| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 1 | DC (Direct Complaint) 22/2026 | Rabnawaz Chana VS Dr Muhammad Mohsin Raza | Ghulam Raza Shah(ADVO-856HC-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-506 | / |
DC called. Complainant and his advocate are present, and advocate field adjournment application. Order on it. Allowed. Put off to 01.10.2026 for recording statement of complainant and witnesses. |
| 2 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 82/2026 | Shabir Ahmed Kori VS Abdullah Malik and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-145 | / |
Crl.Misc.Appli. called. Applicant is called absent but his counsel is present and given statement for withdraw of matter, hence same is disposed off being withdraw. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 35/2024 | The State VS Makhno and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT),Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-457 | 12/2024 Jarwar |
Case called. Accused makhano and arbab are present on bail where as accused akbar and niaz were already acquitted.ADPP is present.Complainant and his counsel are called absent.Munchi of advocate for complainant is present.Record shows that complainant and his pws failed to appear before the court for their evidence. Perused the material.Heard.order passed and announced in open court. That after framing of charge till yet prosecution has failed to examine a single private witness, hence the proceeding of the case are stopped under section:249 crpc against the accused without pronouncing the judgment of acquittal or conviction. That Honourable High Court of Sindh in case reported as PLD 1990 Karachi 233 Re. Mst. SARDARAN BIBI versus THE STATE in para No.8 has Observed that ???The object of surety bonds is to ensure the presence of the accused persons. So, where the accused is released under section 249, Cr.P.C. and his presence is no more required by the Court, the surety is discharged???. Accused persons are present on bail and in the light of above case law, the surety of accused on bail is hereby discharged, however accused are directed to submit P.R bond equivalent to their surety. |
| 4 | PPC 56/2025 | the state VS zohaib and another | Saleem (ADVO-3181-SBC-SUK) | PPC-506-B | 62/2024 Jarwar |
Case called. Accused Zohaib is present on bail. ADPP and DC are is present and DC filed application u/s 249-A C. PC on behalf of present accused Zohaib. Order on it. Issue notice to complainant and state. Put off to 17.10.2026 for evidence and herring on application u/s 249-A Cr. PC. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 5 | PPC 90/2025 | The State VS Sadaqat Ali Kolachi | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-489-F | 89/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP and both parties advocates are present. Complainant is also present. Put off to 10.10.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Complainant is also directed to attend with all private witnesses for evidence. |
| 6 | PPC 94/2026 | The State VS Liaquat Bhayo and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Shahid Ali Pitafi(ADVO-53028-SBC-GHT) | PPC-353,PPC-379 | 25/2026 Belo Mirpur |
Case called. Accused are present on bail. Except accused Liaquat Ali absent. Co-accused field his condonation application.Order on it. ADPP is present. No Ws present. Issue summons to PW Shahmir. Put off to 28.09.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend and informed the absentee accused for the next date of hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 112/2026 | The State VS Abdul Majeed Shar nad others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-392 | 6/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
case called. All accused are present on bail, and accused Sanaullah filed adjournment application or want of time to submit bail order. Order on it. ADPP & DC are present. Necessary documents supplied to all accused and such receipt obtained form them at....Exh.01. Put ff to 15.10.2026 for charge. All accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 87 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 8 | PPC 159/2026 | The State VS Wakeel Ahmed lund and others. | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Gambling Act -Section 5-A | 22/2026 Yaro Lund |
Case and application filed by accused Karam called. ADPP is present. Accused Zafar,kajlo,wazir and wakeel are present on bail.Mr.Abdul Waheed lund advocate is present and files Vakaltnama on behalf of accused Kajlo and zafar.order on it. Accused Zafar,kajlo,wazir and wakeel filed applications under section:249-A crpc.order on them.issue notice to state.ADPP is present and waived the notice.Heard arguments.order passed and announced in open court. Accused namely Zafar,kajlo,wazir,Karam and wakeel are acquitted under section:249-A crpc.The bail bond of accused bail is discharged so also their surties.Issue release writ of accused Karam. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 9 | PPC 170/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Saddique and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-Fv | 53/2026 Jarwar |
Case called. All (10) accused are present on bail. ADPP & DC are present. Accused are jointly filed application for joining trial also also submit bail letter vide No.391/2026 granted by Honourable Ist. Additional Sessions Judge M.Mathelo. Order on it. Necessary documents supplied to all accused and such receipt obtained form them at....Exh.01. . Put off to 15.10.2026 for charge. All accused are directed to attend. |
| 10 | PPC 180/2026 | The State VS Ahmed alias Ahmed Bux and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-506 | 155/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Ahmed@Muhammad Bux,Babar, Hafeez and Arshad@Arshad Ali are present on bail and accused Arshad Ali an Abdul Hafez are jointly filed an application along with affidavits for joining the trial and for want of time to submit bail order on the next date of hearing.Order on it. Keep on record. While accused Naveed is absconder shown in the Challan sheet and he is called absent. NBW issued against him returned un-served. Statement of process Server ASI Jameel Ahmed Kolachi is recorded at??????.Exh.1. He produces NBW, Statement of two Nek mards of locality and his Endorsement/affidavit. Order passed their on R&R at ??????Exh.1-A to 1-D. Issue proclamation u/s 87/88 Cr.P.C against absconding accused. ADPP is present. Mr.Syed Ghulam Rasool Shah advocate filed power on behalf off all present accused. Order on it. File. Put off to 16.10.2026 for Service upon absconding accused. All present accused are directed to attend. |
| 11 | PPC 186/2026 | The State VS Sabir Ali Moosani and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-392 | 173/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Sabir Ali is not produced from District jail Ghotki, only production slip received in which next date of hearing has been communicated with direction to jail authroityt to produce the accused on video link. While accused Ghualm Nabi and Ali @Asghar are expired. Letter for death report of both deceased accused was issued and returned duly complied. Statement of process server ASI Jameel Ahmed is recorded at??????..Exh.01. He produced Death letter, Deth Report,Post Mortem reports of both deceased accused, FIR No 163/2026 of PS M.Mathelo, Statements of two nek mards, of locality and his endorsement/affidavit of process server. Order there on R&R at??????.Exh.1.A to 1.H. ADPP present. Call death report of both deceased accused form Mukhtiarkar ( R ) Daharki. Put off to 28.09.2026 for report. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Other case stage | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 33/2026 | Mai Bachai VS Sohbat Laghari | Ghulam Raza Shah(ADVO-856HC-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff absent, but her advocate is present and filed adjournment application.Order on it. Put off to 29.09.2026 for advocate to be heard. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 26/2026 | Mai Gulshan Chacher VS Nazir Ahmed Chacher. | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family suit called. Plaintiff and her advocate are present. Defendant absent and not yet served. Issue notice to defendant through bailiff and register post AD/TCs on costs. Put off to 22.09.2026 for service. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 4/2025 | Asad Aqeel VS Mst- Nagina Khokhar | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 12 | Suit called. Both parties and their advocates are absent. Advocate for plaintiff has sent adjournment application through his munshi. Order on it. Put off to 14.10.2026 Plaintiff side evidence. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 18/2025 | Mahesh Menghwar VS Smt Aneeta | Nazeer Ahmed (ADVO-649-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for recovery of Gold Ornaments | family suit called. Plaintiff absent, but his advocate is present, and filed adjournment application. Order on it. Defendant absent, but her advocate is present. Put off to 06.10.2026 for arguments. |
|
| 5 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 2/2026 | Mst shahida VS Asghar Bozdar | Hussain Ahmed (ADVO-1011-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family Ex. Application is already allowed by this court vide order dated.30.06.2026 and same was called.DH called absent but her counsel present. JD is called absent and no yet served. Issue BW against JD. Put off to 07.10.2026 for service. |
|