| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Application (U/S 497 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 792/2026 | Allah Dad Chand VS The State | Abdul Rauf Memon(ADVO-241-SBC-MTY) | Sheraz Ali(ADPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-341,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 170/2026 Matiyari |
Cr: Bail Appln: u/s 497 Cr.PC called. Learned counsel for the applicant/accused is present. ADPP is present. Complainant is present along with his counsel. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open court. The bail of applicant/accused is hereby granted subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs: 150,000/- with PR bond in the like amount. |
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 807/2026 | Fayaz Ali VS The State | Sheraz Ali(ADPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-353 | 142/2026 Matiyari |
Cr: Bail Appln: u/s 497 Cr.PC called. Learned counsel for accused is present. ADPP is present. Argument heard. Order passed and announced in open court. The bail of applicant/accused is hereby granted subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs: 30,000/- with PR bond in the like amount. |
|
| 3 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 793/2026 | Allah Dad VS The State | Sheraz Ali(ADPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | PPC-114,PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 168/2026 Matiyari |
Cr: Bail Appln: u/s 497 Cr.PC called. Learned counsel for the applicant/accused is present. ADPP is present. Complainant is present along with his counsel. Arguments heard. Order passed and announced in open court. The bail of applicant/accused is hereby granted subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs: 150,000/- with PR bond in the like amount. |
|
| 4 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 806/2026 | Fayaz Ali Khaskheli VS The State | Sheraz Ali(ADPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-353,PPC-401 | 141/2026 Matiyari |
Cr: Bail Appln: u/s 497 Cr.PC called. Learned counsel for accused is present. ADPP is present. Argument heard. Order passed and announced in open court. The bail of applicant/accused is hereby granted subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs: 30,000/- with PR bond in the like amount. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Compromise Appl: | |||||||
| 5 | SC (Murder Trial) 5/2015 | State VS Bakhshan@ Leemon & Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-302,PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-504 | 6/2014 Jakhri |
Case called. Accused Yaroo and Peero are produced by J.A. through video link. The case against the remaining accused, namely Bakhshan and Haji, was kept on dormant file vide order dated 13.11.2015. Mr. Ghulam Sarwar Khushk, Advocate, as Pauper Counsel for accused Yaroo and Peero is present. Complainant and PWs Qadir Bux present and Report from concerned, SHO received. Order passed on it. Report. from NADRA received in which stated that there is no CNIC of deceased. Complainant as well as accused party are directed to provide CNIC of deceased. Mukhtiarkar Matiari submitted report. Order passed on it. Copy of this report be sent to the learned Deputy commissioner Matiari for information or action in case of misguiding and call report from concerned Mukhtiarkar through D.C. Matiari. Complainant is directed to produce all the legal heirs. Perusal of the record reveals that the case is an old one and its expeditious disposal has also been emphasized by the Honble High Court. The prosecution is directed to ensure the attendance of all PWs on the date of hearing. Matter adjourned to 09.10.2026 for hearing of compromise application. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing | |||||||
| 6 | Criminal Petition U/S 22-A 958/2026 | Mst. Naseema VS SP Complaint cell Matiari & Others | Anwar Khan() | Cr.PC-22-A,Cr.PC-22-B | / |
Contempt application called. Applicant called absent. Report received from SHO PS Matiari. Order passed on it. Application is disposed of. Order. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 7 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 51/2021 | The State VS Jarro | Muhammad Arif(ADPP-0001-GOV-MTR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR),Ghulam Sarwar() | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 24/2021 Oderolal Station |
Case called. Accused Jarro is produced by the J/A through video link. Learned ADPP is present. Mr. Ghulam sarwar Khushk, Advocate, for pauper accused is present. Since the instant case is connected with the main case and the main case has already been adjourned for the same date, therefore, this case is also adjourned to the same date of hearing, viz. 02.10.2026, for evidence. Accused Jarro shall be produced through video link on the next date. Issue summons to all witnesses. |
| 8 | SC (Murder Trial) 201/2021 | The State VS Jaro & others | Muhammad Arif(ADPP-0001-GOV-MTR) | Bashir Ahmed(ADVO-2447-SBC-HYD),Ghulam Sarwar() | Gender Based Violence-,PPC-114,PPC-302,PPC-337-H,PPC-504 | 23/2021 Oderolal Station |
Case called. Accused Jarro is produced by the J/A through video link, Accused Sain Bux and Bashir are present on bail. Mr. Ali Asghar, learned Advocate for accused Bashir and Sain Bux, called absent. Mr. Ghulam sarwar Advocate as pauper accused jaro is present. Office is directed to issue summons to officials witnesses. Perusal of the record reveals that the case is an old one and its expeditious disposal has also been emphasized by the Honble High Court. The prosecution is directed to ensure the attendance of all PWs on the date of hearing. Case is adjourned to 09.10.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. The accused Jarro shall be produced through video link on the next date. |
| 9 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 75/2023 | The State VS Fida Hussain | Sheraz Ali(ADPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | Imdad Ali(ADVO-2354-SBC-HYD) | Control of Narcotic Substances Act -9B | 105/2023 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case called. Accused is produced from Central Prison Hyderabad through video link. ADPP is present. Mr. Anwar Khan Lashari advocate filed power on behalf of accused. Order passed on it. Process not issued. Issue summon to complainant and all PWs, call case property. Matter adjourned to 19.10.2026 for evidence. |
| 10 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 56/2025 | The State VS Abdul Razzaque | Riaz Hussain Sabki(ADPP-0006-GOV-MTR) | Muzamil Ali(ADVO-6850-SBC-HYD) | Control of Narcotic Substances Act -9D | 94/2025 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused Abdul Razzaque produced through video link by J/A Supt CP Hyderabad. Learned ADPP is present. Learned counsel for the accused is present Complainant and PWs are called absent. Issue BWs to complainant and PWs. Put of to 10.10.2026 for hearing on application filed by D.C and evidence |
| 11 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 30/2025 | Ghulam Muhammad VS Rafique & others | Siddique Ali(ADVO-6437-SBC-HYD) | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3,illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 4 | / |
I.D Complaint called. Complainant and PWs are present along with his counsel. Accused Rafique, Din, Sadiq, Jalal, Sharif, Hakim and Sattar are present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused is present. Deposition of Complainant Ghulam Muhammad is recorded at Ex. 03 he produced documents at Ex. 03/A. Deposition of PW 2 Qurban is recorded at Ex. 04. Deposition of PW 3 Irshad Ali is recorded at Ex. 05. Side closing statement filed by learned counsel for the complainant. Order passed on it. File. Matter adjourned to 08.10.2026, for Statement of accused. Accused present on bail are directed to attend. |
|
| 12 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 40/2026 | The State VS Suhail | ADPP(ADPP-0004-GOV-MTR) | Sindh Arms Act 2013-25 | 42/2026 Shahpur |
Case called. The juvenile accused Suhail is present on bail. Learned ADPP for the State is present, summon to complainant and all PWs returned. Issue BWs to complainant and PWs. Call case property. Matter adjourned to 16.10.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 13 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 76/2026 | The State VS Javed @ Arbab & another | Sheraz Ali(ADPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | Musawer Ali(ADVO-6344-SBC-HYD) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 102/2026 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused Javed is produced by J.A C.P Hyderabad through video link. While accused Saleem declared as P.O. Charge could not be framed due to absence of learned counsel for the accused. Put off to. 10.10.2026, for charge. |
| 14 | Juv. Child Act (JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ORDINANCE) 1/2026 | The State VS Wazeer and other | Sheraz Ali(ADPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | Ghulam Sarwar (ADVO-309-SBC-MTY) | PPC-114,PPC-324,PPC-34 | 40/2026 Shahpur |
Case called. Accused Wazeer, and Muhammad Hassan are present on bail. The Juvenile accused Suahil is also present on bail. Learned ADPP and DC are present. Charge framed against accused at Ex: 02 their pleas at Ex: 02/A to 02/C also recorded in which accused persons pleaded not their guilty and claimed for trial. Issue summon to complainant and all PWs, call case property. Matter adjourned to 16.10.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Judgment | |||||||
| 15 | Juv. Child Act (JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ORDINANCE) 25/2025 | The State VS Nouman & another | Riaz Hussain Sabki(ADPP-0006-GOV-MTR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 21/2025 Matiyari |
|
| 16 | Juv. Child Act (JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ORDINANCE) 42/2025 | The State VS Muhaffiz Panhwar | Riaz Hussain Sabki(ADPP-0006-GOV-MTR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 71/2025 Matiyari |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 17 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 52/2024 | The State VS Shahnawaz @ Raja | Riaz Hussain Sabki(ADPP-0006-GOV-MTR) | Zaheer Ali Soomro() | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 110/2024 Bhit Shah |
Case called. Accused is called absent. ADPP is preset. 87 CrPc against accused is returned un-served, same extended Process viz 88 Cr.P.C from concerned mukhtiarkar against the accused not yet received. Issue notice to surety of accused. Put off to 15.10.2026 for service. |
| 18 | PPC 16/2026 | The State VS Khalid & another | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial Act, 2021)-U/S Act: Anti-Rape,PPC-376(A),PPC-452,PPC-506-B | 54/2026 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused Khalid is present on bail. On the last date of hearing accused Sajjad was absent today he is present and has filed condonation application. Order passed on it. ADPP is present. Charge framed against accused at Ex: 02 their pleas at Ex: 02/A and 02/B also recorded in which accused persons pleaded not their guilty and claimed for trial. Issue summon to complainant and all PWs, call case property. Matter adjourned to 20.10.2026 for evidence. Present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | Summary Suits 8/2020 |
Khalid Hussain VS Nazeer Ahmed | Manzoor Hussain Subhopoto(ADVO-3480-SBC-HYD) | Altaf Sachal(ADVO-2814-SBC-HYD) | |||
| 2 | Ins. Pet. (Insolvency Petitions) 1/2025 |
Muhammad Yaseen VS Bhutto Khoso & Others. | Muhammad Afzal(ADVO-4304-SBC-HYD) | Matter called. Applicant called absent. Learned counsel for applicant is present and has filed statement along with cell number of respondents. Respondents No. 03, 07,08,10, 13,14,15,are called absent. Issue notice to the respondent through whats ap as well as publication. Matter is adjourned to 12.10.2026 for service. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 7/2016 |
Saiful Malook VS Province of Sindh & Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | ||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Judgment | |||||||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 63/2024 |
Raja Ram VS Province of Sindh & Others | Jahangir(ADVO-149-SBC-MTY) | Maqbool(ADVO-233-SBC-MTY) | Civil Appeal called. Attorney of appellant is present. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. DA is present on behalf of official Respondents. Arguments heard. Judgment passed and announced in open court. The Civil Appeal is hereby partly allowed. Let copy of this Judgment be communicated to the learned trial court. Decree be prepared accordingly. |
||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 29/2026 | Mst: Wazeer Bano VS Ishrat & Others. | Peeral Majeedano(ADVO-13-SBC-MTY) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372,SUCCESSION ACT 1925-Matter | Matter called. Applicant called absent. Learned counsel for the applicant is present. opponents are called absent. In the interest of justice. Put off to 09.10.2026 for hearing. |
||