| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 4/2025 | The state VS Muhammad Aslam and others. | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 320/2024 Daharki |
Case called. Accused are present on bail. ADP and DC are present. No PWs are present. Case put off to 7.2.2026. While process for the R/PWs returned un-served time of same is extended for their service. Accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 2 | PPC 114/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Bux Meerani | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-406,PPC-420,PPC-506 | 141/2025 Daharki |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP and DC are present. Re-called and reaffirmed of the complainant is recoded at Ex.03. Re-called and re-affirmed of of PW Samiullah is recorded at Ex.4. Re-called and re-affirmed of of PW Ihsan Ali is recorded at Ex.5. Case put off to 14.2.2026. Issue process for the R/PWs. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 3 | PPC 132/2025 | The State VS Anwar Mangrio | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-489-F | 323/2024 Daharki |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP and DC are present. Complainant is present with his advocate at his request of both parties advocates Case put off to 7.2.2026. For evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Complainant and P.Ws to produce his witness on date of hearing. |
|
| 4 | PPC 137/2025 | The State VS Basheer Ahmed Mahar & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-H,PPC-427,PPC-506 | 47/2025 Daharki |
Case called. Accused are present on bail. ADPP and DC are present. Complainant is absent on his behalf his friend filed adjournment. Order on it. Case put off to 11.02.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend. Process extended for the R/PWs. |
|
| 5 | PPC 145/2025 | The State VS Aijaz Ahmed Soomro | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-489-F | 108/2025 Daharki |
Case called. Accused Aijaz Ahmed Soomro is absent on his behalf his son filed application for his condonation. Order on it. ADPP is present. No PWs are present. Advocate for the complainant is present filed adjournment. Order on it. Case put off to 14.2.2026. For evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Issue process for the P.Ws. |
|
| 6 | PPC 197/2025 | The State VS Illim Deen & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-114,PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-H,PPC-382,PPC-427,PPC-447,PPC-504 | 59/2025 Dad Leghari |
Case called. Accused are present on bail. ADPP and Dc are present. No PWs are present. Summons returned un-served. Case put off to 16.2.2026. For evidence. Accused are directed to attend. Issue B.Ws for the P.Ws with directions to be be served through Sub-Inspector. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 42/2024 | St.Vs VS Muhammad Abbas Malik & Others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Saleem Akhtar Malik(ADVO-127-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-452,PPC-504 | 328/2023 Daharki |
Case called. Accused are present on bail. ADPP is present. Dc is absent and sent adjournment. Order on it. Case put off to 11.2.2026. For further arguments. Accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 8 | PPC 180/2022 | St.Vs VS Malik Muhammad Iftakhar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-406,PPC-420 | 109/2022 Daharki |
Case called. Accused Shahzado and Muhammad Sohail Nasir are acquitted.While accused Malik Muhammad Iftakhar is present on bail and filed application for excusing the last date of hearing, Order on it. Accused Syed Zainul Abdin Shah are declared as P.O. ADPP is present DC is present. Complainant is absent. Heard arguments. Judgment passed and announced in open court. Accused Malik Iftakhar is acquitted u/s 245(i) Cr.P.C, his bail bond stands cancelled and surety discharged. While case against accused Syed Zainul Abdin Shah is already kept on D/File till his arrest. Issue NBW against him as life time. |
| 9 | PPC 7/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Hashim Laghari & others | Abdul Majid (ADVO-872-SBC-GHT) | PPC-380,PPC-457 | 1/2026 Dad Leghari |
Case called. Accused are present on bail. ADPP and Dc are present. Case papers supplied to accused at Ex.1. ADPP filed statement for for waiving of charge. Order on it. Charge framed against accused at Ex.2. Plea recorded at Ex.2/A to 2/B to which accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. D/O of the complainant is recorded at Ex.3. He has produce FIR at Ex.3/A. D/O of PW Idress is recorded at Ex.4. Complainant filed application for withdrawal of remaining PWs at Ex.5. ADPP closed the side at Ex.6. Order on it. Statement of accused is recorded at Ex.7 and 8. Heard arguments. Judgment passed and announced in open Court. Accused are acquitted u/s 245(i) Cr.P.C they are present on bail their bail bond stands cancelled and sureties discharged, while M.A pending became infricuous. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 24/2025 |
Abu Bakar Mochi VS Basheer Ahmed Mochi & others | Muhammad Yousif(ADVO-969-SBC-GHT) | Suit called. Both parties are present with their advocates. Defendant filed his W.S. Order on it. Suit put off to 18.2.2026 for pre trial. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 2/2025 |
Muhammad Ramzan Samejo VS Jam Piyaro Kan Samejo | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Suit called. Both parties are present. Advocate for the defendant is absent, while advocate for the Plaintiff is present. Defendant filed adjournment. Order on it. Put off to 07.2.2026 for evidence. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 3 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 2/2024 |
Abdul Razak VS Rasheed Ahmed and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Suit called. Plaintiff is present with his advocate. None present from other sides. Heard final arguments from advocate for the Plaintiff. Put off to 30.1.2026 for Judgment. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 12/2025 | Mst.Sajida VS Ghulam Farooque | Shahid Hussain(ADVO-1083-SBC-GHT) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Suit called. Both parties are called absent, advocate for the D.H is present. In the interest of Justice put off to 10.2.2026 for compliance. D.H is directed to provide CNIC number of the J.D till next date of hearing. |
||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 137/2025 | Mst. Hina Panhwar & others VS Irfan Ali Panhwar | Ghulam Abbas Alias Javed Akhtar(ADVO-642-SBC-GHT) | Noor Hassan(ADVO-454-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Suit called. Both parties are present with their advocates. Meeting of the child held with the Father. By consent of both parties advocates put off to 09.2.2026 for compliance. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 3 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 1/2026 | Majid Ali Soomro VS Abid Ali Soomro & others | Nizamuddin(ADVO-534-SBC-GHT) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act | Matter called. Applicant is present with his advocate. Opponents are present filed their no objections in shape of affidavits. Order passed thereon. Put off to 27.1.2026. For appearance of the opponents and General public and their objections. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 1/2026 | Mst. Haseena Soomro VS Noor Muhammad Soomro | Aftab Hussain(ADVO-324-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Suit called. Plaintiff is present with her advocate. Defendant is called absent. In the interest of Justice put off to 7.2.2026 for appearance of the defendant. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 45/2025 | Sambreen Bhutto and others VS Imtiaz Bhutto. | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Suit called. Both parties are present with their advocates. Both parties filed their respective applications in shape of terms and conditions. Order passed thereon. Heard both parties advocates. Suit of the Plaintiff is compromise decreed with no order as to costs. Let the compromise decree be prepared accordingly. |
||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 147/2025 | Asad Hussain Soomro VS Mst.Ghazala Zubair Soomro | Murad(ADVO-1234-SBC-MKS) | Aftab Hussain(ADVO-324-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights | Family Suit Called. Both parties are present. Advocate for the defendant is present and filed application for 10 of family Act. Order on it. Copy to other sides. Plaintiff filed adjournment. Order on it. Suit put off to 14.2.2026 for cross examination and objection on application u/o 10 of Family Court. |
|
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 7/2026 | Zahoor Jan VS Mst.Asma. | Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Suit called. Both parties called absent their advocates are present. At the request of both parties advocates put off to 14.2.2026 for evidence. |
|||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 8 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 6/2025 | Mst. Fozia Pitafi VS Farooque Pitafi | Muhammad Iqbal (ADVO-542-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Matter called. D.H is absent, her Father is present. J.D is present with his advocate at his request put off to 7.2.2026 for objections on application 9(6) of Family Court act. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Exparte Evidence | |||||||
| 9 | F.S. (Family Suits) 190/2025 | Mst. Rizwana Laghari VS Muhammad Tahir Laghari | Yar Mohammad Jalbani(ADVO-991-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Jactitation of Marriage | Suit called. Plaintiff is present with her witness and advocate. Defendant is present with his advocate with his advocate and gave no objection on application 9(5). Order on it. M.A is allowed. Put off to 11.2.2026. For evidence. |
||