| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 1 | Summary 51/2026 | Ali Muhammad Lund VS unknown accused | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-380,PPC-457 | 38/2026 Yaro Lund |
Summary called.Complainant Ali Muhammad is present and filed application that FIR may be disposed off in C class. ADPP is present.Heard.order passed and announced in open court. Hence, I am of the humble opinion that this is fit case for disposal under ???C??? Class. Thus final report is here by approved under ???C??? Class. Since FIR being Crime No.38/2026 of police station:Yaro lund is disposed of so the accused and his surety is discharged, if any. Let the order be sent to SHO PS Concerned for information. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 169/2025 | The State VS Shespal hindu | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-489-F | 198/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Shahpal is present on bail. ADPP and both parties advocates are present. Complainant is also present. Both parties jointly filed an application on the ground that compromise takes running between each other. Order on it. Put off to 24.10.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. complainant is also directed to attend with all private witnesses for evidence. |
| 3 | PPC 198/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Hassan and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-Fv,PPC-504 | 4/2025 Yaro Lund |
Case called. All (6) accused are present on bail. ADPP & both parties advocates are present. Complainant and PW Pehlwan are also present, and advocate for complainant filed adjournment application. Order on it. Allowed. Put off to 24.10.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. Complainant and present witness are also directed to attend with all other private witnesses for evidence. |
| 4 | PPC 103/2026 | The State VS Iltaf Pitafi and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-392 | 96/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Both accused are not produced from District jail Ghotki, only production slip received in which next date of hearing has been communicated with direction to jail authority to produce the accused on the video link. ADPP and DC are present. Main case is fixed on 07.10.2026 for supplying of documents. Bail application u/s 497 Cr.PC of both accused is already fixed on 07.10.2026 for for hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 5 | PPC 81/2026 | The State VS Roshan Ali and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-Fii,PPC-452 | 19/2026 Belo Mirpur |
Case called. All (3) accused are present on bail. ADPP and complainant are present. Necessary documents supplied to all accused and such receipt obtained form them at....Exh.01. Mr. Awais Khan Pitafi advocate appeared and filed power on behalf of complainant. Order on it.File. Put off to 20.10.2026 for charge. All accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 49/2026 | The State VS Gulsher Samejo and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-341,PPC-353 | 23/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. Except accused Muhamamd Nawaz and Parvaiz Ahmed are absent. Co-accused field their separate condonation applications. Order there on. ADPP & DC are present. Put off to 24.10.2026 for charge. All present accused are directed to attend and informed the both absentee accuse for the next date of hearing. |
| 7 | DC (Direct Complaint) 14/2026 | Naveed Ahmed VS Nasrullah and others | Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-53056-SBC-GHT),Muhammad Azam (ADVO-690-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-380 | / |
Case called. Accused Deedar and Asif are present on bail. While other (4) accused are absent. Co-accused filed their condonation application. Order on it. Put off to 24.10.2026 for charge. Both present accused are directed to attend and informed the all absentee accused for the next date of hearing. |
| 8 | PPC 161/2026 | The State VS Sabir Moosani and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-392 | 162/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Sabir is not produced from District jail Ghotki, only production slip received in which next date of hearing has been communicated with direction to jail authority to produce the accused on the video link. While accused Ghulam Nabi and Ali @Asghar hss been expired and their case has been abated. ADPP & DC are present, and advocate for accused field application u/ 249-A Cr. PC. Order on it. Formal charge against accused Sabir was framed at???xh.03. Plea of accused was framed at???Exh.3.A. Accused is pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Issue summons to complainant and PWs. Call case property if any. Put off to 06.10.2026 for evidence. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 9 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 106/2026 | The State VS Abdul Hafeez Naich | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 76/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused is on present on bail. ADPP present. DC absent. Necessary documents supplied to accused and such receipt obtained from him at...Exh.01. Put of to 24.10.2026 for charge. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 10 | PPC 105/2026 | The State VS Ali Akbar Solangi and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-457 | 116/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Ali Akbar is pesent on bail.While accused Sanaullah is absconder shown in the Challan sheet and he is called absent. Issue proclamation u/s 87/88 Cr.P.C against absconding accused Sanaullah. ADPP is present. DC absent. Put off to 10.10.2026 for Service |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 25/2026 | Mai Sahib Khatoon and others VS Javed ALi Malik | Irshad Ali(ADVO-1054-SBC-GHT),Talat Soomro (ADVO-955-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Plaintiff and her advocate are present. Service upon defendant is held good and he is present and filed application with affidavit on the ground that for want of time that he will engage advocate on the next date of hearing. Put off to 01.10.2026 for WS. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 3/2025 | Mst Shazia VS Asif Ali Mirani | Najeeb Ur Rehman(ADVO-489-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Ex.Application application is allowed by this court vide order date. 30.06.2026 and same was called. Both parties and their advocates are present, and advocate for JD filed objection on Ex.application and also filed application u/o 9 rule 13 CPC. Order there on. Copy of objection and application received by other side. Put off to to 10.10.2026 for hearing on application u/o 9 rule 13 CPC. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 70/2024 | SMT- Reena Menghwar VS Rajesh Menghwar | Najeeb Ur Rehman(ADVO-489-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount | Suit called. Plaintiff absent, but her advocate is present. Defendant and his advocate are absent. Matter is adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to 17.10.2026 for plaintiff side evidence. |
|
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 87/2024 | Mst- Moomal Lolai VS Javed Ali Lolai | Mehdi Hassan(ADVO-916-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Both parties are present, but their advocates are absent, defendant filed adjournment application. Order on it. Put off to 15.10.2026 for plaintiff side evidence. |
|