| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 1 | Summary 8/2026 | SIP Farman Ali VS unknown accused | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-381-A | 3/2026 Jarwar |
Summary called.Complainant and ADPP are present.Heard.order passed and announced in open court. I am of the humble opinion that this is fit case for disposal under ???C??? Class instead of A class. Thus final report is here by approved under ???C??? Class. Since FIR being Crime No.3/2026 of police station:Jarwar is disposed of so the accused and his surety is discharged, if any. Let the order be sent to SHO PS Concerned for information. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 82/2025 | The State VS Attaullah Chijjan and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-452 | 96/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Shahban is present on bail, While accused other all accused are absent. Present accused filed condonation application o all absentee accused. Order on it. Dismissed. Issue BW against all absentee accused. DDPP and advocate for comlainant is present. DC absent. Complainant and witness Muhammad Ismail are preset. Process for R/PWs be extended and hand over to process server for service. Put off to 12.03.2026 for evidence. Present accused Muhammad Shahban is directed to attend. Complaisant and present witness are also directed to attend wit all other private witnesses for evidence. |
| 3 | PPC 116/2025 | The State VS Hakim Ali Sudh | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-216-A | 115/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. DDPP present. DC absent. No PWs present. Process for PWs be extended and hand over to process server for service. Put ff to 25.03.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 4 | PPC 122/2025 | The State VS Attaullah Gadani | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-506 | 138/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case and bail application u/s 497 Cr. PC of accused Attaullah are called. Accused is not produced from District jail Ghotki, only production slip revived in which next date of hearing has been communicated with direction to jail authority to produce the accused on Video Link. DDPP & DC are present. Witness Fida Hussain appeared and filed adjournment application on behalf of complainant. Order on it. Allowed. Main Case is fixed On 07.03.2026, Bail application is adjourned to 26.02.2026 for hearing. |
| 5 | PPC 149/2025 | The State VS Rajesh Oad and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-392 | 154/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case and application u/s 249-A Cr.PC called. Accused Saleem is present on bail. Accused Rajesh is not produced from District Jail Ghotki only production slip is received, in which next date of hearing has been communicated with direction to produce the accused on Video link. DDPP present. Both parties advocates are absent.No PWs present. Process for PWs be extended. Put off to 02.03.2026 for evidence and hearing on application u/s 249-A Cr. PC. Present accused is directed to attend. accordingly. Present witness is directed to attend for evidence. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 202/2025 | The State VS Samandar Lund and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fiii | 235/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All (4) accused are present and they are jointly filed an application along with affidavits for joining trial. They are also submitted photo copy of Confirmation bail order date.29.11.2025 granted by Honourable I- Additional Sessions Judge M.Mathelo. Order on it. Accused are allowed to join trial. Necessary documents supplied to all accused and such receipt obtained from them at??????.Exh.01. DDPP presnt. Mr. Abdul Majeed Mirbahar advocate appeared and filed power on behalf of all accused Order on it. File. Put off to 24.03.2026 for charge.All accused are directed to attend. |
| 7 | PPC 33/2026 | The State VS Sajid Ali Mahar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-379 | 1/2026 Yaro Lund |
Case called. Both accused are present on bail. DDPP present. DC absent. Necessary documents supplied to both accused and such receipt obtained form them at....Exh.01. Put off to 24.03.2026 for charge. Both accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For U/S 87 Cr. P.C | |||||||
| 8 | PPC 34/2026 | The State VS Ramzan Pitafi and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-216.,PPC-419,PPC-420 | 194/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Ramzan is not produced from District Jail Ghotki. Issue PO for his with direction to jail authority to produced the accused on the next date of hearig on Video Link. While accused Nooral@@Noor Ahmed is absconder shown in the Challan sheet and he is called absent, and not yet served. Proclamation U/S 87Cr.PC issued against him returned duly published. Statement of process server ASI Abdul Khalique Kolachi is recorded at??????.Exh.2. He produced Original proclamation u/s 87 Cr.P.C. Mashirnama, endorsement/affidavit. Order there on at Ex???.02/A to 02-C. Proclamation u/s 88 Cr.PC issued against absconding accused and report u/s 88 Cr PC received from Mukhtiarkar M.Mathelo vide his office Letter N0.SR/-134/2026 dated.12.02.2025, it shows, that there is no property entered in the name of absconding accused persosn and placed on record at ???Exh.3. Order passed on it. Absconding accused is declared as Proclaimed offender. Let the case of absconding/ Proclaimed offender accused be proceeded u/s 512 Cr.P.C in his absentia. Issue letter to NADRA for blocking the CNIC, and letter to state Bank of Pakistan to seal the Account of absconding/proclaimed offender accused person, namely Nooral@NoorAhmed, if any. Put off to 09.03.2026 supplying of documents. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 2/2024 |
Ghulam Muhammad VS Yar Muhammad and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Civil suit called. Plaintiff ad his advocate are absent. Defendant No.1 and 3 are served, but they are absent. Advocate for defendant No.3 is present. Respondent No.2 has been expired. Issue notice to LRS of respondent No.2. Put off to 26.03.2026 for service,objection on application u/o 22 rule 4 CPC and arguments on application u/o 9 rule 7 CPC. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 12/2025 | Nisar Ahmed VS Mst Azeeman | Hidayatullah(ADVO-310-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | G&W application called. Applicant and his advocate are present.Respondent not yet served. Issue fresh notice to respondent through bailiff and register post AD/TCS on costs. Put off to 28.02.2026 for service. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 26/2024 | Khalid Ahmed Soomro VS Mst- Muradan and others | Mujeeb Ur Rehman(ADVO-785-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act | G & W. Applicant called. Applicant is present, but his advocate absent, Opponent namely Mst. Muradan is present.Put off to 14.03.2026 for hearing. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 91/2023 | Mst Shaista Kalwar VS Habibullah | Abdul Hafeez Alias Sahib Dino(ADVO-291-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | family suit called.plaintiff is called absent but her counsel is present.defendant and his counsel are present.witness of plaintiff is called absent.Issue notice to plaintiff that in case of failure to proceed on next date the side will be closed.adjourned to 28.2.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
|
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 20/2024 | Mst Shaista VS Habibullah | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | family suit called.plaintiff is called absent but her counsel is present and filed adjournment application.order on it.defendant and his counsel are present.witness of plaintiff is called absent.Issue notice to plaintiff that in case of failure to proceed on next date the side will be closed.adjourned to 28.2.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Exparte Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 38/2025 | Mst: Khadija Kolachi VS Mansoor Ahmed Kolachi | Nisar Ahmed(ADVO-1131-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff is present along with her counsel.Defendant is called absent and already ordered to be proceeded expartee. In Order to prove content of plaint, Plaintiff Mst.Khadija and her witness Mehrab Khan filed their affidavit in expartee evidence.order on them.Advocate for plaintiff filed side close statement.order on it.Heard.judgment passed and announced in open court. Consequently I am of considered opinion that, the plaintiff has made out a good case in her favour. Resultantly, I hereby decree the suit of the plaintiff, as prayed for, as such, the marriage of the plaintiff with defendant stands dissolved by way of Khulla, in lieu of Dower amount with no order as to cost. Let the decree be prepared. Office is directed that the certified copy of decree be sent to the chairman concerned Union Council in compliance of section 21 sub-section (2) of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and upon receipt of such copy the Chairman shall proceed as if he had received an intimation of Talaq required to be given under Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961. |
||