| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 69/2025 | State VS Mumtaz Ali | ADPP(ADPP-0005-GOV-MTR) | Waheed Qadir (ADVO-143-SBC-MTY) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 98/2022 Hala |
Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Case called. Accused Mumtaz Ali is present on bail, while remaining accused Gul Zameer and Kashid @ Kashif have already been acquitted u/s 245(i) Cr.P.C. on dated 04.01.2023. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is called absent. Today case is fixed for Evidence. Process/Summon upon PWs was returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 09.03.2026 for Evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| 2 | PPC 258/2025 | The State VS Shoukat Ali and another | Sabir Hussain (ADVO-202-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 3,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 133/2025 Bhit Shah |
Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Case called. Accused Shoukat Ali is present on bail, while accused Arbab Ali has already declared as proclaimed offender. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is called absent. Today case is fixed for Evidence. Process/Summon upon PWs returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 10.03.2026 for Evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 3 | PPC 298/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Waris | Aaqil(ADVO-172-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(ii) | 121/2025 Bhit Shah |
Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Case called. Accused Muhammad Waris is present on bail. Mr. Humair Ali Memon advocate is present and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of accused. Order passed on it. File. Learned ADPP is present. Today case is fixed for Evidence. Process/Summon upon PWs was returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To Come up on 11.03.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 4 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 67/2025 | The State VS Sajid Ilyas Rajput | Muhammad Asif(ADVO-2734-SBC-HYD) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 148/2025 Bhit Shah |
Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Case called. Accused Sajid Ilyas is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is called absent. Today case is fixed for Evidence. Process/Summon upon PWs was returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 12.03.2026 for Evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 5 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 68/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Ali | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 151/2025 Bhit Shah |
Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Case called. Accused Muhammad Ali is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is called absent. Today case is fixed for Evidence. Process/Summon upon PWs returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 13.03.2026 for Evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 6 | PPC 5/2026 | The State VS Shah Bux | Riaz Ali (ADVO-129-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 3,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 156/2025 Bhit Shah |
Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Case called. Accused Shah Bux is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is called absent. Today case is fixed for Evidence. Process/Summon upon PWs returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 14.03.2026 for Evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications | |||||||
| 7 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 11/2024 | Abdul Rasheed Gahoti VS Sadiq Ali Gahoti and others | Imdad Ali(ADVO-2354-SBC-HYD) | Cr.PC-145 | / |
Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Cr. Misc Application called. Applicant Abdul Rasheed is present, but his counsel is called absent. Respondents namely Sadiq Ali and Abdul Karim are present, but their counsel is called absent. Cr. Misc. Application is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 24.03.2026 for hearing on application. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 8 | PPC 20/2026 | The State VS Shahid | Humair Ali(ADVO-243-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 9/2026 Bhit Shah |
Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Case called. Accused Shahid is present on bail and submitted an application for condonation of last date of hearing. Order passed on it. Condoned. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is called absent. Today case is fixed for Supply of Copies. Copies of police papers u/s 241-A Cr.P.C. supplied to accused vide receipt at Exh.01. To come up on 28.02.2026 for Charge. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 5/2024 |
Seenghar Ali VS Mst. Ghulam Fatima and another | Rozee (ADVO-108-SBC-MTY) | Muneer Ahmed Gahothi(ADVO-132-SBC-MTY) | Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff Seenghar Ali and his counsel are called absent. Defendant Mst. Ghulam Fatima is present, but her counsel is called absent. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 25.03.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side as well as Objections on application. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 2/2025 | Mst. Nabeela VS Mehmood Khan | Inayat Hussain Shawal Khan (ADVO-131-SBC-MTY) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale | Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Matter called. Applicant Mst. Nabeela is present, but her counsel is called absent. Opponents Mehmood Khan and Mst. Zohran & their counsel are also called absent. Minors namely Hussain Ali, Baby Ayat and Baby Noor Fatima are present. Reports were already received from the concerned offices. Today matter is fixed for hearing on application. Matter is adjourned is interest of Justice. To come up on 26.02.2026 for hearing on application. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 107/2025 | Mst Shagufta VS Shuhabuddin | Asif Ali(ADVO-281-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Shagufta and her counsel are called absent. Defendant Shuhabuddin is also called absent. Today matter is fixed for Service. Process/notice to defendant was not issued by the office due to cost not paid. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 25.03.2026 for Service. Issue notice to defendant on fresh address through Court as well as registered post AD/TCS on cost of plaintiff. |
||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 108/2025 | Mst Shaila VS Ikramullah | Asif Ali(ADVO-281-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Shaila and her counsel are called absent. Defendant Ikramullah is also called absent. Today matter is fixed for Service. Process/notice to defendant was not issued by the office due to cost not paid. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 25.03.2026 for Service. Issue notice to defendant through Court as well as registered post AD/TCS on cost of plaintiff. |
||
| 4 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 3/2026 | Mst. Rashida VS Muhammad Asad | Imdad Ali(ADVO-2354-SBC-HYD) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff/D.H Mst. Rashida is called absent, but her counsel is present. Defendant/J.D Dilshad Ahmed is called absent. Today matter is fixed for Service. Process/notice to defendant/J.D through concerned court issued, same was returned un-served with endorsement of bailiff. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has submitted statement alongwith receipt of registered post AD at Exh.06. Order passed on it. File. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 16.03.2026 for Service. Repeat notice to the defendant/J.D through Court as well as TCS/OCS on cost of plaintiff/D.H. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 97/2025 | Mst Haseena VS Mohram Ali | Shoiab Safdar(ADVO-11367-SBC-KHE) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Haseena is present, but her counsel is called absent. Defendant Muharram Ali is called absent. The service upon the defendant is already hereby held good. Today matter is fixed for appearance of defendant/Written statement/objections. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 19.03.2026 for Written statement/objections. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 49/2024 | Mst. Najma VS Shahid | Hub Ali(ADVO-122-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Najma is present, but her counsel is called absent. Defendant Shahid is called absent. Today matter is fixed for evidence of defendant side. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 09.03.2026 for evidence of defendant side. |
||
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 19/2025 | Mst. Azeema VS Muhammad Imran | Noman Niaz(ADVO-300-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Matter called. Both parties are called present, but their counsels are called absent. Today matter is fixed for evidence of plaintiff side. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 26.03.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| 8 | F.S. (Family Suits) 121/2025 | Mst Azeema VS Muhammad Imran | Noman Niaz(ADVO-300-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Matter called. Both parties are called present, but their counsels are called absent. Today matter is fixed for evidence of plaintiff side. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 26.03.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 9 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 22/2025 | Mst Shakeela VS General Public at large | Tanveer Ahmed() | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Matter called. Applicant Mst. Shakeela and her counsel are called absent. Reports were already received from the concerned offices. Today matter is fixed for fresh report of Mukhtiarkar as well as further arguments. Fresh report regarding property was called from the Mukhtiarkar Revenue Taluka Hala, but such report not yet received. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 09.03.2026 for fresh report of Mukhtiarkar as well as further arguments. Issue reminder to call fresh report regarding property from the Mukhtiarkar Revenue Taluka Hala. |
||
| 10 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 27/2025 | Niaz Hussain Hajano VS Shahmir Hajano and others | Tanveer Ahmed() | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Matter called. Applicant Niaz Hussain and his counsel are called absent. Opponents namely Shahmeer and Mst. Janna are also called absent. Reports were already received from the concerned offices. Today matter is fixed for arguments. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 09.03.2026 for arguments. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Exparte Evidence | |||||||
| 11 | F.S. (Family Suits) 76/2025 | Ghulam Nabi and another VS Ghulam Sarwar @ Saroo Dahiri | Imdad Ali(ADVO-2354-SBC-HYD) | Ghulam Ruquia Tooba(ADVO-110-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff Ghulam Nabi and his counsel are called absent. Defendant Ghulam Sarwar is present, but his counsel is called absent. Today matter is fixed for Ex-partee evidence and Order on application u/s 9 Rule 7 CPC. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 24.03.2026 for Ex-partee evidence as well as Order on application u/s 9 Rule 7 CPC. |
|
| 12 | F.S. (Family Suits) 132/2025 | Mst Hameeda and another VS Mahboob Ali | Shakira Azam(ADVO-2824-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Hameeda is present, but her counsel is called absent. Defendant Mehboob Ali has already been debarred from the filing of written statement. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 26.02.2026 for Ex-partee evidence. |
||