Case called. Accused Shan Ali @ Shan is called absent. ADPP for the state is present. Issue notice to accused Shan Ali @ Shan for his appearance to proceed the case without fail. This case is connected/off shoot of Sessions Case No. 524/2026 The state VS Shan Ali @ Shan & others U/S 324, 353, 401, 34 PPC, Crime No.14/2026 of PS Shahpurchakar, which case has been adjourned to 11.11.2026. Hence this case is also adjourned to same date. Put of to 11.11.2026 for appearance of accused.

Case called. Accused Shan Ali @ Shan and Mehboob are called absent. Accused Naveed is not produced in custody from District Prison, Sanghar. Mr. Muhammad Ayoub Magsi counsel for accused Mehboob is called absent. ADPP for the state is present. Issue notice to accused Shan Ali @ Shan and Mehboob for their appearance to proceed the case without fail. Issue P.O for accused Naveed with direction to jail authorities to produce the accused through video link on date of hearing without fail. Put of to 11.11.2026 for appearance of accused.

Disposed of civil execution called. Advocates for the parties are present. Let the process of execution be initiated as already ordered dated 30.09.2026 passed by this Honourable, Court. Put of to 11.11.2026 for compliance.

Matter called four times till 2:40 PM. Plaintiff and his counsel remained present. However, despite repeated calls till 02:40 pm neither defendants nor their learned counsel has appeared and no application or intimation for such absence has been made. Despite having been afforded repeated opportunities. Defendant No.01 and defendant No.02 have failed to cross examined the plaintiff and his witness and produce any evidence. Order passed on order sheet. Sufficient opportunities have already been afforded, this Court finds no justification to grant any further opportunity. The evidence on behalf of the defendants has been closed. The matter shall proceed further in accordance with law. Put of to 05.11.2026 for final arguments

Matter called. Attorney of Plaintiff is called absent. Mr. Rashid Ali Malik advocate for plaintiff is present. Defendants No.1 to 3 & official defendants No.4 to 7 and 9 are called absent they have been debarred from filling of their WS. Repeat notice to defendant No.8 through registered post AD/TCS on costs of plaintiff. Put off to 13.11.2026. For service upon defendants No.8.

Execution application called. Decree holder is called absent. Mr. Fayyaz Hussain Khaskheli advocate for D.H is present and filed statement along with two postal receipts. Order passed thereon. File, Issue notice to the other side on application for submitting amount. J.D No.1 and 2 are called absent. Put off to 11.11.2026 for service on application for submitting amount and objections.

Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent. Counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendant No.1 is present. Defendant No.2 and 3 are called absent. The counsel for defendant NO.1 to 3 is called absent. Official defendant No. 4 to 8 are called absent and they have not filed their written statement as yet. Representative of DDA is present. Defendant No.1 filed an application for seeking adjournment and he suggested date of hearing viz 10.11.2026. Order passed thereon. Allowed and detailed order passed on order sheet. Date fixed is suggested by the defendant No.1. Put off to 10.11.2026. For filing of written statement by the official defendants No.4 to 8 and objection on application U/O XL Rule 1 & 2 R/W Section 151 CPC for appointment of receiver.

Matter called. Plaintiff is present, whereas learned counsel for plaintiff is called absent. Defendant No.2 to 4 are also called absent. Counsel for plaintiff sent statement along with Court fee e-stamp of Rs.15,000/-. Order passed thereon. File. Notice to defendant No.1 be repeated through concerned Court by way of pasting. Put off to 17.11.2026. For service upon defendant No.1 through pasting and filing of W.S by the defendant No. 2 to 4.

Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent. Counsel for plaintiff is present. Notice issued against the defendant is returned duly served upon the defendant No 2 and official defendant No. 4 to 6 by the bailiff of this Court with endorsement. Defendant No.1 to 3 are present. Mr. Naseer Ahmed Rajput files vakalatnama on behalf of defendant No.1 to 3 and filed an application for seeking adjournment. Order passed thereon. Allowed. Learedf DDA files memo of appearance on behalf of official defendants, which is taken on record. Order passed on order sheet. Service upon the defendant No.1 to 7 is held good. Put off to 17.11.2026 for filing of WS by the private defendant No.1 to 3 and official defendant No. 4 to 7.

Matter called. Plaintiff is absent. Advocate for plaintiff is present. Defendant No.1-b Imran Hussain and legal heirs of defendant No.3 are called absent. The official defendant No. 4 to 8 are called absent. Representative of DDA is present. Defendant No.2-d is absent. Mr. Ali Ahmed advocate for defendant No.2-a to 2-h is called absent. The legal heirs of defendant No.1 and legal heirs of defendant No.3 have already been debarred from filing of their written statement. Today the suit is fixed fpor filing of written statement by the official defendant No. 4 yo 08 but they have failed to file their written statements as yet despite providing several opportunities. Order passed on order sheet. The official defendant NO.4 to 8 have been debarred from filing of written statements. Put off to 14.11.2026. For compliance U/O 10(2) CPC.

Matter called. Plaintiff is present. Counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendant No.4 himself as well as attorney of defendant No.1 & 5 is present. Defendant No.2 & 3 are absent. Mr. Mehboob Ali Bhanbhro counsel for defendant No.1, 4 and 5 is present. Mr. Shahid Khan Khanzada counsel for defendant No.2 and 3 is present. Representative of DDA is present. Counsel for plaintiff filed counter affidavit against the application U/O VII Rule 11 CPC. Order passed thereon. Copy to the other side. Copy thereof has been supplied to learned counsel for defendant No.1, 4 and 5. Date fixed is suggested by the counsels of both parties. Put off to 14.11.2026. For filing of W.S by the defendant No.6 to 10/hearing on application U/O XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 CPC and hearing on application U/O VII Rule 11 C{PC.

Matter called. Plaintiff is present along with his counsel. Attorney of legal heirs of Defendant No.1 is absent. Advocate for legal heirs of defendant No.1 is present. Defendants No.2 to 7 are called absent, who have already been declared as Ex-parte. Representative of DDA is present. Three official witnesses are present and have been examined. Deposition of Sikandar Ali Junior Clerk of AC Office, Shahdadpur has been recorded at Ex????????????..27.He has produced authority letter at Ex????????????..28. Deposition Syed Parvez Ali Shah tapedar has been recorded at Ex????????????..29. He has produced authority letter at Ex,30, original Entry No. 328 dated 22.11.1990 of VII-B in the name of Abdul Rehman S/o Muhammad Siddique at ??????Ex.31, original Entry No. 332 dated 22.11.1990 of VII-B in the name of Abdul Rehman S/o Muhammad Siddique at ??????Ex.32. (Origional seen and returned back, while attested copies kept on record). Deposition of Muneer Ahmed junior clerk sub registrar office, DShahdadpur has been recorded at Ex???????????????..33. He has produced authority letter at Ex???.34 and report of Sub Registrar Shahdadpur at ??????.Ex.35. Notice be issued to remaining officials at defendant cost. Date fixed is suggested by the advocates of both parties. Put off to 10.11.2026 for recording evidence of defendant side.

Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent. Advocate for plaintiff is present. Defendant No.1 is present along with his counsel. Defendants No.2 to 5 are called absent, who have already been declared as Ex-parte. The representative of DDA is present. Report is not received from the Assistant Commissioner Shahdadpur, who sent letter for seeking adjournment. Order passed thereon. Allowed as last chance. Issue summons to the remaining official witnesses. Date fixed is suggested by the advocates for both parties. Put off to 06.11.2026. For report and recording evidence of defendant side.

Matter called. Niaz Ali attorney of Plaintiff No.1 and Ghulam Shabbir plaintiff No.2 are called absent. Counsel for plaintiffs is present. Defendant No.1 to 5 are called absent. Defendant No.10(c) is absent. The L.Rs of defendants No.6 & 7, 9 to 10(a), 10(b), and 10(d) to 10(f) and official defendants No.11 to 13 are already declared as Ex-parte. Defendant No.8 is absent. Advocate for defendant No.8 is present. Representative of DDA is present. Counsel for defendant NO.2, 4, 5, 6 (a) to 6(g), 7(a) to 7(e), Manzoor, Muhammad Hayat and Manthar legal heirs of defendant No.2. is present and filed statement along with special power of attorney. Order on it. File. Date fixed is suggested by the advocates for the parties. Put off to 11.11.2026. For recording cross examination of attorney of plaintiff No.1, plaintiff No.2, witnesses Abdul Ghani and Jan Muhammad and recording further evidence of plaintiff side and joining legal heirs of defendant No.02.

Matter called. Plaintiff is present, but his counsel is called absent. Today the matter is affixed for recording evidence of plaintiff side. Defendants No.1 to 7 are absent. Mr. Nadeem Ahmed Pathan learned counsel for defendants No.4 to 6 is present. Paintif submitted an application for seeking adjournment. Detailed order passed on order sheet. In the interest of justice last and final opportunity is granted to the plaintiff for recording his evidence on next date and in case of failure an appropriate order will be passed in accordance with law. Put off to 12.11.2026 for recording evidence of plaintiff side.

Matter called. Plaintiff No.3(a) who is also attorney of remaining plaintiffs is present. Mr. Muhammad Sharif Misrani counsel for plaintiff is called absent but his associate is present. Defendant No. 1 and 3 are present. Defendants No.2 and 4 are called absent. Official defendants No.5 to 9 already debarred from filing their written statement. Representative of DDA is present. Learned counsel for defendants No.2 to 4 is present. Official witnesses are not present. Mr. Fayaz Hussain Khaskheli advocate files vakalatnama on behalf of defendant NO.1 and sought adjournment and filed such application. Order passed thereon. Allowed and order passed on order sheet. Issue summons to the official witnesses on cost of plaintiff. Date fixed is suggested by advocates for both the parties. Put off to: 11.11.2026 for recording cross examination of plaintiff No.3(a) and recording further evidence of plaintiff side. The plaintiff is directed to produce his all witnesses if any on next date for recording their evidence.

Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff No.2-a to 2-g namely Abdul Ahad is called absent. Attorney of plaintiff No.3-a namely Aijaz Ali is called absent. Mr. Abdul Majeed Panhwar advocate for plaintiff No.2, 3-a, 8 & 11 is present. Liaquat Ali as attorney of plaintiffs No.8 & 11 is absent. Attorney of plaintiff No.10 namely Mr. Syed Muhammad Waseem, an advocate by profession, is present. Mr. Ahmed Ali Chandio, advocate for remaining plaintiffs is absent. Defendant No.22 Willayat Ali himself and being attorney of defendant No.23 is present. Mr. Noor Ahmed Memon, advocate for defendants No. 22 & 23 is present. Defendant No.09 Pir Muhammad Ashraf is absent. Mr. Mumtaz Ali Khaskheli advocate for defendant No.09 is absent. Attorney of defendant No.4 (f) Pir Muhammad Shoaib is present. Mr. Muhammad Azamatullah Channa learned counsel for defendant No.4 and 12 is present. Heard final arguments of learned counsels for both the parties. Put off to 06.11.2026 forjudgment.

The suit is consolidated with F.C Suit No.108 of 2012 (Pir Abdullah Jan & others versus Pir Khalid Rifat Jan & others), which suit has been adjourned to 06.11,2026 for judgment. Hence this suit is also adjourned to same date viz 06.11.2026.

Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent, while his learned counsel is present. Defendants are called absent, while their learned counsel is present. Today, the matter is fixed for hearing final arguments on behalf of the defendants. Mr. Muhammad Ali Shaikh, learned counsel for defendants No.1 to 4, appeared and verbally requested an adjournment on the ground of his ill health, stating that he was unable to proceed with the matter today. He further requested that one last opportunity be granted and assured the Court that he would proceed with the matter on the next date of hearing. Thereafter, he also submitted a written application for adjournment. Perusal of the record reveals that, owing to repeated absences on the part of the defendants, their right to lead evidence was closed vide order sheet dated 05.10.2026, and the matter was fixed for hearing arguments. On the previous date of hearing, vide order sheet dated 19.10.2026, a last and final opportunity was granted to the defendants, with a clear direction that, in case of failure to proceed, an appropriate order would be passed. Despite the aforesaid direction, learned counsel for defendants No.1 to 4 has again sought an adjournment on the ground of ill health. Such order passed on order sheet. In the interest of justice, the written adjournment application is allowed, subject to the condition that no further adjournment shall be granted on the same ground. The matter is adjourned to Monday 02.11.2026 11.20 as proposed by learned counsel for defendants No.1 to 4 himself, for final arguments on behalf of the defendants with strict directions to argue the matter on the next date of hearing without fail, in case of failure the matter shall be decided in accordance with law on the basis of the available record, without granting any further opportunity.