| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 1 | DC (Direct Complaint) 15/2026 | Mai Mir Zadi Farooque VS M.Ameen and others | Mehdi Hassan(ADVO-916-SBC-GHT) | PPC-452 | / |
DC called. Complainant and his advocate are present. Witness namely Allah Wadhayo is also present, and his Statements u/s 202 is recorded. Put off to 28.09.2026 for for recording statement of R/witnesses. |
|
| 2 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 85/2026 | Muhammad Nawaz Gabol VS SHO PS Jarwar and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-145 | / |
Crl.Misc.appli.called. applicant is present along with his counsel.advocate for private respondents is present.heard.order passed and announced in open court. I have arrived on my considered opinion that there is no any dispute likely to cause breach of peace, hence application is devoid of merits, same is hereby dismissed. |
| 3 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 86/2026 | Awais Pitafi VS DC Ghotki and others | Awais (ADVO-452-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-133 | / |
Crl.Misc.appli.called.ADPP and applicant are present in person.heard and perused the material.order passed and announced in open court. Therefore, in my view there no occasion existed for applicant to invoke the emergency power, under section 133 Cr.P.C. resultantly application in hand merits no consideration and the same is dismissed. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 38/2025 | The State VS Pyaro shar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi | 6/2025 Yaro Lund |
Case called. All (6) accused are present on bail. ADPP & both parties advocates are present. Complainant and private witnesses are present,advocate for complainant filed adjournment application. Order on it. Allowed. Put off to 19.10.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. Complainant and present witnesses are also directed to attend with other all private witnesses for evidence. |
| 5 | PPC 100/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Qasim and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-435 | 55/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. Except accused Raza Hussain and Muhammad Qasim are absent. Co-accused filed their condontion application.Order on it. ADPP present. Both parties advocates are absent. Complainant and witnes Muhammad Hassan are present. Issue summons to R/PWs. Put off to 15.10.2026 for evidence. All present accused are directed to attend and informed the both absentee accused for the next date of hearing. Complainant and present witness are also directed to attend with all other private witnesses for evidence. |
| 6 | PPC 23/2026 | The State VS Ghulam Fareed and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-504,PPC-506 | 274/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called.accused ghulam fareed and achar are present on bail.accused shareef and mureed were declared as PO.ADPP is present.Mr.Abdul Momin Kalhoro advocate is present and files Vakaltnama on behalf of accused on bail.order on it.Accused filed application under section:249-A crpc.order on it.witnessNazir ahmed is present and filed application.order on it. Heard and perused the material. Hence, I am of the humble view that there is no probability of the applicants/accused namely ghulam fareed and achar being convicted of any offence, therefore applicants/accused are hereby acquitted under section 249-A, Cr.P.C. Accused are on bail,their bail bond stands cancelled and surety discharged. |
| 7 | PPC 47/2026 | The State VS Farooque Bozdar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-380,PPC-457 | 12/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. except accused Asif Ali absent. Co-accused field his condonation application. Order on it. Granted. ADPP and DC are are present. Complainant is also present. Mr.Yar Muhammad Hashamani advocate field power on behalf of complainant and also he has field adjournment application. Order there. . Put off to 13.10.2026 for evidence. All present accused are directed to attend. Complainant is also directed to attend with all all private witnesses for evidence. |
| 8 | PPC 52/2026 | The State VS Jaffar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-452,PPC-506 | 271/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. except accused Asif Ali absent. Co-accused field his condonation application. Order on it. Granted. ADPP & both parties advocates are present. Complainant is also present. Put off to 13.10.2026 for evidence. All present accused are directed to attend. Complainant is also directed to attend with all all private witnesses for evidence. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 9 | PPC 25/2026 | The State VS Sajjad and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-506 | 264/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP & DC are present. Complainant shahnawaz bozdar is present.Copies supplied to accused at exh:3.Charge framed at exh:4,such plea recorded at exh:4/A.Complainant Shahnawaz examined at exh:5,he produce FIR at exh:5/A. PW HC Zafar is present and examined at exh:6.ASI Zahid malik is present and examined at exh:7,he produce memo at exh:7/A.Complainant filed application at exh:8 ADPP filed side close at exh:9. 342 crpc statement of accused is of no use. Heard arguments. Judgment passed and announced in open court.accused is acquitted under section:245 i crpc,he is present on bail his bail bonds stands cancelled and surety discharged. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 10 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 95/2026 | The State VS Shahnawaz alias Rahib and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 9/2026 Yaro Lund |
Case called. Both accused are present on bail. ADPP present. Mr. Wazir Ali Mahar advocate filed power on behalf of both accused. Order on it. Formal charge against both accused was framed at...Exh.2. Plea of accused was recorded at..Exh.2.A and 2.B. Accused are pleaded no guilty and claimed to be tied.Issue summons to PWs. Call case property if any. Put off to 13.10.2026 for evidence. charge. Both accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 87 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 11 | PPC 46/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Illyas chadhar/jat and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-489-F | 220/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. all accused are shown as absconders.Complainant has already filed application that his case may be kept on dormant file.That in view of case reported as PLD 2001 Karachi 211 the case against accused be kept on dormant file.Issue NBW sine-die against accused. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 10/2025 |
HBL Microfinance LTD VS Sikanader Ali Lolao | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | ||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 36/2026 | Amjad Ali Farooqui VS Mst Maham Gujar | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights | Family suit called.plaintiff is present along with his counsel. Heard and perused the material. order passed and announced in open court. I am of the humble view that, this Court has no jurisdiction in the matter to entertain suit, hence the plaint is returned to plaintiff with direction to file suit before the court of competent Jurisdiction. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 2 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 1/2025 | Smt Samina VS Mour Oad | Awais (ADVO-452-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family execution called.DH and her advocate present are present. JD is called absent. Advocate for DH filed statement of fresh address of JD or service. Issue BW against JD through SSPP Khairpur on fresh address of JD. Put off to 08.10.2026 for service and compliance. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Exparte Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 56/2025 | Smt Reena VS Aneel oad | Awais (ADVO-452-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage | ||