| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 94/2024 | The State VS Shahdost Rind Lohar Baloch @ Papoo | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | Toseef Ahmed(ADVO-5375-SBC-HYD) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 118/2024 B-Section Tando Allahyar |
Case called in open Court. Accused Shah Dost alias Papuproduced in custody by the jail authorityfrom Central Prison Mirpurkhas. Mr. KhamisoBheel learned ADPP for the state is present. Advocate for accused called absent. Accused has made request that he will engage his counsel on the next date of hearing. Case adjourned with main case. Put off to: 17.02.2026. For framing of amalgamate charge. Accused remanded back to jail custody with directions to produce him on the next date of hearing. |
| 2 | SC (Murder Trial) 19/2025 | The State VS Sameer Makrani Baloch | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-302 | 362/2024 A-Section Tando Allahyar |
Sessions case called in open court. Accused Sameer produced in custody by the concerned jail authorities. Mr. KhamisoBheel learned ADPP for the state is present. Complainant is present. Mr. Sarfraz Ahmed Janwari learned counsel for complainant is present. Mr. Zahoor A Baloch advocate for accused is also present. Process returned. PW Doctor and investigation officer is present. Evidence of Doctor Ali Nawaz recorded at Ex?????????.08. He produce police letter at Ex:08/A, Lash Chakas form at Ex: 08/B, Postmortem report at Ex: 08/C, Final Post Mortem certificate at Ex:08/D, Laboratory at Ex???08/E, and letter to chemical examiner report at Ex:08/F. The learned ADPP for the state has submitted application under section 540 Cr PC at Ex:08 Order passed on it. By consent application is allowed. Issue summons to witnesses. Put off to . . .14-02-2026 for Evidence .Accused remanded to jail with directions to produce him on the date of hearing. Repeat summons to remaining witnesses and call for case property. |
| 3 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 105/2025 | The State VS Tousif Hussain Samoon | Arsalan Ali (ADVO-1307-SBC-MKS),Aziz Ahmed(ADVO-413-SBC-MKS),DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | Special Case Narcotics -6/9-D | 237/2025 B-Section Tando Allahyar |
Case called in open Court. Accused TouseefHussainis produced in custody by jail authority. Mr.KhamisoBheelLearned ADPP for the state is present. The learned defense counsel Mr. Aziz Ahmed Laghariis not in attendance. Process returned. Witnesses are present. Case adjourned and could not be proceeded in absence of defense counsel. Put off to: 16.02.2026. Forevidence. Accused is remanded back to jail custody with directions to produce him on next date of hearing. Repeat summons to P.Ws through SHO concerned. Call case property. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 4 | SC (Murder Trial) 128/2024 | The State VS Shahdost Rind Lohar Baloch @ Papoo & aonther | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | Toseef Ahmed(ADVO-5375-SBC-HYD) | PPC-302,PPC-34 | 104/2024 B-Section Tando Allahyar |
Case called in open Court. Accused Shah Dost alias Papu and Deedar are produced in custody by the jail authority from Central Prison Mirpurkhas, while accused Abdul Razzaque is declared as proclaimed offender. Mr. KhamisoBheelLearned ADPP for the state is present.Advocate for accused Shah Dost is not in attendance since long, accused has made request that he will engage his counsel on the next date of hearing. Mr. NaveedHussainUmerani advocate for accused Deedar is also called absent. Complainant and her advocate Mr. Mansoor Ali Jarwar is present. Case counsel could not be proceeded due to non-attendance of defense counsels. Adjourned and Put off to: 17.02.2026. For framing of amalgamate charge. Both accused are remanded back to jail custody with directions to produce him on the next date of hearing. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | (Consumer Appeal) 1/2026 |
Islamuddin Khan Qaimkhani VS CEO HESCO Hyderabad & Others | Nihal Khan(ADVO-30-SBC-TAY) | Matter called in open Court. Appellant is present with his learned counsel Mr. Nehal Khan Lashari. Process not issued. The respondents No.01 and 04 did not serve yet. (-) Repeat notice to respondents through bailiff on costs. |
|||