| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 21/2023 | The State VS Murad Ali | Raheem Bux(DDPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | Zaheer Ali Soomro() | SINDH ARMS ACT-24 | 25/2023 Shahpur |
|
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 2 | SC (Murder Trial) 185/2022 | The State VS Khalid Hussain & Others. | Muhammad Arif(ADPP-0001-GOV-MTR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Gender Based Violence-,PPC-114,PPC-302,PPC-305,PPC-311,PPC-324 | 24/2022 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused Khalid Hussain is produced by J/A, through video link. Accused Hazoor Bux is produced by Central Prison Mirpurkhas through video link. Accused Khuda Bux S/O Ali Khan already deleted from charge sheet by learned consumer protection Judge and J.M-Matiari on 27-09-2022, while accused Muhammad Ramzan already declared as P.O. ADPP is present. Mr. Tarique Shah on behalf of accused is present PW ASI Abdul Hakeem, Dr. Rasheeda and Dr. Mansoor Ahmed are present. Deposition of Dr. Rasheed is recorded at Ex. 12 she produced documents at Ex. 12/A to 12/B. Deposition of PW Dr. Mansoor Ahmed is recorded at Ex. 13 he produced documents at Ex. 13/A to 13/C. Learned ADPP requested for adjournment. Request was allowed. Case is an old one and its expeditious disposal has also been emphasized by the Honble High Court. The prosecution is directed to ensure the attendance I/O on the date of hearing. Put off to 21.11.2026 for evidence. |
| 3 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 78/2023 | The State VS Muhammad Raheem | Raheem Bux(DDPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 42/2023 Khybrani |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Raheem is produced by the J/A, through video link. ADPP is present. DC is present. `As the main case is adjourned, hence this case is adjourned to 28.11.2026. For Evidence. |
| 4 | SC (Murder Trial) 23/2024 | The State VS Yar Muhammad and other | Riaz Hussain Sabki(ADPP-0006-GOV-MTR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | PPC-114,PPC-302,PPC-324,PPC-337-A(i),PPC-337-Fi | 40/2023 Khybrani |
Case called. Accused Yar Muhammad, Muhammad Rahim and Yousif are produced by the J/A, through video link, while accused Ali Akber is present on bail. ADPP is present. Associate of learned counsel for the accused is present. Mr. Mazhar Ali Leghari advocate for complainant called absent. Complainant is present and has filed adjournment application. Complainant is directed to produce their witnesses on the date of hearing. The prosecution is also directed to ensure the attendance of the complainant and prosecution witnesses so that the evidence may be recorded without further delay. Issue summons to official witnesses. Put of to--28.11.2026, for evidence. |
| 5 | SC (Murder Trial) 2/2024 | The State VS Muhammad Jumman & Others | Aaqil(ADVO-172-SBC-MTY),Muhammad Arif(ADPP-0001-GOV-MTR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Juman(ADVO-5069-SBC-HYD) | PPC-302,PPC-34 | 87/2023 Matiyari |
Case called. Accused Muhammad Juman, Fida Hussain, Abdul Sattar are present on bail. ADPP is present. Learned counsel for the accused is present, Complainant and PWs Wazeer and Muhamamd Nawaz are present. Associate of learned counsel for the complainant is present. Complainant moved an adjournment application. Order passed on it. Complainant and PWs are bound down with direction to proceed with the case. Application section 540 Cr.P.C is pending before the honourable High Court of Sindh, Put of to 07.12..2026 For evidence. Advocate for complainant is directed to produced copy of order/diary of application, which is pending before Honourable High Court of Sindh. |
| 6 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 38/2024 | The State VS Asif Ali | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 23/2024 Shahpur |
Case called. Accused is present on bail. ADPP is present. Learned counsel for the accused is present. This case is connected with main case No. 107/2024 u/s 302 PPC, which has already been adjourned, hence this case is also adjourned to same date of hearing viz: 23.11.2026 for evidence |
|
| 7 | SC (Murder Trial) 107/2024 | The State VS Asif Ali and other | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-MLR) | PPC-302,PPC-504 | 22/2024 Shahpur |
Case called. All three accused are present on bail. ADPP as well as learned counsel for the accused Asif and Haji are present. Learned counsel for the accused Allah Bachayo called absent. PWs were called absent. Process extended and handed over to the process server. Case is an old one and its expeditious disposal has also been emphasized by the Honorable High Court. The prosecution is directed to ensure the attendance remaining PWs on the date of hearing. Put off to 23.11.2026 for evidence and hearing of cancellation of bail. Accused are directed to attend. Late diary. Associate of learned counsel for the complainant is present in late. The matter is already fixed on 23.11.2026. for evidence. |
|
| 8 | SC (Murder Trial) 1/2025 | The State VS Dhani Bux & Others | Karimdad() | PPC-302,PPC-34,PPC-504 | 31/2024 Shahpur |
Case called. Accused Abdul Shakoor Dhani Bux and Gulzado are present on bail, whereas accused Khan Muhammad is produced by the J/A Hyderabad through video link. Learned ADPP is present. Mr. Ashiq D. Solangi, Advocate for accused Dhani Bux and Gulzado, is called absent. Mr. Raees Amir Lutif, Advocate for accused Abdul Shakoor and Khan Muhammad, is present. Complainant and PWs are present. Learned counsel for the complainant is present and has filed an application for adjournment. Perusal of the record reveals that the charge in this case was framed on 10.05.2025; however, despite the lapse of considerable time, not a single prosecution witness has so far been examined. It is further observed that the instant case is an old one and its proceedings have not progressed satisfactorily. The complainant is, therefore, directed to ensure the presence and examination of all remaining prosecution witnesses on the next date of hearing. It is made clear that no unnecessary adjournment shall be granted and, in case of failure to proceed with the trial on the next date, appropriate orders shall be passed in accordance with law. Adjournment is granted in the interest of justice. To come up on 26.11.2026 for prosecution evidence. Accused present on bail are directed to attend the Court on the next date of hearing. |
|
| 9 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 48/2026 | The State VS Inayat Ali | Sheraz Ali(ADPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | SINDH ARMS ACT-25-A | 23/2026 Shahpur |
Case called. Accused Inayat produced by J/A CP Hyderabad through video link. ADPP for the state is present. As the main case still not yet received from the trial court, hence adjourned to 27.11.2026 for evidence and receiving of main case. |
| 10 | Sindh Arms ACT, 2013 47/2026 | The State VS Ali Nawaz | Sheraz Ali(ADPP-0002-GOV-MTR) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Sindh Arms Act 2013-25 | 22/2026 Shahpur |
Case called. Accused Ali Nawaz produced by J/A CP Hyderabad through video link. ADPP for the state is present. As the main case still not yet received from the trial court, hence adjourned to 27.11.2026 for evidence and receiving of main case. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Statement of Accused | |||||||
| 11 | PPC 256/2023 | The State VS Qadir Bux & others | Mumtaz Sachal(ADVO-192-SBC-JMS) | Anwar Khan() | PPC-114,PPC-324,PPC-334,PPC-34,PPC-506-B | 28/2023 Sekhat |
Case called. Accused Qadir Bux, Mitho, Saindad and Ali Gul are present on bail. ADPP is present. Learned counsel for the accused called absent. Accused Saindad has filed adjournment application. Order passed on it. Complainant and his counsel are present. Matter adjourned to 27.11.2026 for statement of accused. |
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION Advocate to be Heard | |||||||
| 1 | Ins. Pet. (Insolvency Petitions) 1/2025 |
Muhammad Yaseen VS Bhutto Khoso & Others. | Muhammad Afzal(ADVO-4304-SBC-HYD) | Matter called. Applicant called absent. Learned counsel for applicant is present and has filed adjournment application. Order passed on it. Matter is fixed for hearing n the point of maintainability, learned counsel for the applicant is directed to proceed with the case in case of failure appropriate order shall be passed accordance with law. Matter is adjourned to 27.11.2026 for hearing on the point of maintainability. |
|||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | Hearing Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| FAMILY JURISDICTION For Orders | |||||||
| 1 | G.W. A. (G&W Appeals) 3/2026 | Mst: Sumera VS Sabir Hussain | Hatim Ali (ADVO-3942-SBC-HYD) | The Guardian and Wards Act, 1890-U/S 47 (Guardian Appeal ) | Case called. Appellant is present in person. Respondent as well as his counsel are called absent. Arguments already been heard. Today matter is fixed for order. Appellant has filed application. Order passed on it. To come upon 01.12.2026. for order. |
||
| 2 | F.A. (Family Appeals) 11/2026 | Mst: Sumera VS Sabir Hussain | Hatim Ali (ADVO-3942-SBC-HYD) | Family Appeal-Section 14 of Family Court Act | Case called. Appellant is present in person. Respondent as well as his counsel are called absent. Arguments already been heard. Today matter is fixed for order. Appellant has filed application. Order passed on it. To come upon 01.12.2026. for order. |
||