| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 170/2026 | Ghulam Rasool VS The State | Himayoon(ADVO-264-SBC-MTY) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-380,PPC-457 | 229/2026 Hala |
Bail application is called. Advocate for applicant/accused is present. ADPP is present. Notice upon complainant is returned served, He is present and made an application for time. Order passed thereon. adjournment application is allowed in the interest of justice. Put off to 4.11.2026 for hearing on application |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 193/2026 | The State VS Sher Chandio & Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-353,PPC-447,PPC-448,PPC-506-B | 125/2026 Hala |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. Accused Sher Muhammad has filed an application on the ground that his advocate is busy at Honourable High Court Hyderabad. Order passed thereon. Adjournment application is allowed in the interest of justice. Process upon P.Ws is returned served. Complainant is present and filed an application for late coming. Order passed thereon. Excused. Put off to 14.11.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. Process extended and handed over to process server. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 214/2026 | The State VS Gullab @ Kashmeer | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 179/2026 Hala |
Case called. Accused Gulab alias Kashmeer is produced by Central Prison, Hyderabad through video Link. ADPP is present. Copies of case paper is supplied to accused vide receipt at Ex.1. Put off to 10.11.2026 for charge. Accused is remanded back in to J/C with direction that accused be produced on next date of hearing through video Link. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 182/2026 | The State VS Ghulam Murtaza & Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-H,PPC-353,PPC-397,PPC-427,PPC-447,PPC-506-B | 7/2026 Noorketi |
Case called. Accused persons namely: (1) Ghulam Murtaza, (2) Shahid Ali, (3) Allah Bachayo, (4) Mirza Bagri, (5) Muhammad Yousif, (6) Ali Muhammad and (7) Mevo are present on bail, except accused Khadim Hussain, who is absent and has been absconding since the filing of the challan. Notice upon accused Muhammad Yousif is returned served. Accused Muhammad Yousif has filed an application for condonation of his absence on the previous date. Order has been passed thereon. Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) issued against absconding accused Khadim Hussain has been returned unexecuted. Statement of the Process Server has been recorded at Ex.1. He has produced the NBW along with its endorsement at Ex.1/A, intimation from the SHO at Ex.1/B, report of the SHO at Ex.1/B and Ex. 1/C, statements of witnesses along with copies of their CNICs at Ex.1/D to Ex.1/G, and relevant entries of both sides at Ex.1/H to Ex.1/I. Order has been passed on the statement of the Process Server. In view of the above, let proclamation under Sections 87 and 88 Cr.P.C. be issued against absconding accused Khadim Hussain in accordance with law. To come up on 18.11.2026 for service of proclamation. Present accused persons are directed to remain in attendance on the next date of hearing. Issue proclamation against accused Khadim Hussain accordingly. |
|
| 5 | PPC 196/2026 | The State VS Ghulam Akbar Samoo | Sheeraz Ali(ADVO-239-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 104/2026 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case called. Accused Ghulam Akber is present on bail, ADPP is present. Charge framed against accused at Ex.2. Plea of accused is recorded at Ex.2/A in which accused pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Put off to 17.11.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. Issue summon to witness and called case property. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 35/2026 | Shoukat Ali VS Mst. Sumera & Another | Muhammad Rahim(ADVO-174-SBC-MTY) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 of Guardian and Wards Act R/W 100 Cr.PC | Matter called. Applicant called absent; however, learned counsel for the applicant is present. Opponent called. Notice issued to the opponent is duly served, but they are called absent. Service is held good. Separate order passed at Exh. 4. Matter is adjourned to 18.11.2026 for appearance of the opponent and filing of objections. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 34/2026 | Abbas Raza VS Mst. Amna & Another | Shah Nawaz (ADVO-90-SBC-MTY) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 12 | Matter called. Applicant and his advocate are present. Opponent is called absent, but his learned advocate is present. Advocate for opponent has filed has filed an adjournment application at Ex.5. Order passed thereon. adjournment application is allowed in the interest of justice as last and final chance. Put off to 07.11.2026 for objection on application. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 153/2026 | Mst. Khushboo & Another VS Saleem Khaskheli | Muneer Ahmed Gahothi(ADVO-132-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Plaintiff is called absent, whereas learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. Defendant is called absent. Notice issued to the defendant through the Honourable District Judge, Hyderabad, has been received back un-served, as per the endorsement of the bailiff. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has filed a statement along with a copy of daily newspaper Ibrat dated 20.10.2026. Order passed on separate sheet at Ex.5. In view of the statement and material placed on record, service upon the defendant is hereby held good. Let the matter be put off to 18.11.2026 for appearance of the defendant and filing of written statement. |
||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 156/2026 | Mst. Nasreen VS Shakeel Ahmed | Shakira Azam(ADVO-2824-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount | Matter called. Plaintiff along with her learned junior advocate is present. Defendant is called absent. Notice issued to the defendant has not yet been received back, either served or un-served. Matter is adjourned to 16.11.2026 for service of the defendant. Let fresh notice be issued to the defendant through Court as well as by way of publication in a daily newspaper, at the plaintiff's cost. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 55/2026 | Baby Dua Zahra & other VS Madad Ali | Shakira Azam(ADVO-2824-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount | Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent, but his Junior Advocate is present. Defendant and his junior advocate are present. Today matter is fixed for evidence. Advocate for plaintiff has filed an adjournment application at Ex/.16. Order passed thereon. Adjournment application is allowed in there instrest of justice as last and final chance. Put off to...07.11.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
||