Case called. Accused Muneer is present on bail. Accused Raja Drigh and Nooruddin @ Kirar are not produced from CP{ Khairpur. Issue P.O for accused. Learned DDPP for the State is present. Learned counsel for complainant absent. Complainant is absent. Learned counsel for accused Raja is present. Issue B.Ws to all remaining P.Ws. Case adjourned.

Case called. Case called. Accused Wazir Luhar produced by Central Prison, Sukkur through Video Link. While rest accused are already declared as P.O. Learned ADPP for the State is present. Learned counsel for complainant absent. Learned counsel Mr. Daim Khan Chandio pauper Advocate for accused Wazir Luhar is present. Final arguments heard. Judgment passed and announced in open Court at Ex:19. The accused Wazeer s/o Khadim Hussain Lohar beyond any shadow of reasonable doubt regarding murder of deceased. He is held guilty for the murder of deceased Muhammad Hayat Luhar and is convicted as under:- Accused Wazeer s/o Khadim Hussain Lohar is hereby convicted under section 265 H(ii) Cr.P.C for offence under section 302 (b) and is sentenced to death as Ta???zir. The accused shall be hanged by the neck till he is dead; subject to confirmation u/s 374 Cr.P.C. Accused is further directed to pay compensation to the legal heirs of deceased to the sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lacs only) under section 544-A Cr.P.C, and in case of default he shall suffer SI for 06 months more. Accused Wazeer s/o Khadim Hussain Lohar is in custody. Let conviction warrant be issued accordingly to concerned jail authority with for execution of the sentence above mentioned in accordance with law subject to confirmation of death sentence of accused Wazeer s/o Khadim Hussain Lohar. The copy of this judgment is supplied to accused free of cost under proper acknowledgment receipt. The reference/ proceedings for confirmation of death sentence shall be submitted/ made to the Honourable High Court of Sindh, through worthy A/Registrar in compliance of Section 374 Cr. P.C forthwith. Accused is also informed in the open court that they may prefer an appeal within limitation period as prescribed by law as provided under the Limitation Act, 1908, if so advised. Copy of this judgment be provided to the learned DDPP for state, SHO PS concerned, and SSP for taking action against absconding accused and bring them to book, as per law. The SSP shall also submit his report quarterly. Office is directed to make compliance accordingly.