CIVIL JUDGE & JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE II- HALA : 04-FEB-2026

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS FIR No. Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C)
1 Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 19/2026 DOST MUHAMMAD VS THE STATE   Shuib Aziz()     Cr.PC-497,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 3,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) 4/2026
Hala Old


06.02.2026
2 Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 18/2026 GHULAM MUSTAFA VS THE STATE   Inayat Hussain Shawal Khan (ADVO-131-SBC-MTY)     Cr.PC-497,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) 22/2026
Hala


06.02.2026
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence
3 PPC 143/2025 The State VS Imtiaz Ali and others     ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI)   PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-A(iv),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-H,PPC-403,PPC-429,PPC-452,PPC-509 257/2024
Hala


17.02.2026
4 Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 54/2025 The State VS Anwar shah     ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI)   Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO 221/2025
Hala


20.02.2026
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge
5 PPC 173/2025 The State VS Hadi Dino and others     Ashfaque Ali Dahri(ADVO-158-SBC-MTY)   PPC-392 130/2025
Hala


07.02.2026
6 PPC 188/2025 The State VS Baloch Khan @ Waseem Jamali and ors     ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI)   PPC-114,PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-H,PPC-452,PPC-504,PPC-506-B 141/2025
Saeedabad(Matiari)


07.02.2026
7 PPC 18/2026 The State VS Muhammad Ilyas @ Ilyas Ahmed & Others     ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR)   PPC-279 4/2026
Bhutto Forest

Case called. All four accused persons are present on bail. ADPP and DC are present. Charge framed against the accused persons at Exh-02 is recorded. They have pleaded guilty and claimed not for trial at Ex---02/A to 02/D. Respectively. Accused persons have jointly submitted an application at Ex---03 for pleaded guilty. Order passed on it. Issue show cause notice to the accused persons at Ex---04, reply of show cause notice have been submitted by the accused persons at Ex---05. Order passed on it. File. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open court at Ex---06. Accused persons are hereby convicted u/s. 243 Cr.P.C for the offences u/s.279 PPC, sentence him till rising the court and impose fine for Rs.3000/-each, In case of failure to pay the fine amount, they shall serve sentence for 03 days simple imprisonment. The accused persons are present on bail. Their bail bonds stands cancelled and sureties stands discharged.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases
8 PPC 179/2025 The State VS Rehman Dahri     ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR)   PPC-34,PPC-380,PPC-457 44/2025
Hala Old


18.02.2026

Case called. Accused Abdul Rehman is present on bail, while Juvenile accused Imdad @ Bhoro is produced by the jail authority Youthful offender/Industrial School Correctional Facility Hyderabad through video link. ADPP is present. Ossification report of Juvenile accused received from Jail authority. Detailed order passed on separate sheet. The ossification test was earlier conducted on 18.11.2025 by a Special Medical Board constituted at Civil Surgeon Service Hospital, Hyderabad, wherein the age of accused Imdad @ Bhoro was determined to be 17 years, as reflected in the age determination certificate. Since only about two and a half months have elapsed since such age determination, there is no need for a fresh ossification test. Accordingly, the previous ossification test dated 18.11.2025 is hereby accepted, and accused Imdad @ Bhoro is declared to be a juvenile offender within the meaning of the Juvenile Justice System Act, 2018. In view of the above, and as earlier directed vide order dated 11.12.2025. Let the fresh reference be sent to the Honourable Sessions Judge, Matiari, along with a copy of the ossification test report and this order, with a request to transfer the case of juvenile offender to the learned Juvenile Court having jurisdiction. Since the adult accused Rehman S/o Daood Dahri arises out of the same FIR, and to avoid conflicting judgments, reference regarding the adult accused shall also be included, as already ordered. Office is directed to prepare and dispatch the fresh reference forthwith. Put of to 18.02.206. For further proceedings. Present accused is directed to attend. Juvenile accused Imdad to be produced before this court on the next date of hearing through video link.

9 PPC 179/2025 The State VS Imdad @ Bhooro Machhi     ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR)   PPC-34,PPC-380,PPC-457 44/2025
Hala Old


18.02.2026

Case called. Accused Abdul Rehman is present on bail, while Juvenile accused Imdad @ Bhoro is produced by the jail authority Youthful offender/Industrial School Correctional Facility Hyderabad through video link. ADPP is present. Ossification report of Juvenile accused received from Jail authority. Detailed order passed on separate sheet. The ossification test was earlier conducted on 18.11.2025 by a Special Medical Board constituted at Civil Surgeon Service Hospital, Hyderabad, wherein the age of accused Imdad @ Bhoro was determined to be 17 years, as reflected in the age determination certificate. Since only about two and a half months have elapsed since such age determination, there is no need for a fresh ossification test. Accordingly, the previous ossification test dated 18.11.2025 is hereby accepted, and accused Imdad @ Bhoro is declared to be a juvenile offender within the meaning of the Juvenile Justice System Act, 2018. In view of the above, and as earlier directed vide order dated 11.12.2025. Let the fresh reference be sent to the Honourable Sessions Judge, Matiari, along with a copy of the ossification test report and this order, with a request to transfer the case of juvenile offender to the learned Juvenile Court having jurisdiction. Since the adult accused Rehman S/o Daood Dahri arises out of the same FIR, and to avoid conflicting judgments, reference regarding the adult accused shall also be included, as already ordered. Office is directed to prepare and dispatch the fresh reference forthwith. Put of to 18.02.206. For further proceedings. Present accused is directed to attend. Juvenile accused Imdad to be produced before this court on the next date of hearing through video link.

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce
10 PPC 109/2025 The State VS Saddar Gul   Riaz Hussain Sabki(ADPP-0006-GOV-MTR)     National Highway Safety Ordinance 2000-U/S 75 NHSO,PPC-279 29/2025
Bhutto Forest


21.02.2026

FAMILY JURISDICTION

S.NO. CASE NO NAME OF PARTIES ADVOCATES UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS Hearing Status
Party Side 1 Party Side 2
FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service
1 G.W. (G&W Cases) 14/2025 Kandero Sheedi VS The General Public at Large   Arif Ali Shah(ADVO-185-SBC-MTY)   The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act

10.02.2026
2 G.W. (G&W Cases) 1/2026 Abdul Aleem Buriro VS General Public large & Others   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR)   The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale

18.02.2026
3 G.W. (G&W Cases) 2/2026 Mst. Arbi VS Ghulam Hussain & others   Arif Ali Shah(ADVO-185-SBC-MTY)   The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale

09.02.2026
4 G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 15/2025 MST. ZUBAIDA KHASKHELI VS MST. SHAHZADI AND ORS   Arif Ali Shah(ADVO-185-SBC-MTY)   The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7

10.02.2026
FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service
5 F.S. (Family Suits) 3/2026 Humaira Naz Arain VS Malik Abdul Rafeh   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI)   Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula

18.02.2026
FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A.
6 F.S. (Family Suits) 1/2026 Ajmal Rafique VS Mst. Fazeela   ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR)   Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights

14.02.2026
FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial
7 F.S. (Family Suits) 33/2025 MST NAILA VS ATIF   Asif Ali (ADVO-288-SBC-MTY)   Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article

09.02.2026