| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 733/2024 | The State VS Zulfiqar Rind | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 239/2024 Kazi Ahmed |
Case called. Accused Zulfiqar Ali Rind is present in custody, produced by Jail Authorities of District Jail Shaheed Benazir Abad. ADPP for State is present. Advocate for accused Mr. Naeem Ahmed Mangi is present. No PW is present. Main case is adjourned and Case put off to: 04.11.2026, for evidence. Issue BWs against all PWs through SHO Concerned. Call case property from concerned PS. Accused remanded back to concerned Jail Authorities. |
| 2 | SC (Murder Trial) 734/2024 | The State versus VS Ghulam Qadir Rind and others | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-THT),Ali Raza(ADVO-533-SBC-NWB) | Naeem Ahmed(ADVO-636-SBC-NWB) | PPC-302,PPC-337-H,PPC-504 | 230/2024 Kazi Ahmed |
Case called. Accused Ghulam Qadir Rind and Zulfiqar Rind are present in custody, produced by Jail Authorities of District Jail Shaheed Benazir Abad. While accused persons Abdul Kareem and Ghulam Murtaza called absent, they are shown as absconders in the challan sheet and having been already declared as P.Os. ADPP for State is present. Mr. Naeem Ahmed Mangi Advocate of both accused persons is present. Mr. Ali Raza Channa Advocate of complainant is not present. The Complainant Mujahid is present and file application for adjournment. Order passed thereon. Allowed as last chance. Case put off to: 04.11.2026, for evidence. The complainant is bound to bring his witness on next date without fail. Issue BWs upon the remaining official PWs through SHO Concerned. Both accused are remanded back to concerned Jail Authorities. |
| 3 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 47/2025 | The State Versus VS Baloch Khan Rodhrani | ADPP() | Naeem Ahmed(ADVO-636-SBC-NWB) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 259/2024 A-Section Nawabshah |
Case called. Accused Balach Khan is present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate of accused Mr. Naeem Ahmed Mangi is present. No PW is present. The Main case is adjourned and Case put off to: 04.11.2026, for evidence. Issue NBW against remaining all official PWs through SHO Concerned. Call property. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 4 | SC (Murder Trial) 48/2025 | The State Versus VS Khalid Hussain Rind & Others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI),Altaf Hussain Chandio(ADVO-861-SBC-NWP) | Naeem Ahmed(ADVO-636-SBC-NWB) | PPC-302,PPC-324,PPC-506 | 223/2024 A-Section Nawabshah |
Case called. Accused Khalid Hussain Rind is present in custody, produce by Jail Authorities of District Jail Shaheed Benazir Abad. Accused persons Balach Khan alias Muhammad Khan, Doda Khan and Hyder Ali are present on bail. While accused Mst. Saima called absent, she is shown as absconders in the challan sheet and having been already declared as P.O. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Naeem Ahmed Mangi Advocate of accused all accused persons is present. Advocate of complainant Mr. Altaf Hussain Chandio is not present, his Associate Mr. Rana Rizwan is present. No PW is present. Case put off to: 04.11.2026, for evidence. Issue NBW against the PWa SIP Imdad Ali Jatt and Inspector Nisar Ahmed Mughal through SHO Concerned with directions to serve the same by in person and also Issue NBW against Inspector Nisar Ahmed Mughal through SSP SBA and SSB District Naushehro Feroze. Accused persons Balach Khan alias Muhammad Khan, Doda Khan and Hyder Ali are directed to attend. Accused Khalid Rind is remanded back to concerned Jail Authorities. |
| 5 | SC (Murder Trial) 156/2025 | The State VS Mst Musarrat and Others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI),Abdul Hafeez Khoso (ADVO-1015-SBC-NWB) | Ayaz Ali Gopang(ADVO-462-SBC-NWB),Muhammad Shahid(ADVO-614-SBC-NWB) | PPC-114,PPC-302,PPC-34 | 95/2024 Jam Dattar |
Case and BA of accused Gul Sher is called. Accused Mst. Musarat is not produced by Jail Authorities of Women Jail Hyderabad, produced through Video link. Accused Gulsher is present in custody, produced by the Jail Authorities of District Prison Shaheed Benazir Abad. Accused Dhani Bux is present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for complainant Mr. Abdul Hafeez Khoso is not present his Associate is present. Advocate for accused Mst. Musrat and Dhani Bux Mr. Muhammad Shahid Arain is present. Advocate for accused Gul Sher Mr. Ayaz Ali Gopang is present. The complainant Ghulam Sarwar and witness Noor Muhammad are present. The Cross Examination of complainant Ghulam Sarwar is Recalled and Reaffirmed. Cross recorded, but further cross is reserved. Case as well B.A. of accused Gul Sher put to: 12.11.2026, for Order upon the bail application and Case put off to: 12.11.2026, for Evidence. The complainant and PW are bound down. Issue PO for accused Mst. Musarat to concerned Jail Authorities. Accused Dhani Bux is directed to attend and Accused Gul Sher is remanded to District Prison, Shaheed Benazir Abad. |
| 6 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 223/2025 | The State Versus VS Khalid Hussain Rind | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-MLR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 340/2024 A-Section Nawabshah |
Case called. Accused Khalid Rind is present in custody, produce by Jail Authorities of District Jail Shaheed Benazir Abad. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate of accused Mr. Naeem Ahmed Mangi is present. No PW is present. Main case is adjourned. Case put off to: 04.11.2026, for evidence. Issue NBWs against the remaining Official PWs through SHO Concerned and Call case property from concerned Police Station. Accused remanded back to concerned Jail Authorities. |
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 326/2025 | The State VS Ghulam Qadir Lashari | Imtiaz Ahmed-ADPP(ADVO-423-SBC-SHK) | Altaf Hussain(ADVO-897-SBC-NWB) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 33/2025 Daur |
Case called. Accused Ghulam Qadir Lashari is present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Ayaz Ali Gopang advocate for accused is present. Process returned unserved. No PW is present. The main case is adjourned and Case Put off to: 17.11.2026, for evidence. Issue Summons upon the all PWs through SHO Concerned as well Call case property. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 8 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 328/2025 | The State VS Abdul Latif Lashari | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Altaf Hussain(ADVO-897-SBC-NWB) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 34/2025 Daur |
Case called. Accused Abdul Latif Lashari is present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Ayaz Ali Gopang advocate for accused is present. Process returned unserved. No PW is present. The main case is adjourned and Case Put off to: 17.11.2026, for evidence. Issue Summons upon the all PWs through SHO Concerned as well Call case property. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 9 | SC (Murder Trial) 513/2025 | The State VS Ghulam Qadir Lashari & others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK),Taimoor Hussain (ADVO-1075-SBC-MKS) | Altaf Hussain(ADVO-897-SBC-NWB),Ayaz Ali Gopang(ADVO-462-SBC-NWB) | PPC-302,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-D,PPC-337-Fiii,PPC-337-Fv,PPC-337-H | 31/2025 Daur |
Case called. Accused Ghulam Qadir Lashari, Abdul Latif Lashari and Manthar Lashari are present on bail. While Accused Maroof Lashari, Shoukat Lashari, Inayat Lashari and Asif Lashari are called absent as they already declared P.Os by the learned Magistrate Court vide Order dated: 26.08.2025. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Ayaz Ali Gopang advocate for accused Ghulam Qadir and Manthar is present. Mr. Altaf Hussain Ghuman advocate for accused Abdul Latif Lashari is present. Mr. Altaf Hussain Chandio Advocate for complainant is not present, his Associate Mr. Rizwan Rehmani is present. The report regarding the application of the complainant to arrest the PO declared accused Inayat Lashari received from the SHO Concerned, Order passed thereon. File. The complainant Sohrab Lashari file application for adjournment on ground that his counsel is busy in Honourable High Court of Sindh. The learned Counsel for the accused vehemently Objections upon the application as the complainant is not willing to proceed with the matter since long. Heard the learned Counsel for the accused. Order passed thereon. Allowed as last and final Chance. Case put off to: 17.11.2026, for evidence. The complainant is bound down himself and bound to bring his witnesses on next date of hearings without fail as last chance. Accused Ghulam Qadir Lashari, Abdul Latif Lashari and Manthar Lashari are directed to attend. |
| 10 | Railway/Cannt Acts 71/2026 | The State Versus VS Ashique Ali Golachi | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | PPC-34 | 28/2025 Railway (Nawabshah) |
Case called. Accused Ashique Ali Kolachi is called absent without any intimation. While accused Aftab Malik and Azeem @ Naamga Shaikh are already discharged from the present case by the learned trial Magistrate Court i-e Civil Judge & JM-I, Nawabshah vide Order dated: 28.01.2026. The Prosecution of the Railway Mr. Muneeb is present. Mr. Allah Bux Shar Advocate of accused Ashique Ali is not present. The PWs namely HC Muhammad Ameen and Abdul Ghafoor are present. Due to absence of the accused, the matter is adjourned. Case put off to: 13.11.2026, for evidence. Both PWs bound down. Issue NBW against accused and Notice to surety through SHO Concerned. |
|
| 11 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 289/2026 | The State Versus VS Muhammad Tahir Keerio | Sajid Ali (ADVO-1347-SBC-NWB) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 14/2026 Railway (Nawabshah) |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Tahir Keerio is present on bail. The Prosecutor Railway Mr. Muneeb Ahmed is present. Advocates for accused is not present. Process returned served. The PWs namely Inspector/SHO Ameer Ali Shah, ASI Mumtaz Ali, HC Bashir Ahmed, PC Altaf Hussain and HC Arbab Ali are present. The Deposition of PW ASI Mumtaz Ali is recorded at Ex......03. He produce the Memo of arrest and recovery at Ex.....03/A, He produce RC at Ex.....03/B, He produce the FSL report at Ex.....03/C, He produce the Departure and Arrival entries at Ex......03/D. The Deposition of PW HC Bashir Ahmed is recorded at Ex.....04. He produce the Memo of Site inspection at Ex......04/A. The Deposition of PW Altaf Hussain is recorded at Ex......05. He produce the Entry No: 32 at Ex......05/A. The Deposition of PW HC Arbab Ali is recorded at Ex......06. He produce the Departure and Arrival entries at Ex.....06/A. Mr. Bilawal Khan Shar Advocate appeared and file the Vakalatnama on behalf of the accused, Order passed thereon. File. He also file the application for adjournment. Order passed thereon. Allowed as last chance. The Cross is reserved. Case put off to: 18.11.2026, for Evidence. The PWs are bound down. Call case property. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 12 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 414/2026 | The State VS ASif Ali Rajpar | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 38/2026 Taluka Nawabshah |
Case called. Accused Asif Ali Rajper is present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for accused Mr. Israr Ali Mari is present. Process returned to PWs, the PWs namely ASI Athar Channa and I/O ASI Rusman are present. The Depostion of PW ASI Athar Hussain is recorded at Ex......03. He produce the Memo of Arrest and Recovery at Ex......03/A, He produce the Departure and Arrival entries at Ex.....03/B, He produce the FIR at Ex......03/C, He produce the entry of Register-19 at Ex....03/D. The Deposition of PW ASI Muhammad Rusman is recorded at Ex....04. He produce the Memo of site inspection at Ex.....04/A and He produce the Departure and Arrival entries at Ex.....04/B. Cross is recorded. Case put off to: 30.10.2026, for Evidence. Issue BWs against the all remaining PWs through SHO Concerned and Call case property. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 13 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 534/2026 | The State VS Rehman Bhatti | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Haji Khan (ADVO-780-SBC-NWB) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 134/2026 B-Section Nawabshah |
Case called. Accused Abdul Rehman Bhatti is present in custody, produce by Jail Authorities of District Prison, Shaheed Benazir Abad. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Haji Khan Jamali advocate for accused is not present. Summons returned served. No PW is present. Case put off to: 11.11.2026, for Evidence. Issue BWs upon All PWs through SHO Concerned. Call case property. Accused is remanded back to concerned Jail authorities. |
| 14 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 535/2026 | The State VS Faizan Khaskheli | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Haji Khan (ADVO-780-SBC-NWB) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 133/2026 B-Section Nawabshah |
Case called. Accused Faizan Ali Khaskheli is present in custody, produce by Jail Authorities of District Prison, Shaheed Benazir Abad. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Haji Khan Jamali advocate for accused is not present. Summons returned served. No PW is present. Case put off to: 11.11.2026, for Evidence. Issue BWs upon All PWs through SHO Concerned. Call case property. Accused is remanded back to concerned Jail authorities. |
| 15 | PPC 536/2026 | The State VS Faizan Khaskheli and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Haji Khan (ADVO-780-SBC-NWB) | PPC-324,PPC-337-D,PPC-337-H,PPC-34,PPC-506 | 127/2026 B-Section Nawabshah |
Case called. Accused Faizan Ali Khaskhlei and Abdul Rehman Bhatti are present in custody, produced by the Jail Authorities of District Prison, Shaheed Benazir Abad. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Haji Khan Jamali advocate for accused is not present. The Complainant is not present. Both PWs are present. Mr. Muhammad Sabir Khanzada advocate is appeared on behalf of complainant and request for adjournment as the complainant is seriously injured and is not able to move. Request Allowed. Case put off to: 11.11.2026, for Evidence. The PWs are bound down to bring his witnesses on next date of hearing. Call case property. Both accused are remanded back to concerned Jail authorities. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 16 | Application u/s 491 CrPc 438/2026 | Mst. Zareena VS SHO PS Kazi Ahmed & others | Ghulam Farooque(ADVO-1296-SBC-NWB) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
The application U/S 491 Cr.P.C is called. The applicant is present. Advocate for applicant Mr. Ghulam Farooque Khaskheli is present. The opponents No: 02 & 05 are present. Mr. Muhammad Akram Sahito Advocate is present on behalf of the opponents No: 02 & 05. The detainee Minor Mujahid Ali not produced by the Court and both parties claimed that minor is not with them. Report submitted by the SIP Muhammad Parial Kalhoso of P.S. Kazi Ahmed on behalf of the SHO of P.S. Kazi Ahmed, Order passed thereon. The SIP is directed to conducted the raid and also inquiry and sumit detail report with minor that where is minor and in whos custody, The application put off to: 30.10.2026, for production of minor by the police. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 17 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 3623/2026 | Noor Ahmed Lashari VS DIGP SBA | Syed Shahid Ali Shah(ADVO-1087-SBC-NWB) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
The Application U/S 22-A 6 (iii) Cr.P.C is called. Applicant is not present. Advocate for applicant Mr. Ayaz Ali Gopang is present. Reports already received from the SHO PS Daur as well from DSP Complaint Cell Shaheed Benazir Abad. Notice to opponent returned served. The Opponents Sohrab, Yaseen, Patasho @ Jameel, Imtiaz Ahmed, Zaheer and Muhammad Ibrahim are present. Mr. Altaf Hussain Chandio Advocate not present on behalf of the Opponents, his Associate Mr. Rizwan Rehmani is present. Heard the Advocate for applicant as well the private opponents in detail. Order passed and announced in open Court. The application of the applicant is hereby disposed off with directions to local Police to do their act in accordance with law. Order accordingly. |
|
| 18 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 3865/2026 | Muhammad Ameen Bhatti VS DIGP SBA | Adnan Sami (ADVO-1250-SBC-NWB) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
The Application U/S 22-A 6 (iii) Cr.P.C is called. Applicant is present. The Advocate for applicant Mr. Adnan Sami Keerio is present. Reports received from the SHO Concerned as well from DSP Complaint Cell Shaheed Benazir Abad. Order passed thereon. File. Notice to private opponents returned unserved. None is present. Heard the Advocate for applicant in detail. Order passed and announced in open Court. The application of the applicants is hereby Allowed. Order accordingly. |
|
| 19 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 3863/2026 | Mst. Makiyat Bhutto VS DIGP SBA | Babar Khan(ADVO-796-SBC-NWB) | Adnan Sami (ADVO-1250-SBC-NWB) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
The Application U/S 22-A 6 (iii) Cr.P.C is called. Applicant is present. The Advocate for applicant Mr. Babar Khan Chandio is present. Reports received from the SHO Concerned as well from DSP Complaint Cell Shaheed Benazir Abad. Order passed thereon. File. Notice to private opponents returned served. The opponent No: 06 & 08 Junaid and Jamshed Mallah are present. Mr. Adnan Sami Advocate file the Vakalatnama on behalf of the both private opponents No: 06 & 08, Order passed thereon. File. Heard the Advocate for applicant as well Advocate for opponents No: 06 & 08 in detail. The both opponents No: 06 & 08 file the undertaking, Order passed thereon. File. Order passed and announced in open Court. The application of the applicants is hereby Allowed. Order accordingly. |
| 20 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 3860/2026 | Abrarul Haque Brohi VS DIGP SBA | Waseem Ali(ADVO-684-SBC-NWB) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
The Application U/S 22-A 6 (iii) Cr.P.C is called. Applicant is not present. The Advocate for applicant Mr. Waseem Ali Mallah is present. Reports received from the SHO Concerned as well from DSP Complaint Cell Shaheed Benazir Abad. Order passed thereon. File. Notice to private opponents returned unserved. None is present. Heard the Advocate for applicant in detail. Order passed and announced in open Court. The application of the applicants is hereby Allowed. Order accordingly. |
|
| 21 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 3861/2026 | Muhammad Saleem VS DIGP SBA | Waseem Ali(ADVO-684-SBC-NWB) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
The Application U/S 22-A 6 (iii) Cr.P.C is called. Applicant is not present. The Advocate for applicant Mr. Waseem Ali Mallah is present. Reports received from the SHO Concerned as well from DSP Complaint Cell Shaheed Benazir Abad. Order passed thereon. File. Notice to private opponents returned unserved. None is present. Mr. Khalil-ur-Rehman Pirzada Advocate appeared and file the Vakalatnama on behalf of the private opponent No: 05, Dhani Bux, Order passed thereon. File. Heard the Advocate for applicant as well Advocate for opponent No: 05 in detail. Order passed and announced in open Court. The application of the applicants is hereby Allowed. Order accordingly. |
|
| 22 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 3864/2026 | Muhammad Haneef Mallah VS DIGP SBA | Wajid Ali Larau(ADVO-1300-SBC-NWB) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
The Application U/S 22-A 6 (iii) Cr.P.C is called. Applicant is present. The Advocate for applicant Mr. Waqar Ali Shah is present. Reports received from the SHO Concerned as well from DSP Complaint Cell Shaheed Benazir Abad. Order passed thereon. File. Notice to private opponents returned unserved. None is present. Heard the Advocate for applicant in detail. Order passed and announced in open Court. The application of the applicants is hereby Allowed. Order accordingly. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 23 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 687/2026 | The State VS Ali Sher Khaksheli | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 407/2025 Kazi Ahmed |
Case called. Accused Ali Sher Khaskheli is called absent without any intimation, though as per last dairy of the learned Trial Magistrate Court reflect that the accused is on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for accused is not present. In the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned and Case put off to: 13.11.2026, for Charge. Issue Notice to accused through SHO Concerned. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 5/2026 |
Hyder Ali Minhas VS Muhammad Tayyab Arain | Imran Majeed Arain() | The Summary Suit called. The plaintiff is present. The Advocate for Plaintiff Mr. Imran Majeed Arain is not present, his Associate Mr. Safdar Ali Bhatti is present. The defendant Muhammad Tayyab Arain is not present. Mr. Ahmed Ali Jarwar Advocate for defendant is present. The learned Counsel for the plaintiff file Affidavit in Evidence of the plaintiff Hyder Ali and his witnesses namely Muhammad Arshad Ali and Ali Murtaze, Order passed thereon. File/ Copy to other side and received. Matter put off to: 07.11.2026, for Plaintiff evidence. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Next Hearing Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | |||||
| 1 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 3623/2026 |
Noor Ahmed Lashari VS DIGP SBA | Syed Shahid Ali Shah(ADVO-1087-SBC-NWB) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | ||
| 2 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 3863/2026 |
Mst. Makiyat Bhutto VS DIGP SBA | Babar Khan(ADVO-796-SBC-NWB) | Adnan Sami (ADVO-1250-SBC-NWB) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | |
| 3 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 3861/2026 |
Muhammad Saleem VS DIGP SBA | Waseem Ali(ADVO-684-SBC-NWB) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | ||
| 4 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 3864/2026 |
Muhammad Haneef Mallah VS DIGP SBA | Wajid Ali Larau(ADVO-1300-SBC-NWB) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | ||
| 5 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 3865/2026 |
Muhammad Ameen Bhatti VS DIGP SBA | Adnan Sami (ADVO-1250-SBC-NWB) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | ||
| 6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 3860/2026 |
Abrarul Haque Brohi VS DIGP SBA | Waseem Ali(ADVO-684-SBC-NWB) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | ||