| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 1 | Summary 27/2026 | The State VS Jatoi Shar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324,PPC-353 | 277/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 89/2025 | The State VS Sudheer & Ors | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT),Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-325A-SBC-GHT) | Abdul Sattar Mahar(ADVO-485-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337 | 70/2024 B-Section Ghotki |
Crl. Case called. All (03) accused namely 1.Sudheer, 2.Khan Muhammad and 3.Abdul Qadeer are present on bail. The learned ADPP for the State & counsel for complainant are present. No P.ws are present. Issue B.Ws against complainant and P.Ws. Case put off to 28.09.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend. |
| 3 | Juv. Child Act (JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ORDINANCE) 89/2025 | The State VS Siraj Ahmed | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT),Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-325A-SBC-GHT) | Abdul Sattar Mahar(ADVO-485-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337 | 70/2024 B-Section Ghotki |
Crl. Case called. Juvenile accused Siraj Ahmed is present on bail. The learned ADPP for the State & counsel for complainant are present. No P.ws are present. Issue B.Ws against complainant and P.Ws. Case put off to 28.09.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend. |
| 4 | PPC 228/2025 | The State VS Liaquat Waseer & Ors | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-382 | 146/2025 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr. Case called. Accused each one namely 1.Liaquat, 2.Shahzado, 3.Ghulam Dastagir, 4.Qayoom, 5.Imdad, 6.Rasool Bux and 7.Zaman are present on bail. While remaining accused Shoukat, Sanwal and Asad are absconders and have already been declared as P.Os. ADPP for the state and advocate for accused are present. Complainant is present his deposition is recorded at Exh...08. Complainant Abdul Latif submitted application given his remaining P.Ws. Order on it. Kept on record at Exh....09. Heard. Judgment passed and announced in open court. Accused 1.Liaquat, 2.Shahzado, 3.Ghulam Dastagir, 4.Qayoom, 5.Imdad, 6.Rasool Bux and 7.Zaman are acquitted U/s 245 (i) Cr.PC. Accused are present on bail their bail bond stands cancelled and surety discharged. |
| 5 | PPC 109/2026 | The State VS Jeand Mahar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-Fv | 14/2026 Adilpur |
Case called. Accused 1.Jeand, 2.Abdul Rehmand, 3.Abdul Raheem and 4.Faiz Muhammad are present on bail. ADPP for the State and DC are present. Advocate for complainant is absent. Complainant is present. No other P.Ws are present. Issue B.Ws to R/P.Ws. Case put off to 05.10.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 6 | PPC 159/2026 | The State VS Parvez Ali Sangi | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-382,PPC-452 | 189/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr.Case called. Accused Parvez Ali produced by J.As from District Prison Ghotki through video link. ADPP for the state is present. Complainant is present. No other P.Ws are present. Issue summons to R/P.Ws. Put off to 24.09.2026 for evidence. |
|
| 7 | PPC 178/2026 | The state VS Muhammad Nawaz @ Nawaz Khoso and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-504,PPC-506 | 145/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr.Case called. Accused Mohammad Nawaz @ Nawaz is called absent While accused 1.Sanaullah, 2.Abdul Ghani, 3.Rashid, and 4.Amanullah are present on bail ADPP for the State is present. Complainant Mst.Umran and P.W Abdul Hafeez are present. Mr.Mohammad Haneef Channa advocate submitted his Vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. Order on it. File. Mr.Syed Junaid Ahmed Shah advocate submitted his Vakalatnama on behalf of all present accused. Order on it. File. Advocate for accused submitted application U/s 540-A Cr.PC. Order on it. Allowed. Deposition of Complainanat Mst.Umran is recorded at Exh..03. Deposition of P.W Abdul Hafeez is recorded at Exh....04. Mst.Umran submitted application for give-up remaining P.Ws. Order on it. Kept on record. At Exh...05. ADPP for the state submitted statement for closed the side of prosecution. Order on it. File. At Exh.....06. Heard. Judgement passed and announced in open court. The point to be determined is as to what is the effect of evidence of prosecution. The finding is that it has the effect negative for prosecution and positive for the accused. It???s simple reason is that complainant failed to identify accused facing trial available in court-room. There is well settled principal of law that in order to acquit an accused from the charge, there is no need of many doubts but single doubt if is created in the prosecution, same is sufficient for the acquittal of accused.?? Thus, the present accused stand acquitted under section 245(i) Cr.P.C, by extending benefit of doubt to them. Accused are present on bail, their bail bonds stand cancelled and sureties are discharged. |
| 8 | PPC 179/2026 | The state VS Qurban Ali @ Papoo Gadani and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-Fi,PPC-504 | 344/2025 A-Section Ghotki |
Case called. Accused Qurban Ali @ Papoo is already declared as P.O. Accused 1.Abdul Rasheed and 2.Farman Ali @ Farman are present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. Complainant and his private P.Ws are present. Advocate for accused submitted adjournment application. Order on it. Allowed. Issue summons to officials P.Ws. Put off to 30.09.2026, for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend |
| 9 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 186/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Shahzad Malik and another | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Hudood Ordinances-4 PEHO | 276/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr.Case called. Accused Mohammad Shahzad and Imran Ali are present from District Prison Ghotki through video Link. ADPP for the state is present. No P.Ws are present. Issue summons to complainant and P.Ws. Both accused Mohammad Shazad and Imran sent application through Asst:Superintendent District Prison Ghotki for providing services of an advocate on state expenses, claimed that they are a poor persons. Order on it. Pauper accused are provided Adv.Mr.Auragzeb Waseer, detail order passed on separated sheet. Put off to 24.09.2026 for evidence. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 10 | PPC 217/2026 | The State VS Abdul Kareem @ Mitho Mirbahar | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-504,PPC-506 | 291/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr.Case called. Accused Abdul Kareem @ Mitho produced by Jail Authorities from District prison Ghotki. ADPP for the state is present. Charge against accused framed at Exh...02 through J.As to Superintendent District Prison Ghotki, to which pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial vide his plea at Exh...02/A. Issue summons to complainant and all P.Ws. Put off to 26.09.2026, for evidence. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 11 | PPC 215/2026 | The State VS Ghulam Rasool Shar and Ors | Mushtaque Ahmed(ADVO-1268-SBC-GHT) | PPC-382 | 23/2016 Andal Sundrani |
Cr.Case called. Accused Khan Mohammad is present on bail. While all accused are already declared as P.O. Necessary document supplied to accused at Exh....10. Case put off to 22.09.2026, for Charge. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 12 | PPC 214/2026 | The state VS Sain Bux Bozdar & others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-THP) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-452,PPC-506 | 362/2022 A-Section Ghotki |
Case called. Accused Abdul Qadeer, Pahilwan and Abdul Manan are present on bail. While other accused Sain Bux and Attaullah are absconders and declared as P.O. ADPP for the state and advocate for accuse are present. Complainant is present. Charge against present accused framed at Ex.07, to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed for their trial vide pleas recorded at Ex.07/A to 07/C. Advocate for accused submitted statement for waive the right of section 241-A Cr.PC. Order on it. Kept on record. At Exh....8. Deposition of complainant is recorded at Exh...9. Complainant submitted application for giveup remaining P.Ws. Order on it. Kept on record. At Exh....10. Heard. Judgement passed and announced in open court. The Accused namely Abdul Qadeer, Pahilwan and Abdul Manan are acquitted U/s 245 (i) Cr.PC. Accused are present on bail and their bail bonds stand cancelled and surety discharged. Accused Sain Bux and Attaullah are absconders and they are on dormant file till arrest/appearance. |
| 13 | PPC 91/2023 | The State VS Muhammad Yousif Malik | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-489-F | 210/2022 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr. Case called. Accused Muhammad Yousif is called absent without any intimation. The learned ADPP for the State is present. Proclamation u/s 87 Cr.PC and report u/s 88 Cr.PC returned after compliance which were issued against absconding accused Mohammad Yousif, such statement of process server recorded at Ex.15, who produced original proclamation u/s 87 Cr.PC, mashirnama, report u/s 88 Cr.PC and his own endorsement at Ex.15/A to 02/D. Order passed on statement of process server that accused Mohammad Yousif is declared as P.Os. Issue letter to NADRA authorities for blocking the CNIC of accused Muhammad Yousif and Issue Notice u/s 514 Cr.PC to his surety. Put of to 30.09.2026 for formal. |
| 14 | PPC 216/2026 | The state VS Asad Ali Gadani and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(i) | 348/2023 A-Section Ghotki |
Case called. Accused Khadim Hussain is present on bail. While case against other accused already be kept on dormant file vide order dated. 28.02.2026. ADPP and DC are present. Necessary documents supplied to accused at Exh....08. Case put off to 21.09.2026, for charge. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 15 | Juv. Child Act (JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ORDINANCE) 57/2026 | The State VS Faheem Ali | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-Fv | 44/2026 Sarhad |
Cr.Case called. Juvenile accused Faheem is present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. Necessary documents suppled to accused through receipt at Exh.....01. Put off to 22.9.2026, for Charge. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 16 | PPC 57/2026 | The State VS Ali Sher | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-Fv | 44/2026 Sarhad |
Cr.Case called. Accused Ali Sher is present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. Necessary documents suppled to accused through receipt at Exh.....01. Put off to 22.9.2026, for Charge. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications | |||||||
| 17 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 36/2026 | Khadim Hussain Chachar and another VS SHO P.S Katcho Bindi | Mahboob Ahmed(ADVO-752-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-523,Cr.PC-550 | / |
Misc:Applicatin Karwai U/s 550 Cr.PC called. Applicant and his advocate are present. Owner of Motter Showroom Munwar Motors Showroom is present with his record. Heard. Order passed and announced in open court. The Application U/s 523 Cr.PC is allowed. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Judgment | |||||||
| 18 | PPC 359/2025 | The state VS Ali Hassan Laghari | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-489-F | 26/2024 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr. Case called. Accused Ali Hassan is present on bail. The learned ADPP for the State is present. Advocate for accused is absent. Complainant is present. Judgment passed and announced in open court. The accused Ali Hassan S/o Ali Sher Leghari is acquitted U/s 245 (i) Cr.PC. Accused is present on bail his bail bond stand cancelled and surety discharged. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 2/2025 |
Sanwan Soomro VS Jan Muhammad & Ors (expired) through legal heirs | Nadir Ali Chachar(ADVO-514-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Suit called. Attorney of plaintiff absent, and counsel is called absent. Defendant No.1(b) himself and and on behalf of rest defendants being their attorney is present, his counsel is absent. Put off to 17.09.2026, for arguments on application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC and an application U/O 39 Rule 1 & CPC. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 4/2025 |
Muhammad Adnan Rajput VS Farman Ali Chachar & another | Sajid Hussain(ADVO-456-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Suit is called. Plaintiff and his advocate are present. Defendants are called absent. Matter put off to 29.09.2026, for Ex-partee evidence. |
||