| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 75/2025 | The State VS Pakhi Sud and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(iii) | 73/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Ihsan Ali, Ghalib Hussain, Fakhar@Fakhar Hayat and Irfan Ali@ Papoo are present on bail. Accused Pakhi has been expired. DDPP is present. No PWs present. P. Judge is on C/Leave. Put off to 06.07.2026 for evidence. All present accused are directed to attend. |
| 2 | PPC 82/2025 | The State VS Attaullah Chijjan and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-452 | 96/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. Except accused Arbelo and Arbab are absent. Co-accused filed their condonation application. Order on it. DDPP present. Complainant is also present. P. Judge is on C/Leave. Put off to 02.07.2026 for evidence. All present accused are directed to attend and informed the both absentee accused for the next date of hearing. Complainant is also directed to attend for evidence. |
| 3 | PPC 165/2025 | The State VS Ghazanfar Abbass Shah and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-506 | 202/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All (6) accused are present on bail. DDPP and both parties advocates are present. No PWs present. Process for PWs be extended and hand over to process server. P. Judge is on C/Leave. Put off to 06.07.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. |
| 4 | PPC 12/2026 | The State VS Niaz Ahmed | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-419,PPC-420 | 55/2025 Jarwar |
Case called. Accused Niaz Ahmed is present on bail. DDPP is present. P.Judge is on C/Leave. Put off to 08.07.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 5 | PPC 59/2026 | The State VS Zahid Hussain and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-Fiii | 12/2026 Jarwar |
Case called all (3) accused are present on bail. DDPP present. P. Judge is C/Leave. Put off to 08.07.2026 for supplying of documents. All accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 94/2024 | Akash Kumar Hindu VS Lutuf Ali Khan @ Shahzado Bozdar | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-420,PPC-489-F | / |
Case called. Accused Lutuf Ali Khana is absent, but his advocate present and filed condontion application of accused. Order on it. Complainant absent, but his advocate is present. P. Judge is on C/Leave. Put off to 23.06.2026 for Arguments. Advocate for accused is directed to informed the absentee accused for the next date of hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 51/2026 | The State VS Imamuddin Lund and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-382 | 60/2025 Jarwar |
Case called. Accused Imamuddin, Fayyaz Ali and Ali Khan are present on bail. Whie accused Nizamuddin is absocnder in challan sheet. NBW issued against him returned un-served same extended and handed over to the same process Server. DDPP and DC are present, Complainant is also present. P. Judge is on C/Leave. Put off to 11.06.2026 for service of absconding accused. All present accused are directed to attend |
| 8 | PPC 67/2026 | The State VS Farhan Kalwar and another | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | PPC-392 | 75/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Farhan is produced from District jail Ghotki. While accused Khaliq Dino@Khalid is on bail shown in the challan sheet, but he is called absent. Issue NBW against accused. P. Judge is on C/Leave. Put off to 22.06.2026 for service. |
| 9 | PPC 89/2026 | The State VS Mukhtiar Latki and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-448,PPC-504 | 29/2026 Jarwar |
Case called. All (6) accused are on bail shown in the chllan sheet. Issue notice against them, DDPP and complainant are present. P. Judge is on C/Leave. Put of to 07.07.2026 for service. |
| 10 | PPC 102/2026 | The State VS Deedar Shaikh and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-392 | 26/2026 Belo Mirpur |
Case called. Accused Deedar is not produced from District jail Ghotk. Issue PO for him. While other all accused are absconders shown in the challan sheet. Issue BW against them. P. Judge is on C/Leave. Put off to 22.06.2026 for service. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 4/2025 |
Akash Kumar VS Lutuf Ali Bozdar | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Civil suit called. Both parties absent, but their advocates are present. P. Judge is on C/Leave. Put off to 23.06.2026 for hearing on application u/o VII rule 11 CPC. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 57/2025 | Muhammad Sadique VS Mst Tanzeela | Sunder Khan(ADVO-1426-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights | Family suit called. Plaintiff and his advocate are absent, Defendant is present, but her advocate absent.P. Judge is on C/Leave. Put off to 29.06.2026 for WS. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 9/2026 | Mst Deeba VS Chahat Ali Lund | Tanveer Ahmed (ADVO-573-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Plaintiff absent, but her counsel is present. Defendant absent and not yet served. Issue fresh notice to defendant through bailiff and register post AD/TCS on costs. P. Judge is on C/Leave. Put off to 11.06.2026 for service. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 3 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 1/2026 | Mahesh VS Smt Aneeta | Nazeer Ahmed (ADVO-649-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | G&W Application called. Both parties and their advocates are absent. P. Judge is on C/Leave. Put off to 18.06.2026 for WS/Objection. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 10/2026 | Mst Salma Laghari VS Kamran Laghari | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Suit called. Both parties are present, but their advocates are absent. P. Judge is on C/Leave. Put off to 30.06.2026 for Pre-trial. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 87/2024 | Mst- Moomal Lolai VS Javed Ali Lolai | Mehdi Hassan(ADVO-916-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff and her counsel are present. Defendant also present, but his advocate absent. . Defendant filed application with affidavit for deposited the maintenance amount of Rs.5,000/- and also plaintiff filed application for receiving the maintenance amount of Rs.5,000/- Order there on.Such receipt obtained from plaintiff for office record. P. Judge is on C/Leave. Put off to 22.06.2026 for plaintiff side evidence. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 18/2025 | Mahesh Menghwar VS Smt Aneeta | Nazeer Ahmed (ADVO-649-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for recovery of Gold Ornaments | family suit called. Both parties and their advocates are present. P. Judge is on C/Leave. Put off to 18.06.2026 for arguments. |
|
| 7 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 5/2025 | Mst Farhana VS Dilshad Soomro | Najeeb Ur Rehman(ADVO-489-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family Ex.Application is already disposed of by this court vide order dated. 07.05.2026 and same was called. DH absent, but her advocate is present. JD not yet served. Issue notice to JD. P. Judge is on C/Leave. Put off to 23.06.2026 for service. |
|