| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 69/2025 | The State VS Majid and another | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Sanjay Kumar (ADVO-5427-SBC-HYD) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 72/2025 Hala |
R & Ps of this case is received along with letter from Honourable District and Sessions Judge, Matiari Vide letter No.DSJ/MTR/EO/4131/2026 Dated: 5.11.2026 for transferred of case from Civil Judge and JM-III, Matiari to this court. Case called. Accused Majid is called absent, while accused Changez is declared as proclaimed offender. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused Majid is called absent. Today case is fixed for evidence. Case property is not produce by the applicant Waseem. Process viz NBW upon complainant and PWs is not returned served or un-served. Notice to surety is also not returned served or un-served. Put off to-----23.11.2026 For evidence. Issue B.W against accused Majid through SSP Matiari and issue fresh summon to applicant Waseem to produce case property. Issue fresh NBW against complainant and P.W. Call case property from P.S. |
| 2 | PPC 89/2026 | The State VS Waqar Ali | Asif Ali (ADVO-288-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 3,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 239/2025 Hala |
R & Ps of this case is received along with letter from Honourable District and Sessions Judge, Matiari Vide letter No.DSJ/MTR/EO/4131/2026 Dated: 5.11.2026 for transferred of case from Civil Judge and JM-III, Matiari to this court. Case called. Accused Waqar Ali is called absent. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is called absent. Today case is fixed for evidence. Process viz NBW upon PWs is not returned served or un-served. Complainant and PWs called absent. Put off to-------24-11-2026 for evidence. Issue NBW against accused and issue fresh NBW upon complainant and PWs through SSP Matiari and call case property. |
|
| 3 | PPC 120/2026 | The State VS Arbab and ors | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-34,PPC-504 | 15/2025 Hala |
R & Ps of this case is received along with letter from Honourable District and Sessions Judge, Matiari Vide letter No.DSJ/MTR/EO/4131/2026 Dated: 5.11.2026 for transferred of case from Civil Judge and JM-III, Matiari to this court. Case called. Accused Arbab, Nawaz Ali, Abdul Sattar, Roshan, Rahib & Sahib Ali are called absent. Learned ADPP for the state is called absent. Learned counsel for accused persons called absent. P.Ws are called absent. Process is not returned served or un-served. Put off to-------24-11-2026, for evidence. Issue BW against accused and issue fresh BW against complainant and witnesses through SSP Matiari. |
|
| 4 | PPC 91/2026 | The State VS Irshad | Muneer Ahmed Gahothi(ADVO-132-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 38/2026 Hala |
R & Ps of this case is received along with letter from Honourable District and Sessions Judge, Matiari Vide letter No.DSJ/MTR/EO/4131/2026 Dated: 5.11.2026 for transferred of case from Civil Judge and JM-III, Matiari to this court. Case called. Accused Irshad is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused is called absent. Today case is fixed for evidence. Process viz NBW upon complainant and PWs is not returned served or un-served. Complainant and PWs called absent. Put off to--24-11-2026 for Evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Issue fresh NBW upon complainant and PWs through SSP Matiari and call case property |
|
| 5 | PPC 95/2026 | The State VS Ali Gul | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Muneer Ahmed Gahothi(ADVO-132-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 26/2026 Hala |
R & Ps of this case is received along with letter from Honourable District and Sessions Judge, Matiari Vide letter No.DSJ/MTR/EO/4131/2026 Dated: 5.11.2026 for transferred of case from Civil Judge and JM-III, Matiari to this court. Case called. Accused Ali Gul is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused called absent. Today case is fixed for evidence. Process viz NBW upon PWs is not return served or un-served. No PW is present. Put off to-----24-11-2026 For evidence. Issue fresh NBW upon complainant and PWs through SSP Matiari. Call case property. |
| 6 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 27/2026 | The State VS Shan Machi & Murad Machi | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 63/2026 Hala |
R & Ps of this case is received along with letter from Honourable District and Sessions Judge, Matiari Vide letter No.DSJ/MTR/EO/4131/2026 Dated: 5.11.2026 for transferred of case from Civil Judge and JM-III, Matiari to this court. Case called. Accused Shan Ali is produced by J/A Central Prison Hyderabad through video link while accused Murad is already declared as proclaimed offender. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Today case is fixed for evidence. Process viz BW upon complainant and PWs is not returned served or un-served. No P.W is present. Put off to-------23-11-2026. For Evidence. Accused remanded back in to J/A central prison Hyderabad are directed to produce the accused on next date of hearing through video link. Issue fresh NBW against complainant and P.Ws through SSP Matiari and call case property |
| 7 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 26/2026 | The State VS Jan Muhammad @ Janu & Anwar Ali | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Ashfaque Ali Dahri(ADVO-158-SBC-MTY) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 9/2026 Hala Old |
R & Ps of this case is received along with letter from Honourable District and Sessions Judge, Matiari Vide letter No.DSJ/MTR/EO/4131/2026 Dated: 5.11.2026 for transferred of case from Civil Judge and JM-III, Matiari to this court. Case called. Accused Jan Muhammad is called absent. while accused Anwar is produced by J/A central prison Hyderabad on video link. Learned ADPP for the state is present. Learned counsel for accused called absent. Today case is fixed for evidence. No PW is present. Process not returned served or unserved. Put off to-----23-11-2026 for Evidence. Issue B.W against accused Jan Muhammad. While J/A central prison Hyderabad are directed to produce the accused on next date of hearing through video link. Issue fresh NBW upon complainant and PWs so also call case property through SSP Matiari. |
| 8 | PPC 174/2026 | The State VS Mehboob Ali & Another | Ashfaque Ali Dahri(ADVO-158-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 22/2026 Bhutto Forest |
case is transferred. |
|
| 9 | Gambling Act 5/2026 | The State VS Abu Bakar & Others | Roshan Ali Shah (ADVO-2418-SBC-HYD) | Gambling Act -Section 5-A | 121/2026 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case is transferred. |
|
| 10 | PPC 209/2026 | The State VS Imam Ali @ Imamuddin | Ghulam Mehdi(ADVO-9039-SBC-KHE) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 106/2026 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case is transferred. |
|
| 11 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 35/2026 | The State VS Sajjad @ Sajoo | Fahadul Wahab Shah(ADVO-2783-SBC-HYD) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 27/2026 Hala Old |
||
| 12 | PPC 211/2026 | The State VS Shakeel Ahmed | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-420,PPC-489-F | 108/2026 Hala |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 13 | PPC 184/2026 | The State VS Ali Madad Shah & Others | Imdad Ali(ADVO-2354-SBC-HYD) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-337-F(vi),PPC-504 | 88/2026 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case is transferred. |
|
| 14 | PPC 231/2026 | The State VS Mansoor Ahmed | Imdad Ali(ADVO-2354-SBC-HYD) | Adeeb Hyder (ADVO-50308-SBC-HYD) | PPC-489-F | 172/2026 Hala |
Case called. Accused Mansoor Ahmed is produced through video link by the Jail Authorities, Central Prison, Hyderabad. Learned ADPP for the State is present. Mr. Mir Wali, Advocate, learned counsel for the accused, is present. The complainant along with his learned counsel is also present. Both parties, along with their respective learned counsel, have filed an application under Sections 345(2) and 345(6), Cr.P.C., seeking permission to compound the offence and requesting acquittal of the accused on the basis of compromise. Notice of the compromise application was issued to the learned ADPP for the State. Arguments on the compromise application have been heard. Vide separate order passed on a separate sheet, announced in open Court, the compromise application under Section 345(2), Cr.P.C., and the application under Section 345(6), Cr.P.C., are hereby allowed. Consequently, accused Mansoor Ahmed is acquitted under Section 345(6), Cr.P.C., on the basis of compromise. The accused is presently in judicial custody and is remanded back to Central Prison, Hyderabad, with a direction to the Jail Authorities to release him in the present case forthwith, if he is not required to be detained in any other case. Let acquittal intimation be sent to the concerned Jail Authorities for information and necessary compliance. |
| 15 | PPC 232/2026 | The State VS Zeeshan | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 171/2026 Hala |
Case called. Accused Zeeshan is produced from Central Prison, Hyderabad, through video link. Learned ADPP is present. Charge has been framed against the accused at Ex.2. The plea of the accused has been recorded at Ex.2/A, wherein he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. To come up on 23.11.2026 for prosecution evidence. The accused is remanded back to judicial custody with direction to the concerned Jail Authorities to produce him before this Court on the next date of hearing through video link. Issue summons to the prosecution witnesses and call the case property for the next date of hearing. |
|
| 16 | PPC 233/2026 | The State VS Shahryar Ahmed Qureshi | Muhammad Yousif() | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 3,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 205/2026 Hala |
Case called. Accused Shahyar Ahmed is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Charge has been framed against the accused at Ex.2. The plea of the accused has been recorded at Ex.2/A, wherein he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. To come up on 23.11.2026 for prosecution evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. Issue summons to the prosecution witnesses and call the case property for the next date of hearing. |
|
| 17 | PPC 234/2026 | The State VS Suhail Ahmed | Muneer Ahmed Gahothi(ADVO-132-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 177/2026 Hala |
Case called. Accused Suhail Ahmed is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Charge has been framed against the accused at Ex.2. The plea of the accused has been recorded at Ex.2/A, wherein he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. To come up on 21.11.2026 for prosecution evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. Issue summons to the prosecution witnesses and call the case property for the next date of hearing. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 7/2026 |
Muhammad Ibrahim VS Rafique @ Bali Arbab | Riaz Ali (ADVO-129-SBC-MTY) | Case called. The plaintiff, along with his learned counsel, Mr. Riaz Ali Bhatti, is present. The defendant is absent; however, the junior of learned counsel for the defendant is present. The matter is fixed today for compliance. Compliance under Section 10(2) has not been made. Accordingly, an order has been passed on a separate sheet at Exh. 18. Adjourned to 21.11.2026 for settlement of issues. Both learned counsel for the parties are directed to submit their respective draft issues on the next date of hearing. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 2 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 3/2025 |
Inayatullah VS Ali Raza | Imdad Ali(ADVO-2354-SBC-HYD) | Matter is called. Plaintiff is called absent, but his counsel Mr. Imdad Ali Memon advocate is present. Defendant and his learned counsel are present. Today matter is fixed for hearing on maintainability. Heard argument of advocate for plaintiff on point of maintainability. Put off....20.11.2026 for hearing/maintainability. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 3 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 10/2026 |
Muhammad Abid VS Khair Din | Abdul Aziz(ADVO-795-SBC-NWB) | Matter called. Plaintiff and his learned counsel are called absent. Defendant is present. Notice issued to the defendant is received back duly served. Defendant Khairuddin has filed an application seeking time to engage counsel. The application is considered and allowed. Time is granted to the defendant for engagement of counsel. To come up on 20.11.2026 for filing of written statement. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 1 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 8/2026 | Mst. Sitara Memon VS Aamir Memon | Taj Muhammad(ADVO-130-SBC-MTY) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Execution application called. The DH/Plaintiff along with his learned Advocate is present. The JD/Defendant along with his learned Advocate is also present. Both parties, along with their respective learned Advocates, have filed an agreement of settlement supported by their respective affidavits. Separate order has been passed thereon. The Plaintiff/DH has also filed his statement through learned Advocate, which has been recorded. Separate order has been passed thereon. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties and the statements made in this regard, the execution application is hereby fully allowed and disposed of in terms of the settlement agreement. There shall be no order as to costs. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 148/2026 | Mst. Aneela & Others VS Abbass Ali Dahri | Waheed Qadir (ADVO-143-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount | Matter called. The plaintiff and her learned counsel are present in court. The defendant and his learned counsel are also present.The plaintiff has filed an application for withdrawal of the suit along with a photocopy of the Iqrarnama (agreement/undertaking). The application has been considered. Separate order passed on a separate sheet. Consequently, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn, with no order as to costs. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 20/2026 | Zulfat VS Ashique Ali | Sheeraz Ali(ADVO-239-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | |||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 58/2026 | Mst. Mahwish VS Zameer Ali | Waheed Qadir (ADVO-143-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent, but Mr. Waheed Qadir Memon learned for plaintiff is present. Defendant Zameer Ali and his advocate are present. Today matter is fixed for evidence. Advocate for defendant has request for time. Request allowed. Put off to......20.11.2026. For Evidence of defendant side. |
||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 74/2026 | Mst. Allah Bachai & Others VS Muhammad Feroz Dahiri | Imdad Ali(ADVO-2354-SBC-HYD) | Ghulam Ruquia Tooba(ADVO-110-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance | Matter is called. Plaintiff and her learned counsel are present. Defendant and his Learned counsel for defendant are present. Today matter is fixed for evidence. Deposition of Muhammad Feroz is recorded at Ex.21. Put off to....20.11.2026 for evidence of defendant. |
|
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 86/2026 | Mst. Rifat Bano VS Ghulam Mustafa | Abdul Wahab(ADVO-2860-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount | |||