| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 1 | PPC 29/2023 | The State VS Sikandar Ali Shaikh | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR),Waheed Qadir (ADVO-143-SBC-MTY) | Mirza Naeem Baig(ADVO-1694-SBC-HYD) | PPC-489-F | 101/2023 Hala |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. Learned ADPP, defense counsel and Advocate for complainant are present. Manager, Mobilink Bank Hala is present and his deposition is recorded as Ex 7. Process upon remaining PWs is extended and handed over to process server. Put off to--15.04.2026 for evidence Accused is directed to attend. |
| 2 | PPC 53/2025 | The State VS Raheem and other | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR),Kamran Bashir s/o Bashir Ahmed Chandio() | Ali Akbar Shah(ADVO-1-SBC-MTY) | PPC-337-H,PPC-34,PPC-380,PPC-457,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 34/2025 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused Raheem and Qurban are present on bail while accused Ahmed has already been declared as PO. Learned ADPP and Defense counsel are present. Advocate for complainant is called absent. Complainant and his PWs are also called absent. BW against PWs has returned un-served which is extended with strict directions to process server to serve the BW properly and submit report on next date. Put off to---16.04.2026 for evidence Accused are directed to attend. |
| 3 | Juv. Child Act (JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ORDINANCE) 45/2025 | The State VS Raja @ Poch and another | Riaz Hussain Sabki(ADPP-0006-GOV-MTR) | Muneer Ahmed Gahothi(ADVO-132-SBC-MTY) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 166/2025 Hala |
Case called. Accused Sahib Dino has been produced through video link by CP Hyderabad while accused Raja is produced by the Youthful offender Industrial Industrial school Hyderabad. Today the matter is fixed for evidence. BW against the PWs has returned served, yet none is in attendance. Order passed and announced in open Court. Accused are acquitted u/s 249-A Cr. P.C. They are confined in prison, hence let acquittal orders be sent to the concerned prisons with directions to release the accused if so they are not required in any other case/ crime so. |
| 4 | PPC 103/2025 | The State VS Zulfiqar & another | Ghulam Abbas (ADVO-141-SBC-MTY),Muhammad Arif(ADPP-0001-GOV-MTR) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-506-B | 146/2025 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused are present on bail. Learned ADPP and Advocate for complainant are present. Complainant is present with his private witnesses. Accused Zulfiqar has submitted an application seeking an adjournment. Order passed thereon. Accused is directed to engage an Advocate to proceed with the case on next date without fail. Complainant and his PWs are bound down. BW is also extended and handed over to process server. Put off to--22.04.2026 for evidence Accused are directed to attend. |
|
| 5 | PPC 1/2026 | The State VS Nisar Ahmed | ADPP(ADPP-0005-GOV-MTR) | Salamat Ali(ADVO-278-SBC-MTY) | Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 4,Gutka & Main Puri Act 2019-Section 8(i) | 81/2025 Shahpur |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. Learned ADPP and defense counsel are present. Summon upon SIP Ahmed Ali Halo has returned served who is present and his deposition is recorded as Ex 5.Prosecution closed its evidence through statement as Ex 6. Order passed thereon. File. Statement of accused is recorded as Ex 7. Heard. Judgment passed and announced in open Court. Accused is acquitted u/s 245 (i) Cr. P.C. He is present on bail, his bail bond stands cancelled and surety is discharged. |
| 6 | Prohibition Ord. (Prohibition Ordinance (3/4)) 7/2026 | The State VS Punhoon | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Hudood Ordinances-3/4 PEHO | 35/2025 Oderolal |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. Learned ADPP and defense counsel are present. Summon upon SIP Allah Dito has returned served who is present and his deposition is recorded as Ex 5.Prosecution closed its evidence through statement as Ex 6. Order passed thereon. File. Statement of accused is recorded as Ex 7. Heard. Judgment passed and announced in open Court. Accused is acquitted u/s 245 (i) Cr. P.C. He is present on bail, his bail bond stands cancelled and surety is discharged. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 1 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 6/2025 |
Shumail Almani VS Jairam Bheel & others | Loung Khan Jakhrani(ADVO-5550-SBC-HYD) | Matter called. Both parties and their counsels are present. Today the matter is fixed for further proceedings. Adjourned due to none appearance of both parties with directions to proceed with the matter on next date. In case of failure, appropriate orders shall be passed. Put off to---17.04.2026 for further proceedings |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 2 | IIIrd Class Civil Suits 4/2025 |
Shumail Almani VS Chandu Bheel & Others | Loung Khan Jakhrani(ADVO-5550-SBC-HYD) | Nusrat Hussain(ADVO-51394-SBC-MTY) | Matter called. Plaintiff and his counsel are present. Defendant No 1, 3 and 4 are called absent, though defendant No 2 has not appeared yet. Advocate for defendants is called absent. Adjourned due to none appearance of both parties with directions to proceed with the matter on next date. In case of failure, appropriate orders shall be passed. Put off to---17.04.2026 for written statement of defendants No 2 as well as hearing on applications u/o 7 Rule 11 CPC. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | F.S. (Family Suits) 1/2026 | Mst. Khadija VS Khadim Hussain | Ikhlas Ahmed(ADVO-183-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter called. Plaintiff is called but her counsel is present and he has, with statement as Ex 12, submitted receipt of register post. Order passed thereon. File Plaintiff's counsel has also stated in the above statement that all modes of service have been adopted and service of TCS is not available in the area where the defendant resides. Bailiff has submitted E-notice with report. Order passed thereon. Order passed and announced in open Court as Ex 13. Service upon defendant is held good. Put off to---17.04.2026 for appearance/ written statement |
||
| 2 | F.S. (Family Suits) 3/2026 | Mst. Falak Naz VS Dildar | Ikhlas Ahmed(ADVO-183-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Dissolution of Marriage by way of Khula | Matter called. Plaintiff is called but her counsel is present and he has submitted statement as Ex 8 stating therein that all modes of service have been adopted and service of TCS is not available in the area where the defendant resides. Bailiff has submitted report of summons and E-notice as well. Order passed thereon. Order passed and announced in open Court as Ex 09. Service upon defendant is held good. Put off to---17.04.2026 for appearance/ written statement |
||
| 3 | F.S. (Family Suits) 5/2026 | Sht. Najo VS Lalo Bheel | Ikhlas Ahmed(ADVO-183-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Suit for Judicial Separation of Marriage,Family Suit-Suit for Recovery of Dowry Article | Matter called. Plaintiff is called but her counsel is present and he has submitted statement as Ex 8 stating therein that all modes of service have been adopted and service of TCS is not available in the area where the defendant resides. Bailiff has submitted E-notice with report. Order passed thereon. Order passed and announced in open Court as Ex 09. Service upon defendant is held good. Put off to---17.04.2026 for appearance/ written statement |
||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | F.S. (Family Suits) 14/2025 | Muhammad Hanif VS Mst Misbah | Dilshad Ahmed(ADVO-80-SBC-MTY) | Family Suit-Restitution of Conjugal Rights | Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent. Plaintiff's counsel was present on first call but is called absent now. Defendant is present but her counsel is called absent. Adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to---21.04.2026 for evidence of defendant side. |
||