Criminal Bail application is called. The ADPP & DC are present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Accused Altaf Hussain son of Nizam Deen be released on bail subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of 30,000 thirty thousand and P.R bond in the like amount.

Criminal Bail application is called. The ADPP & DC are present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Accused Altaf Hussain son of Nizam Deen be released on bail subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of 30,000 thirty thousand and P.R bond in the like amount.

Criminal Miscellaneous application is called. The applicant, her counsel and ADPP for the state are present. Police report is received which is kept on record and copy thereof supplied to counsel for applicant. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Application is disposed of in terms of direction as mentioned in the order.

Criminal Miscellaneous application is called. The applicant, his counsel and ADPP for the state are present. Police report is received which is kept on record and copy thereof supplied to counsel for applicant. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Application is disposed of in terms of direction as mentioned in the order.

Sessions case called. Accused Ubedullah and Khanzado are present on bail as per case diary maintained by the learned Magistrate. While rest of accused are absconding and declared as proclaimed offenders. The ADPP for the state is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Accused Ubedullah and Khanzado are acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C from the charge. They are present on bail, their bail bonds are cancelled and surety discharged, and the case against absconding accused be kept on dormant file till their arrest and surrender. However, perpetual warrants against proclaimed offenders be issued for 07.01.2026.

Sessions Case is called. Accused (1) Dost Muhammad has been linked and produced by Prison authority of District Prison Ghotki through video link. Accused (2) Jahanzeb is present on bail, while the case of accused (3) Zulqarnain and (4) Aslam Pervez was bifurcated vide an Order dated 16.10.2026 due to absence of accused Zulqarnain along with his on 09.10.2026 and 16.10.2026 followed by issuance of NBW against him and notice to his surety on account of cancellation of bail bond and forfeiture of surety. Further Mr Imtiaz Ali Malano, the learned advocate for injured PW Zahoor Ahmed, Mr Shabbir Ahmed Siyal, the learned A.D.P.P for the State, Mr Anwar Ali Lohar, the learned defense Counsel for accused Jehanzeb and Mr. Muhammad Bux Shar, the learned defense counsel for UTP Dost Muhammad are present. Mr. Karamullah Chachar, the learned co-counsel for accused Dost Muhammad and co-counsel for accused Zulqarnain is also present. Accused Zulqarnain appeared and submitted orally that NBW issued against him may be recalled and cancelled because he could not appear on last two dates due to ???Maleria??? but he neither filed any application nor furnished any proof, hence he was ordered to be taken into custody at 09:00 am for remand to Prison. However, the learned defense counsel Mr. Sajjad Ali Kalhoro appeared and filed an application at about 11:00 am which after hearing has been declined vide a separate Order passed on application purportedly signed filed by accused Zulqarnain and endorsed by Mr. Kalhoro. Bifurcated part of accused Zulqarnain is hereby merged with case file in hand for expeditious proceedings. As such this court proceeded case and therefore, recorded statements u/s 342 Cr.P.C of accused Zulqarnain at Exh:72, accused Jehanzeb at Exh. 73 and accused Dost Muhammad at Exh:74. After around two hours, Mr Muhammad Bux Shar, the learned counsel for accused Dost Muhammad Kalhoro, duly assisted by co-counsel Mr Karamullah Chachar produced two written pages containing replies to question which were put from UTP Dost Muhammad with submission that the same may be reproduced as replies of UTP Dost Muhammad in his statement already recorded at Exh. 72, which this court declined because as per section 342 Cr.P.C trial court has to confront prosecution evidence to accused asking him certain questions and to write his reply in open court in presence of the learned defense counsel which this court has already done but the learned defense counsel emphasized which this court declined, discarded and filed the same written papers bearing his signature which the learned defense counsel Mr. Shar got written by his co-counsel Mr. Karamullah Chachar in open court today. His such acts being illegal amount to professional misconduct but this court tolerated. Accused Aslam Parvez has been called absent, so let notice be repeated in bifurcated part. To come up on 26.10.2026 for final argument with direction to the learned defense counsel to argue this case without fail because this is the oldest case pertaining to the year 2017 and need expeditious proceedings and timely decision in accordance with law as per direction by the Honorable High Court of Sindh Karachi as well as Honourable District & Sessions Judge Ghotki. Needless to say that the learned counsel Mr. Shar since date of filing his vakalatnama takes this case as a personal case so it is worth noting that today as well several other advocates namely Mr Anwar Ali Loharo, Mr Imtiaz Ali Malano, Mr Dildar Pathan, Mr. Zaheer Ahmed Kalwar, Mr. Nadeem Ahmed Chachar, Mr Javed Ahmed Menik, Mr Sajjad Ahmed Kalhoro and other advocates and court Staff also witnessed entire court proceedings in order to avoid further propaganda, which office bearers of DBA Ghotki launched at sweet will of Mr. Shar being Senior to General Secretary, DBA Ghotki.

Disposal Execution Application No.07/2025 (allowed on 04.6.25) is called for satisfaction of decree dated 03.3.25 passed in Summary Suit No.19/2025. The Decree holder and Judgment Debtor have been called absent despite several calls. In the interest of justice, matter is adjourned to 27.10.2026 for further compliance of the decree.

Summary Suit is called. The plaintiff is present along with his counsel. The defendant is absent. Process against him was issued, but not returned served or un-served. Repeat process as already ordered with 2nd reminder letter to the learned Senior Civil Judge Daharki for 27.10.2026.

Summary suit is called. The plaintiff is present along with his counsel. The defendant is present along with his counsel and filed adjournment application. Order on it. adjourned with direction to file written statement if any on next date without fail. Put off to 20.10.2026 for filing the written statement.

Execution Application is called. The Decree Holder is present along with his counsel. The Judgment Debtor is absent. Mr. Atteeq-ur-Rehman Soomro the learned advocate sent his vakalatnama along with adjournment application on behalf of Judgment Debtor. Orders passed thereon. Adjourned with direction to file objections on next date as last chance. In case of failure Execution will be proceeded and decided as per law. To come up on 24.10.2026 for filing objections.