| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Criminal Revision | |||||||
| 1 | Criminal Revisions 23/2026 | Abdul Haque Mahar VS The State | Cr.PC-439,PPC-365B | 12/2026 Khanpur Mahar |
Received Criminal Application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant has been called absent despite several calls. His counsel is present. Order passed on memo of criminal revision application. Heard. File Persued. Notice to accused Mst Marya d/o Abdul Haque Mahar through I/C Darul Aman Hyderabad, I.O and learned A.D.P.P for the State for 27-10-2026. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 135/2026 | The State VS Jatoi Shar | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Muneer Ahmed(ADVO-411-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 278/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions Case called. Accused has been linked and produced by the jail authority of District Prison Ghotki through video link. The ADPP for the State is present. Mr Munir Ahmed Ghoto appeared and filed his vakalatnama on behalf of accused which is taken on record. Prosecution got examined complainant-author ASI Muhammad Shahaban Kolachi, I.O ASI Sher Muhamamd Abro and two police constables (Exh:03 to 06) in both cases and documents produced by them have also been taken on record. The learned ADPP for State therefore closed evidence side vide statement (Exh-7) in both cases hence this court recorded statement of accused at Exh-08 in terms of section 342 Cr.P.C wherein denied prosecution evidence but neither opted to state on oath in terms of section 340 (2) Cr.P.C nor opted to produce any Defense witness. Final argument heard. Judgment passed on separate sheet (Exh 9) and announced. Judicious scanning & appraisal of entire evidence makes it easier to understand for a prudent mind that prosecution case has become doubtful and prosecution failed to prove the truth of charge legally as well as factually entitling the present accused to acquittal as a matter of right. Consequently, I feel no hesitation to acquit present accused named above of charge in terms of section 265-H(i) Cr.P.C by extending benefit of doubt. He has been linked and produced through video link from District Prision Ghotki and this Court pronounced this Judgment in his due presence and hearing. However, let acquittal intimation for his release only in this case captioned above be communicated to Prison Authority for record and compliance subject to Law and Prison Rules. |
| 3 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 136/2026 | The State VS Dadan @ Dadoo Shar | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 279/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions Case called. Accused has been linked and produced by the jail authority of District Prison Ghotki through video link. The ADPP for the State is present. Mr Munir Ahmed Ghoto appeared and filed his vakalatnama on behalf of accused which is taken on record. Prosecution got examined complainant-author ASI Muhammad Shahaban Kolachi, I.O ASI Sher Muhamamd Abro and two police constables (Exh:03 to 06) in both cases and documents produced by them have also been taken on record. The learned ADPP for State therefore closed evidence side vide statement (Exh-7) in both cases hence this court recorded statement of accused at Exh-08 in terms of section 342 Cr.P.C wherein denied prosecution evidence but neither opted to state on oath in terms of section 340 (2) Cr.P.C nor opted to produce any Defense witness. Final argument heard. Judgment passed on separate sheet (Exh 9) and announced. Judicious scanning & appraisal of entire evidence makes it easier to understand for a prudent mind that prosecution case has become doubtful and prosecution failed to prove the truth of charge legally as well as factually entitling the present accused to acquittal as a matter of right. Consequently, I feel no hesitation to acquit present accused named above of charge in terms of section 265-H(i) Cr.P.C by extending benefit of doubt. He has been linked and produced through video link from District Prision Ghotki and this Court pronounced this Judgment in his due presence and hearing. However, let acquittal intimation for his release only in this case captioned above be communicated to Prison Authority for record and compliance subject to Law and Prison Rules. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 4 | Habeas Corpus 323/2026 | Muhammad Hassan Shaikh VS SHO PS Sarhad and ors | Lal Bux (ADVO-425-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application u/s 491 Cr.P.C is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The respondent No.01 is present on notice. The SHO PS Sarhad through SIP Muhammad Sukhiyal Sanghar submitted the report which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to counsel for applicant. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Respondent Hazoor Bux appeared along with his brothers, sister Mst. Khurshidan, having minor daughter Subhana, who stated that she along with minor baby has been residing happily with her parents and brothers but her husband Muhammad Hassan pressurizes her to rejoin him as his wife but she wants to continue residing with her brothers for security purpose so application being baseless may be dismissed. Statement along with supporting affidavits duly endorsed by and advocate Zubair Ali Waseer has been taken on record. Formal police report has also been taken on record.Consequently, Cr.M.A in hand being meritless is hereby dismissed. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 5 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2132/2026 | Mai Sheeran VS SHO PS Sarhad and ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received Criminal Application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant has been called absent despite several calls. His counsel is present. Order passed on memo of criminal miscellaneous application. Call report from SSP Ghotki for 27-10-2026. |
||
| 6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2131/2026 | Assar Dass VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Shahid Aziz(ADVO-1459-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous Application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant has been called absent despite several calls. His counsel is present. Order passed on memo of application. Notice to proposed accused. Call report for 23-10-2026. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 7 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 1/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Shahban Korai | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Mansoor Ali(ADVO-990-SBC-GHT) | Hudood Ordinances-11/A PEHO | 258/2023 Mirpur Mathelo |
Sessions Case (Hudood) bearing No.1/2026 (Hudood) is called. Accused Muhammad Shahban is present on bail. Per file this case being Criminal Case No. 05/2024 initially tried and decided by the court of learned Judicial Magistrate-II Mirpur Mathelo in conviction and sentence of accused Muhammad Shahban son of AAlim Korai vide Judgment dated 16.9.2026, Criminal Appeal No.24/2024 was filed and decided by the Additional Sessions Judge-I Mirpur Mathelo, thereafter Criminal Revision No.2/K/2024 decided by the court of Honorable Shariat Court of Pakistan Bench Registry Karachi. The Honourable Shiariat Court has been pleased to passed an Order dated 05.10.2026. For better understanding operative part read as "2. In such view of the matter, it is directed that the case be remanded to the concerned Sessions Court at District Ghotki. Accordingly, the instant criminal revision petition, along with the accompanied two criminal miscellaneous applications, is hereby disposed of. The learned ADPP for the State is present. In this case accused had filed Criminal Transfer Application No.31/2026 for transfer of case from the file of this court to another court on administrative grounds, which has been declined by the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki today as informed and confirmed by the accused and learned ADPP for the State. Charge against accused framed (Exh 17). Plea of accused recorded (Exh 17/A). Issue summons to P.Ws. Call for case property. To come up on 27-10-2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend and bring his private counsel at his own choice. |