| ( ! ) Notice: Undefined variable: str_fixation_td in C:\wamp\www\cfms_dc_v26\public_ocp.php on line 556 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Call Stack | ||||
| # | Time | Memory | Function | Location |
| 1 | 0.0006 | 403392 | {main}( ) | ...\public_ocp.php:0 |
| 2 | 0.0357 | 407304 | public_ocp->get_ocp_screen( ) | ...\public_ocp.php:678 |
| ( ! ) Notice: Undefined variable: str_fixation_td in C:\wamp\www\cfms_dc_v26\public_ocp.php on line 556 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Call Stack | ||||
| # | Time | Memory | Function | Location |
| 1 | 0.0006 | 403392 | {main}( ) | ...\public_ocp.php:0 |
| 2 | 0.0357 | 407304 | public_ocp->get_ocp_screen( ) | ...\public_ocp.php:678 |
| ( ! ) Notice: Undefined variable: str_fixation_td in C:\wamp\www\cfms_dc_v26\public_ocp.php on line 556 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Call Stack | ||||
| # | Time | Memory | Function | Location |
| 1 | 0.0006 | 403392 | {main}( ) | ...\public_ocp.php:0 |
| 2 | 0.0357 | 407304 | public_ocp->get_ocp_screen( ) | ...\public_ocp.php:678 |
| ( ! ) Notice: Undefined variable: str_fixation_td in C:\wamp\www\cfms_dc_v26\public_ocp.php on line 556 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Call Stack | ||||
| # | Time | Memory | Function | Location |
| 1 | 0.0006 | 403392 | {main}( ) | ...\public_ocp.php:0 |
| 2 | 0.0357 | 407304 | public_ocp->get_ocp_screen( ) | ...\public_ocp.php:678 |
| ( ! ) Notice: Undefined variable: str_fixation_td in C:\wamp\www\cfms_dc_v26\public_ocp.php on line 556 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Call Stack | ||||
| # | Time | Memory | Function | Location |
| 1 | 0.0006 | 403392 | {main}( ) | ...\public_ocp.php:0 |
| 2 | 0.0357 | 407304 | public_ocp->get_ocp_screen( ) | ...\public_ocp.php:678 |
| ( ! ) Notice: Undefined variable: str_fixation_td in C:\wamp\www\cfms_dc_v26\public_ocp.php on line 556 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Call Stack | ||||
| # | Time | Memory | Function | Location |
| 1 | 0.0006 | 403392 | {main}( ) | ...\public_ocp.php:0 |
| 2 | 0.0357 | 407304 | public_ocp->get_ocp_screen( ) | ...\public_ocp.php:678 |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Criminal Revision | |||||||
| 1 | Criminal Revisions 13/2026 | Abdul Wahid Lakhan VS Hakim Ali Lakhan and others | Cr.PC-439 | / |
Criminal revision application u/s 435/439 Cr.P.C is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The ADPP is present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Cr. Revision application stands dismissed summarily being hopelessly meritless and tainted with malice upholding the learned trial court???s order dated 14.4.2026. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | SC (Murder Trial) 275/2012 | The State VS Gullam Hussain and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Mahboob Ahmed(ADVO-752-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 10/2012 Khanpur Mahar |
Sessions case called. Accused (1) Mubarak Lund is produced in custody While accused (2) Ghulam Qadir Lund already acquitted u/s 265-K Cr.P.C on 15.11.2023, accused (3) Ghulam Hussain (4) Ghulam Fareed (5) Mushtaque (6) Munwar and (7) Khawand Bux have already been acquitted in terms of compromise u/s 345(6) Cr.P.C. Accused (8) Muhammad Adam alias Adam also acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C vide an Order dated 29.01.2024. While other absconding accused (9) Akbar is proclaimed offender and his case was kept on dormant file. The ADPP for the State, Junior partner to Mr Pardeep Kumar Counsel for complainant, and Mr. Abdul Majeed Memon Counsel for accused are present. Summons returned with report of process server. Issue BWs against all P.Ws. This is an old case pertaining to the year 2012 and complainant is avoiding to adduce evidence, hence the learned ADPP for the State and the learned ocounsel for complainant are stricktly directed to ensure evidence of all PWs be recorded on next date as per law. In case of failure further proceddings of case in hand will be stopped, subject to law. Case is adjourned to 03.06.2026 for evidence. The produced accused is remanded back to District Prison Ghotki along with slip for his re-production. |
| 3 | PPC 224/2017 | The state VS Zulqarnain and ors | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-325A-SBC-GHT) | PPC- 459 | 329/2016 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions Case is called. Accused (1) Dost Muhammad is produced by jail authority, accused (2) accused Zulqarnain (3) Jahanzeb are present on bail. While accused Aslam Pervez is called absent under intimation. Co-accused Jahanzeb filed an application for excuse of absence of accused Aslam Parvez. Order on it. Mr. Sajjad Ahmed Kalhoro learned Advocate for accused Zulqarnain, Aslam Pervez and Jahanzeb, and Mr. Syed Zafar Ali Shah advocate for accused Dost Muhammad are called absent. Learned ADPP for the state and Mr Imtiaz Ali Malano learned advocate for victim/PW Zahoor Ahmed are present. The junior partner to Mr Sajjad Ahmed Kalhoro appeared and he has submitted adjournment application. Order on it. PW-02 PC-1877 Manjhi Abro, PW-05 victim/injured Zahoor Ahmed and PW-06 Saif-Ur-Rehman Soomro are present. The PW-01 complainant Muhammad Tayyab Soomro, PW-03 PC-37 Mashooque Ali Sawand, PW-04 Second I.O Inspector Zahid Hussain Meerani PW-07 ASI Rustam Ali Kalhoro PW-08 Taxi Driver Abdul Wahid Mahar PW-09 Medical Officer Dr Asif Hakeem Kalwar PW-10 SiP Muhammad Saleem Dayo are called absent. Fresh summons against them be issued. Per file my learned predecessor vide judgment dated 01.12.2023 convicted and sentenced four accused for offence punishable under section 336 , 469, 382 and 337-L (ii) read with section 34 PPC. But the Honourable High Court of Sindh bench at Sukkur vide Judgment dated 13.02.2025, set-aside the same for fresh evidence and judgment in accordance with law. Moreover, per file in hand the present accused had also got filed transfer application No.S-29 of 2025 against my learned predecessor, which due to his transfer was dismissed vide Order dated 21.07.2025. Case is adjourned last further chance to the accused party, with directions to proceed case or to produce copy of stay order if any, because the Honourable High Court of Sindh Sukkur Bench vide Judgment dated 13.02.25 (Appeal No.S-43/2023) passed and directed to conclude case within three months, but accused and the learned counsel always avoided and neglected to proceed it and now intend to prolonged it for indefinite period with ulterior motive. Let a reference/letter be submitted to the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur for direction/guideline. The victim Zahoor Ahmed has moved an application for cancellation of bail. Order on it. To come up on 01.06.2026 for evidence. Parties are informed. Accused produced in custody is remanded back to District Prison Ghotki along with slip for his re-production, and other present accused are directed to attend and present witnesses as well. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 4 | Criminal Revisions 5/2026 | Saeed Ahmed Kalwar VS Dr. Salma Qureshi | Naveed Ahmed (ADVO-858-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-439 | / |
Received criminal revision application u/s 435/439 Cr.P.C from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law for is fixed for hearing today. The applicant is absent. His advocate is present. The respondent is present. Her advocate is absent. The ADPP is present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Cr. Revision application stands dismissed summarily being hopelessly meritless and tainted with malice upholding the learned trial court???s order dated 29.1.2026. |
| 5 | Habeas Corpus 152/2026 | Mst. Sakina Soomro VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Received application u/s 491 Cr.P.C from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. Order on it. Call report for 21.5.2026.` |
||
| 6 | Habeas Corpus 154/2026 | Mai Zainab Shaikh VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Received application u/s 491 Cr.P.C from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. Order on it. Call report from SHO concerned for 21.5.2026.` |
||
| 7 | Habeas Corpus 153/2026 | Muhammad Ilyas Panhwar VS SHO PS Ubauro and ors | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Received application u/s 491 Cr.P.C from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. Order on it. Call report from SHO concerned for 22.5.2026.` |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 953/2026 | Abdul Qadir Kalwar VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The ADPPis present. ASI Sher Muhammad Abro appeared and he has submitted the report on behalf of the SHO PS A-Section Ghotki, which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to the counsel for applicant. ADPP is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. That this is not a fit case for lodging FIR, hence application stands dismissed being meritless and tainted with malice but SHO concerned will proceed in terms of section 155 Cr.P.C at this stage it is worth obseving that DIG POlice Sukur endorsed application filed by present applicant's wife Mst Shazia aainst proposed accused Ghulam Murtaza vide letter No. 59 dated 08.10.2025 to DSP/SDPO Ghotki for action as per law and report, which means that parties are already at inimical terms due to personal issues. |
||
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 952/2026 | Abdul Majid Pahore VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The ADPPis present. ASI Sher Muhammad Abro appeared and he has submitted the report on behalf of the SHO PS A-Section Ghotki, which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to the counsel for applicant. ADPP is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. That this is not a fit case for lodging FIR, hence application stands dismissed being meritless and tainted with malice butSHO concerned will collect MLCs of the alleged injured if any and then to proceed in terms of section 155 Cr.P.C. Parties are informed. |
||
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 959/2026 | Junaid Kalwar VS SHO PS Adilpur and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received application u/s 22-A (6) (i) Cr.P.C from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. Order on it. Notice to proposed accused. Call report for 21.5.2026.` |
||
| 11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 958/2026 | Muhammad Usman Lakhan VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Received application u/s 22 A (6) (iii) Cr.P.C from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. Order passed. Application is disposed of in terms of directions as mentioned in the order. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 12 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 960/2026 | Ali Nawaz Malik VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Received application u/s 22 A (6) (iii) Cr.P.C from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. Order passed. Application is disposed of in terms of directions as mentioned in the order. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 13 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 961/2026 | Muhammad Ali Shaikh VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Received application u/s 22 A (6) (iii) Cr.P.C from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. Order passed. Application is disposed of in terms of directions as mentioned in the order. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Next Hearing Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | |||||
| 1 | Criminal Revisions 5/2026 |
Saeed Ahmed Kalwar VS Dr. Salma Qureshi | Naveed Ahmed (ADVO-858-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-439 | |
| 2 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 952/2026 |
Abdul Majid Pahore VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | |||
| 3 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 953/2026 |
Abdul Qadir Kalwar VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | |||
| 4 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 961/2026 |
Muhammad Ali Shaikh VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | |||
| 5 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 960/2026 |
Ali Nawaz Malik VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | |||
| 6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 958/2026 |
Muhammad Usman Lakhan VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | |||