Sessions case called. Accused of the first version of FIR No.261/2023 PS A-Section Ghotki, accused 1. Imtiaz Ahmed @ Imtiaz Ali called absent under intimation on his behalf co-accused Zain ul Abdin submitted application for excusing the absence of accused Imtiaz Ahmed @ Imtiaz Ali. Order on it. Accused 2. Taj Muhammad, 3. Zain ul Abdin, 4. Ahmed Ali, 5. Zulfiqar Ali, 6. Rafique Ahmed, 7. Shafique Ahmed, 8. Mumtaz Ali, 9. Bhooral, 10. Abdul Rauf, are present on bail, accused 11. Saeed Ahmed and 12 Niaz Ahmed are called absent (their appearance has been dispensed with vide order dated 08.11.2025), today Mr. Shafique Ahmed Laghari learned counsel for accused Saeed Ahmed and Niaz Ahmed submitted statement on behalf of accused Saeed Ahmed and Niaz Ahmed in which he stated that he will appear on each and every date on behalf of both accused. Order on it. While accused of second version/cross version of the same incident, accused 1. Mukhtiar Ahmed, 2. Ghulam Nabi (their appearance has been dispensed with vide order dated 08.11.2025) on their behalf Mr. Ghulam Yaseen Naich advocate is present. 3. Junaid Ahmed, 4. Ghulam Ali, 5. Sanaullah, 6. Bashir, 7. Rafique Ahmed, 08. Waqar Ahmed, 09. Sulleman, 10. Sardar Khan, 11. Muhammad Akhtar are present on bail, while accused 12. Allahdino Sanghar produce by J/A Ghotki and accused (13) Murad S/O Hashim Lakhan was expired and proceedings against him already abated. Perusal of record shows that show cause notice against accused Mukhtiar Ahmed and Ghulam Nabi was issued but reply not yet received. Mr. Ghulam Yaseen Naich advocate appeared and submitted application for time to submit the reply of show cause issued against both accused. Order on it. Complainant Taj Muhammad submitted application in which he stated that he do not want to record the evidence of PWs Din Muhammad, Muhammad Soomar and Shahid Hussain. Order on it. The learned ADPP for the state, counsels for complainants and accused are present. Mr. Ghulam Yaseen Naich counsel for pauper accused Allah Dino Sanghar on state expenses is present. Complainant Rafique Ahmed, Taj Muhammad, PWs/injured Sardar Khan, Zulfiqar, Bhoorl, Muhammad Moosa, Muhammad Sulleman are present and bound down. Today strike called by DBA Ghotki, the instant case is adjourned to 14.03.2026, for evidence/cross examination, further orders on reply of show cause notices, hearing on application for cancellation of bail. Present accused are directed to attend and inform the absentee accused. Complainants and present PWs are directed to appear along with their all private PWs on the date of hearing.

SC Case called. Accused Jahanzaib @ Rajoo is present on bail granted by Honourable High Court, accused Muhammad Rafay and Aamir are produce in custody by J/As Ghotki. R/accused Umair, Uzair, Muhammad Nawaz & Zaffar were already declared as P.Os. The learned ADPP for the state is present while learned counsels for complainant and accused called absent. On process Complainant, PWs Muhammad Qasim, Inam Ali, HC Ali Asghar and PC Allah Jewayo are present and bound down. No other PWs present. SHO PS A.Section Ghotki called absent and submitted his reply of show cause notice thorugh ASI Allah Dewayo. Order on it. A letter received from DSP Legal on behalf of SSP Ghotki. Order on it. Today strike called by DBA Ghotki. Complainant submitted application for adjournment. Order on it. Case put off to 14.03.2026, for evidence. Repeat fresh process against R/PWs. Accused Jahanzaib @ Rajoo is directed to attend while accused Muhammad Rafy and Aamir are remanded back with same custody with directions to produce them before this court on the date of hearing. Complainant and present PWs are directed to attend.

SC called. Accused Fateh Muhammad @ Abdul Fateh is present on bail, accused Ali Bux and Zaman Ali have been declared as PO, while r/accused have been acquitted u/s 345 (6) Cr.P.C vide order dated 30.01.2026. The learned ADPP for the state is present. Complainant is present, no other PWs present. Process against R/PWs not returned served or unserved. Repeat fresh process against R/PWs. Complainant stated that compromise talks are going on with accused, hence he requested to adjourn the instant case. Request allowed. Case put off to 10.04.2026, for evidence. Present complainant and accused are directed to attend.