| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 1 | DC (Direct Complaint) 15/2026 | Mai Mir Zadi Farooque VS M.Ameen and others | Mehdi Hassan(ADVO-916-SBC-GHT) | PPC-452 | / |
DC called. Complainant and her advocate are present. Witness absent. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 06.10.2026 for for recording statement of R/witnesses. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 162/2025 | The State VS Usman and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-379,PPC-427 | 178/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Usman,Maqsood,Niaz, Kabootr,Kojho, and Zahid are present on bail, While other All accused Ghaffar,Rafique.Anwar, Ihsan and Ramzan are absconder shown in the Challan sheet and they are declared as POs. ADPP & DC are present. No PWs present. Issue summon to PWs. Call case property if any. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 19.10.2026 for Evidence. All present accused are directed to attend. |
| 3 | PPC 53/2026 | The State VS Rashid Ali Sial and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-504,PPC-506 | 37/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Both accused are present on bail. ADPP & DC are present. No PWs present. Issue summons to PWs. Call case property if any. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 31.10.2026 for evidence. Both accused are directed to attend. |
| 4 | PPC 83/2026 | The State VS Allah ditto Mahar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-341,PPC-506 | 14/2026 Yaro Lund |
Case called. All (3) accused are present on bail ADPP present. Complainant is also present. Process for R/PWs be extended and hand over to process sever for service. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 31.10.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. |
| 5 | PPC 94/2026 | The State VS Liaquat Bhayo and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Shahid Ali Pitafi(ADVO-53028-SBC-GHT) | PPC-353,PPC-379 | 25/2026 Belo Mirpur |
Case called. All (3) accused are present on bail. ADPP is present. No Ws present. Process for PWs be extended and hand over to process server for service. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 27.10.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 186/2026 | The State VS Sabir Ali Moosani and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-392 | 173/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Sabir Ali is not produced from District Jail Ghotki, only production slip received in which next date of hearing has been communicated with direction to jail authority to produce the accused on the Video link.While other both accused Ghuam Nabi and Ali@ Asghar are expired and their case was abated by this court vide order dated. 12.09.2026. ADPP present. Mr. Yar Muhammad Jalbani advocate appeared an filed power on behalf of accused Sabir. Order on it.File. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Necessary documents supplied to in custody accused Sabir through jail authority on electronic,device system and such receipt obtained from him at???Exh.02. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates.Put off to 12.10.2026 for charge. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Advocate to be Heard | |||||||
| 7 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 86/2026 | HC Aijaz Gadani and others. VS The state | Awais (ADVO-452-SBC-GHT),Hussain Ahmed (ADVO-1011-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-222 | / |
Mr.Awais Khan Pitaffi advocate is present and files Vakaltnama on behalf of accused.order on it.he also filed BA on behalf of accused.Order passed on it and Advocate was directed to be heard on point of Jurisdiction as section:222 PPC is in FIR.Mr.Nand lal ADPP is present and waived the notice.Heard and BA was fixed for order on point of Jurisdiction, mean while Advocate for accused filed statement for withdraw of BA.order on it.Let the BA is disposed off being withdraw. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 87 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 8 | PPC 37/2025 | The State VS Suhbat Shar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi | 7/2025 Yaro Lund |
Case called. Accused Hassan Ali,Farooque,Akrm,and Sarwar@Sarwar@Laloo are present on bail. Accused Sardar, absent. Co-accused field his condonation application. Order on it. While accused Suhbat is jumped out the bail and he is called absent. Proclamation U/S 87Cr.PC issued against him returned duly published. Statement of process server/HC Sharafdin Malik is recorded at??????Exh.4. He produced Original proclamation u/s 87 Cr.P.C. Mashirnama, endorsement/affidavit. Order there on at Ex???.04/A to 04-C. Proclamation u/s 88 Cr.PC issued against absconding accused and report u/s 88 Cr PC received from Mukhtiarkar Daharki vide his office Letter N0.SR/-1367/2026 dated.10.09.2026, it shows, that there is no moveable property entered in the name of absconding accused persosn, and placed on record at .???Ex.5. Order passed on it. Absconding accused Suhbat is declared as Proclaimed offender. Let the case of absconding/ Proclaimed offender accused be proceeded u/s 512 Cr.P.C in his absentia. ADPP present. Issue summons to complainant and PW. Call case property if any. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 31.10.2026 for evidence. All present accused are directed to attend and informed the absentee accused for the next date of hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 9 | PPC 113/2026 | The State VS Abdul Latif and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(ii),PPC-452 | 31/2026 Jarwar |
Case called. Accused Allah Warrayo and Waleed are present on bail. Other (4) accused are absent, but their advocate is present and field condonatioin application of all absentee accused. Order on it. Granted. ADPP present. Complainant is also present and filed application with affidavit. Order on it. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put of to 30.10.2026 for formal. Both present accused are directed to attend. Advocate for accused is also directed to informed the all absentee accused for the next date of hearing. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 4/2025 | Mst- Saima Kalwar VS Muhammad Wajid Kalwar | Munir Ahmed Channa(ADVO-748-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family Execution application is already allowed by this court vide order dated. 12.02.2026 and same was called. DH absent, but her advocate is present. JD also absent. Issue BW to JD. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 22.10.2026 for compliance. |
|
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 40/2026 | Mst Aneela malik VS Nawab Ali Malik | Mansoor Ali(ADVO-990-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called.plaintiff and her counsel are present.wrok is suspended.On 19.9.2026 SHO PS Jarwar submitted report that plaintiff is residing within jurisdiction of PS dad laghari with her father.Today suit is fixed for heard on point of Jurisdiction.advocate for plaintiff filed pS copy of petition along with statement and stated that plaingtiff is residing with her uncle at village Allah adhayo malik within PS Jarwar and in this regard she has also filed petition before court of Honourable ADJ-I Mirpur mathelo.Let the suit is admitted.Issue notice to defendant through postal AD,Bailiff and registry.adjourned to 13.10.2026 for service. |
|
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 42/2026 | Mst Sanam Shaikh VS Jamsheer Juro | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Plaintiff Mst.Sanam is preset with her advocate Mr. Adnan Ahmed Siyal. Heard. Order passed on order sheet and announced in open court that plaint is returned. Order placed on record. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 13/2026 | Mst Afsreen Gabol VS Sadam Pitafi | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Both parties are absent, but their advocate are present. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 09.10.2026 for WS. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 5 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 10/2026 | Mai Jindo VS Mai Koonj and others | Abdul Momin(ADVO-50557-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act | G&W Application called. Applicant is present, but her advocate absent, and advocate for applicant sent statement with NEWS paper daily Pahenji Akhbar vide dated/.25.09.2026.Order on it. One Mai Hakeeman appeared through her advocate Mr. Abdul Hafeez @Sahib Dino Kalwar and advocate field application for impleadment as necessary and proper party with power. Order there on. Issue notice to other side. Call report from Mukhtiarkar and UC concerned, Call verification of death Certificate of deceased. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 13.10.2026 for reports. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 31/2025 | Mst: Asia Solangi VS Umar Farooque Soplangi | Kamran Ali (ADVO-717-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Plaintiff and her advocate are present. Defendant absent, but his advocate is Preston. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 26.10.2026 for plaintiff side evidence. |
||