| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 23/2025 | The State VS Khuda Bux alias Khudan and another | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-379 | 17/2024 Gaibe Dero |
Case called Accused Khuda Bux @ Khudan Gorgej is present on bail along with his Ld. counsel Mr. Jameel Hussain Bhutto. While the accused Fida Hussain Chandio has already been declared as Proclaimed offender. Ld. ADPP is Present. The case is fixed for Evidence. Moreover, the process returned partly served as the complainant is present. Put off to 24.01.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. The process is extended and handed back to process server for re-service. ISSUE FRESH NBW issued against I.O Janib Ali Totani through SSP Kamber. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 1 | C. Misc. Appl. (Civil Misc. Applications) 1/2026 |
Mst Khalida Begum VS Suyed Arshad Hussain | Sabit Ali(ADVO-1554-SBC-LRK) | Application allowed. Rs: 5000/= for each child W.E.F January, 2026. |
|||
| 2 | C. Misc. Appl. (Civil Misc. Applications) 2/2026 |
Mst. Zareena Gopang VS Arshad Ali Gopang | Sabit Ali(ADVO-1554-SBC-LRK) | Interim maintenance application is allowed. Defendant is directed to Rs: 10,000/= per month w.e.f January, 2026. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 19/2025 | Mst Naveeda VS Aamir Chandio | Abdul Nabi (ADVO-258-SBC-KMB) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family execution application called. Plaintiff/D.H Mst. Naveeda Chandio is called absent along with her Ld. counsel M/S Abdul Nabi Chandio. Defendant/J.D Aamir Ali Chandio is called absent. The process/D.N has not been issued. Put off to 26-01-2026 for service. ISSUE FRESH DEMAND NOTICE on Cost; & the same be served on the pointation, accordingly. |
||
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 45/2025 | Mst Naseeban VS Barkat Ali | Abdul Ghaffar(ADVO-291-SBC-KMB) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody),The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | G&W application called. Applicant Mst. Naseeban is present along with her Ld. counsel Mr. Abdul Gaffar Gopang. Defendant Barkat Ali is absent. The process issued upon him through the bailiff of this court has not yet retuned served or unserved. More so, the verification of death certificate & heirship certificate and Verification and Valuation of Form-VII including the daily NEWS paper Awami Awaz dated: 27-11-2025 are already on record. To come up on: 26-01-2026 for service/objections. REPEAT PROCESS ON COST. |
||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 183/2025 | Mst Rehana VS Riaz Panhwar | Abdul Ghaffar(ADVO-291-SBC-KMB) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. plaintiff Mst. Rehana is absent along with her Ld. counsel Mr. Abdul Ghaffar Gopang; while his junior is present. Defendant Riaz Panhwar is absent. Process issued upon him through the Ld. family Judge at Warah has not yet returned served or unserved. Put off to: ____-01-2025 for Service. REPEAT PROCESS ON COST. |
||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 189/2025 | Mst Jameela Khatoon VS Ali Khan | Ashique Hussain Samo(ADVO-389-SBC-KMB) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff Mst. Jameela Khatoon is present along with her Ld. counsel Mr. Aashique Hussain Samo. Defendant Ali Khan Sariyo is absent. The process returned unserved upon him through the bailiff of this court. Put off to 31-01-2025 for service. Repeat process on cost; The plaintiff is required to furnish fresh address of defendant. |
||
| 5 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 47/2025 | Safdar Ali Khuhawar VS Mst Tahira khatoon | Ahmed Ali(ADVO-163-SBC-KMB) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 of Guardian and Wards Act R/W 100 Cr.PC,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Guardianship Application called. Applicant Safdar Ali Khuhawar is present along with his counsel Mr. Ahmed Ali Babar is absent. The instant application is fixed for service. The process returned unserved upon opponent through the bailiff of this court. Put off to 31-01-2026 for Service. ISSUE FRESH PROCESS, ON COST. |
||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 193/2025 | Mst Khalida begum VS Syed Arshad Hussain | Sabit Ali(ADVO-1554-SBC-LRK) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit for maintenance called. Plaintiff Mst. Khalida Begum @ Khalida Bibi is present while her Ld. counsel M/S. Sabit Ali Jagirani is absent. Defendant Syed Arshad Hussain Shah Bukhari is absent. The process issued upon him through the court of Family Judge, Malir at Karachi has not yet returned served or unserved. The matter is fixed for service upon defendant and hearing on the application U/S 17-A of family court's act 1964 for interim maintenance. Heard the arguments. Order passed on separate sheet at Exh------09. whereby maintence amount of Rs: 5,000/= for each child w.e.f: January, 2026. Adjourned to: 30-01-2026 for Service. REPEAT PROCESS ON COST. |
||
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 197/2025 | Mst Sehat Khatoon VS Mst Soan khatoon & others | Abdul Ghaffar(ADVO-291-SBC-KMB) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Suit for maintenance called. Mst. Sehat Khatoon is present along with her Ld. counsel Mr. Abdul Gaffar Gopang. The instant suit is fixed for report from Mukhtiarkar concerned. Mukhtiarkar Nasirabad appeared and submitted an adjournment application at Exh---10. Order thereon. Allowed. Put off to 28-01-2026 for hearing/ report from Mukhtiarkar Nasirabad. |
||
| 8 | F.S. (Family Suits) 6/2026 | Mst Zameeran VS Arshad Ali Gopang | Jameel Hussain(ADVO-226-SBC-KMB) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit for khulla and maintenance called. Plaintiff Mst. Zareena is present along with her Ld. counsel Mr. Jameel Hussain Bhutto. Defendant Arshad Ali Gopang is called, process issued upon him has not yet returned served or un-served. Furthermore, the application U/S 17-A of FC-Act is fixed for hearing. Heard the Ld. counsel for the plaintiff. Order passed on separate sheet whereby interim maintenance is fixed at the rate of Rs: 10,000/- per month with effect from January 2026. Put off to 26-01-2026 for service. Repeat notice on cost. |
||
| 9 | F.S. (Family Suits) 1/2026 | Mst Tabasum VS Muhammad Zakir @ Zakir Ali | Younis Waqar(ADVO-351-SBC-KMB) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit for Khulla called. Plaintiff Mst. Tabbasum is called absent while her Ld. counsel Mr. Waqar Younis is present. Defendant Muhammad Zakir @ Zakir is absent. The process has not been issued upon him. Put off to 28-01-2026 for service. ISSUE PROCESS AS ALREADY ORDERED ON COST, AND THE SAME BE PASTED ON THE DOOR OF DEFENDNANT. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 10 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 32/2025 | Saeed Rahman Bhutto VS Mst Zakiya Bhutto | Ashique Hussain Samo(ADVO-389-SBC-KMB) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 of Guardian and Wards Act R/W 100 Cr.PC,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | G&W application called. Applicant Saeed Rehman Bhutto is present along with his learned counsel Mr. Ashique Hussain Samo. Opponent Zakiya Bhutto is present while her Ld. counsel Mr. Safiullah Rind is absent. Matter is fixed for the applicant side evidence/cross examination. The affidavit in Evidence of applicant Saeed Rehman is already kept on Exh-----17, cross Nil, though chance was given. The affidavit in Evidence of witness Waheed Rehman is already kept on Exh-----18, cross Nil, though a chance was given. Afterwards, Ld. counsel for applicant submitted side close statement at Exh-----22. Order thereon. Hence the same is kept on record. Put off to: 23-01-2026 for the applicant side Evidence/Cross. |
||
| 11 | F.S. (Family Suits) 135/2025 | Mst maria Tunio VS Muneeb u Rahman | Aamir Ali (ADVO-328-SBC-KMB) | Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called which is fixed for Evidence. Plaintiff Maria Tunio is present along with her Ld. counsel Mr. Amir Ali Gopang. Defendant Muneeb ur Rehman is present along with his Ld. counsel Mr. Rafique Ahmed Naich. The suit is fixed for plaintiff's side evidence/cross-examination. Meanwhile the Ld. counsel for plaintiff submitted an affidavit in evidence for witness Imam Bux at Exh-----12. Moreover, the plaintiff Mst. Maria is cross-examined at Exh---------10, her witness Tasleem is cross-examined at Exh------11, so also her witness Imam Bux is cross-examined at Exh------12. Afterwards, the Ld. counsel for the plaintiff submitted a statement for the side close at Exh-----13. Order thereon. Hence, the same is kept on record. Put off to 31-01-206 for the defendant's side Evidence. |
||
| 12 | F.S. (Family Suits) 149/2025 | Mst Ameeran VS Tufail Ahmed Maitlo | Faheem Akhtar (ADVO-325-SBC-KMB) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount | The suit for dissolution of marriage & recovery of dowry articles called. Plaintiff Mst. Ameeran is present along with her Ld. counsel Mr. Faheem Akhtar Chandio. Defendant Tufail Ahmed Maitlo is present along with his Ld. counsel Mr. Ashique Hussain Samo. The suit is fixed for plaintiff side Evidence. Henceforth, the evidence of plaintiff Mst. Ameeran is recorded at Exh-----13. Evidence of her mother (witness) is recorded at Exh-----14 and the evidence of Niaz Hussain (witness) is recorded at Exh-----------15. Afterwards, the Ld. counsel for plaintiff submitted a statement for side close at Exh-----------16. Soon after, the Ld. counsel for the defendant submitted a statement requesting therein not to examine his side witnesses and further requested for the commencement of Post-Trial at Exh------------17. Order thereon. The same is kept on record. In continuation thereof, Post Trial held and the same remains successful. Subsequently, the suit is disposed of as a result of a successful post-trial. Such order is kept on record at Exh-----------18, accordingly. |
||
| 13 | F.S. (Family Suits) 152/2025 | Mst Sanam Gaibyani VS Razi Baksh Gaibyani | Ashique Ali Jatoi(ADVO-830-SBC-KMB) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family Suit called. Plaintiff Mst. Sanam Gaibiyani is absent, her counsel M/S. Ashique Ali Jatoi is present. Defendant Razi Bakhsh Gaibiyani is called absent and has already been de-barred. The matter is fixed for submission of Ex-party evidence. Meanwhile, Ld. counsel for palinitff submitted an adjournment application at Exh-----12. Order thereon. Allowed. Put off to 24-01-2025 for Ex-party Evidence. |
||
| 14 | F.S. (Family Suits) 168/2025 | Mst Dua VS Nadir Ali | Ashique Hussain Samo(ADVO-389-SBC-KMB) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | The suit for dissolution of marriage & recovery of dowry articles called. Mst. Dua is present along with her Ld. counsel Mr. Ashique Hussain Samo. Defendant Nadir Ali Magsi is present along with his Ld. counsel Mr. Faheem Akhtar Chandio. The suit is fixed for the Plaintiff's side evidence. Henceforth, the evidence of plaintiff Mst. Dua is recorded at Exh-----12. Evidence of Mst. Rukhsana (witness) is recorded at Exh-----13 and the evidence of Zulfiquar Ali (witness) is recorded at Exh--------14. Afterwards, the Ld. counsel for plaintiff submitted a statement for side close at Exh-------15. Soon after, the Ld. counsel for the defendant submitted a statement requesting therein not to examine his side witnesses and further requested for the commencement of Post-Trial at Exh-------16. Order thereon. The same is kept on record. In continuation thereof, Post Trial held and the same remains successful. Subsequently, the suit is disposed of as a result of a successful post-trial. Such order is kept on record at Exh-----------17, accordingly. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 15 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 22/2025 | Mst Sakina VS Mehrab Kanasiro | Abdul Ghaffar(ADVO-291-SBC-KMB) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Family execution application called. Plaintiff/DH Mst. Sakina is present along with her Ld. counsel Mr. Abdul Ghaffar Gopang. Defendant/JD Mehrab Kanasiro called absent and has already been debarred. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in the open court whereby the instant Execution is application is allowed. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Exparte Evidence | |||||||
| 16 | F.S. (Family Suits) 195/2025 | Mst Ajeeban VS Ali Naz Brohi | Asad Ali (ADVO-169-SBC-KMB) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called. Plaintiff Mst. Ajeeban is present along with her Ld. counsel M/S Asad Ali Buledi. Defendant Ali Naz is called absent and has already been debarred from the right of filling the objections. The matter is fixed for Ex-party Evidence. Ld. counsel for the plaintiff submitted an affidavit in Ex-party evidence for plaintiff Mst. Ajeeban at Exh-----16, the contents of which were reaffirmed by the plaintiff. Ld. counsel also submitted an affidavit in Ex-party evidence for witness ------------ at Exh---------17. The contents of which were also reaffirmed by him. Ld. counsel further submitted side 'close statement at Exh-----------18. The same is kept on record. Afterwards, the judgment passed and announced in the open court, whereby the suit is decreed ex-party. A sum of Rs: 10,000/= fixed as maintenance. Suit is disposed off accordingly. |
||