| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2307/2026 | Muhammad Shareef Gabol VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497,SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 86/2026 Khanpur Mahar |
|
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 400/2026 | The State VS Abdul Rasool Ogahi and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 170/2025 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions Case is called. Accused (1) Ghulam Yaseen son of Yar Muhammad Ogahi is present on bail. While the case against proclaimed offenders namely (2) Abdul Rasool (3) Yar Muhammad sons of Sarang and (4) Waheed Ahmed son of Yar Muhammad Ogahi already kept on dormant file. The ADPP for the State and DC are present. PW-01 HC Rafique Ahmed PW-02 Medical Officer Dr Abdul Rauf Mahar and PW-03 I.O ASI Sher Muhammad Abro are present and examined (Exh 6 to Exh 8). Mr Ubedullah Mirani advocate appeared and filed an application under section 265-K Cr.P.C along with vakalatnama his power on behalf of present accused. Orders passed thereon. The learned ADPP waived the notice. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Undeniably fair trial (article 10-A) which is now a constitutional right of an accused includes and means fairness in all respects including expeditious proceedings and legal proceedings as per law. Moreover, this court by virtue of section 265-K Cr.P.C is competent to acquit an accused at any stage even on its own motion subject to stipulations contained therein otherwise very purpose of this enactment will stand redundant. Reliance in this regard is respectfully placed on case of Mehboob Hassan versus Akhtar Islam etc (SBLR 2024 SC-78) No sufficient material exists to prove charge against the present accused rather he merits to be acquitted at this stage in terms of section 265-K Cr.P.C because charge so framed became groundless and no probability exits of his conviction even after recording evidence of rest of P.Ws. Consequently I acquit accused named above in terms of section 265-K Cr.P.C. He is present on bail hence bail bond cancelled and surety discharged. However case against proclaimed offenders be kept on dormant file till their arrest or otherwise and perpetual warrants be also issued against them. Case property viz: single crime empty whatever available on record be preserved till further order. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 3 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2067/2026 | Allah Juriyo Kaladi VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Manzoor Ahmed Soomro(ADVO-688-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is absent. His counsel is present and put his marginal note on main application for withdrawing the same. The ADPP for the State is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Disposed of as withdrawn. |
| 4 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2076/2026 | Khuda Dad Gabol VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and others | Khadim Hussain (ADVO-905-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is absent. His counsel is present and submitted statement for withdrawing the same. The ADPP for the State is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Disposed of as withdrawn. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 27/2026 |
Najab Ali Almani VS Syed Omer Ali Anvery | Iftikhar Ahmed (ADVO-545-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | |
||
| 2 | Summary Suits 37/2026 |
Kelash VS Sandeep Kumar and others | Javed Hussain(ADVO-450-SBC-GHT) | Shahid Aziz(ADVO-401-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit called. The plaintiff and defendant No.01 Sandeep Kumar are present. The counsel for plaintiff is absent. Mr Shahid Aziz Kaleri counsel for defendant No.01 is present and submitted statement along with original General Power of Attorney, which is taken on record. Process returned by learned Senior Civil Judge Ghotki for his office letter No. 709 dated 13.102026 which is also taken on record. The plaintiff has filed adjournment application with affidavit. Order on it. Time is granted to produce his counsel for proceedings the suit on next date as per law. Put off to 17.10.2026 for objection and hearing on application for leave to defend. |
||
| 3 | Summary Suits 38/2026 |
Kelash VS Dayanand and another | Javed Hussain(ADVO-450-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit is called. The plaintiff is present. His counsel has been called absent despite several calls. The defendant No.1 Dayanand appeared. Mr Amanullah Khan Kolachi advocate appeared and filed his vakalatnama along with adjournment application on behalf of defendant No.1. Orders passed thereon. Adjourned with direction to file leave to defend, if any, on next date. The process has been returned by learned Senior Civil Judge Ghotki vide his office letter No.708 dated 13.10.2026 which is taken on record and order passed on it. Call concerned Bailiff along with proof that defendant No.2 went to India. Bailiff Ghous Bux Magsi appeared and he has submitted an application excusing him on furnishing the false information. Order on it. Taken on record. He is execused with strict caution to remain careful in future and not to submit report without proof because baseless and vague reports cause complication. On quarry the defendant No.01 Diyanand replied that he has no proof in shape of VISA and Ticket of defendant No.02 Amar Lal and the concerned bailiff also failed to submit such roof along with his endorsement which means that both are liers. Conversly the Plaintiff submit that the defendant No.02 Amar Lal is still residing with the defendant No.01 Dayanand in the same house as such concerned bailiff is directed to avoid false report without proof in future. Let the process be issued with direction to the bailiff to affix on the enterance door of the house in presence of two nek mards of the locality as well as issue publication noticed to be published in the recognized newspaper on costs. Put off to 17.10.2026 for filing an application for leave to defend by the defendant No.01 and service upon the defendant No.02. |
||
| 4 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 15/2026 |
Abdul Qudoos@ Sajid Jameel Malik VS Muhammad Afzal Pathan | Zahid Hussain (ADVO-960-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Execution Application is called. The Decree Holder is absent. His counsel is present and submitted statement along with copy of newspaper daily AWAMI AWAZ Dated 09.10.2026, which is taken on record. The Judgment debtor is called absent. Service against him is hereby held good on the basis of display of notice on the entrance door of the residential house of the judgment debtor followed by said publication notice. Put off to 16.10.2026 for appearance, filing the objections by the Judgment debtor and further proceedings. |
||