| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Report | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 1/2026 | Abdul Ghaffar VS Nisar & others | Allah Dino(ADVO-62-SBC-MTY) | Cr.PC-145 | / |
Cr. Misc. Application called. Complainant Abdul Ghaffar is called absent, but his counsel is present. Report was already received from the SHO of PS Bhitshah. Today Cr. Misc. Application is fixed for Report of Mukhtiarkar Gothabad Scheme. One Zafarullah (Supervising Tapedar Gothabad Matiari) is present and submitted an application for grant of time to submit report. Order passed on it. Granted. Cr. Misc. application is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 13.03.2026 for Report. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 301/2025 | The State VS Farhan & others | Kirshan Kumar(ADVO-248-SBC-MTY) | PPC-392 | 152/2025 Bhit Shah |
Case called. All accused persons are present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is called absent. Today case is fixed for Evidence. Process/Summon upon PWs was returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 14.03.2026 for Evidence. Present accused persons are directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 3 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 3/2026 | The State VS Shahzaib Awan | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 163/2025 Bhit Shah |
Case called. Accused Shahzaib Awan is called absent without any intimation. Learned ADPP is present. Today case is fixed for Service/Supply of Copies. Process/Notice to accused was returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 05.03.2026 for Service/Supply of Copies. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 285/2025 | The State VS Nadeem and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-397 | 187/2025 Hala |
Case called. Accused Nadeem and Javed are produced through video-link by jail authority viz. Central Prison, Hyderabad, accused Sadoro is called absent without any intimation, while accused Shan has already declared as Proclaimed Offender. Learned ADPP is present. Today case is fixed for Charge. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice due to absence of accused. To come up on 09.03.2026 for Charge. Accused Nadeem and Javed are remanded to jail custody with direction to produced the above named accused through video-link. Issue notice to accused Sadoro. |
|
| 5 | PPC 11/2026 | The State VS Ali Muhammad Machi | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 161/2025 Bhit Shah |
Case called. Accused Ali Muhammad is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is called absent. Today case is fixed for Charge. Charge framed against accused at Exh.02, his plea was also recorded at Exh.02/A, in which he is pleaded not guilt and claim for trial. To come up on 02.03.2026 for Evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. Issue Summon to all prosecution witnesses without fail. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 300/2025 | The State VS Manzar & others | Kamran Haider(ADVO-3031-SBC-HYD) | Waheed Qadir (ADVO-143-SBC-MTY) | PPC-427,PPC-447 | 12/2025 Salaro |
Case called. Accused persons namely Manzar, Badar Khan, Baboo, Shahmeer, Siddique, Siraj, Ramzan, Aijaz, Laloo and Sikandar are present on bail, accused Hashim is called absent, his condonation application submitted by co-accused Badar Khan. Order passed on it. Condoned for last time. While accused Eidan has already declared as absconder. Learned ADPP and learned defense counsels are called present. Today case is fixed for Service. Process viz. 87 Cr.P.C. against absconder accused was returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Report u/s 88 Cr.P.C. was already received from the Mukhtiarkar Revenue Taluka Hala. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 17.03.2026 for Service. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 7 | PPC 2/2026 | The State VS Shoukat Ali & another | Kamran Haider(ADPP-0003-GOV-MTR) | PPC-394 | 112/2025 Bhit Shah |
Case called. Accused Shoukat Ali is produced through video-link by jail authority viz. Central Prison, Hyderabad, while accused Jabbar has already been declared as absconder. Learned ADPP is present. Today case is fixed for Service. Process viz. 87 Cr.P.C. against absconder accused was returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Process viz. 88 Cr.P.C. against absconder accused was also issued, such report was received from the Mukhtiarkar Revenue Taluka Hala. Order passed on it. File. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 07.03.2026 for Service. Accused is remanded to jail custody. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 6/2025 |
Mubarak Khan VS Piyaro and others | Riaz Ali (ADVO-129-SBC-MTY) | Matter called. Plaintiff Mubarak Khan is called absent, but his counsel is present. Defendants Piyaro, Muhammad Bux and Waseem are called absent. Today matter is fixed for Service. Process viz: notice to defendants was not issued by the office due to cost not paid. Application for condonation submitted by learned counsel for the plaintiff. Order passed on it. Condoned for last time. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 28.02.2026 for Service. Issue notice to the defendants through bailiff as well as registered post AD/TCS on cost of plaintiff. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 2/2026 | Shah Rukh Rajar VS Kamran Ali Rajar & others | Imdad Ali(ADVO-2354-SBC-HYD) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Matter called. Applicant Shah Rukh is called absent, but his counsel is present. Opponents are called absent. Reports were already received from the SHO of P.S Bhitshah, In-charge NADRA Hala and Town Committee Bhitshah. Today matter is fixed for Report. Report was received from the Mukhtiarkar Revenue Taluka Hala regarding property. Order passed on it. File. Report regarding legal heirs from the Mukhtiarkar Revenue Taluka Hala not yet received. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 03.03.2026 for Report. Issue reminder to Mukhtiarkar Revenue Taluka Hala regarding legal heirs. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 59/2025 | Mst. Naheeda VS Piyar Ali | Rozee (ADVO-108-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Naheeda and her counsel are called present. Defendant Piyar Ali is called absent. From the perusal of record it appears that sufficient time has been passed and the defendant failed to file written statement/objections on family suit. Order passed on separate sheet at Exh.12. The defendant is hereby debarred from filing of written statement/objections. To come up on 13.03.2026 for Ex-partee evidence. |
||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 122/2025 | Mst Bhag Bhari VS Mashooque Ali | Syed Hyder Ali Shah(ADVO-92-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Bhag Bhari and her counsel are called absent. Defendant Mashooque Ali is called absent. The service upon the defendant is already hereby held good. Today matter is fixed for written statement/objections. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 09.03.2026 for written statement/objections. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 118/2025 | Mst Shereen Memon VS Sajid Ali | Imran Zaib (ADVO-95-SBC-MTY) | Imdad Ali(ADVO-2354-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Shereen and her counsel are called present. Defendant Sajid Ali and his counsel are also called present. Today matter is fixed for Pre-trial as well as hearing on application u/s 17-A of Family Court Act. Pre-trial proceedings stands failed. Arguments heard from the learned counsel for plaintiff on application u/s 17-A of Family Court Act. To come up on 10.03.2026 for settlement of Issues as well as arguments on application u/s 17-A of Family Court Act of learned counsel for defendant, meanwhile order on application u/s 17-A of Family Court Act. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 28/2025 | Mst. Hina and others VS Mashooque Ali Memon | Muneer Ahmed Gahothi(ADVO-132-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Hina is called absent, but her counsel is present. Defendant Mashooque Ali is called absent, but his counsel is present. Today matter is fixed for evidence of plaintiff side. Application for adjournment submitted by learned counsel for the defendant. Order passed on it. Adjourned. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 10.03.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 72/2024 | Mst. Sidra and another VS Sarfaraz | Ashfaque Ali Dahri(ADVO-158-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Recovery of Medical Charges / Delivery Expenses ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Sidra is called absent, but her counsel is present. Defendant Sarfaraz is called absent, but his counsel is present. Today matter is fixed for arguments. Arguments heard from the learned counsel for plaintiff. Application for adjournment submitted by learned counsel for the defendant. Order passed on it. Adjourned. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 24.02.2026 for arguments of learned counsel for the defendant. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
| 7 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 24/2025 | Mst Farzana VS Sameer and others | Inayat Hussain Shawal Khan (ADVO-131-SBC-MTY) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Guardianship Application called. Applicant Farzana is called absent, but her counsel is present. Opponents are called absent. Today matter is fixed for Order. Order announced in open court. The guardianship application is allowed. Let the Guardianship certificate be issued. Detail order passed on separate sheet. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Exparte Evidence | |||||||
| 8 | F.S. (Family Suits) 21/2025 | Muhammad Yousuf Memon VS Mst. Aneela | Riaz Ali (ADVO-129-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Muhammad Yousif is called absent, but his counsel is present. Defendant Mst. Aneela has already been declared as Ex-partee. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has already submitted Affidavit in Ex-partee Proof at Exh.15. Today matter is fixed for Ex-partee evidence. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up 12.03.2026 for Ex-partee evidence. |
||