| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 22/2026 | Ghulam Ali shaikh VS The State | Taibah Roohi(ADVO-879-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-379 | 273/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Bail application u/s 497 Cr. PC of accused Ghulam Ali is called. DDPP and advocates for accused are present and filed power on behalf off accused Ghulam Ali Shaikh. Order on it. Complainsat is also present. Police papers received. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open court that Bail application of accused Ghulam Ali is allowed in the sum of Rs.20,000/-(Twenty thousand) and P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of this court. Bail application is disposed off accordingly. Order placed on record. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 104/2022 | The State VS Allah Wadhayo and rs | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-392 | 44/2022 Jarwar |
Case called. Accused raja is not produced by district jail ghotki but only slip produced.ADPP is present.Heard arguments on application under section:249-A crpc.order passed and announced in open court. I am of the humble view that there is no probability of the applicant/accused namely Raja being convicted of any offence, therefore applicant/accused is hereby acquitted under section 249-A, Cr.P.C. Accused is confined in district Jail ghotki.Let the release writ be issued. |
| 3 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 23/2026 | Sachedino VS The State | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-516-A | / |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 171/2024 | St.Vs VS Asif Chhijjan and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Irrigation Act-U/S 61,PPC-379,PPC-427 | 158/2024 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Asif Ali and Ali Asghar are present on bail. Rafique is absconder shown in the Challan sheet and he is declared as PO. DDPP is present. DC absent. Complainant and PWs Shoukat Ali and Mehmood are present. Process for R/PWs be extended and hand over to process server for service. Accused filed adjournment application. Order on it. Put off to 13.04.2026 for supplying of document to accused Asif Ali.Call supplementary of accused Asif Ali. Both present accused are directed to attend. |
| 5 | PPC 75/2025 | The State VS Pakhi Sud and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(iii) | 73/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. Except accused Pakhi@Ali Nawaz absent. Co-accused filed his condonation application. Order on it. Granted. DDPP & both parties advocates are present. No PWs present. Put off to 22.04.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend and informed the absentee accused for the next date of hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 182/2023 | The State VS Seenghar Ali and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-506-B | 32/2023 Yaro Lund |
Case called. Accused Zahoor is not produced by district jail ghotki. Accused Abdul Aziz is already acquitted under section:245 i crpc.accused seenghar,Manzir,M.Saleem,Habibullah and M.Hassan were already declared as PO. ADPP and DA are present.Heard arguments on application under section:249-A crpc.order passed and announced in open court. I am of the humble view that there is no probability of the applicant/accused namely Zahoor being convicted of any offence, therefore applicant/accused is hereby acquitted under section 249-A, Cr.P.C. Accused is confined in district Jail ghotki.Let the release writ be issued. |
|
| 7 | PPC 35/2024 | The State VS Makhno and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT),Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-457 | 12/2024 Jarwar |
Case called. Accused Arbab is present on bail. While case of other accused are already disposed off. Formal charge against accused Arbab is framed at....Exh.12. Plea of accused is recorded at ...Exh.12-A. Accused is pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Issue summons to complainant and PWs. Call case property if any. Put off to 06.04.2026 for evidence. Accused Arbab is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 8 | PPC 29/2026 | The State VS Nasir alias Yasir and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-379 | 273/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Safdar Ali and Nasir@Yasir are absent, without any intimation or application. Issue BW against them. While Accused Ghulam Ali is not produced from District jail Ghotki, Issue PO for him with direction to jail authority to produce the accused on the next date of hearing on Video Link. As per direction of Honourable Sessions Juge, Ghotki, vide office letter 1279/2026 dated.19.02.2206 that lock-up, situated in Civil Court, Buildings at M.Mathelo is in a dilapidated condition and could not used for the custody purpose of under trial prisoners. DDPP & DC are present. Put off to 01.04.2026 for charge. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 87 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 9 | PPC 36/2026 | The State VS Qurban Ali and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(v) | 63/2025 Jarwar |
Case called. All accused namely Qurban, Iltaf and Qasim are absconder shown in the chalaln sheet and they are called absent, Proclamation U/S 87Cr.PC issued against them returned duly published. Statement of process server HC/1436 Biland Khan is recorded at??????.Exh.2. He produced Original proclamation u/s 87 Cr.P.C. Mashirnama, endorsement/affidavit. Order there on at Ex???.02/A to 02-C. Issue proclamation u/s 88 Cr.PC issued against all absconding accused persons through concerned Mukhtiarkar. Put off to 16.04.2026 for report of proclamation u/s 88 Cr.PC of accused all absconding accused. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 10 | PPC 50/2026 | The State VS Zainab Lashari | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-120-B,PPC-216-A | 19/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused is but her advocate is present and filed condonation application of absentee accused. Order on it. Granted. DDPP present. Put off to 22.04.2026 for service. Advocate for accused is directed to informed the absentee accused for the next date of hearing. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 5/2026 | Smt Haleema VS Pyaroo gee | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage | Family suit called. Plaintiff and her advocate are absent. Defendant absent. Issue notice to defendant through court and register post AD/TCS on costs. Put off to 22.04.2026 for service. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 18/2025 | Mahesh Menghwar VS Smt Aneeta | Nazeer Ahmed (ADVO-649-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for recovery of Gold Ornaments | Family suit called. Both parties are absent, but their advocates are present. Put off to 07.04.2026. Arguments. |
|