| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 72/2026 | State VS Umar and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Talib Hussain Siyal(ADVO-276-SBC-GHT) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-440 | 38/2020 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Received subsequent report of accused (1) Rahib son of Qaim Shar and (2) Sanaullah @ Sanoo son of Bago @ Jhangal Shar from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki vide a letter No.5314 dated 20.6.2026. Let the case be restored. Matter already fixed on 30.6.2026. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1379/2026 | Saindino Mahar VS The State | Cr.PC-498 | 49/2026 Khanpur Mahar |
Criminal Bail Application is called. The applicant/accused Saindino Mahar is present on interim pre-arrest bail. His counsel Mr Pardeep Kumar is also present and he has submitted statement along with visible photo copy of FIR, which is taken on record. The complainant Kelash Kumar appeared. Mr Noor Muhammad Siyal advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant, which is taken on record. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Consequently I am of firm view that applicant failed to make out the case for pre-arrest bail thus bail application stands dismissed being hopelessly meritless, which results in re-calling of his interim pre-arrest bail order. Legal consequences thereof cause cancellation of Bail bond and discharge of surety. Let such intimation be communicated to SHO concerned and the learned trial court. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | SC (Murder Trial) 327/2022 | The state VS Sardar Khan and ors | Anwar Ali(ADVO-1059-SBC-GHT),DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Ali Raza Kalwar(ADVO-237-B-SBC-GHT),Muneer Ahmed(ADVO-411-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 22/2022 B-Section Ghotki |
Sessions Case is called. Accused (1) Sardar Khan son of Khair Muhammad (2) Nek Muhammad Korai son of Arz Muhammad (3) Ali Hassan son of Mhammad Aarabi Khan (4) Abdul Azeez Khan Korai son of Ghulam Muhammad (5) Abdul Rasheed son of Muhammad Murad (6) Shabbir Ahmed son of Ghulam Muhammad (7) Mehrab Ali son of Ghulam Hussain and (8) Meer Muhammad Balouch son of Ghulam Muhammad Balouch all by caste Korai are present on bail. The Complainant Mst Basheeran, her advocate Mr Anwar Ali Lohar are called absent as usual. The learned ADPP for the State, Mr Ali Raza Kalwar advocate for accused Sardar Khan, Ali Hassan and Shabbir Ahmed and Mr Liaquat Ali Malano advocate for accused Abdul Aziz are present. Mr Mumtaz Ali Jahangeer Lashari counsel for accused Nek Muhammad, Abdul Rasheed, Meer Muhammad and Mehrab is called absent despite several call. PWs Iftikhar Ahmed @ Sadam and Rabnawaz are present and submitted their joint an application supporting with affidavits with regard to non appearance of complainant and her witnesses, which is taken on record. The BWs were issued, returned with report of process server PC Sayed Qasim Ali Shah of PS B-Section Ghotki which are taken on record. Per file in hand Director General, Health Services Sindh Hyderabad ordered for exhumation of dead body of complainant's son, which she challenged and the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur vide an Order dated 10.1.2023 passed in CP No.D-964/2022 suspended that Order. Per file in hand, the complainant and her counsel have abandoned to pursue this case since long as per case diaries. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Concisely this court under the attending circumstances put the learned ADPP for the State on notice to procure attendance of P.Ws particularly private set thereof and also to assist this court that as to why case in hand be not kept in abeyance and further proceedings thereof be not stopped till appearance of complainant along with her son-witness. Today the learned ADPP for State filed a statement with submission to keep case in hand in abeyance, both private P.Ws also submitted accordingly, thus this court kept joint statement filed by private P.Ws Iftikahr and Rab Nawaz at Exh???07 & statement filed by the learned ADPP for the State at Exh???08 the both learned defense counsels also endorsed it. Undeniably fair trial in terms of Article 10-A, which is by now a Constitutional guarantee as well includes and means fairness in all respects including expeditious proceedings and timely decision thus further proceedings of case in hand will be futile and meaningless. It is also worth observing that conduct of accused towards this court is also un-fair and objectionable because a criminal misc. application S-439/2022 as came to this court???s notice recently was dismissed vide an order dated:05-12-2023 by the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur and per file in hand its fate was also not communicated to this court by the concerned staff of the Honourable Sindh High Court but accused concealed it for more than two years. However, case in hand is hereby kept in abeyance till complainant along with eye-witness appears to proceed it in accordance with law. All present accused, who are enjoying bail will continue to enjoy it and bail bonds and sureties so furnished will remain intact for the period of five years in order to procure their attendance easily and if sureties are discharged they might abscond or avoid their attendance after appearance of complainant. Present parties are informed. Let the file be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
| 4 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 62/2026 | The State VS Abdul Ghaffar Shar | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 3/2026 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Received Sessions case from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki vide a letter No. 5332 dated 20.6.2026 for disposal according to law. Accused (1) Bahadur Ali alias Bahadur alias Shahazado son of Haji Ahmed (2) Khalild alias Khalid Hussain son of Raa Muhammad (3) Nameed alias Nadeem Ahmed son of Rasool Bux and (4) Naimatullah son of Rasool are present on bail, while accused (1) Anwar Ali son of Raza Muhammad is absconding and declared as proclaimed offender. ADPP for the State is present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. Thus the present accused named above stand acquitted in terms fof section 265-K Cr.P.C read with section 265-D Cr.P.C. They are present on bail hence their bail bonds stand cancelled and surety discharged. However case against prolcaimed offender Anwar urif Ali Anwar Kalhoro be kept on dormant file till his arrested or otherwise and perpetual warrant be also issued against him. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 5 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1245/2026 | Mehfooz Ali Soomro VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is received from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is absent. Miss Tallat Manzoor Soomro the counsel for applicant and ADPP for the State are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Protection allowed in terms of directions as mentioned in the order. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1247/2026 | Mst. Razia Labano and another VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is received from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicants and their counsel are called absent. The ADPP for the State is present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Protection allowed in terms of directions as mentioned in the order. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1243/2026 | Tajamul Hussain Pathan VS SHO PS A/Ghotki nd others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is present. His counsel is present. The ADPP for the State is also present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Application is disposed of in terms of directions as mentioned in the order. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1244/2026 | Ghulam Shabeer Bhutto VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is received from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is absent. Miss Tallat Manzoor Soomro the counsel for applicant and ADPP for the State are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Protection allowed in terms of directions as mentioned in the order. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 9 | PPC 248/2026 | The State VS Bahadur Ali @ Bahadur @ Shahzado Kalhoro and others | PPC-364 | 94/2025 Adilpur |
Sessions case called. Accused (1) Bahadur @ Shahzado (2) KHalid Hussain (3) Nadeem Ahmed and (4) Naimatullah are present on bail. Accused Anwar Ali is absconding and declared as proclaimed offender. The ADPP for the State is present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. The present accused are acquitted under section 265-K Cr.p.C read with section 365-D Cr.P.C. They are present on bail, their bail bonds are cancelled and surety discharged. However, case against proclaimed offender Anwar Ali Kalhro be kept on dormant file till his arrest or otherwise and perpetual warrants be issued against him. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 10 | PPC 71/2026 | State VS Nadir Shar and others | Talib Hussain Siyal(ADVO-276-SBC-GHT),Zainab Khatoon (ADVO-1659-SBC-SUK) | Anti Terrorism Act (ATA) -U/S 7 ATA,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-440 | 13/2020 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Received subsequent report of accused Sanaiullah son of Bago @ Jhangal Shar from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. Let the case be restored. Matter already fixed on 30.6.2026. |
|
| 11 | SC (Murder Trial) 242/2026 | The State VS Akram Ali Jagirani and others | PPC-302 | 3/2025 Kacho Bindi-II |
Sessions Case called. Accused (1) Zameer son of Illahi Bux Jageerani and (2) Ayoub son of Ali Hassan Jageerani are produced in custody. Accused (3) Akram Ali son of Muhammad Hayat (4) Farman son of Khabar (5) Hameer son of Illahi Bux (6) Zaheer son of Ali (7) Irfan son of Rehzan (8) Umed Ali son of Noorali (9) Momin son of Illahi Bux (10) Nisar son of Qabil and (11) Punnah son of Gul Hassan all by caste Jageerani are absconding and declared as proclaimed offenders. The ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Haseebullah Lakho advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of present accused persons, which is taken on record. In compliance of provision 265-C Cr.P.C and such receipt obtained from them and kept on record (Exh 01). Put off to 24.6.2026 for charge. In the meanwhile issue summons to P.Ws and call for case property.The present accused are directed to attend. |
||
| 12 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 38/2026 | Billand Khan Chachar VS Bakhgsh @ Bakhsho Chachar and others | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Received the Direct complaint (under Illegal Dispossession Act 2005) from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The complainant and his counsel are called absent. Order passed on direct complaint. Call detailed reports for 24.6.2026. |
||