| ( ! ) Notice: Undefined variable: str_fixation_td in C:\wamp\www\cfms_dc_v26\public_ocp.php on line 556 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Call Stack | ||||
| # | Time | Memory | Function | Location |
| 1 | 0.0004 | 403456 | {main}( ) | ...\public_ocp.php:0 |
| 2 | 0.0311 | 407368 | public_ocp->get_ocp_screen( ) | ...\public_ocp.php:678 |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2116/2026 | Aijaz Mahar VS The State | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-302 | 78/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
On 14.9.2026 M/S Syed Ghulam Rasool Shah and Sikandar Ali Shah advocates has sent their joint power along with bail application under section 497 Cr.P.C and it was ordered that "put up with case file on date of hearing". Today bail application taken up. M/S Syed Ghulam Rasool Shah and Sikandar Ali Shah advocates, complainant Abdul Jabbar Mahar, Munshi/Assistant to advocate for complainant and learned ADPP for the State are present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Undeniably the learned Trial Court declined post arrest bail to accused Aijaz and another on merit for reasons detailed in order dated:17-8-2026 and no fresh ground has been set forth so this court lacks jurisdiction to re-appreciate and discuss merit, which otherwise is evident from the impugned order that FIR and 161 Cr.p.C statements prima facie speak about nomination and participation of present accused as well, which finds confirmation and corroboration from post mortem report. 06.?????????????????????????????????????? Consequenly, I feel no hesitation to dismiss second post arrest bail application being in-competent and not maintainable as per law. Needless to say that applicant at the most may seek bail ,if so advised from the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 2 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1924/2026 | Niaz Ahmed Soomro VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous Application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according law. The applicant and her counsel are absent despite several calls. On the contrary learned ADPP for the State is present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Consequently I allow Cr. Misc. Application in hand with direction to official respondents to provide legal protection to applicant and her family subject to law and rules without interfering with or influencing their civil/family rights or personal issues, if any and also to ensure that no harassment or interference be caused or police help be provided to either of parties in respect of alleged civil/family dispute. Needless to say that this order will not mean to prevent police authorities from taking legal action against applicant or any member of her family if found involved in any criminal act/offence. |
||
| 3 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1925/2026 | Gulsher Shaikh VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received R and Ps of above mentioned criminal Misc; Application u/s 22-A(6)(i( Cr.PC by way of transfer from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge, Ghotki, for disposal according to law. Order on it. Call report from SHO concerned for 19.9.2026. |
||
| 4 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1926/2026 | Sajid Ali Chachar VS SHO PS Sarhad and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Received R and Ps of above mentioned criminal Misc; Application u/s 22-A(6)(i( Cr.PC by way of transfer from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge, Ghotki, for disposal according to law. Order on it. Notice to proposed accused. Call report for 21.9.2026. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 5 | SC (Murder Trial) 366/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Shahban Mahar and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 78/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Sessions Case called. Accused (1) Muhammad Shahban (2) Ghulam Ali (3) Younis @ Jeal @ Mirchoo sons of Allahdad (4) Aijaz son of Muhammad Yousif all by caste Mahar are produced by the jail authority of District Prison Ghotki THROUGH VIDEO LINK. Accused (5) Sikandar Ali son of Ajmal Mahar is present on after arrest bail granted by the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II Mirpur Mathelo in BA No.15052026, while accused (6) Bahawal son of Shamsuddin Mahar is present on interim pre-arrest bail granted by the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II Mirpur Mathelo as appearing from a letter No.594 dated 22.7.2026. The learned ADPP for the State, Complainant Abdul Jabbar Mahar, Syed Ghulam Rasool Shah counsel for accused Sikandar Ali and Bahawal are present. M/S Ali Asghar Panhyar and Shoukat Ali Daudpoto advocates appeared and filed joint their vakalatnama on behalf of accused (1) Muhammad Shahban (2) Ghulam Ali (3) Younis @ Jeal @ Mirchoo sons of Allahdad (4) Aijaz son of Muhammad Yousif all by caste Mahar, which is taken on record. Mr Jamshed Ahmed Faiz counsel for complainant is absent. The bail application No.2116/2026 in respect of accused Aijaz Mahar heard and declined vide order passed today in the said bail application which has been tagged with instant sessions case. Proceedings resumed. Receipt dated 21.8.2026 under section 265-C Cr.P.C placed at Exh 01. Vakalatnama of Syed Ghulam Rasool Shah counsel for accused Sikandar Ali and Bahawal placed at Exh.02, Vakalatnama of M/S Ali Asghar Panhyar and Shoukat Ali Daudpoto advocates for accused (1) Muhammad Shahban (2) Ghulam Ali (3) Younis @ Jeal @ Mirchoo sons of Allahdad (4) Aijaz son of Muhammad Yousif all by caste Mahar placed at Exh:03. Today a formal charge under section 265-D Cr.P.C framed (Exh 4). Pleas of accused recorded (Exh 4/A to Exh.f). The complainant Abdul Jabbar has submitted an application with regard to production of witnesses, which is taken on record. Put off to 22.9.2026 for evidence. Accused present on bail are directed to attend. Accused Bahawal is further directed to produce the certified true copy of bail confirm order. Accused/UTPs so produced through video link have been informed through jail authority, with further direction to jail authority of Distrit Prison Ghotki to produce them on the next date of hearing. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Next Hearing Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | |||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2116/2026 |
Aijaz Mahar VS The State | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-302 | |