Case called. Accused Ghulam Hyder, Jamal and Kamal are present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Complainant is present; his witnesses called absent. Mr. Abdul Sattar Shah, learned Advocate for complainant is present. Learned counsel for the accused called absent. Case is adjourned to.17.09.2026 for evidence.

Case called. Accused Makhdoom Imran is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Advocate for accused is present. BW returned. PWs called absent. Intimation of PWs recieved. Put of to.16-09-2026 for evidence. BW upon PWs extended and handed over to process server.

Case called. Accused Imran Ali is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. Summons returned. PWs called absent. Put of to.14.09.2026 for evidence. Summons to PWs extended and handed over to process server.

Case called. Accused Amanullah produced by J\A CP Hyderabad through videolink. Learned ADPP is present. DC called absent. PWs called absent .Put of to.08.09.2026 for evidence. Accused be produced through videolink. BW upon PWs extended and handed over to process server.

Case called. Accused Ali Murtaza Shah@ Ali Shah is present on bail. Learned ADPP is preset. Mr. Riaz Ali Bhatti learned Advocate is present he has filed vakalatnama on behalf of accused, order passed thereon. Summons returned. Complainant is present. PWs called absent. Put of to.15.09.2026 for evidence. BW upon PWs extended and handed over to process server.

Case called. Accused Shahid is present on bail. . Learned ADPP is present. DC called absent. Complainant is present. Put of to.17.09.2026 for evidence. Issue summons PWs.

Case called. Accused Meer Muhammad is present on bail. Learned ADPP is present. DC is present. Summons returned. I/O is present. Property not produced by SHO, he has sought time to produce case property, order passed thereon. Put of to.14.09.2026 for evidence. Summons to PWs extended and handed over to process server.

Case called. Accused Mirza called absent. Learned ADPP for the State is present, whereas learned counsel for the accused, Mr. Anwar Khan Lashari, Advocate, is also called absent. NBW issued against accused Mirza has been returned unserved for want of time. Order passed thereon. Put up on 11.09.2026 for service of NBW upon the accused and notice upon the surety. NBW extended and handed over to the Process Server for service. Issue notice to surety of accused.

Case called. Accused Mirza, Hassan and Ali Sher called absent. Learned counsel for the accused, Mr. Anwar Khan Lashari, Advocate for accused called absent. NBWs against accused was issued same is returned un executed for want of time. Time is granted. Put off to.11.09.2026 for service of NBWs and notices upon the sureties. NBW upon accused extended and handed over to process server. Issue notice to sureties of accused.

Case called. Accused Mirza, Ubedullah and Hassan called absent. Learned ADPP is present. Learned counsel for the accused, Mr. Anwar Khan Lashari, Advocate for accused called absent, NBWs against accused Mirza, Ubedullah and Hassan was issued same is returned as un executed for want of time, time is granted. Put off to 11.09.2026 for service of NBWs and notices upon the sureties. NBW against accused extended and handed over to process server. Issue notice to surety of accused.

Case called. Accused Ubedullah and Mirza called absent. Learned ADPP is present. Learned counsel for the accused, Mr. Anwar Khan Lashari, Advocate called absent. NBWs was issued against Ubedullah and Mirza same is returned un executed for want of time, time is granted. Put off to 11.09.2026 for service of NBWs and notices upon the sureties. NBW upon accused extended and handed over to process server. Issue notice to surety of accused.

Civil Misc. Appeal called. Appellant No.1 is present. Mr. Parkash Kumar, learned Advocate for the appellants, is present and has advanced his arguments and also filed written synopsis. Learned associate of Mr. Mehboob Ali Qureshi, learned Advocate for Respondent No.1(ii), is present. Mr. Muhammad Ali Shaikh, learned Advocate for Respondents No.2(i) and 3(i), is present. Mr. Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh, learned Advocate for the Attorney of the legal representatives of Respondent No.12, is called absent. Mr. Hakim Ali Siddiqui, learned Advocate for Respondent No.4(i), is also called absent. Mr. Pir Bux Bhurgri, learned Advocate for Respondent No.1(i), is present and has filed written synopsis. None has appeared on behalf of Respondents No.5 to 11(vi). Learned Advocate for the appellants has filed an application U./S:151 CPC, or passed on it. Status-quo is extended till the next date of hearing. Notices through publication in daily Jang and Kawish were issued. Copies of the newspapers have been filed by learned Advocate for the appellants, order passed on it; service upon Respondents No.5 to 11(vi) is held good. Adjourned to 03.09.2026 for appearance of the remaining respondents.5 to 11(vi).

Summary Suit called. Plaintiff; Advocate for Plaintiff called absent. Defendant called absent. Mr. Masood Elahi Sahito, learned Advocate for Defendant is present he has not pressed the application U/O:39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC, order passed thereon, the instant application U/O:39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC is infructious. Put of to.31.08.2026 for hearing on application U/.O 37 Rule 3 R/W section 151 CPC, CA by Plaintiff side on applications (U/O. 07 Rule 11 CPC, and U/A 59 to 61 and 84 of QSO).