| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1825/2026 | Adnan Ahmed Gabol VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497 | 63/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr.BA No. 1825 of 2026 of applicant/accused Adnan Ahmed Gabole fixed at Sr. No.1 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court at 08:35 a.m. The counsel for applicant/accused is absent. The DDPP is present. M/S Karamullah Chachar appeared and filed vakalatnama on behalf of complainant, which is taken on record. Again to be taken up after complete cause list and in case the counsel for applicant/accused fails to appear, the Court is competent to dismiss the post arrest bail in default without further notice. Again on second round it is taken up at 09:50 a.m. The counsel for applicant/accused is absent. Again to be taken up on third call. Again it is taken up on 11:30 a.m. The counsel for applicant/accused has remained absent without intimation. This is third date of hearing, the counsel for applicant/accused has chosen to remain absent. This shows lack of interest on the part of counsel for the applicant/accused. This court has left no other alternate except to dismiss the instant post arrest bail application of applicant/accused in default/non prosecution. |
|
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1826/2026 | Adnan Ahmed Gabol VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497 | 23/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr.BA No. 1826 of 2026 of applicant/accused Adnan Ahmed Gabole fixed at Sr. No.2 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court at 08:38 a.m. The counsel for applicant/accused is absent. The DDPP is present. M/S Karamullah Chachar appeared and filed vakalatnama on behalf of complainant, which is taken on record. Again to be taken up after complete cause list and in case the counsel for applicant/accused fails to appear, the Court is competent to dismiss the post arrest bail in default without further notice. Again on second round it is taken up at 09:50 a.m. The counsel for applicant/accused is absent. Again to be taken up on third call. Again it is taken up on 11:30 a.m. The counsel for applicant/accused has remained absent without intimation. This is third date of hearing, the counsel for applicant/accused has chosen to remain absent. This shows lack of interest on the part of counsel for the applicant/accused. This Court has left no other alternate except to dismiss the instant post arrest bail application of applicant/accused in default/non prosecution. |
|
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1885/2026 | Ghalib Sundrani VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497 | 14/2022 Andal Sundrani |
Cr.BA No. 1885 of 2026 of applicant/accused Ghalib Sundrani fixed at Sr. No.3 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court at 08:40 a.m. The counsel for applicant/accused and DDPP for the State are present. During the initial arguments, the counsel for applicant/accused has pointed out that applicant/accused has been arrested on 28.07.2026 in another case/crime and he has already been granted bail in the said case/crime. However, the counsel for applicant/accused in support of his arguments has failed to produce the copy of said order. Matter is kept a side to be again taken up in open Court on finishing cause list requiring the counsel to produce the copy of said order else Court is competent enough to pass appropriate order. Again on second round it is taken up at 09:55 a.m. The counsel for applicant/accused is absent. Again to be taken up on third call. Again on third round it is taken up at 11:35 a.m. The counsel for applicant/accused appeared and submitted the copies of bail orders granted to applicant/accused in other crimes. Heard. The record has been perused. Accordingly, post arrest bail application of applicant/accused stands allowed. The applicant/accused is admitted on post arrest bail provides he furnishes one solvent surety in the sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) and PR bond in the like amount to the entire satisfaction of this Court. Order pronounced in open Court and kept on record through separate sheet. |
|
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1888/2026 | Rao Farman Rajput VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497 | 269/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr.BA No. 1888 of 2026 of applicant/accused Rao Farman Rajput fixed at Sr. No.4 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court at 08:45 a.m. The counsel for applicant/accused, complainant and DDPP for the State are present. The counsel for the parties advanced their respective arguments at length. The common question was raised from the counsel for the parties as to what other offence has been committed. None of the counsel for the parties has convinced the Court. Matter is kept aside again to be taken up requiring the counsel for the parties to satisfy the query as raised by the Court on next call. Again on second round it is taken up at 09:57 a.m. Still the counsel for the parties including the DDPP has failed to satisfy or to convince the Court. Order passed and pronounced in open Court on separate sheet. Post arrest bail application under section 497 Cr.PC of applicant/accused is devoid of merits and it is hereby dismissed. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | SC (Murder Trial) 50/2023 | The State VS Akbar and ors | Abdul Rehman(ADVO-1415-SBC-GHT) | Irshad Ali(ADVO-1054-SBC-GHT),Mohammad Rafique(ADVO-1493-SBC-GHT),Qurban Ali(ADVO-631-SBC-SUK),Zulfiqar Hussain Bhayo(ADVO-697-SBC-SHK) | PPC-302 | 107/2022 A-Section Ghotki |
S.C No. 50 of 2023 fixed at Sr. No.5 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court at 08:50 a.m. Accused 1. Farman, 2. Najeebullah, 3. Qadeer Ahmed are produced in safe custody from DP and CF Ghotki. Accused 4. Akbar, 5. Safiullah, 6. Abdul Waheed and 7. Miandad are present on bail. DDPP, counsel for complainant and some of accused are present. PW I.O SIP Ali Nawaz Dayo is present. The DDPP is directed to refresh the memory of I.O. Matter is kept aside and would be taken up on second call. It is now 12:15 p.m. The counsel for the parties are present. I.O Rtd. SIP Ali Nawaz Dayo is present, his evidence is recorded at Exh.86, he produced roznamcha entry No.13, lash chakas form, roznamcha entry No.20, Chemical Examiner Report/DNA report and FSL report at Exh.87 to Exh.91 respectively. The DDPP closed the evidence side of prosecution vide statement at Exh.92. Adjourned to day after tomorrow on 24.08.2026, being tomorrow as Sunday for statement of accused under section 342 Cr.PC. Present custody accused are sent back to the prison concerned with direction to produce them through video link arrangement. The complainant is also directed to remain in attendance along with his counsel. |
| 6 | SC (Murder Trial) 10/2025 | The State VS Talish Pathan and ohters | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 136/2024 A-Section Ghotki |
S.C No.10 of 2025 fixed at Sr. No.7 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court at 09:00 a.m. Accused Subhanullah and Ahmed Ali are present on bail. DDPP and counsel for accused are present but counsel for complainant is absent. No PW is present. Issue BWs against complainant and private PWs. Issue summons to all official PWs including MLO concerned. Adjourned to 03.09.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend on the given date. Report of absconding accused is unsatisfactory. Let Chairman JIT and members be put on their personal attended on next date of hearing. The office for compliance. Meanwhile Reader of this Court is directed to verify R&PS to see the status of attachment of CNICs of absconding accused for perusal of the undersigned during the course of the day. In case CNICs of absconding accused has not been attached, the same be attached forthwith. |
|
| 7 | SC (Murder Trial) 9/2025 | The State VS Imdad Pathan and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 134/2024 A-Section Ghotki |
S.C No.09 of 2025 fixed at Sr. No.6 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court at 08:55 a.m. Accused Imdad Ali and Muhammad Yousif are present on bail. The DDPP and counsel for complainant are present. The counsel for accused however is absent. No PW is present. Issue BWs against complainant and private PWs. Issue summons to all official PWs including MLO concerned. Adjourned to 03.09.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend on the given date. Report of absconding accused is unsatisfactory. Let Chairman JIT and members be put on their personal attended on next date of hearing. The office for compliance. Meanwhile Reader of this Court is directed to verify R&PS to see the status of attachment of CNICs of absconding accused for perusal of the undersigned during the course of the day. In case CNICs of absconding accused has not been attached, the same be attached forthwith. |
|
| 8 | PPC 202/2026 | The State VS Habibullah Jiskani | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-320 | 106/2024 Sarhad |
S.C 202 of 2026 fixed at Sr. No.8 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court at 09:05 a.m. Accused Habibullah is present on bail. The DDPP is present. The counsel for accused is absent. Issue notice to counsel for accused. No private PWs or legal heirs of deceased, victim present except official PWs complainant patrolling officer Dhanesh and APO Zafar Ali. The office is directed immediately to release the withheld salaries of all official PWs including present PWs which was stopped/withheld due to their remaining absent. Let such letter be issued to their concerned authority. Issue notices to legal heirs of deceased/victim. Adjourned to 03.09.2026 for evidence. Present accused and PWs are directed to attend on given date. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 9 | Habeas Corpus 258/2026 | Mst. Sakina Malik VS SHO PS Khanpur Mahar and others | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Cr.MA No. 258 of 2026 under section 491 Cr.PC of applicant Mst. Sakeena Malik fixed at Sr. No.9 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court at 09:08 a.m. Applicant is present. Her counsel is absent. DDPP is present. Applicant is required to ensure the appearance of her counsel on second call. It is now 11:40 a.m. The counsel for applicant is present. Issue rule nisi of detenue through SHO P.S Khanpur Mahar. Adjourned to 24.08.2026 for hearing. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 10 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1705/2026 | Hakim Marwari VS SHO PS B/Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr.MA No. 1705 of 2026 under section 22-A 6(i) Cr.PC of applicant Hakim Marwari fixed at Sr. No.10 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court at 09:12 a.m. The applicant is present. His counsel is absent. Mr. Karamullah Chachar Advocate appeared at rostrum and submitted that counsel for applicant is busy before the Court of Assistant Sessions Judge Ghotki. The report is submitted by Incharge Complaint Redressed Center Ghotki through ASI Muhammad Rafique Kolachi, which is taken on record. Again to be taken up on second call. It is now 11:45 a.m. The applicant and his counsel are present. The counsel for applicant advanced his arguments. Detailed order passed and pronounced in open Court on separate sheet. From record, it appears that applicant and proposed accused are originally resident of Taluka Pano Akil District Sukkur. The alleged abductee is also resident of Taluka Pano Akil District Sukkur and married to one Samandar. The Incharge Complaint Redressed Center has denied the alleged abduction of Smt. Hashima. The approach of applicant by filing instant Cr.M.A from the face of it appears with unclean hands. Instant Cr.M.A is devoid of merits and it is hereby dismissed. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 11 | PPC 327/2026 | The State VS Ghulam Rasool Mirani and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Ali Raza Kalwar(ADVO-237-B-SBC-GHT) | PPC-321 | 1/2026 Gamero |
R&Ps of Sessions Case No:327/2026 received by way of transfer from the court of Honourable District & Sessions Judge, Ghotki vide Honours office letter No;Cr:7285 Dt:22.08.2026, for its disposal according to law. Case taken up in open court. Accused Ghulam Rasool, Abdul Wahab, Mai Jamalan , Mai Rooshan and Ghulam Sarwar are present on bail. DDPP present . DC called absent . Put off to 31.08.2026. For framing of charge. Present accused are directed to attend . |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
| 12 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 32/2026 | Abdul Fattah Tart VS Muhammad Khan Jhurah and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Complaint of Illegal Dispossession Act No.32 of 2026 fixed at Sr. No.11 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court at 09:15 a.m. The complainant and his counsel are absent. The DDPP is present. The reports of official respondents are placed on the case file. On the previous date of hearing, the counsel for the complainant advanced his arguments on the instant complaint and after hearing, the order was reserved to be pronounced today. Meanwhile, the counsel for complainant filed detailed withdrawal statement on very date of hearing and reserving the order to be pronounced. The detailed statement of the counsel for the complainant is taken on record. Order passed and pronounced in open Court on separate sheet. Accordingly, instant complainant stands dismissed. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.M.A. (Civil Misc. Appeals) 3/2026 |
Basheer Ahmed Mahar and others VS P.O Sindh and others | Ghulam Yasin(ADVO-1155-SBC-GHT) | Javed Hussain Seerlo (DDA)(ADVO-1015-SBC-SUK) | C.M.A No. 03 of 2026 fixed at Sr. No.1 of civil jurisdiction of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court at 02:35 p.m. Appellants are absent. Their counsel is present. The counsel for respondent No.8, 10, 11, 12 are present. The counsel for the parties advanced their arguments at length and in support thereof, produced case laws. Arguments heard. The record has been perused. Order passed and pronounced in open Court on separate sheet. Impugned order dated 05.03.2026 passed by the Senior Civil Judge Ghotki requires interference and it is hereby set aside. The trial Court is directed to proceed the matter further strictly in accordance with law. |
||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 29/2026 |
Muhammad Hashim Bhutto and others VS P.O Sindh and others | Ayaz Ali(ADVO-1560-SBC-GHT) | Javed Hussain Seerlo (DDA)(ADVO-1015-SBC-SUK) | C.A No.29 of 2026 fixed at Sr. No.2 of civil jurisdiction of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court at 09:35 a.m. Appellants and their counsel are absent. DDA for official respondents is absent. The counsel for contesting respondent No.15 is present. The service against private respondent No. 17, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24 and 15 has already been held good vide dairy dated:17.06.2026. The private respondents No. 18 to 22 had been passed away as per report of bailiff. The fresh notice/process is returned duly served upon 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 22 to 25, as per endorsement of bailiff of Senior Civil Judge Ghotki and in the said endorsement bailiff has submitted that private respondent No. 14 & 22 had been passed away while private respondent No.23 has been shifted away. The process/notice upon private respondent No.6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 22 to 25 stands held good. The appellants or their counsel are directed to submit the list of legal heirs of private respondents, who had been passed away, on next date of hearing failing which this Court shall pass an appropriate orders. Adjourned to 05.09.2026, for appearance of private respondent No. No. 17, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24 and 15, service of private respondent No. 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 22 to 25, list of legal heirs of private respondents(passed away) and explanation from DA Ghotki for non appearance of DDA. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 28/2026 |
Mumtaz Ahmed Mahar VS Banhon Mahar and others | Sudhamo @ Sudhamchand(ADVO-372-SBC-GHT) | Javed Hussain Seerlo (DDA)(ADVO-1015-SBC-SUK) | Civil Appeal No.28 of 2026 fixed at Sr. No.3 of civil jurisdiction of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court at 09:40 a.m. Appellant is absent. His counsel is present. Attorney of private respondent No. 1-A to 1-I is present who is also one of the respondent No.1-A. His counsel is also present. DDA for official respondent is absent. Explanation be called from DA Ghotki for non appearance of DDA. The counsel for contesting private respondents filed adjournment application on the ground that he has to file objections to the appeal. By consent, C.A is adjourned to 08.09.2026 for objections to the appeal or hearing. It is expected from the counsel for the contesting private respondents that he will not make any adjournment application for filing of objection on next date and in case he fails to file objections then he shall make arguments on C.A. |
||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 31/2026 |
Abdul Hafeez Kalwar VS Dewi Dass and others | Jamshed Ahmed Faiz Mahar(ADVO-856-SBC-GHT) | Javed Hussain Seerlo (DDA)(ADVO-1015-SBC-SUK) | Civil Appeal No.31 of 2026 fixed at Sr. No.4 of civil jurisdiction of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court at 12:50 a.m. Appellant and his counsel are present. Contesting respondents No.1 & 2 are absent but their counsel is present. DDA for official represents is also present. For want of time, matter by consent of the counsel for the parties is adjourned to 12.09.2026 for further arguments. |
||