| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 138/2023 | The State VS Agha Badaruddin Shar and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-380,PPC-457 | 13/2023 Yaro Lund |
Case called. Accused Ghulam Muhammad is present on bail. Accused Aagha Badardinand Abdul Jabbar absent, Mr. Rashid Ahmed Shar advocate has sent condonation of both absentee accused. Order on it. While case of accused Riaz Ahmed is kept on dormant file by this court vide order dated.25.09.2023. DDPP present. Put off to 04.05.2026 for charge. Present accused is directed to attend and informed the both absentee accused for the next date of hearing. |
| 2 | DC (Direct Complaint) 7/2026 | Mst Allah Bachai VS Deedar Ali and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-452,PPC-506 | / |
Dc called. Complainant is present along with her counsel. Heard arguments. order passed and announced in open court. For what has been discussed above, I have arrived on my conclusion that there is no sufficient grounds against accused persons for proceeding therefore, instant Direct Complaint is hereby dismissed, under section 203 Cr.P.C. |
| 3 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 26/2026 | Aryan Ali alias Ayan Ali VS The State | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-506 | 41/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
case called.Accused Aryan is not produced by sup.district jil ghotki but JA sent application under section:249-A crpc.order on it.Accused Imran is called absent.issue notice to him.rest of accused are present on bail.Heard arguments.order passed and announced in open court.ACcused aryan is acuitted under section:249-A crpc.Issue release writ.Adjourned to 6.5.2026 for service.accused are directed to attend. |
| 4 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 27/2026 | Mai Haseena VS The State | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-107 | / |
Interim challan and application u/s 164 Cr.PC called. Applicant/Complainant Mst. Haseena absent, but her advocate is present and withdraw application under section:164 crpc.order passed on spate sheet. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | PPC 37/2025 | The State VS Suhbat Shar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi | 7/2025 Yaro Lund |
Case called. Accused Hassan Ali, Farooque, Ikram, Sardar and Sarwar@Ghulam Sarwar@Laloo are present on bail. While accused Suhbat is jumped out the bail. Issue BW against him. DDPP present. DC absent. Complainant and his advocate are present. Put off to 11.05.2026 for service. All present accused are directed to attend. |
| 6 | Gambling Act 70/2025 | The State VS Iqbal and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Gambling Act -Section 5-A | 84/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. ADPP is present.Mr.Muhammad Azam Siyal Advocate is present and files Vakaltnama on behalf of all accused.order on it.HC Abdul razaque is present and examined at exh:5,he produce relevant docuemnts at exh:3/A to 3/C.PW2 ASI Zahid is present and examined at exh:4,he produce entry and memo at eh:4/A and 4/B.PC Noor Muhammad is present and examined at exh:5. ADPP filed side close at eh:6.342 crpc statement of accused recorded at exh:7 to 10.Heard arguments. Judgment passed and announced in open court.accused are acquitted under section:245 i crpc they are present on bail their bail bonds standfs cancelled and surety discharged. |
| 7 | PPC 116/2025 | The State VS Hakim Ali Sudh | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-216-A | 115/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. DDPP present. DC absent. PW HC Shaman present. Process for R/PWs be extended and hand over to process server for service. Put ff to 15.04.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Present witness is also directed to attend. |
| 8 | PPC 3/2026 | The State VS Zubair and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-416,PPC-417 | 254/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Both accused are present on bail. DDPP and DC are present. No PWs present. Issue BW to complainant and PWs. Put to off to 07.05.2026 for evidence. Both accused are directed to attend. |
| 9 | PPC 14/2026 | The State VS Shahnawaz Bhayo and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-120-A,PPC-310A | 268/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail along with their counsel.ADPP is present.Complainant Mst.SHabeeran is present.Charge framed at exh:2,such pleas recorded at exh:2/A to 2/F.SIP Pir bux Bhutto is present and examined at exh:3 he produce relevant docuemnts at exh:3/A and 3/B.No ther pw is present.All accused filed application under section:249-A crpc.order on it.complainant filed no objection affidavit.same is kept on record.Heard.order passed and announced in open court. That Honourable High Court of Sindh in case reported as 2017 PCRLJ 219 (Sukkur bench) has observed that recording of prosecution evidence is not mandatopry condition while passing the acquittal order under section:249-A crpc and in absence of tangiable evidence further trial would be futile exercise. Hence, I am of the humble view that there is no probability of the applicants/accused namely Janib ali,Shahnawaz,Mashooque,Ahmed ali,Muhammad ali and Ghulam Hussain being convicted of any offence, therefore applicants/accused are hereby acquitted under section 249-A, Cr.P.C. Accused are present on bail their bail bond stands cancelled and surety discharged. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 10 | PPC 39/2025 | The State VS Munwar Gabol and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(ii),PPC-337-A(iv) | 13/2025 Jarwar |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. While accused Ali Nawaz is Jumped out the bail and he is called absent, and declared as PO. Issue letter to NADRA for blocking the CNIC, and letter to state Bank of Pakistan to seal the Account of absconding/proclaimed offender accused person, namely Ali Nawaz, if any. DDPP present. Formal charge against all present accused was framed at...Exh.5. Plea of accused are recorded at...Exh.5.A to.5.k. Accused are pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Issue summons to complainant and PWs. Call case property if any. Put off to 13.05.2026 for evidence. All present accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 87 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 11 | PPC 20/2026 | The State VS Suleman Shah and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-420 | 207/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All (3) accused namely Sulleman Shah,Mushtaque Ahmed and Zahid are absconders shown in the Challan sheet and they are called absent and not yet served. Issue fresh proclamation u/s 87/88 Cr.P.C against all absconding accused. DDPP present. Complainant and his advocate are also present. Put off to 23.04.2026 for Service upon absconding accused. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 12 | PPC 65/2026 | The State VS Imran Ali and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-353,PPC-506 | 41/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
case called.Accused Aryan is not produced by sup.district jil ghotki but JA sent application under section:249-A crpc.order on it.Accused Imran is called absent.issue notice to him.rest of accused are present on bail.Heard arguments.order passed and announced in open court.ACcused aryan is acuitted under section:249-A crpc.Issue release writ.Adjourned to 6.5.2026 for service.accused are directed to attend. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 56/2025 | Smt Reena VS Aneel oad | Awais (ADVO-452-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage | Suit called. Plaintiff absent, but her counsel is present. Defendant called absent and not yet served inspite of issuance of process in ordinary modes of service, through Court, Register post A/D and as well as TCS. Advocate for plaintiff has filed application U/O 5 rule 20 CPC for publication to issue notice through publication against the defendant. Order on it. Let the defendant may be served through publication in daily News paper Roznama Khabreen Multan on costs of plaintiff. Put off to 06.05. 2026 for publication. |
|
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 10/2026 | Mst Salma Laghari VS Kamran Laghari | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Plaintiff absent, but her advocate is present. Service upon defendant is held good and he is present, Mr. Ayaz Ahmed advocate field power on behalf of and defendant and also he has filed adjournment application. Order on it.File. Advocate for plaintiff filed statement with receipt of TCS. Order on it.file. Put off to 06.05.2026 for WS. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 115/2024 | Mst- Asia Khokhar VS Abdul Jabbar Khokhar | Awais (ADVO-452-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount | Family suit called. Both parties absent, but their advocates are present.Put off to 06.05.2026 for Cross examination of plaintiff and her witness. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 4 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 8/2025 | Mst Asia and others VS Abdul Jabbar and others | Awais (ADVO-452-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Ex.Application is already allowed by this court vide order dated 29.08.2025 and same was called. DH absent, but he counsel is present. JD absent, his counsel is present. One applicant Farooque Ahmed (Brother of JD) appeared and filed Application along with affidavit for depositing the maintenance amount of Rs.20,000/- Order on. Issue BW to JD. Put off to 06.05.2026 for compliance. |
|
| 5 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 1/2025 | Smt Samina VS Mour Oad | Awais (ADVO-452-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family Ex. Application is already allowed by this court vide order dated.11.11.2025, and same was called. DH absent, but her advocate is present. JD absent. Issue BW to JD. Put off to 06.05.2026 for compliance. |
|