Case called. The plaintiff No.1 in person along with associate of his counsel is present and moved an application for extension of status quo. Learned District Attorney representing defendants No.1 to 3 is present and filed written statement on their behalf. Learned counsel for the intervenor is present and filed an application under Order I, rule 10 CPC. Learned counsel for the intervenor contends that the jurisdiction of this Court is barred by law and that learned counsel for the plaintiffs obtained an order of status quo by misrepresenting the facts before the Court. The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Department, defendant No.1, is also present. The learned District Attorney also contends that the plaintiffs ought to have raised their grievance before the relevant competent authorities instead of approaching this Court without clean hands and obtaining an order of status quo. He further argues that the suit is not maintainable before this Court.. Plaintiff No.1 is present in person. Upon being asked about the situation, he submits that the Irrigation Department itself had previously constructed the watercourse and is now, under the influence of influential landowners, altering the existing arrangement, which would cause irreparable loss to the plaintiffs, who are also landowners situated at the tail end of the watercourse. He further submits that his counsel is out of station and requests an adjournment to enable his counsel to appear and advance arguments on his behalf. Heard the learned District Attorney, defendant No.1 in person, learned counsel for the intervenor, and plaintiff No.1 in person, and have perused the record and relevant law. Order passed on order sheet, The ad-interim injunction order dated 15.07.2026 passed by this Court has been recalled. The plaintiff is put on notice to satisfy this Court regarding the maintainability of the suit in view of the provisions of law. The matter is adjourned to 27.10.2026 for hearing on the maintainability of the suit.

Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff and his advocate are called absent. Official defendant No.03 and 04 and private defendant No.5(a) hare called absent. Notice to defendant No.5(b) to 4(j) and 06 be repeated through pasting and notice to defendant No.1 and 2 be repeated through registered post AD. In the interest of justice the matter is adjourned. Put off to 20.10.2026. For service upon defendant No. 1, 2, 5(b) to 5(i) and 6 and W/S of defendant No. 3 and 4 and 5(a).

Execution application called. Decree Holders are absent, their counsel is present, who filed statement along with one postal receipt. Order passed thereon. File. J.D No.1 is called absent. Notice to the J.D No.2 and 3 and 8 be repeated through bailiff as well as registered post AD/TCS. Put off to 02.11.2026. For service upon the J.D No. 2, 3 and 8 and filing of objections by the J.D No.1 and 4 to 7.

Matter called. Plaintiff No.2 is present. Advocate for plaintiffs is present. Defendant No.1 is present along with his counsel. Official Defendant No.2 to 4 are called absent. The representative of DDA is present. DDA sent memo of appearance on behalf of official defendants. Order passed thereon. File. Order passed on order sheet. The service upon the defendant No.5 has been held good. The advocate for defendant No.1 filed an application U/S 151 CPC in F.C Suit No. 04/2026 Re-Muhammad Iqbal VS Muhammad Aslam & Others for consolidation of the present suit, in which arguments have been heard and that application has been adjourned to 05.11.2026 for order. Put off to 05.11.2026. For filing of written statements by the official defendant No. 2 to 5.

Matter called. Plaintiff is present along with his counsel. Learned counsel for the plaintiff submitted an application for extension of status-quo. Order passed on it. Extended till next date of hearing. Defendant No.1 is called absent. Defendant No.2 to 5 are called absent who have already been debarred from filing of their written statements. The representative of DDA is present. Mr. Waheed Ali Solangi counsel for defendant No.1 is present who filed an application for seeking adjournment. Order passed thereon. Allowed as last chance. Put off to 27.10.2026 for filing of written statement by the defendant No.01, 6 and 7.

Matter called. Plaintiff called absent. Counsel for plaintiff is called absent but his associate is present. Defendant No.2 to 6 are called absent. Mr. Shahzad Iqbal Gujjar advocate appeared, who files vakalatnama on behalf of Nusrat Parveen attorney of defendant No.1 and filed written statement on behalf of defendant No.1 .along with list of legal heirs of defendant NO.1 and counter affidavit on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC. Order passed thereon. Copies to the other side. Copies thereof have been supplied to the associate of advocate for plaintiff by today. Put off to 10.11.2026. For filing of written statements by the official defendant No.2 to 6.

The suit is consolidated with F.C Suit No.108 of 2012 (Pir Abdullah Jan & others versus Pir Khalid Rifat Jan & others), which suit has been adjourned to 28.10,2026 for hearing final arguments. Hence this suit is also adjourned to same date viz 28.10.2026.

Matter called. Plaintiff and his learned counsel are present. Defendant No.2 is present. Attorney of defendant No.1 to 3 is absent. Official defendant No. 4 to 6 are called absent. The representative of DDA is present. Advocate for plaintiff filed an application U/S 151 CPC to consolidate the F.C Suit No. 104/2026 Titled Muhammad Aslam & oth VS Muhammad Iqbal & others. Order passed thereon. Notice to other side. Notice thereof has been given to the learned counsels by today who raised their no objections. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the plaintiff and learned counsel for private defendants. Issue summons to the remaining official witnesses if any. Put off to 05.11.2026 for plaintiff side evidence/hearing on injunction application/hearing on application under order VII rule 11 CPC/Order on application U/S 151 CPC.