| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2072/2026 | Makhno Shar & another VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-364 | 18/2005 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
Cr.B.A No. 2072 of 2026 of applicants/accused of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court. Applicants/accused are confined at DP & CF Ghotki. The Counsel for applicants/accused and ADPP for the State are present. The counsel for applicants/accused did not press instant bail application on the ground that applicants/accused have been acquitted in the case arising out of instant crime. Instant post arrest bail application under section 497 Cr.PC having been become infructuous and stands dismissed, accordingly. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1957/2026 | Meer Muhammad Kalhoro & another VS The State | Liaquat Ali(ADVO-317-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 323/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr.B.A No. 1957 of 2026 of applicants/accused fixed at Sr. No.1 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court. Applicants/accused Meer Muhammad and Nazeer Ahmed @ Sufi Nazeer Ahmed are present on interim pre-arrest bail granted to them vide order dated 31.08.2026 by this Court. The counsel for applicants/accused and ADPP are present. The complainant is also present and he filed application supported by his biometric affidavit, which is taken on record. The counsel for applicants/accused filed statement along with photostat copies of suo moto order cognizance under section 190 Cr.PC taken by Civil Judge & J.M-II, Ghotki and map along with design of alleged cutting from the site. Since, Civil Judge & J.M???II, Ghotki has taken suo moto cognizance of alleged offence as per copy submitted by counsel for applicants/accused, then counsel for applicants/accused is required to place on record the copy of disposal of such suo moto order by tomorrow. Adjourned to 15.09.2026 for orders. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | SC (Murder Trial) 93/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Yameen @ Yameen Solangi & others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 389/2024 A-Section Ghotki |
S.C No.93 of 2025 fixed at Sr.No.2 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused (1) Muhammad Yamin alias Yamin, and (2) Adeel Ahmed alias Adeel are produced through video link arrangement from DP & CF Ghotki. While accused (3) Zaheer Ahmed, (4) Sajjad Ahmed, (5) Muhammad Azeem, (6) Saeed Ahmed and (7) Muhammad Kamran are present on bail. ADPP, partner for the counsel for complainant and accused are present. No PW is present. Process in shape of summons returned with the endorsement that due to death of the relatives of the complainant party, complainant party has not attended the Court today. Process is extended to PC Nisar Ahmed. Issue summons to PWs who remained present on previous date but today did not appear on account of the death of their relatives. By consent case is adjourned to 23.09.2026 for evidence. Age of the case as per CFMS???DC system is one year six months and five days and there are specific directions for disposal of the murder cases within the period of 24 months. Custody accused are again to be produced through video link arrangement while accused present on bail are directed to remain present on next date of hearing. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 4 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1801/2026 | Dileep Kumar VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr.M.A No.1801 of 2026 under section 22-A 6(i) Cr.P.C fixed at Sr.No.4 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Applicant and his counsel are present. ADPP is also present. The counsel for applicant advanced his arguments. Order is reserved to pronounced tomorrow i.e 15.09.2026. |
||
| 5 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1787/2026 | Mukesh VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr.M.A No.1787 of 2026 under section 22-A 6(i) Cr.P.C fixed at Sr.No.03 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Applicant and his counsel are absent. WHC Yar Muhammad Abro of P.S A-Section Ghotki is present and submits that there is an issue of interest/viyaj in respect of the alleged cheque, such report has already been submitted before this Court. The order is reserved to be pronounced today and it is pronounced in open Court. Instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application is devoid of merits and it is hereby dismissed. However, the applicant shall avail an alternate remedy under section 200 Cr.PC and in addition to this, he shall file summary suit before the Court of competent jurisdiction. Detailed order is placed on separate sheet. |
||
| 6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1808/2026 | Abdul Majeed Machi VS SHO PS Adilpur and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr.M.A No.1808 of 2026 under section 22-A 6(i) Cr.P.C fixed at Sr.No.05 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Applicant and his counsel are absent. ADPP is present. HC Anwar Ali, duty officer of police station Adilpur put his personal appearance. This is third consecutive call. Now it is 10:45 a.m. HC Anwar Ali duty officer submitted that if applicant appears along with MLC of injured, which is of cognizable offence, then FIR will be lodged. In this regard, he made such endorsement on memo of instant application. Pertinent to mention here that on previous date of hearing, Incharge Complaint Redressal Center Ghotki submitted report in which he stated that final MLC of injured Rashid has been issued wherein injuries of injured Rashid is falling under Section 337-A(ii) PPC which is cognizable offence. Accordingly, instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application in terms thereof disposed of. Such order passed and pronounced in open Court and placed on separate sheet. |
||
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1858/2026 | Waryam Tart VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr.M.A No.1858 of 2026 under section 22-A 6(iii) Cr.P.C fixed at Sr.No.08 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Applicant is absent but his counsel is present. ADPP is present. Report of official respondent No. 3 is received through his representative, same is taken on record. Heard. The record has been perused. Order passed and pronounced in open Court on separate sheet. Instant Criminal Miscellaneous application stands disposed of. |
||
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1857/2026 | Mst. Abida Shaikh and anoother VS SSP Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr.M.A No.1857 of 2026 under section 22-A 6(iii) Cr.P.C fixed at Sr.No.07 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Applicants are present along with their counsel. ADPP is present. Reports of official respondents Nos. 2 to 4 are received through their representatives, same are taken on record. Heard. The record has been perused. Order passed and pronounced in open Court on separate sheet. Instant Criminal Miscellaneous application stands disposed of. |
||
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1851/2026 | Manzoor Ahmed Pitafi VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr.M.A No.1851 of 2026 under section 22-A 6(i) Cr.P.C fixed at Sr.No.06 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Applicant and his counsel are present. Proposed accused No.4 and his counsel are present. ADPP is also present. On one hand, the counsel for applicant argued that cognizable offence has been made out and on the other hand, counsel for proposed accused argued that proposed accused has no concern in FIR bearing crime No. 91/2025 u/s 302 PPC PS Khanpur Mahar and prayed for dismissal of instant application. The report of Incharge Complaint Redressal Center Ghotki submitted through ASI Ghulam Mustafa Kolachi shows that matter between the parties is ongoing since 2017 which pertains to matrimonial affairs and both the parties have lodged separate FIRs against each other. In report, it is further submitted that no alleged offence has taken place as claimed by the applicant in memo of application. Heard. The record has been perused. Detailed order is passed and pronounced in open Court on separate sheet. Instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application is devoid of merits and it is hereby dismissed. However the applicant shall avail an alternate remedy under section 200 Cr.PC, if he so advised. |
||
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1869/2026 | Altaf Ahmed Bhutto VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III) | / |
Cr.M.A No.1869 of 2026 under section 22-A 6(iii) Cr.P.C fixed at Sr.No.09 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Applicant and his counsel are present. ADPP is present. Reports of official respondents Nos. 1 & 2 are received through their representatives, same are taken on record. Heard. The record has been perused. Order passed and pronounced in open Court on separate sheet. Instant Criminal Miscellaneous application stands disposed of. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 11 | PPC 16/2005 | The State VS Mitho @ Kurri and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 18/2005 Wasti Jiwan Shah |
S.C No.16 of 2005 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused Makhno and Sachloo both by caste Shar are produced through video link arrangement. The counsel for accused and ADPP are present. Complainant is also present. Complainant filed application supported by his own biometric affidavit wherein he raised no objection for acquittal of both accused. An application under section 265-K Cr.PC is also fixed today for hearing. Heard. The record has been perused. Order passed and pronounced in open Court. Accordingly, application under section 265-K Cr.PC stands allowed. Both accused are acquitted accordingly. Let such intimation for their acquittal be sent to the Prison concerned. Such order is placed on separate sheet. |
|