| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 14/2024 | The State VS Allah Ditto Pitafi | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Mohammad Rafique(ADVO-1493-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 388/2023 A-Section Ghotki |
S.C No. 14 of 2024 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused Allah Ditto is produced through video link. The ADPP and counsel for custody accused provided to him on State expenses are present. In main murder case, evidence of all private PWs has been recorded and case has been fixed for evidence of official PWs and those PWs who are material PWs of instant case will also be examined in the instant off-shoot case. By consent, case is adjourned to 15.10.2026, for evidence. |
| 2 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 16/2024 | The State VS Jumo Khushk | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Mohammad Rafique(ADVO-1493-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 389/2023 A-Section Ghotki |
S.C No. 16 of 2024 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused Jumo Khushk is produced through video link. The ADPP and counsel for custody accused provided to him on State expenses are present. In main murder case, evidence of all private PWs has been recorded and case has been fixed for evidence of official PWs and those PWs who are material PWs of instant case will also be examined in the instant off-shoot case. By consent, case is adjourned to 15.10.2026, for evidence. |
| 3 | SC (Murder Trial) 98/2024 | The State VS Allah Ditto Pitafi and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Mohammad Rafique(ADVO-1493-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 358/2023 A-Section Ghotki |
SC. No. 98 of 2024 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused 1. Allah Ditto, 2. Iqbal, 3. Karam Ali and 4. Jumo are produced through video link arrangement from DP & CF Ghotki while accused Muhammad Alam is present on bail. The ADPP, counsel for complainant, the counsel for accused Muhammad Alam as well as the counsel for custody accused provided to them on State expenses are present. Evidence of PW-1 complainant/eye-witness Sikandar Ali recorded at Exh.17, he produced FIR, receipt of receiving dead body of deceased, further statement and PS copy of his CNIC at Exh.18 to Exh.21 respectively; P.W-2/eye witness Abdul Kareem at Exh.22, he produced further statement at Exh.23; P.W-3/eye-witness Sanaullah at Exh.24, he produced further statement and PS copy of his CNIC at Exh. 25 and Exh.26; P.W-4/mashir Abdul Samad at Exh.27, he produced Danishtnama, mashirnama of inspection of dead body of deceased, mashirnama of place of incident, mashirnama of last worn clothes of deceased, mashirnama of arrest of accused Allah Ditto, mashirnama of arrest of accused Iqbal, Karam Ali and Jumo, and PS copy of his CNIC at Exh.28 to Exh.34 respectively; P.W-5/another mashir Nazeer Ahmed at Exh.35, he produced PS copy of his CNIC at Exh.36 and P.W-6 MLO Dr. Akhtar Ali Malik at Exh.37, he produced original postmortem examination report of deceased at Exh.38. The summons of official PWs is extended to process server for next date of hearing. By consent, case is adjourned to 15.10.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend while custody accused are again to be produced through video link arrangement from DP & CF Ghotki on the date of hearing. |
| 4 | SC (Murder Trial) 357/2024 | The State VS Nawab Ali Lakhan and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Sudhamo @ Sudhamchand(ADVO-372-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 109/2023 Sarhad |
S.C No. 357 of 2024 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused Nawab Ali Lakhan is produced through video link arrangement from DP & CF Ghotki. The ADPP, counsel for complainant and counsel for accused are present. No PW is present except PW Muhammad Paryal. The complainant is absent. The absence of complainant reflects that he deliberately avoids to appear before this Court for recording his evidence. In this regard, the counsel for complainant drew attention of this Court to diary dated 07.10.2026 vide No.20538/26 of the Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan whereby the complainant has challenged the order dated 17.09.2026 in Cr.Tr. Application passed by the Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur whereby the Transfer Application filed by the complainant was dismissed. In view of the Court, since no restriction order has been passed by the Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan, avoidance of the complainant not to appear and not to record his evidence amounts to his intentional and deliberate act, the reason best known to him by doing so. Let BWs be issued against the complainant and his absentee PWs through SHO P.S Sarhad. A fresh process in shape of summons to I.O SIP Muhammad Ayaz Bullo who conducted the investigation and recorded the statements of DWs/PWs and thereafter recommended by placing the name of accused in column No.2 of challan due to insufficient evidence be procured so that on next date of hearing, his evidence be recorded. By consent case is adjourned to 16.10.2026 for evidence and hearing on application u/s 265 K Cr.PC. Custody accused is again to be produced through video link on given date of hearing. |
| 5 | PPC 737/2024 | Farhan Ali Kalwar VS Peer Bux Langhah and others | Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-325A-SBC-GHT) | Ghulam Yasin(ADVO-1155-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
S.C No. 737 of 2024 arising out of complaint IDA fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. The complainant is absent but his counsel is present. Accused 1. Muhammad Hashim, 2. Manzoor Ahmed, 3. Hajan and 4. Abdul Rauf are present on bail while attendance of accused Pir Bux had already been dispensed with vide order on separate sheet. The evidence of P.W-4 Assistant Commissioner Insaf Ali Pathan, the then Mukhtiarkar Taluka Ghotki is recorded at Exh.13, he produced original enquiry reports along with annexure at Exh.14 and evidence of P.W-5 Inspector Rizwan Ahmed Narejo, the then SHO P.S Adilpur is recorded at Exh.15, he produced enquiry report along with annexure at Exh.16. The counsel for complainant closed the complainant???s side vide statement at Exh.17. By consent, case is adjourned to 20.10.2026 for statement of accused under section 342 Cr.PC. Present accused are directed to attend on the given date with further direction to counsel for accused to ensure appearance of accused Pir Bux so that his statement is also to be recorded on the given date. |
| 6 | SC (Murder Trial) 15/2025 | State VS Allah Wasayo and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT),Ali Asghar Panhyar(ADVO-602-SBC-GHT) | Anwar Ali(ADVO-1059-SBC-GHT),Mohammad Rafique(ADVO-1493-SBC-GHT) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-302,PPC-324,PPC-334,PPC-337-H | 428/2024 A-Section Ghotki |
S.C No. 15 of 2025 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused 1. Allah Wassayo Shaikh, 2. Aftab Ahmed Mangi and 3. Ahsan Ahmed Mangi are produced through video link arrangement from DP and CF Ghotki. The ADPP, counsel for complainant and counsel for accused are present. The complainant is present for cross examination. The counsel for accused drew attention of the Court that examination in chief of one of the eye witnesses namely Sajjad has yet not been recorded, either the complainant give up his evidence or will record his evidence. Let PW Sajjad be summoned for his evidence to be recorded by the complainant or give up him and thereafter, proper order be passed in case the counsel for complainant under instruction of the complainant and State counsel withhold his evidence. By consent, case is adjourned to 13.10.2026 for evidence. The complainant is also directed to ensure the appearance of his absentee PW Sajjad on next date of hearing. Custody accused are again to be produced through video link arrangement on the date of hearing. |
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 2/2025 | State VS Allah Wassayo Shaikh | Talib Hussain Siyal(ADVO-276-SBC-GHT),Zainab Khatoon (ADVO-1659-SBC-SUK) | Anwar Ali(ADVO-1059-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 442/2024 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions case No. 02 of 2025 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused Allah Wassayo Shaikh is produced through video link arrangement from DP and CF Ghotki. ADPP for State and counsel for accused are present. Main case is adjourned hence, this case being off-shoot is also adjourned to 13.10.2026, for evidence. Custody accused is again to be produced through video link arrangement on the date of hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2019/2026 | Mst. Gulfam Malik VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and ors | Atta Sarmad(ADVO-3249-SBC-SUK) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr.M.A No.2019 of 2026 under section 22-A 6(i) Cr.PC fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Applicant is absent. Her counsel is present. Proposed accused No.1 is present along with his counsel. ADPP is present. Heard. The record has been perused. Order pronounced in open Court. Instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application is devoid of merits and stands dismissed. Order is placed on separate sheet. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 2/2025 |
Pooran Lal VS Muhammad Riaz Rajput | Sabir Ali (ADVO-938-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit No.2 of 2025 fixed in Civil Jurisdiction of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Plaintiff and his counsel are present. Defendant and his counsel are absent. The counsel for plaintiff submitted that he still needs time for collecting the certified true copies of FIRs to be tendered in examination in chief of the plaintiff. Time till next date is granted and no further time shall be granted on any ground. On request of counsel for plaintiff, matter is adjourned to 16.10.2026 for evidence. |
|||