| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 1 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 6/2026 | The State VS Allah Bux | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 56/2026 Bhit Shah |
Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Case called. Accused Allah Bux is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Charge against the accused is framed at EX: 03.Plea of accused is recorded at EX: 03/A to which he pleaded not guilty and claim for trial. To come up on 28.10.2026 for evidence. Preent accused is directed to attend. Issue Summon to Pws. Call case property. |
|
| 2 | PPC 75/2026 | The State VS Wakeel Sangrasi | Kamran Haider(ADVO-3031-SBC-HYD) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 132/2026 Bhit Shah |
Work is susoended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Case called. Accused Wakeel is produced is custody by Cerntral Prison Hyderabad through video link. Learned ADPP is present. Charge against the accused is framed through video link at EX: 02. Plea of accused is recorded at EX: 02/A to which he pleads not guilty and claim for trial. Put of to 23.10.2026 for evidence. Accused shall be produced through video link. Issue Summon to Pws. Call case property. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 49/2026 | The State VS Mehboob & others | Bashir Ahmed Abro(ADVO-2-SBC-MTY) | Sabir Hussain (ADVO-202-SBC-MTY) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-324,PPC-337-H,PPC-427,PPC-452,PPC-504 | 16/2025 Salaro |
Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Councul. Case called. Accused (1) Sajan is produced through video-link by jail authority viz. Central Prison, Hyderabad, Accused (2) Mehboob, (3) Ahmed Khan, (4) Mithoo, (5) Ghulam Nabi, (6) Manthar, (7) Ishaque, (8) Khairoo are present on bail. Accused persons namely (9) Rustam and (10) Sain Bux had been expired/died. Accused (11) Ali Sher and (12) Waris have already been declared as proclaimed offender. Notice against surety of accused Ali Sher is not returned and also death report of accused persons Rustam and Saindad submitted by the SHO PS Salaro. Learned ADPP and learned defense counsels are present. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To Come up on 28.10.2026 for Service. Accused Sajan is shall be produced through video link. Present accused persons are directed to attend. Issue show cause notice to SHO PS Salaro for non submission of death report and also not return pocess upon surety. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 4/2026 | Mst. Wakeela VS Kamran & another | Fida Hussain(ADVO-170-SBC-MTY) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody),The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter called. Applicant Mst. Wakeela is called absent and her learned counsel is present. Opponent Kamran and his learned counsel are called absent. To come up on 30.10.2026 for objection on application for re-calling the order dated 04.09.2026. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 11/2026 | Zaheer Ahmed Khyber VS Mst. Rashida & others | Asif Ali (ADVO-5387-SBC-HYD) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar council. Guardian Application called. Applicant is present and his learned counsel is called absent but his associate is present. Report is received from SSP Sanghr through post at EX: 14. Order passed thereon. Report recieved from SHO PS Bhitshah at EX: 15. Order passed theroen. Put of to 2610.2026 for service through publication. |
|
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 34/2026 | Shrimati Rozina Oad & others VS Waseem Oad | Muhammad Rahim(ADVO-174-SBC-MTY) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent and his learned counsel is present and he has filed statement along-with receipts of postal and TCS and also copy of publication in daily news paper Ibrar dated 11.10.2026 at EX: 05. Order passed thereon. Defendant is called absent. Put of to 30.10.2026 for return of process. |
|
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 35/2026 | Shrimati Haseena Oad & others VS Sureshi Kumar alias Gulzar | Muhammad Rahim(ADVO-174-SBC-MTY) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Recovery of Medical Charges / Delivery Expenses ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent and his learned counsel is present and he has filed statement along-with receipts of postal and TCS and also copy of publication in daily news paper Ibrar dated 11.10.2026 at EX: 05. Order passed thereon. Defendant is called absent. Put of to 30.10.2026 for return of process. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 45/2025 | Mst. Farzana VS Tuifail Ahmed | Mazhar Ali (ADVO-219-SBC-MTY) | Shuib Aziz() | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Farzana and her learned counsel are called absent but his associate is present. Defendant Tufail Ahmed and his learned counsel are called absent since morning. To come up on 31.10.2026 for filling affidavit in evidence of defendant side, and hearing on application for Striking off the defense of defendant. |
|
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 72/2025 | Sht Hari Bai VS Rajesh Kumar | Waheed Qadir (ADVO-143-SBC-MTY) | Wahid Bux Narejo(ADVO-17329-SBC-KHS) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff Sht. Hari Bai is called absent and her learned counsel is present. Defendant Rajesh Kumar is called absent and his learned counsel is present. Matter is adjourned by consent. To come up on 27.10.2026 for Cross examination of defendant. |
|
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 121/2025 | Mst Azeema VS Muhammad Imran | Noman Niaz(ADVO-300-SBC-MTY) | Khuda Dino Saddar(ADVO-1598-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Azeema and her learned counsel are present. Defendant Muhammad Imran and his learned counsel are present. Matter is adjourned by consent., To come up on 28.10.2026 for filing affidavit in evidence of defendant side. |
|
| 8 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 36/2025 | Riyasat Ali Rajput VS Ronaq Ali and others | Muhammad Yousif() | Imdad Ali(ADVO-2354-SBC-HYD) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 of Guardian and Wards Act R/W 100 Cr.PC,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar council. Matter called. Applicant Riyasat Ali and his learned counsel are called absent but his associate is present. Opponents Ronaq Ali and Mst. Mubeena are present and their learned counsel is called absent but his associate is present. Matter is adjourned by consent. To come up on 26.10.2026 for cross of opponents. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 9 | F.S. (Family Suits) 19/2025 | Mst. Azeema VS Muhammad Imran | Noman Niaz(ADVO-300-SBC-MTY) | Khuda Dino Saddar(ADVO-1598-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Azeema and her learned counsel are present. Defendant Muhammad Imran and his learned counsel are present. Matter is adjourned by consent. To come up on 28.10.2026 for arguments. |
|