| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1870/2026 | Asif Malik & another VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497 | 80/2026 Adilpur |
Received bail application u/s 497 Cr.P.C of accused (1) Asif son of Moula Bux Malik and (2) Rafique son of Abdul Kareem Malik from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The counsel for applicant is absent. Order passed on memo of bail application. Notice to ADPP. Call police papers and I.O for 22.8.2026. |
|
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1871/2026 | Muhammad Ali Gadani VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 18/2024 Khanpur Mahar |
On 17.8.2026 the advocate for accused has submitted bail application under section 497 Cr.P.C on behalf of accused Muhammad Ali, which is fixed today along with main Sessions Case NO.672/2024. The ADPP & DC are present. DC seeks time. Put off to 21.08.2026 for hearing when main case has been adjourned for further evidence. |
|
| 3 | Cancellation of Bail Appl. 21/2026 | Ihsan Ali Indhar VS Shah Nawaz Katpar | Cr.PC-497 (v) | 132/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Mr Muhammad Abdul Ahad advocate appeared and he has submitted an application under section 497 (5) Cr.P.C along with his vakalatnama on behalf of complainant Ihsan Ali Indhar for cancellation of bail granted to accused Shahnawaz by this court vide an Order dated 08.7.2026 passed in Cr.B.A No.1522/2026. ADPP is present and waived the notice. Arguments heard. Order passed. Application for cancellation of bail filed under section 497 (5) Cr.P.C is dismissed. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1874/2026 | Basheer Ahmed Mahar & others VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 305/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Received bail application under section 498-A Cr.P.C from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicants/accused (1) Basheer Ahmed son of Shahzado (2) Irfan Ali son of Shahzado (3) Waheed Ahmed @ Abdul Waheed (4) Zameer Ahmed (5) Hidayatullah sons of Basheer Ahmed (6) Nadeem Ali son of Ghulam Mustafa (7) Hakim Ali son of Hajan and (8) Nizamuddin son of Hajan appeared along with their counsel. Order passed on bail application. Interim pre-arrest bail granted subject to furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.50,000/ and P.R bond in the like amount.One Zulfiqar Ali son of Jamal Deen Mahar r/o Lutuf Ali Taluka Khangarh appeared and he has submitted his affidavit along with attested photo copy of deh form VII-B and photo copy of his CNIC for standings surety for the above named accused persons. Order passed on it. The alleged Deh Form is attested P.S copy and not original one thus it is unsatisfactory it and the Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki has been pleased to pass an Order vide Circular No.EB- 6984 dated 13.8.2026 not to accept P.S copy in surety, hence surety in hand is not accepted even provisionally. Accused may furnished another solvent surety having original documents subject to law. Hearing 21.8.2026 |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | PPC 672/2024 | The State VS Irfan Ali Gadani and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 18/2024 Khanpur Mahar |
|
| 6 | PPC 322/2026 | The State VS Parvez Jagirani and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 2/2020 Kacho Bindi-I |
|
|
| 7 | PPC 332/2026 | The State VS Punhoon Lolai and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 95/2020 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions case called. Accused (1) Gulsher son of Arz Muhammad Jageerani is produced in custody. Accused (2) Punhoon son of Meer Muhammad Lolai (3) Parvez son of Abdul Rasool alias Ghulam Rasool (4) Qadir Bux alias Qadiroo son of Muhammad Ramzan alias Adam Jageerani (5) Murad son of Soomar Khan (6) Lutuf Ali son of Arz Muhammad all by caste Jageerani (7) Shahban son of Dhani Bux Korai are absconding and declared as proclaimed offender. The ADPP and DC are present. PW-01 complainant Muhammad Murad Sahto, PW-02 Abductee Altaf PW-03 eye witness-mashir Dilvesh are present and examined. Their examination in chief recorded (Exh 6 to Exh 8). Their cross examination is reserved as prayed for by the learned defense counsel by filing an application. They are bound down. The abductee Altaf has submitted an application for time to produce another abductee Amanullah. Order on it. Issue BWs against the remaining witnesses afresh. Put off to 22.8.2026 for cross examination to PW-01 complainant Muhammad Murad Sahto, PW-02 Abductee Altaf PW-03 eye witness-mashir Dilvesh and evidence other witnesses. Accused produced in custody is remanded back to District Prison Ghotki along with slip for his re-production on next date of hearing. |
|
| 8 | PPC 331/2026 | The State VS Gulsher Jagirani and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-365 | 143/2020 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions Case is called. Accused (1) Gulsher son of Arz Muhammad Jageerani is produced in custody. Accused (2) Lutuf Ali son of Arz Muhammad (3) Parvez son of Abdul Rasool alias Ghulam Rasool and (4) Qadir Bux alias Qadiroo son of Muhammad Ramzan alias Adam Jageerani are absconding and declared as proclaimed offender. PW-01 complainant SIP Ali Nawaz Dayo, PW-02 Abdul Ghani Mahar, PW-03 Muhammad Mithal, PW-04 Ashique Ali, PW-05 ASI Muhammad Murad Sahato are present and examined (Exh 6 to Exh 10). The ADPP for the State has submitted statement for closing the side (Exh 11). Statement of present accused under section 342 Cr.P.C recorded (Exh 12). Final arguments heard. Judgment passed on separate sheet (Exh 13) and announced. The present accused Gulsher son of Arz Muhammad Jageerani is acquitted under section 265-H9i) Cr.P.C. He is produced in custody and remanded back to District Prison Ghotki along with acquittal slip. While the case against absconding accused be kept on dormant file as already ordered. However, perpetual warrants against them be issued for 19.11.2026. |
|
| 9 | PPC 330/2026 | The State VS Gulsher Jagirani and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 150/2020 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions case called. Accused (1) Gulsher son of Arz Muhammad Jageerani is produced in custody. Accused (2) Lutuf Ali son of Arz Muhammad (3) Parvez son of Abdul Rasool alias Ghulam Rasool and (4) Qadir Bux alias Qadiroo son of Muhammad Ramzan alias Adam Jageerani are absconding and declared as proclaimed offender. The ADPP for the State & DC are present. PW-01 complainant ASI Muhammad Murad Sahato PW-02 Ashique Ali and PW-03 SIP Ali Nawaz Dayo are present and examined (Exh 6 to Exh 8). The ADPP for the State has submitted statement for closing the side (Exh 9). Statement of present accused under section 342 Cr.P.C recorded (Exh 10). Final arguments heard. Judgment passed on separate sheet (Exh 11 ) and announced. The present accused Gulsher son of Arz Muhammad Jageerani is acquitted under section 265-H(i) Cr.P.C. He is produced in custody and remanded back to District Prison Ghotki along with acquittal slip. While the case against absconding accused be kept on dormant file as already ordered. However, perpetual warrants against them be issued for 19.11.2026. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 10 | Habeas Corpus 212/2026 | Mst. Ajeeban Panhyar/Domki VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. Applicant is absent her counsel is present. DSP/SDPO Anwar Ali Shaikh did not bother and sent application through Ali Hassan Sawand seeking time as usual. However time is granted as last and final chance in case of failure an appropriate action be taken subject to law. Put off to 27.8.2026 for compliance. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1665/2026 | Malhan Shar VS SHO PS andal Sundrani and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous application is called. The applicant, his counsel and ADPP are present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Consequently, based on judicious assessment of material brought on record I am of firm view that applicant???s alleged grievances at the most may fall under category of alleged male administration on the part of concerned officers of Irrigation Department which this court can???t adjudicate so this is not a fit case even for noticing proposed accused or for calling report from SHO and no cognizable offence is primafacie made out, which means that applicant attempted to twist situation with malice to kneel down the proposed accused through criminal proceedings thus he did not come with clean hands and this is not a fit case for direction to SHO concerned to record applicant???s statement in terms of section 154 Cr.P.C, hence application stands dismissed being meritless. However, applicant is at liberety to avail remedy either filing a complaint against proposed accused to Secretary Irrigation Sindh or Provincial Muhtasib, if so advised subject to law. |
|
| 12 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1688/2026 | Dhani Bux Kalhoro VS SHO PS Adilpur and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is absent. His counsel is present. ADPP for the State is present and waived the notice. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. ?? Consequently, based on judicious assessment of material brought on record I am of firm view that injuries allegedly sustained by applicant???s son Muhammad Alim and 02 others per MLCs have been declared as a shajjah-i-khafifah, JGJ damiyah and other hurts which as per law are non cognizable, actual bone of contention between parties is purely of civil nature but applicant attempted to twist situation with malice to kneel down the proposed accused through criminal proceedings thus he did not come with clean hands and this is not a fit case for direction to SHO concerned to record applicant???s statement in terms of section 154 Cr.P.C, hence application stands dismissed being meritless. However, SHO concerned is directed to proceed in terms of section 155 Cr.P.C as regards the alleged non cognizable injuries. |
||
| 13 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1686/2026 | Nissar Ahmed Gadani VS SHO PS Khanpur Mahar | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received criminal miscellaneous application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is absent. His counsel and ADPP are present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Consequently, based on judicious assessment of material brought on record I am of firm view that undeniably present applicant along with his brother is nominated as accused in FIR Crime No.51/2026 thus he made a foul attempt with malice to kneel down the proposed accused through criminal proceedings which means that he did not come with clean hands and this is not a fit case for direction to SHO concerned to record applicant???s statement in terms of section 154 Cr.P.C, hence application stands dismissed being meritless. |
||
| 14 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1687/2026 | Mai Ameeran Tanwari VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous application is received from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is absent. Her counsel is present. ADPP for the State is present and waived the notice. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Protection allowed. Application is disposed of in terms of directions as mentioned in the order. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 15 | PPC 68/2026 | The State VS Mehboob Shar and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-395 | 29/2022 Andal Sundrani |
Received S/Report from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki vide a letter No.7042 dated 17.8.2026 for disposal according to law. The date of hearing fixed and mentioned in the Remand warrant dated 08.08.2026 by learned Civil Judge & J.M (Family Court) Ghotki was 15.8.2026, hence today accused Abdul Ghafoor son of Hashim Shar is not produced by the jail authority of District Prison Ghotki. Let the P.O for him be issued at once.Put off to 27.08.2026 for supplying the documents to accused. |
|
| 16 | PPC 346/2026 | The State VS Abdul Ghaffar Solangi and others | PPC-324 | 90/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
R&Ps received from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki vide a letter No.Cr/ 7079 dated 17.8.2026 for disposal according to law. The case is already fixed on 29.8.2026. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 17 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 50/2026 | Malik Muhammad Anwar VS Muhammad Ramzan Malik and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
DC called. The complainant is present along with his counsel. The Mukhtiarkar Daharki has submitted his report through Tapedar Munshi Atta Muhamad Pitafi, which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to counsel for complainant. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Consequently, based on reasons and Law I am of firm view that complainant did not come with clean hands, actual bone of contention between the parties is purely of civil nature which he attempted to convert ????into criminal one for ulterior motives thus no case prima facie tri-able under I.D.A 2005 is made out and this is not a fit case even for taking cognizance, hence complaint in hand stands dismissed in limini being meritless. However, complainant is at liberty to file a civil suit seeking possession or any other relief in respect of property in question, if so advised subject to law. |
|
| 18 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 54/2026 | Sikandar Ali Kaleri VS Bux Muhammad Shah | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Direct complaint is present. The complainant is present along with his counsel. The Mukhtiarkar Mirpur Mathelo appeared and he has submitted his report which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to counsel for applicant. The Sub-Registrar has also submitted his report which is taken on record. The concerned SHO has submitted an application for time. Order on it. Put off to 19.8.2026 for hearing. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 30/2026 |
Sobdar Kolachi VS Imamuddin Jiskani | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit is called. The plaintiff is present along with his counsel. On issuance and return of summons issued on the prescribed form, the defendant Imam Deen put his appearance along with Mr. Muhammad Iqbal Kaleri advocate, who acknowledged the memo of plaint along with documents and in token of receipt hie put his signature on memo. He seeks time to file his vakalatnama and an application for leave to defense on behalf of the defendant. Put off to 22.8.2026 for leave to defend . |
|||