| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2086/2026 | Farooque Ahmed @ Farooque Bhutto & others VS The State | Muhammad Tahir Qazi(ADVO-915-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-337-A(iii) | 344/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Criminal Bail Application u/s 498-A Cr.P.C is called. The applicants/accused (1) Farooque Ahmed (2) Abdul Rauf and (3) Javed Ali sons of Allah Dewayo are present on interim pre-arrest bail. The ADPP for the State and DC are present. The complainant/injured present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Interim pre arrest bail is confirmed. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 332/2026 | The State VS Punhoon Lolai and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Kashif Ali Shah(ADVO-302-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 95/2020 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions case called. Accused (1) Lutuf Ali son of Arz Muhammad Jageerani is produced by the jail authority of District Prison Ghotki THROUGH VIDEO LINK. (2) Accused Gulsher son of Arz Muhammad Jageerani already convicted in terms of provision 265-H(ii) Cr.P.C vide Judgment dated 31.8.2026 and the case against proclaimed offenders namely (3) Punhoon son of Meer Muhammad Lolai (4) Parvez son of Abdul Rasool alias Ghulam Rasool (5) Qadir Bux alias Qadiroo son of Muhammad Ramzan alias Adam Jageerani and (6) Murad son of Soomar Khan already kept on dormant file. The ADPP for the State is present. The complainant ASI Muhammad Murad Sahato is present and bound to attend. While other witnesses are absent. Process against them extended and delivered to same process server HC Nazeer Ahmed Mahar. Put off to 21.09.2026 for evidence and further proceedings. Accused Lutuf Ali son of Arz Muhammad is ordered to be returned back to District Prison Ghotki from inside jail Court-room and to be produced again on next date similarly VIDEO LINK with direction to the accused/UTP to engage an advocate at his own choice who would proceed the case as per law. |
| 3 | PPC 355/2026 | The State VS Naseer Kalwar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Alam Sher Khan Bozdar(ADVO-1997-SBC-SUK) | PPC-395 | 48/2026 Belo Mirpur |
Sessions case called. Accused (1) Naseer Ahmed Kalwar son of Ali Muhammad (2) Dhani Bux son of Peer Bux (3) Nawab Ali Kalwar @ Razoo son of Muhammad Umar alias Umar (4) Khalid @ Khaloo @ Khaliqdino son of Peer Bux Kalwar (5) Sallamat Ali @ Salmat @ Salmoon son of Hussain Bux Kalwar are present on bail granted/confirmed by the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Mirpur Mathelo vide an Order dated 01.8.2026 in Cr.B.A No.251/2026. The ADPP for the State, Mr Shoukat Ali Daudpoto counsel for accused are present. The PW-01 complainant Nawab Ali Shaikh is present and he has submitted adjourned application. Order on it. Adjourned as a last chance. In case of failure to produce all private PWs on next date, case will be proceeded and decided as per law. While the evidence of PW-02 HC Mumtaz Ali Laghari has already been recorded with cross examination on last date of hearing. BWs for R/PWs extended and delivered to same process server PC Muhammad Ramzan of PS Belo Mirpur. Put off to 17.9.2026 for cross examination to PW-01 complainant and evidence of remaining witnesses. Present accused are directed to attend. The complainant is also directed to attend and bring his witnesses. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 4 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1876/2026 | Sohni Khatoon Jakhrani VS SHO PS W/J/Shah | Muhammad Javed(ADVO-1125-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
|
| 5 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1897/2026 | Qaloo Malik VS SHO PS Khanpur Mahar and others | Sabir Hussain(ADVO-816-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The ADPP for the State is present. The proposed accused No.01 Imam Deen appeared voluntarily. The SHO PS Khanpur Mahar has sent his report which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to counsel for applicant. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Consequently, based on judicious assessment of material brought on record I am of firm view that actual bone of contention between the parties is pure of civil/family nature and no offence occurred as alleged or otherwise but applicant, having been hinted made a foul attempt to kneel down his opponenets for ulterior motives which he concealed thus application in hand is hereby dismissed being hopelessly meritless and tainted with malice. However, SHO is bound to take legal action against a person of either side whoever violates law or exposes threats to public tranquility. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 6 | DC (Direct Complaint) 14/2026 | Muhammad Ramzan Mahar VS Zaheer Ahmed Abbasi and others | PPC-324 | / |
Received Direct Complaint from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according law. DC already fixed on 29.9.2026. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 7 | Forest/Wild Life Acts 419/2025 | The State VS Punhal Shar and ors | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Mujeeb Ur Rehman(ADVO-785-SBC-GHT) | Forest/Wild Life Act -U/S (9) | / |
Sessions Case called. Accused (1) Punhal son of Alif (2) Imran Ali son of Khan Muhammad (3) Mehboob Ali son of Hamal and (4) Hazoor Ahmed son of Abdul Karim are present on bail. Mr Mujeeb-ur-Rehman Laghari counsel for accused Punhal, Mr Shahmurad Shar counsel for accused Imran and Hazoor Bux and Mr. Ali Nawaz Shar counsel for accused Mahboob Ali are present. The complainant Haji Pathan Khan Gadani the Game Inspector Wild Life District is also present along with Mr. Shabeer Ahmed Siyal ADPP for the State. Arguments heard. The counsel for accused seeks time for production of case laws. Sessions Case is adjourned to 19.09.2026, for Judgment. Both parties are at liberty to produce case laws, if desire so. Parties are informed. The complainant as well as present accused are are directed to attend. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 34/2026 |
Hakim Ali Korai VS Rashid Hussain Shar | Zahid Razzaque(ADVO-342-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit is called. The plaintiff is absent. His counsel is present. The defendant is present along with his counsel is present and submitted application u/o XXXVII Rule 3 CPC with affidavit. R&R Exh 6. Put off to 21.9.2026 for filing objections on Leave to defend application and further proceedings. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Proceeding suspended by SHC / S.C. | |||||||
| 2 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 8/2026 |
Dileep Kumar VS Srichand Bhojwani | Naveed Ahmed Malik(ADVO-1132-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Execution Application is called. Decree Holder is called absent but his counsel Mr. Naveed Ahmed Malik is present on behalf of Decree Holder in respect of post execution proceedings. Judgment debtor is absent. Proceedings of instant execution application has already been stayed by the Honorable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur vide an Order passed in Civil Appeal No.S-25/2026. To come up on 08.10.2026 for further proceedings. |
||