| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 173/2024 | St.Vs VS Aamar Chand Marwai & Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-504 | 178/2024 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case and application u/s 249-Cr. PC called. All (5) Accused are present on bail. DDPP and advocate for complainant are present. No PWs present. Process for PWs be extended and hand over to process server for service. Put off to.30.04.2026 for evidence an hearing on application u/s 249-A Cr. PC. All accused are directed to attend. |
| 2 | PPC 109/2025 | The State VS Zubair and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-379 | 118/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Both accused namely Zubair Ahmed and Mir Hassan are present on bail. DDPP &DCs are present. Complainant is also present. Process for PWs be extended and hand over to process server for service. Put off to 30.04.2026 for evidence. Both accused are directed to attend. Complainant is also directed to attend with all witnesses for evidence. |
| 3 | PPC 197/2025 | the State VS Abdul Karim Shar | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-392 | 227/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. DDPP is present. DC absent. Complainant and witness Muhammad Akram are present. Mr. Mushtaqe Ahmed Solangi advocate appeared and filed power on behalf of complainant and also he has filed adjournment application. Order there on. Put off to 04.05.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Complainant and present witness are also directed to attend with all other private witnesses for evidence. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 13/2026 | The State VS Ali Bux Lund and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-452 | 51/2025 Yaro Lund |
Case called. All (4) accused are present on bail.DDPP present. Formal charge against accused was framed at...Exh.2. Plea of accused is recorded at...Exh.2.A to.2.D. Accused are pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Issue summons to complainant and PWs. Call case property if any. Put of to 04.05.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. |
| 5 | PPC 27/2026 | The State VS Moula Bux and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(ii) | 59/2025 Jarwar |
Case called. All (6) accused are present on bail.DDPP present. Formal charge against accused was framed at...Exh.2. Plea of accused is recorded at...Exh.2.A to.2.F. Accused are pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Issue summons to complainant and PWs. Call case property if any. Put of to 16.04.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 159/2025 | The State VS Irfan Bozdar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-452,PPC-506 | 33/2025 Jarwar |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 2/2026 |
Mohsin Ali Bozdar VS Kamal din Bozdar and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Civil suit called. Plaintiff is absent, but his advocate is present. Both defendant and their advocate are present, and advocate for plaintiff received cop of application u/o VII rule 11-CPC. Put off to 30.04.2026 for objection on application u/o VII rule 11 CPC. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 9/2025 | Mst Shabnam Bozdar VS Nazeer Ahmed Bozdar | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family Ex. Application called. DH and her counsel are present. Notices were issued against JD/defendant through, Bailiff of the court, register post AD/TCS, but defendant did not turn up to peruse the matter. Therefore Publication was made in News paper in Daily Pahenji Akhbar vide dated.28.02.2026 and served notice upon defendant by way of publication for the date of hearing viz.03.03.2026. On same day the JD/defendant called absent and matter was adjourned and fixed for written statement/objection, and the KD/defendant has failed to file written statement/Objection. Therefore the suit of JD/defendant is hereby debarred from filling of written statement and made ex-parte. The DH/plaintiff is hereby directed to file ex-parte proof/evidence on next date of hearing viz.22.04.2026. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 36/2025 | Smt: Payal VS Suneel Kumar | Najeeb Ur Rehman(ADVO-489-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff and her advocate are absent. Defendant not yet served. Issue fresh notice to defendant through court and register post AD/TCs on costs. Put off to 30.04.2026 for service. |
||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 53/2025 | Mai Rehmat VS Rahib Chijjan | Mujeeb Ur Rehman(ADVO-785-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Suit called. Plaintiff and her counsel are absent. Defendant called absent and not yet served. Issue notice through publication in daily News paper Pahenji Akhbar, on costs of plaintiff against the defendant. Put off to 28.04.2026 for publication. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 70/2024 | SMT- Reena Menghwar VS Rajesh Menghwar | Najeeb Ur Rehman(ADVO-489-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount | Suit called. Both parties and their advocates are absent,Matter is adjourned to 30.04.2026 for plaintiff side evidence. |
|
| 5 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 20/2024 | Muhammad Wajid Hussain Kalwar VS Mst- Saima Kalwar | Yar Mohammad Jalbani(ADVO-991-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 12,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | G&W application called. Applicant absent, but his advocate is present. Respondent and her advocate are absent, but advocate for respondent sent adjournment application. Order on it.Allowed. Put off to 30.04.2026 applicant side evidence. |
|
| 6 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 27/2024 | Mst- Saima Kalwar VS Muhammad Wajid Hussain Kalwar | Munir Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-907-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10 | G&W application called. Applicant and her advocate absent. Respondent also absent, but his advocate present. Put off to 30.04.2026 applicant side evidence. |
|