| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | SC (Murder Trial) 44/2023 | The State VS Imdad Shah & another | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK),Mumtaz Ahmed(ADVO-2344-SBC-HYD) | Syed Deedar H. Shah(ADVO-1222-SBC-HYD),Tariq Ahmed(ADVO-2050-SBC-HYD) | PPC-114,PPC-302,PPC-34,PPC-504 | 68/2022 Nasurpur |
Case called in open Court. Accused Imdad Shah @ Dado Shah is produced by the jail authority from Central Prison Hyderabad, while accused Syed GaddaHussain Shah @ Wajid Shah is present on bail. Mr. KhamisoBheel ADPP for the state is present.Complainant, PW Zubair, Tapedar, are present. Mr. Abdul MajeedLashari advocate for complainant is present. Partner of Syed Tarique Ahmed Shah advocate for accused Imdad Shah is present. Syed DeedarHussain Shah advocate for accused Syed Gadda Shah is present. Process returned. Sindh Bar council is observing full day strike.Case adjourned and Put off to:??????.13.01.2026. For evidence. Accused remanded back to jail custody with directions to produce him on next date of hearing. Present accused is directed to attend. Repeat summons to all P.Ws through SHO concerned. Call case property. Call well conversant of investigation officer. |
| 2 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 45/2023 | The State VS Imdad Ali Shah @ Dado Shah | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | Tariq Ahmed(ADVO-2050-SBC-HYD) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 69/2022 Nasurpur |
Case called in open Court. Accused Imdad Shah @ Dado Shah produced in custody by the jail authority from Central Prison Hyderabad. Mr. KhamisoBheel ADPP for the state is present. Junior of Syed Tarique Ahmed Shah advocate for accused is present. Case adjourned with main caseSindh Bar council is observing full day strike..Put off to:???.13.01.2026. For evidence. Accused remanded back to jail custody with directions to produce him on next date of hearing. Repeat summons to all P.Ws through SHO concerned. Call case property. |
| 3 | PPC 99/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Kaleem Shah & Others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | Aadil Akbar(ADVO-249-SBC-TAY),Muhsan Ali(ADVO-238-SBC-TAY) | PPC-34,PPC-397,PPC-420,PPC-506,Sindh Prohibition of Intrest on Pvt Loan Act 2023-3-(1),Sindh Prohibition of Intrest on Pvt Loan Act 2023-4,Sindh Prohibition of Intrest on Pvt Loan Act 2023-5 | 90/2025 A-Section Tando Allahyar |
Case called in open Court. Accused Kaleem Shah, ManzarAlam, NaeemQaimkhani, GhulamRasool, Attaullah, Khalil Memon , Salman Mughal and SabirDasti are present on bail while accused NaveedQaimkhani called absent. His learned counsel filed application for excuse of absence. Order passed on it. The name of accused Yar Muhammad is placed /shown in column No.02. A Mr. KhamsioBheel learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Harpal Das learned counsel for accused SabirDasti, Mr. Imam-Ud-Din Rajput learned counsel for accused GhulamRasool are not in attendance. Mr. Aadil Akbar learned counsel for accused Attaullahis present.. Process returned. Complainant called absent. Power filed by Mr. Muhammad ZohaibKhanzda learned counsel on behalf of accused MuhammadKaleem, Salman Khan and NaveedQaimkhani. Order passed on it. File. Sindh Bar council is observing full day strike.Put off to:????????????. 12.01.2026.For Evidence. Present accused persons are directed to attend. Issue summons to witnesses and call for case property. |