| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 170/2026 | Ghulam Rasool VS The State | Himayoon(ADVO-264-SBC-MTY) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-380,PPC-457 | 229/2026 Hala |
Bail application called. Learned counsel for the applicant/accused is present. Learned ADPP for the State is also present. Complainant called absent without any intimation. Arguments already heard from counsel for applicant/accused and Learned ADPP for the state side. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open Court, the bail application is hereby granted in the sum of Rs. 30,000/-. with PR bond to the satisfaction of this Court. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 163/2026 | The State VS Qurban Ali & Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 112/2026 Hala |
Case is called. Accused Persons namely Qurban ALi, Zahid, Qadeer, Zameer & Azhar are present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state and Advocate for complainant and P.W are present. D.C is present. Complainant is present and his deposition of complainant Majid Ali is recorded at Ex.3. He produced FIR at Ex.3/A. Deposition of witness Jawad is recorded at Ex.4. He produced mashirnama of place at Ex.4/A. Put off to 17.11.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend. Issue summon to remaining witnesses. |
|
| 3 | PPC 209/2026 | The State VS Imam Ali @ Imamuddin | Ghulam Mehdi(ADVO-9039-SBC-KHE) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 106/2026 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. Process upon witnesses is returned. No P.W is present. Put off to 12.11.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. Process viz summon extended and hand over to process server. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 211/2026 | The State VS Shakeel Ahmed | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-420,PPC-489-F | 108/2026 Hala |
. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 5 | PPC 184/2026 | The State VS Ali Madad Shah & Others | Imdad Ali(ADVO-2354-SBC-HYD) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-337-F(vi),PPC-504 | 88/2026 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case called. Accused Sajid Ali is present on bail, whereas accused Ali Madad Shah is produced through video link by CP Hyderabad. Accused Mithal, Sanwan and Liaque are absconding since the date of submission of challan. Learned ADPP is present. Process under Sections 87/88 Cr.P.C. is received back duly served. Statement of the process server is recorded at Ex.2, who has produced the following documents: Notice at Ex.2/A. Report of SHO, Police Station Saeedabad, at Ex.2/B. Publication at Ex.2/C. Mashirnama at Ex.2/D. Report of Mukhtiarkar, Taluka Saeedabad, along with its annexures, at Ex.2/E to Ex.2/H. The statement of the process server has been considered, and an order is passed accordingly. In view of the material available on record and compliance with the requisite legal formalities, accused Mithal, Sanwan and Liaque are hereby declared proclaimed offenders. Copies of the case papers have been supplied to accused Ali Madad Shah and Sajid Ali at Ex.3. All necessary formalities have been completed. The offence under Section 324 PPC is exclusively triable by the Honourable Court of Sessions. Accordingly, let the R&P be submitted before the Honourable District and Sessions Judge, Matiari, for further proceedings in accordance with law. To come up on 12.11.2026 for framing of charge. Present accused person is directed to ensure their attendance before the Honourable Court on the next date of hearing. Accused Ali Madad Shah is remanded back to judicial custody, with a direction to the concerned jail authorities to produce him before the Honourable Court of Sessions, Matiari, through video link on the next date of hearing. |
|
| 6 | PPC 185/2026 | The State VS Jahangir Mari & Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-341,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 70/2026 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case called. Accused Aslam and Mumtaz are present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Bailable warrant (BW) against accused Jehangeer has not been returned. Proclamations issued against accused Nazeer, Jamal and Kamal have been returned unexecuted. Statement of the Process Server is recorded at Ex.2. He has produced the following documents: Notice at Ex.2/A. Report of SHO, Police Station Saeedabad, at Ex.2/B. Publication at Ex.2/C. Mashirnama at Ex.2/D. Report of Mukhtiarkar, Taluka Hala, at Ex.2/E. In view of the statement of the Process Server and the documents produced by him, an order is passed accordingly, and accused Nazeer, Jamal and Kamal are declared proclaimed offenders in accordance with law. Surety papers of accused Jehangeer have not yet been received from the concerned Court. Office is directed to call for the surety papers of accused Jehangeer from the Honourable Additional Sessions Judge, Hala, for taking appropriate action in accordance with law. To come up on 20.11.2026 for service and further proceedings. Present accused Aslam and Mumtaz are directed to ensure their attendance before the Court on the next date of hearing. |
|
| 7 | PPC 199/2026 | The State VS Jawad Ali & Others | Abdul Haleem(ADVO-1961-SBC-HYD) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-452,PPC-506,PPC-509 | 100/2026 Hala |
Case called. Accused Jawad and Majid are present on bail, whereas accused Raja is called absent, who has been absconding since the filing of the challan. Bailable warrants (B.Ws.) issued against both accused are received back duly served. Both accused have filed a joint application for condonation of their previous absence. Order passed thereon. Their absence is condoned with a warning to remain careful in future. Statement of the Process Server is recorded at Ex.1. He has produced the original copy of the non-bailable warrants (NBW) issued by this Court, along with the relevant endorsement, as well as the statements of witnesses and copies of their CNICs, which are placed on record as Ex.1/B to Ex.1/E. Order on the statement of the Process Server has been passed. Let proclamation proceedings under Sections 87/88 Cr.P.C. be initiated against absconding accused Raja. To come up on 23.11.2026 for service. Accused Jawad and Majid are directed to remain in attendance. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 7/2026 |
Muhammad Ibrahim VS Rafique @ Bali Arbab | Riaz Ali (ADVO-129-SBC-MTY) | Case called. Plaintiff along with his learned counsel Mr. Riaz Ali Bhatti are present. Defendant is absent, junior of the advocate for defendant is present. Today, the matter is fixed for order on the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, Order passed on separate sheet. The application U/O VII Rule 11 CPC has no merit and is dismissed. Put off to 12.11.2026 for compliance 10 (2) CPC. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 144/2026 | Mst. Rubeena VS Raheem Khan | Ghulam Ruquia Tooba(ADVO-110-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent, whereas learned counsel for the plaintiff is present. Defendant is called absent. Process issued through the Honourable District and Sessions Judge, Shaheed Benazirabad, has been received back unserved, as per the endorsement of the bailiff. In view of the above, the matter is adjourned to 19.11.2026 for service upon the defendant. Office is directed to issue notice to the defendant through publication in a newspaper, subject to payment of costs by the plaintiff. To come up on 19.11.2026 for service. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 58/2026 | Mst. Mahwish VS Zameer Ali | Waheed Qadir (ADVO-143-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent, but Mr. Waheed Qadir Memon learned for plaintiff is present. Defendant Zameer Ali and his Junior advocate are present. Today matter is fixed for evidence of plaintiff side. Advocate for defendant has filed an adjournment application. Oder passed thereon. Adjournment application is allowed in the interest of justice. Put off to......12.11.2026. For Evidence of defendant side. |
||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 74/2026 | Mst. Allah Bachai & Others VS Muhammad Feroz Dahiri | Imdad Ali(ADVO-2354-SBC-HYD) | Ghulam Ruquia Tooba(ADVO-110-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance | Matter is called. Plaintiff is called absent, but her learned counsel are present. Defendant and his Learned counsel for defendant are present. Today matter is fixed for evidence. Advocate for plaintiff has filed an adjournment application. Order passed thereon. Adjournment application is allowed in the interest of justice. Put off to....12.11.2026 for Evidence of plaintiff. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 4 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 9/2026 | Naila & Another VS Atif Malik | Asif Ali (ADVO-288-SBC-MTY) | Family Execution-Execution Application | |||