| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 8/2026 | Ali Gul VS The State | Ikhlas Ahmed(ADVO-183-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 7/2026 Shahpur |
Bail application called. Advocate for accused and learned ADPP are present. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Bail is granted to accused in the sum of Rs 10,000/- with PR in the like amount for the satisfaction of this Court. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 32/2025 | Mst: Zainab VS Sikander Ali | Dilawar Ode(ADVO-4825-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights | Matter called. Plaintiff and her counsel are called absent. It is evident from the record that the matter for the service upon defendant by way of publication, E-notice and through concerned Court since last 10 date of hearing but the plaintiff has, consecutively, failed to ensure the compliance of service of summons despite grant of sufficient time and opportunities which indicates toward the lack of interest of plaintiff in the instant matter. Not only that but also today neither the plaintiff and her counsel are present, though the matter has been called thrice since morning. Order passed and announced in open Court. The instant suit stands dismissed in none prosecution. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 2 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 9/2025 | Mst. Fatima VS Gul Hassan and other | Kamran Bashir s/o Bashir Ahmed Chandio() | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Matter called. Applicant is called absent but her counsel is present. Heard. Order passed and announced in open Court. Application stands allowed. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 3 | G&W. Appl. (G&W Applications) 12/2026 | Ghulam Raza VS General Public at large and other | Aaqil(ADVO-172-SBC-MTY) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 10,The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 7 | Matter called. Applicant is called absent but his counsel is present. Notice issued to opponent No 4 through concerned Court has returned un-served for want of more time. Order passed thereon. Put off to---06.02.2026 for service Issue notice to opponent No 4 through concerned Court |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 9/2025 | Mst. Shumaila VS Shahzad Ali Dhamach | Dilawar Ode(ADVO-4825-SBC-HYD) | Muhammad Samiullah (ADVO-316-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula ,Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance | Matter called. Plaintiff and her counsel are called absent. Defendant is present with his counsel. Today the matter is fixed for evidence of plaintiff side as well as hearing o application u/s 17-A of WPFC Act. Adjourned with last and final chance to proceed with the matter, else the appropriate order in the matter, shall be passed. Put off to---06.02.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side as well as hearing on application u/s 17-A of WPFC Act. |
|
| 5 | F.S. (Family Suits) 39/2025 | Waqar Ali VS Mst. Rizwana | Sajad Ali (ADVO-319-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights | Matter called. Plaintiff is present with his counsel. Defendant is called absent but her counsel is present. Plaintiff's counsel has submitted an application seeking an adjournment as Ex 14. Order passed thereon. Matter adjourned. Put off to---13.02.2026 for evidence of plaintiff side. |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Judgment | |||||||
| 6 | F.S. (Family Suits) 3/2024 | Sanober VS Abdul Samad Junejo | Peeral Majeedano(ADVO-13-SBC-MTY) | Asad Ali(ADVO-6087-SBC-HYD) | Family Suit-Suit for Maintenance ,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff and her counsel are present. Defendant and his counsel are present. Today the matter is fixed for Judgment. Defendant's counsel has submitted an application u/o 9 Rule 9 Read with section 151 CPC as Ex 44. Order passed thereon. Notice to other side. Same is received. Plaintiff's counsel has given his no objection on the application. Application allowed subject to condition that the defendant shall deposit the maintenance amount as well as proceed with evidence after completing the conditions effectively. Resultantly, the Order dated; 21.01.2026 stands recalled. Simultaneously, the plaintiff's counsel has, with statement as Ex 45, deposited Rs 36000/- (Thirty six thousands) as maintenance of minor at the rate of Rs 6000/- (July, 2025 to December, 2025). Order passed thereon. File. At the request of plaintiff's counsel, the above amount (Rs 36000/-) is handed over to plaintiff in open Court under proper receiving. Evidence of defendant is recorded as Ex 46. Defendant's counsel has submitted side close statement as Ex 47. Order passed thereon. File. Put off to---17.02.2026 for post trial. |
|