Case Flow Management System

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE / ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE I, PANO AQIL : 01-DEC-2025

S.NO.	CASE NO	NAME OF PARTIES	ADVOCATES		UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS	FIR No.	Hearing Status
S.NO.	CASE NO	NAME OF PARTIES	Party Side 1	Party Side 2	UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS	FIR No.	Hearing Status

S.NO.	CASE NO	NAME OF PARTIES	ADVOCATES		UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS	FIR No.	Hearing Status
S.NO.	CASE NO	NAME OF PARTIES	Party Side 1	Party Side 2	UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS	FIR No.	Hearing Status

1	CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 160/2025	The State VS Rehmatullah	DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-SUK)		Special Case Narcotics -9(3)-E CNS Act	49/2025 Dadloi	Case called. Accused Rehmatullah is present on bail. ADPP for the state and counsel for accused are present. Summon to P.Ws was issued and same returned duly served. PW/Mashir PC3685 Bari Bux and HC-Noor Muhammad are in attendance. Evidence of PW/Mashir Bari Bux is recorded at Ex.5. Evidence of HC-Noor Muhammad is recorded at Ex.6. ADPP for the state filed statement for closing the side at Ex. No. 07. Order on it. Put off to 02.12.2025 for statement of accused. Accused is directed to attend.
2	PPC 529/2025	The State VS Gul Bahar and ors	DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-SUK)		PPC-324	94/2025 Baiji Sharif	Case called. Accused Gul Bahar and Muhammad Sharif are present on bail. ADPP for the state and counsel for accused are present. Summons to I.O/ASI Nisar Ahmed Kalwar was issued same returned duly un-served upon him, time extended and handed over to process server. Case property produced by SHO of concerned police station and same is returned to concerned police station with directions to produce again on given date. Put off to 08.12.2025 for evidence. Accused are present on bail are directed to attend on the given date.
3	Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 530/2025	The State VS Gul Bahar	DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-SUK)		SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a)	95/2025 Baiji Sharif	Case called. Accused Gul Bahar is present on bail. ADPP for the state and counsel for accused are present. Summons to I.O/ASI Nisar Ahmed Kalwar was issued same returned duly un-served upon him, time extended and handed over to process server. Case property produced by SHO of concerned police station and same is returned to concerned police station with directions to produce again on given date. Put off to 08.12.2025 for evidence. Accused are present on bail is directed to attend on the given date.
4	PPC 552/2025	The State VS Ghulam Murtaza & ors	DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-SUK)		PPC-324	212/2025 Pano Akil	Today Case called. Accused Ghulam Murtaza, Ranjhan, Khadim Hussain and Shabir Shah are present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Complainant is present. Mr.Fiaz Ali Shaikh Advocate filed his power on behalf of complainant. Accused Ranjhan and Shahbir Shah filed application for excusing late coming. Order on it. Complainant filed applications u/s 345-(2) Cr.P.C along with his affidavit. Order passed on it. Complainant and accused person filed application u/s 345-(6) Cr.P.C along with their affidavits. Order passed on it. Arguments heard from all sides. Order passed on both applications. Both applications is allowed. Accused Ghulam Murtaza, Ranjhan, Khadim Hussain and Shabir Shah are acquitted u/s 345(6) Cr.P.C, they are on bail, their bail bond stands cancelled and sureties are discharged.
5	CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 176/2025	The State VS Hamzo Kalwar	DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-SUK)		Special Case Narcotics -6/9-B	83/2025 Baiji Sharif	Case called. Accused Hamzo is present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Summons to Complainant and P.Ws was issued same returned duly served upon the Complainant and P.W PC Abdul Jabbar Mangi and they are in attendance and bound down. Mr. Abdul Qayoom Advocate is appear and filed his power on behalf of accused along with adjournment application. Order thereon. Evidence of Complainant HC-Muhammad Ali is recorded at Ex. No.03, he produced entry, Mashirnama & FIR at Ex. No. 03-A to 03-C. Cross examination is reserved. Evidence of Complainant PC-Abdul Jabbar is recorded at Ex. No.04, he produced Mashirnama at Ex. No. 04-A. Cross examination is reserved. Case property produced by SHO of PS Baiji Shareef and same returned to concerned police station with directions to produce again on given date. Put off to 03.12.2025 for evidence, office to repeat summons to rest witnesses. Accused is directed to attend.

6	Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 601/2025	The State VS Tufail Ahmed	DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-SUK)	ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK)	SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A	175/2025 Pano Akil	Case called. Accused Tufail Ahmed is present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Imtiaz Ahmed Junejo Advocate is appeared and filed his power on behalf of accused Tufail Ahmed along with statement that he will file CTC of bail order of accused on the next date of hearing. Order on it. Charge framed against accused at Ex.02. Plea of accused is recorded at Ex.2-A, In which he is pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Put off to 08.12.2025 for evidence, office to issue summons to complainant and witnesses and so also call for case property. Accused present on bail and directed to attend.
7	PPC 600/2025	The State VS Tufail Ahmed & ors	DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-SUK)	ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK)	PPC-324	174/2025 Pano Akil	Case called. Accused Tufail Ahmed and Muhammad Asif are present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Imtiaz Ahmed Junejo Advocate is appeared and filed his power on behalf of accused Tufail Ahmed and Muhammad Asif along with statement that he will file CTC of bail order of accused on the next date of hearing. Order thereon. Charge framed against accused at Ex.02. Pleas of accused are recorded at Ex.2-A and 2-B, In which they are pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Put off to 08.12.2025 for evidence, office to issue summons to complainant and witnesses and so also call for case property. Accused present on bail and directed to attend.
8	Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 602/2025	The State VS Muhammad Asif	DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-SUK)	ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK)	SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A	176/2025 Pano Akil	Case called. Accused Muhammad Asif is present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Imtiaz Ahmed Junejo Advocate is appeared and filed his power on behalf of accused Muhammad Asif along with statement that he will file CTC of bail order of accused on the next date of hearing. Order on it. Charge framed against accused at Ex.02. Plea of accused is recorded at Ex.2-A, In which he is pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Put off to 08.12.2025 for evidence, office to issue summons to complainant and witnesses and so also call for case property. Accused present on bail and directed to attend.
9	PPC 605/2025	The State VS Sajid Ali & ors	DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-SUK)		PPC-114,PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-504	5/2025 Gudpur	Case called. Accused Sajid Ali, Abdul Waheed, Abdul Hafeez and Saddam Hussain are present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Counsel for accused is present and submitted CTC of bail order of accused Sajid Ali, Abdul Waheed & Abdul Hafeez. Charge framed against at Exh.2. Pleas of accused are recorded at Exh.2-A to 2-D, In which they are pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Put off to 08.12.2025 for evidence, office to issue summons to complainant and witnesses and so also case property. Accused are directed to attend. Accused Saddam Hussain is directed to produce CTC of bail order on the next date of hearing.

S.NO.	CASE NO	NAME OF PARTIES	ADVOCATES		Hearing Status
S.NO.	CASE NO	NAME OF PARTIES	Party Side 1	Party Side 2	Hearing Status

1	C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 8/2024	Muhammad Siddique Pathan VS M/S China Estate Corporation Engineering	Khan Muhammad(ADVO-1715-SBC-SUK)	ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-SHK)	Today matter is fixed further arguments of learned counsel for D/H as well as learned counsel for J/D (if any). Execution application called. Decree holder is called absent and his junior counsel is present. Attorney of J/D and his counsel are called absent. Main R&Ps of F CS Suit No.112/2019 Re-Muhammad Siddique VS federation of Pakistan and others is lying in the court of Honorable 2nd Additional District Judge Sukkur. It is necessary and just to hear the learned counsel for the decree holder on the question of territorial jurisdiction and made of execution accordingly. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. The execution application is allowed. The DH is directed to take steps for enforcement and satisfaction of the decree through any legally permissible mode under order XXI CPC.