| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 6/2026 | Rano @ Dhano VS The State | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 4/2026 Shahpur |
Bail application called. Learned Advocate for accused and learned ADPP for the state are present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Bail is granted to accused in the sum of Rs 10,000/- with PR bond in the like amount for the satisfaction of this Court. |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | PPC 81/2024 | The State VS Khalid and others | Ghulam Nabi(ADVO-2365-SBC-HYD) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 3,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 97/2024 Hala |
Case called. Accused are present on bail. Learned ADPP and defense counsel are present. Summon upon PWs has returned served out of them IO/SIP Jabar and Mashir/ PC are present. Defense counsel states that he shall cross examine all the witnesses on same day. Summon upon PWs is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to---10.02.2026 for evidence Accused are directed to attend. Issue NBW against the complainant |
|
| 3 | PPC 53/2025 | The State VS Raheem and other | Kamran Bashir s/o Bashir Ahmed Chandio() | PPC-337-H,PPC-34,PPC-380,PPC-457,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 34/2025 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused Raheem and Qurban are present on bail while accused Ahmed has already been declared as PO. Learned ADPP and defense counsel are present. Summon upon Complainant has returned served but he is called absent. Order passed thereon. Put off to---12.02.2026 for evidence Accused are directed to attend. Issue BW against all the PWs. |
|
| 4 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 3/2026 | The State VS Anwar | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Ikhlas Ahmed(ADVO-183-SBC-MTY) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 55/2025 Shahpur |
Case called. Accused is called absent without any intimation. Learned ADPP is present. Summon upon PWs has returned un-served which is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to---07.02.2026 for evidence Issue BW against the accused |
| 5 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 9/2026 | The State VS Lal Malook | Muhammad Arif(ADPP-0001-GOV-MTR) | Zeeshan Bashir Chandio() | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 151/2025 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused is called absent. Learned ADPP and defense counsel are present. Defense counsel has submitted an application seeking condonation for absence of accused. Order passed thereon. Condoned in the interest of justice. No PWs are in attendance. Put off to---11.02.2026 for evidence Issue summons to all the prosecution witnesses. |
| 6 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 12/2026 | The State VS Mir Hassan | Muhammad Arif(ADPP-0001-GOV-MTR) | Peeral Majeedano(ADVO-13-SBC-MTY) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 84/2025 Shahpur |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Accused has submitted an application seeking an adjournment. Order passed thereon. Adjourned in the interest of justice. Summons upon PWs is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to---03.02.2026 for evidence Accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 7 | Minor Acts (Minor Acts / Offences) 1/2026 | The State VS Barkat Ali and other | ADPP(ADPP-0005-GOV-MTR) | PPC-279 | 167/2025 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused are present on bail. Learned ADPP and defense counsel are present. Charge against the accused persons is framed as Ex 2 and their pleas are recorded as Ex 2-A to 2-C respectively to which they pleaded guilty. Accused persons have, simultaneously moved an application whereby pleading guilty. Instantly, accused persons have been served with show cause notice u/s 243 Cr. P.C, they submitted their reply whereby admitted their guilt and prayed for mercy. Order passed and announced in open Court. Accused are convicted u/s 243 Cr. P.C and imposed fine of Rs 3000/- each. In case of none payment of fine amount, they shall undergo SI for one fourth of the imprisonment. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 8 | PPC 133/2025 | The State VS Bilawal and other | Riaz Hussain Sabki(ADPP-0006-GOV-MTR) | PPC-34,PPC-397 | 14/2025 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused Bilawal is produced through video link by CP Hyderabad, while accused Ikhtiar and Farman have already been declared as POs. Learned ADPP is present. Order of attachment of proceedings US.88 Cr.PC yet not recieved. Put off to...07.02.2026 for further proceedings\order of attachment US.88 Cr.PC. Accused Bilawal be produced before this Court on next date. Call report u/s 88 Cr. PC from the Mukhtiarkar as per address of absconding accused as well as Issue show cause notice to him. |
|
| 9 | PPC 187/2025 | The State VS Abu and another | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 3,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 164/2024 Hala |
Case called. Accused Abu and Lal Bux alias Naeem are called absent. Learned ADPP is present. Notice to surety of accused Lal Bux alias Naeem has returned un-served which is extended and handed over to process server. NBW against accused Lal Bux alias Naeem and BW against accused Abu have also returned un-executed for want of more time which are extended and handed over to process server. Put off to--- 10.02.2026 for service |
|
| 10 | PPC 204/2025 | State VS Lal Bux @ Naeem Mallah | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 136/2025 Hala |
Case called. Accused Lal Bux alias Naeem is called absent without any intimation. Learned ADPP is present. NBW against accused and notice to his surety have returned un-executed/ un-served through ASI Tahir seeking further time for service/ execution. Order passed thereon. Time is granted for service of NBW and notice to surety with directions to ensure the service till next date and report. Adjourned till next date. To come up on; 10.02.2026 for service |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 7/2025 |
Mst Mehrunnisa VS Muhammad Ismail | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Ikhlas Ahmed(ADVO-183-SBC-MTY) | Matter called. Parties are called absent but their counsels are present. Defendant's counsel has submitted an application, as Ex 17, seeking adjournment on the ground of compromise talks. Order passed thereon. Adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to----12.02.2026 for arguments on U/O 7 Rule 11 C.P.C as hearing on application U/O 11 Rule 14 R/W section 151 CPC as well objections. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 1/2026 | Mst. Khadija VS Khadim Hussain | Ikhlas Ahmed(ADVO-183-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent but her counsel is present and he has, with statement as Ex 7, submitted receipt of TCS. Order passed thereon. File. Plaintiff's counsel has also submitted an application u/o 5 Rule 20 CPC as Ex 8 for issuance of summons to defendant through substitute way. Order passed thereon. Application is allowed. Put off to---06.02.2026 for service Issue summon to defendant through Bailiff, E-notice and publication in Daily PEHENJIR AKHBAR on costs. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 11/2024 | Mst. Muskan VS Sirat-un-Nabi | Sajad Ali (ADVO-319-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Recovery of Maintenance of Iddat Period,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent but her counsel is present. Defendant is present with his witness Mst Farzana as well as the Counsel. Evidence of defendant's witness Mst Farzana is recorded as Ex 44. Defendant's counsel has submitted side close statement as Ex 45. Order passed thereon. File. Put off to---07.02.2026 for arguments |
||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 18/2025 | Mst. Shazia VS Shahid | Ghulam Sarwar() | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent but her counsel is present. Perusal of R and Ps shows that the defendant had appeared on; 12.09.2025 and moved an application which was treated as his written statement, since then for about 12 dates the defendant has been absent, though, sufficient opportunities were given to him to avail his right of defense but he failed. Today the matter is fixed for evidence of defendant side but the defendant is called absent. Order passed and announced in open Court as Ex 17. Debarred is debarred from leading his defense/ evidence. Put off to---06.02.2026 for final arguments |
||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 31/2025 | Mst: Murk VS Majid Ali | Ghulam Sarwar() | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Matter called. Plaintiff is present with her counsel. Defendant and his counsel are called absent. Learned plaintiff's counsel has submitted side close statement as Ex 19. Order passed thereon. File. It is evident from the record that the defendant, despite being provided with sufficient opportunities, has failed to avail the right to cross examine the plaintiff and her witness. Order passed and announced in open Court as Ex 20. Defense of defendant is hereby struck off and cross to plaintiff and her witness is treated as Nill. Put off to---06.02.2026 for evidence of defendant side. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 5 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 1/2025 | Nasrullah Unnar VS Mst. Tasleem Unnar | Mushtaque Ali(ADVO-467-SBC-NSF) | Ghulam Farooque(ADVO-104-SBC-BDN) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 12,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 25 (For Custody),The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Matter called. Applicant and his counsel are called absent. Opponent is present with her counsel. Today the matter is fixed for arguments. Adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to--10.02.2026 for arguments |
|