| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Report | |||||||
| 1 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 29/2026 | The State VS Khalid Machi | Himayoon(ADVO-264-SBC-MTY) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 15/2026 Hala Old |
case called. Accused is oresent on bail. he filed an application for condonation of previous date. Order passed thereon. Execused. ADPP for the state and DC are present. copies of case papers is supplied to accused vide receipt at Ex.1. Put off to 14.10.2026 for charge. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 160/2026 | Shawal Khan Machi VS The State | Abdul Jabbar(ADVO-268-SBC-MTY) | Cr.PC-497,Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 18/2026 Hala Old |
Bail application is called. Advocate for applicant/accused is present. ADPP is present. Heard arguement. Order passed on separate sheet. The bail application of applicant / accused Shawal is granted in the sum of Rs:10,000 with P.R. bond in the like amount. bail application is disposed of accordingly. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 156/2026 | The State VS Shoukat Ali | Badal Gahoti(ADVO-2200-SBC-HYD) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 3,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 137/2026 Hala |
Case called. Accused Shoukat is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. DC is present. No P.W is present. Process returned unserved. Put off to....10.10.2026 for Evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. process extended. |
|
| 4 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 28/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Umar @ Man & Others | Ashfaque Ali Dahri(ADVO-158-SBC-MTY),Inayat Hussain Shawal Khan (ADVO-131-SBC-MTY) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 103/2026 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case is called. Accused Mukhtiar and Ghulam Muhammad are called absent, excpet accused Muhammad Umer who called absent. ADPP and DC are present. Advocate for accused has filed an appliction for condonation of accused Muhammad Umer. Order passed thereon. condone. No P.W is present. Process returned. Intimation of PC Muhammad Younis of P.S Saeedabad has received through Process server. Order passed thereon. Put off to----17.10.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend. Process extended and hand over to process server. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 5/2026 |
Lal Bux Laghari VS Irshad Ali & Another | Shah Nawaz (ADVO-90-SBC-MTY) | Matter called. Plaintiff and his advocate are present. Defendant No. 01 with his counsel are present. Defendant No. 02 and her advocate are present. Today matter is fixed for filling of written statement. Advocate for defendant No.1 has filed written statment on behalf of defendant No.1 at Ex.23 and Advocate for defendant No.2 has filed written statment on behalf of defendant No.2 at Ex.24 Also advocate for defendant has filed an appliction U/O 7 Rule 11 CPC. Order passed thereon. copy to the other side, same has received by Plaintiff. Put off to 20.10.2026. For compliance 10 (2) CPC and hearing of application U/O: 7 Rule 11 CPC. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Issues | |||||||
| 2 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 1/2026 |
NAWAZ ALI SARIO VS MST.KOUSAR SINDHU | Afaque Ali Wandyar(ADVO-302-SBC-MTY) | Matter called. Plaintiff and his learned counsel are present. Defendant is called absent, but her learned counsel is present. Issue settled by the court at Ex.10. both parties advocate are directed to filed list of list witness and list of documents with seven days. Put off to 14.10.2026 for 10 (2) CPC and arguments on application u/o VII R 11 CPC. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 9/2026 | Naila & Another VS Atif Malik | Asif Ali (ADVO-288-SBC-MTY) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Matter is called. Plaintiff is called absent her learned counsel is present. Defendant is called absent. Advocate for decree holder has filed statment alongwith original Newspapers daily Ibrat dated 4.10.2026 at Ex.4. Order passed thereon. Put off to.......21.10.2026 for appearance of Judgment debtor. |
||
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 34/2026 | Abbas Raza VS Mst. Amna & Another | Shah Nawaz (ADVO-90-SBC-MTY) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 12 | Matter called. Applicant and his advcoate are present. Opponent is called. Notice served upon fahter of opponent through whatups. The service upon oponent is alternative service, therefore issue publication in newspapers. Put off to 17.10.20026 for service. Issue publication on cost. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 130/2026 | Mst. Rukhsana VS Naeem | Muhammad Afzal(ADVO-291-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff called absent. Junior Advocate for plaintiff is present. Defendant is calledd. Today matter is fixed for written statement as well as objection on application u/s 17-A, but defendent failed to file written statment and objection, therefore, he is debarred from filling of written statment and objection. Put off to 13.10.2026 for exparte proof |
||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 131/2026 | Mst. Kousar Sindhu & Another VS Nawaz Ali | Muhammad Asif(ADVO-2734-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent, but her learned counsel is present. Defendant and his advocate are present. Learned counsel for the defendant submitted an application for grant of time at Ex.10. Order passed on it. Time is granetd on last and final chance. Put off to.......14.10.2026 for W.S & objection on application u/s 17-A. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Post-Trial | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 5/2026 | MONSAB VS IRSHAD ALI | Ashfaque Ali Dahri(ADVO-158-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Both paries and their counsels are present. Matter is fixed for post trial. Post trial held, but failed. Put of to 20.10.2026 for final arguement. |
||