| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Bail Before Arrest (U/S 498 Cr.P.C) | |||||||
| 1 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 809/2026 | Ali Hyder & another VS The State | Sheraz Ali(ADPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | PPC-34,PPC-452,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 188/2026 Matiyari |
Cr: Bail Appln: u/s 498 Cr.PC called. Applicants/accused and their counsel are in attendance. Learned ADPP is present. Complainant is present. Mr. Jabbar Kalhoro advocate on behalf of complainant is present. Argument heard. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail of applicants/accused already granted and same is hereby confirmed accordingly. |
|
| 2 | Cr.B.A. (Criminal Bail Application) 815/2026 | Zaheer & others VS The State | Sheraz Ali(ADPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | PPC-34,PPC-452,PPC-504,PPC-506-B | 188/2026 Matiyari |
Cr: Bail Appln: u/s 498 Cr.PC called. Applicants/accused and their counsel are in attendance. Learned ADPP is present. Complainant is present. Mr. Jabbar Kalhoro advocate on behalf of complainant is present. Argument heard. Order passed and announced in open court. The interim pre-arrest bail of applicants/accused already granted and same is hereby confirmed accordingly. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Compromise Appl: | |||||||
| 3 | SC (Murder Trial) 5/2015 | State VS Bakhshan@ Leemon & Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-302,PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-504 | 6/2014 Jakhri |
Case called. Accused Yaroo and Peero are produced by J.A. through video link. The case against the remaining accused, namely Bakhshan and Haji, was kept on dormant file vide order dated 13.11.2015. Mr. Ghulam Sarwar Khushk, Advocate, as Pauper Counsel for accused Yaroo and Peero is present. Order passed on separate sheet. Today, the matter is fixed for compromise proceedings. Learned counsel for the accused is present. A supplementary challan was submitted on 09.10.2025, and since then, the accused has been in judicial custody. The charge has already been framed. Prior to the submission of the supplementary challan, the accused had been shown as an absconder in this old matter of 2014. As per the report submitted by NADRA, the complainant party has not provided a copy of the CNICs or the CNIC numbers. As per the report of the concerned SHO, despite being called upon to appear at the police station, the complainant party avoided doing so. Whereas, as per the report of the concerned Mukhtiarkar, the complainant party is residing in different areas and, therefore, could not be traced within a short period. The concerned Mukhtiarkar has, accordingly, requested further time to submit the report. the prosecution/complainant party is directed to ensure the attendance of the complainant and witnesses on the next date of hearing so that the Court may proceed with the compromise application or, in the alternative, proceed further with the matter in accordance with law. In case of non-appearance/cooperation, prosecution/complainant party should be heard why the proceedings should not be kept in abeyance due to non-interest and appearance of complainant party in the matter Issue BWs against the complainant and witnesses to secure their attendance. The concerned SHO and Mukhtiarkar are also directed to submit their respective reports on the next date of hearing without fail. Matter adjourned to 16.10.2026 for hearing of compromise application. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 4 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 28/2021 | The State VS Bilawal Rind | Muhammad Arif(ADPP-0001-GOV-MTR) | Peeral Majeedano(ADVO-13-SBC-MTY) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 41/2020 Nasurpur |
Case called. Accused Bilawal Rind is produced by J/A, through video link. ADPP is present. Mr. Altaf Hussain advocate on behalf of accused Bilawal is present. As the main case is adjourned, hence this case is also adjourned to.16.10.2026. For evidence. Issue summons to PWs. |
| 5 | SC (Murder Trial) 142/2021 | The State VS Bilawal Rind & 05 others | Muhammad Arif(ADPP-0001-GOV-MTR) | Mehboob Ali Shah(ADVO-122-SBC-TAY),Peeral Majeedano(ADVO-13-SBC-MTY) | PPC-109,PPC-302,PPC-324,PPC-337-Fi,PPC-337-Fii | 72/2020 Shahpur |
Called. Accused Bilawal is produced from Central Prison, Hyderabad, through video link. Accused Abdul Hakeem and Mehboob Ali are present on bail. Accused Muhammad Ayoub is shown as deceased in the charge-sheet, whereas accused Abdul Aziz and Abdul Samad have already been declared proclaimed offenders. Learned ADPP for the prosecution is present. Mr. Peeral Majdedano, learned counsel for accused Abdul Hakeem and Mehboob Ali, is present, while Mr. Altaf Hussain, learned counsel for accused Bilawal, is also present. Process issued to the prosecution witnesses has been received back. As per the report/statement of the process server, Retired Tapedar, one of the prosecution witnesses has gone to Shikarpur, while another prosecution witness is admitted to a hospital. Consequently, the prosecution witnesses have not been secured for recording their evidence today. It is noted that the instant matter is an old case and its expeditious disposal is necessary. The prosecution is, therefore, directed to take effective and necessary steps to ensure the attendance of the remaining prosecution witnesses on the next date of hearing, so that their evidence may be recorded without further delay. The learned ADPP is also directed to ensure proper follow-up of the process issued to the witnesses. Put off to. 16.10.2026. For evidence. |
| 6 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 51/2021 | The State VS Jarro | Muhammad Arif(ADPP-0001-GOV-MTR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR),Ghulam Sarwar() | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 24/2021 Oderolal Station |
Case called. Accused Jarro is produced by the J/A through video link. Learned ADPP is present. Mr. Ghulam sarwar Khushk, Advocate, for pauper accused is present. Since the instant case is connected with the main case and the main case has already been adjourned for the same date, therefore, this case is also adjourned to the same date of hearing, viz. 17.10.2026, for evidence. Accused Jarro shall be produced through video link on the next date. Issue summons to all witnesses. |
| 7 | SC (Murder Trial) 201/2021 | The State VS Jaro & others | Muhammad Arif(ADPP-0001-GOV-MTR) | Bashir Ahmed(ADVO-2447-SBC-HYD),Ghulam Sarwar() | Gender Based Violence-,PPC-114,PPC-302,PPC-337-H,PPC-504 | 23/2021 Oderolal Station |
Case called. Accused Jarro is produced by the J/A through video link, Accused Sain Bux and Bashir are present on bail. Mr. Ali Asghar, learned Advocate for accused Bashir and Sain Bux, is present. Mr. Ghulam sarwar Advocate as pauper accused jaro is present. Process to officials witnesses not issued by the office. Office is directed to issue summons to officials witnesses. Perusal of the record reveals that the case is an old one and its expeditious disposal has also been emphasized by the Honble High Court. The prosecution is directed to ensure the attendance of all PWs on the date of hearing. Case is adjourned to 17.10.2026 for evidence. Present accused is directed to attend. The accused Jarro shall be produced through video link on the next date. |
| 8 | PPC 253/2023 | The State VS Sarfaraz & Others | ADPP(ADVO-003-SBC-LRK) | Abdul Aziz(ADVO-24661-SBC-KHE) | PPC-279,PPC-320,PPC-337-G,PPC-427 | 35/2023 Matiyari |
Case called Accused Sarfaraz is called absent. Learned counsel for the accused has filed condonation application on behalf of accused Sarfaraz, he has also filed application for stop proceeding. Order passed on it. ADPP is present. B.W against P.Ws is returned un-served, Issue fresh BWs to the complainant and PWs through SHO PS Jung( Punjab). Accused is directed to produce case property/vehicle in case of failure order of 516 Cr.PC will be re-called. Put of to 27.10.2026, for evidence |
| 9 | PPC 143/2024 | The State VS Ali Raza | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-295-B | 53/2024 Sekhat |
Case called. Accused Ali Raza is produced in custody through Video link by Jail Authority Hyderabad. ADPP is present. I/O SIP Rajab and WHC Israr are present. Learned counsel for the accused called absent. Issue BWs remaining PWs. Put of to.23.10.09.2026 For evidence. Accused should be produced through video link. |
| 10 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 93/2025 | The State VS Nizamuddain @ Nizam | Sheraz Ali(ADPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 140/2025 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused Nizamuddin is called absent without any intimation. NBW against accused returned un-served same is extended and handed over to the process server. ADPP is present. Learned counsel for the accused called absent. Issue notice to surety of accused. Put off to 23.10.2026 for service. |
|
| 11 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 45/2026 | The State VS Allah Bachayo | Sheraz Ali(ADPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 96/2026 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused Allah Bachayo is produced by J/A C.P Hyderabad. Learned ADPP and DC are present. Issue summon to complainant and all PWs, call case property. Matter adjourned to 13.10.2026 for evidence. |
| 12 | PPC 95/2026 | The State VS Allah Bachayo & others | Sheraz Ali(ADPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-353,PPC-411,PPC-412 | 95/2026 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused Allah Bachayo and Abu @ Sarmad are produced by J/A C.P Hyderabad. While accused Ghulam Mustafa declared as P.O. Learned ADPP and DC are present. Arguments on the application u/s 227 Cr.PC has been heard. Order passed on separate sheet. section 324 PPC is applicable with other sections, except section 412 PPC which is not applicable at this stage as per the contents of the FIR. Hence, the charge is altered/amended and section 412 PPC is hereby deleted with blue pen. Application in hand is disposed of accordingly. Matter adjourned to 13.10.2026 for evidence. Accused should be produced through video link. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Charge | |||||||
| 13 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 76/2026 | The State VS Javed @ Arbab & another | Sheraz Ali(ADPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | Musawer Ali(ADVO-6344-SBC-HYD) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 102/2026 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused Javed is produced by J.A C.P Hyderabad through video link. While accused Saleem declared as P.O. Today matter is fixed for charge, but could not be framed as the order was passed by the Honorable High court Larkana all the CNS cases pertains to Sindh shall be proceeded exclusively by the Sessions Judges not to additional sessions judge, same report was called by MIT-II for pending cases. Hence adjourned for want of jurisdiction. Matter is adjourned to 19.10.2026. for charge. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Formal Cases | |||||||
| 14 | PPC 258/2023 | The State VS Nooruddin & others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-341,PPC-395 | 19/2023 Shahpur |
Case called. Accused Gul Bahar is present on bail. ADPP is present. Mr. Peeral majedano advocate on behalf of accused is present. R &Ps of main case already been sent to Honourable Sessions Judge Hyderabad. Letter not issued. Office is directed to issue letter to the Honorable District and sessions judge Hyderabad for submission R & Ps. Put off to----23.10.2026 For charge. Present accused is directed to attend |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Misc. Applications | |||||||
| 15 | PPC 12/2026 | The State VS Asif & Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-F(vi),PPC-337-H,PPC-354,PPC-397,PPC-506-B | 85/2026 Saeedabad(Matiari) |
Case called. Accused Asif, Ayaz Ali, Manzoor and Ahmed are present on bail. Learned counsel for the accused is present and requested for adjournment on the ground that their application pending before the honorable High court of Hyderabad. In the interest of justice. Put of to 29.10.2026. For hearing on application filed accused Manzoor and charge. Present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 16 | PPC 39/2026 | The State VS Suhail Ahmed alias Babloo & Others | Sheraz Ali(ADPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | PPC-324,PPC-34,PPC-353,PPC-401 | 25/2025 Oderolal |
Case called. Accused Shoaib produced by J/A CP Hyderabad through video link. Accused Sohail has been died as mentioned in challan sheet. Accused Shahbaz has already been declared as PO. Learned ADPP is present. Statement of accused is recorded at Ex. 10. Put off to.16.10.2026 for arguments. Accused be produced through video link. |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Surety Proceedings | |||||||
| 17 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 68/2023 | The State VS Mauviya Khan | Raheem Bux(DDPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | Karimdad() | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3 (a) | 51/2023 Shahpur |
Surety proceedings is called. Accused Mahawiya Khan is called absent and who is already declared as P.O. ADPP is present. Office is directed to issue letter to concerned for submitting surety papers. Put of to---30.10.2026. For proceedings against surety. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Judgment | |||||||
| 18 | Illegal Dispos. Act (Illegal Dispossesion Act) 16/2023 | Mst: Jiyandi Khaskheli VS PIyaro Khaskheli & Others | Muhammad Yousif() | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI),Zeeshan Bashir Chandio() | illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 3,illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 4,illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 5,illegal Dispossesion Act-Section 7 | / |
I.D. Complaint called. Complainant and his counsel are called absent. Accused is present on bail. Learned counsel for accused is present. Judgement passed and announced in open court. Accused Piyaro is hereby acquitted of the charge under section 265-H-(i) Cr.PC his bail bonds stand cancelled sureties discharged. Let the R & Ps be consigned to record room. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 19 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 21/2023 | The State VS Murad Ali | Raheem Bux(DDPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | Zaheer Ali Soomro() | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 25/2023 Shahpur |
Case called. Accused Murad Ali has already been declared as P.O. Case against accused Murad Ali was kept on dormant file. B.W to complainant and P.Ws is returned un-served. Issue NBW to complainant and PWs. Put of to....23.10.2026. |
| 20 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 17/2025 | The State VS Mst. Hania | Riaz Hussain Sabki(ADPP-0006-GOV-MTR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Special Case Narcotics -9(1) 3(c) | 27/2025 Bhit Shah |
Case called. Accused is called absent and has already been declared as proclaimed offender. ADPP is present. Office is directed to issue process under section 88 Cr.P.C against accused without fail. Put of to 27.10.2026 for service |
| 21 | PPC 17/2025 | The State VS Sadoro & Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial Act, 2021)-U/S Act: Anti-Rape,Gender Based Violence-,PPC-34,PPC-365B | 67/2025 Bhit Shah |
Case called. Accused Sadoro Fakir is called absent and who is already declared as proclaimed offender. ADPP is present. Process u/s 88 Cr.PC not issued. Office is directed to issue process u/s 88 Cr.PC. Put of to -----23.10.2026, for further proceedings. |
|
| 22 | PPC 17/2026 | The State VS Eid Muhammad & others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-109,PPC-364-A | 43/2026 Shahpur |
Case called. Accused are shown absconder in the challan sheet. ADPP is present. 88 Cr.PC not yet received from concerned Mukhtiarkar. Issue repeat letter to the Mukhtiarkar, while the SHO PS Matiari submitted application that the jurisdiction of the PS Shahpur. Order passed on it. Office is directed to issue process u/s 87 Cr.PC through SHO PS Shahpur. Put off to 23.10.2026 for service. |
|
| 23 | PPC 21/2026 | The State VS Abdul Razzaque | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial Act, 2021)-U/S Act: Anti-Rape,PPC-377,PPC-511 | 103/2026 Hala |
Case called. Accused Abdul Razzaque is present on bail. ADPP is present. Case copies supplied to the accused vide receipt at Ex. 01. Matter adjourned to 20.10.2026 for charge. Present accused is directed to attend. |
|
| 24 | PPC 22/2026 | The State VS Ali Hyder | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | Anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial Act, 2021)-U/S Act: Anti-Rape,PPC-365B,PPC-506,PPC-509,PPC-511 | 159/2026 Hala |
Case called. Accused Ali Hyder and Gul Muhammad are present on bail. ADPP is present. Case copies supplied to the accused vide receipt at Ex. 01. Matter adjourned to 19.10.2026 for charge. Present accused are directed to attend. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Compliance | |||||||
| 1 | S. Ex. (Summary Executions) 2/2025 |
Allah Dito Shar VS Manzoor Hussain Gul. | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Matter called. D.H is present in person. J.D is called absent. Matter was fixed for compliance of Order dated 31.07.2026. Accountant of district court matiari appeared and requested for time for compliance. Request was allowed. Put off to 30.10.2026 for compliance. |
|||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | Summary Suits 8/2020 |
Khalid Hussain VS Nazeer Ahmed | Manzoor Hussain Subhopoto(ADVO-3480-SBC-HYD) | Altaf Sachal(ADVO-2814-SBC-HYD) | Case called. The matter is fixed today for cross-examination of the plaintiff. However, the plaintiff is called absent without any intimation, despite the clear order dated 02.10.2026, whereby the parties were directed to appear on the next date of hearing, failing which Court will pass the order against the defaulter/violator without fail. as per Order VIII Rule 13 C.P.C., the defendants were bound to submit a list of their legal heirs with complete addresses along with the written statement, mentioning as to who shall intimate the Court in case of death, but the defendants have violated the said provision as well as Order XXII, Rule 4 C.P.C. Defendant No.1(ii) is son of defendant No.1(i) and brother of Defendant No.1(iii), which clearly shows that they have knowledge regarding pendency of the suit and its proceedings, but despite that, they are avoiding to appear before the Court. As per record, service upon Defendant No.1(i) & (iii) has been held good. In the larger interest of justice, the matter is again adjourned to 13.10.2026, with fresh directions to both parties to appear before the Court for cross-examination of the plaintiff. It is made clear that, in case of non-appearance of the plaintiff on the next date of hearing, the suit will be decided u/o VII Rule 3 CPC. In case of appearance of the plaintiff and non-appearance of the defendant, the defendant will again be debarred from cross-examining the plaintiff, and the side of plaintiff will again be closed. Put off to. 13.10.2026, for further proceedings. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 3 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 7/2016 |
Saiful Malook VS Province of Sindh & Others | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | ||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
| 4 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 13/2026 |
Mst: Bakhtawar & another VS Province of Sindh & Others. | Ghulam Sarwar (ADVO-309-SBC-MTY) | Restoration application called. Learned counsel for the applicant is present DDA is present for Respondent No.1 to 5. Respondent No. 06 is present. Mr. Najebullah Khan advocate on behalf of respondent No. 06 called absent. Respondents No. 06 has filed adjournment application. Order passed on it. Arguments of the learned counsel for the applicant has already been heard. Put off to. 16.10.2026. for order on application u/o 9 rule 9 CPC as well as arguments of respondents. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 1 | S.M.A. (S.M.A) 29/2026 | Mst: Wazeer Bano VS Ishrat & Others. | Peeral Majeedano(ADVO-13-SBC-MTY) | SUCCESSION ACT 1925-372,SUCCESSION ACT 1925-Matter | Matter called. Applicant is present along with his counsel. opponents Ishrat and Zoya have filed no objections affidavit. Learned counsel for the applicant has filed statment along with publication published in Daily Kawish News paper. Orde passed and announced in open court. The succession application is allowed and it is ordered that, succession certificate be issued in favour of applicant |
||