| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 956/2025 | Maqsood Alam VS The State | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-342,PPC-500,PPC-504 | 356/2025 A-Section Tando Allahyar |
Bail application called in open court. Applicant/accused MaqsoodAlam is present on interim pre-arrest bail. His learned counsel Mr. Muhammad AlamKhanzada is present. Mr. KhamisoBheel,learned ADPP for the state is present. Complainant called absent. His counsel Syed Talib Shah is present filed power and filed statement of his no objection. Heard both side.The interim pre-arrest bail granted to the applicants/accused vide order 24.10.2025 is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions. |
|
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 964/2025 | Sohail Akhtar & another VS The State | Mohammad Aslam Solangi() | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-429,PPC-489-F | 390/2025 A-Section Tando Allahyar |
Bail application called in open court. Applicants/accused SohailAkhtar and KirshanLal are present on interim pre-arrest bail. His learned counsel Mr. Muhammad AslamSolangi is present. Mr. KhamisoBheel,learned ADPP for the state is present. Complainant called absent despite of notice. Heard both side.The interim pre-arrest bail granted to the applicants/accused vide order 04.11.2025 is hereby confirmed on same terms and conditions. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Compromise Appl: | |||||||
| 3 | SC (Murder Trial) 93/2025 | The State VS Muskan Khuwaja | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | Kamran (ADVO-17-SBC-SUJ) | PPC-302,PPC-34 | 2/2025 B-Section Tando Allahyar |
Case called in open Court. Accused Muskan is present on bail. Mr. KhamisoBheel, learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Kamran Khawaja learned counsel for accused is present. Complainant and Mst. Nazeeran, who is mother of Deceased Shafqutullah are present. Report from Nadra received. Heard both side. Compromise arrived between the parties is accepted and accused is acquitted under section 345(6) Cr PC. The accused is present on bail. His bail and bond are cancelled and surety stand discharged. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Criminal Revision | |||||||
| 4 | Criminal Revisions 21/2025 | Muhammad Khan & Others VS Deputy Commissioner(Revenue) Tando Allahyar & Others | Aghis-u-Salam(ADVO-1773-SBC-HYD) | Cr.PC-439,Cr.PC-U/S 435 Criminal Revision | / |
Case called in open Court. Applicant Muhammad Khan is present. His learned counsel Mr. Aghis-ul-Salam called absent and his junior is present. Mr. KhamisoBheel learned ADPP for the state is present. Respondent NO.03 and representative of Respondent No. 04 & 05 is present. Private respondents No. 06 and 08 arepresent. Mr. Mansoor Ali Jarwaradvocate for respondents is present and filed objection. Order passed on it. Matter adjourned to ?????????..03.12.2025 for hearing |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | SC (Murder Trial) 69/2024 | The State VS Javed Ali & another | Imtiaz Ali Mehar (ADVO-1603-SBC-HYD) | PPC-302 | 23/2024 Sultanabad(TAY) |
Case called in open Court. Accused Javed Ali BrohiBrohiis produced by the jail authority from Central Prison Mirpurkhas while accused Muhammad Raheem is present on bail . Thee Off shoot case of Crime No:25/2024 U/S 25-SAA has already been amalgamated with main crime No:24/2024 U/S 302, 34 PPC, vide Order dated.22-8-2024.Mr. KhamisoBheel learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Anwar Ali Brohi advocate for accused Javed called absent andMr. Zain-ul-Abdin advocate for accused Muhammad Raheemis present. Process returned.PW Tapedarnd Investigation officer are present. The District Bar Association is observing full day strike. Case is adjournedand Put off to???..11.12.2025. For Evidence and hearing on application filed by complainant. Accused Javed Ali remanded back to jail custody with directions to produce him on next date of hearing. Accused Muhammad Raheem is directed to attend. Repeat summons to all P.Ws and call case property through SHO concerned. The learned counsel is directed to pay costs of Rs.2000/- as already ordered. |
|
| 6 | 23 (I) A 67/2024 | The State VS Javed Ali | Imtiaz Ali Mehar (ADVO-1603-SBC-HYD) | Sindh Arms Act 2013-25 | 25/2024 Sultanabad(TAY) |
Case called in open Court. Accused Javed Ali BrohiBrohiis produced by the jail authority from Central Prison Mirpurkhas while accused Muhammad Raheem is present on bail . Thee Off shoot case of Crime No:25/2024 U/S 25-SAA has already been amalgamated with main crime No:24/2024 U/S 302, 34 PPC, vide Order dated.22-8-2024.Mr. KhamisoBheel learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Anwar Ali Brohi advocate for accused Javed called absent andMr. Zain-ul-Abdin advocate for accused Muhammad Raheemis present. Process returned.PW Tapedarnd Investigation officer are present. The District Bar Association is observing full day strike. Case is adjournedand Put off to???..11.12.2025. For Evidence and hearing on application filed by complainant. Accused Javed Ali remanded back to jail custody with directions to produce him on next date of hearing. Accused Muhammad Raheem is directed to attend. Repeat summons to all P.Ws and call case property through SHO concerned. The learned counsel is directed to pay costs of Rs.2000/- as already ordered. |
|
| 7 | PPC 22/2025 | The State VS Mudassir Qureshi @ Musaddique & Others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | Subhan Ali (ADVO-86-SBC-TAY) | PPC-397 | 384/2024 A-Section Tando Allahyar |
Case called in open Court. Accused Mudasir @ Musdik , Ismail , Zeeshan, and Farhan are present on bail. Mr.KhamisoBheel, Learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Subhan Ali Mastoi advocate for accused Farhan, Ismail, and Zeeshanis present. Mr. Muhammad Hakeem Mastoi advocate for accused Mudasir @ Musadik is not in attendance. Complainant is present with his counsel. Process returned. No PW is present. Put off to:??????.03.12.2025. For evidence.Present accused are directed to attend. Repeat summons to remaining P.Ws through SHO concerned. Call case property. |
| 8 | PPC 16/2025 | The State VS Umaid Ali & Another | Nihal Khan(ADVO-30-SBC-TAY) | Anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial Act, 2021)-U/S Act: Anti-Rape,Gender Based Violence-,PPC-377 | 72/2025 B-Section Tando Allahyar |
Sessions case called in open court. Accused Umaid Ali and Sabir Ali are present on bail. Mr. KhamisoBheel, Learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Nehal Khan Lashari advocate for accused UmaidAli and Mr. Mehmood Ali Lashari advocate for accusedSabir Ali are present. Process returned. PW Doctor andInvestigation Officer SIP Asghar Ali Bhurgari are present. Complainant and his counsel called absent. Evidence of Investigation Officer SIP Asghar Ali recorded at Ex:10. He produced the memo of cloths at Ex:10/A, letter for DNA at Ex:10/B, entry No.07 at Ex: 10/C, entry No. 13 at Ex:10/D, letter toMS at Ex:10/E, Letter to DNA at Ex:10/F, letter to MS at Ex:10/G, letter to DNA at EX; 10/H, and Medical certificate at Ex:10/I. Evidence of Doctor SiddiqueRehman at Ex:..11. He produced the police letter at Ex:11/A and Medical certificate at Ex: 11/B , DNA test report at Ex:11/C and Final Medical certificate at Ex:11/D. Thereafter learned ADPP for the state has submitted that statement for closing the side of prosecution at Ex:12. Statement of accused under section 342 Cr PC recorded at Ex:13 and Ex:14 respectively. Heard both side. Judgment announced in open court at Ex:15. Accused Umaid Ali and Sabirare acquitted from the charge under section 265-H(1) Cr PC. They are present on bail. Their bail and bond are cancelled and sureties stand discharged. |
|
| 9 | SC (Murder Trial) 91/2025 | The State VS Mst Bashiran & Others | Mehboob Ali Shah(ADVO-122-SBC-TAY) | PPC-201.,PPC-302 | 36/2025 Bukeera Shareef |
Case called in open Court. Accused Mst. Basheeran is produced in custody from Special Prison for Women Hyderabad while accused Faiz Muhammad is declared as proclaimed offender. Mr. Mehboob Ali Shah learned counsel for accused is present.Mr. KhamisoBheelADPP for the state is present. Process returned. Witnesses are present. The Sindh Bar council is observing full day strike. Put off to:?????????.???..09. 12.2025. For Evidence. Accused remanded back to jail custody with directions to produce her on next date of hearing. Repeat summons to remaining witnesses and call for case property. |
|
| 10 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 115/2025 | The State VS Yar Muhammad Pathan & another | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 89/2025 Umar Sand |
Case called in open Court. Accused Yar Muhammad is present on bail, while accused Akbar Sultan is shown absconder in challan sheet. His case was bifurcated. Mr.KhamisoBheel, Learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Ali Haider Rind learned counsel for accused is not in attendance. Process returned. Investigation Officer Inspector Mumtaz Ali Chandio is present and his evidence recorded at Ex:???08. He produced the entry No. 10 and 14 at Ex:08/A and chemical report at Ex:08/B.Thereafter learned ADPP for the state has submitted that statement for closing the side of prosecution at Ex:09. Statement of accused under section 342 Cr PC recorded at Ex:10. Arguments heard. Judgment announced in open court at Ex:11. Accused is acquitted from the charge under section 265-H(1) Cr PC. He is present on bail. His bail and bond are cancelled and surety stand discharged. |
| 11 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 117/2025 | The State VS Allah Bux Brohi | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | Ali Haider(ADVO-201-SBC-TAY) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 72/2025 Sultanabad(TAY) |
Case called in open court. Accused Allah Bux is produced in custody by J.A. His learned counsel Mr. Ali HaiderRind is not attendance. Mr.KhamisoBhee, Learned ADPP for the state are present. Process returned and witnesses are present. The District Bar Association is observing full day strike.Put off to???. ???02.12.2025 .For evidence. Accused remanded back to jail custody with directions to produce him on next date of hearing. Issue summons to remaining witnesses and call for case property. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 12 | SC (Murder Trial) 500/2023 | The State VS Gul Hassan Lund & Others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI),Saeed Ahmed(ADVO-2820-SBC-HYD) | Har Pal Das(ADVO-78-SBC-TAY),Muhsan Ali(ADVO-238-SBC-TAY) | PPC-114,PPC-302,PPC-34,PPC-504 | 47/2023 Dasori |
Case called in open Court. Accused Gul Hassan and Muhammad Aslamare present on bail, while accused Sarfraz Lund is produced by jail authority from Central Prison Mirpurkhas. The off shoot case of this crime bearing crime No. 47 of 2023, us 23(i) A of Sindh Arms Act is amalgamated vide order dated 10-08-2025. Mr.KhamisoBheel, Learned ADPP for the state is present. Complainant Muhammad Ismail is present. His learned counsel Mr. Saeed Ahmed Waganis not in attendance.Mr. Nisar Ahmed Channa advocate for accused GulHassanis also not in attendance. Mr. Harpal Das advocate for MuhammadAslam and Sarfrazare present.Arguments have already been heard. Judgment announced in open court. Accused Gul Hassan and Sarfraz, have committed the offence punishable under section 302(b) r/w section 34 PPC,and are convicted and sentenced to suffer R.I. for life each as Taz???r. They are also directed to pay compensation of Rs. 10,00,000/-( Ten Lac) each under section 544-A Cr.PC. to the legal heirs of deceased Abdul Waheed. In default thereof they shall have to undergo further S.I for six months more by each accused. Both accused have also committed the offence punishable under section 504 PPC r/w section 34 PPC andare convicted and sentenced to suffer R.I. for one year and fine of Rs. 10,000/- each. In case of failure to pay fine accused should undergo SI for one month. The accused Sarfraz has also committed the offence punishable under section 23(i)(a) of the Sindh Arms Act-2013, and is convicted and sentenced to suffer R.I. for 07 years and fine of Rs. 50,000/-. In case of failure to pay fine |
| 13 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 506/2023 | The State VS Sarafaraz Lund | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | Har Pal Das(ADVO-78-SBC-TAY) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 50/2023 Dasori |
Case called in open Court. Accused Gul Hassan and Muhammad Aslamare present on bail, while accused Sarfraz Lund is produced by jail authority from Central Prison Mirpurkhas. The off shoot case of this crime bearing crime No. 47 of 2023, us 23(i) A of Sindh Arms Act is amalgamated vide order dated 10-08-2025. Mr.KhamisoBheel, Learned ADPP for the state is present. Complainant Muhammad Ismail is present. His learned counsel Mr. Saeed Ahmed Waganis not in attendance.Mr. Nisar Ahmed Channa advocate for accused GulHassanis also not in attendance. Mr. Harpal Das advocate for MuhammadAslam and Sarfrazare present.Arguments have already been heard. Judgment announced in open court. Accused Gul Hassan and Sarfraz, have committed the offence punishable under section 302(b) r/w section 34 PPC,and are convicted and sentenced to suffer R.I. for life each as Taz???r. They are also directed to pay compensation of Rs. 10,00,000/-( Ten Lac) each under section 544-A Cr.PC. to the legal heirs of deceased Abdul Waheed. In default thereof they shall have to undergo further S.I for six months more by each accused. Both accused have also committed the offence punishable under section 504 PPC r/w section 34 PPC andare convicted and sentenced to suffer R.I. for one year and fine of Rs. 10,000/- each. In case of failure to pay fine accused should undergo SI for one month. The accused Sarfraz has also committed the offence punishable under section 23(i)(a) of the Sindh Arms Act-2013, and is convicted and sentenced to suffer R.I. for 07 years and fine of Rs. 50,000/-. In case of failure to pay fine |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 63/2024 |
Harpal Das Bheel VS Abdul Malik Jawar & Others | Aghis-u-Salam(ADVO-1773-SBC-HYD) | Abdul Aziz(ADVO-40-SBC-MKS) | Matter called. Appellant Harpal Das is present and his learned counsel Mr. Aghis-u-Salam is not in attendance. Mr. Abdul Aziz Memon advocate of Respondent No.01 & 2 is present. Respondent No. 1 is present. Mr. Muhammad ShahbazArain advocate for Respondent No 3 called absent. DDA is present on behalf of official respondents No: 04 to 11. District Bar is observing full day strike. (.) For hearing and hearing on application 59 Qanoon-e-shahadat. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 2 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 62/2024 |
Harpal Dsa Bheel VS Muhammad Hashim Shaikh & Others | Aghis-u-Salam(ADVO-1773-SBC-HYD) | Abdul Aziz(ADVO-40-SBC-MKS),Qasim Ali Memon(ADVO-85-SBC-TAY) | Matter called. Appellant Harpal Das is present and his learned counsel Mr. Aghis-u-Salam is not in attendance. Mr. Abdul Aziz Memon Learned counsel for Respondents No 5 is present. Mr. Muhammad QasimMemon advocate for Respondent No.2 called absent. Respondent No 4 and his learned counsel is present. Respondent Nos. 1, 3, and 6 are called absent. DDA present on behalf of Respondents No 7 to 14. District Bar is observing full day strike. . (.) For hearing . (.) For hearing . |
||