| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 80/2025 | The State VS Gullan Chandio | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Afsana(ADVO-370-SBC-KMB),Amjad Ali Abbasi(ADVO-19626-SBC-KHE) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 39/2025 Waggan |
Case called, accused Gullan is present on bail along with his Ld. counsel Ms. Afsana Waggan. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The case is fixed for Evidence. Process returned unserved upon complainant and PWs, the same is extended and handed back to process server for re-service. Put off to 11-12-2025 for Evidence. |
| 2 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 123/2025 | The State VS Gullan chandio | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Afsana(ADVO-370-SBC-KMB) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 45/2025 Waggan |
Case called, accused Gullan is present on bail along with his Ld. learned counsel Ms. Afsana Waggan. Learned ADPP for the state is present. The process returned partly served as HC/ Amanullah Tunio; the author of FIR is present and examined at Ex-03. He produced memo of arrest and recovery, FIR and Roznamcha entry R&R at Ex-03/A to 03/C respectively. While the process upon remaining PWs returned unserved, the same is extended and handed back to process server for re-service. Put off to 11-12-2025 for Evidence. Case property was produced, the same is returned back to P.S Waggan with directions to produce it on the next date of hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 49/2025 | The State VS Abdul Kareem and others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-Fv,PPC-506-B | 18/2025 Waggan |
Case called. Accused Abdul Kareem is present on bail while accused; Mst Abida Thaheem is called absent under intimation/excuse application submitted by co-accused. Order on it. Condoned. Their Ld. counsel Mr. Ashique Hussain Samo is present. Ld. ADPP is Present. While accused Mahmood and Dhani Bux have already been declared as "Proclaimed offenders". More so, compliance report into the writ of attachment U/S 88 Cr.P.C against P.O; Dhani Bux has been received from Mukhtiarkar Warah showing no land property into his name. Hence the same is kept on record at Ex-06. Put off to 22-12-2025 for Supply of copies. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 1 | IInd Class Civil Suits 1/2025 |
Riasat Ali Shahbrani through attorney Ghulam Sarwar VS Abdul Nabi alias Raju Shahbrani and others | Rafiq Ahmed(ADVO-187-SBC-KMB) | Faheem Akhtar (ADVO-325-SBC-KMB) | IInd class suit called. Attorney Ghulam Sarwar of the plaintiff Riasat Ali Shabrani is called absent along with his Ld. counsel Mr. Rafique Ahmed Naich. Defendant Abdul Nabi @ Raju Shabrani is present, his Ld. counsel Mr Faheem Akhtar Chandio absent, while his junior is present. The matter is fixed for objections on application U/O 18 Rule 18 read with section 151 CPC from the defendant side. So also on the application U/O 7 rule 11 C.P.C from plainitif side. Since both the Ld. counsels are called absent, hence the matter is adjourned to: 20-12-2025 for Evidence - hearing on the application U/O 18 Rule 18 read with section 151 CPC and on application U/O 7 rule 11 C.P.C, respectively. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 22/2025 | Mst Sakina VS Mehrab Kanasiro | Abdul Ghaffar(ADVO-291-SBC-KMB) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family execution application called. Plaintiff/DH Mst. Sakina is absent along with her Ld. counsel Mr. Abdul Ghaffar Gopang; while his junior is present. Defendant/JD Mehrab Kanasiro called absent. The notice issued to him through the office of the Ld. family Judge at Warrah has not yet returned served or un-served. Adjourned to 20-12-2025 for SERVICE. REPEAT PROCESS ON COST. |
||
| 2 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 23/2025 | Rehmat Khatoon VS Siraj | Suhendar Kumar(ADVO-98-SBC-KMB) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family Execution application called. Plaintiff/D.H Mst. Rehmat Khatoon is absent under intimation by her father. her Ld. counsel is absent, while his junior is present. Defendant/J.D is called absent. The process has returned unserved upon him through the bailiff of this court. Moreover, perusal of file reveals that that, prior to this execution application. The plaintiff/J.D had filed suit for recovery of dowry articles and maintenance. Whereupon the defendant/J.D had actively contested the matter so also was well aware of the Judgment. Keeping in view the above discussion, the service is held good upon defendant/J.D. Put off to: 12-12-2025 for Objections from the Defendant/J.D side. |
||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 193/2025 | Mst Khalida begum VS Syed Arshad Hussain | Sabit Ali(ADVO-1554-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit for maintenance called. Plaintiff Mst. Khalida Begum @ Khalida Bibi is present along with her Ld. counsel M/S. Sabit Ali Jagirani. Defendant Syed Arshad Hussain Shah Bukhari is absent. The process issued upon him through the court of Family Judge, Malir at Karachi has not yet returned served or unserved. Meanwhile the Ld. counsel for plaintiff submitted an application U/S 17-A of family court's act 1964 seeking the interim maintenance at Ex-09. Order on it. Notice to other side. Put off to 20-12-2025 for Service and hearing on the application U/S 17-A for interim maintenance. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 149/2025 | Mst Ameeran VS Tufail Ahmed Maitlo | Faheem Akhtar (ADVO-325-SBC-KMB) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount | The suit for dissolution of marriage & recovery of dowry articles called. Plaintiff Mst. Ameeran is present, her Ld. counsel Mr. Faheem Akhtar Chandio is called absent; while his junior is present. Defendant Tufail Ahmed Maitlo is present, his Ld. counsel Mr. Ashique Hussain Samo is absent; while his junior is present. The suit is fixed for pre-trial. Hence the pre-trial held, but the same remains to be failed. Resultantly, Khulla is granted. Meanwhile, issues framed at Ex-12 with respect to the recovery of Dowry articles Adjourned to: 11-12-2025 for Evidence. |
||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 168/2025 | Mst Dua VS Nadir Ali | Ashique Hussain Samo(ADVO-389-SBC-KMB) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | The suit for dissolution of marriage & recovery of dowry articles called. Mst. Dua is present, her Ld. counsel Mr. Ashique Hussain Samo is absent while his junior is present. Defendant Nadir Ali Magsi is present, his Ld. counsel Mr. Faheem Akhtar Chandio is called absent; while his junior is present. The suit is fixed for pre-trial. Hence the pre-trial held, but the same remains to be failed. Resultantly, Khulla is granted. Meanwhile, issues framed at Ex-11 with respect to the recovery of Dowry articles. Adjourned to: 11-12-2025 for Evidence. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 6 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 32/2025 | Saeed Rahman Bhutto VS Mst Zakiya Bhutto | Ashique Hussain Samo(ADVO-389-SBC-KMB) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 of Guardian and Wards Act R/W 100 Cr.PC,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | G&W application called. Applicant Saeed Rehman Bhutto is present along with his learned counsel Mr. Ashique Hussain Samo. Opponent Zakiya Bhutto is called absent along with her Ld. counsel Mr. Saifullah Rind; while his junior is present. Matter is fixed for the applicant side evidence. Meanwhile Ld. counsel M/S Waseemullah Rind appeared and submitted an adjournment application at Ex-20. Order thereon. Allowed as last chance. Put off to 17-12-2025 for applicant side Evidence/Cross. |
||
| 7 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 31/2025 | Shoaib Ahmed VS Ibrahim & Others | Ashique Hussain Samo(ADVO-389-SBC-KMB) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 of Guardian and Wards Act R/W 100 Cr.PC,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Guardianship application called. The attorney Abdullah; for the applicant is present along with his Ld. counsel Mr. Ashique Hussain Samo. Opponents No.1 is present while No: 2 is present but soon after the 1st call was called absent under intimation submitted by the opponent No: 01. Order thereon. Allowed. More so, their Ld. counsel Mr. Suhendar Kumar is present. The Matter is fixed for opponent side Evidence. The Ld. counsel for the opponents submitted an affidavit in the Evidence for opponent Ibrahim at Ex-19, so also for opponent No. 02; Sabir Hussian at Ex-20 and affidavit in Evidence for witness Mst. Haleema Magsi at Ex-21. Order on each. Copy to other side. Put off to 11.12.2025 for opponent side evidence/cross examination. |
||
| 8 | F.S. (Family Suits) 117/2025 | Mst Somal Chandio VS Irshad Chandio | Faheem Akhtar (ADVO-325-SBC-KMB) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff Mst. Somal Chandio is present, her Ld. counsel Mr. Faheem Akhtar Chandio is absent while his junior is present. Defendant Irshad Chandio is absent along with his Ld. counsel Mr. Suhendar Kumar. While his junior is present. The matter is fixed for cross examination of plaintiff side. Meanwhile junior of the Ld. counsel for defendant submitted an adjournment application. Order thereon. So also the plaintiff herself submitted an application requesting therein for interim maintenance amount which has been fixed at the rate of Rs.7,000/- P.M for the minor with effect from September, 2025. Order on it. Hence order passed on separate sheet and announced in the open court whereby; |
||
| 9 | F.S. (Family Suits) 142/2025 | Mst Aneela Khatoon VS Suhail Ahmed Chandio | Jameel Hussain(ADVO-226-SBC-KMB) | Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff Mst. Aneela Khatoon is absent while her Ld. counsel Mr. Jameel Hussain Bhutto is present. The defendant Suhail Ahmed Chandio is present, his Ld. counsel M/S Wakeel Ali Shaikh is absent. The matter is fixed for evidence of defendant side evidence. Meanwhile defednant submitted an adjournment application as of absence of his Ld. counsel at Ex-17. Order thereon. Hence the same is allowed. Adjourned to 10.12.2025 for defendant side Evidence/cross examination. |
||