| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1828/2026 | Mumtaz Shaikh VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497 | 140/2026 Mirpur Mathelo |
Cr.B.A No.1828 of 2026 of accused Mumtaz Shaikh is taken up in open Court. It is now 08:30 a.m, and the matter is fixed at Sr.No.1 of CFMS-DC system. The counsel for applicant/accused is called absent. The DDPP is present. Per DDPP, police papers have already been received to him. B.A is kept aside and again to be taken up on appearance of counsel for the applicant/accused or otherwise. Now, it is 12:20 p.m, there is no intimation of the counsel for applicant/accused. Fix it tomorrow i.e- 19.08.2026, as to why instant post arrest bail application may not be dismissed in default without further notice, in case counsel for applicant/accused either fails to appear or appears and fails to advance his arguments. |
|
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1842/2026 | Sadullah Mahar & another VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497 | 239/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr.B.A No.1821 & 1842 of 2026 fixed at Sr. No.1 & 4 of CFMS-DC arising out of same crime are taken up together. The applicants/accused Ali Asghar and five others of Cr.B.A 1821 of 2026 are present on interim pre-arrest bail while applicants/accused Sadullah and Shafi Muhammad are confined at DP & CF Ghotki. The counsel for applicants/accused, complainant and DDPP for the State are present. The complainant is absent. No other injured except injured Iltaf is present, who has submitted biometric affidavit by raising no objection for confirmation and grant of bail to present accused. Arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties. Order passed and pronounced by single/common order on separate sheets. The pre-arrest and post arrest bail applications of applicants/accused is devoid of merits and are dismissed. Interim pre-arrest bail earlier extended to applicants/accused Ali Asghar & 04 others is hereby recalled. Let such intimation be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and necessary compliance as per law. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1821/2026 | Ali Asghar Mahar & others VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 293/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr.B.A No.1821 & 1842 of 2026 fixed at Sr. No.1 & 4 of CFMS-DC arising out of same crime are taken up together. The applicants/accused Ali Asghar and five others of Cr.B.A 1821 of 2026 are present on interim pre-arrest bail while applicants/accused Sadullah and Shafi Muhammad are confined at DP & CF Ghotki. The counsel for applicants/accused, complainant and DDPP for the State are present. The complainant is absent. No other injured except injured Iltaf is present, who has submitted biometric affidavit by raising no objection for confirmation and grant of bail to present accused. Arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties. Order passed and pronounced by single/common order on separate sheets. The pre-arrest and post arrest bail applications of applicants/accused is devoid of merits and are dismissed. Interim pre-arrest bail earlier extended to applicants/accused Ali Asghar & 04 others is hereby recalled. Let such intimation be sent to SHO P.S concerned for information and necessary compliance as per law. |
|
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1817/2026 | Malhan @ Malhoo Shar & others VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 25/2026 Andal Sundrani |
Cr.B.A No.1817 of 2026 of applicants/accused Malhan @ Malhoo Shar & 03 others fixed at Sr. No.3 of CFMS-DC is taken up in open Court. The counsel for applicants/accused and DDPP for the State are present. Arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties. The gist of the arguments advanced by the counsel for the applicants/accused was that actually the applicants/accused have their Khata lands near the forest lands and presently the people of Bhaya community at behest of Minister of Forest who also belong to Bhaya community have illegally occupied the forest land and intend to disposes the applicants/accused from their khata lands. As against DDPP for the State vehemently objected for confirmation of interim pre-arrest bail of applicants/accused on the ground the ground that the complainant has already filed application supported by his biometric affidavit wherein he has shown concern issuance of threats at the hands of applicants/accused. Order passed and pronounced in open Court on separate sheet. Interim pre-arrest bail earlier extended to applicants/accused vide order dated 10.08.2026 by the learned Sessions Judge Ghotki is hereby confirmed on enhanced amount from Rs.10,000/- to 40,000/- each and PR bond in the like amount to be furnished immediately. Instant pre-arrest bail application stands allowed accordingly. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | SC (Murder Trial) 44/2026 | The State VS Ali Nawaz Behan and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 286/2025 A-Section Ghotki |
S.C No. 44 of 2026 is taken up in open Court. Accused Muhammad Moosa is produced in custody from District Prison & Correctional Facility Ghotki while the rest of accused have already been declared as P.Os. The DDPP, the counsel for complainant and accused are present. Dr. Abdul Rauf Mahar MLO and WHC Yar Muhammad Abro are present. While PC Allah Jeewayo is absent. B.A of accused is also fixed for hearing, the partner of the counsel for accused in B.A is present and he seeks time for appearance of his partner at 1200 hours to make arguments. The counsel for accused in trial is present and he is ready to cross examine PW Dr. Abdul Rauf. However, the B.A of accused is firstly to be heard and decided today so, the case is adjourned to 20.08.2026 for evidence. Present custody accused is sent back to the prison concerned with direction again to be produced in safe custody on the given date. Present PWs are also directed to attend on the given date, BWs be issued against PC Allah Jeewayo who has remained absent without intimation. B.A of accused is to be taken up at 1200 hours for hearing and disposal in accordance with law. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1625/2026 | Sri Chand VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr.M.A No.1625 of 2026 fixed at Sr. No.6 of CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court. The applicant is present. His counsel is present. DDPP for the State is also present. In instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application under section 22-A 6(i) Cr.PC, applicant has arrayed 3 PCs as proposed accused. Let proposed accused be put on their personal appearance along with their replies by tomorrow. Adjourned to 19.08.2026 for hearing. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 127/2018 | The state VS Hazaro @ Dadlo and ors | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-311,PPC-324,PPC-337-Fiii,PPC-337-H | 18/2018 Khanpur Mahar |
SC No.127/2018 is taken up in open court. Accused Kehar son of Dhani Bux Pitafi is produced in custody from District Prison Ghotki. DDPP for the State and counsel for accused are present. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in open Court that accused Kehar Pitafi is acquitted U/S 265-K Cr.P.C from the alleged charge. He is remanded back to custody with directions to release him forthwith if he is no more required in some other case/crime. Issue acquittal slip for accused Kehar Pitafi accordingly. Order placed on record. |
| 8 | SC (Murder Trial) 433/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Moosa Lolai and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Ubedullah(ADVO-223-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 6/2023 Kacho Bindi-II |
Case called. Accused Mir Hassan Lolai is present. Accused Punhal is absconding and declared as P.Os. Accused Miral is shown to have expired in charge sheet.Whle remaining accused have already been acquitted U/S 345(6) Cr.P.C vide order dated 27.7.2026. Learned DDPP for State is present. Mr. Riaz Ahmed advocate for accused Khan Muhammad is present and filed an application U/S 345(2) Cr.P.C and application U/S 345(6) Cr.P.C of acquittal of accused Khan. Order passed thereon. Legal heirs of deceased are present and their statements recorded at Ex....45 to 54. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in open court that application U/S 345(2) Cr.P.C is allowed and Mir Hassan Lolai is acquitted U/S 345(6) Cr.P.C from the alleged charge. He is present on bail, his bail bonds stands cancelled and surety discharged. The order placed on record at Ex.....56 |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 7/2026 |
Assar Dass through legal heirs VS Nabi Bux Gujjar and others | Muhammad Jamshed Akhtar(ADVO-681-SBC-GHT) | Javed Hussain Seerlo (DDA)(ADVO-1015-SBC-SUK) | Civil Revision No. 07 of 2026 fixed at Sr. No.1 of civil jurisdiction in CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court. It is now 08:50 a.m. None of the parties and their counsel are present. DDA for official respondents is also absent. The matter is fixed for service of remaining private respondents/opponents and appearance of respondents on whom service was held good. Reader of this Court is directed to verify R&Ps why the processes upon remaining private respondents has not been issued and to submit such report within the Court timings for further orders. In case the process returned un-served, process be repeated on cost of the applicant with direction to the court of Senior Civil Judge Ghotki to direct bailiff of the Court to properly serve the respondents and submit such report before the date of hearing. Adjourned to 25.08.2026. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | Ist Class Civil Suits 86/2024 |
Allah Wassayo Ghoto VS Chandar Bhan & ors | Sudhamo @ Sudhamchand(ADVO-372-SBC-GHT) | Wazir Ahmed Goto(ADVO-88-SBC-GHT) | Consolidated leading suit No. 86 of 2024 along with subsequent summary suit No.15 of 2025 are fixed at Sr. No.2 & 3 at Civil Jurisdiction taken up in open Court. The plaintiff of leading F.C Suit is present while the plaintiff of subsequent summary suit is absent. The counsel for both the parties are present. DDA for official defendants No. 3 to 5 of leading suit is absent. Let report be called from D.A District Ghotki about remaining absent of DDA. In case DDA is on leave, then why substitute has not been provided to this Court, such report be furnished before this Court on or before the date of hearing. The compared copy of this diary is to be sent to DA Ghotki for compliance. The matter is fixed for evidence of official respondent No.2 of leading F.C Suit. Manager Sindh Bank Limited Ghotki authorized Ayaz Ali along with authority letter. His evidence has been recorded at Exh???.., he produced authority letter and original application submitted by the plaintiff Allah Wassayo, which is seen and returned back to the concern after keeping its copy by making such marking at Exh???... Office to issue summon to clerk concerned for his evidence. By consent, both the suits are adjourned to 28.08.2026 for evidence. |
||
| 3 | Summary Suits 15/2025 |
Chandar Bhan Hindu VS Allah Wassayo Ghoto | Wazir Ahmed Goto(ADVO-88-SBC-GHT) | Sudhamo @ Sudhamchand(ADVO-372-SBC-GHT) | Consolidated leading suit No. 86 of 2024 along with subsequent summary suit No.15 of 2025 are fixed at Sr. No.2 & 3 at Civil Jurisdiction taken up in open Court. The plaintiff of leading F.C Suit is present while the plaintiff of subsequent summary suit is absent. The counsel for both the parties are present. DDA for official defendants No. 3 to 5 of leading suit is absent. Let report be called from D.A District Ghotki about remaining absent of DDA. In case DDA is on leave, then why substitute has not been provided to this Court, such report be furnished before this Court on or before the date of hearing. The compared copy of this diary is to be sent to DA Ghotki for compliance. The matter is fixed for evidence of official respondent No.2 of leading F.C Suit. Manager Sindh Bank Limited Ghotki authorized Ayaz Ali along with authority letter. His evidence has been recorded at Exh???.., he produced authority letter and original application submitted by the plaintiff Allah Wassayo, which is seen and returned back to the concern after keeping its copy by making such marking at Exh???... Office to issue summon to clerk concerned for his evidence. By consent, both the suits are adjourned to 28.08.2026 for evidence. |
||