| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 101/2025 | The State VS Bahram and others | Muhammad Asif(ADVO-2734-SBC-HYD) | PPC-409,PPC-419,PPC-420 | 129/2025 Hala |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. ADPP and DC are present. PW SIP Abdul Kareem is present. Deposition of PS SIP Abdul Kareem recorded at EX---07, he produced entry No. 28 and 31 at EX----07/A, entry No. 100 at EX---07/B. Learned ADPP filed statement to close the side at EX----08, order passed on it. Filed. Put off to.18.05.2026 for Statement of accused. Present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 2 | PPC 4/2026 | The State VS Makhdoom Junaid & Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-114,PPC-120-B,PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-427,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 173/2024 Hala |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. ADPP and DC are present. Complainant, PW Nadeem and Illahi Bux are present. Mr. Shawal Khan Lashari advocate for complainant is present. No PWs are present. Matter adjourned due to set of witnesses un-complete. Process returned un-served same is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to.04.06.2026 for evidence. Complainant is directed to bring his witnesses on the date of hearing. |
|
| 3 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 5/2026 | The State VS Younis and ors | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 149/2025 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case called. All accused persons are present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. No PW is present. learned counsel for accused and complainant are present. Process returned served upon one and three but they called absent without intimation. Put off to.09.06.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. Issue BW against Pws. |
|
| 4 | PPC 50/2026 | The State VS Ahmed Ali and ors | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-147,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-L,PPC-506-B | 1/2026 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case called. All accused are present on bail ecept accused Faheem who called absent. ADPP and DC are present. Learned counsel for accused filed application for condonation of accused fahmee, order passed on it. Condonation is allowed. Complainaint is called absent. Brother of complainant Nazeer appeared and filed application for adjournment on behalf of complaiant and also stated that complainant is not felling, order passed on it. Adjournment is granted. Process returned un-served same is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to.10.06.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 5 | PPC 56/2026 | The State VS Arbab and ors | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-34,PPC-504 | 15/2025 Hala |
Case called. All accused are present on bail excused accused Abdul Sattar and Roshan they are called absent, their dondonation application submitted by co-accused. Order passed on it. Complainant has submitted adjournment application on the ground that next date of hearing he produced witnesses. Order passed on it. Put off to,.10.06.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 6 | PPC 59/2026 | The State VS Amjad | Muneer Ahmed Gahothi(ADVO-132-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 39/2026 Hala |
Case called. Accused Amjad is present on bail with counsel. ADPP is present. No PW is present. Process returned un-served same is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to.10.06.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 7 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 7/2026 | The State VS Dilbar @ Ghareebo | Hub Ali(ADVO-122-SBC-MTY) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 2/2026 Hala Old |
Case called. Accused Dilbar @ Ghareebo called absent. His relative namely Sahib is present and moved condonation application on behalf of accused Dilbar @ Ghareebo. Order passed on it. Learned ADPP is present. DC is present. No PW is present. Process returned un-served same is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to.03.06.2026 for evidence. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 8 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 6/2026 | The State VS Dilbar @ Ghareebo & Anwar | Ashfaque Ali Dahri(ADVO-158-SBC-MTY) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 1/2026 Hala Old |
Case called. Both accused Dilbar @ Ghareebo and Anwar are called absent without any intimation. One namely Sahib appeared and submitted condonation applications of accused Dilber @ Gareebo. Order passed there on. Learned Defense counsel is present. ADPP is present. Put off to.03.06.2026 for supply of copies. Issue BW against the accused Anwer and notice to his surety. |
|
| 9 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 9/2026 | The State VS Khorho | Peeral Majeedano(ADVO-13-SBC-MTY) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 34/2026 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP and DC are present. Photo copy of police papers are supplied to the accused vide receipt No.01. Put off to.08.06.2026 for charge. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 10 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 10/2026 | The State VS Lal Muhammad | Ashfaque Ali Dahri(ADVO-158-SBC-MTY) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 33/2026 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case called. Accused called absent. ADPP and DC are present. Learned counsel for the accused has submitted condonation application for absence excused of accused Lal Muhammad. Order passed on it. Put off to.18.05.2026 for charge. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications | |||||||
| 11 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 34/2026 | Taimoor Sajjad VS The State | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Cr.PC-516-A | / |
Cr. Misc. application called. Applicant with his learned counsel is present. Reports received from PS Butho Forest and ETO, same were kept on record. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court. The instant application is allowed. The applicant shall furnish P.R. bond in the sum of Rs. 2,00,00000/- (Two hundred lacs only) with furnishing original book of the vehicle. The applicant shall not sell, transfer, change the colour, or alter the description of the vehicle till final disposal of the case. The applicant shall ensure production of the vehicle before the Court whenever required. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 12 | PPC 119/2025 | The State VS Waseem & others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-342,PPC-392,PPC-458 | 47/2025 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case called. Accused waseem, Gulsher and Muhammad @ Dado are produced by the J/A C.P Hyderabad through video link. while remaining accused are declared as P.O. Learned ADPP is present. Junior advocate for the accused is present. Complainant and his counsel are present. Arguments heard from ADPP complainant side. Junior advocate for the accused has request for repatal arguments. Put off to.21.05.2026 for Judgment mean while for further arguments from accused side. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
| 13 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 9/2026 | Muhammad Suleman Dahri VS Ashique Dahri & Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Cr.PC-145 | / |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 3/2026 |
Shirimati Lahri VS Bhojo Bheel | Asif Ali (ADVO-288-SBC-MTY) | Matter called. Plaintiff called absent but her counsel is present. Defendant and his counsel are present and submitted written statement as well as application under order VII Rule 11 R/W Section 151 CPC. Order passed thereon. Copy to other side. Same received. Put off to.02.07.2026 for compliance 10(2) and objection on application under order VII Rule 11 CPC. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 2/2025 |
Zohaib Ahmed VS Syed Ahsan Ali Shah | Badal Gahoti(ADVO-2200-SBC-HYD) | Ajay Kumar(ADVO-4657-SBC-HYD) | Matter called. Plaintiff and his counsel are present. Defendant called absent but his counsel is present. Today matter was fixed for evidence. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has request for grant of time to proceed the matter. Request allowed. Put off to.02.07.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 69/2026 | Mst. Nirma VS Shahzado | Ahsan Ali (ADVO-250-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter called. Plaintiff called absent but her counsel is p resent. Process against the defendant was issued through concerned court returned un-served. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has submitted statement alongwith receipt of postal service. Order passed on it. Put off to.01.07.2026 for service. Repeat process against the defendant through publication on cost. |
||
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 21/2026 | Noor Hussain VS Ali Hussain & Other | Khuda Dino Saddar(ADVO-1598-SBC-HYD) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale | Guardian application called. Applicant and his counsel are present. Opponent Mst. Amna is present. All reports received from concerned authorities same kept on record. Opponent Mst. Amna has submitted No Objection. Order passed on it. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open court. The Guardian application is hereby allowed. Order accordingly. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 25/2026 | Mst. Fateh Khatoon VS Ali Banoo | Asif Ali (ADVO-288-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff called absent but her counsel is present. Non is present from defendant side. Publication for published received by counsel for the plaintiff but not returned. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has submitted condonation application. Order passed on it. Put off to.02.07.2026 for return publication. |
||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 35/2026 | Sonia Machi VS Shahmeer Machi | Ghulam Ruquia Tooba(ADVO-110-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff called absent but her counsel is present. Process against the defendant through concerned court was issued returned un-served. Put off to.06.07.2026 for service. Repeat process against the defendant through publication on cost. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 50/2026 | Mst Haseena VS WAzir Chawli | Ghulam Ruquia Tooba(ADVO-110-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter called. Plaintiff and her counsel is present. None is present from defendant side. Put off to.25.05.2026 for appearance/written statement. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Issues | |||||||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 62/2025 | Zahid Hussain Leghari VS Mst. Maria Arbab | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights | Matter called. Both parties are called absent but their counsels are present. Issues framed by the court. Put off to.26.05.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 44/2025 | Zainab VS Wakeel | Shah Zaman Shah(ADVO-51178-SBC-MTY) | Anwar Khan() | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff and her counsel are present. Defendant called absent.Today matter was fixed for evidence. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has submitted adjournment application. Order passed on it. Put off to.02.07.2026 for evidence. |
|