| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 695/2026 | Jan Muhammad @ Janoo Mirani VS The State | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-399 | 368/2024 A-Section Ghotki |
Criminal Bail Application No.695/2026 is called. The ADPP & DC are present. The DC put his marginal note on the bail application for not pressing the same. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Bail application is disposed of, as not pressed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 768/2026 | Murad Ali Sundrani VS The State | Cr.PC-498,PPC-382 | 8/2026 Andal Sundrani |
|||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 3 | Criminal Revisions 8/2026 | Muhammad Yaseen Malik and another VS Muhammad Ramzan Malik and another | Cr.PC-439 | / |
Criminal Revision Application is called. The applicants Muhammad Yaseen and Muhammad Sajid are called absent. Their advocate and learned ADPP for the state are present. The private respondents No.01 (Muhammad Ramzan) 2 (Saleem), official respondents No.3 (Assistant Commissioner) 4 (Mukhtiarkar Revenue Ghotki) 5 (SHO PS Sarhad) and 6 The State are called absent. Arguments heard. Admit -Register subject to legal exception if any. Notice to other side on costs. Call reports from official respondents for 23.04.2026. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 68/2026 | The State VS Mehboob Shar and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-395 | 29/2022 Andal Sundrani |
Sessions Case called. Accused (1) Anwar son of Peroz Shar is produced in custody. The proceedings against accused (2) Hakim alias Hakoo Shar (3) Muhammad Ayoub Shar already abated on account of their death vide an Order Order dated 05.12.2025, while the case against absconding accused (4) Mehboob (5) Ghafoor (6) Allah Wassayo (7) Imran and (8) Nazeer already kept on dormant file vide an Order dated 27.02.2026. The ADPP for the State is present and informed the court that ASI Zafardeen Panhwar, ASI Ali Gul Siyal, ASI Shahzado and Dr Abdul Rauf Mahar are present. Mr Mujeeb-ur-Rehman Laghari advocate for present accused is absent. Accused has filed adjournment application. Order on it. Summons returned with report of process server that the complainant Meeral is confined in Central Prison Sukkur in some another custoday case. Issue P.O for him for recording his evidence through video link. Also BWs for R/P.Ws including witnesses of arrest proceedings of present accused, namely PC-4050 Khuda Bux and PC-4099 Nazar Muhammad Mahar. Call for case property. Put off to 30.04.2026 for evidence. Parties are informed. Accused produced in custody is remanded back to District Prison Ghotki along with slip for his re-production. |
|
| 5 | PPC 94/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Ibrahim Gadani and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 183/2024 Khanpur Mahar |
Sessions case called. Accused (1) Muhammad Ibrahim (2) Sudheer (3) Imran Ali (4) Himath Ali and (5) Barkat Ali are present on bail. The ADPP for the State, Mr. Faiz Muhammad Waseer for accused and Mr Wazeer Ahmed advocate for complainant are present. Advocates for both parties seeks time to file their respective proper vakalatnama on next date of hearing, the ground that they had filed their earlier vakalatnama in the bail application. The complainant Aziz Ahmed, PWs Sikandar Ali, Zulfiqar Ali and ASI Liaquat Ali Mahar and SiP Muhammad Aslam Rajput are called absent without intimation. Summons against them was issued, returned with endorsement of the process server. Issue BWs against them. Put off to 27.04.2026 for evidence. Parties are informed. Accused are directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 667/2026 | Allah Rakhio Soomro VS SHO PS Adilpur and ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present along with his advocate. The ADPP is present. ASI Rafique Ahmed Kolachi appeared and submitted a report on behalf of DSP Jam Shahid Dahar Complaint Cell Ghotki, which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to the advocate for applicant. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 730/2026 | Mst. Shaharbano Mirbahar VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous Application is received from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki vide his office letter No.Cr/ 3050 dated 20.04.2026, for disposal in accordance with law. The applicant Mst Shaharbano Mirbahar is called absent. Her advocate is present. The ADPP for the State is also present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Application is allowed in terms of directions as mentioned in the order. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 729/2026 | Shahmore Lolai VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous Application is received from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki vide his office letter No.Cr/ 3050 dated 20.04.2026, for disposal in accordance with law. The applicant Shahmore Lolai is called absent. His advocate is present. The ADPP for the State is also present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Application is allowed in terms of directions as mentioned in the order. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 728/2026 | Mst. Shabana Kousar Labano VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous Application is received from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki vide his office letter No.Cr/ 3050 dated 20.04.2026, for disposal in accordance with law. The applicant Mst Shabana Kousar is called absent. Her advocate is present. The ADPP for the State is also present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Application is allowed in terms of directions as mentioned in the order. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 10 | PPC 72/2026 | State VS Umar and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Talib Hussain Siyal(ADVO-276-SBC-GHT) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-440 | 38/2020 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Sessions Case is called. Accused (1) Qaim son of Billal Shar (2) Sher Alison of Allah Ditto @ Adit Shar are produced by the jail authority of District Prison Ghotki. While accused (3) Ranjho son of Bhudho Shar (4) Asghar Ali alias Malhi son of Umar Shar (5) Kamil @ Kamiloo son of Mano Shar (6) Shahab alias Shabo son of Jam Shar (7) Yaseen son of Lallan Shar (8) Bahazur @ Bahadur son o Ghulam Muhammad @ Sadar Rind have already been acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C vide Orders dated 11.03.2026 and 24.03.2026 (respecitvely) and the case of other absconding accused (7) Shahzado son of Umar (9) Nadir son of Umar (10) Sanhiro son of Mino Shar (11) Rano son of Gahi Shar (12) Kareem Khan son of Umar Shar (13) Shahnawaz son of Deen Muhammad Shar (14) Bhooro son of Mangio Shar (15) Fatoo son of Jeewan Shar (16) Haider son of Naseer Shar (17) Yaseen son of Khaliq Dad alias Khakal Shar (18) Mehar son of Jeewan Shar (19) Qabil son of Giyo son of Jeewan Shar (20) Bhaloo alias Pahlwan son of Peer Bux alias Peero Shar (21) Majoo alias Najoo son of Pahliwan Shar (22) Ali Sher alias Dado son of Lallan alias Lalolo Shar (23) Karam alias Kato son of Raza Muhammad Shgar (24) Rahib son of Qaim Shar (25) Kuraro son of Qaim Shar (26) Nandhoo alias Pahliwan Shar (27) Faizoo son of Wazeer Shar (28) Gulzar son of Weel Shar (29) Fatoo alias Fateh Muhammad son of Morio Shar (30) Imdad son of Nale Chango (31) Mushtaque son of Budho Shar (32) Miandad son of Muhammad Yousif Shar (33) Bakht Ali son of unknown Shar (34) Barkat Ali son of unknown (35) Sanoo son of Bagoo alias Jhangal Shar are absconding and their case already kept on dormant file. While accused (36) Umar son of Kareem Khan Shar (37) Jan Muhammad alias Janoo Shar (38) Imran son of Jeal Shar and (39) Yaseen son of Jhangal Shar already died as per challan sheet. The ADPP is present. In compliance of this court letter No.Cr/ 224 dated 16.04.2026 the learned Civil Judge & J.M-I Ubauro has sent his report No.270 dated 17.04.2026 reporting therein that " accused Sher Ali s/o Allah Ditto @ Adit Shar and Qasim Shar were roduced by the police in Crime No.13/2020 on the same day; however, due to rush of work, the name of accused Sher Ali s/o Allah Ditto @ Adit Shar was mistakenly mentioned in Crime No.38/2020 and conseuently appears to have been inadvertently reflected in the remand warrant of the said case". Such report taken on record. Mr Pardeep Kumar advocate for accused Sher Ali put his marginal note on application under section 265-K Cr.P.C filed on behalf of accused Sher Ali, for not pressing the same, which has been disposed of as not pressed vide Order passed on it. The A.D.P.P for the State and Mr Mushtaque Ahmed Solangi advocate for accused Qaim are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet. Application under section 265-K Cr.P.C is allowed. Accused Qaim son of Billal Shar is acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C from the charge. He is produced in custody and remanded back to District Prison Ghotki and acquittal slip is also prepared and sent through proper channel for his release/acquitted, whilst there is no order for other accused persons, as Orders for them have already been passed by this court. |
| 11 | PPC 72/2026 | State VS Umar and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Talib Hussain Siyal(ADVO-276-SBC-GHT) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-440 | 38/2020 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Sessions Case is called. Accused (1) Qaim son of Billal Shar (2) Sher Alison of Allah Ditto @ Adit Shar are produced by the jail authority of District Prison Ghotki. While accused (3) Ranjho son of Bhudho Shar (4) Asghar Ali alias Malhi son of Umar Shar (5) Kamil @ Kamiloo son of Mano Shar (6) Shahab alias Shabo son of Jam Shar (7) Yaseen son of Lallan Shar (8) Bahazur @ Bahadur son o Ghulam Muhammad @ Sadar Rind have already been acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C vide Orders dated 11.03.2026 and 24.03.2026 (respecitvely) and the case of other absconding accused (7) Shahzado son of Umar (9) Nadir son of Umar (10) Sanhiro son of Mino Shar (11) Rano son of Gahi Shar (12) Kareem Khan son of Umar Shar (13) Shahnawaz son of Deen Muhammad Shar (14) Bhooro son of Mangio Shar (15) Fatoo son of Jeewan Shar (16) Haider son of Naseer Shar (17) Yaseen son of Khaliq Dad alias Khakal Shar (18) Mehar son of Jeewan Shar (19) Qabil son of Giyo son of Jeewan Shar (20) Bhaloo alias Pahlwan son of Peer Bux alias Peero Shar (21) Majoo alias Najoo son of Pahliwan Shar (22) Ali Sher alias Dado son of Lallan alias Lalolo Shar (23) Karam alias Kato son of Raza Muhammad Shgar (24) Rahib son of Qaim Shar (25) Kuraro son of Qaim Shar (26) Nandhoo alias Pahliwan Shar (27) Faizoo son of Wazeer Shar (28) Gulzar son of Weel Shar (29) Fatoo alias Fateh Muhammad son of Morio Shar (30) Imdad son of Nale Chango (31) Mushtaque son of Budho Shar (32) Miandad son of Muhammad Yousif Shar (33) Bakht Ali son of unknown Shar (34) Barkat Ali son of unknown (35) Sanoo son of Bagoo alias Jhangal Shar are absconding and their case already kept on dormant file. While accused (36) Umar son of Kareem Khan Shar (37) Jan Muhammad alias Janoo Shar (38) Imran son of Jeal Shar and (39) Yaseen son of Jhangal Shar already died as per challan sheet. The ADPP is present. In compliance of this court letter No.Cr/ 224 dated 16.04.2026 the learned Civil Judge & J.M-I Ubauro has sent his report No.270 dated 17.04.2026 reporting therein that " accused Sher Ali s/o Allah Ditto @ Adit Shar and Qasim Shar were roduced by the police in Crime No.13/2020 on the same day; however, due to rush of work, the name of accused Sher Ali s/o Allah Ditto @ Adit Shar was mistakenly mentioned in Crime No.38/2020 and conseuently appears to have been inadvertently reflected in the remand warrant of the said case". Such report taken on record. Mr Pardeep Kumar advocate for accused Sher Ali put his marginal note on application under section 265-K Cr.P.C filed on behalf of accused Sher Ali, for not pressing the same, which has been disposed of as not pressed vide Order passed on it. The A.D.P.P for the State and Mr Mushtaque Ahmed Solangi advocate for accused Qaim are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet. Application under section 265-K Cr.P.C is allowed. Accused Qaim son of Billal Shar is acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C from the charge. He is produced in custody and remanded back to District Prison Ghotki and acquittal slip is also prepared and sent through proper channel for his release/acquitted, whilst there is no order for other accused persons, as Orders for them have already been passed by this court. |
| 12 | PPC 782/2024 | The State VS Javed Ahmed @ Javed Kalhoro & others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT),Muhammad Hanif(ADVO-823-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 368/2024 A-Section Ghotki |
Received subsequent report from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki vide a Letter No.Cr/ 3010 dated 17.04.2026 in respect of accused Jan Muhammad alias Janoo son of Gul Muhammad @ Guloo @ Ghulam Mirani, which is tagged with main Sessions Case. The Sessions case stands restored. Accused (2) Javed Ahmed @ Javed (2) Khalid Hussain @ Khalid and (3) Naimatullah have already been acquitted under section 265-H (i) Cr.P.C vide Judgments dated 17.01.2025 and 02.06.2025 (respectively). Accused (4) Jan Muhammad alias Janoo son of Gul Muhammad @ Guloo @ Ghulam Mirani is not produced by the jail authority of District Prison Ghotki and the case against absconding accused (5) Ramzan @ Rajab (6) Naseer already kept on dormant file vide Judgment dated 17.01.2025. The ADPP and DC are present. The ADPP is present. Mr Adnan Ahmed Siyal advocate for accused Jan Muhammad alias Jano is present and he has not pressed the separate bail application No.695/2026 of the present accused. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet (Exh 27) and announced. Accused accused Jan Muhammad alias Janoo son of Gul Muhammad @ Guloo @ Ghulam Mirani is acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C from the charge. Let the acquittal slip in respect of accused accused Jan Muhammad alias Janoo son of Gul Muhammad @ Guloo @ Ghulam Mirani be sent to the jail authority through proper channel for his release/acquittal. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 3/2026 |
Khushi Muhammad Malik VS Tarique Saleem Alvi | Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-326-SBC-GHT) | Execution Application is called. The Decree Holder along with his advocate are called absent and failed to deposit publication charges. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Execution application is dismissed for non-prosecution (default) as the decree-holder fails to appear or take steps for service. Accordingly execution application is disposed of. Let the file be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
|||