ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE III, GHOTKI : 14-OCT-2026

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C)
1 Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2307/2026 Muhammad Shareef Gabol VS The State     DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT)   Cr.PC-497,SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A 86/2026
Khanpur Mahar


14.10.2026

Received bail application from the court of Honourable District Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The DC is present and put his marginal note for withdrawing the bail application. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Taken on record. Cr.B.A No.2307/2026 is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with permission to repeat it at least after submission of interim police report subject to law and Police Rules.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence
2 PPC 400/2026 The State VS Abdul Rasool Ogahi and others   DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT)     PPC-324 170/2025
A-Section Ghotki


14.10.2026

Sessions Case is called. Accused (1) Ghulam Yaseen son of Yar Muhammad Ogahi is present on bail. While the case against proclaimed offenders namely (2) Abdul Rasool (3) Yar Muhammad sons of Sarang and (4) Waheed Ahmed son of Yar Muhammad Ogahi already kept on dormant file. The ADPP for the State and DC are present. PW-01 HC Rafique Ahmed PW-02 Medical Officer Dr Abdul Rauf Mahar and PW-03 I.O ASI Sher Muhammad Abro are present and examined (Exh 6 to Exh 8). Mr Ubedullah Mirani advocate appeared and filed an application under section 265-K Cr.P.C along with vakalatnama his power on behalf of present accused. Orders passed thereon. The learned ADPP waived the notice. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Undeniably fair trial (article 10-A) which is now a constitutional right of an accused includes and means fairness in all respects including expeditious proceedings and legal proceedings as per law. Moreover, this court by virtue of section 265-K Cr.P.C is competent to acquit an accused at any stage even on its own motion subject to stipulations contained therein otherwise very purpose of this enactment will stand redundant. Reliance in this regard is respectfully placed on case of Mehboob Hassan versus Akhtar Islam etc (SBLR 2024 SC-78) No sufficient material exists to prove charge against the present accused rather he merits to be acquitted at this stage in terms of section 265-K Cr.P.C because charge so framed became groundless and no probability exits of his conviction even after recording evidence of rest of P.Ws. Consequently I acquit accused named above in terms of section 265-K Cr.P.C. He is present on bail hence bail bond cancelled and surety discharged. However case against proclaimed offenders be kept on dormant file till their arrest or otherwise and perpetual warrants be also issued against them. Case property viz: single crime empty whatever available on record be preserved till further order.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A
3 Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2067/2026 Allah Juriyo Kaladi VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others   Manzoor Ahmed Soomro(ADVO-688-SBC-GHT)   ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT)   Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) /


14.10.2026

Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is absent. His counsel is present and put his marginal note on main application for withdrawing the same. The ADPP for the State is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Disposed of as withdrawn.

4 Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2076/2026 Khuda Dad Gabol VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and others   Khadim Hussain (ADVO-905-SBC-GHT)   ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT)   Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) /


14.10.2026

Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is absent. His counsel is present and submitted statement for withdrawing the same. The ADPP for the State is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Disposed of as withdrawn.

CIVIL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service
1 Summary Suits 27/2026
Najab Ali Almani VS Syed Omer Ali Anvery   Iftikhar Ahmed (ADVO-545-SBC-GHT)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT)

14.10.2026
سماعت جاری ہے

Summary Suit called. The plaintiff is present along with his counsel and filed an statement along with copy of newspaper daily JANG which is taken on record. The defendant is called has been absent without intimation despite several calls. Per material brought on record defendant received process himself through courier service following service through publication notice. Service against him is hereby held good. Since he has failed to apply for leave no defence, therefore, he is hereby debarred. Let the matter be fixed for exparte evidence. The counsel for plaintiff has filed an application u/o XVI Rule 1 & 2 R/WS-151 CPC with affidavit. Order on it. Application disposed of. Issue a letter to the learned trial court to depute a responsible official to produce complete record of cheque, memo verification and challan etc in crime No.21/2026 PS Khanpur Mahar for this court on 16.10.2026 at 9:00 am in accordance with law.

2 Summary Suits 37/2026
Kelash VS Sandeep Kumar and others   Javed Hussain(ADVO-450-SBC-GHT)   Shahid Aziz(ADVO-401-SBC-GHT)

17.10.2026

Summary suit called. The plaintiff and defendant No.01 Sandeep Kumar are present. The counsel for plaintiff is absent. Mr Shahid Aziz Kaleri counsel for defendant No.01 is present and submitted statement along with original General Power of Attorney, which is taken on record. Process returned by learned Senior Civil Judge Ghotki for his office letter No. 709 dated 13.102026 which is also taken on record. The plaintiff has filed adjournment application with affidavit. Order on it. Time is granted to produce his counsel for proceedings the suit on next date as per law. Put off to 17.10.2026 for objection and hearing on application for leave to defend.

3 Summary Suits 38/2026
Kelash VS Dayanand and another   Javed Hussain(ADVO-450-SBC-GHT)   ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT)

17.10.2026

Summary suit is called. The plaintiff is present. His counsel has been called absent despite several calls. The defendant No.1 Dayanand appeared. Mr Amanullah Khan Kolachi advocate appeared and filed his vakalatnama along with adjournment application on behalf of defendant No.1. Orders passed thereon. Adjourned with direction to file leave to defend, if any, on next date. The process has been returned by learned Senior Civil Judge Ghotki vide his office letter No.708 dated 13.10.2026 which is taken on record and order passed on it. Call concerned Bailiff along with proof that defendant No.2 went to India. Bailiff Ghous Bux Magsi appeared and he has submitted an application excusing him on furnishing the false information. Order on it. Taken on record. He is execused with strict caution to remain careful in future and not to submit report without proof because baseless and vague reports cause complication. On quarry the defendant No.01 Diyanand replied that he has no proof in shape of VISA and Ticket of defendant No.02 Amar Lal and the concerned bailiff also failed to submit such roof along with his endorsement which means that both are liers. Conversly the Plaintiff submit that the defendant No.02 Amar Lal is still residing with the defendant No.01 Dayanand in the same house as such concerned bailiff is directed to avoid false report without proof in future. Let the process be issued with direction to the bailiff to affix on the enterance door of the house in presence of two nek mards of the locality as well as issue publication noticed to be published in the recognized newspaper on costs. Put off to 17.10.2026 for filing an application for leave to defend by the defendant No.01 and service upon the defendant No.02.

4 S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 15/2026
Abdul Qudoos@ Sajid Jameel Malik VS Muhammad Afzal Pathan   Zahid Hussain (ADVO-960-SBC-GHT)   ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT)

16.10.2026

Execution Application is called. The Decree Holder is absent. His counsel is present and submitted statement along with copy of newspaper daily AWAMI AWAZ Dated 09.10.2026, which is taken on record. The Judgment debtor is called absent. Service against him is hereby held good on the basis of display of notice on the entrance door of the residential house of the judgment debtor followed by said publication notice. Put off to 16.10.2026 for appearance, filing the objections by the Judgment debtor and further proceedings.