| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 57/2024 | The State VS Muhammad Mushtaque | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Sabir Hussain (ADVO-202-SBC-MTY) | PPC-380,PPC-457 | 87/2024 Bhit Shah |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Mushtaque is called absent, his condonation application submitted by learned defense counsel. Order passed on it. Condoned. Learned ADPP and learned defense counsel are called present. Process/Summon upon PWs was returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 08.01.2026 for Evidence. Accused is directed to attend. |
| 2 | PPC 63/2024 | The State VS Qurban & ors | Sabir Hussain (ADVO-202-SBC-MTY) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-504,PPC-506 | 17/2024 Hala Old |
Case called. All accused persons are present on bail. Learned ADPP, learned counsel for complainant and learned defense counsel are called present. Process viz. B.W against remaining PWs was returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Application for condonation submitted by learned defense counsel. Order passed on it. Condoned. Application for adjournment submitted by learned counsel for complainant. Order passed on it. Adjourned. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 07.01.2026 for Evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 3 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 36/2025 | The State VS Iqbal and another | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 123/2024 Hala |
The above case has been sent to the Court of Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate-II, Hala vide Order dated 19.11.2025 passed by the Honourable District & Sessions Judge, Matiari. |
|
| 4 | PPC 190/2025 | The State VS Pahar uddin | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 31/2025 Hala Old |
The above case has been sent to the Court of Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate-II, Hala vide Order dated 19.11.2025 passed by the Honourable District & Sessions Judge, Matiari. |
|
| 5 | PPC 212/2025 | The State VS Sultan | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-489-F | 96/2025 Bhit Shah |
Case called. Accused Sultan is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is called absent. Today case is fixed for evidence. Process/Summon upon PWs was returned partly served. Complainant Babar Ali is present in person and submitted an application for adjournment for engage the counsel. Order passed on it. Allowed. Process/Summon upon remaining PWs be extended and handed over to process server. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 24.12.2025 for Evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 6 | PPC 237/2025 | The State VS Amjad Ali | Muneer Ahmed Gahothi(ADVO-132-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 3,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 119/2025 Bhit Shah |
Case called. Accused Amjad Ali is present on bail. Learned ADPP and learned defense counsel are present. Today case is fixed for evidence. Process/Summon to I/O was returned served. I.O/SIP Muhammad Uris is called absent, his intimation received from the SHO of PS Bhitshah. Order passed on it. Kept on record. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 12.12.2025 for Evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 7 | PPC 251/2025 | The State VS Farman @ Bilal | Muhammad Asif(ADVO-2734-SBC-HYD) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 129/2025 Bhit Shah |
Case called. Accused Farman @ Bilal is present on bail. Learned ADPP and learned defense counsel are called present. Process/Summon upon PWs was returned partly served. Complainant/ASI Muhammad Ayoub and Mashir/PC-Irshad Ali are present. Deposition of Complainant/ASI Muhammad Ayoub is recorded at Exh.03, he produced his relevant documents at at Exh.03/A to Exh.03/C respectively. Deposition of Mashir/PC-Irshad Ali is recorded at Exh.04, he produced memo of site inspection at Exh.04/A. Process/Summon upon remaining PWs be extended and handed over to process server. To come up on 13.12.2025 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 8 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 65/2025 | The State VS Ghulam Mairoof | Muneer Ahmed Gahothi(ADVO-132-SBC-MTY) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 149/2025 Bhit Shah |
Case called. Accused Ghulam Mairoof is present on bail. Learned ADPP and learned defense counsel are present. Today case is fixed for evidence. Process/Summon upon PWs was returned served. Complainant/ASI Muhammad Ayoub, Mashir/HC-Ghulam Mustafa and I.O/ASI Jawad Hussain are present. Deposition of Mashir/HC-Ghulam Mustafa is recorded at Exh.03, he produce memo of site inspection at Exh.03/A. Deposition of Complainant/ASI Muhammad Ayoub is recorded at Exh.04, he produce his related documents at Exh.04/A to Exh.04/D respectively. Deposition of I.O/ASI Jawad Hussain is recorded at Exh.05, he produce his related documents at Exh.05/A to Exh.05/E respectively. Thereafter, learned ADPP has submitted statement for close its side at Exh.06. Order passed on it. File. To come up on 16.12.2025 for Statement of accused. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 9 | PPC 282/2025 | The State VS Waqar Ali | Asif Ali (ADVO-288-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 3,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 239/2025 Hala |
The above case has been sent to the Court of Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate-II, Hala vide Order dated 19.11.2025 passed by the Honourable District & Sessions Judge, Matiari. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 10 | PPC 296/2025 | The State VS Rajab Ali | Muneer Ahmed Gahothi(ADVO-132-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 147/2025 Bhit Shah |
Case called. Accused Rajab Ali is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is called absent. Today case is fixed for Charge. Charge framed against accused at Exh.02, his plea was also recorded at Exh.02/A, in which he is pleaded not guilt and claim for trial. To come up on 17.12.2025 for Evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. Issue Summon to all prosecution witnesses without fail. |
|
| 11 | PPC 299/2025 | The State VS Sadam Hussain | Humair Ali(ADVO-243-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 120/2025 Bhit Shah |
Case called. Accused Sadam Hussain is present on bail. Learned ADPP and learned defense counsel are called present. Today case is fixed for Charge. Charge framed against accused at Exh.02, his plea was also recorded at Exh.02/A, in which he is pleaded not guilt and claim for trial. To come up on 29.12.2025 for Evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. Issue Summon to all prosecution witnesses without fail. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 12 | PPC 171/2025 | The State VS Abdul Hakeem | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 89/2025 Bhit Shah |
Case called. Accused Abdul Hakeem is present on bail. Learned ADPP and learned defense counsel are present. Today case is fixed for Statement of accused. Statement of accused u/s 342 Cr.P.C. is recorded at Exh.07. Arguments heard. Judgment announced in open court at Exh.08. Accused Abdul Hakeem is acquitted u/s 245(i) Cr.P.C. his bail bond stands cancelled and surety discharged. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 13 | PPC 249/2025 | The State VS Saleem & Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-34,PPC-392,PPC-452 | 141/2025 Bhit Shah |
Case called. Accused Saleem and Abu Bakar are called absent without any intimation, while accused Shero @ Sheeraz is produced through video-link by jail authority viz. Central Prison, Hyderabad. Learned ADPP is present. Process/notice to accused Saleem and Abu Bakar was not issued by the office due to rush of work. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 22.12.2025 for Service. Accused Shero @ Sheeraz is remanded to jail custody. Issue notice to accused Saleem and Abu Bakar without fail. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 4/2025 |
Muhammad Zaid VS Cultevo Seeds Corporation (PVT. Ltd) & others | Shuib Aziz() | Matter called. Plaintiff Muhammad Zaid is called absent, but his counsel is present. Defendants are called absent. The service upon the defendants is already hereby held good. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 08.01.2026 for appearance of defendants/written statement. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 18/2025 | Muhammad Aslam VS Mst Sahibzadi and another | Shuib Aziz() | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Matter called. Applicant Muhammad Aslam is called absent, but his counsel is present. Opponent and minor are called absent. Today matter is fixed for objections. Application for adjournment submitted by learned counsel for applicant. Order passed on it. Adjourned. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 08.01.2026 for objections. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 12/2025 | Mst. Sahib Zadi VS General Public at large | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Matter called. Applicant Mst. Sahibzadi is called absent, but her counsel is present. Today matter is fixed for evidence. Application for adjournment submitted by learned counsel for applicant. Order passed on it. Adjourned. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 08.01.2026 for Evidence. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 127/2025 | Mst Shahzadi VS Shahnawaz | Imran Zaib (ADVO-95-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Shahzadi is called absent, but her counsel is present. Defendant Shahnawaz is called absent. Process/notice to defendant was not issued by the office due to cost not paid. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 23.12.2025 for Service. Issue notice to defendant through all modes including Publication on cost of plaintiff. |
||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 128/2025 | Mst Naila Khaskheli VS Mumtaz Ali Khaskheli | Ahsan Ali (ADVO-250-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Naila is called absent, but her counsel is present. Defendant Mumtaz Ali Khaskheli is called absent. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has submitted statement for withdrawn the above matter as per instruction of plaintiff. Order passed on separate sheet. The suit is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to cost. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 87/2025 | Mst Aneesa VS Aijaz | Shuib Aziz() | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Aneesa is called absent, but her counsel is present. Defendant Aijaz is called absent. The service upon the defendant is already hereby held good. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice as last and final chance. To come up on 16.12.2025 for appearance/Written statement. |
||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 91/2025 | Mst Naseema VS Sajjad | Waheed Qadir (ADVO-143-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Naseema and her counsel are called present. Defendant Sajjad is called absent. The service upon the defendant is already hereby held good. From the perusal of record it appears that sufficient time has been passed and the defendant failed to file written statement. Order passed on separate sheet at Exh.11. The defendant is hereby debarred from filing of written statement. Learned counsel for plaintiff has submitted Affidavit in Ex-partee proof alongwith affidavit of plaintiff at Exh.12 & Exh.13 respectivly. Order passed on it. File. Deposition of plaintiff Mst. Naseema is recorded at Exh.14. Learned counsel for plaintiff has submitted statement for close its side at Exh.15. Arguments heard. Ex-parte Judgment announced in open court at Exh.16. The suit of Plaintiff is hereby decreed as prayed with no order as to cost. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 72/2024 | Mst. Sidra and another VS Sarfaraz | Ashfaque Ali Dahri(ADVO-158-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Recovery of Medical Charges / Delivery Expenses ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Sidra and her counsel are called present. Defendant Sarfaraz is called absent, but his counsel is present. Today matter is fixed for evidence of witnesses of plaintiff side. Application for adjournment submitted by learned counsel for defendant. Order passed on it. Adjourned. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 18.12.2025 for evidence of witnesses of plaintiff side. |
||
| 8 | F.S. (Family Suits) 102/2024 | Aaisha VS Noor Zaman | Shah Nawaz (ADVO-90-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Aisha and her Junior counsel are called present. Defendant Noor Zaman and his counsel are also called present. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has submitted an application u/s 15 of WPFC Act 1964 alongwith affidavit of plaintiff at Exh.21 & Exh.22 respectively. Order passed on it. Notice to otherside. Copy received by the learned counsel for defendant. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 23.12.2025 for evidence of plaintiff side as well as hearing on application u/s 15 of WPFC Act 1964. |
||
| 9 | F.S. (Family Suits) 104/2024 | Mst. Hina and others VS Ilyas @ Yaseen | Inayat Hussain Shawal Khan (ADVO-131-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Hina is called absent, but her counsel is present. Defendant Ilyas @ Yseen is called absent. Today matter is fixed for hearing on application for Striking off the defense of the defendant u/s 17-A Family Court Act 1964 as well as evidence of plaintiff side. Arguments heard of application. Order passed on separate sheet. The instant application is allowed. The right of defendant is hereby struck off as the defendant has failed to pay Interim maintenance, therefore, the suit of plaintiff is hereby decreed. |
||