| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | UNDER SECTIONS, ACTS | FIR No. | Hearing Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| S.NO. | CASE NO | NAME OF PARTIES | ADVOCATES | Hearing Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party Side 1 | Party Side 2 | ||||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Further Proceedings | |||||||
| 1 | Ist Class Civil Suits 66/2013 |
Ghulam Ali VS Muhammad Aijaz & others | DDA(DDA-0001-GOV-SGR) | ||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Service | |||||||
| 2 | Ist Class Civil Suits 110/2025 |
Mst. Ujala VS Mst. Zaibunisa and others | Ahmed Ali(ADVO-278-SBC-SGR) | ||||
| 3 | Ist Class Civil Suits 1/2026 |
Puma Energy of Pakistan Ltd VS Muneer Ahmed and others | Zeeshan Mustafa(ADVO-1474-SBC-NSF) | Altaf Hussain(ADVO-297-SBC-SGR) | |||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For W/S/Objections/C.A. | |||||||
| 4 | Ist Class Civil Suits 206/2018 |
Abdul Haq & others VS Ubedullah & others | Abdul Majeed(ADVO-689-SBC-SGR) | Sanjay Kumar(ADVO-539-SBC-SGR) | |||
| 5 | R.C. (Rent Cases) 1/2026 |
Mansoor Ahmed and others VS Bilal Suraiyo | Sain Bux(ADVO-493-SBC-MKS) | ||||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Issues | |||||||
| 6 | Ist Class Civil Suits 128/2025 |
Mst. Iqra and another VS Ali Muhammad and others | Nadeem Ahmed(ADVO-427-SBC-SGR) | Naseer Ahmed(ADVO-756-SBC-SGR) | |||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Evidence | |||||||
| 7 | Ist Class Civil Suits 176/2023 |
Muhammad Nawaz & others VS Dhani Bux & others | Sanjay Kumar(ADVO-539-SBC-SGR) | Abdul Majeed(ADVO-689-SBC-SGR) | |||
| 8 | Ist Class Civil Suits 56/2025 |
Sahibzadi VS Mehram and others | Naseer Ahmed(ADVO-756-SBC-SGR) | Mumtaz Ali(ADVO-301-SBC-SGR) | Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff and his counsel are present. Attorney of defendants No.1 & 2 and their counsel are present. Defendants No. 3 to 10 are already declared as Ex: Parte. Learned DDA is absent. Clerk of Mukhtiarkar Revenue Shahdadpur is present and examined accordingly at Ex:.......8. He produced the documents at Ex:..9 to 13. Learned counsel for plaintiff filed side close statement at Ex:........14. Put off to: 13-04-2026 for evidence of defendants side. |
||
| 9 | Ist Class Civil Suits 65/2025 |
Mst. Zaib-ul-Nisa VS Mst. Ujala and others | Fayaz Hussain(ADVO-536-SBC-SGR) | ||||
| 10 | Ist Class Civil Suits 38/2025 |
Irshad Zafar Bukhari VS Muhammad Ali and others | Ahmed Ali(ADVO-278-SBC-SGR) | Muhammad Ali Shaikh(ADVO-158-SBC-SGR) | |||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Hearing of Applications | |||||||
| 11 | Ist Class Civil Suits 52/2022 |
Hamid Ali VS Khalid Hussain & others | Sultan Ahmed(ADVO-121-SBC-TAY) | ||||
| 12 | Ist Class Civil Suits 112/2025 |
Misri khan and others VS Nadir Khan and others | Muhammad Sharif Misrani(ADVO-268-SBC-SGR) | Fayaz Hussain(ADVO-536-SBC-SGR) | Matter called. Attorney of Plaintiff and his counsel are present. Defendants No. 1 is absent. Defendants No.2 to 4 are present. Learned counsel for defendants No.2 to 4 is present. Service against the official defendants No. 5 to 9 is already held good. Learned DDA is absent. Argument heard on application under order 7 rule 11 CPC. Order passed and announced in open court. Application under order 7 rule 11 CPC is dismissed. The official defendants are debarred from filing their written statement and counter affidavits and are declared as Ex: Parte. Such order passed on order sheet. Put off to:03-4-2026 for compliance under order 10 rule 2 CPC. |
||
| CIVIL JURISDICTION For Judgment | |||||||
| 13 | Ist Class Civil Suits 49/2024 |
Mst: Mehnaz VS Muhammad Ali & others | Ghulam Mustafa(ADVO-371-SBC-SGR) | Matter called. Plaintiff and her junior counsel are present. Defendants No.2 and his junior counsel are present. Defendants No. 6 to 9 are already declared as Ex-parte. Learned junior counsel for defendants filed statement with law citations. Order on it. Kept on record. Judgment passed and announced in open court. The plaintiff is declared entitled to her law full share in accordance with Muslim law in the estate as well as the service benefits left by the deceased. The defendants are restrained from depriving the plaintiff and her children of their legitimate rights in the estate and benefits of the deceased. There is no order as to costs. Let such decree be prepared accordingly. |
|||