| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 38/2025 | The State VS Ameer Bux @ Ameero & another | Sheraz Ali(ADPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | Ashfaque Ali Dahri(ADVO-158-SBC-MTY) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 57/2025 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case called. Both accused are produced by J/A C.P Hyderabad through video link. ADPP and DC are present. ASI Sohail Jamali is present and his deposition is recorded at Ex.09. He produced memo of formal arrest at Ex.09/A. Statement of side closed submitted by ADPP at Ex.10. Statement under section of both accused persons are recorded at Ex.11 and Ex.12. Put off to.18.03.2026 for Final Arguments. Both accused are remanded back to J/C with directed to produce them before this court on the above date of hearing through video link. |
| 2 | DC (Direct Complaint) 2/2025 | Mst. Kainat VS Imtiaz | Imdad Ali(ADVO-2354-SBC-HYD) | Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961-Section 6(5)(b) | / |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP is present. DC called absent. Complainant First called absent but 2nd called is present. Father of complainant also present. Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted adjournment application. Order passed on it. Put off to.30.03.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Present PW is bound down. |
|
| 3 | PPC 140/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Ismail | Afaque Ali Wandyar(ADVO-302-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 209/2025 Hala |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP is present. DC called absent. No PW is present. Process returned un-served same is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to.26.03.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 4 | PPC 119/2025 | The State VS Waseem & others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-342,PPC-392,PPC-458 | 47/2025 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case called. Accused Waseem, Gulsher and Muhammad @ Dado are produced by the J/A C.P Hyderabad through video link. While remaining accused are declared as P.O. Learned ADPP and DC are present. Complainant called absent but his counsel is present. Learned counsel for the accused persons has submitted statement alongwith photo copy of order passed by honourable High Court Hyderabad. Order passed on it. Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted condonation application for absence excused of complainant. Order passed on it. Put off to.16.03.2026 for evidence. Accused to be produced through video link on the above date of hearing. |
| 5 | PPC 34/2026 | THE STATE VS GHULAM NABI | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 270/2025 Hala |
Case called. Accused produced by J/A C.P Hyderabad through video link. ADPP is present. No PW is present. Process returned un-served same is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to.11.03.2026 for evidence. Accused to be produced through video link. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 24/2026 | The State VS Mazhar and ors | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-399,PPC-402 | 217/2025 Hala |
Case called. Accused Habib is produced by J/A C.P Hyderabad through video link, accused Mazhar is present on bail, while accused Umed Ali is absconder shown in challan sheet. ADPP is present. As such proclamation under section 87 Cr.PC was issued against absconder accused returned un-executed as such statement of process server HC\Sanghar is recorded at Ex.02. He produce unexecuted under section 87 Cr.PC alongwith endorsement at Ex.02/A and Ex.02/B. He produced Ishtiyar and Mashirnama at Ex.02/C and 2/D. Report under section 88 Cr.Pc received from concerned Mukhtiarkar. Order passed on it. Order passed on Statement of process server. Accused Umed Ali is declared as proclaimed offenders. All legal formalities are completed. Section 399 PPC is exclusively traible by the court of Honourable District and Sessions Judge. Let the R & Ps be sent to the Honourable District and Sessions Judge, Matiari for its trial. Photo copies of police papers are supplied to the accused persons vide receipt No.03/A and 03/B. Put off to.......17.03.2026 for charge. Accused Habib remaned back to J/C with direction to produced him before the court of Honourable District and Sessions Court Matiari on the above date of hearing. Present accused is directed to appeare before before the court Honourable District and Sessions Court Matiari on the above date of hearing. |
|
| 7 | PPC 22/2026 | The State VS Habib and ors | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-397 | 225/2025 Hala |
Case called. Accused Habib is produced by J/A C.P Hyderabad through video link, accused Mazhar is present on bail, while accused Umed Ali is absconder shown in challan sheet. ADPP is present. As such proclamation under section 87 Cr.PC was issued against absconder accused returned un-executed as such statement of process server HC/Sanghar is recorded at Ex.02. He produce un-executed under section 87 Cr.PC alongwith endorsement at Ex.02/A and Ex.02/B. He produced Ishtiyar and Mashirnama at Ex.02/C and 2/D. Report under section 88 Cr.PC received from concerned mukhtiarkar. Order passed on it. Order passed on Statement of process server. Accused Umed Ali is declared as proclaimed offenders. All legal formalities are completed. Section 397 PPC is exclusively traible by the court of Honourable District and Sessions Judge. Let the R & Ps be sent to the Honourable District and Sessions Judge, Matiari for its trial. Photo copies of police papers are supplied to the accused persons vide receipt No.03/A and 03/B. Put off to.17.03.2026 for charge. Accused Habib renamed back to J/C with direction to produced him before the court of Honourable District and Sessions Court matiari on the date of hearing. Present accused is directed to appear before before Honourable District and Sessions Court Matiari on the above date of hearing. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 2/2026 |
Bhae Khan Balal VS Gul Bahar Balal | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Matter called Both parties and their learned counsels are present. Matter is fixed for 10(2) CPC same is held but declared failed. Order passed on separate sheet. Put off to.27.03.2026 for issues. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 3/2026 |
Shirimati Lahri VS Bhojo Bheel | Asif Ali (ADVO-288-SBC-MTY) | Matter called. Plaintiff called absent but her counsel is present. Defendant appeared and submitted an application for grant of time to engage the counsel. Order passed on it. Copy of plaint is received. Put off to.25.03.2026 for written statement. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| 1 | G.W. (G&W Cases) 14/2026 | Tufail Ahmed Mehar VS Mst. Farzana | Shuib Aziz() | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 of Guardian and Wards Act R/W 100 Cr.PC | Matter called. Applicant and his counsel are called absent but his junior is present. Process against the opponent was issued through court bailiff returned served upon the father of opponent with endorsement of bailiff. None is present from opponent side. Put off to.26.03.2026 for service. Repeat process against the opponent with direction to service upon the him in person. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 31/2026 | Mst. Saira Bano VS Nadeem Dahri | Shuib Aziz() | Family Suit-Recovery of Medical Charges / Delivery Expenses ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff called absent but her junior is present. Process returned served upon the Defendant but defendant called absent. Advocate for the defendant appeared and submitted statement on the ground that defendant has gone to Karachi so he filed power/written statement on the next date of hearing. Order passed on it. Put off to.26.03.2026 for written statement. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 63/2025 | Muskan VS Ali Hassan | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called in open Court. Plaintiff and her counsel is present.Today matter is fixed for appearance of defendant and submission of written statement. Defendant called absent. It is now 01:00 pm none is present from defendant's side. Defendant is debarred from filing written statement. Order passed on separate sheet. Learned counsel for plaintiff is directed to file ex-partee proof on next date of hearing. Put off to- 18-03-2026 for filing ex-partee evidence. |
||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 15/2026 | Mst. Nawabzadi & others VS Abdullah Kori | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit called in open Court. Plaintiff and her counsel is present.Today matter is fixed for appearance of defendant and submission of written statement. Defendant called absent. It is now 01:00 pm none is present from defendant's side. Defendant is debarred from filing written statement. Order passed on separate sheet. Learned counsel for plaintiff is directed to file ex-partee proof on next date of hearing. Put off to-14-03-2026 for filing ex-partee evidence. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 65/2025 | Mst. Gull Pari VS Gull Shahbaz Khoso | Abdul Rehman(ADVO-182-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance of Iddat Period,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called in open court. Plaintiff and her counsel are called absent till 12.00 p.m without intimation. Perusal of record show that the plaintiff and her counsel are absent since last several dates, hence the family suit in hand is dismissed in non-prosecution. |
||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 5/2026 | MONSAB VS IRSHAD ALI | Ashfaque Ali Dahri(ADVO-158-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff called absent but her counsel is present. Defendant and his counsel are present. Today matter was fixed for pretrial and hearing on application under section 17-A Family Court Act. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has submitted condonation application. Order passed on it. Put off to.18.03.2026 for pretrial and hearing on application under section 17-A. Family court Act. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Exparte Evidence | |||||||
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 28/2025 | Mst. Marvi VS Abdul Ghaffar | Karim Bux Rind(ADVO-500-SBC-NWB) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit is called. Plaintiff and her learned counsel are present. Defendant has already been debarred from filing of W.S. Learned counsel for plaintiff has filed exparte proof. Ex.Party evidence of plaintiff Mst: Marvi is recorded at Ex.17. He produced Affidavit in Ex-partee at Ex.17/A. Learned counsel for plaintiff has submitted side close statement at Ex.18. Order passed thereon. Heard. The suit of the plaintiff is hereby Ex-Party decreed as prayed with no order as to costs. Let the decree be prepared and the same be send to the concerned union council for information and compliance. |
||
| 8 | F.S. (Family Suits) 67/2025 | Mst. Shahida Kori VS Rasool Bux Kori | Arif Ali Shah(ADVO-185-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Family suit is called. Plaintiff and her learned counsel are present. Defendant has already been debarred from filing of W.S. Learned counsel for plaintiff has filed exparte proof. Exparte evidence of plaintiff Mst: Shahida is recorded at Ex.07. He produced Affidavit in Ex-partee at Ex.07/A. Learned counsel for plaintiff has submitted side close statement at Ex.08. Order passed thereon. Heard. The suit of the plaintiff is hereby ex-parte decreed and her marriage with the defendant is hereby dissolved as prayed with no order as to costs. Let the decree be prepared and the same be send to the concerned union council as required under section 21(2) of Family courts Act 1964 for information and compliance. |
||