| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 199/2025 | Zameer @ Zahmeer VS The State | Ashfaque Ali Dahri(ADVO-158-SBC-MTY) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-353,PPC-427,PPC-447,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 9/2025 Salaro |
Cr. Bail Application called. Learned counsel for the applicant/accused is present. Learned ADPP for the State is present. Today Cr. Bail application is fixed for hearing on application. Arguments heard . Order announced in open court. Bail application is granted subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with P.R bond in the like amount for the satisfaction of this court. Bail application disposed of accordingly. Issue release writ of the accused confined at Central Prison Hyderabad. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 2 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 5/2025 | Dr.Abdul Razzaque VS SSP Matiari and others | Badal Gahoti(ADVO-2200-SBC-HYD) | Cr.PC-145 | / |
Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Counsel Karachi. Cr. Misc application called. Complainant Abdul Razzaque is called absent, but his counsel is preset and submitted application for condonation on behalf of the applicant. Order passed thereon. Respondents namely Ali Nawaz, Muhammad Hassan, Mashooque, Mumtaz and Yar Muhammad are present and their counsel is also present. Today matter is fixed for hearing on application. Cr. Misc. Application is adjourned in the interest of Justice . To come up on 06.12.2025 for hearing on application. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | Gambling Act 5/2025 | The State VS Parvez and Others | Gul Muhammad() | Gambling Act -Section 5-A | 268/2024 Hala |
Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Counsel Karachi. Case called. All accused are present on bail except accused Zahid. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is called absent. Process/Summon upon PWs was returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 11.12.2025 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. Issue notice to accused Zahid Ali without fail. |
|
| 4 | PPC 154/2025 | The State VS Mumtaz Ali and others | Badal Gahoti(ADVO-2200-SBC-HYD) | PPC-381,PPC-457 | 106/2025 Hala |
This Case is already been transferred to the Court of Civil Judge & J.M-II, Hala vide order dated 19.11.2025 of Honourable District & Sessions Court Matiari. |
|
| 5 | PPC 163/2025 | The State VS Imtiaz Ali | Muhammad Rahim(ADVO-174-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 4/2025 Bhanot |
Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Counsel Karachi. Case called. Accused Imtiaz Ali is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is also present. Process/B.W against remaining PWs was returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 13.12.2025 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 6 | PPC 233/2025 | The State VS Muhammad Ismail | Afaque Ali Wandyar(ADVO-302-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 209/2025 Hala |
This Case is already been transferred to the Court of Civil Judge & J.M-II, Hala vide order dated 19.11.2025 of Honourable District & Sessions Court Matiari. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 259/2025 | The State VS Habib and others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-353,PPC-401 | 78/2024 Hala |
This Case is already been transferred to the Court of Civil Judge & J.M-II, Hala vide order dated 19.11.2025 of Honourable District & Sessions Court Matiari. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 112/2025 | Mst Sumera VS Kousar Ali | Irshad Ali (ADVO-453-SBC-SGR) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Counsel Karachi. Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Sumera and her counsel are called present. Defendant Kousar Ali is called absent. Process/notice to defendant was returned served/un-served with endorsement of bailiff. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 19.12.2025 for Service. Issue notice to defendant through bailiff by way of pasting in present of two witnesses on cost of plaintiff. |
||
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 27/2025 | Niaz Hussain Hajano VS Shahmir Hajano and others | Tanveer Ahmed() | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Counsel Karachi. Matter called. Applicant Niaz Hussain is present but his counsel is called absent. Opponents are called absent. Report from Mukhtiarkar Hala received, while Reports from remaining concerned offices were not yet received . Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 16.12.2025 for Reports. Call report from concerned SHO, Nadra and U.C. |
||
| 3 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 25/2025 | Mst Shabeela ali VS General Public at Large | Syed Ayaz Ali Shah (ADVO-22811-SBC-KHW) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Counsel Karachi. Matter called. Applicant Mst. Shabeela is called absent, but her counsel is called present. Opponents are called absent. Reports already received from Concerned SHO, Incharge Nadra Hala, C.M.O Hala and Assistant Mukhtiarkar Taluka Saeedabad, which are kept on record. Further report of legal heirs submitted by Nadra Hala. Order passed thereon. Letter was issued to Mukhtiarkar Revenue Taluka Saeedabad for submission of report but same is not submitted. Issue reminder. To come up on 20.12.2025 for Service. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 4 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 5/2025 | Mst Ghulam Zahra VS Amjad Ali | Shuib Aziz() | Family Execution-Execution Application | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Counsel Karachi. Matter called. Plaintiff/D.H is called absent but her counsel is present. Defendant/J.D & his counsel are called absent. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. Put off to.15.12.2025 for objections. |
||
| 5 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 3/2025 | Mst. Gudi VS Nadir | Muneer Ahmed Gahothi(ADVO-132-SBC-MTY) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Counsel Karachi. Matter called. Plaintiff/D.H is called absent but her learned counsel is present. Defendant Nadir is called absent. The Service upon the defendant is already hereby held good. Learned counsel for plaintiff/D.H submitted statement along with CTC copy of Judgment in Family Suit No. 30/2023. Order passed thereon. filed. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice . Put off to.15.12.2025 for objections. |
||
| 6 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 22/2025 | Mst Shakeela VS General Public at large | Tanveer Ahmed() | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Counsel Karachi. Matter called. None is present from both sides. Learned counsels for applicant & opponents called absent. Report from already received from concerned Mukhtiarkar. which is kept on record. Put off to.16.12.2025 for objections. |
||
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 91/2025 | Mst Naseema VS Sajjad | Waheed Qadir (ADVO-143-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Counsel Karachi. Matter called. Plaintiff and her learned counsel are present. Defendant called absent. Matter is adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to.08.12.2025 for written statement as last and final chance. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Issues | |||||||
| 8 | F.S. (Family Suits) 19/2025 | Mst. Saba VS Maqsood | Himayoon(ADVO-264-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Counsel Karachi. Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Saba and her counsel are called absent. Defendant Maqsood is called absent but his counsel is present. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 18.12.2025 for settlement of Issues. |
||
| 9 | F.S. (Family Suits) 47/2025 | Mst Bashiran VS Ghulam Mustafa | Waheed Qadir (ADVO-143-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Counsel Karachi. Matter called. Plaintiff and her counsel are present. Defendant is called absent but his counsel is present. Matter is adjourned in the interest....18.12.2025 for Issues and hearing on application under section 17-A Family Court Act. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 10 | F.S. (Family Suits) 4/2024 | Mst. Fozia & another VS Imran | Gul Muhammad() | Ashfaque Ali Dahri(ADVO-158-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Counsel Karachi. Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Fozia is called absent but her counsel is present. Defendant Imran is called absent, but his counsel is present. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 20.12.2025 for evidence of defendant side. |
|
| 11 | F.S. (Family Suits) 31/2024 | Mst. Quratul-Aen VS Naveed Raheem Bux Mangrio | Niaz Hussain Bhutto(ADVO-1615-SBC-HYD) | Shakira Azam(ADVO-2824-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Counsel Karachi. Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Qurat-ul-Ain is called absent but her counsel is present. Defendant Naveed Raheem Bux is present, but his counsel is called absent. Matter adjourned in the interest of Justice as last and final chance. To come up on 20.12.2025 for evidence of defendant side. |
|
| 12 | F.S. (Family Suits) 49/2024 | Mst. Najma VS Shahid | Hub Ali(ADVO-122-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Counsel Karachi. Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Najma and her counsel are called absent. Defendant Shahid is called absent but his counsel is present. Today matter is fixed for evidence of plaintiff side. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 19.12.2025 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| 13 | F.S. (Family Suits) 91/2024 | Mst. Sumera and another VS Muhammad Hanif | Intizar Ali (ADVO-133-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Recovery of Medical Charges / Delivery Expenses ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Counsel Karachi. Matter called. Plaintiff & her counsel are present. Defendant is called absent but his counsel is present. To come up on 22.12.2025 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
| 14 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 1/2025 | Mst. Nazia VS Mahboob Hussain | Riaz Ali (ADVO-129-SBC-MTY) | Family Execution-Execution Application | |||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Judgment | |||||||
| 15 | F.S. (Family Suits) 20/2024 | Mst. Rashida VS Dilshad Ahmed Malik | Taj Muhammad(ADVO-130-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | |||
| 16 | F.S. (Family Suits) 57/2024 | Mst. Rabiya VS Wazir Ali | Muhammad Asif(ADVO-2734-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount | |||
| 17 | F.S. (Family Suits) 3/2025 | Mst. Asifa VS Muhammad Saleem | Inayat Hussain Shawal Khan (ADVO-131-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | |||