ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, TANDO ALLAHYAR : 04-SEP-2026

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C)
1 Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 792/2026 Ahmed @ Amoo VS The State   Mohammad Aslam Solangi()   Khamiso(ADVO-721-SBC-MKS)   PPC-34,PPC-397 52/2026
Bukeera Shareef

Bail application called in open court. Mr. Muhammad AslamSolangi learned counsel for applicant/accused and Mr. KhamisoBheel Learned ADPP for the state are present. Complainant is present in person. The learned counsel for applicant/accused did not provided the certified copy of bail order granted to the co-accused byHonourable High court. Put off to ?????????.09.09.2026. For hearing and providing copy of Certified true copy of order

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence
2 23 (I) A 128/2021 The State VS Nawaz Mirjat   DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI)   Qasim Ali Memon(ADVO-85-SBC-TAY)   SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A 17/2021
Umar Sand


Defense counsel for accused are not in attendance

Case called in open Court. The Medical Officer Dr. Bhoora Khan and TapedarMashooque Ali Lund are in attendance. Accused Noor Muhammad and Akbar Ali are produced through video link by the jail authority while accused Nawaz, Sevo, Shoukat and Abdul Majeed are present on bail. Accused Asghar Ali, Mehram Ali, Murtaza and Shahnawaz are already declared proclaimed offenders. The off shoot cases are amalgamated in this main case. Both the Learned counsels for accused despite commitment and seeking date on their choice have failed to appear and proceed the case. This is one old case of the file of this court wherein Honourable High Court have repeatedly given directions and fixed the time of disposal of case but unfortunately the failure attendance of learned counsel this court is not able to decide the case as time frame by Honourable High court. Mr. Muhammad QasimMemonMemon Junior Partner of Mr. Syed Shafique Ahmed Shah advocate is in attendance and requested for adjourn the case. Mr. Abdul Hafeez learned counsel for complainant is present. Process returned.Put off to???07.09.2026. For Cross Examination and Evidence and hearing of bail application of accused Ali Akbar and application us 265-K Cr PC.Jail authorities are directed to produce accused Noor Muhammad and Ali Akbar on the next date of hearing. Present accused are directed to attend. Accused Nawaz is directed to submit his proof. Repeat summons to remaining P.Ws through SHO concerned. Call case property

3 23 (I) A 141/2021 The State VS Abdul Majeed Khaskheli   DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI)   Qasim Ali Memon(ADVO-85-SBC-TAY)   SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) 25/2021
Umar Sand


Defense counsel for accused are not in attendance

Case called in open Court. The Medical Officer Dr. Bhoora Khan and TapedarMashooque Ali Lund are in attendance. Accused Noor Muhammad and Akbar Ali are produced through video link by the jail authority while accused Nawaz, Sevo, Shoukat and Abdul Majeed are present on bail. Accused Asghar Ali, Mehram Ali, Murtaza and Shahnawaz are already declared proclaimed offenders. The off shoot cases are amalgamated in this main case. Both the Learned counsels for accused despite commitment and seeking date on their choice have failed to appear and proceed the case. This is one old case of the file of this court wherein Honourable High Court have repeatedly given directions and fixed the time of disposal of case but unfortunately the failure attendance of learned counsel this court is not able to decide the case as time frame by Honourable High court. Mr. Muhammad QasimMemonMemon Junior Partner of Mr. Syed Shafique Ahmed Shah advocate is in attendance and requested for adjourn the case. Mr. Abdul Hafeez learned counsel for complainant is present. Process returned.Put off to???07.09.2026. For Cross Examination and Evidence and hearing of bail application of accused Ali Akbar and application us 265-K Cr PC.Jail authorities are directed to produce accused Noor Muhammad and Ali Akbar on the next date of hearing. Present accused are directed to attend. Accused Nawaz is directed to submit his proof. Repeat summons to remaining P.Ws through SHO concerned. Call case property

4 SC (Murder Trial) 176/2021 The State VS Nawaz Mirjat & Others   Abdul Hafiz Mari(ADVO-1271-SBC-MKS),DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI),Urooj Aqeel (ADVO-5256-SBC-HYD),Wali Muhammad(ADVO-23-SBC-TAY)   Altaf Ahmed Shahid(ADVO-3116-SBC-HYD),Munir Hussain(ADVO-1159-SBC-HYD),Qasim Ali Memon(ADVO-85-SBC-TAY),Syed Shafique Ahmed(ADVO-2922-SBC-HYD)   PPC-109,PPC-212,PPC-302,PPC-324,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-A(iv),PPC-337-Fii,PPC-337-Fiii,PPC-504 15/2021
Umar Sand


Defense counsel for accused are not in attendance

Case called in open Court. The Medical Officer Dr. Bhoora Khan and TapedarMashooque Ali Lund are in attendance. Accused Noor Muhammad and Akbar Ali are produced through video link by the jail authority while accused Nawaz, Sevo, Shoukat and Abdul Majeed are present on bail. Accused Asghar Ali, Mehram Ali, Murtaza and Shahnawaz are already declared proclaimed offenders. The off shoot cases are amalgamated in this main case. Both the Learned counsels for accused despite commitment and seeking date on their choice have failed to appear and proceed the case. This is one old case of the file of this court wherein Honourable High Court have repeatedly given directions and fixed the time of disposal of case but unfortunately the failure attendance of learned counsel this court is not able to decide the case as time frame by Honourable High court. Mr. Muhammad QasimMemonMemon Junior Partner of Mr. Syed Shafique Ahmed Shah advocate is in attendance and requested for adjourn the case. Mr. Abdul Hafeez learned counsel for complainant is present. Process returned.Put off to???07.09.2026. For Cross Examination and Evidence and hearing of bail application of accused Ali Akbar and application us 265-K Cr PC.Jail authorities are directed to produce accused Noor Muhammad and Ali Akbar on the next date of hearing. Present accused are directed to attend. Accused Nawaz is directed to submit his proof. Repeat summons to remaining P.Ws through SHO concerned. Call case property

5 23 (I) A 209/2021 The State VS Noor Muhammad @ Noor   DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI)   Altaf Ahmed Shahid(ADVO-3116-SBC-HYD)   SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A 51/2021
Umar Sand


Defense counsel for accused are not in attendance

Case called in open Court. The Medical Officer Dr. Bhoora Khan and TapedarMashooque Ali Lund are in attendance. Accused Noor Muhammad and Akbar Ali are produced through video link by the jail authority while accused Nawaz, Sevo, Shoukat and Abdul Majeed are present on bail. Accused Asghar Ali, Mehram Ali, Murtaza and Shahnawaz are already declared proclaimed offenders. The off shoot cases are amalgamated in this main case. Both the Learned counsels for accused despite commitment and seeking date on their choice have failed to appear and proceed the case. This is one old case of the file of this court wherein Honourable High Court have repeatedly given directions and fixed the time of disposal of case but unfortunately the failure attendance of learned counsel this court is not able to decide the case as time frame by Honourable High court. Mr. Muhammad QasimMemonMemon Junior Partner of Mr. Syed Shafique Ahmed Shah advocate is in attendance and requested for adjourn the case. Mr. Abdul Hafeez learned counsel for complainant is present. Process returned.Put off to???07.09.2026. For Cross Examination and Evidence and hearing of bail application of accused Ali Akbar and application us 265-K Cr PC.Jail authorities are directed to produce accused Noor Muhammad and Ali Akbar on the next date of hearing. Present accused are directed to attend. Accused Nawaz is directed to submit his proof. Repeat summons to remaining P.Ws through SHO concerned. Call case property

6 23 (I) A 208/2021 The State VS Ali Akbar @ Akbar Ali Mirjat   DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI)   Altaf Ahmed Shahid(ADVO-3116-SBC-HYD)   SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (i) (a) 50/2021
Umar Sand


Defense counsel for accused are not in attendance

Case called in open Court. The Medical Officer Dr. Bhoora Khan and TapedarMashooque Ali Lund are in attendance. Accused Noor Muhammad and Akbar Ali are produced through video link by the jail authority while accused Nawaz, Sevo, Shoukat and Abdul Majeed are present on bail. Accused Asghar Ali, Mehram Ali, Murtaza and Shahnawaz are already declared proclaimed offenders. The off shoot cases are amalgamated in this main case. Both the Learned counsels for accused despite commitment and seeking date on their choice have failed to appear and proceed the case. This is one old case of the file of this court wherein Honourable High Court have repeatedly given directions and fixed the time of disposal of case but unfortunately the failure attendance of learned counsel this court is not able to decide the case as time frame by Honourable High court. Mr. Muhammad QasimMemonMemon Junior Partner of Mr. Syed Shafique Ahmed Shah advocate is in attendance and requested for adjourn the case. Mr. Abdul Hafeez learned counsel for complainant is present. Process returned.Put off to???07.09.2026. For Cross Examination and Evidence and hearing of bail application of accused Ali Akbar and application us 265-K Cr PC.Jail authorities are directed to produce accused Noor Muhammad and Ali Akbar on the next date of hearing. Present accused are directed to attend. Accused Nawaz is directed to submit his proof. Repeat summons to remaining P.Ws through SHO concerned. Call case property

7 Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 68/2026 The State VS Mashooque Ali Kaloi @ Fida   DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI)   SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A 51/2026
B-Section Tando Allahyar


Complainant moved adjournment application

Case called in open Court. Accused Mashooque Ali is produced in custody by jail authority. The off shoot case bearing crime No.51/2026 punishable under section 25 Sindh Arms Act is amalgamated vide order dated 04.08.2026. Mr. Muhammad Sharif Sahito learned counsel for accused is present. Mr. KhamsioBheel learned ADPP for the state is present. Complainant is present and has moved application for adjournment. Process returned. Put off to:????????????.19.09.2026.For Evidence. Accused Mashooque Ali remanded back to jail custody with directions to produce him on next date of hearing. Repeat summons to witnesses and call for case property

8 SC (Murder Trial) 67/2026 The State VS Mashooque Ali Kaloi @ Fida   DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI)   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI)   PPC-302,PPC-324,PPC-337-F(vi),PPC-337-Fiii 46/2026
B-Section Tando Allahyar


Complainant moved adjournment application

Case called in open Court. Accused Mashooque Ali is produced in custody by jail authority. The off shoot case bearing crime No.51/2026 punishable under section 25 Sindh Arms Act is amalgamated vide order dated 04.08.2026. Mr. Muhammad Sharif Sahito learned counsel for accused is present. Mr. KhamsioBheel learned ADPP for the state is present. Complainant is present and has moved application for adjournment. Process returned. Put off to:????????????.19.09.2026.For Evidence. Accused Mashooque Ali remanded back to jail custody with directions to produce him on next date of hearing. Repeat summons to witnesses and call for case property

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A
9 Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 717/2026 Mehboob Ali Umrani VS SHO PS: Chamber & Others   Muhammad Hakeem(ADVO-173-SBC-TAY)   DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI)   Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I),Cr.PC-22 A (6)(III),Cr.PC-22-B /

R & Ps is received by way of transfer from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge, Tando Allahyar for disposal according to law. Criminal Misc Application called in open court. Applicant Mehboob Ali Umeraniis present. Mr. KhamisoBheel learned ADPP for the state. DSP Complaint cell has submitted his report. Heard learned counsel. Put off to ?????????.05.09.2026 for hearing and providing final Medical Certificate

CIVIL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service
1 Summary Suits 19/2026
Rashid Shaikh VS Zaheer Ahmed Memon    

Plaintiff counsel moved adjournment applications

Summary suit called in open court. Plaintiff called absent his learned counsel Mr. Muhammad ShahbazAlam is present and has moved application for adjournment on the ground that he is not feeling well. Mr. Anwar Ali Rajput learned counsel for defendant is present. (-) For objection on the application under order XXXVII Rule 3 CPC r/w 151 CPC

2 Summary Suits 18/2026
Mushtaque Sipra VS Zaheer Ahmed Memon    

Plaintiff counsel moved adjournment applications

Summary suit called in open court. Plaintiff called absent his learned counsel Mr. Muhammad ShahbazAlam is present and has moved application for adjournment on the ground that he is not feeling well. Mr. Anwar Ali Rajput learned counsel for defendant is present. (-) Forobjection on the application under order XXXVII Rule 3 CPC r/w 151 CPC