| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 7/2025 | The State VS Ali Sher and others | Dilawar Ali (ADVO-2227-SBC-SUK) | Muhammad Yousif() | PPC-147,PPC-148,PPC-149,PPC-353,PPC-427,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 6/2024 Salaro |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Ishaque and Rasool Bux are present on bail while remaining accused are called absent. Learned ADPP and defense counsel are present. Complainant is called absent. Defense counsel has submitted an application seeking condonation for absence of accused Ali Hassan. Order passed thereon. Condoned. Co-accused Rasool Bux has submitted an application seeking condonation for absence on last dates. Condoned with direction to attend the Court regularly. BW against the PWs is extended and handed over to process server. NBW against the absent accused persons is also extended and handed over to process server. Put off to---21.07.2026 for evidence Present accused are directed to attend. |
| 2 | PPC 105/2025 | The State VS Ali Gohar and another | ADPP(ADPP-0005-GOV-MTR) | PPC-34,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 116/2025 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused Waqar is present on bail and accused Ali Gohar is called absent while accused Gada Hussain has already been declared as PO. Learned ADPP is present. Defense counsel and Advocate for complainant are called absent. Complainant is also called absent. Accused Waqar has submitted an application seeking condonation for absence of accused. Order passed thereon. Condoned. Summon upon PWs has returned un-served with endorsement. Put off to---23.07.2026 for evidence Accused are directed to attend. Issue BW against the complainant and PWs. |
|
| 3 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 34/2026 | The State VS Punhoon | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Peeral Majeedano(ADVO-13-SBC-MTY) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 12/2026 Oderolal |
Case called. Accused is called absent without any intimation. Learned ADPP is present. Summon upon PWs has returned un-served for want of more time which is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to---16.07.2026 for evidence Issue BW against the accused. |
| 4 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 9/2026 | The State VS Lal Malook | Muhammad Arif(ADPP-0001-GOV-MTR) | Zeeshan Bashir Chandio() | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 151/2025 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused is called absent without any intimation. Learned ADPP is present. Notice to accused has returned un-served. Order passed thereon. Process upon PWs has returned un-served which is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to---16.07.2026 for evidence Issue BW against the accused. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 5 | DC (Direct Complaint) 2/2026 | Allah bux VS Nadeem @ Naveed & others | Ikhlas Ahmed(ADVO-183-SBC-MTY) | PPC-34,PPC-365B,PPC-397,PPC-452,PPC-496,PPC-496A,PPC-506-B | / |
||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 6 | PPC 5/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Sidique and another | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Karimdad() | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 80/2025 Shahpur |
Case called. Accused Abdul Majeed is called absent as he has absconded while accused Muhammad Siddique has already been declared as PO. Learned ADPP is present. NBW against accused Abdul Majeed and notice to sureties of both accused have returned un-executed/ un-served for want of more time. Accordingly, the time for service of NBW and notice to surety is extended and same are handed over to the process server. Put off to--- 13.07.2026 for service |
| 7 | PPC 33/2026 | The State VS Abdullah and other | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Ali Akbar Shah(ADVO-1-SBC-MTY),Badal Gahoti(ADVO-2200-SBC-HYD) | PPC-392 | 72/2025 Shahpur |
Case called. Accused Khan Muhammad and Muzafar are present on bail and accused Abdullah is called absent while remaining accused have already been shown as absconders in challan sheet. Learned ADPP is present. Report u/s 87 Cr. P.C has not been received yet from the SHO concerned. Process server PS Shahpur has appeared and requested for a date for submission of report u/s 87 Cr. PC as the copy of publication in newspaper has not been received from the concerned news Editor. Request is allowed with direction to submit the report on next date. Put off to---18.07.2026 for service Accused are directed to attend. |
| 8 | PPC 39/2026 | The State VS Abdul Majeed and another | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Karimdad() | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 3/2026 Shahpur |
Case called. Accused Abdul Majeed and Muhammad Siddique are called absent without any intimation. Learned ADPP is present. Process viz NBW against the accused persons returned unserved and the same is extended and handed over to the process server. Notice to surety of both accused persons has returned un-served for want of more time, which is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to---13.07.2026 for service |
| 9 | PPC 15/2026 | The State VS Bhag Chand | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Anwar Khan() | PPC-412 | 14/2026 Oderolal |
Case called. Accused Bhag chand is produced through video link by CP Hyderabad and accused Abdul Hadi is called absent while accused Mazhar alias Mazar has already been shown as proclaimed offender. Learned ADPP is present. Defense counsel is called absent. NBW against absconding accused has returned un-executed with statement of two notables. Statement of process server is recorded as Ex 1. Order passed thereon. Defense counsel of accused Abdul Hadi has submitted an application seeking condonation for absence of accused. Order passed thereon. Condoned. Put off to---18.07.2026 for service Accused Bhag Chand is to be produced through video link on next date. Issue proclamation u/s 87 Cr. P.C and Order of attachment u/s 88 Cr. P.C against the absconding accused. |