| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 1 | Application u/s 516-A CrPc 18/2026 | Ghulam Shabeer Pitafi VS The State | Cr.PC-516-A | 173/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The ADPP for the State is present. Reports are not received. The counsel for applicant has submitted statement along with original token and photo copies of other documents, specifically mentioned in the statement, which is taken on record. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Application in hand is allowed subject to P.R bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- and deposit of original receipt, which according to applicant has been issued by Motor Registration Authority Rahimyar Khan with restriction not to alienate it or to change its look by any means till final decision of case and also to produce it before police or court of law whenever required in writing in FIR captioned above. In case of violation of any such term legal action will be taken against him. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | SC (Murder Trial) 275/2012 | The State VS Gullam Hussain and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Mahboob Ahmed(ADVO-752-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 10/2012 Khanpur Mahar |
Sessions case called. Accused (1) Mubarak Lund is produced in custody. While accused (2) Ghulam Qadir Lund already acquitted u/s 265-K Cr.P.C on 15.11.2023, accused (3) Ghulam Hussain (4) Ghulam Fareed (5) Mushtaque (6) Munwar and (7) Khawand Bux have already been acquitted in terms of compromise u/s 345(6) Cr.P.C. Accused (8) Muhammad Adam alias Adam also acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C vide an Order dated 29.01.2024. While other absconding accused (9) Akbar is proclaimed offender and his case was kept on dormant file. The ADPP for the State, Mr Pardeep Kumar Counsel for complainant are present. Mr Muhammad Achar Gabole learned ASC for present accused is absent. His junior partner is present. Mr Pardeep Kumar advocate has submitted adjournment application. Order on it. The complainant and other PWs are called absent. Process for PWs issued, returned un-served. Time extended and delivered to same process server PC Imdad Ali of PS Khanpur Mahar. This is an old case pertaining to the year 2012 and complainant is avoiding to adduce evidence, hence the learned ADPP for the State and the learned counsel for complainant are once again strictly directed to ensure evidence of all PWs be recorded on next date as per law. In case of failure further proceedings of case in hand will be stopped, subject to law. Case is adjourned to 15.06.2026 for evidence. The produced accused is remanded back to District Prison Ghotki along with slip for his re-production. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 3 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1103/2026 | Abdul Waheed Mahar VS SHO PS Khanpur Mahar and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel Mr Anwar Ali Lohar. The ADPP for the State is present. Reports are not received, although letters were issued by the office. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. It is worth observing that a Circular No.AIGP/Legal/LC/CPO/2957-64 dated:14-4-2026 has been issued by office of IGP Sindh Karachi directing all SSPs, SHOs and other concerned police officers to ensure that FIRs in cognizable cases be lodged strictly in accordance with section 154 Cr.P.C and in case of deviation from the afore mentioned instruction the matter shall viewed seriously and appropriate disciplinary action shall be taken against the concerned officer(s) under the relevant laws and rules. Consequently, application in hand stands disposed off as not pressed with liberty to applicant to appear at P.S Khanpur Mahar today for recording of his statement subject to law. Parties are informed. Let the file be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
||
| 4 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1127/2026 | Muhammad Bakhshal Ghoto VS SHO PS B/Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous Application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is absent. His advocate Mr Assadullah Ghoto appeared and submitted Statement for withdrawing the petition. Order passed on it. Takenon record. Cr.M.A in hand stands dismissed as not pressed with no permission to file afresh one. However, applicant is at liberty to address proper application to police authorities for redress of his grievances if any either in terms of 154 or 155 Cr.P.C. Announced in open court. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 5 | SC (Murder Trial) 308/2018 | The state VS Hazaro and ors | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),Ubedullah(ADVO-223-SBC-GHT) | Ajeeb Junejo(ADVO-1301-SBC-SUK) | PPC-302 | 61/2018 B-Section Ghotki |
Sessions Case called. Accused Ghulam Yaseen Bheri is present on bail granted by the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur. While accused (1) Hazaro (2) Muhammad Bux (3) Adam and (4) Muhammad Yakoub already convicted vide Judgment dated 26.04.2024. Accused (5) Ali Hassan was already acquitted vide Judgment dated 23.08.2021 and the case against absconding accused (6) Khando (7) Ghulam Mustafa (8) Pirano and (9) Mir Muhammad already kept on dormant file vide Judgment dated 23.08.2021. The ADPP for the State and Mr Atif Hussain Dharejo counsel for present accused are present. The complainant and his advocate are called absent. A formal charge against the present accused framed (Exh 58). Plea of accused recorded (Exh 59). Issue summons to P.Ws. Call for case property. Case is adjourned to 18.06.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend and bring his counsel. |
| 6 | PPC 179/2026 | Niaz Muhammad Abbasi VS Haji Ahmed Shaikh and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
|
|
| 7 | PPC 201/2026 | The State VS Habib Ali Lolai | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-364 | 3/2026 Gamero |
|
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 8 | PPC 220/2023 | The State VS Rahib Shar & others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Rashid Ahmed(ADVO-443-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 55/2023 Ubauro |
Received subsequent report in respect of accused (1) Rahib son of Qaim Shar (2) Mour alias Moryo son of Manthar Shar and (3) Nadir son of Muhammad Hassan Shar from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law vide a letter No.Cr/ 4889 dated 10.6.2026. Case is already fixed on 17.6.2026. Let the case be restored at once. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 9 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 31/2026 | Rajib Ali Mahar VS Shahban Ali Mahar and others | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Direct complaint (under Illegal Dispossession Act) is called. The complainant is present along with his counsel Mr Nadir Ali Chachar. The Mukhtiarkar Revenue Ghotki and SHO PS Sarhad have submitted their respective letters for time to conduct the inquiry and submission of report. Orders thereon. Put off to 17.6.2026 for receipts of reports. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 11/2026 |
Muhammad Hayyat Ghoto VS Abdul Rehman Ghoto and another | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | |
|||