| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 224/2017 | The state VS Zulqarnain and ors | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-325A-SBC-GHT) | PPC- 459 | 329/2016 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions Case is called. Accused (1) Dost Muhammad is produced by jail authority of District Prison Ghotki THROUGH VIDEO LINK. Accused (2) Zulqarnain (3) Jahanzeb are present on bail, while accused (4) Aslam Pervez is absent. His attendance has already been dispensed with for time being subject to conditions mentioned in the order dated 01.6.2026 and case has been proceeded through his learned defence counsel. Mr Imtiaz Ali Malano advocate for PW/Victim Zahoor Ahmed, the ADPP for the State, Mr Anwar Ali Lohar Counsel for accused Jehanzeb, M/S Muhammad Bux Shar and Pardeep Kumar counsel for accused Dost Muhammad, Mr Sajjad Ali Kalhoro advocate for accused Zulqarnain and Aslam Pervez are present. PW Zahoor Ahmed is present. PW-7 ASI Rustam Ali Kalhoro is present. His evidence recorded (Exh 67). PW-05 Second I.O Zahid Hussain Meerani and private mashir Abdul Wahid are present and bound to attend. Mr Muhammad Bux Shar has submitted adjournment application. Order on it. Present private mashir Abdul Wahid and second I.O are hereby returned because the learned counsel for accused refused to cross examine them. To come up on 26.9.2026 as prayed for with direction to cross examine PWs on next date without fail. In case of failure case will be proceeded and decided because this is an old case and needs expeditious disposal as per law. BWs extended and delivered to same process server for remaining witnesses. To come up on 26.09.2026 for cross examination of PW-05 second I.O. Evidence Inspector Zahid Hussain Meerani, evidence of private mashir, as well as evidence of other witnesses.show Cause Notices filed and applications seeking cancellation of bail also filed because now case is under progress Parties are informed. The present accused are directed to attend and inform the absentee accused whose absence has already been dispensed with While Jail authority has been directed that accused Dost Muhammad be produced again on next date THROUGH VIDEO LINK. |
| 2 | PPC 346/2026 | The State VS Abdul Ghaffar Solangi and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Nadeem Ahmed Chachar(ADVO-914-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 90/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Sessions Case called. Accused (1) Peer Bux @ Peeral son of Shahzado (2) Qurban Ali son of Ghulam Hussain @ Hussain (3) Muhib Ali son of Muhammad @ Muhammad (4) Abdul Ghaffar son of Muhammad @ Muhammad are present on interim pre-arrest bail. The ADPP for the State, DC and advocate for complainant are present. PW-02 author of FIR & I.O SIP Zafar Ali and PW-05 Nisar Ahmed are called absent without intimation. The complainant and his witnesses are also absent. The counsel for complainant has submitted adjournment application. Order on it. Adjourned as a last chance. In case of failure to proceed on next date, case will be proceeded and decided as per law. Put off to 19.09.2026 for cross examination to PW-02 Zafar Ali Channa PW-05 Nisar Ahmed Solangi, evidence complainant and remaining witnesses. Present accused are directed to attend and bring with them certified true copy of bail confirm order. |
| 3 | PPC 355/2026 | The State VS Naseer Kalwar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Alam Sher Khan Bozdar(ADVO-1997-SBC-SUK) | PPC-395 | 48/2026 Belo Mirpur |
Sessions case called. Accused (1) Naseer Ahmed Kalwar son of Ali Muhammad (2) Dhani Bux son of Peer Bux (3) Nawab Ali Kalwar @ Razoo son of Muhammad Umar alias Umar (4) Sallamat Ali @ Salmat @ Salmoon son of Hussain Bux Kalwar are present on bail granted/confirmed by the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Mirpur Mathelo vide an Order dated 01.8.2026 in Cr.B.A No.251/2026. While accused (5) Khalid @ Khaloo @ Khaliqdino son of Peer Bux Kalwar is absent under intimation filed by co-accused Dhani Bux. Order on it. Absence of accused is condoned for today. Let case be proceeded in terms of Section 540-A Cr.P.C as prayed for with no objection by lthe learned ADPP. The ADPP for the State, Mr Shoukat Ali Daudpoto counsel for accused are present. The PW-01 complainant Nawab Ali Shaikh. While the evidence of PW-02 HC Mumtaz Ali Laghari has already been recorded. PW-03 SIP Aijaz Ali Gadani is present. His evidence recorded (Exh 5). BWs for R/PWs extended and delivered to same process server PC Muhammad Ramzan of PS Belo Mirpur. Put off to 21.9.2026 for cross examination to PW-01 complainant and evidence of remaining witnesses. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 4 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1888/2026 | Qamaruddin Chachar VS SSP Ghotki/DSP Complaint Cell and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The proposed accused No.02 to 5 appeared. Mr. Anwar Ali Lohar advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of present proposed accused persons, which is taken on record. DSP/ IOncharge SP Complaint Redressal Centre has sent his report which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to counsel for applicant. SIP Zaheer Ahmed Bhutto SHO PS Adilpur appeared and he has submitted his report with certain documents, which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to counsel for applicant. DSP Anwar Ali Shaikh neither appeared nor sent his report or sent any intimation. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Consequently, based on judicious assessment of material brought on record I am of firm view that applicant did not come with clean hands and he has made a foul attempt to complel complainant Shabeer Ahmed (proposed accused No.5) through lodging a FIR for an offence u/s 506/2 PPC in hand is hereby dismissed being hopelessly meritless and tainted with malice. However, police authorities are directed to provide legal protection to applicant and his family but this order will not mean to prevent police authorities from taking a legal action against a person of either side whoever commits an offence or causes a threat to public tranquility. |
||
| 5 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1925/2026 | Gulsher Shaikh VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The ADPP for the State is also present. The concerned SHO has sent his report which is taken on record. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Disposed of. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 322/2026 | The State VS Parvez Jagirani and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 2/2020 Kacho Bindi-I |
Sessions Case called. Accused (1) Lutuf Ali son of Arz Muhammad Jageerani produced by the jail authority of District Prison Ghotki THROUGH VIDEO LINK. While accused (2) Gulsher son of Arz Muhammad already convicted under section 265-H(ii) Cr.P.C and the case against proclaimed offenders namely (3) Parvez son of Abdul Rasool alias Ghulam Rasool Jageerani (4) Qadir Bux alias Qadiroo son of Muhammad Ramzan alias Adam Jageerani (5) Murad son of Soomar Khan Jageerani (5) Punhoon son of Meer Muhammad Lolai and (7) Allahdino son of Kareem Bux Chachar already kept on dormant file vide same Judgmenet dated 12.9.2026. The ADPP for the State is present. The necessary documents within purview of section 265-C Cr.P.C supplied to the accused through jail authority and such receipt returned back and placed on record (Exh 18). Charge against the present accused framed (Exh 19). Plea of accused recorded (Exh 19/A). Issue summons to PWs. Put off to 24.9.2026 for evidence. Net date be communicated to jail authority for production of said accused Lutuf Ali THROUGH VIDEO LINK with further direction to direct the accused to engage an private advocate at his own choice who shall proceed the case on next date of hearing. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Judgment | |||||||
| 7 | Forest/Wild Life Acts 419/2025 | The State VS Punhal Shar and ors | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Mujeeb Ur Rehman(ADVO-785-SBC-GHT) | Forest/Wild Life Act -U/S (9) | / |
Sessions Case called. Accused (1) Punhal son of Alif (2) Imran Ali son of Khan Muhammad (3) Mehboob Ali son of Hamal and (4) Hazoor Ahmed son of Abdul Karim are present on bail. Mr Mujeeb-ur-Rehman Laghari counsel for accused Punhal, Mr Shahmurad Shar counsel for accused Imran and Hazoor Bux and Mr. Ali Nawaz Shar counsel for accused Mahboob Ali are present. The complainant Haji Pathan Khan Gadani the Game Inspector Wild Life District is also present along with Mr. Shabeer Ahmed Siyal ADPP for the State. Judgment passed on separate sheet (Exh 8) and announced. Accused (1) Punhal son of Alif (2) Imran Ali son of Khan Muhammad (3) Hazoor Ahmed son of Abdul Karim are convicted and sentenced U/S 9(i) (a) (Chapter-III Protected Areas) read with section 21 (i) The Sindh Wild Life Protection, Preservation, Conservation and Management Act-2020 (SINDH ACT No.XXIII OF 2020) so they are hereby sentenced with R.I for one year and to pay fine Rs.50,000/-each total fine Rs.1,50,000/- and in case of failure convict at fault will also undergo S.I for three months more. Sentence so awarded will run concurrently. Per case file none of the accused (now convicts) remained inside prison, so question of benefit in terms of Section 382-B Cr.P.C does not arise. They are taken in to custody and remanded to jail to serve out the sentence. Judgment provided to them at free of costs and such receipt obtained and kept on record (Exh 9). Copy of conviction warrant placed on record (Exh 10) and copy of conviction slip placed on recorded (Exh 11) While accused (4) Mehboob Ali son of Hamal is acquitted in terms of section 265-H (i) Cr.P.C. He is present on bail his bail bonds are cancelled and surety discharged. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 27/2026 |
Najab Ali Almani VS Syed Omer Ali Anvery | Iftikhar Ahmed (ADVO-545-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit called. The plaintiff is present along with his counsel. On the last date of hearing, due to incomplete and improper address of the defendant, the plaintiff and his learned counsel were strictly directed to provide correct address of the defendant for personal search and service, else matter the suit will be dismissed for non compliance of the order. Today they failed to make the compliance and stated that the plaintiff has filed civil transfer application. In the interest of justice summary suit is adjourned to 24.9.2026 with same caution and direction. The plaintiff is further directed to produce CTC of transfer application with last diary of the C.T.A.on next date of hearing. |
||