Sessions case called. Accused (1) Mubarak Lund is produced in custody. While accused (2) Ghulam Qadir Lund already acquitted u/s 265-K Cr.P.C on 15.11.2023, accused (3) Ghulam Hussain (4) Ghulam Fareed (5) Mushtaque (6) Munwar and (7) Khawand Bux have already been acquitted in terms of compromise u/s 345(6) Cr.P.C. Accused (8) Muhammad Adam alias Adam also acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C vide an Order dated 29.01.2024. While other absconding accused (9) Akbar is proclaimed offender and his case was kept on dormant file. The ADPP for the State, Mr Pardeep Kumar Counsel for complainant are present. Mr Muhammad Achar Gabole learned ASC for present accused is absent despite several calls. The complainant Abdul Jabbar along with witnesses namely Imam Deen, Zahid Hussain, Mst Aisha and mashir Ghulam Murtaza are present. Process for PWs issued, returned un-served. Time extended and delivered to same process server PC Imdad Ali of PS Khanpur Mahar. This is an old case pertaining to the year 2012 and complainant is avoiding to adduce evidence, hence the learned ADPP for the State and the learned counsel for complainant are once again strictly directed to ensure evidence of all PWs be recorded on next date as per law. In case of failure further proceedings of case in hand will be stopped, subject to law. Accused has submitted adjournment application. Order on it. Taken on record. Adjourned with direction to inform his counsel for next date fixed as per his request with consent of complainant. This case needs expeditious disposal because it pertains to the year 2012 and the Honourable Sindh High Court Bench at Sukkur also ordered for its disposal within a month. Case is adjourned to 18.06.2026 for evidence. The produced accused is remanded back to District Prison Ghotki along with slip for his re-production.

Sessions Case is called. Accused (1) Sardar Khan son of Khair Muhammad (2) Nek Muhammad Korai son of Arz Muhammad (3) Ali Hassan son of Mhammad Aarabi Khan (4) Abdul Azeez Khan Korai son of Ghulam Muhammad (5) Abdul Rasheed son of Muhammad Murad (6) Shabbir Ahmed son of Ghulam Muhammad and (7) Mehrab Ali son of Ghulam Hussain all by caste Korai are present on bail, while accused (8) Meer Muhammad Balouch son of Ghulam Muhammad Balouch is called absent. Co-accused Nek Muhammad has submitted an application for excusing the absence of accused Meer Muhammad. Order on it. Absence of accused is condoned for today. The Complainant Mst Basheeran, her advocate Mr Anwar Ali Lohar are called absent as usual. The learned ADPP for the State, Mr Mumtaz Ali Jahangeer Lashari counsel for accused Nek Muhammad, Abdul Rasheed, Meer Muhammad and Mehrab and Junior partner to Mr Ali Raza Kalwar advocate for accused Sardar Khan, Ali Hassan and Shabbir Ahmed are present. Mr Liaquat Ali Malano advocate for accused Abdul Aziz is called absent despite several call. PWs Sajjad Ali and PW Iftikhar Ahmed @ Sadam were present on the last date of hearing and they had filed joint statement with submission that their relatives complainant Mst Bashiran and PW Imtiaz shifted to unknown place and their evidence may be recorded on next date, but today they are called absent despite several calls. Per file in hand Director General, Health Services Sindh Hyderabad ordered for exhumation of dead body of complainant's son, which she challenged and the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur vide an Order dated 10.1.2023 passed in CP No.D-964/2022 suspended that Order and according to learned counsel for accused, it is now fixed after summer vacation. Per file in hand, the complainant and her counsel have abandoned to pursue this case since long as per case diaries. More over, learned Judicial Magistrate took cognizance against accused placed in column No.02 of the challan sheet, which they challenged by filing Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.S-439/2022 and the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur vide Order dated 16.11.2022 suspended its operation. Accused concealed fate of that application for years and even otherwise concerned staff of Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur also did not communicate its disposal to this court, but suddenly on 18.5.2026 the learned Counsel for accused vide statement informed that Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.S-439/2022 was dismissed vide Order dated; 5.12.2023, hence this case has been proceeded and this court framed charge on 18.05.2026. The process returned with report of process server HC Shahnawaz Pathan of PS B-Section Ghotki, which is taken on record. Issue BWs against complainant and other PWs (except Tapedar and Medical Officer) Case property produced and returned. Put of to 22.06.2026 for evidence. Parties are informed. Accused and present PWs are directed to attend. In case of failure to proceed case by either side an appropriate order may be passed as per law on next date because this case needs expeditious proceedings and timely decision as per law.

Sessions case called. Accused Abdul Ghaffar Shar is present on bail. He was released on bail granted by the court of learned Assistant Sessions Judge Ghotki as appearing from a letter No.2475 dated 12.6.2026 of Superintendent District Prison Ghotki, submitted on issuance of P.O, which is taken on record. The learned ADPP for the State is present. Charge against the accused framed (Exh 2). Plea of accused recorded (Exh 2/A). Issue summons to P.Ws. Put off to 22.6.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend.

Disposal Execution Application No.07/2025 (allowed on 04.6.25) is called for satisfaction of decree dated 03.3.25 passed in Summary Suit No.19/2025. The Decree holder is present. The Judgment Debtor is absent as he is already remanded in civil prison of District Prison Ghotki vide Remand Warrant dated 08.6.2026. Surety Lal Bux appeared voluntarily. Mr Ali Bux Mahar advocate, who is no more counsel for J.D in this decided execution application also appeared voluntarily. One Sadam Hussain (brother of Judgment debtor) appeared and he has has submitted an application with affidavit for paying Rs:80000. Order on it.Taken on record. He is directed to hand over cash of Rs:80000 (Eight thousand) to Decree Holder Muhammad Arshad Rajput under receipt today. Such amount given by him to the Decree Holder in open court, in token of receipt the decree holder has submitted such application/acknowledgment with affidavit. Order on it. Taken on record. Decree Holder received cash of Rs:8000 in open court today. Issue release writ accordingly. Per file this court vide a Judicial Order dated 08.06.2026 ordered JD Abdul Majeed son of Mohammad Pathan Soomro to be taken in to custody and remanded to District Prison Ghotkifor reasons detailed therein. Today his brother namely Sadam Hussain deposit two installments of Rs:80000 which has been handed over to decree Holder under receipt in open court today. Let release writ be issued with directions to the civil prison's authority to intimate the J.D with caution that in case of default in payment of even a single installment by now he will be remanded again to prison even without issuing show-cause notice in future. Put off to 29.6.2026 for further proceedings.

Execution Application is called. Decree Holder is called absent but his counsel Mr. Naveed Ahmed Malik is present on behalf of Decree Holder in respect of post execution proceedings so this court informed him about pendency of Civil Appeal No.S-25/2026, stay order passed therein and date of re-listing on 18-6-2026 so that he may inform Decree Holder Dileep Kumar about it as per law. To come up on 30.06.2026.

Disposal Execution Application No.10/26 (allowed on 01.6.2026) is called for satisfaction of decree passed in Summary Suit No.30/25. The Decree Holder is present along with his counsel and seeks time to provide list of movable as well as immovable property of Judgment Debtor for satisfaction of decree. The Judgment Debtor is called absent. Office is directed to issue a show cause notice to him "To show cause that as to why he be not arrested and detained in prison for recovery of decreetal amount in accordance with law" as well as a letter to NADRA authorities to digitally impound his CNIC till further order so that Judgment debtor may not escape outside country. To come up on 30.6.2026 for compliance.

Summary Suit is called. The Decree Holder is present along with his counsel Mr Lal Bux Ghoto. The Judgment Debtor is called absent. Notice against him was issued returned by learned Senior Civil Judge Ghotki vide his office letter No. 440 dated 11.6.2026 with report of bailiff duly served by way of door pasting, which is taken on record. Per file notice for the date of hearing viz 10.6.2026 was returned by said learned Senior Civil Judge Ghotki vide a letter No.427 dated 09.6.2026 with endorsement of bailiff. The Judgment Debtor is called absent despite several calls. Service against him is hereby held good. Put off to 16.06.2026 for appearance and filing the objections by J/D if any and hearing.