| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1569/2026 | Mst. Jindul Ghoto VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The ADPP for the State is present. This is not a fit case for direction to SHO concerned to record applicant's statement in terms of section 154 Cr.P.C hence application stands dismissed being meritless. However, in order to avoid breach of peace SHO concerned will feel no hesitation to take strict legal action against a person of either side whoever exposes threat to public tranquility or commit an offence. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1637/2026 | Moare @ Mukharo Shar VS The State | Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-650-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-302 | 24/2021 Andal Sundrani |
Bail Application No.1637/2026 already tagged with main Sessions Case No.284/2026 and it was dismissed as not pressed. |
| 3 | Cancellation of Bail Appl. 16/2026 | Abdul Razzaque Khan Kolachi VS Ara Muhammad Ghoto | Cr.PC-497 (v) | 215/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Application for cancellation of bail under section 497 (5) Cr.P.C is called. The complainant is present along with his counsel. Order passed on application. Notice. The accused Arz Muhammad voluntarily appeared. Mr Abdu Haque Gadani advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of accused, which is taken on record. He received the memo. The ADPP is present and waived the notice. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Application is dismissed. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1715/2026 | Hakim Ali Memon VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497 | 54/2026 Sarhad |
Criminal Bail Application u/s 497 Cr.P.C is called. The ADPP for the State is present. DC is present and he has submitted an application for adjournment, which is taken on record and declined. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Application is dismissed. File be consigned in record room after its due completion and compilation. |
|
| 5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1714/2026 | Hakim Ali Memon VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497 | 56/2026 Sarhad |
Criminal Bail Application u/s 497 Cr.P.C is called. The ADPP for the State is present. DC is present and he has submitted an application for adjournment, which is taken on record and declined. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Application is dismissed. File be consigned in record room after its due completion and compilation. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 6 | Cancellation of Bail Appl. 15/2026 | Sadaruddin Bhutto VS Murad Ali Sundrani | Cr.PC-497 (v) | / |
Criminal Bail Application for cancellation of bail under section 497(5) Cr.P.C is called. The applicant is absent. His counsel and ADPP for the State are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Application is dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 7 | Cancellation of Bail Appl. 14/2026 | Liaqut Ali Bhutto VS Murad Ali Sundrani | Cr.PC-497 (v) | 11/2026 Andal Sundrani |
Criminal Bail Application for cancellation of bail under section 497(5) Cr.P.C is called. The applicant is absent. His counsel and ADPP for the State are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Application is dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 8 | Cancellation of Bail Appl. 13/2026 | Shabeer Ahmed Bhutto VS Murad Ali Sundrani | Cr.PC-497 (v) | 10/2026 Andal Sundrani |
Criminal Bail Application for cancellation of bail under section 497(5) Cr.P.C is called. The applicant is absent. His counsel and ADPP for the State are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Application is dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1506/2026 | Budh Dev Tharwani VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The ADPP for the State is present. HC-1587 Ghulam Yaseen has submitted report which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to applicant. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Consequently, application in hand stands disposed of with liberty to applicant to address proper applications to police authorities and to report the alleged cognizable offence to SHO concerned/incharge duty officer today for legal action. |
|
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1543/2026 | Gul Hassan Shaikh VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant, his counsel and Mr Shabbir Ahmed Siyal learned ADPP for the State are present. Police report is received which is also taken on record and copy thereof supplied to learned counsel for applicant.. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Application is dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
|
| 11 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1534/2026 | Allah Ditto Channa VS SHO P.S Adilpur | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant, his counsel and Mr Shabbir Ahmed Siyal learned ADPP for the State are present. The proposed accused Ghulam Qadir appeared. Mr Nadeem Ahmed Chachcar advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of proposed accused Ghulam Qadir which is taken on record. Police report is received which is also taken on record and copy thereof supplied to learned counsel for applicant.. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Application is dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
|
| 12 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1544/2026 | Ghulam Sarwar Shaikh VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki | Arz Muhammad(ADVO-334-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous Application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is present. His counsel is absent and sent adjournment application through his Munshi/Clerk. Order on it. Mr. Aurangzeb Waseer advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of proposed accused persons namely Abdul Ghaffar, Mst Bakhtawar, Nazeer and Gul Hassan, which is taken on record. Put off to 03.8.2026 for hearing. |
| 13 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1568/2026 | Muhammad Yaseen Abro VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous Application is received from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant and his counsel are called absent. The ADPP is present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Application is disposed of in terms of directions as mentioned in the order. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 14 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1569/2026 | Mst. Jindul Ghoto VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The ADPP for the State is present. This is not a fit case for direction to SHO concerned to record applicant's statement in terms of section 154 Cr.P.C hence application stands dismissed being meritless. However, in order to avoid breach of peace SHO concerned will feel no hesitation to take strict legal action against a person of either side whoever exposes threat to public tranquility or commit an offence. |
||
| 15 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1568/2026 | Muhammad Yaseen Abro VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous Application is received from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant and his counsel are called absent. The ADPP is present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Application is disposed of in terms of directions as mentioned in the order. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 16 | SC (Murder Trial) 284/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Essa @ Esso Shar and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Murtaza(ADVO-650-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 24/2021 Andal Sundrani |
Sessions case called. Accused (1) Moar @ Mukharo son of Meharo @ Mehar Shar (2) Raib son of Qaim Shar (3) Nadir son of Hussino alias Muhammad Hassan Shar are produced in custody. Accused Lalan alias Laloo son of Khuda Bux (5) Rajoo son of Khuda Bux Shar are present on bail. While accused (6) Muhammad Eissa alias Eisso son of Shahoo Shar and (7) Piyaro son of Hasul Shar are absconding and declared as proclaimed offenders. The documents supplied to the present accused against receipt which is taken on record (Exh5). The ADPP & DC are present. Received copy of an Order dated 08.6.2026 passed by the Honorable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur in BA No.315/2026 whereby bail application of accused Moar @ Mukhro dismissed as not pressed. The complainant Sadam Hussain son of Paripyo, Misri and Meer Mouj Ali appeared and filed applications with affidavits for withdrawing No objection affidavit dated 14.7.2026 and recording their objections on bail application, which are taken on record. The DC has submitted CTC of bail Order dated 16.6.2026, which is taken on record. The DC put his marginal note on bail application for not pressing the same. Order on it. Dismissed as not pressed.Put off to 08.8.2026 for charge. Accused produced in custody are remanded back to District Prison Ghotki along with slip for their re-production. Accused present on bail are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications U/S 265 K Cr.P.C | |||||||
| 17 | PPC 72/2026 | State VS Umar and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Talib Hussain Siyal(ADVO-276-SBC-GHT) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-353,PPC-440 | 38/2020 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Accused Bhooro Shar appeared along with an application and copy of bail Order passed in BA No.972/2026 for joining the trial. Mr Mushtaque Ahmed Solangi advocate has filed his vakalatnama and an application under section 265-K Cr.P.C on behalf of present accused. Order passed thereon. The ADPP is present and waived the notice. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. The present accused Bhooro son of Manghio Shar is acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C. He is present on bail. His bail bonds are cancelled and surety discharged. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 7/2025 |
Muhammad Arshad Rajput VS Abdul Majeed Soomro | Zulfqar Ali(ADVO-278-SBC-GHT) | Ali Bux(ADVO-568-SBC-GHT) | Disposal Execution Application No.07/2025 (allowed on 04.6.25) is called for satisfaction of decree dated 03.3.25 passed in Summary Suit No.19/2025. The Decree holder, his counsel are called absent. The Judgment Debtor is present and submitted an application for time to deposit installment of decreetal amount. Order on it. Perusal of record it appears that on 08.7.2026 the Judgment debtor had given an amount of Rs.40,000 (forty thousand) to the Judgment debtor such receipt also filed by him. Matter is adjourned to 05.08.2026 for further proceedings and compliance. |
||
| 2 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 10/2026 |
Waheed Ahmed Laghari VS Bajhi Khan Kolachi | Disposal Execution Application No.10/26 (allowed on 01.6.2026) is called for further proceeding/satisfaction of decree passed in Summary Suit No.30/25. The Decree Holder, his counsel, Judgment Debtor and his counsel are called absent. Per file on 03.7.2026 one Fateh Muhammad (the brother of Judgmenet Debtor) had given an amount of Rs.10,00,000/ Ten lac to the Decree Holder and such application was filed which is available on record and on the very day, the Decree Holder also filed an application with affidavit, which is available on record and order was passed on it. It was ordered that "Taken on record. Decree Holder present in open court stated that today he received entire decreetal amount of Rs.1000000 (One Million) from Judgment Debtor in cash and nothing is out standing against him". Since decree has fully been satisfied, therefore, R&Ps be cosigned in record after its due completion and compilation. |
||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 3 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 14/2026 |
Shafquat Ali Kalwar VS Mujeeb-ur-Rehman Chachar | Execution Application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. Judgment Debtor is absent and not yet served. Issue notice against him through court and registered post A/D, with directions to the bailiff to serve the notice by way of door pasting as well as through whatsapp 0305 5358655 on costs. Put off to 05.8.2026 for hearing. |
||||
| 4 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 13/2026 |
Waqas Ahmed Rajput VS Muhammad Anwar Rajput | Execution Application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. Order passed. Issue notice against J/D through court and registered post A/D, with directions to the bailiff to serve the notice by way of door pasting as well as through whatsapp 0305 5358655 on costs. Put off to 05.8.2026 for hearing. |
||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 43/2026 | Kashif Mashori VS Mai Aslam Mashori and others | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Succession Application is called. The counsel for applicant is present. Order passed on memo of application. Heard. Admit Register subject to legal exception, if any. Notice to otherside on costs through bailiff and courier for 05.8.2026. |
|||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 23/2026 | Habibullah Panhyar VS Mst. Shaista Kalwar | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Received Family Appeal from the court of Honourable District Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The appellant is present along with his counsel. Arguments heard. Judgment passed on separate sheet and announced. Family appeal is dismissed. Let the decree be prepared. Copies of Judgment and decree be sent to the trial court for information and compliance. |
|||