| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 89/2026 | Ihsan Naich VS The state | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-420 | 227/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Bail application u/s 497 Cr. PC of accused Ihsan Ali is called. ADPP and both parties advocates are present. Complainant is also present. Police papers received. Arguments heard. Advocate for accused is submitted statements with case laws. Order on it. Order passed and announced in open court that Bail application of accused Ihsan Ali is allowed in the sum of Rs.30,000/-(Thirty thousand) and P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of this court. Bail application is disposed off accordingly. Order placed on record. FIR Proceeding is already fixed on ___.10.2026 for final report. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 2 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 117/2026 | The state VS ghos bux alias ghoso pitaffi and another. | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 20/2026 Yaro Lund |
Case called. Both accused were already declared as PO. ADPP is present and stated that on 18.8.2026 complainant has already filed application that case be kept on dormant file till arrest of accused. Let the Case be kept on dormant file.Issue NBW sine-die against accused |
| 3 | Summary 58/2026 | Mushtaque Ali VS Ahmed Ali and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Saeed Ahmed(ADVO-225-SBC-GHT) | PPC-381-A | 159/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Summary under C class called. ADPP,Complainant,DA and advocate for complainant are present.Accused are called absent.Heard arguments of advocate for complainant and ADPP.order passed and announced in open court. For what has been discussed above I am of the considered opinion that accused were implicated by the complainant in FIR and so also by witnesses in their 161 Cr.P.C statements. Therefore the request of SHO PS Mirpur Mathelo for disposing of the case under ???C??? class is declined, the cognizance is taken u/s 190(1) b Cr.P.C. against all accused persons. Keeping in view the guidelines taken form the para No. 10 of judgment passed by Honorable High Court of Sindh in case reported as 2020 P.Cr.LJ 835, SHO PS MPM is directed to submit the Challan on 19.10.2026 on prescribed proforma without fail. Let the copy of order be sent to concerned SHO for information and compliance. |
| 4 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 94/2026 | Uzair Alam VS The State | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-406 | 219/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused is present on bill. ADPP and advocate for complainant are present. Formal charge against accused was framed at...Exh.5. Plea of accused is recorded at ..Exh.5A. Accused are pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Mr. Muhammad Ajaml advocate appeared and filed power on behalf of accused Order on it.File,and also he has field application u/s 249-A Cr. PC on behalf of accused Uzair Alam. Order on it. Issue notice state and complainant. Heard arguments on application u/s 249-A Cr. PC. Order passe and announced in open court that application is dismissed. Order placed on record. Issue summons to complainant and PWs. Call case property if any. Put off to 10.11.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | PPC 132/2025 | The State VS Imamuddin Chachar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-Fv | 30/2025 Jarwar |
case called. Both accused are present on bail. ADPP and advocate for complainant are present. Complainant and PWs Sharafdin and Moua Bux are also present. Mr. Ali Akbar Laghari advocate appeared and field power on behalf of both accused and also he has field adjournment application. Order there on. Put off to 07.11.2026 for evidence. Both accused are directed to attend.Complainant and present witnesses are also directed to attend with all other private witnesses for evidence. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 31/2026 | The state VS Muhammad Uzair Arain | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-420 | 219/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused is present on bill. ADPP and advocate for complainant are present. Formal charge against accused was framed at...Exh.5. Plea of accused is recorded at ..Exh.5A. Accused are pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Mr. Muhammad Ajaml advocate appeared and filed power on behalf of accused Order on it.File,and also he has field application u/s 249-A Cr. PC on behalf of accused Uzair Alam. Order on it. Issue notice state and complainant. Heard arguments on application u/s 249-A Cr. PC. Order passe and announced in open court that application is dismissed. Order placed on record. Issue summons to complainant and PWs. Call case property if any. Put off to 10.11.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 7 | PPC 122/2026 | Hazour Bux Mahar VS The State | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-504,PPC-506 | 121/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP & DC are present. Formal charge against accused was framed at...Exh.2. plea of accused is recorded at...Exh.2.A. Accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Issue summon to PWs. Call case property if any. Put off to 10.11.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 8 | PPC 115/2026 | The State VS Bakhat ALi Gabole and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-506-B | 36/2026 Jarwar |
Case called.Ala (5) accused are present on bail. ADPP and Complainant are present. Mr. Sikandar Ali Siayl advocate appeared and field power on behalf of all accused. Order on it. File. Necessary document supplied to all accused and such receipt obtained form them at...Exh.01. Put off to 11.11.2026 for charge. All accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
| 9 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 88/2026 | Farhan kalwar VS The State | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-392 | 75/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Bail application u/s 497 Cr. PC of accused Farhan Kalwar is called. ADPP and complainant are present. Order passed and announced in open court that Bail application of accused Farhan is dismissed. Bail application is disposed off accordingly. Order placed on record. Case is already fixed on 14.10.2026 for evidence. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 10 | PPC 30/2025 | St.Vs VS Ghulam Ali & Others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-379,PPC-427 | 15/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Ghulam Ali, Muhammad Akmal@Akram, Jamaludidn@Jamal,Ghulam Murtaza, Hussain Bux and Ahad are present on bail. Accused Ali Gul is umped out the bail and he absent.Issue NBW against him and notice to hi surety. Accused Abdul Sattar is acquitted u/s 249-A Cr. PC by this court vide order dated. 15.07.2025. While other both accused Deedar and Suhno are absconder shown in the Challan sheet and they are declared as POs. DPP & DC are present. Put off to 02.11.2026 for service. All present accused are directed to attend. |
| 11 | PPC 185/2026 | The State VS Umar Kalwar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-427,PPC-506 | 179/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called.Accused Abdul Qadir is present on bail. while other all accused are absent. Co-accused filed their cndonation application.Order on it. ADPP present. Pu toff to 11.11.2026 for service. Present accused is directed to attend and informed the all absentee accused for the next date of hearing. |
| 12 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 204/2026 | The State VS Nisar Khoso | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 60/2026 Belo Mirpur |
Case called. Accused Nisar is not produced from District Jail Ghotki, only production slip received in which next date of hearing has been communicated with direction to jail authority to produce the accused before this court on Video link. Necessary documents supplied to custody accused Nisar through jail authority on electronic,device system and such receipt obtained from him at??????Exh.01. ADPP and DC are present. Put off to 19.10.2026 charge. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 7/2026 |
Ghulam Yaseen Bozdar VS Arab Bozdar and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Civil suit called. Plaintiff and his advocate are present. Report receive from Mukhtiarkar ( R ) M.Mathelo vide his office letter No.SR/9530/2026 dated.02.10.2026. Order on it. File. Put off to 24.10.2026 for hearing. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 12/2025 | Nisar Ahmed VS Mst Azeeman | Hidayatullah(ADVO-310-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | G&W application called.Both parties and their advocates are absent. Put off to 27.10.2026 for Objection. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 6/2026 | Fiaz Ali Lund VS Mst Zafeeran Lund | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Jactitation of Marriage | ||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 3 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 6/2026 | Shahrukh Gori VS Mst Kainat Soomro | Mushtaque Ahmed(ADVO-1268-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 12 | G and W called. Applicant absent is called absent, but his counsel is present. Opponent present,Mr. Hussain Ahmed Gadani advocate appeared and field statement on the ground that he will filed power on behalf of respondent and objection. Order on it. Put off to 02.11.2026 for filling of objections. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 59/2025 | Mst Reema Bozdar VS Israr Ali Bozdar | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff absent, but her advocate present and filed adjournment application. Order on it. Defendant and his advocate are present. Put ff to 09.11.2026 for plaintiff side evidence. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 5 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 6/2025 | Mst Kainat Soomro VS Shah Rukh Gori pathan | Hussain Ahmed (ADVO-1011-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Execution application is allowed by this court vide order dated. 26.12.2025 and same was called. DH and her advocate are present. JD absent, but his advocate is present and filed adjournment application.Order on it. Keep on record. Put off to 02.11.2026 for compliance of decree. |
|