| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 20/2026 | Akhtar Ali VS the state | Cr.PC-523 | / |
Misc.Appli.Called. ADPP,Applicant and his counsel are present. Advocate for applicant filed statement along with case publication. order on it. Verification report received. order on it.Heard and perused the material.order passed and announced in open court. I hereby allow this application and handover the possession/custody of Motorcycle, in question, to applicant, subject to furnishing Solvent surety of Rs:20,000/ for six months, with strict directions to produce the Motorcycle, in question, before the Court, as and when required, without creating interest of third party or changing its present condition. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 2 | Summary 10/2026 | The state VS Amjad Hussain and others | PPC-452 | 9/2026 Jarwar |
FIR called.SHO PS Jarwar sent summary under C class.order on it.ADPP and complainant Gulsher are present.Complainant Gulsher filed application for disposal of FIR in C class.Heard arguments.order passed and announced in open court. In view of application filed by complainant, I am of the humble opinion that this is fit case for disposal under ???C??? Class. Thus final report is here by approved under ???C??? Class. Since FIR is disposed of so the accused and his surety is discharged, if any. Let the order be sent to SHO PS Concerned for information. |
||
| 3 | PPC 54/2026 | The state VS Altaf Khoso | PPC-506-B | 226/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Interim report called.ADPP,Complainant Fida Hussain and accused Altaf Hussain is present on bail.Mr.Abdul waheed lund advocate is present and files Vakaltnama on behalf of accused.order on it.SHO PS MPM submitted final challan.order on it. Accused filed application under section:249-A crpc.order on it.Complainant Fida Husain filed application for no objection for acquittal of accused.order on it. Heard arguments on application u/s 249-A Cr. PC.order passed and announced in open court.In view of No objection given by complainant Fida Hussain, I am of view that there is no probability of the accused namely Altaf Hussain being convicted of any offence,hence he is acquitted under section:249-A crpc,accused is present on bail his bail bond stands cancelled and surety discharged. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 171/2024 | St.Vs VS Asif Chhijjan and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Irrigation Act-U/S 61,PPC-379,PPC-427 | 158/2024 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Ali Asghar is present on bail. While accused Asif Ali and Rafique are absconder shown in the Challan sheet and they are declared as POs. DDPP & DC are present. Complainant and PWs Shoukat Ali and Mehmood are present, Process for R/PWs be extended and hand over to process server for service. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 18.03.2026 for evidence. Present accused Asghar is directed to attend. Complainant and present witnesses are also directed to attend with other witnesses for evidence. |
| 5 | PPC 36/2025 | The State VS Imdad Ali Naich | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-489-F | 63/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. DDPP present. Both parties advocates are absent. Complainant is also present. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 01.03.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Complainant is also directed to attend with all private witnesses for evidence. |
| 6 | PPC 81/2025 | The State VS Imran Bozdar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi | 101/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused are present on bail. Except accused Imran abenet.Co-accused filed his condonation application. Order on it. DDPP present. No PWs present. Issue summons to Complainant and PWs. Call case property if any. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 01.04.2026 for evidence. Both present accused are directed to attend and informed the absentee accused for the next date of hearing. |
| 7 | PPC 149/2025 | The State VS Rajesh Oad and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-392 | 154/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case and application u/s 249-A Cr.PC called. Accused Saleem is present on bail. Accused Rajesh is not produced from District Jail Ghotki only production slip is received, in which next date of hearing has been communicated with direction to produce the accused on Video link. As per direction of Honourable Sessions Juge, Ghotki, vide office letter 1279/2026 dated.19.02.2206 that lock-up, situated in Civil Court, Buildings at M.Mathelo is in a dilapidated condition and could not used for the custody purpose of under trial prisoners. DDPP present. No PWs present. Process for PWs be extended. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 02.03.2026 for evidence and hearing on application u/s 249-A Cr. PC. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| 8 | PPC 159/2025 | The State VS Irfan Bozdar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-452,PPC-506 | 33/2025 Jarwar |
Case called. All (4) Accused are present on bail. DDPP present.I/O of the case ASI Farman Ali Naich are present. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to.11.03.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. I/O of the case is directed to attend with complainant and all witnesses for evidence. |
| 9 | PPC 208/2025 | Roshan Ali VS Gul Hassan & ors | Saeed Ahmed(ADVO-1207-SBC-GHT) | Mujeeb Ur Rehman(ADVO-785-SBC-GHT) | PPC-506-B | / |
Case called. All (4) accused are present absent without any intimation or application. Complainant and is advocate are present Issue BW against all accused. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 27.03.2026 for evidence. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 10 | PPC 24/2026 | The State VS Ayaz shaikh and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-379 | 272/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Ayaz and Sadar Ali are present on bail. Accused Sultan is not produced from District Jail Ghotki, only production slip is received, in which next date of hearing has been communicated with direction to produce the accused on Video link. As per direction of Honourable Sessions Judge, Ghotki, vide office letter 1279/2026 dated.19.02.2206 that lock-up, situated in Civil Court, Buildings at M.Mathelo is in a dilapidated condition and could not used for the custody purpose of under trial prisoners. DDPP present. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 16.03.2026 for charge. Both present are accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 11 | PPC 20/2025 | The State VS Islam Khan and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-506 | 18/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused is called absent. ADPP is present.DA is present.DA filed condonation application.order on it.Heard arguments. Judgment passed and announced in open court. accused is acquitted under section:245 i crpc.he is present on bail his bail bonds stands cancelled and surety discharged. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 88 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 12 | PPC 170/2025 | The State VS Majeed Bozdar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-147,PPC-427 | 46/2025 Jarwar |
Case called. All (7) accused namely Majeed@Majan, Hajan,Bahjan,Bux Ali, Raja, Majeed and Meer are absconders shown in the challan sheet and they are called absent. Issue proclamation u/s 88 Cr.PC issued against all absconding accused persons through concerned Mukhtiarkar. DDPP present. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 03.03.2026 for report of proclamation u/s 88 Cr.PC of all accused absconder accused. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 13 | PPC 48/2026 | The State VS Akbar Lund | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-380,PPC-457 | 4/2026 Yaro Lund |
Case called. Accused Akbar is present on bail and filed application under section:249-A crpc.order on it.ADPP is present. Heard arguments on application u/s 249-A Cr. PC.order passed and announced in open court.In view of No objection given by complainant Abdul SHakoor, I am of view that there is no probability of the accused namely Albar being convicted of any offence,hence he is acquitted under section:249-A crpc,accused is present on bail his bail bond stands cancelled and surety discharged |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 56/2025 | Smt Reena VS Aneel oad | Awais (ADVO-452-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage | Family suit called. Plaintiff absent, but her counsel is present. Defendant not yet served. Issue fresh notice to defendant through concerned court on costs. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 16.03.2026 for service. |
|
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 2/2026 | Naseer Ahmed Kori VS Zameeran Bibi andother | Mujeeb Ur Rehman(ADVO-785-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act | G&W application called. Applicant and his advocate are present. Opponents absent. Advocate for applicant filed statement with Newspapers daily News papers Pahenji Akhar dated. 16.02.2026. Order onit. File. Reports received from Mukhtiarkar M.Mathelo,Secretary UC Garhi Chakar, and PS Jarwar. Order there on. File. Call reports from of LRS of deceased NADRA,Valuation f property and call verification of death of deceased Nazeer Ahmed from concreted authority. Issue notice to opponents. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates.Pu toff to 31.03.2026 for service and reports. |
|
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 5/2026 | Smt Haleema VS Pyaroo gee | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage | Family suit called. Plaintiff and her advocate are present. Defendant absent. Issue notice to defendant through court and register post AD/TCS on costs. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates.Put off to 18.03.2026 for service. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 18/2025 | Mahesh Menghwar VS Smt Aneeta | Nazeer Ahmed (ADVO-649-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for recovery of Gold Ornaments | Family suit called. Plaintiff absent, but her advocate is Present. Defendant and his advocate are absent. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 09.03.2026. Arguments. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 2/2025 | Smt Aneeta VS Mukesh Kumar | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Plaintiff absent, but her advocate is Present. Defendant and his advocate are absent. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 09.03.2026. Arguments. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. |
|
| 6 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 1/2025 | Smt Samina VS Mour Oad | Awais (ADVO-452-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family Ex. Application is already allowed by this court vide order dated.11.11.2025, and same was called. DH absent, but her advocate is present. Issue notice to JD. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 16.03.2026 for compliance. |
|