| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2193/2026 | Shah Nawaz Jiskani VS The State | Ali Hassan(ADVO-1601-SBC-SUK) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-381-A | 210/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Criminal Bail Application is called. The ADPP & DC are present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Bail granted. Let the accused Shanawaz son of Habibullah Jiskani be released on bail subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs:50,000/ (fifty thousand) and P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial court. Let the compared copy of Order be sent to the court of learned Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate-II/MCTC Ghotki for information and compliance. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2173/2026 | Vijay Kumar VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-489-F | 350/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Criminal Bail Application is called. The applicant/accused Vijay Kumar son of Hari Chand is called absent, despite several calls. The complainant Suneel Kumar is present. Mr. Liaquat Ali Malano advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of complainant which is taken on record. DC is absent. Mr Amanullah Kolachi advocate appeared on behalf of DC and he has submitted adjournment application on behalf of learned DC the ground that applicant/accused is seriously ill and suffering from Mararia parasite disease. Order on it. Accused has been called absent despite several calls. Mr. Amanullah Kolachi advocate appeared on behalf learned counsel for accused and sought adjournment, which due to willful absence of accused is hereby declined. The learned counsel submitted that he is not aware about presence location of accused. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Dismissed for non prosecution due to non appearance of accused and counsel. The interim prearrest bail granted earlier is recalled. Let concerned I.O be informed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
|
| 3 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 62/2026 | Gul Hassan Kobhar VS Rajib Ali Kobhar and others | Parvez Ali(ADVO-52347-SBC-KHW) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Direct Complaint (under Illegal Dispossession Act 2005) is called. The complainant is present along with his counsel. The Mukhtiarkar Revenue Daharki and SHO PS Daharki have submitted letters for time through their representatives. Orders passed thereon. Time is granted to ensure compliance till 07.10.2026 as per law. |
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2206/2026 | Gulzar Chachar VS The State | Inyatullah Pathan() | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-382 | 24/2024 Andal Sundrani |
Criminal Bail application is called. The applicant/accused Gulzar Chachar is present on interim prearrest bail. The ADPP & DC are present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Interim prearrest bail is confirmed. |
| 5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2209/2026 | Abdul Hameed Tart VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-302 | 198/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Criminal Basil Application is called. The applicant/accused Abdul Hameed son of Naseer Ahmed Tart is present on interim pre-arrest bail. The ADPP for the State and DC are present. The complainant Bashir Ahmed is present. Mr Liaquat Ali Malano advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant, which is taken on record. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. The interim prearrest bail is confirmed. Parties are informed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
|
| 6 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2221/2026 | Abdul Rasheed Mahar VS The State | Zahid Razzaque(ADVO-342-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-436 | 76/2026 Sarhad |
Received Criminal Bail Application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. Criminal Bail Application is called. The applicant/accused Abdul Rasheed s/o Dost Ali by caste Mahar, appeared along with their counsel. Interim pre-arrest bail is granted subject to furnishing surety. Deponent Abdul Sattar s/o Muhammad Yousif by caste Shaikh, appeared and he has submitted his affidavit along with original book/letter of registration of motorcycle Honda 70-cc Registration No.SLY-2276, Chassis No.CB-441921, Engine No.9718723, Model 2017, and photo copy of his CNIC for standing surety for above named accused persons. Order on it. Surety accepted provisionally. The counsel for applicants has submitted statement with regard to joining the trial by the applicant/accused, which is taken on record. The ADPP for the State is present and waived the notice. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Interim pre-arrest bail is confirmed. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 224/2017 | The state VS Zulqarnain and ors | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-325A-SBC-GHT) | PPC- 459 | 329/2016 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions Case is called. Accused (1) Dost Muhammad is produced by jail authority of District Prison Ghotki THROUGH VIDEO LINK. Accused (2) Zulqarnain (3) Jahanzeb are present on bail, while accused (4) Aslam Pervez is absent. His attendance has already been dispensed with for time being subject to conditions mentioned in the order dated 01.6.2026 and case has been proceeded through his learned defence counsel. Mr Imtiaz Ali Malano advocate for PW/Victim Zahoor Ahmed, the ADPP for the State, Mr Anwar Ali Lohar Counsel for accused Jehanzeb Mr Sajjad Ali Kalhoro counsel for accused Zulqarnain and Aslam Parvez and Mr Muhammad Bux Shar counsel for accused Dost Muhammad are present. Per case file this is the oldest case arising from FIR Crime Crime No.328/2016, required for expeditious proceedings and timely disposal as per law and as per National Judicial Police and direction of the Honorable District & Sessions Judge Ghotki given in the monthly meeting. This court recorded cross examination of mashir Abdul Wahid (Exh.68) conducted by Mr Muhammad Bux Shar and adoptted by Mr Sajjad Kalhoro advocate. DSP Zahid Hussain Mirani is absent and sent a letter for time. Time is granted as last chacne. NBWs for second I.O Muhammad Saleem Dayo extended and delivered to same process server. To come up on 03.10.2026 for evidence. Parties are informed and directed accordingly. Accused who are present in court today are bound down to attend on next date. The Prisoner Authorities are also directed to procure attendance of UTP Dost Muhammad Kalhoro on next date THROUGH VIDEO LINK. |
| 8 | PPC 346/2026 | The State VS Abdul Ghaffar Solangi and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Nadeem Ahmed Chachar(ADVO-914-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 90/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Sessions Case called. Accused (1) Peer Bux @ Peeral son of Shahzado (2) Qurban Ali son of Ghulam Hussain @ Hussain (3) Muhib Ali son of Muhammad @ Muhammad (4) Abdul Ghaffar son of Muhammad @ Muhammad are present on interim pre-arrest bail. The ADPP for the State, DC and advocate for complainant are present. PW-02 SIP Zafar Ali Chandio and PW-6 complainant Nisar Ahmed are present. Their cross examination recorded (Exh 4 & Exh 8). PW-07 injured eye witness cum mashir Sadiq Ali is present and his evidence recorded (Exh 9). The ADPP for the State has submitted statement for closing the side (Exh 10). The statements of accused persons under section 342 Cr.P.C recorded (Exh 11 to Exh 14). Final arguments heard. Judgment passed on separate sheet (Exh 15) and announced. accused namely (1) Abdul Ghaffar s/o Muhammad Bux urif Muhammad Solangi and (2) Peer Bux urif Peeral s/o Shahzado Solangi r/o village Jam Muhammad Ali Lakhan Taluka & District Ghotki in terms of section 265-H(ii) Cr.P.C for offence punishable U/S 324, 337-A (ii), 337-F (iii) R/W Section 114, 34 PPC and sentenced them for offence punishable u/s 324 PPC R/W section 34 PPC with R.I for ten years as Ta???azir and to pay fine of RS.1,00,000/- (one lac rupees only) each and in case of default convict at fault will also undergo simple imprisonment for two years more (ii) For offence U/S 337-A(ii) PPC (Shajjah-i-Mudihah) read with section 34 PPC to undergo R.I for five years as Ta???zir and to pay Arsh amounting to Rs. 967,619.50 (Nine hundred sixty-seven thousand, six hundred nineteen rupees and fifty paisas) in equal share being equivalent to five percent of the notified Diyat Rs.19,352,390/ for payment to the injuredcomplainant Nisar Ahmed (iii) For offence U/S 337-F (iii) PPC (Jurh Ghayr-Jaifah Mutalahimah) read with section 34 PPC to undergo R.I. for three (3)-years as Tazir each and to pay Rs.200000/- (two lac) in equal share as daman for paymentto injured Sadiq Ali. In case nonpayment of compensation convict at fault will remain inside prison till such payment in lumpsum for payment to injured PW Sadiq Ali. Per file particularly interim challan and final challan both the accused (now convicts) were on bail, therefore, they are not entitled to benefit under section 382-B Cr.P.C. Sentence so awarded will run concurrently. They are present on bail, their bail bonds are cancelled, surety discharged and they are taken in to custody and remanded to jail to serve out the above sentence. However, (3) Qurban Ali son of Ghulam Hussain @ Hussain (4) Muhib Ali son of Muhammad @ Muhammad are acquitted under section 265-H(i) Cr.P.C from the charge. They are also on bail, their bail bonds are cancelled and surety discharged. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 9 | Habeas Corpus 303/2026 | Allah Ditto Kolachi VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Criminal miscellaneous application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The respondents No.02 to 4 are present. The respondents No.02 and 04 have submitted their reports which are taken on record and copies supplied to counsel for applicant. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Application is dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. The ADPP for the State is present. The alleged detenue namely Irfan Ali son of Ali Muhammad Kolachi is not produced. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Application under section 492 Cr.P.C is dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 10 | Habeas Corpus 304/2026 | Mst. Hafeezan Ghoto VS SHO PS Katcho Bindi-I | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application under section 491 Cr.P.C called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The ADPP for the State is also present. The SHO PS Katcho Bindi-I Muhammad Hashim Shar appeared in the morning time and intimate that alleged detainee is residing within the jurisdiction of PS B-Section Ghotki. Accordingly order passed separately and Additional SHO PS B-Section Ghotki as well as WHC Muhammad Afzal Kolachi were directed to help out SHO PS Katcho Bindi for recovery and production of alleged detainee. She was produced. The alleged detainee DUA daughter of Niaz Hussain Ghoto appeared and she has submitted an application with affidavit that she wants to go with her mother Mst Hafeezan, which is taken on record. The applicant Mst Hafeezan wife of Mst Hidayatullah Ghoto has filed an application with affidavit that she is ready to receive, keep alleged detainee happily and safely, which is taken on record. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Application is disposed of accordingly. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1994/2026 | Irshad Ahmed Mahar VS SHO PS Khanpur Mahar | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal miscellaneous application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The ADPP for the State is present. The SHO PS Khanpur Mahar has sent his report, which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to counsel for applicant. The proposed accused Habib Anwar appeared. Mr. Zulfiqar Ali Arain advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of proposed accused, which is taken on record. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Application is dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 12 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1992/2026 | Syed Sajid Ali Shah VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and ors | Mian Raheel Ahmed(ADVO-52370-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal miscellaneous application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The ADPP for the State is present. The SHO PS A-Section Ghotki has sent his report, which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to counsel for applicant. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Application is dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
|
| 13 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1995/2026 | Ali Asghar Ghoto VS SHO PS B/Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal miscellaneous application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The counsel for applicant has submitted statement along with photo copy of application, which is taken on record. The ADPP for the State is present. The SHO PS B-Section Ghotki has sent his report, which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to counsel for applicant. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Application is dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 14 | PPC 257/2026 | The State VS Ali Hassan Shaikh & others | Talib Hussain Siyal(ADVO-276-SBC-GHT) | Anti Terrorism Act (ATA) -U/S 7 ATA,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353 | 98/2016 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Disposal Sessions case No.257/2026 is called for progress report of perpetual warrants. Per file. Accused (1) Sanhro @ Sanaullah @ Sano son of Baggo @ Jhangal Shar already acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C vide an Order dated 29.6.2026 and the case against the proclaimed offenders namely (2) Ali Hassan son of Soomar Shaikh (3) Bagoo son of Younis Kosh (4) Shareef alias Shareefo son of Rajo Shar (5) Haboo son of Rajo Shar (6) Yaseen alias Yasoo son of Eiddan Shar have already been kept on dormant file. Let the perpetual warrants against them be issued as already ordered for 30.12.2026. |
|
| 15 | PPC 408/2026 | Aamir Saleem Arain VS Dr. Shafquat Hussain Jumani & othes | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-319 | / |
Sessions case called. The complainant Amir Salim Arain and his counsel are called absent. On issuance and return of process accused (1) Dr Shafqat Ali Jumani son of Illahi Bux Jumani Ex-Medical Superintendent taluka Hospital Ubauro (2) Dr Shah Jahan Dahar son of Abdul Ghafoor Medical Officer Taluka Hospital Ubauro (3) Ghulam Murtaza Dayo son of Zulfiqar Ali Dayo Dispener of Taluka Hospital Ubauro and (4) Taj Muhammad Dayo son of Liaquat Ali Dayo Ambulance Driver Taluka Hospital Ghotki appeared and submitted joint application with their respective affidavits for permission to furnish surety and join the trial, which is taken on record. Deponent Zahid Hussain son of Illahi Bux Jumani resident of House No.A-147 Muhalla Khanpur town Ubauro appeared and he has submitted an affidavit along with CTC of deh from VII-B and photo copy of his CNIC for standing surety for above named accused in the sum of Rs:3,00,000 (three lac) each and P.R bond in the like amount. Order on it. Surety accepted provisionally subject to report. Mr Shoukat Ali Daudpoto advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of above named accused persons, which is taken on record. Necessary documents in compliance of provision 265-C Cr.P.C supplied to the accused persons against receipt which is taken on record (Exh.1). Put off to 12.10.2026 for charge. Accused are directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Execution of NBW | |||||||
| 16 | PPC 382/2023 | The State VS Deepak Menghwar & others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Nizamuddin(ADVO-1081-SBC-GHT) | PPC-395 | 208/2023 Daharki |
Disposal Sessions case No. 382/2023 is called for Progress report of proclaimed offenders. Per file (1) Accused Deepak son of Chetan (2) Rashid Ali son of Abdul Majeed already acquitted in terms of section 265-H(i) Cr.P.C and the case of proclaimed offender Aneel son of NOtan Menghwar already kept on dormant file vide same Judgment dated 04.01.2025. The ADPP for the State is present. Let the perpetual warrants against proclaimed offender be issued as already ordered for 30.12.2026. |
| 17 | PPC 39/2026 | The State VS Wazeer Ahmed Ghoto & others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Wazir Ahmed Goto(ADVO-88-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 256/2025 A-Section Ghotki |
Disposal Sessions Case No.35/2026 is called for progress report of perpetual warrants. Per file accused (1) Wazeer Ahmed son of Atta Muhammad (2) Riaz Ali son of Dur Muhammad (3) Assadullah son of Khuda Bux (4) Parvez Ahmed son of Muhammad Bachal (5) Abdul Kareem son of Haji Sanwan (6) Sarwar son of Ameen (7) Akram Ali son of Basheer Ahmed (8) Jameel Ahmed son of Fareed have already been acquitted under section 265-H(i) Cr.P.C and accused Accused (9) Lutuf Ali son of Arz Muhammad Jageerani already acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C vide an Order dated. 15.9.2026 and proceedings against accused (10) Kamran Ali Khan urif Kamran son of Mustan Faqeer Ghotki abated and case against proclaimed offender namely (11) Nadeem son of Abdul Rasool Jageerani already kept on dormant file as per Judgment dated 11.3.2026. Let the perpetual warrants against the proclaimed offender be issued as already ordered for 30.12.2026. |
| 18 | PPC 172/2026 | The State VS Ali Hassan Jagirani and others | PPC-324 | 3/2024 Kacho Bindi-I |
Disposal Sessions Case No.172/2026 is called for progress report of perpetual warrants. Per file accused (1) Noorali son of Khuda Bux and (2) Gulsher son of Arz Muhammad Jageerani have already been acquitted under section 265-H(i) Cr.P.C vide Judgment dated 01.6.2026 and accused (3) Lutuf Ali son of Arz Muhammad Jageerani acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C vide an Order dated 15.9.2026. Accused (4) Ali Hassan son of Yar Muhammad already died and proceedings against him abated vide an Order dated 28.2.2020 and case against proclaimed offenders namely (5) Meer Ahmed (6) Bhooral (7) Ehsan sons of Rahzan (8) Meerali son of Khuda Bux (9) Ghalib (10) Talib sons of Gadali (11) Altaf son of Khabbar (12) Hidayat son of Mehmood (13) Khawand Bux son of Sajjan (14) Nizam son of Abdul Ghafoor (15) Parvez son of Abdul Rasool (16) Haji son of Saindad (17) Murad son of Soomar already kept on dormant file vide aforesaid Judgment. Let the perpetual warrants against them be issued as already ordered for 30.12.2026. |
||
| 19 | PPC 173/2026 | The State VS Mirali Jagirani and others | PPC-324 | 21/2024 B-Section Ghotki |
Disposal Sessions case No.173/2026 is called. Accused (1) Noorali son of Khuda Bux and (2) Gulsher son of Arz Muhammad Jageerani have already been acquitted under section 265-H (i) Cr.P.C. Accused (3) Ali Hassan son of Yar Muhammad already died and proceedings against him abated vide an Order dated 06.5.2026. The case of proclaimed offenders (4) Meerali son of Khuda Bux (5) Meer Ahmed son of Khuda Bux (6) Ghalib son of Gadali (7) Altaf son of Khabar (8) Rasoolo son of Piyaro (9) Qadir Bux (10) Farman sons of Adam (11) Riaz son of Aamil (12) Khabbar son of Yar Muhammad (13) Parvez son of Abdul Rasool (14) Abdul Qadir son of Muhammad Ramzan (15) Gulsher son of Arz Muhammad (16) Altaf son of Arz Muhammad already kept on dormant file. Let perpetual warrants against the proclaimed offenders be issued for 30.12.2026. |
||
| 20 | SC (Murder Trial) 242/2026 | The State VS Akram Ali Jagirani and others | PPC-302 | 3/2025 Kacho Bindi-II |
Disposal Sessions Case No:242/2026 is called for progress report of perpetual warrants issued against the proclaimed offenders. Per file accused (1) Zameer son of Illahi Bux Jageerani and (2) Ayoub son of Ali Hassan Jageerani have already been acquitted in terms of section 265-H(i) Cr.P.C and the case of accused (3) Akram Ali son of Muhammad Hayat (4) Farman son of Khabar (5) Hameer son of Illahi Bux (6) Zaheer son of Ali (7) Irfan son of Rehzan (8) Umed Ali son of Noorali (9) Momin son of Illahi Bux (10) Nisar son of Qabil and (11) Punnah son of Gul Hassan all by caste Jageerani have already been kept on dormant file vide Judgment dated 29.6.2026. Let perpetual warrants against the proclaimed offenders be issued for 30.12.2026. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 27/2026 |
Najab Ali Almani VS Syed Omer Ali Anvery | Iftikhar Ahmed (ADVO-545-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Civil appeal is called. The plaintiff is present along with his counsel and submitted an application/address of defendant for service. Order on it. Taken on record. Let process be repeated through TCS on costs at the same address for 07.10.2026 for service. |
||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 117/2026 |
Rehmatullah Gurgaij and others VS Haji Jatoi Rind and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal No.117/2026 has been called several time since morning to 2.50 pm but appellants and their counsel Mr. Ghulam Murtaza Dayo have been called absent despite intimation. More over this court vide an Order dated 25.9.2026 granted time to appellants and learned counsel to deposit requisite court fee if any on or before the date without fail with caution that in case of failure appeal will be proceeded and decided as per law. As such direction has not been complied with by appellant and learned counsel and they failed to produce required court fee despite direction and ample chance to the appellant and learned counsel and neither time in this regard has been sought to taken. Consequently memo of appeal is rejected under order 7 rule 11 (c) CPC which is also applicable in appeal in right time as provided under section 41 CPC 1908 and PLD 1984 SC 289. |
|||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 119/2026 |
Jumo Malik VS Fazal Ahmed @ Fazal Din Malik and others | Civil appeal is called. The appellant is present along with his counsel and deposit court fee stamp paper worth Rs:15,000/ which is taken on record. The counsel for appellant has submitted adjournment application. Order on it. Adjoured. Put off to 13.10.2026 for hearing. |
||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 118/2026 |
Muhammad Ayoub Mangi through attorney Abdullah Mangi VS Abdul Hakeem Shar and other | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Civil Appeal is called. The appellant, his attorney Abduollah Mangi are called absent. The counsel for appellant is present. Process against the official as well as private respondents were issued, returned by learned Senior Civil Judge Daharki vide his office letter No. 420 dated 29.9.2026, which is taken on record and Order passed on it. Process be repeated through personal service as well as affixing the process on the outer door of of house of private respondents as per law. The process also returned by the learned Senior Civil Judge Mirpur Mathelo vide his office letter No.524 dated 29.9.2026, which is also taken on record. One Abdul Razzak Waseer put his appearance on behalf of Mukhtiarkar State District Ghotki and submitted authority letter, which is taken on record. The learned DDA appeared on behalf of the official respondents No.05 to 11 and seeks time. Put off to 08.10.2026 for service upon private respondents No.01 to 04. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 5 | Summary Suits 29/2024 |
Chandar Lal and anohter VS Pesho Ram @ Raj Kumar | Sudhamo @ Sudhamchand(ADVO-372-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Application under section 12 (2) CPC is called. The applicant is called absent. His counsel is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Application u/s 12 (2) CPC is dismissed. File be reconsigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||