| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 175/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Imran | Ashfaque Ali Dahri(ADVO-158-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 43/2026 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case Called. Accused Muhammad Imran Rajput is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the State and learned DC are present. Today, the case is fixed for evidence. The summons has been returned served ASI Anwar Ali Kalhoro is present. Deposition of ASI Anwar Ali Kalhoro is recorded at Ex.5, he produced departure and arrival entries of place of incident bearing No.46 and 07 at Ex.5/A and Ex.5/B and entries No.43 and 33 regarding sending of the property at Ex.5/C and police letter with receipt of chemical examination at Ex,5/D. Then learned ADPP for the Stat has filed statement for close side at Ex.6. Statement of accused is recorded at Ex.7. Heard final arguments. Judgment passed, announced in open court, same placed at Ex.08. Accused is acquitted U/S: 245 (i) Cr.P.C, He is present on bail, his bail bond is cancelled and surety is discharged. |
|
| 2 | PPC 188/2026 | The State VS Gull Bahar Shaikh | Ashfaque Ali Dahri(ADVO-158-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 17/2026 Bhutto Forest |
Case is called. Accused Gul Bahar is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. D.C called absent. Today case was fixed for evidence. Process is returned un-served. No P.W is present. Put off to 4.11.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. Process extended. |
|
| 3 | DC (Direct Complaint) 4/2026 | Abdul Latif VS Shakeel Ahmed & Others | Furqan Hussain Memon(ADVO-50758-SBC-HYD) | / |
Direct Complaint called. Complainant is called absent, but his advocate is present. Today matter fixed for inquiry report. Process server has submitted inquiry report. Order passed thereon. (file) Advocate for complainant has filed an adjournment application. Order passed thereon. Adjournment application allowed in the interest of justice as last and final chance. Put off to 30.11.2026 for statements of witnesses & inquiry. Complainant is directed to being his witnesses on next date of hearing. |
||
| 4 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 29/2026 | The State VS Khalid Machi | Himayoon(ADVO-264-SBC-MTY) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 15/2026 Hala Old |
Case called. Accused is called absent without any intimation. ADPP for the state is present. Junior advocate for accused is present. No P.W is present. Process is returned served upon PC Farman, he is present and process upon remaining P.W is returned un-served. Put off to 10.11.2026 for evidence. Process extended and hand over to process server. Issue B.W against accused and notice to his surety. |
|
| 5 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 32/2026 | The State VS Syed Haji Shah | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 151/2026 Hala |
|
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 203/2026 | The State VS Ali Shan & Others | Inayat Hussain Shawal Khan (ADVO-131-SBC-MTY) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-H,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 124/2026 Hala |
Case called. Accused Abdul Salam, Adil are present on bail, while accused Ali Shan is called present. Co-accused has filed an application for condonation of accused. Order passed thereon. Excused. Learned ADPP is present. D.C is present. Application U/S: 540-A Cr.P.C is pending. Notice upon complainant is returned served, but he called absent. Advocate for accused has written note for not press on the application U/S: 540-A Cr.PC. Order passed thereon. Application is dismissed as not pressed. Put off to 16.11.2026 for charge. Accused are directed to present on the next date of hearing. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 7 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 31/2026 | The State VS Gull Bahar & Another | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 116/2026 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case called. Accused Gul Bahar and Nadeem are produced in custody by jail authority C.P Hyderabad through video link. ADPP is present. Heard final arguments. Judgment passed, announced in open court and same place at Ex.09. Both accused are hereby acquitted U/S: 245 (1) Cr.P.C, they are present in custody and they remanded back into J/C with direction that both accused are acquitted from this case. Issue acquittal order be sent to concern Jail authority. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 8 | PPC 208/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Sajjad & Others | Ghulam Shabeer (ADVO-252-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 3,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 102/2026 Hala |
|
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 8/2026 |
Ashique Dahri VS Abid Khan Rajput | Shuaib Muhammad(ADVO-94-SBC-MTY) | ||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 2 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 5/2026 |
Lal Bux Laghari VS Irshad Ali & Another | Shah Nawaz (ADVO-90-SBC-MTY) | Matter called. Plaintiff and his advocate are present. Defendant No. 01 with his counsel are present. Defendant No. 02 is called absent but her advocate is present. Today matter is fixed for filling of objection on application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC. Advocate for plaintiff has submitted counter affidavit on the application U/S: VII Rule 11 CPC. Order passed thereon. Copy to other side, same has received by advocate for defendant No.2. Put off to 04.11.2026. For compliance 10 (2) CPC and hearing of application U/O: 7 Rule 11 CPC. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 147/2026 | Mst. Naheeda @ Haleema VS Ali Muhammad Chandio | Muneer Ahmed Gahothi(ADVO-132-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter is called. Plaintiff and his advocate are present. Defendant is called absent. Order passed on separate sheet. The defendant is hereby debarred from filing the written statement. defendant is proceeded as exparte. Depoistion of Mst. Naheed is recorded at Ex.07. She produced affidavit of Ex-partee proof at Ex.07/A. Advocate for plaintiff has filed statement for closed side at Ex.08. Heard arguments. Ex-parte Judgment passed, announced in open same place at Ex.09. The suit of plaintiff is decree as followed by exparte judgment. Let the decree be prepared accordingly. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 141/2026 | Mst. Soni & Others VS Moula Bux | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Matter called. Both parties and their respective counsels are present. Today the matter is fixed for proceeding pre-trial/hearing on application u/s 17-A. Proceedings pre-trial is held and both parties are ready to compromise with each. Thereafter, both parties submitted compromise application along with their affidavits. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open Court, the suit of the plaintiff is stands decreed in terms of compromised application. Let the compromise decree be prepared. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 86/2026 | Mst. Rifat Bano VS Ghulam Mustafa | Abdul Wahab(ADVO-2860-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount | Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent, but her learned counsel is present. Defendant is present. Today matter is fixed for evidence of defendant. Advocate for plaintiff has filed an adjournment application. Order passed thereon. Adjournment application is allowed in the interest of justice. Put off to 12.11.2026. For evidence of defendant side. |
||