| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 416/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Arif Mirani and others | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Abdul Shakoor(ADVO-669-SBC-GHT),Liaquat Ali(ADVO-1549-SBC-SUK) | PPC-399 | 15/2025 B-Section Ghotki |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications | |||||||
| 2 | Cancellation of Bail Appl. 1/2026 | Razik Dino Shaikh VS Muhammad Yakoob Chachar | Shafquat Ali(ADVO-304-SBC-GHT) | Syed Waqar Ali Shah(ADVO-440-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-497 (v),PPC-382 | 285/2025 A-Section Ghotki |
Cancellation of BA called. Applicant/complainant along with his counsel are present. Respondent/accused Muhammad Yakoob Chachar and his counsel also prsent The learned ADPP for the state is present. Heard arguments. The instant application u/s 497 (5) Cr.P.C is dismissed. The bail granted to respondent/accused Muhammad Yakoob Chachar vide order dated 27.01.2026 shall remain intact. Trial court is however, directed to proceed with the case expeditiously in accordance with law. Let office is directed to consign the R&Ps to record after completion of usual formalities. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Direct Complaints | |||||||
| 3 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 75/2025 | Muhammad Siddique Mahar VS Rabnawaz Mahar and others | Ashfaq Ahmed(ADVO-367-SBC-GHT) | Javed Ahmed (ADVO-556-SBC-GHT) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3 | / |
Cr.DC called. Complainant and his counsel are present. Proposed accused Rabnawaz and Wahid Bux are present their counsel absent, partly arguments heard of learned counsel for complainant, at the request of learned counsel for complainant, the instant DC adjourned to 23.02.2026, for further arguments. Complainant is directed to attend. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 16/2024 |
Muhammad Hayat Ghoto VS Abdul Rehman Ghoto and others | Wazir Ahmed Goto(ADVO-88-SBC-GHT) | Mubarak Ali(ADVO-20927-SBC-KHS) | Summary suit called. The plaintiff, his witnesses namely Hakim Ali and Abbass Ali an counsel for plaintiff are present. Defendant Abdul Rehman and his counsel are present. Order passed on order sheet. Learned counsel for defendant requested for adjournment on the ground that he is not feeling well. Per record in present matter issues were framed on 26.02.2026, since the date matter is pending for evidence and it was adjourned for one or other reason. Record further shows that examination-in-chief of witnesses already recorded. This suit is filed under Order 37 Rule 2 CPC which requires expeditious disposal hence parties are put at notice to cooperate in trial to conclude proceedings. Adjourned at the choice of learned counsel for defendant with notice that in case he failed to proceed on the next date he will face consequences. Adjourned to 07.03.2026, for further cross of plaintiff and cross of his witnesses. Both parties informed accordingly. |
||
| 2 | Summary Suits 30/2025 |
Waheed Ahmed Laghari VS Bajhi Khan Kolachi | Syed Waqar Ali Shah(ADVO-440-SBC-GHT) | Ali Asghar Panhyar(ADVO-602-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff absent his counsel present. Defendant Bajhi Khan and his counsel called absent. At the request of learned counsel for plaintiff the instant summary suit is adjourned to 24.02.2026, for exparte evidence of the plaintiff side. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 3 | Summary Suits 34/2023 |
Baroch Mahar VS Lal Khan Shar | Sudhamo @ Sudhamchand(ADVO-372-SBC-GHT) | Akhtar Hussain Malik(ADVO-621-SBC-GHT) | Summary Suit called. Plaintiff and his counsel present. Defendant absent his counsel present. Order passed on order sheet. Learned counsel for defendant requested time that he is not feeling well due to pain in his teeth hence he could not properly argue. At the choice of learned counsel for defendant adjourned as last chance with notice to learned counsel for plaintiff that he will argue the matter in failure of either party this court will decide on own after examining the material available and pleadings of the parties. Adjourned to 27.02.2026. Both parties informed accordingly. |
||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 99/2025 |
Aijaz Ali Kalwar and another VS Rehmatullah Kalwar and others | Khadim Hussain() | Javed Hussain Seerlo (DDA)(ADVO-1015-SBC-SUK) | Civil appeal called. Appellant No.02 present his counsel absent. Respondent Rehmatullah and his counsel are present. The learned DDA for official respondents is present. Appellant No. 02 filed application for adjournment. Order on it. Order passed on order sheet and announced in open court. Record shows that on 23.01.2026 las chance was granted to the appellants for arguing the case but again today he filed adjournment application which shows that appellants are only interested to keep the case pending without fruitful result, hence in the interest of justice case is adjourned subject to costs of Rs.1000/- to be paid by the appellants in the library of District Bar Association, Ghotki with notice that if appellant failed to proceed on next date he will face consequences. Adjourned to 28.02.2026, for arguments. Present parties informed accordingly. |
||