| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 30/2026 | Fahad Dharejo VS The State | Saeed Ahmed(ADVO-455-SBC-GHT) | Abdul Qadir (ADVO-945-SBC-GHT),Abdul Shakoor(ADVO-669-SBC-GHT) | PPC-489-F | 89/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
BA called. ADPP is present. Order passed and announced in open court. It is settled principle that for deciding the bail application the court has to observe the tentative assessment and deeper appreciation of evidence is not required and it will not be fair to go into discussion about the merits of the case at this juncture. From the material evaluated tentatively, no ???reasonable grounds??? as contemplated in section 497 (2) Cr.P.C., are available to extend concession of bail. Under such exceptional circumstances, applicant/accused named above are unable to make out his case for post arrest bail as such the bail application is dismissed. Needless to mention that observations made herein above are tentative in nature and will not prejudice case of either side. I have gone through the case law submitted by learned advocate for applicant/accused but in my humble opinion same is not applicable to the circumstances of matter in hand. |
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 31/2026 | Makhno Malik VS The State | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT),Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | PPC-380,PPC-457 | 12/2024 Jarwar |
Bail application u/s 497 Cr. PC of accused Makhno Malik is called. DDPP and both parties advocates for accued are present. Complainsnt is also present. Police papers received. Arguments heard. Both parties advocates filed statements along with Case laws. Order there on. File. Order passed and announced in open court that Bail application of accused Makhno Malik is allowed in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Fifty thousand) and P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of this court. Bail application is disposed off accordingly. Order placed o record. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 45/2024 | St.Vs VS Retak Kumar Hindu | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-489-F | 44/2024 Mirpur Mathelo |
case called. Accused is present on ball. DDPP & DC are present. Complainant absent, but his advocate is present. Put off to 19.05.026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 4 | PPC 35/2024 | The State VS Makhno and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT),Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-457 | 12/2024 Jarwar |
Case called. Accused Arbab is present on bail. Accused Makhno is not produced from District jail Ghotki, only production slip received in which next date of hearing has been communicated with direction to jail authority to produce the accused on the next date of hearing on Video link. While case of other accused are already disposed off. DDPP & DC are present. Complainant is also present. Put off to 04.05.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| 5 | PPC 9/2025 | St.Vs VS Kashif Soomro & Others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | PPC-380,PPC-457 | 291/2024 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case and application u/s 249-A Cr.PC called. Accused Kashif, and Farman are present on bail. Accused Zaheer absent, but his advocate present and field his condonation application of absentee accused. Order on it. Accused Syed Waqar Shah@Gogan Shah is acquitted u/s 249-A Cr. PC by this court vide order dated. 11.09.2025. DDPP & DC are present. Advocate for complainant filed adjournment application. Order on it. Allowed. Put off to 18.05.2026 for evidence and hearing on application u/s 249-A Cr. PC. Present accused are directed to attend and informed the absentee accused. |
| 6 | PPC 38/2025 | St.Vs VS Allah Warayo & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-504 | 111/2024 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case and application u/s 249-A Cr. PC called. Accused Allah Jiwayo, Barkat Ali, Abbass Ali, Sabir and Harif are present on bail, While accused Allah warrayo is already acquitted u/s 249-A Cr. PC by this court vide order dated. 02.08.2025. DDPP present. Complainant is also present. Mr. Abdul Jabbar Soomro advocate has sent power on behalf of complainant and also he has sent adjournment application. Order here on. Put to off to 14.05.2026 for evidence and hearing on application u/s 249-A Cr.PC. All present accused are directed to attend. Complainant is also directed to attend with all private witnesses for evidence. |
| 7 | PPC 72/2025 | The State VS Jhangal Malik and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-Fv | 21/2025 Jarwar |
Case called. Accused Allah Ditto and Aitbar are present on bail. Accused Jhangal absent. co-accused filed his condonation application. Order on it. Allowed. While accused Rasool Bux is declared as PO. DDPP & DC are present. Complainant is also present. Put off to 20.05.2026 for evidence, and reports of NADRA and state bank. Both present accused are directed to attend and informed the absentee accused for the next date of hearing. Complainant is directed to attend with all private witnesses for evidence. |
| 8 | PPC 81/2025 | The State VS Imran Bozdar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi | 101/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All (3) accused are present on bail. DDPP & DC are present. No PWs present. Issue summons to Complainant and PWs. Call case property if any. Put off to 08.05.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. |
| 9 | PPC 118/2025 | The State VS Ramzan Shaikh and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-380 | 132/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called.Accused Ramzan and Gulzar Ahmed are present on bail. DDPP & DC are present, The case of minor accused Abdul Manan has already been sent up to the Court of Learned II-Civil Judge & J.M Ghotki vide letter No:8694 dated:13.12.2025 wherein reference was allowed by Honourable Sessions Judge Ghotki. DDPP & DC are present. No PWs present. Issue BW to PWs. Put to off to 18.05.2026 for evidence. Both accused are directed to attend. |
| 10 | PPC 176/2025 | The State VS Asghar Ali and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-224,PPC-353 | 212/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. Except accused Abid Ali he is absent without any intimation or application. Issue BW against accused Abid Ali, Advocate for accused Abid Ali is also absent. DDPP & other advocate for accused are present. No PWs present. Issue summons to complainant and PWs. Call case property if any. Put off to 13.05.2026 for service and evidence. All present accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 87 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 11 | PPC 18/2026 | The State VS Pervaiz and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-452 | 269/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Parvez, Aamir and Javeed are present on bail. While accused Nawazo is absconder shown in the Challan sheet and he is called absent, and not yet served. Proclamation U/S 87Cr.PC issued against him returned duly published. Statement of process server ASI Abdul Khalique is recorded at??????.Exh.2. He produced Original proclamation u/s 87 Cr.P.C. Mashirnama, endorsement/affidavit. Order there on at Ex???.02/A to 02-C. Issue fresh Proclamation u/s 88 Cr.PC against absconding accused Nawazo through concerned Mukhtiarkar. DDPP present. Mr. Khursheed Ahmed Laghari appeared and filed power on behalf of all present accused. Order on it. File. Put off to 18.05.2026 for report. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 12 | PPC 47/2026 | The State VS Farooque Bozdar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-380,PPC-457 | 12/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All (4) accused are present on bail. DDPP present. Mr. Tariq Hussain Bozdar advocate appeared and filed statement with interim pre-rarest bail letter No.42/2026 dated. 13.01.2026 granted by Honourable Ist. Additional Sessions Judge M.Mathelo on behalf of accused. Order on it. Necessary documents supplied to all accused and such receipt obtained form them at...Exh.01. Put off to 13.05.2026 for charge. All accused are directed to attend with CTC of confirmation bail order. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 3/2025 | Mst Shazia VS Asif Ali Mirani | Najeeb Ur Rehman(ADVO-489-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family Ex. Application called. DH absent, but her advocate are present. JD not yet served. Issue fresh notice to JD through court and register post AD/TCS on costs. Put off to 07.05.2026 for service. |
|
| 2 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 5/2025 | Mst Farhana VS Dilshad Soomro | Najeeb Ur Rehman(ADVO-489-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family Ex. Application called. DH absent, but her advocate are present and filed statement with receipt of TCS. Order on it. JD not yet served. Issue fresh notice to JD through court on costs. Put off to 07.05.2026 for service. |
|
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 8/2026 | Ravi Kumar VS Sapna Kumari | Chiman Lal(ADVO-1921-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights | Family suit called. Plaintiff is present, but his advocate absent. Service upon defendant is held good but she is absent, Mr. Sikandar Ali Siyal advocate sent power on behalf of defendant with adjournment application. Order there on. Put off to 19.05.2026 for WS. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 2/2026 | Smt Devi bai VS Shahmir jee | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage | Family suit called. Both parties and their advocates are present and advocate for defendant filed adjournment application. Order on it. Allowed. Put off to 07.05.2026 for WS. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 33/2025 | Mst: Fareeda Lund VS Muhammad Moosa Lund | Saddam Hussain (ADVO-882-SBC-GHT) | Ali Asghar Panhyar(ADVO-602-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family Suit called.parties are present along with their counsel.Defendant filed application that compromise has been taken place between him and plaintiff outside court.order on it.File.Advocate for plaintiff filed statement for withdraw of suit with permission to file afresh. Let the matter is disposed off being with drawn with permission to file afresh if so advised. |
|
| 6 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 11/2025 | Muhammad Moosa VS Mst Fareeda | Ali Asghar Panhyar(ADVO-602-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act | ||