| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 1 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 158/2026 | Suhail Ul Rehman Lund VS SHO PS: Umar Sand & Others | Mohammad Aslam Solangi() | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Criminal Misc Application called in open court. ApplicantSuhail-ul-Rehman is present with his learned counsel Mr. Muhammad AslamSolangi. Mr. KhamisoBheelLearned ADPP for the state is present.Heard.Order announced in open court. The application is disposed of accordingly |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 2 | Application u/s 491 CrPc 26/2026 | Azeem Ali VS Imtiaz Ali & Others | Mohammad Aslam Solangi() | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Matter called in open court. Applicant is present with his learned counsel Mr. Muhammad AslamSolangi advocate. Mr. KhamisoBheellearned ADPP for the state is present. SHO PS Chamber has submitted his report. Detainee is present with her babies. Statement of BakhatBhari( Detainee) recorded wherein she has stated that she will go with her parents and reside there. Heard. Order announced in open Court. The instant application is hereby dismissed with cost of Rs.20,000/- t be paid to the alleged detainee for the bothering and inconvenience caused to her by the malafide application of the applicant. Order accordingly |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 36/2026 | The State VS Tanveer & Others | PPC-147,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-354,PPC-382 | 3/2026 Women & Children (TAY) |
Case called in open Court. All accused are present on bail. Mr. KhamsioBheel learned ADPP for the state is present. Defense counsel called absent. Copies of police paper supplied to the accused on receipt at Ex:???.01. Complainant is present and filed application. Order passed on it. Put off to:????????????. 18.03.2026.For Charge. Accused are directed to attend. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 4 | SC (Murder Trial) 71/2025 | The State VS Asghar Ali Rind | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Gender Based Violence-,PPC-302,PPC-324 | 54/2025 Chamber |
Case called in open court. Accused Asghar Ali is produced in custody by the jail authority. The Learned ADPP for the state is present. No defense counsel appeared on his behalf. His application is pending for providing advocate is pending.The prisoner/accused has requested that a counsel on state expenses be provided to him so that case be proceeded and disposed of according to law. Accordingly Mr. Nehal Khan Lashari, learned counsel is appointed as a pauper advocate to represent the accused on the state expenses. Complainant is present with his counsel. Put off to ??????11.03.2026 For charge. Accused remanded back to jail custody with directions to produce him on next date of hearing. |
| 5 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 10/2026 | The State VS Rasool Bux | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | SINDH ARMS ACT-U/S 27/B SAA | 399/2025 A-Section Tando Allahyar |
Case called in open Court. Accused RasoolBux is present on bail. His counsel Mr. Imtiaz Ahmed is present and filed power. Mr. KhamsioBheel learned ADPP for the state is present. Case adjourned with main case. Put off to:????????????. 19.03.2026.For Charge. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 6 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 9/2026 | The State VS Ghulam Sarwar | ADPP(ADPP-0003-GOV-MPK) | Sindh Arms Act 2013-23-A | 395/2025 A-Section Tando Allahyar |
Case called in open Court. Accused GhulamSarwar is produced in custody by jail authority. No defense counsel is appeared on behalf of accused. Mr. KhamsioBheel learned ADPP for the state is present. Case is adjourned with main case. Put off to:????????????. 19.03.2026.For Charge. Accused remanded back to jail custody with directions to produce him on next date of hearing. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 7 | Cr.P.E. (Criminal Preliminary Enquiry) 10/2026 | Abdul Qayoom Dago VS Abdul Rasheed Dago & Others | Ali Sher(ADVO-1219-SBC-MKS) | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-KHI) | / |
R & Ps is received by way of transfer from the court of Honourable Sessions Judge, TandoAllahyar for disposal according to law. Matter called in open court. Applicant is present with his learned counsel Mr. Ali SherBaloch. Mr. Syed Sajjad Ali Shah leared counsel appeared and filed power on behalf of accused Waqar. Order passed on it. File. Heard both side. Put off to ???????????????13.3.2026 for hearing. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 8 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 9/2025 | Obhrio VS Khadim Hussain | Qasim Ali Memon(ADVO-85-SBC-TAY) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3,illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 4,illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 5,illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 6,illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 7,illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 8 | / |
Matter called in open court. Complainant Obheriois present and has filed application for grant of time to engage counsel. Order passed on it. Granted.Accused KhadimHussain is present on bail. His learned counsel Mr. Muhammad QasimMemon advocate is not in attendance. Statement of accused under section 342 Cr PC recorded at Ex:06.Matter adjourn and Put off to ????????? ????????????09.03.2026. For arguments.Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 27/2025 |
Shahid Ali Kumbhar VS Muhammad Zubair Mughal | Muhammad Asghar(ADVO-51219-SBC-TAY) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Suit called in open Court. Plaintiff is present.. His learned counsel Mr. AsgharShaikh is present. Defendant is declared as Ex-parte vide order dated 18-02-206. Plaintiff has filed Affidavit in Evidence as Ex-Parte Proof. The learned counsel for plaintiff has submitted statement for closing his side. Order passed on it. (-) For arguments. |
||