| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 89/2024 | The State VS Muhammad Juman and others | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Niaz Hussain Bhutto(ADVO-1615-SBC-HYD) | PPC-392,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 192/2024 Hala |
Case called. Accused are present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Defense counsel and Advocate for complainant are called absent. Order passed and announced in open Court. Application u/s 249-A Cr. P.C stands dismissed. Investigation officer/ SIP Sain Dino is present and directed to appear on next date. BW against the IO is also extended and handed over to process server. Put off to--23.02.2026 for evidence Accused are directed to attend. |
| 2 | PPC 68/2025 | The State VS Saleem | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGED(ADVO-007-SBC-LRK) | PPC-380,PPC-457 | 226/2024 Hala |
Case called. Accused Saleem is present on bail. Learned ADPP and defense counsel are present. Summon upon Investigation officer has returned served who is present and his deposition is recorded as Ex 5. Prosecution closed its evidence side through statement as Ex 6. Order passed thereon. File. Statement of accused is recorded as Ex 7. Heard. Judgement passed and announced in open Court. Accused is acquitted u/s 245 (i) Cr. P.C. He is present on bail, his bail bonds stands cancelled and surety is discharged. |
|
| 3 | PPC 53/2025 | The State VS Raheem and other | Kamran Bashir s/o Bashir Ahmed Chandio() | PPC-337-H,PPC-34,PPC-380,PPC-457,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 34/2025 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused Raheem and Qurban are present on bail while accused Ahmed has already been declared as PO. Learned ADPP and defense counsel are present. Advocate for complainant is called absent. Complainant is present and he has submitted an application seeking an adjournment. Order passed thereon. Adjourned in the interest of justice. Process upon PWs is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to---26.02.2026 for evidence Accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 4 | PPC 206/2025 | The State VS Ali Murtaza | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-489-F | 139/2025 Hala |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. Learned ADPP and Advocate for complainant are present. Defense counsel is called absent. Summon Complainant and his PW has returned served who are present. Complainant is directed to bring his witnesses on next date. Summon upon PWs is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to---18.02.2026 for evidence Accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 5 | PPC 106/2025 | The State VS Saleem and another | ADPP(ADPP-0005-GOV-MTR) | Maqbool(ADVO-233-SBC-MTY) | 33/2025 Oderolal |
Case called. Accused are present on bail. Learned ADPP and defense counsel are present. Summon Complainant and his PW has returned served who were present on first call but later one left away the Court without intimation on second and third calls. Defense counsel has submitted an application seeking an adjournment. Order passed thereon. Adjourned. Put off to---26.02.2026 for evidence Accused are directed to attend. Issue BW against the complainant and PWs. |
|
| 6 | PPC 2/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Ishaque @ Porho | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 158/2025 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. Learned ADPP and defense counsel are present. Summon upon Mashir/ HC and Investigation officer has returned served who are present and their depositions are recorded as Ex 4 and 5 respectively. Prosecution closed its evidence side through statement as Ex 6. Order passed thereon. File. Statement of accused is recorded as Ex 7. Heard. Judgement passed and announced in open Court. Accused is acquitted u/s 245 (i) Cr. P.C. He is present on bail, his bail bonds stands cancelled and surety is discharged. |
|
| 7 | PPC 9/2026 | The State VS jai hemnani | PPC-324,PPC-420 | 45/2025 Shahpur |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. Learned ADPP and defense counsel are present. Learned defense counsel has submitted an application seeking condonation for late coming of accused. Order passed thereon. Condoned. Summon upon PWs has returned un-served for want of more time. Accordingly, it is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to---05.03.2026 for evidence Accused is directed to attend. |
||
| 8 | PPC 11/2026 | The State VS Abdul Majeed | Muhammad Arif(ADPP-0001-GOV-MTR) | Peeral Majeedano(ADVO-13-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 78/2025 Shahpur |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. Learned ADPP and defense counsel are present. Summon Mashir and IO has returned served who are present and their depositions are recorded as Ex 3 and 5 respectively. Summon upon remaining PWs is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to---21.02.2026 for evidence Accused is directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 9 | Juv. Child Act (JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ORDINANCE) 45/2025 | The State VS Raja @ Poch and another | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 166/2025 Hala |
Case called. Accused Sahib Dino has been produced through video link by CP Hyderabad while accused Raja is not produced by the Youthful offender Industrial Industrial school Hyderabad. Today the case is fixed for Charge. Adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to---19.02.2026 for charge. Superintendent central Prison Hyderabad is directed to produce the accused Sahib Dino on next date through video link. Issue Order for online production of accused Raja to Superintendent Youthful offender Industrial Industrial school Hyderabad with directions to produce the accused before this court through video link. |
|
| 10 | Minor Acts (Minor Acts / Offences) 4/2026 | The State VS Dilshad Ahmed and another | Muhammad Arif(ADPP-0001-GOV-MTR) | Muhammad Yousif() | PPC-279 | 179/2025 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused are called absent without any intimation. Learned ADPP and defense counsels are present. Defense counsels have submitted a joint application seeking condonation for absence of both accused persons. Order passed thereon. Condoned as last and final chance. Put off to---23.02.2026 for Charge |
| 11 | PPC 15/2026 | The State VS Muhammad Irfan | Muhammad Arif(ADPP-0001-GOV-MTR) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 73/2025 Shahpur |
Case called. Accused Irfan Abbasi is present on bail while accused Abdul Latif has already been declared PO. Learned ADPP is present. Charge against the accused is framed as Ex 4 and his plea is recorded as Ex 4-A to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed the trial. Put off to---26.02.2026 for evidence Accused directed to attend. Issue summons to all the PWs. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 12 | PPC 38/2025 | The State VS Farqooque and another | Muhammad Arif(ADPP-0001-GOV-MTR) | PPC-379,PPC-419,PPC-420 | 121/2024 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused Farooque has absconded away while accused Arsalan is already shown as absconder in challan sheet. Learned ADPP is present. Today the matte is fixed for service of 88 Cr. P.C. Report from the Mukhtiarkar concerned has not been received yet. Notice to surety of accused has not been issued by the office due to rush of work. In the circumstances the case is adjourned. Put off to--- 24.02.2026 for service Issue show cause notice to the Mukhtiarkar Faisalabad, Punjab for none submission of report u/s 88 Cr. P.C. Issue notice to surety of accused Farooque. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 7/2025 |
Mst Mehrunnisa VS Muhammad Ismail | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Ikhlas Ahmed(ADVO-183-SBC-MTY) | Matter called. Both parties and their counsles are present and have submitted a joint application as Ex 18 stating therein that the parties have settled their issued outside the Court hence withdraw from the instant suit. Order passed and announced in open Court. Parties are present. Plaintiff affirms that compromise between parties was executed out of the Court hence the suit is dismissed as withdrawn. |
||