| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 42/2026 | Abdul Latif Shaikh VS SHO PS Mirpur Mathelo | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-516-A | / |
Crl.Misc.appli.called. ADPP is present. Applicant Abdul Latif through instant application filed under section:517 crpc, seeks restoration of one mobile on superdari. Applicant Abdul Latif is called absent,on last date he was also called absent,hence application filed by applicant is dismissed in Non-prosecution. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 48/2025 | The State VS Allah Wassayo Bhayo | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 51/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. DDPP & DC are present. Complainant I/O of the case HC Arshad Ali is also present. No other PWs present. Issue BW to R/PWs. Call case property if any. Put off to 04.06.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Complainant is also directed to attend with all witnesses for evidence. |
| 3 | PPC 82/2025 | The State VS Attaullah Chijjan and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-452 | 96/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. Except accused Arbelo absent. Co-accused filed his condonation application. Order on it.Granted. DDPP present. DC absent. Complainant and PWs namely Muhammad Ismail, and Mst. Sughran are present. Put off to 08.06.2026 for evidence. All present accused are directed to attend and informed the absentee accused for the next date of hearing. Complainant and both present witnesses are also directed to attend for evidence. |
| 4 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 97/2025 | The State VS Ghulam Yaseen Lund | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 24/2025 Yaro Lund |
|
| 5 | PPC 100/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Qasim and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-435 | 55/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All (6) accused are present on bail. DDPP and both parties advocates are present. Complainant and PWs namely Muhammad IHassan and Jalal are present. Advocate for complainant filed adjournment application. Order on it. Allowed. Put off to 10.06.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. Complainant and both present witnesses are also directed to attend for evidence. |
| 6 | PPC 123/2025 | The State VS Shahzore and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-506 | 19/2025 Jarwar |
Case called. All(4) accused are present on bail. DDPP present. Complainant is also present and filed adjournment application. Order it. Allowed. Put off to 10.06.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend. Complainant is also directed to attend with all private witnesses for evidence. |
| 7 | PPC 134/2025 | The State VS Noor Hassan and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-382,PPC-427 | 133/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All Accused are present on bail. DA is present. ADPP is present.DA is called absent. Complainant Abdul Jabbar Chandio and pws are called absent. Summons issued to complainant and pws returned.Perused the material.order passed and announced in open court. The proceeding of the case are stopped under section:249 crpc against the accused without pronouncing the judgment of acquittal or conviction. That Honourable High Court of Sindh in case reported as P L D 1990 Karachi 233 Re. Mst. SARDARAN BIBI versus THE STATE in para No.8 has Observed that ??? The object of surety bonds is to ensure the presence of the accused persons. So, where the accused is released under section 249, Cr.P.C. and his presence is no more required by the Court, the surety is discharged???. Accused are present on bail and in the light of above case law, the sureties of accused on bail is hereby discharged, however accused are directed to submit P.R bond equivalent to their surety |
| 8 | PPC 184/2025 | Abdul Latif VS Faiz Muhammad and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-Fi | / |
Case called. All (7) accused are present on bail. Complainant is present. Put off to 10.06.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. Complainant is also directed to attend with all witnesses for evidence. |
| 9 | PPC 188/2025 | The State VS Abdul Jabbar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT),Adnan Ahmed Siyal(ADVO-1082-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(iii),PPC-452 | 47/2025 Jarwar |
Case called. All(5) accused are present on bail. DDPP present. No PWs present. Issue BW to Complainant and PWs. Put off to 10.06.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. |
| 10 | PPC 202/2025 | The State VS Samandar Lund and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fiii | 235/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. Except accused Safdar Hussain absent. Co-accused filed his condonation application. Order on it.Granted. DDPP and DC are present. No PW present. Issue summons to complainant and witnesses. Call case property if any. Put off to 11.06.2026 for evidence. All present accused are directed to attend and informed the absentee accused for the next date of hearing. |
| 11 | PPC 6/2026 | The State VS Samandar Shar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-506 | 261/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. Except accused Safdar Hussain absent. Co-accused filed his condonation application. Order on it.Granted. DDPP and DC are present. No PW present. Issue summons to complainant and witnesses. Call case property if any. Put off to 11.06.2026 for evidence. All present accused are directed to attend and informed the absentee accused for the next date of hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 12 | PPC 49/2026 | The State VS Gulsher Samejo and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-341,PPC-353 | 23/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. Except accused Amir Bux and Abdul Hafeez are absent. Co-accused filed separately their condonation applications. Order there on. DDPP present. DC absent. Put off to 25.05.2026 for supplying of documents. All present accused are directed to attend and informed the both absentee accused for the next date of hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 13 | PPC 139/2025 | Faiz Muhammad Gabol VS Shahzore and others | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-452 | / |
Case called. All (6) accused are present on bail. Complainant is present. Put off to 10.06.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. Complainant is also directed to attend with all witnesses for evidence. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 14 | DC (Direct Complaint) 8/2026 | Aijaz Ahmed VS Sabir alias bagro | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-392 | / |
Dc called. Complainant is present along with his counsel. the statement of complainant Aijaz Ahmed, under section 200 Cr.P.C, was recorded and to ascertain truth or falsehood of the complaint, P.E was ordered to be conducted in terms of section 202 Cr.P.C. The complainant produce his witnesses namely Lal dino and Muneer, their statement under section 202 crpc was recorded. Adjourned to 4.6.2026. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 12/2025 | Nisar Ahmed VS Mst Azeeman | Hidayatullah(ADVO-310-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | G&W application called. Applicant is present. Advocate for applicant absent. Respondent not yet served. Issue fresh notice to respondent through bailiff and register post AD/TCS on costs. Put off to 11.05.2026 for service. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 9/2026 | Mst Deeba VS Chahat Ali Lund | Tanveer Ahmed (ADVO-573-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Plaintiff and her counsel are absent, and counsel sent adjournment application through his munshi. Order on it. Allowed. Defendant absent and not yet served. Issue fresh notice to defendant through bailiff and register post AD/TCS on costs. Put off to 08.06.2026 for service. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 28/2024 | Abdul Waheed Mirani VS Mst- Salma Suhno Khan | Mushtaque Ahmed(ADVO-1268-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 12,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | G and W called. Applicant and her counsel are called absent without intimation. Opponent and his counsel are also called absent without intimation. Now time is 12:00 Noon. Record shows that on 16.10.2025,1.12.2025,9.2.2026,5.3.2026 and 7.4.2026 applicant and his counsel are called absent which shows that applicant has lost interest to pursue his case hence application is dismissed in non-prosecution. |
|