predecessor and link Judge at the same rate till realization of decree for which the learned counsel for D.H is directed to submit such statement on next date. Per file in hand this court vide Order dated: 08.6.2026 had ordered for custody and remand of J.D Abdul Majeed Soomro to District Prison Ghotki due to his continuous failure for payment of decreetal amount, which annoyed the learned counsel Mr. Ali Bux Mahar, who at that time also got filed such baseless complaint against the under signed to the Honorable I/C District & Sessions Judge Ghotki (Mr Tahir Hussain Abro), who at the sweet will of President and General Secretary DBA Ghotki issued an illegal Order beyond his jurisdiction interfering with this court???s judicial domain which this court replied but lateron he apologized in my chamber in presence of another Honorable Judge. Not only this learned counsel Mr. Ali Bux Mahar also appeared in this court on following day and apolagized with submission that complaint has been withdrawn by him. Such facts were incorporated in relevant diary in order to avoid further propegenda by office bearers of DBA Ghotki. As per decree, execution application and subsequent orders summarized in this diary the Judgment Debtor is still bound to pay amount Rs.1,09350/ with future interest-markup. To come up on 18.11.2026 for recovery of interest amount through instalments at the same rate in accordance with law. Per file in hand Judgment, decree and Orders passed by my learned predecessor and link Judges are still intact. The decree holder filed receipt in shape of an application with affidavit, which is taken on record.

2 S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 12/2026
Hidayatullah Ghoto VS Amanullah Ghoto   Lal Bux (ADVO-425-SBC-GHT)   ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT)

04.11.2026

Disposal Execution Application No.12/2026 is called for satisfaction of decree passed in 10/2026. The decree Holder is present along with his counsel. The Mukhtiarkar/City Survey Officer Ghotki has sent a Report No.CS/ 18 dated 29.9.2026 which is taken on record and ordered passed on it. The NADRA also furnished report recrading blocking the CNIC of Judgment debtor. BWs against the Judgment Debtor issued, returned with report of process server HC Shahnawaz Pathan. Time extended and delivered to him for execution and report. Put off to 18.11.2026 for further compliance.

3 S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 13/2026
Waqas Ahmed Rajput VS Muhammad Anwar Rajput   Liaquat Ali(ADVO-317-SBC-GHT)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT)

04.11.2026

Disposal Execution Application No.13/2026 is called for satisfaction of decree. The D/H and his counsel are present. The Judgment Debtor is called absent. BW against J.D for 21.10.2026 issued, returned with report of process server HC Nazeer Ahmed Chachar. Time extended and delivered to same process server.The learned counsel for Decree Holder is directed to provide exclusive particular of moveable and immoveable property of Judgment Debtor whatever it be for satisfaction of Decree. Hearing 04.11.2026.

4 C.M.A. (Civil Misc. Appeals) 15/2026
Altaf Hussain through attorney Muhammad Hasnain Panhwar VS Muhammad Sadique Panhwar and others   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT)

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is called. The appellants and the alleged attorney have been called absent despite several calls, but the learned counsel appeared and argued at length. Heard. File perused. Consequently civil miscellaneous appeal No.15/2026 is hereby dismissed in limini being hopelessly and meritless with no order as costs at about 12:15 noon. The impugned Order dated 17.9.2026 declining temporarly injunction in FCS No.21/2026 by the learned trial court of Senior Civil Judge Ubauro, therefore, stands upheld. Order announced in open court in presence of the learned counsel and his colleagues. Let copy of this order be communicated to the learned trial court as warranted under law.

CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A.
5 Summary Suits 44/2026
Makhan Mahar VS Wazeer Ali Malhan   Shahid Aziz(ADVO-1459-SBC-GHT)   ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT)

23.10.2026

Summary suit called. The plaintiff is present along with his counsel. The defendant Wazeer Ali is also present and filed adjournment application with affidavit. Order on it. Adjourned as a last chance with direction to file leave to defend application, if any on or before 23.10.2026. In case of failure matter will be proceeded exparte as per law.

CIVIL JURISDICTION Proceeding suspended by SHC / S.C.
6 S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 11/2026
Muhammad Hayyat Ghoto VS Abdul Rehman Ghoto and another   Wazir Ahmed Goto(ADVO-88-SBC-GHT)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT)

18.11.2026

Disposal Execution Application No.11/2026 (allowed on 11.6.2026) has been called for satisfaction of decree dated 14.4.2026 passed in Summary Suit No.16/2024. The Decree Holder is called absent. His counsel is present. The Judgment Debtors and their counsel are present. As per an Order dated 19.06.2026 passed by Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur in 1st Civil Appeal No.S-38 of 2026, it was ordered that no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants (Judgment debtors). The J.D No.02 produce CTC of last diary dated 24-9-2026, which is taken on record. To come up on 18.11.2026 for further proceedings and hearing.