| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | SC (Murder Trial) 323/2004 | The State VS Shah Nawaz and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 44/2004 Adilpur |
Sessions Case No:323/2004 is taken up in open court. Accused Qasim S/O KhanMuhammad is produced by the jail authority D.P and C.F Ghotki on video link .Proceeding of against accused Shah Nawaz S/O Bakhsho Mahar is abated to account of his death. ADPP and DC are present .Today case is fixed for evidence of P.Ws .On Summons PW:Ghulam Nabi Pitafi amd PW:Nawab Ali Pitafi are present. No other P.Ws are present. Deposition of PW:Ghulam Nabi Pitafi is recorded at Ex.No:12.He produced P.S Copy of his CNIC at Ex.No:13. Deposition of Nawab Ali Pitafi is recorded at Exh.No:14. He produced copy of mashirnama of place of incident and P.S copy of his CNIC at Ex.No:15 and 16. The summons of R/P.Ws extended and handed over to process server. Issue summons official witnesses/M.O. Case adjourned to 08.10.2026. For Evidence. Jail Authority is directed to produce accused Qasim @ Muhammad on video link on next date of hearing. |
| 2 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 14/2024 | The State VS Allah Ditto Pitafi | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Mohammad Rafique(ADVO-1493-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 388/2023 A-Section Ghotki |
S.C No. 14 of 2024 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused Allah Ditto is produced through video link. The ADPP and counsel for custody accused provided on state expenses are present. The main case is fixed for evidence; hence office is directed to issue summons to complainant, mashirs, I.O, WHC and sample bearer so also to call case property. Adjourned to 09.10.2026, for evidence. |
| 3 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 16/2024 | The State VS Jumo Khushk | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Mohammad Rafique(ADVO-1493-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 389/2023 A-Section Ghotki |
S.C No. 16 of 2024 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused Jumo Khushk is produced through video link. The ADPP and counsel for custody accused provided on state expenses are present. The main case is fixed for evidence; hence office is directed to issue summons to complainant, mashirs, I.O, WHC and sample bearer so also to call case property. Adjourned to 09.10.2026, for evidence. |
| 4 | SC (Murder Trial) 98/2024 | The State VS Allah Ditto Pitafi and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Mohammad Rafique(ADVO-1493-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 358/2023 A-Section Ghotki |
SC. No. 98 of 2024 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused 1. Allah Ditto, 2. Iqbal, 3. Karam Ali and 4. Jumo are produced through video link arrangement from DP & CF Ghotki while accused Muhammad Alam is present on bail. The ADPP, counsel for complainant, the counsel for accused Muhammad Alam as well as the counsel for custody accused provided to them on State expenses are present. The complainant is present. The counsel for the complainant filed adjournment application by undertaking that in case on next date of hearing the complainant and his PWs do not record their evidence, then the Court is competent to proceed with the case without further notice. The counsel for accused on that count raised no objection on the undertaking of counsel for complainant. The complainant is present and he is directed to ensure appearance of his PWs of FIR. Meanwhile office is directed to ensure appearance of PWs of FIR through BWs so that on next date of hearing the case on no ground be adjourned. The office is also directed to issue summons to all official PWs including MLO concerned, so also to call case property. By consent, case is adjourned to 09.10.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend while custody accused are again to be produced through video link arrangement from DP & CF Ghotki on next date of hearing. |
| 5 | Juv. Child Act (JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ORDINANCE) 215/2026 | The State VS Arslan Ahmed Malik | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Saleem Ahmed (ADVO-733-SBC-GHT) | PPC-377 | 62/2025 Sarhad |
S.C No. 215-A of 2026 is fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up. The case of juvenile accused Arslan has been bifurcated from the case of adult accused. The ADPP and counsel for accused are present. The counsel for complainant is absent as usual. In the case of adult accused, amended charge has been framed today and it has been adjourned to 16.10.2026; hence, instant case is also adjourned to 16.10.2026. Present accused is directed to attend on given date. |
| 6 | PPC 215/2026 | The State VS Abdul Waheed Shah & others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-377 | 62/2025 Sarhad |
S.C No. 215 of 2026 is fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up. Adult accused (1) Ghulam Murtaza and (2) Ghulam Mustafa are present on bail. Accused (3) Abdul Waheed is on interim pre-arrest bail granted to him by Honourable High Court of Sindh Bench at Sukkur in Cr.B.A No.S-945 of 2026 dated 22.09.2026. The case of juvenile accused Arslan has been bifurcated from the case of present adult accused. The ADPP and counsel for accused are present. Mr. Abdul Shakoor Mirbahar, Advocate filed vakalatnama on behalf of accused Abdul WAheed which is taken on record at Ex.No:11. The status of the case as per CFMS-DC system has inadvertently been mentioned as evidence instead of amended charge after joining of trial by accused Abdul Waheed. Amended charge is framed at ExhNo:12 to which accused pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial as per their pleas recorded at Exh No:13 to Exh No:15. The complainant filed application about the absence of his PW Irfan Hussain. The counsel for complainant is absent as usual. An application under section 540-A Cr.PC for dispensing the attendance of accused Ghulam Mustafa is also fixed today and on request of counsel for accused, it is adjourned to next date. By consent, case is adjourned to 16.10.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend on the given date. The complainant is also directed to ensure appearance of his counsel as well his PWs on the date of hearing. |
| 7 | PPC 327/2026 | The State VS Ghulam Rasool Mirani and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Ali Raza Kalwar(ADVO-237-B-SBC-GHT) | PPC-321 | 1/2026 Gamero |
S.C No.327 of 2026 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused (1) Abdul Wahab, (2) Ghulam Sarwar, (3) Mst. Jamalan and (4) Mst. Roshan are present on bail while accused (5) Ghulam Rasool remained absent under intimation submitted by co-accused Abdul Wahab that accused has been admitted at Hira Private Hospital Sukkur due to renal failure; hence his absence of today???s date of hearing is excused. ADPP for State and counsel for accused are present. The summons returned partly served and partly un-served and it is extended till next date of hearing as the summons upon those PWs which was served upon them but did not attend the Court. By consent, case is adjourned to 15.10.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend on the date of hearing. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 28/2026 |
Mumtaz Ahmed Mahar VS Banhon Mahar and others | Sudhamo @ Sudhamchand(ADVO-372-SBC-GHT) | Javed Hussain Seerlo (DDA)(ADVO-1015-SBC-SUK) | Civil Appeal No.28 of 2026 fixed in Civil Jurisdiction of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up. Attorney of the appellant and his counsel are present. Attorney of contesting respondent and his counsel are absent. DDA for official respondent is present. Due to absence of the counsel for contesting respondents and adjournment application filed by the counsel for appellant, to come prepared on next date of hearing for advancing arguments. Adjourned to 20.10.2026 for hearing. Meanwhile office is directed to issue notice to counsel for contesting respondents for his appearance to advance arguments on the appeal. |
||