| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2011/2026 | Ali Gohar Malik & another VS The State | Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-325A-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-302 | 65/2026 Adilpur |
Cr.B.A No. 2011 of 2026 of applicants/accused fixed at Sr. No.1 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court. Applicants/accused 1. Ali Gohar and 2. Sikandar are confined at DP & CF Ghotki. The counsel for applicants/accused and ADPP are present. While counsel for complainant is called absent. The counsel for applicants/accused and ADPP advanced their respective arguments. In support of arguments, counsel for applicants/accused placed reliance on the case laws along with his statement. Adjourned to 16.09.2026 for hearing of arguments of the counsel for complainant and in case he fails to appear, then this Court reserves its right to decide the post arrest bail application of applicants/accused without further notice. |
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2057/2026 | Ali Ahmed @ Ali Lakho VS The State | Ghulam Rasool Shah(ADVO-1717-SBC-SUK) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-392 | 23/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr.B.A No. 2057 of 2026 of applicant/accused fixed at Sr. No.2 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court. Applicant/accused is confined at DP & CF Ghotki. The counsel for applicant/accused and ADPP are present. Mr. Pardeep Kumar (Premy) Chouhan appeared and submitted that today complainant is not present; hence he undertaken to file vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant on the next date. Pertinent to mention here that as per certificate appended with the instant post arrest bail application, it is 2nd like nature application filed on behalf of applicant/accused. Initially, the counsel for applicant/accused advanced his arguments on a query raised by this Court by submitting that prior to this post arrest bail application of application was dismissed by this Court on merits and now it has been repeated on submission of final challan and co-accused having attributed identical role had already been admitted to post arrest bail. With regard to another query, the counsel for applicant/accused submitted that co-accused who had been admitted on post arrest bail, it was their first post arrest bail application. The counsel for the parties were required to come prepared on next date of hearing and to advance their arguments on the instant 2nd post arrest bail application. By consent, matter is adjourned to 17.09.2026 for arguments. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1953/2026 | Arbelo Mashori & others VS The State | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 321/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr.B.A No. 1953 of 2026 of applicants/accused fixed at Sr. No.3 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court. Applicants/accused 1. Arbelo, 2. Muhammad Sulleman @ Sulleman, 3. Altaf Ali @ Altaf, 4. Fazal @ Fazal Muhammad, 5. Muhammad Ali, 6. Tarique, 7. Nasrullah and 8. Rehmatullah are present on interim pre-arrest bail extended to them by this Court vide order dated 31.08.2026. The counsel for applicants/accused and ADPP for the State are present. The complainant is also present. The counsel for applicants/accused mainly contended that instant FIR is an outcome of FIR bearing crime No.310/2026 registered at Police Station A-Section Ghotki by the applicants/accused party against the complainant party and he further contended that co-accused Muhammad Ayoub had already been admitted on post arrest bail in Cr.B.A No.88/2026 vide order dated 05.09.2026 by Civil Judge & J.M-II, Ghotki. Before to rebut, the ADPP for the State submitted that police/case papers are incomplete and no MLCs of injured are lying in it; hence he prayed that he may be granted time enabling him to collect the complete police papers on next date of hearing. Considering the submission of the ADPP, matter is adjourned to 16.09.2026 for further arguments. Meanwhile, I.O of this crime also be put on his personal appearance for tomorrow. |
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 1957/2026 | Meer Muhammad Kalhoro & another VS The State | Liaquat Ali(ADVO-317-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498 | 323/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr.B.A No. 1957 of 2026 of applicants/accused fixed at Sr. No.4 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court. Applicants/accused Meer Muhammad and Nazeer Ahmed @ Sufi Nazeer Ahmed are present on interim pre-arrest bail granted to them vide order dated 31.08.2026 by this Court. The counsel for applicants/accused and ADPP are present. Per counsel for applicants/accused no further order to dispose of suo moto notice has been passed by the Civil Judge & J.M-II, Ghotki. The counsel for the parties have already advanced their arguments and order is fixed today for pronouncement. Order passed and pronounced in open Court. Instant pre-arrest bail under section 498-A Cr.PC of applicants/accused merits no consideration and it is hereby dismissed. Interim pre-arrest bail earlier extended to applicants/accused is hereby recalled. Such order is passed and pronounced in open Court and its copy is placed on separate sheet. |
| 5 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2063/2026 | Ghulam Shabeer @ Shabeer Tagar VS The State | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT),DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-324 | 326/2026 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr.B.A No. 2063 of 2026 of applicant/accused fixed at Sr. No.6 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court. Applicant/accused Ghulam Shabeer alias Shabeer is present on interim pre-arrest bail vide order dated 10.09.2026 granted to him by the learned Sessions Judge Ghotki. The counsel for applicant/accused and ADPP for the State are present. It is mainly contended by the counsel for applicant/accused that applicant/accused has allegedly been assigned the role of instigation; FIR has been lodged with inordinate delay of two days and enmity has been admitted by complainant in his FIR. The ADPP recorded his objection that applicant/accused has allegedly been attributed the role of instigation but at the same time he pointed out that injuries of injured Sajjad allegedly attributed against co-accused Manthar falls under section 337-A(i) PPC, same is bailable and in addition to this all offences applied in FIR are also bailable. The complainant also appeared and he filed application supported by his biometric affidavit, which is filed. Heard. The record has been perused. Interim pre-arrest bail earlier extended to applicant/accused is confirmed on enhanced surety amount of Rs.50,000/- instead of Rs.30,000/- previously granted to him and same be furnished immediately. Accordingly, instant pre-arrest bail application under section 498 Cr.PC stands allowed. Such order is passed and pronounced in open Court and its detailed tentative reasoning is mentioned in separate sheet. |
| 6 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 2059/2026 | Imdad Ali @ Imdad Waseer VS The State | Ghulam Nabi(ADVO-285-SBC-GHT) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-382 | 146/2025 A-Section Ghotki |
Cr.B.A No. 2059 of 2026 of applicant/accused fixed at Sr. No.5 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court. Applicant/accused is present on interim pre-arrest bail vide order dated 10.09.2026 granted to him by learned Sessions Judge Ghotki. The counsel for applicant/accused is called absent but ADPP for the State is present. Report in respect of bail bonds of the accused either are intact or otherwise is received from Civil Judge & J.M-II, Ghotki which is taken on record. Matter is kept aside with the direction to applicant/accused to ensure the appearance of this counsel on second call. On second call, counsel for applicant/accused appeared and submitted that criminal case arising out of instant FIR has been disposed of by the Court of Civil Judge & J.M-II, Ghotki and then he expressed his intention not to press instant pre-arrest bail application. Accordingly, instant pre-arrest bail application under section 498-A Cr.PC having become infructous and it is hereby dismissed accordingly. Interim pre-arrest bail earlier extended to applicant/accused is hereby recalled. Such order is passed and pronounced in open Court and placed its copy on separate sheet. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 14/2024 | The State VS Allah Ditto Pitafi | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Mohammad Rafique(ADVO-1493-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 388/2023 A-Section Ghotki |
S.C No. 14 of 2024 fixed at Sr. No.7 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court. Accused Allah Ditto is produced through video link. The ADPP is present while counsel for custody accused is absent. Main case is adjourned, hence this off shoot case is adjourned to 29.09.2026, for evidence. |
| 8 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 16/2024 | The State VS Jumo Khushk | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Mohammad Rafique(ADVO-1493-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 389/2023 A-Section Ghotki |
S.C No. 16 of 2024 fixed at Sr. No.8 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court. Accused Jumo Khushk is produced through video link. The ADPP is present while counsel for custody accused is absent. Main case is adjourned, hence this off shoot case is adjourned to 29.09.2026, for evidence. |
| 9 | SC (Murder Trial) 98/2024 | The State VS Allah Ditto Pitafi and others | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Mohammad Rafique(ADVO-1493-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 358/2023 A-Section Ghotki |
SC. No. 98 of 2024 fixed at Sr. No. 9 is taken up in open Court. Accused 1. Allah Ditto, 2. Iqbal, 3. Karam Ali and 4. Jumo are produced through video link arrangement from DP & CF Ghotki while accused Muhammad Alam is present on bail. The ADPP, counsel for complainant and the counsel for accused Muhammad Alam are present. While the counsel for remaining custody accused is called absent, he was also absent on previous date of hearing. The complainant along with PWs is present. In order to proceed the case expeditiously, the presence of the counsel for all accused is very much essential in the murder trial; hence to ensure the appearance of counsel for custody accused, he be put on his personal appearance through notice. The counsel for complainant on the other hand also brought in notice to this Court that talks of private settlement had already been settled but one of the custody accused Allah Ditto is not ready for the terms and conditions of the private faisla. Whatever it has been done outside, it is upto the parties. The Court, however, proceed with the case as per law. In case the talks of private settlement have been settled then proper application be filed for its hearing and disposal in accordance with law. The office is directed to issue notice to the counsel for custody accused for his appearance on next date of hearing. By consent, case is adjourned to 29.09.2026 for evidence. Custody accused are again to be produced through video link arrangement with direction to the Reader of this Court to approach IT office of Honourable District & Sessions Judge Ghotki for proper arrangement of video link arrangement as audio/video and internet are not properly working. Present accused and PWs are directed to attend on the given date of hearing. |
| 10 | SC (Murder Trial) 41/2026 | The State VS Gul Shah Jahan @ Shah Jahan Labano & others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 291/2025 A-Section Ghotki |
S.C No. 41 of 2026 fixed at Sr.No.10 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Accused Gul Shah Jahan is present on bail. While custody of accused Allah Dino and Zubair is produced through video link arrangement. The ADPP and counsel for complainant are preset but counsel for accused are absent. This is murder case and in absence of counsel for accused, case cannot be proceeded; henceforth the counsel for accused be put on their personal appearance through notice. Office is directed to make its compliance. Adjourned to 26.09.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend while custody accused are again to be produced through video link arrangement. The complainant is directed to bring his PWs on given date. |
| 11 | PPC 215/2026 | The State VS Abdul Waheed Shah & others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-377 | 62/2025 Sarhad |
S.C No. 215 of 2026 fixed at Sr. No.11 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up in open Court. Adult accused (1) Ghulam Murtaza and (2) Ghulam Mustafa are present on bail while case of juvenile accused Arslan has been bifurcated form the case of present adult accused. The case of absconder accused Abdul Waheed has also been bifurcated and his proceedings have been separated from the adult and juvenile accused. The ADPP and counsel for accused are present. The counsel for complainant is absent. As per the complainant, his counsel has fallen ill and he is still unstable to appear and to proceed with the case and he further submitted the he will proceed his case in presence of his counsel. The counsel for accused Ghulam Mustafa filed application under section 540-A Cr.PC whereof notice is given to ADPP. Due to absence of the counsel for complainant and material PWs, case is adjourned to 26.09.2026, for evidence. The complainant is directed to ensure the appearance of his counsel and material PWs on next date of hearing. Present accused are directed to attend on the given date. |
| 12 | Juv. Child Act (JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ORDINANCE) 215/2026 | The State VS Arslan Ahmed Malik | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Saleem Ahmed (ADVO-733-SBC-GHT) | PPC-377 | 62/2025 Sarhad |
S.C No. 215-A of 2026 fixed at Sr. No.12 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC system is taken up. The case of juvenile accused Arslan has been bifurcated from the case of adult accused. The juvenile accused is present on bail. The ADPP and counsel for accused are present. The counsel for complainant is absent. As per the complainant, his counsel has fallen ill and he is still unstable to appear and to proceed with the case and he further submitted the he will proceed his case in presence of his counsel. The counsel for adult accused Ghulam Mustafa in bifurcate case of adult accused filed application under section 540-A Cr.PC whereof notice is given to ADPP. Due to absence of the counsel for complainant and material PWs, case is adjourned to 26.09.2026, for evidence. The complainant is directed to ensure the appearance of his counsel and material PWs on next date of hearing. Present accused is directed to attend on the given date. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 13 | Habeas Corpus 284/2026 | Muhammad Saleh Shaikh VS SSP Ghotki and others | Liaquat Ali(ADVO-317-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Cr.M.A 284 of 2026 under section 491 Cr.PC fixed at Sr. No.13 of today???s cause list generated form CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Applicant and his counsel are present. The mother of alleged detenue No.1 and maternal grandmother of alleged detenues No. 2 to 4 is also present. Issue rule nisi of alleged detenues through official respondent No.2/SHO P.S Reti with direction to recover and produce the alleged detenues in safe custody before this Court tomorrow. Also issue notices to private respondents No.3 to 5. Adjourned to 16.09.2026 for recovery and production of alleged detenues through SHO P.S Reti and hearing. Office o f this Court is directed to make above compliance. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 14 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1801/2026 | Dileep Kumar VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Shahid Iqbal(ADVO-474-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr.M.A No.1801 of 2026 under section 22-A 6(i) Cr.P.C fixed at Sr.No.14 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Applicant and his counsel are present. ADPP is also present. Yesterday the counsel for the parties advanced their respective arguments and order was reserved to be pronounced today. Order passed and pronounced in open Court. Instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application is devoid of merits and it is hereby dismissed. Such order is placed on separate sheet. |
| 15 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 1842/2026 | Kaleemullah Bullo VS SHO PS A/Ghotki and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | DDPP(ADVO-005-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr.M.A No.1842 of 2026 under section 22-A 6(i) Cr.PC fixed at Sr. No.15 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Applicant and his counsel are absent. ADPP is also present. Notice upon proposed accuse returned un-served with endorsement of PC Nisar Ahmed of P.S A-Section Ghotki wherein he has submitted that proposed accused used to reside at Saudi Arabia/KSA. The counsel for the applicant advanced his arguments. Order is reserved to be pronounced tomorrow i.e 16.09.2026. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 16 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 102/2026 | The State VS Zubair Ahmed Labano | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 93/2026 Ubauro |
S.C No. 102 of 2026 fixed at Sr. No.16 of today???s cause list generated from CFMS-DC System is taken up in open Court. Custody accused Zubair is produced through video link arrangement from DP & CF Ghotki. ADPP is present. The charge against accused is framed at Exh.02 to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried as per his plea recorded at Exh.03. Since, the mode of electronic signature is not presently available with the Prison Authority, hence plea of accused be sent to Prison concerned for signature. Issue summons to all material PWs and call case property. Adjourned to 26.09.2026 for evidence. Present custody accused is again to be produced through video link arrangement. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 17 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 48/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Saleh Phulpoto | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 38/2024 Andal Sundrani |
Sessions case No:48/2025 taken up in open court .Accused UTP Muhammad Saleh S/O Rustam Ali by caste Phulpoto produced by the Central Prison /Correctional Facility Khairpur on through video link. Complainant ASI Rabdino , PC:Moula Bux, PC:Deedar,HWC Khamiso and HC Baloch Khan are present. ADPP and DC are present. Deposition of ASI Rabdino is recorded at Ex.No:04.He produced documents in his deposition at Ex.No:04( A to E). Deposition of PC: Deedar is recorded at Ex.No:05. Deposition of PC: Moula Bux is recorded at No:06. Deposition of HC: Khamiso Khan is recorded at Ex.No:07. He produced document in his deposition at Ex.No:7(A). Deposition of HC:Baloch KHan is recorded at Ex.No:08. He produced document in his deposition at Ex.08(A).ADPP for state has submitted side close statement at Ex.No:09. Arguments heard. Judgement passed at Ex.No:10 and announced in open court. Accused Muhammad Saleh Phulpoto is acquitted U/S 265-H(i) Cr.Pc . Issue Acquittal slip to concerned jail authroity. |
|