| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 391/2025 | The State VS Ghulam Mustafa Ruk and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-380,PPC-457 | 261/2024 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr. Case called. Ghulam Mustaf Ruk is called absent, under intimation, while remaining accused persons namely namely 1. Mukhtiar Ahmed @ Mukhtiar, 3. Zulfiqar Ali @ Zulfiqar and 3. Ghulam Murtaza are present on bail. The learned counsel for complainant and accused are present. No PW present. Issue B.Ws against complainant and P.Ws. Co accused Ghulam Murtaza has filed has filed application for excusing the absence of accused Ghulam Mustafa. Order on it. Allowed. Case put off to 29.04.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 2 | PPC 66/2026 | The State VS Sadam Hussain Magsi and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-34,PPC-506 | 342/2025 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr. Case called. Accused Majid Ali is called absent under intimation. While remaining accused persons namely 1. Sadam Hussain and 2. Amir Ali are present on bail. The learned ADPP for the State and counsel for accused are present. Complainant is called absent. Issue B.Ws against complainant and P.Ws. Co accused Sadam Hussain has submitted application for excusing the absence of accused Majid Ali. Order on it. Allowed. Put off to 30.04.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed tpo attend and inform the absentee accused to appear on next date of hearing. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 259/2025 | The State VS Zafeer Ahmed Soomro | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-489-F | 148/2025 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr. Case called. Accused Zafeer Ahmed is called absent and not yet arrested. Proclamation under 87 Cr.PC and Report of attachment under section 88 Cr.PC issued. Proclmaation under section 87 Cr.P.C returned with compliance. Statement of process server is recorded at Exh....10, who produced proclamation under section 87 Cr.PC, mashirnama and his won endorsement. Order on it. Report of attachment 88 Cr.PC also received from concerned Mukhtiarkar which is kept on record at Exh...11. Issue fresh notice to surety of accused under section 514 Cr.P.C. Put off to 30.04.2026 for fromal. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 65/2025 | The State VS Azad @ Azad Ali & Ors | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-452 | 185/2024 A-Section Ghotki |
Case is called. Accused Liaquat Ali, Azad @ Azad Ali, Arshad Ali, Agho @ Asghar and Mour are present on bail, while accused Asadullah is declared as PO. Heard. Judgment passed and announced in open Court. The present accused are acquitted under section 245(i) Cr.P.C. They are present on bail. Their bail bond stand cancelled and sureties are discharge. The case against absconding accused is kept on dormant file till his arrest of voluntarily appear. |
| 5 | PPC 356/2025 | The state VS Ghulam Mustafa Ruk | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Najamuddin(ADVO-1110-SBC-SUK) | PPC-380,PPC-457 | 35/2023 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr. Case called. Ghulam Mustaf Ruk is called absent, under intimation, The learned counsel for complainant and accused are present.The learned counsel for accused is called absent. The learned counsel for complainant has filed adjournment application. Order on it. Applicant Ghulam Murtaza is appear and submitted application for excusing the absence of accused Ghulam Mustafa. Order on it. Allowed. Case put off to 29.04.2026 for evidence. Applicant is directed to inform the absentee accused to appear on the date of hearing. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 14/2025 |
Abdul Hafeez Lakhan VS Kamal Din (Deceased) through his legal heirs & ors | Muhammad Umar (ADVO-892-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Umar (ADVO-892-SBC-GHT) | Suit is called. Plaintiff along with his counsel are present. Defendant called absent. Issue fresh notice to defendant on costs through Bailiff, Registered post A/D as well as TCS. The learned counsel for plaintiff has submitted application under order 5 Rule 20 CPC. Order on it. Put off to 05.05.2026 for service and hearing application under order 5 rule 20 CPC. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For ex-parte proof. | |||||||
| 2 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 15/2025 |
Abdul Hafeez Lakhan VS Irshad Ali & ors | Muhammad Umar (ADVO-892-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Suit is called. Plaintiff along with his counsel are present. Defendants already served with notice, but they called absent, the service against them has already been held good and defendants have been debarred from filing of written statement as sufficient time of filing of written statement has already been expired. Put off to 05.05.2026, for ex-parte proof/evidence. |
||