Sessions Case called. Accused (1) Abdul Kareem @ Kareemon (2) Munir Ahmed (3) Abdul Rasheed (4) Arbelo (5) Aamir Ali (6) Abdul Haleem (7) Allah Warrayo and (8) Sadam Hussain are present on bail. While Accused (9) Mir Hassan @ Miro (10) Sakhawat Hussain (11) Javed (12) Insaf (13) Kamran and (14) Saleem are absconding and declared as P.Os. Learned ADPP for State and Mr Liaquat Ali Malano Counsel for accused are present. Mr Wazeer Ahmed Mahar advocate appeared and he has submitted his vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant which is taken on record. All the present accused persons have submitted their joint application with affidavit of accused Arbelo, for faisila/private negotiations out side the court with the complainant party, which is taken on record and order on it. All accused endorsed contents of this joint statement in presence of thier counsel Mr Mahar and Malik Rani it is taken on record. The PW-01 complainant Mst Manzooran, PW-02 Imtiaz Ali and PW-03 I.O SiP Muhammad Siklhiyal Sanghar appeared and their deposition/evidence recorded (Exh 6 to Exh 8). The complainant has submitted an application stating therein that she does not want to get rest of P.Ws examined in this case, which is taken on record (Exh 9). The ADPP has submitted statement for closing the side (Exh 10). The statements of accused under section 342 Cr.P.C recorded (Exh 11 to Exh 18). Final arguments heard. Judgment passed on separate sheet (Exh 19) and announced. Accused (1) Abdul Kareem @ Kareemon (2) Munir Ahmed (3) Abdul Rasheed (4) Arbelo (5) Aamir Ali (6) Abdul Haleem (7) Allah Warrayo and (8) Sadam Hussain are acquitted under section 265-H(i) Cr.P.C. They are present on bail, their bail bonds are cancelled and surety discharged. However case against proclaimed offenders/Accused (9) Mir Hassan @ Miro (10) Sakhawat Hussain (11) Javed (12) Insaf (13) Kamran and (14) Saleem be kept on dormant file till their arrest and perpetual warrants be also issued. To come up on 17.08.2026 for progress report of perpetual warrants.

Execution Application is called. The Decree Holder is absent. His advocate is present. Notice issued, returned by learned Senior Civil Judge Ghotki vide a letter No. 363 dated 12.5.2026 and report of bailiff duly served. But the judgment debtor is called absent. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Per file in hand he failed to do so and no appeal has also been noticed to this court and Judgment Debtor despite ordinary as well as substitute service such as affixation of process on outer door of his house at last known address per endorsement furnished by Bailiff Ghous Bux dated:12-5-2026 and ample opportunity and sufficient time did not come forward to defend or to oppose execution application in hand obviously for reason that he has nothing to reply in this regard. Decree holder is therefore directed to provide list of moveable as well as immoveable property of Judgment Debtor for satisfaction of Decree and office is directed to issue a showcause notice to Judgmnet Debtor ???To showcuase that as to why he be not arrested and detained in prison for recovery of decreetal amount in accordance with law??? as well as a letter to NADRA authorities to digitally impound his CNIC till further order so that Judgment Debtor may not escape outside country.