| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1206/2026 | Allah Wadhayo Machhi & another VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498,Gambling Act -Section 5-A | 66/2026 B-Section Ghotki |
||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1205/2026 | Sannaullah @ Sono Mirani & another VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498,Gambling Act -Section 5-A | 66/2026 B-Section Ghotki |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | SC (Murder Trial) 275/2012 | The State VS Gullam Hussain and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Mahboob Ahmed(ADVO-752-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 10/2012 Khanpur Mahar |
|
| 4 | SC (Murder Trial) 327/2022 | The state VS Sardar Khan and ors | Anwar Ali(ADVO-1059-SBC-GHT),DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Ali Raza Kalwar(ADVO-237-B-SBC-GHT),Muneer Ahmed(ADVO-411-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 22/2022 B-Section Ghotki |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 5 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 997/2026 | Sadaruddin Pitafi VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and ors | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
|
|
| 6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1003/2026 | Qurban Arain VS SHO PS Ubauro and ors | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present and his counsel Mr Mushtaque Ahmed Kolachi is called absent. Mr Zulfiqar Ali Ghoto advocate appeared and he has submitted his vakalatnama on behalf of applicant, which is taken on record. Report from SHO PS Ubauro has already been received. The proposed accused No.03 and 04 are called absent. Their counsel Mr Tarique Ali Panhwar and ADPP for the State are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet and announced. Consequently application stands dismissed being meritless and tainted with malice. However, applicant is at liberty to address a complaint against the concerned bank officers to the competent Bank authorities or Worthy Banking Mohtasib, if so advised subject to law and rules. |
|
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1058/2026 | Abdul Qudoos @ Sajid Jameel Malik VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
||