ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE III, GHOTKI : 03-JUN-2026

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C)
1 Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1206/2026 Allah Wadhayo Machhi & another VS The State     DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT)   Cr.PC-498,Gambling Act -Section 5-A 66/2026
B-Section Ghotki
2 Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1205/2026 Sannaullah @ Sono Mirani & another VS The State     DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT)   Cr.PC-498,Gambling Act -Section 5-A 66/2026
B-Section Ghotki
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence
3 SC (Murder Trial) 275/2012 The State VS Gullam Hussain and others   DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT)   Mahboob Ahmed(ADVO-752-SBC-GHT)   PPC-302 10/2012
Khanpur Mahar


03.6.2026
4 SC (Murder Trial) 327/2022 The state VS Sardar Khan and ors   Anwar Ali(ADVO-1059-SBC-GHT),DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT)   Ali Raza Kalwar(ADVO-237-B-SBC-GHT),Muneer Ahmed(ADVO-411-SBC-GHT)   PPC-302 22/2022
B-Section Ghotki


03.6.2026
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A
5 Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 997/2026 Sadaruddin Pitafi VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and ors     ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT)   Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) /


03.6.2026
6 Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1003/2026 Qurban Arain VS SHO PS Ubauro and ors     ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT)   Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) /


03.6.2026

Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present and his counsel Mr Mushtaque Ahmed Kolachi is called absent. Mr Zulfiqar Ali Ghoto advocate appeared and he has submitted his vakalatnama on behalf of applicant, which is taken on record. Report from SHO PS Ubauro has already been received. The proposed accused No.03 and 04 are called absent. Their counsel Mr Tarique Ali Panhwar and ADPP for the State are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Consequently application stands dismissed being meritless and tainted with malice. However, applicant is at liberty to address a complaint against the concerned bank officers to the competent Bank authorities or Worthy Banking Mohtasib, if so advised subject to law and rules.

7 Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1058/2026 Abdul Qudoos @ Sajid Jameel Malik VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki     DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT)   Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) /