| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 53/2026 | Bilawal @ Bilal VS The State | Dilawar Ode(ADVO-4825-SBC-HYD) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 50/2026 Shahpur |
Bail application called. Advocate for accused and learned ADPP for state are present. Heard. Put off to---15.07.2026 for Orders |
|
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 52/2026 | Hassan @ Hussain VS The State | PPC-216-A | 51/2025 Matiyari |
Bail application called. Advocate for applicant/ accused and learned ADPP for state are present. Heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Bail is granted to accused in the sum of Rs 20,000/- with PR bond in the like amount for the satisfaction of this Court. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | PPC 99/2024 | The State VS Rehmat Ali and others | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Inayat Hussain Shawal Khan (ADVO-131-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 3,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 142/2024 Hala |
Case called. Accused Rehmat is present on bail. Learned ADPP and defense counsel are present. BW against Complainant and Mashir has returned served who are present and they are directed to appear on next date. Learned ADPP states that due to some reasons the case property could not be produced before the Court hence another date be fixed for such purpose. BW against the PWs is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to---22.07.2026 for evidence Accused are directed to attend. Call case property |
| 4 | PPC 89/2025 | The State VS Liaqat and other | ADPP(ADPP-0005-GOV-MTR) | Ali Akbar Shah(ADVO-1-SBC-MTY),Sajad Ali (ADVO-319-SBC-MTY) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-F,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 84/2025 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused are present on bail except accused Abdul Rehman. Learned ADPP, Advocate for complainant and defense counsel are present. Today the case is fixed for evidence. Complainant is called absent. Two PWs namely Sadam and Nizam are present and they are directed to appear on next date. BW against the PWs is also extended and handed over to process server. Put off to---28.07.2026 for evidence Present accused are directed to attend. Issue NBW against the accused Abdul Rehman. |
| 5 | PPC 88/2025 | The State VS Sadam Hussain and other | ADPP(ADPP-0005-GOV-MTR) | Muhammad Yousif() | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-L,PPC-427,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 70/2025 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused are present on bail except accused Ali. Learned ADPP, Advocate complainant and defense counsel are present. Learned defense counsel has submitted an application seeking condonation for absence of accused Ali. Order passed thereon. Condoned in the interest of justice. No PWs are in attendance. Put off to---28.07.2026 for evidence Present accused are directed to attend. Issue summons to Lady MO. |
| 6 | PPC 50/2026 | The State VS Bhag Chand | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | PPC-34,PPC-397 | 150/2024 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused is called absent as he has been released on bail from the Jail on; 13.07.2026. Learned ADPP is present. Summon upon PWs has returned with endorsement of process server. Order passed thereon. Put off to---25.07.2026 for evidence Issue BW against the accused. Issue BW against the PWs through SSP Matiari. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 7 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 50/2026 | The State VS Mst. Shamim and another | Riaz Hussain Sabki(ADPP-0006-GOV-MTR) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 21/2026 Oderolal |
Case called. Accused Mst Shamim is called absent while accused Arbab has already been shown as absconder in challan sheet. Learned ADPP is present. NBW against the absconding accused has returned un-executed with statements of two notables. Statement of process server/ ASI Allah Dino is recorded as Ex 1. Order passed thereon. Put off to---28.07.2026 for service Issue BW against the accused Shamim. Issue Proclamation u/s 87 Cr. PC and Order of attachment u/s 88 Cr. P.C against the absconding accused. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 3/2024 | Mst: Shazia VS Muhammad Ramzan | Ghulam Sarwar() | Family Execution-Execution Application | Execution application is fixed for compliance. Decree holder and her counsel are called absent. JD is present and submitted an application seeking time to deposit the amount. Order passed thereon. Adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to---21.07.2026 for compliance as well as order on application. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 6/2026 | Sht. Shanti VS Jagoo | Aaqil(ADVO-172-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent but her counsel is present. Defendant has appeared today. Mr Ghulam Sarwar Khushk Advocate has appeared and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of defendant with an application seeking time to file objections as Ex 13 and 14 respectively. Order passed thereon. File. Time granted for filing written statement. Put off to--21.07.2026 for written statement/ objections |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 3 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 7/2025 | Anwar Khoso VS Mst. Gulshan Khoso | Ghulam Sarwar (ADVO-309-SBC-MTY) | Kirshan Kumar(ADVO-248-SBC-MTY) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-Application U/S 7 & 10 of Guardian & Ward Act,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody) | Matter called. Applicant is present with his counsel. Opponent is called absent but her counsel is present. Applicant's counsel verbally requests for a date. Perusal of record shows that since last many dates of hearing the applicant has failed to appear for evidence hence request of applicant's counsel is allowed with strict directions to lead the evidence on next date. In case of failure, appropriate order in the matter shall be passed. Put off to---25.07.2026 for evidence of applicant side as well as objections on application u/s 12 G and W Act. |
|