| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2290/2026 | Nazeer Ahmed Chachar & another VS The State | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-382 | 100/2026 Adilpur |
Cr.B.A No.2290 of 2026 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Applicants/accused 1. Nazeer Ahmed and 2. Wajid Ali are present on interim pre-arrest bail. Their counsel and DDPP for the State are present. The counsel for the parties advanced their respective arguments. Heard. The record has been perused. Order pronounced in open Court. Considering the submissions advanced by the counsel for applicants/accused and having been joined the investigation of applicants/accused and have not misused the relief of interim pre-arrest bail, I am inclined to confirm interim pre-arrest bail of applicants/accused earlier extended to them vide order dated 10.10.2026 by this court and it is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions. Accordingly, instant pre-arrest bail application under section 498-A Cr.PC stands allowed. Copy of order is placed on separate sheet. |
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2289/2026 | Amjad Ali Kalwar & others VS The State | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-420 | 102/2026 Adilpur |
Cr.B.A No.2289 of 2026 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Applicants/accused 1. Amjad Ali, 2. Zohaib Ahmed, 3. Safdar Ali, 4. Farooque Ahmed and 5. Hidayatullah are present on interim pre-arrest bail extended to them by this Court vide order dated 10.10.2026. The counsel for applicants/accused and DDPP for the State are present. Heard. The record has been perused. Having been convinced with the contentions of the counsel for applicants/accused with regard to false implication of applicants/accused in the commission of alleged crime, as applicants/accused and complainant belong to same community and complainant has annoyed with applicants/accused so also applicants/accused have joined the investigation and in this regard, the counsel for applicants/accused has placed the receiving copy of interim pre-arrest bail letter bearing signature and seal of the police station concerned, meaning thereby applicants/accused have not misused the relief of interim pre-arrest bail. Considering the aspects of the matter and having been convinced by the contentions of counsel for applicants/accused, I am inclined to confirm interim pre-arrest bail of applicants/accused earlier extended to them on same terms and conditions. Order pronounced in open court and its copy is placed on separate sheet. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 2/2025 | State VS Allah Wassayo Shaikh | Talib Hussain Siyal(ADVO-276-SBC-GHT),Zainab Khatoon (ADVO-1659-SBC-SUK) | Anwar Ali(ADVO-1059-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 442/2024 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions case No. 02 of 2025 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused Allah Wassayo Shaikh is produced through video link arrangement from DP and CF Ghotki. DDPP for State and counsel for accused are present. Main case is adjourned hence, this case being off-shoot is also adjourned to 20.10.2026, for evidence. Custody accused is again to be produced through video link arrangement on the date of hearing. |
| 4 | SC (Murder Trial) 15/2025 | State VS Allah Wasayo and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT),Ali Asghar Panhyar(ADVO-602-SBC-GHT) | Anwar Ali(ADVO-1059-SBC-GHT),Mohammad Rafique(ADVO-1493-SBC-GHT) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-302,PPC-324,PPC-334,PPC-337-H | 428/2024 A-Section Ghotki |
S.C No. 15 of 2025 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused 1. Allah Wassayo Shaikh, 2. Aftab Ahmed Mangi and 3. Ahsan Ahmed Mangi are produced through video link arrangement from DP and CF Ghotki. The DDPP, counsel for complainant and counsel for accused are present. The complainant filed application supported by his own biometric affidavit by giving up the evidence of PW/eye witness Sajjad Hussain, as examination in chief of injured PWs have already been recorded. The said PW Sajjad Hussain is also present. Notice to DDPP, counsel for complainant and counsel for accused. Notice to counsel for complainant was given, as the complainant is represented by him and application is submitted by the complainant by himself, while the notice to counsel for accused has been given so that the application be heard from the counsel for the parties to meet the ends of justice. The counsel for the parties advanced their respective arguments on the said application. The order is reserved to be pronounced on next date of hearing. The complainant is directed to appear on next date of hearing along with those PWs whose examination in chief have been recorded for cross examination. By consent, case is adjourned to 20.10.2026 for evidence. Custody accused are again to be produced through video link arrangement on the given date of hearing. |
| 5 | SC (Murder Trial) 120/2025 | The State VS Usman Bozdar and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Anwar Ali(ADVO-1059-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 116/2022 Khanpur Mahar |
S.C No. 120 of 2025 fixed in today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court. Accused Usman is present on bail while accused Sadam Hussain remained absent under intimation submitted by his counsel on ground of illness of his mother and have gone out of district Ghotki. Absence of accused Sadam Hussain will be considered when found with supported documents of the illness of his mother otherwise proper order for his absence will be passed on the next date of hearing. Accused Shahzado @ Rind is produced through video link arrangement from DP & CF Ghotki. The DDPP, counsel for complainant and counsel for accused Usman are present. The complainant is absent and on previous date of hearing she filed adjournment application regarding the absence of her PWs and today neither she appeared nor did produce her witnesses. Issue BWs against the complainant and PWs of FIR. The summons to official PWs is extended to same process server for service upon them on next date of hearing. By consent, case is adjourned to 26.10.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend while custody accused is again to be produced through video link arrangement on next date of hearing. The detailed order on application of absence of the accused Sadam Hussain is conveyed to his counsel and he is required to inform him accordingly. |
| 6 | Juv. Child Act (JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ORDINANCE) 249/2026 | The State VS Abid Arain | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Irshad Ali(ADVO-1054-SBC-GHT) | PPC-376 | 184/2025 Daharki |
Sessions Case No.249 of 2026 fixed in today's cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up. Juvenile accused Abid Arain is produced through video link/Zoom arrangement by the CP/CF Sukkur. The DDPP for the State, counsel for accused and counsel for complainant are present. Evidence of ASI Manzoor Ahmed Mirani, author of the FIR recorded as P.W-03 at Exh.13, he produced reference letter and roznamcha entry No.23 at Exh.14 & Exh.15. The DDPP for the State made request for grant of adjournment to refresh the memory of I.O SIP Ghulam Akbar Mirani, as he is not well prepared for recording his evidence today. The summons of remaining official PWs including MLO is extended to process server PC Mehrban Kolachi. By consent, case is adjourned to 16.10.2026, for evidence. Custody accused is again to be produced through video link/Zoom arrangement from CP & CF Sukkur. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2056/2026 | Mashooque Ali Hakro VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr.M.A No.2056 of 2026 under section 22-A 6(i) Cr.PC generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Applicant is present in person. Report of Incharge Complaint Redressal Center Ghotki is received through ASI Ghulam Mustafa Kolachi which is taken on record. DDPP for the State is present. Heard. The record has been perused. In the background of the matter, applicant shall avail an alternate remedy under section 200 Cr.PC, which is as efficacious as FIR. Instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application stands dismissed. Order pronounced in open Court and its copy is placed on separate sheet. |
| 8 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2062/2026 | Ali Bux Chachar VS SHO PS SArhad and others | Muhammad Younis (ADVO-51378-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr.M.A No.2062 of 2026 under section 22-A 6(i) Cr.PC generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Applicant and his counsel are present. Proposed accused and his counsel are present. DDPP is also present. Report of Incharge Complaint Redressal Center Ghotki is received through ASI Ghulam Mustafa Kolachi, which is taken on record. Heard. The record has been perused. Accordingly, instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application is devoid of merits and it is hereby dismissed. However, the applicant shall avail an alternate remedy and in addition to this he shall also seek the remedy from the Competent Court of Civil Jurisdiction. Order pronounced in open Court and its copy is placed on separate sheet. |
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 2061/2026 | Mst. Allah Wadhai Shaikh VS SHO PS Sarhad and others | Mujeeb Ur Rehman(ADVO-785-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr.M.A No.2061 of 2026 under section 22-A 6(i) Cr.PC generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Applicant and her counsel are present. Report of Incharge Complaint Redressal Center Ghotki through ASI Ghulam Mustafa Kolachi is received and placed on record. DDPP is present. In order to meet the ends of justice, proposed accused No.1 (father-in-law of applicant) be put on his personal appearance tomorrow. Adjourned to 14.10.2026 for appearance of proposed accused No.1 and hearing. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 29/2026 |
Muhammad Hashim Bhutto and others VS P.O Sindh and others | Ayaz Ali(ADVO-1560-SBC-GHT) | Irshad Ali(ADVO-1054-SBC-GHT),Javed Hussain Seerlo (DDA)(ADVO-1015-SBC-SUK) | C.A No. 29 of 2026 fixed in Civil Jurisdiction of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Appellants and their counsel are absent as before. One Mr. Imran Ali, student of 3rd year LLB came to rostrum and submitted that counsel for appellants will not appear before this Court today due to his availability in other Courts at Pano Akil. The contesting respondent No.15 and his counsel are present. DDA for official respondents is also present. Since the appellants and respondent No.15 contested the suit before trial Court; hence the counsel for contesting respondent No.15 and DDA for official respondents advanced their respective arguments on the instant appeal. Adjourned to 14.10.2026 for arguments from the counsel for appellants and in case he fails to appear then this Court reserves its right to finally decide the fate of instant appeal without further notice to either side. Mr. Imran Ali student of 3rd year LLB sent by counsel for appellants, is required to inform the counsel for appellants accordingly. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 2 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 7/2026 |
Assar Dass through legal heirs VS Nabi Bux Gujjar and others | Muhammad Jamshed Akhtar(ADVO-681-SBC-GHT) | Javed Hussain Seerlo (DDA)(ADVO-1015-SBC-SUK),Shakeel Ahmed(ADVO-59-SBC-GHT) | Civil Revision No. 07 of 2026 fixed in Civil Jurisdiction of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Applicants 1 (a) to 1(c) are called absent while their counsel is present. Contesting respondent No.1 is present but his counsel is absent. DDA for official respondents is present. The counsel for applicants, contesting respondent No.1 and DDA for official respondents advanced their arguments. Heard. The record has been perused. Order is pronounced in open Court. Instant Civil Revision is dismissed and impugned order of learned trial court is maintained. There shall be no order as to costs. Let compared copy of this order be sent to learned trial Court for information. Order is placed on separate sheet. |
||