| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 25/2026 | Abdul Hafeez Naich VS The State | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 76/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Bail application u/s 497 Cr. PC of accused Abdul Hafeez Naich is called. DDPP and advocate for accused are present. Police papers received. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open court that Bail application of accused Abdul Hafeez Naich is allowed in the sum of Rs.30,000/-(Thirty thousand) and P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of this court. Bail application is disposed off accordingly. Order placed o record. FIR Proceedings is already fixed on .04.2026 for final report. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 64/2022 | State VS Arbelo Hyderani & Others. | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT),Muhammad Murad(ADVO-1141-SBC-SUK) | Abdul Waheed (ADVO-721-SBC-GHT) | PPC-447 | 99/2022 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called.ADPP,all accused and DA are present.Heard arguments.order passed and announced in open court. Hence, I am of the humble view that there is no probability of the applicants/accused namely Arbelo,Iqbal ahmed and Aitbar Ali being convicted of any offence, therefore applicants/accused are hereby acquitted under section 249-A, Cr.P.C.They are present on bail their bail bond stands cancelled and surery discharged. |
| 3 | PPC 102/2024 | St.Vs VS Abdul Hameed Chachar | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Aftab Hussain(ADVO-324-SBC-GHT) | PPC-489-F | 153/2024 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. DDPP & DC are present. Advocate for complainant is absent. No PWs present. Issue BW to complainant and PWs. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 22.04.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 4 | PPC 182/2025 | The State VS Gulab Laghari and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-506 | 172/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called.all accused are present on bail along with their counsel. ADPP is present.Complainant Shafique Ahmed is present and examined at exh:3,he produce FIR at exh:3/A.PW-2 HC M.Malook is present and examined at exh:4. PW-3 ASI Abdul Khalique is present and examined at exh:5. Complainant filed application at exh:6.ADPP put note of side close on it.342 crpc statement of accused is no use.Heard arguments. Judgment passed and announced in open court.all accused are acquitted under section:245 i crpc.they are present on bail their bail bonds stands cancelled and surety discharged. |
| 5 | PPC 208/2025 | Roshan Ali VS Gul Hassan & ors | Saeed Ahmed(ADVO-1207-SBC-GHT) | Mujeeb Ur Rehman(ADVO-785-SBC-GHT) | PPC-506-B | / |
Case called. All (4) accused are absent without any intimation or application. Complainant and is advocate are present BW issued against all accused, but return un-served same is extended and hand over to process server for service. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 22.04.2026 for service. |
| 6 | PPC 5/2026 | The State VS Khamiso alias Arbelo Soomro and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-353,PPC-506 | 201/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. All (4) accused are present on bail. DDPP present. No PWs present. Issue summons to complainant and PWs. Call case property if any. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 22.04.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. |
| 7 | PPC 32/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Arif Arain and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-447,PPC-474 | 98/2025 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Aarif is present on bail. DDPP and both parties advocates are present. Complainant absent. Accused filed application with affidavit. Order on it. File, already received an order dated. 09.03.2026 from Honourable High court, of Sindh Bench at Sukkur, in Cr. Miss. application No.S-108/2026 Reg. Muhammad Aarif..vs..Riaz Ahmed Arain, that the operation of the order dated. 23.01.2026 passed by Ist. Civil Judge & JM M.Mathelo is hereby suspended. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 24.04.2026. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 8 | PPC 35/2026 | tE sTATE VS Ghulam Yaseen and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-379 | 2/2026 Yaro Lund |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. DDPP and DC are present. Formal charge against accused was framed at...Exh.2. Plea of accused is recorded at...xh.02.A. Accused is pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Issue summons to complainant and PWs. Call case property if any. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates.Put off to 22.04.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 9 | PPC 101/2024 | St.Vs VS Ali Ahmed Shah and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-427,PPC-452,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 172/2024 Mirpur Mathelo |
Case called. Accused Ali Ahmed Shah, Aftab Shah, Muzaffar Shah, Insaf Shah and Mazhar Shah are present on bail. While accused Hussain Ahmed Shah and Muzafar Shah has been expired and their proceedings are abated. DDPP and both parties advocates are present. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates. Put off to 27.04.2026 for statement of accused. All present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 63/2025 | Smt Shango bai VS Jameel thori | Mujeeb Ur Rehman(ADVO-785-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage | Suit called. Plaintiff and her counsel are present. Advocate for plaintiff has filed statement with News Papers Daily Pahenji Akhbar dated.03.03.2026. Order on it. Service upon defendant is held good through Publication, but he is called absent. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates.Put off to 27.04.2026 for appearance of defendant and W.S |
|
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 6/2026 | Fiaz Ali Lund VS Mst Zafeeran Lund | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Family Suit-Suit for Jactitation of Marriage | Family suit called. Plaintiff and his advocate are present. Defendant not yet served. Issue fresh notice to defendant through bailiff and register post AD/TCS on cots. Court work is suspended at the requested of District, Bar due to strike of advocates.Put off to 22.04.2026 for service. |
|