| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 71/2026 | Lal Muhammad & Others VS Commissioner Hyd Division & others | Rafique Ahmed (ADVO-206-SBC-MTY) | Cr.PC-133 | / |
Cr. Misc. Application called. Applicants No. 1 and 3, along with their learned counsel, are present. Respondents Gulab and Pretam Bagri, along with their learned counsel, are present. Learned counsel for Respondents No. 08 and 09 is also present. All reports have been received. Learned counsel for the applicants has filed an application seeking adjournment. Order has been passed thereon. Adjournment application is allowed in the interest of justice. Put up on 28.11.2026 for hearing on the application. The respondents present today are directed to remain in attendance on the next date of hearing. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 83/2025 | The State VS Ashique Ali & others | Riaz Hussain (ADVO-2612-SBC-HYD) | Allah Dino Dero(ADVO-801-SBC-SGR) | PPC-34,PPC-382,PPC-427,PPC-506 | 116/2024 Bhit Shah |
|
| 3 | PPC 110/2026 | The State VS Amanullah and others | Intizar Ali (ADVO-133-SBC-MTY),Shah Zaman Shah(ADVO-51178-SBC-MTY) | PPC-392 | 200/2025 Hala |
R & Ps of this case is received along with letter from Honourable District and Sessions Judge, Matiari Vide letter No.DSJ/MTR/EO/4131/2026 Dated: 5.11.2026 for transferred of case from Civil Judge and JM-III, Matiari to this court. Case called. Accused Amanullah and Shan are produced by jail authorities Central Prison, Hyderabad through video link while accused Arbab Ali is declared as Proclaimed offender. Learned ADPP is present. Today case is fixed for evidence. Process not returned served or unserved. Complainant is called. Advocate for complainant has filed an adjournment application. Order passed thereon. Adjournment application is allowed in the interest of justice as last and final chance. Put off to 28.11.2026 for evidence. J/A central prison Hyderabad are directed to produce the accused on next date of hearing through video link without fail. |
|
| 4 | PPC 146/2025 | The State VS Zahoor and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-H,PPC-452,PPC-506-B | 206/2024 Hala |
||
| 5 | PPC 76/2026 | The State VS Khan Muhammad @ Khanoo | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Muneer Ahmed Gahothi(ADVO-132-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 28/2026 Hala |
|
| 6 | PPC 105/2026 | The State VS Asadullah | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Asif Ali (ADVO-288-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 41/2026 Hala |
|
| 7 | PPC 39/2026 | The State VS Wali Muhammad | Muhammad Arif Memon() | Asif Ali (ADVO-288-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 55/2026 Hala |
|
| 8 | PPC 98/2026 | The State VS Dildar Ali | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Ashfaque Ali Dahri(ADVO-158-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 54/2026 Hala |
|
| 9 | PPC 71/2026 | The State VS Shahzad S/o Rasool Bux Keerio | Muhammad Arif Memon() | Afaque Ali Wandyar(ADVO-302-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 3,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 64/2026 Hala |
|
| 10 | PPC 100/2026 | The State VS Faheem Shah & another | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Waheed Qadir (ADVO-143-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 72/2026 Hala |
|
| 11 | PPC 93/2026 | The State VS Shahid Wahinyani & another | Abdul Rauf Memon(ADVO-241-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 62/2026 Hala |
||
| 12 | PPC 55/2026 | The State VS Atta Muhammad Kori | Abdul Rauf Memon(ADVO-241-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 3,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 77/2026 Hala |
||
| 13 | PPC 53/2026 | The State VS Saleem S/o Mubarak Brohi | Muhammad Arif Memon() | Riaz Ali (ADVO-129-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 88/2026 Hala |
|
| 14 | PPC 92/2026 | The State VS Asif S/o Muhammad Ismail Shaikh | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Shah Nawaz (ADVO-90-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 3,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 96/2026 Hala |
|
| 15 | PPC 189/2026 | The State VS Lakhdino & Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(vi),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-427,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 99/2026 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
. |
|
| 16 | PPC 193/2026 | The State VS Sher Chandio & Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-353,PPC-447,PPC-448,PPC-506-B | 125/2026 Hala |
Case called. All accused are present on bail. ADPP for the state is present. Mr. Zeeshan Bashir Chandio advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of all accused. Order passed thereon (file). Process upon complainant and witnesses is returned served. Complainant Qamaruddin has filed an adjournment application. Order passed thereon. P.W Waryam and Rajib Ali are present. Put off to 28.11.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. Process extended. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 17 | PPC 235/2026 | The State VS Laloo B/c Kori | Ashraf Ali (ADVO-221-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 69/2026 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Matter called. Plaintiff and his advocate are present. Defendant No. 01 with his counsel are present. Defendant No. 02 is called absent, but her Junior Advocate is present. Today matter is fixed for compliance 10 (2) CPC and hearing of application U/S: 7 Rule 11 CPC. Heard arguments of advocate for plaintiff and advocate for defendant No. 2 on the application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC. Put off to 23.11.2026. For compliance 10 (2) CPC and Order of application U/O: 7 Rule 11 CPC. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 18 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 30/2026 | The State VS Anwar & Another | Himayoon(ADVO-264-SBC-MTY) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 24/2026 Hala Old |
Case called. Accused Anwar is produced in custody by the Jail Authority, Central Prison, Hyderabad, through video link, whereas accused Abid is present on bail. Learned ADPP is also present. Mr. Himayoon Arbab advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of accused Abid. Order passed thereon. Charge framed against both accused at Ex.2, pleas of both accused are recorded at Ex.2/A and Ex.2/B, in which both accused pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Put off to 26.11.2026 for evidence. Accused Anwar is remanded back to judicial custody with the direction to the Jail Authority, Central Prison, Hyderabad, to produce him before this Court on the next date of hearing through video link. Accused Abid is directed to ensure his presence before this Court on the next date of hearing. Issue summon to complainant and witnesses as well as call case property. |
|
| 19 | PPC 236/2026 | The State VS Nazeer Ahmed | Shuaib Muhammad(ADVO-94-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 3,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 181/2026 Hala |
Case called. Accused Nazeer Ahmed is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Charge framed against accused at Ex.2, Plea of accused is recorded at Ex.2/A, in which accused pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. Put off to 01.12.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. Issue summons to complainant and witnesses and call case property. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Final Arguments | |||||||
| 20 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 31/2026 | Saira Bano VS Nadeem Dahri | Shuib Aziz() | Riaz Ali (ADVO-129-SBC-MTY) | Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961-Section 6(5)(b) | / |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 6/2026 |
Muhammad Shahzad VS Abdul Wahab | Fateh Muhammad(ADVO-6713-SBC-HYD) | The matter is called. The plaintiff along with his learned counsel is present, whereas the defendant and his learned advocate are called absent. Today, the matter is fixed for evidence. Since the learned advocate for the defendant has failed to appear, the cross-examination could not be conducted. However, in the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned to 28.11.2026 for recording the evidence of the plaintiff's side. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 2 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 5/2026 |
Lal Bux Laghari VS Irshad Ali & Another | Shah Nawaz (ADVO-90-SBC-MTY) | Matter called. Plaintiff and his advocate are present. Defendant No. 01 with his counsel are present. Defendant No. 02 is called absent, but her Junior Advocate is present. Today matter is fixed for compliance 10 (2) CPC and hearing of application U/S: 7 Rule 11 CPC. Heard arguments of advocate for plaintiff and advocate for defendant No. 2 on the application U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC. Put off to 23.11.2026. For compliance 10 (2) CPC and Order of application U/O: 7 Rule 11 CPC. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 158/2026 | Mst. Hakimzadi VS Muqadar Ali | Shuhabul Din Shah(ADVO-2766-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | |||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 165/2026 | Fatima Yusra VS Abdullah Lakho | Imdad Ali(ADVO-2354-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | |||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 160/2026 | Mst. Nusrat & Others VS Zulfiqar Jarh | Muneer Ahmed Gahothi(ADVO-132-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | 1. Matter called. Plaintiff is absent; however, learned Junior Advocate for the plaintiff is present. Defendant is also absent. Notice issued to the defendant has been returned duly served. Separate order passed on a separate sheet. Service upon the defendant is held to be good vide Exh. 4. Matter is adjourned to 28.11.2026 for appearance of the defendant and filing of written statement. |
||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 155/2026 | Mst. Farzana @ Tabasum & Another VS Tahir Chandio | Imdad Ali(ADVO-2354-SBC-HYD),Muhammad Rahim(ADVO-174-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent, but learned Junior Advocate is present. Defendant is called absent. Notice issued to the defendant has been returned duly served upon his father. For the reasons recorded on a separate sheet, service upon the defendant is hereby held to be sufficient at Exh. 4. Put off to 24.11.2026 for appearance of the defendant and filing of written statement. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 134/2026 | Mst. Arifa VS Muneer Haidar | Muhammad Afzal(ADVO-291-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Case called. Plaintiff is called absent, but her learned Junior Counsel is present. Defendant, along with his learned Advocate, is called absent. Learned Junior Counsel for the plaintiff has filed an application seeking adjournment. The adjournment application is allowed in the interest of justice, subject to this being the last and final chance, To come up on 18.11.2026 for pre-trial proceedings as well as hearing of the application U/S: XVII-A CPC. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 55/2026 | Baby Dua Zahra & other VS Madad Ali | Shakira Azam(ADVO-2824-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount | Called. Plaintiff along with her learned Junior Counsel is present. Defendant along with his learned Junior Advocate is also present. Today, the matter is fixed for recording of evidence. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has filed the affidavit-in-evidence of Mst. Salma at Ex.17. The same is taken on record. Copy thereof has been supplied to the other side, and the learned Junior Advocate for the defendant has acknowledged receipt of the same. Put off to 24.11.2026 for recording of evidence and cross-examination. |
||