ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE III, GHOTKI : 29-SEP-2026

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C)
1 Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2211/2026 Ghulam Yaseen Ogahi VS The State   Gul Masroor (ADVO-25275-SBC-KHS)     Cr.PC-498 170/2025
A-Section Ghotki

Received bail application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant Ghulam Yaseen son of Yar Muhammad Ogahi appeared along with his counsel. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Application for prearrest bail is declined and taken in to custody as he is proclaimed offender in Sessions Case No.400/2026 outcomes of FIR Crime No.170/2026 PS A-Section Ghotki.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Criminal Revision
2 Criminal Revisions 19/2026 Muhammad Sukhiyal Sanghar VS Liaquat and others     ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT)   Cr.PC-439 64/2026
Sarhad


29.9.2026

Criminal miscellaneous application is called. The applicant SIP Muhammad Sukhyal Sanghar I.O of FIR Crime No.64/2026 PS Sarhad is present along with learned ADPP for the State. Notice was issued, returned with report, which is taken on record. The accused (1) Liaquat son of Ali Murad (2) Ghulam Murtaza son of Ghulam Sarwar and (3) Aijaz son of Gul Muhammad Pitafi are produced by the jail authority of District Prison Ghotki THROUGH VIDEO LINK. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Undeniably, this is a murder case coupled with robbery, I.O per material arrested three accused and produced them on the same date in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate and Family Judge seeking P.C remand for fair investigation and interrogation, which on one hand is sole domain of police and on the other hand is also very much essential to reach at fair conclusion. As such the learned Judicial Magistrate ought to have grant first P.C remand at least for few days subject to certain conditions but he failed and declined only for the alleged maltreatment to accused, which amounts to exercise of jurisdiction with material illegality because mere nomination of accused through further statements and simple arrest without independent investigation and interrogation by I.O will not serve true purpose of investigation in accordance with law.Consequently, based on judicious assessment of entire material on touch stone of law visualized under Chapter XIV Part V (INFORMATION TO THE POLICE AND THEIR POWERS TO INVESTIGATE) and Police Rules, 1934 I am clear in my mind that the impugned order calls for interference hence I set aside it and order In-charge/Prison authority District Ghotki to handover sound physical custody of all three accused named above in FIR Crime No.64/2026 P.S Sarhad to I.O SIP Muhammad Sukhiyal Sanghar today soon after receiving order, for fair investigation and interrogation from them at P.S strictly in accordance with law and Police Rules and to produce them in the same sound condition without any torture on 02-10-2026 before the learned Judicial Magistrate & Family Judge Ghotki for seeking further remand if need be, which will be decided by the learned Judicial Magistrate on merit keeping in the view necessity and object of P.C remand which under the law is upto 14 days and not to be declined or granted in routine and being a Judicial Order demands exercise of dynamic and independent judicial mind with purpose to provide fair and ample opportunity of investigation to I.O in the best interest of Justice.Let copy of this order be communicated to the learned Judicial Magistrate & Family Judge Ghotki as well as In-charge District Prison Ghotki by hand of present applicant I.O SIP Muhammad Sukhiyal Sanghar, for information and compliance today.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence
3 SC (Murder Trial) 366/2026 The State VS Muhammad Shahban Mahar and others     ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT)   PPC-302 78/2026
Mirpur Mathelo


29.9.2026

Sessions Case called. Accused/Four UTPs namely (1) Muhammad Shahban (2) Ghulam Ali (3) Younis @ Jeal @ Mirchoo all sons of Allahdad and (4) Aijaz son of Muhammad Yousif all by caste Mahar have been linked and produced through Video link from District Prison and Correctional facility Ghotki. Two co-accused namely Sikandar and Bahawal are present on bail. The learned ADPP for state, complainant Abdul Jabbar Mahar, his counsels M/S Jamshed Ahmed Faiz and Muhammad Yasmeen Qureshi. PW-08 WMO Asma Kalwar appeared. Her evidence recorded (Exh 8). PW-05 author of FIR and I.O SiP Peer Bux Bhutto is present. His examination in chief recorded (Exh 09) and cross examination is reserved as prayed by the learned defense counsel on the ground that he will cross examine present P.W after cross examination of private P.Ws. PW-06 Tapedar Abdul Qayoom Shar are present and his evidence recorded (Exh 10). DC and complainant have filed their individual adjournments applications. Orders passed thereon. Adjourned as last chance. Process extended and handed over to process server for service. To came up on 03.10.2026 for cross examination to PW-02 eye witness Parvez Ahmed PW-03 Dispatch official PC Arbelo Khoso,by DC Mr Ali Asghar Panyar, as well as cross examination to PW-04 SiP Peer Bux Bhutto by both DC and of evidence in accordance with law.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491
4 Habeas Corpus 303/2026 Allah Ditto Kolachi VS SSP Ghotki and others       Cr.PC-491 /


30.9.2026

Received criminal miscellaneous application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is present along with his counsel. Order passed on memo. Notice to respondents for production of alleged detenue, if any in this court on 30.9.2026.

5 Habeas Corpus 304/2026 Mst. Hafeezan Ghoto VS SHO PS Katcho Bindi-I       Cr.PC-491 /

Received R and Ps of above mentioned criminal Misc; Application u/s 491 Cr.PC by way of transfer from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge, Ghotki, for disposal according to law. Order on it. Notice to respondents for recovery and production of the alleged detenue accordance with law in this court on 30.9.2026.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A
6 Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1985/2026 Abdul Qadir Banbh VS SHO PS Ubauro and others       Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) /


29.9.2026

Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. Mr Abdul Fatah Kalhoro advocate appeared and he has submitted his vakalatnama on behalf of proposed accused persons, which is taken on record. The SHO PS Ubauro has submitted his report which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to counsel for applicant. The ADPP for the State is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Consequently, based on judicious assessment of material brought on record I am of firm view that actual bone of contention between the parties is purely of family nature but applicant due to ill advice twisted the situation and made a fould attempt to kneel down his second wife and others for ulterior motives through dragging them in criminal proceedings, which is not permissible under the law rather amounts to mis-use this legal provision thus application is hereby dismissed being hopelessly meritless and tainted with malice. However, he is at liberty to seek legal remedy from a competent court.

7 Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1993/2026 Muhammad Ayaz Pathan VS SSP Ghotki and others       Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) /


30.9.2026

Criminal Miscellaneous Application is received from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The ADPP for the State is also present and waived the notice. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. This Court in capacity of an ex-officio Justice of Peace can???t notice or restrain or direct a private person to perform any act in petition of this nature because this court can only pass an appropriate order only to police authorities and that too subject to certain stipulations contained in terms of section 22-A sub section 6 clause i to iii The Cr.P.C 1898. Despite such legal position the learned counsel insisted for notice and a restraint order against private persons as well which being against law stands discarded.Consequently I allow Cr. Misc. Application in hand with direction to official respondents to provide legal protection to applicant and her family subject to law and rules without interfering with or influencing their civil/family rights or personal issues, if any and also to ensure that no harassment or interference be caused or police help be provided to either of parties in respect of alleged civil/family dispute. Needless to say that this order will not mean to prevent police authorities from taking legal action against applicant or any member of her family if found involved in any criminal act/offence.

8 Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1995/2026 Ali Asghar Ghoto VS SHO PS B/Ghotki and others       Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) /


30.9.2026

Received criminal miscellaneous application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is present along with his counsel. Order passed on memo. Call report from SHO concerned for 30.9.2026.

9 Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1994/2026 Irshad Ahmed Mahar VS SHO PS Khanpur Mahar       Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) /


30.9.2026

Received criminal miscellaneous application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is absent. His counsel is present. Order passed on memo. Call report from SHO concerned for 30.9.2026.

10 Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1992/2026 Syed Sajid Ali Shah VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and ors   Mian Raheel Ahmed(ADVO-52370-SBC-GHT)     Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) /


30.9.2026

Received criminal miscellaneous application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is present along with his counsel. Order passed on memo. Call report from SHO concerned for 30.9.2026.

11 Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1996/2026 Muhammad Aslam Panhwar VS SSP Ghotki and others       Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) /

Received criminal miscellaneous application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is absent. His counsel Mr Atta Sarmad is present. The ADPP for the State is also presented and waived the notice. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Protection is allowed and application is disposed of in terms of direction as mentioned in the order.

12 Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1998/2026 Aijaz Ahmed Gadani VS SSP Ghotki and others       Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) /

Received criminal miscellaneous application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is absent. His counsel Mr Atta Sarmad is present. The ADPP for the State is also presented and waived the notice. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Protection is allowed and application is disposed of in terms of direction as mentioned in the order.

13 Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1997/2026 Rehman Waheed Khilji VS SSP Ghotki and others       Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) /

Received criminal miscellaneous application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is absent. His counsel Mr Atta Sarmad is present. The ADPP for the State is also presented and waived the notice. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Protection is allowed and application is disposed of in terms of direction as mentioned in the order.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases
14 PPC 400/2026 The State VS Abdul Rasool Ogahi and others   DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT)   PPC-324 170/2025
A-Section Ghotki

Today i.e 29.9.2026 accused Ghulam Yaseen son of Yar Muhammad Ogahi appeared in Bail Application No.2211/2026, which has been declined. He is taken in to custody and remanded to District Prison Ghotki with direction to produce him before this court THROUGH VIDEO. Let his S/report be called from concerned SHO through concerned Magistrate. Let the case be restored. To come up on 06.10.2026 for receipt of S/Report supplying the documents to the accused under section 265-C Cr.P.C. M/S Ubedullah Mirani and Gul Masroor advocates appeared and they have filed their joint power along with bail application under section 497 Cr.P.C on behalf of accused Ghulam Yaseen. Order passed. Put up with case file on date of hearing viz: 06.10.2026. Application has been filed at 3.30 pm. Case has already fixed on 06.10.2026.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints
15 DC (Direct Complaint) 14/2026 Muhammad Ramzan Mahar VS Zaheer Ahmed Abbasi and others     ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT)   PPC-324 /


29.9.2026

Direct complaint is called. The complainant, his witness and counsel are present. The statement under section 200 Cr.P.C of complainant Muhammad Ramzan and statement under section 201 Cr.P.C of witness Ghulam Hussain alias Babloo recorded and kpet on record. The counsel for complainant has submitted statement for closing the side which is also taken on record. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Undeniably, this court as per scheme of law visualized under Chapter XVI The Cr.P.C, 1898 is competent as well as bound to form a justified opinion for the purpose of either to dismiss complaint in terms of section 203 Cr.P.C when there is no sufficient ground for proceedings or to take cognizance when there is a sufficient ground for proceedings to the satisfaction of the court in terms of section 204 Cr.P.C (Chapter XVII The Cr.P.C, 1898).Consequently, based on reasons and Law I am of firm view that complainant did not come with clean hands, actual bone of contention between the parties is purely of family/civil nature which he attempted to convert into criminal one for ulterior motives thus no case prima facie tri-able under relevant sections is made out and this is not a fit case even for taking cognizance, hence complaint in hand stands dismissed in limine being meritless. Complainant dismissed in limine.

CIVIL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance
1 S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 14/2026
Shafquat Ali Kalwar VS Mujeeb-ur-Rehman Chachar    

06.10.2026

Disposal Execution Application No.14/2026 for satisfaction of decree dated 19.5.2026 passed in Summary Suit No.13/2025 is called. The Decree Holder is present along with his counsel. The Judgment Debtor is called absent. The Deputy Assistant Director NADRA Office Ghotki has sent a letter No.803 dated 21.9.2026 intimating therein that the CNIC No:4510249462815 of the Judgment debtor has been blocked, which is taken on record. Warrants issued against the J/D returned un-executed, extended and the same handed over to process server HC Anwar Ali Meerani for 06.10.2026.9.2026.