| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION Hearing of Petition U/S 491 | |||||||
| 1 | Application u/s 491 CrPc 673/2025 | Mst-Nazeeran Mirani VS SHO PS Shah Latif @ A-Sec:Khairpur | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | DPP(DPP-0001-GOV-KHP) | Cr.PC-491 | / |
Misc. application called. None is present from applicant side. DPP is present. Raid and police reports are received. Heard arguments. Order passed and announced in open court. The criminal Misc. application u/s 491 Cr. PC disposed of. |
| CRIMINAL JURISDICTION For Serivce | |||||||
| 2 | CNS (Special Cases Narcotics.) 4/2013 | The State VS. VS Sabir Hussain Rajput | ADPP(ADVO-002-SBC-KHI) | Nisar Ahmed(ADVO-628-SBC-KHP) | 8/2013 Kumb |
Case called. Accused declared as P.O. and case already kept on dormant file.DPP is present. NBW issued against him but the same is returned un-served for want of time. Time extended and handed over to process server HC-Chand Khan Solangi for service upon accused. Issue fresh letter to PDSP Khairpur with direction to comprehensive report called from concerned SHO Case adjourned to.16.03.2026. For service of accused. |
|
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 1 | C.A. (Civil Appeals) 130/2025 |
Hyder Zaman VS Province of Sindh through Secretary Govt: of Sindh Revenue Karachi &others | Barkat Ali (DDA)(ADVO-674-SBC-KHP) | Civil appeal called. Attorney of Appellant and his advocate are present. DDA is present on behalf of official respondents No.1 to 5. Process returned duly served upon respondent No.15 and un-served upon respondent No.14. Private respondents are called absent. Issue fresh process upon respondents No.14 on costs through learned District Judge, Naushehro Feroze. Issue notice upon all private respondents on cost on application U/O XL rule 1 and 2 RWS 151 CPC. Civil appeal adjourned to 05-01-2026, for appearance/objection by respondent No.6 to 13,15, and16, production of attorney power, service of respondents No.14 and service of respondents on application U/O XL rule 1 and 2 RWS 151 CPC. |
|||
| 2 | Summary Suits 69/2025 |
Zaheer Ahmed VS Ghulam Nabi | Ali Gohar (ADVO-1597-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | The summary suit called. Plaintiff called absent but his counsel is present and filed statement alongwith newspapers. Order passed thereon. File. A perusal of R & Ps reveals that Service through all modes I,e Bailiff as well as publication were effected for the appearance of the defendant. However the defendant failed to appear in person or through his representative hence, service against him is held good. Let the matter be adjourned to 15.01.2026 for hearing. |
||
| 3 | C.Rev. (Civil Revisions) 68/2025 |
Khadim Hussain Narejo VS Ali Dino Burdi & others | Mahboob Ali Wassan(ADVO-456-SBC-KHP) | ADVOCATE NOT ENGAGE(ADVO-006-SBC-KHI) | Civil revision called. Applicant called absent but his advocate is present. Process returned duly served upon respondent NO. 1 (f)2 to 5 and 9. DDA is present and filed memo of appearance on behalf of official respondents 2 to 5. Order on it. File. Served respondents are called absent. Remaining private respondents are called absent and not yet served. Issue fresh notice upon private respondents except 1(f) and 9 on costs as before. Civil revision adjourned to 14-01-2026, for appearance of respondents and service of private respondents except 1(f) and 9. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Arguments | |||||||
| 4 | Summary Suits 61/2024 |
Mst Rehana VS Ali Muhammad | Mumtaz Ali Jahangir(ADVO-643-SBC-KHP) | Nizamuddin(ADVO-1395-SBC-KHP) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff is called absent but her advocate is present. Defendant and his advocate are called absent. Summary suit adjourned due to absence of defendant side. Put of to.05-01-2026. For arguments on application u/s 37 rule 3 CPC as well as report of mediator. |
||
| 5 | Summary Suits 2/2025 |
Khush Muhammad VS Mehmood Ali | Nadeem Ahmed(ADVO-701-SBC-KHP) | Altaf Hussain(ADVO-726-SBC-KHP) | Summary suit called. Plaintiff and his counsel are called absent. Defendant is present but his advocate is called absent. Summary suit adjourned due to absence of advocates of both parties. Put of to.06-01-2026. For further arguments on application u/s 37 rule 3 and 4 CPC and on maintainability of application u/s 37 rule 3 and 4 CPC. |
||