| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 30/2026 | Zaheer Khoso VS The State | Muhammad Asif(ADVO-2734-SBC-HYD) | Aftab Ali(ADVO-3186-SBC-HYD) | Cr.PC-497,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-34,PPC-427,PPC-506-B | 39/2026 Bhit Shah |
Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Cr. Bail Application called. Learned counsel for the applicant/accused is present. Learned ADPP for the State is present. Today Cr. Bail application is fixed for Service/hearing on application. Process/notice to complainant was returned served. Complainant Asif is present in person and submitted an application for grant of time to engage the counsel. Order passed on it. Granted. Copy of memo of application received by the complainant. Cr. Bail application is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 21.04.2026 for hearing on application. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 22/2026 | The State VS Abdul Ghaffar Rahu | Aftab Ali(ADVO-3186-SBC-HYD) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 10/2026 Bhit Shah |
Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Case called. Accused Abdul Ghaffar is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is called absent. Today case is fixed for Evidence. No PWs are present. Process/Summon upon PWs was returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 06.05.2026 for Evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 34/2015 | The state versus VS Shakeel & ors | Aftab Ali(ADVO-3186-SBC-HYD) | Arshad Ali (ADVO-470LC-SBC-JMS) | PPC-420,PPC-468,PPC-471,PPC-489-F | 105/2015 Hala |
Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Case called. Accused Shakeel Ahmed is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is called absent. Today case is fixed for Supply of copies. Application for adjournment submitted by Assistant of learned defense counsel. Order passed on it. Adjourned. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 13.05.2026 for Supply of copies. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| 4 | PPC 263/2025 | The State VS Khamiso and others | Aftab Ali(ADVO-3186-SBC-HYD) | Inayat Hussain Shawal Khan (ADVO-131-SBC-MTY) | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-353,PPC-427,PPC-447,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 15/2025 Salaro |
Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Case called. Accused Khamiso, Qasim, Shaman, Aijaz, Mukhtiar @ Ikhtiyar and Mukhtiar S/o Shah Dost are present on bail, accused Rustam is called absent without any intimation. While remaining accused Salahuddin, Abdul Razzaque, Ghulam Qadir and Meean are already declared as proclaimed offenders. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is called absent. Today case is fixed for Service/Supply of copies. Process/notice to accused Rustam was not issued by the office due to rush of work. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 14.05.2026 for Service/Supply of copies. Present accused are directed to attend. Issue notice to accused Rustam without fail. |
| 5 | PPC 34/2026 | The State VS Hazrat Yousif | Aftab Ali(ADVO-3186-SBC-HYD) | Muhammad Ibrahim(ADVO-1094-SBC-NWB) | 18/2026 Bhit Shah |
Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Case called. Accused Hazrat Yousif is called absent without any intimation. Learned ADPP is present. Today case is fixed for Service/Supply of copies. Process/notice to accused was returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 19.05.2026 for Service/Supply of copies. Issue notice to surety of accused without fail. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
| 6 | Cr.M.A. (Criminal Misc. Applications) 12/2025 | Jeewan VS The State and others | Allah Dino(ADVO-62-SBC-MTY) | Aftab Ali(ADVO-3186-SBC-HYD) | Cr.PC-145 | / |
Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Cr. Misc. application called. Complainant Jeewan and his counsel are called present. Respondents namely Ghulam Nabi, Aijaz and Rasool Bux are present, their counsel is called absent. Today Cr. Misc. application is fixed for Order. Cr. Misc. Application is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 30.04.2026 for Order. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 10/2026 | The State VS Shakeel Ahmed & others | Aftab Ali(ADVO-3186-SBC-HYD) | Arshad Ali (ADVO-470LC-SBC-JMS) | PPC-34,PPC-406,PPC-420,PPC-489-F | 99/2021 Hala |
Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Case called. Accused Shakeel Ahmed is present on bail, while remaining accused Sajid Ali and Ali Imran are already declared as absconders. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is called absent. Today case is fixed for Service. Process viz. 87 Cr.P.C. against absconders accused was returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Process viz. 88 Cr.P.C. against absconder accused Ali Imran was also issued, but such report not yet received. Application for adjournment submitted by Assistant of learned defense counsel. Order passed on it. Adjourned. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 13.05.2026 for Service. Present accused is directed to attend. Issue reminder of proclamation U/S 88 Cr.P.C. against absconder accused Ali Imran without fail. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 6/2025 |
Mubarak Khan VS Piyaro and others | Riaz Ali (ADVO-129-SBC-MTY) | Allah Dino(ADVO-62-SBC-MTY) | Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff Mubarak Khan is called absent, but his counsel is present. Defendants Piyaro, Muhammad Bux and Waseem alongwith their counsel are called present. Today matter is fixed for Written statement. Learned counsel for the defendants has submitted Written statement alongwith affidavits of defendant at Exh.11 to Exh.14 respectively. Order passed on it. Copy to otherside. Copy received by the learned counsel for plaintiff. Learned counsel for the defendants has also submitted an application u/o VII Rule XI CPC alongwith affidavit of defendant at Exh.15 & Exh.16 respectively. Order passed on it. Notice to otherside. Copy received by the learned counsel for plaintiff. To come up on 21.05.2026 10(2) compliance as well as Objections on application u/o VII Rule XI CPC. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 2/2026 | Shah Rukh Rajar VS Kamran Ali Rajar & others | Imdad Ali(ADVO-2354-SBC-HYD) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Matter called. Applicant Shah Rukh and his counsel are called absent. Opponents are also called absent. Reports were already received from the SHO of P.S Bhitshah, In-charge NADRA Hala, Town Committee Bhitshah and Mukhtiarkar Revenue Taluka Hala regarding legal heirs and property. Today matter is fixed for Objections. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 14.05.2026 for Objections. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 1/2026 | Mst. Zahida VS Asad Ali | Imran Zaib (ADVO-95-SBC-MTY) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Zahida and her counsel are called absent. Defendant Asad Ali is also called absent. Today matter is fixed for Service. Process/notice to defendant was not issued by the office due to cost not paid. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice as last and final chance. To come up on 18.05.2026 for Service. Issue notice to defendant through all modes including Publication on cost of plaintiff. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 4/2024 | Mst. Fozia & another VS Imran | Gul Muhammad() | Ashfaque Ali Dahri(ADVO-158-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Fozia and her counsel are called absent. Defendant Imran is present, but his counsel is called absent. The defendant Imran has deposited maintenance amount of Rs.3,000/-, same amount be deposited in NBP Hala bank account of this court. Today matter is fixed for evidence of defendant side. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 18.05.2026 for evidence of defendant side. |
|
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 91/2024 | Mst. Sumera and another VS Muhammad Hanif | Intizar Ali (ADVO-133-SBC-MTY) | Marvi(ADVO-6596-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Recovery of Medical Charges / Delivery Expenses ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Sumera and her counsel are called present. Defendant Muhammad Hanif and his counsel are also called present. Both learned counsels have jointly submitted compromise statement for withdrawn on the terms and conditions alongwith affidavits of both parties. Order passed on separate sheet. The suit of plaintiff is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to cost. |
|
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 102/2024 | Aaisha VS Noor Zaman | Shakira Azam(ADVO-2824-SBC-HYD) | Niaz Hussain Bhutto(ADVO-1615-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Matter called. Both parties are called present, but their counsels are called absent. Today matter is fixed for evidence of plaintiff side. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 18.05.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
|
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 49/2025 | Mst Malookan Leghari VS Muhammad Bachal | Ashfaque Ali Dahri(ADVO-158-SBC-MTY) | Niaz Hussain(ADVO-31-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work suspended due to strike of District Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Malookan and her counsel are called absent. Defendant Muhammad Bachal is called absent. Today matter is fixed for evidence of plaintiff side as well as Objections on application. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 13.05.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side as well as Objections on application. |
|