| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 63/2025 | The State VS Mehboob Ali | Aftab Ali(ADVO-3186-SBC-HYD) | Zeeshan Bashir Chandio() | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 226/2025 Hala |
Work has been suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Case called. Accused Mehboob Ali is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is present. No Pws are present. Process against Pws returned ,same is extended and handed over to the process server. To come up on 21.11.2026 for Evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| 2 | PPC 10/2026 | The State VS Shakeel Ahmed & others | Aftab Ali(ADVO-3186-SBC-HYD) | Sheeraz Ali(ADVO-239-SBC-MTY) | PPC-34,PPC-406,PPC-420,PPC-489-F | 99/2021 Hala |
Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Case called. Accused Shakeel Ahmed is called absent, his condonation application has filed by his learned counsel. Order passed thereon. while remaining accused Sajid Ali and Ali Imran have already been declared as proclaimed offenders. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is present. Complainant and his learned counsel are called absent but his associate is present. Process against Pws returned un-served,same is extended and handed over to the process server. Matter is adjourned by consent. To come up on 21.112026 for Evidence. |
| 3 | PPC 16/2026 | The State VS Kamal | Aftab Ali(ADVO-3186-SBC-HYD) | Faisal Aziz(ADVO-21739-SBC-KHS) | PPC-489-F | 166/2025 Bhit Shah |
Case called. Accused Kamal is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is present. No Pws are present. Process returned un-served,same is extended and handed over to the process server. Matter is adjourned by consent. To come up on 21.11.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| 4 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 5/2026 | The State VS Sikandar &another | Aftab Ali(ADVO-3186-SBC-HYD) | Muhammad Akram Rajput(ADVO-1772-SBC-HYD) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 55/2026 Bhit Shah |
Work has been suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Case called. Both accused persons namely Sikandar Ali and Ghulam Rasool are present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is present. No. Pws are present. Process returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to the process server. To come up on 17.11.10.2026 for Evidence. Present accused persons are directed to attend. |
| 5 | PPC 82/2026 | The State VS Shahnawaz Malookhani | Riaz Hussain Sabki(ADPP-0006-GOV-MTR) | Shuhabul Din Shah(ADVO-2766-SBC-HYD) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 122/2026 Bhit Shah |
Work has been suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Case called. Accused is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Learned defense counsel is called absent. Process against Pws is returned un-served, same is extended and handed over to the process server. Put of to 18.11.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
| 6 | PPC 87/2026 | The State VS Imam Bux & another | Riaz Hussain Sabki(ADPP-0006-GOV-MTR) | Muhammad Asif(ADVO-2734-SBC-HYD) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 123/2026 Bhit Shah |
Work has been suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Case called. Both accused persons are present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Process/Summon upon PWs is returned un-served and same is extended over to process server. Put of to 16.11.2026 for evidence. Present accused persons are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 7 | PPC 92/2026 | The State VS Dildar Ditani | Riaz Hussain Sabki(ADPP-0006-GOV-MTR) | Shuhabul Din Shah(ADVO-2766-SBC-HYD) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 120/2026 Bhit Shah |
Case Called. Accused Dildar is present on Bail. Learned ADPP is present. Charge against the accused is framed at EX: 02.Plea of accused is recorded at EX:02/A to which accused pleaded not guilty and claim for trial. Put of to 16.11.2026 For evidence. Accused is directed to attend on next date of hearing. Issue Summon to Pws. Call case property. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 8 | PPC 96/2026 | The State VS Ubedullah & another | Riaz Hussain Sabki(ADPP-0006-GOV-MTR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-34,PPC-399,PPC-401 | 92/2026 Bhit Shah |
Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Case called. Accused Ubedullah is called absent while accused Mirzo has shown absconder in the challan sheet. Lerned ADPP is present. NBW against absconder accused is returned un-executed,same is extended and handed over to the process server. Put of to 21.11.2026 for formal. Issue NBW against accused Ubedullah and notice to his surety. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 4/2026 |
Irfan Hussain Qureshi VS Ziabuddin Gambheer | Muhammad Akram Rajput(ADVO-1772-SBC-HYD) | Work has been suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent and his learned counsel is present. Defendant and his learned counsel are called absent but his associate is present. To come up on 14.11.2026 for written statement. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 4/2024 |
Naseer Kumbhar VS Mst. Shahida & others | Inayat Hussain Shawal Khan (ADVO-131-SBC-MTY) | Taj Muhammad(ADVO-130-SBC-MTY) | Work has been suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff Naseer Kumbhar and his learned counsel are called absent but his associate is present. Defendant Mst. Shahida and her learned counsel are called absent, but his associate is present. To come up on 14.11.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| 3 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 6/2024 |
Khalique Dino VS Mr. Jaro & others | Rafique Ul Zaman (ADVO-20085-SBC-KHE) | Riaz Ali (ADVO-129-SBC-MTY) | Work has been suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter called. Plaintiff Khalique Dino and his learned counsel are present. Defendants and their learned counsel are called absent but his associate is present. Matter is adjourned by consent. To come up on 19.11.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 27/2026 | Mst. Aaliya & Others VS Usama Tayyab | Muhammad Akram Rajput(ADVO-1772-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit is called. Plaintiff is called absent and her learned counsel is present and he has filed statement for withdrawn the suit at EX: 12. Heard. Order announced in open court. The suit of the plaintiff is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. |
||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 28/2026 | Mst. Aqsa VS Sufian Tayyab | Muhammad Akram Rajput(ADVO-1772-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Family suit is called. Plaintiff is called absent and her learned counsel is present and he has filed statement for withdrawn the suit at EX: 12. Heard. Order announced in open court. The suit of the plaintiff is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. |
||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 37/2026 | Mst. Attya Kharal VS Ali Raza Kharal | Rafique Ul Zaman (ADVO-20085-SBC-KHE) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Work has been suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Family Suit is called. Plaintiff is called absent and her learned counsel is present. Defendant appeared through his counsel Mr. Muhammad Rahim Ganbheer advocate and he has filed vakalatnama on behalf of defendant at EX: 13. Order passed thereon. Copies received by the learned counsel of defendant. Put of to 23.11.2026 for written statement. |
|
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 38/2026 | Mst. Aisha Wassan VS Hassan Raza Arain | Muhammad Asif(ADVO-2734-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Family suit called. Plaintiff is called absent and her learned counsel is present and he has filed statement along-with copy of News paper daily Ibrated dated 28.10.2026 and TCS receipt along-with confirmation report at EX: 13. Order passed thereon. Order passed on Order sheet. The service upon defendant is held good. Put of to 21.11.2026 for appearance of the defendant/written statement. |
||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 41/2026 | Mst. Maryam VS Muhammad Iqbal | Muhammad Asif(ADVO-2734-SBC-HYD) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work is suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Family suit called. Plaintiff is called absent and her learned counsel is present and he has filed statement along-with postal receipt at EX: 06. Order passed thereon. Learned counsel of plaintiff is directed to provide mobile number of the defendant for service through whatsp. Put of to 19.11.2026 for service. Repeat process against the defendant on costs through bailiff, Whatsp, TCS and publication. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 6 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 10/2026 | Ghulam Hussain @ Lakhmir VS Mst. Aisha & Others | Muneer Ahmed Gahothi(ADVO-132-SBC-MTY) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody),The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Work has been suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter called. Applicant Ghulam Hussain @ Lakhmir and his learned Counsel are present. Opponent Mst. Aisha is called absent and her learned counsel is present. Matter is adjourned by consent. To come up on 12.11.2026 for Objections. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Pre-Trial | |||||||
| 7 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 7/2026 | Bashir Ahmed Lakho VS Mst. Rani Sand | Arif Ali Shah(ADVO-185-SBC-MTY) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody),The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Work has been suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter called. Applicant Bashir Ahmed and his learned counsel are called absent. Opponent Mst. Rani and her learned counsel are present. Put of to 13.11.2026 for pre-trial and hearing on application under section 12 of Guardian and Wards Act. |
|
| 8 | F.S. (Family Suits) 33/2026 | Mst. Rani Sand & another VS Bashir Ahmed Lakho | Asif Ali (ADVO-288-SBC-MTY) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI),Arif Ali Shah(ADVO-185-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Worl has been suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar council. Matter called. Plaintiff Mst. Rani and her learned Counsel are present. Defendant Bashir Ahmed and his learned counsel are called absent. To come up on 13.11.2026 for pre-trial and hearing on application under section 17-A of Family Court Act. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 9 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 1/2025 | Mst. Khairan VS Shahbaz & others | Ghulam Ruquia Tooba(ADVO-110-SBC-MTY) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 of Guardian and Wards Act R/W 100 Cr.PC | Work has been suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter called. Applicant Mst. Khairan and her learned counsel are present. Opponents Shahbaz and Badal have already been declared as Ex-partee. Advocate of Opponent Shahbaz Rind is called absent. Mr. Tahir Nizamani advocate of Mst Jadi is present. Matter is adjourned by consent. To come up on 16.11.2026 for hering on application under order 1 Rule 10 CPC. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 10 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 36/2025 | Riyasat Ali Rajput VS Ronaq Ali and others | Muhammad Yousif() | Imdad Ali(ADVO-2354-SBC-HYD) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 of Guardian and Wards Act R/W 100 Cr.PC,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Work has been suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter called. Applicant Riyasat Ali and his learned counsel are present. Opponents Ronaq Ali and Mst. Mubeena are present and their learned counsel is called absent but his associate is present. Meeting of the Minor is held in court room, meeting expenses has been recieved by the opponent. Matter is adjourned by consent. To come up on 21.11.2026 for cross of opponents. |
|
| 11 | F.S. (Family Suits) 144/2025 | Mst. Aisha VS Ghulam Hussain & Lakhmir | Jawaid Ali(ADVO-68-SBC-MTY) | Asif Ali (ADVO-288-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Work has been suspended due to strike of Sindh Bar Council. Matter Called. Plaintiff Mst. Aisha is called absent and her learned counsel is present. Defendant Ghulam Hussain @ Lakhmir and his learned counsel are present. Put of to 12.11.2026 for Cross examination of plaintiff side/ hearing on application of striking of the defense of defendant and objection on application for modification. |
|