| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 40/2026 | Nadeem @ Sepo VS The State | Abdul Jabbar(ADVO-268-SBC-MTY) | PPC-392 | 113/2025 Matiyari |
Bail application called. Advocate for accused and learned ADPP for state are present. Notice upon complainant has returned served who is present. Mr Maqbool Khoso Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf complainant with no objection of complainant on the grant of bail to accused. Order passed thereon. File. Order passed and announced in open Court. Bail is granted to accused in the sum of Rs 50,000/- with PR bond in the like amount for the satisfaction of this Court. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Supply of Copies | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 46/2026 | The State VS Abdul Hameed | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Ikhlas Ahmed(ADVO-183-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 13/2026 Shahpur |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Accused has submitted an application seeking condonation for absence on last dates. Order passed thereon. Condoned. Copy of police papers is supplied to accused as Ex 1. Put off to--04.06.2026 for Charge Accused is directed to attend. |
| 3 | Minor Acts (Minor Acts / Offences) 12/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Shoaib | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | PPC-279 | 79/2026 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Copy of police papers is supplied to accused as Ex 1 and Charge against accused is framed as Ex 2 and his plea is recorded as Ex 2-A to which he pleaded guilty, simultaneously, moved an application for same. Accused was served with show cause notice u/s 243 Cr. P.C. He submitted his reply. Order passed and announced in open Court. Accused is convicted u/s 243 Cr. P.C and imposed fine of Rs 3000/-. In case of failure in payment of fine amount, the accused shall undergo SI for one third of the imprisonment. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 4 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 43/2026 | The State VS Asghar Ali and another | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 19/2026 Shahpur |
Case called. Accused Asghar is present on bail while accused Jawad is already shown as absconder in challan. Learned ADPP is present. NBW against the absconding accused could not be issued by the office due to rush of work. Adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to---09.06.2026 for service Present accused is directed to attend. Issue NBW against the absconding accused without fail. |
|
| 5 | PPC 45/2026 | The State VS Hassan @ Hussain and another | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | PPC-216-A | 51/2025 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused Hassan alias Hussain is produced through video link by CP Hyderabad while accused Arbab is already shown as absconder in challan. Learned ADPP is present. NBW against accused has returned un-executed for want of more time, which is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to--04.06.2026 for evidence Accused is to be produced through video link by CP Hyderabad. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 1/2024 | Mst: Gullan VS Allah Bachayo | Peeral Majeedano(ADVO-13-SBC-MTY) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Matter called. Decree holder and her counsel are called absent. JD is also called absent. Notice to JD could not be issued by the office due to rush of work. Adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to---15.06.2026 for compliance Issue notice to JD through Bailiff. |
||
| 2 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 3/2024 | Mst: Shazia VS Muhammad Ramzan | Ghulam Sarwar() | Family Execution-Execution Application | Execution application is fixed for compliance. Decree holder is present with her counsel. JD is also present and submitted bank slip of Rs 22000/- with application. Order passed thereon. File. Heard. Put off to---15.06.2026 for compliance as well as order on application |
||
| 3 | F.Ex. (Family Executions) 1/2025 | Mst. Laila VS Ramesh | Dilawar Ode(ADVO-4825-SBC-HYD) | Family Execution-Execution Application | Execution application is fixed for compliance. Decree holder and her counsel are called absent. Warrant of arrest against the JD has not returned from the PS Shahpur. Put off to--- 15.06.2026 for compliance as well as objections on application for remaining dowry articles. Issue a fresh warrant of arrest against the JD through SHO PS Shahpur as well as issue show cause notice to SHO PS Shahpur. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 6/2026 | Sht. Shanti VS Jagoo | Aaqil(ADVO-172-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent but her counsel is present. Perusal of record shows that summons to defendant through concerend Court was issued but same has not returned in any manner. Order passed and announced in open Court as Ex 12. Service upon defendant is held good. Put off to--02.07.2026 for appearance/ written statement |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 7/2026 | Mst. Nazeeran VS Muhammad Khadim | Zeeshan Bashir Chandio() | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Amount,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff and her counsel are called absent. Summon upon defendant was issued through concerned Court but same has not returned in any manner. Plaintiff is directed to cause the issuance of summons to defendant as already ordered. In case of failure the appropriate order in the matter shall be decided in accordance with the law. Put off to---02.07.2026 for service Issue summons to defendant through concerned Court, TCS and E-notice on costs. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 12/2025 | Mst Tania VS Ashraf | Dilshad Ahmed(ADVO-80-SBC-MTY) | Ghulam Sarwar() | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance,Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent but her counsel is present. Defendant is called absent and his counsel is present. Plaintiff's counsel has submitted an application seeking condonation for absence of plaintiff as Ex 23. Order passed thereon. Condoned. Put off to---01.07.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
|
| 7 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 1/2026 | Abdul Karim VS Mst. Afshan | Peeral Majeedano(ADVO-13-SBC-MTY) | Ghulam Sarwar (ADVO-309-SBC-MTY) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 12,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody),The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Matter called. Applicant and his counsels are called absent. Opponent is called absent but her counsel is present and he has submitted an application seeking Condonation for absence of opponent as Ex 18. Order passed thereon. Condoned as last and final chance for evidence. Put off to--09.07.2026 for evidence of opponent side. |
|
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Judgment | |||||||
| 8 | F.S. (Family Suits) 14/2025 | Muhammad Hanif VS Mst Misbah | Dilshad Ahmed(ADVO-80-SBC-MTY) | Ghulam Sarwar() | Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights | Matter called. Parties are called absent but their counsels are present. Judgment passed and announced in open Court. Suit of plaintiff stands decreed with no order as to costs. |
|