| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 7/2026 | Basant ram VS SHO Police Station Mirpur Mathelo and ors | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-145 | / |
Crl.Misc.Appli. called.Applicant is present along with his counsel. ADPP is present. Advocate for applicant filed statement for withdraw of matter. Let the Misc.appli is disposed off being withdrawn. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 12/2023 | The State VS Abdul Wahab Soomro | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-489-F | 351/2022 A-Section Ghotki |
Case called. Accused Abdul Wahab is produced from District jail,Ghotki. DDPP and DC are present.Advocate for complainant absent. Witness, Aftab Ahmed Manager HBL Ghotki absent. Issue summons to PWs. Put off to 10.02.2026 for evidence. Accused is remanded back to same custody with direction to jail authority to produce him accordingly. |
| 3 | PPC 27/2023 | State VS Mohammad Hayat Bozdar & ors | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-Fi | 14/2023 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called.All accused are present on bail.ADPP is present.Complainant Ali Muhamamd and witness namely Noor Hassan and Gulab are present and stated that they have no objection if accused are acquitted.DA is present.Advdvocate for complainant is present.Heard argued.Order passed and announced in open court. All accused are acquitted under section:249-A crpc,they are present on bail their bail bonds stands cancelled and surety discharged. |
|
| 4 | PPC 28/2023 | State VS Ali Mohammad Bozdar & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(i) | 15/2023 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Ali Muhammad,Abdul Latif, Noor Hassan, Gulab, AHmed and Muhammad Saddique are present on bail. Accused Muhammad Ayoub is produced from District Jail Ghotki.ADPP is present.Advocate for all accused are present. Advocate for complainant is present.Heard arguments on applications under section:249-A crpc of all accused. Complainant M.Ramzan and witness namely M.Hayat and Qurban Ali are present and stated that they have no objection if accused are acquitted. Order passed and announced in open court. All accused are acquitted under section:249-A crpc,accused who are present on bail their bail bond stands cancelled and surety discharged,while the intimation of acquittal be issued against accused M.Ayoub as he is on bail in instant crime but in custody in another crime. |
| 5 | PPC 5/2025 | St.Vs VS Abdul Hakeem Channa | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Faqeer Muhammad (ADVO-855-SBC-GHT) | PPC-489-F | 296/2024 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. DDPP& DC are present. Advocate for complainant absent. Complainant and witness Muhammad Akram are present. Advocate for accused filed adjournment application. Order on it. Allowed. Process for R/PWs be extended and hand over to process server for service. Put off to 28.02.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Complainant and present witness are also directed to attend with all private witnesses for evidence. |
| 6 | PPC 2/2026 | The State VS Kashif alias Dili | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-380,PPC-454 | 48/2025 Yaro Lund |
Case called. Accused is produced from District jail Ghotki. DDPP and DC are present. Complainant is also present. Mr. Yar Muhammad Jalbani advocate filed power on behalf of complainant. Order on it. file. Put off to 17.02.2026 for evidence. Accused is remanded back to same custody with direction to jail authority to produce him accordingly. Complainant is directed to attend with all private witnesses for evidence. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 197/2025 | the State VS Abdul Karim Shar | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-392 | 227/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. DDPP & DC are present. Formal charge against accused was framed at...Exh.2. Plea of accused is recorded at...Exh.2.A. Accused is pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Issue summons to complainant and PWs. Call case property if any. Put off to 05.03.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 8 | PPC 199/2025 | Khamiso shaikh VS Ghafoor and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-506 | / |
Case called.All (3) accused are present on bail. Complainant and his advocate are present. Formal charge against accused was framed at...Exh.5. Plea of accused is recorded at..Exh5.A to 5.C. Accused are pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tired. Both parties have jointly filed application on the ground that compromise take running between both parties. Order on it. Issue summons to witnesses. Put off to 09. 03.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend. Complainant is also directed to attend with all witnesses for evidence. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 9 | PPC 187/2025 | The State VS Nasrullah and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-452,PPC-506 | 41/2025 Yaro Lund |
Case called.All (4) accused are preset on bail. DDPP present. Put off to 07.03.2026 for formal. Accused are directed to attend. |
| 10 | PPC 8/2026 | The State VS Ishaque and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-380 | 53/2025 Yaro Lund |
Case called.All (3) accused are present on bail. DDPP present. Accused namely Parvaiz Ahmed and Muhammad Iishque are jointly filed an application for joining trial with Photo copy of confirmation bail order in C. BA No.437/25 granted by Honourable I-Additional Sessions Judge M.Mathelo vide order dated.30.12.2025. Order on it. Necessary documents supplied to all accused and such receipt obtained form them at...Exh.1. Put off to 26.02.2026 for charge. All accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 11 | PPC 59/2025 | The State VS Hazour Bux Rind and another | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-506 | 72/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. both accused are present on bail. ADPP is present. M.Ranal Junior clerk Probation department District Ghotki is present.Heard arguments. Judgment passed and announced in open court. Accused are convicted under section:245 (2) Crpc and sentenced as mentioned in Judgment. I instead of sentencing accused persons to prison, keeping in view the concept of law, facts and circumstances of the case, I find the present case fit where the accused can be sent on probation, I therefore exercise the powers under section 5 of probation of Offenders Ordinance and under the supervision of the Probation Officer 12 months, upon executing the requisite bonds subject to furnishing surety of Rs.10,000/- and PR bonds of the equal amounts. As the accused persons are on bail and has furnished surety of the same amount before Honourable sessions Court; therefore, the same will be suffice for their probation bond. The bond shall contain a condition that during the period of probation, the accused shall restrain from any immoral, illegal activities and felonies and shall also improve his behavior. There will be no stigma of conviction on the probationer as per provision of Section 11 of the said Ordinance. However, in the case of violation of any terms and condition of the probation bond, the probation officer may submit a report before this court and on such report an appropriate order of imposing a fresh condition or extending the period of probation or even cancellation of the probation order will be passed and the original punishment will be executed. Copy of this Judgment shall be given to accused persons free of cost and copy shall also be forwarded to Probation officer for information and compliance. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 12 | PPC 34/2026 | The State VS Ramzan Pitafi and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-216.,PPC-419,PPC-420 | 194/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Ramzan is produced from District jail Ghotki. While accused Noorlal@ Noor Ahmed is absconder shown in the Challan sheet and he is called absent. NBW issued against him returned un-served. Statement of process Server ASI Abdul Khalique Kolachi is recorded at??.Exh.1. He produces NBW, entry of PS Jarwar,Statement of two Nek mards of locality and his Endorsement/affidavit. Order passed their on R&R at ??Exh.1-A to 1-E. Issue proclamation u/s 87/88 Cr.P.C against absconding accused. DDPP & DC are present. Put off to 23.02.2026 for Service upon absconding accused. Accused produced in custody is remanded back to same custody with direction to jail authority to produce him accordingly. |
| 13 | PPC 39/2026 | The State VS Shahnaz Gul | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-279 | 260/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. accused is present on bail along with his counsel. ADPP is present. Accused filed application that he pleaded his guilt duly supported with affidavit. same was kept on record at exh:1. Thereafter show cause notice issued to accused at exh:2.Accused submitted reply of show cause notice at exh:3. Heard the parties and perused the material. order passed and announced in open court. Since accused have pleaded his guilt voluntarily, therefore by taking lenient view, as he has admitted his guilt voluntarily, I do hereby convict/sentence the accused U/S 243 Cr.P.C, for the offence punishable U/S:279 PPC R/w 75 NHSO Act and sentence him to pay fine of Rs.3000/ only and in default of payment of fine amount, he shall undergo for one day as S.I. Accused have deposited the fine amount imposed upon him. Reader is directed to deposit the same in Govt. Treasury under proper challan which be annexed with file. Accused is shown on bail his bail bond stand cancelled and surety discharged. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 63/2025 | Smt Shango bai VS Jameel thori | Mujeeb Ur Rehman(ADVO-785-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage | Family suit called. Plaintiff absent, but her counsel is present. Defendant not yet served. Issue fresh notice to defendant through concerned court on costs. Put off to 26.02.2026 for service. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 38/2025 | Mst: Khadija Kolachi VS Mansoor Ahmed Kolachi | Nisar Ahmed(ADVO-1131-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Suit called. Plaintiff and her counsel are absent. Notices were issued against defendant through, Court, register post AD/TCS, but defendant did not turn up to peruse the matter. Therefore Publication was made in News paper daily Phanji Akhbar vide dated.17.12.2025 and served notice upon defendant by way of publication for the date of hearing viz.19.12.2025. On same day the defendant called absent and suit was adjourned and fixed for written statement, and the defendant has failed to file written statement. Therefore the suit of defendant is hereby debarred from filling of written statement and made exparte. The plaintiff is hereby directed to file exparte proof/evidence on next date of hearing viz.23.02.2026. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 18/2025 | Mahesh Menghwar VS Smt Aneeta | Nazeer Ahmed (ADVO-649-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for recovery of Gold Ornaments | Family suit called. Both parties absent, but their advocates are present, and advocate for Plaintiff filed adjournment application. Order on it. Allowed. Put off to 14.02.2026. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Issues | |||||||
| 4 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 28/2024 | Abdul Waheed Mirani VS Mst- Salma Suhno Khan | Mushtaque Ahmed(ADVO-1268-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 12,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | G&W application called. Both parties and their advocates are absent. Put off to 05.03.2026 for settlements of Issues. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 2/2025 | Smt Aneeta VS Mukesh Kumar | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Both parties absent, but their advocates are present, and advocate for defendant filed adjournment application. Order on it. Allowed. Put off to 14.02.2026. |
|