| ( ! ) Notice: Undefined variable: str_fixation_td in C:\wamp\www\cfms_dc_v26\public_ocp.php on line 556 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Call Stack | ||||
| # | Time | Memory | Function | Location |
| 1 | 0.0006 | 403392 | {main}( ) | ...\public_ocp.php:0 |
| 2 | 0.1852 | 407304 | public_ocp->get_ocp_screen( ) | ...\public_ocp.php:678 |
| ( ! ) Notice: Undefined variable: str_fixation_td in C:\wamp\www\cfms_dc_v26\public_ocp.php on line 556 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Call Stack | ||||
| # | Time | Memory | Function | Location |
| 1 | 0.0006 | 403392 | {main}( ) | ...\public_ocp.php:0 |
| 2 | 0.1852 | 407304 | public_ocp->get_ocp_screen( ) | ...\public_ocp.php:678 |
| ( ! ) Notice: Undefined variable: str_fixation_td in C:\wamp\www\cfms_dc_v26\public_ocp.php on line 556 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Call Stack | ||||
| # | Time | Memory | Function | Location |
| 1 | 0.0006 | 403392 | {main}( ) | ...\public_ocp.php:0 |
| 2 | 0.1852 | 407304 | public_ocp->get_ocp_screen( ) | ...\public_ocp.php:678 |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 186/2026 | Muhammad Wajdan Qureshi VS The State | Irfan Ali (ADVO-5237-SBC-HYD) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-498 | 59/2022 A-Section Nawabshah |
The application U/S 498 Cr.P.C is called. The applicant/accused is present on pre-arrest interim bail. The Advocate for applicant/accused is present. ADPP for the State is present. Police papers received. Heard the ADPP for the State as well Advocate for applicant/accused. Order passed and announced in open Court. The pre-arrest interim bail of applicant/accused is hereby Confirmed. Order accordingly. |
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 216/2026 | Zahid Ahmed Abbasi & another VS The State | Raja Khan (ADVO-949-SBC-NWB) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | PPC-379 | 37/2025 Railway (Nawabshah) |
The bail application U/S 498 Cr.P.C is called. The both applicants/accused namely Zahid Ahmed and Shoaib Ali are present on pre-arrest interim bail. The Prosecutor for the State is present. Mr. Raja Khan Abro Advocate appeared on behalf of the both applicants/accused. The IO is present. The Complainant is also present. Mr. Naeem Ahmed Mangi Advocate appeared on behalf of the complainant, Heard the Advocate for complainant, ADPP for the State, Advocate for applicants/accused, Order passed and announced in open Court. The Pre-arrest interim bail of the applicants/accused is hereby concerned. Order accordingly. |
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 323/2026 | Faizan Ahmed VS The State | Abdul Aziz(ADVO-795-SBC-NWB) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-498 | 35/2026 A-Section Nawabshah |
The application U/S 498 Cr.P.C is called. The applicant/accused is present on pre-arrest interim bail. The Advocate for applicant/accused is present. ADPP for the State is present. Police papers received. Heard the ADPP for the State as well Advocate for applicant/accused. Order passed and announced in open Court. The pre-arrest interim bail of applicant/accused is hereby Confirmed. Order accordingly. |
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 390/2026 | Ghulam Hussain & Others VS The State | Riaz Hussain (ADVO-1145-SBC-NSF) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-498 | 130/2025 A-Section Nawabshah |
The bail application U/S 498 Cr.P.C is called. The all Six applicants/accused are present on pre-arrest interim bail. The Advocate for applicants/accused is present. ADPP for the State is present. Police papers received. Notice to complainant returned served. The complainant Shahmir Khan and witnesses namely Zahid Hussain and Dilbar Ali are present. Mr. Raheem Khan Lashari Advocate file the Vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant, Order passed thereon. File. The complainant Shahmir Khan and witnesses Zahid Hussain and Dilbar Ali are file their No-Objection Affidavits, Order passed thereon. File. Heard the ADPP for the State, Advocate for complainant as well Advocate for applicants/accused. Order passed and announced in open Court. The Pre-arrest interim bail of the applicants/accused is hereby confirmed. Order accordingly. |
| 5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 389/2026 | Bhittai Dino Meerani VS The State | Imtiaz Ali (ADVO-926-SBC-NWB) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-498 | 37/2025 Railway (Nawabshah) |
The bail application U/S 498 Cr.P.C is called. The applicant/accused Bhittai Dino is present on pre-arrest interim bail. The Prosecutor for the State is present. Mr. Imtiaz Ahmed Chandio Advocate appeared on behalf of the applicant/accused. The IO is present. The Complainant is also present. Mr. Naeem Ahmed Mangi Advocate appeared and file the Vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant, Heard the Advocate for complainant, ADPP for the State, Advocate for applicant/accused, Order passed and announced in open Court. The Pre-arrest interim bail of the applicant/accused is hereby concerned. Order accordingly. |
| 6 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 388/2026 | Anwar Khanzada & Others VS The State | Israr Ahmed Qureshi(ADVO-448-SBC-NWB) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-498 | 52/2026 Sakrand |
The bail application U/S 498 Cr.P.C is called. The All three applicants/accused are present on pre-arrest interim bail. The Advocate for applicants/accused is present. Police paper received. Notice upon the complainant returned served. The complainant is present. Mr. Muhammad Anwar Khanzada Advocate file the Vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant, Order passed thereon. File. The Advocate for applicants/accused request for adjournment, Request Allowed. Matter put off to: 26.02.2026, for Arguments. All three applicants/accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 7 | SC (Murder Trial) 623/2023 | The State VS Tarique Brohi | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Naeem Ahmed(ADVO-636-SBC-NWB) | PPC-302 | 88/2023 B-Section Nawabshah |
Case called. Accused Tarique Ali Brohi produced by J/A of District Jail SBA. ADPP for the State is Present. Mr. Naeem Ahmed Mangi advocate is present on behalf of accused. The PW HC Lutuf Ali Waggan is present. No other PW is present. The Deposition of PW HC Lutuf Ali Waggan is recorded at Ex......10. He produce the RC at Ex.....10/A, He produce the departure entry at Ex....10/B, He produce the Arrival entry at Ex....10/C, He produce the RC of Hyderabad at Ex......10/D, He produce the Departure entry at Ex.....10/E, He produce the Arrivial entry at Ex.....10/F, Cross is recorded. Case put off to: 04.03.2026, for Evidence. Issue BWs upon the all remaining PWs through SHO Concerned. Accused remanded back to concerned J/A. |
| 8 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 622/2023 | The State VS Tarique Brohi | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Naeem Ahmed(ADVO-636-SBC-NWB) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 98/2023 B-Section Nawabshah |
Case called. Accused Tarique Ali Brohi produced by J/A of District Jail SBA. ADPP for the State is Present. Mr. Naeem Ahmed Mangi advocate is present on behalf of accused. The PW HC Lutuf Ali Waggan is present. No other PW is present. The Deposition of PW HC Lutuf Ali Waggan is recorded at Ex......04. He produce the RC of Hyderabad at Ex......04/A, He produce the Departure entry at Ex.....04/B, He produce the Arrivial entry at Ex.....04/C, Cross is recorded. Case put off to: 04.03.2026, for Evidence. Issue BWs upon the all remaining PWs through SHO Concerned. Accused remanded back to concerned J/A. |
| 9 | PPC 1009/2023 | The State VS Sadam & Others | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-SBA),Naeem Ahmed(ADVO-636-SBC-NWB) | Ali Raza(ADVO-533-SBC-NWB) | PPC-337-Fiv,PPC-394,PPC-504 | 6/2023 Mirzapur |
Case called. Accused Nadir Bhand and Akhtar Bhand are called absent without any intimation. While accused Saddam Mallah is called absent and already declared as Proclaimed Offender by this Court vide Order dated: 17.12.2025. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for accused is not present, his Associate is present. Advocate for complainant is present. The complainant and PW Zaheer are not present, No other PW is present. The Advocate for accused file the application for excuse the absence of accused persons, Order passed thereon. Case put off to: 09.03.2026, for evidence. Issue Summons upon the all PWs through SHO Concerned. Issue Notice to surety of accused Saddam Mallah through SHO Concerned. |
| 10 | SC (Murder Trial) 1053/2023 | The State VS Ramzan Chutto and Another | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI),Umed Ali (ADVO-942-SBC-NWB) | Ayaz Ali Gopang(ADVO-462-SBC-NWB) | PPC-302,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-A(ii),PPC-34,PPC-506-B | 60/2023 Jam Dattar |
Case called. Accused Ramzan Chutto is present on bail, While accused Farhan Chutto is produced by J/A of District Prison SBA. ADPP for State the is present. Mr. Ayaz Ali Gopang Advocate for both accused persons is present. The Advocate of complainant is present in late hours. No PW is present. In the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned and Case put off to: 04.03.2026, for Evidence. Issue BWs to private PWs as well Officials PWs namely WHC Abdul Khalique through SHO Concerned. Accused Ramzan Chutto is directed to attend, while accused Farhan Chutto is remanded back to concerned Jail Authorities. |
| 11 | PPC 109/2024 | The State versus VS Nizam Lakho & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI),Naeem Ahmed (ADVO-6927-SBC-KHE) | Ahmed Ali Jarwar(ADVO-564-SBC-NWB),Test Representative() | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-337-A(ii),PPC-337-H,PPC-504 | 9/2023 Khah |
Case called. Accused namely Imtiaz, Arbab, Saddam, Dildar and Atta Muhammad are present on bail. While accused Nizam Lakho already declared as P.O. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for complainant Mr. Naeem Ahmed Mangi is present. Advocate for accused Mr. Muhammad Akram Sahito is also present. The PW ASI Muhammad Nawaz is present. No other PW is present. The Cross of accused Recall and Reaffirmed. Cross is recorded. Case put off to: 10.03.2026, for evidence/Cross of complainant and his PWs. Issue Summons upon private complainant and PWs as well all remaining official witness through SHO Concerned. Accused are directed to attend. |
| 12 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 371/2024 | The State Versus VS Asghar Papu Jatt | ADPP(ADPP-0006-GOV-MPK) | Ayaz Ali Gopang(ADVO-462-SBC-NWB) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24,SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 120/2024 A-Section Nawabshah |
Case called. Accused Asghar @ Papu is present on bail. The ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for accused is present. Process returned served. No PW is present. In the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned and Case Put off to: 21.02.2026, for evidence. Issue BWs upon the all Official PWs through SHO Concerned as well Call case property. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 13 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 393/2024 | The State VS Kamran Jatt | ADPP() | Naeem Ahmed(ADVO-636-SBC-NWB) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 114/2024 A-Section Nawabshah |
Case called. Accused Kamran Jat is present on bail. The ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for accused is present. Process returned served. No PW is present. In the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned and Case Put off to: 21.02.2026, for evidence. Issue BWs upon the all Official PWs through SHO Concerned as well Call case property. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 14 | PPC 758/2024 | The State VS Allah Bakhsh Bhand & Others | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-SBA) | PPC-324,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-F(vi),PPC-337-L,PPC-338-G,PPC-34,PPC-506-B | 10/2024 Bachalpur |
Case called. Accused persons namely Allah Bux Bhand, Akhtar Bhand and Nadir Ali Bhand are called absent without any intimation. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for complainant is present. Advocate for accused is not present, his Associate is present and file application for excuse the absence of accused persons, Order passed thereon. Case put off to: 09.03.2026, for evidence. Issue Summons upon the all PWs through SHO Concerned. |
|
| 15 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 274/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Ishtiaque | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Majid Ali (ADVO-922-SBC-NWB) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 50/2025 B-Section Nawabshah |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Ishtiaque Allam is present in custody, produced by the Jail Authorities of District Prison, Shaheed Benazir Abad. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for accused is not present. The PWs namely ASI Muhammad Fareed Khan Pathan and PW HC Nazar Muhammad Jamali are present. The Deposition of PW ASI Muhammad Fareed Pathan is recorded at Ex......07. He produce the Memo of arrest and recovery at Ex.....07/A, He produce the Departure and Arrival entry at Ex.....07/B, He produce the Entry of Registration of FIR at Ex.....07/C, He produce the FIR at Ex......07/D, He produce the Copy of Register-19 at Ex.....07/E, He produce the Memo of Place of incident at Ex.....07/F, He produce the Departure and Arrivil entry at Ex......07/G, He produce the copy of letter at Ex....07/H, He produce the Departure entry at Ex.....07/I, He produce the Arrival entry at Ex......07/J, He produce the Examination report at Ex....07/K, The Deposition of PW HC Nazar Muhammad Jamali is recorded at Ex......08. Due to non-present of Advocate for accused, the cross of both PWs is reserved. Case put off to: 24.02.2026, for Evidence. Both PWs are bound down. Accused is remanded back to concerned Jail Authorities. |
| 16 | Foreigner Act 746/2025 | The State VS Paind Khan and others | ADPP() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Passport Foreign Act-Section 14 | 151/2025 Airport, Nawabshah |
Case called. Accused Paind Khan Pathan is present on bail. Accused Moosa Khan is present in custody produced by the District Jail Authority SBA. While accused Hakeemullah already convicted vide dated: 11.02.2026. ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Akbar Khan Sulleman Khail Pathan advocate is present on behalf of the all accused persons at morning time. The PW PC Asif Ali Chandio is present. No other PW is present. Reports received from the UC-93 TMC Hyderabad, from the Deputy Commissioner Hyderabad as well from the Principal of New Banat Higher Secondary School Hyderabad. Order passed thereon. File. The Deposition of PW PC Asif Ali Chandio is recorded at Ex.......05, The Associate of the Advocate for accused file application for adjournment. Order passed thereon. Allowed. Case put off to: 03.03.2026, for Evidence and hearings upon the application U/S 265-K Cr.P.C. Issue Summons upon the all PWs through SHO Concerned. Accused Paind Khan is directed to attend. Accused Moosa Khan is remanded back to concerned Jail Authorities. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 17 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 392/2026 | Farooque S/o Ali Mardan VS SHO PS A-Section Nawabshah | Imam Bux (ADVO-784-SBC-NWB) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
The application U/S 22-A Cr.P.C is called. The applicant is present. Advocate for applicant is also present. Reports already received from the SHO Concerned as well from the DSP Complaint Cell SBA. The proposed accused No: 01 & 02 are present. Mr. Ayaz Ali Gopang Advocate is present on behalf of the proposed accused No: 01 & 02. The both Advocates for applicant as well Advocate for proposed accused persons No: 01 & 02 already heard. Notice to IO returned served, but IO is not present. Due to absence of the IO of Crime No: 38/2026, the matter is adjourned and Application put off to: 23.02.2026, for hearings. Office is directed to Call the IO of the said FIR No: 38/2026 namely SIP Mansoor Raheem Khaskheli to appear in person along with complete record and report. |
|
| 18 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 469/2026 | Mst. Uzma Yameen VS SHO PS Airport Nawabshah | Muhammad Suhail(ADVO-624-SBC-NWB) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
The application U/S 22-A Cr.P.C is called. The applicant is present. Advocate for applicant is also present. Reports received from the SHO Concerned as well from the DSP Complaint Cell SBA. Order passed thereon. File. Notice to proposed accused returned served. The proposed accused Shahbaz Shabbir Arain is present. Mr. Toseef Jalal Arain Advocate is present and file the Vakalatnama on behalf of the proposed accused Shahbaz Shabbir Arain, Order passed thereon. File. Heard the Advocate for applicant as well Advocate for proposed accused and perused the reports. Order passed and announced in open Court. The application of the applicant is hereby dismissed. Order accordingly. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 19 | PPC 88/2026 | The State versus VS Ihsan Jokhio and others | ADPP(ADPP-0002-GOV-THT) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-A(ii),PPC-337-D,PPC-337-Fii,PPC-337-Fiii,PPC-337-L,PPC-504 | 473/2024 Kazi Ahmed |
Case called. Accused persons namely Ehsan Jokhio, Talib-ul-Din Jokhio, Mureed Jokhio, Wajid Jokhio, Shahbaz Jokhio, Sher Muhammad Jokhio, Ghulam Wahid Jokhio, Qurb Ali Jokhio and Nisar Ali Jokho are present on bail. ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for accused is Mr. Ali Gul Khorkani is present. Complainant Muharm and injured namely Gul Sher, Ali Muhammad, Hub Ali, Muhbat Ali and Mitha Khan are present. The accused persons as well complainant and present injured person jointly file the applications U/S 345 (2) Cr.P.C. as well U/S 345 (6) Cr.P.C with the Affidavits of the complainant and present injured persons. Heard the complainant and present injured, they admitted the facts of compromise. Order passed thereon. Notice to ADPP for the State. The complainant file application for production of the remaining injured. Order passed thereon. Allowed. Case put off to: 28.02.2026, for compromise. The complainant is bound to bring his other witnesses/injured on next date. All nine accused persons are directed to attend. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 19/2025 | Mst. Naseem Khatoon Khaskheli VS Tarique Khaskheli | Deeba Marry Kousar(ADVO-420-SBC-NWB) | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Family Appeal is called. The appellant is present. Advocate for appellant is not present, his Clerk is present. The Summons upon the Respondent returned un-served. Order passed thereon. Repeat on pointation. Matter put off to: 28.02.2026, for Service. Issue Summons upon the Respondent through bailiff of Senior Civil Court with specific directions to seved the same upon the defendant/JD via Pointation on the appellant side as well through Post AD on costs. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Next Hearing Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | |||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 390/2026 |
Ghulam Hussain & Others VS The State | Riaz Hussain (ADVO-1145-SBC-NSF) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-498 | |
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 389/2026 |
Bhittai Dino Meerani VS The State | Imtiaz Ali (ADVO-926-SBC-NWB) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-498 | |
| 3 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 469/2026 |
Mst. Uzma Yameen VS SHO PS Airport Nawabshah | Muhammad Suhail(ADVO-624-SBC-NWB) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | ||