| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | Criminal Revisions 8/2026 | Muhammad Yaseen Malik and another VS Muhammad Ramzan Malik and another | Muhammad Noman(ADVO-1058LC-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-439 | / |
Per file (1) Criminal Revision Application No.08/2026 decided on 23.4.2026 (2) Criminal Revision Application No.11/2026 decided on 30.4.2026 and (3) Criminal Revision Application No.12/2026 decided on 08.5.2026 by this court. The applicant Muhammad Ramzan son of Imam Deen Malik had filed contempt application in Criminal Revision Application No.12/2026 on 01.8.2026, while applicants Muhammad Yaseen and Muhammad Sajid had filed contempt application in Criminal Revision Application No.08/2026. Applicants in both applications along with their counsels and learned ADPP for the State are present. Mr Shahid Hussain Dayo Mukhtiarkar Revenue Ghotki and Mr. Kamran Ali Mahar Assistant Mukhtiarkar Revenue Ghotki appeared and submitted their joint compliance report/Reply, which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to both the counsel. Arguments heard. Orders passed on both the aforesaid application. Consequently, Orders passed by this court have been found to be complied with thus contempt application filed by rival parties are hereby disposed of having achieved purpose. Parties are informed. Files be re-cosigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
|
| 2 | Criminal Revisions 12/2026 | Muhammad Ramzan Malik VS Muhammad Yaseen and others | Cr.PC-439 | / |
Per file (1) Criminal Revision Application No.08/2026 decided on 23.4.2026 (2) Criminal Revision Application No.11/2026 decided on 30.4.2026 and (3) Criminal Revision Application No.12/2026 decided on 08.5.2026 by this court. The applicant Muhammad Ramzan son of Imam Deen Malik had filed contempt application in Criminal Revision Application No.12/2026 on 01.8.2026, while applicants Muhammad Yaseen and Muhammad Sajid had filed contempt application in Criminal Revision Application No.08/2026. Applicants in both applications along with their counsels and learned ADPP for the State are present. Mr Shahid Hussain Dayo Mukhtiarkar Revenue Ghotki and Mr. Kamran Ali Mahar Assistant Mukhtiarkar Revenue Ghotki appeared and submitted their joint compliance report/Reply, which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to both the counsel. Arguments heard. Orders passed on both the aforesaid application. Consequently, Orders passed by this court have been found to be complied with thus contempt application filed by rival parties are hereby disposed of having achieved purpose. Parties are informed. Files be re-cosigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1840/2026 | Nadeem Oad VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497 | 189/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Received criminal bail application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The learned counsel for applicant is present and he does not press the bail application with permission to file afresh. Order passed. Dismissed as not pressed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1820/2026 | Muhammad Ameen Kolachi VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 29/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Criminal Bail Application is called. The applicant/accused Muhammad Ameen Kolachi is present on interim prearrest bail. The learned ADPP for the State and DC are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Interim prearrest bail is confirmed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
|
| 5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1831/2026 | Farman Ali Chachar VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 171/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Criminal Bail Application is called. The applicant/accused Farman Ali Chachar is present on interim prearrest bail. The learned ADPP for the State and DC are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Interim prearrest bail is confirmed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 322/2026 | The State VS Parvez Jagirani and others | PPC-324 | 2/2020 Kacho Bindi-I |
Sessions case called. Accused Gulsher is produced in custody From District Jail Ghotki, While accused Qadir Bux @ Qadir s/o Muhammad Ramzan, 2.Murad s/o Soomar Khan, 3.Lutuf s/o Arz Muhammad all by caste Jagirani, Punhoon s/o Meer Muhammad Lolai and Allah dino s/o Karim Bux Chachar are absconding and declared as proclaimed offenders. The ADPP and DC are present. Summons to PWs to be issued at once. Call for case property. Put off to 18.8.2026 for evidence. The present accused is directed to attend. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1651/2026 | Mst. Waheedan Shaikh VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present along with her counsel Mr Aijaz Ali Mahar. The ADPP for the State is present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1662/2026 | Abdul Sattar Malik VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous Application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is absent. His counsel Mr Mehafil Hussain is present. The ADPP for the State is also present. Arguments heard. Protection allowed and application is disposed of in terms of direction as mentioned in the order. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1657/2026 | Qadeer Ahmed Channa VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous Application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is present along with counsel Mr Abdul Jabbar Kaleri is present. The ADPP for the State is also present. Arguments heard. Protection allowed and application is disposed of in terms of direction as mentioned in the order. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1658/2026 | Manzoor Ahmed Chachar VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous Application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is absent. His counsel and ADPP for the State is also present. Arguments heard. Protection allowed and application is disposed of in terms of direction as mentioned in the order. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1660/2026 | Muhammad Ibrahim Mahar VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous Application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The petitioner is absent. His counsel Mr Ehsan Ali Mahar is present. The ADPP for the State is present as well. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 12 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1659/2026 | Attaullah Noonari VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous Application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is absent. His counsel Mr Mehafil Hussain is present. The ADPP for the State is also present. Arguments heard. Protection allowed and application is disposed of in terms of direction as mentioned in the order. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 13 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1661/2026 | Mst. Bakhtawar Shaikh VS SHO PS SArhad and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received criminal miscellaneous application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is absent. His counsel Miss Tallat Manzoor Soomro and learned ADPP for the State are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 14 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1656/2026 | Bilawal Shaikh VS SHO PS Gamero | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received criminal miscellaneous application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is absent. Her counsel Miss Tallat Manzoor Soomro and learned ADPP for the State are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 15 | PPC 332/2026 | The State VS Punhoon Lolai and others | PPC-324 | 95/2020 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions case called. Accused (1) Gulsher son of Arz Muhammad Jageerani is produced in custody. Accused (2) Punhoon son of Meer Muhammad Lolai (3) Parvez son of Abdul Rasool alias Ghulam Rasool (4) Qadir Bux alias Qadiroo son of Muhammad Ramzan alias Adam Jageerani (5) Murad son of Soomar Khan (6) Lutuf Ali son of Arz Muhammad all by caste Jageerani (7) Shahban son of Dhani Bux Korai are absconding and declared as proclaimed offender. The ADPP and DC are present. Charge against present accused framed (Exh 5) and his plea recorded (Exh5/A). Summons against witnesses was issued, returned with report of HC Ghulam Qadir Malik. Issue BWs against all the P.Ws. Put off to 18.8.2026 for evidence. Accused produced in custody is remanded back to District Prison Ghotki along with slip for his re-production on next date of hearing. |
||
| 16 | PPC 331/2026 | The State VS Gulsher Jagirani and others | PPC-365 | 143/2020 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions Case is called. Accused (1) Gulsher son of Arz Muhammad Jageerani is produced in custody. Accused (2) Lutuf Ali son of Arz Muhammad (3) Parvez son of Abdul Rasool alias Ghulam Rasool and (4) Qadir Bux alias Qadiroo son of Muhammad Ramzan alias Adam Jageerani are absconding and declared as proclaimed offender. The ADPP for the State and DC are present. Charge against the present accused framed (Exh 5). Plea of accused recorded (Exh 5/A). Summons issued, returned with report of process server HC Ghulam Qadir. Issue BWs against all the P.Ws. Put off to 18.8.2026 for evidence Accused produced in custody is remanded back to District Prison Ghotki along with slip for his re-production on next date of hearing. |
||
| 17 | PPC 330/2026 | The State VS Gulsher Jagirani and others | PPC-324 | 150/2020 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions case called. Accused (1) Gulsher son of Arz Muhammad Jageerani is produced in custody. Accused (2) Lutuf Ali son of Arz Muhammad (3) Parvez son of Abdul Rasool alias Ghulam Rasool and (4) Qadir Bux alias Qadiroo son of Muhammad Ramzan alias Adam Jageerani are absconding and declared as proclaimed offender. The ADPP for the State & DC are present. Charge against accused framed (Exh5). Plea of accused recorded (Exh 5/A). Summons issued, returned with report of process server HC Ghulam Qadir Malik. Issue BWs against all the PWs. Put off to 18.8.2026 for evidence. Accused produced in custody is remanded back to District Prison Ghotki along with slip for his re-production on next date of hearing. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 18 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 49/2026 | Khalil Ahmed Shah VS Manthar Shar and others | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
The Direct complaint (under the provision of Illegal Dispossession Act) is called. The complainant and his counsel are called absent as usual. However, Munshi to counsel for complainant is present. The SHO PS Shaheed Deen Muhammad Laghari (Wasti Jiwan Shah) appeared and he has submitted his Inquiry report which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to Munshi to counsel for complainant. The Mukhtiarkar Revenue Ubauro has failed to submit his inquiry report although his office acknowledged the letter along with memo. Issue show cause notice against him. Put off to 20.8.2026 for hearing. |
||
| 19 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 53/2026 | Pahlwan Laghari VS Muhammad Yousif Laghari and others | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Received Direct Complaint (under the provision of Illegal Dispossession Act) from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The complainant is present along with his counsel. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Dismissed in limine. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 20 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 54/2026 | Sikandar Ali Kaleri VS Bux Muhammad Shah | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Received Direct complaint (under the provision of Illegal Dispossession Act) from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki. The complainant is absent. His counsel is present. Order passed on memo of complaint. Heard. Perused. Call reports from official respondents for 18.8.2026. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 30/2026 |
Sobdar Kolachi VS Imamuddin Jiskani | Received summary suit from the court of Honourable District Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The plaintiff is absent. His counsel is preset. Order passed on memo. Admit Register subject to legal exception if any.Summons be issued on prescribed form to defendant through court bailiff and courier on cost for 18.8.2026. |
||||