| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Order On Application | |||||||
| 1 | Ist Class Civil Suits 20/2026 |
Ghulam Akbar Shah VS PO Sindh & others | Mir Mazhar Hussain(ADVO-55786-SBC-SUK) | ||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | Ist Class Civil Suits 34/2026 |
Muhammad Aslam VS Province of Sindh and others | Faisal Naeem(ADVO-1025-SBC-SUK) | DDA(DDA-0010-GOV-SUK) | |||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Advocate to be Heard | |||||||
| 3 | Ist Class Civil Suits 69/2026 |
Noor Ahmed & Ors VS P.O Sindh & others | DDA(DDA-0010-GOV-SUK) | Suit called. Plaintiff No.1 called absent. Counsel for plaintiff???s Mr. Shewak Ram Valecha is also called absent, but his Jr. is present. Order not ready due to rush of work. Put off to 23.11.2026 for Order on point of admission. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 4 | Ist Class Civil Suits 53/2026 |
Wazeer Ahmed VS P.O Sindh and others | Abdul Sattar(ADVO-1521-SBC-SUK) | DDA(DDA-0010-GOV-SUK) | |||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Advocate to be Heard | |||||||
| 5 | Ist Class Civil Suits 70/2026 |
Noor Ahmed VS P.O Sindh & others | DDA(DDA-0010-GOV-SUK) | Suit called. Plaintiff and his Counsel Mr. Shewak Ram Valecha are called absent, but his Jr. is present and request for grant of time. Reqeust allowed. Put off to 23.11.2026 for making compliance order dated 10.10.2026/hearing on point of admission. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 6 | Ist Class Civil Suits 46/2026 |
Ghulam Fareed VS Malik Nizamuddin and others | Shamsuddin Rajper(ADVO-8641-SBC-KHS) | DDA(DDA-0010-GOV-SUK) | Suit called. Counsel for plaintiff is present. Def: No.1 and his Counsel Mr. Nasir Malik are called absent, but his Jr. Counsel is present and filed appl: U/S 151 CPC for postponement of stage of W.S. Order. Advocate to be heard and also filed appl: U/O VII Rule 10 CPC. Order. Notice to other side. Same copy delivered to plaintiff side. Put off to 21.11.2026 for W.S of def: No.1 & 2/objection on appl: for production of original cheques and relevant documents/objection on appl: U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC/Objection on appl: U/O VII R 10 CPC/Appl: U/S 151 CPC for postponement of stage of W.S is fixed for advocate to heard. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 7 | Ist Class Civil Suits 45/2015 |
Budho Khan & Ors VS Ghulam Ali Naich & Ors | DDA(DDA-0010-GOV-SUK) | Suit called. Plaintiff No.1 being attorney of rest plaintiff is called absent, whereas his Counsel Mr. Faisal Naeem is present. Def: No.1 & 4 are called absent. DDA for official def: is present. Def: No.4 is already ex-parte. Order passed on order sheet. The side of the defendant No. 1 is hereby closed and he stands debarred from adducing the evidence. Suit be relisted for final arguments. Put off to 21.11.2026 for final arguments. |
|||
| 8 | Ist Class Civil Suits 62/2024 |
Muhammad Khlique-Ur-Rehman and others VS P.O Sindh and others | Nisar Ali(ADVO-1428-SBC-SUK) | Suit called. Mr. Nisar Memon, Advocate for the Plaintiff, is present. DDA is present. Def: No.1 to 4 and 6 to 12 are already ex-parte. Def: No.13 and his Counsel are called absent, whereas his Clerk, Munawar Soomro, and Jr. Counsel are present. Def: No.13 has neither produced the required record nor submitted a reply to the show-cause notice. Jr. Counsel for def: No.13 requests time for compliance. Request is allowed. Put off to 16.11.2026 for def: evidence/official of def No.13 (Society), production of record by def: No.13/submission of replies to the show-cause notices by def: No.12 and 13. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 9 | Ist Class Civil Suits 47/2026 |
Abida Wali VS Muhammad Anwar | Irfan Ali (ADVO-1795-SBC-SUK) | Ghulam Shabir(ADVO-1031-SBC-SUK) | Suit called. Plaintiff & her Counsel Mr. Irfan Ali Soomro are called absent, but his Jr. Counsel is present and not deposit cost of Rs.1000/-already imposed upon her. Notice not issued due to not deposit the process fee. Def: No.1 and his Counsel are called absent, but his Jr is present and filed adjournment application on ground that Sr. Counsel is out of station. Order on it. Adjourned with last chance. DDA for official def: No.6 to 10 is present. Notice not issued due to not deposit of process fee. Issue notices to Def: No.3, 5 & L.Rs of Def: No.2 with direction to Bailiff of this Court that Def: be served through door pasting in present of two witnesses. While Def: No. 4 & 11 be served through concerned court/as well as Bailiff of this court and notice be send TCS/Registered post A/D. Put off to 18.11.2026 for W.S official def: No.6 to 10/objection on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC/service of def: No.3, 5 & L.Rs of def: No.2 through door pasting/Service of def: No.4 & 11/hearing on application U/O 7 R 11 CPC/hearing on application 9 Rule 7 CPC. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Next Hearing Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | |||||
| 1 | C.Ex. (Civil Executions) 9/2025 On Application:Application U/S 151 CPC, |
Nadeem Ahmed VS Arshad Hussain & Ors | Mohsin Ali (ADVO-2590-SBC-SUK) | Civil Execution-21 Rule 2 | ||
| 2 | Ist Class Civil Suits 81/2013 On Application:Application under Section 12 (2) CPC, |
Malik Muhammad Riaz Awan VS Muhammad Asmat Khan & Ors | Muhammad Asim(ADVO-1235-SBC-SUK) | C.P.C.-Suit for Specific Performance of Contract & Perpetual Injunction | ||