| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 220/2023 | The State VS Rahib Shar & others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Rashid Ahmed(ADVO-443-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 55/2023 Ubauro |
Sessions Case called. Accused (1) Bahadur @ Ghulam Muhiyuddin son of Ghulam Mehdi Shar (2) Soonharo Khan son of Mithan Khan Shar and (3) Nandhoo @ Shanee son of Tillan Shar have already been acquitted u/s 265-H(i) Cr.P.C vide Judgments dated 21.03.2026, 21.09.2024 and 05.03.2026 (respectively) while accused (4) Jeand son of Belo Shar acquitted u/s 265-K Cr.P.C on 13.4.2026, accused (5) Ghulam Qadir son of Gono Ghunio is not produced by the jail authority of District Jail Ghotki and the case of absconding accused (6) Rahib @ Ranbo son of Angano Rind already died as per S/Report dated 22.02.2026. Accused (7) Rahib son of Qaim Shar (9) Mour Ali @ Morio son of Manthar Shar (10) Nadir son of Muhammad Hassan Shar (11) Ishaque son of Qutub Shar (12) Ibrahim son of Qutub Shar (13) Badeehal son of Jannan Shar (14) Suhino son of Abdul Kareem Shar (15) Ali Khan @ Teko son of Mour Shar (16) Zahoor son of Ubedullah Shar (17) Allah Bux son of Gullab Shar (18) Nadir son of Sazoo Shar (19) Fareed son of Haneef Meerani (20) Harif alias Arif son of Gul Muhammad Mirani Jeeal son of Dhingano Rind already kept on dormant file. The ADPP is present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet. Accused Ghulam Qadir son of Gono Ghunio is acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C form the charge. He produced in custody and remanded back to District Prison Ghotki along with acquittal slip sent through proper channel. While there is no order for other accused, as order for them has already been passed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
| 2 | PPC 173/2026 | The State VS Mirali Jagirani and others | PPC-324 | 21/2024 B-Section Ghotki |
Received R&Ps from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law vide his office letter No.Cr/ 4009 dated 15.5.2026. Accused (1) Noorali son of Khuda Bux and (2) Gulsher son of Arz Muhammad Jageerani are not produced by the jail authority of District Prison Ghotki. Issue P.O for him. Accused (3) Ali Hassan son of Yar Muhammad already diary and proceedings against him abated vide an Order dated 06.5.2026. Accused (4) Meerali son of Khuda Bux (5) Meer Ahmed son of Khuda Bux (6) Ghalib son of Gadali (7) Altaf son of Khabar (8) Rasoolo son of Piyaro (9) Qadir Bux (10) Farman sons of Adam (11) Riaz son of Aamil (12) Khabbar son of Yar Muhammad (13) Parvez son of Abdul Rasool (14) Abdul Qadir son of Muhammad Ramzan (15) Gulsher son of Arz Muhammad (16) Altaf son of Arz Muhammad are absconding and declared as proclaimed offenders. Put off to 21.5.2026 for supplying the documents to the accused persons and appearance of PWs. |
||
| 3 | PPC 172/2026 | The State VS Ali Hassan Jagirani and others | PPC-324 | 3/2024 Kacho Bindi-I |
Received R&Ps from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law vide his office letter No.Cr/ 4008 dated 15.5.2026. Accused (1) Noorali son of Khuda Bux and (2) Gulsher son of Arz Muhammad Jageerani are not produced by the jail authority of District Prison Ghotki. Issue P.O for him. Accused (3) Ali Hassan son of Yar Muhammad already diary and proceedings against him abated vide an Order dated 28.2.2020. Accused (4) Meer Ahmed (5) Bhooral (6) Ehsan sons of Rahzan (7) Meerali son of Khuda Bux (8) Ghalib (9) Talib sons of Gadali (10) Altaf son of Khabbar (11) Lutuf son of Arz Muhammad (12) Hidayat son of Mehmood (13) Khawand Bux son of Sajjan (14) Nizam son of Abdul Ghafoor (15) Parvez son of Abdul Rasool (16) Haji son of Saindad (17) Murad son of Soomar are absconding and declared as proclaimed offenders. The complainant and witnesses are absent. Issue summons against them. Put off to 21.5.2026 for supplying the documents to the accused persons and appearance of PWs. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Proceeding suspended by SHC / S.C. | |||||||
| 4 | SC (Murder Trial) 327/2022 | The state VS Sardar Khan and ors | Anwar Ali(ADVO-1059-SBC-GHT),DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Ali Raza Kalwar(ADVO-237-B-SBC-GHT),Muneer Ahmed(ADVO-411-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 22/2022 B-Section Ghotki |
Sessions Case is called. Accused (1) Sardar Khan son of Khair Muhammad (2) Nek Muhammad Korai son of Arz Muhammad (3) Ali Hassan son of Mhammad Aarabi Khan (4) Meer Muhammad Balouch son of Ghulam Muhammad Balouch (5) Abdul Azeez Khan Korai son of Ghulam Muhammad (6) Abdul Rasheed son of Muhammad Murad (7) Shabbir Ahmed son of Ghulam Muhammad and (8) Mehrab Ali son of Ghulam Hussain all by caste Korai are present on bail. The Complainant Mst Basheeran and her advocate Mr Anwar Ali Lohar are called absent without intimation. The ADPP for the state is present. Mr Mumtaz Ali Jahangeer Lashari advocate counsel for accused Nek Muhammad, Abdul Rasheed and Mehrab is present and he has submitted his another vakalatnama on behalf of accused Meer Muhammad, which is taken on record. He also filed statement along with copy of an Order dated 5.12.2023 passed by Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench @ Sukkur in Crl.Misc.Application No.S-439 of 2022, whereby Crl.Misc.Application is dismissed accordingly directing the applicants to prove their innocence by joining the trial, which is taken on record too. Mr Ali Raza Kalwar counsel for rest accused is also present. It may be noted here that in C.P No.D-964 of 2022 the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur vide an Order dated 10.01.2023 has been pleased to suspend the operation of impugned Order dated 16.06.2022 passed by Director General Health Service Sindh Hyderabad. Hence proceedings resumed. Charge against accused framed (Exh 6). Pleas of accused recorded (Exh.6/A to Exh 6/H). Issue summons to P.Ws. Call for case property. Put off to 03.06.2026 for evidence. Parties are informed. Accused are directed to attend. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 7/2025 |
Muhammad Arshad Rajput VS Abdul Majeed Soomro | Zulfqar Ali(ADVO-278-SBC-GHT) | Ali Bux(ADVO-568-SBC-GHT) | Disposal Execution Application No.07/2025 (allowed on 04.06.2025) is called for satisfaction of decree dated 03.03.2025 passed in summary Suit No.19/2024. The Decree Holder Mohammad Arshad is present along with his advocate. The Judgment Debtor Abdul Majeed, his surety Sadam Hussain and advocate are called absent and JD failed to pay outstanding. Issue show cause notice to the Judgment debtor and his surety. Put off to 25.05.2026 for further compliance. |
||
| 2 | Summary Suits 12/2026 |
Ahmed Hussain Shahani VS Abdul Samad Lashari | Ali Raza Kalwar(ADVO-237-B-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Summary Suit is called. The plaintiff is present. Mr Zulfiqar Ali Arain advocate has filed his vakalatnama alongwith an application u/o 6 rule 17 CPC with affidavit, statement with postal receipt, on behalf of the plaintiff. Orders passed therfeon. an Order dated 28.4.2026 was passed whereby, it was ordered that "Learned advocate for plaintiff to put on notice that whether document relied upon annexed with the plaint a promissory note in accordance with the Negotiation able Instrument Act 1881 and how suit filed on the basis thereof is maintainable? " . Notice was issued to the defendant through Honourable DJ Bahawalpur, but not returned served or un-served. Issue fresh through all modes including publication in the nation news paper daily NAWA-E-WAQAT on ocsts. To come up on 26.05.2026, for hearing on above poinnt as well as service |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | Summary Suits 2/2025 |
Pooran Lal VS Muhammad Riaz Rajput | Sabir Ali (ADVO-938-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit called. The plaintiff Pooran Lal, his learned counsel Mr Shahnawaz Waseer, and defendant in person are present. His counsel is absent. This matter has been withdrawn from the file of this court and transferred to the court of learned Additional District Judge-II, Ghotki. Parties are informed and directed to appear before that court today without claiming further notice. R&Ps be sent to that court immediately. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 4 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 9/2026 |
Ishfaque Ahmed Arain VS Muhammad Zubair Arain | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | Already fixed on 19.5.2026 |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 5 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 28/2026 |
Mumtaz Ahmed Mahar VS Banhon Mahar and others | Sudhamo @ Sudhamchand(ADVO-372-SBC-GHT) | Javed Hussain Seerlo (DDA)(ADVO-1015-SBC-SUK) | Already fixed on 19.5.26. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 1 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 5/2026 | Mst. Shabeeran Mahar VS Riaz Ali Mahar | Rahib Islam Nabi(ADVO-1812-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Family Appeal is called. The appellants are called absent. Their counsel is present and he has submitted statement along with copies of TCS receipts and its confirmation slip, which is taken on record. Notice was issued, returned by the bailiff of the court of learned Family Judge Ghotki, which is taken on record. The bailiff has served the notice by way of door pasting, and picture clicked out by him which annexed by him along with his report. The service stands held good. The respondent is absent despite several calls. R&Ps of lower court is received. Arguments heard. Judgment passed on separate sheet and announced. Family appeal is dismissed. Decree be followed. R&Ps of lower court along with compared copies of judgment and decree be sent back to the trial court for information and compliance. |
|