| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 156/2026 | The State VS Shoukat Ali | Badal Gahoti(ADVO-2200-SBC-HYD) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 3,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 137/2026 Hala |
Case called. Accused Shoukat is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the state is present. DC is present. Process returned. SIP Abdul Hakeem Dahri is present. Learned ADPP for the State has submitted an adjourned application on the ground that I.O failed to produce the chemical report. Order passed thereon. Adjourned application is allowed in the interest of justice. Put off to....28.10.2026 for Evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. Process extended and hand over to process server. |
|
| 2 | PPC 171/2026 | The State VS Abdul Sattar | Muneer Ahmed Gahothi(ADVO-132-SBC-MTY) | PPC-354,PPC-457 | 158/2025 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case called. Accused Abdul Sattar is called absent, Learned ADPP is present. Learned DC is present. Complainant and his Advocate are called absent. Advocate for accused has filed an application for condontion of accused. Order passed thereon. (Excused). Process returned un-served, same extended and hand over to process server. Put off to......31.10.2026 for evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 3 | PPC 181/2026 | The State VS Waheed Ali & Another | Arif Ali Shah(ADVO-185-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 113/2026 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case is called. Accused Waheed Ali and Rahid are present on bail. ADPP and DC are present. Process returned. P.Ws are present. Deposition of PW Azizullah is recorded at Ex.3. He produced mashirnama of arrest and recovery at Ex.3/A, mashirnama of place of incident at Ex.3/B. Deposition of SIP Abdullah is recorded at Ex.4. He produced roznamacha entry at Ex.4/A, Departure and entries No.13 and 16 arrival at Ex. 4/B, entry No.44 at Ex.4/C, police letter at Ex.4/D, Receipt at Ex.4/F, chemical report at Ex.4/G. Intimation of ASI Suhail Zaman has sent by process server. Order passed thereon. Put off to 27.10.2026 for evidence. Accused are directed to attend. Process extended and hand over to process server |
|
| 4 | PPC 195/2026 | The State VS Sajid Ali | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-489-F | 98/2026 Hala |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Complainant Javeed is present. Mr. Muneer Ahmed has filed vakalatnama on behalf of complainant. Order passed thereon. Mr. Faisal Anjum Advocate for accused has filed vakalatnama on behalf of accused. Order passed thereon. Both parties have filed joint application U/S: 345 (2) and 345 (6) Cr.P.C. Order passed thereon. Notice to ADPP. Heard arguments. Order passed on separate sheet. Application allowed, Accused is acquitted U/S: 345 (6) Cr.P.C. Accused is present on bail, his bail bond stands is cancelled and surety is discharge. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | PPC 167/2026 | The State VS Faraz & Another | Afaque Ali Wandyar(ADVO-302-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 3,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 118/2026 Hala |
Case is called. Accused Faraz, Naseer and Ahsanullah are present on bail. ADPP for the state and DC are present. No P.W is present. Process returned un-served. Put off to 27.10.2026 for evidence. All accused are directed to attend. Process extended. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 6 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 57/2026 | Muhammad Faisal VS SHO of PS Hala New & Others | Inayat Hussain Shawal Khan (ADVO-131-SBC-MTY) | Riaz Ali (ADVO-129-SBC-MTY) | Cr.PC-107 | / |
Criminal Miscellaneous Application called. Applicant is called absent but his Learned counsel is present. Respondents No.02 to 06 is called absent. Mr. Riaz Ali Bhatti, learned counsel for the respondents is called absent. Respondents No.02 to 06 have failed to furnish the requisite surety in the sum of Rs.20,000/- each for keeping the peace, despite the direction of this Court. Process server is present and returned show cause notice. Order passed thereon. Also order passed on separate sheet. The application stands disposed of. Let a copy of this Order be sent to SHO P.S Hala New for compliance regarding the maintenance of law and order in the area |
| 7 | PPC 177/2026 | The State VS Saifullah | Muhammad Rahim(ADVO-174-SBC-MTY) | PPC-279 | 24/2026 Bhutto Forest |
|
|
| 8 | PPC 205/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Asghar & Others | Waheed Qadir (ADVO-143-SBC-MTY) | PPC-34,PPC-380,PPC-457 | 18/2026 Hala |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Asghar and Own Muhammad are produced by J/A at Video Link. Accused Mujahid, Muhammad Bilawal and Shakeel Chandio are shown as absconder. ADPP is present. NBW against them returned. Statement of process server is recorded at Ex.1, He produced unexecuted NBW of accused persons, endorsement, statements of local area persons and copies of CNICs at Ex.1/A to Ex.1/E. Order passed on statement of process server. Issue proclamation U/S: 87/88 Cr.P.C against the accused. Put off to....2.11.2026 for service. Accused are remanded to jail with direction that accused be produced on next date of hearing on video link. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 2/2026 |
Bhae Khan Balal VS Gul Bahar Balal | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Matter is called. Plaintiff is called absent, but his counsel is present. Defendant is called absent, but junior advocate for defendant is present. Today matter fixed for evidence of plaintiff side. Learned Advocate for plaintiff has filed statement for withdrawn from the suit. Order passed on separate. The suit in hand is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to cost. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 153/2026 | Mst. Khushboo & Another VS Saleem Khaskheli | Muneer Ahmed Gahothi(ADVO-132-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit called. Plaintiff is called absent, but her advocate is present. Defendant is called absent. Advocate for plaintiff has filed statement along with receipt of registry. Order passed on it. (File) Put off to 03.11.2026 for service. Report Notice upon defendant, in all modes through concerned court as well as publication on cost. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Issues | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 137/2026 | Mst. Waseema & Another VS Noordin Dahri | Muhammad Asif(ADVO-2734-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Matter called. Both parties and their respective counsels are present and filed compromise application alongwith affidavits of both parties. Order passed on separate sheet and announced in open Court, the suit of the plaintiff is stands decreed in terms of compromised application. Let the compromise decree be prepared. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Exparte Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 136/2026 | MSt. Rabia VS Abdullah Jatoi | Waheed Qadir (ADVO-143-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter called. Plaintiff with her counsel are present. Defendant called absent. Defendant has already been debarred. Deposition of Mst. Rabia is recorded at Ex.12, she is produced affidavit in expartee proof as Ex.12/A. Advocate for plaintiff has filed statement for close side at Ex.13. Heard arguments. Ex-parte Judgment passed, announced in open same place at Ex.14. The suit of plaintiff is decree as followed by exparte judgment. Let the decree be prepared accordingly. |
||