Matter called. Decree Holder and his counsel are present. Attorney of J.D No.1 to 5 is called absent. Mr. Mirza Fawad Baig advocate for J.D.No.1 to 5 is absent, but his associate Mr. Ifran Ali advocate is present, who sought adjournment and filed such application. Order passed thereon. Allowed as last and final chance. J.D No.7 is called absent, but his advocate is present, who also sought adjournment and filed such application. Order passed thereon. Allowed as last and final chance. J.D No.6 has passed away. Repeat summons to the J.D No.6, 12 and 13. By consent matter is adjourned. Put off to: 17.09.2026 for service upon J.D No.6, 12 and 13 and objections of J.D No.1 to 5 and 7 to 11.

Umerdaraz VS Rahim Dino & Others Matter called. Plaintiff and his counsel are called absent. Defendants No.1 & 3 are present. Mr. Tarique Mehmood advocate for defendant No.1 and Mr. Naseer Ahmed Rajput advocate for defendant No.3 are present. Both the advocates filed written statements on behalf of defendant No.1 and 3 along with list of legal heirs. Order passed thereon. Copy to the other side. Copies are supplied to other side by today. Official Defendants No.4 to 8 are called absent. DDA is absent. Put off to 24.09.2026. For written statement of defendants No.2 and 4 to 8.

Matter called. Plaintiff is called absent. Mr. Naseer Ahmed advocate for plaintiff is present. Defendant No.1 and 2 are called resent. Mr. Sadam Khoso advocate for defendant No.1 is absent. Defendant No.2 is present. Advocate for defendant No.2 is present. Official defendant No.3 to 7 are absent. From perusal of the record, it appears that in the powers/vakalatnamas filed by learned counsel for the plaintiff, Mr. Naseer Ahmed Rajput, and learned counsel for defendant No.1, Mr. Saddam @ Koro, the name of Mr. Zain-ul-Abdin, Advocate, is mentioned; however, the signatures of Mr. Zain-ul-Abdin, Advocate, are not available thereon. Both the powers/vakalatnamas also appear to be in the same format and bear similar particulars. Learned counsel for the plaintiff, Mr. Naseer Ahmed Rajput, submitted that he had previously been working in the firm of Mr. Zain-ul-Abdin, Advocate, but is now practising independently, since long and even before filing of this suit: He further submitted that the said vakalatnama was an old one, which inadvertently came to be filed before this Court due to mistake. Such order jas been passed on order sheet. learned counsel for the plaintiff, Mr. Naseer Ahmed Rajput, has been directed to file a fresh power/vakalatnama along with an affidavit, specifically stating the aforesaid facts and clarifying the circumstances. Put off to 23.09.2026 for W.S of official defendant No.3 to 7.

Matter called. Plaintiff and his counsel are present. Defendants are absent. Representative of NADRA/defendants is present and filed written statement along with photo copies o documents authority letter/vakalatnama. Order passed thereon. Copy to the other side. Copy has been supplied to other side by today. Put off to 24.09.2026. For compliance under order 10 rule 2 CPC.

Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff is present. Mr. Noman Khan advocate for plaintiff is called absent. Defendant No.1 is present. Mr. Fayaz Hussain advocate defendant No.1 is present. Attorney of defendants No.2 is absent. Defendant No.3 is absent, his counsel is present. Official defendants No. 4 to 8 are already declared as Exparte. Mr. Mirza Fawad Saleem Baig advocate for defendant No.2 is absent, but his associate Mr. Irfan Ali is present, who filed an application for adjournment. Order passed thereon. Application has been dismissed with direction to file proposed issued by today. Issues have been framed. Put off to 10.09.2026. For list of documents and lost of witnesses/hearing on application U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC.

Matter called. Ali Murad Attorney of plaintiff is present. Mr. Sulleman Dahri counsel for plaintiff is present, who filed TCS receipt with statement. Order on it. Attorney/LRs of defendants NO.4 to 6 namely Asadullah is present. Mr. Muhammad Idrees counsel for defendants is present. Letter issued to D.C Sanghar regarding production of relevant record from Mukhtiarkar Estate Barrage. Repeat notice to the remaining witnesses. Put off to 11.09.2026. For further evidence of plaintiff side.

Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff is absent. Mr. Mirza Fawad Baig advocate for plaintiff is called absent, but his associate Mr. Irfan Ali is present. Contesting defendants are present. Mr. Tarique Mehmood learned counsel for defendants No.2-a(1 to 6), (B-1 to B-4)(C, D, and E) Mashooqur Ali Magsi defendant is present. is present. Defendants No.3 to 7 are already declared as Ex-parte. Learned DDA is absent. Muhammad Ishaque Sahito MCO of ZTBL Shahdadpur Branch is present and his evidence has been recorded at EX??????.32. He has produced authority letter and report at Ex???????????????.33 and 34. Advocate for defendant filed statement to close the side of evidence on behalf of defendant at Ex????????????.35. Order passed thereon. File. Put off to: 17.09.2026. For hearing final arguments.

Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff are called absent. Advocate for plaintiffs is absent, but his associate Mr. Irfan Ali is present, who sought adjournment and filed such application. Order passed thereon. Allowed as last chance. Defendant No.1 to 5 are called absent, but their attorney is present. Advocate for defendants No.1 to 5 is present. Defendants 6 to 8 declared Ex-parte. By consent matter is adjourned. Put off to:24.09.2026. For evidence of plaintiff side/hearing on application U/O 18 Rule 18 CPC.

Matter called. L.Rs of plaintiffs are absent. Advocate for plaintiffs is present. Representative of NADRA is present. Defendants No.4 & 5 are absent, their learned counsel is present and filed statement along with receipts. Order passed thereon. File. Sikandar Ali Secretary U.C Lundo is present and his evidence has been recorded at Ex??????17. He has produced attested copy of death registration certificate o deceased Seed Khan, entry No.05 of register and entry No.587 of register of issuance of death certificate at Ex???18 to 20. Mukhtiarkar Taluka Shahdadpur sent an application for adjournment. Order passed thereon. Allowed as last and final chance. Issue notice to remaining official witnesses to produce relevant record and give evidence. Put off to 07.9.2026. For evidence of official witnesses.

Matter called. Attorney of plaintiff called absent. Advocate for plaintiff is present. Learned DDA is absent. Defendant No.7 is present. Mr. Tarique Mehmood advocate for defendant No.7 is present. Defendant No.3 is absent. Mr. Fayaz Hussain advocate for defendant No.3 is present. Advocate for defendant No.07 is present. Evidence of Lakhmir Ahmed Dahri Jr Clerk Digital Scanning unit at Shaheed Benazirabad has been recorded at Ex:89. He has produced authority letter and CTC of sale deed at Ex?????????.90 and 91. Evidence of Shoaib Ahmed Senior Clerk of sub Registrar Office, Sanghar has been recorded at Ex????????????92. He has produced authority letter, attested copy of serial No. 3234, attested copy of R.DS No. 3062, attested copy of seral No. 1766, and attested copy of RD No.1775 at Ex:93 to 97. Issue summon to the remaining official witnesses on cost. Put off to 10.09.2026. For evidence of defendants side.

Matter called. Plaintiff is present. Advocate for plaintiff is present. Defendants No.1-a is present, his counsel is present. Defendant No.1-b and his advocate are called absent. Defendant No.2 is called absent, but his advocate is present. Defendants No.3 to 7 are already declared as Ex-parte. Learned DDA is absent. Put off to 24.09.2026. For evidence of plaintiff side. Issue summons to the official witnesses if any on costs.

Matter called. Attorney of Plaintiff' is absent. Mr. Fayaz Hussain counsel for plaintiff is present. Defendant No.1 is absent, his counsel is present. Attorney of defendant No.2 namely Mst Razia is present. Mr. Ghulam Mustafa Bagrani counsel for defendant No.2 is present. Defendants No.3 to 9 are already declared as Ex-parte. Learned DDA is absent. Advocate for plaintiff filed an application for adjournment, Order passed thereon. Allowed as last chance. Put off to:16.09.2026 for evidence of defendants side.

Matter called. Plaintiff No.02 is present, who is also attorney of plaintiff No.1, 3 and 4. Defendants No.1 to 4 are called absent, who have already been declared as Ex-Parte. Learned DDA is absent. Defendants No.5 to 10 are absent. Mr. Muhammad Imran Ghori counsel for defendants No. 5 to 10 is absent. Defendant No.11 & 12 are called absent. Mr. Muhammad Tahir Yasin counsel for defendants No.11 & 12 is present. Mr. Kashif Raza Rajput advocate appeared, who filed vakalatnama on behalf of plaintiff No. 2 along with photo copy of special power of attorney and seek adjournment and filed such application. Order passed thereon. Allowed. By consent date suggested by the advocate for defendant and matter is adjourned. Put off to 12.09.2026 for evidence of defendants side/cross examination of defendant No.11 & 12 so also Cross of A.C Shahdadpur.

Matter called. Plaintiff No.1 is present. Advocate for plaintiffs is present and filed list of witnesses and list of documents. Order passed thereon. Copy to other side. Copies are supplied to other side by today. Defendants No.1(a)-iv Muhammad Rashid for himself and being attorney of remaining LRs is present. Mr. Mirza Fawad Baig advocate for L.Rs of defendant No.1 is called absent but his associate Mr. Irfan Ali is present. Official defendants No.2 to 6 are already debarred and declared as Ex-Parte. Learned DDA is absent. Put off to 24.09.2026. For evidence of plaintiff side.

Matter called. Attorney of Plaintiff No.1 who is also attorney of plaintiffs No.2 to 7 is present. Advocate for plaintiffs is present, who filed statement along with postal receipts, Order passed thereon. File. Defendant No.1 and his counsel are present. Official defendants No.8 to 12 have already been made Ex-parte. DDA called absent. One Mirza Shahzad Ali Mughal Assistant Mukhtiarkar Sinjhoro is present and his evidence has been recorded at Ex?????????..01. Issue show cause notice to other official witnesses. CTC of order dated 17.08.2026 passed by the Honourable, High Court of Sindh Circuit Court Mirpurkhas in Constitutional Petition No.S-75 of 2026. Whereby directions have been issued to this Court to decide the said suit within a period of 45 days and same be adjourned not more than a week as it pertains to the year 2014. By consent matter is adjourned. Put off to:08.09.2026. For evidence of plaintiff side.

Matter called. Plaintiff/attorney for remaining all the plaintiffs is present. Mr. Mirza Fawad Baig advocate for plaintiffs is called absent but his associate Mr Irfan Ali is present. Defendant No.1 himself and attorney for defendants No.2 to 10 is present. Mr. Zain-ul-Abedin advocate for defendants No.1 to 10 is present. Official defendants No.12 to 14 already made ex-parte. Defendant No. 11 is absent. Mr. Tariq Mehmood learned counsel for defendant No.11 is present. Heard learned advocates on both applications filed by the plaintiffs under Order XIII Rules 1 & 2 CPC, read with Section 151 CPC and Order XVI Rules 1 & 2 CPC read with Section 151 CPC. Order passed on order sheet. Both the above application have been allowed without any costs. The list of documents and witnesses is taken on record, subject to proof and admissibility in accordance with law. The concerned Mukhtiarkar, Estate Sanghar and Sub-Registrar, Shahdadpur shall produce the relevant record specified in the applications, and the proposed witnesses shall be examined at the appropriate stage. Put off to 24.09.2026. For plaintiff evidence.

Matter called. Plaintiff is present, but his advocate called absent. One witness Ghulam Rasool is present. Representative of NADRA is present. Plaintiff seeks adjournment and filed such application. Order passed thereon. Allowed as last and final chance. Put off to 10.09.2026. For evidence of plaintiff side.

Matter called. From perusal of the record reveals that issues in the matter were framed on 09.04.2026, and thereafter the case was repeatedly fixed for the plaintiff's evidence. However, despite being afforded ample opportunities, the plaintiff failed to appear and produce his evidence. Even today, the matter is repeatedly called but none is present. This conduct clearly demonstrates that the plaintiff has lost interest in prosecuting the present suit. Moreover, this Court cannot keep the matter pending indefinitely by granting unlimited opportunities for the production of evidence. Order passed on order sheet. This shows that the plaintiff has lost interest in pursuing the suit. Consequently, the suit has been dismissed for non-prosecution, with no order as to costs.

Matter called. Plaintiff and her advocate are called absent without any intimation. Representative of NADRA is present. Matter adjourned in the interest of justice. Put off to 04.09.2026. For evidence of plaintiff side.