| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 157/2026 | Manthar Ali @ budo VS The State | Ashique Hussain(ADVO-264-SBC-TAY) | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-497,Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 13/2026 Piaro Lund |
Bail application called in open court. Heard Mr. AshiqueHussainJarwar learned counsel for applicant/accused and Mr. Abdul HafeezGhori learned ADPP for the state. Heard both side. Order announced in open court. The bail application is hereby dismissed accordingly. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 65/2025 | The State VS Shahrukh Rafique Khanzada | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A | 192/2025 A-Section Tando Allahyar |
Sessions case called in open Court. Accused ShahrukhRafique is produced in custody by the jail authority from Central Prison Mirpurkhas, while accused Hassan Bin Sardar and UbairRafique are present on bail. The off shoot case of crime No. 192/2025, under section 25 SAA 2013 of PS A Section registered against accused Shahrukh has been amalgamated vide order dated 01-10-2025. Mr. KhamisoBheel, Learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Ghulamullah Chang advocate for accused is present. Complainant and his witness Najaf Ali are present. Mr. RafiqueAmedLaghari advocate for complainant is present. Examination in chief of complainant and her witness Najaf Ali recorded at Ex: 04 and Ex:05. Complainant produced the FIR at Ex: 04/A. Cross of both witnesses is reserved at the request of learned counsel for accused. Case is adjourned and Put off to: 10.03.2026. For Evidence.Accused Shah Rukh remanded back to jail custody with directions to produce him on next date of hearing. Present accused are directed to attend. Repeat summons to witnesses and call for case property. |
| 3 | SC (Murder Trial) 87/2025 | The State VS Shahrukh Khanzada & Others | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK),Rafique Ahmed(ADVO-228-SBC-TAY) | PPC-302 | 133/2025 A-Section Tando Allahyar |
Sessions case called in open Court. Accused ShahrukhRafique is produced in custody by the jail authority from Central Prison Mirpurkhas, while accused Hassan Bin Sardar and UbairRafique are present on bail. The off shoot case of crime No. 192/2025, under section 25 SAA 2013 of PS A Section registered against accused Shahrukh has been amalgamated vide order dated 01-10-2025. Mr. KhamisoBheel, Learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Ghulamullah Chang advocate for accused is present. Complainant and his witness Najaf Ali are present. Mr. RafiqueAmedLaghari advocate for complainant is present. Examination in chief of complainant and her witness Najaf Ali recorded at Ex: 04 and Ex:05. Complainant produced the FIR at Ex: 04/A. Cross of both witnesses is reserved at the request of learned counsel for accused. Case is adjourned and Put off to: 10.03.2026. For Evidence.Accused Shah Rukh remanded back to jail custody with directions to produce him on next date of hearing. Present accused are directed to attend. Repeat summons to witnesses and call for case property. |
|
| 4 | PPC 130/2025 | The State VS Ghulam Haider & Others | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | PPC-114,PPC-147,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-504 | 66/2025 Piaro Lund |
Case called in open Court. Accused GhulamHaider, Hari, Jairam,Gulab and Hakim Ali are present on bail. Mr. Abdul HafeezGhorilearned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Muhammad Sharif Sahto, learned counsel for accused GhulamHaider, Gulaband , Hakim, is present and moved adjournment application. Order passed on it. Granted.Mr. MuneerHussainLaghari advocate for accused Hari and Jairamis not in attendance. Mr. Ghulamullah Chang advocate for complainant is present. Process returned. Official witnesses are present. Put off to:????????????. 10.03.2026.For Evidence. Present accused persons are directed to attend on next date of hearing. Repeat summons to remaining witnesses through concerned SHO. Call for case property |
|
| 5 | PPC 129/2025 | The State VS Asadullah | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | PPC-114,PPC-147,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-504 | 66/2025 Piaro Lund |
Case called in open Court. Juvenile offence accused Asadullah is present on bail. Mr. Abdul HafeezGhoriLearned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Muhammad Sharif Sahito learned counsel for accused is present.Complainant is present with his learned counsel. Official witnesses are present. Case is adjourned with main case. Put off to:????????????.10.03.2026.For Evidence. Present accused is directed to attend on next date of hearing. Repeat summons to remaining witnesses and call for case property. |
|
| 6 | PPC 31/2026 | The State VS Shahid Hussain Arain | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-279,PPC-320 | 126/2025 Bukeera Shareef |
Case called in open Court. Accused ShahidHussain is present on bail. Mr. Nehal Khan Lashari learned counsel for accused is not in attendance and has moved application for adjournment. Order passed on it. Granted.Complainant called absent. Mr. Abdul HafeezGhorilearned ADPP for the state is present.Process returned. No PW is present. Put off to:?????????.???..09.03.2026. For Evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Issue summons to witnesses and call for case property. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 7 | Application u/s 491 CrPc 25/2026 | Mst Rehana VS SHO P.S Nasarpur | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Matter called in open court. Applicant is present. Mr. Mansoor Ali Jarwar learned counsel has appeared and filed power on behalf of applicant. Order passed on it. File. The learned counsel for applicant has also filed adjournment application. Order passed on it. Mr. Abdul HafeezGhorilearned ADPP for the state is present. SIP Murad Ali has submitted report on behalf of SHO which shows that respondent is residing at the Jurisdiction of PS Shahpur District Matiari. Let DSP legal is directed to submit report as to whether respondent is residing in the territorial jurisdiction of PS Nasarpur or not. Put off to ??????????????????..05.03.2026 for hearing |
||
| 8 | Application u/s 491 CrPc 26/2026 | Azeem Ali VS Imtiaz Ali & Others | Mohammad Aslam Solangi() | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Matter called in open court. Applicant is present. Mr. Wishal learned counsel for applicant is present and has filed statement for correction that name of police station Bukera Sharif was written instead of PS Chamber. Order passed on it. Let the name of PS corrected with red ink. Mr. Abdul HafeezGhorilearned ADPP for the state is present. SIP MumtazJamali of PS Bukera Sharif has submittedreport which reveals that, detainees are residing with the jurisdiction of PS Chamber. Put off to ??????????????????..04.03.2026. Issue letter to SHO PS chamber with directions to cause the production of detainees through private respondents |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 9 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 142/2026 | Muhammad Aqib @ Patoo VS SSP Tando Allahyar & Others | Ali Haider(ADVO-201-SBC-TAY) | DDPP(DDPP-0001-GOV-KHP) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Criminal Misc Application called in open court. Applicant called absent. His learned counsel Mr. Ali Haider Rind advocate is present. Mr. Abdul HafeezGhori, Learned ADPP for the state is present.DSP complaint cell has submitted his report. Call report from Director FIA Hyderabad. Put off to ?????????..12.3.2026 for hearing. Call report from FIA Hyderabad. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 10 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 94/2024 | The State VS Shahdost Rind Lohar Baloch @ Papoo | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | Toseef Ahmed(ADVO-5375-SBC-HYD) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 118/2024 B-Section Tando Allahyar |
Case called in open Court. Accused Shah Dost alias Papuproduced in custody by the jail authorityfrom Central Prison Mirpurkhas. His learned counsel is not in attendance. Mr. Abdul HafeezGhori Learned DDPP for the state is present. Case adjourned with main case. Put off to: 18.03.2026. For framing of amalgamate charge. Accused remanded back to jail custody with directions to produce him on the next date of hearing. |
| 11 | SC (Murder Trial) 128/2024 | The State VS Shahdost Rind Lohar Baloch @ Papoo & aonther | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | Toseef Ahmed(ADVO-5375-SBC-HYD) | PPC-302,PPC-34 | 104/2024 B-Section Tando Allahyar |
Case called in open Court. Accused Shah Dost alias Papu and Deedar are produced in custody by the jail authority from Central Prison Mirpurkhas, while accused Abdul Razzaque is declared as proclaimed offender. Mr. NaveedHussainUmerani learned counsel for accused Deedar is present, while the learned counsel for accused Shah Dost is not in attendance since long. The prisoner/accused has requested that a counsel on state expense be provided to him as he does not have means to engage a counsel. Accordingly Mr. Anwar Ali Brohi, learned counsel is appointed as a pauper advocate to represent the accused Shah Dost on the state expenses. Let an intimation be sent to the learned counsel for his appointment as a pauper advocate. Mr. Abdul HafeezGhoriLearned ADPP for the state is present. Complainant is present with her advocate Mr. Mansoor Ali Jarwar. Adjourned and Put off to: 18.03.2026. For framing of amalgamate charge. Both accused are remanded back to jail custody with directions to produce him on the next date of hearing. Let such intimation be sent to learned counsel for his appointment as a pauper advocate. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Criminal Appeal | |||||||
| 12 | Cr.A. (Criminal Appeals) 3/2026 | Abdullah & Others VS The State | Salman Khan(ADVO-211-SBC-TAY) | Cr.PC-408 | 283/2025 A-Section Tando Allahyar |
Matter called in open court. Appellants/convicts are not produced from the jail authorities. Mr. NoumanGulBozdar learned counsel for appellants/convicts is present. Mr. Abdul HafeezGhorilearned ADPP for the state is present. Complainant is present and on his behalf Mr. Rafique Ahmed Laghari learned counsel has filed power. Heard argument on application under section 426 Cr PC. Order announced in open court. The sentence awarded by the learned trial court to the appellants/accused are hereby suspended and consequently appellants/convict are enlarged on bail subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each and P.R Bond in the like amount |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Execution of NBW | |||||||
| 13 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 10/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Siddique Masrik & Others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 1/2026 Nasurpur |
Case called in open court. Accused Muhammad Siddique and Shahid are produced by the JA while accused MoulaBux is shown absconder in challan sheet. Mr.Abdul HafeezGhoriLearned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Ali Haider Rind learned counsel for both accused is present. Process viz NBW against absconding accused not returned Put off to???.12.03.2026. Formal. Both accused remanded back to jail custody with directions to produce them on next date of hearing. Repeat NBW against absconding accused MoulaBux @ Moulai through concerned SHO. Bail application of accused was already fixed on ..04.3.2026. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Land Acq. Appl. (Land Acquisition Applications) 1/2024 |
Ali Gul Keerio & Others VS P.O Sindh & Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI),Wali Muhammad(ADVO-23-SBC-TAY) | Asif Iqbal Memon(ADVO-274-SBC-SGR) | Suit called in open Court. Attorney/Plaintiff No. 2 KarimBux is present. Associate of Mr. Wali Muhammad Thebow learned counsel for plaintiff is present and made request that his senior is not feeling well. Mr. Waseem-ul-Haque learned DA is present on behalf of defendants. Defendant witness Mr. NiazHussainMukhtiarkarTandoAllahyar is present. By consent matter adjourned |
||