| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 161/2025 | The State VS Rao Muhammad Hussain Rajput | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-489-F | 135/2025 Daharki |
Case called. Accused not yet served. ADPP is present. Proclamation u/s 87 Cr.P.C against the absconding accused returned. Statement of process server is recorded at Ex.2. He has produce proclamation u/s 87 Cr.P.C, Memo of proceeding, copy of entry and his endorsement at Ex.2/A to 2/D. Order on it. Put off to 14.2.2026. For report of proclamation u/s 88 Cr.P.C. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 220/2025 | The State VS Hafiz Muhammad Muzamil Bhutto | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-489-F | 194/2025 Daharki |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP is present. Complainant is present with his advocate. By consent of both parties Case put off to 18.2.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Complainant is directed to produce his witness on date of hearing. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications | |||||||
| 3 | Cr.P.C. 12/2026 | Abdul Majeed Samejo VS SHO PS Khenjhu & others | Ghulam Abbas Alias Javed Akhtar(ADVO-642-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-145 | / |
M.A called. Both parties are present with their advocates. Opponent filed his objection/W.S. Order on it. Applicant filed application. Order on it. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in open Court. M.A is disposed off. |
|
| 4 | Cr.P.C. 11/2026 | Mst. Muneeba Shaikh VS The State | Danish Ali(ADVO-52356-SBC-GHT) | / |
M.A called. Applicant is present with her advocate. None present from other sides. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in open Court. M.A is dismissed. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Challan | |||||||
| 5 | Summary 1/2026 | Rafique Ahmed Samejo VS Muhammad Ibrahim Samejo & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-364,PPC-452 | 163/2025 Daharki |
Summary called. Complainant and victum are present. All proposed accused are present. Complainant and Victum filed applications. Order passed thereon. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in open Court. Summary is disposed off in C Class. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 79/2025 | The State VS Sikandar Panhwar | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-489-F | 46/2025 Daharki |
Case called. Accused called absent. ADPP and DC are present. Dc filed applicatication for condonation of absence of accused. Order on it. Complainant is present. Case put off to 09.2.2026. Accused is directed to attend. For statement of accused. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 10/2026 | The State VS Abdul Rehman Laghari and others | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | PPC-342,PPC-384 | 5/2026 Daharki |
Case called. Accused not yet served. Put off to 13.2.2026. Issue notice for the accused. |
|
| 8 | Gambling Act 9/2026 | The State VS Ghazi Shah and others | ADPP(ADV-001-GOV-SHK) | Gambling Act -Section 5-A | 1/2026 Daharki |
Case called. Accused Ghazi Shah, Mohammad Bux, Abdul Rehman and Mohammad Akmal are present on Police bail on their behalf Mr.Meharban Pitafi advocate filed his power with statement. Order on it. Put off to 12.2.2026. Accused are directed to attend and brought their surety on next date of hearing. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 2/2024 |
Abdul Razak VS Rasheed Ahmed and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Suit called. Plaintiff is present with his advocate. None present from other sides. Judgment passed and announced in open Court. Suit of the Plaintiff is decreed with no order as to costs. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 43/2025 | Mst. Haneefan Solangi VS Mai Shafia Solangi & others | Shabana Kousar (ADVO-926-SBC-GHT) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act | Application for permission to sale called. Applicant is present with her advocate. None present from other sides. Report of Mukhtiarkar already received. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. M.A is allowed subject to furnish PR bond in the sum of Rs.50,00,000/-for each minor. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | G.W. Ex. (G&W Executions) 3/2026 | Mai Haneefan Solangi VS Mai Shafia Solangi & others | Shabana Kousar (ADVO-926-SBC-GHT) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale | Application for permission to sale called. Applicant is present with her advocate. None present from other sides. Report of Mukhtiarkar already received. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. M.A is allowed subject to furnish PR bond in the sum of Rs.50,00,000/-for each minor. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 181/2025 | Smt. Poonum Bai Kinger VS Vinod Kumar Lohana | Riaz Ahmed Ghunio(ADVO-133-SBC-GHT),Ubedullah(ADVO-52355-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage | Family Suit called. Plaintiff is absent, her counsel is present. Advocate for the defendant sent application for re-calling the order for debarred for filling of W.S. Copy to other sides. Case put off to 7.02.2026 objection on application of defendant's advocate. |
||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 180/2025 | Smt. Poonam Bai Kinger VS Vinod Kumar Loana & others | Ubedullah(ADVO-52355-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family Suit called. Plaintiff is absent, her counsel is present. Advocate for the defendant sent application for re-calling the order for debarred for filling of W.S. Copy to other sides. Case put off to 7.02.2026 objection on application of defendant's advocate. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 177/2025 | Mst. Shumaila Soomro VS Javed Ali Soomro | Meharban Ali (ADVO-3015-SBC-SUK) | Ghulam Abbas Alias Javed Akhtar(ADVO-642-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Both parties are absent, advocate for the Plaintiff is present at his request suit put off to 6.02.2026 for further Plaintiff side evidence. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 12/2024 | Mst. Sadia Yaseen Awan VS Muhammad Danish Kanjoon | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT),Shamsuddin Kobhar(ADVO-338-SBC-GHT) | Taibah Roohi(ADVO-879-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Suit called. Both parties are absent their advocates are present. Heard final arguments. Put off to 12.2.2026 for Judgment. |
|