| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Report | |||||||
| 1 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 32/2026 | Abdul Fattah Tart VS Muhammad Khan Jhurah and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Complaint of Illegal Dispossession Act No.32 of 2026 is taken up in open Court. Complainant and his counsel are present. SHO P.S Andal Sundrani appeared and submitted reply of show cause notice U/s 175 PPC along with report of complaint. Show cause issued to SHO P.S Andal Sundrani is vacated. The report of SHO P.S Andal Sundrani is taken on record. The counsel for complainant is required to come prepare on next date of hearing for advancing his argument. On request of counsel for complainant, complaint is adjourned to 19.08.2026 for hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1843/2026 | Nazeer Jaffery & another VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497 | 51/2026 Belo Mirpur |
Cr.B.A No.1843 of 2026 is taken in open Court. The counsel for applicants/accused and ADPP for the State are present. The complainant Mst. Jan Bibi appeared and sworn biometric affidavit raising no objection for grant of post arrest bail to applicants/accused. Arguments heard. Order passed and pronounced in open Court. Bail to applicants/accused is granted provide they furnish sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each and PR bond in the equal amount to the entire satisfaction of trial court. Instant post arrest bail application stands allowed. |
|
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1862/2026 | Ahsan @ foki Khushk VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497 | 92/2024 Khanpur Mahar |
Bail Application U/S 497- Cr.Pc taken up in open court. Mr: Faiz Muhammad Waseer Advocate present and submitted power on behalf of Applicant/Accused .Order on it. ADPP present .B.A adjourned 20.08.2026.For Hearing . |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1817/2026 | Malhan @ Malhoo Shar & others VS The State | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 25/2026 Andal Sundrani |
Cr.B.A No.1817 of 2026 is taken up in open Court. Applicants/accused 1. Malhan @ Malhoo, 2. Ghulam Muhiuddin @ Mahi, 3. Allauddin and 4. Muhammad Ibrahim @ Ibrahim are present on interim pre-arrest bail. The ADPP is present but counsel for applicants/accused is absent. The complainant appeared and filed biometric affidavit wherein he has submitted that applicants/accused are threatening to him and he has apprehension of life at their hands, such application is taken on record. Adjourn to 18.08.2026 for hearing. Present applicants/accused are directed to attend long with his counsel. The complainant is also directed to attend on next date of hearing. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | SC (Murder Trial) 654/2024 | The State VS Abu Bakar Sangi and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT),Ubedullah(ADVO-223-SBC-GHT) | Anwar Ali(ADVO-1059-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 156/2024 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions Case No.654 of 2024 is taken up in open Court. Accused Abu Bakar is produced in custody from District Prison & Correction Facility, Ghotki. The rest of accused have already been declared as P.Os. The DDPP is absent as usual. Let explanation be called from DPP Ghotki as to why in absence of DDPP Mr. Munir Alam Kolachi, regular DDPP or ADPP is not being assigned to this Court. If, the reply is found unsatisfactory or no reply is furnished, such report shall be sent to PG Sindh for action as per law. The counsel for complainant is absent. The complainant is present. Process in shape of BWs upon PWs of FIR Ghulam Murtaza and Ghulam Mustafa (sons of the complainant) as per endorsement of ASI Manzoor Ahmed Langah had been declared as P.Os in FIR bearing crime No.367 of 2023 u/s 395, 397, 365 PPC of police station A-Section Ghotki. Issue NBWs against both PWs to be executed not below the rank of ASI with the aid of SHO P.S A Section Ghotki. M/S Muhammad Bux Shar filed vakalatnama on behalf of accused which is taken on record with direction to Reader to properly exhibit it. Adjourned to 04.09.2026 for evidence. Present custody accused is sent back in safe custody to prison concerned with direction again to be produced in safe custody on given date. |
| 6 | SC (Murder Trial) 370/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Arif Anwar @ Arif Rajput and another | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Umar (ADVO-892-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 103/2025 A-Section Ghotki |
S.C No.370 of 2025 is taken up in open Court. Accused Arif is present on bail while reset of accused had already been declared as P.Os. The DDPP Mr. Munir Alam Kolachi, as assigned to this Court is absent as usual and in his absence on each and every date of hearing another ADPP is appearing before the Court. Strange to notice that no information in writing from the office of DPP Ghotki has yet been furnished to this Court as to why DDPP Munir Alam Kolachi is remaining absent and in case he is on leave, then no letter or information in writing has been furnished to this Court. Let DPP Ghotki be put on his personal appearance with reply. In case reply is found unsatisfactory or no reply is furnished then the matter will be sent to PG Sindh. Mr. Shabir Ahmed Siyal is present. The counsel for complainant and accused are absent. Per PC Nisar Ahmed of P.S A-Section Ghotki that counsel for complainant has restrained the complainant not to appear before the Court as he and his witnesses are incurring heavy expenses. BWs retuned with such endorsement. Process server PC Nisra Ahmed is directed to execute BWs upon complainant and PWs on next date of hearing. Adjourned to 28.08.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend on next date of hearing with assurance of appearance of his counsel. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1542/2026 | Mehrab Ali Gadani VS SHO P.S Khanpur Mahar | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr.M.A No 1542 of 2026 is taken up in open Court. Applicant and his counsel are absent. The proposed accused are absent but counsel Mr. Shoukat Ali is present. ADPP is present. Order passed and pronounced in open Court on separate sheet. Instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application u/s 22-A 6(i) Cr.PC is devoid of merits and it is hereby dismissed. |
|
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1606/2026 | Mai Salma Khoso VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr.M.A No 1606 of 2026 is taken up in open Court. Applicant and her counsel are present. ADPP is present. The counsel for proposed accused is also present. Mr. Junaid Ahmed Soomro appeared and filed vakalatnama on behalf of proposed accused No.3, which is taken on record. Arguments have already been advanced by the counsel for the parties except counsel for proposed accused No.3 and such audience was also provided to counsel for proposed accused No.3 today. Order passed and pronounced in open Court on separate sheet. Instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application is devoid of merits and it is hereby dismissed. |
||
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1615/2026 | Wali Muhammad Lolai VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and ors | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr.M.A No 1615 of 2026 is taken up in open Court. Applicant and his counsel are present. The counsel for proposed accused is present. Official proposed accused No.14 is present. ADPP is also present. Argument heard at length. Order passed and pronounced in open Court on separate sheet. The incident had been shown occurred on 30.05.2026 while applicant has filed instant Cr.MA before the Court of Ex-Officio Justice of Peace on 07.08.2026 after more than two months while basing the ground that he met with SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and requested him to lodge the FIR but he kept him on false hopes and finally he refused to lodge his FIR. In support of such ground, the Court has not been convinced. Even otherwise the counsel for applicant has produced number of photographs in respect of alleged incident which is rebutted by the counsel for proposed accused according to which the photographs are not of alleged incident. In the given circumstances, this Court has not been persuaded with contentions of counsel for applicant to issue direction for lodgment of FIR. The applicant however, shall be at liberty to avail an alternate remedy u/s 200 Cr.PC which is as efficacious as FIR. Instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application stands dismissed accordingly. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 10 | SC (Murder Trial) 205/2021 | The state VS Abdul Latif and ors | Ali Asghar Panhyar(ADVO-602-SBC-GHT) | Ubedullah(ADVO-223-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 15/2021 Khanpur Mahar |
S.C No.205 of 2021 is taken up in open Court. Accused (1) Abdul Latif, (2) Sadam, (3) Altaf, (4) Khaliq Dino and (5) Lal Bux @ Bindo are present on bail while bail of accused Taj Muhammad has already been cancelled, his bail bond and bond of his surety have been forfeited. NBW against him and notice to his surety were ordered to be issued. NBWs returned unexecuted by process sever HC Irshad Ahmed. Reply of surety Budho is furnished by Mr. Pardeep Kumar (Premy) Chouhan along with his vakalatnama which are taken on record. ADPP, counsel for complainant and counsel for accused are present. DDPP on regular basis assigned to this Court has chosen to remain absent without furnishing any information to this Court by DPP Ghotki. Let explanation be called from DPP Ghotki as to why such intimation has not been furnished to this Court and on regular basis in his absence one or other ADPP assigned to this Court whereby the Court work is being badly suffered. The case of absconding accused Taj Muhammad alias Tajo is bifurcated from the case of present accused as almost the trial has been concluded still ADPP is require to go through the case file and if he thinks that any PWs is remained to be examined then without any wait and if he find that all the PWs has been examined then he must close the side of prosecution. Arguments on reply of show cause notice u/s 514 Cr.PC were heard. Order passed and pronounced in open Court on separate sheet. Entire amount is penalized upon the surety. With direction to deposit the same within one month as required u/s 514(2) failing which office is directed to attach the movable property of the surety through quarter concerned. Adjourn to 25.08.2026 for evidence or otherwise. The ADPP present in Court to inform the status of the trial till the Court timing so that late diary be maintained accordingly. Present accused are directed to attend on the given date. LATE DAIRY. Assistant District Public Prosecuter Ghotki is submitted Application U/S 540 Cr.Pc for calling of PWs:PC:Janib Ali and WHC:Ahmed Hussain Malik .Order on application. Notice to Defense counsels and also learned counsel for complainant .Matter is already fixed On:25.08.206.For hearing on Application U/S 540 Cr.PC /Evidence. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 2/2025 |
Pooran Lal VS Muhammad Riaz Rajput | Sabir Ali (ADVO-938-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit No.2 of 2025 is taken up in open Court. The plaintiff and his counsel are absent. The defendant and his counsel are present. The suit is fixed for evidence of plaintiff side. The plaintiff and his counsel have chosen to remained absent today as well as the counsel for plaintiff has remained absent on previous date. As to why the suit may not be dismissed on next date of hearing in case plaintiff and his counsel remain absent or fail to proceed with the case. Adjourn to 28.08.2026 for evidence or otherwise. |
|||