| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1355/2026 | Ali Hassan Ghoto VS The State | Cr.PC-498 | 195/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant/accused Ali Hassan Ghoto is present on interim pre-arrest bail. His counsel and ADPP for the State are present. One Abdul Hameed the father of injured/victim minor Sahib Chachar appeared and he has submitted no objection affidavit for confirmation of interim pre-arrest bail, which is taken on record. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. The interim pre-arrest bail already granted to the applicant/accused is confirmed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1391/2026 | Wazeer Ahmed Chachar and other VS The State | Cr.PC-498 | 14/2026 Andal Sundrani |
Received Criminal Bail Application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicants/accused (1) Wazeer Ahmed son of Raban @ Rabnawaz (2) Javed Ali son of Ashique Ali and (3) Imran Ali son of Wazeer Ahmed are present along with his counsel. ADPP for the State is present. Arguments heard. Order passed. Without touching the merits and de-merits of the case, ad-interim pre-arrest bail is granted to the applicants/accused in the sum of Rs:30,000/ (thirty thousand) with P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of this court. Applicants/accused are directed to join investigation/trial and submit such proof on next date. Notice to State. The deponent Khuda Bux son of Jamal Chachar resident of village Rabnawaz Chachar taluka and District Ghotki appeared along with his affidavit, original registered sale deed specifically mentioned in the report of Accountant and photo copy of CNIC for standing surety for above named accused persons in the sum of Rs:30,000/ thrity thousand each and P.R bond in the like amount. Surety accepted subject to report. The counsel for applicant has submitted statement under taking with regard to joining the investigation by accused, which is taken on record. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. The interim pre-arrest bail is confirmed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 179/2026 | Niaz Muhammad Abbasi VS Haji Ahmed Shaikh and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Sessions Case is called. The complainant Niaz Muhammad Abbasi, his witnesses and counsel Mr Jamshed Ahmed Faiz ASC are present. Accused (1) Haji Ahmed (2) Sher Dil are present on bail and accused (3) Moula Buxis absent under intimation filed by co-accused Sherdil. Order on it. Absence of accused is condoned for today. Let case be proceeded in terms of Section 540-A Cr.P.C as prayed for by the learned defence counsel. Mr. Imtiaz Ali Malano advocate for accused is also present. PW-01 Niaz Muhammad, PW-02 Sadam Hussain and Imam Deen are present and examined (Exh 03 to Exh 05). The complainant and his advocate has submitted joint statement for giving up remaining witnesses and closing the side (Exh 6). The statement of present accused recorded (Exh 7 & 8). Final arguments heard. Judgment passed on separate sheet (Exh 9) and announced. Consequently, all accused named above stand acquitted in terms of section 265-H (i) The Cr.P.C, 1898, thus their bail bonds are cancelled and surety discharged. However, complainant Niaz Muhammad Abbasi on basis of evidence brought on record has become entitled to retain and to continue peaceful physical possession of property detailed above as a final relief in terms of section 8, I.D.A, 2005 as well. Needless to say that per file in hand the concerned trial courts as well as appellate courts decided civil litigation in respect of the same property in complainant???s favour, which have not been set aside as yet. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 4 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1200/2026 | Ali Asghar Rind VS SHO PS B/Ghotki and ors | Ali Hassan Seelro(ADVO-803-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is received from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant and his counsel are called absent. The ADPP for the State is present. Report is submitted by HC-43 Shah Murad Sawand which is taken on record. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Application in hand stands disposed of with liberty to applicant, who is present to address applications to police authorities and to appear at P.S B-Section Ghotki today for legal action as assured by SHO's representative HC-43 Shah Murad Sanwand in order to unearth the truth subject to law and police rules. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
| 5 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1223/2026 | Abdul Razzaque Kolachi VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. On issuance of notice, the proposed accused put their appearance. Mr Ubedulolah Ghoto advocate appeared and he has vied his vakalatnama on behalf of proposed accused No. 01 and 02 which is taken on record. ASI Manzoor Ahmed Langah is present and he has submitted the report, which is taken on record. Consequently, applicaiton in hand stands disposed of with liberty to applicant who is present to address applications to police authorities and to appear at police station A-Section Ghotki today having original cheque ahd bank return memo, if any for legal action as assured by ASI Manzoor Ahmed Lagah on behalf of SHO concerned. Needless to say that undeniably proposed accused No.02 Muhammad Umar Ghoto is one of witness in the alleged agreement which were admittedly written by stamp vendor Arjan Dass (proposed accused No.3) thus they have no concerned with the alleged offence, which means that applicant has wrongly joined them as proposed accused. Parties are informed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1221/2026 | Assar Dass VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is absent. His counsel is present. The ADPP for the State is present. Police report is received which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to counsel for applicant. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1231/2026 | Mst. Roshna Sanghar VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received (1) Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.1231/2026 Re: Mst Roshna Sanghar Vs SHO PS A-Section and another and (2) Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.1233/2026 Re: Ramzan Sanghar Vs SHO PS A-Section and another from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. In both applications the applicants are called absent. However, Mr Muhammad Abdul Ahad counsel for applicant in Crl Misc Application No.1231/2026 and Mr. Javed Hussain Menik counsel for applicant in Crl Misc Application No.1233/2026, are present. The ADPP for the State is also present. Arguments heard. Both applications are dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1232/2026 | Ihsan Ali Sanghar VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is received from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is absent. His counsel and ADPP for the State are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Consequently, based on dicious assessment of material brought on record, I am of firm view that this is not a fit case for noticing the proposed accused for directions to register applicant's FIR, which is hereby declined because application is hopelessly meritless and tainted with malice. Application dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1233/2026 | Ramzan Sanghar VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received (1) Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.1231/2026 Re: Mst Roshna Sanghar Vs SHO PS A-Section and another and (2) Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.1233/2026 Re: Ramzan Sanghar Vs SHO PS A-Section and another from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. In both applications the applicants are called absent. However, Mr Muhammad Abdul Ahad counsel for applicant in Crl Misc Application No.1231/2026 and Mr. Javed Hussain Menik counsel for applicant in Crl Misc Application No.1233/2026, are present. The ADPP for the State is also present. Arguments heard. Both applications are dismissed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 69/2026 |
Rustam Khan Chachar and others VS Mst. Ashraf Khatoon Chachar and others | Civil Appeal is called. The appellants, their attorney Muhammad Ameen are called absent. Mr Irfan Ali Sanghar advocate for appellants appeared and he has submitted statement along with E-Stamp paper worth Rs:9000 nine thousand, which is taken on record. He has also submitted adjournment application. Order on it. Put off to 23.6.2026 for hearing/arguments. |
||||