| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 108/2026 | Gahi Khan @ Gahi Mirbahar and ors VS The State | Imtiaz Ali(ADVO-325A-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-498,PPC-457 | 3/2026 B-Section Ghotki |
BA called. Applicants/accused 1. Gahi Khan @ Gahi, 2. Qurban Ali @ Qurban, 3. Kareem Dad @ Abdul Kareem, 4. Gaman Khan @ Gaman and 5. Ashique Ali @ Ashique are present on interim pre-arrest bail. The learned ADPP for the state is present. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in open court, the bail before arrest earlier granted vide order dated 17.01.2026, to the applicants/accused is hereby confirmed on the same terms and conditions, subject to their continued cooperation with with the investigation and attendance before the trial court as and when required. Let office is directed to consign the R&Ps to record after completion of usual formalities. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Criminal Revision | |||||||
| 2 | Criminal Revisions 1/2026 | Shahzado Dal VS Daim Khan and others | Faiz Muhammad(ADVO-495LC-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-439 | / |
Cr.Revision Application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Respondents No. 01 to 03 and 06 & 07 and their counsel are also present. Report received from Mukhtiarkar (Estate), Ghotki. Order on it. File. Order passed on order sheet. After hearing to some extent, both the partieds agreed that commissioner may be appointed to examine the site and verify the facts relating to the availability of street and submit report. In this regard Mr. Sanaullah Mahar, advocate is appointed as Commissioner, he shall conduct the site inspection in presence of Mukhtiarkar and Tapedar concerned, both the parties shall cooperate with him. Tapedar concerned, is directed to cooperate with the commissioner and assist him properly at the time of site inspection, commissioner shall prepare report and submit confidentially on the next date. In this regard, commissioner fees of Rs. 20,000/- is fixed, Rs.10,000/- to be paid to the commissioner by each within three (03) days. Adjourned to 31.01.2026, for commissioner report/hearing. Both parties are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | SC (Murder Trial) 252/2012 | The State VS Rasheed Ahmed | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT),Sudhamo @ Sudhamchand(ADVO-372-SBC-GHT) | Irshad Ali(ADVO-1054-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302,PPC-34 | 108/2012 A-Section Ghotki |
Sessions case called. Accused Abdul Rasheed Gadani produced by CP, Sukkur. The learned ADPP for the state is present while leanred counsel for complainant and learned counsel for accused on state expenses called absent. Complainant Manzoor Ahmed & PWs PC Muhammad Essa, PC Muhamamd Saleem Malik and Tapedar Rabnawaz (now Mukhtiarkar serving at Head Quarter Larkana) are present. Order passed on order sheet. Learned ADPP submits that witnesses PC Muhammad Essa and PC Muhamamd Saleem are formal witnesses their evidence is un-necessary to be recorded and for the conduct of the then then Tapedar Rabnawaz, he submitsthough in police papers, a police letter issued to the then Mukhtiarkar is available but he is not cooperating to produce the report before this court, which is showing his ignorance and apparently is misuse of his authority and laso misconduct on his part as well as of the then Mukhtiarkar. Issue show ???cause to the then Mukhtiarkar and Tapedar presently working as Mukhtiarkar, as to why a complaint shall not be registered against them for misuse of their authority and screening out the evidence of necessary report required in the court as record shows that a letter was issued to Mukhtiarkar for site inspection through Tapedar. Issue fresh process for remaining PWs through SSP with directions either he shall execute the same personally or through any police officer not below the rank of DSP. Case put off to 28.01.2026, for evidence. Accused is remanded back to same custody with directions to produce him before this court on the date of hearing. However present Tapedar is directed to attend and submit his reply of show cause notice. |
| 4 | SC (Murder Trial) 25/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Nawaz Gabole and others | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-GHT) | Sikandar Ali(ADVO-1261-SBC-GHT) | PPC-302 | 349/2024 A-Section Ghotki |
SC Case called. Accused Jahanzaib @ Rajoo is present on bail granted by Honourable High Court, accused Muhammad Rafay and Aamir are produce in custody by J/As Ghotki. R/accused Umair, Uzair, Muhammad Nawaz & Zaffar were already declared as P.Os. The learned ADPP for the state and counsels for complainant and accused are present. On process Complainant, PWs Inam & Muhammad Qasim are present and bound down. No other PWs present. At the request of complainant the instant case is adjourned to 31.01.2026, for evidence. Issue fresh process against R/PWs. Accused Jahanzaib @ Rajoo is directed to attend while accused Muhammad Rafy and Aamir are remanded back with same custody with directions to produce them before this court on the date of hearing. Complainant and present PWs are directed to attend. |
| 5 | PPC 204/2025 | The State VS Mehmood Ali @ Mehmood @ Sonaro Mahar and others | Rashid Ahmed Naich(Suspend) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | PPC-324 | 483/2024 A-Section Ghotki |
|
| 6 | PPC 381/2025 | The State VS Muhsin Ali Balouch | DPP(ADVO-001-SBC-GHT) | Muhammad Bux(ADVO-874-SBC-GHT) | PPC-320 | 93/2025 Sarhad |
Sessions case called. Accused Mohsin Ali produced by J/A Ghotki. The learned ADPP for the state and counsel for accused are present. Father of deceased Shahzadi along with his counsel are present. On process complainant, witness/mashir Ali Muhammad and Dr. Mujib-ul-Rehman are present and their evidence has been recorded at Exh. 03 to 05, respectively. Repeat fresh process against R/PWs. Case put off to 28.01.2026, for evidence. Accused Mohsin Ali is remanded back to same custody with directions to produce him before this court on the date of hearing. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 22-A | |||||||
| 7 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 75/2026 | Sardar Khan Lakhan VS SHO P.S A-Section Ghotki and others | Rustam Ali(ADVO-288-SBC-GHT) | Cr.PC-22 A (6)(I) | / |
Cr. Misc. Application called. Applicant Sardar Khan Lakhan called absent his counsel present. The learned ADPP for the state is present. Order passed on statement of learned counsel for applicant. Order on separate sheet. In view of statement the instant criminal Miscellaneous Application stands dismissed as withdrawn. let office is directed to consign the R&Ps to record after completion of usual formalities. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 2/2026 |
Waqar Ahmed Rajput VS Muhammad Anwar Rajput | Abdul Razzaque Mahar(ADVO-61-SBC-GHT) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-GHT) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff and his counsel called absent but clerk of learned counsel for plaintiff is present. Process issued to the defendant through learned Senior Civil Judge, Ghotki and returned duly unserved as per endorsement of Bailiff that the defendant has shifted to unknown place. Order passed on order sheet. Repeat summons by way of pasting in presence of two witnesses, as well as publication in daily Awami Awaz. The plaintiff is directed to send summon to defendant on his mobile phone number through WhatsApp, as well as he is having any social contact with the defendant, he shall send the summon to the defendant on social contact and submit screen shot on the next date. Adjourned to 31.01.2026, for service. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | Summary Suits 24/2021 |
Dileep Kumar VS Srichand | Naveed Ahmed Malik(ADVO-1132-SBC-GHT) | Ziaul Haque(ADVO-199-SBC-KHP) | Matter called. Plaintiff and his counsel are present. Defendant and his counsel absent. Mr. Lal Bux Ghoto learned advocate appeared and informed that the father of learned counsel for defendant has passed away and requested for adjourn the instant matter to some other date. Request allowed as last chance. Put off to 28.01.2026, for hearing/arguments on application u/o18 Rule 17 RWS 151 CPC. Present parties informed accordingly. |
||