| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Report | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 71/2026 | The State VS Tharoo Sundrani and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 37/2023 Andal Sundrani |
Case already kept on dormant file. All accused are already declared as P.O. ADPP for the state is present. Perpetual warrants be issued against said accused as already ordered. Hearing 31.07.2026 |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 836/2026 | Muhammad Mureed @ Mureed Lolai VS The State | Riaz Ahmed(ADVO-442-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 8/2015 Gamero |
Criminal Bail application is called. The applicant/accused Muhammad Mureed @ Mureed son of Meer Muhammad Lolai is present on interim pre-arrest bail. The ADPP for the State and DC are present. Complainant Ali Murad is absent. R&Ps in Criminal Case No.67/15 State Vs Hakro @ Abdul Haque and others u/s 382 PPC (Crime NO.08/2012 PS Gamero) is received, perused and returned back to the trial court i.e learned Civil Judge &JM-I, Ghotki. Arguments heard. Order passed. Per R&Ps received from the trial court 1st Civil Judge Ghotki, present accused Muhammad Mureed son of Meer Muhammad was also acquitted in his absentia along with seven others who were facing trial vide Judgment dated 02.12.2025 hence he is no more accused in that FIR, so question of seeking pre-arrest bail does not arise. Pre-arrest bail application appears to have been wrongly filed by the learned counsel without perusal of trial court???s judgment. Hence Cr.BA stands dismissed being in fractious, which also results in recalling of interim bail order. Parties are informed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
|
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 835/2026 | Muhammad Mureed @ Mureed Lolai VS The State | Riaz Ahmed(ADVO-442-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 1/2012 Gamero |
Criminal Bail application is called. The applicant/accused Muhammad Mureed @ Mureed son of Meer Muhammad Lolai is present on interim pre-arrest bail. The ADPP for the State and DC are present. Complainant Abid Ogahi is absent. R&Ps in Criminal Case No.21/12 State Vs Karam and others u/s 382 PPC (Crime NO.01/2012 PS Gamero) is received, perused and returned back to the trial court i.e learned Civil Judge &JM-I, Ghotki. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. The interim pre-arrest bail is confirmed. Parties are informed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 28/2025 | Khudad Dad Gabole VS Abdul Ghani Gabole and others | Ali Raza Kalwar(ADVO-237-B-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Sessions case called. Accused (1) Abdul Ghani is absent under intimation filed by co-accused. Accused (2)Raheem (3)Bego (4) Abbas (5) Muhammad Qasim (6) Ali Sher and (7) Saleh are present on bail. While accused Achar son of Ghulam Haider Gabole is absconding and already declared as proclaimed offender. Issue writ of attachment under section 88 Cr.P.C and NADRA as already. The complainant, his advocate and advocate for accused are present. The advocate for accused has filed adjournment application. Order on it. Summons for private witnesses, returned, who are present. Write a letter to Deputy Commissioner Ghotki @ Mirpur Mathelo along with photo copy of anvestigation Report NO.SR/ 9 dated 03.01.2025 of Mukhtiarkar Revenue Mirpur Mathelo, with directions to produce him on the next date of hearing. Also similar letter along with photo copy of investigation Report No.24 dated 08.01.2025 of SHO PS Khanpur Mahar to SSP Ghotki @ Mirpur Mathelo to produce him, for evidence purpose. Put off to 07.05.2026 for evidence. Parties are informed. Accused are directed to attend. The complainant is also directed to attend and bring his witnesses. |
| 5 | PPC 68/2026 | The State VS Mehboob Shar and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-395 | 29/2022 Andal Sundrani |
Sessions Case called. Accused (1) Anwar son of Peroz Shar is produced in custody. The proceedings against accused (2) Hakim alias Hakoo Shar (3) Muhammad Ayoub Shar already abated on account of their death vide an Order Order dated 05.12.2025, while the case against absconding accused (4) Mehboob (5) Ghafoor (6) Allah Wassayo (7) Imran and (8) Nazeer already kept on dormant file vide an Order dated 27.02.2026. The ADPP for the State and DC are present and seeks time. The complainant Meeral (who is confined in Central Prison Sukkur in some another custody case) is produced through video link. He seeks time on the ground that he will engage a private advocate. At the request of complainant case is adjourned to 7.05.2026, for evidence. Parties are informed. Accused produced in custody is remanded back to District Prison Ghotki along with slip for his re-production. Issue Summons against the remaining witnesses. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 6 | Habeas Corpus 123/2026 | Ali Hassan Siyal VS SSP Ghotki and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant, his advocate, the private respondents NO.05 and 07 and ADPP for the State are present. Mr Pardeep Kumar advocate has filed his power on behalf of the present private respondents. The SHO PS Khanpur Mahar has sent his report, which is taken on record and copies thereof supplied to both the present advocates. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
|
| 7 | Habeas Corpus 129/2026 | Atif Awan VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application under section 491 Cr.P.C is called. The applicant is present along with his advocate. The ADPP for the State is present. ASI Sher Muhammad Abro has submitted report on behalf of SHO PS A-Section Ghotki, which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to advocate for applicant. Arguments heard. Order passed. Dismissed. Parties are informed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 8 | SC (Murder Trial) 275/2012 | The State VS Gullam Hussain and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Mahboob Ahmed(ADVO-752-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 10/2012 Khanpur Mahar |
Sessions case called. Accused (1) Mubarak Lund is produced in custody and he has filed adjournment application. Order on it. While accused (2) Ghulam Qadir Lund already acquitted u/s 265-K Cr.P.C on 15.11.2023, accused (3) Ghulam Hussain (4) Ghulam Fareed (5) Mushtaque (6) Munwar and (7) Khawand Bux have already been acquitted in terms of compromise u/s 345(6) Cr.P.C. Accused (8) Muhammad Adam alias Adam also acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C vide an Order dated 29.01.2024. While other absconding accused (9) Akbar is proclaimed offender and his case was kept on dormant file. The ADPP for the State, and Mr Pardeep Kumar advocate for complainant are present. Mr. Abdul Majeed Memon advocate for accused is absence. Te complainant Abdul Jabbar Lund is absent. Due to absence of DC and filing adjournment application by accused, the Case is adjourned to 06.05.2026 for charge. The produced accused is remanded back to District Prison Ghotki along with slip for his re-production. The complainant is also directed to attend and bring his witnesses. |
| 9 | PPC 155/2026 | The State VS Abdul Ghani Shaikh and othes | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | PPC-395 | 129/2025 Sarhad |
Sessions Case called. Accused Abdul Ghani is present on bail granted/confirmed by the court of Honourable Additional Sessions Judge-I, (MCTC) Ghotki, while accused (2) Wahid Bux (3) Waqar (4) Mukhtiar Ali (5) Iqrar Ali (6) Imtiaz Ali and (7) Sadam Hussain are absconding and declared as proclaimed offenders. The ADPP for the State is present. Charge against the present accused framed (Exh 5). Plea of accused recorded (Exh 6). Issue summons to P.Ws. Put off to 07.05.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 10 | SC (Murder Trial) 159/2016 | The state VS Dildar @ Diloo | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 81/2015 Jarwar |
Sessions case called. Accused Dildar alias Diloo son of Eiddan Gabole is absconding and declared as proclaimed offender. The case against proclaimed offender was kepton dormant file vide order dated 30.04.2025 and Copy of Order sent to the concerned SHO PS Jarwar has submitted progress report, which is taken on record. Time extended for compliance. To come up on 31.07.2026 for formal proceedings/compliance. |
| 11 | SC (Murder Trial) 308/2018 | The state VS Hazaro and ors | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Ubedullah(ADVO-223-SBC-GHT) | Ajeeb Junejo(ADVO-1301-SBC-SUK) | PPC-302 | 61/2018 B-Section Ghotki |
Sessions Case called. Accused Ghulam Yaseen Bheri is present on bail granted by the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur. While accused (1) Hazaro (2) Muhammad Bux (3) Adam and (4) Muhammad Yakoub already re-convicted vide Judgment dated 26.04.2024. Accused (5) Ali Hassan was already acquitted vide Judgment dated 23.08.2021 and the case against absconding accused (6) Khando (7) Ghulam Mustafa (8) Pirano and (9) Mir Muhammad already kept on dormant file vide Judgment dated 23.08.2021. The ADPP for the State is present and DC is absent. The complainant and his advocate are called absent. The main R&Ps already lying in the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur. Perusal of record it appears that; in this case, the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur has been pleased to direct this court that the trial of an accused Yaseen Bheri son of Mehrab Khan in this case be expedited and concluded within three months vide kind order dated 28.11.2024 passed in Cr.B.A No.S- 723/2024. But the trial is not yet commenced, due to non-availability of original R&Ps which has already been submitted to the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur in connection with Criminal Appeal No. S- 47 of 2024. An other copy of an Order dated 23.05.2025 was also already received from the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur, whereby time has been granted, but R&Ps not received back. However, a copy of an Order dated 12.03.2026 passed in Crl Appeal No.S-47, 48 and 49 of 2024 passed by the Honourable High Court of Sindh bench at Sukkur is received through the office of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki vide endorsement bearing No.Cr/ 2239 dated 19.03.2026. The Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkurhas been pleased to Order that "Let R&P be returned to the learned trial court". Only copy of Order is received, but R&Ps not received. Case is adjourned for want of original R&Ps. Put off to 13.05.2026 for formal hearing/Returning the main R&Ps. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 12 | 23 Arms Ordinance 88/2019 | The State VS Noushad | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 315/2018 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions case called. Accused Noushad @ Diloo Gabole is absconding and declared as proclaimed offender. The case against proclaimed offender was kept on dormant file vide order dated 30.04.2025. The SHO PS A-Section Ghotki has sent the compliance report. Time extended for further compliance of the directions contained in the Order already communicated to him. To come up on 31.7.2026 for formal proceedings. |
| 13 | PPC 176/2023 | The State VS Badeehal Shar & others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-324 | 84/2022 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Sessions Case called. Accused (1) Muhammad Younis son of Ali Muhammad alias Ali Madad alias Nando Shar is produced in custody. Accused (2) Badeehal son of Khuda Bux Shar already acquitted u/s 265-K Cr.P.C vide an Order dated 07.03.2026, other accused (3) Nawab son of Ahmed Deen Haiderani Shar (4) Muhammad Ismail son of Muhammad Khan Haiderani Shar (5) Sahato son of Abdul Kareem Haiderani Shar (6) Sheroo alias Sher Muhammad son of Muhammad Khan Haiderani Shar (7) Umar son of Ladho Haiderani Shar (8) Sabiz Ali son of Mouj Ali Shar (9) Muhammad Umar son of Qutub Deen Shar (10) Amanullah son of Faiz Muhammad Jakhiro Shar (11) Ghulam Yaseen son of Qutuib Deen Shar (12) Ghulam Ali alias Ghulamoon son of Jannan Shar (13) Fareed son of Harif Meerani (14) Laloo alias Fouji son of Khuda Bux (15) Rajo son of Khuda Bux Shar (16) Qaim son of Khuda Bux Shar and (17) Badeehal son of Jannan Shar are absconding and already declared as proclaimed offender. The ADPP & DC are resent. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Application under section 265-K Cr.P.C is allowed. Accused Muhammad Younis son of Ali Muhammad alias Ali Madad alias Nando Shar is acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C from the charge. He is produced in custody and remanded back to District Prison Ghotki and Acquittal slip is being sent through proper channel. |
|
| 14 | PPC 268/2023 | The State VS Shahzado Pitafi & others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-324 | 113/2023 Mirpur Mathelo |
Sessions case called. Accused Shahzado (2) Shahban (3) Khalid Ahmed and (4) Imdad Ali are absconding and already declared as proclaimed offenders. The ADPP is present. THe case is already kept on dormant file vide an Order dated 30.08.2023, however, the proceedings against the accused are continued in the light of case reported as Nasrullah Versus Station House Officer, Police Station Jacobabad and 06 others (PLD 2016 Sindh 238). The SHO PS Miprur Mathelo has sent his progress report, which is taken on record. Time extended for compliance. Put off to 31.07.2026. |
| 15 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 11/2026 | Mst. Jamilan Soomro VS Ali Raza Soomro and others | Naveed Ahmed (ADVO-858-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Sessions Case called. The complainant is present along with her advocate. BW against the accused persons were issued, returned by HC Asghar Ali of PS Sarhad along with accused Ali Raza, who submitted that private talks are already fixed between him and the comlainant party (his aunt) in respect of subject matter, thus he is not bound to furnish surety. Under the attending circumstances, this court asked him to furnish requisite surety otherwise he may be taken in to custody and remanded to District Prison Ghotki to which he again refused, thus for want of surety he is taken in to custody and remanded to District Prison Ghotki in order to produce his regular attendance in this case in this court. Needless to say that he will be released whenever he furnishes requisite solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 and PR bond in the like amount because this court has already taken cognizance of the offence against him and others vide an Order dated 23.04.2026 and despite execution of BW upon him and this court's direction to him to furnish requisite surety, he refused repeatedly. The BWs for remaining accused Jake Ali son of Muhammad Yakoob Sanaullah son of Fajal Ali Muhammad Ali son of Umed Ali Nouman Ali alias Noumi son of Shoukat Ali Masoo alias Misoo son of Jamaluddin Agha Pathan, extended and delivered to same process server. To come up on 06.05.2026 for formal. Accused Ali Raza is remanded to District Prison Ghotki along with remand warrant. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 137/2024 |
Mst. Kousar Parveen Soomro VS P.O Sindh and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal is called. The attorney of appellant is present along with junior partner to advocate for appellant is present. The DDA for official respondents No.01 to 09 is present. On issuance and return of process, Mr Zulfiqar Ali Arain advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent NO.10 Azizullah son of Badal Soomro, which is taken on record. He states at bar that he is ready to argue the matter in straight away manner instead to file the objection. The respondent NO.11 Ahmed s/o Badal (brother of respondent NO.10) is absent. Service against him is hereby held good. The junior partner to advocate for appellant has filed adjournment application. Order on it. Call for R&Ps of lower court. Put off to 07.05.2026 for regular hearing. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Advocate to be Heard | |||||||
| 2 | Summary Suits 18/2026 |
Muhammad Asif Zaman Rajput VS Muhammad Shabeer Rajput | Humair Ali() | Summary Suit called. None appeared in this court from plaintiff's side and learned counsel inspite of several called is absent.The plaintiff along with the learned counsel neither complied such direction nor appeared in this court despite several call since morning till 11-45 a.m ONe Attaullah Laghari, the clerned counsel's clerk appeared in this open court on 27.04.2026 and asked about position of suit in hand so this court in presence of court Reader, stengrapher and others informed him that the suit was fixed to deposit requisite court fee on 30.04.2026 by plaintiff or the learned counsel and he went away. The plaint rejected u/s VII Rule 11 (c) C.P.C 1908. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | Ist Class Civil Suits 139/2023 |
Ali Hassan Laghari VS Abdul Samad and others. | Mohammad Rafique(ADVO-412-SBC-GHT) | Civil Suit is called. The plaintiff Ali Hassan and his witness Allah Ditto as well as his advocate are present. The defendants No.01 and 4, advocate for defendants No.01 to 4 and DDA for official defendant No.06 are present. None present on behalf of defendant No.05, but he has already filed his written statement. Relevancy of instant F.C.Suit No.139/2023 is with summary suit No.14/2024. The instant civil suit is received for disposal according to law, in pursuance of an Order dated 09.10.2025 passed by Honourable District Judge Ghotki in C.T.A No. 30/25. The defendants No.01 to 04 are required to make the compliance of an Order dated 11.02.2026 and they have to produce the original documents as mentioned in the said order. While the plaintiff party is required to make the compliance of directions as mentioned in the Order dated 13.03.2025 passed by this court in CA No.190/2024. PW-01 Ali Hassan and PW-02 Allahditto are examined (Exh 33 and Exh 34). Their cross examination is reserved because at 2040 pm, defendant Abdul Samad filed adjournment application, which is granted as a last chance with caution that in case of failure to produce his counsel on next date the suit will be proceeded and decided as per law. (adjournment application placed Exh 25). To come up on 11.05.2026 cross examination to PW-01 and PW-02 and compliance of Orders dated 13.03.2025 and 11.02.2026. |
|||
| 4 | Summary Suits 14/2024 |
Abdul Samad Kolachi VS Ali Hassan Kolachi | Junaid Ahmed (ADVO-693-SBC-GHT) | Summary Suit is called. The plaintiff is present and he has submitted adjournment application. Order on it. Adjourned as last chance with directions to produce his counsel and to adduce evidence in both suits as per law. In case of failure his evidence side in both suits will be closed and suits will be proceeded and decided forthwith as per law. The defendant and his advocate are present.Relevancy of instant summary suit No.14/24 is with F.C. Suit No.139/2023 which is fixed today and pending on the file of this court, as per an Order dated.09.10.2025 passed by Honorable District Judge Ghotki. Issue summons to the official/Clerk Ist Civil Judge & J.M Ghotki to appear along with relevant record as mentioned in application u/o XVI Rule 1 CPC in pursuance of an Order dated 06.05.2025. Put off to 11.05.2026 for evidence of plaintiff's, appearance of Clerk of the court of 1st CJ & JM Ghotki along with relevant record. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Next Hearing Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | |||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 835/2026 |
Muhammad Mureed @ Mureed Lolai VS The State | Riaz Ahmed(ADVO-442-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | ||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 836/2026 |
Muhammad Mureed @ Mureed Lolai VS The State | Riaz Ahmed(ADVO-442-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | ||
| 3 | Habeas Corpus 129/2026 |
Atif Awan VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-491 | ||