| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 151/2025 | The State VS Pahar uddin | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 31/2025 Hala Old |
Work suspended due to strike of advocates. Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP is present. DC called absent. Process returned un-served same is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to.28.03.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 2 | PPC 107/2025 | The State VS Naeem Keerio | Riaz Hussain Sabki(ADPP-0006-GOV-MTR) | Roshan Ali Shah (ADVO-2418-SBC-HYD) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 112/2025 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Work suspended due to strike of advocates. Case called. Accused called absent without any intimation who is confined in C.P Hyderabad an other crime. ADPP is present. No PW is present. Process returned un-served same is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to.18.03.2026 for evidence. Issue P.O for accused Naeem. |
| 3 | PPC 161/2025 | The State VS Jaam and others | Abdul Rauf Memon(ADVO-241-SBC-MTY) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-448,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 58/2025 Hala |
Work suspended due to strike of advocates. Case called. Accused Jam called absent without any intimation. while remaining accused are already declared as P.O. ADPP is present. Defense counsel called absent. Process returned un-served same is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to.27.03.2026 for evidence. Issue BW against the accused Jam. |
|
| 4 | PPC 197/2025 | The State VS Amanullah and others | Shah Zaman Shah(ADVO-51178-SBC-MTY) | PPC-392 | 200/2025 Hala |
Work suspended due to strike of advocates. Case called: Accused Amanullah produced by J/A C.P Hyderabad through video link, while accused Arbab Ali and Shan are already declared as proclaimed offenders. ADPP is present. Defense counsel called absent. Process returned un-served same is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to.18.03.2026 for evidence. Accused Amanullah to be produced through video link on the date of hearing. Complainant is directed to bring his witness on the date of hearing. |
|
| 5 | PPC 184/2025 | THE STATE VS SABIT ALI | Rozee (ADVO-108-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 222/2025 Hala |
Work suspended due to strike of advocates. Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP is present. Defense counsel called absent. No PWs is present. Process returned un-served same is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to.18.03.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 6 | PPC 8/2026 | The State VS Yaqoob and ors | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 248/2025 Hala |
Work suspended due to strike of advocates. Case called. Accused Yakoob is present on bail while accused Akram called absent without any intimation. ADPP is present. Defense counsel called absent. No PW is present. Process returned un-served same is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to.25.03.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. Issue BW against the accused Akram. |
|
| 7 | PPC 26/2026 | The State VS Dilbar | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 3,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 265/2025 Hala |
Work suspended due to strike of advocates. Case called. Accused Dilber is produced by J/A C.P Hyderabad through video link. ADPP is present. No PW is present. Process returned un-served same is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to.19.03.2026 for evidence. Accused Dilbar to be produced through video link on the date of hearing. |
|
| 8 | PPC 34/2026 | THE STATE VS GHULAM NABI | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 270/2025 Hala |
Work suspended due to strike of advocates. Case called. Accused produced by J/A C.P Hyderabad through video link. ADPP is present. No PW is present. Process returned un-served same is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to.19.03.2026 for evidence. Accused to be produced through video link. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Order On Application | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 3/2025 |
Inayatullah VS Ali Raza | Imdad Ali(ADVO-2354-SBC-HYD) | Work suspended due to strike of advocates. Matter called. Both parties and their counsels are called absent but junior of plaintiff is present.Today matter was fixed for order on applications 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC, and VII Rule 11. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to.18.03.2026 for order. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For ex-parte proof. | |||||||
| 2 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 1/2026 |
NAWAZ ALI SARIO VS MST.KOUSAR SINDHU | Afaque Ali Wandyar(ADVO-302-SBC-MTY) | Work suspended due to strike of advocates. Matter called. Plaintiff is present with his counsel. Defendant is already debarred. Today matter was fixed for ex-partee proof. Put off to.14.03.2026 for exparty proof. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | G.W. (G&W Cases) 6/2026 | Muhammad Dilshad Malik VS Seema & Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act | Work suspended due to strike of advocates. Matter called. Applicant called absent but his counsel is present. Opponents called absent. Reports received from Concerned Mukhtiarkar, CMO, Union council and Nadra office same kept on record. Put off to.18.03.2026 for service. Issue Notice to opponents as well as publication on cost. |
||
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 16/2025 | Sajjad Ali VS Chandni | Attaullah Shaikh (ADVO-1079-SBC-MKS) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | Work suspended due to strike of advocates. Matter called. Applicant and his counsel are called absent without any intimation on several dates. Process not issued by the office due to cost not paid. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. Last and final chance given to the applicant. Put off to.19.03.2026 for service. Repeat process as already ordered on cost. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 25/2026 | Mst. Fateh Khatoon VS Ali Banoo | Asif Ali (ADVO-288-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Work suspended due to strike of advocates. Matter called. Plaintiff called absent but her counsel is present. Process against the defendant through concerned was issued but not returned served or un-served. Publication for published received by counsel for the plaintiff but not returned. Put off to.04.04.2026 for service. Repeat process against the defendant through concerned , PCS, in all modes on cost. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 23/2026 | Mst Saima VS Sanaullah | Waheed Qadir (ADVO-143-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Work suspended due to strike of advocates. Matter called. Plaintiff and her counsel are present. Defendant is present. Ms Aisha Dadri advocate has filed power on behalf of defendant and request for grant of time to submit written statement. Order passed on it. Put off to.18.03.2026 for written statement. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 33/2025 | MST NAILA VS ATIF | Asif Ali (ADVO-288-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work suspended due to strike of advocates. Matter called. Both parties and their counsels are present. Learned counsel for the defendant has submitted statement alongwith photo copy of application for issue certificate of confirmation of talaq and divorce dead and courier receipt. Order passed on it. Defendant has paid maintenance of minors of Rs.10,000/- same received by plaintiff such receipt kept on record. Put off to.30.03.2026 for evidence. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Exparte Evidence | |||||||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 64/2025 | Asma Dero VS Zaman Dero | Waheed Qadir (ADVO-143-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work suspended due to strike of advocates. Matter called. Plaintiff and her counsel are present. Defendant is already debarred. Today matter was fixed for exparte proof. Put off to.18.03.2026 for exparte proof. |
||