| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2381/2026 | Ali Sarwar Balkani VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-420 | 239/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Received criminal bail application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law which is already fixed on 27.10.2026. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 2 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2144/2026 | Mst. Ameena Labano VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Abdul Qadir (ADVO-945-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present along with her counsel. The learned ADPP for the State is present. Police report is received which is kept on record and copy thereof supplied to counsel for applicant. Argument heard. Order passed and announced. The applicant seeks direction in terms of section 22-A sub-section 6 (i) Cr.P.C to SHO concerned to record her statement in terms of section 154 Cr.P.C against her son Ghulam Shabeer for the alleged offence of murderous threats, maltreatement and damage to house hold articles being a drugs addict on 20-10-2026 at 07-00 p.m. Negative police report has been taken on record and copy thereof also supplied to the learned counsel for applicant who did not controvert it but prayed that proposed accused being a drugs addict is liable to legal action but SHO refused. Consequently, based on judicious assessment of material brought on record I am of firm view that this is not a fit case for lodging of her FIR hence prayer for recording her statement is hereby declined. However, SHO concerned is directed to provide legal protection to applicant and her husband and legal action be taken against proposed accused, if he is found drugs addict, subject to law and Police Rules. |
| 3 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2142/2026 | Kamran Ali Kalwar VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Naveed Ahmed (ADVO-858-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is called. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The learned ADPP for the State is present. The proposed accused appeared on notice. Mr Shafique Ahmed Kalwar, the learned advocate appeared and filed his vakalatnama on behalf of proposed accused which is taken on record. The SHO PS A-Section Ghotki sent his report which is taken on record and copy thereof supplied to counsel for applicant. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced.?? The applicant seeks direction in terms of section 22-A sub-section 6 (i) Cr.P.C to SHO concerned to record his statement in terms of section 154 Cr.P.C against his uncle Waqar Ahmed Kalwar for the alleged offence punishable u/s 489-F PPC. This Court undeniably in capacity of an Ex-Officio Justice of Peace can not conduct a detailed inquiry or investigation in respect of allegations and counter allegations, which can only be thrashed out only during investigation which commences after lodging FIR as per law. Moreover, applicant???s version is also based on certain documents including a cheque along with a return memo. Consequently, based on tentative judicious assessment of material brought on record I am of firm view that applicant???s version requires incorporation followed by fair investigation in accordance with scheme of law visualized under Cr.P.C thus application in hand stands disposed of with direction to SHO concerned to record applicant???s version in terms of section 154 Cr.P.C in order to set law into motion. I.O will not arrest accused until and unless he collects sufficient incriminating material against accused. |
| 4 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2153/2026 | Jam Malik VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous Application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The learned ADPP for the State is present and waived the notice. Argument heard. Order passed and announced. Protection is allowed in terms of order. |
||
| 5 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2155/2026 | Aijaz-ul-Haque Rajput VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous Application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The learned ADPP for the State is present and waived the notice. Argument heard. Order passed and announced. Protection is allowed in terms of order. |
||
| 6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2154/2026 | Sakina khatoon Channa VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Received Criminal Miscellaneous Application from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is present along with his counsel. The learned ADPP for the State is present and waived the notice. Argument heard. Order passed and announced. Protection is allowed in terms of order. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 142/2026 | The State VS Waheed Ahmed Shah | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) | 222/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Received Sessions case from the court of Honorable District Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The case is already fixed on 05-11-2026. |
||
| 8 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 143/2026 | The State VS Waqar Ahmed Gadani | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 73/2026 Belo Mirpur |
Received Sessions case from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The case is already fixed on 03.11.2026. |
||
| 9 | PPC 490/2026 | The State VS Wazeer Shar and others | PPC-324 | 103/2025 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Received Sessions case from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The case is already fixed on 03.11.2026. |
||
| 10 | PPC 489/2026 | The State VS Waqar Ahmed Gadani | PPC-398 | 72/2026 Belo Mirpur |
Received Sessions case from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The case is already fixed on 03.11.2026. |
||
| 11 | PPC 488/2026 | The State VS Irshad @ Irshoo Gadani and others | PPC-399 | 7/2026 Jarwar |
Received Sessions case from the court of Honorable Sessions Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The case is already fixed on 10.11.2026. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 12 | PPC 484/2026 | The State VS Bachal @ Bacho Bozdar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 43/2022 Khanpur Mahar |
Sessions Case called. Accused (1) Dilawar Hussain son of Hazoor Bux @ Qalandar Bux Bozdar (2) Sanhro son of Muhammad Hassan @ Bhahoo Bozdar are present on bail granted by the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Ghotki vide an Orders dated: 11-05-2026 and 19-06-2026 in BA Nos. 874 and 1323 of 2026 (respectively). Accused (3) Bachal @ Bachoo son of Chibhar (4) Ganhwar son of Sanhro and (5) Amjad son of Sachal Bozdar all by cast Bozdar r/o Mandhal Bozdar taluka Mirpur Mathelo are absconding and declared as proclaimed offender. The learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr Naveed Ahmed Samejo, the learned counsel for accused Sanhro and Mr. Abdul Shakoor Mirbahar, the learned counsel for accused Dilawar Hussain are also present. The necessary documents supplied to the present accused such receipt obtained from them and kept on record (Exh 4). Argument heard. Order passed and announced. Accused (1) Dilawar Hussain son of Hazoor Bux @ Qalandar Bux Bozdar (2) Sanhro son of Muhammad Hassan @ Bhahoo Bozdar are acquitted under section 265-K read with section 265-D Cr.P.C. They are present on bail, their bail bonds are cancelled and surety discharged. While the case against proclaimed offenders namely Bachal @ Bachoo son of Chibhar, Ganhwar son of Sanhro and Amjad son of Sachal Bozdar all by cast Bozdar be kept on dormant file till their arrest or surrender. However, perpetual against them be issued for 07.01.2026. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 13 | PPC 224/2017 | The state VS Zulqarnain and ors | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Anwar Ali(ADVO-1059-SBC-GHT),Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-325A-SBC-GHT),Pardeep Kumar() | PPC- 459 | 329/2016 A-Section Ghotki |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 18/2026 |
Muhammad Aslam Mahar VS Mumtaz Ali Bhutto | Nawab Ali(ADVO-1073-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Execution Application is called. The Decree Holder is present along with his counsel. On issuance and return of process (Exh. 03 & Exh 04), the Judgment Debtor put his appearance and filed adjournment application with affidavit (Exh5). Order on it. Adjourned with direction to file objection in person or through a learned counsel on next date as per law. Put off to 29.10.2026 for filing objection by J.D and hearing. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 25/2026 |
Syed Sajjad Ali Shah VS Liaquat Ali Malano and others | Abdul Mujeeb(ADVO-1585-SBC-SUK) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Civil Revision Application is called. The applicant is present. His counsel is absent. The learned DDA for official respondents No.4 to 7 is present. The respondent No.01 Liaquat Ali Malano is absent. Mr Zubair Ahmed Laghari, claiming to be the junior partner of Respondent Liaquat Ali Malano appeared on his behalf and shought adjournment which is granted. Per diary dated 17-10-2026 service upon respondents was held good and the matter was adjourned for their appearance and to defend civil revision application in hand but only respondent No.07-B Imam Bux, who claimed to be son of Ghous Bux Channa and attorney of rest respondents No:7-A, 7-C to 7-E. Mr. Liaquat Al;I Malano respondent No.01 got filed CTA in which comments have already been submitted on 22-10-2026. The respondents Wali Muhammad and Shamsuddin Chachar despite service and ample opportunity did not appear to contest or to defend civil revision application in hand which means that they have nothing to reply or defend in this regard, hence they are hereby proceeded ex-parte for expeditious proceedings and timely disposal, because mere filing of transfer application does not per se operate as a stay. More over, the respondent Imdad Deen Channa filed objections along with supporting affidavit and certain CTC documents which are taken on record and copies thereof supplied to applicant as well as Mr. Zubar Ahmed Laghari and learned DDA. Moreover Mukhtiarkar Revenue-City Survey Officer Ghotki did not abid by direction contained in this court???s Order dated 17-10-2026 and the junior Clerk Mr Muhammad Moosa Dreho appeared and sought time, which shows that the concerned Mukhtiarkar has no regard for this court order and act on his behalf amount to gross misconduct. However, time is hereby granted-extended as last chance to ensure compliance and to appear in person on next date. In case of failure strict legal action might be taken against Mukhtiarkar Revenue-City Survey Officer Ghotki in accordance with law. By consent adjourned to 28-10-2026 for further legal proceedings-hearing. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 3 | Summary Suits 44/2026 |
Makhan Mahar VS Wazeer Ali Malhan | Shahid Aziz(ADVO-1459-SBC-GHT) | Muneer Ahmed(ADVO-411-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit called. The plaintiff, his counsel, defendant Wazeer Ali and his counsel are present. Argument heard. Order passed and announced. Leave to defend application is declined. Consequently the suit of plaintiff is decreed in terms of Judgment passed separately. Let the decree be followed. |
||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 137/2026 |
Jam Chachar VS Sher Muhammad Chachar and others | Family appeal is called. The appellant and his counsel have been called absent despite several calls. It is now 02:30 pm. In the interest of justice, family appeal is adjourned to 27-10-2026 for arguments on admission point. |
||||
| 5 | C.M.A. (Civil Misc. Appeals) 16/2026 |
Smt. Lellan Bai and others VS Sudham Chand and others | Shewak Ram Valecha(ADVO-608-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is called. The appellant is present along with his counsel. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. CMA is dismissed. Let the copy of Order be sent to the trial court for information and compliance. |
||
| 6 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 138/2026 |
Nazeer Ahmed Kalar VS Muhammad Akram Khambhro and others | Received civil appeal from the court of Honorable Disrict Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The appellant and counsel for appellants are present. Arguments heard. Judgment passed on separate sheet. Civil appeal is dismissed summarily in terms of judgment. Decree be followed. Let the compared copies of judgment and decree be sent to the trial court for information and compliance. |
||||
| 7 | C.M.A. (Civil Misc. Appeals) 17/2026 |
Abdul Ghaffar Kalwar VS Manzoor Ahmed Wadhyo and others | Received civil miscellaneous appeal from the court of Honorable Disrict Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The appellant and counsel for appellants are present. Arguments heard. Order passed on separate sheet. Civil miscellaneous appeal is dismissed summarily in terms of Order. Let the compared copies of judgment and decree be sent to the trial court for information and compliance. |
||||
| 8 | Summary Suits 49/2026 |
Abbas Ali Buriro VS Muhammad Farooque Qureshi | Received summary suit from the court of Honorable Disrict Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The plaintiff is present along with his counsel. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced. Application u/s 5 of Limitation Act is dismissed, and plaint in the summary suit is rejected u/o 7 rule 11 (a) & (d) CPC with no Order as to costs. plaiJudgment passed on separate sheet. Civil appeal is dismissed summarily in terms of judgment. Decree be followed. Let the compared copies of judgment and decree be sent to the trial court for information and compliance. |
||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 64/2026 | Fozia Channa VS Sakeena Khatoon Channa and others | Abdul Rasheed (ADVO-936-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | ||
| 2 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 63/2026 | Mai Rabia Tagar VS The General Public and others | Naveed Ahmed (ADVO-958-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-278 | ||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 3 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 33/2026 | Rehan Abdul Sallam Malik VS Mst. Tahmina Malik and another | Muhammad Akram(ADVO-180-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Family appeal is called. The appellant and his counsel have been called absent despite several calls. It is now 02:30 pm. In the interest of justice, family appeal is adjourned to 27-10-2026 for arguments on admission point. |
|
| 4 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 32/2026 | Rehan Abdul Sallam Malik VS Mst. Tahmina Malik | Muhammad Akram(ADVO-180-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Family appeal is called. The appellant and his counsel have been called absent despite several calls. It is now 02:30 pm. In the interest of justice, family appeal is adjourned to 27-10-2026 for arguments on admission point. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Succession Miscellaneous Applications | |||||||
| 5 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 65/2026 | Shahida Bozdar VS Yasmeen Bozdar and others | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372 | Received succession application from the court of Honorable District Judge Ghotki for disposal according to law. The applicant is present along with her counsel. Notice to parties. Call for reports hearing 30-102026. |
|||