| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2350/2026 | Imdad Ali Ghoto & another VS The State | Lal Bux(ADVO-332-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-302 | 177/2021 A-Section Ghotki |
Criminal Bail application is called. The applicants Imdad Ali and Ghous Bux are present on interim prearrest bail. The ADPP for the State and learned DC are present. THe complainant Wasand Ali, eye witness Rab Nawaz and Shah Nawaz appeared and filed their no objection affidavits which are taken on record. Mr Shafique Ahmed Laghari learned advocate appeared and he filed vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant which is taken on record. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Un-deniably Section 497 (i) Cr.P.C puts a legal bar to grant of bail until and unless a case of further enquiry in terms of section 497 (ii) Cr.P.C is made out which is not a case in hand because present accused per material brought on record participated in the offence of double murder. Consequently I am of firm view that applicant failed to make out the case for pre-arrest bail thus bail application in hand stands dismissed being meritless, which results in re-calling of his interim pre-arrest bail order. Bail bond cancelled and surety discharged. Let both accused be taken into custody so that they may be remanded to District Prison Ghotki to face trial. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | SC (Murder Trial) 366/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Shahban Mahar and others | Ghulam Abbas Shah(ADVO-523-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 78/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
|
| 3 | PPC 437/2026 | Muhammad Saleem Channa VS Ahsan Ahmed Malik and othes | Jamshed Ahmed Faiz Mahar(ADVO-856-SBC-GHT) | Nabi Bakhsh(ADVO-54933-SBC-GHT) | 2/2026 Daharki |
Sessions Case No.437/2026 (outcomes of I.D.A Direct Complaint No. 63/2026) is called. The complainant Muhammad Saleem Channa is present along with his counsel M/S Jasmshed Ahmed Faiz and Muhammad Yameen Qureshi. Accused (1) Ahsan Ahmed (2) Aamir Hussain (3) Muhammad Ali (4) Muhammad Asghar sons of Muhammad Punhal Malik and (5) Muhammad Punhal son of Muhammad Ramzan Malik are present on bail. While accused (6) Aftab Ahmed is absent. DC is present and filed an application under section 540 Cr.P.C. While other accused persons have submitted application with affidavits affirming therein that neither they have occupied the dispute property no intends to do so, the same have been taken on record. Absence of accused Aftab Ahmed has been condoned and case proceeded against him through the learned counsel as per application filed U/S 540 Cr.P.C with no objection by the learned counsel for complainant. The complainant led his evidence at Exh???03 and then evidence side was closed vide a statement (Exh???.04) signed by him and the learned counsel so this court recorded statements of accused at Exh???05 to 09) in terms of section 342 Cr.P.C. but none of them opted to state on oath in terms of section 340 (2) Cr.P.C or to lead defense evidence. They also filed a joint statement along with supporting affidavits, which has also been taken on record at Exh:10. Arguments heard. Judgment passed (Exh 11) and announced. Consequently, all accused named above stand acquitted in terms of section 265-H (i) The Cr.P.C, 1898, thus their bail bonds are cancelled and surety discharged. However, complainant Muhammad Saleem Channa on basis of evidence brought on record has become entitled to peaceful physical possession of property detailed above as a final relief in terms of section 8, I.D.A, 2005. As such SHO P.S Daharki and Mukhtiarkar Revenue Daharki are hereby directed to put complainant Muhammad Saleem s/o Ghulam Nabi Channa in peaceful physical possession of his house-property area 3811 sq. feet (423.5 sq. yards) out of S.No.328 located at Deh, Tapo, Town and Taluka Daharki District Ghotki on basis of Registered Sale Deed bearing Registration No.859 dated:05-5-2026 purportedly registered in office of Sub-Registrar Mirpur Mathelo followed by Deh Form No.II strictly in accordance with law and Rules under compliance report within 24 hours without fail. Let copy of this Judgment be communicated to officers concerned for record and compliance. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 4 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2143/2026 | Farzand Ali Khoso VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present. Mr. Javed Hussain Menik, the learned advocate appeared and filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the applicant, which is taken on record. The learned ADPP for the State is present. The SHO PS A-Section Ghotki sent his report which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to counsel for applicant. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Dismissed. |
| 5 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2151/2026 | Suhrab Ali Kalwar VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received criminal miscellaneous application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant and his counsel are present. Order passed on memo of application. Notice to proposed accused. Call report for 27-10-2026. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 6 | SC (Murder Trial) 276/2026 | The State VS Imdad Ghoto & another | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Lal Bux(ADVO-332-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 177/2021 A-Section Ghotki |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 7 | SC (Murder Trial) 299/2011 | The State VS Sachal @ Sachlo shar and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 6/2011 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Absconding accused/proclaimed offender Sultan Ahmed @ Sultan @ More son of Juma Khan @ Jumo Shar appeared voluntarily with bail letter No.Cr/ 1393 dated 23-10-2026 of the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge Ubauro, whereby he has been admitted on interim pre-arrest bail. Mr Qadir Bux Bhatto the learned advocate appeared and filed an application with affidavit of said accused and vakalatnama on behalf of above named accused for joining the trial. Orders passed thereon. Appearance as an accused is hereby marked in S.C No.299/2011. Let case be restored. Documents be supplied to accused in the present of the learned counsel. To come up on 31-10-2026 for charge or therwise. Documents supplied to the accused against receipt which is kept on record (Exh 13). Call for S/report of accused from SHO PS Wasti Jiwan Shah through concerned Magistrate. |
|
| 8 | PPC 452/2026 | Gul Hassan Kobhar VS Rajib Ali and others | Parvez Ali(ADVO-52347-SBC-KHW) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Sessions Case called. The complainant Gul Hassan is present along with his counsel. Accused (1) Rajib Ali (2) Qurban Ali (3) Dilbar Ali sons of Ghulam Fareed (4) Hamid Ali son of Rajib Ali have been called absent. PC Mehrban Ali Kolachi appeared and submitted report that accused have concealed themselves somewhere in order to defeat the BWs issued against them. Let the NBW be issued against the accused in order to procure their appearance and face the trial. Also write a letter to NADRA for blocking the CNIC of accused persons digitally. To come up on 30-10-2026. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 17/2026 |
Wali Muhammad Lakhan VS Rashid Ali Lakhan | Rustam Ali(ADVO-288-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Execution application is called. The Decree Holder appeared along with his learned counsel. The Judgment Debtor has been called absent despite several calls since morning till 01:00 pm, whereas learned counsel for Judgmenet Debtor Mr. Ateeq-ur-Rehman Soomro along with Mr. Dildar Ali Pathan appeared at 12:30 noon and filed objection on main execution application as well as an application u/o XXI Rule 26 CPC seeking stay of execution application which have been supplied to Decree Holder who is ready to file objection on stay application as well as ready to argue the main application, but Mr. Soomro insisted for date so at his request execution application is adjourned to 31-10-2026 for further legal proceedings, hearing and decision. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 137/2026 |
Jam Chachar VS Sher Muhammad Chachar and others | Received civil appeal from the court of Honorable District Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. Appellant and the learned counsel have been called absent despite several calls, so let advocate to be heard on 26-10-2026. |
||||