| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | SC (Murder Trial) 654/2024 | The State VS Abu Bakar Sangi and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT),Ubedullah(ADVO-223-SBC-GHT) | Anwar Ali(ADVO-1059-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 156/2024 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions Case No.654 of 2024 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC is taken up in open Court. Accused Abu Bakar is produced through video link arrangement from District Prison & Correction Facility, Ghotki. The rest of accused have already been declared as P.Os. The DDPP and counsel for accused are present. The counsel for complainant is absent but his junior partner Mr. Assadullah Ghoto is present. NBWs upon PWs of FIR namely Ghulam Mustafa and Ghulam Murtaza (both sons of the complainant) returned unexecuted and process server apprised the Court that said PWs are the proclaimed offenders of FIR bearing crime No.367/2023 of P.S A-Section Ghotki. As to why process server HC 1611 Ghulam Murtaza Mirani not performing his duty, as expected from him under the law and in case he adopts the same routine, then he will be dealt strictly in accordance with law and NBWs with such direction is extended to him for next date of hearing. An application u/s 87/88 Cr.PC filed by the counsel for accused for attachment of moveable property of the absconders PWs and same will be taken after the said PWs are declared as proclaimed PWs. The complainant is present and he is directed to bring his PWs along with his counsel. By consent, case is adjourned to 23.10.2026, for evidence. Custody accused is again to be produced through video link arrangement. |
| 2 | SC (Murder Trial) 711/2024 | The State VS Muhammad Usman Gurgage and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT),Qadir Bux(ADVO-1126-SBC-GHT) | Ubedullah(ADVO-223-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 207/2024 Daharki |
S.C No. 711 of 2024 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused Manzoor Ahmed is present on bail. The case of juvenile accused Muhammad Usman has been separated from the case of present adult accused. The DDPP and the counsel for complainant are present while counsel for accused is absent, as before. However his partner Mr. Assadullah Ghoto is present. PWs being accused of counter blast case bearing S.C No.400 of 2025 are present except the complainant who is being accused of that case, his custody is produced through video link arrangement from DP & CF Ghotki. NBWs upon the principal accused Wazir Ali is returned un-executed. NBWs upon the principal accused was issued when it was apprised by the counsel for complainant that the said accused is being staying at the otaq of Wadero Anwar Ali Gurgej. Wadero Anwar Ali Gurgej voluntarily appeared before the Court and submitted that the said accused is not staying at his otaq; henceforth NBWs upon accused Wazir Ali is filed. The cross examination of PWs being accused of counter blast case is not being carried out due to continuous absence of counsel for accused. In this regard, the perusal of the cause list of today???s list, the age of the case is near about 2 years. Therefore, this Court has not other alternate except to provide the counsel to accused on State expenses so that in absence of their private counsel, the case be proceeded expeditiously. Accordingly, Mr. Muhammad Rafique Kalwar is appointed as counsel on State expenses to accused to proceed with the case of accused and in this way the case without any further delay will be proceeded in accordance with law. Mr. Muhammad Rafique Kalwar, Advocate is present and he is directed to collect the relevant police papers and instructions from the accused so that the cross examination of those PWs whose examination in chief has already been recorded, be recorded on next date of hearing. Adjourned to 28.10.2026, for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend on the given date. The custody of complainant through video link arrangement is again to be produced through the same mode from DP & CF Ghotki. Present accused is directed to attend on the given date. |
| 3 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 147/2024 | The State VS Muhammad Usman Gurgage | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Ubedullah(ADVO-223-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 215/2024 Daharki |
SC No.147 of 2024 fixed in today???s casus list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open court. Accused Muhammad Usman is produced through video link arrangement from DP and CF Ghotki. Main case is adjourned. Hence this off-shoot case is adjourned to 28.10.2026 for evidence. Custody accused is again to be produced through video link on next date of hearing. |
| 4 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 3/2025 | The State VS Sher Muhammad Sawand | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Liaquat Ali(ADVO-317-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 420/2024 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions Case No. 03 of 2025 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused Sher Muhammad is present on bail. The DDPP and counsel for accused are present. Main case is adjourned, hence, this off-shoot case is adjourned to 21.10.2026 for evidence. The summons to PWs is extended till next date. Present accused is directed to attend on the given date. |
| 5 | SC (Murder Trial) 24/2025 | The State VS Sher Muhammad Sawand and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Liaquat Ali(ADVO-317-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 402/2024 A-Section Ghotki |
S.C No. 24 of 2025 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused Sher Muhammad is present on bail. The DDPP and counsel for accused are present. NBWs upon the complainant and PWS of the FIR returned unexecuted HC/1611 Ghulam Murtaza Mirani and it is extended to him with strict direction to execute it in accordance with law on next date of hearing. The summons of official PWs is extended to next date of hearing. The case of absconding accused Abdul Ghani has already been bifurcated form the case of present accused and his surety has already been penalized, such order has been challenged before the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur. Notice upon the surety retuned un-served. Mr. Ali Asghar Panhyar filed vakalatnama on behalf of the surety, which is taken on record with direction to apprise the Court about the present status of the matter of surety before Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur or any restriction order has been passed not to recover penalized amount from the surety through attachment. Adjourned to 21.10.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend on given date. |
| 6 | Juv. Child Act (JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ORDINANCE) 225/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Usman Gurgej | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Ubedullah(ADVO-223-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 207/2024 Daharki |
SC No.225 of 2025 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up. Juvenile accused Muhammad Usman is produced through video link by DP and CF Ghotki. The DDPP and the counsel for complainant are present while counsel for accused is absent, as before. However his partner Mr. Assadullah Ghoto is present. PWs being accused of counter blast case bearing S.C No.400 of 2025 are present except the complainant who is being accused of that case, his custody is produced through video link arrangement from DP & CF Ghotki. The cross examination of PWs being accused of counter blast case is not being carried out due to continuous absence of counsel for accused. In this regard, the perusal of the cause list of today???s list, the age of the case is near about 2 years. Therefore, this Court has not other alternate except to provide the counsel to accused on State expenses so that in absence of his private counsel, the case be proceeded expeditiously. Accordingly, Mr. Muhammad Rafique Kalwar is appointed as counsel on State expenses to accused to proceed with the case of accused and in this way the case without any further delay will be proceeded in accordance with law. Mr. Muhammad Rafique Kalwar, Advocate is present and he is directed to collect the relevant police papers and instructions from the accused so that the cross examination of those PWs whose examination in chief has already been recorded, be recorded on next date of hearing. Adjourned to 28.10.2026, for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend on the given date. The custody of complainant through video link arrangement is again to be produced through the same mode from DP & CF Ghotki. |
| 7 | SC (Murder Trial) 400/2025 | The State VS Riaz Ahmed Gurgage & others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Qadir Bux(ADVO-1126-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 57/2025 Ubauro |
S.C No.400 of 2025 fixed in today???s cause generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused 1. Riaz Ahmed, 2. Mir Muhammad, 3. Rab Nawaz, 4. Waqar Ahmed and 5. Bilawal are present on bail. While accused Fida Hussain is produced through video link arrangement from DP & CF Ghotki. The DDPP and counsel for accused are present but counsel for complainant is absent. No PW is present. Issue summons to complainant and PWs of FIR while summon to all official PWs is extended till next date. This is the counter blast case of sessions case No.711 of 2025, which has been adjourned on account of absence of counsel for accused and in that case, accused has been provided counsel for State expenses for expeditious proceedings. Adjourned to 28.10.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend on the given date while custody accused is again to be produced through video link arrangement from DP & CF Ghotki. |
| 8 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 100/2025 | The state VS Mir Muhammad Gurgage | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Qadir Bux(ADVO-1126-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 59/2025 Ubauro |
S.C No.100 of 2025 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused Mir Muhammad is present on bail. DDPP for the State is present and counsel for accused is present. Main case is adjourned. Hence this case is also adjourned to 28.10.2026, for evidence. Accused is directed to attend on given date. |
| 9 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 101/2025 | The State VS Riaz Ahmed Gurgage | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Qadir Bux(ADVO-1126-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 58/2025 Ubauro |
S.C No.101 of 2025 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused Riaz Ahmed is present on bail. DDPP for the State and counsel for accused are present. Main case is adjourned. Hence this case is also adjourned to 28.10.2026 Accused is directed to attend on given date. |
| 10 | PPC 194/2026 | The State VS Gada Hussain @ Gadali Jageerani & others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Haseebullah(ADVO-1477-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 2/2024 Kacho Bindi-II |
Sessions case No.194 of 2026 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court. Accused Gada Hussain alias Gada Ali is present on bail. The DDPP for the State and counsel for accused are present. Mr. Irshad Ali Soomro appeared and filed vakalatnama on behalf of PW Eidan, which is taken on record. No other private or official PW is present. The separate BWs upon the private PWs and summons to official PWs returned un-served and same are extended to ASI Riaz Ahmed Channo for service on next date of hearing. By consent, case is adjourned to 21.10.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend on given date. |
| 11 | PPC 299/2026 | The State VS Fida Hussain Bozdar and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Pardeep Kumar() | PPC-324 | 38/2022 Khanpur Mahar |
S.C No.299 of 2026 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused Fida Hussain and Sakhawat are present on bail. The DDPP, counsel for accused Sakhawat, counsel for accused Fida Hussain and counsel for complainant are present. No PW is present. The summons returned by the process server PC/2430 Imdad Ali Kumbhar duly un-served and he from the list of 7 PWs comprised of private and official PWs did not serve upon any PW. As to why he may not be dealt strictly in accordance with law in case he fails to serve the summons upon private and official PWs. By consent, case is adjourned to 27.10.2026, for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend on given date. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 12 | Habeas Corpus 317/2026 | Ghulam Qadir Mirbahar VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and ors | Pardeep Kumar() | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Cr.M.A No.317 of 2026 under section 491 Cr.PC fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Applicant and his counsel are present. DDPP for the State is present. Alleged detenues are not produced. HC/1611 Ghulam Murtaza Mirani submitted report of official respondent No.1. In said report, it has been mentioned that alleged detenue No.1 was produced on 06.10.2026 before the Court of Additional Sessions Judge-III, Ghotki where her statement was recorded and her custody was handed over to her husband Altaf Hussain (Private respondent No.4). The counsel for the applicant is required to come prepared along with requisite documents about the alleged detenue No.1 under which her custody was handed over to her husband Altaf Hussain (Private respondent No.4). Let notice be issued to private respondent No.4/Altaf Hussain. Adjourned to 15.10.2026, for hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 13 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2061/2026 | Mst. Allah Wadhai Shaikh VS SHO PS Sarhad and others | Mujeeb Ur Rehman(ADVO-785-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr.M.A No.2061 of 2026 under section 22-A 6(i) Cr.PC generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Applicant and her counsel are present. DDPP is present. Heard. The record has been perused. Order pronounced in open Court. Instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application stands dismissed vide order on separate sheet. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 14 | SC (Murder Trial) 93/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Yameen @ Yameen Solangi & others | Pardeep Kumar() | Ali Asghar Panhyar(ADVO-602-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 389/2024 A-Section Ghotki |
S.C No.93 of 2025 is taken up in open Court. Accused (1) Muhammad Yamin alias Yamin, and (2) Adeel Ahmed alias Adeel are produced through video link arrangement from DP & CF Ghotki. While accused (3) Zaheer Ahmed, (4) Sajjad Ahmed, (5) Muhammad Azeem and (6) Muhammad Kamran are present on bail. Accused (7) Saeed Ahmed has remained absent as before and his bail already cancelled and bail bonds were forfeited. NBWs upon accused Saeed Ahmed retuned unexecuted by HC/1611 Ghulam Murtaza Mirani and same is extended to him for next date of hearing. Notice u/s 514 (1) Cr.PC returned duly served upon surety Waqar Hussain and he is present. He is afforded chance to furnish his reply on next date of hearing. In case, he either appears and does not furnish reply or fails to appear and fails to furnish reply or the reply furnished by him is found unsatisfactory the Court will pass appropriate orders on the next date of hearing without any further notice. No PW is present. The counsel for complainant submitted that talks of amicable settlement between the parties are going on and on next date of hearing the complainant along with his PWs will appear. By consent, case is adjourned to 28.10.2026, for service/evidence. Custody accused are again to be produced through video link arrangement while accused present on bail are directed to remain present on next date of hearing. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 29/2026 |
Muhammad Hashim Bhutto and others VS P.O Sindh and others | Ayaz Ali(ADVO-1560-SBC-GHT) | Irshad Ali(ADVO-1054-SBC-GHT),Javed Hussain Seerlo (DDA)(ADVO-1015-SBC-SUK) | C.A No. 29 of 2026 fixed in Civil Jurisdiction of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Appellants and their counsel are absent as before. The counsel for appellant sent adjournment application through Mr. Eshan Ali, Advocate and he further requested for fixation of the matter tomorrow. The counsel for contesting respondent No.15 is present. DDA for official respondents is also present. The counsel for contesting respondent No.15 and DDA have already advanced their arguments yesterday. By consent, matter is adjourned to 15.10.2026 at 11:00 a.m, for arguments. |
||