| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1841/2026 | Nazeer Ahmed Chachar VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497 | 74/2026 Jarwar |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is received from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant, his counsel and ADPP for the State are present. The proposed accused Muhammad Chhuttal, Wazeer Ahmed and Zameer Ahmed appeared voluntarily. Mr Rafique Ahmed Chachar advocate has submitted his vakalatnama on behalf of present proposed accused persons. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Consequently, based on tentative judicious assessment broguth on record I am clear in my mind that the alleged cognizable offence needs incorporation in terms of section 154 Cr.P.C followed by fair investigation in accordance with law and Police Rules thus application in hand stands allowed with direction to SHO concerned to record applicant???s version in order to set law into motivation and to ascertain real facts. Needless to say that I.O will not arrest any of the accused until and unless he collects tangible and incriminating material against accused in the alleged offence. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1853/2026 | Ali Asghar Pitafi & another VS The State | Anwar Ali(ADVO-1059-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 63/2026 Khanpur Mahar |
Received bail application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law vide a letter No.Cr/ 7100 dated 18.8.2026. Bail application is already fixed on 20.8.2026. |
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1866/2026 | Ghulam Fareed Arain VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 83/2026 Adilpur |
Criminal Bail Application u/s 498-A Cr.P.C is called. The applicant/accused Ghulam Fareed is present on interim prearrest bail. The ADPP &DC are present. The complainant Muhammad Shafique Kalwar appeared. Mr Saeed Ahmed Dharejo advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant, which is taken on record. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. The interim prearrest bail is confirmed. |
|
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1854/2026 | Gahno Kalhoro & others VS The State | Ali Raza Kalwar(ADVO-237-B-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 79/2026 Adilpur |
Received bail application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law vide a letter No.7114 dated 19.8.2026. The applicants/accused (1) Gahno (2) Shahnawaz @ Shanoo and (3) Mumtaz all sons of Pathan and (4) Gulshan son of Nihal are present on interim pre-arrest bail. The ADPP & DC are present. The complainant Abdul Mannan Bullo appeared. Mr Rana Sajid Ali Rajput has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant which is taken on record. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. The interim prearrest bail is confirmed. |
| 5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1880/2026 | Ranjhan Ali Mahar & others VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 65/2026 Sarhad |
Received bail application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicants/accused (1) Ranjhan Ali son of Hakim Ali (2) Afzal Hussain son of Hakim Ali and (3) Salman Ali son of Ranjhan Ali are present along with their counsel. Order passed. The interim prearrest bail is granted subject to furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.30,000/ each and P.R bond in the like amount. Deponent Habibullah sonof Gohar by caste Mahar resident of village Haseja Mahar Taluka and District Ghotki appeared and he has submitted affidavit along with original special saving certificates specifically mentioned in the accountant report, and photo copy of his CNIC for standing surety for above named accused persons. Order on it. Surety accepted subject to report. The counsel for applicants/accused has submitted statement with regard to joining the trial by the applicants/accused, which is taken on record. The ADPP for the State is resent and waived the notice. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. The interim prearrest bail is confirmed. |
|
| 6 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1881/2026 | Nazir Ahmed Gabol & others VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 67/2026 Khanpur Mahar |
Received bail application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicants/accused (1) Nazeer Ahmed son of Pathan (2) Muhammad Ali son of Ghulam Hussain (3) Ashique Ali son of Nazir Ahmed and (4) Ihsan Ali son of Nazir Ahmed Gabole are present along with their counsel. Order passed. The interim prearrest bail is granted subject to furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.30,000/ each and P.R bond in the like amount. Hearing 22.8.2026 |
|
| 7 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1882/2026 | Abdul Malik @ Malik Dino Bullo & another VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 84/2026 B-Section Ghotki |
Received bail application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicants/accused (1) Abdul Malik @ Malik son of Dilwash and (2) Saleem son of Bahawal are present along with their counsel. Order passed. The interim prearrest bail is granted subject to furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.30,000/ each and P.R bond in the like amount. Deponent Bagh Ali son of Shahdad Khan by caste Bullo resident of village Muhammad Saleh Jatoi Taluka Pano Aqil District Sukkur appeared and he has submitted affidavit along with original special saving certificates specifically mentioned in the accountant report, and photo copy of his CNIC for standing surety for above named accused persons. Order on it. Surety accepted subject to report. Hearing 21.8.2026. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 8 | PPC 224/2017 | The state VS Zulqarnain and ors | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-325A-SBC-GHT) | PPC- 459 | 329/2016 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions Case is called. Accused (1) Dost Muhammad is produced by jail authority due to "Chehlum", accused (2) accused Zulqarnain (3) Jahanzeb are present on bail, while accused Aslam Pervez is absent under intimation. His application for excusing his absence on the ground of ailment is pending. Mr Imtiaz Ali Malano advocate for PW/Victim Zahoor Ahmed, the ADPP for the State, Mr Sajjad Ali Kalhoro advocate for accused Zulqarnain and Aslam Pervez, Mr Anwar Ali Lohar Counsel for accused Jehanzeb are present and Mr. Syed Zafar Ali Shah advocate for accused Dost Muhammad is absent. Accused Zulqarnain has submitted his reply to SCN which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to ADPP. Mr Sajjad Ali Kalhoro advocate states at Bar that he will proceed the case on next date hearing. Accused Dost Muhammad has submitted adjournment application with affidavit. Order on it. Adjourned as a last and final chance. In case of failure case will be proceeded as per law and further under take that he will cross examine to PWs. PW-02 PC Manjhi Khan Abro, PW-05 victim/injured Zahoor Ahmed, PW-06 Saif-Ur-Rehman Soomro and PW-08 Taxi Driver Abdul Wahid Mahar are present and bound to attend. The PW-01 complainant Muhammad Tayyab Soomro, PW-03 PC-37 Mashooque Ali Sawand, PW-04 Second I.O Inspector Zahid Hussain Meerani PW-07 ASI Rustam Ali Kalhoro PW-09 Medical Officer Dr Asif Hakeem Kalwar PW-10 SiP Muhammad Saleem Dayo and others are called absent. The summons to Medical Officer and BWs against remaining witnesses were issued, returned with endorsement of process server HC Nazeer Ahmed Chachar. Time extended and process handed over to him for compliance. Per file my learned predecessor vide judgment dated 01.12.2023 convicted and sentenced four accused for offence punishable under section 336 , 469, 382 and 337-L (ii) read with section 34 PPC. But the Honourable High Court of Sindh bench at Sukkur vide Judgment dated 13.02.2025, set-aside the same for fresh evidence and judgment in accordance with law. Moreover, per file in hand the present accused had also got filed transfer application No.S-29 of 2025 against my learned predecessor, which due to his transfer was dismissed vide Order dated 21.07.2025. A letter No.Cr/ 297 dated 20.5.2026 was sent to the Assistant Registrar (Criminal) Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur for further guideline. Case is adjourned last further chance to the accused party, with directions to proceed case or to produce copy of stay order if any, because the Honourable High Court of Sindh Sukkur Bench vide Judgment dated 13.02.25 (Appeal No.S-43/2023) passed and directed to conclude case within three months, but accused and the learned counsel always avoided and neglected to proceed it and now intend to prolonged it for indefinite period with ulterior motive. More over, case in hand is ful of adjournment application filed by one or another D.C or accused. To come up on 02.09.2026 for evidence, hearing on application u/s 540 Cr.P.C, hearing on reply to SCNs and hearing on application for cancellation of bail moved by PW/victim Zahoor Ahmed. Parties are informed. The present present accused are directed to attend and inform the absentee accused to attend. While next date be communicated to the jail authority for production of accused Dost Ali. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1670/2026 | Muhammad Yousif Khuhawar VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and ors | Rafique Ahmed(ADVO-482-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received criminal miscellaneous application is received from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant, his counsel and ADPP are present.Police report is received which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to counsel for applicant. The proposed accused appeared voluntarily. Mr Junaid Ahmed Soomro advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of proposed accused, which is taken on record. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Application is allowed in terms of direction as mentioned in the order. |
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1678/2026 | Muhammad Aslam Bhatti VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki | Humair Ali() | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous Application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The ADPP for the State is present. Report has already been received. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Application is allowed in terms of direction as mentioned in the order. |
| 11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1680/2026 | Shahmoar Khoso VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki | Lal Bux(ADVO-332-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received criminal miscellaneous application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant and his counsel are absent despite several calls. It is now 02:40 pm. The ADPP for the State is present. SHO PS A-Section Ghotki has submitted his report which is taken on record. In the interest of justice chance is given to the applicant's side. To come up on 21.8.2026 for hearing. |
| 12 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1698/2026 | Mir Muhammad Memon VS SHO PS Sarhad and ors | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received criminal miscellaneous application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is absent. His counsel is present. Order passed. Notice to proposed accused call report from SHO concerned for 21.8.2026. |
|
| 13 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1697/2026 | Nazeer Ahmed Chachar VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous Application under section 22-A sub-section 6 (i) Cr.P.C from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is present along with his counsel. Mr. Rafique Ahmed Chachar, advocate appeared along with proposed accused Muhammad Chhuttal, Wazeer Ahmed and Zameer Ahmed and submitted vakalatnama on their behalf, which is taken on record. ??Perusal of material and argument by the both learned counsel reveals that Doctor Asif Hakeem Kalwar purportedly issued MLC No.1276/2026 dated:16-8-2026 declaring injury No.1 as JGJ mutalahimah, which being punishable u/s 337-F(iii) PPC is cognizable and other injuries JGJ damiyah and other hurts are non cognizable. Applicant???s version prima facie finds support from MLC and per file in hand present applicant prior to invoking this Court???s jurisdiction also addressed an application in this regard to SSP Ghotki and SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki duly received by P.S on 17-8-2026. It is worth observing that a Circular No.AIGP/Legal/LC/CPO/2957-64 dated:14-4-2026 has been issued by office of IGP Sindh Karachi directing all SSPs, SHOs and other concerned police officers to ensure that FIRs in cognizable cases be lodged strictly in accordance with section 154 Cr.P.C and in case of deviation from the afore mentioned instruction the matter shall viewed seriously and appropriate disciplinary action shall be taken against the concerned officer(s) under the relevant laws and rules. The learned ADPP for State submitted that SHO/In-charge duty officer by law is bound to record applicant???s statement in terms of section 154 of 155 Cr.P.C whatever situation be. Consequently, based on tentative judicious assessment broguth on record I am clear in my mind that the alleged cognizable offence needs incorporation in terms of section 154 Cr.P.C followed by fair investigation in accordance with law and Police Rules thus application in hand stands allowed with direction to SHO concerned to record applicant???s version in order to set law into motition and to ascertain real facts. Needless to say that I.O will not arrest any of the accused until and unless he collects tengible and incriminating material against accused in the alleged offence. |
||
| 14 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1699/2026 | Roshan Shaikh and another VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Received criminal miscellaneous application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicants, their counsel and ADPP for the State are present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Consequently, based on judicious assessment of material brought on record I am of firm view that this is not a fit case for direction to register applicants??? FIR against proposed accused which is therefore declined but police authorities including SHO B-Section Ghotki are strictly directed to provide legal protection to applicants and their minor daughters and also to ensure that no threats be extended to them by any of proposed accused in order to avoid any untoward incident and in order to achieve that object SHO will feel no hesitation to take strict legal action against a person, who commits an offence.Application dismissed. |
||
| 15 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1700/2026 | Syed Mukhtiar Adam Shah VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Received criminal miscellaneous application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant, his counsel are called absent. The ADPP for the State is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Protection allowed. Application is disposed of in terms of directions as mentioned in the order. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 16 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 54/2026 | Sikandar Ali Kaleri VS Bux Muhammad Shah | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Direct complaint is present. The complainant is present along with his counsel. Accused Bux Muhammad Shah voluntarily appeared. The concerned SHO PS Mirpur Mathelo has submitted his report which is taken on record. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Direct complaint is dismissed. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 14/2026 |
Shafquat Ali Kalwar VS Mujeeb-ur-Rehman Chachar | Disposal Execution Application No.14/2026 for satisfaction of decree dated 19.5.2026 passed in Summary Suit No.13/2025 is called. The Decree Holder is absent. His counsel is present. The Judgment Debtor is called absent, thereforeOffice is, therefore directed to issue show cuase notice to Judgment Debtor to appear on next date viz:19-8-2026 for payment of decretal amount and to file a reply ???To show cause that as to why he be not arrested/taken into custody and remanded to prison for recovery of decretal amount in accordance with law??? because this court by law and justice is bound to help out Decree Holder to achieve legal fruit of Judgment and Decree coupled with execution passed by this court within legal parameters. Moreover, the learned counsel for Decree older is also directed to provide list of Judgment Debtor???s movable or immovable property whatever it be for satisfaction of Decree. Put off to 02.9.2026 for service of show cause notice upon the Judgment debtor. ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? |
||||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 98/2026 |
Roshan Ali Lakhan VS Federation of Pakistan and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal is called. The appellant is absent. His counsel is present. Arguments heard. Judgment passed on separate sheet and announced. Civil Appeal is dismissed. Let the decree be prepared. Copies of Judgment and Decree be sent to the trial court for information and compliance. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 3 | Summary Suits 29/2026 |
Abdul Qudoos Malik VS Muhammad Afzal Pathan | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit is called. The plaintiff is present along with his counsel and submitted an application to condone the delay in depositing "one time process fee" and sets. Time is granted. Office is directed to issue notices against the defendant through bailiff and TCS on costs. Put off to 22.8.2026 for service. |
|||