| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 18/2026 | Mir Hassan Korai VS Hazaro Korai and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Direct complaint (IDA) is called. The complainant is present along with his counsel. Accused Hazaro has moved an application with intimation that he is not in possession of S.No.307, which is taken on record. The proposed accused Wali Muhammad and Imdad Ali has also submitted similar type application which is also taken on record. The SHO PS Sarhad and Mukhtiarkar Revenue Ghotki have submitted their respective reports bearing No.571 dated 14.5.26 and bearing No.STM/893 dated 12.5.2026 (respectively) which are taken on record and copies thereof provided to the counsel for applicant. Mr Ashfaque Ahmed Kolachi advocate has filed his power on behalf of present accused, which is taken on record. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Consequently, based on reasons and documents brought on record I am of firm view that present complaint against proposed accused Hazaro and others is meritless and complainant???s actual grievances, if any are against his own brother-in-law Manik Korai so there are no grounds sufficient enough to take cognizance against present accused and complaint in hands stands dismissed in terms of section 203 Cr.P.C with liberty to complainant to seek civil remedy against Manik Korai, if so advised ??subject to law. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 849/2026 | Imam Bux Lashari and others VS The State | Pardeep Kumar() | Abdul Sattar Mahar(ADVO-485-SBC-GHT),DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 33/2026 Khanpur Mahar |
Received bail application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki vide his office letter No.Cr/ 3948 dated 14.5.2026 for disposal according to law, which isfixed today. The applicants/accused Imam Bux (2) Moula Bux sons of Jeewan (3) Sadiq Ali (4) Muhammad Akram sons of Darya Khan @ Duroo (5) Meer Hassan son of Mahboob and (6) Hamza Khan @ Hamzo son of Muhammad Mossa @ Mooso are present on interim prearrest bail. The complainant Ahmed Deen, his counsel Mr. Abdul Sattar Mahar, Counsel for applicants/accused Mr Pardeep Kumar and ADPP for the state are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. The interim pre-arrest bail is confirmed. Parties are informed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 849/2026 | Imam Bux Lashari and others VS The State | Pardeep Kumar() | Abdul Sattar Mahar(ADVO-485-SBC-GHT),DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 33/2026 Khanpur Mahar |
Received bail application from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki vide his office letter No.Cr/ 3948 dated 14.5.2026 for disposal according to law, which isfixed today. The applicants/accused Imam Bux (2) Moula Bux sons of Jeewan (3) Sadiq Ali (4) Muhammad Akram sons of Darya Khan @ Duroo (5) Meer Hassan son of Mahboob and (6) Hamza Khan @ Hamzo son of Muhammad Mossa @ Mooso are present on interim prearrest bail. The complainant Ahmed Deen, his counsel Mr. Abdul Sattar Mahar, Counsel for applicants/accused Mr Pardeep Kumar and ADPP for the state are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. The interim pre-arrest bail is confirmed. Parties are informed. File be consigned in the record room after its due completion and compilation. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 47/2026 | The State VS Abdul Ghani Ludhar and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 34/2025 Andal Sundrani |
Sessions Case called. Accused (1) Shafique Ahmed @ Shafique s/o Abdul Ghani Ludhar (2) Ali Asghar son of Budhal Ludhar and (3) Jam Baroach @ Baroach son of Budhal Ludhar are produced in custody. Accused (4) Abdul Ghani Ludhar is present on bail. While accused (5) Sardar alias Sardar Ali and (6) Rafique are absconding and declared as proclaimed offender. The learned ADPP for the State is present. On issuance and return of notice which is taken on record, the complainant Qaim Deen appeared and he has submitted an application with affidavit for keeping the case in abeyance till final MLCs reports. Order on it. Taken on record. Mr. Ali Hassan Seelro advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant which is taken on record. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Consequently case in hand is kept in abeyance for time being so that complainant along with the injured P.Ws may appear before Special Medical Board for decision of fate of MLCs after examination of alleged injured and appreciation of documents by the board. Accused Abdul Ghani who is present on bail will continue to enjoy it till further order and accused Shafique Ahmed, Ali Asghar and Jam Baroch urif Baroch will be released subject to furnishing requied surety. Needless to say that surety will remain intact for a period of a year and complainant may seek restoration of case for trial whenever he deems fit after decision of fate of MLCs by concerned Medical Board. an order. The applicant/suretyRafique Ahmed son of Moula Bux Memon r/o village Ramzan Memon taluka and district Ghotki appeared and he has submitted affidavit along with Spl SC in the sum of Rs.150,000 and photo copy of his CNIC for standing surety of above named three accused/UTP. Order on it. Send for verification. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 5 | PPC 176/2023 | The State VS Badeehal Shar & others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-324 | 84/2022 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
On declining Application for pre-arrest bail bearing No.907/2026, accused Lal Dino @ Laloo @ Lallan @ Fouji son of Khuda Bux Shar r/o village Haji Khan Gehalpur Taluka and District Kashmore, having CNIC No.43504-0482630-1) taken in to custody and remanded to District Prison Ghotki vide a Remand Warrant dated 07.5.2026. Today his subsequent report is received from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki vide a letter No.Cr/ 3960 dated 12.5.2026 which is tagged in the main file. Accused Lal Dino @ Laloo @ Lallan @ Fouji son of Khuda Bux Shar is produced in custody. His advocate is present and he has submitted an application under section 265-K Cr.P.C and he put his note on bail application for not pressing the same. Bail application is disposed of as not pressed. ADPP is present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Accused Lal Dino @ Laloo @ Lallan @ Fouji son of Khuda Bux Shar is acquitted under section 265-K Cr.P.C. He is produced in custody and remanded back to District Prison Ghotki from his release in this case. Acquittal slip has been prepared and sent through proper channel. However the case against proclaimed offender is already fixed on 06.08.2026. |
|
| 6 | SC (Murder Trial) 128/2026 | Ghulam Mustafa Khoso VS Inspector Muhammad Ali Mahar and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | / |
Sessions Case No.128/2026 (outcomes of Direct Complaint No.39/24) is called. The complainant Ghulam Mustafa Khoso is present. His counsel Mr Ubedullah Ghoto is absent. Junior partner to counsel for complainant is present. Accused (1) Inspector Muhammad Ali Mahar (2) ASI Anwar Ali Shaikh (3) PC Ahmed Ali Lakhan and (4) PC Noor Hassan are present. While accused (5) ASI Ali Akbar Malik (6) PC Israr Ahmed (7) Rahib Ali (8) Sepoy Muhammad Saqlain and (9) Sepoy Azmat Khan are called absent. The advocates for accused are present. On 20.04.2026 a certified true copy of an Order dated 13.04.2026 passed in Cr. Revision Application No. 29 of 2026 Re: Muhammad Ali Mahar and others Vs The State and another by Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur, was received. The Honourable High Court has been pleased to suspend the impugned Order dated 26.03.2026 with further directions that "As any corrosive action which is against that applicants are also discharged". The learned counsel for complainant is put on notice to assist this court on the point that as to why further proceedings be not stopped of this case till final disposal of criminal revision application by the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur. Put off to 18.06.2026 for hearing on the point of stopping the proceedings of instant sessions case and receipt of further Order from the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur. The present parties are informed. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 157/2026 | Mst. Jameelan Soomro VS Ali Raza Soomro and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Sessions Case called. The complainant Mst Jameelan is present along with his counsel Mr. Naveed Ahmed Mahar. Accused (1) Ali Raza (2) Abdul Razak aliasJake Ali (3) Sanaullah (4) Muhammad Ali (5) Nouman Ali (6) Meer Hassan alias Masoo and (7) Matiullah alias Agha Pathan are present on bail. Documents supplied to the accused persons against joint receipt which is taken on record (Exh 01) Mr Lal Bux Mahar advocate for accused Sanaullah and Muhammad Ali is present and he has submitted fresh vakalatnama on behalf of accused No.03, 04, 06, 07 and 08, which is taken on record, while accused No.01, 02 and 4 did not engage an advocate. Put off to 19.05.2026, for charge. Both parties are informed and directed to attend. |
|