Case Flow Management System

ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, TANDO ALLAHYAR : 17-JAN-2026

S.NO.	CASE NO	NAME OF PARTIES	ADVOCATES		UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS	FIR No.	Hearing Status
S.NO.	CASE NO	NAME OF PARTIES	Party Side 1	Party Side 2	UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS	FIR No.	Hearing Status

S.NO.	CASE NO	NAME OF PARTIES	ADVOCATES		UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS	FIR No.	Hearing Status
S.NO.	CASE NO	NAME OF PARTIES	Party Side 1	Party Side 2	UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS	FIR No.	Hearing Status

1	SC (Murder Trial) 73/2024	The State VS Mujahid Gopang & another	DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI)	ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI)	PPC-114,PPC-302,PPC-34	77/2024 A-Section Tando Allahyar	`Adjourned to 31.1.2026` Case called in open Court. Accused MujahidGopangis not producedby JA of Central Prison MPK due to emergency duty of police as reported by SSP TandoAllahyar. Accused Imdad Ali is present on bail. Accused Sudheer is shown as absconder and his case is bifurcated vide order dated 25.07.2024. Mr. KhamisoBheel, Learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Shehzad Ali Shah advocate for accused Imdad and Mr. Altaf Ahmed ShahidAbro advocate for accused Mujahid are called absent. Complainant is present with his one witness. Syed Sajjad Ali Shah Advocate for complainant is present. Process returned. Put off to: 31-01-2026 For Evidence as well as hearing on application for framing of joint charge. And hearing on applications filed by complainant and accused Imdad.Issue PO for accused Mujahid. Accused Imdad is directed to attend. Repeat summons to witnesses and call for case property through concerned SHO.
2	Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 74/2024	The State VS Mujahid Gopang	DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI)	ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI)	SINDH ARMS ACT-23 (I) A	78/2024 A-Section Tando Allahyar	`Adjourned to 31.1.2026` Case called in open Court. Accused MujahidGopang isproduced in custody by the concerned Jail authorities. Mr. KhamisoBheel , learned ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Altaf Ahmed ShahidAbro advocate for accused is not in attendance. Matter is adjourned with main case and put off to: ???.31.01.2026. For Evidence.Accused Mujahid remanded back to jail custody with directions to produce him on next date of hearing.Repeat summons to witnesses and call for case property through concerned SHO.

3	PPC 21/2025	The State VS Muhammad Ikram and Others	Nihal Khan(ADVO-30-SBC-TAY)		Anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial Act, 2021)-U/S Act: Anti-Rape,Gender Based Violence-,PPC-365B	146/2025 A-Section Tando Allahyar	`Adjourned to 30.1.2026` Case called in open court. Accused Muhammad Ikram, Sanaullah ,Usman @ Bacha and Mst. Palosha called absent. Mr. KhamisoBheel, ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Nehal Khan Lashari advocate for complainant called absent. Complainant called absent. Process did not return. Surety called absent. Adjourned and Put off to: 30.01.2026. For Supply of copies. Repeat NBW against accused persons and notice to surety of accused Ikram through concerned SHO.

S.NO.	CASE NO	NAME OF PARTIES	ADVOCATES		Hearing Status
S.NO.	CASE NO	NAME OF PARTIES	Party Side 1	Party Side 2	Hearing Status

1	Summary Suits 27/2025	Shahid Ali Kumbhar VS Muhammad Zubair Mughal	Muhammad Asghar(ADVO-51219-SBC-TAY)	ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI)	`Adjourned to 30.1.2026` Suit called in open Court. Plaintiff Shahid Ali called absent. His counsel Mr. Muhammad AsgharShaikh is present and filed statement along with receipt of TCS. Process returned un-served. (-) Repeat summons to defendant through bailiff as well as registered post AD on cost. (-) For Service.

2	C.A. (Civil Appeals) 63/2024	Harpal Das Bheel VS Abdul Malik Jawar & Others	Aghis-u-Salam(ADVO-1773-SBC-HYD)	Abdul Aziz(ADVO-40-SBC-MKS)	`Appeal is allowed` Matter called. Appellant Harpal Das is present. Heard Mr. Aghis-u-Salam learned counsel appellant and Mr. Abdul Aziz Memon advocate of Respondent No.01 & 2. Mr. AsifIqbalMemon DDA is also heard on behalf of official respondents No: 04 to 11. Mr. Muhammad ShahbazArain advocate for Respondent No 3 called absent. learned counsel for plaintiff made endorsement on the first page of application 59 Qanoon-e-Shahadat that he does not press the same. Order passed on it. Judgment announced in open court. Appeal is allowed. Impugned Judgment and Decree is set-aside and the suit is partly decreed against the respondent/defendant No No.1 Abdul Malik to the extent of only refund of sale consideration of Rs.59,40,000/- with mark-up 3% percent per annum till the amount is realized in fullto the plaintiff/appellant. The parties are left to bear their own costs. Office is directed to draw the decree accordingly and R & Ps be returned to the trial court.

3	C.A. (Civil Appeals) 62/2024	Harpal Dsa Bheel VS Muhammad Hashim Shaikh & Others	Aghis-u-Salam(ADVO-1773-SBC-HYD)	Abdul Aziz(ADVO-40-SBC-MKS),Qasim Ali Memon(ADVO-85-SBC-TAY)	`Appeal is allowed` Matter called. Appellant Harpal Das is present. Heard Mr. Aghis-u-Salam learned counsel for appellant and Mr. Abdul Aziz Memon Learned counsel for Respondents No 5. Mr. IqbalMemonDDA on behalf of Respondents No 7 to 14 and Mr. Sher Muhammad Dal advocate for respondent No.04 are present and they are also.Mr. Muhammad QasimMemon advocate for Respondent No.2 called absent. Respondent Nos. 1, 3, and 6 called absent.Appeal is allowed. Impugned Judgment and Decree is set-aside and the suit is partly decreed against the respondent/defendant No No.5 Abdul Malik to the extent of only refund of sale consideration of Rs.40,00,000/- with mark-up 3% percent per annum till the amount is realized in fullto the plaintiff/appellant. The parties are left to bear their own costs. Office is directed to draw the decree accordingly and R & Ps be returned to the trial court.