| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 12/2025 | Jeewan VS The State and others | Allah Dino(ADVO-62-SBC-MTY) | Cr.PC-145 | / |
Cr. Misc. application called. Complainant Jeewan and his counsel are called present. Respondents namely Ghulam Nabi, Aijaz and Rasool Bux are called present, but their counsel is called absent. Today Cr. Misc. application is fixed for arguments. Application for adjournment submitted by respondent Ghulam Nabi on the ground that their counsel is busy at Hyderabad. Order passed on it. Adjourned. Cr. Misc. application is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 30.01.2026 for arguments on application. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 3/2025 | Zakir Ali and another VS Allah Jurio and others | Noman Niaz(ADVO-300-SBC-MTY) | Cr.PC-145 | / |
Cr. Misc. Application called. Applicants are called absent, but their counsel is called present. Respondents Allah Jurio and Ramzan alongwith their counsel are called present. Cr. Misc. application is adjourned in the interest of Justice due to undersigned has gone to School visit in compliance of C.P. To come up on 16.01.2026 for Order on application. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 184/2025 | The State VS Qadeer and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-34,PPC-399,PPC-401 | 33/2025 Bhit Shah |
Case called. Accused Qadeer, Irfan and Aamir are present on bail, while accused Haji has already declared as absconder. Learned ADPP and learned defense counsel are called present. Today case is fixed for Service. Process viz. 87 Cr.P.C. against absconder accused was returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Process viz. 88 Cr.P.C. against absconder accused was also issued, such report received from the Mukhtiarkar Revenue Taluka Hala. Order passed on it. File. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 19.01.2026 for Service. Present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 4 | PPC 203/2025 | The State VS Younis Ali | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 106/2025 Bhit Shah |
Case called. Accused Younis Ali is called absent without any intimation. Learned ADPP is present. Today case is fixed for Service. Process viz. NBW against accused Younis Ali was returned un-served by process server, his statement on oath has been recorded at Ex.01. He produced the un-executed warrant alongwith endorsement and statement of two witnesses namely Badaruddin and Bakht Nawaz alongwith their CNICs at Exh.01/A to Exh.01/E respectively. Order passed on it. The above named accused is hereby declared as absconder. Proceedings against the absconder accused shall be initiated in accordance with section 87 & 88 Cr.P.C. simultaneously. To come up on 20.01.2026 for Service. Issue proclamation u/s 87 & 88 Cr.P.C. against absconder accused without fail. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 5/2024 |
Muhammad Akbar VS Ghulam Raza | Zeeshan Bashir Chandio() | Matter called. Plaintiff Muhammad Akbar is called present, but his counsel is called absent. Defendant Ghulam Raza and his counsel are called present. Today matter is fixed for evidence of plaintiff side. Application for adjournment submitted by the plaintiff on the ground that his counsel is busy at Sessions Court Matiari. Order passed on it. Adjourned. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 27.01.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 7/2025 | Mst Sultana Nisar VS Irfan Ali | Ashfaque Ali Dahri(ADVO-158-SBC-MTY) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Matter called. Plaintiff/D.H Mst. Sultana Nisar is called absent, but her counsel is present. Defendant/J.D Irfan Ali is called absent. Today matter is fixed for Service. Process/notice to defendant/J.D was not issued by the office due to cost not paid. Application for condonation submitted by learned counsel for the plaintiff/D.H. Order passed on it. Condoned. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 23.01.2026 for Service. Issue notice to defendant/J.D through bailiff as well as TCS/OCS on cost of plaintiff/D.H. |
||
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 39/2025 | Nawaz Ali VS Mst. Kosar Sindhu | Abdul Rauf Memon(ADVO-241-SBC-MTY) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody),The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Matter called. Applicant Nawaz Ali and his counsel are called present. Opponent Mst. Kosar Sindhu is called absent. Today matter is fixed for Service. Process/notice to opponent was returned un-served with endorsement of bailiff. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted statement alongwith receipt of registered post AD at Exh.11. Order passed on it. File. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up 22.01.2026 for Service. Repeat notice to opponent through bailiff by way of pasting as well as TCS/OCS on cost of applicant. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 42/2025 | Mst. Sana Arbab VS Waqar Baeed | Imdad Ali(ADVO-2354-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Sana Arbab and her counsel are called present. Defendant Waqar Baeed is present, but his counsel is called absent. Today matter is fixed for evidence of plaintiff side. The defendant has submitted an application for adjournment on the ground that his counsel is busy at High Court Hyderabad. Order passed on it. Adjourned. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 23.01.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 47/2025 | Mst Bashiran VS Ghulam Mustafa | Waheed Qadir (ADVO-143-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Bashiran and her counsel are called present. Defendant Ghulam Mustafa is called absent, but his counsel is called present. Today matter is fixed for for evidence of plaintiff side as well as Order on application u/s 17-A of Family Court Act. Order passed on separate sheet of application u/s 17-A of WPFC Act at Exh.16. To come up on 26.01.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
||