| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1380/2026 | Faiz Muhammad Pitafi and others VS The State | Cr.PC-498 | 36/2026 Sarhad |
Received bail application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant/accused Faiz Muhammad s/o Arz Muhammad, 2.Bahadur @ Tego s/o Makhno (as per FIR Tego @ Bahadur), 3.Abdul Ghaffar s/o Bahadur @ Tego (as per FIR Abdul Ghaffar s/o Tego @ Bahadur), 4.Siraj Ahmed s/o Bahadur @ Tego (as per FIR Siraj Ahmed s/o Tego @ Bahadur) all by caste Pitafi. is present along with his counsel Abdul Momin Kalhoro. Arguments heard. Interim pre-arrest bail is granted subject to furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.30,000/each and P.R bond in the like amount. One deponent Haji Khan s/o Ramzan Khan Pitafi, appeared and submitted his affidavit along with original Deh Form VII-B mentioned in the report of Accountant, and photo copy of his CNIC for standing surety for accused in the sum of Rs:30,000/ each and P.R bond in the like amount. The DC has submitted statement/undertaking on behalf of the applicant/accused for joining the investigation, which is taken on record. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. An interim pre-arrest bail is confirmed. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | SC (Murder Trial) 275/2012 | The State VS Gullam Hussain and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Mahboob Ahmed(ADVO-752-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 10/2012 Khanpur Mahar |
|
| 3 | SC (Murder Trial) 275/2012 | The State VS Gullam Hussain and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Abdul Majeed Memon(ADVO-606-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 10/2012 Khanpur Mahar |
Sessions case called. Accused (1) Mubarak Lund is produced in custody. While accused (2) Ghulam Qadir Lund already acquitted u/s 265-K Cr.P.C on 15.11.2023, accused (3) Ghulam Hussain (4) Ghulam Fareed (5) Mushtaque (6) Munwar and (7) Khawand Bux have already been acquitted in terms of compromise u/s 345(6) Cr.P.C. Accused (8) Muhammad Adam alias Adam also acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C vide an Order dated 29.01.2024. While other absconding accused (9) Akbar is proclaimed offender and his case was kept on dormant file. The ADPP for the State, Mr Pardeep Kumar Counsel for complainant are present. Mr Jameel Ahmed the junior partner to Mr Muhammad Achar Gabole learned ASC for present accused is present. The complainant Abdul Jabbar, witnesses Zahid, Ghulam Murtaza, Imam Deen are present and examined (Exh 79 to Exh 82). The complainant has submitted an application along with affidavit for giving up remaining witnesses and closing the side (Exh 83). The ADPP for the State has submitted statement for closing the side (Exh 84). The statement under section 342 Cr.P.C of present accused recorded (Exh 85). Final arguments heard. Judgment passed on separate sheet (Exh 87) and announced. The present accused Mubarak Lund is acquitted under section 265-H(i) Cr.P.C. He is produced in custody and remanded to District Prison Ghotki along with acquittal slip for his release in this case. While there is no order for proclaimed offender. |
| 4 | SC (Murder Trial) 308/2018 | The state VS Hazaro and ors | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Atif Hussain(ADVO-1582-SBC-SUK) | PPC-302 | 61/2018 B-Section Ghotki |
Sessions Case called. Accused Ghulam Yaseen Bheri is present on bail granted by the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur. While accused (1) Hazaro (2) Muhammad Bux (3) Adam and (4) Muhammad Yakoub already convicted vide Judgment dated 26.04.2024. Accused (5) Ali Hassan was already acquitted vide Judgment dated 23.08.2021 and the case against absconding accused (6) Khando (7) Ghulam Mustafa (8) Pirano and (9) Mir Muhammad already kept on dormant file vide Judgment dated 23.08.2021. The ADPP for the State and Mr Atif Hussain Dharejo counsel for present accused are present. The complainant and his advocate are called absent. ASI Muhammad Shahban Bozdar appeared. His deposition recorded (Exh 60). Summons returned with the report of process server. Issue BWs against complainant, remaining PWs except Medical Officer Dr Asif Hakeem Kalwar, summons against him be issued. Call for case property. Case is adjourned to 30.06.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend and bring his counsel. |
| 5 | PPC 179/2026 | Niaz Muhammad Abbasi VS Haji Ahmed Shaikh and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Sessions Case is called. The complainant Niaz Muhammad Abbasi is present. His counsel Mr Jamshed Ahmed Faiz ASC is absent. Accused (1) Haji Ahmed (2) Moula Bux and (3) Sher Dil are present on bail. Mr. Imtiaz Ali Malano advocate for accused is also present. In compliance of an Order dated 17.6.2026, Inspector Muhammad Aslam Chachar SHO PS B-Section Ghotki appeared and he has submitted his report vide outward No.207 dated 18.6.2026 along with mashirnama and receipt of the complainant, regarding take over the possession and handing over the same to complainant. Order on it. Taken on record, copy be supplied to the learned counsel for complainant and complainant in order to ascertain that whether he has been put in peaceful physical possession of property in question or not. The complainant has submitted an application with affidavit with regard to receive the peaceful physical possession. Order on it. Taken on record. Adjourned with direction to produce his counsel on net date for further proceedings as per law. All the accused persons also submitted joint application stating therein that neither they occupied not intends to do so in future. Order on it. Taken on record. All accused endorsed contents of this document in open court. The counsel for complainant has sent adjournment application at about 2.30 pm. Order on it. Put off to 20.06.2026 for evidence and hearing. Accused are directed to attend. The complainant is also directed to attend and bring his witnesses. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1206/2026 | Shahida Parveen Kalwar VS SHO PS Adilpur and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous Application is received from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki. The applicant, her counsel and ADPP for the State are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Application is disposed of in terms of directions as mentioned in the order. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1209/2026 | Mst. Hamshera Khoso VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received R and Ps of above mentioned criminal Misc; Application u/s 22-A(6)(i) Cr.pc by way of transfer from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge, Ghotki for disposal according to law. Order on it. Call report from SHO PS concerned. Put off to 19.6.2026. |
||
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1210/2026 | Taj Muhammad Ghunio VS SHO PS W/J/Shah | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received R and Ps of above mentioned criminal Misc; Application u/s 22-A(6)(i) Cr.pc by way of transfer from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge, Ghotki for disposal according to law. Order on it. Call report from SHO PS concerned. Put off to 19.6.2026. |
||
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1207/2026 | Mst. Pathani Malik VS SHO PS Khanpur Mahar | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received R and Ps of above mentioned criminal Misc; Application u/s 22-A(6)(i) Cr.pc by way of transfer from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge, Ghotki for disposal according to law. Order on it. Call report from SHO PS concerned. Put off to 19.6.2026. |
||
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1208/2026 | Asghar Ali Bheri VS SHO PS B/Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received R and Ps of above mentioned criminal Misc; Application u/s 22-A(6)(i) Cr.pc by way of transfer from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge, Ghotki for disposal according to law. Order on it. Call report from SHO PS concerned. Put off to 19.6.2026. |
||
| 11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1197/2026 | Aijaz-ul-Haque Rajput VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The ADPP is present. ASI Muhammad Shahban Kolachi of PS A-Section Ghotki appeared and he has submitted report which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to counsel for applicant. ASI Muhammad Shahban Kolachi also returned process with his endorsement. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Application is disposed of in terms of directions as mentioned in the order. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 12 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1223/2026 | Abdul Razzaque Kolachi VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
|||
| 13 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1218/2026 | Ghulam Hussain Waso VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
|||
| 14 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1222/2026 | Mst. Jeejan Marwari VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
|||
| 15 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1220/2026 | Mst. Shazia Chachar VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
|||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Proceeding suspended by SHC / S.C. | |||||||
| 16 | SC (Murder Trial) 128/2026 | Ghulam Mustafa Khoso VS Inspector Muhammad Ali Mahar and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | / |
Sessions Case No.128/2026 (outcomes of Direct Complaint No.39/24) is called. The complainant Ghulam Mustafa Khoso appeared along with advocate Mr. Asadullah Ghoto at several calls and sought time on the ground that his senior Counsel is but in the court of law at Mirpur Mathelo and will appear to argue and proceed with the case in hand. At abut 1.45 pm Mr Zulfiqar Ali Ghoto appeared and sought adjournment application on the ground that his Senior Counsel is budy in the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur, thus can not appear today. The complainant is also present and repeats his version that his Senior Counsel still budy in the court of law at Mirpur Mathelo. All accused persons namely (1) Inspector Muhammad Ali Mahar (2) ASI Anwar Ali Shaikh (3) PC Ahmed Ali Lakhan and (4) PC Noor Hassan (5) ASI Ali Akbar Malik (6) PC Israr Ahmed (7) Rahib Ali (8) Sepoy Muhammad Saqlain and (9) Sepoy Azmat Khan are called absent. The advocates are also absent. On 20.04.2026 a certified true copy of an Order dated 13.04.2026 passed in Cr. Revision Application No. 29 of 2026 Re: Muhammad Ali Mahar and others Vs The State and another by Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur, was received. The Honourable High Court has been pleased to suspend the impugned Order dated 26.03.2026 with further directions that "As any corrosive action which is against that applicants are also discharged". The learned counsel for complainant has already on notice to assist this court on the point that as to why further proceedings be not stopped of this case till final disposal of criminal revision application by the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur. However, to come up on 19.06.2026 for arguments and hearing. |
|