| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 76/2026 | Nisar Ahmed Khoso VS The State | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 60/2026 Belo Mirpur |
Bail application u/s 497 Cr. PC of accused Nisar Ahmed Khoso is called. DDPP and advocate for accued are present. Police papers received. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open court that Bail application of accused Nisar Ahmed Khoso is allowed in the sum of Rs.5,000/-(Five thousand) and P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of this court. Bail application is disposed off accordingly. Order placed o record. FIR Proceedings is already fixed on 30.07.2026 for final report. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 158/2025 | The State VS Manzoor Hussain and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149 | 123/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called.Accused Subhan is confined in district jail ghotki and not produced.Issue PO Through Video link.Accused Kouro,Shakeel and Manzoor are present on bail.Accused Hanif is acuitted under section:249-A crpc.Rest of accused were declared as PO.Copies supplied to four accused and such reciept obtained at exh:4.DA is present.Complainant has expired and his counsel is called absent.Adjourned to 10.9.2026 for charge.Accused on bail are directed to attend. |
| 3 | Summary 42/2026 | Sifullah Kalhoro VS Muhammad Yaseem Kalhoro | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-395 | 188/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
FIR called.SHO PS Mirpur mathelo sent summary under C class. ADPP is present.Complainant Safiullah Kalhoro is present and filed application for satisfication with investigation.order on it.Heard.order passed and announced in open court. For what has been discussed above I am of the considered opinion that there is no any material to take cognizance of the offence, hence Final report is here by approved under C Class as recommended by SHO PS MPM. Since F.I.R is disposed of, so accused persons are hereby discharged so also their surety, if any. Let the order be sent to SHO concerned Police Station for keeping the same in relevant record. |
| 4 | Summary 41/2026 | Qurban Ali Abbasi VS unknown accused | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-504,PPC-506 | 170/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Summary called. ADPP is present.Complainant is present and filed application.order on it.Heard.order passed and announced in open court. For what has been discussed above I am of the considered opinion that there is no any material to take cognizance of the offence, hence Final report is here by approved under C Class instead of A class. Let the order be sent to SHO concerned Police Station for keeping the same in relevant record. |
| 5 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 76/2026 | Mst Babbi VS SHO PS Mirpur Mathelo and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-107 | / |
Crl.Misc.Appli.called.ADPP is present.Applicant Mst.Baby called absent but her counsel is present and filed application for withdraw of application.order passed on separate sheet. Let the Misc.Appli. is disposed off being withdrawn. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 82/2025 | The State VS Attaullah Chijjan and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-452 | 96/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. Except accused Muhammad Shahban is absent. Co-accused filed his condonation application. Order on it. DDPP and both parties advocates are present. Complainant is also present.Put off to 29.09.2026 for evidence. All present accused are directed to attend and informed the absentee accused for the next date of hearing. Complainant is also directed to attend for evidence. |
| 7 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 178/2025 | The State VS Sajjad Ahmed and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 188/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Imran is present on bail. While other both accuse are absent. Advoctae for accued Toqueer Ahmed appeared and field his condonation application, and one applicant Jameel Ahmed appeared and filed condonatiion application of accused Sajjad Ali. Order there on. DDPP present. No PWs present. Issue summons to PWs. Put to off to 30.09.20256 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend and informed the absentee accused for the next date of hearing. |
| 8 | PPC 177/2025 | The State VS Noor Hassan Sud and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-380 | 180/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All 19 accused are present on bail along with their counsel. ADPP is present.Complainant and his counsel are called absent.Private pws are called absent. Perused the material.Heard.order passed and announced in open court. That after framing of charge till yet prosecution has failed to examine a single private witness, hence the proceeding of the case are stopped under section:249 crpc against the accused without pronouncing the judgment of acquittal or conviction. That Honourable High Court of Sindh in case reported as PLD 1990 Karachi 233 Re. Mst. SARDARAN BIBI versus THE STATE in para No.8 has Observed that ???The object of surety bonds is to ensure the presence of the accused persons. So, where the accused is released under section 249, Cr.P.C. and his presence is no more required by the Court, the surety is discharged???. Accused persons are present on bail and in the light of above case law, the surety of accused on bail is hereby discharged, however accused are directed to submit P.R bond equivalent to their surety. |
| 9 | PPC 40/2026 | The State VS Gulab Pitafi and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-380,PPC-457 | 3/2026 Yaro Lund |
Case called. Both accused are present on ball. DDPP and advocate complainant are present. DC absent. No PW present. Issue summons to PWs. Put off to 01.10.2026 for evidence. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 10 | PPC 191/2025 | The State VS Jan Muhammad Shar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-120-B,PPC-310,PPC-310A | 39/2025 Yaro Lund |
Case called. All (9) accused are present on bail. DDPP & DC are present. Necessary documents supplied to all accused and such receipt obtained form them at..Exh.01. Put of to 29.09.2026 for charge. All accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 11 | PPC 187/2025 | The State VS Nasrullah and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-452,PPC-506 | 41/2025 Yaro Lund |
Case called.All accused are present on bail. Except accused Nasrullah is absent. Co-accused filed his condemnation application. Order on it. DDPP present. DC filed statement with photo copy of bail letter. Order on it. Put off to 29.09.2026 for Charge.Present accused are directed to attend and informed the absentee accused for the next date of hearing. |
| 12 | PPC 192/2025 | The State VS Mir Hassan Shar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-120-B,PPC-310,PPC-310A | 40/2025 Yaro Lund |
Case called. Accused Ghulam Nabi, Nawab and Shabir are absconders shown in the challan sheet and the are declared as POs. While other all(19) accused are present on bail. DDPP & DCs are present. Formal charge against all present accused was framed at....Exh.5 plea of accused is recorded at...Exh.5.A to 5.S. Accused are pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tied. Issue summons to complainant and PWs. Call case property if any. Put off to 29.09.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
| 13 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 75/2026 | Mst.Zareena Sandello VS Mushtaque Abbasi and others. | Nabi Bux(ADVO-21660-SBC-KHS) | Aijaz Ahmed(ADVO-475-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-133 | / |
Crl.Misc.Appli.called.applicant is called absent but her counsel is present. respondnets no:1 to 3 are present and 4 is called absent.Advocate for respondents no:1 to 4 is present.order passed and announced in open court. Therefore, in my view there no occasion existed for applicant to invoke the emergency power, under section 133 Cr.P.C. resultantly application in hand merits no consideration and the same is dismissed. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 14 | PPC 78/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Ayoub and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-353,PPC-506 | 80/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. Except accused Khalid, Abdul Hanan and Abdul Manan are absent. Co-accused filed jointly an applications for their condonation. Order there on. Dismissed. Issue BW against them and notice to their sureties. All present accused are jointly filed an application along with affidavits for joining the trial and they are also submitted interim pre-arrest bail Letter No.511/2026 dated:03.04.2026 granted by Honourable I-Additional Sessions Judge M.Mathelo. Order on it. Accused are allowed to join trial with direction to produced CTC of confirmation bail order.d DDPP preset. Put off to 03.10.2026 for service. All present accused are directed to attend and informed the absentee accused for the next date of hearing. |
| 15 | PPC 114/2026 | The State VS Rahib Ali Mahar | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-392 | 113/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. DDPP present. Mr. Taanveer Ahmed Korai advocate appeared and filed power on behalf of accused. Order on it. File. Necessary documents supplied to accused and such receipt obtained form him at..Exh.01. Put off to 01.10.2026 for charge. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 16 | PPC 124/2026 | The State VS Allah Ditto Gopang | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-279 | 28/2026 Belo Mirpur |
Case called. Accused absent and not yet server. DDPP present. Issue BW to accused. Put ff to 01.09.2026 for service. |
| 17 | PPC 136/2026 | The State VS Akhtar Kalhoro and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-452,PPC-506 | 117/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Akhtar, Khan Muhammad, Zakir,Ghulam Yaseen,Habib, Khalid, and Sajid are present on bail. Accused Abdul Jabbar absent. Co-accused filed his condonation application. Order on it. While other accused Baqir,Saleem and Jahangir are absconders shown in the challn sheet and they are absent. Issue NBW against them. DDPP and DC are present and DC filed statement with photo copy of bail orders. Order on it. Mr. Awais Khan Pitafi advocate field power on behalf of accused Akhtar, and Mr.Shahid Ali Pitafi advocate filed power on behalf of Khan Muhammad, Zakir,Khalid Hussain Habibullah,and Nadeem Order on it. File. Call supplementary challan of accused Khalid and Sajid Ali. Put off to 30.09.2026 for service. All present accused are directed to attend and informed the absentee accused for the next date of hearing. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 4/2025 | Mst- Saima Kalwar VS Muhammad Wajid Kalwar | Munir Ahmed Channa(ADVO-748-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Execution application is already allowed by this court vide order dated. 12.02.2026 and same was called. DH and her advocate are present. JD also absent. Issue BW to JD. Put off to 28.09.2026 for compliance. |
|
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 7/2026 | Mst Farzana VS Abdul Qadir Bozdar | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 of Guardian and Wards Act R/W 100 Cr.PC | Family suit called.plaintiff and her counsel are called absent.adjourned to 3.10.2026. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 31/2025 | Mst: Asia Solangi VS Umar Farooque Soplangi | Kamran Ali (ADVO-717-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Plaintiff and her advocate are present. Defendant absent, but his advocate is Preston. Put off to 28.09.2026 for plaintiff side evidence. |
||