| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 249/2025 | The State VS Saleem & Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-34,PPC-392,PPC-452 | 141/2025 Bhit Shah |
Work suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Case called. Accused Saleem and Abu Bakar are present on bail, while accused Shero @ Sheeraz is produced through video-link by jail authority viz. Central Prison, Hyderabad. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is called absent. Today case is fixed for Evidence. Process/Summon upon PWs was returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 31.03.2026 for Evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. Accused Shero @ Sheeraz is remanded to jail custody with direction to produce the above named accused through video-link on next date of hearing. |
|
| 2 | PPC 272/2025 | The State VS Mujahid Hussain | Aftab Ali(ADVO-3186-SBC-HYD) | Inayat Hussain Shawal Khan (ADVO-131-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 3,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 138/2025 Bhit Shah |
Work suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Case called. Accused Mujahid Hussain is present on bail. Learned ADPP and learned defense counsel are called present. Learned defense counsel has submitted an application for condonation of last date of hearing on behalf of accused. Order passed on it. Condoned. Today case is fixed for Service/Evidence. Process/Notice to accused was returned served. Process/Summon upon remaining PWs were returned un-served, same are extended and handed over to process server. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 06.03.2026 for Evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| 3 | PPC 11/2026 | The State VS Ali Muhammad Machi | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 161/2025 Bhit Shah |
Work suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Case called. Accused Ali Muhammad is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is called absent. Today case is fixed for Evidence. Process/Summon to PWs was returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 05.03.2026 for Evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 4 | PPC 34/2015 | The state versus VS Shakeel & ors | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-420,PPC-468,PPC-471,PPC-489-F | 105/2015 Hala |
Work suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Case called. Accused Shakeel Ahmed is called absent without any intimation. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is called absent. Today case is fixed for supply of copies. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice due to absence of accused. To come up on 30.03.2026 for Service/Supply of copies. Issue notice to accused and his surety without fail. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 5 | 13-D Arms Ordinance 189/2012 | The state VS Ali Gohar | / |
Dormant case called. SIP/I.O has appeared and submitted progress report. Order passed on it. I/O and SP to arrest of proclaimed accused persons and ensure attendance of witnesses. SHO concerned is directed to submit progress report. To come up on 02.06.2026 for progress report. |
|||
| 6 | PPC 115/2013 | Mir Chakar khan VS Nawaz & ors | / |
Dormant case called. SIP/I.O has appeared and submitted progress report. Order passed on it. I/O and SP to arrest of proclaimed accused persons and ensure attendance of witnesses. SHO concerned is directed to submit progress report. To come up on 02.06.2026 for progress report. |
|||
| 7 | Hd.T. (Hudood Trial) 124/2013 | the state VS Muhammad Aslam | 90/2013 Hala |
Dormant case called. SIP/I.O has appeared and submitted progress report. Order passed on it. I/O and SP to arrest of proclaimed accused persons and ensure attendance of witnesses. SHO concerned is directed to submit progress report. To come up on 02.06.2026 for progress report. |
|||
| 8 | PPC 23/2015 | the State VS Anwar | 93/2015 Hala |
Dormant case called. SIP/I.O has appeared and submitted progress report. Order passed on it. I/O and SP to arrest of proclaimed accused persons and ensure attendance of witnesses. SHO concerned is directed to submit progress report. To come up on 02.06.2026 for progress report. |
|||
| 9 | PPC 10/2026 | The State VS Shakeel Ahmed & others | Aftab Ali(ADVO-3186-SBC-HYD) | PPC-34,PPC-406,PPC-420,PPC-489-F | 99/2021 Hala |
Work suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Case called. Accused Shakeel Ahmed is called absent without any intimation. While remaining accused Sajid Ali and Ali Imran are already declared as absconders. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is called absent. Today case is fixed for Service. Process viz. 87 Cr.P.C. against absconders accused was returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to process server. Process viz. 88 Cr.P.C. against absconders accused was also issued, but such report not yet received. Case is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 30.03.2026 for Service. Issue notice to accused and his surety and Issue reminder of proclamation U/S 88 Cr.P.C. against absconders accused without fail. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 16/2025 | Mst. Sabika Ansari VS Faris Khalique | Ghulam Ruquia Tooba(ADVO-110-SBC-MTY) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 of Guardian and Wards Act R/W 100 Cr.PC,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Work suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter called. Applicant Mst. Sabika Ansari and her counsel are called absent. Opponent Faris Khalique is also called absent. Reports were already received from the Incharge NADRA Hala, Municipal Committee Hala, SHO of PS Hala and Mukhtiarkar Revenue Hala. Process/notice to opponent was not issued by the office due to cost not paid. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 27.03.2026 for Service. Issue notice to opponent through bailiff as well as TCS/OCS on cost of applicant. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 1/2025 | Mst. Khairan VS Shahbaz & others | Ghulam Ruquia Tooba(ADVO-110-SBC-MTY) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 of Guardian and Wards Act R/W 100 Cr.PC | Work suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter called. Applicant Mst. Khairan and her counsel are called absent. The opponents are also called absent. The service upon the opponent No.01 & 02 is already hereby held good. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 27.03.2026 for Objections/Maintainability. |
||
| 3 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 25/2025 | Mst Shabeela ali VS General Public at Large | Syed Ayaz Ali Shah (ADVO-22811-SBC-KHW) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 29 Guardian and wards Act 1890 for permission of sale,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Work suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter called. Applicant Mst. Shabeela is called absent, but her counsel is present. Reports were already received from the concerned offices. Today matter is fixed for Objections. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 16.03.2026 for Objections. |
||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 144/2025 | Mst. Aisha VS Ghulam Hussain & Lakhmir | Jawaid Ali(ADVO-68-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Aisha and her counsel are called absent. Defendant Ghulam Hussain @ Lakhmeer is present, but his counsel is called absent. Today matter is fixed for Written statement/Objections. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 30.03.2026 for Written statement/Objections. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 102/2024 | Aaisha VS Noor Zaman | Shah Nawaz (ADVO-90-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Aisha is present, but her counsel is called absent. Defendant Noor Zaman and his counsel are called absent. Today matter is fixed for evidence of plaintiff side. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 30.03.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 1/2025 | Mst. Meema and another VS Zainal | Waheed Qadir (ADVO-143-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Work suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Meema and her counsel are called present. Defendant Zainal and his counsel are also called present. The defendant has deposited Interim maintenance amount of Rs.5,000/, same amount be deposited in NBP Hala bank account of this court. Today matter is fixed for evidence of plaintiff side. Matter is adjourned in the interest of Justice. To come up on 25.03.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Post-Trial | |||||||
| 7 | F.S. (Family Suits) 51/2024 | Mst. Zakiya VS Shahid Hussain | Jawaid Ali(ADVO-68-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Plaintiff Mst. Zakiya and her counsel are called present. Defendant Shahid Hussain and his counsel are called absent. Today matter is fixed for Post-trial. The opportunity was given to defendant but he has failed to appear before this court. Therefore, Post-trial proceedings stands failed. To come up on 16.03.2026 for final arguments. |
||