Case called .Case already disposed off. Accused Fida Hussain,Abbas Ali ,Muharam and Nunawar are acquitted by this court . Case of Accused Subhan@ Tedi son of Azam @ Achoo and Raja S/O Muhammad Bux , both by caste Pitafi , is kept on dormant file . NBWs against Accused Subhan @ Tedi and Raja Pitafi issued to concerned P.S and returned un-served by ASI Ali Gul Siyal and also submit progress report. Order on it. NBWS extended and handed over to ASI Ali Gul Siyal. Put off to 04.05.2026.For progress report.

Suit called. Plaintiff Gaman along with his attorney Muhammad Punhal is present. Defendant No.1 Kamal is in attendance without his counsel. Learned DDA is present on behalf of official defendants. Order on order sheet. Matter is fixed for judgment, case of plaintiff is that the Entry.337 has been cancelled; therefore, registered sale deed No.2303 dated 25.10.2007 is required to be cancelled, being consequence thereof. While going through the record it is noted that none from the private defendants except defendants No.5(a) to 5(g) lead their evidence. Since the claim of plaintiff is that, suit land admeasuring (12-22) acres were belonged to Kamal, Ghous Bux, Mst. Bhagul, Mst. Bhani, Mst. Jatni, Mst. Bakhtawar, and Mst. Lalan, being legal heirs of Manik. Be that as it may, let the report be called from Mukhtiarkar concerned qua share of Kamal, Ghous Bux, Mst. Jatni, with the suit property in hand, and Sub-Registrar Ghotki is hereby directed to submit detailed report qua sale deed No.2303 dated 25.10.2007 along with M.F Roll executed or otherwise by the Vendors. Office is directed to communicate instant order to incumbent officials for its compliance. Put off to 10.02.2026.For Compliance of order sheet.

Suit called. Plaintiff and his counsel are present. Mr:Majid Ali Senior Clerk of Defendant No:02 present. Defendant No:6 present and submitted reply of show cause and also filed W.S at Ex.No:07.Order thereon. DDA present and submitted Adj: Application on behalf of defendant No:2 at Ex.No:08.Order on it. Put off to 10.02.2026.For W.S of defendant No:1 and 2 .

Suit called. Plaintiff No.2 without his counsel, defendants No.2 and 3 together with their counsel and learned DDA are in attendance. Order on order sheet. Matter is fixed for order on application U/O VII Rule 11 CPC. Learned counsel for defendants was confronted qua attendance of defendants No.1 and 4 for which he could not submit satisfactory. The plaintiff in attendance submitted an application, stating that private settlement is fixed on 05.02.2026, but learned counsel for defendants did not consented with it. Perusal of record reveals that, defendants No.6 and 7, despite effective service as admitted by learned DDA, has not bothered to submit their written statement, and defendants have claimed to have approved the scheme with title ???Sindhu Capital Residency??? by the official defendants, but in such regard no any report is on record. Accordingly, before moving further, this Court strictly direct defendants No.6 and 7 to submit their report in shape of written statement by the next date of hearing i.e.11.02.2026. Besides that, let the matter be fixed for appearance of defendants No.1 and 4 as well as for submission of report as directed. Learned DDA is required to ensure compliance and communicate instant order to the incumbent officials. For further proceedings.